Next Article in Journal
Catalytic Pyrolysis of a Residual Plastic Waste Using Zeolites Produced by Coal Fly Ash
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on CO2 Methanation over Ni/Al2O3, Ru/Al2O3, and Ru-Ni/Al2O3 Catalysts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring Metagenomic Enzymes: A Novel Esterase Useful for Short-Chain Ester Synthesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Regioselective Hydroxylation of Rhododendrol by CYP102A1 and Tyrosinase

1
School of Biological Sciences and Technology, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbongro, Gwangju 61186, Korea
2
Namhae Garlic Research Institute, 2465-8 Namhaedaero, Namhae, Gyeongsangnamdo 52430, Korea
3
Gwangju Center, Korea Basic Science Center, 77 Yongbongro, Gwangju 61186, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2020, 10(10), 1114; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10101114
Submission received: 12 August 2020 / Revised: 21 September 2020 / Accepted: 24 September 2020 / Published: 25 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocatalytic Applications in Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
Rhododendrol (RD) is a naturally occurring phenolic compound found in many plants. Tyrosinase (Ty) converts RD to RD-catechol and subsequently RD-quinone via two-step oxidation reactions, after which RD-melanin forms spontaneously from RD-quinone. RD is cytotoxic in melanocytes and lung cancer cells, but not in keratinocytes and fibroblasts. However, the function of RD metabolites has not been possible to investigate due to the lack of available high purity metabolites. In this study, an enzymatic strategy for RD-catechol production was devised using engineered cytochrome P450 102A1 (CYP102A1) and Ty, and the product was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), LC-MS, and NMR spectroscopy. Engineered CYP102A1 regioselectively produced RD-catechol via hydroxylation at the ortho position of RD. Although RD-quinone was subsequently formed by two step oxidation in Ty catalyzed reactions, L-ascorbic acid (LAA) inhibited RD-quinone formation and contributed to regioselective production of RD-catechol. When LAA was present, the productivity of RD-catechol by Ty was 5.3-fold higher than that by engineered CYP102A1. These results indicate that engineered CYP102A1 and Ty can be used as effective biocatalysts to produce hydroxylated products, and Ty is a more cost-effective biocatalyst for industrial applications than engineered CYP102A1.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Biocatalysts are biological systems, such as purified enzymes and whole cells, that can catalyze diverse chemical reactions. Enzymes can accept a wide range of molecules as substrates, and they exhibit high catalytic activities towards simple and complex chemicals. Consequently, they are used as biocatalysts in fields of chemical synthesis, biosensor production, and bioremediation. The biocatalysts can also be used to support several cascade reactions during organic compound synthesis. In particular, they are effective tools in the fine chemical and pharmaceutical industries because they exhibit chemo-, stereo-, and regioselectivity for chemical production in eco-friendly ways [1,2,3,4,5].
Generally, cytochrome P450 (P450 or CYP) enzymes catalyze the monooxygenase reaction (i.e., the insertion of one atom of molecular oxygen into a substrate and the reduction of the other oxygen atom to water) [6]. Required electrons for the reaction are provided from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide cofactors (NADPH or NADH) via cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR). In addition, P450s catalyze diverse reactions such as C-hydroxylation; N-oxidation; N-, O-, and S-dealkylation; C–C bond cleavage; alcohol oxidation using diverse natural and non-natural compounds as substrates. Accordingly, CYPs have considerable potential as biocatalysts for novel drug development [7,8,9]. CYP102A1 from Bacillus megaterium (BM3) consists of the catalytic heme domain and the reductase domain in a single polypeptide [10]. CYP102A1 is more effective as a biocatalyst because of its high activity and solubility. The engineering of CYP102A1 through site-directed and random mutagenesis is reported to improve their activities toward various marketed drugs, steroids, and non-natural substrates. However, bioconversions via CYP102A1 have drawbacks on an industrial scale because they still require the use of a high-cost cofactor, NADPH [11,12,13,14,15].
Tyrosinase (Ty) is a copper-containing dioxygenase responsible for melanin formation in many organisms. Two copper ions, CuA and CuB, coordinate six conserved histidine residues in the active sites [16,17]. Ty catalyzes the ortho-hydroxylation of monophenols to ortho-diphenols (catechols) via monophenolase activity, as well as the subsequent oxidation of ortho-diphenols to ortho-quinones via diphenolase activity. The highly reactive ortho-quinones convert to melanin spontaneously, and are involved in skin pigmentation and fruit and vegetable browning [18,19]. Ty has a considerable potential to synthesize bioactive catechol derivatives because of regioselective ortho-hydroxylation via monophenolase activity. However, Ty-associated melanin formation should be inhibited for industrial applications of the bioactive catechol derivatives [20,21]. Protein engineering using site-directed and random mutagenesis has been attempted to improve Ty’s activity and substrate specificity [22,23]. Furthermore, the inhibition of Ty’s diphenolase activity using catechol, NADH, and ascorbic acid was found to enhance the production of catechol derivatives [24,25,26]. For the industrial use of Ty to produce catechol compounds, the issue of further oxidation of catechol needs to be solved, but Ty seems to be a more cost-effective biocatalyst compared with P450 because it does not require the redox partners and NADPH.
Rhododendrol (RD, 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanol) is a naturally-occurring phenolic compound found in many plants such as Acer nikoense and Betula pubescens [27,28,29]. In melanocytes, RD is metabolized to RD-quinone via RD-catechol by a Ty-catalyzed reaction. Subsequent spontaneous reactions convert RD-quinone to melanin [30]. RD metabolites and RD-derived melanin generated by Ty cause oxidative stress and exhibit cytotoxicity in melanocytes [31]. RD is also cytotoxic in human lung cancer cells [32], but not in keratocytes and fibroblasts [33]. However, the bioactive or adverse effects of various RD metabolites are not well established because metabolites with high purity cannot be obtained on a large scale.
The aim of this study was to produce a highly pure RD-catechol product using engineered CYP102A1 and Ty as biocatalysts. We found that engineered CYP102A1 and Ty can catalyze the regioselective hydroxylation at the ortho position of RD to produce an RD-catechol with high selectivity (Figure 1). In addition, we compared the yield, final product concentration, and productivity for RD-catechol production by engineered CYP102A1 and Ty. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first report of the production of a highly pure RD-catechol using engineered CYP102A1 and Ty.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Hydroxylation of RD by Engineered CYP102A1

To find a CYP102A1 enzyme with a high activity towards RD, the catalytic activities of the CYP102A1 wild type (WT) and its engineered enzymes toward RD were investigated at a fixed substrate concentration of 200 μM for 30 min of incubation. An NADPH regenerating system (NGS) was added to provide NADPH to the CYP102A1. The formation of RD-derived products by CYP102A1 was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). One major product was generated by engineered CYP102A1. The retention times of RD and its major product were 13.4 and 8.4 min, respectively (Figure 2). Among this study’s tested enzymes, WT CYP102A1 apparently could not oxidize RD, whereas ten engineered CYP102A1 showed high activity toward RD with more than 200 nmol product/nmol P450. Engineered CYP102A1 #16 (M16) was selected for further experiments because it showed the highest activity with 645 nmol product/nmol P450 among the tested 45 engineered CYP102A1 (Figure S1).
M16 might produce RD-catechol or RD-resorcinol via hydroxylation at the ortho or meta positions of the RD’s phenol ring. The major RD-derived product was identified using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Although the molecular mass of RD is 166.22 g·mol−1, its mass to charge (m/z) value was calculated as 149 via LC-MS [34]. The m/z value of the major product was 165, which was 16 higher compared to RD (Figure S2). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of RD and the product of M16 are shown in Figures S3–S6. Chemical structure and chemical shift assignments for RD and the product of M16 are shown in Figure S7 and Table S1. These results indicate that engineered CYP102A1 regioselectively produces an RD-catechol via hydroxylation at the ortho position.

2.2. RD-Catechol Production by Engineered CYP102A1

To increase the product concentration, M16 catalytic reactions were performed with various RD concentrations. RD-catechol production increased with RD concentration, and the productivity increased up to 200 µM RD (Figure 3). In this condition, product yield, final product concentration, and productivity were 50.4%, 18.4 mg·L−1, and 36.7 mg·L−1·h−1, respectively. The maximum RD-catechol was produced when RD concentration was 200 µM. The RD-catechol yield increased until 100 µM RD, and then decreased. When RD concentration was 100 µM, the yield was highest at 53.8%. These results indicate that M16 catalytic reactions below 200 µM RD to produce RD-catechol is efficient Further purification steps might be needed to obtain highly pure RD-catechol, as the yield of RD-catechol was lower than 90%. Although M16 can catalyze the regioselective hydroxylation of RD, M16 has limitations for industrial-scale applications due to its low yield and demand for NADPH. Therefore, it is necessary to develop alternative enzymes that can reduce cost and time of RD-catechol production.

2.3. Inhibition of RD-Quinone Formation by Ascorbic Acid Analogs

To develop an alternative enzyme to overcome the limitations of the CYP102A1 catalysis requiring NADPH, we attempted to produce RD-catechol using Ty as a biocatalyst. Ty produces RD-catechol and RD-quinone from RD by catalyzing two-step oxidations of ortho-hydroxylation and the subsequent oxidation. RD-quinone is spontaneously converted to RD-melanin via a non-enzymatic pathway [30]. The absorbance of RD at 280 nm changed after the Ty-catalyzed reactions. Within 3 min, absorbance near 400 nm increased, and absorbance at 280 and 340 nm also increased over time (Figure S8). This indicate that Ty rapidly produces RD-quinone and secondary quinone from RD [31]. Therefore, secondary oxidation by Ty should be inhibited to selectively produce RD-catechol. It has been reported that L-ascorbic acid (LAA) increases catechol production via the reduction of ortho-quinone to ortho-catechol [26]. In addition, LAA and D-ascorbic acid (DAA), an isomer of LAA, act as a suicide substrate against Ty in aerobic conditions [35]. In this study, we investigated the inhibitory effects of LAA, D-ascorbic acid (DAA), and dehydroascorbic acid (DHA), an oxidized form of LAA, on Ty-induced RD-quinone formation by monitoring absorbance at 400 nm. The inhibitory effects of LAA and its analogs increased with increasing their concentrations. When Ty reacted with RD at 37 °C for 30 min, 1 mM LAA, DAA, and DHA inhibited RD-quinone formation by 86%, 95%, and 8%, respectively (Figure 4). The inhibitory effects of LAA and its analogs at 25 °C were similar to those at 37 °C (Figure S9). These results indicate that LAA analogs act as inhibitors of Ty, not as antioxidants for the reduction of ortho-quinone to ortho-catechol. In addition, it can be suggested that Ty has potential as an alternative biocatalyst for RD-catechol production because RD-quinone formation is inhibited in the presence of LAA analogs.

2.4. Regioselective Production of RD-Catechol by Ty

For selective production of RD-catechol by Ty, LAA was selected as an inhibitor of its diphenolase activity. Ty produced one major product at a temperature range of 25–45 °C when the reaction mixture contained Ty, RD, and LAA. RD’s conversion to the product by Ty was the highest at 37 °C (Figure S10). In addition, production of the major product by Ty was investigated when 5–100 mM LAA contained in reaction mixture at 37 °C. RD’s conversion by Ty increased over time and was saturated within 30 min. Ty produced the highest product of 84.1 mg·L−1 when the reaction mixture containing 10 mM LAA was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min (Figure 5).
The major product of Ty eluted at 8.4 min on HPLC (Figure S11), which was the same retention time with the major product of M16 (Figure 2). To identify Ty’s product, LC-MS and NMR analyses were performed. The m/z value of this product was 165 on LC-MS, which was 16 higher compared to the RD (Figure S12). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of Ty’s product were the same as those of M16’s product (Figures S13 and S14). These results indicate that Ty catalyzes the ortho-hydroxylation to regioselectively produce RD-catechol when LAA acts as an inhibitor of Ty’s diphenolase activity.
To increase RD-catechol production, Ty catalytic reactions were performed at high RD concentrations. Ty’s RD-catechol production increased with RD concentration, and it became saturated from 2 mM RD. In this condition, yield, product concentration, and productivity were 69.3%, 252 mg·L−1, and 505 mg·L−1·h−1, respectively. The RD-catechol yield increased until 500 μM and then decreased. When the RD concentration was 500 μM, the yield was highest at 93.9%. The final product concentration and productivity were 85.6 mg·L−1 and 171 mg·L−1·h−1, respectively (Figure 6). These results suggest that Ty can be used as an alternative biocatalyst for the selective production of RD-catechol with high productivity.
The production capability of enzymes is evaluated in terms of productivity (mg·L−1·h−1) and final product concentration (mg·L−1). For pharmaceutical production, the estimated minimum productivity and final product concentration are 1 mg·L−1·h−1 and 100 mg·L−1, respectively [36,37,38,39]. The production abilities of M16 and Ty were compared when the RD concentration was 500 μM (Table 1). In this condition, both biocatalysts produced mainly RD-catechol, and their selectivity values exceeded 90%. Ty yielded 93.9% RD-catechol from RD, whereas M16 produced 17.6% RD-catechol from RD. The productivities of M16 and Ty were 32.1 mg·L−1·h−1 and 171 mg·L−1·h−1, respectively. These results indicate that Ty produced 5.3 times more RD-catechol compared with M16. In addition, one-pot synthesis of RD-catechol by Ty is possible without additional purification steps when the RD concentration is 500 μM.
In conclusion, we found that engineered CYP102A1 and Ty can catalyze the regioselective hydroxylation of RD and produce RD-catechol. Additionally, LAA and its analogs inhibit Ty’s diphenolase activity and contribute to selective RD-catechol production by inhibiting RD-quinone and melanin formation. Compared with engineered CYP102A1, Ty can reduce the cost and time of RD-catechol production because its productivity and yield were quite high at 171 mg·L−1·h−1 and 93.9%, and it does not require high-cost NADPH. Taken together, these findings indicate that engineered CYP102A1 and Ty can be used as efficient biocatalysts and immobilized systems to make hydroxylated products. Ty is a cost-effective biocatalyst and is more appropriate for industrial applications compared with engineered CYP102A1.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH, from yeast), glucose-6-phosphate (G6P), NADP+, Ty (from Agaricus bisporus), LAA, DAA, and DHA were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). RD was obtained from Tokyo Chemical Industry (Tokyo, Japan). All the other chemicals were of analytical grade.

3.2. Preparation of Engineered CYP102A1

The engineered CYP102A1 enzymes used in this study are known to have high activities toward non-natural substrates, and they were constructed by site-directed and random mutagenesis [14,40,41,42]. The changed amino acid residues of engineered CYP102A1 are shown in Table S2. CYP102A1 WT and engineered enzymes were expressed in Escherichia coli and were purified as previously described [40]. The plasmid of CYP102A1 enzymes (in pCW vector) was transformed to E. coli DH5α F’-IQ strain. The transformed cells were grown overnight in 5 mL of Luria–Bertani (LB) broth with ampicillin (100 μg·mL−1) at 37 °C. Precultured cells were inoculated to 250 mL of terrific broth (TB) containing ampicillin (100 μg·mL−1) and were grown at 37 °C with shaking at 250 rpm until reaching 0.8 of A600. The expression of CYP102A1 enzymes was induced by adding 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 1 mM δ-aminolevulinic acid. The culture was grown at 30 °C with shaking at 190 rpm for 24 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000× g for 15 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in a TES buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 500 mM sucrose) and lysed by sonication. After the lysate was centrifuged at 100,000× g for 90 min at 4 °C, the soluble cytosolic fraction was collected and used for the activity assay. The CYP102A1 enzymes’ concentration in the cytosolic fraction was determined from the CO-difference spectra using ε = 91 mM−1·cm−1 [43].

3.3. Hydroxylation of RD by Engineered CYP102A1

The catalytic activity of RD hydroxylation by CYP102A1 was measured as described previously [44]. To measure the activity of the CYP102A1 WT and engineered enzymes, the reaction mixtures contained 0.2 µM enzyme, 200 µM RD, and NGS in 250 μL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). To investigate the effects of RD concentration on RD-catechol production by M16, the reaction mixtures contained 0.2 µM M16 and NGS in 250 µL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer with 0, 50, 100, 200, or 500 µM RD. The reactions were initiated by adding NGS (10 mM G6P, 2 mM NADP+, and 0.5 μg yeast G6PDH in 250 μL) and were stopped with 25 μL of 1 N HCl containing 2 M NaCl and 600 μL of ice-cold ethyl acetate after incubating for 30 min at 37 °C. After centrifugation of the samples at 3000 rpm for 10 min, an organic layer was transferred to a new tube and evaporated under nitrogen gas. The samples were dissolved using 180 μL of mobile phase. The reaction products were analyzed using an SPD-20A UV-Visible detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) on an LC-20AD HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The products were separated by a Gemini C18 column (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) with a mobile phase of 10 mM formic acid in water/methanol (60:40, v/v). The sample was injected with 30 µL using a SIL-20A auto sampler (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and the flow rate was 0.5 mL/min. The RD and products were detected at 280 nm.

3.4. Inhibition of RD-Quinone Formation

RD-quinone formation by Ty was monitored using a UV-160 IPC UV–Visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The reaction mixtures contained 20 units of Ty, 500 µM RD, and 1 mM LAA, DAA, or DHA in 1 mL of 100 mM of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), and were incubated at 25 or 37 °C for 30 min. The inhibitory effects were expressed as percentage of the absorbance decreased relative to the absorbance at 400 nm of the sample without the inhibitor.

3.5. Production of RD-Catechol by Tyrosinase

The Ty reaction mixtures contained five units of Ty and 500 μM RD in 250 μL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) with 5, 10, 50, or 100 mM LAA, and were incubated at 37 °C for 0, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, or 120 min. To increase RD-catechol production, five units of Ty; 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, or 10 mM RD; and 10 mM LAA were incubated in 250 μL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) at 37 °C for 30 min. The reaction mixtures were initiated by adding enzyme and were stopped with 25 μL of 1 N HCl containing 2 M NaCl and 600 μL of ice-cold ethyl acetate. After centrifugation at 1000× g for 10 min, an organic layer was transferred to a new tube and evaporated under nitrogen gas. The samples were dissolved using 180 μL of mobile phase, and the products were analyzed via HPLC as described above.

3.6. Identification of RD-Catechol by LC-MS

To investigate the mass of the major product, we used a CYP102A1 reaction mixture containing 0.2 µM M16, 500 µM RD, and NGS in 250 µL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The Ty reaction mixture contained five units of Ty, 500 µM RD, and 10 mM LAA in 250 μL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5). These mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Injection samples were created as described above. The mass values of RD and its products were analyzed using a TSQ Quantum™ Access MAX Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer on an Accela 1250 HPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The samples were separated on a ZORBAX SB-C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d. 5 µm; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The mobile phases were (A) 10 mM formic acid in water and (B) methanol. The isocratic flow of mobile phase was (A) 60%: (B) 40% on HPLC. The injection volume was 10 µL. The mass spectra were recorded by electrospray ionization in positive mode to identify the RD metabolites. The collision energy and scan rate were 10 V and 0.5 spectra/s, respectively.

3.7. Identification of RD-Catechol by NMR Spectroscopy

To identify the products of engineered CYP102A1 and Ty, reaction mixtures and injection samples were prepared as described above. The samples were separated using HPLC, and the major product eluted at 8.4 min was collected. The collected samples were dried using a freezing drier (Operon, Gimpo, Korea). NMR experiments were performed at 25 °C on a Varian VNMRS 600 MHz NMR spectrometer (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a carbon-enhanced cryogenic probe. Methanol-d4 was used as the solvent, and the chemical shifts for the proton NMR spectra were measured in parts per million (ppm) relative to tetramethylsilane. All of the NMR experiments were carried out with standard pulse sequences in the VNMRJ (v. 3.2) library and processed with the same software (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

3.8. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed three times. The values are presented as means with a standard error of mean (SEM).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/10/10/1114/s1: Figure S1: Total turnover numbers of engineered CYP102A1 enzymes. Figure S2: Total ion chromatography and mass scan of RD and product of M16. Figure S3: 1H NMR spectra of RD (a) and the major product of M16 (b), Figure S4: Comparison of aromatic region in the 1H NMR spectra of RD (a) and the major product of M16 (b), Figure S5: 13C NMR spectra of RD (a) and the major product of M16 (b), Figure S6: Comparison of quaternary peaks in the 13C NMR spectra of RD (a) and the major product of M16 (b), Figure S7: Chemical structures of RD and RD-catechol, Figure S8: RD-quinone formation by Ty was analyzed by UV–Vis spectrophotometer, Figure S9: Inhibition of RD-quinone formation by L-ascorbic acid (LAA), D-ascorbic acid (DAA), and dehydroascorbic acid (DHA) at 25 °C, Figure S10: Effects of temperature on conversion rate of CYP102A1 and Ty, Figure S11: HPLC chromatogram of RD and RD-catechol produced by Ty, Figure S12: Total ion chromatography and mass scan of RD and product of Ty, Figure S13: 1H NMR spectra of products of M16 (a) and Ty (b), Figure S14: 13C NMR spectra of products of M16 (a) and Ty (b), Table S1: 1H and 13C chemical shifts of RD and RD-catechol, Table S2: Changed amino acid residues of the engineered CYP102A1 used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.P., G.S.C., and C.-H.Y.; validation, C.M.P., H.S.P., and G.S.C.; formal analysis, C.M.P.; investigation, C.M.P., H.S.P., G.S.C., and K.D.P.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.P.; writing—review and editing, C.-H.Y.; visualization, C.M.P.; supervision, C.-H.Y.; funding acquisition, C.M.P. and C.-H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2020R1I1A1A01055345) and the Basic Research Lab Program (NRF-2018R1A4A1023882), National Research Foundation of Korea, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schmid, A.; Dordick, J.S.; Hauer, B.; Kiener, A.; Wubbolts, M.; Witholt, B. Industrial biocatalysis today and tomorrow. Nature 2001, 409, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Torres, J.A.; Nogueirab, F.G.E.; Silvac, M.C.; Lopes, J.H.; Tavaresa, T.S.; Ramalho, T.C.; Corrêaa, A.D. Novel eco-friendly biocatalyst: Soybean peroxidase immobilized onto activated carbon obtained from agricultural waste. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 16460–16466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Choi, J.M.; Han, S.S.; Kim, H.S. Industrial applications of enzyme biocatalysis: Current status and future aspects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1443–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nitti, A.; Bianchi, G.; Po, R.; Swager, T.M.; Pasini, D. Domino Direct Arylation and Cross-Aldol for Rapid Construction of Extended Polycyclic pi-Scaffolds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 8788–8791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Osburn, P.L.; Bergbreiter, D.E. Molecular engineering of organic reagents and catalysts using soluble polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 2015–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nelson, D.R. The cytochrome p450 homepage. Hum. Genom. 2009, 4, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Guengerich, F.P. Common and uncommon cytochrome P450 reactions related to metabolism and chemical toxicity. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 611–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Guengerich, F.P.; Munro, A.W. Unusual cytochrome p450 enzymes and reactions. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 17065–17073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Urlacher, V.B.; Girhard, M. Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenases in Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 882–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Munro, A.W.; Daff, S.; Coggins, J.R.; Lindsay, J.G.; Chapman, S.K. Probing electron transfer in flavocytochrome P-450 BM3 and its component domains. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996, 239, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lussenburg, B.M.A.; Babel, L.C.; Vermeulen, N.P.E.; Commandeur, J.N.M. Evaluation of alkoxyresorufins as fluorescent substrates for cytochrome P450 BM3 and site-directed mutants. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 341, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yun, C.H.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, D.H.; Jung, H.C.; Pan, J.G. The bacterial P450 BM3: A prototype for a biocatalyst with human P450 activities. Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Whitehouse, C.J.; Bell, S.G.; Wong, L.L. P450 (BM3) (CYP102A1): Connecting the dots. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1218–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kang, J.Y.; Ryu, S.H.; Park, S.H.; Cha, G.S.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, K.H.; Hong, A.W.; Ahn, T.; Pan, J.G.; Joung, Y.H.; et al. Chimeric cytochromes P450 engineered by domain swapping and random mutagenesis for producing human metabolites of drugs. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014, 111, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Urlacher, V.B.; Eiben, S. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases: Perspectives for synthetic application. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ismaya, W.T.; Rozeboom, H.J.; Weijn, A.; Mes, J.J.; Fusetti, F.; Wichers, H.J.; Dijkstra, B.W. Crystal structure of Agaricus bisporus mushroom tyrosinase: Identity of the tetramer subunits and interaction with tropolone. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 5477–5486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ramsden, C.A.; Riley, P.A. Tyrosinase: The four oxidation states of the active site and their relevance to enzymatic activation, oxidation and inactivation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 2388–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pillaiyar, T.; Namasivayam, V.; Manickam, M.; Jung, S.H. Inhibitors of Melanogenesis: An Updated Review. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 7395–7418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Goldfeder, M.; Kanteev, M.; Adir, N.; Fishman, A. Influencing the monophenolase/diphenolase activity ratio in tyrosinase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1834, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Halaouli, S.; Asther, M.; Sigoillot, J.C.; Hamdi, M.; Lomascolo, A. Fungal tyrosinases: New prospects in molecular characteristics, bioengineering and biotechnological applications. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 100, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hernandez-Romero, D.; Sanchez-Amat, A.; Solano, F. A tyrosinase with an abnormally high tyrosine hydroxylase/dopa oxidase ratio. FEBS J. 2006, 273, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shuster Ben-Yosef, V.; Sendovski, M.; Fishman, A. Directed evolution of tyrosinase for enhanced monophenolase/diphenolase activity ratio. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2010, 47, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Molloy, S.; Nikodinovic-Runic, J.; Martin, L.B.; Hartmann, H.; Solano, F.; Decker, H.; O’Connor, K.E. Engineering of a bacterial tyrosinase for improved catalytic efficiency towards D-tyrosine using random and site directed mutagenesis approaches. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110, 1849–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lee, N.; Kim, E.J.; Kim, B.G. Regioselective hydroxylation of trans-resveratrol via inhibition of tyrosinase from Streptomyces avermitilis MA4680. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 1687–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, N.; Lee, S.H.; Baek, K.; Kim, B.G. Heterologous expression of tyrosinase (MelC2) from Streptomyces avermitilis MA4680 in E. coli and its application for ortho-hydroxylation of resveratrol to produce piceatannol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 7915–7924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, S.H.; Baek, K.; Lee, J.E.; Kim, B.G. Using tyrosinase as a monophenol monooxygenase: A combined strategy for effective inhibition of melanin formation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016, 113, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tallent, W.H. d-Betuligenol from Rhododendron maximum L. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29, 988–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fujita, T.; Hatamoto, H.; Iwasaki, T.; Takafuji, S.I. Bioconversion of rhododendrol by Acer nikoense. Phytochemistry 1995, 39, 1085–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pan, H.; Lundgren, L.N. Rhododendrol glycosides and phenyl glucoside esters from inner bark of Betula pubescens. Phytochemistry 1994, 36, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ito, S.; Wakamatsu, K. Biochemical Mechanism of Rhododendrol-Induced Leukoderma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 552. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ito, S.; Ojika, M.; Yamashita, T.; Wakamatsu, K. Tyrosinase-catalyzed oxidation of rhododendrol produces 2-methylchromane-6,7-dione, the putative ultimate toxic metabolite: Implications for melanocyte toxicity. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014, 27, 744–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, E.J.; An, J.H.; Son, Y.K.; Yeo, J.H.; Song, K.S. The Cytotoxic Constituents of Betula platyphylla and their Effects on Human Lung A549 Cancer Cells. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2018, 24, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Yang, L.; Yang, F.; Wataya-Kaneda, M.; Tanemura, A.; Tsuruta, D.; Katayama, I. 4-(4-Hydroroxyphenyl)-2-butanol (rhododendrol) activates the autophagy-lysosome pathway in melanocytes: Insights into the mechanisms of rhododendrol-induced leukoderma. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2015, 77, 182–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kasamatsu, S.; Hachiya, A.; Nakamura, S.; Yasuda, Y.; Fujimori, T.; Takano, K.; Moriwaki, S.; Hase, T.; Suzuki, T.; Matsunaga, K. Depigmentation caused by application of the active brightening material, rhododendrol, is related to tyrosinase activity at a certain threshold. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2014, 76, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Munoz-Munoz, J.L.; Garcia-Molina, F.; García-Ruiz, P.A.; Varon, R.; Tudela, J.; García-Cánovas, F.; Rodriguez-Lopez, J.N. Stereospecific inactivation of tyrosinase by l- and d-ascorbic acid. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Proteins Proteom. 2009, 1794, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Porter, J.L.; Rusli, R.A.; Ollis, D.L. Directed Evolution of Enzymes for Industrial Biocatalysis. ChemBioChem 2016, 17, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Julsing, M.K.; Cornelissen, S.; Buhler, B.; Schmid, A. Heme-iron oxygenases: Powerful industrial biocatalysts? Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 12, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pollard, D.J.; Woodley, J.M. Biocatalysis for pharmaceutical intermediates: The future is now. Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Straathof, A.J.J.; Panke, S.; Schmid, A. The production of fine chemicals by biotransformations. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2002, 13, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, D.H.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, D.H.; Liu, K.H.; Jung, H.C.; Pan, J.G.; Yun, C.H. Generation of human metabolites of 7-ethoxycoumarin by bacterial cytochrome P450 BM3. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2008, 36, 2166–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Park, S.H.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, D.; Kim, D.H.; Jung, H.C.; Pan, J.G.; Ahn, T.; Kim, D.; Yun, C.H. Engineering bacterial cytochrome P450 (P450) BM3 into a prototype with human P450 enzyme activity using indigo formation. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2010, 38, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Jang, H.H.; Ryu, S.H.; Le, T.K.; Doan, T.T.; Nguyen, T.H.; Park, K.D.; Yim, D.E.; Kim, D.H.; Kang, C.K.; Ahn, T.; et al. Regioselective C-H hydroxylation of omeprazole sulfide by Bacillus megaterium CYP102A1 to produce a human metabolite. Biotechnol. Lett. 2017, 39, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Omura, T.; Sato, R. The Carbon Monoxide-Binding Pigment of Liver Microsomes. II. Solubilization, Purification, and Properties. J. Biol. Chem. 1964, 239, 2379–2385. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Nguyen, N.A.; Jang, J.; Le, T.K.; Nguyen, T.H.H.; Woo, S.M.; Yoo, S.K.; Lee, Y.J.; Park, K.D.; Yeom, S.J.; Kim, G.J.; et al. Biocatalytic Production of a Potent Inhibitor of Adipocyte Differentiation from Phloretin Using Engineered CYP102A1. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 6683–6691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Scheme for rhododendrol (RD)-catechol production using cytochrome (CYP)102A1 and tyrosinase (Ty).
Figure 1. Scheme for rhododendrol (RD)-catechol production using cytochrome (CYP)102A1 and tyrosinase (Ty).
Catalysts 10 01114 g001
Figure 2. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatogram of RD and RD-catechol produced by engineered CYP102A1. The reaction mixtures contained 0.2 µM M16 or 200 µM RD with or without NADPH regenerating system (NGS). RD and RD-catechol were eluted at 13.4 and 8.4 min, respectively.
Figure 2. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatogram of RD and RD-catechol produced by engineered CYP102A1. The reaction mixtures contained 0.2 µM M16 or 200 µM RD with or without NADPH regenerating system (NGS). RD and RD-catechol were eluted at 13.4 and 8.4 min, respectively.
Catalysts 10 01114 g002
Figure 3. RD-catechol production by engineered CYP102A1 with increasing RD concentration. The reaction mixtures contained 0.2 µM M16 with indicated RD concentration up to 500 µM, and NGS. RD-catechol produced by M16 was analyzed using HPLC.
Figure 3. RD-catechol production by engineered CYP102A1 with increasing RD concentration. The reaction mixtures contained 0.2 µM M16 with indicated RD concentration up to 500 µM, and NGS. RD-catechol produced by M16 was analyzed using HPLC.
Catalysts 10 01114 g003
Figure 4. Inhibition of RD-quinone formation by L-ascorbic acid (LAA), D-ascorbic acid (DAA), and dehydroascorbic acid (DHA) at 37 °C.
Figure 4. Inhibition of RD-quinone formation by L-ascorbic acid (LAA), D-ascorbic acid (DAA), and dehydroascorbic acid (DHA) at 37 °C.
Catalysts 10 01114 g004
Figure 5. Effect of LAA concentration on the production of RD-catechol. The reaction mixtures contained five units of Ty and 500 µM RD in 250 µL of a 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) with 5 (a), 10 (b), 50 (c), or 100 mM LAA (d). The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 0–120 min. The RD-catechol produced by Ty was analyzed using HPLC. The circle (●) and square () lines indicate concentration of RD and RD-catechol, respectively.
Figure 5. Effect of LAA concentration on the production of RD-catechol. The reaction mixtures contained five units of Ty and 500 µM RD in 250 µL of a 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) with 5 (a), 10 (b), 50 (c), or 100 mM LAA (d). The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 0–120 min. The RD-catechol produced by Ty was analyzed using HPLC. The circle (●) and square () lines indicate concentration of RD and RD-catechol, respectively.
Catalysts 10 01114 g005
Figure 6. RD-catechol production by Ty with increasing RD concentration. The reaction mixtures contained five units of Ty, indicated concentrations of RD, and 10 mM LAA. RD-catechol produced by Ty was analyzed using HPLC.
Figure 6. RD-catechol production by Ty with increasing RD concentration. The reaction mixtures contained five units of Ty, indicated concentrations of RD, and 10 mM LAA. RD-catechol produced by Ty was analyzed using HPLC.
Catalysts 10 01114 g006
Table 1. Comparison of production abilities of engineered CYP102A1 and Ty.
Table 1. Comparison of production abilities of engineered CYP102A1 and Ty.
BiocatalystSelectivity (%)Yield (%)Product Concentration (mg·L−1)Productivity (mg·L−1·h−1)
CYP102A1 193.5 ± 1.417.6 ± 0.716.1 ± 0.732.1
Ty 290.4 ± 0.493.9 ± 1.885.6 ± 1.6171
1 The reaction mixture contained 0.2 μM M16, 500 μM RD, and NGS in 250 μL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min (Figure 3). 2 The reaction mixture contained five units of Ty, 500 μM RD, and 10 mM LAA in 250 μL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min (Figure 6).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, C.M.; Park, H.S.; Cha, G.S.; Park, K.D.; Yun, C.-H. Regioselective Hydroxylation of Rhododendrol by CYP102A1 and Tyrosinase. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1114. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10101114

AMA Style

Park CM, Park HS, Cha GS, Park KD, Yun C-H. Regioselective Hydroxylation of Rhododendrol by CYP102A1 and Tyrosinase. Catalysts. 2020; 10(10):1114. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10101114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Chan Mi, Hyun Seo Park, Gun Su Cha, Ki Deok Park, and Chul-Ho Yun. 2020. "Regioselective Hydroxylation of Rhododendrol by CYP102A1 and Tyrosinase" Catalysts 10, no. 10: 1114. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10101114

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop