Next Article in Journal
Interferon-Alpha Decreases Cancer Stem Cell Properties and Modulates Exosomes in Malignant Melanoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advancements for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Analysis and Drug Modulation of Human Endogenous Retrovirus in Hepatocellular Carcinomas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 14
10.3390/cancers15143665
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Image-Guided Ablation Therapies for Extrahepatic Metastases from Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review

by
Noriyuki Umakoshi
1,*,
Yusuke Matsui
2,
Koji Tomita
1,
Mayu Uka
1,
Takahiro Kawabata
1,
Toshihiro Iguchi
3 and
Takao Hiraki
2
1
Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
2
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
3
Department of Radiological Technology, Okayama University Graduate School of Health Science, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(14), 3665; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143665
Submission received: 13 June 2023 / Revised: 10 July 2023 / Accepted: 17 July 2023 / Published: 18 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advancement for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Although systemic therapies are a common treatment for patients with extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), local ablative therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation, can be used in select patients who have metastases to the lung, bone, and other sites with curative or palliative intent. This review summarizes the currently available evidence on image-guided thermal ablation therapies for extrahepatic metastases from HCC.

Abstract

The most common sites of extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the lungs, intra-abdominal lymph nodes, bones, and adrenal glands, in that order. Although systemic therapies are a common treatment for patients with extrahepatic metastases, local ablative therapies for the extrahepatic metastatic lesions can be performed in selected patients. In this article, the literature on image-guided thermal ablation for metastasis to each organ was reviewed to summarize the current evidence. Radiofrequency ablation was the most commonly evaluated technique, and microwave ablation, cryoablation, and percutaneous ethanol injection were also utilized. The local control rate of thermal ablation therapy was relatively favorable, at approximately 70–90% in various organs. The survival outcomes varied among the studies, and several studies reported that the absence of viable intrahepatic lesions was associated with improved survival rates. Since only retrospective data from relatively small studies has been available thus far, more robust studies with prospective designs and larger cohorts are desired to prove the usefulness of thermal ablation for extrahepatic metastases from HCC.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver tumor that often develops in patients with chronic liver disease, especially those with cirrhosis due to alcohol use, chronic hepatitis B or C viral infection, or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [1,2]. According to the World Health Organization’s Global Cancer Observatory database, HCC is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with extrahepatic metastases present in approximately 10–15% of cases at diagnosis in unsurveyed patients [3,4,5]. Extrahepatic metastases are more common in patients with advanced-stage primary tumors (>5 cm or macrovascular invasion) [4,6,7]. Patients with extrahepatic metastases have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of only 3% [8,9]. The common sites of extrahepatic metastasis include the lungs, intra-abdominal lymph nodes, bones, and adrenal glands, and metastases to the pleura, peritoneum, and brain are also possible [10,11,12]. Extrahepatic metastases may also occur as a part of disease recurrence after local therapy for HCC in approximately 5–25% of patients [13,14,15].
In general, systemic therapies such as chemotherapy and molecularly targeted drugs are selected for extrahepatic metastases [16]. Alternatively, or in combination with systemic therapies, local therapies such as surgery, radiotherapy, and thermal ablation therapy can be performed with curative intent for oligometastases or with palliative intent for metastases causing pain [12,17,18]. Image-guided thermal ablation therapies, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CA), are preferred for patients who are ineligible for surgery due to the minimally invasive and repeatable characteristics of these therapies. Recent studies have shown the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ablative therapies for extrahepatic oligometastases in the lung, adrenal gland, bone, lymph node [LN], and pleura/peritoneum of HCC [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. There is also a report regarding the efficacy of ablation in the treatment of painful bone metastases of HCC [28]. This review provides an overview of the current evidence regarding the outcomes of image-guided thermal ablation therapies for extrahepatic metastases of HCC.

2. Literature Search and Screening

PubMed was searched on 17 March 2023, using the following search terms: (“extrahepatic” [Title] OR “HCC” [Title] OR “hepatocellular carcinoma” [Title]) AND (“metastasis” [Title] OR “metastases” [Title] OR “metastatic” [Title] OR “oligometastases” [Title]) AND (“ablation” [Title] OR “ablative” [Title] OR “cryoablation” [Title] OR “laser interstitial thermal therapy” [Title] OR “LITT” [Title] OR “irreversible electroporation” [Title] OR “IRE” [Title]). Eighty-seven related articles were extracted, all published in 2003 or later.
The articles were screened using certain criteria based on their titles, abstracts, and texts. The criteria included: (i) articles written in English; (ii) clinical studies or meta-analyses; and (iii) studies showing outcomes, including survival after thermal ablation for extrahepatic metastases from HCC. When multiple studies conducted by the same institution had considerable overlap in terms of participants, only the study with the largest sample size was chosen.
Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the studies retrieved from the literature search and included in the analysis. Abstracts of the articles were reviewed according to pre-defined criteria. The full text of the subject papers was then evaluated, and data were extracted. An initial search identified 87 articles, of which 14 complete text articles were assessed and 11 were included [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31].

3. Techniques of Thermal Ablation

Ablative therapies represent a focused approach to eliminating or significantly destroying localized tumors with reduced invasiveness compared to surgical removal. In the local treatment of HCC, RFA and MWA play a fundamental role due to their safety and efficacy in completely necrotic tumor nodes, with comparable complete response rates [32,33]. Percutaneous thermal ablation has also been established as an effective treatment for renal, lung, and bone tumors [34,35,36,37,38], as well as benign masses of the thyroid and uterus [39,40]. These therapies achieve irreversible destruction of tumor tissue by applying either hot or cold thermal energy.
RFA employs an applicator to administer high-frequency alternating current (at 400 and 500 kHz) to the targeted tissue, inducing ionic agitation and generating frictional heat (temperatures ranging from 60 to 100 °C). The extent of the ablation zone achieved depends on the impedance of the target tissue as well as the adjacent perfusion and ventilation.
MWA utilizes a 915-MHz or 2.45-GHz generator to produce an electrical current, which is delivered through a water-cooled interstitial antenna to create a localized, non-ionizing electromagnetic field. This field interacts with dipolar molecules, leading to frictional heating. MWA offers several theoretical advantages, such as a rapid temperature increase, a reduced heat-sink effect compared to RFA, and a larger ablation zone [41,42].
CA destroys tumors by subjecting them to extremely cold temperatures. This is accomplished by delivering argon gas at high pressure through a cryoprobe, causing rapid expansion and a sudden drop in temperature below 183 °C (known as the Joule-Thompson phenomenon). Consequently, intra- and extracellular water freeze, resulting in the disruption of cell membranes and organelle structures. Upon passive thawing, a fluid shift occurs from the interstitium into the tumor cells, leading to cell rupture. Intravascular ice crystals, direct endothelial freezing, microthrombi, and post-ablation edema contribute to indirect ischemia. The advantages of CA include preservation of the collagenous architecture and reduced intraprocedural pain [41,42].
Imaging techniques are employed for immediate preoperative planning, targeting, and intraoperative guidance. X-ray fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT) (with or without CT fluoroscopy), and magnetic resonance imaging can be utilized for guidance either alone or in conjunction with 3D navigation or image fusion systems. Ultrasound guidance is appropriate when the tumor is clearly delineated in superficial regions or abdominal organs, allowing for the avoidance of adjacent sensitive structures.
The choice of ablation therapies and imaging modalities should be individualized based on the type of tumor, surrounding organs, and patient background.

4. Outcomes of Thermal Ablation for HCC Extrahepatic Metastases in Various Organs

Table 1 shows the results of studies on ablative therapies for metastases to various organs from HCC [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31].

4.1. Lung

The lung is the most common site of extrahepatic metastases. Lung metastasis occurs in 20–39% of advanced-stage HCC [43,44]. The most common ablation technique for HCC lung metastases was RFA in previous studies (Table 1). The local efficacy exhibited a high degree of consistency and favorability throughout studies; tumors with a mean or median size of 14–19 mm were treated with local control rates of 83–92% [21,22,23,24,25] (Table 1). The reported 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after lung ablation ranged from 73% to 89%, 26% to 70%, and 26% to 31%, respectively [21,22,23,24,25] (Table 1). Patients with up to two or three lung metastases showed better survival than those with more tumors [22,24]. The absence of viable or uncontrolled intrahepatic tumors was also associated with better survival [24,25]. Other factors were associated with a favorable prognosis, including a tumor diameter of less than or equal to 3 cm, lower serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, Child-Pugh grade A, no liver cirrhosis, and no hepatitis C infection [24,25]. Yuan et al. [22] compared RFA, MWA, and CA for HCC lung metastases, finding no difference in survival outcomes among those different ablation methods. Wang et al. [21] investigated the outcomes of cone-beam CT-guided thermal ablation (RFA or MWA) and helical tomotherapy in 106 patients with pulmonary metastases from HCC. The 1- and 3-year OS rates were 75% and 26%, respectively, in the thermal ablation group (n = 63) and 77% and 37%, respectively, in the helical tomotherapy group (n = 43). The median OS was 18.0 months in the thermal ablation group and 23.4 months in the helical tomotherapy group (p = 0.38). These findings indicate that thermal ablation and helical tomotherapy exhibit comparable OS for pulmonary metastases from HCC. However, it should be noted that the ablation group had significantly higher Child-Pugh grades and AFP values compared to the helical tomotherapy group, which warrants caution in the interpretation of the results [21].
Major complications occurred in 2.5–25% of cases after ablation for HCC lung metastases, which were mostly pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement [21,22,23,24,25]. In addition, cases of pleural effusion requiring thoracocentesis drainage and massive hematomas caused by a pulmonary pseudoaneurysm have been reported [21,22,25].

4.2. LNs

The LNs represent the second most prevalent location for extrahepatic metastasis from HCC. During hepatectomy, LN metastases were detected in approximately 0.75% to 7.5% of HCC patients, as reported in previous studies [45,46], while autopsy findings indicated LN metastases in approximately 30.3% of patients [47]. The presence of metastases in the LNs significantly impacts the survival of affected individuals, with a median survival of merely three months observed in HCC patients with LN metastases in the absence of any therapeutic interventions [48]. A few studies are available on ablative therapies for LN metastases from HCC (Table 1) [26,27].
Yuan et al. [26] performed RFA, percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), and MWA for LN metastases of HCC in 14, 5, and 12 patients, respectively, and showed that the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates after LN ablation were 74.6%, 50.3%, and 50.3%, respectively. No significant differences were found in the accumulated OS rates among the three ablation techniques. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year rates of liver progression-free survival (LPFS) were 78.7%, 69.9%, and 69.9%, respectively. The local tumor control was reported to be 83.3% at 6 months. Pan et al. [27] documented that the 1-year OS rate was 58.3% after ablation for LN metastases. The local tumor control rate was reported to be 84.4% at 3 months after RFA. They retrospectively compared 46 matched pairs of patients undergoing RFA for LN metastases or not, using propensity score matching analysis, and found that RFA for LN metastases resulted in a 5.2-month median survival benefit. Their multivariate analyses showed that the presence of intrahepatic tumors (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.146, p = 0.001), the response to RFA (HR = 2.248, p = 0.017), and the number of LNs (HR = 2.013, p = 0.034) correlated with the OS after RFA.
In these two studies, major complications occurred in only one patient, who developed massive pleural effusion and severe pneumonia, requiring chest tube placement and anti-infection treatment [26].

4.3. Bone

The incidence of bone metastases in patients with HCC was 6–20% in autopsy studies [7,49] and 4–13% in clinical studies [50,51]. The median survival time of patients with bone metastases was 2.9 months without treatment, 5 months after cementoplasty, or 6 months after external beam radiotherapy [52,53]. Bone metastasis is often accompanied by pain and lowers the patient’s quality of life. Radiation therapy is commonly used for pain relief; however, it takes 3–4 weeks for symptom relief with radiotherapy, with pain elimination rates of 23–35% [54,55]. Only one retrospective study on ablative therapy for bone metastases from HCC was found (Table 1) [28]. Kashima et al. [28] reported the therapeutic results of RFA for 40 patients with 54 bone metastases, including 29 patients for whom pain relief was the purpose of RFA. The visual analog scale score was reduced by two points or more 1 week after bone RFA in 28 out of 29 patients (96.6%). A significant decrease was found in the mean visual analog scale score from 6.1 ± 2.5 (standard deviation) to 1.8 ± 1.7 (p < 0.001) after RFA. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 34.2%, 19.9%, and 10.0%, respectively, with a median survival time of 7.1 months. Factors significantly associated with a more favorable prognosis included complete ablation of bone metastases, the presence of a single bone lesion, negative AFP levels, and the absence of viable intrahepatic lesions. There were no major complications, except for a transient nerve injury observed in one patient (2.5%, 1/40), who experienced leg paralysis and vesicorectal dysfunction one day after undergoing RFA for bone metastasis in the fifth lumbar spinous process [28].

4.4. Adrenal Glands

Adrenal metastases from HCC are relatively rare, occurring in less than 10% of patients with HCC [11]. The prognosis for patients with HCC with adrenal metastases without effective treatment was poor [3]. Four reports have described the results of ablation therapy for adrenal metastases from HCC [29,30,31] (Table 1). Two retrospective studies have reported local tumor control of 74–79%, median OS of 14–16.8 months, and 1- and 2-year OS rates of 53–67% and 33%, respectively, in patients treated with RFA or MWA (Table 1) [29,30]. Lyu et al. [30] reported that 18 patients with adrenal oligometastases survived for a longer period than the nine patients with extra-adrenal metastases (21.8 months vs. 12.8 months, p = 0.037; HR, 0.330; 95% CI, 0.117–0.933). Technical success—defined as the disappearance of tumor enhancement on contrast-enhanced images 3–4 weeks after RFA—was 86.4–93.1% [29,30]. A tumor diameter of >3 or 5 cm was associated with an increased risk of residual tumors [29,30].
Yuan et al. [31] have reported that complete ablation of adrenal metastases with a mean size of 3.3 cm in diameter can be achieved with a combination of RFA and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Tumor-feeding arteries were embolized in TACE, which might reduce the cooling effect caused by blood flow (i.e., the heat sink effect) during RFA. They retrospectively compared treatment outcomes between patients who received RFA combined with TACE and TACE alone for adrenal metastasis. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 92.1%, 73.7%, and 55.3%, respectively, in the TACE+ RFA group and 88.0%, 64.0%, and 44.0%, respectively, in the TACE group. The RFA group combined with the TACE group exhibited higher survival rates than the TACE group. The mean survival time was 26.8 ± 2.0 months in the TACE + RFA group and 17.5 ± 2.2 months in the TACE group [31].
In ablation therapy for adrenal metastases from HCC, intraprocedural hypertension (>180 mmHg) occurred in 9–24.2% of cases [29,30,31]. The incidence of hypertension was higher in patients aged >65 years than in younger patients (66.7% [4/6 patients] vs. 14.8% [4/27 patients], p = 0.031) [30]. Huang et al. [29] reported myocardial transient ischemia occurring after RFA for adrenal metastasis in one patient (1/22, 4.5%).

5. Description in Guidelines

According to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) Standards of Practice on Thermal Ablation of Primary and Secondary Lung Tumours, ablation therapy is described as a treatment with level 2 evidence for colorectal lung metastases but with low evidence for pulmonary metastasis from other diseases, including HCC, lung cancers, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and sarcoma [41].
The CIRSE Standards of Practice for Thermal Ablation of Bone Tumors outline the indications for curative ablation therapy in selected patients with oligometastatic, oligorecurrent, and oligoprogressive disease without specifying the type of primary tumor [56]. Specifically, this therapy is recommended for the treatment of 3–5 potentially treatable metastases, each measuring less than 3 cm [57]. Ablation can be performed to prevent the compromise of critical structures adjacent to the tumor, particularly in spinal lesions [58]. Ablation can also be provided with palliative intent to alleviate painful metastases that are either unresponsive to or unsuitable for pharmacological management, radiation therapy, or surgery [59,60,61,62,63].
International guidelines for the treatment of HCC include the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Clinical Practice Guidelines [16] and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) Guidelines [64], but the indication for thermal ablation for extrahepatic metastases is not defined in these leading guidelines due to a lack of high-level evidence. The EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of HCC recommend systemic therapy for the treatment of patients with extrahepatic metastases [16]. Although the EASL Guidelines refer to palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases causing pain or at significant risk of spontaneous secondary fracture, they do not mention local therapies such as surgery, radiotherapy, or thermal ablation therapy for other extrahepatic metastases.

6. Conclusions

Although the conventional approach for patients presenting with HCC extrahepatic metastases involves systemic therapy, image-guided thermal ablation therapy can be utilized for extrahepatic metastases, specifically affecting the lung, LNs, bone, and adrenal glands. RFA is considered to be the predominant technique, although MWA, CA, and PEI may also be employed. While the indication for ablation therapy for extrahepatic metastases has not been clearly defined, studies focusing on curative ablation for oligometastases have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of this treatment in the lungs, LNs, bone, and adrenal glands. Although the data are available from only retrospective studies, the survival outcomes of HCC patients after thermal ablation for extrahepatic metastases seem promising, considering the reported low survival rates of patients with stage 4 HCCs [8,9]. Sincee several studies indicated that the absence of viable intrahepatic lesions was associated with better survival, patients with a limited number of metastatic tumors and without intrahepatic lesions may be favorable candidates for curative thermal ablation of extrahepatic metastases. Additionally, ablation therapy for bone metastases may serve as a palliative intervention primarily aimed at pain alleviation. Further investigations involving larger cohorts and a prospective design are desired to validate the efficacy of ablation therapies for extrahepatic metastases from HCC. It is also warranted to explore the effectiveness of combining ablation therapy with systemic therapy and to compare its outcomes with other local therapies such as surgery and radiation therapy.

Author Contributions

This review was conceptualized by N.U., Y.M. and T.H. Literature searches and reviews were performed by N.U. The first draft of the manuscript was written by N.U. and Y.M., K.T., M.U., T.K., T.I. and T.H. contributed to revising the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ganne-Carrié, N.; Nahon, P. Hepatocellular carcinoma in the setting of alcohol-related liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Mahmud, N.; Fricker, Z.; Hubbard, R.A.; Ioannou, G.N.; Lewis, J.D.; Taddei, T.H.; Rothstein, K.D.; Serper, M.; Goldberg, D.S.; Kaplan, D.E. Risk prediction models for post-operative mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2021, 73, 204–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Uka, K.; Aikata, H.; Takaki, S.; Shirakawa, H.; Jeong, S.C.; Yamashina, K.; Hiramatsu, A.; Kodama, H.; Takahashi, S.; Chayama, K. Clinical features and prognosis of patients with extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yi, J.; Gwak, G.Y.; Sinn, D.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, H.N.; Choi, M.S.; Lee, J.H.; Koh, K.C.; Paik, S.W.; Yoo, B.C. Screening for extrahepatic metastases by additional staging modalities is required for hepatocellular carcinoma patients beyond modified UICC stage T1. Hepatogastroenterology 2013, 60, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jin, Y.J.; Lee, H.C.; Lee, D.; Shim, J.H.; Kim, K.M.; Lim, Y.S.; Do, K.H.; Ryu, J.S. Role of the routine use of chest computed tomography and bone scan in staging workup of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, 1324–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yoon, K.T.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, D.Y.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, J.D.; Yun, M.; Rha, S.Y.; Chon, C.Y.; Han, K.H. Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in detecting extrahepatic metastasis in pretreatment staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 2007, 72 (Suppl. S1), 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yuki, K.; Hirohashi, S.; Sakamoto, M.; Kanai, T.; Shimosato, Y. Growth and spread of hepatocellular carcinoma. A review of 240 consecutive autopsy cases. Cancer 1990, 66, 2174–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Asrani, S.K.; Devarbhavi, H.; Eaton, J.; Kamath, P.S. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 151–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Park, J.W.; Chen, M.; Colombo, M.; Roberts, L.R.; Schwartz, M.; Chen, P.; Kudo, M.; Johnson, P.; Wagner, S.; Orcini, L.S.; et al. Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death: The BRIDGE Study. Liver Int. 2015, 35, 2155–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Natsuizaka, M.; Omura, T.; Akaike, T.; Kuwata, Y.; Yamazaki, K.; Sato, T.; Karino, Y.; Toyota, J.; Suga, T.; Asaka, M. Clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastases. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2005, 20, 1781–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kanda, M.; Tateishi, R.; Yoshida, H.; Sato, T.; Masuzaki, R.; Ohki, T.; Imamura, J.; Goto, T.; Yoshida, H.; Hamamura, K.; et al. Extrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Incidence and risk factors. Liver Int. 2008, 28, 1256–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Aino, H.; Sumie, S.; Niizeki, T.; Kuromatsu, R.; Tajiri, N.; Nakano, M.; Satani, M.; Yamada, S.; Okamura, S.; Shimose, S.; et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 2, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Yang, Y.; Nagano, H.; Ota, H.; Morimoto, O.; Nakamura, M.; Wada, H.; Noda, T.; Damdinsuren, B.; Marubashi, S.; Miyamoto, A.; et al. Patterns and clinicopathologic features of extrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Surgery 2007, 141, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tonolini, M.; Solbiati, L.; Ierace, T.; Kirn, V.; Croce, F. Extrahepatic recurrence and second malignancies after treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Spectrum of imaging findings. Radiol. Med. 2002, 103, 196–205. [Google Scholar]
  15. Senthilnathan, S.; Memon, K.; Lewandowski, R.J.; Kulik, L.; Mulcahy, M.F.; Riaz, A.; Miller, F.H.; Yaghmai, V.; Nikolaidis, P.; Wang, E.; et al. Extrahepatic metastases occur in a minority of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with locoregional therapies: Analyzing patterns of progression in 285 patients. Hepatology 2012, 55, 1432–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2018, 69, 182–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chua, T.C.; Morris, D.L. Exploring the role of resection of extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 21, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Uchino, K.; Tateishi, R.; Shiina, S.; Kanda, M.; Masuzaki, R.; Kondo, Y.; Goto, T.; Omata, M.; Yoshida, H.; Koike, K. Hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: Clinical features and prognostic factors. Cancer 2011, 117, 4475–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Doreille, A.; N’Kontchou, G.; Halimi, A.; Bouhafs, F.; Coderc, E.; Sellier, N.; Seror, O. Percutaneous treatment of extrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2016, 97, 1117–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mu, L.; Sun, L.; Pan, T.; Lyu, N.; Li, S.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Xie, Q.; Deng, H.; Zheng, L.; et al. Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation for patients with extrahepatic oligometastases of hepatocellular carcinoma: Long-term results. Int. J. Hyperth. 2018, 34, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wang, F.; Fan, S.; Shi, Q.; Zhao, D.; Sun, H.; Sothea, Y.; Wu, M.; Song, H.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, J.; et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between cone beam CT-guided thermal ablation and helical tomotherapy in pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 947284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yuan, Z.; Liu, B.; Hu, C.; Li, Z.; Zheng, J.; Li, W. Clinical outcomes of percutaneous thermal ablation for pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study. Int. J. Hyperth. 2020, 37, 651–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lassandro, G.; Picchi, S.G.; Bianco, A.; Di Costanzo, G.; Coppola, A.; Ierardi, A.M.; Lassandro, F. Effectiveness and safety in radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary metastases from HCC: A five years study. Med. Oncol. 2020, 37, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, X.; Wang, J.; Li, W.; Huang, Z.; Fan, W.; Chen, Y.; Shen, L.; Pan, T.; Wu, P.; Zhao, M. Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma pulmonary metastases. Int. J. Hyperth. 2012, 28, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hiraki, T.; Yamakado, K.; Ikeda, O.; Matsuoka, T.; Kaminou, T.; Yamagami, T.; Gobara, H.; Mimura, H.; Kawanaka, K.; Takeda, K.; et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: Results of a multicenter study in Japan. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2011, 22, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yuan, Z.; Xing, A.; Zheng, J.; Li, W. Safety and technical feasibility of percutaneous ablation for lymph node metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Hyperth. 2019, 36, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pan, T.; Xie, Q.K.; Lv, N.; Li, X.S.; Mu, L.W.; Wu, P.H.; Zhao, M. Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation for lymph node oligometastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matching analysis. Radiology 2017, 282, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kashima, M.; Yamakado, K.; Takaki, H.; Kaminou, T.; Tanigawa, N.; Nakatsuka, A.; Takeda, K. Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of bone metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2010, 194, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, J.; Xie, X.; Lin, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, M.; Li, X.; Huang, G.; Liu, B.; Xie, X. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of adrenal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center experience. Cancer Imaging 2019, 19, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lyu, N.; Kong, Y.; Pan, T.; Mu, L.; Sun, X.; Li, S.; Deng, H.; Lai, J.; Zhao, M. Survival benefits of computed tomography-guided thermal ablation for adrenal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Hyperth. 2019, 36, 1002–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yuan, H.; Liu, F.; Li, X.; Guan, Y.; Wang, M. Clinical efficacy of chemoembolization with simultaneous radiofrequency ablation for treatment of adrenal metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Imaging 2018, 18, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Facciorusso, A.; El Aziz, M.A.A.; Tartaglia, N.; Ramai, D.; Mohan, B.P.; Cotsoglou, C.; Pusceddu, S.; Giacomelli, L.; Ambrosi, A.; Sacco, R. Microwave Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cancers 2020, 12, 3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Crocetti, L.; Iezzi, R.; Goldberg, S.N.; Bilbao, J.I.; Sami, A.; Akhan, O.; Giuliante, F.; Pompili, M.; Malagari, K.; Valentini, V.; et al. The ten commandments of liver ablation: Expert discussion and report from Mediterranean Interventional Oncology (MIOLive) congress 2017. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 3896–3904. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Tomita, K.; Matsui, Y.; Uka, M.; Umakoshi, N.; Kawabata, T.; Munetomo, K.; Nagata, S.; Iguchi, T.; Hiraki, T. Evidence on percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation for liver metastases over the last decade. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2022, 40, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fujimori, M.; Yamanaka, T.; Sugino, Y.; Matsushita, N.; Sakuma, H. Percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma. Interv. Radiol. 2020, 5, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Matsui, Y.; Iguchi, T.; Tomita, K.; Uka, M.; Sakurai, J.; Gobara, H.; Kanazawa, S. Radiofrequency ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: An updated review of literature from the last decade. Interv. Radiol. 2020, 5, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Matsui, Y.; Tomita, K.; Uka, M.; Umakoshi, N.; Kawabata, T.; Munetomo, K.; Nagata, S.; Iguchi, T.; Hiraki, T. Up-to-date evidence on image-guided thermal ablation for metastatic lung tumors: A review. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2022, 40, 1024–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cazzato, R.L.; Auloge, P.; De Marini, P.; Rousseau, C.; Chiang, J.B.; Koch, G.; Caudrelier, J.; Rao, P.; Garnon, J.; Gangi, A. Percutaneous image-guided ablation of bone metastases: Local tumor control in oligometastatic patients. Int. J. Hyperth. 2018, 35, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zheng, B.; Wang, J.; Ju, J.; Wu, T.; Tong, G.; Ren, J. Efficacy and safety of cooled and uncooled microwave ablation for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 2018, 62, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ierardi, A.M.; Savasi, V.; Angileri, S.A.; Petrillo, M.; Sbaraini, S.; Pinto, A.; Hanozet, F.; Marconi, A.M.; Carrafiello, G. Percutaneous high frequency microwave ablation of uterine fibroids: Systematic review. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 2360107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Venturini, M.; Cariati, M.; Marra, P.; Masala, S.; Pereira, P.L.; Carrafiello, G. CIRSE standards of practice on thermal ablation of primary and secondary lung tumours. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2020, 43, 667–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Palussière, J.; Catena, V.; Buy, X. Percutaneous thermal ablation of lung tumors—Radiofrequency, microwave and cryotherapy: Where are we going? Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2017, 98, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Davidson, R.S.; Nwogu, C.E.; Brentjens, M.J.; Anderson, T.M. The surgical management of pulmonary metastasis: Current concepts. Surg. Oncol. 2001, 10, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, Z.; Zhang, K.; Lin, S.-M.; Mi, D.-H.; Cao, N.; Wen, Z.-Z.; Li, Z.-X. Radiofrequency ablation combined with percutaneous ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Hyperth. 2016, 33, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ercolani, G.; Grazi, G.L.; Ravaioli, M.; Grigioni, W.F.; Cescon, M.; Gardini, A.; Del Gaudio, M.; Cavallari, A. The role of lymphadenectomy for liver tumors: Further considerations on the appropriateness of treatment strategy. Ann. Surg. 2004, 239, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hasegawa, K.; Makuuchi, M.; Kokudo, N.; Izumi, N.; Ichida, T.; Kudo, M.; Ku, Y.; Sakamoto, M.; Nakashima, O.; Matsui, O.; et al. Impact of histologically confirmed lymph node metastases on patient survival after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: Report of a Japanese nationwide survey. Ann. Surg. 2014, 259, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Watanabe, J.; Nakashima, O.; Kojiro, M. Clinicopathologic study on lymph node metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study of 660 consecutive autopsy cases. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 1994, 24, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
  48. Xia, F.; Wu, L.; Lau, W.-Y.; Li, G.; Huan, H.; Qian, C.; Ma, K.; Bie, P. Positive lymph node metastasis has a marked impact on the long-term survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nakashima, T.; Okuda, K.; Kojiro, M.; Jimi, A.; Yamaguchi, R.; Sakamoto, K.; Ikari, T. Pathology of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: 232 consecutive cases autopsied in ten years. Cancer 1983, 51, 863–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Taki, Y.; Yamaoka, Y.; Takayasu, T.; Ino, K.; Shimahara, Y.; Mori, K.; Morimoto, T.; Ozawa, K. Bone metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 1992, 50, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fukutomi, M.; Yokota, M.; Chuman, H.; Harada, H.; Zaitsu, Y.; Funakoshi, A.; Wakasugi, H.; Iguchi, H. Increased incidence of bone metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2001, 13, 1083–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kaizu, T.; Karasawa, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Matuda, T.; Kurosaki, H.; Tanaka, S.; Kumazaki, T. Radiotherapy for osseous metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study of 57 patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1998, 93, 2167–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim, S.U.; Kim, D.Y.; Park, J.Y.; Ahn, S.H.; Nah, H.J.; Chon, C.Y.; Han, K.-H. Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting with bone metastasis: Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 134, 1377–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Steenland, E.; Leer, J.W.; van Houwelingen, H.; Post, W.J.; van den Hout, W.B.; Kievit, J.; de Haes, H.; Martijn, H.; Oei, B.; Vonk, E.; et al. The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: A global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study. Radiother. Oncol. 1999, 52, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yarnold, J.R. 8 Gy single fraction radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic skeletal pain: Randomised comparison with a multifraction schedule over 12 months of patient follow-up on behalf of the Bone Pain Trial Working Party. Radiother. Oncol. 1999, 52, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ryan, A.; Byrne, C.; Pusceddu, C.; Buy, X.; Tsoumakidou, G.; Filippiadis, D. CIRSE standards of practice on thermal ablation of bone tumours. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2022, 45, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. McMenomy, B.P.; Kurup, A.N.; Johnson, G.B.; Carter, R.E.; McWilliams, R.R.; Markovic, S.N.; Atwell, T.D.; Schmit, G.D.; Morris, J.M.; Woodrum, D.A.; et al. Percutaneous cryoablation of musculoskeletal oligometastatic disease for complete remission. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2013, 24, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Barat, M.; Tselikas, L.; de Bae‘re, T.; Gravel, G.; Yevich, S.; Delpla, A.; Magand, N.; Louvel, G.; Hadoux, J.; Berdelou, A.; et al. Thermal-ablation of vertebral metastases prevents adverse events in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Eur. J. Radiol. 2019, 119, 108650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kelekis, A.; Cornelis, F.; Tutton, S.; Filippiadis, D. Metastatic osseous pain control: Bone ablation and cementoplasty. Semin. Interv. Radiol. 2017, 34, 328–336. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vaswani, D.; Wallace, A.N.; Eiswirth, P.S.; Madaelil, T.P.; Chang, R.O.; Tomasian, A.; Jennings, J.W. Radiographic local tumor control and pain palliation of sarcoma metastases within the musculoskeletal system with percutaneous thermal ablation. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2018, 41, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pusceddu, C.; Sotgia, B.; Fele, R.M.; Ballicu, N.; Melis, L. Combined microwave ablation and cementoplasty in patients with painful bone metastases at high risk of fracture. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2016, 39, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wallace, A.N.; Robinson, C.G.; Meyer, J.; Tran, N.D.; Gangi, A.; Callstrom, M.R.; Chao, S.T.; Van Tine, B.A.; Morris, J.M.; Bruel, B.M.; et al. The metastatic spine disease multidisciplinary working group algorithms. Oncologist 2015, 20, 1205–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Gennaro, N.; Sconfienza, L.M.; Ambrogi, F.; Boveri, S.; Lanza, E. Thermal ablation to relieve pain from metastatic bone disease: A systematic review. Skelet. Radiol. 2019, 48, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Heimbach, J.K.; Kulik, L.M.; Finn, R.S.; Sirlin, C.B.; Abecassis, M.M.; Roberts, L.R.; Zhu, A.X.; Murad, M.H.; Marrero, J.A. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2018, 67, 358–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 15 03665 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart of the search strategy.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the search strategy.
Cancers 15 03665 g001
Table
Table 1. Outcomes of ablation for extrahepatic metastases from HCC.
Table 1. Outcomes of ablation for extrahepatic metastases from HCC.
Author, YearMetastatic SiteAblation
Modality		Patients, n
(Child–Pugh Grade A/B or C)		Tumors, nTumor Size [mm]Follow-Up Period
[mo]		Local
Efficacy [%]		SurvivalMajor Complications
Wang et al., 2022 [21]LungRFA or
MWA		63
(52/11)		-17.521.6
(mean)		-1-/3-year OS: 75%/26%, Median OS: 18.0 mopneumothorax requiring CTP (3.2%), pleural effusion requiring drainage (1.6%)
Yuan et al., 2020 [22]LungRFA or
MWA or
CA		39-15 (median)13.5
(median)		84.21-/3-/5-year OS: 79.8%/58%/30.9%pneumothorax requiring CTP (7.7%), pleural effusion requiring drainage (5.1%)
Lassandro et al., 2020 [23]LungRFA264214 (mean)--1-/2-/3-/4-/5-year OS: 88.5%/69.8%/69.8% 34.9%/26.2%pneumothorax requiring CTP (2.5%)
Li et al., 2012 [24]LungRFA296819.3 (mean)23
(median)		82.81-/2-/3-year OS: 73.4%/41.1%/30%, Median OS: 21 mo, 1-/2-year PFS: 59.7%/28.2%pneumothorax requiring CTP (8.9%)
Hiraki et al., 2011 [25]LungRFA32
(27/5)		8314 (mean)20.5
(median)		92 1-/2-/3-year OS: 87%/57%/57%,
Median OS: 37.7 mo		pneumothorax requiring CTP (23.1%), massive hematoma caused by a pulmonary pseudoaneurysm (1.5%)
Yuan et al., 2019 [26]Lymph nodeRFA or
MWA or
PEI		31
(31/0)		-30 (median)-83.31-/2-/3-/4-/5-year OS: 74.6%/50.3%/50.3%/50.3%/50.3%, 1-/2-/3-year PFS: 24.7%/13.2%/0%massive pleural effusion and severe pneumonia (3.2%)
Pan et al., 2017 [27]Lymph nodeRFA46
(44/2)		6232.4 (mean)14.0
(median)		84.41-year OS: 58.3%, Median OS: 13.0 monone
Kashima et al., 2010 [28]BoneRFA40
(28/12)		5448 (mean)11.9
(mean)		-1-/2-/3-year OS: 34.2%/19.9%/10.0%,
Median OS: 7.1 mo		transient nerve injury (2.5%)
Huang et al., 2019 [29]Adrenal glandRFA22
(19/3)		224010
(median)		73.71-/2-year OS: 52.6%/32.9%, Median OS: 14 mointraprocedural hypertension (9%), myocardial transient ischemia (4.5%)
Lyu et al., 2019 [30]Adrenal glandRFA or
MWA		27
(25/2)		2935 (mean)19.3
(median)		77.8OS 1-/2-year: 66.7%/33.3%, Median OS: 16.8 mointraprocedural hypertension (24.2%)
Yuan et al., 2018 [31]Adrenal glandRFA
+ TACE		38
(30/8)		3833 (mean)-92.11-/2-/3-year OS: 92.1%/73.7%/55.3%,
Mean OS: 26.8 mo		intraprocedural hypertension (15.8%)
HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; MWA, microwave ablation; CA, cryoablation; PEI, percutaneous ethanol injection; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; CTP, chest tube placement.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Umakoshi, N.; Matsui, Y.; Tomita, K.; Uka, M.; Kawabata, T.; Iguchi, T.; Hiraki, T. Image-Guided Ablation Therapies for Extrahepatic Metastases from Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review. Cancers 2023, 15, 3665. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143665

AMA Style

Umakoshi N, Matsui Y, Tomita K, Uka M, Kawabata T, Iguchi T, Hiraki T. Image-Guided Ablation Therapies for Extrahepatic Metastases from Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review. Cancers. 2023; 15(14):3665. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143665

Chicago/Turabian Style

Umakoshi, Noriyuki, Yusuke Matsui, Koji Tomita, Mayu Uka, Takahiro Kawabata, Toshihiro Iguchi, and Takao Hiraki. 2023. "Image-Guided Ablation Therapies for Extrahepatic Metastases from Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review" Cancers 15, no. 14: 3665. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143665

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop