Next Article in Journal
UroVysionTM Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Urological Cancers: A Narrative Review and Future Perspectives
Next Article in Special Issue
Set Protein Is Involved in FLT3 Membrane Trafficking
Previous Article in Journal
Glucose Enhances Pro-Tumorigenic Functions of Mammary Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells on Breast Cancer Cell Lines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Role of the PP2A Pathway in Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

by
Ion Cristóbal
1,*,† and
Angela Lamarca
2,*,†
1
Cancer Unit for Research on Novel Therapeutic Targets, Oncohealth Institute, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz-UAM, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Medical Oncology Department, Oncohealth Institute, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz-UAM, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2022, 14(21), 5422; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14215422
Submission received: 26 October 2022 / Accepted: 31 October 2022 / Published: 3 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Molecular Pathways in Cancers)

Introduction

Cholangiocarcinoma represents a heterogeneous disease at both a clinical and molecular level. The fact that it is usually diagnosed at advanced (non-resectable) stages significantly contributes to its marked poor prognosis. Despite treatment advances in the last decade, patient outcomes are still very poor, with the 5-year survival rate below 20% [1]. Only 20–30% of cholangiocarcinoma will be diagnosed at a resectable stage; despite surgery and adjuvant treatment, the relapse rate remains high [2]. Thus, the majority of patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma will, at some point in their journey, receive treatment with a palliative aim for advanced or recurrent disease.
Palliative treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma are evolving. The development of targeted therapies has dramatically changed the scenario, but these are only suitable for a small proportion of patients [3]. For all patients without targetable alteration, the standard first-line treatment relies on cytotoxic chemotherapy in the form of cisplatin and gemcitabine, with second-line treatment strategies of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), and nanoliposomal irinotecan combined with 5-FU as potential options [4]. Recently, the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin and gemcitabine has shown improved outcomes in the first-line setting [5]. Despite these treatment options, response rate and survival remain poor. It is imperative to improve our knowledge around the molecular mechanisms that govern cholangiocarcinoma progression, in order to develop novel predictive biomarkers and alternative therapeutic strategies that improve the current unfavorable patient outcomes. In this regard, to date, the PP2A pathway has been poorly investigated in cholangiocarcinoma in comparison with other central pathways, but preliminary evidence in the literature suggests that it could be of high relevance in this disease.
PP2A is a well-known tumor suppressor that regulates a wide variety of signaling pathways and cellular processes. Therefore, PP2A inhibition has been described as a common alteration in many tumor types, and overexpression of its endogenous inhibitors SET and CIP2A has been described as key molecular alterations that contribute to inactivate this phosphatase in human cancer [6]. In recent years, the PP2A pathway has emerged as a druggable tumor suppressor with important roles as a regulator of treatment efficacy in many tumor models [7]. This issue could also be of interest in cholangiocarcinoma, since the PP2A pathway has been demonstrated to modulate tumor sensitivity to the chemotherapeutic agents used in standard treatments such as gemcitabine, cisplatin, 5-FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Thus, PP2A has been shown to enhance sensitivity to gemcitabine, negatively regulating AKT through its dephosphorylation in pancreatic cancer cells [8]. Moreover, several studies have demonstrated the role of the PP2A pathway-enhancing response to 5-FU and overcoming resistance to this compound [9,10,11]. However, it seems that certain PP2A complexes such as those harboring the B56delta subunit could have opposite functions [12], which is concordant with a previously described dual function of some specific PP2A subunits in cancer [13]. The importance of PP2A as a key modulator of cisplatin sensitivity has also been described in different tumor types such as lung cancer [14] and oral squamous cell carcinoma [15], and FTY720-induced PP2A activation has shown synergistic effects with cisplatin in hepatoblastoma cells [16]. Finally, PP2A has been reported to regulate the response of lung cancer cells to irinotecan treatment [17].
In concordance with the expected tumor suppressor role of PP2A in cholangiocarcinoma, the work by Lu and colleagues [18] showed that the PP2A activator FTY720 inhibited proliferation, invasiveness and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, as well as promoted apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in vitro and affected tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Of note, it has also been reported that cantharidin induces antitumor effects in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines that are partially dependent on its PP2A inhibitory activity, thereby resulting in activation of the IKKα/IκBα/NF-κB pathway [19]. The authors claimed that cantharidin is a specific PP2A inhibitor. However, its effects on PP1 at the micromolar level (similar to PP2A) and, more importantly, its inhibitory effects on PP5 at the nanomolar level could modulate these reported effects, and their contribution should be clarified [20]. In fact, PP5 has been demonstrated to play oncogenic functions in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines in vitro and in a xenograft model derived from the human liver bile duct carcinoma cell line HuCCT1 in vivo, at least in part directly binding and regulating AMPK activation [21]. These considerations are further supported by recent data in the literature demonstrating the opposite functions of PP2A and PP5 in human cancer in the regulation of key pathways such as MAPK signaling [22].
Furthermore, microcystin-leucine-arginine (MC-LR) promoted the survival of cholangiocarcinoma cells via PP2A inhibition and ulterior activation of the ERK/MEK signaling axis through a direct positive regulation of the PP2A inhibitor SET at the transcriptional level. Moreover, the content level of MC-LR was identified as an independent predictive factor of poor prognosis in a cohort of 58 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients [23]. In addition, SET has been reported to induce 5-FU and oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancer [24,25], and has been described as a key mediator of the acquisition of a cisplatin resistance phenotype in lung cancer [26]. Notably, several data in the literature regarding the involvement of CIP2A in cholangiocarcinoma further highlight the potential relevance of the PP2A pathway in this disease. CIP2A is a well-known endogenous PP2A inhibitor that plays oncogenic functions promoting the proliferation, migration, drug resistance, stemness or invasiveness abilities of tumor cells. CIP2A overexpression has been largely reported as a common event in human cancer and represents a key molecular mechanism to inactivate PP2A [27]. Moreover, this alteration has shown clinical impact as a biomarker of poor outcome in many tumor types, including cholangiocarcinoma. In fact, Xu and colleagues [28] analyzed a cohort of 57 patients with cholangiocarcinoma as well as a set of 23 tumor adjacent normal bile duct samples. They found that CIP2A expression was higher in tumor samples than in normal tissues and represents an alteration that independently predicted shorter overall survival, suggesting its potential usefulness as a poor prognostic marker in this disease. Moreover, CIP2A downregulation has been described to increase sensitivity to gemcitabine in pancreatic cells [29]. The fact that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is widely used in a standard first-line chemotherapy regimen in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma [30] suggests a potential relevance of CIP2A as a novel molecular target in this disease. Of note, these findings are further supported by the fact that the long intergenic non-coding RNA 00665 (LINC00665), which encodes a micropeptide CIP2A-BP [31], has been reported to promote the gemcitabine resistance of cholangiocarcinoma cells [32]. Moreover, CIP2A downregulation has been found to increase the sensitivity of lung cancer cells to cisplatin [33] and SN-38 (an active metabolite of irinotecan) [34], suggesting that it could also have relevance in re-sensitizing cholangiocarcinoma cells to these treatments. Although the reported effects of CIP2A and SET on gemcitabine, cisplatin, 5-FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan are probably due to their role as potent endogenous PP2A inhibitors, it would be very interesting to evaluate whether they can also activate PP2A-independent molecular mechanisms to regulate efficacy in these compounds.
In conclusion, a significant amount of evidence in the literature suggests that the PP2A pathway could be of high relevance in cholangiocarcinoma. The endogenous PP2A inhibitors CIP2A and SET emerge as molecular target candidates in this disease, and the use of PP2A activators to overcome resistance and restore sensitivity to current standard chemotherapy regimens should also be experimentally investigated in forthcoming studies. Whether these strategies could also enhance the activity of currently used chemotherapy options could also be hypothesized. Altogether, the PP2A pathway shows potential usefulness for improving the clinical management of this disease, improving response rates to current treatments as well as providing clinicians with novel predictive biomarkers of therapy response and outcome that need clarification.

Funding

Angela Lamarca received funding from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Fellowship Programme (Return Fellowship) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [grant number 825510, ESCALON].

Conflicts of Interest

IC declares no conflict of interest. AL declares travel and educational support from Ipsen, Pfizer, Bayer, AAA, Sirtex, Novartis, Mylan and Delcath; speaker honoraria from Merck, Pfizer, Ipsen, Incyte, AAA, QED, Servier, Astra Zeneca, EISAI, Roche and Advanz Pharma; advisory and consultancy honoraria from EISAI, Nutricia Ipsen, QED, Roche, Servier, Boston Scientific, Albireo Pharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GENFIT, TransThera Biosciences and Taiho; she is a member of the Knowledge Network and NETConnect Initiatives funded by Ipsen.

References

  1. Banales, J.M.; Marin, J.J.G.; Lamarca, A.; Rodrigues, P.M.; Khan, S.A.; Roberts, L.R.; Cardinale, V.; Carpino, G.; Andersen, J.B.; Braconi, C.; et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: The next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 557–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bridgewater, J.; Fletcher, P.; Palmer, D.H.; Malik, H.Z.; Prasad, R.; Mirza, D.; Anthony, A.; Corrie, P.; Falk, S.; Finch-Jones, M.; et al. Long-term outcomes and exploratory analyses of the randomized phase III BILCAP study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 40, 2048–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lamarca, A.; Barriuso, J.; McNamara, M.G.; Valle, J.W. Molecular targeted therapies: Ready for “prime time” in biliary tract cancer. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 170–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lamarca, A.; Edeline, J.; Goyal, L. How I treat biliary tract cancer. ESMO Open 2022, 7, 100378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yuan, Z.G.; Zeng, T.M.; Tao, C.J. Current and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches for biliary tract cancers. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2022, 21, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Westermarck, J.; Hahn, W.C. Multiple pathways regulated by the tumor suppressor PP2A in transformation. Trends Mol. Med. 2008, 14, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mazhar, S.; Taylor, S.E.; Sangodkar, J.; Narla, G. Targeting PP2A in cancer: Combination therapies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2019, 1866, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, T.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Deng, M.; Gao, B.; Niu, N.; Yu, J.; Lee, S.; Kim, J.; Qin, B.; et al. HEATR1 negatively regulates akt to help sensitize pancreatic cancer cells to chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cristóbal, I.; Rincón, R.; Manso, R.; Madoz-Gúrpide, J.; Caramés, C.; del Puerto-Nevado, L.; Rojo, F.; García-Foncillas, J. Hyperphosphorylation of PP2A in colorectal cancer and the potential therapeutic value showed by its forskolin-induced dephosphorylation and activation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014, 1842, 1823–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cristóbal, I.; Manso, R.; Rincón, R.; Caramés, C.; Senin, C.; Borrero, A.; Martínez-Useros, J.; Rodriguez, M.; Zazo, S.; Aguilera, O.; et al. PP2A inhibition is a common event in colorectal cancer and its restoration using FTY720 shows promising therapeutic potential. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 938–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Talmon, G.; Wang, J. MicroRNA-587 antagonizes 5-FU-induced apoptosis and confers drug resistance by regulating PPP2R1B expression in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, L.; Guo, P.; Li, W.; Jiang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Li, D.; Wang, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Xing, X.; Pang, Y.; et al. Protein phosphatase 2A regulates cytotoxicity and drug resistance by dephosphorylating AHR and MDR1. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 101918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Eichhorn, P.J.; Creyghton, M.P.; Bernards, R. Protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunits and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1795, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arribas, R.L.; Bordas, A.; Omella, J.D.; Cedillo, J.L.; Janssens, V.; Montiel, C.; de Los Ríos, C. An okadaic acid fragment analogue prevents nicotine-induced resistance to cisplatin by recovering PP2A activity in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 100, 103874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gouttia, O.G.; Zhao, J.; Li, Y.; Zwiener, M.J.; Wang, L.; Oakley, G.G.; Peng, A. The MASTL-ENSA-PP2A/B55 axis modulates cisplatin resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 904719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stafman, L.L.; Williams, A.P.; Marayati, R.; Aye, J.M.; Stewart, J.E.; Mroczek-Musulman, E.; Beierle, E.A. PP2A activation alone and in combination with cisplatin decreases cell growth and tumor formation in human HuH6 hepatoblastoma cells. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Seo, S.H.; Kim, S.G.; Shin, J.H.; Ham, D.W.; Shin, E.H. Toxoplasma GRA16 Inhibits NF-κB Activation through PP2A-B55 Upregulation in Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lu, Z.; Wang, J.; Zheng, T.; Liang, Y.; Yin, D.; Song, R.; Pei, T.; Pan, S.; Jiang, H.; Liu, L. FTY720 inhibits proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cholangiocarcinoma by inactivating STAT3 signaling. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhou, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, S.; Peng, J. Role of cantharidin in the activation of IKKα/IκBα/NF-κB pathway by inhibiting PP2A activity in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 7672–7682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, G.; Dong, J.; Deng, L. Overview of cantharidin and its analogues. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 25, 2034–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, M.H.; Huang, T.T.; Chao, T.I.; Chen, L.J.; Chen, Y.L.; Tsai, M.H.; Liu, C.Y.; Kao, J.H.; Chen, K.F. Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 5 is a potential therapeutic target in cholangiocarcinoma. Liver. Int. 2018, 38, 2248–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, J.; Yan, G.; Chen, Q.; Zeng, Q.; Wang, X. Modified 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (M-PDT) inhibits cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma cell proliferation via targeting PP2A/PP5-mediated MAPK signalling pathway. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2021, 137, 106036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gu, S.; He, W.; Yan, M.; He, J.; Zhou, Q.; Yan, X.; Fu, X.; Chen, J.; Han, X.; Qiu, Y. Higher content of microcystin-leucine-arginine promotes the survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells via regulating SET resulting in the poorer prognosis of patients. Cell Prolif. 2021, 54, e12961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cristóbal, I.; Rincón, R.; Manso, R.; Caramés, C.; Zazo, S.; Madoz-Gúrpide, J.; Rojo, F.; García-Foncillas, J. Deregulation of the PP2A inhibitor SET shows promising therapeutic implications and determines poor clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Cristóbal, I.; Rubio, J.; Santos, A.; Torrejón, B.; Caramés, C.; Imedio, L.; Mariblanca, S.; Luque, M.; Sanz-Alvarez, M.; Zazo, S.; et al. MicroRNA-199b downregulation confers resistance to 5-fluorouracil treatment and predicts poor outcome and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Cancers 2020, 12, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, H.; Gu, Y.; Yin, J.; Zheng, G.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, M.; Liu, J.; Jia, X.; He, Z. SET-mediated NDRG1 inhibition is involved in acquisition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition phenotype and cisplatin resistance in human lung cancer cell. Cell Signal. 2014, 26, 2710–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Soofiyani, S.R.; Hejazi, M.S.; Baradaran, B. The role of CIP2A in cancer: A review and update. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 96, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, P.; Huang, Q.; Xie, F.; Xu, X.L.; Shao, F. Increased expression of CIP2A in cholangiocarcinoma and correlation with poor prognosis. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2013, 60, 669–672. [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu, P.; Yao, J.; He, J.; Zhao, L.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Qian, J. CIP2A down regulation enhances the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 14831–14840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Halder, R.; Amaraneni, A.; Shroff, R.T. Cholangiocarcinoma: A review of the literature and future directions in therapy. Hepatobiliary Surg. Nutr. 2022, 11, 555–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhong, C.; Xie, Z.; Shen, J.; Jia, Y.; Duan, S. LINC00665: An emerging biomarker for cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. Cells 2022, 11, 1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lu, M.; Qin, X.; Zhou, Y.; Li, G.; Liu, Z.; Geng, X.; Yue, H. Long non-coding RNA LINC00665 promotes gemcitabine resistance of Cholangiocarcinoma cells via regulating EMT and stemness properties through miR-424-5p/BCL9L axis. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wei, L.; Qu, W.; Sun, J.; Wang, X.; Lv, L.; Xie, L.; Song, X. Knockdown of cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A may sensitize NSCLC cells to cisplatin. Cancer Gene Ther. 2014, 21, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Teng, H.-W.; Yang, S.-H.; Lin, J.-K.; Chen, W.-S.; Lin, T.-C.; Jiang, J.-K.; Yen, C.-C.; Li, A.F.-Y.; Chen, P.C.-H.; Lan, Y.-T.; et al. CIP2A is a predictor of poor prognosis in colon cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2012, 16, 1037–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cristóbal, I.; Lamarca, A. Role of the PP2A Pathway in Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Cancers 2022, 14, 5422. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14215422

AMA Style

Cristóbal I, Lamarca A. Role of the PP2A Pathway in Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Cancers. 2022; 14(21):5422. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14215422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cristóbal, Ion, and Angela Lamarca. 2022. "Role of the PP2A Pathway in Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art and Future Perspectives" Cancers 14, no. 21: 5422. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14215422

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop