Next Article in Journal
Soft Tissue Reconstruction of the Posterior Trunk after Tumor Excision: A Surgical Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
New Horizons in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Prognostic Role of CD44 Expression
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Associated with Axillary Lymph Node Status in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 4
10.3390/cancers15041213
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Use of San-Huang-Xie-Xin-Tang Reduces the Mortality Rate among Breast Cancer Patients

by
Daniel Winardi
1,
Chieh-Hsin Wu
2,3,
Jen-Huai Chiang
4,
Yung-Hsiang Chen
1,5,
Ching-Liang Hsieh
6,7,
Juan-Cheng Yang
8,9,*,† and
Yang-Chang Wu
1,8,10,*,†
1
Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
2
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
3
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
4
Management Office for Health Data, Clinical Trial Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
5
Department of Psychology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan
6
Department of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
7
Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, Graduate Institute of Acupuncture Science, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
8
Chinese Medicine Research and Development Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
9
School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40604, Taiwan
10
Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Cancers 2023, 15(4), 1213; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041213
Submission received: 11 January 2023 / Revised: 21 January 2023 / Accepted: 29 January 2023 / Published: 14 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Since San-Huang-Xie-Xin-Tang (SHXXT) is a potent anti-tumor therapy and breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide, in the present retrospective cohort study, we explore the influence of SHXXT and its constituents on the mortality rate by analyzing 5387 breast cancer patients taking SHXXT and its constituents and 5387 breast cancer patients not using SHXXT and its constituents. Our study confirms SHXXT and its constituents are a useful alternative therapy to decrease the breast cancer mortality rate. In particular, the use of SHXXT is more effective than the use of only one constituent. With the increasing cumulative days of use and the annual average dose, the anti-tumor effect is more pronounced.

Abstract

Globally, breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths. In Taiwan, it is the most prevalent cancer among females. Since San-Huang-Xie-Xin-Tang (SHXXT) exerts not only an anti-inflammatory but an immunomodulatory effect, it may act as a potent anti-tumor agent. Herein, the study aimed to explore the influence of SHXXT and its constituents on the mortality rate among breast cancer patients in Taiwan regarding the component effect and the dose–relationship effect. By using the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) Research Database (NHIRD), the study analyzed 5387 breast cancer patients taking Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) and 5387 breast cancer patients not using CHM. CHM means SHXXT and its constituents in the study. The Kaplan–Meier method was utilized to determine the mortality probabilities among patients. Whether the CHM influences the mortality rate among patients was estimated by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. The use of CHM could lower the cancer mortality rate by 59% in breast cancer patients. The protective effect was parallel to the cumulative days of CHM use and the annual average CHM dose. In addition, the mortality rate was lower in patients who used SHXXT compared to those who only used one of its constituents. SHXXT and its constituents were all promising therapeutic weapons against breast cancer.

1. Introduction

Around the world, cancer is the top reason of death. During the past two decades, the annual incidence of breast cancer has doubled or tripled in Asia [1]. In Taiwan, breast cancer is also the most common cancer among females with increasing prevalence and incidence [2,3,4]. The etiology of breast cancer remains unsettled, which is attributable to genetic, hormonal, or reproductive factors [5]. Although the standard treatments for breast cancer patients include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and target therapy [6], many patients still seek for help with complementary and alternative medicine. In Taiwan, adult cancer patients who used traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) had a lower cancer mortality rate than those without using TCM (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.69). Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) and acupuncture are the most common alternative choices [7,8,9,10]. TCM elicits a protective effect against breast cancer; accordingly, consumption of Chinese herbs can reduce the incidence of invasive breast cancer [11]. In Taiwan, a large proportion of patients receive CHM and Western medicine concurrently against breast cancer [12].
Since the inflammatory signals can trigger the formation of a tumor microenvironment, several cancers arise from chronic inflammation [13]. Being a CHM, San-Huang-Xie-Xin-Tang (SHXXT) is composed of three herbal medicines, Rhizoma Rhei, Radix Scutellaria, and Rhizoma Coptidis at a ratio of 2:1:1 or 1:1:1 [14]. It serves as a possible therapeutic choice for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection [15], hypertension [16,17,18], septic shock [19], neuronal damage [20], gastrointestinal (GI) disorders [21,22], acute lung injury [23], and cardiomyocyte injury [24]. SHXXT can decrease COX2 and NF-κB induction to suppress the replication of HCV [15]. Through the expression of COX2, ROCK-II, and PDE5, SHXXT ameliorated U46619-induced systemic and pulmonary arterial blood hypertension [18]. Mediating by the formation of iNOs, COX2, and PGE2, SHXXT can prevent hypotension in LPS-treated rats [19]. In the neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, SHXXT can prevent the formation of ROS and inflammatory response against neurotoxicity [20]. In experimentally induced GI motility dysfunction mice, SHXXT is a novel prokinetic agent to alleviate GI motility dysfunction in a dose-dependent manner [21]. In Helicobacter pylori infection, SHXXT can induce the anti-inflammatory effect through inhibiting the activation of NF-κB, the production of iNOS, COX-2, and IL-8 in human gastric epithelial AGS cells [22]. In addition, SHXXT attenuates inflammatory responses by decreasing the expression of IL-1β, iNOS, and TNF-α in lipopolysaccharide-induced rat lung injury [23]. It can protect rats’ cardiomyocyte against apoptosis through eNOs and MAPK pathways after ischemia-reperfusion injury [24]. Besides, series studies have demonstrated that SHXXT has immunomodulatory, neuroprotective, and a potent anti-cancer effect [25,26,27,28]. Since, up till now, no studies have elucidated the relevance of SHXXT for breast cancers in detail, this population-based study aimed to investigate the effect of SHXXT and its constituents on breast cancer patients by analyzing the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Beside the impact of single constituent or compounds on cancer mortality rate, the study also clarified the dose–relationship effect based on the stratification of cumulative days of CHM use and the annual average CHM dose.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

From March 1995 till now, the Taiwan national health insurance (NHI) program has covered 99.6% of residents. All medical records reimbursed by the NHI were included in the NHIRD, in which the registry of beneficiaries, ambulatory and inpatient care claims data, and the registry of catastrophic illness were the source of the database. In the study, study subjects were recruited from the ambulatory and inpatient claims data liked with the registry of Catastrophic Illness during 2000 to 2010 and followed to the end of 2011.

2.2. Study Design and Cohort

This study aimed to evaluate the association between breast cancer mortality rate and the use of CHM, including SHXXT or one of its constituents (Rhizoma Coptidis, Rhizoma Rhei, or Radix Scutellaria). From the Registry for Catastrophic Illness database, 79,510 female patients who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer (International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) = 174) during 2000–2010 were enrolled. The ICD-9-CM codes were identified by Chinese medicine physicians. The index date was the date of new diagnosis with breast cancer. They were followed up until the end of December 2011, death, or withdrawn from the insurance within a year of the follow-up period. Subjects younger than 18 years old or incomplete data were excluded from the analysis (n = 273). Subjects who withdraw from the insurance within a year of the follow-up period were also excluded (n = 51). A patient who took SHXXT or one of the constituents for more than 30 days was set as a CHM user (n = 5505). A patient without using CHM, acupuncture, or manipulative records was identified as a non-CHM user (n = 10,153). Subsequently, in order to match the two populations equally, the CHM user and the non-CHM user identified 5387 breast cancer patients in each group randomly frequency matched with distributions of age, and index year at 1 to 1 ratio. Age was set into three categories (18 to 39 years, 40 to 59 years, and more than 60 years). Gender was categorized as male and female. Urbanization was set into four levels (1, highest, 2, 3 and 4, lowest). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was divided into three groups (0, 1, and 2 or higher). Besides, treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, breast cancer surgery) and drugs which patients received within half a year after the new diagnosis of breast cancer were included and followed up to the end of the study.

2.3. Study Outcome

All-cause mortality was set as the study outcome, in which date of death was obtained from the major illness certificate. The follow-up time was estimated in person-years, continued until the end of December 2011 or the death of the patient, whichever occurred first.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The CHM user and the non-CHM user were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, CCI score, treatment, and drugs. To exam the categorical variables of the baseline characteristics, chi-square test was used. Otherwise, to exam continuous variables, t test was used. The survival probability between CHM group and non-CHM group were plotted by the Kaplan–Meier method and estimated by the Log-rank test, respectively. To calculate the HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the breast cancer mortality rate, the Cox proportional hazard model was utilized. SAS statistical software (version 9.4) was used to analyze all the database in the study with a two-tailed significance level of 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Breast Cancer Patients

The baseline characteristics of the CHM user and non-CHM user were displayed in Table 1. In total, 5387 CHM users and 5387 non-CHM users with respective mean ages of 49.35 ± 10.08 and 49.41 ± 10.12 years were recruited in the analysis. In total, 67.94 % of patients were 40–59 years old, and almost all patients (94.45%) had a CCI score of 0. A significantly higher percentages of patients had received previous breast surgery (94.8% vs. 85.74%, p < 0.0001), Cyclophosphamide (70.54% vs. 67.27%, p = 0.0002), Tamoxifen (69.96% vs. 65.23%, p < 0.0001), and Anastrozole (16.3% vs. 12.31%, p < 0.0001) in the CHM users. Otherwise, a significantly lower percentages of patients had received Docetaxel (16.87% vs. 21.55%, p < 0.0001), Paclitaxel (11.62 vs. 14.52, p < 0.0001) and Trastuzumab (6.61% vs. 7.82%, p = 0.0155) in the CHM users.

3.2. Effect of CHM on Mortality Rate of Breast Cancer Patients

At the end of the follow up, 1597 of all enrolled patients had died (456 CHM-users and 1141 non-CHM users) (Figure 1). To elucidate the effect of CHM on breast cancer mortality rate, the cancer mortality rate among CHM user and non-CHM user was stratified according to baseline characteristics of breast cancer patients using the Cox proportional hazard regression model (Table 2). Mortality incidence densities were 13.62 per 1000 person-years and 41.38 per 1000 person-years in the CHM users and non-CHM users, respectively. The mortality rate was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the CHM users (decrease by 59 % after adjusting for age group, urbanization level, CCI score, treatment, and drugs). In age-specific analyses, the CHM users also had a significantly lower mortality rate than non-CHM users in all age groups. In urbanization level or CCI score-specific analyses, the CHM users also had a significantly lower mortality rate than non-CHM users in all groups. Regardless of comorbidities, treatment, and drugs, CHM users had a relatively lower mortality rate. Treatment-stratified analysis revealed that mortality was higher in the treatment group compared to the group without receiving treatment. In sub-analyses of the drug, mortality was higher in the drug group compared to the group not receiving a drug except Toremifene.
The survival probability between CHM user and non-CHM user among breast cancer patients was plotted in Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with a log rank test revealed that CHM users had significantly higher survival rate compared to non-CHM users (p < 0.001).

3.3. The Cumulative Days and Annual Average Dose of CHM Use Influence the Breast Cancer Mortality Rate

Next, subgroup analyses were further arranged to clarify the influence of the cumulative days and annual average dose of CHM use among breast cancer patients. The results shows that the risk of cancer mortality rate significantly decreased with the increasing cumulative days of CHM use (HR = 0.44, 0.41 and 0.31 in 30–90 days, 90–180 days, and >180 days, respectively, p for trend <0.001) (Table 3). In total, 25, 50, and 75 percentiles of the annual average CHM dose were 35.1, 67.2, and 147 (g), respectively. The risk of cancer mortality rate significantly decreased with the increasing annual average CHM dose (HR = 0.50, 0.43, 0.39, and 0.30 at <35.1 g, 35.1–67.2 g, 67.2–147 g, and >147 g, respectively, p for trend <0.001) (Table 4). Relative to non-CHM users, the cancer mortality rate in CHM users was the lowest during follow-up periods <2 years and then increased with an increasing follow-up period. However, the mortality rate did not significantly differ between CHM users and non-CHM users after a follow-up of more than 5 years (Table 5). Taken together, the protective effect of CHM was parallel to the cumulative days of CHM use and the annual average CHM dose, which is most dominant during the initial usage.

3.4. The Impact of SHXXT and Its Constituents on the Breast Cancer Mortality Rate

At last, to clarify the effect of SHXXT and its constituents among breast cancer patients, stratified analyses were performed further. The results reveals that the mortality rate was lower in patients who used SHXXT compound compared to patients who only used one of its constituents (HR = 0.42, 0.40, 0.39 and 0.32 for Rhizoma Rhei, Radix Scutellaria, Rhizoma Coptidis, and SHXXT, respectively) (Table 6). Above all, SHXXT compound elicited the more significant impact on the deceasing cancer mortality rate compared to the use of one individual constituents.

4. Discussion

This retrospective, large-scale, population-based cohort study is not only the first Taiwanese study to investigate the cancer mortality rate among breast cancer patients who received SHXXT or its constituents but also the first study in the Asian population. The use of SHXXT or its constituents reduced the breast cancer mortality rate by 59%. Notably, the protective effect of SHXXT and its constituents on breast cancer increased with the cumulative days and annual average dose. Moreover, the mortality rate was lower in breast cancer patients who used the SHXXT compound than those who only used one of its constituents.
Series studies have reported that extracts of SHXXT constituents have anti-cancer effects. According to the gene set enrichment analysis by Cheng et al., SHXXT can exert anti-proliferative effects on breast cancer HepG2 cells through regulating p53 signaling [26]. The decoction SHXXT typically contains Rhizoma Rhei, Radix Scutellaria, and Rhizoma Coptidis at ratios of 2:1:1 or 1:1:1. Notably, the anti-proliferative effects of SHXXT are mainly conferred by Rhizoma Coptidis. The major component of Rhizoma Coptidis is berberine; it can induce human breast cancer cell apoptosis by upregulating TNF-α and interferon-β in a time- or dose-dependent manner [29,30]. Chou and their colleagues reported that berberine induces cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells through reactive oxygen species, dysregulation of redox regulation, centrosomal structure, electron transport, cell signaling, protein folding, proteolysis, and protein trafficking [31]. Berberine decreases cell viability by inhibiting the Ras/MAPK and PI3K pathways, by suppressing activation of growth factor receptors (Her2/neu, EGF receptor, and VEGF receptor), by increasing apoptosis-related molecules (Smac/DIABLO, caspases, and Bax), tumor suppressor genes (p53, Clip/p21, Klip/p27, and Rb) [32], and over-expression of HDAC1 [33], prohibitin [34], serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A [35,36], and by blockade of Bcl-2 expression. In addition, berberine can increase the amount of E-cadherin and suppress activation of the Wnt/ β-catenin pathway to modulate tumor cell migration and metastasis [37]. Apart from berberine, coptisine is an isoquinoline alkaloid extract of Rhizoma Coptidis, from which can emerge the anti-metastasis effect. Through down-regulating MMP-9 and increasing TIMP-1, coptisine can suppress adhesion, migration, and invasion of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells [38]. Hence, Rhizoma Coptidis inhibits the breast cancer cell proliferation and metastasis based on these two important components.
In addition to Rhizoma Coptidis, Radix Scutellaria is another constituent of SHXXT, which also has an anti-cancer effect due to its containing Oroxylin A and numerous flavonoids such as wogonin and baicalin [39]. Being a major component of Radix Scutellaria, Oroxylin A inhibits the binding activity of hexokinase-II (HK-II) with mitochondria in a SIRT3-dependent manner to suppress glycolysis and induce mitochondrial cytotoxicity in human breast cancer cell lines [40]. Another component of Radix Scutellaria, wogonin, inhibits breast cancer cells invasion by downregulating ERK1/2 and PKC-δ [41]. Through decreasing both endogenous and PMA-induced MMP-9 expression, wogonin could inhibit tumor invasion and metastasis [42]. Wogonin also could induce cell differentiation, impair cell apoptosis, and activate both antioxidant and anti-angiogenesis activity against breast cancer formation [43,44,45,46].
Moreover, the other constituent of SHXXT, Rhizoma Rhei, exerts a high estrogenic potency, of which chrysophanol 1-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, aloe emodin, and rhapontigenin are the main isolated compounds. Most breast cancer cells are estrogen receptor- (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (69%), and almost half of postmenopausal patients have ER-positive breast cancer cells [47,48]. Since estrogen can stimulate ER-positive breast cancer cell to proliferate, a selective ER modulator that blocks the binding of estrogen to ER is effective to treat ER-positive breast cancer [49,50]. Through regulating the expression of ER, Rhizoma Rhei can modulate the proliferation of breast cancer MCF-7 cell in a concentration-dependent manner [51]. Chrysophanol 1-O-β-D-glucopyranoside mediates mitochondria-dependent apoptosis, whereas aloe emodin and rhapontigenin activate the caspase-8 pathway to induce mitochondria-independent apoptosis. Therefore, Rhizoma Rhei components could help hormone replacement therapy and chemoprevention against breast cancer owing to their potent estrogenic and inhibitory activities [52].
Since three constituents of SHXXT all have an important anti-cancer effect, the cancer mortality rate influence of the SHXXT component is supposed to be superior to that of a single constituent. Around the world, the major causes of morbidity and mortality are tumor invasion and metastasis. To halt the breast cancer mortality, the main objective is to inhibit cancer invasion and metastasis. Since extracts of three SHXXT constituents not only have anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenesis effects but also exert anti-invasive and anti-metastatic impacts on breast cancer, the multi-component nature of medicinal herbs makes them particularly suitable to treat complex disease through synergistic activity [53]. Therefore, SHXXT is more effective than its individual components in terms of reducing mortality in breast cancer patients.
The strength of the study is that the study traced a large sample size of patients for a long period by using NHIRD. NHIRD is good for assessing survival rates, herb–drug interactions, and the cost-effectiveness of drug treatments. In addition, the study analyzed the specific ascertainment of numerous outcome events, the identification of an exposure–response relationship, and the comparison of different average annual doses. Besides, the data contained in an administrative database rather than data collected in a hospital-based study helped to avoid selection bias.
However, several limitations are retained in the study. First, this retrospective observational study could only analyze the data contained in NHIRD. Since the de-identified data are released for public research and the NHIRD is a claims-based database, no additional clinical information is available, e.g., histology subtype, gene change, and cancer staging [54,55,56]. Second, some possible confounders such as lifestyle practices, physical activity, dietary intake, and genetic factors are unavailable. Besides, the exposure–response relationship is only expressed in terms of cumulative days of CHM use; the actual adherence could not be ascertained. In addition, patients directly purchasing CHM or herbs from herbal pharmacies or health food stores cannot be identified in the NHI program. Only CHM prescribed by licensed doctors can be reimbursed; hence, the frequency of the CHM use might have been under-estimated. However, a large portion of patients would likely prefer to purchase CHM in the NHI system because of the comprehensive coverage and lower cost of CHM prescriptions. Finally, randomized controlled trials should be arranged in the future due to the more powerful statistical significance.

5. Conclusions

Our study suggests that exposure to CHM and SHXXT, especially a high annual average dose, or high cumulative use days, is associated with reduced mortality in breast cancer patients. Patients receiving SHXXT for more than 30 days as a treatment apparently seem to have a better overall survival outcome than do patients who did not receive it more than 30 days. However, mortality increased with a follow-up duration at all timepoints except >5 years. Hence, SHXXT and its individual compounds can be considered promising therapeutic weapons against breast cancer. Although the detailed mechanisms are as yet elusive, SHXXT is generally considered the stronger anti-inflammatory medicine, or the so-called “clear the heat”, in the Chinese Medicine system. Therefore, we are now performing ongoing clinical trials at Kaohsiung medical university hospital which were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital to investigate the effects of SHXXT intervention in patients who suffer from breast cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.W., Y.-C.W. and J.-C.Y.; methodology, J.-H.C.; validation, D.W., Y.-C.W. and J.-C.Y.; formal analysis, J.-H.C.; investigation, D.W., C.-H.W., J.-H.C. and Y.-H.C. and C.-L.H.; data curation, D.W., C.-H.W. and J.-H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, D.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.-C.W. and J.-C.Y.; supervision, Y.-C.W. and J.-C.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (MOHW107-TDU-B-212-123004), China Medical University Hospital, Academia Sinica Stroke Biosignature Project (BM10701010021), MOST Clinical Trial Consortium for Stroke (MOST 106-2321-B-039-005), Tseng-Lien Lin Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan, and Katsuzo and Kiyo Aoshima Memorial Funds, Japan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Public Health, Social and Behavioral Science Research Ethics Committee, China Medical University and Hospital (CMUH104-REC2-115).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the de-identified databases.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Youlden, D.R.; Cramb, S.M.; Dunn, N.A.; Muller, J.M.; Pyke, C.M.; Baade, P.D. The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: An international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012, 36, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kamangar, F.; Dores, G.M.; Anderson, W.F. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: Defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 2137–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Banas, T.; Juszczyk, G.; Pitynski, K.; Nieweglowska, D.; Ludwin, A.; Czerw, A. Incidence and mortality rates in breast, corpus uteri, and ovarian cancers in poland (1980–2013): An analysis of population-based data in relation to socioeconomic changes. OncoTargets Ther. 2016, 9, 5521–5530. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, F.C.; Lin, H.T.; Kuo, C.F.; See, L.C.; Chiou, M.J.; Yu, H.P. Epidemiology and survival outcome of breast cancer in a nationwide study. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 16939–16950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chuang, S.C.; Wu, G.J.; Lu, Y.S.; Lin, C.H.; Hsiung, C.A. Associations between medical conditions and breast cancer risk in asians: A nationwide population-based study in taiwan. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Figueroa-Magalhaes, M.C.; Jelovac, D.; Connolly, R.; Wolff, A.C. Treatment of her2-positive breast cancer. Breast 2014, 23, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hu, C.; Zhang, H.; Wu, W.; Yu, W.; Li, Y.; Bai, J.; Luo, B.; Li, S. Acupuncture for pain management in cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. ECAM 2016, 2016, 1720239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chung, V.C.; Wu, X.; Lu, P.; Hui, E.P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, A.L.; Lau, A.Y.; Zhao, J.; Fan, M.; Ziea, E.T.; et al. Chinese herbal medicine for symptom management in cancer palliative care: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2016, 95, e2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pu, C.Y.; Lan, V.M.; Lan, C.F.; Lang, H.C. The determinants of traditional chinese medicine and acupuncture utilization for cancer patients with simultaneous conventional treatment. Eur. J. Cancer Care 2008, 17, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kuo, Y.T.; Chang, T.T.; Muo, C.H.; Wu, M.Y.; Sun, M.F.; Yeh, C.C.; Yen, H.R. Use of complementary traditional chinese medicines by adult cancer patients in taiwan: A nationwide population-based study. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tsai, Y.T.; Lai, J.N.; Lo, P.C.; Chen, C.N.; Lin, J.G. Prescription of chinese herbal products is associated with a decreased risk of invasive breast cancer. Medicine 2017, 96, e7918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lin, Y.H.; Chiu, J.H. Use of chinese medicine by women with breast cancer: A nationwide cross-sectional study in taiwan. Complement. Ther. Med. 2011, 19, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Coussens, L.M.; Werb, Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature 2002, 420, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, J.; Hu, Y.; Xiang, L.; Li, S.; Yuan, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, W.; Meng, X.; Wang, P. San-huang-xie-xin-tang constituents exert drug-drug interaction of mutual reinforcement at both pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic level: A review. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lee, J.C.; Tseng, C.K.; Wu, S.F.; Chang, F.R.; Chiu, C.C.; Wu, Y.C. San-huang-xie-xin-tang extract suppresses hepatitis c virus replication and virus-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression. J. Viral Hepat. 2011, 18, e315–e324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, H.C.; Hsieh, M.T. Two-year experience with “san-huang-hsieh-hsin-tang” in essential hypertension. Am. J. Chin. Med. 1986, 14, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, H.C.; Hsieh, M.T.; Tsai, H.Y.; Chang, H.H.; Wang, T.F.; Shibuya, T. Studies on the “san-huang-hsieh-hsin-tang” in the treatment of essential hypertension. Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi 1984, 83, 340–346. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tsai, H.H.; Chen, I.J.; Lo, Y.C. Effects of san-huang-xie-xin-tang on u46619-induced increase in pulmonary arterial blood pressure. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 117, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lo, Y.C.; Tsai, P.L.; Huang, Y.B.; Shen, K.P.; Tsai, Y.H.; Wu, Y.C.; Lai, Y.H.; Chen, I.J. San-huang-xie-xin-tang reduces lipopolysaccharides-induced hypotension and inflammatory mediators. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 96, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shih, Y.T.; Chen, I.J.; Wu, Y.C.; Lo, Y.C. San-huang-xie-xin-tang protects against activated microglia- and 6-ohda-induced toxicity in neuronal sh-sy5y cells. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 429384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hwang, M.W.; Ahn, T.S.; Hong, N.R.; Jeong, H.S.; Jung, M.H.; Ha, K.T.; Kim, B.J. Effects of traditional chinese herbal medicine san-huang-xie-xin-tang on gastrointestinal motility in mice. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shih, Y.T.; Wu, D.C.; Liu, C.M.; Yang, Y.C.; Chen, I.J.; Lo, Y.C. San-huang-xie-xin-tang inhibits helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation in human gastric epithelial ags cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 112, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lo, Y.C.; Lin, Y.L.; Yu, K.L.; Lai, Y.H.; Wu, Y.C.; Ann, L.M.; Chen, I.J. San-huang-xie-xin-tang attenuates inflammatory responses in lipopolysaccharide-exposed rat lungs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 101, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liou, S.F.; Ke, H.J.; Hsu, J.H.; Liang, J.C.; Lin, H.H.; Chen, I.J.; Yeh, J.L. San-huang-xie-xin-tang prevents rat hearts from ischemia/reperfusion-induced apoptosis through enos and mapk pathways. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 915051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, C.Y.; Hou, Y.C.; Lee Chao, P.D.; Shia, C.S.; Hsu, I.C.; Fang, S.H. Potential ex vivo immunomodulatory effects of san-huang-xie-xin-tang and its component herbs on mice and humans. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 127, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cheng, W.Y.; Wu, S.L.; Hsiang, C.Y.; Li, C.C.; Lai, T.Y.; Lo, H.Y.; Shen, W.S.; Lee, C.H.; Chen, J.C.; Wu, H.C.; et al. Relationship between san-huang-xie-xin-tang and its herbal components on the gene expression profiles in hepg2 cells. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2008, 36, 783–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shia, C.S.; Hou, Y.C.; Juang, S.H.; Tsai, S.Y.; Hsieh, P.H.; Ho, L.C.; Chao, P.D. Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of san-huang-xie-xin-tang, a polyphenol-rich chinese medicine formula, in rats and ex-vivo antioxidant activity. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. ECAM 2011, 2011, 721293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lo, Y.C.; Shih, Y.T.; Tseng, Y.T.; Hsu, H.T. Neuroprotective effects of san-huang-xie-xin-tang in the mpp(+)/mptp models of parkinson’s disease in vitro and in vivo. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. ECAM 2012, 2012, 501032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, X.K.; Motwani, M.; Tong, W.; Bornmann, W.; Schwartz, G.K. Huanglian, a chinese herbal extract, inhibits cell growth by suppressing the expression of cyclin b1 and inhibiting cdc2 kinase activity in human cancer cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000, 58, 1287–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kang, J.X.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; He, C.; Li, F.P. The extract of huanglian, a medicinal herb, induces cell growth arrest and apoptosis by upregulation of interferon-beta and tnf-alpha in human breast cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2005, 26, 1934–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chou, H.C.; Lu, Y.C.; Cheng, C.S.; Chen, Y.W.; Lyu, P.C.; Lin, C.W.; Timms, J.F.; Chan, H.L. Proteomic and redox-proteomic analysis of berberine-induced cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 3158–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gu, W.; Luo, J.; Brooks, C.L.; Nikolaev, A.Y.; Li, M. Dynamics of the p53 acetylation pathway. Novartis Found. Symp. 2004, 259, 197–205; discussion 195–223. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Cai, R.L.; Yan-Neale, Y.; Cueto, M.A.; Xu, H.; Cohen, D. Hdac1, a histone deacetylase, forms a complex with hus1 and rad9, two g2/m checkpoint rad proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 27909–27916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. McClung, J.K.; Jupe, E.R.; Liu, X.T.; Dell’Orco, R.T. Prohibitin: Potential role in senescence, development, and tumor suppression. Exp. Gerontol. 1995, 30, 99–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Klumpp, S.; Krieglstein, J. Serine/threonine protein phosphatases in apoptosis. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2002, 2, 458–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Garcia, A.; Cayla, X.; Guergnon, J.; Dessauge, F.; Hospital, V.; Rebollo, M.P.; Fleischer, A.; Rebollo, A. Serine/threonine protein phosphatases pp1 and pp2a are key players in apoptosis. Biochimie 2003, 85, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Qi, H.W.; Xin, L.Y.; Xu, X.; Ji, X.X.; Fan, L.H. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers to predict response of berberine in suppressing lung cancer invasion and metastasis. J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, J.; Qiu, D.M.; Chen, S.H.; Cao, S.P.; Xia, X.L. Suppression of human breast cancer cell metastasis by coptisine in vitro. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP 2014, 15, 5747–5751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yu, C.P.; Hsieh, Y.C.; Shia, C.S.; Hsu, P.W.; Chen, J.Y.; Hou, Y.C.; Hsieh, Y.W. Increased systemic exposure of methotrexate by a polyphenol-rich herb via modulation on efflux transporters multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 and breast cancer resistance protein. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wei, L.; Zhou, Y.; Dai, Q.; Qiao, C.; Zhao, L.; Hui, H.; Lu, N.; Guo, Q.L. Oroxylin a induces dissociation of hexokinase ii from the mitochondria and inhibits glycolysis by sirt3-mediated deacetylation of cyclophilin d in breast carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, J.; Anastasiadis, P.Z.; Liu, Y.; Thompson, E.A.; Fields, A.P. Protein kinase c (pkc) betaii induces cell invasion through a ras/mek-, pkc iota/rac 1-dependent signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 22118–22123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, P.; Lu, N.; Ling, Y.; Chen, Y.; Hui, H.; Lu, Z.; Song, X.; Li, Z.; You, Q.; Guo, Q. Inhibitory effects of wogonin on the invasion of human breast carcinoma cells by downregulating the expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Toxicology 2011, 282, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lim, B.O. Effects of wogonin, wogonoside, and 3,5,7,2’,6’-pentahydroxyflavone on chemical mediator production in peritoneal exduate cells and immunoglobulin e of rat mesenteric lymph node lymphocytes. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 84, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, W.; Guo, Q.; You, Q.; Zhang, K.; Yang, Y.; Yu, J.; Liu, W.; Zhao, L.; Gu, H.; Hu, Y.; et al. Involvement of bax/bcl-2 in wogonin-induced apoptosis of human hepatoma cell line smmc-7721. Anti Cancer Drugs 2006, 17, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tai, M.C.; Tsang, S.Y.; Chang, L.Y.; Xue, H. Therapeutic potential of wogonin: A naturally occurring flavonoid. CNS Drug Rev. 2005, 11, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lu, N.; Gao, Y.; Ling, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Y.; Gu, H.Y.; Qi, Q.; Liu, W.; Wang, X.T.; You, Q.D.; et al. Wogonin suppresses tumor growth in vivo and vegf-induced angiogenesis through inhibiting tyrosine phosphorylation of vegfr2. Life Sci. 2008, 82, 956–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zingue, S.; Nde, C.B.M.; Michel, T.; Ndinteh, D.T.; Tchatchou, J.; Adamou, M.; Fernandez, X.; Fohouo, F.T.; Clyne, C.; Njamen, D. Ethanol-extracted cameroonian propolis exerts estrogenic effects and alleviates hot flushes in ovariectomized wistar rats. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oumarou, M.R.; Zingue, S.; Bakam, B.Y.; Ateba, S.B.; Foyet, S.H.; Mbakop, F.T.T.; Njamen, D. Lannea acida a. Rich. (anacardiaceae) ethanol extract exhibits estrogenic effects and prevents bone loss in an ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. ECAM 2017, 2017, 7829059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Leung, E.; Kim, J.E.; Askarian-Amiri, M.; Finlay, G.J.; Baguley, B.C. Evidence for the existence of triple-negative variants in the mcf-7 breast cancer cell population. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 836769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tung, N.; Wang, Y.; Collins, L.C.; Kaplan, J.; Li, H.; Gelman, R.; Comander, A.H.; Gallagher, B.; Fetten, K.; Krag, K.; et al. Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers in brca1 mutation carriers: Clinical risk factors and pathologic features. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2010, 12, R12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kim, I.G.; Kang, S.C.; Kim, K.C.; Choung, E.S.; Zee, O.P. Screening of estrogenic and antiestrogenic activities from medicinal plants. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 25, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lee, D.; Park, S.; Choi, S.; Kim, S.H.; Kang, K.S. In vitro estrogenic and breast cancer inhibitory activities of chemical constituents isolated from rheum undulatum L. Molecules 2018, 23, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Ye, X.; Li, X.; He, K. Synergy effects of herb extracts: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic basis. Fitoterapia 2014, 92, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lee, Y.W.; Chen, T.L.; Shih, Y.R.; Tsai, C.L.; Chang, C.C.; Liang, H.H.; Tseng, S.H.; Chien, S.C.; Wang, C.C. Adjunctive traditional chinese medicine therapy improves survival in patients with advanced breast cancer: A population-based study. Cancer 2014, 120, 1338–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lin, H.C.; Lin, C.L.; Huang, W.Y.; Shangkuan, W.C.; Kang, B.H.; Chu, Y.H.; Lee, J.C.; Fan, H.C.; Kao, C.H. The use of adjunctive traditional chinese medicine therapy and survival outcome in patients with head and neck cancer: A nationwide population-based cohort study. QJM 2015, 108, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kuo, Y.T.; Liao, H.H.; Chiang, J.H.; Wu, M.Y.; Chen, B.C.; Chang, C.M.; Yeh, M.H.; Chang, T.T.; Sun, M.F.; Yeh, C.C.; et al. Complementary chinese herbal medicine therapy improves survival of patients with pancreatic cancer in taiwan: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Integr. Cancer 2018, 17, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cancers 15 01213 g001 550
Figure 1. Mortality number in breast cancer patients with and without taking CHM.
Figure 1. Mortality number in breast cancer patients with and without taking CHM.
Cancers 15 01213 g001
Cancers 15 01213 g002 550
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves for the survival analysis in breast cancer patients with and without taking CHM.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves for the survival analysis in breast cancer patients with and without taking CHM.
Cancers 15 01213 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of breast cancer patients.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of breast cancer patients.
CharacteristicsNon-CHM User (n = 5387)CHM User (n = 5387)p-Value
Age, mean ± SD (years)49.41 (10.12)49.35 (10.08)0.7591
Age group, n (%) 0.99
18–39911 (16.91)911 (16.91)
40–593660 (67.94)3660 (67.94)
≥60816 (15.15)816 (15.15)
Urbanization level, n (%) <0.0001
1 2002 (37.16)1790 (33.23)
21724 (32)1784 (33.12)
3725 (13.46)879 (16.32)
4936 (17.38)934 (17.34)
CCI score, n (%) 0.0006
05044 (96.63)5088 (94.45)
1201 (3.73)214 (3.97)
More than 2142 (2.64)85 (1.58)
Treatment, n (%)
Breast cancer surgery4619 (85.74)5107 (94.8)<.0001
Radiotherapy2666 (49.49)2770 (51.42)0.0451
Chemotherapy3936(73.06)3958 (73.47)0.632
Drugs, n (%)
Epirubicin2179 (40.45)2207 (40.97)0.583
Fluorouracil3082 (57.21)3126 (58.03)0.391
Cyclophosphamide3624 (67.27)3800 (70.54)0.0002
Docetaxel1161 (21.55)909 (16.87)<0.0001
Paclitaxel782 (14.52)626 (11.62)<0.0001
Goserelin acetate67 (1.24)61 (1.13)0.5937
Tamoxifen3514 (65.23)3769 (69.96)<0.0001
Anastrozole663 (12.31)878 (16.3)<0.0001
Letrozole771 (14.31)824 (15.3)0.1505
Exemestane413 (7.67)405 (7.52)0.7711
Toremifene52 (0.97)64 (1.19)0.2626
Trastuzumab421 (7.82)356 (6.61)0.0155
Abbreviations: CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Table
Table 2. Breast cancer mortality rate among CHM user and non-CHM user stratified by age group, urbanization level, CCI score, treatment, and drugs.
Table 2. Breast cancer mortality rate among CHM user and non-CHM user stratified by age group, urbanization level, CCI score, treatment, and drugs.
CharacteristicsNon-CHM UserCHM UserCrude HRAdjusted HR ‡
EventPerson YearsIR †EventPerson YearsIR †
Total114127,57641.3845633,48813.620.33 (0.3–0.37) ***0.41 (0.37–0.46) ***
Age group
 18–39171487934.9275608312.330.35 (0.27–0.46) ***0.4 (0.3–0.54) ***
 40–5974118,92939.1528822,64112.720.33 (0.29–0.38) ***0.41 (0.35–0.47) ***
 ≥60229375061.0793476519.520.33 (0.26–0.42) ***0.35 (0.27–0.45) ***
Urbanization level
134810,70132.5213811,09712.440.39 (0.32–0.47) ***0.49 (0.4–0.6) ***
2368878641.8815811,06914.270.34 (0.28–0.41) ***0.38 (0.31–0.46) ***
3185351252.6871543813.060.25 (0.19–0.33) ***0.33 (0.25–0.43) ***
4240457752.4389588415.130.3 (0.23–0.38) ***0.39 (0.3–0.5) ***
CCI score
 0101226,10038.7741631,83813.070.34 (0.3–0.38) ***0.41 (0.37–0.46) ***
 17093774.7321124016.930.23 (0.14–0.37) ***0.29 (0.17–0.49) ***
 More than 259539109.421941046.300.43 (0.26–0.73) **0.42 (0.24–0.73) **
Treatment
 Breast cancer surgery
 No3672704135.74 48190325.220.23 (0.17–0.32) ***0.25 (0.18–0.34) ***
 Yes77424,87231.1240831,58512.920.41 (0.37–0.46) ***0.43 (0.38–0.49) ***
 Radiotherapy
 No42614,84828.6911617,4936.630.24 (0.2–0.3) ***0.29 (0.24–0.36) ***
 Yes71512,72856.1834015,99621.260.37 (0.33–0.43) ***0.46 (0.41–0.53) ***
 Chemotherapy
 No177768923.023795843.860.18 (0.13–0.26) ***0.2 (0.14–0.28) ***
 Yes96419,88748.8741923,90417.530.36 (0.32–0.41) ***0.45 (0.4–0.5) ***
Drugs
 Epirubicin
 No56717.18532.99 18220.655 8.81 0.27 (0.23–0.32) ***0.35 (0.3–0.42) ***
 Yes57410.391 55.24 27412.834 21.35 0.38 (0.33–0.44) ***0.44 (0.38–0.51) ***
 Fluorouracil
 No38311.574 33.09 12413.796 8.99 0.28 (0.23–0.34) ***0.35 (0.28–0.43) ***
 Yes75816.002 47.37 33219.692 16.86 0.36 (0.31–0.4) ***0.42 (0.37–0.48) ***
Cyclophosphamide
 No3328825 37.62 8310.396 7.98 0.23 (0.18–0.29) ***0.29 (0.22–0.37) ***
 Yes80918.751 43.14 37322.093 16.15 0.37 (0.33–0.42) ***0.44 (0.38–0.49) ***
 Docetaxel
 No61023.279 26.20 19629.218 6.71 0.26 (0.22–0.31) ***0.31 (0.26–0.36) ***
 Yes5314297 123.57 260427060.89 0.46 (0.39–0.53) ***0.52 (0.45–0.61) ***
 Paclitaxel
 No72224.227 29.80 22830.102 7.57 0.26 (0.23–0.3) ***0.31 (0.27–0.36) ***
 Yes4193349 125.12 2283387 67.32 0.5 (0.43–0.59) ***0.55 (0.47–0.65) ***
 Goserelin acetate
 No113327.222 40.89 44033.156 13.27 0.33 (0.29–0.37) ***0.4 (0.36–0.45) ***
 Yes28354 79.19 16332 48.14 0.59 (0.32–1.09)0.49 (0.22–1.07)
 Tamoxifen
 No5268274 63.57 1479402 15.64 0.26 (0.22–0.31) ***0.34 (0.28–0.41) ***
 Yes61519.302 31.86 30924.087 12.83 0.4 (0.35–0.46) ***0.45 (0.39–0.52) ***
 Anastrozole
 No89523.944 37.38 29927.69410.80 0.3 (0.26–0.34) ***0.37 (0.32–0.42) ***
 Yes2463632 67.741575795 27.09 0.39 (0.32–0.47) ***0.5 (0.4–0.61) ***
 Letrozole
 No89823.522 38.18 29528.283 10.43 0.28 (0.25–0.32) ***0.35 (0.3–0.39) ***
 Yes2434054 59.94 161520630.93 0.49 (0.4–0.6) ***0.6 (0.49–0.74) ***
 Exemestane
 No96225.296 38.03 33730.880 10.91 0.29 (0.26–0.33) ***0.37 (0.32–0.42) ***
 Yes1792280 78.49 1192609 45.62 0.55 (0.44–0.7) ***0.58 (0.46–0.74) ***
 Toremifene
 No112327.243 41.22 44733.027 13.53 0.33 (0.3–0.37) ***0.41 (0.36–0.45) ***
 Yes18333 54.05 9461 19.50 0.35 (0.16–0.78) **0.11 (0.02–0.48) **
 Trastuzumab
 No93426.041 35.87 34731.897 10.88 0.31 (0.27–0.35) ***0.39 (0.34–0.44) ***
 Yes2071535 134.90 1091591 68.50 0.46 (0.37–0.58) ***0.48 (0.38–0.61) ***
Abbreviations: CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. † IR, incidence rates, per 1000 person-years. ‡: represented adjusted hazard ratio: mutually adjusted for CHM use, age group, urbanization level, CCI score, treatment, and drugs by Cox proportional hazard regression. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 3. The risk of mortality rate stratified by the cumulative days of CHM use among breast cancer patients.
Table 3. The risk of mortality rate stratified by the cumulative days of CHM use among breast cancer patients.
CharacteristicsNMortalityHR (95% CI)
No. of EventCrudeAdjusted †
Non-CHM users538711411 (reference)1 (reference)
CHM users
 30–90 days32092880.36 (0.31–0.40) ***0.44 (0.38–0.50) ***
 90–180 days12331060.33 (0.27–0.41) ***0.41 (0.33–0.50) ***
 >180 days945620.26 (0.20–0.33) ***0.31 (0.24–0.40) ***
 p for trend <0.0001<0.0001
Abbreviations: CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Crude HR represented relative hazard ratio. † Adjusted HR represented adjusted hazard ratio: mutually adjusted for age group, urbanization level, CCI score, treatment, and drugs by Cox proportional hazard regression. *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 4. The risk of mortality rate stratified by the annual average CHM dose among breast cancer patients.
Table 4. The risk of mortality rate stratified by the annual average CHM dose among breast cancer patients.
Annual Average CHM Dose (g)NMortalityHR (95% CI)
No. of EventCrudeAdjusted †
Non-CHM users538711411 (reference)1 (reference)
CHM users
<35.1 (g)/year13461400.42 (0.35–0.50) ***0.50 (0.42–0.60) ***
35.1–67.2 (g)/year13461230.36 (0.30–0.44) ***0.43 (0.35–0.51) ***
67.2–147 (g)/year13401130.33 (0.27–0.40) ***0.39 (0.32–0.48) ***
>147 (g)/year1355800.23 (0.18–0.29) ***0.30 (0.24–0.38) ***
p for trend <0.0001<0.0001
Abbreviations: CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Crude HR represented relative hazard ratio. † Adjusted HR represented adjusted hazard ratio: mutually adjusted for age group, urbanization level, CCI score, treatment, and drugs by Cox proportional hazard regression. *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 5. The effects of the cumulative days of CHM use on the mortality rate among breast cancer patients stratified by follow-up period.
Table 5. The effects of the cumulative days of CHM use on the mortality rate among breast cancer patients stratified by follow-up period.
CharacteristicsMortalityHR (95% CI)
No. of EventCrudeAdjusted †
Follow-up period:≤2 years
Non-CHM users4401 (reference)1 (reference)
CHM users
 30–90 days1360.43 (0.35–0.52) ***0.51 (0.42–0.62) ***
 90–180 days520.42 (0.31–0.56) ***0.45 (0.34–0.61) ***
 >180 days240.25 (0.17–0.38) ***0.29 (0.19–0.44) ***
Follow-up period: 2–5 years
Non-CHM users1371 (reference)1 (reference)
CHM users
 30–90 days910.82 (0.63–1.07)0.88 (0.68–1.15)
 90–180 days370.83 (0.58–1.20)0.82 (0.57–1.19)
 >180 days280.87 (0.58–1.31)0.82 (0.55–1.24)
Follow-up period: >5 years
Non-CHM users251 (reference)1 (reference)
CHM users
 30–90 days160.70 (0.37–1.31)0.60 (0.31–1.51)
 90–180 days60.69 (0.28–1.67)0.58 (0.22–1.57)
 >180 days81.28 (0.58–2.83)0.75 (0.32–1.78)
Abbreviations: CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Crude HR represented relative hazard ratio. † Adjusted HR represented adjusted hazard ratio: mutually adjusted for age group, urbanization level, CCI score, treatment, and drugs by Cox proportional hazard regression. *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 6. The effects of CHM formulation on mortality rate among breast cancer patients.
Table 6. The effects of CHM formulation on mortality rate among breast cancer patients.
CHM PrescriptionMortalityHR (95% CI)
NNo. of EventCrudeAdjusted †
Non-CHM user538711411 (reference)1 (reference)
Single constituent
 Rhizoma Rhei30492780.36 (0.31–0.41) ***0.42 (0.37–0.48) ***
 Radix Scutellaria39583270.32 (0.28–0.36) ***0.40 (0.36–0.46) ***
 Rhizoma Coptidis26442150.31 (0.27–0.36) ***0.39 (0.34–0.45) ***
Compounds
SHXXT489330.25 (0.18–0.36) ***0.32 (0.22–0.45) ***
Abbreviations: CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. Crude HR represented relative hazard ratio. † Adjusted HR represented adjusted hazard ratio: mutually adjusted for age group, urbanization level, CCI score, treatment, and drugs by Cox proportional hazard regression. *** p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Winardi, D.; Wu, C.-H.; Chiang, J.-H.; Chen, Y.-H.; Hsieh, C.-L.; Yang, J.-C.; Wu, Y.-C. The Use of San-Huang-Xie-Xin-Tang Reduces the Mortality Rate among Breast Cancer Patients. Cancers 2023, 15, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041213

AMA Style

Winardi D, Wu C-H, Chiang J-H, Chen Y-H, Hsieh C-L, Yang J-C, Wu Y-C. The Use of San-Huang-Xie-Xin-Tang Reduces the Mortality Rate among Breast Cancer Patients. Cancers. 2023; 15(4):1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041213

Chicago/Turabian Style

Winardi, Daniel, Chieh-Hsin Wu, Jen-Huai Chiang, Yung-Hsiang Chen, Ching-Liang Hsieh, Juan-Cheng Yang, and Yang-Chang Wu. 2023. "The Use of San-Huang-Xie-Xin-Tang Reduces the Mortality Rate among Breast Cancer Patients" Cancers 15, no. 4: 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041213

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop