Next Article in Journal
Leukoplakia in the Oral Cavity and Oral Microbiota: A Comprehensive Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Integrating Cancer Vaccines in the Standard-of-Care of Ovarian Cancer: Translating Preclinical Models to Human
Previous Article in Journal
Electrochemotherapy of Deep-Seated Tumors: State of Art and Perspectives as Possible “EPR Effect Enhancer” to Improve Cancer Nanomedicine Efficacy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Macrophages Impair TLR9 Agonist Antitumor Activity through Interacting with the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Fc Domain
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Ovarian Cancer in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Cancers 2021, 13(17), 4438; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174438
by Brigida Anna Maiorano 1,2,*, Mauro Francesco Pio Maiorano 3, Domenica Lorusso 4,5 and Evaristo Maiello 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cancers 2021, 13(17), 4438; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174438
Submission received: 30 July 2021 / Revised: 31 August 2021 / Accepted: 1 September 2021 / Published: 3 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immunotherapy: New Prospective in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This review is a nice summary on the clinical trials conducted with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced ovarian cancer either as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies. The summary of the clinical trials is detailed and well described. 

Major Issue:

There is an inconsistence in the abstract and the review 

Abstract: "20 studies were selected, of which 16 were phase I or II and 4 phase III trials."

Results: "17 phase I or II and 3 phase III trials have been published (Table 1)."

Please correct as appropriate

Minor issues:

  1. Ovarian cancer should not be preceded by "the"
  2. Other grammatical changes are marked in the manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We are extremely thankful to the reviewer for the precious comments and suggestions. We corrected the numeric inconsistency between the abstract and the review and modified the grammatical changes as suggested.

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a well organized (with use of tables and figure) and comprehensive review on such an important topic. Why are they not working? I feel the manuscript is ready for publication but would like to see the authors comment on uniqueness of ovarian cancer patients not responding? and why? in their thoughts etc. in particular there is alot of talk about glycosylation of the PD proteins and ovarian cancer associated with lots of glycosylation?? thoughts? The points in the discussion are all important points and appropriately based on current literature. 

Author Response

We are very thankful to the reviewer for the kind and useful comments. As suggested, we added some findings of genetics, proteomics, relationship with immunogenomics, and also regarding the glycosylation of PD1 proteins, aiming to address the inter-tumor heterogeneity, trying to find out possible explanations for the different ICI responses reported in OC patients.

Back to TopTop