Next Article in Journal
Intra-Operative Electron Radiation Therapy: An Update of the Evidence Collected in 40 Years to Search for Models for Electron-FLASH Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Class Cancer Subtyping in Salivary Gland Carcinomas with MALDI Imaging and Deep Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Cellular Models for Preclinical Drug Testing: From 2D Cultures to Organ-on-a-Chip Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
PSMA PET Imaging and Therapy in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma and Other Salivary Gland Cancers: A Systematic Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 15
10.3390/cancers14153691
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rearrangements, Expression, and Clinical Significance of MYB and MYBL1 in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study

by
Marta Persson
1,†,
Mattias K. Andersson
1,†,
Yoshitsugu Mitani
2,
Margaret S. Brandwein-Weber
3,
Henry F. Frierson, Jr.
4,
Christopher Moskaluk
4,
Isabel Fonseca
5,
Renata Ferrarotto
6,
Werner Boecker
7,8,
Thomas Loening
8,
Adel K. El-Naggar
2 and
Göran Stenman
1,*
1
Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Pathology, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
2
Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3
Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10019, USA
4
Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
5
Serviço de Anatomia Patológica, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Francisco Gentil-Lisboa and Instituto de Anatomia Patológica, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal
6
Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
7
Gerhard Domagk Institute of Pathology, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
8
Gerhard-Seifert Reference Centre, Hansepathnet, 22453 Hamburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2022, 14(15), 3691; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153691
Submission received: 15 June 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 24 July 2022 / Published: 28 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Salivary Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is an aggressive glandular cancer with poor prognosis that preferentially occurs in the head and neck. The MYB and MYBL1 oncogenes are main oncogenic drivers, but the true frequency and clinical significance of these alterations are unclear. Here, we have used tissue microarrays to study these genes in a multi-institutional study of close to 400 ACCs, the largest study to date. We found alterations of MYB/MYBL1 in 78% of the cases and overexpression of the MYB/MYBL1 proteins in 93% of the cases. Importantly, we show that patients with loss of one part of the MYB gene and its neighboring sequences on chromosome 6 have a significantly shorter overall survival compared to those without loss. Our study provides new knowledge about the frequency and clinical significance of MYB/MYBL1 alterations and identifies genes with tumor suppressive functions on chromosome 6 that contribute to poor prognosis in ACC.

Abstract

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is an aggressive head and neck malignancy characterized by a t (6;9) translocation resulting in an MYB–NFIB gene fusion or, more rarely, an MYBL1 fusion. The true frequency and clinical significance of these alterations are still unclear. Here, we have used tissue microarrays and analyzed 391 ACCs and 647 non-ACC salivary neoplasms to study the prevalence, expression, and clinical significance of MYB/MYBL1 alterations by FISH and immunohistochemistry. Alterations of MYB or MYBL1 were found in 78% of the cases, of which 62% had MYB alterations and 16% had MYBL1 rearrangements. Overexpression of MYB/MYBL1 oncoproteins was detected in 93% of the cases. MYB split signal, seen in 39% of the cases, was specific for ACC and not encountered in non-ACC salivary tumors. Loss of the 3′-part of MYB was enriched in grade 3 tumors and was a significant independent prognostic biomarker for overall survival in multivariate analyses. We hypothesize that loss of the 3′-part of MYB results from an unbalanced t(6;9) leading to an MYB–NFIB fusion with concomitant loss of the segment distal to the MYB breakpoint in 6q23.3. Our study provides new knowledge about the prevalence and clinical significance of MYB/MYBL1 alterations and indicates the presence of genes with tumor suppressive functions in 6q23.3-qter that contribute to poor prognosis and short overall survival in ACC.

1. Introduction

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy that preferentially occurs in the head and neck region [1,2]. It is one of the most common salivary gland cancers, but may also occur at other sites, such as the breast, skin, lung, female genital tract, and prostate [3]. It is often a slow-growing cancer with a protracted clinical course and a poor long-term prognosis [1,2,4,5,6]. About 40% of the patients develop local recurrencies and up to 60% develop distant metastases within 10 years after diagnosis. The standard treatment for resectable ACCs is radical surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy [2,6,7]. However, so far there are no effective systemic or targeted therapies available for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic disease. There is thus an unmet need for new therapeutic targets and treatment strategies for patients with this fatal cancer.
We have previously identified a recurrent t(6;9)(q23;p24) translocation in ACC [8] and demonstrated that it results in a fusion of the two transcription factor genes MYB in 6q23.3 and NFIB in 9p23–22.3 [9,10,11,12]. The t(6;9) was, together with the t(X;1) translocation in renal cancer, the first characteristic translocation identified in malignant human epithelial tumors [13]. The MYB–NFIB fusions consist of the N-terminal part of MYB, including the DNA-binding and transcription activation domains, linked to the C-terminal end of NFIB [9]. In a small subset of cases, MYB is replaced by the closely related MYBL1 gene [14,15]. The structure and functional consequences of the MYBL1–NFIB fusions are very similar to those of the MYB fusions. In addition to gene fusion, MYB and MYBL1 can also be activated by enhancer hijacking with breakpoints located either upstream or downstream of the genes [16].
Although previous studies have unequivocally established that the t(6;9) translocation and MYB/MYBL1 fusions are the major genomic hallmarks of ACC [9,11,17,18,19,20], the true frequency and clinical significance of these alterations are still unclear. Previous studies have shown that the frequency of rearrangements/expression of MYB varies from 16 to 100%, depending on the method used for detection of MYB alterations [21]. The frequency of the less common MYBL1 rearrangements is still unknown. In routine clinical work, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are the gold standard methods for analyses of such biomarkers. Here, we have used tissue microarrays (TMAs) to study rearrangements, expression, and the clinical significance, of MYB and MYBL1 in a multi-institutional study of ACC, the largest ACC cohort studied to date.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tumor Material

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections from tissue microarrays (TMAs), including 498 ACCs, 1019 non-ACC salivary neoplasms, and 40 non-salivary carcinomas (Supplementary Table S1), were available for analysis [22,23,24]. Each tumor was represented by at least two core biopsies. We also had access to paraffin blocks from 47 ACCs. TMA paraffin sections and tissue blocks were obtained from the Departments of Pathology at University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the University of Virginia Health System/Charlottesville, and Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Survival data was available for 366 cases. In addition, we had access to the following clinicopathological parameters: sex, age, perineural invasion, and tumor grade (Supplementary Table S2). Tumors were graded as lesions with no solid component (grade 1), <30% solid component (grade 2), and ≥30% solid component (grade 3) [25].

2.2. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Analysis

To detect rearrangements of MYB and MYBL1, FISH was used to analyze TMAs with locus-specific probes for MYB (6q23.3; dual-color MYB split probe; Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan) and MYBL1 (8q13.1; dual-color MYBL1 break-apart probe; Empire Genomics, Buffalo, NY, USA). The protocols for pretreatment, hybridization, and post-hybridization washes were as recommended by the manufacturers. Cell nuclei were stained blue with DAPI. Fluorescence signals were digitized, processed, and analyzed with the CytoVision image-analysis system (Applied Imaging, San Jose, CA, USA) and Isis FISH imaging system v.5.5 (MetaSystems, Altlussheim, Germany). At least 20 nuclei were scored from each core biopsy.

2.3. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

FFPE sections from ACC TMAs and tumor blocks were deparaffinized, and antigen epitopes were retrieved with EnVision FLEX Target Retrieval Solution pH 9 (Agilent Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The slides were rinsed, and endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with the EnVision Flex Mini Kit (Agilent Dako) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Slides were incubated at room temperature with an MYB monoclonal antibody (SPM175; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Bound antibodies were detected with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and visualized with EnVision FLEX DAB+ Chromogen substrate (Agilent Dako). Cell nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. Control sections were treated identically but without the primary antibody. TMA slides were scanned with a MIRAX SCAN microscope (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and Pannoramic SCAN Control software (3DHISTECH, Budapest, Hungary). Images were viewed with the Pannoramic Viewer v1.15.4 (3DHISTECH). MYB immunostaining was considered positive if >20% of tumor cells showed strong nuclear immunoreactivity.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Chi-square tests were conducted with Prism v.9.3.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Uni- and multivariate analyses using Cox regression were performed with SPSS Statistics v.28 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Confirmation of the proportional hazards assumption and the linearity of Martingale and deviance residuals was performed with the survival package of R.

3. Results

3.1. Genomic Alterations of MYB and MYBL1 in ACC

To study the frequency and types of alterations of MYB in ACC, we analyzed 391 tumors using FISH (Supplementary Table S1). Alterations of the MYB locus were detected in 62.1% of the tumors (Figure 1A–C and Figure 2). Split signals, indicating translocation of MYB, were found in 39.1% (153/391) (Figure 1A). In contrast, split signals were not detected in any of the 647 analyzable non-ACC salivary tumors or 32 non-salivary carcinomas, indicating that MYB split is specific for ACC. Loss of the 3′-part of MYB was seen in 16.1% (63/391) (Figure 1B) of the tumors, and gain of an apparently intact MYB allele was seen in 3.1% (12/391) (Figure 1C). In addition, loss of one MYB allele was seen in 3.8% (15/391). In the remaining 37.9% of the tumors (148/391), no alterations of the MYB locus were detected by the FISH split probe used.
Alterations of the MYBL1 locus were found in 16% (28/175) of the ACCs (Figure 1 D and Figure 2). Split signals indicating translocation of MYBL1 were detected in 7.4% (13/175), gain of one apparently intact MYBL1 allele in 4.6% (8 of 175), and loss of one MYBL1 allele in 4% (7/175) (Figure 1D). All tumors with rearrangements of MYBL1 were MYB negative by FISH.

3.2. Expression of MYB and MYBL1 Oncoproteins in ACC

The expression of the MYB oncoprotein was studied by IHC in TMAs and tissue sections containing 292 ACCs (Figure 3). Strong nuclear staining for MYB was found in 93.2% (272/292) of the ACCs (Figure 3A–L). The remaining tumors were all negative. Normal tissues adjacent to the tumors were also consistently negative. All tumors that were MYBL1-positive and MYB-negative by FISH (n = 11) stained positive for the MYB antibody (Figure 3H,I), indicating that the MYB antibody reacts with both MYB and the closely related MYBL1 oncoprotein. MYB and MYBL1 were overexpressed in all morphological subtypes of ACC, including tubular, cribriform, solid, and mixed forms of these patterns (Figure 3A–L). In tumors with tubular differentiation, mainly the outer myoepithelial cells were positive for MYB. Analysis of whole tissue sections from 47 ACCs revealed limited heterogeneity in the staining pattern between different tumors. Taken together, our findings clearly show that more than 90% of ACCs are MYB/MYBL1-positive, demonstrating that MYB/MYBL1 is a significant biomarker for ACC.

3.3. Clinical Significance of MYB and MYBL1 Rearrangements

To study the clinical significance of MYB/MYBL1 rearrangements, we analyzed the overall survival (OS) of ACC patients with and without these rearrangements (Figure 4A,B). OS did not differ in patients with or without rearrangement of MYB (p = 0.22) and MYBL1 (p = 0.52) (Figure 4A,B). To further investigate a potential clinical impact of specific MYB rearrangements, we sequentially compared patients harboring one of the two most common MYB rearrangements, MYB split and loss of the 3′-part of MYB, with patients lacking such rearrangements (Table 1 and Figure 4C,D). Whereas MYB split did not provide prognostic information, loss of the 3′-part of MYB was significantly associated with shorter OS (5-year OS, 55% vs. 74%; 10-year OS, 28% vs. 55%). Further analyses revealed that loss of the 3′-part of MYB was present in tumors of all grades but was significantly more common in grade 3 tumors (Figure 4E). Loss of the 3′-part was not associated with patient age at diagnosis (Figure 4F), sex, or perineural invasion (data not shown). Neither was MYB split associated with any of the analyzed clinicopathological parameters (data not shown). Notably, loss of the 3′-part of MYB was a significant independent prognostic biomarker for OS in multivariate analyses together with age and grade (Table 1).

4. Discussion

Previous studies have unequivocally demonstrated that constitutive activation of MYB, or more rarely MYBL1, are key genomic events in the pathogenesis of ACC [9,11,14,15,17,18,19,20]. However, the actual frequency of MYB/MYBL1 alterations and overexpression is still unclear. From a diagnostic point of view, this is particularly important to clarify since these genes are increasingly used as ancillary markers for ACC. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and prognostic impact of the t(6;9) and MYB–NFIB fusion in head and neck ACC, the prevalence varied significantly from 16–100% depending on the methodology used in the different studies [21]. In the largest studies, MYB rearrangements or MYB–NFIB fusions were detected in 33–75% of the ACCs by FISH (n = 24–100) [18,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The corresponding figures for MYBL1 rearrangements/fusions using FISH varied from 9 to 23% (n = 33–100) [30,31,32].
The present FISH analysis revealed rearrangements/gain of MYB in 62% (243/391) of the ACCs and of MYBL1 in 16% (28/175). Thus, our FISH assays detected alterations of MYB or MYBL1 in 78% of the ACCs. Notably, IHC revealed overexpression of MYB or MYBL1 oncoproteins in 93.2% of the 292 ACCs analyzed. This frequency is almost identical to a recent RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) study showing MYB overexpression in 92% of 77 analyzed ACCs [33]. In addition, the MYB ISH study showed an 89% specificity for ACC compared to a 54% specificity for MYB IHC. Although not as specific as ISH, IHC is a method available in pathology laboratories worldwide. The discrepancy between the frequency of MYB/MYBL1 alterations by FISH and MYB/MYBL1 oncoprotein expression likely reflects different mechanisms of activation of MYB/MYBL1, including gene fusion, gain/amplification, and enhancer hijacking. All in all, our study, the largest to date, clearly demonstrates that activation of MYB/MYBL1 is nearly universal in ACC. Future studies will reveal whether there are other unknown drivers in MYB/MYBL1 negative ACCs or whether these instead may be ACC mimics.
The most common MYB alteration in our study was MYB split in 39.1% of the cases, followed by loss of the 3´-part of MYB in 16.1%, loss of one MYB allele in 3.8%, and gain of one MYB allele in 3.1%. The corresponding figures for MYBL1 alterations were MYBL1 split in 7.4%, gain of MYBL1 in 4.6%, and loss of one MYBL1 allele in 4%. Importantly, MYB split signals were not seen in any of the more than 600 non-ACC salivary tumors, demonstrating that MYB FISH split signals are indeed specific for ACC. Based on previous cytogenetic and arrayCGH studies [17,34], gain of one MYB allele is likely to result from gene duplication rather than trisomy 6 since this aberration has previously not been detected in ACC [34]. Gene duplication has previously been shown as a mechanism of MYB activation in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia [35]. In contrast, gain of one MYBL1 allele is more likely to result from trisomy 8, which is a known recurrent aberration in ACC [34]. Importantly, there was no difference in MYB protein expression between ACCs with different genomic alterations, thus confirming that all these changes result in activation of MYB/MYBL1 expression.
There is partly contradicting information in the literature whether the MYB fusion carries prognostic information. Although some studies have suggested certain correlations between MYB alterations and various clinicopathological parameters, most have failed to find significant associations [21,36]. For instance, Rettig et al. [28] have suggested that minor salivary gland ACCs are more often MYB fusion-positive and that fusions are more common in females than in males. Mitani et al. [15] found that ACCs with MYB alterations are associated with recurrences and metastases. High MYB [27] or MYB/MYBL1 [14] mRNA expression in ACC has also been linked to poor patient survival, solid tumor histology, and advanced disease stage. In the present study, we found no significant differences in OS between ACC patients with or without rearrangements of MYB or MYBL1. However, detailed sequential comparison of patients with and without the two most common types of MYB rearrangements revealed that loss of the 3′-part of MYB was significantly associated with shorter OS. Importantly, loss of the 3´-part of MYB was also an independent prognostic marker for OS in multivariate analyses and was significantly enriched in grade 3 tumors. In contrast, MYB split did not correlate with OS or any other clinicopathological parameter.
Our finding of loss of the 3′-part of MYB and flanking sequences is strongly supported by previous cytogenetic and molecular observations of deletions of the terminal part of 6q in a subset of ACCs [8,17,37,38,39,40,41]. The present and previous observations indicate that there are one or more genes in 6q23.3-qter with tumor suppressive functions and whose loss/losses contribute to poor prognosis and short OS in ACC. We hypothesize that the loss of the 3′-part of MYB results from an unbalanced 6;9-translocation leading to an MYB–NFIB fusion with concomitant loss of the 6q-segment distal to the MYB breakpoint in 6q23.3. Further molecular analyses will reveal whether any of the known tumor suppressors in this region, e.g., LATS1, PARK2, or PLAGL1 [42,43,44,45,46], is the target of these deletions in ACC.
A limitation of our study is that we have only used MYB/MYBL1 break-apart FISH probes and MYB IHC, and we have not screened for fusions by RT-PCR or fusion-specific FISH. Moreover, our FISH assays do not detect breakpoints not covered by our MYB and MYBL1 probes, such as cases in which the genes are activated by enhancer hijacking. However, these cases may be readily identified by MYB IHC. Although not specifically addressed in the present study, MYB overexpression does not seem to be limited to ACC but may occasionally occur also in other salivary gland tumors, such as acinic cell carcinoma [47], and basal cell and myoepithelial neoplasms [3,33].

5. Conclusions

This comprehensive multi-institutional study, the largest to date, demonstrates that alterations in MYB and MYBL1 occur in 78% of ACCs and that overexpression of the MYB/MYBL1 oncoproteins is found in 93% of the cases. These findings further strengthen MYB/MYBL1 as significant diagnostic biomarkers and targets for therapy in ACC. Moreover, we show that an MYB split signal is specific for ACC and that loss of the 3′-part of MYB is enriched in grade 3 tumors. Notably, we also demonstrate that loss of the 3′-part of MYB and its flanking sequences is an independent prognostic marker for OS in multivariate analyses. Taken together, our study provides new knowledge about the prevalence and clinical significance of MYB and MYBL1 alterations in ACC and indicates the presence of genes with tumor suppressive functions in 6q23.3-qter that contribute to poor prognosis in a subset of tumors.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers14153691/s1, Table S1: Salivary and non-salivary gland tumors included in the tissue microarrays (TMAs) and analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); Table S2: Clinicopathological characteristics of 366 adenoid cystic carcinomas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.S. and M.P.; methodology, M.P., M.K.A. and G.S.; formal analysis, M.P., M.K.A. and G.S.; investigation, M.P. and M.K.A.; resources, Y.M., M.S.B.-W., H.F.F.J., C.M., I.F., R.F., W.B., T.L. and A.K.E.-N.; data curation, all authors; writing—original draft, G.S.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, M.P. and M.K.A.; funding acquisition, G.S., M.P. and M.K.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society [CAN 21 1773], The Sjöberg Foundation [2021-01-14:4], the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the country councils, the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-721711), and the AG-fond [FB17-22 and FB20-91].

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the regional ethics committee in Gothenburg (D-No: 178-08), the ethics committee of Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil-Lisboa (UIC-1042), the MD Anderson Cancer Center IRB, the University of Virginia IRB, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham IRB. The use of archived diagnostic leftover tissues for manufacturing of TMAs (Institute for Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany) and their analysis for research purposes was approved by local laws (HmbKHG, §12.1) and by the local ethics committee (Ethics commission Hamburg, WF-049/09). The work was performed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects from the University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, and the Serviço de Anatomia Patológica, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal. For the remaining subjects, there were approved waivers of informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

Data is maintained in this article. Data is not publicly available due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Guido Sauter and Waldemar Wilczak at the Institute for Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, for generously providing FFPE sections from tissue microarrays containing ACCs, non-ACC salivary neoplasms, and non-salivary carcinomas. The authors also thank Therese Carlsson for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stenman, G.; Licitra, L.; Said-Al-Naief, N.; van Zante, A.; Yarbrough, W.G. Adenoid cystic carcinoma. In World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumours; El-Naggar, A.K., Chan, J.K.C., Grandis, J.R., Takata, T., Slootweg, P.J., Eds.; IARC Press: Lyon, France, 2017; pp. 164–165. [Google Scholar]
  2. Coca-Pelaz, A.; Rodrigo, J.P.; Bradley, P.J.; Poorten, V.V.; Triantafyllou, A.; Hunt, J.L.; Strojan, P.; Rinaldo, A.; Haigentz, M.; Takes, R.P.; et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck—An update. Oral Oncol. 2015, 51, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brill, L.B., 2nd; Kanner, W.A.; Fehr, A.; Andren, Y.; Moskaluk, C.A.; Loning, T.; Stenman, G.; Frierson, H.F., Jr. Analysis of MYB expression and MYB-NFIB gene fusions in adenoid cystic carcinoma and other salivary neoplasms. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24, 1169–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Laurie, S.A.; Ho, A.L.; Fury, M.G.; Sherman, E.; Pfister, D.G. Systemic therapy in the management of metastatic or locally recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands: A systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2011, 12, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, B.; Drill, E.; Ho, A.; Ho, A.; Dunn, L.; Prieto-Granada, C.N.; Chan, T.; Ganly, I.; Ghossein, R.; Katabi, N. Predictors of Outcome in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Salivary Glands: A Clinicopathologic Study with Correlation Between MYB Fusion and Protein Expression. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017, 41, 1422–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Carlson, J.; Licitra, L.; Locati, L.; Raben, D.; Persson, F.; Stenman, G. Salivary Gland Cancer: An Update on Present and Emerging Therapies. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 2013, 33, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Geiger, J.L.; Ismaila, N.; Beadle, B.; Caudell, J.J.; Chau, N.; Deschler, D.; Glastonbury, C.; Kaufman, M.; Lamarre, E.; Lau, H.Y.; et al. Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 1909–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stenman, G.; Sandros, J.; Dahlenfors, R.; Juberg-Ode, M.; Mark, J. 6q- and loss of the Y chromosome—Two common deviations in malignant human salivary gland tumors. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1986, 22, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Persson, M.; Andren, Y.; Mark, J.; Horlings, H.M.; Persson, F.; Stenman, G. Recurrent fusion of MYB and NFIB transcription factor genes in carcinomas of the breast and head and neck. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 18740–18744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Andersson, M.K.; Stenman, G. The landscape of gene fusions and somatic mutations in salivary gland neoplasms—Implications for diagnosis and therapy. Oral Oncol. 2016, 57, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Andersson, M.K.; Afshari, M.K.; Andrén, Y.; Wick, M.J.; Stenman, G. Targeting the Oncogenic Transcriptional Regulator MYB in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma by Inhibition of IGF1R/AKT Signaling. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2017, 109, djx017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Andersson, M.K.; Åman, P.; Stenman, G. IGF2/IGF1R Signaling as a Therapeutic Target in MYB-Positive Adenoid Cystic Carcinomas and Other Fusion Gene-Driven Tumors. Cells 2019, 8, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Mertens, F.; Johansson, B.; Fioretos, T.; Mitelman, F. The emerging complexity of gene fusions in cancer. Nat. Cancer 2015, 15, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brayer, K.J.; Frerich, C.A.; Kang, H.; Ness, S.A. Recurrent Fusions in MYB and MYBL1 Define a Common, Transcription Factor–Driven Oncogenic Pathway in Salivary Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2016, 6, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Mitani, Y.; Liu, B.; Rao, P.H.; Borra, V.J.; Zafereo, M.; Weber, R.S.; Kies, M.; Lozano, G.; Futreal, P.A.; Caulin, C.; et al. Novel MYBL1 Gene Rearrangements with Recurrent MYBL1–NFIB Fusions in Salivary Adenoid Cystic Carcinomas Lacking t(6;9) Translocations. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Drier, Y.; Cotton, M.J.; Williamson, K.E.; Gillespie, S.M.; Ryan, R.J.H.; Kluk, M.J.; Carey, C.D.; Rodig, S.J.; Sholl, L.M.; Afrogheh, A.H.; et al. An oncogenic MYB feedback loop drives alternate cell fates in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Persson, M.; Andrén, Y.; Moskaluk, C.A.; Frierson, H.F., Jr.; Cooke, S.L.; Futreal, P.A.; Kling, T.; Nelander, S.; Nordkvist, A.; Persson, F.; et al. Clinically significant copy number alterations and complex rearrangements of MYB and NFIB in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 2012, 51, 805–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ho, A.S.; Kannan, K.; Roy, D.M.; Morris, L.G.T.; Ganly, I.; Katabi, N.; Ramaswami, D.; Walsh, L.; Eng, S.; Huse, J.T.; et al. The mutational landscape of adenoid cystic carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Stephens, P.J.; Davies, H.R.; Mitani, Y.; Van Loo, P.; Shlien, A.; Tarpey, P.S.; Papaemmanuil, E.; Cheverton, A.; Bignell, G.R.; Butler, A.P.; et al. Whole exome sequencing of adenoid cystic carcinoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 2965–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rettig, E.M.; Talbot, C.C., Jr.; Sausen, M.; Jones, S.; Bishop, J.A.; Wood, L.D.; Tokheim, C.; Niknafs, N.; Karchin, R.; Fertig, E.J.; et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Salivary Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Cancer Prev. Res. 2016, 9, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. De Almeida-Pinto, Y.D.; Costa, S.F.D.S.; de Andrade, B.A.B.; Altemani, A.; Vargas, P.A.; Abreu, L.G.; Fonseca, F.P. t(6;9)(MYB-NFIB) in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Oral Dis. 2019, 25, 1277–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Clauditz, T.S.; Gontarewicz, A.; Lebok, P.; Tsourlakis, M.-C.; Grob, T.J.; Muenscher, A.; Sauter, G.; Bokemeyer, C.; Knecht, R.; Wilczak, W. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in salivary gland carcinomas: Potentials as therapeutic target. Oral Oncol. 2012, 48, 991–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Clauditz, T.S.; Gontarewicz, A.; Wang, C.-J.; Münscher, A.; Laban, S.; Tsourlakis, M.C.; Knecht, R.; Sauter, G.; Wilczak, W. 11q21 Rearrangement is a Frequent and Highly Specific Genetic Alteration in Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 2012, 21, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Clauditz, T.S.; Gontarewicz, A.; Bokemeyer, C.; Sauter, G.; Knecht, R.; Münscher, A.; Wilczak, W. Abundant expression of mTOR kinase in salivary gland tumors—Potentials as therapy target? J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2013, 42, 769–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Szanto, P.A.; Luna, M.A.; Tortoledo, M.E.; White, R.A. Histologic grading of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands. Cancer 1984, 54, 1062–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mitani, Y.; Li, J.; Rao, P.H.; Zhao, Y.-J.; Bell, D.; Lippman, S.M.; Weber, R.S.; Caulin, C.; El-Naggar, A.K. Comprehensive Analysis of the MYB-NFIB Gene Fusion in Salivary Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: Incidence, Variability, and Clinicopathologic Significance. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 4722–4731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Mitani, Y.; Rao, P.H.; Futreal, P.A.; Roberts, D.B.; Stephens, P.J.; Zhao, Y.-J.; Zhang, L.; Mitani, M.; Weber, R.S.; Lippman, S.M.; et al. Novel Chromosomal Rearrangements and Break Points at the t(6;9) in Salivary Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: Association with MYB–NFIB Chimeric Fusion, MYB Expression, and Clinical Outcome. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 7003–7014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Rettig, E.M.; Tan, M.; Ling, S.; Yonescu, R.; Bishop, J.A.; Fakhry, C.; Ha, P.K. MYB rearrangement and clinicopathologic characteristics in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2015, 125, E292–E299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ho, A.L.; Dunn, L.; Sherman, E.J.; Fury, M.G.; Baxi, S.S.; Chandramohan, R.; Dogan, S.; Morris, L.G.T.; Cullen, G.; Haque, S.; et al. A phase II study of axitinib (AG-013736) in patients with incurable adenoid cystic carcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, 1902–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fujii, K.; Murase, T.; Beppu, S.; Saida, K.; Takino, H.; Masaki, A.; Ijichi, K.; Kusafuka, K.; Iida, Y.; Onitsuka, T.; et al. MYB, MYBL1, MYBL2 and NFIB gene alterations and MYC overexpression in salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma. Histopathology 2017, 71, 823–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Andreasen, S.; Tan, Q.; Agander, T.K.; Steiner, P.; Bjørndal, K.; Høgdall, E.; Larsen, S.R.; Erentaite, D.; Olsen, C.H.; Ulhøi, B.P.; et al. Adenoid cystic carcinomas of the salivary gland, lacrimal gland, and breast are morphologically and genetically similar but have distinct microRNA expression profiles. Mod. Pathol. 2018, 31, 1211–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Togashi, Y.; Dobashi, A.; Sakata, S.; Sato, Y.; Baba, S.; Seto, A.; Mitani, H.; Kawabata, K.; Takeuchi, K. MYB and MYBL1 in adenoid cystic carcinoma: Diversity in the mode of genomic rearrangement and transcripts. Mod. Pathol. 2018, 31, 934–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rooper, L.M.; Lombardo, K.A.; Oliai, B.R.; Ha, P.K.; Bishop, J.A. MYB RNA In Situ Hybridization Facilitates Sensitive and Specific Diagnosis of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Regardless of Translocation Status. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2020, 45, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mitelman, F.; Johansson, B.; Mertens, F. (Eds.) Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations and Gene Fusions in Cancer. 2022. Available online: https://mitelmandatabase.isb-cgc.org (accessed on 10 June 2022).
  35. Lahortiga, I.; De Keersmaecker, K.; Van Vlierberghe, P.; Graux, C.; Cauwelier, B.; Lambert, F.; Mentens, N.; Beverloo, H.B.; Pieters, R.; Speleman, F.; et al. Duplication of the MYB oncogene in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 593–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, X.; Chen, D.; Lao, X.; Liang, Y. The value of MYB as a prognostic marker for adenoid cystic carcinoma: Meta-analysis. Head Neck 2019, 41, 1517–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sandros, J.; Mark, J.; Happonen, R.P.; Stenman, G. Specificity of 6q- markers and other recurrent deviations in human malignant salivary gland tumors. Anticancer Res. 1988, 8, 637–643. [Google Scholar]
  38. Sandros, J.; Stenman, G.; Mark, J. Cytogenetic and molecular observations in human and experimental salivary gland tumors. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1990, 44, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Queimado, L.; Reis, A.; Fonseca, I.; Martins, C.; Lovett, M.; Soares, J.; Parreira, L. A refined localization of two deleted regions in chromosome 6q associated with salivary gland carcinomas. Oncogene 1998, 16, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Rutherford, S.; Yu, Y.; Rumpel, C.A.; Frierson, H.F.; Moskaluk, C.A. Chromosome 6 deletion and candidate tumor suppressor genes in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2006, 236, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. von Holstein, S.L.; Fehr, A.; Persson, M.; Therkildsen, M.H.; Prause, J.U.; Heegaard, S.; Stenman, G. Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Gland: MYB Gene Activation, Genomic Imbalances, and Clinical Characteristics. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 2130–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Abdollahi, A.; Roberts, D.; Godwin, A.K.; Schultz, D.C.; Sonoda, G.; Testa, J.R.; Hamilton, T.C. Identification of a zinc-finger gene at 6q25: A chromosomal region implicated in development of many solid tumors. Oncogene 1997, 14, 1973–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Abdollahi, A. LOT1 (ZAC1/PLAGL1) and its family members: Mechanisms and functions. J. Cell. Physiol. 2006, 210, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Veeriah, S.; Taylor, B.S.; Meng, S.; Fang, F.; Yilmaz, E.; Vivanco, I.; Janakiraman, M.; Schultz, N.; Hanrahan, A.J.; Pao, W.; et al. Somatic mutations of the Parkinson’s disease–associated gene PARK2 in glioblastoma and other human malignancies. Nat. Genet. 2009, 42, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Visser, S.; Yang, X. LATS tumor suppressor: A new governor of cellular homeostasis. Cell Cycle 2010, 9, 3892–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Sharif, A.A.D.; Hergovich, A. The NDR/LATS protein kinases in immunology and cancer biology. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018, 48, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lee, D.Y.; Brayer, K.J.; Mitani, Y.; Burns, E.A.; Rao, P.H.; Bell, D.; Williams, M.D.; Ferrarotto, R.; Pytynia, K.B.; El-Naggar, A.K.; et al. Oncogenic Orphan Nuclear Receptor NR4A3 Interacts and Cooperates with MYB in Acinic Cell Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 14 03691 g001 550
Figure 1. FISH analyses of MYB and MYBL1 in ACC. (A) ACC with a split MYB signal (separated red and green signals indicated by arrowheads). (B) ACC with loss of the 3′-part of MYB (loss of one red signal; arrowheads indicate the remaining green signal). (C) ACC with gain of one copy of MYB (three fused red/green signals indicated by arrowheads). (D) ACC with a split MYBL1 signal (separated red and green signals indicated by arrowheads). Images were captured using an 100× objective.
Figure 1. FISH analyses of MYB and MYBL1 in ACC. (A) ACC with a split MYB signal (separated red and green signals indicated by arrowheads). (B) ACC with loss of the 3′-part of MYB (loss of one red signal; arrowheads indicate the remaining green signal). (C) ACC with gain of one copy of MYB (three fused red/green signals indicated by arrowheads). (D) ACC with a split MYBL1 signal (separated red and green signals indicated by arrowheads). Images were captured using an 100× objective.
Cancers 14 03691 g001
Cancers 14 03691 g002 550
Figure 2. MYB and MYBL1 alterations in ACC. Pie charts showing the frequencies of different types of MYB and MYBL1 alterations detected by FISH in ACC.
Figure 2. MYB and MYBL1 alterations in ACC. Pie charts showing the frequencies of different types of MYB and MYBL1 alterations detected by FISH in ACC.
Cancers 14 03691 g002
Cancers 14 03691 g003 550
Figure 3. IHC staining of the MYB and MYBL1 oncoproteins in ACC tissue microarrays. (A–C) MYB staining in three ACCs with MYB split signals. (D–F) MYB staining in three ACCs with loss of the 3′-part of MYB. (G) MYB staining in an ACC with gain of one copy of MYB. (H,I) MYBL1 staining in two ACCs with MYBL1 split signals (no MYB rearrangements by FISH). (J–L) MYB/MYBL1 staining in three ACCs with no rearrangements of MYB or MYBL1 by FISH. Images were captured using a 20× objective.
Figure 3. IHC staining of the MYB and MYBL1 oncoproteins in ACC tissue microarrays. (A–C) MYB staining in three ACCs with MYB split signals. (D–F) MYB staining in three ACCs with loss of the 3′-part of MYB. (G) MYB staining in an ACC with gain of one copy of MYB. (H,I) MYBL1 staining in two ACCs with MYBL1 split signals (no MYB rearrangements by FISH). (J–L) MYB/MYBL1 staining in three ACCs with no rearrangements of MYB or MYBL1 by FISH. Images were captured using a 20× objective.
Cancers 14 03691 g003
Cancers 14 03691 g004 550
Figure 4. Prognostic significance of MYB and MYBL1 alterations in ACC. (A) OS in ACC patients with or without MYB rearrangements. (B) OS in ACC patients with or without MYBL1 rearrangements. (C) OS of ACC patients with or without MYB split signal. (D) OS of ACC patients with or without loss of the 3′-part of MYB. (E) Distribution of ACC cases with or without loss of the 3′-part of MYB by tumor grade. (F) Distribution of ACC cases with or without loss of the 3′-part of MYB by median age.
Figure 4. Prognostic significance of MYB and MYBL1 alterations in ACC. (A) OS in ACC patients with or without MYB rearrangements. (B) OS in ACC patients with or without MYBL1 rearrangements. (C) OS of ACC patients with or without MYB split signal. (D) OS of ACC patients with or without loss of the 3′-part of MYB. (E) Distribution of ACC cases with or without loss of the 3′-part of MYB by tumor grade. (F) Distribution of ACC cases with or without loss of the 3′-part of MYB by median age.
Cancers 14 03691 g004
Table
Table 1. Univariate and multivariate (n = 224) analyses of the hazard function of death in ACC patients.
Table 1. Univariate and multivariate (n = 224) analyses of the hazard function of death in ACC patients.
Univariate Multivariate
HRHR 95% CIp-ValueHRHR 95% CIp-Value
MYB—loss of the 3′-part (n = 278)1.7911.187–2.7030.0061.6331.032–2.5840.036
MYB—split (n = 278)0.9620.686–1.3490.822
Age (n = 365)1.0271.017–1.038<0.0011.0281.014–1.043<0.001
Sex (n = 366)1.1100.827–1.4910.487
Perineural invasion (n = 180)0.7700.397–1.4920.439
Grade (n = 304)
1 (n = 127)reference reference
2 (n = 104)1.3690.904–2.0710.1381.4400.886–2.3390.141
3 (n = 73)3.7512.480–5.673<0.0014.4812.760–7.275<0.001
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Persson, M.; Andersson, M.K.; Mitani, Y.; Brandwein-Weber, M.S.; Frierson, H.F., Jr.; Moskaluk, C.; Fonseca, I.; Ferrarotto, R.; Boecker, W.; Loening, T.; et al. Rearrangements, Expression, and Clinical Significance of MYB and MYBL1 in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study. Cancers 2022, 14, 3691. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153691

AMA Style

Persson M, Andersson MK, Mitani Y, Brandwein-Weber MS, Frierson HF Jr., Moskaluk C, Fonseca I, Ferrarotto R, Boecker W, Loening T, et al. Rearrangements, Expression, and Clinical Significance of MYB and MYBL1 in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study. Cancers. 2022; 14(15):3691. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Persson, Marta, Mattias K. Andersson, Yoshitsugu Mitani, Margaret S. Brandwein-Weber, Henry F. Frierson, Jr., Christopher Moskaluk, Isabel Fonseca, Renata Ferrarotto, Werner Boecker, Thomas Loening, and et al. 2022. "Rearrangements, Expression, and Clinical Significance of MYB and MYBL1 in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study" Cancers 14, no. 15: 3691. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop