Next Article in Journal
A Novel Reduced Graphene Oxide-Attapulgite (RGO-ATP) Supported Fe2O3 Catalyst for Heterogeneous Fenton-like Oxidation of Ciprofloxacin: Degradation Mechanism and Pathway
Next Article in Special Issue
Utilization of Coal Fly Ash and Rice Hull Ash as Geopolymer Matrix-cum-Metal Dopant Applied to Visible-Light-Active Nanotitania Photocatalyst System for Degradation of Dye in Wastewater
Previous Article in Journal
Comparing the Nature of Active Sites in Cu-loaded SAPO-34 and SSZ-13 for the Direct Conversion of Methane to Methanol
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrothermally Carbonized Waste Biomass as Electrocatalyst Support for α-MnO2 in Oxygen Reduction Reaction
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Biodiesel Synthesis from Honne-Rubber-Neem Oil Blend with a Novel Mesoporous Base Catalyst Synthesized from a Mixture of Three Agrowastes

1
Biochemical Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife 220005, Osun State, Nigeria
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Bellville, Symphony Way, Bellville, Cape Town 7535, South Africa
3
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical Engineering University, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Present address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Landmark University, Omu-Aran 251101, Kwara State, Nigeria.
Catalysts 2020, 10(2), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10020190
Received: 29 November 2019 / Revised: 16 December 2019 / Accepted: 29 December 2019 / Published: 5 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation of Catalysts from Renewable and Waste Materials)

Abstract

:
Application of solid catalysts synthesized from agricultural wastes provides an environmentally benign and low-cost process path to synthesize biodiesel. An ash containing an equal mixture of cocoa pod husk, plantain peel and kola nut pod husk ashes (CPK) was obtained by open combustion of each of the biomass in air and calcined at 500 °C for 4 h. The calcined CPK ash was characterized to determine its catalytic potential. Two-level transesterification technique was used to synthesize biodiesel using the developed catalyst. The process parameters involved were optimized for the microwave-aided transesterification of a blend of honne, rubber seed and neem oils in a volumetric ratio of 20:20:60, respectively. The study showed that the ash derived from combination of the biomass wastes provided a catalyst which consists all necessary catalytic ingredients in their relative abundance. The calcined CPK consists of 47.67% of potassium, 5.56% calcium and 4.21% magnesium attesting to its heterogenous status. The physisorption isotherms reveals that it was dominantly mesoporous in structure and made up of nanoparticles. A maximum of 98.45 wt.% biodiesel was obtained from a MeOH:oil blend of 12:1, CPK concentration of 1.158 wt.% and reaction time of 6 min under microwave irradiation. The quality of the synthesized biodiesel satisfied the requirements stipulated by standard specifications. Thus, this work demonstrates that a blend of agrowastes and mixtures of non-edible oils could be used to synthesize good quality and sustainable biodiesel that can replace fossil diesel.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Active research in renewable and nonpolluting energy sources has taken center stage in a bid to enhance energy security and prevent environmental degradation. Presently, fuel derived from fossil sources is the socioeconomic mainstay of several countries in the world. However, concerns such as unstable petroleum price, depletion of oil reserves and emission of greenhouse gases are discouraging long-term usage of petro-diesel worldwide [1]. Total or partial replacement of fossil-derived fuel with clean, economically feasible, sustainable and renewable energy sources has become imperative towards achieving balance in energy security and environmental protection in any developing economy.
Biodiesel is a renewable fuel having remarkable features and can serve as an alternative to fossil diesel. Transesterification of the triglycerides found in vegetable oil or animal fat or lipids from algae and methanol or ethanol in the presence of a catalyst is by far the most widely applied technique for biodiesel synthesis. Generally, biodiesel synthesis via transesterification employs catalysts that can be acid, alkali or enzyme [2]. The free fatty acid (FFA) level in oils primarily determines the choice of catalyst to be used for the process [3].
Homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis have been applied to transesterification of oils to obtain biodiesel. Homogeneous catalysis has several advantages, including low price, abundant raw materials, shorter reaction time, high catalytic activities and moderate operating conditions [4,5]. In spite of these benefits, homogeneous catalysis is not without shortcomings which limits its continuous application in biodiesel production. Homogenous alkali catalysts are highly hygroscopic; they absorb water during storage [5]. Besides, purification steps require several washes and removing the traces of Na/K together with the glycerol from the biodiesel becomes increasingly difficult. A lot of water required in washing and consequent wastewater treatment cost leads to high production cost [6]. To counter these negative effects posed by this type of catalysts, eco-friendly materials are used to synthesize heterogenous solid catalysts [7,8]. Heterogenous catalysis offers several advantages including recyclability, easy separation, non-corrosiveness, higher selectivity, environmentally benign nature and longer catalyst life [4,5]. Exploitation of wastes for catalyst development in biodiesel production could be used to mitigate environmental damage [9,10]. Currently, a lot of effort has been put into development of heterogeneous solid acid and alkali catalysts for biodiesel synthesis which may help reduce overall production costs. Evidence from several works indicate that this approach has been successfully applied for biodiesel production. Sources of biomass-derived catalysts include waste shells, biomass ashes, activated carbon-supported catalysts, animal bones and waste coral [10,11,12,13,14,15].
The belief that heterogenous catalysis is limited by mass transfer rate, low active site and leaching may have been exaggerated and attaching a solid catalyst to a support will increase the price of biodiesel. It should be noted that loading a catalyst on a support incurs extra cost, thereby further increasing the total production cost. In contrast, biodiesel production using different heterogenous alkali catalysts prepared by calcination without catalyst support showed high yields. For instance, conversion of soybean oil to biodiesel at a temperature of 65 °C, reaction time of 25 min, MeOH:oil of 12:1 and 7 wt.% amount of a catalyst from waste Brassica nigra plant gave 98.79 wt.% yield [13]. Betiku et al. [7] reported biodiesel yield of 98.5 wt.% using calcined banana peel as catalyst under the reaction conditions of temperature of 65 °C, time of 69.02 min, MeOH:oil of 7.6:1 and catalyst amount of 2.75 wt.% from Napoleon’s plume oil. Biodiesel produced from Ceiba pentandra oil gave a maximum yield of 98.69 ± 0.18 wt.% using calcined banana peduncle ash of 1.978 wt.% at reaction temperature of 65 °C, time of 1 h and MeOH:oil of 9.20:1 [14]. Transesterification of soybean oil in the presence of banana peel ash at room temperature, reaction time of [14], MeOH:oil of 6:1 and catalyst amount of 0.7 wt.% gave a biodiesel yield of 98.95% [16]. Several heterogenous catalysts with high catalytic activities have been developed at suitable calcination temperatures from waste materials. Calcination of ash is a cost-effective approach in producing catalyst [9]. Although carbon-based solid catalysts have been touted as the ideal catalyst for transesterification process; costs incurred due to high carbonization temperature and unwanted chemical reactions due to functionalization of the carbonaceous substance have restricted its application on a large scale. Hence, calcination of biomass ashes could offer a simpler and cost-effective means in synthesizing catalyst with high catalytic behavior for transesterification processes.
Proximate analysis has revealed that agricultural wastes such as kola nut pod husk, plantain peel (ripe and unripe) and cocoa pod husk are potential raw materials for industrial applications [17]. Heterogeneous biobase catalysts for the conversion of vegetable oils to biodiesel have been synthesized separately from kola nut pod husks [18,19], cocoa pod husks [20,21] and plantain peels [22,23] (Table 1), but the catalytic activity of the ash obtained from the mixture of these wastes as a potential biobase catalyst for the transesterification reaction has not been reported. Mixtures of oils viz. edible, inedible and waste cooking oils have been exploited for biodiesel synthesis.
Menegehetti et al. [24] evaluated mixtures of cottonseed/castor oils (50:50) and soybean/castor (25:75) oils for biodiesel synthesis and reported 86 and 87 wt.% yields, respectively. Khalil et al. [25] produced biodiesel from a blend of palm oil/rubber seed oil (50:50) and obtained 97 wt.% yield. Also, a mixture of pongamia/neem oils (70:30) was converted to biodiesel with a yield of 86.3 wt.% [26]. In the study of mixture of waste cooking/honne oils (70:30) carried out with the aid of microwave irradiation, a yield of 97.65 wt.% was reported by Milano et al. [27]. In the work of Miraculas et al. [28], a mixture of pongamia/jatropha/honne oils (in equal proportions) was used to produce biodiesel with a reported yield of ~98 wt.%. When a mixture of soybean oil and rapeseed oil (50:50) was used as feedstock for biodiesel synthesis by Qiu et al. [29], a yield of ~94% was observed using KOH of 0.8 wt.%, temperature of 55 °C, MeOH:oil blend of 5:1 and time of 2 h. In our previous report on a mixture of rubber seed/neem oils (40:60), 98.77 wt.% biodiesel yield was achieved under transesterification aided with microwave irradiation [30]. Fadhil et al. [31] obtained 95.2 ± 2.5 wt.% biodiesel yield when castor seed oil and waste fish oil were mixed together (50:50) using MeOH:blend oil of 8:1, KOH of 0.5 wt.%, time of 30 min, stirring rate of 600 rpm and temperature of 32 °C. In all of these reports biodiesel was synthesized through transesterification processes with either KOH or NaOH as the homogeneous catalyst, except in our work in which calcined ash of elephant ear pod husk was used as a base catalyst. Besides the work of Milano et al. [27] and Falowo et al. [30], none of the other works applied microwave irradiation which accounts for the longer time needed to complete the transesterification reactions.
The focus of this present study was to synthesize a functional heterogeneous base catalyst from a mixture of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) pod husk, plantain (Musa paradisiaca) peel and kola nut (Cola nitida) pod husk (CPK) and apply it to transesterification of a ternary blend of inedible oils made up of honne (Calophyllum inophyllum), neem (Azadirachta indica) and rubber seed (Hevea brasiliensis) using microwave-assisted transesterification. This was with a view to developing a sustainable path for biodiesel production to deal with both food vs. fuel concerns and environmental threats. Detailed characterization of the developed catalyst was carried out to ascertain its catalytic potential. The important process parameters for the transesterification process were optimized to maximize the biodiesel yield from the oil blend.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Calcined CPK Characterization

2.1.1. EDX Results on CPK

Table 2 describes the elemental composition of the analyzed samples of calcined CPK prepared at various temperatures. The major metals present are K, Ca and Mg (Figure 1). From the results, variation of calcination temperature affected the element present and amount of each element as previously established [21].
Elements such as K, Ca and Mg are good metals for catalyst formation because of their ability to easily donate electron to other molecules. At 500 °C and 700 °C, K had the highest peak of 47.67% and 47.93%, respectively, among the elements present. Also, Mg and Ca are present in higher amounts at 500 °C than at 700 °C. Increasing the calcination temperature beyond 700 °C led to a slight reduction in K content, which could possibly be attributed to the vaporization of KCl [32]. On the basis of this observation, coupled with the conservation of energy by lowering calcination temperature, additional CPK production was subsequently carried out at 500 °C.
The results in this study agree with previous reports. As can be seen in Table 1, K has been observed to be the dominant element in calcined cocoa pod husk ash [20], calcined plantain peel [22] and calcined kola nut pod ash [18,19]. In another report, mass fraction of calcined banana peduncle ash at 700 °C for 4 h showed K (68.37%) as the dominant component, but with traces of Ca and Mg too [14]. Gohain et al. [15] reported that calcined Carica papaya stem at 700 °C for 4 h contains K (56.71%), Ca (21.08%), Na (14.78%) and Mg (4.41%). Calcined waste of cupuaçu seeds at 800 °C for 4 h was reported to contain K, Ca and Mg with composition of 54.76, 17.57 and 3.61%, respectively [12]. Also, it was found that K (56.13%) and Ca (26.04%) were the predominant elements in Brassica nigra leaves calcined at 550 °C for 2 h [13]. All of these calcined ashes from agricultural wastes have been tested as catalysts for transesterification reactions to synthesize biodiesel with great success.

2.1.2. SEM Analysis of Calcined CPK

The morphological nature of the calcined CPK shows small aggregates of fine particles (Figure 2). The material is porous and spongy in nature, with clusters of small particles scattered in the micrographs. It is worth mentioning that the sintering of metal oxide could be responsible for the agglomerated particles at the calcined temperature [30].
The particle structure of this nature usually exhibits a higher surface area, thereby suggesting a good catalytic activity of the developed catalyst. The SEM images reveal irregularly sized particles of uneven shape. Observations of similar structures in ashes developed from cocoa pod husk [21], ripe plantain peel [23], unripe plantain peel [22] and kola nut pod husk [18] have been reported.

2.1.3. XRD Pattern of Calcined CPK

The crystalline structure of the calcined CPK was described by the corresponding XRD diffractogram (Figure 3). The diffraction peak centered at 2θ shows numerous peaks which is an indication of crystalline phases. Calcination led to the decomposition of the compounds present in the CPK to KCl, K2CO3·1.5H2O and K2Ca(CO3). The XRD spectrum shows that potassium compounds dominated the phases. The observation agrees with the elemental composition obtained by the EDX analysis supporting that K is the predominant element in the CPK. Furthermore, our observation aligns with earlier reports on the calcined individual agrowastes which was combined in this study [18,21,22,23]. This is also true for agrowastes such as banana peduncle and C. papaya stem [14,15].

2.1.4. IR Spectrum for Calcined CPK

The IR spectrum of calcined CPK is shown in Figure 4. A close observation shows adsorption bands at 1367 and 879 cm−1 that indicate the presence of carbonate stretching and bending of C-O vibrations [33]. Also, the -C-O stretching and bending vibrations of carbonate was detected at 1132 cm−1 [13]. The phosphate and silicate ion components are identified by the adsorption band of 1029 cm−1 [7,13,23]. The band at 679 cm−1 is attributable to stretching vibrations of K-O [15]. The characteristic bands at 879 and 679 cm-1 indicate the presence of K2CO3·1.5H2O. In addition, a characteristic band for K2CO3 at 1367 cm−1 is prominent in calcined CPK ash [7,32]. This band is also supported by the strong presence of K2CO3 in the XRD spectrum of calcined CPK (Figure 3). The EDX results (Table 2) corroborate the observed functional groups identified in the IR spectrum of the CPK. Previous studies on the synthesis of solid catalysts from cocoa pod husk [21], plantain peel [22,23] and kola nut pod husk [18], the precursors of the calcined CPK, show that their spectra have similar functional groups to those observed by IR in this study. In addition, these compounds have been reported in calcined ashes of Brassica nigra leaves [13], C. papaya stem [15] and elephant ear pod husk [30].

2.1.5. Surface Properties of Calcined CPK

Measurable quantities such as pore volume and specific surface area that described physical properties of the calcined CPK at 500 °C were determined by physisorption of nitrogen gas (N2) at 77.3 K. The calcined CPK had a BET surface area of 16.871 m2/g and the BJH pore volume was 0.041 cm3/g. The BET surface areas reported for calcined ashes of cocoa pod husk, plantain peel and kola nut pod husk are 2.76, 18.80 and 5.22, respectively [18,21,23]. This shows that combing the agrowastes has improved the surface areas of both calcined ashes of cocoa pod husk and kola nut pod husk. The surface area of the calcined CPK ash in this present study is much higher compare to calcined ashes of Brassica nigra leaves, Musa acuminata peel and wood obtained from Acacia nilotica with 7.038, 1.4546 and 1.33–3.72 m2/g, respectively [13,16,32]. The physisorption isotherms of the calcined CPK ash is depicted in Figure 5. At low P/Po, the adsorption isotherm shows progressive increase in the volume of N2 adsorbed, an important feature in type IV isotherm [34,35]. A sharp uptake in adsorbate volume observed at P/Po > 0.9 can be linked to adsorption in the mesopores region of the catalyst together with type H3 loop, an indication of the presence of mesopores that consists of agglomerates in the calcined CPK [30,34,35,36]. The plot of the BJH pore-size distribution for the calcined CPK is illustrated in Figure 6. The plot suggests the presence of nanoparticles of mesopore size (2–50 nm) for the calcined CPK ash [34].

2.2. Physicochemical Properties of Oil Blends

The suitability of the oil blend for biodiesel synthesis was determined by evaluating the physicochemical properties of each oil blend sample obtained from crude honne, rubber seed and neem oils. Based on the properties of the oil blends presented in Table 3, acid value was extremely high for all oil blends with H20R20N60 having the lowest. The value increases with decrease in the proportion of neem oil in the oil blend. Oil density varies based on the nature of the triglycerides [37]. In this study, the density of the oil blend increases with increase in the amount of neem oil but decrease with the increase in rubber seed oil. Changes in kinematic viscosity across the blend follow the same pattern as that of density since both have a linear correlation [38]. Kinematic viscosity was lowest when the honne oil had highest proportion. Iodine value increased as the proportion of rubber seed oil increased in the blends while the value decreased as the proportion of neem oil in the mixture increased. Though, calorific value of all blends was high, particularly when honne and neem oils are high in the mixture, however, there was an appreciable increase in H20R20N60 (code named HRNO). Therefore, properties such as lower saponification value, acid value, iodine value and high calorific value made HRNO blend a suitable choice for the biodiesel conversion.

2.3. Results of Esterification of HRNO

The pretreatment step, which is an esterification reaction, was included to reduce the acid value of the HRNO to < 2 mg KOH/g oil or %FFA < 1, so as to avoid soap formation during the transesterification process. The results obtained showed a significant reduction in %FFA from 16.07 to a final value of 0.88 ± 0.085 using reaction time of 120 min, temperature of 65 °C, MeOH: Oil blend of 25:1 and catalyst weight of 10 wt.%. The result shows the good catalytic capability of the ferric sulfate in addition to easy separation and recovery of the catalyst [39]. Similar reduction of %FFA was reported at the same processing condition using a blend of rubber seed oil and neem oil. Hence, the process condition was used for the mass production of esterified HRNO used for the transesterification step.

2.4. Modelling Results of Transesterification Process

The central composite rotatable design (CCRD) modeling of the transesterification of HRNO via irradiation with microwave was carried out. The regression model equation obtained is described by the Equation (1):
H R N O B   =   + 87.89   +   2.08 A     0.50 B   +   1.10 C   +   1.67 A B   +   3.22 A C     4.57 B C     1.59 A 2 +   0.52 B 2   +   0.63 C 2
where, HRNOB (wt.%) is the response from the oil blend, the terms A, B and C represent MeOH: HRNO, CPK concentration (wt.%) and reaction time (min), respectively. AB, AC, and BC are the interaction terms, and A2, B2, and C2 are the quadratic terms of the independent variables.
ANOVA results and regression analysis of the selected responses are presented in Table 4 to establish the level of significance of the model as well as all the terms of the model. The F-value of 87.33 and p value of 0.0001 indicate the statistical significance of the process of the model. From Table 4, all the model terms are significant, except CPK loading (B) and the quadratic term of CPK loading (B2). MeOH: HRNO has the highest significant effect on the honne-rubber seed-neem oil biodiesel (HRNOB) yield out of the three process input variables investigated. This implies that it has stronger effect on the HRNOB yield than both reaction time and CPK loading.
The fitness of experimental data to a model can be explained by its R2. R2 of the model was evaluated as 0.9937, which signifies that the model could explain 99.37% of the variability [21]. For adequate precision, the required ratio should be >4, for the value of 42.38 for the model indicates strong signal for the design purpose. Therefore, the design space can be directed by the model. Coefficient of variation (CV) is used to evaluate the capability of a model; a value <10% indicates efficient model. The CV obtained for the model is 0.68%, which suggests that the model is capable of illustrating the process.
Figure 7a displays the plot of predicted HRNOB yields by the model versus the experimental HRNOB yields obtained in the laboratory. The predicted yields by the model are close in values to the experimental yields, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the model. It should be noted that the pure error in this model is insignificant within the range of process parameters investigated due to the near-alignment of experimental HRNOB yields and predicted HRNOB yields; which further confirms a good agreement between the model predicted yields and the experimental yields. Residual is a value between the experimental and predicted value. Hence, randomness of the experimental errors would make the residuals to follow a normal distribution [40]. Figure 7b shows a normal distribution of studentized residuals since it is a straight line and not S-shape curve [41]. Figure 7c shows the plot of studentized residuals against model predicted HRNOB yields. The data points randomly scattered within the boundary, which may mean that the variation is consistent for all values of the response, an indication that the model is appropriate. The plot of outlier t for all experimental runs can be visualized as shown in Figure 7d. All the studentized residuals are within the ± 3.0 interval limit, demonstrating the fitness of the model. The diagnostic plots obtained from this current study are similar to the ones reported for the modeling of transesterification process of neem-rubber seed oil blend with methanol over calcined elephant ear pod husk as catalyst [30]. Also, similar plots are reported for the model developed for the transesterification of soybean oil with ethanol using calcined waste cupuaçu seed as a solid catalyst [12].

2.5. Interactive Effect of Process Parameters on HRNOB

Two-dimensional (contour) interactive effect of CPK loading and MeOH: HRNO while time was held constant is shown in Figure 8a. This plot reveals that at low CPK concentration, HRNOB yield increases with an increase in MeOH:HRNO. Also, at high levels of both parameters, the plot reveals a direct relationship between CPK concentration and MeOH:HRNO which leads to high HRNOB yield. It has been shown that as the amount of catalyst increases, transesterification reaction accelerates due to attainment of equilibrium in shorter time [42]. Visual inspection of this plot could explain the reason the CPK loading is insignificant in the ANOVA results.
The two-dimensional plot of reaction time and CPK loading at constant MeOH: HRNO of 9:1 is shown in Figure 8b. From the plot, an increase in CPK loading does not significantly increase the HRNOB yield with time. While the HRNOB yield is maximum at the highest reaction time and lowest CPK amount, any further increase in CPK concentration at that point leads to sharp reduction in biodiesel yield, though the HRNOB yield at high catalyst loading later increases with a reduction in reaction time. The level of significance of reaction time could be attributed to the effectiveness of microwave irradiation in enhancing the conversion rate of the reactant mixture. Compared to conventional heating method, microwave irradiation within short time proved to be efficient in producing biodiesel. For instance, Nayak and Vyas [43] obtained biodiesel of 99.3% from papaya oil within 3.3 min when microwave was applied to the transesterification process. Similarly, biodiesel yield of 95.42% was observed within 388 s when transesterification of Ceiba pentandra oil was used under microwave-assisted transesterification [44]. In our study of rubber-neem oil blend, biodiesel yield of 98.77 ± 0.16 wt.% was observed through transesterification-aided with microwave within 5.88 min [30].
Figure 8c shows the interaction between time and MeOH: HRNO on HRNOB yield at constant CPK loading of 3 wt.%. In microwave-aided transesterification, reaction time has been shown to have significant effect on biodiesel yield [30,45]. At low reaction time and low MeOH: HRNO, the biodiesel yield barely increased. This shows that enough time and high MeOH: HRNO are requirements for high biodiesel formation [7]. Thus, interaction of these two variables at the highest points increased the HRNOB yield. Both time and MeOH have been demonstrated to influence biodiesel formation. MeOH level higher than what is required in terms of stochiometric is needed to drive the equilibrium reaction forward and at the same time, enough time is needed for the reaction to be completed. These observations have been reported in previous studies on transesterification reactions [12,30,43].

2.6. Optimization Condition and Model Validation

The optimum values suggested for the three process input variables investigated in this study after solving the regression equation (Equation (1)) are MeOH:HRNO of 12:1, CPK of 1.158 wt.% and reaction time of 6 min with HRNOB yield predicted as 99 wt.% at desirability of 1.0. The optimal condition predicted was proved by validation experiment repeated three times. An average of 98.45 wt.% HRNOB yield was observed, indicating that the model could accurately predict biodiesel yield. In a study of biodiesel synthesis using papaya oil and microwave-assisted transesterification, optimum biodiesel yield of 99.93 wt.% was obtained at NaOH loading of 0.95 wt.%, temperature of 62.33 °C, reaction time of 3.3 min and MeOH:oil ratio of 9.5:1 [43]. In another study involving blend of waste cooking oil and honne oil, it was shown that maximum biodiesel yield of 97.40 wt.% can be produced via microwave-aided transesterification using a KOH concentration of 0.774 wt.%, stirring speed of 600 rpm, MeOH:oil of 59.60 vol.%, time of 7.15 min and at 100 °C [27]. Transesterification assisted with microwave was used to convert Ceiba pentandra oil to biodiesel with a maximum yield of 96.19%. using KOH concentration of 0.84%, stirring speed of 800 rpm, MeOH:oil of 60% and reaction time of 388 s [44]. In our previous study in which rubber seed and neem oils were blended and calcined ash of elephant ear pod husk was applied as a base catalyst, 98.77 wt.% biodiesel yield was achieved using optimal condition reaction time of 5.88 min, catalyst amount of 2.96 wt.% and MeOH: Oil blend of 11.44:1 conducted under microwave irradiation [30]. The results of the current study showed that the CPK developed is effective and compared well with synthetic chemicals (KOH and NaOH) used as catalysts in other studies (Table 5).
The application of microwave irradiation in this present study helped reduced the reaction time significantly compared to the conventional heating via water bath or hotplate used for transesterification reaction. The typical reaction time reported in the conventional transesterification of some oils to biodiesel ranged between 25 min and 180 min [7,13,14,18,20,21]. Microwave irradiation enhances transesterification reactions through a thermal effect and by evaporation of methanol [46]. The microwave interaction with the triglycerides and methanol results in a large reduction of activation energy due to increased interaction of triglycerides and methanol with the microwave irradiation which results in significant reduction of activation energy because of increased dipolar polarization. The choice of methanol over ethanol for the transesterification process in this current study is also helpful in the reduction of the reaction time used since methanol is a strong microwave absorber [46].

2.7. Quality of HRNOB

The characteristics of the HRNO and HRNOB were determined and compared with US and European standards (Table 6). The acid value of the HRNOB was within allowable limit, which means it can be used without causing corrosion in the internal combustion engine and other metal parts [47]. Flash point is the temperature at which biodiesel will ignite when exposed to flame [48]. Biodiesel produced in this study was well within the range specified. High flash point obtained may be due to the predominant presence of C18:1 and C18: 2 in the vegetable oil blend [49]. The cloud point of +12 °C and pour point of −6 °C of biodiesel produced in this study suggest that this fuel could be used successfully in cold weather areas.
All parameters of the HRNOB were found to be within the prescribed standards. Thus, no modifications may be required in using this fuel in an existing diesel engine. The IR spectra of HRNO and HRNOB are depicted in Figure 9a,b. Both spectra have similar peaks and the characteristics of the peaks are described in Table 7.
The band around 3446 cm−1 is allocated to –C=O overtones. The region from 3009–2854 cm −1 indicates symmetric and asymetric streching vibration of the methyl group (-CH3) [53]. The vibration at 2928 cm−1 is assigned to asymmetric CH3 stretching. The well-known carbonyl peak 1750–1700 cm−1 has strong intensity in both spectral. Since no changes are obvious between 1650 cm−1 and 1540 cm−1, it shows no soap was present in the HRNOB [18,54]. The fingerprint region (1300–900 cm−1) which is recognized in oils are very distinct in both the spectral for HRNO and HRNOB [18,54]. The rocking vibration is located in the region of 881–723 cm−1. The presence of esters in both the HRNO and HRNOB are charaterized by the strong absorption of C = O streching frequency at 1743 cm−1 and by the strong absorption involving the streching of C-O near 1240 cm−1 [14,18,51,54].
Figure 10 shows the chromatogram of the HRNOB. The fatty acids of the HRNOB contain of a total saturated methyl esters amount of 36.69%, which suggests improved oxidation stability and a total unsaturated methyl esters level of 63.51%, an indication that the biodiesel produced possessed excellent cold flow properties [55]. According to Table 8, the monounsaturated fatty acid of oleic acid is the predominant contributor to the total unsaturated fatty acid methyl esters. The fatty acid composition of HRNOB is quite similar to the findings of previous studies in which biodiesel was produced from neem oil and neem-rubber oil blend [21,30].

2.8. Reusability Study of CPK Catalyst

Reusability study of the calcined CPK was conducted at the optimized process condition and the results observed shown in Figure 11. On completion of each transesterification cycle, the product mixture and the catalyst were separated by centrifugation (8000 rpm for 10 min). The catalyst was reused without further treatment (no washing FF with acetone or calcination). At the end of the 4th cycle, calcined CPK was able to facilitate 89.46 wt.% biodiesel yield; hence, the calcined CPK demonstrated appreciable catalytic activity in its reutilization for transesterification. The reduction in the HRNOB yield after each cycle could be attributed to blockage of the catalyst active site and loss of part of the catalyst as well as leaching of active metals from the catalyst.
When Brassica nigra leaves calcined at 550 °C for 2 h was reused in the transesterification of soybean oil with methanol, the biodiesel yield reduced from 98.79% to 96% after the 3rd cycle [13]. The was a reduction of biodiesel yield from 95.23% to 85.4% after 6th cycle of reuse of catalyst developed by calcination of C. papaya stem at 700 °C for 4 h [15]. In the case of calcined waste of cupuaçu seeds at 800 °C for 4 h, its reusability test showed that after the 3rd cycle, the biodiesel yield from soybean oil was reduced from 98% to 22% [12]. We have previously reported that elephant ear pod husk calcined at 700 for 4 h can reused up to four times for transesterification of neem-rubber seed oil blend with a biodiesel yield reduction from 98.68% to 74.68% [30]. The reusability potential of the calcined CPK catalyst synthesized compared favourably with those cited in this work.

3. Experimental

3.1. Materials

Honne oil used for this study was extracted in the Biochemical Engineering Laboratory, Obafemi Awolowo University (Ile-Ife, Nigeria). Rubber seed oil was procured from the Nigerian Rubber Research Institute (Edo State, Nigeria). Neem oil was purchased from the Nigerian National Research Institute for Chemical Technology (Kaduna State, Nigeria). Analytical grade reagents and chemicals were used in this study.

3.2. Preparation of CPK Catalyst

CPK catalyst was developed from agrowastes, namely husk of cocoa pods, plantain peel and husk of kola nut pods. The plantain peels and cocoa pod husks used in this work were collected from a restaurant on the OAU campus and Aba Gbooro village (Ile-Ife, Nigeria), respectively while kola nut pod husks were from a farm (Modakeke, Nigeria). First, each waste was separately sorted to remove dirt present. The agrowastes were cut into small pieces, thoroughly washed with municipal water and sundried for 2 weeks. The pieces of the agrowastes were further dried in an oven at 80 °C for 48 h to constant weight [22]. Then, the oven-dried agrowastes were completely combusted to produce ash individually. The resulting ashes were milled into powder in a porcelain mortar and pestle. The to synthesize the CPK, the three ashes from cocoa pod husk, plantain peel and kola nut pod husk were mixed in equal proportions. The ash mixture was heated in a muffle furnace at 300–1100 °C for 4 h [7,22]. The heat-treated ash was ground to fine powder using porcelain mortar and pestle which was stored in a screwed bottle and kept in a desiccator for further analysis.

3.3. Characterization of Synthesized CPK Catalyst

The activity of the calcined CPK was analyzed to establish its suitability as a catalyst. The elemental composition and surface morphology of calcined CPK were analyzed with high resolution scanning electron microscope (AURIGA, Zeiss, Jena, Germany) attached to the EDX spectrometer. To observe the crystalline structure of the sample the diffraction pattern of calcined CPK was documented by an Advance diffractometer-D8 (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany). The diffractometer was fitted out a LynxEye position sensitive detector employed with Cu Kα radiation source (λKα1 = 1.5406 Å). Scanning of CPK was carried out in the region between 4.013°−60.0152° in a continuous mode over 2-theta range. FTIR spectrometer was used to examine the active functional groups present at the active site of the calcined CPK. IR spectra were recorded using the KBr technique on a Nicolet iS10 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) fitted with attenuated total reflectance (ATR) between 4000 cm−1 and 400 cm−1 range. The pore structure and surface area of the calcined CPK was measured by BET method of physisorption of N2 with a Micromeritics instrument (ASAP 2020, Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA, USA). The BJH method was used to estimate total average pore size and pore volume of the calcined CPK [18,23,30].

3.4. Blending of Honne, Rubber Seed and Neem Oils

The blending of honne oil, rubber seed oil and neem oil was done using a 1000 mL round bottom flask following the method earlier described in our previous report [30]. The mixtures were prepared according to the following volumetric ratios: 20:60:20, 40:40:20, 60:20:20, 20:40:40, 40:20:40, 20:20:60 and 33.3:33.3:33.3 (Table 3). Prior to the blending, each oil was preheated at 60 °C for 15 min. The preheated oils were blended together in a flask placed on a hot plate and stirred. Each blended oil was further heated at 60 °C for 30 min on the on a hot plate with stirring to ensure uniform mixing. Physical and chemical properties of the individual oil and each oil blend were measured using the standard methods [58].

3.5. Model Development for HRNO Blend Transesterification

In this study, CCRD design was used to model the transesterification of the oil blend with methanol using calcined CPK as the base catalyst. The range of independent variables investigated were MeOH: HRNO (6:1–12:1), CPK loading (2–4 wt.%) and reaction time (2–6 min) with the HRNOB yield as the response. A fractional factorial design with five-level-three-factor was applied to generate 15 set of experimental conditions carried out in batch-wise in a microwave device (Table 9). The axial distance α of each process variable was selected to be 1.414 for orthogonality of the design and to test how repeatable the technique is the center point was repeated five times. The experimental runs were randomized to reduce unexpected variation in the response. To connect the response and the independent variables, multiple regression model was used to fit the experimental data (Equation (2)). The characteristics of the quadratic model was assessed by various statistics. Optimum values of the process variables were determined with Design Expert 10.0 (Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The condition for optimum biodiesel yield was validated by performing experiment at optimum points of the design variables in triplicate:
R = µo + µ1A + µ2B + µ3C + µ12AB + µ13AC + µ23BC + µ11A2 + µ22B2 + µ33C2
where, R is the response (HRNOB yield), µo is the intercept term, µ1, µ2 and µ3 are the coefficients of linear terms. µ12, µ13, and µ23 are coefficients of the interactive terms, µ11, µ22 and µ33 are quadratic terms coefficients. A, B and C represent MeOH: HRNO, CPK loading and time, respectively.

3.6. Esterification of HRNO Blend

The HRNO blend (20:20:60) had an acid value of 31.97 mg KOH/g oil, which is too high for biodiesel synthesis. The pretreatment of this ternary oil blend was carried out in order to reduce the acid value in the oil blend to <2 mg KOH/g oil [57]. The esterification process and the treatment of anhydrous ferric sulphate used as catalyst in this study are according to Falowo et al. [30], which are as follows: temperature of 65 °C, reaction time 2 h, MeOH: Oil blend of 25:1 and 10 wt.% ferric sulfate.

3.7. Transesterification of Treated HRNO Blend

Base catalyzed transesterification of the pretreated HRNO was carried out using a three-neck glass reactor of 500 mL capacity placed in a modified microwave device (model number MW 7820 Severin Microwave, Sundern, Germany). The microwave device was equipped with an external stirrer fitted with a Teflon rod with two blades and a reflux condenser system. The experiments were conducted as previously described following the experimental design in Table 9 [30]. For each experiment, the microwave device was set at 150 W and the reaction was performed at specified time according to CCRD. At the completion of the reaction, product mixture was centrifuged for 5 min at 8000 rpm. The biodiesel produced after separation was washed three times with distilled water warmed to 50 °C. The HRNOB yield from the HRNO was determined as described by Equation (3). The quality of the biodiesel obtained was determined to ascertain its suitability as a fuel using methods earlier described our previous study [30]:
HRNOB   yield   = HRNOB   produced   ( g ) HRNO   blend   used   ( g )   ×   100

4. Conclusions

Blends of cocoa, plantain and kola nut wastes were used as raw materials for catalyst synthesis. The characterization of the CPK catalyst obtained indicates that it could serve as a heterogenous catalyst for transesterification reactions. Particularly, the presence of high level of K in the CPK makes it an alkaline biobase catalyst. The features of the CPK catalyst developed in this study indicate that it could provide sufficient accessibility to reactants in heterogenous catalyzed-transesterification reactions. Honne, rubber seed and neem oil blend in a volumetric ratio of 20:20:60 was converted into biodiesel by a two-step transesterification process under microwave irradiation and catalyzed by the CPK. The optimum process parameters that gave maximum HRNOB yield of 98.45 wt.% under microwave irradiation are a reaction time of 6 min, CPK loading of 1.158 wt.% and a MeOH:oil blend of 12:1. Analysis of fuel quality of the HRNOB produced satisfied the standards specified for biodiesel. Therefore, this study underscores the possible use of mixtures of agrowastes and blend of non-edible oils for biodiesel synthesis in a sustainable manner. The HRNOB produced could be a potential replacement for diesel fuel either to be used directly or partially mixed with diesel fuel in diesel engines.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.B. and T.V.O.; methodology, E.B., T.V.O., O.A.F. and O.P.; software, O.A.F. and E.B.; validation, O.A.F. and E.B.; formal analysis, O.A.F. and O.P.; investigation, O.A.F. and O.P.; resources, E.B. and T.V.O.; data curation, O.A.F. and E.B.; writing—original draft preparation, O.A.F.; writing—review and editing, O.A.F., O.P., E.B. and T.V.O.; visualization, O.A.F. and E.B.; supervision, E.B. and T.V.O.; project administration, E.B.; funding acquisition, E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by TETFUND, IBR grant number DESS/RP/Vol.V/2014/4.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sahoo, P.; Das, L. Process optimization for biodiesel production from Jatropha, Karanja and Polanga oils. Fuel 2009, 88, 1588–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Knothe, G.; Razon, L.F. Biodiesel fuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2017, 58, 36–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thanh, L.T.; Okitsu, K.; Boi, L.V.; Maeda, Y. Catalytic technologies for biodiesel fuel production and utilization of glycerol: A review. Catalysts 2012, 2, 191–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  4. Abdullah, S.H.Y.S.; Hanapi, N.H.M.; Azid, A.; Umar, R.; Juahir, H.; Khatoon, H.; Endut, A. A review of biomass-derived heterogeneous catalyst for a sustainable biodiesel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 70, 1040–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Leung, D.Y.C.; Wu, X.; Leung, M.K.H. A review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Semwal, S.; Arora, A.K.; Badoni, R.P.; Tuli, D.K. Biodiesel production using heterogeneous catalysts. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 2151–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Betiku, E.; Akintunde, A.M.; Ojumu, T.V. Banana peels as a biobase catalyst for fatty acid methyl esters production using Napoleon’s plume (Bauhinia monandra) seed oil: A process parameters optimization study. Energy 2016, 103, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Boey, P.-L.; Maniam, G.P.; Hamid, S.A.; Ali, D.M.H. Utilization of waste cockle shell (Anadara granosa) in biodiesel production from palm olein: Optimization using response surface methodology. Fuel 2011, 90, 2353–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Odude, V.O.; Adesina, A.J.; Oyetunde, O.O.; Adeyemi, O.O.; Ishola, N.B.; Etim, A.O.; Betiku, E. Application of Agricultural Waste-Based Catalysts to Transesterification of Esterified Palm Kernel Oil into Biodiesel: A Case of Banana Fruit Peel Versus Cocoa Pod Husk. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2017, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, D.; Seeburg, D.; Kreft, S.; Bindig, R.; Hartmann, I.; Schneider, D.; Enke, D.; Wohlrab, S. Rice Husk Derived Porous Silica as Support for Pd and CeO2 for Low Temperature Catalytic Methane Combustion. Catalysts 2019, 9, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Nisar, J.; Razaq, R.; Farooq, M.; Iqbal, M.; Khan, R.A.; Sayed, M.; Shah, A.; ur Rahman, I. Enhanced biodiesel production from Jatropha oil using calcined waste animal bones as catalyst. Renew. Energy 2017, 101, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mendonça, I.M.; Machado, F.L.; Silva, C.C.; Junior, S.D.; Takeno, M.L.; de Sousa Maia, P.J.; Manzato, L.; de Freitas, F.A. Application of calcined waste cupuaçu (Theobroma grandiflorum) seeds as a low-cost solid catalyst in soybean oil ethanolysis: Statistical optimization. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 200, 112095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nath, B.; Das, B.; Kalita, P.; Basumatary, S. Waste to value addition: Utilization of waste Brassica nigra plant derived novel green heterogeneous base catalyst for effective synthesis of biodiesel. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 239, 118112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Balajii, M.; Niju, S. Banana peduncle—A green and renewable heterogeneous base catalyst for biodiesel production from Ceiba pentandra oil. Renew. Energy 2020, 146, 2255–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gohain, M.; Laskar, K.; Paul, A.K.; Daimary, N.; Maharana, M.; Goswami, I.K.; Hazarika, A.; Bora, U.; Deka, D. Carica papaya stem: A source of versatile heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production and C–C bond formation. Renew. Energy 2020, 147, 541–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pathak, G.; Das, D.; Rajkumari, K.; Rokhum, L. Exploiting waste: Towards a sustainable production of biodiesel using Musa acuminata peel ash as a heterogeneous catalyst. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 2365–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Adeyi, O. Proximate composition of some agricultural wastes in Nigeria and their potential use in activated carbon production. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2010, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Betiku, E.; Okeleye, A.A.; Ishola, N.B.; Osunleke, A.S.; Ojumu, T.V. Development of a Novel Mesoporous Biocatalyst Derived from Kola Nut Pod Husk for Conversion of Kariya Seed Oil to Methyl Esters: A Case of Synthesis, Modeling and Optimization Studies. Catal. Lett. 2019, 149, 1772–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Osakwe, E.; Ani, I.; Akpan, U.; Olutoye, M. Kolanut pod husk as a biobase catalyst for fatty acid methyl ester production using Thevetia peruviana (Yellow oleander) seed oil. IOP Conf. Ser. 2018, 173, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ofori-Boateng, C.; Lee, K.T. The potential of using cocoa pod husks as green solid base catalysts for the transesterification of soybean oil into biodiesel: Effects of biodiesel on engine performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Betiku, E.; Etim, A.O.; Pereao, O.; Ojumu, T.V. Two-step conversion of neem (Azadirachta indica) seed oil into fatty methyl esters using an heterogeneous biomass-based catalyst: An example of cocoa pod husk. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 6182–6193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Betiku, E.; Ajala, S.O. Modeling and optimization of Thevetia peruviana (yellow oleander) oil biodiesel synthesis via Musa paradisiacal (plantain) peels as heterogeneous base catalyst: A case of artificial neural network vs. response surface methodology. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 53, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Etim, A.O.; Betiku, E.; Ajala, S.O.; Olaniyi, P.J.; Ojumu, T.V. Potential of Ripe Plantain Fruit Peels as an Ecofriendly Catalyst for Biodiesel Synthesis: Optimization by Artificial Neural Network Integrated with Genetic Algorithm. Sustainability 2018, 10, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  24. Meneghetti, S.M.P.; Meneghetti, M.R.; Serra, T.M.; Barbosa, D.C.; Wolf, C.R. Biodiesel production from vegetable oil mixtures: Cottonseed, soybean, and castor oils. Energy Fuels 2007, 21, 3746–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khalil, I.; Aziz, A.R.A.; Yusup, S.; Heikal, M.; El-Adawy, M. Response surface methodology for the optimization of the production of rubber seed/palm oil biodiesel, IDI diesel engine performance, and emissions. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2017, 7, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vinayaka, A.S.; Mahanty, B.; Rene, E.R.; Behera, S.K. Biodiesel production by transesterification of a mixture of pongamia and neem oils. Biofuels 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Milano, J.; Ong, H.C.; Masjuki, H.; Silitonga, A.; Chen, W.-H.; Kusumo, F.; Dharma, S.; Sebayang, A. Optimization of biodiesel production by microwave irradiation-assisted transesterification for waste cooking oil-Calophyllum inophyllum oil via response surface methodology. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 158, 400–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miraculas, G.A.; Bose, N.; Raj, R.E. Process parameter optimization for biodiesel production from mixed feedstock using empirical model. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2018, 28, 54–59. [Google Scholar]
  29. Qiu, F.; Li, Y.; Yang, D.; Li, X.; Sun, P. Biodiesel production from mixed soybean oil and rapeseed oil. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 2050–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Falowo, O.A.; Oloko-Oba, M.I.; Betiku, E. Biodiesel production intensification via microwave irradiation-assisted transesterification of oil blend using nanoparticles from elephant-ear tree pod husk as a base heterogeneous catalyst. Chem. Eng. Process.-Process Intensif. 2019, 140, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fadhil, A.B.; Al-Tikrity, E.T.; Albadree, M.A. Biodiesel production from mixed non-edible oils, castor seed oil and waste fish oil. Fuel 2017, 210, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sharma, M.; Khan, A.A.; Puri, S.; Tuli, D. Wood ash as a potential heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel synthesis. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 41, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lukić, I.; Krstić, J.; Jovanović, D.; Skala, D. Alumina/silica supported K 2 CO 3 as a catalyst for biodiesel synthesis from sunflower oil. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 4690–4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sing, K.; Everett, D.; Haul, R.; Moscou, L.; Pierotti, L.; Rouquerol, J.; Siemieniewska, T. International union of pure and applied chemistry physical chemistry division reporting physisorption data for gas/soils systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Deshmane, V.G.; Adewuyi, Y.G. Mesoporous nanocrystalline sulfated zirconia synthesis and its application for FFA esterification in oils. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 462, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Storck, S.; Bretinger, H.; Maier, W.F. Characterization of micro-and mesoporous solids by physisorption methods and pore-size analysis. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1998, 174, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  37. Knothe, G. Dependence of biodiesel fuel properties on the structure of fatty acid alkyl esters. Fuel Process. Technol. 2005, 86, 1059–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Demirbaş, A. Relationships derived from physical properties of vegetable oil and biodiesel fuels. Fuel 2008, 87, 1743–1748. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, Y.; Ou, S.; Liu, P.; Zhang, Z. Preparation of biodiesel from waste cooking oil via two-step catalyzed process. Energy Convers. Manag. 2007, 48, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hamidreza, J.; Nor, A.; Amin, T.-K.; Noshadi, I. Microwave assisted biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas L. seed by two-step in situ process: Optimization using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 136, 565–573. [Google Scholar]
  41. Körbahti, B.K.; Rauf, M. Response surface methodology (RSM) analysis of photoinduced decoloration of toludine blue. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 136, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tan, Y.H.; Abdullah, M.O.; Nolasco-Hipolito, C.; Zauzi, N.S.A. Application of RSM and Taguchi methods for optimizing the transesterification of waste cooking oil catalyzed by solid ostrich and chicken-eggshell derived CaO. Renew. Energy 2017, 114, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nayak, M.G.; Vyas, A.P. Optimization of microwave-assisted biodiesel production from Papaya oil using response surface methodology. Renew. Energy 2019, 138, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Silitonga, A.; Shamsuddin, A.; Mahlia, T.; Milano, J.; Kusumo, F.; Siswantoro, J.; Dharma, S.; Sebayang, A.; Masjuki, H.; Ong, H.C. Biodiesel synthesis from Ceiba pentandra oil by microwave irradiation-assisted transesterification: ELM modeling and optimization. Renew. Energy 2020, 146, 1278–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hsiao, M.-C.; Lin, C.-C.; Chang, Y.-H. Microwave irradiation-assisted transesterification of soybean oil to biodiesel catalyzed by nanopowder calcium oxide. Fuel 2011, 90, 1963–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gude, V.G.; Patil, P.; Martinez-Guerra, E.; Deng, S.; Nirmalakhandan, N. Microwave energy potential for biodiesel production. Sustain. Chem. Process. 2013, 1, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  47. Ong, H.C.; Masjuki, H.; Mahlia, T.; Silitonga, A.; Chong, W.; Leong, K. Optimization of biodiesel production and engine performance from high free fatty acid Calophyllum inophyllum oil in CI diesel engine. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 81, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Atabani, A.E.; Silitonga, A.S.; Badruddin, I.A.; Mahlia, T.; Masjuki, H.; Mekhilef, S. A comprehensive review on biodiesel as an alternative energy resource and its characteristics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 2070–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sanford, S.D.; White, J.; Shah, P.; Wee, C.; Valverde, M.; Meier, G. Feedstock and Biodiesel Characteristics Report–2009; Renewable Energy Group: Ames, IA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  50. Oladipo, B.; Betiku, E. Process optimization of solvent extraction of seed oil from Moringa oleifera: An appraisal of quantitative and qualitative process variables on oil quality using D-optimal design. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 20, 101187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guillén, M.D.; Cabo, N. Relationships between the Composition of Edible Oils and Lard and the Ratio of the Absorbance of Specific Bands of Their Fourier Transform Infrared Spectra. Role of Some Bands of the Fingerprint Region. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 1788–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Latchubugata, C.S.; Kondapaneni, R.V.; Patluri, K.K.; Virendra, U.; Vedantam, S. Kinetics and Optimization Studies using Response Surface Methodology in Biodiesel Production using Heterogeneous Catalyst. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018, 135, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rabelo, S.N.; Ferraz, V.P.; Oliveira, L.S.; Franca, A.S. FTIR analysis for quantification of fatty acid methyl esters in biodiesel produced by microwave-assisted transesterification. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2015, 6, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  54. Soares, I.P.; Rezende, T.F.; Silva, R.C.; Castro, E.V.R.; Fortes, I.C. Multivariate calibration by variable selection for blends of raw soybean oil/biodiesel from different sources using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra data. Energy Fuels 2008, 22, 2079–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dharma, S.; Masjuki, H.H.; Ong, H.C.; Sebayang, A.H.; Silitonga, A.S.; Kusumo, F.; Mahlia, T.M.I. Optimization of biodiesel production process for mixed Jatropha curcas–Ceiba pentandra biodiesel using response surface methodology. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 115, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gimbun, J.; Ali, S.; Kanwal, C.; Shah, L.A.; Ghazali, N.H.M.; Cheng, C.K.; Nurdin, S. Biodiesel production from rubber seed oil using a limestone based catalyst. Adv. Mater. Phys. Chem. 2012, 2, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Betiku, E.; Omilakin, O.R.; Ajala, S.O.; Okeleye, A.A.; Taiwo, A.E.; Solomon, B.O. Mathematical modeling and process parameters optimization studies by artificial neural network and response surface methodology: A case of non-edible neem (Azadirachta indica) seed oil biodiesel synthesis. Energy 2014, 72, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists; AOAC: Washington, DC, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. EDX plot of calcined CPK ash at 500 °C.
Figure 1. EDX plot of calcined CPK ash at 500 °C.
Catalysts 10 00190 g001
Figure 2. SEM image of calcined CPK ash at 500 °C.
Figure 2. SEM image of calcined CPK ash at 500 °C.
Catalysts 10 00190 g002
Figure 3. XRD plot of calcined CPK ash at 500 °C.
Figure 3. XRD plot of calcined CPK ash at 500 °C.
Catalysts 10 00190 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectrum of calcined CPK ash at 500 °C.
Figure 4. FTIR spectrum of calcined CPK ash at 500 °C.
Catalysts 10 00190 g004
Figure 5. Plot of physisorption isotherms against relative pressure.
Figure 5. Plot of physisorption isotherms against relative pressure.
Catalysts 10 00190 g005
Figure 6. Pore size distribution of calcined CPK ash at 500 °C.
Figure 6. Pore size distribution of calcined CPK ash at 500 °C.
Catalysts 10 00190 g006
Figure 7. Diagnostic plots of the surface model for HRNOB synthesis.
Figure 7. Diagnostic plots of the surface model for HRNOB synthesis.
Catalysts 10 00190 g007
Figure 8. (a)—Two-dimensional plot of CPK loading and MeOH:HRNO on HRNOB yield. (b)—Two-dimensional plot of CPK loading and time on HRNOB yield. (c)—Two-dimensional plot of time and MeOH: HRNO on HRNOB yield.
Figure 8. (a)—Two-dimensional plot of CPK loading and MeOH:HRNO on HRNOB yield. (b)—Two-dimensional plot of CPK loading and time on HRNOB yield. (c)—Two-dimensional plot of time and MeOH: HRNO on HRNOB yield.
Catalysts 10 00190 g008aCatalysts 10 00190 g008b
Figure 9. IR spectra; (a) HRNO and (b) HRNOB.
Figure 9. IR spectra; (a) HRNO and (b) HRNOB.
Catalysts 10 00190 g009aCatalysts 10 00190 g009b
Figure 10. Chromatogram of HRNOB.
Figure 10. Chromatogram of HRNOB.
Catalysts 10 00190 g010
Figure 11. Reusability of calcined CPK at optimized condition.
Figure 11. Reusability of calcined CPK at optimized condition.
Catalysts 10 00190 g011
Table 1. Solid based-heterogeneous catalyst derived from biomass.
Table 1. Solid based-heterogeneous catalyst derived from biomass.
BiowasteCalcination ConditionTransesterification ConditionBiodiesel YieldReference
Heat (°C)Time (h)Main Metallic ContentOilMeOH:Oil Molar RatioCatalyst (wt.%)Temperature (°C)Time (min)
Cocoa pod husk7004K (59.2%), Mg (3%)Neem0.73v/v0.65655799.3[21]
Cocoa pod husk6504-Soybean6:116012091.4[20]
Plantain peel (ripe)7004K (51.02%), Mg (1.15%)Neem0.73v/v0.65655799.2[23]
Plantain peel (unripe)5003.5K (54.73%), Ca (1.13%), Al (3.42%)Yellow oleander0.33v/v3609095.25[22]
Kola nut husk5004K (47.14%), Ca (7.59%), Mg (5.32%)Kariya6:13657598.67[18]
Kola nut husk6003K (33.914%), Ca 25.382%), Mg (12.398%)Yellow oleander6:11.5609084.5[19]
Banana peel7004K (99.73%), Ca (0.03%), Na (0.19%), Mg (0.03%), Fe (0.01%)Napoleon’s plume7.6:12.756569.0298.5[7]
Banana peelOpen air burningNSK (70.06%), Ca (9.54%) Mg (1.78%), Fe (1.49%)Soybean6:10.7Room temperature24098.95%[16]
Banana peduncle7004K K (68.37%), Mg K (4.66%), Ca K (7.09%)Ceiba pentandra9.20:11.978606098.69%[14]
CPK5004K (47.67%), Ca (5.56%), Mg (4.21%)Neem-rubber-honne oil blend12:11.16150 W698.45Present study
Table 2. Elemental composition of calcined CPK by EDX.
Table 2. Elemental composition of calcined CPK by EDX.
Temperature (°C)Composition (%)
OMgSiPSClKCaFeAl
30040.434.060.901.741.411.9743.995.500.000.00
50037.214.210.561.651.261.8847.675.560.000.00
70041.203.050.791.610.921.8847.933.930.000.00
90041.591.851.411.771.291.4345.554.680.640.00
110045.300.812.825.201.171.0343.900.000.000.75
Table 3. Physicochemical properties of hone-rubber seed-neem oil blends.
Table 3. Physicochemical properties of hone-rubber seed-neem oil blends.
PropertiesH20R60N20H40R40N20H60R20N20H20R40N40H40R20N40H20R20N60H33R33N33
RI1.4726 ± 01.4732 ± 01.4743 ± 01.4738 ± 01.4745 ± 0.021.4732 ± 0.011.4737 ± 0
Density (g/cm3)0.931 ± 0.010.93 ± 0.020.934 ± 0.20.935 ± 0.940.935 ± 0.010.938 ± 1.340.934 ± 0.01
Viscosity (mm2/s)51.31 ± 1.6749.06 ± 0.7847.99 ± 0.9965.08 ± 0.2257.48 ± 1.1566.15 ± 2.0859.1 ± 0.18
Acid Value (mg KOH/g)55.68 ± 2.247.01 ± 0.1141.4 ± 0.1142.53 ± 0.1235.35 ± 0.1231.97 ± 0.1139.5 ± 0.46
IV (g I2/100 g oil)90.62 ± 2.485.76 ± 1.4687.72 ± 1.4684.84 ± 2.4682.38 ± 1.9481.89 ± 2.4283.4 ± 0.99
SV (mg KOH/g)219.49 ± 0.70236.32 ± 0.70244.04 ± 0.34254.55 ± 0.70241.94 ± 0.61206.17 ± 1.40224.4 ± 0.48
Calorific value (MJ/kg)39.07 ± 0.0738.4 5 ± 0.0538.11 ± 0.0137.73 ± 0.0638.26 ± 0.0439.75 ± 0.0239 ± 0.01
RI—refractive index, IV—iodine value, SV—saponification value, value. Values reported are mean with standard deviation of triplicate determinations.
Table 4. Statistical results for the model.
Table 4. Statistical results for the model.
Source of VarianceSum of SquaresDegree of FreedomMean SquareF Valuep-Value
Model282.08931.3487.33<0.0001
A-MeOH: HRNO17.29117.2948.170.0010
B-CPK loading0.9910.992.770.1569
C-Time4.8714.8713.560.0143
AB5.6015.6015.600.0109
AC20.69120.6957.650.0006
BC41.79141.79116.440.0001
A219.51119.5154.370.0007
B22.1012.105.860.0601
C23.0613.068.520.0331
Lack of fit1.5111.5120.950.0102
Fit statistics
Standard deviation0.60
Mean87.65
Coefficient of variation (%)0.68
R20.9937
Adjusted R20.9823
Adequate Precision42.38
Table 5. Review of mixed oils transesterification reaction conditions and yields.
Table 5. Review of mixed oils transesterification reaction conditions and yields.
Mixed OilsNature of OilsRatioCatalystTransesterification ConditionYieldRef
Cottonseed/castorBoth non-edible50:50NaOHMeOH/oil/catalyst of 34:6:186%[24]
Soybean/castorEdible/non-edible25:75NaOHMeOH/oil/catalyst of 34:6:187%[24]
Palm oil/rubber seedEdible/non-edible50:50KOH64 °C, 1 h, catalyst of 1.3, MeOH: Oil 6:197%[25]
Pongamia/neemBoth non-edible70:30NaOH60–65 °C, catalyst of 0.67%, MeOH: Oil of 6:1 and 77 min,86.2%[26]
Waste cooking/honneWaste/non-edible70:30KOH100 °C, catalyst of 0.774 wt.%, 600 rpm, MeOH: Oil of 59.60 vol.% and 7.15 min under microwave irradiation97.65%[27]
Pongamia/jatropha/honneAll are non-edible1:1:1KOH64 °C, catalyst of 1.17w/v, oil:MeOH of 2.5 v/v and 95 min98%[28]
Soybean/rapeseedBoth edible50:50NaOH55 °C, catalyst of 0.8 wt.%, MeOH: Oil of 5:1 and 2 h94%[29]
Rubber seed/neemBoth non-edible40:60Calcined ash of elephant ear pod husk150 W, MeOH: Oil 11.44:1, catalyst of 2.96 wt.% and 5.88 min under microwave irradiation98.77%[30]
Castor/waste fish oilNon-edible/waste50:50KOH32 °C, catalyst of 0.5 wt.%, MeOH: Oil of 8:1, 600 rpm and 30 min95.2 ± 2.5%[31]
Honne/rubber seed/neemAll are non-edible1:1:1Calcined CPK150 W, MeOH: Oil 12:1, catalyst of 1.158 wt.% and 6 min under microwave irradiation98.45 wt.%Present study
Except where indicated as v/v, MeOH: Oil is in molar ratio.
Table 6. Properties of HRNO, HRNOB and standards.
Table 6. Properties of HRNO, HRNOB and standards.
PropertiesUnitHRNOHRNOBLimit
EN 14214ASTM D6751
Density (15 °C)kg/m3938889860–900880
Acid valuemg KOH/g31.970.450.5 max0.5 max
FFA content%16.070.226NSNS
Kinematic viscositymm2/s66.154.893.5–51.9–6
Iodine valueg I2/100g oil81.8944.9˂120NS
SVmg KOH/g206.17190.74NSNS
Cetane number 51.3464.851 min47 min
Calorific ValueMJ/kg39.7540.9435NS
Pour Point°CND−6NS−15 to 16
Flash point°CND128<120100 to170
Cloud point°CND12NS−3 to 12
NS = Not Specified, ND = Not Determined, SV = Saponification value.
Table 7. Properties of absorption peaks for HRNO and HRNOB.
Table 7. Properties of absorption peaks for HRNO and HRNOB.
Wavenumber (cm−1)Functional GroupMode of VibrationIntensityReference
3450-C=OOvertoneWeak[18,50,51]
3007=C-HStretchingStrong[29,30,52]
2926-C-H (CH2)Asymmetric stretching vibrationVery strong[14,18,50]
2854-C-H (CH2)Symmetric stretching vibrationVery strong[14,18,29]
1745-C=OStretchingVery strong[14,18,51]
1465-CH2Shear-type vibrationMedium[30,51,52]
1377-CH3Bending vibration, symmetric deformationMedium[30,51,52]
1242-CH2StretchingMedium[30,52]
1168C-O-CSymmetric stretching vibrationstrong[14,18,29]
721-CH2Bending out of plane, rocking vibrationMedium[14,18,29]
Table 8. Fatty acid profile of HRNOB.
Table 8. Fatty acid profile of HRNOB.
Chain LengthComposition (%)
HRNOBHonneRubberNeem
This StudyOng et al. [47]Gimbun et al. [56]Betiku et al. [57]
C14:00.220.1--
C16:015.7314.210.2913.98
C16:10.120.3-0.39
C18:018.6515.98.686.25
C18:140.4239.820.0745.00
C18:220.1528.158.232.46
C18:32.840.20.80.6
C20:01.550.8-0.8
C22:00.54--0.5
Table 9. Experimental design for HRNOB synthesis.
Table 9. Experimental design for HRNOB synthesis.
RunMeOH: HRNOCPK (wt.%)Time (min)
(A)(B)(C)
1931.17157
21242
31226
4934
5934
6934
794.414214
8622
9934
1091.585794
11934
1213.242634
134.7573634
14936.82843
15646

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Falowo, O.A.; Ojumu, T.V.; Pereao, O.; Betiku, E. Sustainable Biodiesel Synthesis from Honne-Rubber-Neem Oil Blend with a Novel Mesoporous Base Catalyst Synthesized from a Mixture of Three Agrowastes. Catalysts 2020, 10, 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10020190

AMA Style

Falowo OA, Ojumu TV, Pereao O, Betiku E. Sustainable Biodiesel Synthesis from Honne-Rubber-Neem Oil Blend with a Novel Mesoporous Base Catalyst Synthesized from a Mixture of Three Agrowastes. Catalysts. 2020; 10(2):190. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10020190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Falowo, Olayomi A., Tunde V. Ojumu, Omoniyi Pereao, and Eriola Betiku. 2020. "Sustainable Biodiesel Synthesis from Honne-Rubber-Neem Oil Blend with a Novel Mesoporous Base Catalyst Synthesized from a Mixture of Three Agrowastes" Catalysts 10, no. 2: 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10020190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop