Next Article in Journal
The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
The Ying and Yang of Ganglioside Function in Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Type 2 Cystatins and Their Roles in the Regulation of Human Immune Response and Cancer Progression

Myeloma Center, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(22), 5363; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225363
Submission received: 21 September 2023 / Revised: 8 November 2023 / Accepted: 8 November 2023 / Published: 10 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Cancer Biology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Type 2 cystatins are a group of small secreted protease inhibitors that regulate cysteine protease cathepsins and legumain. These enzymes regulate important cellular processes that are linked to the immune response and tumor progression, playing important roles in both autoimmune diseases and various types of cancers. This review aims to explore the roles of type 2 cystatins in immune regulation and cancer development, shedding light on their significance in maintaining health.

Abstract

Cystatins are a family of intracellular and extracellular protease inhibitors that inhibit cysteine cathepsins—a group of lysosomal cysteine proteases that participate in multiple biological processes, including protein degradation and post-translational cleavage. Cysteine cathepsins are associated with the development of autoimmune diseases, tumor progression, and metastasis. Cystatins are categorized into three subfamilies: type 1, type 2, and type 3. The type 2 cystatin subfamily is the largest, containing 10 members, and consists entirely of small secreted proteins. Although type 2 cystatins have many shared biological roles, each member differs in structure, post-translational modifications (e.g., glycosylation), and expression in different cell types. These distinctions allow the type 2 cystatins to have unique biological functions and properties. This review provides an overview of type 2 cystatins, including their biological similarities and differences, their regulatory effect on human immune responses, and their roles in tumor progression, immune evasion, and metastasis.

1. Introduction

Cysteine cathepsins, categorized as papain-like cysteine proteases, form a large group of cysteine-cleaving proteases that play crucial roles in various cellular processes, including extracellular matrix maintenance, immune surveillance, and cell infiltration [1]. The human cathepsin family comprises 11 members that are cysteine proteases. Cathepsin B, C, F, H, L, O, V, and X are ubiquitously expressed, whereas cathepsin K, S, and W are predominantly expressed in osteoclasts, cytotoxic lymphocytes, and antigen-presenting cells, respectively [2]. Cathepsins play important roles in oncogenesis and autoimmune diseases by mainly activating inflammatory responses and promoting extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation. Therefore, studying both cathepsins and their inhibitors holds immense value for understanding their role in both normal and diseased contexts.
Cystatins, originally isolated from chicken egg whites and subsequently found in various organisms, serve as natural inhibitors of cysteine cathepsins [3,4]. The human cystatin superfamily is categorized into three subfamilies (Figure 1A). Type 1 cystatins, also known as stefins, are small intracellular proteins of approximately 11 kDa that lack disulfide bonds. Type 2 cystatins, often called cystatins, are small (13–14 kDa) secreted proteins. Type 3 cystatins, also called kininogens, are large (88–114 kDa) glycosylated proteins that contain at least 1 type 2 cystatin-like cathepsin inhibitory sequence. Most cystatin members belong to the type 2 cystatin subfamily [5]. Although type 2 cystatins likely evolved from a common ancestral gene and share a similar overall structure, these cystatins exhibit distinct expression patterns, chemical properties, and biological functions. Therefore, it is likely that each member of the type 2 cystatin subfamily has different physiological processes within the human body. Since multiple cathepsins promote immune response activation, type 2 cystatins are natural immunosuppressants. Additionally, since cathepsins also enhance cell migration, type 2 cystatins also have anti-tumor functions. Type 2 cystatins also have non-protease inhibitory functions and can modulate several important immune and oncogenic pathways, making their role in tumor development and progression intricate. This review describes the immunomodulatory and oncologic roles of each type 2 cystatin with the goal of providing an overview of the immune-oncology axis of type 2 cystatins.

2. Cystatins as Protease Inhibitors

There are 10 known type 2 cystatin genes, each encoding a different cystatin protein (Table 1). All type 2 cystatin genes are located on chromosome 20p11.21, except for CST6, which is found on 11q13.1 [7]. Human type 2 cystatins share a common 3D structure (Figure 1B). The peptide sequence forms a protein with one beta sheet connected to an alpha helix connected to four beta sheets. This peptide folds into a structure in which the five beta sheets are arranged in an antiparallel form, covering the alpha helix at the top [5]. Several conserved regions are shared among human type 2 cystatins, and these conserved regions are highly relevant to their ability to inhibit protease function (Figure 2 and Figure S1). The G-QXVXG-VPW sequence is capable of inhibiting cathepsins and composed of three conserved sequences: the G near the N-terminus, the QXVXG fragment in the middle of the amino sequences, and the VPW fragment close to the C-terminus [5]. These three sequences form a wedge-shaped structure within the overall 3D structure and bind to the V-shaped cleft of cathepsin that contains the active site, thus effectively masking the active site and inhibiting protease function [5,8]. Additionally, three members of type 2 cystatins—cystatin C, E/M, and F—can inhibit asparaginyl endopeptidase (i.e., legumain), one of only two members of the peptidase family C13 that is closely related to the cathepsin superfamily C1 [4,9]. The conserved post-helix N residue in type 2 cystatins directly binds to the active site of legumain, which is located on the opposite side of the cathepsin inhibitory site in the 3D structure [4,10,11,12]. Thus, cystatin C, E/M, and F act as competitive inhibitors of legumain. The following subsections will briefly cover the features and functions of each type 2 cystatin in healthy individuals.

2.1. SD-Type Cystatins: Cystatin SN, SA, S, D (CST1, CST2, CST4, CST5)

The SD-type cystatins, named from the combination of cystatin S and cystatin D, include four members: cystatin SN, SA, S, and D. Cystatin SN, SA, and S contain 113 amino acids and are approximately 90% identical to each other. Along with cystatin D, these proteins share an identity of more than 55% [17,18,19]. These cystatins are exclusively expressed in parotid and submandibular glands and are found in human saliva, hence why they are sometimes called “salivary cystatins” [13]. The SD-type cystatins play an important role in maintaining a healthy oral environment. SD-type cystatins inhibit proteolytic events induced by cathepsin B, H, and L. The dysregulation of these proteolytic events causes periodontal tissue destruction which ultimately leads to bacteria colonization and periodontal disease [20]. Additionally, SD-type cystatins show anti-microbial function and can inhibit the growth of multiple bacteria strains, including Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Porphyromonas gingivalis in in vitro experiments [21,22,23]. The anti-microbial mechanism of SD-type cystatins is not fully understood, but SD-type cystatins may be inhibiting proteolytic activity necessary for growth promotion in the bacteria [24]. This antimicrobial effect is also observed in human cystatin C and cystatins isolated from other species [25]. Given the conserved nature of this antimicrobial effect, type 2 cystatins may have originally served as antimicrobials [26].
Cystatin SN (CYS1), encoded by the gene CST1, is the most studied SD-type cystatin. CYS1 has a similar cathepsin inhibitory function with the ubiquitous cystatin C; however, the inhibitory efficiency of CYS1 is much lower than that of cystatin C [8,19,27].
Cystatin SA, also referred to as cystatin 2 (CYS2), is encoded by CST2. Its amino acid sequence is 87% identical with cystatin SN and 90% identical with cystatin S. The CST2 locus has two allele variants that encode cystatin SA1 and cystatin SA2. These alleles only differ by two amino acids (SA2 contains G79D and E140D polymorphisms in comparison to SA1). The gene frequency of cystatin SA1 is 0.935, and the gene frequency of cystatin SA2 is 0.065 [28]. The G79D polymorphism is within the highly conserved QXVXG fragment, and this makes cystatin SA2 a weaker protease inhibitor than cystatin SA1 [29]. Currently, there are no studies that reveal any other function of cystatin SA2.
Cystatin S (CYSS), originally called SAP-1, is encoded by CST4 [30,31]. CYSS shows very similar activity to cystatin SN and SA, but CYSS contains a higher Asp+Glu/Asn+Gln ratio, making CYSS a more acidic protein [32]. CYSS has an F instead of a V within the QXVXG fragment. This makes CYSS the weakest cathepsin inhibitor among all the type 2 cystatins [19]. CYSS is largely expressed in the submandibular and parotid glands of humans and rats [33]. Although it is a weak cathepsin inhibitor, CYSS retains an antibacterial function and inhibits the growth of Porphyromonas gingivalis [23]. Since its discovery, CYSS is most often used as a prognostic biomarker of dry eyes [34].
Cystatin D (CYSD) is encoded by CST5, a homolog of CST1, CST2, CST3, and CST4. CYSD is a small 122-amino-acid protein that shares more than 50% identity with cystatin SA, SN, C, and S. CST5 has two alleles, which encode two forms of CYSD. The two forms of CYSD differ by either a C or an R at residue 26. Both variants act as protease inhibitors and have the same activity [35]. Compared with other SD-type cystatins, CYSD is a less potent inhibitor of cathepsin L and does not inhibit cathepsin B. However, CYSD is a much stronger inhibitor of cathepsin S and cathepsin H [18]. Clinically, CST5 is considered an early biomarker of traumatic brain injury [36].

2.2. Cystatin C (CST3)

CST3 encodes cystatin C (CYSC), which was first found in human saliva [37]. CST3 was originally categorized as an SD-type cystatin until scientists realized that CST3 expression is not limited to parotid and submandibular glands [38]. Instead, it is ubiquitously expressed in all nucleated cells [14,39]. CST3 is likely the ancestral gene of all the members of the type 2 cystatin family [19]. CST3 is a housekeeping gene. It is ubiquitously expressed at relatively low levels throughout the human body [14]. The highest CST3 expression is found in the brain and salivary glands. CYSC is also present in all body fluids, with the highest CYSC concentration found in brain fluid, semen, and breast milk [14]. This indicates that CYSC may be related to reproduction. However, its reproduction-related function and mechanism remain to be elucidated. Because of its small size, CYSC can be filtered by the glomerulus without being reabsorbed by the kidney’s proximal convoluted tubule. At the same time, the proximal tubular cells catabolize their own CYSC but do not secrete it [40]. As a result, CYSC is widely used as a marker for the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a standard for kidney function diagnosis [41,42].
CYSC can dimerize by 3D domain swapping, a process in which two CYSC molecules exchange the position of their α1 helix and β1 and β2 strands [43]. During this exchange, the L1 loop of CYSC, which is required for cathepsin inhibitory activity, is disturbed. As a result, dimerized CYSC is inactive and unable to inhibit cathepsins [43,44]. Extracellular CYSC is mainly produced by macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs). Cells synthesize CYSC as both dimers and monomers; however, only the active monomer is secreted into the extracellular space [44].
Like the SD-type cystatins, CYSC also has antibacterial activity [22]. Since CYSC is a housekeeping protein, it is likely one of the systematic regulators of general cellular cathepsin activity. In the brain, cathepsin B, one of the known targets of CYSC, degrades amyloid beta, a protein associated with neurodegeneration [45,46]. At the same time, the domain-swapping property of CYSC can also promote amyloid beta plaque formation. CYSC dysregulation induced by a polymorphism or mutation is highly linked to the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s disease [45,47,48]. A study conducted by Wahlbom et al. showed that CYSC with L86Q, a common mutation in cerebral amyloidosis patients, does not form normal dimers by domain swapping. Instead, CYSC oligomerizes by continuously inserting its α1-β1-β2 domain into the flexible region of the next CYSC molecule. This leads to the formation of a large donut-shaped oligomer, which eventually causes amyloid fibril generation [49].

2.3. Cystatin E/M (CST6)

Cystatin E/M (CYS6) was simultaneously identified by two groups: one group isolated CYS6 from epithelial cells and named it cystatin E; the other group identified CYS6 mRNA downregulated in breast cancer, and they named it cystatin M [50,51]. Eventually, scientists discovered that the same gene encodes cystatin E and M and the proteins have the same amino acid sequence. Therefore, the protein encoded by CST6 was renamed cystatin E/M. Compared with other members of the type 2 cystatin subfamily, CST6 is the only cystatin gene located on chromosome 11q13 [52]. CYS6 is one of three cystatins that can inhibit cathepsins and legumain and is currently the strongest legumain inhibitor. CYS6 is one of two glycoproteins in the type 2 cystatins subfamily. It has an N-linked glycosylation site at residue 137, attached to a mannose-6-phosphate-rich glycan [53]. The function of the glycan on CYS6 has not been deduced in the current literature. Similar to CYSC, CYS6 can dimerize via domain swapping; however, the CYS6 dimer is only generated in vitro in a high-temperature, destabilizing condition [54].
In healthy individuals, low levels of CYS6 were found in most human tissues. High levels of CYS6 were found in human cutaneous epithelia, hair follicles, sebaceous glands, and sweat glands [15]. Within the category of mucosal body fluids, the highest concentration of cystatin E/M was found in semen, with levels as high as 500 ng/mL [55]. This indicates that CYS6 may play a role in reproduction, but currently, there are no studies in this area. High cystatin E/M expression in epidermal tissue is highly related to skin development and epidermal homeostasis. One of the known targets of CYS6, cathepsin V, degrades desmosomal proteins, including DSG1, DSC1, and CDSN. Another target of CYS6, cathepsin L, activates transglutaminase 3 [56]. Cystatin E/M regulates the desquamation and cornification process by inhibiting cathepsin V and L activity with high efficiency. The dysfunction of CST6 results in dry skin and keratosis caused by unregulated proteolytic events induced by cathepsin V, L, and legumain in the epidermis [57,58]. Knockdown of CST6 in vitro causes deficient development of the multilayer epidermis [59]. Mice null for CST6 (i.e., ichq mice) exhibit multiple abnormalities related to epidermal development, including keratosis, dry skin, hair loss, hypotrichosis, and even neonatal lethality. Fortunately, these phenotypes can be partially rescued by cathepsin L knockdown [60].

2.4. Cystatin F (CST7)

Cystatin F (CYSF), also referred to as cystatin-like metastasis-associated protein (CMAP) or leukocystatin, is encoded by CST7 [16,61]. Human CYSF is a glycoprotein that has 145 amino acids. It has a glycosylation site on N62 and N115 [62]. It shares approximately 35% identity with CYSC, 30% with SD-type cystatins, and 32% with CYS6 [62]. CYSF is a potent inhibitor of cathepsin F, K, and V and it can also weakly inhibit cathepsin S and H. CYSF cannot inhibit cathepsin C and X in kinetic measurement experiments when only the enzyme and the substrate are present in the system [63]. However, the inhibition of cathepsin C can be observed in myeloid cells in both in vitro and in vivo experiments [64,65,66]. This activity difference is attributed to the cellular processing of CYSF, where cleavage of the N-terminus region enables CYSF to inhibit cathepsin C. CYSF is selectively expressed by hematopoietic cells, especially in NK cells, T cells, and DCs [16,62]. Tissue from the spleen, bone marrow, lymph nodes, and lung express the highest levels of CST7 [14,67].
CYSF is capable of dimerization through disulfide bonds, which differs from the dimerization mechanism of domain swapping utilized by CYSC and CYS6. CYSF is synthesized as a dimer, which is inactive due to steric hindrance [68]. After synthesis, the inactive dimer is delivered to the lysosome and cleaved by the proteasome, a process mediated by the glycosylation on CYSF [68]. Similar to all type 2 cystatins, CYSF is a secreted protein; however, after secretion, CYSF is quickly taken up by its secreting cell and delivered to the lysosome as a functional protease inhibitor via the mannose-6-phosphate pathway [68]. CYSF is an important immune modulator in healthy individuals. The role of CYSF as an immune modulator is covered in detail in the next section.

2.5. Testatins: CST8, CST9, CST11

Cystatin 8, 9, and 11 are selectively expressed in the testis and are thought to play a role in the reproductive system [69]. Therefore, they are also referred to as testatins. Currently, there are very few papers studying testatins and no detailed conclusion could be drawn on their accurate function. One paper reported that the loss of function of CST8 is related to reduced fertility and abnormal testis development [70]. Although a few studies have reported that CST9 is linked to cancer development, no study has focused on the oncogenic roles or immune modulatory roles of testatins [71]. Therefore, they will not be covered in this review.

3. Cathepsin, Legumain, and Cystatins as Immune Modulators

To introduce the immune-modulatory role of cystatins, it is important to also briefly cover the immunomodulatory role of their target proteins, which are cathepsins and legumain. Cathepsin C, S, L, K, and legumain are involved in autoimmune regulation and exhibit pro-inflammatory functions.
Cathepsin C regulates the maturation of neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs). The secretion of NSPs helps to degrade invading microorganisms and represents one of the major anti-bacterial mechanisms of neutrophils. NSPs also participate in inflammatory response regulation by proteolytically modifying or degrading extracellular inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and catalyzing the activation of inflammatory response-related receptors [72]. NSPs are initially generated as zymogens, which have a dipeptide structure at their N-terminus, keeping the protein in an inactive state. Cathepsin C cleaves this dipeptide to activate the NSPs [73]. In addition, cathepsin C regulates the activity of granzyme B, which is related to the immune response of CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells [74].
Cathepsin S is required for MHC class II antigen presentation since maturation of the MHC class II molecules depends on cathepsin S activity [75,76]. In antigen-presenting cells, the MHC-li chaperone complex is first generated. The li peptide in the MHC-li complex is a 10 kDa invariant peptide chain that masks the antigen binding site of MHC class II molecules, thereby inactivating the whole MHC class II molecule. The MHC-li complex is then delivered to the lysosome and the li peptide is cleaved by cathepsin S to activate the MHC class II molecule [77,78]. As a result, cathepsin S is mainly an immune modulator that enhances immune surveillance.
Cathepsin L is also involved in the maturation of MHC class II molecules in macrophages [79]. Additionally, cathepsin L is an activator of perforin, a key enzyme involved in pore formation by cytotoxic lymphocytes [74,80].
Cathepsin K, a collagenase that is selectively expressed in osteoclasts, is associated with autoimmune disease. It plays an important role in bone matrix remodeling and mediates the inflammatory stress on the bone surface by degrading collagen I, II, and elastin [75,81].
Legumain, as the target of CYSC, CYS6, and CYSF, also participates in immune regulation. Like cathepsin S and L, legumain promotes the maturation of MHC class II molecules and participates in the direct cleavage of antigens, thereby facilitating overall antigen presentation. Legumain can also activate Toll-like receptors, an upstream receptor of the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, which are key players in the innate immune response [82].
Overall, cathepsins and legumain can trigger immune responses, and their dysregulation often correlates with the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, including rheumatic arthritis, systemic lupus, Sjogren’s syndrome, asthma, and psoriasis [75].
Since type 2 cystatins inhibit cathepsins and legumain, which in turn suppress inflammatory responses and immune cell activation, type 2 cystatins can be considered immune modulators. Indeed, most of the type 2 cystatins are immunosuppressive due, at least in part, to their ability to inhibit protease function. Type 2 cystatins play key roles in DC maturation and neutralizing cytotoxic lymphocyte cytotoxicity. Additionally, some of them can also act as ligands to activate anti-inflammatory pathways. The following subsections will talk about this in detail for each member of type 2 cystatins.

3.1. Cystatin SN (CYS1)

CYS1 contributes to allergic responses and the pathogenesis of allergic respiratory diseases. CYS1 and cystatin SA are highly expressed in the nasal epithelial surface of patients who have chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps. Using proteomics, researchers have discovered that the mucus of CRS patients contains high concentrations of CYS1 [83,84]. CYS1 is related to the Th2 immune response—an inflammation-related response that is highly associated with allergic responses and induced by IL-4. Currently, CYS1 serves as a biomarker for the activated Th2 immune response, which is mainly triggered by CD4+ T cells [85]. CST1 expression can be induced by IL-4 stimulation and is positively correlated with the upregulation of the Th2 immune response markers IL-33 and TSLP in eosinophilic CRS cases [86]. In addition, recombinant human CYS1 induces secretion of several Th2-related cytokines, including IL-5, IL-13, and IL-4, with an increase in Th2 cell infiltration [83]. For this reason, CST1 is a well-accepted biomarker for CRS diagnosis. Since CYS1 regulates the Th2 immune response, it is a good biomarker for asthma and allergic rhinitis. CST1 is upregulated in epithelial cells of the upper and lower airways in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis [87,88]. The upregulation of CST1 is correlated with severe allergic respiratory disease [89,90]. Interestingly, allergic respiratory diseases are treated with corticosteroids which downregulate CST1 expression in the airway epithelial cells [87]. One study showed that CYS1 promotes the proliferation and migration of airway smooth muscle cells by activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in an in vitro asthma model. This indicates that CYS1 participates in airway remodeling events and maybe a main contributor to asthma development [91].
Because CYS1 promotes the secretion of IL-4 in the immune cells, CYS1 may introduce an anti-inflammatory response in the microenvironment. Indeed, patients with CRS who have high CST1 expression in their nasal epithelial cells also have high levels of CCL18. CCL18 is an M2 macrophage polarizing cytokine that induces immunosuppression and anti-inflammatory responses [92,93]. In addition, CST1 plays an important role in introducing an anti-inflammatory response in acute liver failure (ALF) models [94]. CYS1 can directly bind to IFNGR1/2, acting as a competitive inhibitor of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IFN-γ. As a consequence, CYS1 inhibits the activation of the JAK/STAT1 pathway induced by IFN-γ and promotes the M2 polarization of macrophages in the liver [94]. In summary, CYS1 plays a role in the allergic Th2 immune response and anti-inflammatory processes.

3.2. Other SD-Type Cystatins (CST2, CST4, CST5)

In addition to CST1, clinical studies have shown that the other SD-type cystatins (CST2, CST4, and CST5) also participate in immune response regulation. To date, the mechanism behind their immune regulatory function is unknown. As a result, conclusions about their function in immune regulation cannot be drawn.
Although CST1 is the preferred clinical biomarker for allergic respiratory diseases, like asthma and CRS, CST2 can also be used as a clinical biomarker for allergic respiratory diseases [95,96,97]. CST4 is used as an anti-inflammatory marker since it is downregulated in rheumatic arthritis and Sjogren’s syndrome [98,99].
Unlike the other SD-type cystatins which are used as anti-inflammatory biomarkers, CST5 is used as an inflammatory biomarker [100,101,102]. An in vitro experiment on the human MRC-5 diploid lung cell transfection model showed that CYSD inhibits the replication of OC43 and 229e coronavirus strains at its physiological concentration, showing that CYSD has an anti-viral function [103].

3.3. Cystatin C (CYSC)

CYSC has been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties. Immature DCs express high levels of CST3, and this upregulation gradually disappears during DC maturation [104]. The expression of CYSC protein in immature DCs prevents the protease activity of cathepsin S from activating the MHC class II molecules. Therefore, immature DCs are less able to complete antigen presentation and a following immune response [105]. A high level of CYSC positively correlates with the severity of several autoimmune diseases, including sepsis and rheumatoid arthritis [106,107]. A high level of CYSC also correlates with more severe HIV infections, which can be suppressed by antiviral treatment [108].
On the other hand, CYSC also shows pro-inflammatory activities. In hematopoietic cells, CYSC is expressed at higher levels in macrophages and DCs than in T cells [44,109]. In macrophages, CYSC modulates the immune response by enhancing macrophage responses to IFN-γ. This consequently upregulates the activation of the NF-κB pathway and promotes immune-related cytokine NO and TNF-α secretion [110]. CYSC expression can inhibit the secretion of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and it is an antagonist of TGF-β [111,112]. At the same time, IL-10 and TGF-β can also modulate the expression of CYSC via the upregulation of its transcription factor IRF-8, forming a negative feedback loop [110,111].

3.4. Cystatin E/M (CYS6)

The immunomodulatory role of CYS6 has not been reported in the current literature. However, some predictions can be made based on the current mechanistic studies of CYS6. CYS6 can inhibit the activation of NF-κB signaling by both canonical and non-canonical pathways [113,114]. CYS6 can also be internalized by macrophages where it highly suppresses osteoclast cathepsin K [114]. Given this evidence, CYS6 has the potential for development as a therapeutic agent to alleviate rheumatic arthritis [75].

3.5. Cystatin F (CYSF)

CYSF is an important immune modulator that acts as a natural immunosuppressant in the human body. High levels of CYSF in NK cells, T cells, and DC cells have been used to counteract the activated immune response mediated by cathepsins. A high level of CYSF reduces the cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells and NK cells. The inhibition of cathepsin C, L, and H in NK cells and CD8+ T cells suppresses the expression of the downstream cytotoxic-related protein perforin and granzymes [115,116]. In contrast, CYSF co-localizes with cathepsin S in immature DCs and weakens as the DCs mature [117]. The inhibition of cathepsin S by CYSF in immature DCs likely suppresses antigen presentation induced by the MHC class II molecules in DCs. Studies suggest that CYSF is associated with inflammatory responses in the central nervous system induced by microglia, a type of cell that is closely related to macrophages in the neural system [118,119].
In conclusion, besides CYSD and CYSC’s non-protease inhibitory function, the type 2 cystatins are all anti-inflammatory factors and are potential immunosuppressants.

4. The Role of Cathepsins, Legumain, and Type 2 Cystatins in Cancer Development

Type 2 cystatins are cysteine cathepsin inhibitors and this is also the reason why they have immunosuppressive effects. Theoretically, type 2 cystatins should have pro-tumor effects on cancer models as they are immunosuppressants. However, the situation is complex because several cathepsins also play roles in tumorigenesis-enhancing cellular events. The activity of cathepsin B, a ubiquitous cathepsin, is highly related to tumor progression and various devastating immunosuppressive events. These events include reduction in CD8+ T cell persistence, infiltration of immunosuppressive tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) [75,120]. In addition, cathepsin B, L, S, and K participate in the cleavage and degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM). As a result, the activation of these cathepsins facilitates the migration, invasion, and metastasis of tumor cells [121]. Cathepsins also have a protective effect on tumor cells and are involved in the chemoresistance of cancer.
Legumain is largely expressed on TAMs and cancer cells from the breast, prostate, and liver. The overexpression of legumain is highly correlated with tumor migration, invasion, poor prognosis, and inferior survival. Legumain can activate MMP-2&9, PI3K/AKT, and integrin signaling pathways to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and the TGF-β signaling pathway. Additionally, it also cleaves and inactivates the tumor suppressor protein p53 [122].
Since type 2 cystatins inhibit both protease-induced inflammatory responses and pro-tumor activity, they exhibit a complex dual effect on tumorigenesis. In the following subsections, the role of each type 2 cystatin in cancer development is discussed.

4.1. Cystatin SN (CYS1)

CST1 is a pro-tumor gene in multiple cancer models, including esophageal, breast, colon, gastric, liver, and lung cancer [123,124,125,126,127,128]. In lung cancer, CST1 is hypomethylated [129], resulting in upregulation of CST1. This upregulation is often correlated with poor prognosis, metastasis, and recurrence [124,125,127,128]. Compared to CYSC, CYS1 is a weaker inhibitor but it displays a higher affinity for cathepsin B, which is known to be involved in tumor progression. Therefore, overexpression of CYS1 can partially neutralize the inhibitory effect of CYSC on cathepsin B, inducing stronger tumor invasiveness mediated by enhanced cathepsin B activity [130]. In addition to its ability to neutralize CYSC, CYS1 also upregulates AKT phosphorylation and activates the PI3K/AKT pathway. This subsequently downregulates E-cadherin and facilitates EMT, promoting tumor metastasis [128]. CYS1 directly interacts with the ferroptosis mediator GPX4 by interfering with the ubiquitination of GPX4 and stabilizing it, thus inhibiting tumor cell ferroptosis. This consequently promotes tumor progression and metastasis in gastric cancer models [123].

4.2. Other SD-Type Cystatins (CST2, CST4, CST5)

Since SD-type cystatins share a highly similar amino acid sequence and protein structure, it is not surprising that CYS2 and CYSS exhibit pro-tumor functions. However, studies on these cystatins are limited, which makes it difficult to conclude whether they have the same pro-tumor mechanism as CYS1. Upregulation of CST2 correlates with tumor metastasis of prostate and gastric cancer [131,132]. CYS2 may help regulate the TGF-β signaling pathway and promote EMT like CYS1, but the mechanism needs further exploration to be certain [131]. CST4 is upregulated in esophageal, colon, and gastric cancer and is associated with poor prognosis [133,134,135]. The overexpression of CYSS in gastric tumor cells upregulates a protein called ELFN2, which directly inhibits the expression of E-cadherin and promotes EMT, like CYS1 and CYS2 [134]. However, there are very few studies on ELFN2 and its connection with tumor invasiveness. Thus, future studies are needed to determine how CYSS promotes tumor growth.
In contrast, based on biomarker studies of colon, gastric, and prostate cancer, CST5 is considered an antitumor gene [136,137,138]. CST5 expression is induced by vitamin D, which is known to have antitumor activity and is downregulated in human colon cancer cells [139,140,141]. CYSD inhibits the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and oncogenic c-MYC expression, which consequently extends the cell cycle and reduces the proliferation, migration, and invasiveness of colorectal tumor cells [139]. Importantly, some studies have suggested that CST5 is a downstream target of p53 [142]. The p53 protein enhances CST5 expression by interacting with the CST5 promoter region and simultaneously downregulating EMT-promoting transcription factor SNAIL, which in turn downregulates CST5 expression [142].

4.3. Cystatin C (CYSC)

CYSC has a dual effect on cancer development. It was observed to have an antitumor function on several cancer types, including pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, and leukemia [143,144,145,146]. Currently, there are at least two mechanisms that can explain the antitumor function of CYSC. First, the antitumor effect of CYSC is highly related to its strong inhibitory effect on cathepsin B. Compared with other type 2 cystatins, CYSC is the strongest inhibitor of cathepsin B [147]. Because CYSC inhibits cathepsin B, CYSC acts as a suppressor of cell migration, thereby inhibiting tumor invasion and metastasis [148]. CYSC is also an inhibitor of the TGF-β pathway. CYSC directly interacts with TGF-β receptor 2 and competes with the binding of the TGF-β ligand. By inhibiting the TGF- β signaling pathway, CYSC inhibits multiple metastatic events in tumor cells, such as loss of cell contacts, downregulation of cell polarization, and increased cell migration [149].
In contrast, there are also several studies stating that a high CYSC level correlates with a worse prognosis. High levels of CYSC were found in tumor tissue of ovary, colon, and esophageal cancer [150,151,152]. Cathepsin B has been found to promote apoptosis and this could be linked to the observed phenomenon that CYSC suppresses apoptosis of tumor cells [153,154]. However, the mechanism by which CYSC promotes tumor progression is unknown. CYSC can be used as a biomarker for cancer prognosis. However, recent studies suggest that renal function, which is frequently altered in cancer, heavily influences the levels of serum CYSC and intercellular CYSC [155,156]. This could negatively impact the use of CYSC as an effective biomarker for cancer prognosis.

4.4. Cystatin E/M (CYS6)

CYS6 has been found to have dual effects, exhibiting pro-tumor properties in some cancers and anti-tumor properties in others. CST6 is an antitumor gene that is hypermethylated in breast, prostate, brain, and cervical cancer [113,157,158,159]. The antitumor effect of CST6 has been mostly studied in breast cancer models and its downregulation correlates with higher levels of migration and invasiveness in both in vivo and in vitro models of breast cancer [157]. The epigenetic silencing of CST6 is strongly correlated to breast cancer bone metastasis [157]. CYS6 also inhibits the pro-oncogenic function of legumain [160,161]. In addition, CYS6 inhibits cathepsin B, which is frequently upregulated in breast cancer [162]. Cathepsin B cleaves SPHK1, an enzyme that inhibits osteoclast differentiation by inhibiting p38 activation induced by RANKL [162]. Uncontrolled osteoclast differentiation disrupts bone homeostasis, causes bone disease, and promotes cancer bone metastasis [163]. Furthermore, CYS6 inhibits cathepsin K, an enzyme that is predominantly expressed in osteoclasts and participates in bone matrix remodeling [114]. Therefore, CYS6 suppresses bone metastasis of tumor cells by inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. CYS6 also inhibits NF-κB signaling in both canonical and non-canonical pathways [113,114].
In contrast, CST6 has also been found to have pro-tumor functions in pancreatic, liver, gastric, and triple-negative breast cancer [164,165,166,167]. Additionally, a small fraction of patients with multiple myeloma express high levels of CST6 [114]. A recent paper has identified CST6 as a factor involved in the dysregulation of necroptosis in gastric tumor cells, resulting in a poor prognosis for patients with gastric cancer [167]. Compared to our understanding of the antitumor effects of CYS6, the mechanism by which CYS6 promotes tumor growth is poorly understood.

4.5. Cystatin F (CYSF)

Although there are extensive reports on the immunoregulatory function of CYSF, the role of CYSF in cancer is unclear. Given the immunosuppressive function of CYSF, uncontrolled upregulation of CST7 likely enhances tumor progression. Indeed, high levels of CST7 are associated with poor prognosis and lower survival rates in patients with liver, oral, and brain cancer [116,168,169]. The current literature has shown that the pro-tumor effects of CYSF are highly correlated to its immunosuppressive function. Upregulation of CST7 causes a decrease in the cytotoxicity of NK cells to tumor cells [168]. In contrast, multiple studies suggest that CST7 downregulation is associated with higher invasiveness of tumors, more metastatic events, and tumor progression in prostate cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and lymphoma [170,171,172,173]. Since CST7 downregulation is correlated with metastasis and tumor progression, this indicates that CST7, like other type 2 cystatin family members, regulates the cathepsin B-L metastatic axis. However, further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on the role of CST7 in cancer progression.

5. Type 2 Cystatin Studies on Mouse Model: A Brief Overview

Although type 2 cystatins play important roles in human immune responses and tumor progression, it is important to choose a good animal model for cystatin in vivo studies. Fortunately, the sequence homology and function of many type 2 cystatins are highly conserved in mice. CST3, CST5, CST6, and CST7 are highly conserved in mice, with very close similarities in their protein sequences compared to humans (Figure S2) [174]. According to the current literature, mouse models, especially the C57/BL strain (the gene of interest could be manipulated) are frequently used in Cst3, Cst6, and Cst7 studies and the results harmonize with the clinical data obtained in humans [162,175,176]. Although mice lack matched genes for CST1, CST2, and CST4, studies show that human recombinant CYS1 and CYS2, which are the matched proteins of CST1 and CST2, are also functional in mouse models and their findings align with clinical data obtained from humans [83,123]. These studies provide evidence that the function of many type 2 cystatins is also highly conserved in mouse models and can serve to uncover their unique functions at the immune-oncology axis.

6. Conclusions

Type 2 cystatins are the natural inhibitors for a group of proteases called cysteine cathepsins. Since their discovery, type 2 cystatins have emerged as valuable biomarkers for various autoimmune-related diseases and cancer. These small secreted protease inhibitors suppress proteolytic activities that are necessary for immune cell development and polarization, protein maturation, and cytotoxicity exertion. Therefore, type 2 cystatins are potential immunosuppressants. Secondly, they inhibit the proteolytic activity necessary to promote tumor metastasis, such as ECM degradation and EMT. Finally, the regulatory role of type 2 cystatins extends beyond protease inhibition, since they can interact with receptors involved in crucial immune-oncogenic pathways (Figure 3 and Table 2). This suggests the presence of additional structural regions within type 2 cystatins that may function as ligands for these receptors. There are conserved regions in type 2 cystatins with unknown functions, and these regions may play a role in ligand-receptor interactions (Figure 2 and Figure S1). Thus, it might be worthwhile to re-evaluate the structure of type 2 cystatins, as it potentially provides insights into their non-protease inhibitory functions.
Despite the frequent use of type 2 cystatins as biomarkers, few studies have investigated the mechanisms underlying their immune regulatory functions and their pro-tumor and antitumor effects on tumor development. Given the immense potential of type 2 cystatins as novel immunosuppressants, anticancer agents, and targets for cancer therapeutics, future studies should investigate the molecular and cellular mechanisms of type 2 cystatins. Such investigations should not only focus on their protease inhibitory function but also delve into the characteristics that go beyond protease inhibition.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers15225363/s1, Figure S1: The sequence alignment of type 2 cystatin family. The sequence of each cystatin was retrieved from the NCBI GenPept database. Multiple sequence alignment was performed by Clustal Omega and Boxshade. The G-QXVXG-VPW fragment is highlighted in the red box and post-helix N is highlighted in the blue box; Figure S2: The sequence alignment of human and mouse cystatin C, D, E/M, and F. The sequence of each cystatin was retrieved from the NCBI GenPept database. The sequence alignment was performed by Clustal Omega and Boxshade. The G-QXVXG-VPW fragment is highlighted in the red box and post-helix N is highlighted in the blue box.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z. and F.Z.; resources, Z.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, F.Z.; visualization, Z.Z.; supervision, F.Z.; project administration, F.Z.; funding acquisition, F.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Cancer Institute 1R01CA236814-01A1 (F.Z.), 3R01-CA236814-03S1 (F.Z.), and U54CA272691-01 (F.Z.), U.S. Department of Defense CA180190 (F.Z.) as well as funding from the Myeloma Crowd Research Initiative Award (F.Z.) and the Paula and Rodger Riney Foundation (F.Z.), and UAMS Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute (WRCRI) Fund (F.Z.).

Acknowledgments

We also thank the UAMS Research and Science Communication, and David E. Mery for editing this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Novinec, M.; Lenarcic, B. Papain-like peptidases: Structure, function, and evolution. Biomol. Concepts 2013, 4, 287–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Turk, V.; Stoka, V.; Vasiljeva, O.; Renko, M.; Sun, T.; Turk, B.; Turk, D. Cysteine cathepsins: From structure, function and regulation to new frontiers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1824, 68–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fossum, K.; Whitaker, J.R. Ficin and papain inhibitor from chicken egg white. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Abrahamson, M.; Alvarez-Fernandez, M.; Nathanson, C.M. Cystatins. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 2003, 70, 179–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ochieng, J.; Chaudhuri, G. Cystatin superfamily. J. Health Care Poor Underserved 2010, 21, 51–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kolodziejczyk, R.; Michalska, K.; Hernandez-Santoyo, A.; Wahlbom, M.; Grubb, A.; Jaskolski, M. Crystal structure of human cystatin C stabilized against amyloid formation. FEBS J 2010, 277, 1726–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sayers, E.W.; Bolton, E.E.; Brister, J.R.; Canese, K.; Chan, J.; Comeau, D.C.; Connor, R.; Funk, K.; Kelly, C.; Kim, S.; et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D20–D26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nandy, S.K.; Seal, A. Structural Dynamics Investigation of Human Family 1 & 2 Cystatin-Cathepsin L1 Interaction: A Comparison of Binding Modes. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0164970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barrett, A.J.; Rawlings, N.D. Families and clans of cysteine peptidases. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 1996, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Turk, V.; Stoka, V.; Turk, D. Cystatins: Biochemical and structural properties, and medical relevance. Front. Biosci. J. Virtual Libr. 2008, 13, 5406–5420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lalmanach, G.; Kasabova-Arjomand, M.; Lecaille, F.; Saidi, A. Cystatin M/E (Cystatin 6): A Janus-Faced Cysteine Protease Inhibitor with Both Tumor-Suppressing and Tumor-Promoting Functions. Cancers 2021, 13, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alvarez-Fernandez, M.; Barrett, A.J.; Gerhartz, B.; Dando, P.M.; Ni, J.; Abrahamson, M. Inhibition of mammalian legumain by some cystatins is due to a novel second reactive site. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 19195–19203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dickinson, D.P.; Thiesse, M.; Hicks, M.J. Expression of type 2 cystatin genes CST1-CST5 in adult human tissues and the developing submandibular gland. DNA Cell Biol. 2002, 21, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fagerberg, L.; Hallstrom, B.M.; Oksvold, P.; Kampf, C.; Djureinovic, D.; Odeberg, J.; Habuka, M.; Tahmasebpoor, S.; Danielsson, A.; Edlund, K.; et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2014, 13, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zeeuwen, P.L.; van Vlijmen-Willems, I.M.; Egami, H.; Schalkwijk, J. Cystatin M / E expression in inflammatory and neoplastic skin disorders. Br. J. Dermatol. 2002, 147, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Halfon, S.; Ford, J.; Foster, J.; Dowling, L.; Lucian, L.; Sterling, M.; Xu, Y.; Weiss, M.; Ikeda, M.; Liggett, D.; et al. Leukocystatin, a new Class II cystatin expressed selectively by hematopoietic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 16400–16408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Freije, J.P.; Abrahamson, M.; Olafsson, I.; Velasco, G.; Grubb, A.; Lopez-Otin, C. Structure and expression of the gene encoding cystatin D, a novel human cysteine proteinase inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 20538–20543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alvarez-Fernandez, M.; Liang, Y.H.; Abrahamson, M.; Su, X.D. Crystal structure of human cystatin D, a cysteine peptidase inhibitor with restricted inhibition profile. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 18221–18228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dickinson, D.P. Salivary (SD-type) cystatins: Over one billion years in the making—But to what purpose? Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med. 2002, 13, 485–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Sousa-Pereira, P.; Abrantes, J.; Pinheiro, A.; Colaco, B.; Vitorino, R.; Esteves, P.J. Evolution of C, D and S-type cystatins in mammals: An extensive gene duplication in primates. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ganeshnarayan, K.; Velliyagounder, K.; Furgang, D.; Fine, D.H. Human salivary cystatin SA exhibits antimicrobial effect against Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. J. Periodontal. Res. 2012, 47, 661–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Blankenvoorde, M.F.; van’t Hof, W.; Walgreen-Weterings, E.; van Steenbergen, T.J.; Brand, H.S.; Veerman, E.C.; Nieuw Amerongen, A.V. Cystatin and cystatin-derived peptides have antibacterial activity against the pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis. Biol. Chem. 1998, 379, 1371–1375. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Bosch, J.A.; de Geus, E.J.; Veerman, E.C.; Hoogstraten, J.; Nieuw Amerongen, A.V. Innate secretory immunity in response to laboratory stressors that evoke distinct patterns of cardiac autonomic activity. Psychosom. Med. 2003, 65, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jasir, A.; Kasprzykowski, F.; Kasprzykowska, R.; Lindstrom, V.; Schalen, C.; Grubb, A. New antimicrobial cystatin C-based peptide active against gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multiresistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. APMIS 2003, 111, 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Blancas-Luciano, B.E.; Becker-Fauser, I.; Zamora-Chimal, J.; Delgado-Dominguez, J.; Ruiz-Remigio, A.; Leyva-Huerta, E.R.; Portilla-Robertson, J.; Fernandez-Presas, A.M. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity of Cystatin C on human gingival fibroblast incubated with Porphyromonas gingivalis. Peerj 2022, 10, e14232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Szpak, M.; Trziszka, T.; Polanowski, A.; Gburek, J.; Golab, K.; Juszczynska, K.; Janik, P.; Malicki, A.; Szyplik, K. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of cystatin against selected strains of Escherichia coli. Folia Biol. 2014, 62, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baron, A.; DeCarlo, A.; Featherstone, J. Functional aspects of the human salivary cystatins in the oral environment. Oral Dis. 1999, 5, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shintani, M.; Minaguchi, K.; Isemura, S.; Saitoh, E.; Sanada, K.; Semba, T. Genetic polymorphisms of the CST2 locus coding for cystatin SA. Hum. Genet. 1994, 94, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saitoh, E.; Minaguchi, K.; Ishibashi, O. Production and characterization of two variants of human cystatin SA encoded by two alleles at the CST2 locus of the type 2 cystatin gene family. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1998, 352, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Isemura, S.; Saitoh, E.; Ito, S.; Isemura, M.; Sanada, K. Cystatin S: A cysteine proteinase inhibitor of human saliva. J. Biochem. 1984, 96, 1311–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Isemura, S.; Saitoh, E.; Sanada, K. Isolation and amino acid sequence of SAP-1, an acidic protein of human whole saliva, and sequence homology with human gamma-trace. J. Biochem. 1984, 96, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ramasubbu, N.; Reddy, M.S.; Bergey, E.J.; Haraszthy, G.G.; Soni, S.D.; Levine, M.J. Large-scale purification and characterization of the major phosphoproteins and mucins of human submandibular-sublingual saliva. Biochem. J. 1991, 280 Pt 2, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shaw, P.A.; Yu, W.A. Autonomic regulation of cystatin S gene expression in rat submandibular glands. Auton Neurosci. 2000, 83, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Laguna, M.; Holgado, M.; Hernandez, A.L.; Santamaria, B.; Lavin, A.; Soria, J.; Suarez, T.; Bardina, C.; Jara, M.; Sanza, F.J.; et al. Antigen-Antibody Affinity for Dry Eye Biomarkers by Label Free Biosensing. Comparison with the ELISA Technique. Sensors 2015, 15, 19819–19829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Balbin, M.; Hall, A.; Grubb, A.; Mason, R.W.; Lopez-Otin, C.; Abrahamson, M. Structural and functional characterization of two allelic variants of human cystatin D sharing a characteristic inhibition spectrum against mammalian cysteine proteinases. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 23156–23162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dyhrfort, P.; Shen, Q.; Clausen, F.; Thulin, M.; Enblad, P.; Kamali-Moghaddam, M.; Lewen, A.; Hillered, L. Monitoring of Protein Biomarkers of Inflammation in Human Traumatic Brain Injury Using Microdialysis and Proximity Extension Assay Technology in Neurointensive Care. J. Neurotrauma 2019, 36, 2872–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Saitoh, E.; Sabatini, L.M.; Eddy, R.L.; Shows, T.B.; Azen, E.A.; Isemura, S.; Sanada, K. The human cystatin C gene (CST3) is a member of the cystatin gene family which is localized on chromosome 20. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1989, 162, 1324–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schnittger, S.; Rao, V.V.; Abrahamson, M.; Hansmann, I. Cystatin C (CST3), the candidate gene for hereditary cystatin C amyloid angiopathy (HCCAA), and other members of the cystatin gene family are clustered on chromosome 20p11.2. Genomics 1993, 16, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abrahamson, M.; Dalboge, H.; Olafsson, I.; Carlsen, S.; Grubb, A. Efficient production of native, biologically active human cystatin C by Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1988, 236, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ferguson, T.W.; Komenda, P.; Tangri, N. Cystatin C as a biomarker for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens 2015, 24, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Urbschat, A.; Obermuller, N.; Haferkamp, A. Biomarkers of kidney injury. Biomarkers 2011, 16 (Suppl. S1), S22–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Dharnidharka, V.R.; Kwon, C.; Stevens, G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2002, 40, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Janowski, R.; Kozak, M.; Jankowska, E.; Grzonka, Z.; Grubb, A.; Abrahamson, M.; Jaskolski, M. Human cystatin C, an amyloidogenic protein, dimerizes through three-dimensional domain swapping. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xu, Y.; Lindemann, P.; Vega-Ramos, J.; Zhang, J.G.; Villadangos, J.A. Developmental regulation of synthesis and dimerization of the amyloidogenic protease inhibitor cystatin C in the hematopoietic system. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 9730–9740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sun, B.; Zhou, Y.; Halabisky, B.; Lo, I.; Cho, S.H.; Mueller-Steiner, S.; Devidze, N.; Wang, X.; Grubb, A.; Gan, L. Cystatin C-cathepsin B axis regulates amyloid beta levels and associated neuronal deficits in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 2008, 60, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hardy, J.; Selkoe, D.J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: Progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 2002, 297, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Finckh, U.; von der Kammer, H.; Velden, J.; Michel, T.; Andresen, B.; Deng, A.; Zhang, J.; Muller-Thomsen, T.; Zuchowski, K.; Menzer, G.; et al. Genetic association of a cystatin C gene polymorphism with late-onset Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 2000, 57, 1579–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Crawford, F.C.; Freeman, M.J.; Schinka, J.A.; Abdullah, L.I.; Gold, M.; Hartman, R.; Krivian, K.; Morris, M.D.; Richards, D.; Duara, R.; et al. A polymorphism in the cystatin C gene is a novel risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2000, 55, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wahlbom, M.; Wang, X.; Lindstrom, V.; Carlemalm, E.; Jaskolski, M.; Grubb, A. Fibrillogenic oligomers of human cystatin C are formed by propagated domain swapping. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 18318–18326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sotiropoulou, G.; Anisowicz, A.; Sager, R. Identification, cloning, and characterization of cystatin M, a novel cysteine proteinase inhibitor, down-regulated in breast cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 903–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ni, J.; Abrahamson, M.; Zhang, M.; Fernandez, M.A.; Grubb, A.; Su, J.; Yu, G.L.; Li, Y.; Parmelee, D.; Xing, L.; et al. Cystatin E is a novel human cysteine proteinase inhibitor with structural resemblance to family 2 cystatins. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 10853–10858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Stenman, G.; Astrom, A.K.; Roijer, E.; Sotiropoulou, G.; Zhang, M.; Sager, R. Assignment of a novel cysteine proteinase inhibitor (CST6) to 11q13 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1997, 76, 45–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lunde, N.N.; Haugen, M.H.; Bodin Larsen, K.B.; Damgaard, I.; Pettersen, S.J.; Kasem, R.; Rut, W.; Drag, M.; Poreba, M.; Johansen, H.T.; et al. Glycosylation is important for legumain localization and processing to active forms but not for cystatin E/M inhibitory functions. Biochimie 2017, 139, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dall, E.; Hollerweger, J.C.; Dahms, S.O.; Cui, H.; Haussermann, K.; Brandstetter, H. Structural and functional analysis of cystatin E reveals enzymologically relevant dimer and amyloid fibril states. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 13151–13165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tjabringa, G.S.; Vos, J.B.; Olthuis, D.; Ninaber, D.K.; Rabe, K.F.; Schalkwijk, J.; Hiemstra, P.S.; Zeeuwen, P.L. Host defense effector molecules in mucosal secretions. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 45, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zeeuwen, P.L.; van Vlijmen-Willems, I.M.; Cheng, T.; Rodijk-Olthuis, D.; Hitomi, K.; Hara-Nishimura, I.; John, S.; Smyth, N.; Reinheckel, T.; Hendriks, W.J.; et al. The cystatin M/E-cathepsin L balance is essential for tissue homeostasis in epidermis, hair follicles, and cornea. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 3744–3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, J.; Xu, X.; Zhong, Y.; Xu, Y.; Lu, P.; Zhou, J.; Lin, Z.; Yang, B.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations in CST6 cause dry skin, desquamation and abnormal keratosis without hypotrichosis. Clin. Genet. 2023, 103, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Eckl, K.M.; Gruber, R.; Brennan, L.; Marriott, A.; Plank, R.; Moosbrugger-Martinz, V.; Blunder, S.; Schossig, A.; Altmuller, J.; Thiele, H.; et al. Cystatin M/E Variant Causes Autosomal Dominant Keratosis Follicularis Spinulosa Decalvans by Dysregulating Cathepsins L and V. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 689940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jansen, P.A.; van den Bogaard, E.H.; Kersten, F.F.; Oostendorp, C.; van Vlijmen-Willems, I.M.; Oji, V.; Traupe, H.; Hennies, H.C.; Schalkwijk, J.; Zeeuwen, P.L. Cystatin M/E knockdown by lentiviral delivery of shRNA impairs epidermal morphogenesis of human skin equivalents. Exp. Dermatol. 2012, 21, 889–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zeeuwen, P.L.; van Vlijmen-Willems, I.M.; Hendriks, W.; Merkx, G.F.; Schalkwijk, J. A null mutation in the cystatin M/E gene of ichq mice causes juvenile lethality and defects in epidermal cornification. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002, 11, 2867–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Morita, M.; Yoshiuchi, N.; Arakawa, H.; Nishimura, S. CMAP: A novel cystatin-like gene involved in liver metastasis. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Ni, J.; Fernandez, M.A.; Danielsson, L.; Chillakuru, R.A.; Zhang, J.; Grubb, A.; Su, J.; Gentz, R.; Abrahamson, M. Cystatin F is a glycosylated human low molecular weight cysteine proteinase inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 24797–24804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Langerholc, T.; Zavasnik-Bergant, V.; Turk, B.; Turk, V.; Abrahamson, M.; Kos, J. Inhibitory properties of cystatin F and its localization in U937 promonocyte cells. FEBS J. 2005, 272, 1535–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Maher, K.; Konjar, S.; Watts, C.; Turk, B.; Kopitar-Jerala, N. Cystatin F regulates proteinase activity in IL-2-activated natural killer cells. Protein Pept. Lett. 2014, 21, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dautovic, E.; Perisic Nanut, M.; Softic, A.; Kos, J. The transcription factor C/EBP alpha controls the role of cystatin F during the differentiation of monocytes to macrophages. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 97, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hamilton, G.; Colbert, J.D.; Schuettelkopf, A.W.; Watts, C. Cystatin F is a cathepsin C-directed protease inhibitor regulated by proteolysis. EMBO J. 2008, 27, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Duff, M.O.; Olson, S.; Wei, X.; Garrett, S.C.; Osman, A.; Bolisetty, M.; Plocik, A.; Celniker, S.E.; Graveley, B.R. Genome-wide identification of zero nucleotide recursive splicing in Drosophila. Nature 2015, 521, 376–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Colbert, J.D.; Plechanovova, A.; Watts, C. Glycosylation directs targeting and activation of cystatin f from intracellular and extracellular sources. Traffic 2009, 10, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Parent, A.D.; Cornwall, G.A.; Liu, L.Y.; Smith, C.E.; Hermo, L. Alterations in the testis and epididymis associated with loss of function of the cystatin-related epididymal spermatogenic (CRES) protein. J. Androl. 2011, 32, 444–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chau, K.M.; Cornwall, G.A. Reduced fertility in vitro in mice lacking the cystatin CRES (cystatin-related epididymal spermatogenic): Rescue by exposure of spermatozoa to dibutyryl cAMP and isobutylmethylxanthine. Biol. Reprod. 2011, 84, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Belotti, Y.; Lim, E.H.; Lim, C.T. The Role of the Extracellular Matrix and Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells in the Prognostication of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Pham, C.T. Neutrophil serine proteases: Specific regulators of inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 541–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Shen, X.B.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Wu, F.F.; Liu, X.H. Cathepsin C inhibitors as anti-inflammatory drug discovery: Challenges and opportunities. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 225, 113818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kos, J.; Nanut, M.P.; Prunk, M.; Sabotic, J.; Dautovic, E.; Jewett, A. Cystatin F as a regulator of immune cell cytotoxicity. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2018, 67, 1931–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Senjor, E.; Kos, J.; Nanut, M.P. Cysteine Cathepsins as Therapeutic Targets in Immune Regulation and Immune Disorders. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Shi, G.P.; Villadangos, J.A.; Dranoff, G.; Small, C.; Gu, L.; Haley, K.J.; Riese, R.; Ploegh, H.L.; Chapman, H.A. Cathepsin S required for normal MHC class II peptide loading and germinal center development. Immunity 1999, 10, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Riese, R.J.; Wolf, P.R.; Bromme, D.; Natkin, L.R.; Villadangos, J.A.; Ploegh, H.L.; Chapman, H.A. Essential role for cathepsin S in MHC class II-associated invariant chain processing and peptide loading. Immunity 1996, 4, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Driessen, C.; Bryant, R.A.; Lennon-Dumenil, A.M.; Villadangos, J.A.; Bryant, P.W.; Shi, G.P.; Chapman, H.A.; Ploegh, H.L. Cathepsin S controls the trafficking and maturation of MHC class II molecules in dendritic cells. J. Cell. Biol. 1999, 147, 775–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nakagawa, T.Y.; Brissette, W.H.; Lira, P.D.; Griffiths, R.J.; Petrushova, N.; Stock, J.; McNeish, J.D.; Eastman, S.E.; Howard, E.D.; Clarke, S.R.; et al. Impaired invariant chain degradation and antigen presentation and diminished collagen-induced arthritis in cathepsin S null mice. Immunity 1999, 10, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. House, I.G.; House, C.M.; Brennan, A.J.; Gilan, O.; Dawson, M.A.; Whisstock, J.C.; Law, R.H.; Trapani, J.A.; Voskoboinik, I. Regulation of perforin activation and pre-synaptic toxicity through C-terminal glycosylation. EMBO Rep. 2017, 18, 1775–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Garnero, P.; Borel, O.; Byrjalsen, I.; Ferreras, M.; Drake, F.H.; McQueney, M.S.; Foged, N.T.; Delmas, P.D.; Delaisse, J.M. The collagenolytic activity of cathepsin K is unique among mammalian proteinases. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 32347–32352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Solberg, R.; Lunde, N.N.; Forbord, K.M.; Okla, M.; Kassem, M.; Jafari, A. The Mammalian Cysteine Protease Legumain in Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Nocera, A.L.; Mueller, S.K.; Workman, A.D.; Wu, D.; McDonnell, K.; Sadow, P.M.; Amiji, M.M.; Bleier, B.S. Cystatin SN is a potent upstream initiator of epithelial-derived type 2 inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2022, 150, 872–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yan, B.; Lou, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Meng, Y.; Qi, S.; Wang, M.; Xiao, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L. Epithelium-derived cystatin SN enhances eosinophil activation and infiltration through IL-5 in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 144, 455–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Higham, A.; Dungwa, J.; Pham, T.H.; McCrae, C.; Singh, D. Increased mast cell activation in eosinophilic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2022, 11, e1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kato, Y.; Takabayashi, T.; Sakashita, M.; Imoto, Y.; Tokunaga, T.; Ninomiya, T.; Morikawa, T.; Yoshida, K.; Noguchi, E.; Fujieda, S. Expression and Functional Analysis of CST1 in Intractable Nasal Polyps. Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2018, 59, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, M.; Gong, L.; Luo, Y.; He, S.; Zhang, X.; Xie, X.; Li, X.; Feng, X. Transcriptomic analysis of asthma and allergic rhinitis reveals CST1 as a biomarker of unified airways. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1048195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jakiela, B.; Soja, J.; Sladek, K.; Przybyszowski, M.; Plutecka, H.; Gielicz, A.; Licholai, S.; Aab, A.; Rebane, A.; Bochenek, G. Bronchial epithelial cell transcriptome shows endotype heterogeneity of asthma in patients with NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2023, 151, 953–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kack, U.; Einarsdottir, E.; van Hage, M.; Asarnoj, A.; James, A.; Nopp, A.; Krjutskov, K.; Katayama, S.; Kere, J.; Lilja, G.; et al. Nasal upregulation of CST1 in dog-sensitised children with severe allergic airway disease. ERJ Open Res. 2021, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wu, D.; Yan, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L. Prognostic and pharmacologic value of cystatin SN for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 148, 450–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liu, H.B.; Bai, J.; Wang, W.X. CST1 promotes the proliferation and migration of PDGF-BB-treated airway smooth muscle cells via the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2023, 39, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Nakayama, T.; Lee, I.T.; Le, W.; Tsunemi, Y.; Borchard, N.A.; Zarabanda, D.; Dholakia, S.S.; Gall, P.A.; Yang, A.; Kim, D.; et al. Inflammatory molecular endotypes of nasal polyps derived from White and Japanese populations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2022, 149, 1296–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Schraufstatter, I.U.; Zhao, M.; Khaldoyanidi, S.K.; Discipio, R.G. The chemokine CCL18 causes maturation of cultured monocytes to macrophages in the M2 spectrum. Immunology 2012, 135, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Xu, Y.; Wang, J.; Ren, H.; Dai, H.; Zhou, Y.; Ren, X.; Wang, Y.; Feng, S.; Deng, X.; Wu, J.; et al. Human endoderm stem cells reverse inflammation-related acute liver failure through cystatin SN-mediated inhibition of interferon signaling. Cell Res. 2023, 33, 147–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Miyake, M.M.; Workman, A.D.; Nocera, A.L.; Wu, D.; Mueller, S.K.; Finn, K.; Amiji, M.M.; Bleier, B.S. Discriminant analysis followed by unsupervised cluster analysis including exosomal cystatins predict presence of chronic rhinosinusitis, phenotype, and disease severity. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019, 9, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mueller, S.K.; Wendler, O.; Nocera, A.; Grundtner, P.; Schlegel, P.; Agaimy, A.; Iro, H.; Bleier, B.S. Escalation in mucus cystatin 2, pappalysin-A, and periostin levels over time predict need for recurrent surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019, 9, 1212–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Workman, A.D.; Nocera, A.L.; Mueller, S.K.; Otu, H.H.; Libermann, T.A.; Bleier, B.S. Translating transcription: Proteomics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps reveals significant discordance with messenger RNA expression. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019, 9, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Boto de Los Bueis, A.; de la Fuente, M.; Montejano-Milner, R.; Del Hierro Zarzuelo, A.; Vecino, E.; Acera, A. A Pilot Study of a Panel of Ocular Inflammation Biomarkers in Patients with Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 2881–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Soria, J.; Acera, A.; Merayo, L.J.; Duran, J.A.; Gonzalez, N.; Rodriguez, S.; Bistolas, N.; Schumacher, S.; Bier, F.F.; Peter, H.; et al. Tear proteome analysis in ocular surface diseases using label-free LC-MS/MS and multiplexed-microarray biomarker validation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Elam, M.B.; Majumdar, G.; Mozhui, K.; Gerling, I.C.; Vera, S.R.; Fish-Trotter, H.; Williams, R.W.; Childress, R.D.; Raghow, R. Patients experiencing statin-induced myalgia exhibit a unique program of skeletal muscle gene expression following statin re-challenge. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cowell, W.; Colicino, E.; Lee, A.G.; Bosquet Enlow, M.; Flom, J.D.; Berin, C.; Wright, R.O.; Wright, R.J. Data-driven discovery of mid-pregnancy immune markers associated with maternal lifetime stress: Results from an urban pre-birth cohort. Stress 2020, 23, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Panezai, J.; Ali, A.; Ghaffar, A.; Benchimol, D.; Altamash, M.; Klinge, B.; Engstrom, P.E.; Larsson, A. Upregulation of circulating inflammatory biomarkers under the influence of periodontal disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Cytokine 2020, 131, 155117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Collins, A.R.; Grubb, A. Cystatin D, a natural salivary cysteine protease inhibitor, inhibits coronavirus replication at its physiologic concentration. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 1998, 13, 59–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zavasnik-Bergant, T.; Repnik, U.; Schweiger, A.; Romih, R.; Jeras, M.; Turk, V.; Kos, J. Differentiation- and maturation-dependent content, localization, and secretion of cystatin C in human dendritic cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2005, 78, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Pierre, P.; Mellman, I. Developmental regulation of invariant chain proteolysis controls MHC class II trafficking in mouse dendritic cells. Cell 1998, 93, 1135–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Biasizzo, M.; Trstenjak-Prebanda, M.; Dolinar, K.; Pirkmajer, S.; Zavrsnik, J.; Turk, B.; Kopitar-Jerala, N. Cystatin C Deficiency Increases LPS-Induced Sepsis and NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Mice. Cells 2021, 10, 2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hansen, T.; Petrow, P.K.; Gaumann, A.; Keyszer, G.; Brauer, R.; Kriegsmann, J. Synovial giant cells in rheumatoid arthritis: Expression of cystatin C, but not of cathepsin B. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2000, 52, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Longenecker, C.T.; Hileman, C.O.; Funderburg, N.T.; McComsey, G.A. Rosuvastatin preserves renal function and lowers cystatin C in HIV-infected subjects on antiretroviral therapy: The SATURN-HIV trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 59, 1148–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. El-Sukkari, D.; Wilson, N.S.; Hakansson, K.; Steptoe, R.J.; Grubb, A.; Shortman, K.; Villadangos, J.A. The protease inhibitor cystatin C is differentially expressed among dendritic cell populations, but does not control antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 5003–5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Frendeus, K.H.; Wallin, H.; Janciauskiene, S.; Abrahamson, M. Macrophage responses to interferon-gamma are dependent on cystatin C levels. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2009, 41, 2262–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Xu, Y.; Schnorrer, P.; Proietto, A.; Kowalski, G.; Febbraio, M.A.; Acha-Orbea, H.; Dickins, R.A.; Villadangos, J.A. IL-10 controls cystatin C synthesis and blood concentration in response to inflammation through regulation of IFN regulatory factor 8 expression. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 3666–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Sokol, J.P.; Schiemann, W.P. Cystatin C antagonizes transforming growth factor beta signaling in normal and cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 2004, 2, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Soh, H.; Venkatesan, N.; Veena, M.S.; Ravichandran, S.; Zinabadi, A.; Basak, S.K.; Parvatiyar, K.; Srivastava, M.; Liang, L.J.; Gjertson, D.W.; et al. Cystatin E/M Suppresses Tumor Cell Growth through Cytoplasmic Retention of NF-kappaB. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 36, 1776–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Gai, D.; Chen, J.R.; Stewart, J.P.; Nookaew, I.; Habelhah, H.; Ashby, C.; Sun, F.; Cheng, Y.; Li, C.; Xu, H.; et al. CST6 suppresses osteolytic bone disease in multiple myeloma by blocking osteoclast differentiation. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 132, e159527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Prunk, M.; Nanut, M.P.; Sabotic, J.; Svajger, U.; Kos, J. Increased cystatin F levels correlate with decreased cytotoxicity of cytotoxic T cells. Radiol. Oncol. 2019, 53, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Magister, S.; Tseng, H.C.; Bui, V.T.; Kos, J.; Jewett, A. Regulation of split anergy in natural killer cells by inhibition of cathepsins C and H and cystatin F. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 22310–22327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Magister, S.; Obermajer, N.; Mirkovic, B.; Svajger, U.; Renko, M.; Softic, A.; Romih, R.; Colbert, J.D.; Watts, C.; Kos, J. Regulation of cathepsins S and L by cystatin F during maturation of dendritic cells. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 2012, 91, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jin, C.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xiang, J.; Zhang, R.; Sun, Z.; Mei, S.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, J.; Shi, L. A Unique Type of Highly-Activated Microglia Evoking Brain Inflammation via Mif/Cd74 Signaling Axis in Aged Mice. Aging Dis. 2021, 12, 2125–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Mangale, V.; Syage, A.R.; Ekiz, H.A.; Skinner, D.D.; Cheng, Y.; Stone, C.L.; Brown, R.M.; O’Connell, R.M.; Green, K.N.; Lane, T.E. Microglia influence host defense, disease, and repair following murine coronavirus infection of the central nervous system. Glia 2020, 68, 2345–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ma, K.; Chen, X.; Liu, W.; Chen, S.; Yang, C.; Yang, J. CTSB is a negative prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target associated with immune cells infiltration and immunosuppression in gliomas. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Fonovic, M.; Turk, B. Cysteine cathepsins and extracellular matrix degradation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014, 1840, 2560–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mai, C.W.; Chung, F.F.; Leong, C.O. Targeting Legumain As a Novel Therapeutic Strategy in Cancers. Curr. Drug Targets 2017, 18, 1259–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Dong, C.; Chen, T.; Dong, A.; Ren, J.; Li, W.; Shu, G.; Yang, J.; Shen, W.; et al. CST1 inhibits ferroptosis and promotes gastric cancer metastasis by regulating GPX4 protein stability via OTUB1. Oncogene 2023, 42, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Dai, D.N.; Li, Y.; Chen, B.; Du, Y.; Li, S.B.; Lu, S.X.; Zhao, Z.P.; Zhou, A.J.; Xue, N.; Xia, T.L.; et al. Elevated expression of CST1 promotes breast cancer progression and predicts a poor prognosis. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 95, 873–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Cao, X.; Li, Y.; Luo, R.Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.L.; Zeng, J.; Han, Y.J.; Wen, Z.S. Expression of Cystatin SN significantly correlates with recurrence, metastasis, and survival duration in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer patients. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhang, L.; Yu, S.; Yin, X.; Tu, M.; Cai, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, L.; Zhang, S.; Pan, X.; Huang, Y. MiR-942-5p inhibits tumor migration and invasion through targeting CST1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0277006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Li, T.; Xiong, Q.; Zou, Z.; Lei, X.; Jiang, Q.; Liu, D. Prognostic significance of cystatin SN associated nomograms in patients with colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 115153–115163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Cui, Y.; Sun, D.; Song, R.; Zhang, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Meng, F.; Lan, Y.; Han, J.; Pan, S.; et al. Upregulation of cystatin SN promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression and predicts a poor prognosis. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 22623–22634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Mullapudi, N.; Ye, B.; Suzuki, M.; Fazzari, M.; Han, W.; Shi, M.K.; Marquardt, G.; Lin, J.; Wang, T.; Keller, S.; et al. Genome Wide Methylome Alterations in Lung Cancer. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kim, J.T.; Lee, S.J.; Kang, M.A.; Park, J.E.; Kim, B.Y.; Yoon, D.Y.; Yang, Y.; Lee, C.H.; Yeom, Y.I.; Choe, Y.K.; et al. Cystatin SN neutralizes the inhibitory effect of cystatin C on cathepsin B activity. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhang, W.P.; Wang, Y.; Tan, D.; Xing, C.G. Cystatin 2 leads to a worse prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2020, 34, 2059–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Song, F.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, Z.; Hu, X.; Yi, Y.; Zheng, X.; Wei, H.; Huang, P. Identification of novel key genes associated with the metastasis of prostate cancer based on bioinformatics prediction and validation. Cancer Cell. Int. 2021, 21, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Shi, D.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, S. miRNA-6715-5p Inhibits Cellular Proliferation and Invasion in Colorectal Cancer by Directly Targeting CST4. J. Oncol. 2021, 2021, 7615712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Zhang, Y.Q.; Zhang, J.J.; Song, H.J.; Li, D.W. Overexpression of CST4 promotes gastric cancer aggressiveness by activating the ELFN2 signaling pathway. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017, 7, 2290–2304. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  135. Yang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, H.; Liu, J.; Huang, S.; Zhong, W.; Peng, C.; Du, L. CircRNA circ_0023984 promotes the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via regulating miR-134-5p/cystatin-s axis. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 10578–10593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wu, W.; Yong, W.W.; Chung, M.C. A simple biomarker scoring matrix for early gastric cancer detection. Proteomics 2016, 16, 2921–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Berger, M.D.; Stintzing, S.; Heinemann, V.; Cao, S.; Yang, D.; Sunakawa, Y.; Matsusaka, S.; Ning, Y.; Okazaki, S.; Miyamoto, Y.; et al. A Polymorphism within the Vitamin D Transporter Gene Predicts Outcome in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with FOLFIRI/Bevacizumab or FOLFIRI/Cetuximab. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Munetsuna, E.; Kawanami, R.; Nishikawa, M.; Ikeda, S.; Nakabayashi, S.; Yasuda, K.; Ohta, M.; Kamakura, M.; Ikushiro, S.; Sakaki, T. Anti-proliferative activity of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in human prostate cells. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2014, 382, 960–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Alvarez-Diaz, S.; Valle, N.; Garcia, J.M.; Pena, C.; Freije, J.M.; Quesada, V.; Astudillo, A.; Bonilla, F.; Lopez-Otin, C.; Munoz, A. Cystatin D is a candidate tumor suppressor gene induced by vitamin D in human colon cancer cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 2343–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Deeb, K.K.; Trump, D.L.; Johnson, C.S. Vitamin D signalling pathways in cancer: Potential for anticancer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 684–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Carlberg, C.; Munoz, A. An update on vitamin D signaling and cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2022, 79, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Hunten, S.; Hermeking, H. p53 directly activates cystatin D/CST5 to mediate mesenchymal-epithelial transition: A possible link to tumor suppression by vitamin D3. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 15842–15856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Wang, B.; Sun, J.; Kitamoto, S.; Yang, M.; Grubb, A.; Chapman, H.A.; Kalluri, R.; Shi, G.P. Cathepsin S controls angiogenesis and tumor growth via matrix-derived angiogenic factors. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 6020–6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Balaji, K.N.; Schaschke, N.; Machleidt, W.; Catalfamo, M.; Henkart, P.A. Surface cathepsin B protects cytotoxic lymphocytes from self-destruction after degranulation. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 196, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Indacochea, A.; Guerrero, S.; Urena, M.; Araujo, F.; Coll, O.; ME, L.L.; Gebauer, F. Cold-inducible RNA binding protein promotes breast cancer cell malignancy by regulating Cystatin C levels. RNA 2021, 27, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Mori, J.; Tanikawa, C.; Funauchi, Y.; Lo, P.H.; Nakamura, Y.; Matsuda, K. Cystatin C as a p53-inducible apoptotic mediator that regulates cathepsin L activity. Cancer Sci. 2016, 107, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Abrahamson, M.; Barrett, A.J.; Salvesen, G.; Grubb, A. Isolation of six cysteine proteinase inhibitors from human urine. Their physicochemical and enzyme kinetic properties and concentrations in biological fluids. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 11282–11289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Nakabayashi, H.; Hara, M.; Shimuzu, K. Clinicopathologic significance of cystatin C expression in gliomas. Hum. Pathol. 2005, 36, 1008–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sokol, J.P.; Neil, J.R.; Schiemann, B.J.; Schiemann, W.P. The use of cystatin C to inhibit epithelial-mesenchymal transition and morphological transformation stimulated by transforming growth factor-beta. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7, R844–R853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Saleh, Y.; Sebzda, T.; Warwas, M.; Kopec, W.; Ziolkowska, J.; Siewinski, M. Expression of cystatin C in clinical human colorectal cancer tissues. J. Exp. Ther. Oncol. 2005, 5, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
  151. Periyasamy, A.; Gopisetty, G.; Subramanium, M.J.; Velusamy, S.; Rajkumar, T. Identification and validation of differential plasma proteins levels in epithelial ovarian cancer. J. Proteom. 2020, 226, 103893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Yan, Y.; Fan, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Zhou, K. LncRNA Snhg1, a non-degradable sponge for miR-338, promotes expression of proto-oncogene CST3 in primary esophageal cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 35750–35760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Vancompernolle, K.; Van Herreweghe, F.; Pynaert, G.; Van de Craen, M.; De Vos, K.; Totty, N.; Sterling, A.; Fiers, W.; Vandenabeele, P.; Grooten, J. Atractyloside-induced release of cathepsin B, a protease with caspase-processing activity. FEBS Lett. 1998, 438, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Decock, J.; Obermajer, N.; Vozelj, S.; Hendrickx, W.; Paridaens, R.; Kos, J. Cathepsin B, cathepsin H, cathepsin X and cystatin C in sera of patients with early-stage and inflammatory breast cancer. Int. J. Biol. Markers 2008, 23, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Lameire, N.; Vanholder, R.; Van Biesen, W.; Benoit, D. Acute kidney injury in critically ill cancer patients: An update. Crit. Care 2016, 20, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Rosner, M.H.; Perazella, M.A. Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 1770–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Jin, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Yao, L.; Fu, D.; Yao, X.; Xu, L.X.; Hu, X.; Hu, G. Differential secretome analysis reveals CST6 as a suppressor of breast cancer bone metastasis. Cell. Res. 2012, 22, 1356–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Pulukuri, S.M.; Gorantla, B.; Knost, J.A.; Rao, J.S. Frequent loss of cystatin E/M expression implicated in the progression of prostate cancer. Oncogene 2009, 28, 2829–2838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Qiu, J.; Ai, L.; Ramachandran, C.; Yao, B.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Fields, C.R.; Delmas, A.L.; Dyer, L.M.; Melnick, S.J.; Yachnis, A.T.; et al. Invasion suppressor cystatin E/M (CST6): High-level cell type-specific expression in normal brain and epigenetic silencing in gliomas. Lab Investig. 2008, 88, 910–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. D’Costa, Z.C.; Higgins, C.; Ong, C.W.; Irwin, G.W.; Boyle, D.; McArt, D.G.; McCloskey, K.; Buckley, N.E.; Crawford, N.T.; Thiagarajan, L.; et al. TBX2 represses CST6 resulting in uncontrolled legumain activity to sustain breast cancer proliferation: A novel cancer-selective target pathway with therapeutic opportunities. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 1609–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Wallin, H.; Apelqvist, J.; Andersson, F.; Ekstrom, U.; Abrahamson, M. Low-level internalization of cystatin E/M affects legumain activity and migration of melanoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 14413–14424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Li, X.; Liang, Y.; Lian, C.; Peng, F.; Xiao, Y.; He, Y.; Ma, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Deng, Y.; et al. CST6 protein and peptides inhibit breast cancer bone metastasis by suppressing CTSB activity and osteoclastogenesis. Theranostics 2021, 11, 9821–9832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Fornetti, J.; Welm, A.L.; Stewart, S.A. Understanding the Bone in Cancer Metastasis. J. Bone Min. Res. 2018, 33, 2099–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Li, Q.; Zheng, Z.C.; Ni, C.J.; Jin, W.X.; Jin, Y.X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.H.; Chen, E.D.; Cai, Y.F. Correlation of Cystatin E/M with Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2018, 48, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  165. Zhou, X.; Wang, X.; Huang, K.; Liao, X.; Yang, C.; Yu, T.; Liu, J.; Han, C.; Zhu, G.; Su, H.; et al. Investigation of the clinical significance and prospective molecular mechanisms of cystatin genes in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 42, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Hosokawa, M.; Kashiwaya, K.; Eguchi, H.; Ohigashi, H.; Ishikawa, O.; Furihata, M.; Shinomura, Y.; Imai, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakagawa, H. Over-expression of cysteine proteinase inhibitor cystatin 6 promotes pancreatic cancer growth. Cancer Sci. 2008, 99, 1626–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Khan, M.; Lin, J.; Wang, B.; Chen, C.; Huang, Z.; Tian, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Bu, J. A novel necroptosis-related gene index for predicting prognosis and a cold tumor immune microenvironment in stomach adenocarcinoma. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 968165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Senjor, E.; Perisic Nanut, M.; Breznik, B.; Mitrovic, A.; Mlakar, J.; Rotter, A.; Porcnik, A.; Lah Turnsek, T.; Kos, J. Cystatin F acts as a mediator of immune suppression in glioblastoma. Cell. Oncol. 2021, 44, 1051–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Utsunomiya, T.; Hara, Y.; Kataoka, A.; Morita, M.; Arakawa, H.; Mori, M.; Nishimura, S. Cystatin-like metastasis-associated protein mRNA expression in human colorectal cancer is associated with both liver metastasis and patient survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 2002, 8, 2591–2594. [Google Scholar]
  170. Chahal, M.S.; Ku, H.T.; Zhang, Z.; Legaspi, C.M.; Luo, A.; Hopkins, M.M.; Meier, K.E. Differential Expression of Ccn4 and Other Genes Between Metastatic and Non-metastatic EL4 Mouse Lymphoma Cells. Cancer Genom. Proteom. 2016, 13, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Yang, C.; Yu, T.; Liu, Z.; Ye, X.; Liao, X.; Wang, X.; Han, C.; Zhu, G.; Qin, W.; Peng, T. Cystatin F as a key family 2 cystatin subunit and prognostic biomarker for early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 42, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Baniwal, S.K.; Khalid, O.; Gabet, Y.; Shah, R.R.; Purcell, D.J.; Mav, D.; Kohn-Gabet, A.E.; Shi, Y.; Coetzee, G.A.; Frenkel, B. Runx2 transcriptome of prostate cancer cells: Insights into invasiveness and bone metastasis. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Qi, Q.; Chen, C.; Liu, C.; Zhang, B.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, W.; Wang, C. Linc8087 predicts favorable prognosis and inhibits cell migration and invasion in NSCLC. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2021, 225, 153569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Yue, F.; Cheng, Y.; Breschi, A.; Vierstra, J.; Wu, W.; Ryba, T.; Sandstrom, R.; Ma, Z.; Davis, C.; Pope, B.D.; et al. A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature 2014, 515, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Danjo, A.; Yamaza, T.; Kido, M.A.; Shimohira, D.; Tsukuba, T.; Kagiya, T.; Yamashita, Y.; Nishijima, K.; Masuko, S.; Goto, M.; et al. Cystatin C stimulates the differentiation of mouse osteoblastic cells and bone formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 360, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Matthews, S.P.; McMillan, S.J.; Colbert, J.D.; Lawrence, R.A.; Watts, C. Cystatin F Ensures Eosinophil Survival by Regulating Granule Biogenesis. Immunity 2016, 44, 795–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) The categorization of cystatins. (B) The structure of cystatins. Using cystatin C as an example. The coordinate file was retrieved from RCSB PDB, id: 3GAX. The image was generated using PyMOL (Schrodinger). The green region represents the cathepsin inhibitory site and the yellow residue represents the LGMN inhibitory site. This structure was originally discovered and published by Kolodziejczyk et al. [6].
Figure 1. (A) The categorization of cystatins. (B) The structure of cystatins. Using cystatin C as an example. The coordinate file was retrieved from RCSB PDB, id: 3GAX. The image was generated using PyMOL (Schrodinger). The green region represents the cathepsin inhibitory site and the yellow residue represents the LGMN inhibitory site. This structure was originally discovered and published by Kolodziejczyk et al. [6].
Cancers 15 05363 g001
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of key region alignment of type 2 cystatin family. The sequence of each cystatin was retrieved from the NCBI GenPept database. Multiple sequence alignment was performed by Clustal Omega and Boxshade. The conserved G-QXVXG-VPW fragment is highlighted in red and post-helix N is highlighted in blue.
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of key region alignment of type 2 cystatin family. The sequence of each cystatin was retrieved from the NCBI GenPept database. Multiple sequence alignment was performed by Clustal Omega and Boxshade. The conserved G-QXVXG-VPW fragment is highlighted in red and post-helix N is highlighted in blue.
Cancers 15 05363 g002
Figure 3. The overview of type 2 cystatins’ role on immune regulation and cancer development.
Figure 3. The overview of type 2 cystatins’ role on immune regulation and cancer development.
Cancers 15 05363 g003
Table 1. List of Type 2 Cystatins. Gene location info retrieved from the NCBI database of each gene.
Table 1. List of Type 2 Cystatins. Gene location info retrieved from the NCBI database of each gene.
Name of GeneEncoded ProteinGene LocationSite of Expression
CST1Cystatin SN20p11.21Parotid gland, lacrimal gland [13]
CST2Cystatin SA20p11.21Parotid gland [13]
CST3Cystatin C20p11.21Ubiquitous [14]
CST4Cystatin S20p11.21Parotid gland [13]
CST5Cystatin D20p11.21Parotid gland, lacrimal gland [13]
CST6Cystatin E/M11q13.1Epidermal tissue [15]
CST7Cystatin F20p11.21Hematopoietic cells [16]
CST8Cystatin 820p11.21Testis [14]
CST9Cystatin 920p11.21Testis [14]
CST11Cystatin 1120p11.21Testis [14]
Table 2. Summary of type 2 cystatins on their inflammation and tumor progression regulatory functions.
Table 2. Summary of type 2 cystatins on their inflammation and tumor progression regulatory functions.
Name of ProteinAnti-Inflammatory Effect
Pro-Tumor Effect
Pro-Inflammatory Effect
Anti-Tumor Effect
CYS1
  • Promotes Th2 inflammatory response [85]
  • Promotes M2 macrophage polarization [93]
  • Inhibits JAK/STAT1 pathway [94]
  • Inhibit tumor cell ferroptosis [123]
  • Activates PI3K/AKT pathway [128]
  • Partially neutralizes CYSC’s strong cathepsin B inhibitory effect [130]
  • Uncertain
CYS2
  • Uncertain
  • May regulate the TGF-β signaling pathway [131]
  • Uncertain
CYSC
  • Suppresses MHC class II molecule maturation in immature DCs [105]
  • Stronger inhibitor of pro-tumor cathepsin B [147]
  • Inhibits TGF- β pathway [149]
CYSS
  • Uncertain
  • May promote EMT [134]
  • Uncertain
CYSD
  • Uncertain
  • Inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [139]
  • Inhibits c-MYC expression [139]
CYS6
  • Suppress osteoclast differentiation and alleviate bone-matrix inflammatory stress [114]
  • Stronger inhibitor of pro-tumor legumain [160,161]
  • Inhibits p38 activation induced by RANKL [162]
  • Inhibits NF-κB signaling pathway [113,114]
  • Suppresses osteoclast differentiation and prevents bone metastasis [114]
CYSF
  • Reduces NK cell and CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity [115,116]
  • Regulates DC maturation [117]
  • Uncertain
  • May be related to cathepsin B-L metastatic axis regulation
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Zhan, F. Type 2 Cystatins and Their Roles in the Regulation of Human Immune Response and Cancer Progression. Cancers 2023, 15, 5363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225363

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Zhan F. Type 2 Cystatins and Their Roles in the Regulation of Human Immune Response and Cancer Progression. Cancers. 2023; 15(22):5363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225363

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zijun, and Fenghuang Zhan. 2023. "Type 2 Cystatins and Their Roles in the Regulation of Human Immune Response and Cancer Progression" Cancers 15, no. 22: 5363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225363

APA Style

Zhang, Z., & Zhan, F. (2023). Type 2 Cystatins and Their Roles in the Regulation of Human Immune Response and Cancer Progression. Cancers, 15(22), 5363. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225363

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop