Next Article in Journal
Harnessing the Microbiome to Reduce Pancreatic Cancer Burden
Next Article in Special Issue
Prognostic Value of Erythroblastic Leukemia Viral Oncogene Homolog 2 and Neuregulin 4 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
c-Met Mediated Cytokine Network Promotes Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer by Remodeling Neutrophil Activities
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Narrative Review on the History, Current Landscape, and Future Directions of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Systemic Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 9
10.3390/cancers15092628
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of HER2 Status in the Biliary Tract Cancers

by
Ruveyda Ayasun
1,
Muhammet Ozer
2 and
Ilyas Sahin
3,*
1
Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
2
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02132, USA
3
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(9), 2628; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092628
Submission received: 16 March 2023 / Revised: 28 April 2023 / Accepted: 4 May 2023 / Published: 5 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Hepatobiliary Cancers: From Diagnosis to Treatment)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Simple Summary

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) plays a critical role in breast and gastric cancer. More recently, a growing body of literature demonstrated that HER2 is involved in biliary tract cancers. In this review, we discuss the potential therapeutic utilization of HER2-blocking antibodies and ongoing clinical trials assessing the efficacy of HER2-blocking antibodies in HER2-altered and/or -amplified biliary tract cancers.

Abstract

Despite recent advances, biliary tract cancer (BTC) is traditionally known as being hard to treat with a poor prognosis. Recent state-of-the-art genomic technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) revolutionized cancer management and shed light on the genomic landscape of BTCs. There are ongoing clinical trials to assess the efficacy of HER2-blocking antibodies or drug conjugates in BTCs with HER2 amplifications. However, HER2 amplifications may not be the sole eligibility factor for these clinical trials. In this review, we aimed to comprehensively examine the role of somatic HER2 alterations and amplifications in patient stratification and provide an overview of the current state of ongoing clinical trials.

1. Introduction

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) represent 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers and have a dismal prognosis with a 5 year survival rate of 2% [1]. BTCs consist of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampulla of Vater cancer [2]. Geographical location is one of the determinants of the incidence of BTCs. Due to endemic liver flukes, cholangiocarcinoma is more common in southeast Asian countries [3]. Although a growing body of literature demonstrated the efficacy of targeted therapies in patients with BTC, systemic chemotherapy remained the backbone treatment for this devastating disease. Gemcitabine with cisplatin (GEMCIS) is still recommended as first-line treatment (ABC-02 trial) [4] and mFOLFOX with active symptom control as second-line therapy (ABC-06 trial) [5]. In an era of immune-based therapies, the TOPAZ-1 trial evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab (anti-PDL1) plus GEMCIS in patients with BTC (NCT03875235). The addition of durvalumab to standard of care treatment significantly improved overall survival rate in patients with BTC. The estimated 24 month overall survival rate (OS) was 24.9% and 10.4% in the durvalumab plus GEMCIS and placebo plus GEMCIS arm, respectively [5]. Median OS was 12.8 months in the durvalumab plus GEMICS group and 11.5 months in the GEMCIS group. Considering the observed survival advantage associated with the addition of durvalumab, the NCCN updated their guidelines and reclassified GEMCIS plus durvalumab as the preferred category 1 recommendation for BTC. Despite the increased survival advantage, the disease prognosis remained dismal and the objective response rate with the addition of durvalumab to GEMCIS improved objective response rates from 18.7% to 26.7%. As a second-line treatment, options are limited, and the prognosis is very poor for patients without access to targeted therapy. The median OS for mFOLFOX as a second-line treatment showed only a minimal survival benefit of 6.2 months compared to 5.3 months in active symptom control, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 5%. These findings highlighted an unmet need for the development of novel treatments, not only as first-line therapy but also for the management of treatment-refractory BTC [5].
BTCs are heterogenous in terms of anatomy, thus their pathogenesis and genomic drivers may vary. Despite precision medicine having revolutionized cancer care over the last decades, there is an unmet need for more precise approaches in patients with BTC. The number of somatic alterations significantly differs in patients with BTC based on primary site of tumor. For instance, there is a significant difference between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer or extrahepatic CCA in terms of somatic alterations [1]. To date, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) have been extensively studied in intrahepatic biliary tract cancers [2]. According to the results of a phase 2 study, the median overall survival (OS) data for the cohort of patients with FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement who received pemigatinib as a second-line treatment had not yet been reached at the time of the data cutoff, which was 21.1 months. This suggests that the survival benefit of pemigatinib for this patient population may be substantial, although longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results [6]. However, for the cohorts with other FGFR alterations and no FGFR alterations, the median OS was 6.7 months and 4.0 months, respectively. The 12 month OS rate for the cohort with FGFR2 fusion/rearrangement was 68%. Consequently, pemigatinib, an FGFR1-3 inhibitor, received FDA approval for the treatment of patients with BTC with FGFR2 fusions in April 2020 [6]. After the approval of a FGFR1-3 inhibitor by the FDA for the treatment of BTC, several other FGFR inhibitors were tested for their effectiveness. As a result, clinical trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of infigratinib and futibatinib. In a phase 2 trial evaluating infigratinib, another competitive and reversible inhibitor of FGFR1-3, as a second-line treatment option, objective response rate was determined to be 23.1%, while the median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.3 months [7]. Thus, infigratinib was granted accelerated approval by FDA in 2021 for previously treated, unresectable locally advanced, or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 rearrangements. Futibatinib, a selective and irreversible FGFR1–4 inhibitor, obtained accelerated FDA approval in September 2022 after the completion of the FOENIX-101 phase 1 trial that enrolled 86 patients [8]. The results demonstrated partial responses in five patients, including three with FGFR2 fusion-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and two with FGFR1-mutant primary brain tumors. Additionally, 41 patients (48%) achieved stable disease. Following the completion of the FOENIX-101 study, the efficacy of futibatinib was evaluated in the FOENIX-CCA2 phase 2 trial. A total of 42% of patients (95% CI, 32 to 52) had a response, and the median duration of response was 9.7 months. After a median follow-up period of 17.1 months, the trial showed a median PFS of 9.0 months and an OS of 21.7 months [9].
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) alterations have been found in approximately 20% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In a phase 3 trial (ClarIDHy), it has been demonstrated that ivosidenib yielded a favorable median OS benefit with a tolerable safety profile when compared to the placebo group (10.3 months 95% CI, 7.8–12.4 months and 5.1 months 95% CI, 3.8–7.6 months, respectively) [10].
The prevalence of BRAFV600E mutations, another actionable target for BTC, is approximately 3% [11]. BRAFV600E mutation in biliary tract cancer has been linked to worse long-term OS than patients without this mutation. In phase 2 clinical trial (ROAR), dabrafenib plus trametinib has been evaluated in patients with BTC with BRAFV600E mutation with encouraging results [12]. The overall response (OR) was achieved by 47% of patients (95% CI 31–62).
Given aforementioned milestones in this hard-to-treat cancer, the utilizing of genomic profiling for all patients is crucial to guide treatment decisions and patient enrolment into clinical trials. In the MOSCATO 01 trial, the benefit of utilizing next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the management of patients with BTC has been demonstrated. Remarkably, tumor biopsy and NGS was utilized in 843 patients, and actionable targets were identified in 411 out of 843 patients [13]. Actionability has been described in the ESMO guidelines to raise awareness among clinicians. IDH1 and FGFR2 mutations in this guideline have been classified as ESCAT I (ready for routine implementation). Moreover, HER2 alterations have been classified as ESCAT III, implying that mutation–drug match is suspected to improve outcomes in other cancer types [1,14]. Galdy et al. published a meta-analysis in 2016 which showed that the prevalence of HER2 overexpression varied depending on the anatomic origin of the biliary tract cancer. The study found that extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma had a higher rate of HER2 overexpression (17.4%) compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (4.8%) [15].
In this review, we aim to critically evaluate the rationale and status of targeting HER2 and what the future holds for this class of cancer therapeutics in patients with advanced or unresectable HER2-positive BTC.

2. Prognostic Role of HER2 Status in BTC

There are controversial studies pertaining to the prognostic role of HER2 alterations in patients with BTC. A retrospective study of the 100 resected BTC cases from Italy found that 11% of cases exhibited HER2 overexpression, which was defined as a score of 3+ by IHC or a score of 2+ that was confirmed by FISH amplification. In the study, disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly shorter in patients with HER2-positive BTC compared to HER2-negative patients with 10.6 and 20.9 months, respectively. Although there was a noticeable disparity in the median overall survival between HER2-positive and -negative patients, which was 23.4 months and 55.2 months, respectively, the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.068) [16]. The median overall survival (OS) in various types of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) differed significantly, as indicated by this study. In particular, ampullary tumors had not yet reached the median OS, intrahepatic tumors had a median OS of 55.3 months, extrahepatic tumors had a median OS of 34.7 months, and gallbladder tumors had a median OS of 18.1 months. It is worth noting that these differences suggest that the primary site of BTC may be an important factor in determining patient prognosis. In another study from South Korea, HER2 alterations have been detected in 14.9% of patients with advanced BTC [17]. The patients with and without HER2 aberrations did not have a significant difference in tumor response to GEMCIS in the study (33.3% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.571). The median progression-free survival (PFS) to GP was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 5.5 months) for patients with HER2 aberrations and 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 8.8 months) for those without HER2 aberrations (p = 0.776). Moreover, the median OS was not reached in either group (p = 0.739). The role of HER2 aberrations as an independent biomarker was evaluated through univariate analyses for PFS to GEMCIS and OS. The analysis for PFS to GEMCIS revealed that the grade of differentiation (poorly differentiated vs. well/moderately differentiated), disease stage (metastasis vs. locally advanced), and number of metastatic sites (≤2 vs. >2) were significant independent factors. However, HER2 aberrations did not demonstrate statistical significance as an independent factor [17]. The results of these studies indicated that there might be differences in the prevalence and characteristics of biliary tract cancers between various anatomical regions and between countries in Asia and non-Asia. Moreover, there are retrospective studies that investigated the differences in HER2 overexpression in Asian and Caucasian patients with biliary tract cancer. A meta-analysis revealed that HER2 expression was more prevalent in Asian patients (28.4%) than western patients (19.7%) [18]. In a study from Japan, 454 cases of biliary tract cancer have been assessed for HER2 positivity. It has been demonstrated that HER2 positivity differed among different subtypes of BTCs (3.7% in iCCA, 3% in perihilar eCCA, 18.5% in distal eCCA, 31.3% in GBC, and 16.4% in ampullary cancer) [19]. The percentage of HER2 overexpression observed in different studies may differ because of varying factors such as the use of different cutoff values to determine overexpression, the diverse detection methods employed, and the specific site of the primary tumor. Nevertheless, additional prospective cohorts are needed to validate these findings and to conclude whether HER2 alterations are prognostic for patients with advanced BTC. Given that there are accumulating clinical trials that evaluate HER2-targeting agents in patients with BTC, next-generation sequencing, along with IHC or FISH, may be required to stratify patients for anti-HER2 therapies. Intriguingly, not only membranous staining but also cytoplasmic staining might have an implication in the survival of patients with BTC. Ata et al. demonstrated that, though statistical significance was limited, lower cytoplasmic HER2 scores have been correlated with longer survival in patients with pancreatic, gallbladder, cholangiocarcinoma, and periampullary cancers (p = 0.052) [20].

3. HER2 Alterations in BTC

HER2-targeting agents have demonstrated remarkable responses in patients with HER2 alterations in gastric and breast cancer. Based on the ToGA study, HER2 scoring allows the appropriate selection of patients eligible for treatment with HER2-targeted therapies in gastric cancer. This study also revealed that immunohistochemistry should be the initial test and 2+ samples should be retested with FISH [21]. Hence, the vast majority of our knowledge on the role of HER2 in oncology stems from breast and gastric cancer trials. Due to the widespread acceptance of tumor-agnostic approaches in precision medicine, there is currently significant interest in investigating whether anti-HER2 therapies can be applied to other types of cancer, including biliary tract cancer (BTC). This may have important implications for the development of targeted therapies for BTC and other cancers with HER2 aberrations. It has been previously demonstrated that 54.3% of patients with BTC have a HER2 IHC score of 1+ and that 10.9% of them have a HER2 score of 3+ [2,22]. More recently, a nationwide retrospective study for clinicopathological data of 642 gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients from the Netherlands unveiled that about 50% of patients with GBC harbor actionable targets [23]. In this study, HER2 overexpression (IHC score of 3+) has been observed in 7% of patients with GBC. Notably, HER2 mutations typically occur in the absence of HER2 amplifications in all types of cancers [2]. G660D, V659E, R678Q, and Q709L mutations have been recognized as the most common HER2 alterations in all types of cancers. Functional analysis of these alterations has shown them to be activating [24]. Although HER2 amplifications (5–15%) and overexpression (20%) have been observed more frequently than HER2 mutations (2%) in BTC, activating HER2 mutations emerged as druggable by anti-HER2 therapies in patients with BTC without amplification or overexpression [2]. The frequency of HER2 alterations may vary according to the primary tumor site. Researchers from South Korea analyzed the HER2 status of 121 patients with BTC. HER2 alterations were found in 14.9% of patients with the highest frequency in GBC (36.4%) (Table 1) [17]. In addition to gene amplification or overexpression, point mutations are detected in this patient cohort as summarized in Table 2. These findings encourage future world-wide studies investigating HER2 aberrations in patients with BTC (Table 3). Since point mutations have been found in 27.8% of patients, it is critical to assess whether they are activating mutation, namely, druggable by HER2-targeting agents such as neratinib [25].

4. Resistance to Anti-HER2 Therapies

There are multiple FDA-approved HER2-targeted therapies, including antibody–drug conjugates (e.g., T-DM1 and DS-8201), monoclonal antibodies (e.g., trastuzumab and pertuzumab), and small-molecule HER1/2 TKIs (e.g., tucatinib, lapatinib, and neratinib) [27]. However, intrinsic or acquired resistance is a major limitation of these therapies. Activating HER2 mutations have been linked to resistance to lapatinib but responsiveness to neratinib in prior breast cancer studies [28]. The efficacy of neratinib, which is an irreversible HER2 inhibitor, has been evaluated in patients with HER2-mutant, nonamplified breast cancer. Ma et al. demonstrated in this trial that the clinical benefit ratio was 31% [29]. Therefore, an IHC score of 0 or 1+ HER2 may not be the sole predictor for responsiveness to HER2 therapies [30]. Due to intratumor heterogeneity, some cell clones within tumor tissue may express low levels of HER2 or may not be HER2-dependent, resulting in primary resistance to anti-HER2 therapies [31].
The downstream pathway of HER2 induces PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation, thus anti-HER2 therapies inhibit this signaling pathway. However, the constitutive activation of PI3K has previously been described in breast cancer patients. Alterations in PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway occur in 40% and 25% of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients, respectively [32]. Hence, the clinical utility of PI3K inhibitors such as taselisib may benefit patients who are irresponsive to anti-HER2 therapies and have constitutively active PI3K signaling. Moreover, FGFR1 and FGF3 amplification has been linked to lower pathologic response in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab [33]. Given that pemigatinib (FGFR 1-2-3 inhibitor) was among the very first targeted therapies that was approved by the FDA for the management of advanced BTC [34], it could be considered in patients that progressed on anti-HER2 therapies. In the phase 2 SUMMIT basket trial, 25 patients with treatment-refractory metastatic BTC were enrolled and screened for HER2 mutations. The most common HER2 mutations in these cohorts were S310F (n = 11, 48%) and V777L (n = 4, 17%). In this trial, patients who received neratinib treatment demonstrated an ORR of 16% (95% CI, 4.5–36.1%) and a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 28% (95% CI, 12.1–49.4%) [35]. The diagnostic tests for HER2 gene mutations that were approved by the FDA in August 2022 are as follows: Guardant360 CDx (blood) and Oncomine Dx Target Test (tumor tisssue). Even though HER2 amplifications (2–3%) or overexpression (2.5%) occur to a lesser extent in lung cancer, trastuzumab deruxtecan, an antibody–drug conjugate, received accelerated approval by FDA for patients with HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer in August 2022 due to an encouraging phase 2 study [36]. In the study, trastuzumab deruxtecan showed durable responses in patients who had metastatic HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer that was refractory to standard treatment. The confirmed objective response rate was 55% (95% CI, 44 to 65), with a median OS of 17.8 months (95% CI, 13.8 to 22.1). Objective responses were observed in various HER2 mutation subtypes and even among patients with undetectable HER2 expression or HER2 amplification. This landmark study may also provide the clinical rationale of HER2-targeted therapy for patients with HER2-mutant BTC.

5. Completed and Ongoing Clinical Trials

Several clinical trials have investigated the targeting of HER2 in BTC, with some reports available on their outcomes. Zanidatamab (ZW25) is a humanized bispecific antibody that targets both the juxtamembrane extracellular domain (ECD4) and the dimerization domain (ECD2) of HER2. This is similar to trastuzumab (T) and pertuzumab (P), which target the same domains, respectively. The anti-tumor activity of zanidatamab appears to be greater than trastuzumab both in vitro and in vivo, and across various HER2-overexpressing tumor cell types with different HER2 expression levels [37]. Findings from human cell line and animal models indicate that zanidatamab may also have clinical efficacy against tumors with low HER2 expression. The first in-human, multicenter, phase 1 trial reported the safety and tolerability of zanidatamab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including BTC (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 5), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 4), and gallbladder cancer (n = 13)) with HER2 overexpression or amplification, who had received all available approved therapies [38] (NCT02892123). The study had 22 patients with HER2-overexpressing or -amplified BTC enrolled with a confirmed ORR of 38% (95% CI, 18–62) with a median duration of response of 8.5 months. These early-phase study results support that HER2 is a promising actionable target for treating BTC in patients with HER2 overexpression or amplification.
In the MyPathway study, 39 previously treated metastatic biliary tract cancers with HER2 amplification, HER2 overexpression, or both were treated with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab [39]. The study subgroups by tumor location within the biliary tract were intrahepatic (n = 7), extrahepatic (n = 7), gallbladder (n = 16), ampulla (n = 5), and undesignated (n = 4). In this patient population with a median follow-up of 8.1 months, 9 out of 39 patients (23%; 95% CI 11–39) achieved an ORR, while 20 patients (51%; 95% CI 35–68) achieved disease control rate. The median PFS was 4.0 months, median OS was 10.9 months, and the 1 year OS rate was 50% (NCT02091141). In the study, exploratory post hoc analyses were conducted on subgroups of patients with HER2 alterations. Among the six patients who had both HER2 amplification or overexpression and HER2 mutations, three showed partial response (S310F [n = 2] and T733I), one had stable disease (S310F), and two had progressive disease (T862A and H878Y). In four patients with HER2 amplification but without protocol-defined HER2 overexpression (IHC 3+), one showed partial response (IHC 2+), two had stable disease (both IHC 2+), and one had progressive disease (IHC 0). It is noteworthy that all of these four patients progressed within two months from treatment initiation.
A recent Korean single-arm phase 2 study evaluated trastuzumab plus FOLFOX regimen in patients with BTC harboring HER2 amplification or overexpression who are refractory to GEMCIS [40]. Out of the 34 patients in the study, 10 experienced a partial response, and 17 had stable disease, leading to an overall response rate of 29.4% (95% CI 16.7–46.3) and a disease control rate of 79.4% (95% CI 62.9–89.9). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months (95% CI 3.6–6.7), and the median overall survival was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.9—not reached). Given the historical data demonstrating a 5% ORR with FOLFOX as second-line treatment for BTC [5], the promising results of this phase 2 study pave the way for future combination treatments utilizing HER2-targeted therapies.
There are ongoing clinical trials investigating HER2-targeting agents in BTC, such as zanidatamab alone (NCT04466891) and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) which are monoclonal antibodies chemically linked to a chemotherapeutic. The several ongoing clinical trials to assess the clinical activity of ADCs in a variety of cancers, including BTC, are listed in Table 4. The benefit of ADCs is to reduce off-target toxicity by binding specific tumor markers. In a phase 1 study, RC48-ADC showed promising activity in patients with HER2+ gastric cancer who were pretreated with HER-targeted drugs (ORR of 15% and DCR of 45%) [41]. Given that RC48-ADC demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and promising clinical activity in HER2+ gastric cancer, its efficacy in HER2+ unresectable BTCs is under investigation (NCT04329429). MRG002 is a type of investigational ADC that binds to HER2 on the surface of cancer cells. Subsequently, HER2-expressing cells internalize MRG002 and monomethyl auristatin E, which is conjugated to the HER2 antibody, blocks microtubule polymerization [42]. A phase 2 clinical trial is currently being conducted in China to evaluate the effectiveness of MRG002 for patients who have HER2-positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer and who have experienced progression or relapse after their first-line treatment (NCT04837508). In a study from Japan, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd), which is composed of a humanized monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor, has been tested in patients with HER2-positive BTC [43]. In the study, there were 22 patients with HER2-positive and 8 with HER2-low BTC. Among these 22 patients, 45.5% had IHC3+ and 54.5% had IHC2+/ISH+; the primary sites were gallbladder, extrahepatic, intrahepatic, and Vater in 11, 6, 3, and 2 patients, respectively. The confirmed ORR in HER2-positive patients was 36.4% (8/22; 2 complete response and 6 partial response; 90% CI, 19.6–56.1), which indicated a statistically significant improvement in ORR (p = 0.01). The disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 81.8% (95% CI, 59.7–94.8), 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.8–8.3), and 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.7–14.6), respectively. Encouraging efficacy was also observed in patients with HER2-low BTC, with an ORR of 12.5% (1/8; 1 partial response; 95% CI, 0.3–52.7), a disease control rate of 75.0% (95% CI, 34.9–96.8), a median PFS of 4.2 months (95% CI, 1.3–6.2), and a median OS of 8.9 months (95% CI, 3.0–12.8).
Given that trastuzumab deruxtecan received FDA approval for lung cancer, it seems feasible to test this ADC for BTC in the USA. Although HER2-mutant BTCs may not be as responsive to HER2 monoclonal antibodies as HER2-amplified or -overexpressed cancer types, irreversible HER2 inhibitors such as neratinib seem to be promising treatment options. HER2 ADCs are underway with the hope of overcoming resistance owing to the low HER2 expression. In a phase 3 trial for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer who had received one or two previous lines of chemotherapy, T-Dxd has been shown to yield a survival benefit in patients with HER2-low advanced breast cancer compared to the physician’s choice of chemotherapy [44]. T-DXd has an advantage over other HER2-targeting due to its ability to induce a bystander effect. This is because T-DXd is internalized into cancer cells upon binding to HER2 and then releases its cytotoxic payload inside the cells, which can diffuse to neighboring cells and kill them even if they express lower levels of HER2. This makes T-DXd a promising treatment option for patients with heterogeneous HER2 expression within the tumor.
Lapatinib is a small molecule inhibitor that targets the ATP-binding pocket of the protein kinase domain in EGFR/HER2 receptors. In doing so, it prevents self-phosphorylation and blocks downstream signaling pathways, resulting in the inhibition of receptor-mediated signaling processes. Both EGFR and HER2/neu were thought to be potential targets for anticancer therapy in BTC as they were reported to be overexpressed in this cancer type and play a direct role in cholangiocarcinogenesis [45]. Based on the knowledge that both EGFR and HER2/neu may play a role in BTC, the hypothesis was that a dual inhibitor capable of blocking both targets would have a greater therapeutic benefit compared to compounds that only target one receptor. Consequently, two phase 2 studies were conducted to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of lapatinib, a single-agent inhibitor, in patients with advanced BTC [45,46]. Despite being widely used in the treatment of breast cancer, clinical trials using a single agent of lapatinib for biliary tract cancer have not produced positive results. These disappointing outcomes have led to the conclusion that targeting HER2 may not be an effective approach for managing biliary tract cancer. In a preclinical study, lapatinib demonstrated a synergistic effect in gemcitabine-responsive human gallbladder cells (TGBC1-TKB) when combined with gemcitabine [47]. In parallel to this study, lapatinib inhibited growth of HER2-overexpressing cholangiocarcinoma in patient-derived organoids and cell lines. Intriguingly, lapatinib in combination with gemcitabine demonstrated a synergistic effect via inhibiting the ABCB1 transporter which mediates resistance to gemcitabine in CCA patients [48]. Overall, it might be more feasible to stratify patients based on their initial HER2 expression and combine HER2-targeting drugs with other FDA-approved chemotherapeutics.

6. Conclusions—Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives

Patients with BTC have a poor prognosis and, due to high heterogeneity, they are difficult to treat using common therapeutic strategies. However, this unique feature also presents an opportunity for personalized, targeted therapies. Novel targeted therapies such as IDH and FGFR inhibitors have revolutionized the management of BTC and, in recent years, various molecular aberrations have been identified, including HER2. Next-generation sequencing may help clinicians better stratify and predict which patients benefit from small molecule inhibitors the most. Moreover, the frequency of HER2 alterations may vary based on the anatomic localization of BTC. For instance, such alterations are more prevalent in gallbladder cancers than in other BTCs. To date, it is unclear whether the response to HER2-directed therapies may differ according to the primary tumor site. Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in BTC pave the way for designing more precise clinical trials. As aforementioned, HER2 alterations are not limited to overexpression or amplification. Therefore, testing for HER2 alterations should not be limited to protein expression levels. BTC patients with activating point mutations of HER2 but without overexpression might benefit from novel HER2-targeted therapies such as neratinib or antibody-drug conjugates. Currently, durvalumab, combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin, is the new standard of care treatment for unresectable gallbladder cancer. As more clinical trials assess the efficacy of HER2-targeted therapies in BTC, it may change clinical practice in the near future. Collateral and vertical oncogenic signaling pathways are the current hurdle in precision medicine. Even though results from clinical trials assessing HER2-targeting therapies in BTC are promising, combinational treatment options might be imperative in achieving breakthrough responses. In this regard, the combining of immunotherapy or chemotherapy agents with anti-HER2 therapies seems to be feasible for greater and more durable responses [49]. The efficient development of targeted therapies and clinical trials for this rare and genomically heterogeneous disease will require collaboration between academic centers and industry to harmonize efforts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.A. and I.S.; methodology, R.A. and I.S.; validation, R.A., M.O. and I.S.; formal analysis, R.A., M.O. and I.S.; investigation, R.A. and I.S.; resources, R.A., M.O. and I.S.; data curation, R.A. and I.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A., M.O. and I.S.; writing—review and editing, R.A. and I.S.; visualization, R.A., M.O. and I.S.; supervision, I.S.; project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kam, A.E.; Masood, A.; Shroff, R.T. Current and emerging therapies for advanced biliary tract cancers. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 6, 956–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oh, D.Y.; Bang, Y.J. HER2-targeted therapies—A role beyond breast cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 17, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Clements, O.; Eliahoo, J.; Kim, J.U.; Taylor-Robinson, S.D.; Khan, S.A. Risk factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Valle, J.; Wasan, H.; Palmer, D.H.; Cunningham, D.; Anthoney, A.; Maraveyas, A.; Madhusudan, S.; Iveson, T.; Hughes, S.; Pereira, S.P.; et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 1273–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  5. Lamarca, A.; Palmer, D.H.; Wasan, H.S.; Ross, P.J.; Ma, Y.T.; Arora, A.; Falk, S.; Gillmore, R.; Wadsley, J.; Patel, K.; et al. Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy versus active symptom control for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC-06): A phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021, 22, 690–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abou-Alfa, G.K.; Sahai, V.; Hollebecque, A.; Vaccaro, G.; Melisi, D.; Al-Rajabi, R.; Paulson, A.S.; Borad, M.J.; Gallinson, D.; Murphy, A.G.; et al. Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Javle, M.; Roychowdhury, S.; Kelley, R.K.; Sadeghi, S.; Macarulla, T.; Weiss, K.H.; Waldschmidt, D.-T.; Goyal, L.; Borbath, I.; El-Khoueiry, A.; et al. Infigratinib (BGJ398) in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements: Mature results from a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 6, 803–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bahleda, R.; Meric-Bernstam, F.; Goyal, L.; Tran, B.; He, Y.; Yamamiya, I.; Benhadji, K.A.; Matos, I.; Arkenau, H.-T. Phase I, first-in-human study of futibatinib, a highly selective, irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors. Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, 1405–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goyal, L.; Meric-Bernstam, F.; Hollebecque, A.; Valle, J.W.; Morizane, C.; Karasic, T.B.; Abrams, T.A.; Furuse, J.; Kelley, R.K.; Cassier, P.A.; et al. Futibatinib for FGFR2-Rearranged Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 388, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, A.X.; Macarulla, T.; Javle, M.M.; Kelley, R.K.; Lubner, S.J.; Adeva, J.; Cleary, J.M.; Catenacci, D.V.T.; Borad, M.J.; Bridgewater, J.A.; et al. Final Overall Survival Efficacy Results of Ivosidenib for Patients With Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With IDH1 Mutation: The Phase 3 Randomized Clinical ClarIDHy Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021, 7, 1669–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. van Golen, R.F.; Dekker, T.J.A. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, e515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Subbiah, V.; Kreitman, R.; Wainberg, Z.; Cho, J.; Schellens, J.; Soria, J.; Wen, P.; Zielinski, C.; Cabanillas, M.; Boran, A.; et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 1234–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Massard, C.; Michiels, S.; Ferté, C.; Le Deley, M.-C.; Lacroix, L.; Hollebecque, A.; Verlingue, L.; Ileana, E.; Rosellini, S.; Ammari, S.; et al. High-Throughput Genomics and Clinical Outcome in Hard-to-Treat Advanced Cancers: Results of the MOSCATO 01 Trial. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 586–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  14. Mosele, F.; Remon, J.; Mateo, J.; Westphalen, C.; Barlesi, F.; Lolkema, M.; Normanno, N.; Scarpa, A.; Robson, M.; Meric-Bernstam, F.; et al. Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: A report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann. Oncol. 2020, 31, 1491–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Valle, J.W.; Lamarca, A.; Goyal, L.; Barriuso, J.; Zhu, A.X. New Horizons for Precision Medicine in Biliary Tract Cancers. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 943–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  16. Vivaldi, C.; Fornaro, L.; Ugolini, C.; Niccoli, C.; Musettini, G.; Pecora, I.; Insilla, A.C.; Salani, F.; Pasquini, G.; Catanese, S.; et al. HER2 Overexpression as a Poor Prognostic Determinant in Resected Biliary Tract Cancer. Oncologist 2020, 25, 886–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kim, H.; Kim, R.; Kim, H.R.; Jo, H.; Kim, H.; Ha, S.Y.; Park, J.O.; Park, Y.S.; Kim, S.T. HER2 Aberrations as a Novel Marker in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 834104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Galdy, S.; Lamarca, A.; McNamara, M.G.; Hubner, R.A.; Cella, C.A.; Fazio, N.; Valle, J.W. HER2/HER3 pathway in biliary tract malignancies; systematic review and meta-analysis: A potential therapeutic target? Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2017, 36, 141–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. Hiraoka, N.; Nitta, H.; Ohba, A.; Yoshida, H.; Morizane, C.; Okusaka, T.; Nara, S.; Esaki, M.; Kishi, Y.; Shimada, K. Details of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in 454 cases of biliary tract cancer. Hum. Pathol. 2020, 105, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ata, A.; Polat, A.; Serinsöz, E.; Sungur, M.A.; Arican, A. Prognostıc value of increased HER2 expression in cancers of pancreas and biliary tree. Pathol. Oncol. Res 2015, 21, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rüschoff, J.; Hanna, W.; Bilous, M.; Hofmann, M.; Osamura, R.Y.; Penault-Llorca, F.; van de Vijver, M.; Viale, G. HER2 testing in gastric cancer: A practical approach. Mod. Pathol. 2012, 25, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  22. Nam, A.R.; Kim, J.-W.; Cha, Y.; Ha, H.; Park, J.E.; Bang, J.-H.; Jin, M.H.; Lee, K.-H.; Kim, T.-Y.; Han, S.-W.; et al. Therapeutic implication of HER2 in advanced biliary tract cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 58007–58021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  23. de Bitter, T.J.J.; de Reuver, P.R.; de Savornin Lohman, E.A.; Kroeze, L.I.; Vink-Börger, M.E.; van Vliet, S.; Simmer, F.; von Rhein, D.; Jansen, E.A.M.; Verheij, J.; et al. Comprehensive clinicopathological and genomic profiling of gallbladder cancer reveals actionable targets in half of patients. NPJ. Precis. Oncol. 2022, 6, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pahuja, K.B.; Nguyen, T.T.; Jaiswal, B.S.; Prabhash, K.; Thaker, T.M.; Senger, K.; Chaudhuri, S.; Kljavin, N.M.; Antony, A.; Phalke, S.; et al. Actionable Activating Oncogenic ERBB2/HER2 Transmembrane and Juxtamembrane Domain Mutations. Cancer Cell 2018, 34, 792–806.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  25. Ayasun, R.; Sahin, I. Trastuzumab plus FOLFOX for HER2-positive biliary tract cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 8, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jacobi, O.; Ross, J.S.; Goshen-Lago, T.; Haddad, R.; Moore, A.; Sulkes, A.; Brenner, B.; Ben-Aharon, I. ERBB2 Pathway in Biliary Tract Carcinoma: Clinical Implications of a Targetable Pathway. Oncol. Res. Treat 2021, 44, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, X.; Yang, H.; Yu, X.; Qin, J.-J. Drug-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer: Molecular mechanisms and overcoming strategies. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1012552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bose, R.; Kavuri, S.M.; Searleman, A.C.; Shen, W.; Shen, D.; Koboldt, D.C.; Monsey, J.; Goel, N.; Aronson, A.B.; Li, S.; et al. Activating HER2 mutations in HER2 gene amplification negative breast cancer. Cancer Discov. 2013, 3, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  29. Ma, C.X.; Bose, R.; Gao, F.; Freedman, R.A.; Telli, M.L.; Kimmick, G.; Winer, E.; Naughton, M.; Goetz, M.P.; Russell, C.; et al. Neratinib Efficacy and Circulating Tumor DNA Detection of HER2 Mutations in HER2 Nonamplified Metastatic Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 5687–5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  30. Meric-Bernstam, F.; Johnson, A.M.; Dumbrava, E.E.I.; Raghav, K.; Balaji, K.; Bhatt, M.; Murthy, R.K.; Rodon, J.; Piha-Paul, S.A. Advances in HER2-Targeted Therapy: Novel Agents and Opportunities Beyond Breast and Gastric Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 2033–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Vernieri, C.; Milano, M.; Brambilla, M.; Mennitto, A.; Maggi, C.; Cona, M.S.; Prisciandaro, M.; Fabbroni, C.; Celio, L.; Mariani, G.; et al. Resistance mechanisms to anti-HER2 therapies in HER2-positive breast cancer: Current knowledge, new research directions and therapeutic perspectives. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2019, 139, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bogenberger, J.M.; DeLeon, T.T.; Arora, M.; Ahn, D.H.; Borad, M.J. Emerging role of precision medicine in biliary tract cancers. NPJ. Precis. Oncol. 2018, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Hanker, A.B.; Garrett, J.T.; Estrada, M.V.; Moore, P.D.; Ericsson, P.G.; Koch, J.P.; Langley, E.; Singh, S.; Kim, P.S.; Frampton, G.M.; et al. HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancers Amplify FGFR Signaling upon Acquisition of Resistance to Dual Therapeutic Blockade of HER2. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 4323–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  34. Rizzo, A.; Ricci, A.D.; Brandi, G. Pemigatinib: Hot topics behind the first approval of a targeted therapy in cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Treat Res. Commun. 2021, 27, 100337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Harding, J.J.; Piha-Paul, S.A.; Shah, R.H.; Cleary, J.M.; Quinn, D.I.; Brana, I.; Moreno, V.; Borad, M.J.; Loi, S.; Spanggaard, I.; et al. Targeting HER2 mutation–positive advanced biliary tract cancers with neratinib: Final results from the phase 2 SUMMIT basket trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 40 (Suppl. 16), 4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, B.T.; Smit, E.F.; Goto, Y.; Nakagawa, K.; Udagawa, H.; Mazières, J.; Nagasaka, M.; Bazhenova, L.; Saltos, A.N.; Felip, E.; et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in HER2-Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Weisser, N.E.; Wickman, G.; Abraham, L.; O’Toole, J.; Harbourne, B.; Guedia, J.; Cheng, C.W.; Chan, P.; Browman, D.; Gold, M.R.; et al. Abstract 1005: The bispecific antibody zanidatamab’s (ZW25’s) unique mechanisms of action and durable anti-tumor activity in HER2-expressing cancers. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Meric-Bernstam, F.; Beeram, M.; Hamilton, E.; Oh, D.-Y.; Hanna, D.L.; Kang, Y.-K.; Elimova, E.; Chaves, J.; Goodwin, R.; Lee, J.; et al. Zanidatamab, a novel bispecific antibody, for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic HER2-expressing or HER2-amplified cancers: A phase 1, dose-escalation and expansion study. Lancet Oncol. 2022, 23, 1558–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Javle, M.; Borad, M.J.; Azad, N.S.; Kurzrock, R.; Abou-Alfa, G.K.; George, B.; Hainsworth, J.; Meric-Bernstam, F.; Swanton, C.; Sweeney, C.J.; et al. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab for HER2-positive, metastatic biliary tract cancer (MyPathway): A multicentre, open-label, phase 2a, multiple basket study. Lancet Oncol. 2021, 22, 1290–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, C.K.; Chon, H.J.; Cheon, J.; Lee, M.A.; Im, H.-S.; Jang, J.-S.; Kim, M.H.; Park, S.; Kang, B.; Hong, M.; et al. Trastuzumab plus FOLFOX for HER2-positive biliary tract cancer refractory to gemcitabine and cisplatin: A multi-institutional phase 2 trial of the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG-HB19-14). Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 8, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gong, J.; Zhang, X.; Peng, Z.; Sheng, X.; Mao, C.; Fan, Q.; Bai, Y.; Ba, Y.; et al. Phase I study of the recombinant humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody-MMAE conjugate RC48-ADC in patients with HER2-positive advanced solid tumors. Gastric Cancer 2021, 24, 913–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yu, J.; Fang, T.; Yun, C.; Liu, X.; Cai, X. Antibody-Drug Conjugates Targeting the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Family in Cancers. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 847835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ohba, A.; Morizane, C.; Kawamoto, Y.; Komatsu, Y.; Ueno, M.; Kobayashi, S.; Ikeda, M.; Sasaki, M.; Furuse, J.; Okano, N.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients (pts) with HER2-expressing unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC): An investigator-initiated multicenter phase 2 study (HERB trial). J. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 40, 4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Modi, S.; Jacot, W.; Yamashita, T.; Sohn, J.; Vidal, M.; Tokunaga, E.; Tsurutani, J.; Ueno, N.T.; Prat, A.; Chae, Y.S.; et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Peck, J.; Wei, L.; Zalupski, M.; O’Neil, B.; Calero, M.V.; Bekaii-Saab, T. HER2/neu may not be an interesting target in biliary cancers: Results of an early phase II study with lapatinib. Oncology 2012, 82, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ramanathan, R.K.; Belani, C.; Singh, D.A.; Tanaka, M.; Lenz, H.-J.; Yen, Y.; Kindler, H.L.; Iqbal, S.; Longmate, J.; Mack, P.C.; et al. A phase II study of lapatinib in patients with advanced biliary tree and hepatocellular cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2009, 64, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pignochino, Y.; Sarotto, I.; Peraldo-Neia, C.; Penachioni, J.Y.; Cavalloni, G.; Migliardi, G.; Casorzo, L.; Chiorino, G.; Risio, M.; Bardelli, A.; et al. Targeting EGFR/HER2 pathways enhances the antiproliferative effect of gemcitabine in biliary tract and gallbladder carcinomas. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  48. Bai, Z.; Guo, Z.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.-A.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, P.; Hong, L.; Wang, Y.; Dong, J. Lapatinib Suppresses HER2-Overexpressed Cholangiocarcinoma and Overcomes ABCB1-Mediated Gemcitabine Chemoresistance. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 860339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chakrabarti, S.; Kamgar, M.; Mahipal, A. Targeted Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: An Evolving Paradigm. Cancers 2020, 12, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. The frequency of HER2 aberrations in South Korean patients with BTC (adapted from [17]).
Table 1. The frequency of HER2 aberrations in South Korean patients with BTC (adapted from [17]).
Primary Tumor SiteFrequency of HER2 Alteration
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma5.8%
Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 13.9%
Gallbladder cancer 36.4%
Ampulla of Vater18.2%
Table 2. Subtypes of HER2 aberrations in South Korean patients with BTC (adapted from [17]).
Table 2. Subtypes of HER2 aberrations in South Korean patients with BTC (adapted from [17]).
Type of HER2 AlterationFrequency of HER2 Alteration
100% (n = 18)
Point mutation27.8% (n = 5)
Gene amplification61.1% (n = 11)
Point mutation and gene amplification11.1% (n = 2)
Table 3. HER2 aberrations in European patients with BTC [26].
Table 3. HER2 aberrations in European patients with BTC [26].
Primary Tumor SiteFrequency of HER2 AlterationType of HER2 Alteration
Intrahepatic CCA4.2%Point mutation (23.8%) and copy number alteration (66.6%)
Extrahepatic CCA9.7%Point mutation (53.6%) and copy number alteration (41.2%)
Table 4. Clinical trials of HER2-targeted therapies in biliary tract cancers.
Table 4. Clinical trials of HER2-targeted therapies in biliary tract cancers.
Clinical Trial Drug Patient Characteristics Study PhaseRecruitment StatusPrimary EndpointResults
NCT00478140TrastuzumabPreviously treated, locally advanced or metastatic gallbladder cancer or bile duct cancer that cannot be removed by surgeryIITerminated due to slow accrual ORR, DORTerminated
NCT00107536Lapatinib ditosylatePreviously treated, unresectable liver or biliary tract cancer (BTC)IICompletedORR, PFS, AEs, median OS, OSCompleted
NCT04466891
(HERIZON-BTC-01)		ZanidatamabPreviously treated, advanced or metastatic HER2-amplified BTCs IIActive, not recruitingORR, DOR, DCR, PFS, OS, AEsNot recruiting
NCT04329429RC48-ADCPreviously treated, locally advanced or metastatic HER2 overexpressed BTC who have failed first-line chemotherapyIIRecruitingORR, DOR, PFS, OS, DCR, AEsActive
NCT03929666ZW25 (Zanidatamab)
Capecitabine
Cisplatin
Fluorouracil
Leucovorin
Oxaliplatin
Bevacizumab Gemcitabine		Previously treated, unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic HER2-expressing BTCIIRecruitingDLT, AEs,
ORR		Active
NCT04837508MRG002 ADCPreviously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BTC patients who have progressed during or relapsed after at least one prior stand therapyIIRecruitingORRActive
NCT04722133Herzuma (Trastuzumab-pkrb)
mFOLFOX		Previously treated, HER2-positive advanced/metastatic/nonresectable BTCIIRecruitingORR, PFS, DCR, OS, AEsActive
NCT05417230RC48-ADC
Envafolimab (anti-PDL1)		Previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic BTC with positive HER-2IINot yet recruitingORR, PFS, DCR, OS, AEsActive
NCT04482309 (DESTINY-PanTumor02)Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201a)HER2-overexpressing tumor-specific cohorts including BTCIIActive, not recruitingORR, PFS, DCR, OS, AEsActive, not recruiting
NCT05540483 (RIGHT)RC-48
GLS-010 (anti-PD1)		Previously treated unresectable BTCIIRecruitingORR, AEs, PFS, DOR, DCR, OSActive
NCT04450732GQ1001Previously treated, HER2-positive advanced solid tumorsIRecruitingDLT, AEs, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)Active
NCT02451553Afatinib dimaleate
Capecitabine		Previously treated, advanced refractory solid tumors, pancreatic cancer, or biliary cancerICompletedDLT, AEs, MTDCompleted
NCT04660929CT-0508 (CAR macrophages)Previously treated, HER2-overexpressing solid tumorsIRecruitingAEs, ORR, PFSActive
NCT04579380Tucatinib TrastuzumabPreviously treated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic solid tumors driven by HER2 alterations IIRecruitingcORR, DCR, PFS, OS, AEsActive
NCT04278144BDC-1001 (immune stimulating antibody conjugate, ISAC)
Nivolumab		HER2-overexpressing advanced malignanciesI/IIRecruiting AEs, DLT, ORR, DOR, DCR, PFSActive
NCT04460456SBT6050 (ISAC)
Pembrolizumab
Cemiplimab		HER2 expressing or amplified advanced malignanciesIActive, not recruitingDLT, AEs, ORR, DOR, DCR, PFSActive, not recruiting
NCT05150691DB-1303 HER2 expressing advanced solid tumors I/IIRecruitingDLT, ORR, AEsActive
NCT00478140TrastuzumabHER2/neu-positive advanced gallbladder or biliary tract cancerIITerminated (Due to slow accrual)ORR, DCR, OSTerminated
NCT02999672Trastuzumab emtansineHER2 overexpressing solid tumorsIICompleted OS, PFS, AEsCompleted
NCT04430738Tucatinib
Trastuzumab
FOLFOX
CAPOX
Pembrolizumab		HER2+ gastrointestinal cancersI/IIRecruiting DLT, AEs, ORR, DOR, PFS, OSActive
NCT03613168 (BILHER)Trastuzumab
GEMCIS		HER2+ biliary tract cancerIICompletedRR, PFS, OSCompleted
NCT00101036Lapatinib ditosylateLocally Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract or Liver Cancer That Cannot Be Removed By SurgeryIICompletedORR, OS, PFSCompleted
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ayasun, R.; Ozer, M.; Sahin, I. The Role of HER2 Status in the Biliary Tract Cancers. Cancers 2023, 15, 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092628

AMA Style

Ayasun R, Ozer M, Sahin I. The Role of HER2 Status in the Biliary Tract Cancers. Cancers. 2023; 15(9):2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092628

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ayasun, Ruveyda, Muhammet Ozer, and Ilyas Sahin. 2023. "The Role of HER2 Status in the Biliary Tract Cancers" Cancers 15, no. 9: 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092628

APA Style

Ayasun, R., Ozer, M., & Sahin, I. (2023). The Role of HER2 Status in the Biliary Tract Cancers. Cancers, 15(9), 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092628

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop