Next Article in Journal
Quality of Life in Patients with NSCLC Receiving Maintenance Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Complications from Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Age on the Detection and Management of Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to ALK Inhibitors and the Rationale for Treating ALK-positive Lung Cancer
Article Menu

Export Article

Cancers 2015, 7(2), 930-949;

Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer—Beyond EGFR and ALK
Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
Academic Editor: Siow Ming Lee
Received: 27 February 2015 / Accepted: 13 May 2015 / Published: 26 May 2015


Systemic therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a dramatic paradigm shift over the past decade. Advances in our understanding of the underlying biology of NSCLC have revealed distinct molecular subtypes. A substantial proportion of NSCLC depends on oncogenic molecular aberrations (so-called “driver mutations”) for their malignant phenotype. Personalized therapy encompasses the strategy of matching these subtypes with effective targeted therapies. EGFR mutations and ALK translocation are the most effectively targeted oncogenes in NSCLC. EGFR mutations and ALK gene rearrangements are successfully being targeted with specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The number of molecular subgroups of NSCLC continues to grow. The scope of this review is to discuss recent data on novel molecular targets as ROS1, BRAF, KRAS, HER2, c-MET, RET, PIK3CA, FGFR1 and DDR2. Thereby the review will focus on therapeutic strategies targeting these aberrations. Moreover, the emerging challenge of acquired resistance to initially effective therapies will be discussed.
lung cancer; targeted cancer therapy; oncogene; ROS1; c-MET; RET; BRAF; HER2; FGFR1; DDR2

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated death worldwide [1]. Lung cancer is traditionally classified into non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and carcinoid. NSCLC accounts for approximately 80% of all lung cancers and is further subtyped into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma [2]. This purely morphological taxonomy has been challenged in the past decade as it has been recognized that somatic oncogenetic alterations can further molecularly subdivide these NSCLC subtypes. Genotype-driven therapy (“targeted therapy”) is nowadays standard of care for a significant subgroup of NSCLC patients with advanced/metastatic disease.
Genotype-driven treatment with rationally targeted therapies has led to unprecedented outcome improvements. Historically, the estimated median overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC (stage IV) has been 10 to 12 months. The discovery of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations as predictors of a response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy profoundly changed the therapeutic landscape of lung adenocarcinoma [3,4]. More recently, targeted therapies directed at NSCLC harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions and ROS1 fusions have produced similar results in terms of overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) [5,6]. A recently published analysis showed a significant survival improvement for patients with an oncogenic driver undergoing targeted therapy with a median OS for these patients of more than three years [7]. In addition to EGFR, ALK, and ROS1, there are several other molecular abnormalities that could potentially be treated with drugs already approved for other malignancies or with investigational agents [8].
This review aims at providing an overview on genomic aberrations beyond the well-known and established EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements. The current evidence on targeted therapies for each aberration, its role as predictive marker, ongoing clinical trials and potential mechanisms of resistance towards targeted therapies will be discussed.

2. ROS1

The c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor from the insulin receptor family. A rearrangement of ROS1 has initially been described in glioblastoma [9,10,11,12]. In 2007 ROS1 rearrangement was found in NSCLC cell lines and primary tumors [13]. ROS1 fusion partners include SLC34A2, CD74, TPM3, SDC4, EZR, LRIG3, KDELR2, and CCDC6 [14]. A ROS1 rearrangement has been described in 0.7%–1.7% of NSCLC patients [14,15,16]. Similar to previously described oncogenic aberrations in lung cancer, ROS1 translocation is predominantly found in younger patients with adenocarcinoma histology who are never or former light smokers. However, ROS1 translocations have also been described in squamous cell histology [16]. Crizotinib, a potent inhibitor of ALK and MET has also shown activity against ROS1-rearranged NSCLC [15]. An expansion cohort of the phase I trial of crizotinib (PROFILE 1001) included 50 patients with ROS1 translocation [17]. An overall response rate (ORR) of 72% has been reported including three patients with a complete remission. The median duration of response was 17.6 months and the median progression-free survival was 19.2 months with 25 patients still in follow-up for progression when the results have been reported. In a European Cohort (EUROS1) 31 ROS1-positive NSCLC patients have been treated with crizotinib [18]. Median age was 50.5 years, 64.5% of patients were women, and 67.7% were never-smokers. The overall response rate for crizotinib therapy was 80% and the disease control rate was 86.7%. The median PFS in this retrospective analysis was 9.1 months. This cohort study confirms the findings from the prospective trial that crizotinib is a highly active therapeutic option in NSCLC patients harboring a ROS1 rearrangement. Other agents are currently investigated for ROS1-positive lung cancer patients including foretinib, ceritinib, AP26113, PF-06463922 as well as HSP90 inhibitors.
As shown in other molecular NSCLC subgroups treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), acquired resistance is inevitable and various mechanisms for different molecular alterations have been described. Mechanism of acquired resistance to crizotinib was partly mediated by the ROS1 G2032R mutation in a patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma harboring CD74-ROS1 fusion [19] or EGFR pathway activation in a patient with NSCLC harboring SDC4-ROS1 fusion [20]. Recently, novel ROS1 mutations in lung cancer cell lines as well as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition have been described to confer resistance to crizotinib [21]. In a preclinical model, the c-MET/RET/VEGFR inhibitor cabozantinib has shown activity in acquired ROS1 inhibitor-resistant mutations [22].
Currently, novel TKIs with activity against ROS1 are under clinical investigation. AP26113 is a small molecule with activity against ALK and ROS1 also inhibiting ROS1-positive cell lines with a ROS1 resistance mutation [23]. Foretinib has shown preclinical activity in cell lines harboring ROS1 translocations and also in cell lines with the G2032R resistance mutation [24]. PF-06463922 is another potent and selective ALK/ROS1 inhibitor showing efficacy in a preclinical model even in cell lines resistant to crizotinib [25]. Another approach currently investigated in crizotinib resistant patients harboring ALK or ROS1 translocations is the combination of ALK/ROS1 and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors [26].


BRAF (v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B) is a serine-threonine kinase belonging to the RAF kinase family lying downstream of KRAS and directly interacting with the MEK-ERK signaling cascade. BRAF mutations have initially been described in malignant melanoma where 40%–60% of tumors harbor an activating V600E BRAF mutation [27]. Subsequently, BRAF mutations have also been detected in colorectal cancer, papillary thyroid cancer and other solid tumors [27,28,29]. BRAF targeting TKIs (dabrafenib, vemurafenib) are approved for BRAF mutated malignant melanoma based on pivotal phase III trials [30,31]. In lung adenocarcinoma BRAF mutations are found in 1%–5%, half of them harboring the classical V600E mutation [32,33]. Other mutations occur within exons 11 and 15 [33]. BRAF V600E mutations are associated with light/never smoker status, micropapillary histology and occur more frequently in female patients. In contrary, non-V600E mutations are more frequent in former or current smokers and are associated with poorer outcome [33,34].
The BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib is currently tested in a phase II trial. Preliminary results from 17 patients harboring a V600E mutation demonstrate a durable partial response in 54% [35]. Responses for vemurafenib have been demonstrated in several case reports [36,37,38,39]. Preclinical data suggest resistance in non-V600E BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines [40]. This finding is supported by a recent case report showing a rapid tumor progression in a patient with a BRAF G469L mutation undergoing therapy with vemurafenib [41]. Recently, response to dabrafenib in a patients progressing on vemurafenib and docetaxel has been shown [42].
Preclinical data suggests that BRAF activating mutations may predict sensitivity to inhibition of MEK which is supported by clinical response seen with MEK TKIs in BRAF mutated melanoma [43,44]. Furthermore, synergistic activity for the combination of BRAF- and MEK-inhibition has been demonstrated in another preclinical model [45]. Ongoing trials in BRAF mutated lung adenocarcinoma investigate BRAF-, MEK- and AKT-inhibitors.


KRAS belongs to the RAS family of oncogenes together with HRAS and NRAS. KRAS is one of the first characterized oncogenes [46]. KRAS mutations are detected in approximately 20%–25% of lung adenocarcinoma and 4% of lung squamous cell carcinoma [7,47]. Contrary to most other oncogenic driver mutations, KRAS is more often found in smokers and is detected at lower frequency in East Asian patient cohorts [48,49]. Mutations in KRAS are usually mutually exclusive with other oncogenic driver aberrations including EGFR, BRAF, HER2 mutations and ALK and ROS1 rearrangements [47]. KRAS mutations in NSCLC most often occur in codons 12 or 13 and with a lower frequency in codon 61 [7]. HRAS and NRAS mutations are very uncommon in NSCLC [7]. The prognostic as well as predictive role of KRAS mutations is still controversial. In early stage lung cancer, KRAS mutations are neither of prognostic relevance nor are they predictive for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy [50]. However, a large meta-analysis detected a negative prognostic impact of RAS mutations in NSCLC, especially in adenocarcinoma patients [51]. In metastatic NSCLC KRAS mutations did not predict response to standard chemotherapy [52,53]. However, KRAS mutations seem to negatively predict response to EGFR TKIs [54,55,56].
Although various attempts inhibiting KRAS have been made, there is no established therapy for this large patient subpopulation. Initially, direct targeting of mutant KRAS with farnesyl transferase inhibitors has been investigated with only minimal clinical activity [57]. The most promising approach for KRAS mutant lung cancer seems to be the inhibition of MEK in combination with conventional chemotherapy. In a phase II trial in 87 previously treated KRAS mutant NSCLC patients the addition of the MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib to docetaxel improved ORR (37% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001) and median PFS (5.3 vs. 2.1 months, HR 0.58, p = 0.014) with a trend towards longer overall survival (9.4 vs. 5.2 months, HR 0.80, p = 0.21) [58]. The combination showed significantly higher grade 3/4 toxicity (45% vs. 4%) with neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and pneumonia being the most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities. Currently, a phase III trial with selumetinib is ongoing (SELECT-1, NCT01933932). Trametinib is another inhibitor of MEK showing activity in KRAS mutant NSCLC patients in combination with docetaxel or pemetrexed [59]. However, trametinib single agent could not improve the outcome of KRAS mutant patients compared to docetaxel in the second-line setting [60]. Several clinical trials are currently investigating selumetinib and trametinib in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. Other therapeutic approaches for KRAS mutant lung cancer are the inhibition of other downstream signaling pathways as PI3K and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) [61,62]. Furthermore, direct KRAS G12C inhibitors have shown activity in preclinical models [63,64]. Also the combination of two targeted agents interacting with the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway might be a future option for these patients, e.g., selumetinib plus the AKT inhibitor MK-2206.
NRAS mutations have been found in 1% of NSCLC, more commonly in adenocarcinoma patients with a smoking history. In preclinical models, these tumors appear sensitive to MEK inhibitor treatment [65].

5. HER2

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a member of the ERBB receptor tyrosine kinase family. It is activated by homo- or heterodimerization. In breast cancer, HER2 amplification occurs in about 20% of patients and is a predictive marker for anti-HER2 antibodies and TKIs [66,67,68]. In NSCLC, amplification of HER2 detected by FISH is found in 2%–4% of NSCLC patients. HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry is detected in 13%–20% of NSCLC samples, although strong expression is only found in 2%–4% [69,70]. HER2 aberrations are more prevalent in adenocarcinoma patients and HER2 amplification is a negative prognostic marker as shown in a recent meta-analysis [71]. About 1%–2% of adenocarcinoma patients harbor mutations in the exon 20 of HER2 [72,73,74]. These mutations are not clearly associated with HER2 amplification. Anti-HER2 therapies have not shown efficacy in HER2-amplified NSCLC [75,76,77]. However, in a European cohort study HER2 mutation positive adenocarcinoma has been shown to be responsive to HER2-targeted therapies with an ORR of 50% and a disease control rate of 83% [78]. In patients treated with chemotherapy in combination with an anti-HER2 therapy the disease control rate was 93%. The median PFS in this cohort was 5.1 months. Afatinib, a TKI with activity against ERBB family members is approved for EGFR mutation positive adenocarcinoma and has shown clinical activity in lung cancer patients harboring a HER2 mutation even after failure of other EGFR- or HER2-targeting therapies [78,79]. Neratinib is an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor showing clinical activity in HER2-mutated NSCLC patients in a phase I trial combined with the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus [80]. Currently, several clinical trials are investigating the role of HER2-directed antibodies (trastuzumab, pertuzumab) as well as HER2-targeting TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib and neratinib).

6. c-MET

Mesenchymal-epidermal transition (MET) is a receptor tyrosine kinase, which undergoes homodimerization by binding its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Homodimerization and autophosphorylation of MET leads to the activation of various intracellular signaling pathways including RAS-RAF-MAPK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR [81]. In lung cancer, MET mutations are rarely detected [82], amplifications are found in around 2%–5% of NSCLC, predominantly in adenocarcinoma [83,84]. However, in a Japanese cohort an amplification rate of 21% has been described [81]. MET overexpression occurs in more than 25% of NSCLC and is associated with poor prognosis [85,86]. MET amplification has been described as one potential mechanism of resistance towards EGFR inhibition in EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma [87,88].
Various approaches targeting MET have been investigated. However, most of the trial did not select for MET-specific patient cohorts but investigated the role of MET inhibition in unselected lung cancer patients. Onartuzumab is a monovalent, monoclonal antibody against HGFR. In a randomized phase II trial onartuzumab was investigated as second- or third-line treatment option in combination with erlotinib and compared to erlotinib in combination with placebo [89]. There was no difference in outcome in the whole patient population of 137 patients. However, 66 patients with immunohistochemistry positive (2+ or 3+) showed significantly longer PFS (median 2.9 vs. 1.5 months, HR 0.53, p = 0.04) and OS (median 12.6 vs. 3.8 months, HR 0.37, p = 0.002) when treated with onartuzumab. In a phase III trial 499 previously treated MET-positive NSCLC patients were randomized between erlotinib plus placebo and erlotinib plus onartuzumab [90]. This trial could not confirm the results from the previous phase II trial. An independent data review committee recommended to stop the trial for futility, as the addition of onartuzumab to erlotinib did not improve OS (median 6.8 vs. 9.1 months, HR 1.27, p = 0.068), PFS (median 2.7 vs. 2.6 months, HR 0.99, p = 0.92), or ORR (8.4% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.63). Based on these negative results, the development of onartuzumab for NSCLC was stopped. Ficlatuzumab and rilotumumab are two other MET antibodies showing clinical activity in phase I trials and are currently investigated in NSCLC patients [91,92].
Tivantinib is a multi-kinase TKI with high affinity for the inactive kinase domain of MET. In a phase II trial 167 previously treated but EGFR TKI naïve NSCLC patients were randomized to erlotinib plus placebo or erlotinib plus tivantinib [93]. The trial arms were balanced with regard to MET amplification. The combination of erlotinib plus tivantinib did not improve the primary endpoint PFS (median 2.3 vs. 3.8 months, HR 0.81, p = 0.24). Also within the MET-positive cohort there was no statistically significant difference (HR 0.71, p = 0.387). However, in a small cohort of KRAS mutation positive patients the combination therapy achieved a significant prolongation of median PFS (HR 0.18, p = 0.006). The randomized, double-blind MARQUEE study investigated the addition of tivantinib to erlotinib in previously treated NSCLC patients. After a planned interim analysis the trial was stopped due to futility [94]. In a recent preclinical model, tivantinib efficacy has been shown to be independent of MET inhibition in NSCLC cell lines [95]. The ALK/ROS1 inhibitor crizotinib was originally developed as MET inhibitor [96]. Clinical activity of crizotinib in MET amplified patients has been demonstrated [97]. Other TKIs with activity against MET are currently investigated in clinical trials including cabozantinib and foretinib.

7. RET

RET (rearranged during transfection) is a receptor tyrosine kinase and a known oncogene in thyroid cancer where translocations as well as activating mutations have been detected [98,99]. In NSCLC RET translocations can be detected in about 1.5% of patients predominantly in younger, light or never smokers with adenocarcinoma histology and poorly differentiated tumors [100]. RET translocations seem to occur mutually exclusive with other known oncogenic driver mutations or translocations [101]. The most often detected fusion variant KIF5B-RET occurs through a paracentric inversion on chromosome 10 [14,102,103]. Additional gene fusion partners including CCD6, NCOA4 and TRIM33 have been described [104,105].
Alectinib is a potent inhibitor of ALK and has shown antitumor activity against RET positive NSCLC [106]. RET inhibition with vandetanib, sunitinib, and sorafenib resulted in loss of cell viability and abrogation of the transformed phenotype in preclinical models [14,102,103]. In a preliminary report of a phase II trial (NCT01639508) investigating the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib confirmed partial responses have been described in two of three RET-positive patients [104]. The third patient showed a prolonged stable disease. The activity of vandetanib for lung adenocarcinoma patients with RET translocation has been demonstrated in two case reports [107,108]. Clinical trials investigating a variety of different multi-kinase TKIs with activity against RET (e.g., vandetanib, cabozantinib, ponatinib) are currently ongoing.


The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT-mTOR pathway is one of the most often deregulated signaling cascades in human cancers, including NSCLC. PIK3CA encodes the catalytic subunit of PI3K. In NSCLC mutations and amplifications are detected in 2% and 12%–17%, respectively [109,110]. The incidence of PIK3CA mutations seems to be higher in lung squamous cell carcinoma [111]. PIK3CA mutations can occur in combination with other known driver mutations like EGFR or KRAS mutations as well as in the setting of acquired EGFR TKI resistance [112,113]. The fact that up to 70% of patients with a PIK3CA mutation harbor other coexisting mutations or rearrangements in other oncogenes supports the hypothesis that PIK3CA mutations are not oncogenic driver mutations per se in NSCLC [112]. Preclinical data suggest that tumors harboring PIK3CA mutations are highly sensitive to PI3K inhibitors [114]. Clinical trials with PI3K inhibitors as well as mTOR inhibitors are ongoing.

9. FGFR1

FGFR1 is a member of the FGFR family of receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFR1–4). FGFRs are transmembrane tyrosine kinases interfering with the RAS/RAF/MAPK and the PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. FGFR amplifications have been detected in about 20% of squamous cell carcinomas and in a lower frequency (about 5%) of adenocarcinomas [115,116]. FGFR1 amplification is more common in male smokers and associated with a poor outcome [117]. However, the negative prognostic impact of FGFR1 amplifications was not confirmed in a Caucasian patient cohort [118]. Clinical trials with FGFR inhibitors are currently ongoing. Activating mutations in the FGFR2/3 genes have recently been described in lung squamous cell carcinoma and have shown to be sensitive to FGFR inhibition [119].

10. DDR2

Discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) together with DDR1 are receptor tyrosine kinases involved in cell adhesion, migration and proliferation [120]. In NSCLC DDR2 mutations have been described with a frequency of nearly 4% [121]. In a preclinical model the multikinase TKI dasatinib with activity against DDR2 showed activity in squamous carcinoma cell lines harboring DDR2 mutations [121]. Currently, a clinical trial with dasatinib in DDR2 mutant NSCLC is ongoing.

11. Other Genomic Aberrations

MEK1 (also named MAP2K1) is a serine-threonine kinase with mutations occurring in approximately 1% of NSCLC (mostly adenocarcinoma) [122]. NTRIK1 fusions have recently been described approximately 3% in never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma not harboring other oncogenic driver aberrations [123]. The NTRK1 gene encodes the high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor (TRKA protein). In a preclinical model two fusion variants (MPRIP-NTRK1, CD74-NTRK) have shown to have oncogenic potential [123]. RXDX-101 is an oral small molecule inhibitor of TrkA, TrkB and TrkC, as well as ROS1 and ALK. In a phase I trial RXDX-101 has demonstrated clinical activity in TRK-fusion positive lung cancer [124].
PTEN loss with subsequent AKT overexpression occurs in one third of NSCLC cases and is associated with poor prognosis [125]. PTEN mutations occur in 4%–8% of NSCLC and are more commonly detected in squamous cell histology and in patients with a smoking history [126]. Clinical trials investigating PI3K inhibitors in patients with PTEN deficiency are ongoing.

12. Conclusions

The therapeutic landscape of NSCLC therapy has profoundly changed since the first discovery of activating EGFR mutations and the development of specific EGFR TKIs. This has introduced the era of “personalized medicine”. There are still a growing number of new genomic aberrations in NSCLC serving as potential new predictive biomarkers and drug targets. Comprehensive genomic characterization of lung cancer tissue has recently been reported with high-quality [111,127,128]. In Western countries more than 50% of patients have at least one genomic aberration potentially amenable to specific therapeutic intervention [129]. Furthermore, the Lung Cancer Mutations Consortium has recently published their data showing that for patients harboring an actionable oncogenic driver treated with genotype-directed therapy the median survival is more than three years [7]. Although, this is a highly selected patient population it clearly shows that advances in the molecular understanding and novel treatment options during the last decade have significantly improved the outcome for a subgroup of NSCLC patients. However, as treating physicians and specialists in thoracic oncology we should not forget about the still larger subgroup of NSCLC patients not harboring an actionable genomic aberration. Beside putting our research focus on the detection of novel potentially predictive biomarkers, the investigation of new more specific and more potent inhibitors of specific signaling pathways further examination of potential resistance mechanisms in patients progressing during therapy with a targeted molecule and the investigation of novel treatment approaches with activity in the resistant setting are urgently needed.
Current international guidelines recommend analysis of the following seven genes before starting palliative intent therapy for lung adenocarcinoma: KRAS, EGFR, ALK, ROS1, HER2, BRAF, RET [130]. However, only for EGFR and ALK approved therapies are currently available. With the growing number of genomic drivers and novel molecularly targeted agents in incrementally smaller patient subgroups it’s a basic necessity to establish collaborative groups and foster preclinical and clinical research. Furthermore, novel approaches in clinical research have to be determined as the evaluation of targeted therapies can be highly challenging when the genomic aberrations are very rare. Recently, a novel trial design (so called “basket trials”) have been initiated. These trials include patients based on the presence of a predictive molecular marker independent of the tumor histology [131]. Recently, first results of the CUSTOM (Molecular Profiling and Targeted Therapies in Advanced Thoracic Malignancies) have been reported [132]. This trial was seeking to identify molecular biomarkers in advanced NSCLC, small-cell lung cancer, and thymic malignancies and to simultaneously evaluate five targeted therapies in patients grouped by molecular markers along with tumor histology. The five targeted therapies included erlotinib (EGFR mutations), the MEK inhibitor selumetinib (KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations), the AKT inhibitor MK2206 (PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN mutations), lapatinib (HER2 mutations), and sunitinib (KIT and PDGFRA mutations).
Another challenge with the growing number of targeted therapies is how to overcome the inevitable acquired resistance to these therapies. The concept of repeated biopsies at the time of tumor progression to investigate the specific resistance mechanism is nowadays an established approach and indispensable component of clinical trials. The optimal sequence for the use of multiple inhibitors, potential combinations of targeted therapeutics with each other, with chemotherapy or with immunotherapeutic approaches or the intercalation of these different treatment options as well as the tolerability of these approaches are currently investigated.
Although metastatic NSCLC is still an incurable disease, recent advantages in the understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms, the implementation of high-throughput technologies including next-generation sequencing in the clinical diagnostic and the discovery of targeted therapeutics have clearly improved the prognosis and quality of life for a substantial group of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Conflicts of Interest

The author has received honoraria as an advisor for BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche and honoraria for invited talks for BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis and Roche.


  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015, 65, 5–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Travis, W.; Brambilla, E.; Mueller-Hermelink, H.; Harris, C.; Harris, C. (Eds.) Pathology and Genetics: Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart, 3rd ed.; World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004; Volume 10.
  3. Paez, J.G.; Janne, P.A.; Lee, J.C.; Tracy, S.; Greulich, H.; Gabriel, S.; Herman, P.; Kaye, F.J.; Lindeman, N.; Boggon, T.J.; et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: Correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004, 304, 1497–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lynch, T.J.; Bell, D.W.; Sordella, R.; Gurubhagavatula, S.; Okimoto, R.A.; Brannigan, B.W.; Harris, P.L.; Haserlat, S.M.; Supko, J.G.; Haluska, F.G.; et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 2129–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kwak, E.L.; Bang, Y.J.; Camidge, D.R.; Shaw, A.T.; Solomon, B.; Maki, R.G.; Ou, S.H.; Dezube, B.J.; Janne, P.A.; Costa, D.B.; et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1693–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shaw, A.T.; Kim, D.W.; Nakagawa, K.; Seto, T.; Crino, L.; Ahn, M.J.; de Pas, T.; Besse, B.; Solomon, B.J.; Blackhall, F.; et al. Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 2385–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kris, M.G.; Johnson, B.E.; Berry, L.D.; Kwiatkowski, D.J.; Iafrate, A.J.; Wistuba, I.I.; Varella-Garcia, M.; Franklin, W.A.; Aronson, S.L.; Su, P.-F.; et al. Using multiplexed assays of oncogenic drivers in lung cancers to select targeted drugs. JAMA 2014, 311, 1998–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Oxnard, G.R.; Binder, A.; Jänne, P.A. New targetable oncogenes in non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 1097–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Birchmeier, C.; O’Neill, K.; Riggs, M.; Wigler, M. Characterization of ROS1 cDNA from a human glioblastoma cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 4799–4803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Birchmeier, C.; Sharma, S.; Wigler, M. Expression and rearrangement of the ROS1 gene in human glioblastoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 9270–9274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Charest, A.; Wilker, E.W.; McLaughlin, M.E.; Lane, K.; Gowda, R.; Coven, S.; McMahon, K.; Kovach, S.; Feng, Y.; Yaffe, M.B.; et al. ROS fusion tyrosine kinase activates a SH2 domain-containing phosphatase-2/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling axis to form glioblastoma in mice. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 7473–7481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Charest, A.; Lane, K.; McMahon, K.; Park, J.; Preisinger, E.; Conroy, H.; Housman, D. Fusion of FIG to the receptor tyrosine kinase ROS in a glioblastoma with an interstitial del(6)(q21q21). Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003, 37, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rikova, K.; Guo, A.; Zeng, Q.; Possemato, A.; Yu, J.; Haack, H.; Nardone, J.; Lee, K.; Reeves, C.; Li, Y.; et al. Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell 2007, 131, 1190–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Takeuchi, K.; Soda, M.; Togashi, Y.; Suzuki, R.; Sakata, S.; Hatano, S.; Asaka, R.; Hamanaka, W.; Ninomiya, H.; Uehara, H.; et al. RET, ROS1 and ALK fusions in lung cancer. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bergethon, K.; Shaw, A.T.; Ou, S.H.; Katayama, R.; Lovly, C.M.; McDonald, N.T.; Massion, P.P.; Siwak-Tapp, C.; Gonzalez, A.; Fang, R.; et al. ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Davies, K.D.; Le, A.T.; Theodoro, M.F.; Skokan, M.C.; Aisner, D.L.; Berge, E.M.; Terracciano, L.M.; Cappuzzo, F.; Incarbone, M.; Roncalli, M.; et al. Identifying and targeting ROS1 gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 4570–4579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shaw, A.T.; Ou, S.-H.I.; Bang, Y.-J.; Camidge, D.R.; Solomon, B.J.; Salgia, R.; Riely, G.J.; Varella-Garcia, M.; Shapiro, G.I.; Costa, D.B.; et al. Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mazieres, J.; Zalcman, G.; Crino, L.; Biondani, P.; Barlesi, F.; Filleron, T.; Dingemans, A.M.; Léna, H.; Monnet, I.; Rothschild, S.I.; et al. Crizotinib therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma and a ROS1 rearrangement: Results from the EUROS1 cohort. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 992–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Awad, M.M.; Katayama, R.; McTigue, M.; Liu, W.; Deng, Y.-L.; Brooun, A.; Friboulet, L.; Huang, D.; Falk, M.D.; Timofeevski, S.; et al. Acquired resistance to crizotinib from a mutation in CD74-ROS1. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 2395–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Davies, K.D.; Mahale, S.; Astling, D.P.; Aisner, D.L.; Le, A.T.; Hinz, T.K.; Vaishnavi, A.; Bunn, P.A.; Heasley, L.E.; Tan, A.-C.; et al. Resistance to ROS1 inhibition mediated by EGFR pathway activation in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Song, A.; Kim, T.M.; Kim, D.-W.; Kim, S.; Keam, B.; Lee, S.-H.; Heo, D.S. Molecular changes associated with acquired resistance to crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clin. Cancer Res. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Katayama, R.; Kobayashi, Y.; Friboulet, L.; Lockerman, E.L.; Koike, S.; Shaw, A.T.; Engelman, J.A.; Fujita, N. Cabozantinib overcomes crizotinib resistance in ROS1 fusion positive cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 21, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Katayama, R.; Khan, T.M.; Benes, C.; Lifshits, E.; Ebi, H.; Rivera, V.M.; Shakespeare, W.C.; Iafrate, A.J.; Engelman, J.A.; Shaw, A.T. Therapeutic strategies to overcome crizotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancers harboring the fusion oncogene EML4-ALK. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7535–7540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Davare, M.A.; Saborowski, A.; Eide, C.A.; Tognon, C.; Smith, R.L.; Elferich, J.; Agarwal, A.; Tyner, J.W.; Shinde, U.P.; Lowe, S.W.; et al. Foretinib is a potent inhibitor of oncogenic ROS1 fusion proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 19519–19524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zou, H.Y.; Li, Q.; Engstrom, L.D.; West, M.; Appleman, V.; Wong, K.A.; McTigue, M.; Deng, Y.-L.; Liu, W.; Brooun, A.; et al. PF-06463922 is a potent and selective next-generation ROS1/ALK inhibitor capable of blocking crizotinib-resistant ROS1 mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3493–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sang, J.; Acquaviva, J.; Friedland, J.C.; Smith, D.L.; Sequeira, M.; Zhang, C.; Jiang, Q.; Xue, L.; Lovly, C.M.; Jimenez, J.-P.; et al. Targeted inhibition of the molecular chaperone Hsp90 overcomes ALK inhibitor resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2013, 3, 430–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Davies, H.; Bignell, G.R.; Cox, C.; Stephens, P.; Edkins, S.; Clegg, S.; Teague, J.; Woffendin, H.; Garnett, M.J.; Bottomley, W.; et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 2002, 417, 949–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yuen, S.T.; Davies, H.; Chan, T.L.; Ho, J.W.; Bignell, G.R.; Cox, C.; Stephens, P.; Edkins, S.; Tsui, W.W.; Chan, A.S.; et al. Similarity of the phenotypic patterns associated with BRAF and KRAS mutations in colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 6451–6455. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Kimura, E.T.; Nikiforova, M.N.; Zhu, Z.; Knauf, J.A.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Fagin, J.A. High prevalence of BRAF mutations in thyroid cancer: Genetic evidence for constitutive activation of the RET/PTC-RAS-BRAF signaling pathway in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 1454–1457. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Hauschild, A.; Grob, J.-J.; Demidov, L.V.; Jouary, T.; Gutzmer, R.; Millward, M.; Rutkowski, P.; Blank, C.U.; Miller, W.H.; Kaempgen, E.; et al. Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: A multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012, 380, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. McArthur, G.A.; Chapman, P.B.; Robert, C.; Larkin, J.; Haanen, J.B.; Dummer, R.; Ribas, A.; Hogg, D.; Hamid, O.; Ascierto, P.A.; et al. Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAF(V600E) and BRAF(V600K) mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): Extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Naoki, K.; Chen, T.H.; Richards, W.G.; Sugarbaker, D.J.; Meyerson, M. Missense mutations of the BRAF gene in human lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 7001–7003. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Marchetti, A.; Felicioni, L.; Malatesta, S.; Grazia Sciarrotta, M.; Guetti, L.; Chella, A.; Viola, P.; Pullara, C.; Mucilli, F.; Buttitta, F. Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring BRAF mutations. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 3574–3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Paik, P.K.; Arcila, M.E.; Fara, M.; Sima, C.S.; Miller, V.A.; Kris, M.G.; Ladanyi, M.; Riely, G.J. Clinical characteristics of patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring BRAF mutations. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 2046–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Planchard, D.; Mazieres, J.; Riely, G.J.; Rudin, C.M.; Barlesi, F.; Quoix, E.A.; Souquet, P.J.; Socinski, M.A.; Switzky, J.; Ma, B.; et al. Interim results of phase II study BRF113928 of dabrafenib in BRAF V600E mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 8009. [Google Scholar]
  36. Robinson, S.D.; O’Shaughnessy, J.A.; Cowey, C.L.; Konduri, K. BRAF V600E-mutated lung adenocarcinoma with metastases to the brain responding to treatment with vemurafenib. Lung Cancer 2014, 85, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Peters, S.; Michielin, O.; Zimmermann, S. Dramatic response induced by vemurafenib in a BRAF V600E-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, e341–e344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bahadoran, P.; Allegra, M.; Le Duff, F.; Long-Mira, E.; Hofman, P.; Giacchero, D.; Passeron, T.; Lacour, J.-P.; Ballotti, R. Major clinical response to a BRAF inhibitor in a patient with a BRAF L597R-mutated melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, e324–e326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gautschi, O.; Pauli, C.; Strobel, K.; Hirschmann, A.; Printzen, G.; Aebi, S.; Diebold, J. A patient with BRAF V600E lung adenocarcinoma responding to vemurafenib. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2012, 7, e23–e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yang, H.; Higgins, B.; Kolinsky, K.; Packman, K.; Go, Z.; Iyer, R.; Kolis, S.; Zhao, S.; Lee, R.; Grippo, J.F.; et al. RG7204 (PLX4032), a selective BRAFV600E inhibitor, displays potent antitumor activity in preclinical melanoma models. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 5518–5527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Gautschi, O.; Peters, S.; Zoete, V.; Aebersold-Keller, F.; Strobel, K.; Schwizer, B.; Hirschmann, A.; Michielin, O.; Diebold, J. Lung adenocarcinoma with BRAF G469L mutation refractory to vemurafenib. Lung Cancer 2013, 82, 365–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Schmid, S.; Siano, M.; Joerger, M.; Rodriguez, R.; Müller, J.; Früh, M. Response to dabrafenib after progression on vemurafenib in a patient with advanced BRAF V600E-mutant bronchial adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 2015, 87, 85–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Flaherty, K.T.; Robert, C.; Hersey, P.; Nathan, P.; Garbe, C.; Milhem, M.; Demidov, L.V.; Hassel, J.C.; Rutkowski, P.; Mohr, P.; et al. Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pratilas, C.A.; Hanrahan, A.J.; Halilovic, E.; Persaud, Y.; Soh, J.; Chitale, D.; Shigematsu, H.; Yamamoto, H.; Sawai, A.; Janakiraman, M.; et al. Genetic predictors of MEK dependence in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 9375–9383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Joshi, M.; Rice, S.J.; Liu, X.; Miller, B.; Belani, C.P. Trametinib with or without Vemurafenib in BRAF Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Santos, E.; Martin-Zanca, D.; Reddy, E.P.; Pierotti, M.A.; Della Porta, G.; Barbacid, M. Malignant activation of a K-ras oncogene in lung carcinoma but not in normal tissue of the same patient. Science 1984, 223, 661–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sequist, L.V.; Heist, R.S.; Shaw, A.T.; Fidias, P.; Rosovsky, R.; Temel, J.S.; Lennes, I.T.; Digumarthy, S.; Waltman, B.A.; Bast, E.; et al. Implementing multiplexed genotyping of non-small-cell lung cancers into routine clinical practice. Ann. Oncol. 2011, 22, 2616–2624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Riely, G.J.; Kris, M.G.; Rosenbaum, D.; Marks, J.; Li, A.; Chitale, D.A.; Nafa, K.; Riedel, E.R.; Hsu, M.; Pao, W.; et al. Frequency and distinctive spectrum of KRAS mutations in never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 5731–5734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sun, Y.; Ren, Y.; Fang, Z.; Li, C.; Fang, R.; Gao, B.; Han, X.; Tian, W.; Pao, W.; Chen, H.; et al. Lung adenocarcinoma from East Asian never-smokers is a disease largely defined by targetable oncogenic mutant kinases. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 4616–4620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Shepherd, F.A.; Domerg, C.; Hainaut, P.; Jänne, P.A.; Pignon, J.-P.; Graziano, S.; Douillard, J.-Y.; Brambilla, E.; Le Chevalier, T.; Seymour, L.; et al. Pooled analysis of the prognostic and predictive effects of KRAS mutation status and KRAS mutation subtype in early-stage resected non-small-cell lung cancer in four trials of adjuvant chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2173–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mascaux, C.; Iannino, N.; Martin, B.; Paesmans, M.; Berghmans, T.; Dusart, M.; Haller, A.; Lothaire, P.; Meert, A.-P.; Noel, S.; et al. The role of RAS oncogene in survival of patients with lung cancer: A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 92, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kalikaki, A.; Koutsopoulos, A.; Hatzidaki, D.; Trypaki, M.; Kontopodis, E.; Stathopoulos, E.; Mavroudis, D.; Georgoulias, V.; Voutsina, A. Clinical outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving front-line chemotherapy according to EGFR and K-RAS mutation status. Lung Cancer 2010, 69, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Camps, C.; Jantus-Lewintre, E.; Cabrera, A.; Blasco, A.; Sanmartín, E.; Gallach, S.; Caballero, C.; del Pozo, N.; Rosell, R.; Guijarro, R.; et al. The identification of KRAS mutations at codon 12 in plasma DNA is not a prognostic factor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 2011, 72, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cappuzzo, F.; Ciuleanu, T.; Stelmakh, L.; Cicenas, S.; Szczesna, A.; Juhasz, E.; Esteban, E.; Molinier, O.; Brugger, W.; Melezinek, I.; et al. Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Pao, W.; Wang, T.Y.; Riely, G.J.; Miller, V.A.; Pan, Q.; Ladanyi, M.; Zakowski, M.F.; Heelan, R.T.; Kris, M.G.; Varmus, H.E. KRAS mutations and primary resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib. PLoS Med. 2005, 2, e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  56. Linardou, H.; Dahabreh, I.J.; Kanaloupiti, D.; Siannis, F.; Bafaloukos, D.; Kosmidis, P.; Papadimitriou, C.A.; Murray, S. Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9, 962–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Adjei, A.A.; Mauer, A.; Bruzek, L.; Marks, R.S.; Hillman, S.; Geyer, S.; Hanson, L.J.; Wright, J.J.; Erlichman, C.; Kaufmann, S.H.; et al. Phase II study of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 1760–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jänne, P.A.; Shaw, A.T.; Pereira, J.R.; Jeannin, G.; Vansteenkiste, J.; Barrios, C.; Franke, F.A.; Grinsted, L.; Zazulina, V.; Smith, P.; et al. Selumetinib plus docetaxel for KRAS-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gandara, D.R.; Hiret, S.; Blumenschein, G.R.; Barlesi, F.; Delord, J.-P.; Madelaine, J.; Infante, J.R.; Reckamp, K.L.; Lara, P.; Audebert, C.; et al. Oral MEK1/MEK2 inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212) in combination with docetaxel in KRAS-mutant and wild-type (WT) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A phase I/Ib trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 8028. [Google Scholar]
  60. Blumenschein, G.R.; Smit, E.F.; Planchard, D.; Kim, D.-W.; Cadranel, J.; de Pas, T.; Dunphy, F.; Udud, K.; Ahn, M.-J.; Hanna, N.H.; et al. MEK114653, A randomized, multicenter, phase II study to assess efficacy and safety of trametinib (T) compared with docetaxel (D) in KRAS-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 8029. [Google Scholar]
  61. Konstantinidou, G.; Bey, E.A.; Rabellino, A.; Schuster, K.; Maira, M.S.; Gazdar, A.F.; Amici, A.; Boothman, D.A.; Scaglioni, P.P. Dual phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin blockade is an effective radiosensitizing strategy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer harboring K-RAS mutations. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 7644–7652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Konstantinidou, G.; Ramadori, G.; Torti, F.; Kangasniemi, K.; Ramirez, R.E.; Cai, Y.; Behrens, C.; Dellinger, M.T.; Brekken, R.A.; Wistuba, I.I.; et al. RHOA-FAK is a required signaling axis for the maintenance of KRAS-driven lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer Discov. 2013, 3, 444–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ostrem, J.M.; Peters, U.; Sos, M.L.; Wells, J.A.; Shokat, K.M. K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature 2013, 503, 548–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hunter, J.C.; Gurbani, D.; Ficarro, S.B.; Carrasco, M.A.; Lim, S.M.; Choi, H.G.; Xie, T.; Marto, J.A.; Chen, Z.; Gray, N.S.; et al. In situ selectivity profiling and crystal structure of SML-8-73-1, an active site inhibitor of oncogenic K-Ras G12C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 8895–8900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ohashi, K.; Sequist L, V.; Arcila, M.E.; Lovly, C.M.; Chen, X.; Rudin, C.M.; Moran, T.; Camidge, D.R.; Vnencak-Jones, C.L.; Berry, L.; et al. Characteristics of lung cancers harboring NRAS mutations. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 2584–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Swain, S.M.; Kim, S.-B.; Cortés, J.; Ro, J.; Semiglazov, V.; Campone, M.; Ciruelos, E.; Ferrero, J.-.M.; Schneeweiss, A.; Knott, A.; et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA study): Overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Verma, S.; Miles, D.; Gianni, L.; Krop, I.E.; Welslau, M.; Baselga, J.; Pegram, M.; Oh, D.-Y.; Diéras, V.; Guardino, E.; et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1783–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Geyer, C.E.; Forster, J.; Lindquist, D.; Chan, S.; Romieu, C.G.; Pienkowski, T.; Jagiello-Gruszfeld, A.; Crown, J.; Chan, A.; Kaufman, B.; et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 2733–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hirsch, F.R.; Varella-Garcia, M.; Franklin, W.A.; Veve, R.; Chen, L.; Helfrich, B.; Zeng, C.; Baron, A.; Bunn, P.A.; Bunn, P.A., Jr. Evaluation of HER-2/neu gene amplification and protein expression in non-small cell lung carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer 2002, 86, 1449–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Heinmoller, P.; Gross, C.; Beyser, K.; Schmidtgen, C.; Maass, G.; Pedrocchi, M.; Ruschoff, J. HER2 status in non-small cell lung cancer: Results from patient screening for enrollment to a phase II study of herceptin. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 5238–5243. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  71. Liu, L.; Shao, X.; Gao, W.; Bai, J.; Wang, R.; Huang, P.; Yin, Y.; Liu, P.; Shu, Y. The role of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 as a prognostic factor in lung cancer: A meta-analysis of published data. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010, 5, 1922–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Arcila, M.E.; Chaft, J.E.; Nafa, K.L.; Roy-Chowdhuri, S.; Lau, C.; Zaidinski, M.; Paik, P.K.; Zakowski, M.F.; Kris, M.G.; Ladanyi, M. Prevalence, clinicopathologic associations, and molecular spectrum of ERBB2 (HER2) tyrosine kinase mutations in lung adenocarcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 4910–4918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Stephens, P.; Hunter, C.; Bignell, G.; Edkins, S.; Davies, H.; Teague, J.; Stevens, C.; O’Meara, S.; Smith, R.; Parker, A.; et al. Lung cancer: Intragenic ERBB2 kinase mutations in tumours. Nature 2004, 431, 525–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Shigematsu, H.; Takahashi, T.; Nomura, M.; Majmudar, K.; Suzuki, M.; Lee, H.; Wistuba, I.I.; Fong, K.M.; Toyooka, S.; Shimizu, N.; et al. Somatic mutations of the HER2 kinase domain in lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 1642–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gatzemeier, U.; Groth, G.; Butts, C.; van Zandwijk, N.; Shepherd, F.; Ardizzoni, A.; Barton, C.; Ghahramani, P.; Hirsh, V. Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine-cisplatin with or without trastuzumab in HER2-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2004, 15, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zinner, R.G.; Glisson, B.S.; Fossella, F.V.; Pisters, K.M.W.; Kies, M.S.; Lee, P.M.; Massarelli, E.; Sabloff, B.; Fritsche, H.A.; Ro, J.Y.; et al. Trastuzumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with Her2-overexpressing, untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Report of a phase II trial and findings regarding optimal identification of patients with Her2-overexpressing d. Lung Cancer 2004, 44, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ross, H.J.; Blumenschein, G.R.; Aisner, J.; Damjanov, N.; Dowlati, A.; Garst, J.; Rigas, J.R.; Smylie, M.; Hassani, H.; Allen, K.E.; et al. Randomized phase II multicenter trial of two schedules of lapatinib as first- or second-line monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 1938–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Mazières, J.; Peters, S.; Lepage, B.; Cortot, A.B.; Barlesi, F.; Beau-Faller, M.; Besse, B.; Blons, H.; Mansuet-Lupo, A.; Urban, T.; et al. Lung cancer that harbors an HER2 mutation: Epidemiologic characteristics and therapeutic perspectives. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 1997–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. De Grève, J.; Teugels, E.; Geers, C.; Decoster, L.; Galdermans, D.; de Mey, J.; Everaert, H.; Umelo, I.; In’t Veld, P.; Schallier, D. Clinical activity of afatinib (BIBW 2992) in patients with lung adenocarcinoma with mutations in the kinase domain of HER2/neu. Lung Cancer 2012, 76, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Gandhi, L.; Bahleda, R.; Tolaney, S.M.; Kwak, E.L.; Cleary, J.M.; Pandya, S.S.; Hollebecque, A.; Abbas, R.; Ananthakrishnan, R.; Berkenblit, A.; et al. Phase I study of neratinib in combination with temsirolimus in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-dependent and other solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 32, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Onozato, R.; Kosaka, T.; Kuwano, H.; Sekido, Y.; Yatabe, Y.; Mitsudomi, T. Activation of MET by gene amplification or by splice mutations deleting the juxtamembrane domain in primary resected lung cancers. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2009, 4, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Seo, J.-S.; Ju, Y.S.; Lee, W.-C.; Shin, J.-Y.; Lee, J.K.; Bleazard, T.; Lee, J.; Jung, Y.J.; Kim, J.-O.; Shin, J.-Y.; et al. The transcriptional landscape and mutational profile of lung adenocarcinoma. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 2109–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Beau-Faller, M.; Ruppert, A.-M.; Voegeli, A.-C.; Neuville, A.; Meyer, N.; Guerin, E.; Legrain, M.; Mennecier, B.; Wihlm, J.-M.; Massard, G.; et al. MET gene copy number in non-small cell lung cancer: Molecular analysis in a targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor naïve cohort. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2008, 3, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cappuzzo, F.; Marchetti, A.; Skokan, M.; Rossi, E.; Gajapathy, S.; Felicioni, L.; Del Grammastro, M.; Sciarrotta, M.G.; Buttitta, F.; Incarbone, M.; et al. Increased MET gene copy number negatively affects survival of surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer patients. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 1667–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Tsao, M.S.; Liu, N.; Chen, J.R.; Pappas, J.; Ho, J.; To, C.; Viallet, J.; Park, M.; Zhu, H. Differential expression of Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor in subtypes of non-small cell lung cancers. Lung Cancer 1998, 20, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ichimura, E.; Maeshima, A.; Nakajima, T.; Nakamura, T. Expression of c-met/HGF receptor in human non-small cell lung carcinomas in vitro and in vivo and its prognostic significance. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1996, 87, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Engelman, J.A.; Zejnullahu, K.; Mitsudomi, T.; Song, Y.; Hyland, C.; Park, J.O.; Lindeman, N.; Gale, C.-M.M.; Zhao, X.; Christensen, J.; et al. MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science 2007, 316, 1039–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Bean, J.; Brennan, C.; Shih, J.-Y.; Riely, G.; Viale, A.; Wang, L.; Chitale, D.; Motoi, N.; Szoke, J.; Broderick, S.; et al. MET amplification occurs with or without T790M mutations in EGFR mutant lung tumors with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 20932–20937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Spigel, D.R.; Ervin, T.J.; Ramlau, R.A.; Daniel, D.B.; Goldschmidt, J.H., Jr.; Blumenschein, G.R., Jr.; Krzakowski, M.J.; Robinet, G.; Godbert, B.; Barlesi, F.; et al. Randomized phase II trial of onartuzumab in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Spigel, D.R.; Edelman, M.J.; O’Byrne, K.; Paz-Ares, L.; Shames, D.S.; Yu, W.; Paton, V.E.; Mok, T.; Sarah Cannon Research Institute; Nashville, T.N.; et al. Onartuzumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib in previously treated stage IIIb or IV NSCLC: Results from the pivotal phase III randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled METLung (OAM4971g) global trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 8000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Patnaik, A.; Weiss, G.J.; Papadopoulos, K.P.; Hofmeister, C.C.; Tibes, R.; Tolcher, A.; Isaacs, R.; Jac, J.; Han, M.; Payumo, F.C.; et al. Phase I ficlatuzumab monotherapy or with erlotinib for refractory advanced solid tumours and multiple myeloma. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 111, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Gordon, M.S.; Sweeney, C.S.; Mendelson, D.S.; Eckhardt, S.G.; Anderson, A.; Beaupre, D.M.; Branstetter, D.; Burgess, T.L.; Coxon, A.; Deng, H.; et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AMG 102, a fully human hepatocyte growth factor-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, in a first-in-human study of patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 699–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Sequist, L.V.; von Pawel, J.; Garmey, E.G.; Akerley, W.L.; Brugger, W.; Ferrari, D.; Chen, Y.; Costa, D.B.; Gerber, D.E.; Orlov, S.; et al. Randomized phase II study of erlotinib plus tivantinib versus erlotinib plus placebo in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 3307–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Scagliotti, G.; Novello, S.; Ramlau, R.; Favaretto, A.; Barlesi, F.; Akerley, W.; von Pawel, J.; Shuster, D.; Schwartz, B.; Sandler, A. MARQUEE: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of tivantinib (ARQ 197) plus erlotinib versus placebo plus erlotinib in previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic, non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In Proceedings of the 17th ECCO-38th ESMO-32nd ESTRO European Cancer Congress 2013, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 27 September–1 October 2013.
  95. Calles, A.; Kwiatkowski, N.; Cammarata, B.K.; Ercan, D.; Gray, N.S.; Jänne, P.A. Tivantinib (ARQ 197) efficacy is independent of MET inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines. Mol. Oncol. 2015, 9, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Zou, H.Y.; Li, Q.; Lee, J.H.; Arango, M.E.; McDonnell, S.R.; Yamazaki, S.; Koudriakova, T.B.; Alton, G.; Cui, J.J.; Kung, P.P.; et al. An orally available small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, PF-2341066, exhibits cytoreductive antitumor efficacy through antiproliferative and antiangiogenic mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 4408–4417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Ou, S.H.; Kwak, E.L.; Siwak-Tapp, C.; Dy, J.; Bergethon, K.; Clark, J.W.; Camidge, D.R.; Solomon, B.J.; Maki, R.G.; Bang, Y.J.; et al. Activity of crizotinib (PF02341066), a dual mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, in a non-small cell lung cancer patient with de novo MET amplification. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2011, 6, 942–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wells, S.A., Jr.; Santoro, M. Targeting the RET pathway in thyroid cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 7119–7123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Santoro, M.; Chiappetta, G.; Cerrato, A.; Salvatore, D.; Zhang, L.; Manzo, G.; Picone, A.; Portella, G.; Santelli, G.; Vecchio, G.; et al. Development of thyroid papillary carcinomas secondary to tissue-specific expression of the RET/PTC1 oncogene in transgenic mice. Oncogene 1996, 12, 1821–1826. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Wang, R.; Hu, H.; Pan, Y.; Li, Y.; Ye, T.; Li, C.; Luo, X.; Wang, L.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; et al. RET fusions define a unique molecular and clinicopathologic subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 4352–4359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Varella-Garcia, M.; Xu, L.G.; Mahale, S.; Berge, E.M.; Bennati, C.; Le, A.T.; Aisner, D.; Crinò, L.; Bunn, P.A.; Camidge, D.R.; et al. RET rearrangements detected by FISH in “pan-negative” lung adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 8024. [Google Scholar]
  102. Lipson, D.; Capelletti, M.; Yelensky, R.; Otto, G.; Parker, A.; Jarosz, M.; Curran, J.A.; Balasubramanian, S.; Bloom, T.; Brennan, K.W.; et al. Identification of new ALK and RET gene fusions from colorectal and lung cancer biopsies. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 382–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kohno, T.; Ichikawa, H.; Totoki, Y.; Yasuda, K.; Hiramoto, M.; Nammo, T.; Sakamoto, H.; Tsuta, K.; Furuta, K.; Shimada, Y.; et al. KIF5B-RET fusions in lung adenocarcinoma. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 375–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Drilon, A.; Wang, L.; Hasanovic, A.; Suehara, Y.; Lipson, D.; Stephens, P.; Ross, J.; Miller, V.; Ginsberg, M.; Zakowski, M.F.; et al. Response to Cabozantinib in patients with RET fusion-positive lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer Discov. 2013, 3, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Suzuki, M.; Makinoshima, H.; Matsumoto, S.; Suzuki, A.; Mimaki, S.; Matsushima, K.; Yoh, K.; Goto, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Ishii, G.; et al. Identification of a lung adenocarcinoma cell line with CCDC6-RET fusion gene and the effect of RET inhibitors in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Sci. 2013, 104, 896–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Kodama, T.; Tsukaguchi, T.; Satoh, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Watanabe, Y.; Kondoh, O.; Sakamoto, H. Alectinib shows potent antitumor activity against RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 2910–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Falchook, G.S.; Ordóñez, N.G.; Bastida, C.C.; Stephens, P.J.; Miller, V.A.; Gaido, L.; Jackson, T.; Karp, D.D. Effect of the RET inhibitor vandetanib in a patient with RET fusion-positive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gautschi, O.; Zander, T.; Keller, F.A.; Strobel, K.; Hirschmann, A.; Aebi, S.; Diebold, J. A patient with lung adenocarcinoma and RET fusion treated with vandetanib. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2013, 8, e43–e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kawano, O.; Sasaki, H.; Endo, K.; Suzuki, E.; Haneda, H.; Yukiue, H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yano, M.; Fujii, Y. PIK3CA mutation status in Japanese lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 2006, 54, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Kawano, O.; Sasaki, H.; Okuda, K.; Yukiue, H.; Yokoyama, T.; Yano, M.; Fujii, Y. PIK3CA gene amplification in Japanese non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2007, 58, 159–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers. Nature 2012, 489, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Chaft, J.E.; Arcila, M.E.; Paik, P.K.; Lau, C.; Riely, G.J.; Pietanza, M.C.; Zakowski, M.F.; Rusch, V.; Sima, C.S.; Ladanyi, M.; et al. Coexistence of PIK3CA and other oncogene mutations in lung adenocarcinoma-rationale for comprehensive mutation profiling. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sequist, L.V.; Waltman, B.A.; Dias-Santagata, D.; Digumarthy, S.; Turke, A.B.; Fidias, P.; Bergethon, K.; Shaw, A.T.; Gettinger, S.; Cosper, A.K.; et al. Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011, 3, 75ra26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Engelman, J.A.; Chen, L.; Tan, X.; Crosby, K.; Guimaraes, A.R.; Upadhyay, R.; Maira, M.; McNamara, K.; Perera, S.A.; Song, Y.; et al. Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Dutt, A.; Ramos, A.H.; Hammerman, P.S.; Mermel, C.; Cho, J.; Sharifnia, T.; Chande, A.; Tanaka, K.E.; Stransky, N.; Greulich, H.; et al. Inhibitor-sensitive FGFR1 amplification in human non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  116. Weiss, J.; Sos, M.L.; Seidel, D.; Peifer, M.; Zander, T.; Heuckmann, J.M.; Ullrich, R.T.; Menon, R.; Maier, S.; Soltermann, A.; et al. Frequent and focal FGFR1 amplification associates with therapeutically tractable FGFR1 dependency in squamous cell lung cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. 2010, 2, 62ra93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Kim, H.R.; Kim, D.J.; Kang, D.R.; Lee, J.G.; Lim, S.M.; Lee, C.Y.; Rha, S.Y.; Bae, M.K.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, S.H.; et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene amplification is associated with poor survival and cigarette smoking dosage in patients with resected squamous cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Heist, R.S.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Sequist, L.V.; Tammireddy, S.; Morrissey, L.; Christiani, D.C.; Engelman, J.A.; Iafrate, A.J. FGFR1 amplification in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2012, 7, 1775–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Liao, R.G.; Jung, J.; Tchaicha, J.; Wilkerson, M.D.; Sivachenko, A.; Beauchamp, E.M.; Liu, Q.; Pugh, T.J.; Pedamallu, C.S.; Hayes, D.N.; et al. Inhibitor-sensitive FGFR2 and FGFR3 mutations in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 5195–5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Vogel, W. Discoidin domain receptors: structural relations and functional implications. FASEB J. 1999, 13, S77–S82. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  121. Hammerman, P.S.; Sos, M.L.; Ramos, A.H.; Xu, C.; Dutt, A.; Zhou, W.; Brace, L.E.; Woods, B.A.; Lin, W.; Zhang, J.; et al. Mutations in the DDR2 kinase gene identify a novel therapeutic target in squamous cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2011, 1, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Marks, J.L.; Gong, Y.; Chitale, D.; Golas, B.; McLellan, M.D.; Kasai, Y.; Ding, L.; Mardis, E.R.; Wilson, R.K.; Solit, D.; et al. Novel MEK1 mutation identified by mutational analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway genes in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 5524–5528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Vaishnavi, A.; Capelletti, M.; Le, A.T.; Kako, S.; Butaney, M.; Ercan, D.; Mahale, S.; Davies, K.D.; Aisner, D.L.; Pilling, A.B.; et al. Oncogenic and drug-sensitive NTRK1 rearrangements in lung cancer. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1469–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. De Braud, F.G.; Pilla, L.; Niger, M.; Damian, S.; Bardazza, B.; Martinetti, A.; Pelosi, G.; Marrapese, G.; Palmeri, L.; Cerea, G.; et al. Phase 1 open label, dose escalation study of RXDX101, an oral pan-trk, ROS1, and ALK inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors with relevant molecular alterations. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 2502. [Google Scholar]
  125. Tang, J.-M.; He, Q.-Y.; Guo, R.-X.; Chang, X.-J. Phosphorylated Akt overexpression and loss of PTEN expression in non-small cell lung cancer confers poor prognosis. Lung Cancer 2006, 51, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Jin, G.; Kim, M.J.; Jeon, H.-S.; Choi, J.E.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, E.B.; Cha, S.I.; Yoon, G.S.; Kim, C.H.; Jung, T.H.; et al. PTEN mutations and relationship to EGFR, ERBB2, KRAS, and TP53 mutations in non-small cell lung cancers. Lung Cancer 2010, 69, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Ding, L.; Getz, G.; Wheeler, D.A.; Mardis, E.R.; McLellan, M.D.; Cibulskis, K.; Sougnez, C.; Greulich, H.; Muzny, D.M.; Morgan, M.B.; et al. Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 2008, 455, 1069–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Kim, S.C.; Jung, Y.; Park, J.; Cho, S.; Seo, C.; Kim, J.; Kim, P.; Park, J.; Seo, J.; Kim, J.; et al. A high-dimensional, deep-sequencing study of lung adenocarcinoma in female never-smokers. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. The Clinical Lung Cancer Genome Project (CLCGP) and Network Genomic Medicine (NGM). A genomics-based classification of human lung tumors. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 209ra153. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  130. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; NCCN: Fort Washington, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  131. Redig, A.J.; Jänne, P.A. Basket trials and the evolution of clinical trial design in an era of genomic medicine. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lopez-Chavez, A.; Thomas, A.; Rajan, A.; Raffeld, M.; Morrow, B.; Kelly, R.; Carter, C.A.; Guha, U.; Killian, K.; Lau, C.C.; et al. Molecular profiling and targeted therapy for advanced thoracic malignancies: A Biomarker-derived, multiarm, multihistology phase II basket trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers EISSN 2072-6694 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top