Next Article in Journal
Current Understanding of Hypoxia in Glioblastoma Multiforme and Its Response to Immunotherapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Targeted Dual-Modal PET/SPECT-NIR Imaging: From Building Blocks and Construction Strategies to Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Reduced Absolute Count of Monocytes in Patients Carrying Hematological Neoplasms and SARS-CoV2 Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
DNA Repair Enzyme Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1/2 (PARP1/2)-Targeted Nuclear Imaging and Radiotherapy
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs—A Continuously Evolving Class of Radiopharmaceuticals

Cancers 2022, 14(5), 1172; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051172
by Melpomeni Fani 1,*, Rosalba Mansi 1, Guillaume P. Nicolas 2,3 and Damian Wild 2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Cancers 2022, 14(5), 1172; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051172
Submission received: 31 January 2022 / Revised: 21 February 2022 / Accepted: 22 February 2022 / Published: 24 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiopharmaceuticals for Oncological Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A very interesting and well-prepared review publication. The authors presented in detail somatostatin analogues showing affinity for sst receptors, labeled with both diagnostic (68Ga, 99mTc) and therapeutic (90Y, 177Lu, 225Ac, 213Bi) receptors. Interesting is comparison  of the properties of peptide antagonists and agonists of sst receptors. The work will be of use to a wide range of readers. It can be published in present form.

Author Response

Thank you for appreciating our article.

Reviewer 2 Report

The review titled "Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs – a Continuing Evolving Class of Radiopharmaceuticals" focused on radiolabeled Somatostatin analogs as theranostic application for somatostatin receptors expressing tumors. The authors provided decent background to the topic. In this review, the authors nicely summarized the evolution of Somatostatin to its clinical application. Overall, this is a well organized and well written review on the selected topic.

Minor suggestion, it is hard to read the figure 1 tables, please consider changing font size or color. 

Author Response

Thank you for the suggestion. Font size was increased and the color codes is now clarified in the figure legend.

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors report an overview on the development of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, clinical translation and future prospective.
The document is well organized with an objective description on the design of somatostatin agonists and antagonists, from the preclinical studies to their clinical translation for diagnostic applications.
The authors also address concisely other applications of the radiolabeled peptides for radiotherapy in the clinical setting, spamming from cancers with high receptor expression to cancers with heterogenous and low receptor expression. The manuscript also highlights strategies to improve pharmacokinetics of the radiotracers for clinical applications.
Overall, the authors cover all the advances in the field of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs in the clinical setting.
Minor comments:
The authors should highlight the main contribution of this document to others in the field.
The review is easy to read, however, the authors should provide a brief description of the review content in the introduction.

Author Response

Thank you for the suggestion. The last paragraph of the introduction was adjusted accordingly (see page 2, lines 68-78).

Back to TopTop