Next Article in Journal
Regenerative Immunotherapy for Cancer: Transcription Factor Reprogramming of Tumor-Specific T Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Exposures Increase Health Risks in Childhood Cancer Survivors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Vistas in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Its Association with Lung Cancer Development

by
Kostas A. Papavassiliou
1,
Amalia A. Sofianidi
2,
Fotios G. Spiliopoulos
2,
Alice G. Vassiliou
3 and
Athanasios G. Papavassiliou
2,*
1
First University Department of Respiratory Medicine, ‘Sotiria’ Chest Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
3
First Department of Critical Care Medicine, ‘Evangelismos’ Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2224; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132224
Submission received: 25 June 2025 / Accepted: 30 June 2025 / Published: 2 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Pathophysiology)
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with the American Cancer Society estimating approximately 124,730 deaths from lung cancer in 2025 [1]. Another major public health issue is tuberculosis (TB), an infection caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), lung cancer ranked as the sixth leading cause of death in 2021, while tuberculosis ranked as the tenth [2]. The oncogenic potential of various infectious agents has been established for years; multiple viruses and microbes, such as the bacterium Helicobacter pylori, are listed amongst them [3]. A volume of data suggest that there is a causal relationship between previous MTB infection and lung cancer development [4]. In addition, the oncogenic nature of non-tuberculous Mycobacterium complex infections has already been described; Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium ulcerans, and Mycobacterium xenopi are incriminated in augmented risk of tumorigenesis in different organs [5]. However, the molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the connection between MTB and lung cancer remain largely unknown. Herein, we provide a succinct overview of recent research shedding light on TB infection and subsequent lung carcinogenesis.
Although the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has not yet classified MTB as a carcinogenic agent [6], there are several epidemiological reports indicating heightened lung cancer risk in patients with previous TB infection [7,8]. A recently published meta-analysis confirmed a statistically significant link between a previous pulmonary TB infection and lung neoplasm formation (odds ratio (OR) 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62–2.69, p < 0.001) [4]. Additionally, a population-based study in Taiwan demonstrated that the risk of pulmonary malignancy development was 1.67-fold higher in the group of patients with a medical history of pulmonary TB disease than in the group of patients with an unremarkable medical history [9].
The precise molecular underpinnings of lung tumorigenesis due to MTB infection are yet to be elucidated. It is clear that reactive oxygen species (ROS) alongside reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are essential for the initiation and the sustenance of carcinogenesis [10]. Macrophages and neutrophils, cells aberrantly involved in MTB infection, produce the aforementioned harmful species leading to perturbation of redox homeostasis, which represents a major hallmark of cancer development. An inflammatory environment in the lung is created, which results in persistent tissue impairment due to the prolonged nature of MTB infection [11,12]. Furthermore, long-term inflammation is associated with DNA damage, which eventually triggers lung tumorigenesis [13]. Also, tenacious inflammation gives rise to fibrosis and scar formation, elements with high tumorigenic potential [14].
Delving deeper into the intersection between MTB infection and lung cancer, it has recently been proposed that bacterial DNA could be incorporated into the DNA of bronchial epithelial cells, causing their malignant transformation [15]. This mechanism is not new; hepatitis B virus has been implicated in liver carcinogenesis by integrating into the hepatic genome [16]. Indeed, the IS6110 MTB transposon, widely recognized for its utility in TB diagnosis and epidemiology, was detected inside the nucleus of cancer cells derived from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The IS6110 transposon is unique for MTB and its presence in the host genome verifies bacterial DNA integration [17]. Moreover, granuloma formation, which is the “stamp” of MTB infection, is fulfilled through the induction of epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) expression by macrophages. E-cadherin expression, a Ca2+-dependent cell–cell adhesion transmembrane glycoprotein, confers an epithelioid phenotype to macrophages via a process termed mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) [18]. On the other hand, MTB prompts epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), a major hallmark of cancer verified in lung cancer cell lines [19]. Notably, both MET and EMT are processes involved in tumor initiation alongside tumor metastasis [20].
Secondary lung cancer due to MTB infection involves the regulation of genes that foster tumorigenesis. MTB induces DNA damage through the SecA2 secretome, which leads to activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, and particularly the stimulation of the host ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) serine/threonine kinase. The ensuing cell cycle alteration inhibits apoptosis and accentuates cell growth [21]. A recent study demonstrated that a vital enzyme engaged in MTB infection development, namely protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) phosphatase activator (PtpA), influences the expression of the antigen Kiel 67 (Ki-67; also known as marker of proliferation Kiel 67 (MKI67)) gene. MKI67 encodes the Ki-67 protein, a prominent tumor cell marker correlated with various stages of tumorigenesis [22]. Another study utilizing bioinformatics revealed a different expression pattern of the Keratin 80 (KRT80; a typical epithelial cell marker) gene in TB versus lung adenocarcinoma. KRT80 exhibited opposite expression patterns between the two diseases; it was downregulated in TB but upregulated in NSCLC. This differential expression suggests a potential shift in the role of the KRT80 gene during disease progression from TB infection to lung cancer, which likely promotes oncogenesis [23]. Likewise, differences in the frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations between patients with TB and lung cancer have been studied. It has been shown that patients with previous TB infection have a higher rate of EGFR mutations and worse treatment responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in case they develop lung cancer [24]. Apparently, further research is needed in the field, as these observations could potentially change the therapeutic algorithms that are currently used in clinical lung cancer practice.
The updated hallmarks of cancer, introduced by Hanahan in 2022, recognized the modulatory role of the microbiome in tumorigenesis [25]. DNA damage and host immune response modification are listed amongst the mechanisms employed by the microbiome to stimulate malignant transformation of cells [25]. In this vein, it has been proposed that in the case of TB infection, prolonged antibiotic administration disrupts microbial living in the gut, triggering a microbiome-impelled immunomodulation that drives lung cancer growth [26]. Whether probiotics could help soothe these responses and eliminate the risk of lung cancer evolution is an area of future exploration suggested by investigators [26]. As far as immune destruction avoidance by malignant cells is concerned, it has been a well-established cancer hallmark since 2011 [27]. Immune suppression has also emerged as a hallmark of MTB infection; MTB exploits the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway to promote lung cancer metastasis and conquer the cellular immune response supported by Th1 cells. Immune suppression renders cancer development and progression unchallenging [28]. Although this observation was made in preclinical models, it can be concluded that the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway could be therapeutically exploited earlier on during TB lung infection to prevent future oncogenesis.
In summary, TB lung infection and lung cancer are two entities that have intricate connections with one another. TB has proven to be a major risk factor for lung carcinogenesis; lung inflammation induced by MTB leads to tissue lesion and subsequent scar formation and DNA damage, processes that encourage neoplasia. Extensive research is urgent to unravel the complexity underlying this perplexing relationship and move towards prevention rather than cure. Evidently, medical practitioners should be aware of distinguishing these two diseases and be alert to patients with a history of TB infection in case they develop early clinical signs of lung cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.A.P., A.A.S., A.G.V. and A.G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, K.A.P., A.A.S., F.G.S. and A.G.V.; literature search and preparation of all references, A.A.S. and F.G.S.; supervision, A.G.P.; writing—review and editing, K.A.P. and A.G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Key Statistics for Lung Cancer. 2025. Available online: Https://Www.Cancer.Org/Cancer/Types/Lung-Cancer/about/Key-Statistics.Html (accessed on 17 June 2025).
  2. World Health Organization. The Top Ten Causes of Death. 2024. Available online: https://www.Who.Int/News-Room/Fact-Sheets/Detail/the-Top-10-Causes-of-Death (accessed on 17 June 2025).
  3. Newton, R.; de Martel, C.; Plummer, M.; Qiao, Y.-L. Infectious Agents: Missed Opportunities for Prevention. In World Cancer Report: Cancer Research for Cancer Prevention; Wild, C.P., Weiderpass, E., Stewart, B.W., Eds.; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hwang, S.Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, H.S.; Lee, S.; Kim, D.; Kim, S.; Hyun, J.H.; Shin, J.I.; Lee, K.H.; Han, S.H.; et al. Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Risk of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fol, M.; Koziński, P.; Kulesza, J.; Białecki, P.; Druszczyńska, M. Dual Nature of Relationship between Mycobacteria and Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. International Agency for Research on Cancer. List of Classifications. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans. 2015. Available online: Https://Monographs.Iarc.Who.Int/List-of-Classifications (accessed on 17 June 2025).
  7. Molina-Romero, C.; Arrieta, O.; Hernández-Pando, R. Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer. Salud Publica Mex. 2019, 61, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abdeahad, H.; Salehi, M.; Yaghoubi, A.; Aalami, A.H.; Aalami, F.; Soleimanpour, S. Previous Pulmonary Tuberculosis Enhances the Risk of Lung Cancer: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Infect. Dis. 2022, 54, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ho, L.-J.; Yang, H.-Y.; Chung, C.-H.; Chang, W.-C.; Yang, S.-S.; Sun, C.-A.; Chien, W.-C.; Su, R.-Y. Increased Risk of Secondary Lung Cancer in Patients with Tuberculosis: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0250531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mijatović, S.; Savić-Radojević, A.; Plješa-Ercegovac, M.; Simić, T.; Nicoletti, F.; Maksimović-Ivanić, D. The Double-Faced Role of Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species in Solid Tumors. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muefong, C.N.; Sutherland, J.S. Neutrophils in Tuberculosis-Associated Inflammation and Lung Pathology. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nwongbouwoh Muefong, C.; Owolabi, O.; Donkor, S.; Charalambous, S.; Bakuli, A.; Rachow, A.; Geldmacher, C.; Sutherland, J.S. Neutrophils Contribute to Severity of Tuberculosis Pathology and Recovery From Lung Damage Pre- and Posttreatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 74, 1757–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiong, K.; Sun, W.; He, Y.; Fan, L. Advances in Molecular Mechanisms of Interaction between Mycobacterium Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2021, 10, 4012–4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chandler, C.; Liu, T.; Buckanovich, R.; Coffman, L.G. The Double Edge Sword of Fibrosis in Cancer. Transl. Res. 2019, 209, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Malik, A.A.; Sheikh, J.A.; Ehtesham, N.Z.; Hira, S.; Hasnain, S.E. Can Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection Lead to Cancer? Call for a Paradigm Shift in Understanding TB and Cancer. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 312, 151558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zoulim, F.; Chen, P.-J.; Dandri, M.; Kennedy, P.T.; Seeger, C. Hepatitis B Virus DNA Integration: Implications for Diagnostics, Therapy, and Outcome. J. Hepatol. 2024, 81, 1087–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arrieta, O.; Molina-Romero, C.; Cornejo-Granados, F.; Marquina-Castillo, B.; Avilés-Salas, A.; López-Leal, G.; Cardona, A.F.; Ortega-Gómez, A.; Orozco-Morales, M.; Ochoa-Leyva, A.; et al. Clinical and Pathological Characteristics Associated with the Presence of the IS6110 Mycobacterim Tuberculosis Transposon in Neoplastic Cells from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ahmad, F.; Rani, A.; Alam, A.; Zarin, S.; Pandey, S.; Singh, H.; Hasnain, S.E.; Ehtesham, N.Z. Macrophage: A Cell with Many Faces and Functions in Tuberculosis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 747799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gupta, P.K.; Tripathi, D.; Kulkarni, S.; Rajan, M.G.R. Mycobacterium Tuberculosis H37Rv Infected THP-1 Cells Induce Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in Lung Adenocarcinoma Epithelial Cell Line (A549). Cell. Immunol. 2016, 300, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yao, D.; Dai, C.; Peng, S. Mechanism of the Mesenchymal–Epithelial Transition and Its Relationship with Metastatic Tumor Formation. Mol. Cancer Res. 2011, 9, 1608–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lochab, S.; Singh, Y.; Sengupta, S.; Nandicoori, V.K. Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Exploits Host ATM Kinase for Survival Advantage through SecA2 Secretome. eLife 2020, 9, e51466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chai, Q.; Lu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhong, Y.; Zhang, F.; Qiu, C.; Li, B.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Pang, Y.; et al. Lung Gene Expression Signatures Suggest Pathogenic Links and Molecular Markers for Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Adenocarcinoma and Sarcoidosis. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feng, F.; Xu, W.; Lian, C.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J. Tuberculosis to Lung Cancer: Application of Tuberculosis Signatures in Identification of Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtypes and Marker Screening. J. Cancer 2024, 15, 5329–5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hwang, I.K.; Paik, S.S.; Lee, S.H. Impact of Pulmonary Tuberculosis on the EGFR Mutational Status and Clinical Outcome in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 51, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hanahan, D. Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022, 12, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fang, C.; He, X.; Tang, F.; Wang, Z.; Pan, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, J.; Wang, Q.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Y. Where Lung Cancer and Tuberculosis Intersect: Recent Advances. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1561719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of Cancer: The next Generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cao, S.; Li, J.; Lu, J.; Zhong, R.; Zhong, H. Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Antigens Repress Th1 Immune Response Suppression and Promotes Lung Cancer Metastasis through PD-1/PDl-1 Signaling Pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Papavassiliou, K.A.; Sofianidi, A.A.; Spiliopoulos, F.G.; Vassiliou, A.G.; Papavassiliou, A.G. New Vistas in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Its Association with Lung Cancer Development. Cancers 2025, 17, 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132224

AMA Style

Papavassiliou KA, Sofianidi AA, Spiliopoulos FG, Vassiliou AG, Papavassiliou AG. New Vistas in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Its Association with Lung Cancer Development. Cancers. 2025; 17(13):2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Papavassiliou, Kostas A., Amalia A. Sofianidi, Fotios G. Spiliopoulos, Alice G. Vassiliou, and Athanasios G. Papavassiliou. 2025. "New Vistas in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Its Association with Lung Cancer Development" Cancers 17, no. 13: 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132224

APA Style

Papavassiliou, K. A., Sofianidi, A. A., Spiliopoulos, F. G., Vassiliou, A. G., & Papavassiliou, A. G. (2025). New Vistas in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Its Association with Lung Cancer Development. Cancers, 17(13), 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop