Next Article in Journal
Intention-Based Sharing
Next Article in Special Issue
Game Theory of Tumor–Stroma Interactions in Multiple Myeloma: Effect of Nonlinear Benefits
Previous Article in Journal
Ethics, Morality, and Game Theory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fractionated Follow-Up Chemotherapy Delays the Onset of Resistance in Bone Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Article

Bifurcation Mechanism Design—From Optimal Flat Taxes to Better Cancer Treatments

1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78705, USA
2
Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
3
Engineering Systems and Design (ESD), Singapore University of Technology and Design, 8 Somapah Road, Singapore 487372, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Games 2018, 9(2), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/g9020021
Received: 25 February 2018 / Revised: 6 April 2018 / Accepted: 18 April 2018 / Published: 26 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Game Theory and Cancer)
Small changes to the parameters of a system can lead to abrupt qualitative changes of its behavior, a phenomenon known as bifurcation. Such instabilities are typically considered problematic, however, we show that their power can be leveraged to design novel types of mechanisms. Hysteresis mechanisms use transient changes of system parameters to induce a permanent improvement to its performance via optimal equilibrium selection. Optimal control mechanisms induce convergence to states whose performance is better than even the best equilibrium. We apply these mechanisms in two different settings that illustrate the versatility of bifurcation mechanism design. In the first one we explore how introducing flat taxation could improve social welfare, despite decreasing agent “rationality,” by destabilizing inefficient equilibria. From there we move on to consider a well known game of tumor metabolism and use our approach to derive potential new cancer treatment strategies. View Full-Text
Keywords: game theory; cancer; economics; hysteresis game theory; cancer; economics; hysteresis
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, G.; Basanta, D.; Piliouras, G. Bifurcation Mechanism Design—From Optimal Flat Taxes to Better Cancer Treatments. Games 2018, 9, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/g9020021

AMA Style

Yang G, Basanta D, Piliouras G. Bifurcation Mechanism Design—From Optimal Flat Taxes to Better Cancer Treatments. Games. 2018; 9(2):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/g9020021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Ger; Basanta, David; Piliouras, Georgios. 2018. "Bifurcation Mechanism Design—From Optimal Flat Taxes to Better Cancer Treatments" Games 9, no. 2: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/g9020021

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop