1. Introduction
Breast cancer remains one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in women worldwide [
1]. With continued advances in early detection and screening, the incidence has increased approximately 1% annually [
2]. In the United States in 2024, an estimated 310,720 new breast cancer cases were diagnosed in women, representing over 30% of all female cancer diagnoses [
3]. Many breast cancers express several protein receptors that serve as therapeutic targets, including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Approximately 15% of breast cancers lack ER and PR and do not overexpress HER2, defining Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) [
4,
5]. TNBCs represent one of the most aggressive, highly metastatic, and heterogeneous breast cancer subtypes, characterized by higher mortality rates compared to the other subtypes. This poor prognosis relates, in part, to the absence of targetable hormone receptors and HER2, limiting therapeutic options. Unlike other breast cancer subtypes amenable to targeted therapies, TNBC treatment relies primarily on systemic chemotherapy. Currently, the FDA has approved treatment strategies for TNBC including taxane-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel and docetaxel), platinum derivatives (carboplatin), anthracyclines (doxorubicin), alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide), targeted therapy (PARP-inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugate therapy) and immunotherapy (pembrolizumab and other immune checkpoint inhibitors) [
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11]. Paclitaxel, a microtubule-stabilizing agent, is the most commonly used chemotherapeutic for TNBC and is FDA-approved as a first-line therapy for multiple malignancies, including ovarian, lung, and pancreatic cancers, as well as hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and metastatic TNBC [
12]. Paclitaxel promotes microtubule assembly and stabilizes tubulin subunit associations, leading to mitotic arrest at the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). This prolonged mitotic delay ultimately triggers aberrant cell division and apoptosis [
12,
13]. Despite its widespread use, not all TNBCs respond to paclitaxel, and treatment outcomes remain suboptimal. The prognosis for metastatic TNBC is particularly poor, with a median overall survival of approximately 13.6 months [
14]. Although paclitaxel improves outcomes in early-stage breast cancer, TNBC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy experience significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those with other breast cancer subtypes (63% versus 76%) [
14]. These observations underscore an urgent need for strategies to enhance paclitaxel efficacy in TNBC [
15,
16].
One promising strategy to enhance paclitaxel efficacy is combination therapy with an inhibitor of salt-inducible kinase 2 (SIK2), a serine threonine kinase and a member of the AMPK family. SIK2 regulates diverse cellular processes, including the Hippo, PI3K-AKT, and Wnt/β-Catenin pathways, while also regulating metabolic homeostasis and centrosome dynamics [
1,
17,
18,
19,
20]. Given its involvement in these critical pathways, SIK2 has emerged as a potential therapeutic target in ovarian cancer and TNBC [
21,
22]. GRN-300 is a potent selective small molecule inhibitor of SIK2. Previous studies demonstrated that GRN-300 treatment reduces cancer cell and xenograft growth and enhances sensitivity to paclitaxel in ovarian cancer models [
22]. Moreover, SIK2 localizes to kinetochores and mitotic spindles during cell division, particularly in
FANCA-deficient cells. SIK2 inhibition by ARN-3236, a small molecule closely related to GRN-300, impaired SAC function and caused cytokinetic defects, resulting in hyperploidy and polynucleation [
23]. These findings suggest that SIK2 inhibition may enhance paclitaxel efficacy by disrupting mitotic regulation through complementary mechanisms. Given the urgent need for novel combination therapies for TNBC and the emergence of chemoresistance to standard chemotherapy, we investigated whether the SIK2 inhibitor GRN-300 could enhance paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity in TNBC models. We also sought to elucidate the molecular mechanism(s) underlying this synergy and to define SIK2’s role in mitotic regulation and cell division.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Immunohistochemical (IHC) Staining
Tumor microarray slides (BR1301 and BR1401, TissueArray, Derwood, MD, USA) were deparaffinized using xylene and rehydrated through a series of graded ethanol solutions. Antigen retrieval was performed in Tris-based Antigen Unmasking Solution (H-3301-250, Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA) at 95 °C for 10 min (min). Slides were then subjected to sequential blocking steps: PeroxAbolish (PXA969M, BioCare Medical, Pacheco, CA, USA) for 30 min, Rodent Block M (RBM961, BioCare Medical) for 1 h, and 3% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) in Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) for 30 min. For SIK2 protein detection, slides were incubated overnight at 4 °C with a primary antibody (636702, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) diluted 1:30 in 3% BSA in PBS, followed by VisUCyte HRP Polymer (DB801, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Images were acquired using an Olympus IX71 microscope equipped with a DP74 camera (Evident Scientific, Webster, TX, USA). Staining intensity and scoring were independently evaluated by two pathologists in a blinded manner.
2.2. Cell Lines and Culture Conditions
Human breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231 (MB-231), MDA-MB-436 (MB-436), MDA-MB-468 (MB-468), MDA-MB-453 (MB-453), SUM159, HCC1143, HCC1395, HCC1428, HCC1569, HCC1937, HCC1954, HCC202, HCC38, HCC70, BT-474, T47D, MCF7, SKBr3, and ZR75-1) were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and Cal51 was purchased from Creative Bioarray (Shirley, NY, USA). KPL-4 was maintained in Dr. Bast’s laboratory; the original source could not be verified. (
Table S1 for additional cell line information). Cell lines were cultured in either RPMI-1640 (Corning) or DMEM (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) media supplemented with 10% FBS (GeminiBio, West Sacramento, CA, USA), 200 mM L-Glutamine, and 100 mM Sodium Pyruvate (Corning). SUM159 cells were cultured in Ham’s F12 media supplemented with 10%FBS, insulin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sugar Land, TX, USA), 1X hydrocortisone (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO
2 and were regularly tested for mycoplasma contamination.
2.3. Paclitaxel and GRN-300 Cytotoxicity Assays
Cell viability was assessed using the Cell Titer-Glo (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) luminescent cell viability assay. The paclitaxel IC50 value was obtained by seeding 2000–4000 cells per well, depending on doubling time, onto a 96-well plate (Corning) and treated 24 h after seeding using serial dilutions of paclitaxel with 100 nM being the highest dose. Cancer cells were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Then the plate’s media was removed carefully from wells to avoid disturbing the cells, and 30 µL of Blank Media + 30 μL of Cell Titer-Glo reagent was added to each well. The plates were shaken at 600 rpm for 15 min in the dark, and luminescence was measured using a Synergy 2 microplate reader (Agilent Bio-Tek, Winooski, WT, USA). For combination treatment with both paclitaxel and GRN-300, cells were seeded at 2000–4000 cells per well (density adjusted based on doubling time) in 96-well plates and treated with serial dilutions of paclitaxel (0 nM to the cell line-specific IC50) and GRN-300 (0–2 µM). Paclitaxel was administered once at 24 h post-seeding. GRN-300 was administered at both 24 h and 48 h post-seeding. The plates were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 72 h total. Then, blank media and cell Titer-glo were added as described above. The plates were shaken, and luminescence was measured using a microplate reader. Raw values were normalized to control wells using Microsoft Excel and graphed using GraphPad Prism 10. Combination index (CI) values were calculated using CalcuSyn Version 2.11 (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK).
2.4. Clonogenic Assays
Cells were harvested from culture plates using 0.25% trypsin in RPMI or Ham’s medium with 2.21 mM EDTA and 1X sodium bicarbonate (Corning), then seeded at a density of 600 cells per well in 12-well plates (Corning). Cells were allowed to adhere to the plate for 48 h, before removing media and providing their respective growth mediums. GRN-300 was added to achieve a concentration of 0.5 μM, 1 µM, or 2 μM per well. Plates were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 24 h before GRN-300 was added for a second time. When cell growth had achieved 85% confluency, medium was removed, and wells were washed with 1 mL of PBS and stained with 1 mL of 0.5% crystal violet dye for 10 min. Plates were then washed until excess dye was removed from all wells and allowed to dry overnight protected from light. On the next day, plates were imaged using a ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Colony area was analyzed using ImageJ software (open-source software).
2.5. Cell Cycle Analysis
Breast cancer cells were harvested with 0.25% trypsin and seeded onto 100 × 20 mm dishes (Corning) at 5.0 × 105 cells per dish. Cells were allowed to adhere to the plate overnight and after 24 h, medium was replaced with fresh medium containing either vehicle control, GRN-300 (1 µM), paclitaxel (2 nM), or both GRN-300 (1 µM) and paclitaxel (2 nM). Paclitaxel was administered 24 h post-seeding, while GRN-300 was administered at, 24 h and 48 h, post-seeding. Cells and media were collected at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h post-treatment. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and cells were fixed by adding 5 mL of 70% cold ethanol dropwise to tubes while vortexing. Fixed cells were stored overnight at 4 °C. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, cells were washed once in PBS before stained with FX Cycle PI/RNase staining solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at room temperature and protected from light for 30 min. Samples were analyzed using Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) with assistance from the UT MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) South Campus Flow Core. Flow cytometry data files were analyzed using the FlowJo program (Waters Biosciences, Ashland, OR, USA). Debris was excluded by gating the cell population using FS-H vs. SS-H axis followed by FS-A vs. FS-H gating to select single cells. Cell cycle distribution was determined from the FL3-A PI histograms, and the percentage of G1, S and G2 populations were quantified.
2.6. Annexin V-FITC Assay
Breast cancer cells were harvested with 0.25% trypsin and seeded onto 100 × 20 mm dishes (Corning) at 5.0 × 105 cells per dish. Cells were allowed to adhere to the plate overnight and after 24 h, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing either vehicle control or GRN-300 (1 µM or 2 μM). GRN-300 was administered twice, 24 h and 48 h, post-seeding. After 48 h of GRN-300 treatment, both the medium and cells were collected via trypsinization and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was removed and cells were washed twice with 5 mL of PBS, resuspended in 1X Annexin V-binding buffer and stained with 100 µg/mL Propidium Iodide (PI) mixed with and FITC-Annexin V (A13201, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were incubated for 15 min at room temperature covered from light. With the assistance of the MDACC South Campus Flow Core Laboratory, fluorescence was measured at 495/519 excitation/emission using a Fortessa X-20 analyzer (Waters Biosciences).
2.7. Western Blot Analysis
Breast cancer cells were cultured with diluent, GRN-300, paclitaxel or the combination. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, cells were collected and treated with lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM PMSF, 10 μg/mL leupeptin, and 10 μg/mL aprotinin) on ice for 40 min, vertexing every 10 min. Lysates were then centrifuged at 14,800 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a clean Eppendorf tube. The protein concentration of each sample was determined with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay (23225, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Equal amounts of protein were loaded onto a 4–15% gradient CriterionTM TGXTM precast gel (5671085, Bio-Rad) and electrophoresed in 1X Running Buffer (10X Tris/Glycine/SDS; 1610772, Bio-Rad) at 120 volts for 1–2 h. They were then transferred to 0.45 μm PVDF membranes (IPVH00010, Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MS, USA) in 1X Transfer Buffer (10X Tris/Glycine Buffer; 1610771, Bio-Rad) at 35 volts overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were blocked with 2% BSA (A7906, Millipore Sigma) in 1X TRIS-Buffered Saline (7732-18-5, Research Products International, Mount Prospect, IL, USA) with 0.1% Tween-20 (Tween201, MP Biomedical, distributed by Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. Following this, 1:2000 HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (31439, goat anti-mouse and 31463, goat anti-rabbit from Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to the membranes while rocking at room temperature for 60 min. The protein bands were visualized using Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (32106, Thermo Fisher Scientific) on a ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad). Primary antibodies used in this study include: SIK2 (6919), CDK1 (9116), phospho-CDK1 T14 (2543), PLK1 (4513), phospho-PLK1 T210 (5472), phospho-Histone H2A.X (2577) and cleaved Caspase-3 (9661) from Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; Cyclin B1 (sc-7393), CDC27 (sc-9972) and Lamin B1 (sc-365214) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA; phospho-CDC27 (600-401-866) from Rockland Immunochemicals, Pottstown, PA, USA; and alpha-Tubulin (T7451) and GAPDH (MAB374) from Millipore Sigma.
2.8. SIK2 siRNA Knockdown
Human SIK2 (Gene ID: 23235) siRNA—SMARTpool, 10 nmole was purchased from Horizon Discovery Dharmacon Reagents, Lafayette, CO, USA, (Ref# SO-3278441G). Pool siRNA target sequences were as follows: GGUAUGUCCUGGUGAAUUA, CAAGAGCUAUAACCACUUU, GGACCGACUCUUCCAAUUU, and GGUGUGUGCUAUUGCAUAU. SUM159 and MB-231 breast cancer cells were seeded onto a 6-well plate at a density of 50,000 cells per well. Twenty-four hrs post-seeding, the desired siRNA concentrations were diluted in serum free media. This mixture was incubated at room temperature for 5 min before adding to the cells. SUM159 was transfected with 20 nM of siRNA and MB-231 was transfected with 35 nM of siRNA in serum free media. Plates were incubated for 72 h, before adherent cells were harvested with trypsin. Cells were centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min, supernatant was removed, and cell pellets were lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor (PPI). Following sample preparation as described above, proteins were analyzed by Western blot using antibodies against SIK2, CDC27, phospho-CDC27, CDK1, PLK1, and GAPDH.
2.9. MDA-MB-231 and SUM159 Breast Cancer Xenografts
Forty female nu/nu mice (6–8 weeks old) were injected with 3.0 × 106 cells into their fourth mammary fat pads. After 14 days, mice were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 10): vehicle control, GRN-300 (50 mg/kg; 5 times per week), Paclitaxel (8 mg/kg; once a week), and a combination of GRN-300 and paclitaxel. GRN-300 was administered by oral gavage and paclitaxel was administered by intraperitoneal injection (ip). Tumors were measured weekly and monitored until tumors grew beyond an ethically acceptable endpoint, at which point, the animals were euthanized. Animals were purchased from Inotiv, Lafayette, IN, USA. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines.
2.10. Virus Generation and Infection
The lentivirus pLOC-CDC27 (Horizon Discovery Dharmacon Reagents Clone ID: PLOHS_100005410) was obtained from the MDACC shRNA and ORFeome Core Facility. MB-231 and SUM159 were seeded onto 6-well plates at a density of 100,000 cells per well in 2 mL of respective media. After allowing the cells to attach to the plate for 24 h, cells were transduced at an MOI of 10. The stock pLOC-CDC27 lentivirus concentration was 2 × 106 TU/mL and the stock pLOC-RFP vector concentration was >108 TU/mL. Additionally, polybrene was added to assist with transduction efficiency at a dilution of 1:1000. After an additional 48 h, cells were treated with blasticidin antibiotic selection agent at a concentration of 8 µg/mL.
2.11. Statistical Analyses
Data was compared using Student t-test, one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance), or two-way ANOVA. In vivo tumor growth was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and presented as mean ± SEM (Standard Error of the Mean). Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan–Meier survival curves using a log-rank test. Statistical analyses and graphical representations were performed using GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software; San Diego, CA, USA). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
4. Discussion
This study demonstrates the therapeutic potential of combining GRN-300, a novel SIK2 inhibitor with paclitaxel for treating Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Our data indicated that SIK2 was expressed in 88% of TNBC clinical specimens and in eight of nine TNBC cell lines, supporting the relevance of SIK2 as a therapeutic target in this breast cancer subtype. Given the limited targeted treatment options currently available for TNBC, these findings provide a strong rationale for further investigation of SIK2-directed therapeutic strategies.
Paclitaxel exerts its antitumor activity through stabilization of microtubules, resulting in prolonged mitotic arrest through activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) [
7,
24]. Sustained SAC activation subsequently suppresses APC/C activation, a critical regulator required for mitotic exit [
25,
26,
27]. Building on this mechanistic framework, we demonstrated that GRN-300 significantly enhanced sensitivity in TNBC models. Combination index analysis revealed synergistic interactions (CI < 1) in eight of nine TNBC cell lines tested, with the most pronounced synergy observed in SUM159 and MB-231 cell lines. In contrast, non-TNBC breast cancer cell lines showed limited or no enhancement with combination treatment, suggesting that the therapeutic effect of GRN-300 may be more pronounced in TNBC models. Importantly, the enhanced antitumor activity of the combination was validated in two in orthotopic xenograft models. Combination treatment produced greater tumor growth inhibition than either monotherapy alone and improved overall survival in both the MB-231 and SUM159 models, supporting the potential translational relevance of this therapeutic strategy.
To investigate the mechanisms underlying these effects, we examined the impact of SIK2 inhibition on cell-cycle progression and mitotic signaling. Previous work from our laboratory demonstrated that SIK2 regulates centrosome separation and mitotic progression in ovarian cancer models [
17]. Consistent with these findings, GRN-300 treatment induced significant accumulation of TNBC cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, indicating disruption of mitotic progression. This effect was particularly evident in the highly responsive MB-231 and SUM159 in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, indicating disruption of mitotic progression. This effect was particularly evident in the highly responsive MB-231 and SUM159 cell lines and was sustained at both 24 h and 48 h time points in both cell lines. GRN-300 treatment also induced apoptosis, as demonstrated by increased Annexin V positivity and elevated cleaved caspase-3 expression. When combined with paclitaxel, an even greater proportion of cells accumulated in the G2/M phase, accompanied by increased Sub-G1 populations, suggesting enhanced apoptotic cell death following prolonged mitotic arrest. Together, these findings support a model in which SIK2 inhibition enhances paclitaxel-induced mitotic stress and promotes apoptotic cell death in TNBC cells.
Our molecular analysis further demonstrated that SIK2 inhibition disrupts key components of the APC/C regulatory network. GRN-300 treatment reduced expression of CDC27 and phospho-CDC27, as well as CDK1, PLK1, and cyclin B1, all of which are essential regulators of mitotic progression and APC/C activation [
28,
29]. Similar findings were observed following siRNA-mediated SIK2 knockdown, supporting the specificity of these effects. CDC27, also known as APC3, is a core APC/C subunit that regulates ubiquitination and degradation of key mitotic substrates, including securin and cyclin B1 [
30]. Proper APC/C activation requires coordinated phosphorylation events mediated by CDK1 and PLK1 [
25,
31,
32,
33]. Therefore, the coordinated suppression of CDC27, CDK1, PLK1, and cyclin B1 following SIK2 inhibition suggests broad disruption of mitotic regulatory signaling. In addition, restoration of phospho-CDK1 and phospho-PLK1 expression following CDC27 overexpression further supports the functional importance of the SIK2-CDC27 signaling axis in maintaining mitotic progression.
Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. Although our findings support a role for SIK2 in regulating APC/C-associated mitotic signaling, the precise molecular relationship between SIK2 and CDC27 remains incompletely defined and warrants further investigation. We did not perform CDC27 overexpression rescue experiments to directly test whether CDC27 can reverse the effect of the GRN-300/paclitaxel combination on cell viability, clonogenic survival, cell-cycle arrest, or apoptosis, which would provide more definitive causal evidence and represents an important direction for future studies. In addition, TNBC is a highly heterogeneous disease, and the impact of tumor heterogeneity on sensitivity to SIK2 inhibition was not extensively explored in this study. Future studies using a broader range of TNBC models and molecular subtypes will be important to better define determinants of therapeutic response. Furthermore, although we observed high SIK2 expressions in TNBC specimens and demonstrated that GRN-300 treatment affected cell growth, cell-cycle progression, and apoptosis, this study was not designed to directly establish whether SIK2 expression levels correlate with these phenotypic responses. Additional mechanistic studies will therefore be needed to determine whether SIK2 expression or APC/C pathway activity may serve as predictive biomarkers for sensitivity to SIK2-targeted therapies.