Next Article in Journal
Activated Carbons as Supports for Sulfided Mo-Based Catalysts Intended for the Hydroprocessing of Lipidic Feedstocks
Next Article in Special Issue
Precipitation of Struvite from Supernatants Separated from Enzymatically Disintegrated Digested Sewage Sludge
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding Lipase-Deep Eutectic Solvent Interactions Towards Biocatalytic Esterification
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Application of Zeolites in the Selective Synthesis of Methylamine: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Copper Molybdate-Catalyzed Esterification of Levulinic Acid: A Heterogeneous Approach for Biofuel Synthesis

by
Alyne Pereira de Oliveira Ribeiro
1,
Wyvirlany Valente Lobo
2,
Talles André Feitosa de Carvalho
3,
José Milton Elias de Matos
3,
Flávio Augusto de Freitas
2,
Yurimiler Leyet Ruiz
4,
Robert S. Matos
5,*,
Ştefan Ţălu
6,
Henrique Duarte da Fonseca Filho
7,
Lianet Aguilera Domínguez
4,
Walter Ricardo Brito
8 and
Francisco Xavier Nobre
1,*
1
Grupo de Recursos Energéticos e Nanomateriais (GREEN), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Amazonas, Campus Manaus Centro (IFAM-CMC), Manaus 6975-351, AM, Brazil
2
Centro de Bionegócios da Amazônia, Núcleo de Materiais e Energia—NME. Av. Gov. Danilo de Matos Areosa, 690—Distrito Industrial I, Manaus 69075-351, AM, Brazil
3
Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Materiais Avançados, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina 64049-550, PI, Brazil
4
Laboratório de Processamento de Materiais Tecnológicos (LPMAT), Departamento de Ciências e Engenharia de Materiais, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus 69067-005, AM, Brazil
5
Amazonian Materials Group, Department of Physics, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá 68903-419, AP, Brazil
6
The Directorate of Research, Development and Innovation Management (DMCDI), Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Constantin Daicoviciu St., No. 15, 400020 Cluj-Napoca, CJ, Romania
7
Laboratório de Desenvolvimento e Aplicações de Nanomateriais da Amazônia (LADENA), Department of Materials Physics, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus 69067-005, AM, Brazil
8
Laboratório de Bioeletrônica e Eletroanalítica (LABEL), Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus 69067-005, AM, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2025, 15(4), 357; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15040357
Submission received: 24 February 2025 / Revised: 30 March 2025 / Accepted: 2 April 2025 / Published: 6 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Catalysis for Green Chemistry and Energy Transition)

Abstract

:
The catalytic esterification of levulinic acid (LA) to methyl levulinate (ML) was investigated using copper molybdate (Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2) as a heterogeneous catalyst. The catalyst, synthesized via chemical precipitation, exhibited a monoclinic structure with self-assembled nanoplates forming spherical mesostructures. Structural characterization confirmed its high crystallinity, while textural analysis revealed a BET surface area of 70.55 m2 g−1 with pore sizes in the nanometric range (1–6 nm). The catalytic performance was systematically evaluated under varying reaction conditions, including temperature, catalyst dosage, reaction time, methanol-to-LA molar ratio, alcohol type, and catalyst reusability. Optimal conversion of 99.3% was achieved at 100 °C, a 1:20 methanol-to-LA molar ratio, 5% catalyst loading, and a reaction time of 4 h. Comparative analysis with other heterogeneous catalysts demonstrated superior efficiency and stability of Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2, with minimal activity loss over four reuse cycles (final conversion of 77.1%). Mechanistic insights suggest that its high activity is attributed to Lewis and Brønsted acid sites, facilitating efficient esterification. This study underscores the potential of copper molybdate as a sustainable and recyclable catalyst for biofuel additive synthesis, advancing green chemistry strategies for biomass valorization.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The ecological impacts caused by the predatory use of natural reserves have become constant and reported by climate change that has affected the entire world, causing an increase in the volume of the oceans, droughts, storms, desertification, and mass extinction of species [1,2]. In this context, the future of the next generations and the existence of the species of animals, plants, and other organisms that make up our ecosystem are entirely compromised by the attitudes taken throughout this decade. Therefore, the change in human behavior, especially concerning the use of renewable energy matrices, reduction of consumerism and, consequently, the volume of solid waste generated, partial or total replacement of petroleum inputs, and maintenance of water resources, are some of the emerging initiatives [3,4].
According to the World Economic Forum (WEF), the world population has reached 8 billion people and is estimated to reach 10.4 billion people in the year 2086 [5]. These data reinforce the need for strategic strengthening according to the sustainable development goals of the United Nations (UN), especially concerning the quality of water resources, affordable and clean energy, healthy life, and maintenance of terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity. Based on these premises, the search for renewable and biogenic sources of inputs for various purposes has been the subject of studies by numerous researchers worldwide, who aim to partially or entirely replace traditional inputs with biodegradable materials from residual matrices [6,7,8]. This approach allows, among other main advantages, the reduction in dependence on petroleum inputs, valorization of production and extractive chains and, consequently, preservation of forests and green areas, reduction in the volume of urban solid waste, and reduction in emissions of compounds harmful to the environment [9,10,11].
Vaithyanathan et al. [12] report the importance of valuing research related to the economic valorization associated with the transformation of residual biomass into products of industrial interest, also called commodity chemicals, which allows for economic gain from solid waste composed of biomass-derived materials, mainly from extractive activity, agriculture, and wood derivatives. In addition, the authors present a classification model for residual biomass according to the source of the raw material and the advantages and disadvantages of these inputs for energy generation. The first generation of biomass includes starch and vegetable oils and animal fats, i.e., mono-, di-, and triglycerides, which are used to obtain biofuels, resins, polymers, cosmetics, inputs for the processing industry, and agrochemicals. The second generation includes, among others, cellulosic lignin biomass and organic residues from the processing or post-consumption of food, agroforestry residues, and manure, which can be used in the production of biogas, biofertilizers, animal feed, and inputs to produce biopolymers, biochar, and chemical inputs for the transformation industry. The third generation concentrates biomass derived from algae, both micro-, and macroalgae, which has the advantage of a rich availability of polysaccharides, enzymes, and oils, which provide opportunities for the development of cosmetics, biopolymers, biofuels, and other materials under lower or no concentrations of pesticides.
The study of the transformation of residual biomass into molecules of industrial interest has become the object of study over the last decades, mainly driven by investments motivated by bioeconomy. In this way, it is possible to highlight the chemical transformation of vegetable fibers, rich in lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose, into molecules called platform, as is the case of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural—HMF [13], formic acid [14], alcohols [15], sugars [16], sorbitol and mannitol [17], lactic acid [18], and levulinic acid [19].
Among the compounds presented in the previous paragraph, levulinic acid (C5H8O3), also known as 4-oxopentanoic acid, in addition to other organic acids, has aroused the interest of the industrial due to its applications in the field of agrochemicals, biofuels, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and plasticizers and adhesives [20]. Several chemical routes are presented in the literature to obtain levulinic acid, among which it is possible to highlight the use of biorefinery, starting from sugarcane biomass [21], rice hull [21], straw [22] and corn cobs [23], potato peel [24], hazelnut shell [23], and coconut shell [25]. Besides that, levulinic acid is also used in different reactions to obtain different products, such as ketalization [26], esterification [27], amination, oxidation/reduction [28], and condensation [29], among others. In the vast majority, homogeneous or heterogeneous catalysts are used to increase the percentage of conversion, selectivity, and/or reduction of the reaction period required in the processing, commonly adopting hydrothermal or microwave-assisted hydrothermal methods [26].
The literature reports recent studies [13,21,22,30,31,32] in the field of biofuel applications that sought to obtain methyl esters from levulinic acid using homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. In this regard, Chaffey et al. [31] obtained biofuel esters and lactones from levulinic acid using ZSM-5 and Amberlyst®-15 materials as heterogeneous catalysts (catalyst dosage = 40 mg, 1 mmol of DMPO in 2 mL of DMC as solvent at 75 °C for 1 h), resulting in a conversion percentage higher than 90%, even after the third cycle of reuse. On the other hand, Zhao et al. [30] used a sulfonic acid-functionalized lignin-montmorillonite complex as a catalyst in the esterification reaction of levulinic acid into n-butyl levulinate, which resulted in a conversion percentage close to 98% in hexane as a solvent, using catalyst dosage, temperature, and reaction time of 10%, 120 °C, and 4 h, respectively. Gallego-Villada et al. [33] also performed the esterification of n-butyl levulinate using n-butanol and Preyssles’s catalyst—H14(NaP5W30O110); in this study, the authors obtained a yield of 77% (mol) conversion and 100% (mol) selectivity over 3 h of reaction at a temperature of 160 °C. Therefore, it is noted that the search for catalysts that provide reactions for the esterification of levulinic acid has been a promising field of research aimed beyond obtaining biofuels and other types of molecules of industrial and commercial interest.
It is known that the class of molybdates (M2+MoO4) and tungstates (M2+WO4), where M2+ is a metal with a 2+ valence, are promising materials for different applications, including photocatalysis [34], antimicrobials [35], electrochemical [36], capacitors [37,38], diodes [39], and sensors [36], and as heterogeneous catalysts in esterification and transesterification reactions [40]. Among the transition metal molybdates (M2+ = Cu2+, Ni2+, Fe2+, Zn2+, and Mn2+), the copper molybdate polymorphs, which exhibit the formulas CuMoO4, Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2, Cu3(MoO4)(OH)4, and Cu3O(MoO4)2, have excellent physicochemical properties that make them promising in catalytic applications. In addition, six polymorphs are currently known for copper molybdate, exhibiting five crystal structures, where the alpha phase (α-CuMoO4) is metastable, and the alpha-beta phase (β-CuMoO4) is predominant at high temperatures. However, variations, called gamma phase (ϒ-CuMoO4), Type II (CuMoO4-II), and III (CuMoO4-III), are also possible, above all, under specific pressure conditions and temperatures. The polymorphs Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2 and Cu3(MoO4)(OH)4 exhibit natural occurrence, these being popularly known as the Lindgrenite minerals [41,42] and Markascherite [43], respectively.
Lindgrenite exhibits a monoclinic structure with a space group P21/n and two formulas per unit cell, the result of the organization of cluster’s [MoO4] tetrahedral symmetry, and the clusters [CuO6]OH or [CuO4(OH)2], the octahedral symmetries of which suffer substantial bond distortions in octahedral clusters mainly due to the Jahn–Teller effect and the configuration of copper ions in the structure. The synthesis method and applications of synthetic lindgrenite, that is, its catalytic, photoluminescent, and antimicrobial properties, have been previously investigated [41,42] and were confirmed in all of the applications investigated with high performance and reproducibility of the results obtained.
Herein, we investigate the esterification of levulinic acid under different experimental conditions, utilizing copper molybdate nanocrystals in the form of synthetic lindgrenite as a heterogeneous catalyst. The nanostructured catalyst was synthesized via chemical precipitation at room temperature for 90 min, resulting in highly crystalline and well-defined morphologies. The catalytic performance was systematically evaluated by varying key reaction parameters, including temperature, catalyst loading, reaction time, and the molar ratio of reactants. Furthermore, the catalyst stability and reusability were evaluated over multiple cycles to further assess its durability and potential for sustainable industrial applications.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structural and Morphological Characterization

Figure 1a,b presents the structural characterization by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and vibrational Raman spectroscopies performed with the copper molybdate sample synthesized by the chemical coprecipitation method. Indexing the crystallographic planes for the data collected in the interval 2θ between 10 and 80° (Figure 1a) reveals the characteristic profile of materials with a high degree of crystallinity and ordering [35,44,45]. In addition, the occurrence of a single phase is confirmed, named tricopper bis(molybdate) dihydroxide and chemical formula Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2, following the literature consulted [41,42,43,46]. Therefore, the identified structure exhibits crystallographic plans characteristic of the monoclinic, special group structure P21/n; no diffraction peaks associated with the presence of synthesis precursors or secondary phases were evidenced, that is, XRD diffraction peaks associated with the copper oxide (CuO) or molybdenum oxide (MoO3), which confirms the efficiency of the synthesis method adopted. The comparison of the crystallographic information for copper molybdate obtained in this study with the crystallographic standard contained in the inorganic crystal structure database (ICSD) no. 30946 confirms the obtaining of copper molybdate with network parameters of a = 5.39(4) Å, b = 14.02(3) Å, and c = 5.60(8) Å, and a unit cell volume (V) of 419.53(1) Å3 [47,48,49].
The formation of copper molybdate with a structure similar to the mineral lindgrenite resulted primarily from the ionic interaction between the ions Cu2+ and M o O 4 2 , which had, as precursors, the salts Cu(NO3)2∙3H2O and Na2MoO4∙2H2O, respectively [41,46]. In aqueous media, copper nitrate solubilizes easily (137.8 g/100 H2O, 0 °C), a behavior that was also observed for sodium molybdate dihydrate (84 g/100 g H2O, 100 °C). The crystallization of the structure leads to the formation of tetrahedral clusters composed of molybdenum atoms coordinated with four oxygen atoms [MoO4], while octahedral symmetry clusters [CuO4(OH)2] are composed of copper atoms coordinated with six oxygen atoms, which have the presence of hydrogen atoms for two of the shared oxygens, resulting in hydroxyl groups [36].
Corroborating the information obtained by X-ray diffraction, the Raman spectroscopy, as shown in Figure 1b, resulted in molecular vibration bands in the interval between 100 and 1000 cm−1, which are in excellent agreement with the spectra reported in the RRUFF website for copper molybdate minerals with monoclinic structure, as found by John Dagenais in Chuquicamata mine, Calama, Antofagasta Province, Chile (R050213); Rock Currier, in San Samuel mine, Carrera Pinto, Chile (R060241); and Ron Gibbs, in Childs Aldwinkle mine, Copper Creek, Pinal County, Arizona, USA (R110061). From the spectrum presented in Figure 1b, it was possible to identify the presence of the vibration modes in the wave numbers 984, 931, 901, 885, 840, 796, 775, 497, 401, 361, 337, 313, 302, 289, 254, 217, 174, 129, and 105 cm−1. These vibrational modes are associated with the vibrations of the units [MoO4] and [CuO4(OH)2] [43]. In particular, the strong intensity bands of the vibration modes associated with the symmetrical and asymmetrical stretches of the Mo-O connections of the clusters [MoO4], characteristic of transition metal molybdates [30,47,48,49,50,51,52,53], were identified in the values of 933 and 901, respectively.
In the study conducted by Wen et al. [48], polymorphs of copper molybdate were obtained using the hydrothermal method, starting from ammonium molybdate and copper nitrate in an aqueous medium. The authors confirm, from the Raman vibrational spectroscopy data, the presence of bands at the values 289, 304, 342, 363, 405, 797, 841, and 930 cm−1; in addition, they report that the band located in 289 cm−1 is associated with the stretching mode of Cu–O bonds along the crystal lattice. The bands at 304, 342, 363, and 405 cm−1 correlate with the symmetrical and asymmetric stretches of the O–Mo–O bonds present in the clusters [MoO4] of tetrahedral symmetry. The bands at 841 and 930 cm−1 are due to the symmetrical and asymmetrical stretches of the Mo–O connections; finally, the band in 930 cm−1 is due to the vibration of the Mo=O groups and is considered an indicator of the presence of oxygen vacancies and different valences for molybdenum.
Figure 2a,b shows the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of copper molybdate synthesized by the chemical precipitation method, as well as the spectrum of copper molybdate before and after exposure to pyridine adsorption for determination of Brønsted and Lewis acid sites. Starting from the graphical analysis of the spectrum presented in Figure 2a, it is possible to corroborate the information given by Raman spectroscopy, where the molecular vibration bands observed in the range from 480 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1 are all assigned to the structure of the Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2. Therefore, the vibrations associated with the bands at 866 and 918 cm−1 are attributed to the asymmetric stretches, while the band at 972 cm−1 is associated with symmetrical stretches of the Mo–O bonds of the tetrahedral clusters, respectively [54]. Vibrations identified in the range between 3250 and 3500 cm−1 are due to stretches of the O–H bonds present in octahedral clusters [CuO4(OH)2] [55]. The asymmetric band of strong intensity between 774 and 866 cm−1, is due to the vibrations of the crystalline lattice for unity Cu3[MoO4]2O.
The spectrum in Figure 2b presents the graphic profile of the modes of molecular vibration of copper molybdate before and after exposure to pyridine molecules, which allows the identification of the Brønsted and Lewis sites. In this case, the interaction of pyridine molecules results in the appearance of bands at the interval between 1425 and 1650 cm−1 [31]. Vibration bands near 1451 cm−1 and 1543 cm−1 are generally associated with the Lewis and Brønsted sites, respectively [56]. In this study, it is noted that bands emerged at 1427 and 1590 cm−1, which confirms the presence of Lewis and Brønsted sites. The first case is confirmed by the presence of the band in 930 cm−1 in the Raman spectrum, which confirms the presence of molybdenum atoms with the configurations Mo6+, Mo5+, and Mo4+. On the other hand, the Brønsted sites are associated with the OH groups present in the clusters [CuO4(OH)2] of octahedral symmetry.
The thermal stability of copper molybdate was investigated by adopting the thermogravimetric analysis, in this case, by means of the thermogravimetry (TG), derived thermogravimetry (dTG), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves. In addition, the textural properties were studied by nitrogen adsorption/desorption (N2), adopting the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. Figure 3a–d shows the characterizations obtained by TG/dTG (Figure 3a), DSC (Figure 3b), adsorption/desorption hysteresis of N2 (Figure 3c), and pore distribution, as shown in Figure 3d.
The analysis of the graphic data presented in Figure 4a reveals three main mass loss events for copper molybdate in the ambient temperature range up to 900 °C. In this case, the first event, observed in the DTG curve at 295 °C, which implied a weight variation of 5.76%, was also evidenced in the DSC curve at 303 °C (Figure 4b); this is due to the release of water molecules, a process that occurs under energy absorption, that is, endothermically, and is characterized by the reactivity between the hydroxyl groups present in the clusters [CuO4(OH)2]. Consequently, it results in a change in the monoclinic structure of the Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2 in the orthorhombic structure of the Cu3Mo2O9, which has a space group Pna21 [57]. The second event was observed at a temperature of 502 °C, as can be observed in the TG/DTG curve, which implied the event of low intensity in the DSC curve, more precisely, at 520 °C, and is due to the process of recrystallization of the structure of the Cu3Mo2O9, a characteristically exothermic process. Finally, the third event, associated with the decomposition of the Cu3Mo2O9 in copper oxide and molybdenum trioxide (MoO3), occurred at a temperature of 820 °C (TG/DTG), resulting in an endothermic event, as shown in Figure 4b, at a temperature of 822 °C, which varied by 2.45% of the sample weight. The two mass losses that occurred at temperatures of 520 °C and 822 °C may be related to the formation of oxygen atom vacancies, which, during the heating process and reorganization of the structure, can carry O2 molecules, implying the emergence of oxides with the metals molybdenum and copper, with different valences [56].
The textural properties of synthesized copper molybdate were studied by nitrogen adsorption/desorption (N2), as shown in Figure 3c,d. Therefore, according to the IUPAC international classification, the hysteresis exhibited for the relative pressure (P/P0) range from 0 to 1 is type III, i.e., materials absent from micropores, which corroborates the graph shown in Figure 3d. Therefore, based on these results is confirmed the occurrence of pores with radii in the predominantly nanometric range (1 and 6 nm) and specific surface area determined of 70.55(2) m2 g−1.
The morphological and semiquantitative analysis of the synthesized copper molybdate was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray dispersive spectroscopy (EDX), as can be seen in parts of Figure 4a–c. Therefore, the morphology obtained for the synthesized material consists of the arrangement of nanocrystals in the shape of sheets, which result in spherical-shaped mesostructures with a diameter close to 9 μm. This arrangement is made possible by the self-assembly of the nanoplates of Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2, which, through surface interactions, mainly involving hydroxide groups and differences in charges, promote the organization, as can be seen in Figure 4a,b. Moreover, the analysis by EDX revealed the presence of all the energy peaks associated with the characteristic elements of copper molybdate, namely, molybdenum, copper, and oxygen. For the peak of EDX for carbon, the carbon tape used to attach the samples to the sample holders (stubs) is due.
In the study conducted by Wen et al. [48], irregular agglomerates of nanoplates of Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2 were obtained by the hydrothermal method, using different synthesis conditions. While Wu et al. [58] report the achievement of spherical structures of Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2 with dimensions between 300 and 500 nm, in this case, adopting the method of chemical precipitation with the addition of hydrazine, at a temperature of 70 °C. The study carried out by Carvalho et al. [41] also reports the obtaining of spherical-shaped mesostructures, composed of nanoplates that underwent the self-assembly process, according to the authors, due to the surface interaction in the search to reduce the surface energy difference.

2.2. Catalytic Conversion of Levulinic Acid into Methyl Levulinate

2.2.1. Effect of Temperature

Increasing the temperature increases the reaction rate due to the higher kinetic energy of the molecules and promotes a reduction in solution viscosity. This improvement facilitates better interaction between the reactants and the catalyst [59]. The conversion of LA increases with temperature between 80 and 120 °C, reaching up to 99.33% (acid–base titration) and 96% (NMR) (Figure 5). This behavior is expected, as esterification is an endothermic reaction, which shifts the equilibrium toward the products at higher temperatures [60]. Similar optimal temperatures were reported in studies applying heterogeneous catalysts: carrageenan/DFNS composite (150 °C, 61% conversion, [61]); defective MOF-808 (74 °C, 97.5%; [62]); MOF/TiO2 composites (100%, 120 °C [63]); and phosphotungstic acid supported on residual sugarcane bagasse (90 °C, 95%; [60]). Therefore, considering green synthesis and low energy consumption, 100 °C is deemed ideal [62].

2.2.2. Catalyst Dosage

The efficiency of the reaction is directly related to the availability of active sites in the reaction medium that promote product formation. In this study, the catalyst dosage varied from 1% to 7% wt. relative to the mass of levulinic acid. Figure 6 shows that, at 1% (wt.), the conversion was relatively low, similar to the reaction without a catalyst. This corroborates the idea that, at low dosages, the number of catalytic sites available on the lindgrinite cannot efficiently adsorb and activate all the reactant molecules. As the dosage increases, more active sites become available, facilitating adsorption and the reaction between levulinic acid and methanol [64]. At dosages of 5% wt. and above, the catalyst quantity exceeds the demand of the available reactants, leading to the saturation of the catalytic sites. This explains the stabilization of conversion from this dosage onwards. However, excessive catalyst dosages may reduce conversion due to increased solution viscosity, which hinders the esterification reaction. Excess catalyst impairs mass transfer, and the increased mixture viscosity may compromise catalytic activity [65]. Higher catalyst dosages can also generate more solid waste or require more energy for recycling and recovery. Therefore, 5% was considered the optimal catalyst dosage. Similar studies reported higher catalyst amounts, such as commercial TiO2 nanoparticles (8.6% wt. of catalyst, 77.6% wt. conversion [66]); copper molybdate nanoplates (5% wt., 98.38% [42]), sulfonated corn cobs (10% wt. of catalyst, 83.15% [67]); and carbon cryogel (25% wt. of catalyst, 87.2% [68]).

2.2.3. Effect of Time

By varying the reaction time, it is possible to see a gradual increase from 1 to 3 h (Figure 7). At 4 h, maximum conversions were observed. By titration, a slight decrease was observed in the conversion measured by titration, but it remained the same when measured by 1H NMR. This result shows that titration, despite being a cheaper technique, is more susceptible to systematic and operator-dependent errors than NMR, requiring careful alcohol evaporation from the medium to reduce errors. However, good reproducibility was observed in both techniques. Therefore, 4 h was considered the optimal reaction time. Higher optimal reaction times were observed in similar studies using heterogeneous catalysts: metal oxide-supported catalysts (TiO2, SiO2, and Al2O3) (6 h, 96% conversion; [69]); anchored silicotungstic acid (90 °C, 4 h; [70]); sulfonated corn cobs (9 h, 83% [67]).

2.2.4. Effect of Molar Ratio of Levulinic Acid to Methanol

The molar ratio between methanol and levulinic acid directly affects the equilibrium shift in the esterification reaction and the final yield. This behavior is evident in Figure 8, where, at lower initial molar ratios (5:1), the methyl levulinate (ML) yield is relatively low, indicating that the limited amount of methanol is insufficient to shift the equilibrium toward the product significantly [32]. As the molar ratio increases to 10:1 and 20:1, the conversion grows substantially, reaching 99% (NMR) at 20:1, which is considered the optimal point of the reaction. This observation aligns with Le Chatelier’s principle, as esterification is a reversible reaction, and increasing the concentration of one reactant (methanol) shifts the equilibrium toward forming the ester (ML). However, at a molar ratio of 30:1, the conversion decreases, showing that excessive methanol does not further promote product formation. This is likely due to the reaching of a saturation zone where the chemical equilibrium is already maximally shifted toward the product side [67]. In a related study, Alsalim et al. [61] used a carrageenan/DFNS composite catalyst under optimal reaction conditions (reaction time of 6 h, 10 mg catalyst, ethanol–LA molar ratio of 12:1, and reaction temperature of 150 °C) to achieve a 61% yield of ethyl levulinate.

2.2.5. Effects of Different Alcohol

The esterification reaction depends on the interactions between levulinic acid and alcohol at the acidic sites of the catalyst. More polar alcohols have a higher affinity for catalytic sites, facilitating the reaction. However, as the alcohol carbon chain increases, its polarity decreases, reducing the efficiency of the interaction. Figure 9 demonstrates this behavior, showing methanol achieving the highest conversion, likely due to its smaller molecular size and high polarity. In contrast, n-butanol exhibited lower yield, as its larger molecular volume and reduced polarity hinder its interaction with the catalyst [71]. Although ethanol has a shorter chain and is more polar than n-butanol, its conversion rate was lower. This peculiarity may be explained by its higher affinity for water, a byproduct of the reaction, leading to intermolecular associations that inhibit ethanol’s interaction with the catalytic sites [39]; in comparison, n-butanol, being less polar, is less affected by competition with water, allowing it to interact more effectively with the catalyst. Isopropanol, which showed the lowest conversion rate, and isobutanol are branched-chain alcohols that experience more significant steric hindrance, making it difficult to access the catalytic centers of lindgrinite. This reduces the overall product formation rate. Additionally, the molecular size of the alcohol affects the energy required to break and form bonds during the reaction, further lowering the yield [30]. Similar results were reported by Maggi et al. [72], who used sulfonic acids supported on silica for the esterification of levulinic acid with different alcohols, and Lobo et al. [59], who studied the esterification of LA and oleic acid using sulfonated passion fruit seed catalysts with various alcohols.

2.2.6. Recycling

As shown in Figure 10, the catalyst exhibits high initial efficiency in converting levulinic acid but undergoes progressive deactivation over successive recycling cycles. Nevertheless, it achieves more than 70% conversion after the fourth cycle, indicating its stability and viability for repeated use. Because of this result, we tested the possible leaching of the active phase in the reaction medium in optimized conditions. However, it did not happen in the methanol, confirming a total heterogeneous catalyzed reaction. Therefore, this decline in activity may be attributed to the formation of byproducts during the reaction, such as water or organic compounds, which may adsorb onto the catalyst’s active sites, blocking them and reducing their efficiency [62]. Additional factors contributing to decreased activity could include impurities accumulating in the catalyst’s pores, hindering reactant diffusion, or partial degradation of the catalyst structure due to repeated exposure to reaction conditions, such as high temperatures and the presence of reactants [69]. Similar behavior was observed in other studies. For example, Liu et al. [32] used a sulfonated solid carbon acid catalyst. They reported an 8% decrease in conversion, from 84.2 to 76.8%, after the first cycle under reaction conditions of a 5:1 EtOH/LA molar ratio, 0.3 g of catalyst, 120 °C, and 9 h. Their study attributed this decline to the possible instability of acidic sites that remained on the catalyst surface after being repeatedly washed with deionized water. Most of these unstable acidic sites were lost during the first cycle of the reaction.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Sodium molybdate dihydrate—Na2MoO4∙2H2O (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, purity > 99.9%), copper nitrate trihydrate—Cu(NO3)2.3H2O (Sigma Aldrich, purity = 98–104%) and sodium hydroxide—NaOH (Merk, St. Louis, MO, USA, purity > 98%), isopropyl alcohol—C3H8O (Synth, Rio de Janeiro, BR, purity = 95%), acetone—C3H6O (Synth, Rio de Janeiro, BR, purity > 99.5%), n-buthyl alcohol—CH3(CH2)3OH (ACS reagent, St. Louis, MO, USA, purity ≥ 99.4%), 4-oxopentanoic acid—CH3COCH2CH2COOH (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, purity = 98%), methanol—CH3OH (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, purity ≥ 99.9%), pyridine—C5H5N (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, purity ≥ 99.4%), chloroform-d—CDCl3 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, purity = 99.8 atom % D, containing 1% (v/v) of TMS), ethanol—CH3CH2OH (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, purity ≥ 99.5%) were used without any previous treatment.

3.2. Methods

The synthesis of copper molybdate nanocrystals was conducted using the co-precipitation method as described by Carvalho et al. [41]. Figure 11 presents a detailed schematic diagram that clearly summarizes each step of the synthesis process. Initially, two solutions were prepared, named solution A and solution B, where solution A consisted of 50 mL of 4 × 10−3 mol of Na2MoO4∙2H2O, while solution B consisted of 50 mL of 4 × 10−3 mol of Cu(NO3)2∙3H2O. Solution A was subjected to constant magnetic agitation at 600 rpm. In contrast, solution B was added drop-by-drop, with a noticeable change in the suspension color obtained, intensifying the green color of solution B until its total transfer. The suspension remained for 90 min under constant magnetic agitation, followed by collecting the precipitate obtained by centrifugation, adopting 5 min cycles with a speed of 4000 rpm. At the same time, the spectator ions were efficiently removed by adopting successive washes with distilled water and, in the last cycle, with isopropyl alcohol. The collected material was dried in an oven for 24 h at 85 °C, followed by maceration, storage, and subsequent characterizations.

3.3. Characterization

The obtained materials were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Shimadzu XRD-7000 diffractometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with a Cu/kα X-ray tube, λCu = 1.5406 Å, in the 2θ range between 10° and 100°, at a speed of 0.02 °min−1, a voltage of 60 kV, and a current of 50 mA. The detailed crystallographic analysis of all samples was performed using the Rietveld refinement method. Therefore, in this study, the unit cell lattice parameters, atomic position, scale factor, and background were refined, in this case, adopting the pseudo-Voigt profile function in adjusting the intensity and profile of the experimental diffraction peaks.
Sample morphology and semiquantitative analysis were performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) with a Tescan Vega3 microscope (Tescan Orsay Holding, Brno, Czech Republic), operating under high vacuum conditions. In this case, images were captured using a secondary and backscattered electron detector at different magnifications. Before the acquisition stage of the images, the samples were suspended in acetone, adding about 10 mg in 2 mL of acetone, followed by dispersing them in an ultrasonic washer of the brand Schuster, model L100, with a frequency of 42 MHz, followed by the collection of 100 µL of suspension and the pouring of it over the aluminum stub, initially containing the carbon tape, and then drying in an oven at a temperature of 35 °C for 1 h.
The vibrational Raman spectrum of the sample was collected using a Bruker confocal Raman spectrometer (SENTERRA model, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) in the spectral range of 50–1100 cm−1. The sample was exciting using a green laser (λ = 532 nm) with output power, resolution, and integration time of 0.5 mW, 4 cm−1, and 10s−1, respectively.
The textural analysis by N2 adsorption/desorption of the sample was conducted using a Quantachrome Autosorb iQ instrument (Boynton Beach, FL, USA) at −196 °C, within a relative pressure range from 0.005 to 1.0. This study used a 300 mg sample, which was previously degassed at 140 °C for 12 h under vacuum conditions and was subjected to the analysis. Based on this analysis, the surface area was estimated using the BET method (Brunauer, Emmett, Teller). The experimental data and data processing were acquired using ASiQwin software, version 5.21.
Vibrational analysis was performed using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy with a Bruker Vertex 70 V spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), employing the Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) technique. Thus, the IR data were collected using 32 scans with 4 cm−1 of resolution in the range of 4000–400 cm−1.
The determination of Lewis and Brønsted sites of the copper molybdate sample was achieved using the vibrational infrared spectrum of copper molybdate which was recorded using Bruker Fourier-transform infrared equipment. For this purpose, a portion of each dried sample was saturated with pyridine vapor, and the samples were exposed to pyridine in a controlled atmosphere for 24 h. Then, the wavenumber interval from 480 to 4000 cm−1 was selected and the vibrational spectrum was recorded at a resolution of 4 cm−1 under 32 scans.

3.4. Catalytic Esterification of Levulinic Acid

For the synthesis, 1 g of LA (8.61 mmol) was used in a steel-clad PTFE reactor with a volume of 15 mL, to which the solid catalyst and methanol were added in different proportions. The reactor was sealed and heated to the desired temperature with constant agitation. The reaction parameters were adjusted according to the experimental conditions, varying the temperature (80, 100, 120, and 140 °C), the reaction time (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h), the catalyst dosage (1, 3, 5, and 7% wt. related to the LA mass), the methanol/acid molar ratio (5, 10, 20, and 30 mol/mol), and the variation of alcohol (methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, isobutanol, and n-butanol). At the end of each reaction, an ice bath was used to rapidly cool the system, the products were centrifuged, and the excess alcohol was rotavaporated from the reaction medium using a rota evaporator (Buchi) with reduced pressure. Two different techniques determined the conversion of the product for comparison: (1) acid–base titration: the reaction product was dissolved in a mixture of solvents (ethanol–ether 1:1) and subsequently titrated with a solution of NaOH 0.1 molL−1 and 1% (w/v) alcoholic solution of phenolphthalein as indicator [59]; (2) 1H NMR spectrometry: a Bruker Avance Spectrometer III 300 MHz/54 mm was used to measure the conversion, and the product has been solubilized in CDCl3. Based on Equation (1), we obtained the following conversion:
C o n v e r s i o n % = A O C H 3 A C H 3 × 100
where AOCH3 is the integrated area referring to the hydrogens present in the methoxy group of the esters formed (3.67 ppm), and ACH3 refers to the methyl group hydrogens (2.19 ppm) present in both the reagent and the product (Figure 12).

3.5. Catalyst Recycling and Leaching Test

Catalyst recycling was performed under the optimized reaction conditions (100 °C, 5% wt. of catalyst, 3 h of reaction). After each cycle, the solid catalyst was recovered by centrifugation, thoroughly washed with methanol under vigorous manual stirring to remove adsorbed reactants and products, and subsequently dried at 100 °C overnight in a forced-air oven prior to reuse in the following catalytic run.
In order to evaluate the potential leaching of the active phase into the reaction medium, a leaching test was performed, following the methodology proposed by Mendonça et al. [65] with slight modifications. In this procedure, the catalyst (5% wt) was suspended in methanol under the same optimized reaction conditions (100 °C, 3 h) in the absence of levulinic acid. After this period, the solid was separated by centrifugation, and the supernatant (methanol phase) was transferred to a clean reactor, to which levulinic acid was added at a methanol–acid molar ratio of 20:1. The mixture was then subjected again to the optimized reaction conditions (100 °C, 3 h), and the conversion was analyzed by the same method. The resulting conversion was negligible, indicating that no significant catalytic activity was present in the liquid phase, thereby confirming the heterogeneous nature and structural stability of the catalyst.

4. Conclusions

In summary, nanostructures composed of copper molybdate with a structure similar to the mineral lindgrenite were efficiently synthesized by the co-precipitation method at room temperature under constant magnetic stirring, starting from the reagents copper nitrate trihydrate and sodium molybdate dihydrate. Through the characterization techniques, it was possible to verify the formation of the monoclinic structure with the chemical formula Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2, with morphology in the form of self-assembled nanoplates in spherical morphological mesostructures. The nanoplates showed adsorption/desorption hysteresis of type III N₂ isotherms, allowing the determination of the specific surface area by the BET method as 70.55 m2 g−1, and a pore distribution concentrated in the range from 1 to 6 nm. In addition, the thermal stability extended up to a temperature close to 300 °C, above which the material converted to the orthorhombic structure with the chemical formula Cu3Mo3O9.
In the catalytic assays for the conversion of levulinic acid to methyl levulinate, a systematic study was conducted to evaluate the effects of temperature, catalyst dosage, time, methanol–alcohol ratio, and type of alcohol. Catalyst recycling was also investigated. The best experimental conditions were reached at a temperature of 100 °C, 5% catalyst dosage, 3 h of reaction time, and a methanol–acid molar ratio of 20:1, with methanol as the alcohol that led to the highest conversion (>97%). Meanwhile, catalyst reuse showed a gradual decrease in conversion, reaching approximately 77% after the fourth consecutive cycle of use, probably due to the adsorption of organic compounds on the catalyst surface. Leaching tests showed that the reaction occurs through a heterogeneous pathway and that the active phase does not leach into methanol after 4 h of reaction. Therefore, these results demonstrate the promising potential of copper molybdate nanostructures as efficient and recyclable heterogeneous catalysts for bio-based ester synthesis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S.M., H.D.d.F.F. and L.A.D.; data curation, A.P.d.O.R., W.V.L., T.A.F.d.C., J.M.E.d.M., F.A.d.F. and Ş.Ţ.; formal analysis, A.P.d.O.R., W.V.L., T.A.F.d.C., J.M.E.d.M., F.A.d.F. and Ş.Ţ.; investigation, A.P.d.O.R., W.V.L., T.A.F.d.C., J.M.E.d.M., F.A.d.F. and Ş.Ţ.; methodology, R.S.M., H.D.d.F.F. and L.A.D.; project administration, Y.L.R., W.R.B. and F.X.N.; resources, R.S.M., H.D.d.F.F. and L.A.D.; validation, R.S.M., H.D.d.F.F. and L.A.D.; visualization, R.S.M., H.D.d.F.F. and L.A.D.; writing—original draft, A.P.d.O.R., W.V.L., T.A.F.d.C., J.M.E.d.M., F.A.d.F., Y.L.R., R.S.M., Ş.Ţ., W.R.B. and F.X.N.; writing—review and editing, Y.L.R., R.S.M., H.D.d.F.F., L.A.D., W.R.B. and F.X.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Departamento de Química, Meio Ambiente e Alimentos (DQA) and Central Analítica of Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Amazonas for support in the XRD analysis; the “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)”—Finance Code 001; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for their financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Meena, S.; Singh, H. Pharmaceutical Waste: Risk to Human Health And Environment. Eur. J. Mol. Clin. Med. 2020, 7, 3512–3518. [Google Scholar]
  2. Capurro, R.; Fiorentino, R.; Galeotti, R.M.; Garzella, S. The Impact of Digitalization and Sustainability on Governance Structures and Corporate Communication: A Cross-Industry and Cross-Country Approach. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kalyabina, V.P.; Esimbekova, E.N.; Kopylova, K.V.; Kratasyuk, V.A. Pesticides: Formulants, Distribution Pathways and Effects on Human Health—A Review. Toxicol. Rep. 2021, 8, 1179–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zaller, J.G.; Kruse-Plaß, M.; Schlechtriemen, U.; Gruber, E.; Peer, M.; Nadeem, I.; Formayer, H.; Hutter, H.P.; Landler, L. Pesticides in Ambient Air, Influenced by Surrounding Land Use and Weather, Pose a Potential Threat to Biodiversity and Humans. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 156012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. O’Sullivan, J.N. Demographic Delusions: World Population Growth Is Exceeding Most Projections and Jeopardising Scenarios for Sustainable Futures. World 2023, 4, 545–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Deus, M.S.; Deus, K.C.O.; Lira, D.S.; Oliveira, J.A.; Padilha, C.E.A.; Souza, D.F.S. Esterification of Oleic Acid for Biodiesel Production Using a Semibatch Atomization Apparatus. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 2023, 6957812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fallah, Z.; Zare, E.N.; Ghomi, M.; Ahmadijokani, F.; Amini, M.; Tajbakhsh, M.; Arjmand, M.; Sharma, G.; Ali, H.; Ahmad, A.; et al. Toxicity and Remediation of Pharmaceuticals and Pesticides Using Metal Oxides and Carbon Nanomaterials. Chemosphere 2021, 275, 130055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mishra, B.; Mohanta, Y.K.; Reddy, C.N.; Reddy, S.D.M.; Mandal, S.K.; Yadavalli, R.; Sarma, H. Valorization of Agro-Industrial Biowaste to Biomaterials: An Innovative Circular Bioeconomy Approach. Circ. Econ. 2023, 2, 100050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Benbettaïeb, N.; Debeaufort, F.; Karbowiak, T. Bioactive Edible Films for Food Applications: Mechanisms of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 3431–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cesca, R.S.; Fonseca, G.G.; Paz, M.F.D.; Cortez-Vega, W.R. Advances and Perspectives on the Application of Essential Oils in Food Packaging Films, Coatings, and Nanoencapsulated Materials. Bragantia 2024, 83, e20230132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Asomadu, R.O.; Ezeorba, T.P.C.; Ezike, T.C.; Uzoechina, J.O. Exploring the Antioxidant Potential of Endophytic Fungi: A Review on Methods for Extraction and Quantification of Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC). 3 Biotech 2024, 14, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vaithyanathan, V.K.; Goyette, B.; Rajagopal, R. A Critical Review of the Transformation of Biomass into Commodity Chemicals: Prominence of Pretreatments. Environ. Chall. 2023, 11, 100700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, J.; Cui, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, R.; Xie, Y.; Wang, M.; Yi, W. Efficient Catalytic Conversion of Cellulose to Levulinic Acid in the Biphasic System of Molten Salt Hydrate and Methyl Isobutyl Ketone. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 4240–4251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Weingarten, R.; Conner, W.C.; Huber, G.W. Production of Levulinic Acid from Cellulose by Hydrothermal Decomposition Combined with Aqueous Phase Dehydration with a Solid Acid Catalyst. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Y.; Gu, F.; Xu, G.; Zhong, Z.; Su, F. Hydrogenolysis of Cellulose to C4–C7 Alcohols over Bi-Functional CuO–MO/Al2O3 (M=Ce, Mg, Mn, Ni, Zn) Catalysts Coupled with Methanol Reforming Reaction. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 137, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Galadima, A.; Masudi, A.; Muraza, O. Conversion of Cellulose to Glucose and Further Transformation into Fuels over Solid Acid Catalysts: A Mini Review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022, 336, 111846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shrotri, A.; Kobayashi, H.; Fukuoka, A. Cellulose Depolymerization over Heterogeneous Catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boonyakarn, T.; Wataniyakul, P.; Boonnoun, P.; Quitain, A.T.; Kida, T.; Sasaki, M.; Laosiripojana, N.; Jongsomjit, B.; Shotipruk, A. Enhanced Levulinic Acid Production from Cellulose by Combined Brønsted Hydrothermal Carbon and Lewis Acid Catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 2697–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tulaphol, S.; Hossain, M.A.; Rahaman, M.S.; Liu, L.Y.; Phung, T.K.; Renneckar, S.; Grisdanurak, N.; Sathitsuksanoh, N. Direct Production of Levulinic Acid in One Pot from Hemp Hurd by Dilute Acid in Ionic Liquids. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 1764–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Santos, L.; Fraga, G.; Pontes, D.; Campos, L.; Pontes, L.; Teixeira, L. Alternatives for the Production of Levulinic Acid Obtained from Biomass. Quim. Nova 2021, 44, 1300–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lopes, E.S.; Silva, J.F.L.; do Nascimento, L.A.; Bohórquez, J.F.C.; Lopes, M.S.; Tovar, L.P.; Filho, R.M. Feasibility of the Conversion of Sugarcane Molasses to Levulinic Acid: Reaction Optimization and Techno-Economic Analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 15646–15657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, X.; Xu, R.; Liu, Q.; Liang, M.; Yang, J.; Lu, S.; Li, G.; Lu, L.; Si, C. Valorization of Corn Stover into Furfural and Levulinic Acid over SAPO-18 Zeolites: Effect of Brønsted to Lewis Acid Sites Ratios. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 141, 111759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Perveen, F.; Farooq, M.; Ramli, A.; Naeem, A.; Khan, I.W.; Saeed, T.; Khan, J. Levulinic Acid Production from Waste Corncob Biomass Using an Environmentally Benign WO3-Grafted ZnCo2O4@CeO2 Bifunctional Heterogeneous Catalyst. ACS Omega 2022, 8, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lappalainen, K.; Vogeler, N.; Kärkkäinen, J.; Dong, Y.; Niemelä, M.; Rusanen, A.; Ruotsalainen, A.L.; Wäli, P.; Markkola, A.; Lassi, U. Microwave-Assisted Conversion of Novel Biomass Materials into Levulinic Acid. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2018, 8, 965–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Santana Junior, C.C.; Rambo, M.C.D.; Teófilo, R.F.; Cardoso, W.J.; Bertuol, D.A.; Rambo, M.K.D. Production of Levulinic Acid from Coconut Residues (Cocos Nucifera) Using Differents Approaches. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 6875–6886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Freitas, F.A.; Licursi, D.; Lachter, E.R.; Galletti, A.M.R.; Antonetti, C.; Brito, T.C.; Nascimento, R.S.V. Heterogeneous Catalysis for the Ketalisation of Ethyl Levulinate with 1,2-Dodecanediol: Opening the Way to a New Class of Bio-Degradable Surfactants. Catal. Commun. 2016, 73, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ravutsov, M.A.; Marinova, M.M.; Kurutos, A.; Simeonov, S.P. Sources, Sustainability and Directions in the Chemical Synthesis of δ-Aminolevulinic Acid. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2024, 38, 101491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, H.; Song, J.; Xie, C.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Yang, G.; Han, B. Surface Engineering in PbS: Via Partial Oxidation: Towards an Advanced Electrocatalyst for Reduction of Levulinic Acid to γ-Valerolactone. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 1754–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Juárez, P.; López-Aguado, C.; Paniagua, M.; Melero, J.A.; Mariscal, R.; Morales, G. Self-Condensation of Levulinic Acid into Bio-Jet Fuel Precursors over Acid Zeolites: Elucidating the Role of Nature, Strength and Density of Acid Sites. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2022, 631, 118480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, W.; Ding, H.; Zhu, J.; Liu, X.; Xu, Q.; Yin, D. Esterification of Levulinic Acid into n-Butyl Levulinate Catalyzed by Sulfonic Acid-Functionalized Lignin-Montmorillonite Complex. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2020, 5, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chaffey, D.R.; Bere, T.; Davies, T.E.; Apperley, D.C.; Taylor, S.H.; Graham, A.E. Conversion of Levulinic Acid to Levulinate Ester Biofuels by Heterogeneous Catalysts in the Presence of Acetals and Ketals. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 293, 120219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, C.; Zhang, K.; Liu, Y.; Wu, S. Esterification of Levulinic Acid into Ethyl Levulinate Catalyzed by Sulfonated Bagasse-Carbonized Solid Acid. BioResources 2019, 14, 2186–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gallego-Villada, L.A.; Alarcón, E.A.; Cerrutti, C.; Blustein, G.; Sathicq, Á.G.; Romanelli, G.P. Levulinic Acid Esterification with n-Butanol over a Preyssler Catalyst in a Microwave-Assisted Batch Reactor: A Kinetic Study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62, 10915–10929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Subalakshmi, A.; Kavitha, B.; Srinivasan, N.; Rajarajan, M.; Suganthi, A. An Affordable Efficient SrWO4 Decorated Bi2O3 Nanocomposite: Photocatalytic Activity for the Degradation of Methylene Blue under Visible Light Irradiation. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 48, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, X.; Li, S.; Mei, Y.; Chen, L.; Guo, H.; Liu, B. The Antibacterial Properties of Nano ZnMoO4 Powder. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 16820–16829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Saraj, C.S.; Singh, S.C.; Verma, G.; Alquliah, A.; Li, W.; Guo, C. Rapid Fabrication of CuMoO4 Nanocomposites via Electric Field Assisted Pulsed-Laser Ablation in Liquids for Electrochemical Hydrogen Generation. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2023, 13, 100358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Murugan, E.; Govindaraju, S.; Santhoshkumar, S. Hydrothermal Synthesis, Characterization and Electrochemical Behavior of NiMoO4 Nanoflower and NiMoO4/RGO Nanocomposite for High-Performance Supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 392, 138973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tong, Y.; Zhang, T.; Sun, Y.; Wang, X.; Wu, X. Co3O4@NiMoO4 Composite Electrode Materials for Flexible Hybrid Capacitors. Front. Optoelectron. 2022, 15, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Singh, R.; Kumar, M.; Khajuria, H.; Sharma, S.; Sheikh, H.N. Studies on Hydrothermal Synthesis of Photolumniscent Rare Earth (Eu3+ & Tb3+) Doped NG@FeMoO4 for Enhanced Visible Light Photodegradation of Methylene Blue Dye. Solid State Sci. 2018, 76, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Karthikeyan, M. Production of Biodiesel from Cordiamyxa Bio-Oil Using BaMoO4-Ce2O3 Nanoparticles as an Alternative Fuel for Diesel Engine. Mater. Lett. 2019, 243, 199–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Feitosa de Carvalho, T.A.; Nobre, F.X.; de Lima Barros, A.; Ghosh, A.; de Almeida Lima e Silva, A.; Oliveira dos Santos Fontenelle, R.; Rita de Morais Chaves Santos, M.; Elias de Matos, J.M. Investigation of Optical, Structural, and Antifungal Properties of Lindgrenite Obtained by Conventional Coprecipitation and Ultrasound-Assisted Coprecipitation Methods. J. Solid State Chem. 2021, 295, 121957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Silva Junior, J.L.; Nobre, F.X.; de Freitas, F.A.; de Carvalho, T.A.F.; de Barros, S.S.; Nascimento, M.C.; Manzato, L.; Matos, J.M.E.; Brito, W.R.; Leyet, Y.; et al. Copper Molybdate Synthesized by Sonochemistry Route at Room Temperature as an Efficient Solid Catalyst for Esterification of Oleic Acid. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 73, 105541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, H.; Jenkins, R.A.; Thompson, R.M.; Downs, R.T.; Evans, S.H.; Bloch, E.M. Markascherite, Cu3(MoO4)(OH)4, a New Mineral Species Polymorphic with Szenicsite, from Copper Creek, Pinal County, Arizona, U.S.A. Am. Mineral. 2012, 97, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Feng, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, G.; Yu, W.; Dong, X. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Rod-like CoMoO4 and Its Excellent Properties for the Anode of Lithium-ion Batteries. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2020, 67, 2012–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, W.; Zhu, C.; Ma, Z.; Sun, C.; Chen, L.; Chen, Y. MoO3 Nanorods/Fe2(MoO4)3 Nanoparticles Composite Anode for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 14411–14415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Carvalho, T.A.F.D.; Brenord, G.; Pinto, B.F.; Mendes, M.K.D.A.; Silva, D.S.N.; Silva, A.D.A.L.E.; de Moura, E.M.; Vieira, E.C.; Ghosh, A.; Nobre, F.X.; et al. Lindgrenite as an Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst to Obtain Biodiesel. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dummer, N.F.; Sodiq-Ajala, Z.; Morgan, D.J.; Davies, T.E. Investigating the Preparation of Cu3Mo2O9 as a Photocatalyst. Catal. Commun. 2022, 163, 106414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wen, P.; He, Q.; Hu, D.; Ren, L.; Zhao, W.; Wei, F. Preparation and Characterization of Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2 Nanosheets with Solar Photocatalytic Activity. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202200087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ávila-López, M.A.; Luévano-Hipólito, E.; Torres-Martínez, L.M. In-Situ Fabrication of Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2 Films Decorated with MO (M = Zn, Cu, and Ni) for CO2 Photoconversion into Value-Added Compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 873, 159846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bomio, M.R.D.; Tranquilin, R.L.; Motta, F.V.; Paskocimas, C.A.; Nascimento, R.M.; Gracia, L.; Andres, J.; Longo, E. Toward Understanding the Photocatalytic Activity of PbMoO4 Powders with Predominant (111), (100), (011), and (110) Facets. A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 21382–21395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bi, J.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Fu, X. Solvothermal Preparation, Electronic Structure and Photocatalytic Properties of PbMoO4 and SrMoO4. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 91, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hernández-Uresti, D.B.; Martínez-de la Cruz, A.; Torres-Martínez, L.M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Compounds by PbMoO4 Synthesized by a Microwave-Assisted Solvothermal Method. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 3096–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ismail, A.A.; Alsheheri, S.Z.; Albukhari, S.M.; Mahmoud, M.H.H. Facile Synthesis of Visible-Light-Induced Mesoporous Ag2O/Fe2(MoO4)3 Photocatalysts for Degradation of Tetracycline. Opt. Mater. 2021, 121, 111505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, X.; Xu, L.; Liu, Y.; Mei, Y.; Chen, L.; Zheng, A.; Yin, K.; Xiao, X.; Li, S.; Sun, X.; et al. Highly Stable and Antifungal Properties on the Oilseed Rape of Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2 Nanoflakes Prepared by Simple Aqueous Precipitation. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 5235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hassani, H.O.; Akouibaa, M.; Rakass, S.; Abboudi, M.; El Bali, B.; Lachkar, M.; Al Wadaani, F. A Simple and Cost-Effective New Synthesis Method of Copper Molybdate CuMoO4 Nanoparticles and Their Catalytic Performance. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2021, 6, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Medeiros Leão, G.S.; Silva Ribeiro, M.D.; Filho, R.L.D.F.; Saraiva, L.B.; Peña-Garcia, R.R.; Teixeira, A.P.D.C.; Lago, R.M.; Freitas, F.A.; de Sá Barros, S.; Junior, S.D.; et al. The Synergic Effect of h -MoO3, α-MoO3, and β-MoO3 Phase Mixture as a Solid Catalyst to Obtain Methyl Oleate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 60103–60121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rahmani, A.; Farsi, H. Nanostructured Copper Molybdates as Promising Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting and CO2 reduction. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 39037–39048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wu, Q.; Zhang, P.; Kuo, D.H.; Wu, B.; Abdeta, A.B.; Su, Z.; Chen, L.; Zelekew, O.A.; Lin, J.; Chen, X. Activation of Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2 with the Hydrazine-Driven Cation Reduction into a Highly Efficient Catalyst for the Reduction of Organic Dyes and Heavy Metals Ion. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lobo, W.V.; Paes, O.A.R.L.; Sousa, A.D.S.; Pinheiro, W.; Sousa, C.A.S.; de Araújo Bezerra, J.; Novita, L.; Cheng, I.F.; de Souza, L.K.C.; de Freitas, F.A. Application of Sulfonated Passion Fruit Seeds as a Heterogeneous Catalyst in the Esterification of Oleic and Levulinic Acids: Optimization of Reaction Parameters. Renew. Energy 2025, 241, 122355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Patel, A.; Dave, R. Phosphotungstic Acid Supported on Waste Sugarcane Bagasse: A Sustainable and Recyclable Catalyst for the Synthesis of Biofuel Additives from Levulinic Acid. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2025, 102, 101574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Alsalim, M.; Najafi Chermahini, A.; Dinari, M.; Luque, R.; Pineda, A.; Vargas Fernández, C. Synthesis of Carrageenan/DFNS Composite and Its Application in the Esterification of Levulinic Acid with Alcohols. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2024, 169, 113054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jin, L.; Zhou, C.; Chen, S.; Liu, P. Controlled Synthesis of Defective MOF-808 and Its Application in Levulinic Acid Esterification. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2024, 681, 119773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Qin, L.; Wang, J.; Mao, H.; Ge, L.; Yao, C. Efficient Cascade Reactions Involving Esterification, Hydrogen Transfer, and Lactonization for Biomass Conversion Using MOF/Metal Oxide Composites as Heterogeneous Catalysts. Mol. Catal. 2024, 568, 114525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Desai, D.S.; Yadav, G.D. Synthesis of Energy Rich Fuel Additive from Biomass Derived Levulinic Acid and Furfuryl Alcohol Using Novel Tin-Exchanged Heteropoly Acid Supported on Titania Nanotubes as Catalyst. Fuel 2023, 331, 125700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mendonça, I.M.; Paes, O.A.R.L.; Maia, P.J.S.; Souza, M.P.; Almeida, R.A.; Silva, C.C.; Duvoisin, S.; de Freitas, F.A. New Heterogeneous Catalyst for Biodiesel Production from Waste Tucumã Peels (Astrocaryum Aculeatum Meyer): Parameters Optimization Study. Renew. Energy 2019, 130, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhou, S.; Wu, L.; Bai, J.; Lei, M.; Long, M.; Huang, K. Catalytic Esterification of Levulinic Acid into the Biofuel n-Butyl Levulinate over Nanosized TiO2 Particles. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Suminar, D.R.; Pribadi, C.Z.; Fitriana, Q.R.; Andrijanto, E.; Permana, M.D.; Eddy, D.R.; Rahayu, I. Corncob Waste Derived Carbon with Sulfonic Acid Group: An Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for Production of Ethyl Levulinate as Biodiesel Additives. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zainol, M.M.; Amin, N.A.S.; Asmadi, M. Kinetics and Thermodynamic Analysis of Levulinic Acid Esterification Using Lignin-Furfural Carbon Cryogel Catalyst. Renew. Energy 2019, 130, 547–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ntshibongo, S.; Maumela, M.; Bingwa, N. Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Evaluation of Supported Catalysts (PdNPs/TiO2, PdNPs/Al2O3, PdNPs/SiO2) for Esterification of Levulinic Acid to Levulinate Esters. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 146, 110101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pithadia, D.; Patel, A. Anchored Silicotungstic Acid: Study of the Synthesis of Biofuel Additive from Levulinic Acid & Effect of Supports. Catal. Today 2024, 433, 114666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Goga, G.; Chauhan, B.S.; Mahla, S.K.; Cho, H.M. Performance and Emission Characteristics of Diesel Engine Fueled with Rice Bran Biodiesel and N-Butanol. Energy Rep. 2019, 5, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Maggi, R.; Shiju, N.R.; Santacroce, V.; Maestri, G.; Bigi, F.; Rothenberg, G. Silica-Supported Sulfonic Acids as Recyclable Catalyst for Esterification of Levulinic Acid with Stoichiometric Amounts of Alcohols. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 2173–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) XRD diffraction pattern and (b) Raman vibrational spectroscopy for Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2. The Raman spectrum identified as R050213, R060241, and R110061 is available on the website https://rruff.info/lindgrenite (accessed on 1 July 2024) for free download.
Figure 1. (a) XRD diffraction pattern and (b) Raman vibrational spectroscopy for Cu3(MoO4)2(OH)2. The Raman spectrum identified as R050213, R060241, and R110061 is available on the website https://rruff.info/lindgrenite (accessed on 1 July 2024) for free download.
Catalysts 15 00357 g001
Figure 2. Infrared spectrum of (a) lingrenite and (b) lindgrenite before and after exposition in pyridine probe of Lewis and Brønsted sites.
Figure 2. Infrared spectrum of (a) lingrenite and (b) lindgrenite before and after exposition in pyridine probe of Lewis and Brønsted sites.
Catalysts 15 00357 g002
Figure 3. Thermal analysis by (a) TG/DTG, (b) differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and textural analysis by (c) adsorption/desorption of N2 and (d) pore radius of lindgrenite.
Figure 3. Thermal analysis by (a) TG/DTG, (b) differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and textural analysis by (c) adsorption/desorption of N2 and (d) pore radius of lindgrenite.
Catalysts 15 00357 g003
Figure 4. Images (a) and (b) are the scanning electron microscopy of copper molybdate and (c) the dispersive energy X-ray (EDX) spectrum.
Figure 4. Images (a) and (b) are the scanning electron microscopy of copper molybdate and (c) the dispersive energy X-ray (EDX) spectrum.
Catalysts 15 00357 g004
Figure 5. Effect of temperature on converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate. Reaction conditions: molar ratio (LA:MeOH) of 1:20, 4 h, and 5% wt. of catalyst.
Figure 5. Effect of temperature on converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate. Reaction conditions: molar ratio (LA:MeOH) of 1:20, 4 h, and 5% wt. of catalyst.
Catalysts 15 00357 g005
Figure 6. Effect of catalyst dosage on converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate. Reaction conditions: molar ratio (LA:MeOH) of 1:20, 100 °C, and 4 h of reaction.
Figure 6. Effect of catalyst dosage on converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate. Reaction conditions: molar ratio (LA:MeOH) of 1:20, 100 °C, and 4 h of reaction.
Catalysts 15 00357 g006
Figure 7. Effect of reaction time on converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate. Reaction conditions: molar ratio (LA:MeOH) of 1:20, 100 °C, 5% wt. of catalyst.
Figure 7. Effect of reaction time on converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate. Reaction conditions: molar ratio (LA:MeOH) of 1:20, 100 °C, 5% wt. of catalyst.
Catalysts 15 00357 g007
Figure 8. Effect of molar ratio on converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate. Reaction conditions: 100 °C, 5% of catalyst, and 3 h of reaction.
Figure 8. Effect of molar ratio on converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate. Reaction conditions: 100 °C, 5% of catalyst, and 3 h of reaction.
Catalysts 15 00357 g008
Figure 9. Effect of alcohol variation on converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate (ML). Reaction conditions: 100 °C, 5% wt. catalyst, 3 h, molar ratio (LA:MeOH) of 1:20.
Figure 9. Effect of alcohol variation on converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate (ML). Reaction conditions: 100 °C, 5% wt. catalyst, 3 h, molar ratio (LA:MeOH) of 1:20.
Catalysts 15 00357 g009
Figure 10. Catalyst recycling in converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate. Reaction conditions: molar ratio (LA:MeOH) of 1:20, 100 °C, 5% of catalyst, 3 h.
Figure 10. Catalyst recycling in converting levulinic acid (LA) into methyl levulinate. Reaction conditions: molar ratio (LA:MeOH) of 1:20, 100 °C, 5% of catalyst, 3 h.
Catalysts 15 00357 g010
Figure 11. Schematic representation of (a) solutions of precursors, (b) mixing the solutions of ions, (c) centrifugation, washing and drying, and (d) characterization for obtaining lindgrenite nanocrystals by the coprecipitation method.
Figure 11. Schematic representation of (a) solutions of precursors, (b) mixing the solutions of ions, (c) centrifugation, washing and drying, and (d) characterization for obtaining lindgrenite nanocrystals by the coprecipitation method.
Catalysts 15 00357 g011
Figure 12. NMR 1H spectrum of methyl levulinate with the integration of characteristic peaks of interest. The red lines indicate the integrated areas under the signals corresponding to specific proton environments, which are used for quantitative analysis of the compound’s hydrogen atoms.
Figure 12. NMR 1H spectrum of methyl levulinate with the integration of characteristic peaks of interest. The red lines indicate the integrated areas under the signals corresponding to specific proton environments, which are used for quantitative analysis of the compound’s hydrogen atoms.
Catalysts 15 00357 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ribeiro, A.P.d.O.; Lobo, W.V.; de Carvalho, T.A.F.; de Matos, J.M.E.; de Freitas, F.A.; Ruiz, Y.L.; Matos, R.S.; Ţălu, Ş.; da Fonseca Filho, H.D.; Domínguez, L.A.; et al. Copper Molybdate-Catalyzed Esterification of Levulinic Acid: A Heterogeneous Approach for Biofuel Synthesis. Catalysts 2025, 15, 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15040357

AMA Style

Ribeiro APdO, Lobo WV, de Carvalho TAF, de Matos JME, de Freitas FA, Ruiz YL, Matos RS, Ţălu Ş, da Fonseca Filho HD, Domínguez LA, et al. Copper Molybdate-Catalyzed Esterification of Levulinic Acid: A Heterogeneous Approach for Biofuel Synthesis. Catalysts. 2025; 15(4):357. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15040357

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ribeiro, Alyne Pereira de Oliveira, Wyvirlany Valente Lobo, Talles André Feitosa de Carvalho, José Milton Elias de Matos, Flávio Augusto de Freitas, Yurimiler Leyet Ruiz, Robert S. Matos, Ştefan Ţălu, Henrique Duarte da Fonseca Filho, Lianet Aguilera Domínguez, and et al. 2025. "Copper Molybdate-Catalyzed Esterification of Levulinic Acid: A Heterogeneous Approach for Biofuel Synthesis" Catalysts 15, no. 4: 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15040357

APA Style

Ribeiro, A. P. d. O., Lobo, W. V., de Carvalho, T. A. F., de Matos, J. M. E., de Freitas, F. A., Ruiz, Y. L., Matos, R. S., Ţălu, Ş., da Fonseca Filho, H. D., Domínguez, L. A., Brito, W. R., & Nobre, F. X. (2025). Copper Molybdate-Catalyzed Esterification of Levulinic Acid: A Heterogeneous Approach for Biofuel Synthesis. Catalysts, 15(4), 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15040357

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop