Next Article in Journal
Magnetic-Based Enrichment of Rare Cells from High Concentrated Blood Samples
Next Article in Special Issue
Treatment of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Ready for Prime Time?
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Mishra, et al.; Lactate Dehydrogenases as Metabolic Links between Tumor and Stroma in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers 2019, 11, 750
Previous Article in Special Issue
Imaging of Monoclonal Gammapathy of Undetermined Significance and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/cancers12040924
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

PD-L1–PD-1 Pathway in the Pathophysiology of Multiple Myeloma

by
Hideto Tamura
1,2,*,
Mariko Ishibashi
3,
Mika Sunakawa-Kii
2 and
Koiti Inokuchi
2
1
Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 343-8555, Japan
2
Department of Hematology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan
3
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(4), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040924
Submission received: 8 March 2020 / Revised: 3 April 2020 / Accepted: 7 April 2020 / Published: 10 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Asymptomatic Version of Myeloma: MGUS and Smoldering Myeloma)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells contributes to disease progression with evasion from tumor immunity. Plasma cells from multiple myeloma (MM) patients expressed higher levels of PD-L1 compared with healthy volunteers and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) patients, and its expression is significantly upregulated in relapsed/refractory patients. Furthermore, high PD-L1 expression is induced by the myeloma microenvironment and PD-L1+ patients with MGUS and asymptomatic MM tend to show disease progression. PD-L1 expression on myeloma cells was associated with more proliferative potential and resistance to antimyeloma agents because of activation of the Akt pathway through PD-1-bound PD-L1 in MM cells. Those data suggest that PD-L1 plays a crucial role in the disease progression of MM.

1. Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease even with new treatment strategies using proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and monoclonal antibodies. Ten percent of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) patients develop MM and related disorders at 10 years [1]. MM patients with a prior diagnosis of MGUS had a prognosis similar to those without known MGUS [2]. The survival time is a median 2–3 and 5–7 years in MM patients with high-risk cyotogenetic abnormalities, i.e., IgH translocations (t(4;14), t(14;16)) and 17p13 deletion, and standard-risk MM patients, respectively [3]. It is important to elucidate the mechanism of disease progression from MGUS to MM, and new treatment strategies including immunotherapy are needed to inhibit progression and improve prognosis in MM patients [4,5].
PD-L1, which we first identified as a homologue of B7 family molecules [6,7], is expressed on immune cells, i.e., dendritic cells (DCs) and B and T cells, and controls T-cell immune responses such as peripheral tolerance, termination of immune responses and immune exhaustion after prolonged exposure to an antigen stimulus [8,9,10]. B7-1 (CD80) and PD-1 were identified as receptors of PD-L1, and PD-1, a 55-KDa transmembrane protein belonging to the CD28/CTLA-4 family, has an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif in its intracellular domain. PD-L1−PD-1 ligation activates PD-1 downstream from SHP-2 and dephosphorylates ZAP70, which interferes with T-cell receptor signaling, leading to the inhibition of T-cell activation [11,12,13,14,15]. PD-L2, the other ligand for PD-1, is expressed in more restricted cells, such as DCs and macrophages, after activation [10,16]. In tumor immunity, most tumor cells express PD-L1 on their surface, and PD-L1 can bind to PD-1 expressed on cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), resulting in the escape from immune surveillance by the induction of CTL apoptosis [17,18,19].
Consistent with immune evasion by PD-L1, patients with PD-L1 expression on tumor cells had shorter survival times, compared with other patients, in many types of cancer [20,21,22]. In hematologic malignancies, PD-L1+ patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma had shorter overall survival [23]. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies, recovered tumor immune surveillance by tumor-specific CTLs and achieved 12–28% overall response rates, resulting in the improvement of survival in refractory cancer patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer [24,25]. These results demonstrate the emergence of a promising new immunotherapeutic approach for treatment-refractory cancer patients. In hematologic malignancies, the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab induced an approximately 66–87% overall response in relapsed/refractory patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, in which alterations in chromosome 9p24.1 increase the level of PD-1 [26,27].
This review describes the expression and function of the PD-1–PD-L1 pathway in MGUS and MM, and the possibility of immunotherapy through the blockade of this pathway.

2. Expression of PD-L1 in MGUS and MM

Leukemia and lymphoma cells express various levels of PD-L1 on their surface [28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. We analyzed PD-L1 expression in 14 human MM cell lines (HMCLs) and detected PD-L1 mRNA expression in nine using RT-PCR, although only four cell lines (KMS-12BM, KMS-34, RPMI8226 and U266) expressed cell-surface PD-L1 in flow cytometry [35]. In primary cells from patients, a high expression of PD-L1 was detected in 25% of 40 samples from newly diagnosed MM patients, although its expression on plasma cells from healthy volunteers and MGUS patients was lower [35,36,37]. PD-L1 expression on malignant plasma cells was also associated with an increased risk of disease progression from smoldering to symptomatic MM [37]. Furthermore, the expression levels were increased in relapsed/refractory MM patients compared with newly diagnosed ones [35,38], and samples from those with minimal residual disease (MRD) expressed higher levels of PD-L1 compared with those at diagnosis [38], suggesting that PD-L1 expression on MM cells may be involved in disease progression. However, other groups reported no difference in PD-L1 expression levels between MM and MGUS patients and healthy volunteers [38]. Kelly et al. found that the PD-L1 transcript levels in MM patients were equivalent to those in normal plasma cells [39], suggesting that PD-L1 protein expression may be post-transcriptionally regulated.
In the bone marrow microenvironment of myeloma, other cells expressed PD-L1. Myeloid and plasmacytoid DCs expressed significantly higher levels of PD-L1 compared with those in peripheral blood from healthy controls, and there was a significant correlation in the percentage of PD-L1+ cells between MM cells and CD141+ myeloid DCs [40]. In addition, some relapsed MM patients had high PD-L1 expression on myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [41], although PD-L1 expression was not detected on CD138+ cells in normal bone marrow [42].
The expression of PD-1, a receptor of PD-L1, was increased on T and natural killer (NK) cells in MM patients compared with its expression in healthy volunteers [43,44]. In patients with MRD, T cells expressed higher levels of PD-1 compared with those at diagnosis [38]. In a murine myeloma model using 5T33 cells, in which CD138+PD-L1+ myeloma cells were found in the bone marrow and spleen, the percentages of PD-1+ cells in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in the spleen were 20–60% and 18–40% in the advanced stage, respectively, although those percentages were only 5–10% in control mice. Furthermore, the number of PD-1+CD8+ T cells was increased in the bone marrow and spleen, although PD-1 expression was very low on T cells in the peripheral blood and lymph nodes, indicating that MM cells might induce PD-1 expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In those myeloma mice, PD-1+CD8+ T cells were susceptible to the induction of apoptosis and had decreased production of IL-1, TNF-α and IFN-γ. In addition, the proportion of PD-1+ NK cells, regulatory T cells and MDSCs was significantly increased compared with that in controls [42]. In bone marrow obtained from MM patients, the percentage of PD-1+ cells in CD8+ T cells was significantly increased compared with that from MGUS/smoldering MM patients [45]. In addition, our results showed the negligible expression of PD-L2, another ligand of PD-1 (in submission).

3. Induction of PD-L1 Expression in MGUS and MM

Various mechanisms of PD-L1 induction on cancer cells were reported to be associated with proinflammatory cytokines and oncogenic and transcriptional pathways, such as PTEN, mTOR or PI3K [8,46,47,48,49]. PD-L1 protein expression was restricted, while PD-L1 mRNA expression was detected in most normal tissues, suggesting the mechanism of the post-transcriptional regulation of PD-L1, i.e., deacetylation, palmitoylation, microRNAs (miRNAs) and phosphorylation-dependent proteasome degradation induced by glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) (Table 1) [19,46,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. miRNAs such as mi-RNA34a, miRNA-200, miRNA-513 and miRNA-570 decrease PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, which confers T-cell immunity in the tumor microenvironment [46,57]. Not only epidermal growth factor (EGF)-mediated glycosylation, which could inactivate GSK3β, but also COP9 signalosome 5 (CSN5)-mediated deubiquitination induced by TNF-α, stabilized PD-L1 expression on tumor cells [58,59,60]. Ogawa’s group reported that PD-L1 3’-untranslated region disruption could elevate PD-L1 expression in multiple cancers [61].
In MM, several regulatory pathways were shown to be involved in PD-L1 upregulation on myeloma cells (Figure 1). For example, its upregulation was induced by IFN-γ or TLR-stimulated STAT1 activation through the MyD88/TRAF6 or MEK/ERK pathway [36]. IFN-γ produced by several types of immune cells, i.e., activated Th1 (CD4+ helper T cells), CD8+ CTLs, macrophages, γδ T cells, NK cells and NKT cells, activated the JAK/STAT pathway, resulting in the induction of PD-L1 via IRF1 expression, although the amount of intrinsic IRF1 was not sufficient to induce PD-L1 expression [62,63,64,65,66]. In addition, MM cells expressed high levels of TLR2, TLR4, TRL7 and TLR9 [67,68]. We found that bone marrow stroma cells (BMSCs) also induced PD-L1 expression on MM cells by BMSC-derived soluble factor IL-6 through the IL-6 signaling cascade, including JAK2, STAT3 and the MEK1/2 pathway [35]. Consistent with these results, the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib downregulated PD-L1 expression on MM cells [69,70]. It was reported that a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), secreted by eosinophils, osteoclasts and myeloid cells in the MM microenvironment, could bind B-cell maturation antigens (BCMAs) expressed on MM cells, resulting in tumor cell survival as well as the upregulation of PD-L1 expression via the phosphorylation of MEK1/2 [71,72]. Those findings demonstrated that PD-L1 expression could be induced in the MM microenvironment.
The upregulation of PD-L1 expression on MM cells is induced by interleukin (IL)-6 and interferon (IFN)-γ, which are produced by the MM microenvironment. PD-L1 delivers PI3K/Akt signals to MM cells through PD-1 binding, contributing to the proliferative potential and drug resistance against antimyeloma agents. The soluble form of PD-L1 may contribute to the escape from immune evasion. APRIL, induced by eosinophils, osteoclasts and myeloid cells in the MM microenvironment, binds B-cell maturation antigens (BCMAs) on MM cells, resulting in tumor cell survival as well as the upregulation of PD-L1 expression via the phosphorylation of MEK1/2.
During the clinical course of MM, PD-L1 expression on monocyte, myeloid and plasmacytoid DCs was increased during treatment without daratumumab, although daratumumab treatment prevented PD-L1 upregulation in patients with MM [73]. Our in vitro study showed that lenalidomide and pomalidomide, but not thalidomide, induced PD-L1 expression on IMiD-insensitive MM cell lines and plasma cells from relapsed/refractory MM patients through the BCMA–APRIL pathway. We found that IMiDs induced APRIL expression through Ikaros degradation mediated by cereblon in MM cells [74]. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) were also reported to induce PD-L1 expression on MM cells, indicating that HDACis combined with the anti-PD-L1 antibody enhance anti-MM immunity [75].

4. Functions of PD-L1 in MM; a Disease Progression Enabler?

In general oncology, PD-L1 is expressed on most tumor cells and binds to PD-1 on tumor-specific CTLs, resulting in the recruitment of SHP-1 and SHP-2 to the C-terminal of the PD-1 intracellular domain, leading to the inhibition of downstream PI3K/Akt signaling, which downregulates cell survival gene Bcl-xL expression and induces the apoptosis of CTLs. Thus, the PD-L1−PD-1 signaling pathway has a crucial role in tumor immune escape.
Numerous pathogenetic and potential pathways involved in the pathophysiology of MM have been reported [76]. The interactions between MM cells and bone marrow stromal cells are associated with the pathophysiology of MM. This interaction in the MM microenvironment induces the secretion of several cytokines, such as IL-6, IGF-1, VEGF, SDF1α, TGF-β, HGF and TNF-α, derived from both BMSCs and MM cells, leading to the activation of multiple signaling pathways in MM cells. These include important pathways, such as PI3K/Akt, JAK/STAT3, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and NF-κB, for cell growth, anti-apoptosis and drug resistance in MM cells.
As in other tumors, PD-L1-expressing myeloma cells can inhibit the activity of CTLs, resulting in immune evasion. In addition, plasmacytoid DCs with high expressions of PD-L1 inhibit the activation of T and NK cells [77]. In a myeloma model, BMSCs promoted MM cells, likely by suppressing CD4+ T cells via the PD-L1−PD-1 pathway, indicating that the anti-PD-1 antibody may inhibit BMSC-induced MM cell growth [78]. We found that PD-L1-expressing myeloma cells exhibit aggressive behavior, with not only greater proliferative potential, but also more resistance to antimyeloma drugs [35]. PD-L1+ fractions in RPMI8226 and KMS-34 MM cells had more proliferative cells in the G2/M phase and high BrdU incorporation as well as Ki-67 and BCL2 expression and more rapid proliferation in culture compared with PD-L1− fractions [35]. PD-L1 knockdown in highly PD-L1-expressing MM cell lines resulted in a significant inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and an increase in melphalan-induced apoptosis. We also found that PD-L1 binding with PD-1-Fc beads in myeloma cells induced resistance to anti-myeloma agents, such as melphalan and bortezomib, accompanied by the activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, because PD-1−PD-L1 bingeing delivered a reverse signal from PD-L1 into myeloma cells with the upregulation of CCND3, BCL2 and MCL1 [79]. PD-L1+ cells had higher Ki-67 and BCL2 expression levels, and highly positive PD-L1 cells were associated with high levels of serum LDH and the percentage of plasma cells in the bone marrow of MM patients, indicating that PD-L1 may be associated with MM disease progression [35]. Consistent with those results, in MGUS and asymptomatic MM, a higher expression of PD-L1 on MM cells was correlated with an increased risk of progression to clinical MM [37]. The expression levels of PD-L1 were also increased during smoldering myeloma progression [80].

5. Soluble Form of PD-L1 in MM Patients

The soluble form of PD-L1, which is released from surface PD-L1 on tumor cells into the circulation, is also thought to exert immunosuppressive activity [81]. Frigola et al. reported that soluble PD-L1 from tumor cell lines had a molecular weight of 45 kDa and an Ig-V ligand-binding domain that could bind to PD-1 [78]. High soluble levels of serum PD-L1 were associated with poor prognosis in patients with renal cell cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer and B cell lymphoma [81,82,83,84]. In MM patients, high serum soluble PD-L1 levels were reported to be associated with advanced R-ISS stage and shorter progression-free and overall survival times [85,86]. High soluble PD-L1 levels in bone marrow plasma from MM patients at 100 days after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was an independent risk factor for a short response period [87]. Some tumor cells, such as melanoma and lung and breast cancer cells, have been known to release extracellular vesicles, mostly in the form of exosomes, which could include PD-L1 [88]. Exosomal PD-L1 also has immune-suppressive functions through the suppression of T-cell immunity. In vivo experiments showed that exosomal PD-L1-derived tumor cells promoted the growth of PD-L1-knockdown tumors. Thus, myeloma-derived extracellular vesicles might inhibit anti-tumor immune responses by PD-L1 delivery, as well as the expansion of regulatory T cells, stimulation of M2 macrophage polarization and induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells [89]. These results suggest that soluble PD-L1 may be associated with disease progression by impairing host immunity.

6. Blockade of the PD-L1−PD-1 Pathway as a Therapeutic Target in MM

Considering that the PD-L1−PD-1 pathway may be associated with the pathophysiology of MM, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatment could be clinically effective in MM patients by recovering T-cell cytotoxicity and inhibiting reverse signaling from PD-L1 on MM cells. Furthermore, DCs also expressed PD-L1 in the MM microenvironment and then suppressed PD-1-expressing T-cell and NK-cell immune functions via the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway [40]. PD-L1 expression on plasmacytoid DCs, which play important roles in the cell growth and prolonged survival in MM cells, was increased and localized with PD-L1-expressing MM cells in bone marrow [90]. In addition, PD-L1 expression on monocytes obtained from MM patients was increased compared with those from healthy volunteers [70]. PD-L1 on those cells as well as MM cells may be a therapeutic target of the PD-L1−PD-1 blockade.
In vivo experiments using a murine myeloma model demonstrated that both the PD-1 deficiency and PD-L1 blockade inhibited tumor growth [43]. Furthermore, the anti-PD-L1 antibody enhanced T-cell immune responses when used in combination with other therapies, such as DC-myeloma fusion vaccine and irradiation [44,91]. In the 5T33 murine MM model, autologous stem cell transplantation in combination with vaccination could prolong survival in those mice when the PD-L1 blockade was added [42]. An in vivo murine myeloma model showed that low-dose irradiation followed by anti-PD-1 treatment prolonged survival with increased tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, in which both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were necessary to eliminate MM cells [91]. These reports suggested that the blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, combined with the induction of tumor-specific CTLs by other immunotherapy, radiation or chemotherapy, may have great promise as a treatment for MM patients [4,92].
The results of a nivolumab phase 1B trial showed that nivolumab had little effect, except for one complete response along with stable disease among 63% of the 27 MM patients enrolled [93]. This low effectiveness of the immune checkpoint inhibitor may be due to immune dysfunction with increased immunosuppressive cells such as regulatory T cells and MDSCs and exhausted T cells [94,95]. In MM patients with advanced-stage disease, T-cell signaling (CD28, CD152, CD3zeta, p56lck, ZAP-70, PI3-k) was impaired and its intracellular cytokine expression (IL-γ, IL-2, IL-4) was downregulated in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [96], and PD-1+CD8+ T cells from the bone marrow of MM patients co-expressed other immune checkpoint inhibitory receptors such as RAG3 and TIGIT. Therefore, the anti-PD antibody alone did not result in the recovery of T-cell proliferation, indicating that the blockade of the PD-L1−PD-1 pathway does not markedly reverse T-cell exhaustion [45]. In a murine myeloma model, anti-TIGIT was more effective in improving survival compared with anti-PD-1 [97]. Anti-PD-1 combined with a TGF-β inhibitor could reactivate T cells from the bone marrow of MM patients, suggesting that the combination may be effective in treating refractory disease [45].
In addition, numerous types of T-cell dysfunction have been reported, i.e., a decreased number of CD4+ T cells, an abnormal ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cells and an imbalance of Th1/Th2 [98,99,100]. Suen et al. showed that the clonal expansion of CD8+ TCRVβ+CD57+CD28– T cells, which are thought to be tumor specific, had a lower PD-1 expression compared with CD8+TCRVβ–CD57+ nonclonal T cells, indicating low binding of the anti-PD-1 antibody [101]. Furthermore, immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective in patients with cancers exhibiting frequent nonsynonymous mutations, which could induce tumor-specific CTLs, although myeloma has a lower frequency of nonsynonymous mutations than cancers that have been approved as treatment targets of immune checkpoint inhibitors [101].
IMiDs have various immunomodulatory effects, i.e., the activation of T and NK cells, inhibition of regulatory T cells and MDSCs, increased IL-2 production and Th1 cells, and the fact that lenalidomide decreases PD-1 expression on T cells [43,102,103,104]. Thus, IMiDs could be reasonable in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treating MM patients. In vitro experimental results showed that the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with lenalidomide could induce the apoptosis of MM cells and increase IFN-γ production in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [41]. It was also reported that the anti-PD-1 antibody increased chemotaxis through the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis, resulting in the enhancement of NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity against MM cells [43,44], and those results support the reasonable combination of anti-PD-1 and IMiDs. Consistent with that concept, treatment with the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab combined with lenalidomide or pomalidomide achieved a 44% or 60% overall response rate in relapsed/refractory MM patients, respectively [105,106] (Table 2). However, patients treated with pembrolizumab and pomalidomide had a shorter progression-free survival time and a higher incidence of treatment-related deaths (3%), including neutropenic sepsis, myocarditis and Stevens–Johnson syndrome, resulting in the suspension of clinical trials of the anti-PD-1 and IMiD combination [107].
Clinical trials using other combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with immunotherapies are ongoing. A clinical trial of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab combined with the anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab is underway but not recruiting (NCT01592370). A murine myeloma model using 5T33 cell lines showed that a whole-tumor cell vaccine combined with the anti-PD-L1 antibody increased the antimyeloma effects compared with tumor-cell vaccination alone or the anti-PD-L1 antibody alone [42]. A clinical trial of the anti-PD-1 antibody pidilizumab, combined with a myeloma-specific DC fusion vaccine, which induces tumor-specific CTLs, is in progress without recruiting (NCT01067287). Treatment strategies based on the blockade of the PD-L1−PD-L1 pathway are being developed to prevent disease progression in smoldering MM and stable disease after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (Table 3). It appears reasonable to control the disease using the T-cell immune surveillance recovered by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, although several clinical trials have been suspended due to safety concerns.

7. Conclusions

The myeloma environment induces PD-L1 expression on myeloma cells as well as immune cells in the bone marrow, resulting in the inhibition of T-cell immunity. Furthermore, PD-L1+ myeloma cells exhibit intrinsic aggressive behavior independent of the immune evasion mechanism, because PD-L1 can deliver a reverse signal to MM cells via activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Thus, the PD-1–PD-L1 pathway plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of MM, as well as in disease progression from MGUS to MM, providing new potential immunotherapy approaches targeting the PD-L1 protein. The combination of the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody with an IMiD led to a high mortality rate, which might be associated with an excessive autoimmune reaction. Other combination treatments, such as the anti-PD-1 antibody and radiation therapy or tumor vaccination, etc., may improve the prognosis of refractory MM patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, manuscript preparation, and funding acquisition, H.T.; literature review and draft preparation, H.T., M.I. and M.S.-K.; manuscript editing, K.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Our research on PD-L1 was sponsored by Celgene Corporation.

Conflicts of Interest

H.T.: Celgene: research funding, honoraria; Janssen: research funding, honoraria; Takeda: research funding, honoraria.

References

  1. Kyle, R.A.; Larson, D.R.; Therneau, T.M.; Dispenzieri, A.; Kumar, S.; Cerhan, J.R.; Rajkumar, S.V. Long-Term Follow-up of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Goyal, G.; Rajkumar, S.V.; Lacy, M.Q.; Gertz, M.A.; Buadi, F.K.; Dispenzieri, A.; Hwa, Y.L.; Fonder, A.L.; Hobbs, M.A.; Hayman, S.R.; et al. Impact of prior diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy on outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2019, 33, 1273–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chng, W.J.; Dispenzieri, A.; Chim, C.S.; Fonseca, R.; Goldschmidt, H.; Lentzsch, S.; Munshi, N.; Palumbo, A.; Miguel, J.S.; Sonneveld, P.; et al. Myeloma Working, G., IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2014, 28, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tamura, H. Immunopathogenesis and immunotherapy of multiple myeloma. Int. J. Hematol. 2018, 107, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Tamura, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Sunakawa, M.; Inokuchi, K. Immunotherapy for Multiple Myeloma. Cancers 2019, 11, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Dong, H.; Zhu, G.; Tamada, K.; Chen, L. B7-H1, a third member of the B7 family, co-stimulates T-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 1365–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tamura, H.; Dong, H.; Zhu, G.; Sica, G.L.; Flies, D.B.; Tamada, K.; Chen, L. B7-H1 costimulation preferentially enhances CD28-independent T-helper cell function. Blood 2001, 97, 1809–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kythreotou, A.; Siddique, A.; Mauri, F.A.; Bower, M.; Pinato, D.J. Pd-L1. J. Clin. Pathol. 2018, 71, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wherry, E.J.; Kurachi, M. Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 486–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boussiotis, V.A. Molecular and Biochemical Aspects of the PD-1 Checkpoint Pathway. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1767–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Freeman, G.J.; Long, A.J.; Iwai, Y.; Bourque, K.; Chernova, T.; Nishimura, H.; Fitz, L.J.; Malenkovich, N.; Okazaki, T.; Byrne, M.C.; et al. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ishida, Y.; Agata, Y.; Shibahara, K.; Honjo, T. Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 3887–3895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chemnitz, J.M.; Parry, R.V.; Nichols, K.E.; June, C.H.; Riley, J.L. SHP-1 and SHP-2 associate with immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif of programmed death 1 upon primary human T cell stimulation, but only receptor ligation prevents T cell activation. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 945–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sheppard, K.A.; Fitz, L.J.; Lee, J.M.; Benander, C.; George, J.A.; Wooters, J.; Qiu, Y.; Jussif, J.M.; Carter, L.L.; Wood, C.R.; et al. PD-1 inhibits T-cell receptor induced phosphorylation of the ZAP70/CD3zeta signalosome and downstream signaling to PKCtheta. FEBS Lett. 2004, 574, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Nirschl, C.J.; Drake, C.G. Molecular pathways: Coexpression of immune checkpoint molecules: Signaling pathways and implications for cancer immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 4917–4924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tseng, S.Y.; Otsuji, M.; Gorski, K.; Huang, X.; Slansky, J.E.; Pai, S.I.; Shalabi, A.; Shin, T.; Pardoll, D.M.; Tsuchiya, H. B7-DC, a new dendritic cell molecule with potent costimulatory properties for T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 193, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dong, H.; Strome, S.E.; Salomao, D.R.; Tamura, H.; Hirano, F.; Flies, D.B.; Roche, P.C.; Lu, J.; Zhu, G.; Tamada, K.; et al. Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zou, W.; Chen, L. Inhibitory B7-family molecules in the tumour microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hirano, F.; Kaneko, K.; Tamura, H.; Dong, H.; Wang, S.; Ichikawa, M.; Rietz, C.; Flies, D.B.; Lau, J.S.; Zhu, G.; et al. Blockade of B7-H1 and PD-1 by monoclonal antibodies potentiates cancer therapeutic immunity. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 1089–1096. [Google Scholar]
  20. Thompson, R.H.; Dong, H.; Kwon, E.D. Implications of B7-H1 expression in clear cell carcinoma of the kidney for prognostication and therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 709s–C715s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Muenst, S.; Schaerli, A.R.; Gao, F.; Daster, S.; Trella, E.; Droeser, R.A.; Muraro, M.G.; Zajac, P.; Zanetti, R.; Gillanders, W.E.; et al. Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is associated with poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2014, 146, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, M.; Dong, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Xuan, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q. The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 studies with 1,901 patients. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kiyasu, J.; Miyoshi, H.; Hirata, A.; Arakawa, F.; Ichikawa, A.; Niino, D.; Sugita, Y.; Yufu, Y.; Choi, I.; Abe, Y.; et al. Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 is associated with poor overall survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2015, 126, 2193–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Topalian, S.L.; Hodi, F.S.; Brahmer, J.R.; Gettinger, S.N.; Smith, D.C.; McDermott, D.F.; Powderly, J.D.; Carvajal, R.D.; Sosman, J.A.; Atkins, M.B.; et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2443–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brahmer, J.R.; Tykodi, S.S.; Chow, L.Q.; Hwu, W.J.; Topalian, S.L.; Hwu, P.; Drake, C.G.; Camacho, L.H.; Kauh, J.; Odunsi, K.; et al. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2455–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ansell, S.M.; Lesokhin, A.M.; Borrello, I.; Halwani, A.; Scott, E.C.; Gutierrez, M.; Schuster, S.J.; Millenson, M.M.; Cattry, D.; Freeman, G.J.; et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Younes, A.; Santoro, A.; Shipp, M.; Zinzani, P.L.; Timmerman, J.M.; Ansell, S.; Armand, P.; Fanale, M.; Ratanatharathorn, V.; Kuruvilla, J.; et al. Nivolumab for classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma after failure of both autologous stem-cell transplantation and brentuximab vedotin: A multicentre, multicohort, single-arm phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016, 17, 1283–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Tamura, H.; Dan, K.; Tamada, K.; Nakamura, K.; Shioi, Y.; Hyodo, H.; Wang, S.D.; Dong, H.; Chen, L.; Ogata, K. Expression of functional B7-H2 and B7.2 costimulatory molecules and their prognostic implications in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 5708–5717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kondo, A.; Yamashita, T.; Tamura, H.; Zhao, W.; Tsuji, T.; Shimizu, M.; Shinya, E.; Takahashi, H.; Tamada, K.; Chen, L.; et al. Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha induce an immunoinhibitory molecule, B7-H1, via nuclear factor-kappaB activation in blasts in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2010, 116, 1124–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yamamoto, R.; Nishikori, M.; Kitawaki, T.; Sakai, T.; Hishizawa, M.; Tashima, M.; Kondo, T.; Ohmori, K.; Kurata, M.; Hayashi, T.; et al. PD-1-PD-1 ligand interaction contributes to immunosuppressive microenvironment of Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2008, 111, 3220–3224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Andorsky, D.J.; Yamada, R.E.; Said, J.; Pinkus, G.S.; Betting, D.J.; Timmerman, J.M. Programmed death ligand 1 is expressed by non-hodgkin lymphomas and inhibits the activity of tumor-associated T cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 4232–4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Green, M.R.; Monti, S.; Rodig, S.J.; Juszczynski, P.; Currie, T.; O’Donnell, E.; Chapuy, B.; Takeyama, K.; Neuberg, D.; Golub, T.R.; et al. Integrative analysis reveals selective 9p24.1 amplification, increased PD-1 ligand expression, and further induction via JAK2 in nodular sclerosing Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2010, 116, 3268–3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Wilcox, R.A.; Feldman, A.L.; Wada, D.A.; Yang, Z.Z.; Comfere, N.I.; Dong, H.; Kwon, E.D.; Novak, A.J.; Markovic, S.N.; Pittelkow, M.R.; et al. B7-H1 (PD-L1, CD274) suppresses host immunity in T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Blood 2009, 114, 2149–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kozako, T.; Yoshimitsu, M.; Fujiwara, H.; Masamoto, I.; Horai, S.; White, Y.; Akimoto, M.; Suzuki, S.; Matsushita, K.; Uozumi, K.; et al. PD-1/PD-L1 expression in human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 carriers and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma patients. Leukemia 2009, 23, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tamura, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Yamashita, T.; Tanosaki, S.; Okuyama, N.; Kondo, A.; Hyodo, H.; Shinya, E.; Takahashi, H.; Dong, H.; et al. Marrow stromal cells induce B7-H1 expression on myeloma cells, generating aggressive characteristics in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2013, 27, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Liu, J.; Hamrouni, A.; Wolowiec, D.; Coiteux, V.; Kuliczkowski, K.; Hetuin, D.; Saudemont, A.; Quesnel, B. Plasma cells from multiple myeloma patients express B7-H1 (PD-L1) and increase expression after stimulation with IFN-{gamma} and TLR ligands via a MyD88-, TRAF6-, and MEK-dependent pathway. Blood 2007, 110, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dhodapkar, M.V.; Sexton, R.; Das, R.; Dhodapkar, K.M.; Zhang, L.; Sundaram, R.; Soni, S.; Crowley, J.J.; Orlowski, R.Z.; Barlogie, B. Prospective analysis of antigen-specific immunity, stem-cell antigens, and immune checkpoints in monoclonal gammopathy. Blood 2015, 126, 2475–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Paiva, B.; Azpilikueta, A.; Puig, N.; Ocio, E.M.; Sharma, R.; Oyajobi, B.O.; Labiano, S.; San-Segundo, L.; Rodriguez, A.; Aires-Mejia, I.; et al. PD-L1/PD-1 presence in the tumor microenvironment and activity of PD-1 blockade in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2015, 29, 2110–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kelly, K.R.; Espitia, C.M.; Zhao, W.; Wu, K.; Visconte, V.; Anwer, F.; Calton, C.M.; Carew, J.S.; Nawrocki, S.T. Oncolytic reovirus sensitizes multiple myeloma cells to anti-PD-L1 therapy. Leukemia 2018, 32, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sponaas, A.M.; Moharrami, N.N.; Feyzi, E.; Standal, T.; Holth Rustad, E.; Waage, A.; Sundan, A. PDL1 Expression on Plasma and Dendritic Cells in Myeloma Bone Marrow Suggests Benefit of Targeted anti PD1-PDL1 Therapy. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gorgun, G.; Samur, M.K.; Cowens, K.B.; Paula, S.; Bianchi, G.; Anderson, J.E.; White, R.E.; Singh, A.; Ohguchi, H.; Suzuki, R.; et al. Lenalidomide Enhances Immune Checkpoint Blockade-Induced Immune Response in Multiple Myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 4607–4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hallett, W.H.; Jing, W.; Drobyski, W.R.; Johnson, B.D. Immunosuppressive effects of multiple myeloma are overcome by PD-L1 blockade. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011, 17, 1133–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Benson, D.M., Jr.; Bakan, C.E.; Mishra, A.; Hofmeister, C.C.; Efebera, Y.; Becknell, B.; Baiocchi, R.A.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.; Smith, M.K.; et al. The PD-1/PD-L1 axis modulates the natural killer cell versus multiple myeloma effect: A therapeutic target for CT-011, a novel monoclonal anti-PD-1 antibody. Blood 2010, 116, 2286–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rosenblatt, J.; Glotzbecker, B.; Mills, H.; Vasir, B.; Tzachanis, D.; Levine, J.D.; Joyce, R.M.; Wellenstein, K.; Keefe, W.; Schickler, M.; et al. PD-1 blockade by CT-011, anti-PD-1 antibody, enhances ex vivo T-cell responses to autologous dendritic cell/myeloma fusion vaccine. J. Immunother. 2011, 34, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kwon, M.; Kim, C.G.; Lee, H.; Cho, H.; Kim, Y.; Lee, E.C.; Choi, S.J.; Park, J.; Seo, I.H.; Bogen, B.; et al. PD-1 Blockade Reinvigorates Bone Marrow CD8(+) T Cells from Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the Presence of TGFbeta Inhibitors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 1644–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, Q.; Lin, W.; Tang, X.; Li, S.; Guo, L.; Lin, Y.; Kwok, H.F. The Roles of microRNAs in Regulating the Expression of PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Dong, Z.Y.; Wu, S.P.; Liao, R.Q.; Huang, S.M.; Wu, Y.L. Potential biomarker for checkpoint blockade immunotherapy and treatment strategy. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 4251–4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, J.; Jiang, C.C.; Jin, L.; Zhang, X.D. Regulation of PD-L1: A novel role of pro-survival signalling in cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sanmamed, M.F.; Chen, L. Inducible expression of B7-H1 (PD-L1) and its selective role in tumor site immune modulation. Cancer J. 2014, 20, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Yang, Y.; Hsu, J.M.; Sun, L.; Chan, L.C.; Li, C.W.; Hsu, J.L.; Wei, Y.; Xia, W.; Hou, J.; Qiu, Y.; et al. Palmitoylation stabilizes PD-L1 to promote breast tumor growth. Cell Res. 2019, 29, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Woods, D.M.; Sodre, A.L.; Villagra, A.; Sarnaik, A.; Sotomayor, E.M.; Weber, J. HDAC Inhibition Upregulates PD-1 Ligands in Melanoma and Augments Immunotherapy with PD-1 Blockade. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2015, 3, 1375–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Gong, A.Y.; Zhou, R.; Hu, G.; Liu, J.; Sosnowska, D.; Drescher, K.M.; Dong, H.; Chen, X.M. Cryptosporidium parvum induces B7-H1 expression in cholangiocytes by down-regulating microRNA-513. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 201, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Wang, W.; Li, F.; Mao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Sun, J.; Li, R.; Liu, C.; Chen, W.; Hua, D.; Zhang, X. A miR-570 binding site polymorphism in the B7-H1 gene is associated with the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Hum. Genet. 2013, 132, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chen, L.; Gibbons, D.L.; Goswami, S.; Cortez, M.A.; Ahn, Y.H.; Byers, L.A.; Zhang, X.; Yi, X.; Dwyer, D.; Lin, W.; et al. Metastasis is regulated via microRNA-200/ZEB1 axis control of tumour cell PD-L1 expression and intratumoral immunosuppression. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, X.; Li, J.; Dong, K.; Lin, F.; Long, M.; Ouyang, Y.; Wei, J.; Chen, X.; Weng, Y.; He, T.; et al. Tumor suppressor miR-34a targets PD-L1 and functions as a potential immunotherapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell. Signal. 2015, 27, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, C.W.; Lim, S.O.; Xia, W.; Lee, H.H.; Chan, L.C.; Kuo, C.W.; Khoo, K.H.; Chang, S.S.; Cha, J.H.; Kim, T.; et al. Glycosylation and stabilization of programmed death ligand-1 suppresses T-cell activity. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Tremblay-LeMay, R.; Rastgoo, N.; Chang, H. Modulating PD-L1 expression in multiple myeloma: An alternative strategy to target the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 27, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Morales-Betanzos, C.A.; Lee, H.; Gonzalez Ericsson, P.I.; Balko, J.M.; Johnson, D.B.; Zimmerman, L.J.; Liebler, D.C. Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Analysis of PD-L1 Protein Expression, N-glycosylation and Expression Stoichiometry with PD-1 and PD-L2 in Human Melanoma. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2017, 16, 1705–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Horita, H.; Law, A.; Hong, S.; Middleton, K. Identifying Regulatory Posttranslational Modifications of PD-L1: A Focus on Monoubiquitinaton. Neoplasia 2017, 19, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lim, S.O.; Li, C.W.; Xia, W.; Cha, J.H.; Chan, L.C.; Wu, Y.; Chang, S.S.; Lin, W.C.; Hsu, J.M.; Hsu, Y.H.; et al. Deubiquitination and Stabilization of PD-L1 by CSN5. Cancer Cell 2016, 30, 925–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Kataoka, K.; Shiraishi, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Sakata, S.; Matsumoto, M.; Nagano, S.; Maeda, T.; Nagata, Y.; Kitanaka, A.; Mizuno, S.; et al. Aberrant PD-L1 expression through 3’-UTR disruption in multiple cancers. Nature 2016, 534, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lee, S.J.; Jang, B.C.; Lee, S.W.; Yang, Y.I.; Suh, S.I.; Park, Y.M.; Oh, S.; Shin, J.G.; Yao, S.; Chen, L.; et al. Interferon regulatory factor-1 is prerequisite to the constitutive expression and IFN-gamma-induced upregulation of B7-H1 (CD274). FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Zaidi, M.R.; Merlino, G. The two faces of interferon-gamma in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 6118–6124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Ikeda, H.; Old, L.J.; Schreiber, R.D. The roles of IFN gamma in protection against tumor development and cancer immunoediting. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002, 13, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, Z.; Pradera, F.; Kammertoens, T.; Li, B.; Liu, S.; Qin, Z. Cross-talk between T cells and innate immune cells is crucial for IFN-gamma-dependent tumor rejection. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 1568–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Martin-Fontecha, A.; Thomsen, L.L.; Brett, S.; Gerard, C.; Lipp, M.; Lanzavecchia, A.; Sallusto, F. Induced recruitment of NK cells to lymph nodes provides IFN-gamma for T(H)1 priming. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 1260–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jego, G.; Bataille, R.; Geffroy-Luseau, A.; Descamps, G.; Pellat-Deceunynck, C. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns are growth and survival factors for human myeloma cells through Toll-like receptors. Leukemia 2006, 20, 1130–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Bohnhorst, J.; Rasmussen, T.; Moen, S.H.; Flottum, M.; Knudsen, L.; Borset, M.; Espevik, T.; Sundan, A. Toll-like receptors mediate proliferation and survival of multiple myeloma cells. Leukemia 2006, 20, 1138–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chen, H.; Li, M.; Sanchez, E.; Soof, C.M.; Bujarski, S.; Ng, N.; Cao, J.; Hekmati, T.; Tanenbaum, E.J.; Zahab, B.; et al. The JAK inhibitor blocks PD-L1, PD-L2 and CD44 expression in multiple myeloma (MM) and sensitizes MM cells to lenalidomide and steroids. Blood 2018, 132 (Suppl. 1), 1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vincent-Fabert, C.; Roland, L.; Zimber-Strobl, U.; Feuillard, J.; Faumont, N. Pre-clinical blocking of PD-L1 molecule, which expression is down regulated by NF-kappaB, JAK1/JAK2 and BTK inhibitors, induces regression of activated B-cell lymphoma. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019, 17, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Driscoll, J.; Aslam, I.; Malek, E. Eosinophils Upregulate PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression to enhance the immunosuppressive microenvironment in multiple myeloma. Blood 2017, 130 (Suppl. 1), 4417. [Google Scholar]
  72. An, G.; Acharya, C.; Feng, X.; Wen, K.; Zhong, M.; Zhang, L.; Munshi, N.C.; Qiu, L.; Tai, Y.T.; Anderson, K.C. Osteoclasts promote immune suppressive microenvironment in multiple myeloma: Therapeutic implication. Blood 2016, 128, 1590–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Stocker, N.; Gaugler, B.; Ricard, L.; de Vassoigne, F.; Marjanovic, Z.; Mohty, M.; Malard, F. Daratumumab prevents programmed death ligand-1 expression on antigen-presenting cells in de novo multiple myeloma. Cancer Med. 2020, 9, 2077–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ishibashi, M.; Yamamoto, J.; Ito, T.; Handa, H.; Inokuchi, K.; Takahashi, H.; Tamura, H. Upregulation of PD-L1 on myeloma cells by immunomodulatory agents potentiates the effect of durvalumab. In Proceedings of the 60th ASH Annual Meeting & Exposition, San Diego, CA, USA, 1–4 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
  75. Ray, A.; Das, D.S.; Song, Y.; Hideshima, T.; Tai, Y.T.; Chauhan, D.; Anderson, K.C. Combination of a novel HDAC6 inhibitor ACY-241 and anti-PD-L1 antibody enhances anti-tumor immunity and cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2018, 32, 843–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mimura, N.; Hideshima, T.; Anderson, K.C. Novel therapeutic strategies for multiple myeloma. Exp. Hematol. 2015, 3, 732–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Ray, A.; Das, D.S.; Song, Y.; Richardson, P.; Munshi, N.C.; Chauhan, D.; Anderson, K.C. Targeting PD1-PDL1 immune checkpoint in plasmacytoid dendritic cell interactions with T cells, natural killer cells and multiple myeloma cells. Leukemia 2015, 29, 1441–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Chen, D.; Tang, P.; Liu, L.; Wang, F.; Xing, H.; Sun, L.; Jiang, Z. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote cell proliferation of multiple myeloma through inhibiting T cell immune responses via PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 858–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Ishibashi, M.; Tamura, H.; Sunakawa, M.; Kondo-Onodera, A.; Okuyama, N.; Hamada, Y.; Moriya, K.; Choi, I.; Tamada, K.; Inokuchi, K. Myeloma Drug Resistance Induced by Binding of Myeloma B7-H1 (PD-L1) to PD-1. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2016, 4, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Mussetti, A.; Pellegrinelli, A.; Cieri, N.; Garzone, G.; Dominoni, F.; Cabras, A.; Montefusco, V. PD-L1, LAG3, and HLA-DR are increasingly expressed during smoldering myeloma progression. Ann. Hematol. 2019, 98, 1713–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Frigola, X.; Inman, B.A.; Lohse, C.M.; Krco, C.J.; Cheville, J.C.; Thompson, R.H.; Leibovich, B.; Blute, M.L.; Dong, H.; Kwon, E.D. Identification of a soluble form of B7-H1 that retains immunosuppressive activity and is associated with aggressive renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 1915–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Finkelmeier, F.; Canli, O.; Tal, A.; Pleli, T.; Trojan, J.; Schmidt, M.; Kronenberger, B.; Zeuzem, S.; Piiper, A.; Greten, F.R.; et al. High levels of the soluble programmed death-ligand (sPD-L1) identify hepatocellular carcinoma patients with a poor prognosis. Eur. J. Cancer 2016, 59, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Shigemori, T.; Toiyama, Y.; Okugawa, Y.; Yamamoto, A.; Yin, C.; Narumi, A.; Ichikawa, T.; Ide, S.; Shimura, T.; Fujikawa, H.; et al. Soluble PD-L1 Expression in Circulation as a Predictive Marker for Recurrence and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer: Direct Comparison of the Clinical Burden Between Tissue and Serum PD-L1 Expression. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 26, 876–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Rossille, D.; Gressier, M.; Damotte, D.; Maucort-Boulch, D.; Pangault, C.; Semana, G.; Le Gouill, S.; Haioun, C.; Tarte, K.; Lamy, T.; et al. High level of soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 in blood impacts overall survival in aggressive diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma: Results from a French multicenter clinical trial. Leukemia 2014, 28, 2367–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sunakawa, M.; Tamura, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Sasaki, M.; Handa, H.; Imai, Y.; Tanaka, J.; Tanosaki, S.; Ito, S.; Inokuchi, K. Clinical impact and possible immunosuppressive function of soluble B7-H1 (PD-L1) in multiple myeloma. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017, 17, e110–e111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, H.; Wang, W.D.; Chen, X.Q.; Geng, Q.R.; Xia, Z.J.; Lu, Y. Serum levels of soluble programmed death ligand 1 predict treatment response and progression free survival in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 41228–41236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Huang, S.Y.; Lin, H.H.; Lin, C.W.; Li, C.C.; Yao, M.; Tang, J.L.; Hou, H.A.; Tsay, W.; Chou, S.J.; Cheng, C.L.; et al. Soluble PD-L1: A biomarker to predict progression of autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 62490–62502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Chen, G.; Huang, A.C.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, G.; Wu, M.; Xu, W.; Yu, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, B.; Sun, H.; et al. Exosomal PD-L1 contributes to immunosuppression and is associated with anti-PD-1 response. Nature 2018, 560, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Colombo, M.; Giannandrea, D.; Lesma, E.; Basile, A.; Chiaramonte, R. Extracellular Vesicles Enhance Multiple Myeloma Metastatic Dissemination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, E3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Chauhan, D.; Singh, A.V.; Brahmandam, M.; Carrasco, R.; Bandi, M.; Hideshima, T.; Bianchi, G.; Podar, K.; Tai, Y.T.; Mitsiades, C.; et al. Functional interaction of plasmacytoid dendritic cells with multiple myeloma cells: A therapeutic target. Cancer Cell 2009, 16, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Lesokhin, A.M.; Ansell, S.M.; Armand, P.; Scott, E.C.; Halwani, A.; Gutierrez, M.; Millenson, M.M.; Cohen, A.D.; Schuster, S.J.; Lebovic, D.; et al. Nivolumab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancy: Preliminary Results of a Phase Ib Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 2698–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Atanackovic, D.; Luetkens, T.; Kröger, N. Coinhibitory molecule PD-1 as a potential target for the immunotherapy of multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2014, 28, 993–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Dosani, T.; Carlsten, M.; Maric, I.; Landgren, O. The cellular immune system in myelomagenesis: NK cells and T cells in the development of myeloma and their uses in immunotherapies. Blood Cancer J. 2015, 5, e306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Ramachandran, I.R.; Martner, A.; Pisklakova, A.; Condamine, T.; Chase, T.; Vogl, T.; Roth, J.; Gabrilovich, D.; Nefedova, Y. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells regulate growth of multiple myeloma by inhibiting T cells in bone marrow. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 3815–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Mozaffari, F.; Hansson, L.; Kiaii, S.; Ju, X.; Rossmann, E.D.; Rabbani, H.; Mellstedt, H.; Osterborg, A. Signalling molecules and cytokine production in T cells of multiple myeloma-increased abnormalities with advancing stage. Br. J. Haematol. 2004, 124, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Guillerey, C.; Harjunpaa, H.; Carrie, N.; Kassem, S.; Teo, T.; Miles, K.; Krumeich, S.; Weulersse, M.; Cuisinier, M.; Stannard, K.; et al. TIGIT immune checkpoint blockade restores CD8(+) T-cell immunity against multiple myeloma. Blood 2018, 132, 1689–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. San Miguel, J.F.; Gonzalez, M.; Gascon, A.; Moro, M.J.; Hernandez, J.M.; Ortega, F.; Jimenez, R.; Guerras, L.; Romero, M.; Casanova, F.; et al. Lymphoid subsets and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Cooperative Group for the Study of Monoclonal Gammopathies. Br. J. Haematol. 1992, 80, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Koike, M.; Sekigawa, I.; Okada, M.; Matsumoto, M.; Iida, N.; Hashimoto, H.; Oshimi, K. Relationship between CD4 (+)/CD8 (+) T cell ratio and T cell activation in multiple myeloma: Reference to IL-16. Leuk. Res. 2002, 26, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lawrence, M.S.; Stojanov, P.; Polak, P.; Kryukov, G.V.; Cibulskis, K.; Sivachenko, A.; Carter, S.L.; Stewart, C.; Mermel, C.H.; Roberts, S.A.; et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 2013, 499, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ogawara, H.; Handa, H.; Yamazaki, T.; Toda, T.; Yoshida, K.; Nishimoto, N.; Al-ma’Quol, W.H.; Kaneko, Y.; Matsushima, T.; Tsukamoto, N.; et al. High Th1/Th2 ratio in patients with multiple myeloma. Leuk. Res. 2005, 29, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Davies, F.E.; Raje, N.; Hideshima, T.; Lentzsch, S.; Young, G.; Tai, Y.T.; Lin, B.; Podar, K.; Gupta, D.; Chauhan, D.; et al. Thalidomide and immunomodulatory derivatives augment natural killer cell cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma. Blood 2001, 98, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Galustian, C.; Meyer, B.; Labarthe, M.C.; Dredge, K.; Klaschka, D.; Henry, J.; Todryk, S.; Chen, R.; Muller, G.; Stirling, D.; et al. The anti-cancer agents lenalidomide and pomalidomide inhibit the proliferation and function of T regulatory cells. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2009, 58, 1033–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Luptakova, K.; Rosenblatt, J.; Glotzbecker, B.; Mills, H.; Stroopinsky, D.; Kufe, T.; Vasir, B.; Arnason, J.; Tzachanis, D.; Zwicker, J.I.; et al. Lenalidomide enhances anti-myeloma cellular immunity. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2013, 62, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Mateos, M.V.; Orlowski, R.Z.; Ocio, E.M.; Rodriguez-Otero, P.; Reece, D.; Moreau, P.; Munshi, N.; Avigan, D.E.; Siegel, D.S.; Ghori, R.; et al. Pembrolizumab combined with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Phase I KEYNOTE-023 study. Br. J. Haematol. 2019, 186, e117–e121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Badros, A.; Hyjek, E.; Ma, N.; Lesokhin, A.; Dogan, A.; Rapoport, A.P.; Kocoglu, M.; Lederer, E.; Philip, S.; Milliron, T.; et al. Pembrolizumab, pomalidomide, and low-dose dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2017, 130, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Mateos, M.V.; Blacklock, H.; Schjesvold, F.; Oriol, A.; Simpson, D.; George, A.; Goldschmidt, H.; Larocca, A.; Chanan-Khan, A.; Sherbenou, D.; et al. Pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (KEYNOTE-183): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019, 6, e459–e469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kearl, T.J.; Jing, W.; Gershan, J.A.; Johnson, B.D. Programmed death receptor-1/programmed death receptor ligand-1 blockade after transient lymphodepletion to treat myeloma. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 5620–5628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cancers 12 00924 g001 550
Figure 1. PD-L1 induced by the MM microenvironment.
Figure 1. PD-L1 induced by the MM microenvironment.
Cancers 12 00924 g001
Table
Table 1. Mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation of PD-L1 on tumor cells.
Table 1. Mechanism of post-transcriptional regulation of PD-L1 on tumor cells.
Downregulation of PD-L1
Deacetylation
miRNAs (miRNA-34a, miRNA-200, miRNA-513, miRNA-570)
Phosphorylation-dependent proteasome degradation induced by GSK3β
Stabilized PD-L1
DHHC(Asp-His-His-Cys)3-dependent palmitoylation (inhibition of PD-L1 ubiquitination)
EGF-mediated glycosylation (GSK3β inactivation)
Reduction of PD-L1 degradation by EGF via B3NT3 upregulation
PTEN/PI2K/mTOR/S6K1 pathway
CSN5-mediated deubiquitination induced by TNF-α
miRNA, microRNA; GSK3β, glycogen synthase kinase 3β; EGF, epidermal growth factor; CSN5, COP9 signalosome 5.
Table
Table 2. PD-1 inhibitors in combination with IMiDs in patients with relapsed/refractory MM.
Table 2. PD-1 inhibitors in combination with IMiDs in patients with relapsed/refractory MM.
TreatmentNPrior Therapy LinesAge, Median (Range), Years Patient CharacteristicsORR/CR/VGPRPFS/OS, MonthsAdverse Events Grade ≥ 3
Nivolumab (Phase 1b) [85]272–3; 44%4–5; 30%≥6; 22%63(32–81)-4%/4%/0%-19%
PEM + Rd(Phase 1)KEYNOTE-023 [97]620–1; 30.6%2–3; 35.5%≥4; 33.9%61(46–77)HRC 10%, LEN-refractory 76%, prior ASCT 87%44%/4%/12%7.2/N.R.60% (neutropenia 27%, thrombocytopenia 16%, anemia 8%, hyperglycemia 7%)
PEM + Pd (Phase 2) [98]48Median 3, range 2–564(35–83)HRC 62%, PI/IMiD-refractory 73%,prior ASCT 70%60%/8%/27%17.4/N.R.40% (hematologic toxicities 40%, hyperglycemia 25%, pneumonia 15%)
PEM + Pd (Phase 3) KEYNOTE-183 [99]125≥265(45–94)HRC 22%34%5·6 (8·4 in Pd) /N.R.63% (treatment-related deaths 3%; unknown cause, neutropenic sepsis, myocarditis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome)
ORR, overall response rate; CR, complete response; VGPR, very good partial response; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; PEM, pembrolizumab; Rd, lenalidomide + dexamethasone; LEN; lenalidomide; HRC, high-risk cytogenetics; ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; N.R., not reached; Pd, pomalidomide + dexamethasone; PI, proteasome inhibitor; IMiD, immunomodulatory drug.
Table
Table 3. Clinical trials using blockade of the PD-L1−PD-1 pathway to prevent disease progression in multiple myeloma.
Table 3. Clinical trials using blockade of the PD-L1−PD-1 pathway to prevent disease progression in multiple myeloma.
TreatmentPatientsPhaseStatusIdentifier
PD-1 inhibitors
PembrolizumabIntermediate or high-risk SMMEarly phase 1Active, not recruitingNCT02603887
PembrolizumabMM during lymphopenia post-HDT/ASCTPhase 2CompletedNCT02331368
Nivolumab + LEN + DEXHigh-risk SMMPhase 2SuspendedNCT029003381
PD-L1 inhibitors
AtezolizumabHigh-risk asymptomatic MMPhase 1SuspendedNCT02784483
PD-L1 peptide vaccineMM post-HDT/ASCTPhase 1Active, not recruitingNCT03042793
PD-L1 peptide vaccineHigh-risk SMMPhase 2RecruitingNCT03850522
SMM, smoldering multiple myeloma; HDT/ASCT, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation; LEN, lenalidomide; DEX, dexamethasone.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tamura, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Sunakawa-Kii, M.; Inokuchi, K. PD-L1–PD-1 Pathway in the Pathophysiology of Multiple Myeloma. Cancers 2020, 12, 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040924

AMA Style

Tamura H, Ishibashi M, Sunakawa-Kii M, Inokuchi K. PD-L1–PD-1 Pathway in the Pathophysiology of Multiple Myeloma. Cancers. 2020; 12(4):924. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040924

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tamura, Hideto, Mariko Ishibashi, Mika Sunakawa-Kii, and Koiti Inokuchi. 2020. "PD-L1–PD-1 Pathway in the Pathophysiology of Multiple Myeloma" Cancers 12, no. 4: 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040924

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop