Next Article in Journal
Nanowire-Based Materials as Coke-Resistant Catalyst Supports for Dry Methane Reforming
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrophilic/Hydrophobic Silane Grafting on TiO2 Nanoparticles: Photocatalytic Paint for Atmospheric Cleaning
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Characterization of Composite Carbon Adsorbents with Photocatalytic Regeneration Ability: Application to Diclofenac Removal from Water
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Adsorption in the Photocatalytic Decomposition of Dyes on APTES-Modified TiO2 Nanomaterials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Synthesis of Au or Pt@Perovskite Nanocrystals via Interfacial Photoreduction

1
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(2), 174; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020174
Submission received: 13 December 2020 / Revised: 22 January 2021 / Accepted: 25 January 2021 / Published: 27 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Commemorative Issue in Honor of Professor Akira Fujishima)

Abstract

:
The surface modification of perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) (i.e., their decoration with noble metals) holds great promise with respect to the tailoring of their properties but has remained a challenge because perovskite NCs are extremely sensitive to water and alcohols. In this study, Au or Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs were successfully synthesized by photoreduction at the water/hexane interface. First, Cs4PbBr6 NCs were synthesized through the hot-injection method. Then, Cs4PbBr6 was transformed into CsPbBr3 and subjected to noble metal modification, both at the interface. The synthesized CsPbBr3 NCs exhibited a cubic perovskite phase and had an average size of approximately 13.5 nm. The deposited Au and Pt nanoparticles were crystalline, with a face-centered cubic lattice and average diameters of approximately 3.9 and 4.4 nm, respectively. The noble metal modification process had almost no effect on the steady-state photoluminescence (PL) emission wavelength but affected the charge-recombination kinetics of the CsPbBr3 NCs. Time-resolved PL decay spectral analysis indicated that the fluorescence lifetimes of the Au and Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs were shorter than those of the pure CsPbBr3 NCs, probably owing to the quenching of the free charges because of electron transfer from the perovskite to the noble metal nanoparticles.

1. Introduction

Organic–inorganic lead halide perovskite (OIHP) materials with a general ABX3 (A = organic cation, B = metal cation, and X = halide anion) formula have attracted significant attention in the field of optoelectronics because of their unique optical and semiconducting characteristics [1,2,3]. For instance, their use has rapidly increased the power conversion efficiency of solar cells from 3.81% [4] to more than 25% [5] within a few years. However, owing to the instability of OIHP, including its extreme sensitivity to oxygen and moisture, as well as its poor photo- and thermostability [6], a number of perovskite analogues have been developed. Replacing the A-site organic groups with inorganic cations to construct all-inorganic halide perovskites (IHPs) is a potential strategy for improving the stability of OIHP while maintaining its optical and electrical properties [7].
Cesium lead halide perovskite (CsPbX3) nanocrystals (NCs), an IHP material, show great promise for use in a range of fields owing to their high photoluminescence quantum yield, narrow emission width, and tunable band gap, which covers the entire visible range [8]. They were first reported by the Kovalenko group in 2015 [9]. Since then, considerable progress has been made in the synthesis of CsPbX3 NCs. For instance, the hot-injection method [10,11], the solvothermal method [12], ultrasonication [13], room-temperature precipitation [14], and chemical vapor deposition [15] have been employed to prepare CsPbX3 NCs with controllable shapes and compositions.
Although the advances made in the synthesis of CsPbX3 NCs have been impressive, it is known that heterostructured NCs formed by tailoring the properties of two or more dissimilar materials usually exhibit several interesting functionalities. An example is the surface modification of CsPbX3 NCs at the individual particle level [16,17]. However, it remains a challenge to use conventional sol-gel methods for surface modification of CsPbX3 NCs because of their water and alcohol intolerance. Recently, Hu et al. demonstrated an effective sol-gel process for modifying the surfaces of CsPbX3 NCs at the interface of water and a nonpolar solvent and were able to produce CsPbX3/metal oxide Janus NCs with improved stability [17]. Thus, interfacial synthesis is the key to preparing heterostructured NCs and is different from the other reported methods for preparing CsPbX3/metal [18,19] and CsPbX3/SiO2 [20] heterostructures. Inspired by their report, herein, we performed photoreduction at the water/hexane interface to produce noble metal@CsPbBr3 NCs. First, Cs4PbBr6 NCs were synthesized through the hot-injection method. Subsequently, the Cs4PbBr6 was transformed into CsPbBr3 and subjected to noble metal modification, both at the interface. Owing to the localized surface plasmon resonance effect [21], high catalytic activity [22], and ease of charge separation [23] of the noble metal nanoparticles, the noble metal@CsPbX3 NCs have the potential to play an important role in photodetectors, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), solar cells, and photocatalysts.

2. Results and Discussion

We propose the following mechanism to explain the synthesis process (Figure 1). When the hexane suspension containing the Cs4PbBr6 NCs comes in contact with water, the Cs4PbBr6 is transformed into CsPbBr3, which accompanies the stripping of CsBr through the hexane/water interface and removing partial hydrophobic capping ligands (i.e., oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OAm)) [17]. Subsequently, the noble metal precursor in contact with the interface reacts with the electrons photogenerated from CsPbBr3 (methanol was used as a sacrificial agent). According to a previous report [8], the CsPbBr3 NCs obtained through this water-triggered transformation process exhibit enhanced stability against moisture compared with those formed through the hot-injection method. Thus, Cs4PbBr6 NCs were chosen to prepare the Au or Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs instead of CsPbBr3 NCs presynthesized by the hot-injection method.
To explore the morphologies of the synthesized Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 NCs, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging was performed. Figure 2a shows that the original Cs4PbBr6 NCs are quasispherical with an average diameter of approximately 13.9 nm. The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image in the inset clearly shows that the lattice spacing is 0.122 nm and is in good agreement with that of the (1 0 1) plane of rhombohedral Cs4PbBr6. The size distribution of the NCs was relatively narrow (Figure 2b), indicating that the NC growth process was well controlled. After the water-triggered transformation process, the NCs show a cube-like structure with an average edge length of approximately 13.5 nm. Further, the d-spacing of 0.152 nm, as measured using the HRTEM image (Figure 2c and its inset), could be assigned to the (1 1 1) plane of cubic CsPbBr3. The size distribution of these NCs was similar to that of the Cs4PbBr6 NCs (Figure 2d).
The transformation was also monitored through ultraviolet (UV)-visible (vis) absorption and photoluminescence (PL) measurements. As shown in Figure 3a, two sharp peaks were observed at 230 and 314 nm (solid black line). These could be assigned to the pristine Cs4PbBr6 NCs [24]. The spectrum shows that the Cs4PbBr6 NC suspension did not exhibit any distinct absorption peaks in the visible-light region, in accordance with the colorless appearance of the suspension. After the reaction with water, the sharp peak at 314 nm disappeared and a new absorption peak emerged at approximately 510 nm (solid red line), indicating the transformation of Cs4PbBr6 into CsPbBr3. The corresponding PL spectrum shows a sharp peak at 532 nm, with a small full-width-at-half-maximum value. Figure 3b shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the original Cs4PbBr6 NCs, as well as that of the product after the water-triggered transformation. The Cs4PbBr6 NCs exhibit a rhombohedral phase, and the diffraction peaks at approximately 22.4°, 27.8°, 28.7°, 29.0°, and 30.4° correspond to the (101), (610), (230), (121), and (330) planes, respectively [17]. On the other hand, the product formed after the water treatment exhibits a pure cubic CsPbBr3 perovskite phase, and its diffraction pattern contains peaks related to the (100), (110), and (200) planes [17]. These results confirm that a change in the crystal structure from Cs4PbBr6 to CsPbBr3 was successfully realized at the water/hexane interface.
Figure 4 shows the TEM images of the Au or Pt@CsPbBr3 hybrid NCs prepared by reacting Cs4PbBr6 NCs with the corresponding noble metal precursor under light irradiation at the water/hexane interface. These hybrid NCs were similar in shape and size to the pure CsPbBr3 NCs shown in Figure 1c. Moreover, the Au and Pt nanoparticles were deposited randomly on the surfaces of the CsPbBr3 NCs, and their sizes were relatively small, at 3.9 and 4.4 nm, respectively. The HRTEM images show that the formed Au and Pt nanoparticles are crystalline with d-spacings of 0.106 and 0.090 nm, respectively, which correspond to the face-centered cubic (fcc) Au (400) (JCPDS Card No. 04–0784) and Pt (331) planes (JCPDS Card No. 70–2057), respectively. These results confirmed that the photoreduction reaction had been carried out successfully at the water/hexane interface. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey scans of Au@CsPbBr3 and Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs are presented in the left of Figure 5, in which the presence of Cs, Pb, Br, and Au (or Pt) elements is confirmed. In the high-resolution XPS spectra (the right part of Figure 5), doublet peaks containing a low energy band (Au4f7/2) and a high energy band (Au4f5/2) are observed at 84.0 and 87.7 eV for Au@CsPbBr3, respectively, and 71.0 (Pt4f7/2) and 74.3 eV (Pt4f5/2) for Pt@CsPbBr3, which are assigned to metallic Au(0) or Pt(0) [25,26]. The results demonstrate that the noble metal precursors can be effectively reduced through the interfacial photoreduction.
Successful deposition of the Au or Pt nanoparticles was also verified through UV-vis absorption measurements. Figure 6a shows the absorption spectra of suspensions containing the different NCs. Compared with the peaks of the pure CsPbBr3 NCs, the absorption edges of the Au@CsPbBr3 and Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs exhibited a red shift. Furthermore, the Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs showed enhanced absorption for wavelengths greater than 520 nm, while the Au@CsPbBr3 NCs showed additional weak absorption peaks at 420–450 nm. These differences in the absorption spectra may be attributed to the surface plasmonic resonance effect of the deposited noble metal nanoparticles [16]. All the NCs exhibited PL emission peaks at 532 nm, and their full-width-at-half-maximum values were also similar (Figure 6b). A bright-green PL emission was observed under UV-light irradiation (Figure 6c). Time-resolved PL (TRPL) measurements were performed to study charge transfer from the perovskite NCs to the noble metal nanoparticles. The TRPL decay data (Figure 6d) were fitted using a biexponential function of time, t, as shown in Equation (1), and the fitted data are listed in Table 1.
I   ( t )   =   A 1 e t / τ 1   +   A 2 e t / τ 2
where t is the time after optical excitation, I (t) is the luminescence intensity at t, τ1 is the fast transient lifetime related to the charge-trapping process (nonradiative recombination), τ2 is the slow lifetime attributed to the intrinsic band-to-band recombination (radiative recombination) [27], and A1 and A2 are coefficients corresponding to the contributions of the fast and slow lifetimes, respectively [28]. The τ2 value of the Au or Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs was much smaller than that of the pure CsPbBr3 NCs (Table 1). This can be ascribed to the quenching of the free charges because of electron transfer from the perovskite to the noble metal nanoparticles.

3. Materials and Methods

Materials: Cesium carbonate (Cs2CO3, 99.99%), lead (II) bromide (PbBr2, 99.99%), OA (90%), OAm (80%), 1-octadecene (ODE, 90%), and dihydrogen hexachloroplatinate(IV) hexahydrate (H2PtCl6·6H2O, AR) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Hexane and methanol (99.5%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Gold(III) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O, 99.9%) was obtained from China National Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). All chemicals were used without further purification.
Synthesis of Cs4PbBr6 NCs: The Cs4PbBr6 NCs were prepared using the hot-injection method [17]. A cesium oleate solution was prepared by mixing 0.32 g of Cs2CO3 (0.98 mmol), 1 mL of OA, and 16 mL of ODE in a 100-mL three-neck flask. The solution was dried for 1 h at 120 °C under vacuum and then heated in an Ar atmosphere to 150 °C until all the Cs2CO3 had reacted with OA. During a typical run to synthesize the Cs4PbBr6 NCs, OAm (2 mL), OA (2 mL), ODE (20 mL), and PbBr2 (0.4 mmol) were added to a 100-mL three-neck flask and dried under vacuum for 1 h. The reaction mixture was then heated to 140 °C. Next, 8.8 mL of a hot cesium oleate solution was rapidly injected into the PbBr2 solution. After 6 s, the reaction mixture was immersed in an ice-water bath for immediate cooling. The product was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min to remove the ODE and unreacted OA as well as the OAm. The precipitate was collected and redispersed in hexane and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min to remove the oversized Cs4PbBr6 NCs. The concentration of the Cs4PbBr6 NC suspension was adjusted to 1 mg/mL for further synthesis.
Synthesis of Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs: During a typical synthesis process, 0.1 mL of methanol was mixed with 0.4 mL of an aqueous H2PtCl6·6H2O solution (1.448 mM), and the mixture was injected into 10 mL of the Cs4PbBr6 NC suspension. The system was irradiated with a halogen lamp (~20 mW/cm2) for 1 h under vigorous stirring and then kept undisturbed under the ambient conditions for 12 h. The product was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 5 min. The precipitates were discarded, and the supernatant was collected for characterization.
Synthesis of Au@CsPbBr3 NCs: The synthesis procedure was similar to that for Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs, except that an aqueous HAuCl4·3H2O solution (1.904 mM) was used.
Synthesis of CsPbBr3 NCs. The synthesis procedure was similar to that of the Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs, except that pure water without a metal precursor or methanol was used.
Characterization: The UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded using a Shimadzu UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV3600) (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The morphologies of the NCs were characterized by means of TEM (JEOL JEM-2100HR) (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). For the XRD measurements, the NC suspensions were cast on cleaned glass substrates and dried. The measurements were performed using a Rigaku diffractometer (D/max 2500 PC) (Rigaku Corporation, Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) and Cu Kα radiation. XPS analysis was carried out using PHI Quantera II (Ulvac-PHI, Kanagawa, Japan). The PL and TRPL decay measurements were performed using a Horiba DeltaFlex PL system (Horiba, Tokyo, Japan) with a 520-nm pulsed laser for excitation at approximately 25 °C.

4. Conclusions

In this study, Au and Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs were successfully synthesized via a reaction at the water/hexane interface, which involved the transformation of Cs4PbBr6 into CsPbBr3 and its subsequent modification with a noble metal. The prepared CsPbBr3 NCs exhibited a cubic perovskite phase and an average size of approximately 13.5 nm. The deposited Au and Pt nanoparticles were crystalline, with an fcc lattice and average diameters of approximately 3.9 and 4.4 nm, respectively. The noble metal modification process affected the charge recombination kinetics of the CsPbBr3 NCs, probably owing to the quenching of the free charges because of electron transfer from the perovskite to the noble metal nanoparticles. This simple strategy for designing and synthesizing perovskite/noble metal nanostructures offers new opportunities to increase their applicability in photodetectors, LEDs, solar cells, photocatalysts, and other such devices. With respect to solar cells, CsPbBr3 NCs modified with a noble metal may be used to construct perovskite quantum dot-based solar cells. Compared with bare perovskite NCs, those modified with a noble metal can enhance the light-harvesting properties of devices owing to their localized surface plasmon resonance effect. In the case of photocatalysts, a composite of Au or Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs and reduced graphene oxide or TiO2 would be suitable for use as a visible-light-responsive photocatalyst for H2 evolution in aqueous HI solutions. Modification with a noble metal has the potential to enhance the photocatalytic activity of CsPbBr3 NCs. Further research in these directions is underway in our laboratory.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z. and Z.G.; methodology, S.Z.; validation, L.W., W.L., and M.C.; investigation, J.Z.1; resources, N.Y.; data curation, J.Z.2; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z.1; writing—review and editing, S.Z. and Z.G.; visualization, J.Z.2; supervision, Z.G.; project administration, Z.G.; funding acquisition, S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51602031 and 51603021), the Qinlan Project (2019), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 19KJA430014), and the Jiangsu Graduate Scientific Research Innovation Program (2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wiley, A.; Dunlap, S.; Zhou, Y.; Nitin, P.; David, B.M. Synthetic Approaches for Halide Perovskite Thin Films. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 3193–3295. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, S.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Jia, X.; Jiang, J.; Chen, Y.; Lin, B.; Jiang, H.; Fang, B.; Yuan, N.; et al. Interface engineering via phthalocyanine decoration of perovskite solar cells with high efficiency and stability. J. Power Sources 2019, 438, 226987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, S.; Lu, Y.; Lin, B.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Yuan, N.; Ding, J.; Fang, B. PVDF-HFP additive for visible-light-semitransparent perovskite films yielding enhanced photovoltaic performance. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 170, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed on 13 December 2020).
  6. Li, X.; Cao, F.; Yu, D.; Chen, J.; Sun, Z.; Shen, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, L.; Wei, Y.; Wu, Y.; et al. All Inorganic Halide Perovskites Nanosystem: Synthesis, Structural Features, Optical Properties and Optoelectronic Applications. Small 2017, 13, 1603996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, J.; Lai, M.; Lin, J.; Yang, P. Rich Chemistry in Inorganic Halide Perovskite Nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1802856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wu, L.; Hu, H.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, S.; Chen, M.; Zhong, Q.; Yang, D.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, B.; et al. From Nonluminescent Cs4PbX6 (X = Cl, Br, I) Nanocrystals to Highly Luminescent CsPbX3 Nanocrystals: Water-Triggered Transformation through a CsX-Stripping Mechanism. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 5799–5804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Protesescu, L.; Yakunin, S.; Bodnarchuk, M.I.; Krieg, F.; Caputo, R.; Hendon, C.H.; Yang, R.-X.; Walsh, A.; Kovalenko, M.V. Nanocrystals of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel Optoelectronic Materials Showing Bright Emission with Wide Color Gamut. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3692–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, D.; Yu, Y.; Bekenstein, Y.; Wong, A.-B.; Alivisatos, P.; Yang, P. Ultrathin Colloidal Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanowires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 13155–13158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Nedelcu, G.; Protesescu, L.; Yakunin, S.; Bodnarchuk, M.I.; Grotevent, M.J.; Kovalenko, M.V. Fast Anion-Exchange in Highly Luminescent Nanocrystals of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, I). Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 5635–5640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, M.; Zou, Y.; Wu, L.; Pan, Q.; Yang, D.; Hu, H.; Tan, Y.; Zhong, Q.; Xu, Y.; Liu, H.; et al. Solvothermal Synthesis of High-Quality All-Inorganic Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals: From Nanocube to Ultrathin Nanowire. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1701121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tong, Y.; Bladt, E.; Aygüler, M.F.; Manzi, A.; Milowska, K.Z.; Hintermayr, V.A.; Docampo, P.; Bals, S.; Urban, A.S.; Polavarapu, L.; et al. Highly Luminescent Cesium Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals with Tunable Composition and Thickness by Ultrasonication. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 13887–13892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dong, Y.; Gu, Y.; Zou, Y.; Song, J.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; Xue, J.; Li, X.; Zeng, H. Improving All-Inorganic Perovskite Photodetectors by Preferred Orientation and Plasmonic Effect. Small 2016, 12, 5622–5632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Deschler, F.; Sun, X.; Lu, T.; Wertz, E.A.; Hu, J.; Shi, J. Epitaxial Halide Perovskite Lateral Double Heterostructure. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3355–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Su, S.; Shen, J.; Sun, H.; Tao, J.; Xu, D.; Wei, T.; Fan, C.; Wang, Z.; Sun, C.; Bi, W. Shape-controlled synthesis of Ag/Cs4PbBr6 Janus nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2020, 32, 075601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, H.; Wu, L.; Tan, Y.; Zhong, Q.; Chen, M.; Qiu, Y.; Yang, D.; Sun, B.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, Y. Interfacial Synthesis of Highly Stable CsPbX3/Oxide Janus Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balakrishnan, B.K.; Kamat, P.V. Au-CsPbBr3 Hybrid Architecture: Anchoring Gold Nanoparticles on Cubic Perovskite Nanocrystals. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gong, M.; Alamri, M.; Ewing, D.; Sadeghi, S.M.; Wu, J.Z. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Enhanced Light Absorption in AuCu/CsPbCl3 Core/Shell Nanocrystals. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2002163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhong, Q.-X.; Cao, M.-H.; Hu, H.-C.; Yang, D.; Chen, M.; Li, P.-L.; Wu, L.-Z.; Zhang, Q. One-Pot Synthesis of Highly Stable CsPbBr3@SiO2 Core-Shell Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 8579–8587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, C.; Peng, T.-W.; Hu, X.-X.; Nie, Y.-L.; Zhou, X.-F.; Qu, J.; He, H. Plasmon-Induced Photodegradation of Toxic Pollutants with Ag-AgI/Al2O3 under Visible-Light Irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 857–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, H.-Y.; Yu, A.-C. Photophysics and Photocatalysis of Carbon Nitride Synthesized at Different Temperatures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5216–5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, M.; Chen, P.; Liu, M. Graphene Oxide Enwrapped Ag/AgX (X = Br, Cl) Nanocomposite as a Highly Efficient Visible-Light Plasmonic Photocatalyst. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4529–4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Saidaminov, M.I.; Almutlaq, J.; Sarmah, S.; Dursun, I.; Zhumekenov, A.A.; Begum, R.; Pan, J.; Cho, N.; Mohammed, O.F.; BakrPure, O.M. Pure Cs4PbBr6: Highly Luminescent Zero-Dimensional Perovskite Solids. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 840–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Rakočević, L.; Štrbac, S.; Srejić, I. Hydrogen evolution on Au/GC and PdAu/GC nanostructures in acid solution: AFM, XPS, and electrochemical study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, X.; Huang, Q.; Li, Z.; Ma, A.; He, X.; Lin, S. Effects of silicotungstic acid on the physical stability and electrocatalytic activity of platinum nanoparticles assembled on graphene. Mater. Res. Bull. 2014, 60, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, S.; Dai, J.; Yu, Z.; Shao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, X.; Zeng, X.; Huang, J. Tailoring Passivation Molecular Structures for Extremely Small Open-Circuit Voltage Loss in Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5781–5787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, Y.; Wang, P.; Wang, Z.; Cai, B.; Zheng, X.; Chen, Y.; Yuan, N.; Ding, J.; Zhang, W. Heterojunction Engineering for High Efficiency Cesium Formamidinium Double-Cation Lead Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Diagram of transformation of Cs4PbBr6 into Au or Pt@CsPbBr3 at the water/hexane interface. NCs–nanocrystals.
Figure 1. Diagram of transformation of Cs4PbBr6 into Au or Pt@CsPbBr3 at the water/hexane interface. NCs–nanocrystals.
Catalysts 11 00174 g001
Figure 2. TEM images and size distributions of Cs4PbBr6 (a) and CsPbBr3 NCs (b).
Figure 2. TEM images and size distributions of Cs4PbBr6 (a) and CsPbBr3 NCs (b).
Catalysts 11 00174 g002
Figure 3. (a) Absorption and photoluminescence (PL) spectra and (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 NCs. The background of XRD patterns in (b) is shifted because of artificial translation of Y-axis.
Figure 3. (a) Absorption and photoluminescence (PL) spectra and (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Cs4PbBr6 and CsPbBr3 NCs. The background of XRD patterns in (b) is shifted because of artificial translation of Y-axis.
Catalysts 11 00174 g003
Figure 4. TEM images of (a) Au@CsPbBr3 and (b) Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs.
Figure 4. TEM images of (a) Au@CsPbBr3 and (b) Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs.
Catalysts 11 00174 g004
Figure 5. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data of (a) Au@CsPbBr3 and (b) Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs.
Figure 5. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data of (a) Au@CsPbBr3 and (b) Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs.
Catalysts 11 00174 g005aCatalysts 11 00174 g005b
Figure 6. (a) Absorption and (b) photoluminescence (PL) spectra and (c) photographs and (d) time-resolved PL (TRPL) decay curves of different NC suspensions. Photographs were taken under daylight (top) and UV-light illumination (bottom).
Figure 6. (a) Absorption and (b) photoluminescence (PL) spectra and (c) photographs and (d) time-resolved PL (TRPL) decay curves of different NC suspensions. Photographs were taken under daylight (top) and UV-light illumination (bottom).
Catalysts 11 00174 g006
Table 1. Fitting parameters for TRPL spectra shown in Figure 6d.
Table 1. Fitting parameters for TRPL spectra shown in Figure 6d.
τ1 (ns)A1τ2 (ns)A2
CsPbBr314.80.9459.40.06
Au@CsPbBr3 NCs7.030.9528.20.05
Pt@CsPbBr3 NCs2.490.969.970.04
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, W.; Cao, M.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, N.; Zhang, S.; Gu, Z. Synthesis of Au or Pt@Perovskite Nanocrystals via Interfacial Photoreduction. Catalysts 2021, 11, 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020174

AMA Style

Zhang J, Wang L, Liu W, Cao M, Zhang J, Yuan N, Zhang S, Gu Z. Synthesis of Au or Pt@Perovskite Nanocrystals via Interfacial Photoreduction. Catalysts. 2021; 11(2):174. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020174

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jing, Li Wang, Wenwen Liu, Mengsha Cao, Jing Zhang, Ningyi Yuan, Shuai Zhang, and Zhongze Gu. 2021. "Synthesis of Au or Pt@Perovskite Nanocrystals via Interfacial Photoreduction" Catalysts 11, no. 2: 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020174

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop