Next Article in Journal
Recent Progress of Non-Noble Metal Catalysts for Oxygen Electrode in Zn-Air Batteries: A Mini Review
Next Article in Special Issue
NO Reduction Reaction by Kiwi Biochar-Modified MnO2 Denitrification Catalyst: Redox Cycle and Reaction Process
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogenation of Xylose to Xylitol in the Presence of Bimetallic Nanoparticles Ni3Fe Catalyst in the Presence of Choline Chloride
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mitigation of Air Pollutants by UV-A Photocatalysis in Livestock and Poultry Farming: A Mini-Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Vanadium-Containing Catalytically Active Phases for Exhaust Gas Neutralizers of Motor Vehicles and Industrial Enterprises

by
Bolatbek Khussain
1,
Alexandr Brodskiy
1,*,
Alexandr Sass
1,
Kenzhegul Rakhmetova
1,
Vladimir Yaskevich
1,
Valentina Grigor’eva
1,
Altay Ishmukhamedov
1,
Anatoliy Shapovalov
1,
Irina Shlygina
1,
Svetlana Tungatarova
1,2,* and
Atabek Khussain
1
1
D.V. Sokolsky Institute of Fuel, Catalysis and Electrochemistry, 142, Kunaev str., Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71, al-Farabi str., Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(8), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12080842
Submission received: 6 July 2022 / Revised: 25 July 2022 / Accepted: 28 July 2022 / Published: 31 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Catalysis for Air Pollution Applications)

Abstract

:
The catalytically active vanadium-containing system of γ-Al2O3 was studied using a wide range of physical and chemical methods, depending on the synthesis conditions. It is shown that the vanadium-containing system includes several complexes with different thermal stabilities and catalytic activities. Low-active complexes are destroyed with the formation of more active ones based on V2O5 oxide, as the temperature of heat treatment increases. It can be assumed that V2O5 oxide has the decisive role in its catalytic activity. It was concluded that the vanadium-containing catalytic system on aluminium oxide, in the studied temperature range, is thermally stable and shows high activity not only in the reduction of nitrogen oxides but also in the oxidation of hydrocarbons (even of the most difficult ones, such as oxidizable methane). These properties of the system make it quite promising in the field of application for the purification of the exhaust gases of motor transport and industrial enterprises with environmentally harmful components, as well as for understanding the mechanism of the action of the catalysts in these processes, which is very important for solving the problems of decarbonization and achieving carbon neutrality.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Environmental protection is one of the most pressing problems. One of the main factors that has a negative impact on the environment are the exhaust gases of industrial enterprises and vehicles, as a variety of gases enter the atmosphere as a result of their functioning. Harmful toxic emissions include unreacted fuel hydrocarbons, CO, NOx, sulphur-containing compounds, soot, etc. Catalytic purification can be one of the most effective and rational ways to neutralize as well as recycle components of harmful emissions, in particular, the complete catalytic oxidation of organic substances to carbon dioxide and water and sulphur dioxide and the reduction of nitrogen oxides.
Often, catalytic systems of aluminium–cobalt, aluminium–cobalt–magnesium and systems using 4 and 5d transition metals of the VIII group are the basis for catalytic converters of toxic exhaust-gas components from motor vehicles and industrial plants [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. As a rule, the latter show the best results and are the most effective.
Vanadium containing an oxide catalytically active phases were synthesized to replace expensive components in neutralizers and to approximate the efficiency of such systems to that of systems based on noble metals. The choice of vanadium oxides is due to the fact that catalytic systems based on vanadium (V) oxide such as [23] and supported on various supports with a high specific surface area, for example, oxides of aluminium, silicon, titanium, etc., are known [24,25,26,27,28,29,30], which can be used as oxidation catalysts, in particular, nitrogen oxides, as well as in the selective purification of exhaust gases from internal combustion engines [31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
The emission of incompletely burned and unreacted hydrocarbons into the atmosphere is one of the main and intractable problems in relation to non-stationary consumers of hydrocarbon fuel (internal combustion engines of vehicles, mobile power generators, heat guns, etc.). This is due to the frequent switching of the engine-operation mode, causing changes in the conditions of hydrocarbon fuel combustion [38].
In this regard, vanadium containing an oxide’s catalytically active phases that exhibit activity in redox reactions was synthesized, as specified above. The physical and chemical properties and catalytic activity in the oxidation of saturated hydrocarbons using the example of methane, as the most difficult object to be oxidized, were studied by a wide range of physicochemical methods.
Testing the activity of catalysts in redox processes in the presence of and, most importantly, after the destruction of the sulfo group in vanadyl sulfate was the goal of studying the catalytic characteristics.

2. Results and Discussion

The elemental composition of powdered samples of catalytically active phase 10% V/γAl2O3 was investigated after its calcination by energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. The results are shown in Table 1.
As follows from Table 1, an increase in the calcination temperature above 600 °C results in the disappearance of sulphur. This is due to the formation of vanadium oxide from VOSO4·3H2O, the decomposition of aluminium sulfate and the transition of sulphur to the gas phase. The increase in vanadium content occurs as a result.
Powdered samples of the initial substance VOSO4·3H2O and the catalytically active phase of 10% V/γ-Al2O3 under different temperature conditions were studied using the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) method. The samples were calcined for 1 h in air at varying temperatures. The EPR spectra were recorded at room temperature in air in the registration mode: microwave power −2 mW, modulation amplitude 20 gauss, time constant 0.1 s, magnetic field 3300 ± 2500 gauss and field sweep time 2.5 min.
Figure 1 shows the EPR spectra of the 10% V/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Table 1 shows the results of their processing. The 51V isotope is the only stable isotope with a nucleus spin of 7/2. Therefore, its EPR signal should have eight superfine splitting components with slightly different g-factors. Thus, the recorded total spectrum was the sum of all signal components. Indeed, at least eight strongly broadened hyperfine structure components are observed in the EPR spectra of the samples (Figure 1).
The EPR spectra have ∆H width (116–483 gauss) and a g-factor≈1.97. The spectra intensity decreases with an increase in the sample calcination temperature. The EPR signal is associated with V4+ ions, which are part of the vanadyl ion of the original VOSO4·3H2O thatundergoes destruction when deposited on a carrier, due to the interaction of aluminium oxide with the sulfo group of vanadyl sulfate. The resulting free vanadyl transforms into diamagnetic vanadium oxide V2O5, which does not give an EPR signal, upon deposition and drying at room temperature. This process intensifies with increasing temperature (Table 2).
Since vanadium is present in all samples, regardless of the calcination temperature (Table 1), therefore, in this case, the EPR method can serve as an “ideal indicator” of vanadium oxidation states, which means determining the presence or absence of vanadyl or V2O5 oxide by the signal intensity.
Since 10% vanadium in terms of metal is present on the carrier, the signal-amplitude intensity for all supported samples (Table 2) should be increased 10-fold, and it will increase from 2250 to 9570 a.u. for VOSO4·3H2O in terms of metallic vanadium.
Consequently, even a simple impregnation of γ-Al2O3 with an aqueous solution of vanadyl sulfate and drying at room temperature results in a decrease in the signal amplitude from V4+ ions from 9570 to 1200 a.u., or almost eight times, which can be associated with the formation of diamagnetic phase of the V2O5.
X-ray diffraction patterns of 10% V/Al2O3 catalysts under different heat treatment regimes are shown in Figure 2. Three main maxima corresponding to V2O5 (4.37; 3.40; 2.87; ASTM 9-387) are present against the background of broad maxima of γ-Al2O3 (2.28; 1.97; 1.52; 1.395 Å-ASTM 10-425) on the diffraction pattern of the original sample dried in air at room temperature (Figure 2a). The same pattern persists after heating the samples up to 400 °C (Figure 2b).
Diffraction maxima from Al2(SO4)3 (5.86; 3.51–3.52; 2.03; ASTM 30-43) appear additionally in the samples heated at temperatures above 400 °C (Figure 2c). The diffraction maxima from aluminium sulfate disappear, and the intensity of the V2O5 maxima increases at heating temperatures of 700 °C and above (Figure 2d).
The narrowing of the diffraction peaks and an increase in their intensity is associated with a better crystallization of the sample, as evidenced by a decrease in the X-ray amorphous component. The formation of more ordered structures can be associated with the melting of the V2O5 phase at 700 °C and its subsequent crystallization after cooling.
The data obtained using scanning electron microscopy also indicate a change in the surface morphology of 10% V/Al2O3 catalysts during the transition from 500 to 700 °C (Figure 3). It is clearly seen that the particles have more clearly defined contours after heating at 700 °C at all magnifications, and this is in good agreement with the X-ray diffraction data. It can be assumed that the vanadium oxide phase on the surface of aluminium oxide is in a weakly crystallized state, up to the melting point. After melting upon cooling, the phase has a clearer crystalline structure. The decrease in the width of the diffraction peaks and the increase in their intensity are associated precisely with this effect. It should be noted that in this case there is no significant change in particle size.
The specific surface area (S) of samples of aluminium–vanadium phases at different temperatures were determined by the BET method by low-temperature nitrogen adsorption, (Table 3). The use of this method is due to the fact that the value of the specific surface area can serve as a criterion for the uniformity and degree of filling of the carrier surface with a vanadium-containing phase. It follows from the obtained data that the specific surface area of the samples was in the range of 172–195 m2/g, in the temperature range of 25–600 °C. Per the literature data, V2O5 melts at 670–690 °C [39,40]. After the melting of vanadium oxides at 700 °C, the surface of the catalyst decreases by about 6.5 times compared with the surface of the sample heated at 600 °C, from 174 to 27 m2/g. At the same time, in the same temperature range, the surface of aluminium oxide without supported vanadium oxide practically does not change.
A sharp decrease in the specific surface area (for the 10% V/γ-Al2O3 catalyst) indicates a change in the surface morphology, which also confirms the conclusions made on the basis of X-ray diffractometry and electron microscopy data. Comparison of specific surface data of the 10% V/γ-Al2O3 catalyst, γ-Al2O3 carrier at various temperatures and vanadyl sulfate indicates that during the melting process, vanadium oxide is more evenly distributed over the surface of carrier than it was in the initial state, thereby reducing its specific size. Therefore, it can be argued that vanadium is retained on the surface of aluminium oxide even after the melting of V2O5 (at temperatures above 600 °C). Moreover, its relative content increases as a result of the decomposition of aluminium and vanadium sulfates (Table 3).
The H2-TPR method was used to reduce the 10% V/γ-Al2O3 catalyst by varying the preheating temperature in air. H2-TPR spectra are shown in Figure 4, and their results are given in Table 4.
As follows from Figure 4 and Table 4, two peaks at 640 and 670 °C are observed in the initial sample (25 °C). It can be assumed that they are associated with the interaction of hydrogen with oxygen of vanadium oxide and oxygen of vanadyl sulfate. Based on the EPR data (Table 2), the more intense peak at 640 °C belongs to vanadium oxide. The relatively high temperatures of the TPR peaks, in contrast to the data of [29] for aluminium–vanadium catalysts, may be associated with a higher content of vanadium on the carrier, as well as another initial vanadium compound used to prepare the catalyst.
The same situation persists for 300 °C. At the same time, there is a decrease in the total area of the peaks (Table 4), probably due to a decrease in the amount of vanadyl sulfate.
Starting from 400 °C, the spectra contain only one peak corresponding to the oxygen of vanadium oxide. The identical positions of the peaks and their area in the range of 400–600 °C should be noted. This indicates the completion of the formation of 10% V/γ-Al2O3 catalyst after 300 °C.
The decrease in the peak area at 700 °C and above is associated with the melting of vanadium oxide (BET method, Table 3).
Thus, the data obtained in the study of physical and chemical properties of the 10% V/γ-Al2O3 catalyst in the process of its preparation allow to describe the processes according to the following scheme:
3VOSO4 + γ-Al2O3 → Al2(SO4)3 + V2O4
4V2O4 + O2 → 2V2O5
Al2(SO4)3 → γ-Al2O3 + 3SO3
Therefore, the thermal decomposition of vanadyl sulfate should not lead to side effects (formation of additional phases), since this process results in the formation of the γ-Al2O3 phase, which is similar to the initial carrier.
The S-shaped curves shown in Figure 5 were obtained from testing the activity of the vanadium-containing catalysts.
The catalyst showed the lowest activity at a heating temperature of 300 °C (Figure 5, curve 1). Apparently, the presence of the product of interaction between the carrier and vanadyl sulfate on the surface reduces its catalytic activity. The presence of strong interaction of vanadyl sulfate with aluminium oxide is evidenced by the EPR data (Table 2). The catalyst activity increases (Figure 5, curve 4), and the sample itself turns from dark green at 300 °C (almost black) to an orange colour at 600 °C, when the same catalyst is reheated at 600 °C in air during 1 h in order to decompose this complex. It may indicate the presence of an inactive complex of vanadyl sulfate with aluminium oxide at 300 °C and its destruction as the temperature increases, with the formation of a more active complex with V2O5.
The specific surface area of catalyst sharply decreases from 174 to 27 m2/g, due to the melting of vanadium oxide at the increase in heating temperature in the air from 600 to 700 °C (Table 3). The catalyst activity in methane oxidation at these temperatures was determined. The data are shown in Figure 5, curves 2 and 3. Activity of the catalyst heated at 700 °C is somewhat lower than the activity of the catalyst heated at 600 °C. Despite the fact that the specific surface area decreases by more than six times, the catalytic activity does not drop so significantly, so its activity is higher than when heated at 300 °C (Figure 5, curves 3, 4).

3. Materials and Methods

The catalytically active phase was prepared by impregnation of γ-Al2O3 with a 30% VOSO4 solution, followed by drying at room temperature. The content of vanadium in terms of metal was 10% for all samples. This sample was the zero-reference point for all subsequent catalyst treatments. Sometimes the starting substance VOSO4·3H2O was used to compare changes when supporting vanadyl sulfate to the carrier. Vanadyl sulfate was chosen as initial compound due to the possibility to obtain aqueous solutions of high concentration and low decomposition temperature (lower than the melting point of vanadium (V) oxide).
The dependence of the catalytic properties of the vanadium-containing phase on the preheating temperature in air was evaluated. For this purpose, 10% V/Al2O3 catalysts (per metallic vanadium) were prepared on metallic blocks (neutralizer body) from X15U5 Fechral.
The simplest hydrocarbon methane was used to simulate the interaction of the saturated hydrocarbons with the neutralizers.
Activity tests were performed in a flow-through apparatus at atmospheric pressure with chromatographic control of methane concentration in the gas mixture (1% methane in argon–air) before and after the catalyst. The ratio of methane to oxygen in the mixture before reaction was 1/15 at space velocity of 25,000 h−1. The initial catalyst with a secondary carrier from alumina was preliminarily impregnated with an aqueous salt solution of VOSO4·3H2O according to its moisture capacity and dried at room temperature. Then, the catalyst was heated in air at a given temperature for 1 h and placed in a quartz reactor. Methane content before and after passage through the catalyst was measured at different temperatures of the gas mixture (methane–argon–air) on a gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector.
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies were performed at room temperature with a JES ME ESR spectrometer, JEOL, in the 3 cm range.
A surface analyser, an AccuSorb gas adsorption porosimeter by Micromeritics, was used in the BET method for low-temperature nitrogen adsorption.
Microphotographs were taken with a JSM 6610 LV scanning electron microscope, JEOL, at different magnifications. The accelerating voltage was 20 kV, imaging mode was SEL.
The elemental composition was determined using an INCA Energy 450 energy dispersive microanalysis system mounted on a JSM 6610 LV scanning electron microscope, JEOL.
X-ray diffractometry was performed on DRON-4M X-ray diffractometer. A tube with a cobalt cathode was used. Imaging conditions were tube voltage 30 kV, current 20 mA, and sweep rate 2 °C/min.
Thermo-programmed hydrogen reduction (H2-TPR) of the 10% V/γ-Al2O3 system was performed between 25 and 1100 °C in linear mode, with the 5% mixture of hydrogen and argon at a temperature change rate of 5 °C/min. The gas flow rate was 30 mL/min. Signals were recorded using a thermal conductivity detector on the Crystal 5000 “Chromatec” chromatograph.

4. Conclusions

As a result of this research, it was possible to show that the catalytically active vanadium-containing system includes several complexes with different thermal stability and catalytic activity. The presence of thermal stable, but inactive spinel complexes with aluminium oxide, which are quite easily formed from low-valent s- and d-elements and aluminium oxide, was not detected in the system at moderate heating [22,37].
As the temperature of the heat treatment increases, the low-active vanadyl sulfate complexes decompose with the formation of more active ones based on V2O5 oxide. It can be assumed that V2O5 plays the determining role in the catalytic activity of the system.
Since the decomposition temperature of aluminium sulfate is lower than the melting point of vanadium oxide, it was possible to obtain an aluminium–vanadium catalyst with a well-developed surface, high activity and low sulphur content.
Thus, the 10% V/Al2O3 catalyst in the studied temperature range is thermally stable and exhibits high activity not only in the reduction of nitrogen oxides [31,32,33,34,35,36,37] but also in the oxidation of hydrocarbons (even the most difficult oxidizable methane). These properties of the system make it quite promising in the field of the application for the purification of the exhaust gases of motor vehicles and industrial enterprises with environmentally harmful components as well as for understanding the mechanism of the action of the catalysts in these processes, which is very important for solving the problems of decarbonization and achieving carbon neutrality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, B.K. and A.S. (Alexander Sass); methodology, A.S. (Alexander Sass) and A.B.; validation, K.R.; formal analysis, V.Y., V.G., A.I., A.S. (Anatoliy Shapovalov) and I.S.; investigation, K.R., A.S. (Alexander Sass) and A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B. and A.S. (Alexander Sass); writing—review and editing, A.B. and A.S. (Alexander Sass); visualisation, A.I. and A.K.; supervision, A.S. (Alexander Sass), B.K., A.B. and S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, grant number AP08856680.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are especially grateful to M. Zhurinov from the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan for their support of the research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Garbowski, E.; Guenin, M.; Marion, M.; Primet, M. Catalytic properties and surface states of cobalt-containing oxidation catalysts. Appl. Catal. 1990, 64, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zeng, H.; Ji, L.; Lin, J. Metal−support interactions in Co/Al2O3 catalysts. A comparative study on reactivity of support. Phys. Chem. 2000, 104, 1783–1790. [Google Scholar]
  3. Thormählen, P.; Skoglundh, M.; Fridell, E.; Andersson, B. Low-temperature CO oxidation over platinum and cobalt oxide catalysts. J. Catal. 1999, 188, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Avgouropoulos, G.; Ioannides, T.; Papadopoulou, C.; Batista, J.; Hocevar, S.; Matralis, H.K. A Comparative study of Pt/γ-Al2O3, Au/α-Fe2O3 and CuO–CeO2 catalysts for the selective oxidation of carbon monoxide in excess hydrogen. Catal. Today 2002, 75, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jansson, J. Low-temperature CO oxidation over Co3O4/Al2O3. J. Catal. 2000, 194, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, W.; Jacobs, G.; Keogh, R.A.; Bukur, D.B.; Davis, B.H. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Effect of Pd, Pt, Re, and Ru noble metal promoters on the activity and selectivity of a 25% Co/Al2O3 catalyst. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2012, 437, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rattan, G.; Kumar, M. Carbon monoxide oxidation using cobalt catalysts. Chem. Chem. Technol. 2014, 8, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zavyalova, U.F.; Tretyakov, V.F.; Burdeinaya, T.N.; Lunin, V.V.; Titkov, A.I.; Salanov, A.N.; Ryzhova, N.D.; Tsyrulnikov, P.G. Oxidation of CO, deep oxidation of CH4 and reduction of NOx by propane on CuCo2O4 and Pd-CeO2 catalysts supported on tape carriers. Pet. Chem. 2005, 45, 281–286. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  9. Zavyalova, U.F.; Petrov, V.F.; Burdeinaya, T.N.; Tsyrulnikov, T.N. Block catalysts for neutralization of exhaust gases synthesized by the combustion method. Chem. Sustain. Dev. 2005, 13, 751–755. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Noskov, A.S.; Pai, Z.P. Technological Methods for Protecting the Atmosphere from Harmful Emissions at Energy Enterprises; SB RAS: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1996; p. 156. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Popova, N.M. Catalysts for the Purification of Gas Emissions from Industrial Production; Nauka: Alma-Ata, Kazakh SSR, 1991; p. 176. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  12. Borshch, V.N.; Pugacheva, E.V.; Zhuk, S.Y.; Andreev, D.E.; Sanin, V.N.; Yukhvid, V.I. Multicomponent metal catalysts for deep oxidation of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons. Proc. Acad. Sci. 2008, 419, 775–777. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vaneman, G.L. Comparison of metal foil and ceramic monolith automotive catalytic converters. Catal. Automot. Pollut. Control II 1991, 71, 537–555. [Google Scholar]
  14. Anders, J.J.; Palmqvist, E.C.; Fridell, E.; Skoglundh, M.; Österlund, L.; Thormählen, P.; Langer, V. On the catalytic activity of Co3O4 in low-temperature CO oxidation. J. Catal. 2002, 211, 387–397. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, H.F.; Kavanagh, R.; Guo, Y.L.; Guo, Y.; Hu, P. Synthesis-structure-activity relationships in Co3O4 catalyzed CO oxidation. J. Catal. 2012, 296, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ozkara, S.; Akin, A.N.; Misirli, Z.; Aksoylu, A.E. The effect of metal loading on structural characteristics and low temperature CO oxidation activity of coprecipitated Co/Al2O3. Turk. J. Chem. 2005, 29, 219–224. [Google Scholar]
  17. Oliveira, H.A.; Franceschini, D.F.; Passos, F.B. Cobalt catalyst characterization for methane decomposition and carbon nanotube growth. J. Brazil. Chem. Soc. 2014, 25, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vosoughi, V.; Dalai, A.K.; Abatzoglou, N.; Hu, Y. Performances of promoted cobalt catalysts supported on mesoporous alumina for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Appl. Catal. A Gen 2017, 547, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kurzina, I.A. Deep oxidation of methane on platinum and palladium catalysts supported on silicon nitride. Bull. Tomsk. Polytech. Univ. 2005, 308, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ivanova, N.D.; Ivanov, S.V.; Boldyrev, E.I.; Sokolsky, G.V.; Makeeva, I.S. Highly efficient manganese oxide catalysts for the CO oxidation reaction. J. Appl. Chem. 2002, 75, 1452–1455. [Google Scholar]
  21. Olsson, L.; Fridell, H.; Skoglundh, M.; Andersson, B. A kinetic study of NO oxidation and NOx storage on Pt/Al2O3 and Pt/BaO/Al2O3. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6895–6906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Massenova, A.; Kalykberdiyev, M.; Ussenov, A.; Sass, A.; Kenzin, N.; Kanatbayev, E.; Baiken, A. Catalytic technologies for the production of eco-friendly gasolines and reducing the toxicity of vehicle exhaust gases. Orient. J. Chem. 2019, 35, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gruber, M.; Hermann, K. Elementary steps of the catalytic NOx reduction with NH3: Cluster studies on reaction paths and energetics at vanadium oxide substrate. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 244701–244708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kalinkin, P.; Kovalenko, O.; Lapina, O.; Khabibulin, D.; Kundo, N. Kinetic peculiarities in the low-temperature oxidation of H2S over vanadium catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2002, 178, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. León, M.; Jiménez-Jiménez, J.; Jiménez-López, A.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Soriano, D.; Nieto, J.M.L. Vanadium oxide-porous phosphate heterostructure catalysts for the selective oxidation of H2S to sulphur. Solid State Sci. 2010, 12, 996–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barba, D.; Palma, V.; Ciambelli, P. Screening of catalysts for H2S abatement from biogas to feed molten carbonate fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Soriano, M.D.; Nieto, J.M.L.; Ivars, F.; Concepcion, P.; Rodriguez-Castellon, E. Alkali-promoted V2O5 catalysts for the partial oxidation of H2S to sulphur. Catal. Today 2012, 192, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Amiridis, M.D.; Solar, J.P. Selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide by ammonia over V2O5/TiO2, V2O5/TiO2/SiO2, and V2O5−WO3 /TiO2 catalysts: Effect of vanadia content on the activation energy. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 978–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Garbarino, G.; Kowalik, P.; Riani, P.; Antoniak-Jurak, K.; Pieta, P.; Lewalska-Graczyk, A.; Lisowski, W.; Nowakowski, R.; Busca, G.; Pieta, I. Improvement of Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for low-temperature CO2 methanation by vanadium and calcium oxide addition. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 6554–6564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wachs, I.E. Catalysis science of supported vanadium oxide catalysts. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 11762–11769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Koebel, M.; Elsener, M.; Kleemann, M. Urea-SCR: A promising technique to reduce NOx emissions from automotive diesel engines. Catal. Today 2000, 59, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Forzatti, P. Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis. Appl. Catal. A Gen 2001, 222, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Borovkov, V.Y.; Mikheeva, E.P.; Zhidomirov, G.M.; Lapina, O.B. Theoretical and experimental studies of the nature of the catalytic activity of VOX/TIO2 systems. Kinet. Catal. 2003, 44, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, M.; Ung, K.C.; Dai, Q.; Wang, X. Catalytic combustion of chlorinated VOCS over VOx/TiO2 catalysts. Catal. Commun. 2012, 18, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Inomata, Y.; Hata, S.; Mino, M.; Kiyonaga, E.; Morita, K.; Hikino, K.; Yoshida, K.; Kubota, H.; Toyao, T.; Shimizu, K.; et al. Bulk vanadium oxide versus conventional V2O5/TiO2: NH3–SCR catalysts working at a low temperature below 150 °C. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 9327–9331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Marberger, A.; Elsener, M.; Ferri, D.; Kröcher, O. VOx surface coverage optimization of V2O5/WO3-TiO2 SCR catalysts by variation of the V loading and by aging. Catalysts 2015, 5, 1704–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Massenova, A.; Kalykberdiyev, M.; Sass, A.; Kenzin, N.; Ussenov, A.; Baiken, A.; Rakhmetova, K. Catalytic technologies for solving environmental problems in the production of fuels and motor transport in Kazakhstan. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rovenskikh, A.S.; Kariychina, A.E.; Iguminova, V.A. Automobile emission effect on the environment. Investigations of young scientists. In Proceedings of the XV International Scientific Conference, Kazan, Russia, 24 December 2020; pp. 15–18. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  39. Zeidel, A.N.; Prokofiev, V.K.; Raysky, S.M.; Slavny, V.A.; Schrader, E.Y. Tables of Spectral Lines. Directory; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1977; p. 800. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  40. Kalinkin, I.P.; Mosichev, V.I. New Handbook of Chemist and Technologist. Analytical Chemistry; Peace and Family: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2003; p. 984. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. EPR spectra of 10% V/γ-Al2O3. 1—initial catalyst after heating in air for 1 h at temperatures: 2—300 °C; 3—400 °C; 4—500 °C; 5—600 °C; 6—700 °C; 7—800 °C; 8—900 °C; 9—initial VOSO4·3H2O.
Figure 1. EPR spectra of 10% V/γ-Al2O3. 1—initial catalyst after heating in air for 1 h at temperatures: 2—300 °C; 3—400 °C; 4—500 °C; 5—600 °C; 6—700 °C; 7—800 °C; 8—900 °C; 9—initial VOSO4·3H2O.
Catalysts 12 00842 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of 10% V/Al2O3 catalyst under different heat-treatment modes: (a) initial system; (b) heating at 400 °C; (c) heating at 600 °C; (d) heating at 700 °C.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of 10% V/Al2O3 catalyst under different heat-treatment modes: (a) initial system; (b) heating at 400 °C; (c) heating at 600 °C; (d) heating at 700 °C.
Catalysts 12 00842 g002
Figure 3. Micrographs of the 10% V/Al2O3 system at different magnifications and heat treatment modes: (a) magnification by 300 times, 500 °C; (b) magnification by 300 times, 700 °C; (c) magnification by 1000 times, 500 °C; (d) magnification by 1000 times, 700 °C; (e) magnification by 3000 times, 500 °C; (f) magnification by 3000 times, 700 °C.
Figure 3. Micrographs of the 10% V/Al2O3 system at different magnifications and heat treatment modes: (a) magnification by 300 times, 500 °C; (b) magnification by 300 times, 700 °C; (c) magnification by 1000 times, 500 °C; (d) magnification by 1000 times, 700 °C; (e) magnification by 3000 times, 500 °C; (f) magnification by 3000 times, 700 °C.
Catalysts 12 00842 g003
Figure 4. Reduction of the 10% V/γ-Al2O3 catalyst by H2-TPR method at varying the preheating temperature in air. (a) 25 °C; (b) 300 °C; (c) 400 °C; (d) 500 °C; (e) 600 °C; (f) 700 °C; (g) 800 °C.
Figure 4. Reduction of the 10% V/γ-Al2O3 catalyst by H2-TPR method at varying the preheating temperature in air. (a) 25 °C; (b) 300 °C; (c) 400 °C; (d) 500 °C; (e) 600 °C; (f) 700 °C; (g) 800 °C.
Catalysts 12 00842 g004
Figure 5. The relative content of methane in the methane–air mixture after reaction on the 10% V/Al2O3 catalyst at different temperatures: 1—heating of the catalyst in air for 1 h at 300 °C; 2—at 600 °C for 1 h; 3—at 700 °C for 1 h; 4—sample additionally heated at 600 °C for 1 h after all measurements.
Figure 5. The relative content of methane in the methane–air mixture after reaction on the 10% V/Al2O3 catalyst at different temperatures: 1—heating of the catalyst in air for 1 h at 300 °C; 2—at 600 °C for 1 h; 3—at 700 °C for 1 h; 4—sample additionally heated at 600 °C for 1 h after all measurements.
Catalysts 12 00842 g005
Table 1. Elemental content of the 10% V/γAl2O3 catalyst calcined in air at different temperatures.
Table 1. Elemental content of the 10% V/γAl2O3 catalyst calcined in air at different temperatures.
T (°C)Elements (wt%)
OAlSiSVTotal
25 (initial)45.0740.600.425.198.72100
300 °C44.7941.620.115.118.37100
400 °C45.2841.300.074.958.40100
500 °C47.2341.160.094.047.49100
600 °C45.6944.140.103.216.86100
700 °C37.9250.990.080.0011.01100
800 °C40.4248.780.080.0010.72100
Table 2. Results of EPR spectra of vanadium-containing phases at various heating temperatures.
Table 2. Results of EPR spectra of vanadium-containing phases at various heating temperatures.
SampleIntensity, Amplitude (a.u.)g-Factor∆H (gauss)
Initial 10% V/γ-Al2O31201.99270
300 °C1161.97261
400 °C241.97116
500 °C131.97155
600 °C111.97193
700 °C6.51.97213
800 °C1.31.97213
900 °C1.51.97174
VOSO4·3H2O22501.97126
Table 3. Specific surface area of the aluminium–vanadium phases after calcination in air at different temperatures.
Table 3. Specific surface area of the aluminium–vanadium phases after calcination in air at different temperatures.
SampleS (m2/g)
VOSO4·3H2O vanadyl sulfate23
10% V/γ-Al2O3, initial192
10% V/γ-Al2O3, calcination for 1 h, 300 °C, air184
10% V/γ-Al2O3, calcination for 1 h, 400 °C, air195
10% V/γ-Al2O3, calcination for 1 h, 500 °C, air172
10% V/γ-Al2O3, calcination for 1 h, 600 °C, air174
10% V/γ-Al2O3, calcination for 1 h, 700 °C, air27
10% V/γ-Al2O3, calcination for 1 h, 800 °C, air10
γ-Al2O3 after calcination in air at 600 °C, 1 h195
γ-Al2O3 after calcination in air at 700 °C, 1 h189
Table 4. Results of the study of 10% V/γ-Al2O3 catalyst using H2-TPR.
Table 4. Results of the study of 10% V/γ-Al2O3 catalyst using H2-TPR.
Temperature of Heating in Air (°C)Total Area of Peaks (a.u.)Temperature of the Peaks (°C)
2514,407,832640,670
30011,858,380640,670
40011,382,953640
50011,110,654650
60011,063,026635
7007,920,939645
8008,052,778645
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khussain, B.; Brodskiy, A.; Sass, A.; Rakhmetova, K.; Yaskevich, V.; Grigor’eva, V.; Ishmukhamedov, A.; Shapovalov, A.; Shlygina, I.; Tungatarova, S.; et al. Synthesis of Vanadium-Containing Catalytically Active Phases for Exhaust Gas Neutralizers of Motor Vehicles and Industrial Enterprises. Catalysts 2022, 12, 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12080842

AMA Style

Khussain B, Brodskiy A, Sass A, Rakhmetova K, Yaskevich V, Grigor’eva V, Ishmukhamedov A, Shapovalov A, Shlygina I, Tungatarova S, et al. Synthesis of Vanadium-Containing Catalytically Active Phases for Exhaust Gas Neutralizers of Motor Vehicles and Industrial Enterprises. Catalysts. 2022; 12(8):842. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12080842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khussain, Bolatbek, Alexandr Brodskiy, Alexandr Sass, Kenzhegul Rakhmetova, Vladimir Yaskevich, Valentina Grigor’eva, Altay Ishmukhamedov, Anatoliy Shapovalov, Irina Shlygina, Svetlana Tungatarova, and et al. 2022. "Synthesis of Vanadium-Containing Catalytically Active Phases for Exhaust Gas Neutralizers of Motor Vehicles and Industrial Enterprises" Catalysts 12, no. 8: 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12080842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop