Next Article in Journal
Effect of Estrogen Receptor Status on Circulatory Immune and Metabolomics Profiles of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Enrolled for Neoadjuvant Targeted Chemotherapy
Next Article in Special Issue
YB-1 Mediates TNF-Induced Pro-Survival Signaling by Regulating NF-κB Activation
Previous Article in Journal
NK Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Communication between the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway and Y-Box Binding Protein-1 in Gynecological Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/cancers12020315
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dephosphorylation of YB-1 is Required for Nuclear Localisation During G2 Phase of the Cell Cycle

by
Sunali Mehta
1,2,†,
Cushla McKinney
1,†,
Michael Algie
1,3,
Chandra S. Verma
4,5,6,
Srinivasaraghavan Kannan
4,
Rhodri Harfoot
1,
Tara K. Bartolec
7,
Puja Bhatia
1,
Alistair J. Fisher
1,
Maree L. Gould
1,
Kim Parker
1,
Anthony J. Cesare
7,
Heather E. Cunliffe
1,
Scott B. Cohen
7,
Torsten Kleffmann
3,
Antony W. Braithwaite
1,2,8 and
Adele G. Woolley
1,2,*
1
Department of Pathology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
2
Maurice Wilkins Centre for Biodiscovery, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
3
Centre for Protein Research, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
4
Bioinformatics Institute (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, 07-01 Matrix, Singapore 138671, Singapore
5
School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637551, Singapore
6
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117558, Singapore
7
Children’s Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
8
Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria University, Wellington 6242, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equal contribution.
Cancers 2020, 12(2), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12020315
Submission received: 21 November 2019 / Revised: 18 January 2020 / Accepted: 25 January 2020 / Published: 29 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Close links between Cold Shock Proteins and Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Elevated levels of nuclear Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1) are linked to poor prognosis in cancer. It has been proposed that entry into the nucleus requires specific proteasomal cleavage. However, evidence for cleavage is contradictory and high YB-1 levels are prognostic regardless of cellular location. Here, using confocal microscopy and mass spectrometry, we find no evidence of specific proteolytic cleavage. Doxorubicin treatment, and the resultant G2 arrest, leads to a significant increase in the number of cells where YB-1 is not found in the cytoplasm, suggesting that its cellular localisation is variable during the cell cycle. Live cell imaging reveals that the location of YB-1 is linked to progression through the cell cycle. Primarily perinuclear during G1 and S phases, YB-1 enters the nucleus as cells transition through late G2/M and exits at the completion of mitosis. Atomistic modelling and molecular dynamics simulations show that dephosphorylation of YB-1 at serine residues 102, 165 and 176 increases the accessibility of the nuclear localisation signal (NLS). We propose that this conformational change facilitates nuclear entry during late G2/M. Thus, the phosphorylation status of YB-1 determines its cellular location.

1. Introduction

Y-box-binding protein 1 (YB-1; encoded by YBX1), is a multifunctional protein involved in numerous biological processes including cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and drug resistance. There have been a number of reports linking YB-1 cleavage and subsequent nuclear translocation to poor cancer prognosis, reviewed in [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. When in the nucleus, YB-1 acts as a transcription factor where it transactivates the growth promoting genes c-ERBB2 [10] and EGFR [11] and also downregulates the death-promoting genes TP53 [12] and FAS [13]. Nuclear translocation of YB-1 is reported to occur in a cell cycle dependent fashion [14,15] and in response to a range of stressors including DNA damaging agents [16,17,18]. As tumour cells are thought to be under constant stress due to the accumulation of mutations, the significance of nuclear YB-1 in cancer has been the focus of ongoing investigations. Nuclear YB-1 has been shown to be a negative prognostic marker in patients with a range of cancers including synovial sarcoma [19], breast [3], prostate [2] and non-small cell lung cancers [1]. However, other studies have found that it is the overall level of YB-1 protein (and mRNA), rather than its nuclear location, which is associated with high grade cancers [6,20,21,22].
Reports that increased nuclear YB-1 is linked to both tumour progression and drug resistance stimulated investigations into the molecular mechanism underpinning YB-1 transcriptional activation. A model of proteasome-mediated cleavage by the 20S proteasome through sequence-specific endoproteolytic cleavage was proposed [7,8]. Cleavage would allow the N-terminal region of YB-1 to be free of the dominant cytoplasmic retention signal (CRS; aa 247–267) [23], thus enabling the nuclear localisation signal (NLS; aa 186–205 [24]) to direct the cleaved N-terminal product to the nucleus (Supplementary Figure S1A). It was suggested that this proteolytic activation is associated with genotoxic stress, and that cleaved nuclear YB-1 is a distinct species with transcription factor activity compared to the full-length cytoplasmic YB-1 [7]. Subsequent domain mapping revealed the presence of three additional NLS at aa 149–156, 185–194 and 276–292 [9], with part of the latter located within the CRS (aa 264–290) previously proposed by Bader et al. [24]. Van Roeyen et al. also reported the presence of a C-terminal fragment in the nucleus following proteolytic cleavage [9], rather than the N-terminus, as previously reported [7]. We have sequenced nuclear YB-1 using mass spectrometry and found no evidence of cleavage at the aa 219/220 site [25]. Due to these inconsistencies within the literature we decided to further investigate whether we could detect any evidence of specific proteolytic cleavage.
In this paper we used YB-1 plasmids with tags at each end of the protein and carried out immunofluorescent (IF) labelling after transfection of several cancer cell lines, either untreated or treated with doxorubicin (DOX), or paclitaxel (PTX). We also used confocal and live cell imaging and in some cases mass spectrometry of purified YB-1 protein. Our results provide no compelling evidence of specific cleavage at the site originally proposed in the 20S model [7,8]. We do however confirm that YB-1 migrates to the nucleus but we make the novel observation that this occurs during late G2/M coinciding with the onset of nuclear membrane disruption. Finally, we provide mechanistic evidence using 3D structural modelling, that the phosphorylation status of YB-1 alters the accessibility of both the cytoplasmic retention signal (CRS) and the nuclear localisation signal (NLS) and confirm this experimentally by showing that when these serine residues are mutated, YB-1 remains in the nucleus. We propose that dynamic changes in the phosphorylation status of specific residues of YB-1 and the resultant conformational fluctuation in the accessibility of both the NRS and the CRS, regulates the cellular location of YB-1.

2. Results

2.1. Full Length YB-1 is Present in Both Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Compartments

To determine whether YB-1 is full length or cleaved upon nuclear translocation we transfected three cancer cell lines (A549, H1299 and Saos-2) with a plasmid carrying both N- and C-terminal labels (HAYB-1FLAG, Supplementary Figure S1A) and quantitated the location of each tag using IF labelling of tag-specific antibodies. Confocal images of representative cells from each cell line are shown in Figure 1A. Both anti-HA (red) and anti-FLAG (green) antibodies detecting the N and C terminus of HAYB-1FLAG respectively, were found in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of all three cell lines and these two labels are co-localised (Figure 1A, lower panels). We quantitated the intensity of HAYB-1 and YB-1FLAG in at least 100 cells from each cell line. The nucleus and cytoplasm were defined using masks created by the imaging software (Figure 1B). Results from this analysis show that the average ratio of intensity per area of both HAYB-1 and YB-1FLAG is 1.0671 (range 0.8376–1.2966) for the three cell lines in either the nucleus or cytoplasm (Figure 1C), confirming that these two labels co-localise.
This was shown further by performing western blot analyses on whole cell lysates as well as cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions. Full length YB-1 protein (49kDa) is present in both cellular fractions (Supplementary Figure S2B, Tables S1–S3). There is no obvious evidence of enrichment for a smaller species (~32kDa) consistent with 20S proteasomal cleavage.
In further confirmation of this conclusion, we performed LC-MS/MS analysis of endogenous YB-1 immunopurified from the cytoplasm and nuclei of A549 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Results show (Supplementary Figure S1B; Table S5) that the peptides assigned to YB-1 from two independent runs cover the length of YB-1. Importantly, tryptic peptides (RPQYSNPPVQGEVMEGADNQGAGEQRPVR) spanning the proposed 20S proteasomal cleavage site (Supplementary Figure S1C) were identified in immunopurified YB-1 from cytoplasm (3/4 samples) and nucleus (3/4 samples; Supplementary Figure S8). Mass spectrometry indicates that full length YB-1 is in the nucleus of A549 and MDA-MB231 cells.

2.2. Specific Proteosomal Cleavage of YB-1 does not Occur in Response to Treatment with Doxorubicin or Paclitaxel

We next asked whether treatment with drugs causing genotoxic stress promotes YB-1 cleavage. We used either the topoisomerase inhibitor doxorubicin (DOX) or the microtubule inhibitor paclitaxel (PTX). We chose these two different treatments due to their differential effects on the cell cycle. DOX causes replicative stress leading to G2 phase arrest [26] and PTX causes cells to arrest in late G2/M and eventually the cells undergo death by mitotic catastrophe [27,28]. The dosages used for each of these drugs was chosen based on their IC50 values (Figure S2A). Cells were treated with either drug 24 hours after transfection with HAYB-1FLAG and IF analysis was carried out. Again, both anti-HA (red) and anti-FLAG (green) antibodies detecting the N and C terminals of HAYB-1FLAG were found in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of all three cell lines (Figure 2A). Quantitation of >100 cells was performed as above and the results show that the average ratio of intensity per area of both HAYB-1 and YB-1FLAG is 1.13 (range 0.9017–1.3561) for the three cell lines treated with either DOX or PTX (Figure 2B). These data show that both labels are present in equal intensities, providing evidence that YB-1 is full-length. In order to ensure that this effect is not due to differences in antibody specificity, we repeated these experiments with the opposite secondary antibodies (i.e., Alexa Fluor 568 (red) anti-rabbit (HA) /Alexa Fluor 488 (green) anti-mouse (FLAG) compared to Alexa Fluor 488 (green) anti-rabbit (HA)/Alexa Fluor 568 (red) anti-mouse (FLAG). These data are shown in Figure S3; quantification of signal intensities in Tables S6 and S7. The average ratios of the 2 fluorochromes is 1.02 (range: 0.54–1.31) shown in Figure S3B, essentially confirming the data in Figure 2B, implying that equal amounts of each tag are present in both compartments and arguing against proteolysis. There is one exception and that is with DOX treated nuclear YB-1 in the A549 cells where the ratio is ~0.5. suggesting relative loss of the C-terminus; but this was not consistent across experiments.
Cellular fractionation and immunoblotting confirm the presence of full length YB-1 in both nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments (Supplementary Figure S2). The blots also reveal the presence of smaller YB-1 fragments. In both the A549 and H1299 cells they are primarily associated with the whole-cell (WCL) lysates. In the merged western blots for these cells, the fragments appear as green, suggesting that the C-terminal end of the protein (with the red tag) is no longer present. In the Saos-2 cells, additional fragments are evident in the nuclear lysates. Again, in the merged image these bands are green, suggesting the absence of the C-terminus. There is also a red band in the WCL fraction at ~20 kDa that is present following treatment with either PTX or DOX, suggesting the absence of the N-terminus (carrying the green tag). The size of these smaller bands is not consistent with that of a fragment proposed in the cleavage model [7]. To try and understand whether these fragments were influenced by the location of the tags, we carried out the same nuclear fractionation experiment with FLAGYB-1HA construct. These data are shown in Figure S4. Again, we find the presence of additional fragments in the WCL and nuclear fragments, which are more numerous in the H1299 cells. Again, none of these fragments is consistent with proteolytic cleavage at the 219/220 site.
Of note, when we quantitated the cellular location of HAYB-1FLAG in response to DOX treatment, we surprisingly found many cells where YB-1 could not be detected in the cytoplasm (acytoplasmic; Figure 2C, D). As DOX leads to arrest in G2, this led us to consider the possibility that, in addition to the response to DNA-damaging agents, the nuclear location of YB-1 may be linked to cell cycle phase; and specifically, to the G2/M phases.

2.3. Nuclear Localisation of YB-1 Occurs during Late G2 Phase of the Cell Cycle

To investigate this possibility, A549 cells were transfected with the HAYB-1FLAG plasmid and subsequently stained with antibodies to both HA, FLAG and the nuclear envelope marker Lamin B1 to determine YB-1 location. As shown in Figure 3A, the cellular location of YB-1, as demonstrated by IF analysis of the HAYB-1FLAG-transfected cell varies. Due to the fact that cells round up in early mitosis some of this variation appears to be linked to the cell cycle. To investigate this further, we carried out live cell imaging to identify cell cycle phases at single cell resolution using A549 FUCCI cells carrying both mCherry (red)-cdt1 and mVenus (green)-geminin tags [29]. By linking these two proteins to fluorescent labels, cell cycle progression can be visualised in real time [30]. These cells were transfected with a YB-1 construct carrying the blue fluorescent protein 2 (YB-1EBFP2) marker. The data (Figure 3B) show that during G1, YB-1 EBFP2 is cytoplasmic (as shown by the red (cdt1) nucleus) but it begins to enter the nucleus in the G2 phase (as shown by the green (geminin) nucleus). During M phase, YB-1 EBFP2 (blue) appears centrally in the cell (Figure 3B, arrowed). During the earliest stage of mitosis (prophase) the paired copies of DNA condense and the nuclear envelope begins to disintegrate, enabling the DNA pairs to align with the central axis of the cell. Towards the end of mitosis, as the cell moves into telophase, the two daughter cells move into G1 and YB-1 is again present in the cytoplasmic compartment (Figure 3B).
To confirm that the observed movement of YB-1 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus during G2/M is not an artefact of exogenously expressed YB-1, we repeated this experiment in A549 cells that were synchronised using a double thymidine block and samples taken at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 hours followed by 15 min time intervals up to 8 hours after release of the second block. These data are shown in Figure 4. The upper row of this figure is a projection of a z-stack of adjacent 0.2 µm optical slices acquired by confocal microscopy. The rows below represent top, middle and bottom slices of each z-projection. As previously reported, YB-1 can be found in both the nucleus and/or cytoplasm, and is often found in the perinuclear region of cells [4,20,22,31].
Interestingly, when YB-1 is perinuclear, when visualised using conventional light microscopy it often appears to be nuclear. Comparison between the z-projection of a cell in G1 (top left-hand panel) and the slices shown below provides insight into why YB-1 may appear to be nuclear when viewed two-dimensionally. The green punctate staining that appears nuclear on the projected stack in the first column is on the outside of the nuclear envelope. YB-1 is found in the cytoplasm during G1 (Figure 4; column 1) and increasingly localises to the perinuclear region during the G2 phase (Figure 4; column 2). We used this localisation, clearly visible by microscopy, as a marker of G2. As the cells progress into the mitotic phase of the cell cycle, YB-1 becomes localised to the nucleus. This is evident (Figure 4; column 3) in prophase which is the first phase of mitosis and continues until anaphase (Figure 4; column 6). Prophase is characterised by disruption of the nuclear envelope (as evidenced by lamin B1 staining (shown in red)). YB-1 remains nuclear until the nuclear envelope is re-established at the end of anaphase and begins to return to the cytoplasmic compartment during telophase (the last stage of mitosis; Figure 4; column 7).

2.4. Nuclear Localisation of YB-1 is Dependent on Phosphorylation Status

Given that our data suggest that YB-1 nuclear translocation varies with cell cycle phase, we wished to understand how this process is controlled. Previously, phosphorylation of serine 102 [32,33,34,35], as well as phosphorylation of both serines 165 and 176 [36,37] have been shown to play a role in oncogenic activation. Given that two of these residues are close to the nuclear localisation signal (NLS; see Figure S1A) we hypothesised that the phosphorylation status of these residues would alter the tertiary structure of YB-1 and hence the accessibility of the nuclear localisation signal (NLS). Increased accessibility of the NLS and/or reduced accessibility of the CRS would theoretically result in an increased amount of YB-1 present in the nucleus. To test this hypothesis, we performed atomistic modelling of YB-1 to measure the solvent accessibility surface area (SASA) in Å2 of the nuclear localisation signal (NLS), using the I-TASSER pipeline followed by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Of the five potential models that were generated by the I-TASSER server (Figure S6), model 3 was selected as the predicted cold shock domain of this model was close to the known NMR structure of YB-1 [38].
As shown in the graph at the far right of Figure 5A, the accessible surface area of the NLS in YB-1 where all three serine residues are phosphorylated (YB-1phos; black line) is reduced compared to unphosphorylated (YB-1unphos; red line). Thus, phosphorylation reduces access to the NLS, increasing the likelihood of YB-1 remaining in the cytoplasm. Modelling of individual serine mutations (S102A, S165A and S176A; red, brown and green lines) shows that the SASA values for the mutants are increased. Therefore, the accessibility of the NLS (shown in blue on each of the models) is dependent on the phosphorylation of these serine residues. Conversely, Figure 5B shows that phosphorylation of these serine residues (YB-1phos) leads to an increase in the accessibility of the cytoplasmic retention signal (CRS; shown in orange in the models). Again, perturbation of this phosphorylation in the mutants reduces the SASA value of the CRS. The predictions from this modelling were confirmed by IF labelling of HA-tagged YB-1 plasmid constructs containing alanine mutations at each of these three serine residues (S102, S165 and S176) transfected into either A549/FUCCI or HCT116 cells. The subcellular location of HA-tagged YB-1 was carried out by confocal analysis of Z-stacks using the colour-profiling tool in Fiji2. Representative confocal images of HA-YB-1 and each of the three HA-tagged YB-1 serine-to-alanine mutants are shown in Figure 5C, where nuclear localisation of HA-YB-1 (green) is clearly evident in the mutants. Quantification of the IF analysis in > 100 cells transfected the mutants (Figure 5C, graphs) reveals the number of cells with nuclear YB-1 is significantly increased (p < 0.0001) compared to wild type (wt)YB-1. The inability of these residues to be phosphorylated reduces the accessibility of the CRS and YB-1 remains nuclear. To determine whether this effect was seen in mutants where the acidic charge of the mutation was maintained, we carried out live cell imaging of cells where we had either mutated S176 alone or together with S165 to an aspartic acid (D) residue. Following transfection with the YB-1eBFPconstruct, live-imaging showed that YB-1 remains in the cytoplasm in contrast to the alanine mutants, in support of our hypothesis. Of note, these mutations led to cell death as they begin to enter mitosis (Figure S7).
Our results suggest a model in which dephosphorylation of YB-1 increases NLS exposure and leads to nuclear localisation, whereas YB-1 phosphorylation increases CRS exposure resulting in increased retention in the cytoplasm. To confirm that dephosphorylation of endogenous YB-1 does occur during the cell cycle, we carried out western blotting using either an antibody to wtYB-1 [25] or to pYB-1S102 on synchronised A549 cells. The timepoints that were chosen are based on the cell cycle progression of the A549 FUCCI cells following release from a double thymidine block, as shown in Figure S5. These data are shown in Figure 6; quantification of signal intensities contained in Table S4.
They confirm that despite levels of wtYB-1 remaining constant throughout the cell cycle (Figure 6A), phosphorylation levels of YB-1 as detected by the rabbit polyclonal against phosphorylated S102 (pS102) are increased during early S phase (0–5.5 h), followed by a decrease in the late S and G2 phases (6–7 h), and then an increase in M phase (9 h) (Figure 6B,C for quantitation relative to β actin).

3. Discussion

Proteolytic cleavage has been reported to occur prior to nuclear translocation [7,8,9]. Elevated levels of YB-1 have been linked to oncogenic activity and poor prognosis in a range of cancers [1,2,3,4,5,6,20,22]. Previous analysis carried out by us does not support specific proteolytic cleavage at the aa 219/220 site [25]. The evidence regarding the details of proteolytic cleavage are contradictory with both N- and C-terminal fragments being reported as translocating to the nucleus by different groups [7,9]. To address these discrepancies, we use IF confocal analysis of three cancer cell lines transfected with a plasmid construct carrying epitopes to both an N-terminal HA and a C-terminal FLAG (HAYB-1FLAG) to determine whether this would provide evidence for cleavage. We find equal proportions of both epitopes suggesting that only full length YB-1 is present in the nucleus and the cytoplasm of cells and that this ratio does not change in response to treatment with either DOX or PTX. These results are confirmed by LC-MS/MS analyses of endogenous protein, where a tryptic peptide spanning the proposed site at aa 219/220 targeted by the 20S proteasome [5,7,9] was detected. Western Blot analysis of subcellular fractions did reveal the presence of smaller fragments. However, the size of these fragments is not consistent with the predicted proteasomal cleavage product, which would run at ~32 kDa [7,9].
Specific cleavage was originally reported to occur in response to treatment with bovine α-thrombin in endothelial cells in vitro [23]. Subsequently, cleavage via the 20S proteasome was reported to take place in YB-1 purified from rabbit reticulocyte lysate, in murine fibroblasts [7] and in rat mesangial cells [9], in response to a range of treatments including DOX. However, neither cleavage nor nuclear localisation occurred following treatment with taxol [7], a result supported by our data. Of note, the concentrations of DOX that we used were based on the IC50 values (see Figure S2A) which is ~two orders of magnitudes less (0.005 µg/mL) than the 0.6 µg/mL previously used [7,9]. In our hands the percentage of surviving cells at the higher dose was drastically reduced, as shown in Figure S2A. The use of this lower dose is in line with that used previously [26,39]. The differences between our results and those previously published [7,9,23] may be due to both the difference in the DOX concentration and to the response of the different cell lines used in these studies. It is also possible that the tags we used (HA and FLAG) could alter putative site-specific cleavage patterns. However, this seems unlikely as Sorokin et al. showed that cleavage of ectopically expressed HA-YB-1 by the 20S proteasome produced both 32 kDa and 22 kDa protein species [7] in untreated and DOX treated cells and the generation of these two species was blocked following treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. Similarly, van Roeyen et al. demonstrated that proteasomal cleavage of GFP-tagged YB-1 takes place in response to DOX treatment [9]. Both of these reports illustrate that neither the N-terminal nor C-terminal tags interfere with either cleavage or nuclear import of YB-1.
Our finding that the cellular location of YB-1 is cell cycle dependent is in line with earlier reports [14,15,21,40,41,42]. YB-1 has been shown to transcriptionally activate mRNAs for the cyclins CCNA1 and CCNB1 [14] as well as CDC6 [40]. This finding was further extended by bioinformatic analysis to reveal that YB-1 binds to the promotor regions of E2F target genes including CDC6, CCND1 and CDK1 [21] in human cancer cells, thus driving cell cycle progression. Most recently, Kotake et al. (2017) used a Rb family triple knockout (TKO) model to investigate the role of YB-1 in cell cycle phases other than G1. They showed that in this model silencing YB-1 led to a G2/M phase arrest and the repression of CCND1 [15]. In the same paper, RIP-CHIP assay showed YB-1 to be associated with the mRNA of multiple cell-cycle genes including that of G2/M phase regulators [15]. These findings are in line with our finding that YB-1 moves into the nucleus during the G2/M transition, potentially to bind with mRNAs identified by Kotake et al [15]. In line with this, nuclear YB-1 has been shown to interact directly with the cyclin A2 promoter leading to a downregulation of cyclin A2 mRNA expression in zebrafish [42]. In addition to this transcriptional role, YB-1 may also play a post-translational regulatory role. These same authors demonstrate that presence of YB-1 in the nucleus is driven by a circadian clock mechanism and involves the SUMOylation of YB-1 [42]. YB-1 has been shown to be ‘nuclear’ in 5% of exponentially growing HeLa cells, 6–8 hours following release from lovastatin-induced G1 arrest [14]. As lovastatin activates p21CIP1 and p27ink4a cyclin inhibitory proteins at or near the G1/S phase boundary [43,44], the timing would be consistent with our data that nuclear translocation of YB-1 occurs in late S phase or G2 and then into mitosis (M). This is further supported by a subsequent paper [41], where the authors found that tetracycline-induced YB-1 overexpression for a sustained period of time led to increased expression of cyclin E and subsequent slippage through the G1/S checkpoint [41]. In the same paper, IF analysis found that YB-1 localised to the centrosome forming a complex with pericentrin and α-tubulin which was vital in maintaining structural integrity and microtubule nucleation capacity of the organelle. These reports suggest that YB-1 plays a principal role in the organisation of the cytoskeleton during cell division. Our data support such a role.
The importance of YB-1 phosphorylation at serine 102 has long been known since it was recognised as key in the transcriptional activation of oncogenic genes such as EGFR [34]. S102 has been shown to be a target of p90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase (RSK) [35,45]. Phosphorylation of either serine 165 or 176 of YB-1 has also been reported to activate NF-κB [37]. The atomistic modelling data presented here defines a novel mechanistic role for serine residues 102, 165 and 176. Our data show that the phosphorylation status of these residues is dynamic and alters the conformation of YB-1 providing a mechanism for biomolecular recognition as detailed in [46]. Such phosphorylation-induced conformational switching has also been reported in PAGE4, another intrinsically disordered protein [47].
We propose a model, as shown in Figure 7, where the serine residues of YB-1 are phosphorylated in G1 leading to an increase in the accessible energy surface area of the CRS, as suggested by the 3D structural modelling in Figure 5A. YB-1 remains cytoplasmic as the cells move from G1 through to G2, when dephosphorylation occurs and YB-1 begins to move into the nucleus in late G2 just prior to the onset of nuclear envelope disruption in early M (prophase), concomitantly reducing the accessibility of the CRS and increasing the accessible energy surface of the NLS resulting in nuclear translocation. These residues are again phosphorylated in late M (telophase), to facilitate its export to the cytoplasm where it now (presumably) plays a role in translational regulation [48,49,50,51].
This model supports previously published data [7], where removal of the C-terminal region of YB-1 was shown to lead to nuclear translocation. We suggest that the loss of the C-terminal region may lead to a similar conformational change in YB-1 making the NLS more accessible. It is also in agreement with data demonstrating that nuclear translocation of YB-1 is dependent on an intact NLS [52].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture

Cells obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in either Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)-F12 (A549, Saos-2, MDA-MB-231 and HCT116) or RPMI (H1299), Life Technologies (Thermo Fisher Scientific), Waltham, MA, USA or Sigma (Merck), St Louis, MO, USA supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), in a 37 °C humidified incubator under 5% CO2. The cell lines were validated for authenticity by CellBank Australia (http://www.cellbankaustralia.com/) using STR profiling and were regularly tested and found negative for mycoplasma contamination.

4.2. Generation of HAYB-1 FLAG and FLAGYB-1HA Expression Constructs

A haemaglutinin (HA) tag flanked by XbaI and BamHI sites was cloned into the N-terminal of YBX1 cDNA of a pc3-DNA backbone using a pcDNA3.3-TOPO cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Serine to either alanine or aspartic acid mutations at specific serine residues (S102, S165, S176) were generated in the pcDNA3.3 HA-YBX1 plasmid by site-directed mutagenesis using mutagenesis primers (Table S8) and were subsequently amplified with a Kapa high fidelity polymerase (Kappa HiFi PCR kit #KK2502, Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). To introduce a FLAG tag to the 3’ end of HA-YBX1, two unique restriction sites, an EcoR1 site near the 3’ end of YBX1 and an Xho1 site, were used for cloning in conjunction with the TOPO-TA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The DNA removed by these nucleases was replaced with synthetic oligonucleotides. The oligonucleotides contained compatible ends to replace the 3’ end of YBX1 with the original sequence while incorporating an in-frame FLAG tag before the termination codon.

4.3. Generation of YB-1EBFP2 Expression Constructs

A two-stage process was used to create HA-tagged YB-1EBFP2 expression constructs. Firstly, an oligonucleotide encoding an HA tag flanked by XhoI and HindIII 5’ and SacII/BamHI 3’ was cloned into the XhoI/BglII sites in the MCS of pEBFP2-N1 (Addgene 54595) in-frame with EBFP2. The coding sequence of YB-1 and upstream Kozac sequence was amplified using TaKaRa Hi Fidelity Taq and cloned upstream of the HA tag XhoI/HindIII. The pHA-YB-1 was generated with pcDNA3.3-TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The resulting plasmid produced a YB-1-HA-EBFP2 (YB-1EBFP2) fusion protein under the control of the CMV promotor. All plasmids were propagated through Stbl3 E. coli to prevent recombination and sequenced prior to experimental use.

4.4. Generation of A549 FUCCI Cell Line

FUCCI was used to identify cell cycle phases at a single cell resolution. mVenus-hGeminin (1/110)/pCSII-EF and mCherry-hCdt1 (30/120)/pCSII-EF (a kind gift from Atsushi Miyawaki and Hiroyuki Miyoshi) were individually packaged into lentivectors using the 2nd generation packaging system, and the viral supernatants were used simultaneously to co-infect target cells. Three days post-transduction, cell cultures were sorted at the Westmead Institute for Medical Research flow cytometry core (Sydney, Australia) for mVenus fluorescence, allowed to expand for 5 to 7 days, and sorted again for mCherry fluorescence. Proper progression of red/green coloration during cell cycling was confirmed with live cell imaging as described below before use.

4.5. Plasmid Transfection and Drug Treatment

Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 3000 (LF3000, Invitrogen (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham MA, USA), distributed by Biosciences, Dublin, Ireland)) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For drug treatment, media were changed 24 hours post transfection, the cells were then treated with either 100 nM Paclitaxel or 10 nM Doxorubicin in DMSO for 24 hours. DMSO was used as a control for drug treatment. The medium containing the drug (or control) was then aspirated and the cells were thoroughly washed in PBS prior to collection for cell fractionation for either western blotting (6-well plates), fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (24-well plates), or immunofluorescence (IF).
For live cell imaging A549 FUCCI cells (1 × 104) were seeded in 2mL of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS in a 12 well plate. After overnight incubation, cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 3000 (LF3000, Invitrogen) with 250 ng of shRNA targeting the 3’UTR (sh-YB-1) in combination with 250 ng YB-1EBFP2. Media was changed 24 hours post transfection following which the cells were monitored over 60 hours using the live cell time lapse imaging or were harvested at 48 h for western blot.

4.6. Live Imaging and Processing of Time-Lapse Data

For live cell imaging, cells were grown in 12-well glass bottom plates (MatTek, Ashland, MA, USA). Time lapse live cell imaging was performed on a Zeiss Cell Observer inverted wide field microscope, with 20 × 0.8 NA air objective, at 37 °C, 10% CO2 and atmospheric oxygen. Image capture commenced 24 hours post transfection, with images taken every six minutes for a duration of sixty hours using an Axiocam 506 monochromatic camera (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and Zen Blue software (v1.0, Zeiss). A Zeiss HXP 120C mercury short-arc lamp and compatible filter cubes were used to obtain fluorescent images and differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy to capture brightfield images. To achieve optimal image resolution without excessive illumination, a binning factor was applied prior to imaging and the ambient conditions were maintained to minimize variations in optical resolution and illumination. The acquired videos were analyzed using the Zen Blue software (v1.0, Zeiss). For all videos, mitotic duration and outcomes were scored by eye and calculated from nuclear envelope breakdown until cytokinesis. FUCCI videos were scored by eye, for G1 (red) and S/G2/M (green) and EBFP2 (blue).

4.7. Cell Fractionation and Western Blotting

Cells were harvested for cell fractionation using a Cell Fractionation kit (Cell Signaling Technology, cat #9038, Danvers, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the exception of substitution of 4× NuPage LDS for the 3× SDS loading buffer. Protein samples were then electrophoretically separated on Bolt™ 4–12% Bis-Tris Plus Gels (Invitrogen) using MES buffer (LiCor, Lincoln, NA, USA) and an equal amount of total protein was loaded into each lane. The Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standard Ladder (Bio-Rad NZ, Auckland, NZ) was used. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using iBlot2 gel transfer stacks (Invitrogen). Membranes were blocked with Odyssey® Blocking Buffer (PBS) (LiCor) for 1 h and then incubated for 1 h with the primary antibodies diluted in Odyssey® Blocking Buffer (PBS)/0.2% Tween20. For the HA/FLAG western experiments shown in Figure S2B and S4 the primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-HA (H6908 Sigma-Aldrich 1:500 and mouse anti-FLAG (Sigma-Aldrich F1804 1:500, (Merck St Louis, MO, USA), with rabbit anti-H3 (Millipore, 1:5000, Burlington, MA, USA)) and mouse -tubulin (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:5000) as loading controls. For the westerns to detect changes in serine 102 phosphorylation (Figure S4), TBS blocking buffer was used together with goat anti-YB-1 [25] or rabbit anti-phospho-YB1ser102(Cell Signalling Technology) 1:1000 and mouse anti-β-actin, clone AC-15 (Sigma-Aldrich, 1:10000) as the loading control. In both sets of experiments, membranes were subsequently incubated with the secondary antibodies (IRDye® 680RD Goat anti-Mouse IgG (LiCor) and IRDye® 800CW Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (LiCor)) diluted in Odyssey® Blocking Buffer (TBS or PBS)/0.2% Tween20. Membranes were imaged on the Odyssey® CLx Imaging System (LiCor) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were quantified using ImageStudioLite (LiCor) software.

4.8. Cell Synchronization and IF Labelling

Cells were seeded onto coverslips in a 24 well plate and subsequently subjected to a double thymidine block with 2 mM thymidine (Sigma). Following 7–8 hours release from the second block, cells were then fixed in 4% PFA, permeabilised with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and then blocked with 10% goat or donkey serum in PBS (depending on the secondary; Sigma-Aldrich) prior to incubation with primary antibodies in blocking solution. Primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-HA (Sigma-Aldrich H6908, 1:1000); mouse anti Flag M2 (Sigma-Aldrich F1804, 1:1000); rabbit anti-LaminB1 (Abcam 16048, 1:250) and sheep anti-YB-1 polyclonal to an N-terminal epitope (MSSEAETQQPPAC) of YB-1 generated in house (Cohen et al. 2010); 1:1000). Following primary incubation, cells were washed with PBS-Tween20 (0.1%) to remove any unbound primary antibody and then incubated with either Alexafluor-labelled secondary antibodies (goat anti-mouse 568/goat anti-rabbit 488 or goat anti-rabbit 568/goat anti-mouse 488, and (in the case of the sheep anti-YB-1) donkey anti-goat 568, all at 1:1000). In some instances, the DNA-binding dye Hoechst 33258 (Molecular Probes 1:1000) was used to visualise cell nuclei. Cells were then washed with PBS prior to mounting in Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) on glass slides prior to visualization using a Nikon Ti-E inverted microscope with a 63× oil objective (N/A 1.4) and equipped with a DSRi2 CCD camera (Nikon Belmont, CA, USA). The acquired images were analysed using both NIS elements (Nikon) and Fiji2. In addition, a Lionheart FX Automated Live Cell Imager (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) equipped with a 20 × 0.45 NA air objective was used to collect data from multiple cells on these slides (at least 100 cells per image) using the montaging function of Gen5 4.0 from both 365nm, 488nm and 568nm channels. Images were then analysed for fluorescence intensity using the Dual masking capability of the same software.

4.9. Cell Proliferation Assay

Cells were treated with paclitaxel (1–1000 nM) or doxorubicin (0.01–30nM) for 48h, at which time the media was removed and the plates were frozen at −80°C. The plates were subsequently thawed and the DNA content measured using a SYBR Green I-based fluorimetric assay as described previously [53]. Briefly, 100 µL of lysis buffer (10mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 2.5mM EDTA and 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100) containing 1:4000 SYBR Green I (Invitrogen) was added to the wells and the plates were incubated overnight at 4 °C. The plates were mixed and the fluorescence signal for each well was measured for 1 second at an excitation of 485nm and emission of 535nm using a BioTek microplate reader (BioTek). Growth curves were plotted as the fluorescence values at drug concentration.

4.10. Subcellular Fractionation of Cultured Cells for LC-MS/MS

Harvested cells (A549 and MDA-MB-231) were enriched into subcellular fractions as described previously [25]. Briefly, 1 × 104 cells per µL were swollen in a hypotonic buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 1 × Complete EDTA-free), and incubated for 5 min at 4 °C before being transferred to a Dounce homogeniser (885300-0002, 2 mL, tight pestle; 0.013–0.064 mm clearance, Kontes, Wayne, PA, USA). The Dounce was applied until 95% of the cell membranes were ruptured and lysate was spun at 220 g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and stored as cytoplasmic extract. The pelleted nuclei were resuspended in 5 mL of chilled low sucrose solution (0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM MgCl2) which was gently layered over 5 mL of chilled high sucrose solution (0.88 M sucrose, 10 mM MgCl2). The nuclei were spun at 2800 g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove contaminating cytoplasmic proteins.

4.11. Immunopurification of YB-1 and Mass Spectrometry

YB-1 was purified from the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of two cancer cell lines; the adenocarcinoma cell line A549 and the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB23, as previously described [25]. Purified YB-1 was then separated using SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie (Supplementary Figure S1B). Excised bands were analysed by LC-MS/MS to identify the proteins that copurified with immunoprecipitated YB-1, again as previously described [25]. Peaklists and MS/MS data were generated using the Proteome Discoverer (version 1.4) software using default settings and searched against the Human Swiss-Prot amino acid sequence database using both the Mascot (http://www.matrixscience.com) and Sequest (Thermo Scientific) search engines. The search was set up for full tryptic peptides with a maximum of 3 missed cleavage sites. Carboxyamidomethyl cysteine, oxidized methionine, deamidation (N, Q), and phosphorylation (S, T, Y) were included as variable modifications. The precursor mass tolerance threshold was 10 ppm and the maximum fragment mass error 0.8 Da. Peptides were accepted as identified if their false discovery rate adjusted scores were above the score threshold at a false discovery rate≥ 1% as assessed by the Percolator algorithm [54]. Proteins were considered identified when they were assigned ≥ 2 peptides above the aforementioned score threshold.

4.12. siRNA Transfection

Cells were reverse transfected with stealth modified 25 bp duplex siRNAs targeted to YB-1 (si-YB-1 [21]); or a scrambled control siRNA (si-Control [53] primer sequences detailed in Figure 6 legend) both from Invitrogen. The control siRNA has no known human mRNA targets [53]. Stealth siRNAs were transfected at a final concentration of 5 nM using Lipofectamine RNAiMax (Invitrogen). Both siRNAs and RNAiMax were diluted in medium without serum. After 10 minutes at room temperature, the diluted RNAiMax was added to the siRNAs, and the mixture was incubated for a further 15 minutes. The lipoplexes formed were added to cells. After overnight transfection, the culture medium was replaced with medium supplemented with 10% FBS following which the cells were harvested at 48 h for western blot.

4.13. Modelling the Structure of YB-1 Protein

In the absence of the crystal structures of full length YB-1 protein, the 3D structure was generated using standard protein modelling methods. The full-length sequence of YB-1 was used as query to retrieve structures of sequences with homology to YB-1 from the protein databank database using the program BLASTp [55], however no template structure was identified for the full length protein. Therefore, the automated I-TASSER pipeline [56,57], which uses multi-threading alignment and iterative template fragment assembly simulations to generate a 3D structural model of the YB-1 protein.

4.14. MD Simulations

The structures of full length wild type (wt) YB-1, phosphorylated YB-1 (YB-1phos), YB-1S102A, YB-1S165A, and YB-1S176A were modelled and subjected to molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using the pemed.CUDA module of the program Amber18 [58]. The all atom version of the Amber 14SB force field (ff14SB) [59] was used to model the proteins. Force field parameters for phosphorylated serine were taken as described elsewhere [60]. The phosphate groups were assigned an overall charge of −2e. The Xleap module of Amber18 was used to prepare the system for the MD simulations. All the simulation systems were neutralized with appropriate numbers of counterions. Each neutralized system was solvated in an octahedral box with TIP3P [61] water molecules, leaving at least 10 Å between the solute atoms and the borders of the box. All MD simulations were carried out in explicit solvent at 300K. During the simulations, the long-range electrostatic interactions were treated with the particle mesh Ewald [62] method using a real space cutoff distance of 9 Å. The Settle [63] algorithm was used to constrain bond vibrations involving hydrogen atoms, which allowed a time step of 2 fs during the simulations. Solvent molecules and counterions were initially relaxed using energy minimization with restraints on the protein and inhibitor atoms. This was followed by unrestrained energy minimization to remove any steric clashes. Subsequently the system was gradually heated from 0 to 300 K using MD simulations with positional restraints (force constant: 50 kcal mol-1 Å-2) on the protein over a period of 0.25 ns allowing water molecules and ions to move freely. During an additional 0.25 ns, the positional restraints were gradually reduced followed by a 2 ns unrestrained MD simulation to equilibrate all the atoms. For each system, three independent MD simulations (assigning different initial velocities) were carried out for 250 ns with conformations saved every 10 ps. Solvent accessible surface area (SASA) of the nuclear localization signal (NLS; residues 183–205) and cytoplasmic retention signal (CRS; residues 247–267) was calculated using the program NACCESS [64]. Simulation trajectories were visualized using VMD [65] and figures were generated using PyMOL [66].

5. Conclusions

Using quantitative confocal analysis of cells fluorescently labelled with a construct tagged at both termini (HAYB-1FLAG), we found equal ratios of both termini present in cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments in both drug-treated and untreated cells, suggesting that cleavage does not take place. In confirmation, we then used mass spectrometry to reveal the presence of a tryptic peptide spanning the proposed cleavage site. We also revealed, using live cell imaging, that the cellular location of YB-1 is linked to cell cycle phase. Full-length YB-1 is primarily cytoplasmic and begins to enter the nucleus as cells transition through the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, coinciding with the dissolution of the nuclear membrane. Towards the end of mitosis, with the reassembly of the nuclear membrane, YB-1 is again excluded to the cytoplasmic compartment.
To provide insight into the mechanism underpinning the cellular location of YB-1 we then used atomistic modelling data and molecular dynamics simulations to show that the phosphorylation status of particular serine residues affects the conformation of YB-1 altering the accessibility of both the nuclear localisation signal (NLS) and the cytoplasmic retention signal (CRS). We confirmed the validity of this model by showing that YB-1 is retained in the nucleus in cells with a mutation of either serine S102A, S165A or S176A, by confocal z-stack analysis. We also showed, using live-cell imaging that mutation of S176 to S176D either independently or together with mutation of S165 to S165D lead to an inability of YB-1 to enter the nucleus at mitosis. These findings are consistent with the model.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/2/315/s1, Figure S1A: Linear Representation of YB-1, Figure S1B: Representative coomassie stain of purified cytoplasmic and nuclear YB-1 from A549 and MDA- MB231 cells, Figure S1C: Sequence coverage from peptides for YB-1 identified by LC-MS/MS, Figure S2A: Cell survival curves following treatment with either Doxorubicin (DOX) or Paclitaxel (PTX), Figure S2B: Immunoblots from cellular fractions of A549, H1299 and Saos-2 cells, Figure S3: Immunofluorescent labelling with alternative antibodies, Figure S4: Immunoblots from cellular fractions of A549 and H1299 following transfection with FLAGYB-1HA construct, Figure S5: Cell-cycle progression following release from double thymidine block, Figure S6: Models generated by I-TASSER server, Figure S7: Live-cell images of cells with a serine (S) to aspartic acid (D) mutation, Figure S8: Peptide spectrum matches for a YB-1 peptide that spans a proposed 20S cleavage site found in the cytoplasm and nucleus of MDA-MB231 and A549 cells, Table S1: Signal intensity for HAYB-1, YB-1FLAG and H3 in A549 whole cell lysates (WCL), nuclear (Nuc) and cytoplasmic (Cyto) fractions, Table S2: Signal intensity for HAYB-1, YB-1FLAG and H3 in H1299 whole cell lysates (WCL), nuclear (Nuc) and cytoplasmic (Cyto) fractions, Table S3: Signal intensity for HAYB-1, YB-1FLAG and H3 in Saos-2 whole cell lysates (WCL), nuclear (Nuc) and cytoplasmic (Cyto) fractions, Table S4: Signal intensity for total YB-1, pYB-1S102 and β-actin in A549 cells after release from double thymidine block over 24hours, Table S5: Peptide sequences of YB-1 identified by tandem mass spectrometry, Table S6: Signal intensity for YB-1HA, FLAGYB-1 and H3 in A549 whole cell lysates (WCL), nuclear (Nuc) and cytoplasmic (Cyto) fractions, Table S7: Signal intensity for YB-1HA, FLAGYB-1 and H3 in H1299 whole cell lysates (WCL), nuclear (Nuc) and cytoplasmic (Cyto) fractions, Table S8: Primer sequences used for generation of HAYB-1FLAG and FLAGYB-1HA expression constructs.

Author Contributions

A.G.W. and A.W.B. were involved in the conceptualisation and funding acquisition of this project. S.M. performed the transfections and cell synchronisation experiments and carried out the data curation and formal analysis of these. C.M. generated the plasmids used in these experiments. M.A. and T.K. carried out the mass spectrometry and analyses. A.G.W. performed the immunofluorescent labelling, data curation and confocal analyses. R.H. and P.B. generated the mutant plasmid constructs. C.S.V. and S.K. modelled the structure of YB-1 and carried out the MD simulations of the mutant plasmid constructs. H.E.C. developed the LDS-based cell fractionation assay. K.P., M.L.G. and A.J.F. carried out the fractionation and immunoblotting experiments, T.K.B. made and A.J.C. provided the FUCCI cell lines used in these experiments, S.B.C. developed the method for immunopurification of YB-1. A.G.W. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Cancer Society of New Zealand, grant number 11/07 and a Dean’s Bequest Fund (Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand).

Acknowledgments

We thank the Cancer Society of New Zealand (11/07), the Maurice Wilkins Centre of New Zealand and the Dean’s Bequest Fund (Dunedin School of Medicine) for their funding support of this project. We also acknowledge the Health Research Council (HRC) of New Zealand and the Royal Society James Cook Fellowship for their ongoing support of Antony Braithwaite and his lab group. The Westmead Institute of Medical Research (WIMR) Flow Cytometry Centre, supported by the Australian NHMRC and the Cancer Institute NSW are thanked for cell sorting. Anthony Cesare and his lab are supported by grants from the NHMRC (1053195, 1106241). Srinivasaraghavan Kannan and Chandra Verma would like to thank A*STAR and National Supercomputer Centre Singapore for support. Srinivasaraghavan Kannan and Chandra Verma are founders/scientific consultants of Sinopsee Therapeutics, a biotechnology company developing molecules for therapeutic purposes; the current work does not conflict with the company.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

  1. Gessner, C.; Woischwill, C.; Schumacher, A.; Liebers, U.; Kuhn, H.; Stiehl, P.; Jurchott, K.; Royer, H.D.; Witt, C.; Wolff, G. Nuclear YB-1 expression as a negative prognostic marker in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Eur. Respir. J. 2004, 23, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Gimenez-Bonafe, P.; Fedoruk, M.N.; Whitmore, T.G.; Akbari, M.; Ralph, J.L.; Ettinger, S.; Gleave, M.E.; Nelson, C.C. YB-1 is upregulated during prostate cancer tumor progression and increases P-glycoprotein activity. The Prostate 2004, 59, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Janz, M.; Harbeck, N.; Dettmar, P.; Berger, U.; Schmidt, A.; Jurchott, K.; Schmitt, M.; Royer, H.D. Y-box factor YB-1 predicts drug resistance and patient outcome in breast cancer independent of clinically relevant tumor biologic factors HER2, uPA and PAI-1. Int. J. Cancer 2002, 97, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Oda, Y.; Sakamoto, A.; Ohga, N.T.; Uchiumi, T.; Kohno, K.; Tsuneyoshi, M.; Kuwano, M.; Iwamoto, Y. Nuclear expression of YB-1 protein correlates with P-glycoprotein expression in human osteosarcoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 1998, 4, 2273–2277. [Google Scholar]
  5. Raffetseder, U.; Frye, B.; Rauen, T.; Jurchott, K.; Royer, H.D.; Jansen, P.L.; Mertens, P.R. Splicing factor SRp30c interaction with Y-box protein-1 confers nuclear YB-1 shuttling and alternative splice site selection. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 18241–18248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Shibahara, K.; Sugio, K.; Osaki, T.; Uchiumi, T.; Maehara, Y.; Kohno, K.; Yasumoto, K.; Sugimachi, K.; Kuwano, M. Nuclear expression of the Y-box binding protein, YB-1, as a novel marker of disease progression in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7, 3151–3155. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sorokin, A.V.; Selyutina, A.A.; Skabkin, M.A.; Guryanov, S.G.; Nazimov, I.V.; Richard, C.; Th'ng, J.; Yau, J.; Sorensen, P.H.; Ovchinnikov, L.P.; et al. Proteasome-mediated cleavage of the Y-box-binding protein 1 is linked to DNA-damage stress response. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 3602–3612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Stenina, O.I.; Poptic, E.J.; DiCorleto, P.E. Thrombin activates a Y box-binding protein (DNA-binding protein B) in endothelial cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2000, 106, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Van Roeyen, C.R.; Scurt, F.G.; Brandt, S.; Kuhl, V.A.; Martinkus, S.; Djudjaj, S.; Raffetseder, U.; Royer, H.D.; Stefanidis, I.; Dunn, S.E.; et al. Cold shock Y-box protein-1 proteolysis autoregulates its transcriptional activities. CCS 2013, 11, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sakura, H.; Maekawa, T.; Imamoto, F.; Yasuda, K.; Ishii, S. Two human genes isolated by a novel method encode DNA-binding proteins containing a common region of homology. Gene 1988, 73, 499–507. [Google Scholar]
  11. Berquin, I.M.; Pang, B.; Dziubinski, M.L.; Scott, L.M.; Chen, Y.Q.; Nolan, G.P.; Ethier, S.P. Y-box-binding protein 1 confers EGF independence to human mammary epithelial cells. Oncogene 2005, 24, 3177–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Lasham, A.; Moloney, S.; Hale, T.; Homer, C.; Zhang, Y.F.; Murison, J.G.; Braithwaite, A.W.; Watson, J. The Y-box-binding protein, YB1, is a potential negative regulator of the p53 tumor suppressor. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 35516–35523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lasham, A.; Lindridge, E.; Rudert, F.; Onrust, R.; Watson, J. Regulation of the human Fas promoter by YB-1, Puralpha and AP-1 transcription factors. Gene 2000, 252, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jurchott, K.; Bergmann, S.; Stein, U.; Walther, W.; Janz, M.; Manni, I.; Piaggio, G.; Fietze, E.; Dietel, M.; Royer, H.D. YB-1 as a cell cycle-regulated transcription factor facilitating cyclin A and cyclin B1 gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 27988–27996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kotake, Y.; Arikawa, N.; Tahara, K.; Maru, H.; Naemura, M. Y-box Binding Protein 1 Is Involved in Regulating the G2/M Phase of the Cell Cycle. Anticancer Res. 2017, 37, 1603–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Guay, D.; Gaudreault, I.; Massip, L.; Lebel, M. Formation of a nuclear complex containing the p53 tumor suppressor, YB-1, and the Werner syndrome gene product in cells treated with UV light. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2006, 38, 1300–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ohga, T.; Uchiumi, T.; Makino, Y.; Koike, K.; Wada, M.; Kuwano, M.; Kohno, K. Direct involvement of the Y-box binding protein YB-1 in genotoxic stress-induced activation of the human multidrug resistance 1 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 5997–6000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhang, Y.F.; Homer, C.; Edwards, S.J.; Hananeia, L.; Lasham, A.; Royds, J.; Sheard, P.; Braithwaite, A.W. Nuclear localization of Y-box factor YB1 requires wild-type p53. Oncogene 2003, 22, 2782–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Oda, Y.; Ohishi, Y.; Saito, T.; Hinoshita, E.; Uchiumi, T.; Kinukawa, N.; Iwamoto, Y.; Kohno, K.; Kuwano, M.; Tsuneyoshi, M. Nuclear expression of Y-box-binding protein-1 correlates with P-glycoprotein and topoisomerase II alpha expression, and with poor prognosis in synovial sarcoma. J. Pathol. 2003, 199, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Habibi, G.; Leung, S.; Law, J.H.; Gelmon, K.; Masoudi, H.; Turbin, D.; Pollak, M.; Nielsen, T.O.; Huntsman, D.; Dunn, S.E. Redefining prognostic factors for breast cancer: YB-1 is a stronger predictor of relapse and disease-specific survival than estrogen receptor or HER-2 across all tumor subtypes. Breast Cancer Res. 2008, 10, R86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lasham, A.; Samuel, W.; Cao, H.; Patel, R.; Mehta, R.; Stern, J.L.; Reid, G.; Woolley, A.G.; Miller, L.D.; Black, M.A.; et al. YB-1, the E2F Pathway, and Regulation of Tumor Cell Growth. J. NatI. Cancer Inst. 2012, 104, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Woolley, A.G.; Algie, M.; Samuel, W.; Harfoot, R.; Wiles, A.; Hung, N.A.; Tan, P.H.; Hains, P.; Valova, V.A.; Huschtscha, L.; et al. Prognostic Association of YB-1 Expression in Breast Cancers: A Matter of Antibody. PloS ONE 2011, 6, e20603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Stenina, O.I.; Shaneyfelt, K.M.; DiCorleto, P.E. Thrombin induces the release of the Y-box protein dbpB from mRNA: a mechanism of transcriptional activation. Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 7277–7282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bader, A.G.; Vogt, P.K. Inhibition of protein synthesis by Y box-binding protein 1 blocks oncogenic cell transformation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25, 2095–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Cohen, S.B.; Ma, W.; Valova, V.A.; Algie, M.; Harfoot, R.; Woolley, A.G.; Robinson, P.J.; Braithwaite, A.W. Genotoxic stress-induced nuclear localization of oncoprotein YB-1 in the absence of proteolytic processing. Oncogene 2010, 29, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Fornari, F.A.; Randolph, J.K.; Yalowich, J.C.; Ritke, M.K.; Gewirtz, D.A. Interference by doxorubicin with DNA unwinding in MCF-7 breast tumor cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 1994, 45, 649–656. [Google Scholar]
  27. Arnal, I.; Wade, R.H. How does taxol stabilize microtubules? CB 1995, 5, 900–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, T.H.; Wang, H.S.; Soong, Y.K. Paclitaxel-induced cell death: where the cell cycle and apoptosis come together. Cancer 2000, 88, 2619–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tada, S. Cdt1 and geminin: role during cell cycle progression and DNA damage in higher eukaryotes. Front. Biosci. 2007, 12, 1629–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zielke, N.; Edgar, B.A. FUCCI sensors: Powerful new tools for analysis of cell proliferation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2015, 4, 469–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bargou, R.C.; Jurchott, K.; Wagener, C.; Bergmann, S.; Metzner, S.; Bommert, K.; Mapara, M.Y.; Winzer, K.J.; Dietel, M.; Dorken, B.; et al. Nuclear localization and increased levels of transcription factor YB-1 in primary human breast cancers are associated with intrinsic MDR1 gene expression. Nature Med. 1997, 3, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Reipas, K.M.; Law, J.H.; Couto, N.; Islam, S.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Cherkasov, A.; Jung, K.; Cheema, A.S.; Jones, S.J.; et al. Luteolin is a novel p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) inhibitor that suppresses Notch4 signaling by blocking the activation of Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1). Oncotarget 2013, 4, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sinnberg, T.; Sauer, B.; Holm, P.; Spangler, B.; Kuphal, S.; Bosserhoff, A.; Schittek, B. MAPK and PI3K/AKT mediated YB-1 activation promotes melanoma cell proliferation which is counteracted by an autoregulatory loop. Exp. Dermatol. 2012, 21, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Stratford, A.L.; Habibi, G.; Astanehe, A.; Jiang, H.; Hu, K.; Park, E.; Shadeo, A.; Buys, T.P.; Lam, W.; Pugh, T.; et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is transcriptionally induced by the Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) and can be inhibited with Iressa in basal-like breast cancer, providing a potential target for therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2007, 9, R61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Stratford, A.L.; Reipas, K.; Hu, K.; Fotovati, A.; Brough, R.; Frankum, J.; Takhar, M.; Watson, P.; Ashworth, A.; Lord, C.J.; et al. Targeting p90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase Eliminates Tumor-Initiating Cells by Inactivating Y-Box Binding Protein-1 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancers. Stem Cells 2012, 30, 1338–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martin, M.; Hua, L.; Wang, B.; Wei, H.; Prabhu, L.; Hartley, A.V.; Jiang, G.; Liu, Y.; Lu, T. Novel Serine 176 Phosphorylation of YBX1 Activates NF-kappaB in Colon Cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 3433–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Prabhu, L.; Mundade, R.; Wang, B.; Wei, H.; Hartley, A.V.; Martin, M.; McElyea, K.; Temm, C.J.; Sandusky, G.; Liu, Y.; et al. Critical role of phosphorylation of serine 165 of YBX1 on the activation of NF-kappaB in colon cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 29396–29412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kloks, C.P.; Spronk, C.A.; Lasonder, E.; Hoffmann, A.; Vuister, G.W.; Grzesiek, S.; Hilbers, C.W. The solution structure and DNA-binding properties of the cold-shock domain of the human Y-box protein YB-1. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 316, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chatterjee, M.; Rancso, C.; Stuhmer, T.; Eckstein, N.; Andrulis, M.; Gerecke, C.; Lorentz, H.; Royer, H.D.; Bargou, R.C. The Y-box binding protein YB-1 is associated with progressive disease and mediates survival and drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Blood 2008, 111, 3714–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Basaki, Y.; Taguchi, K.; Izumi, H.; Murakami, Y.; Kubo, T.; Hosoi, F.; Watari, K.; Nakano, K.; Kawaguchi, H.; Ohno, S.; et al. Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) promotes cell cycle progression through CDC6-dependent pathway in human cancer cells. Eur. J. Cancer 2010, 46, 954–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Davies, A.H.; Barrett, I.; Pambid, M.R.; Hu, K.; Stratford, A.L.; Freeman, S.; Berquin, I.M.; Pelech, S.; Hieter, P.; Maxwell, C.; et al. YB-1 evokes susceptibility to cancer through cytokinesis failure, mitotic dysfunction and HER2 amplification. Oncogene 2011, 30, 3649–3660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Pagano, C.; di Martino, O.; Ruggiero, G.; Guarino, A.M.; Mueller, N.; Siauciunaite, R.; Reischl, M.; Foulkes, N.S.; Vallone, D.; Calabro, V. The tumor-associated YB-1 protein: new player in the circadian control of cell proliferation. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 6193–6205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rao, S.; Lowe, M.; Herliczek, T.W.; Keyomarsi, K. Lovastatin mediated G1 arrest in normal and tumor breast cells is through inhibition of CDK2 activity and redistribution of p21 and p27, independent of p53. Oncogene 1998, 17, 2393–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Terada, Y.; Inoshita, S.; Nakashima, O.; Yamada, T.; Kuwahara, M.; Sasaki, S.; Marumo, F. Lovastatin inhibits mesangial cell proliferation via p27Kip1. JASN 1998, 9, 2235–2243. [Google Scholar]
  45. Stratford, A.L.; Fry, C.J.; Desilets, C.; Davies, A.H.; Cho, Y.Y.; Li, Y.; Dong, Z.; Berquin, I.M.; Roux, P.P.; Dunn, S.E. Y-box binding protein-1 serine 102 is a downstream target of p90 ribosomal S6 kinase in basal-like breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2008, 10, R99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kahn, K.; Plaxco, K.W. Principles of Biomolecular Recognition. In Recognition Receptors in Biosensors; Zoureb, M., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  47. He, Y.; Chen, Y.; Mooney, S.M.; Rajagopalan, K.; Bhargava, A.; Sacho, E.; Weninger, K.; Bryan, P.N.; Kulkarni, P.; Orban, J. Phosphorylation-induced Conformational Ensemble Switching in an Intrinsically Disordered Cancer/Testis Antigen. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 25090–25102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Eliseeva, I.; Kim, E.; Guryanov, S.; Ovchinnikov, L.; Lyabin, D. Y-box-binding protein 1 (YB-1) and its functions. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2011, 76, 1402–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Evdokimova, V.; Ovchinnikov, L.P.; Sorensen, P.H. Y-box binding protein 1: providing a new angle on translational regulation. Cell Cycle 2006, 5, 1143–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wolffe, A.P.; Tafuri, S.; Ranjan, M.; Familari, M. The Y-box factors: a family of nucleic acid binding proteins conserved from Escherichia coli to man. New Biologist 1992, 4, 290–298. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu, J.; Stratford, A.L.; Astamehe, A.; Dunn, S.E. YB-1 is a transcription/translation factor that orchestrates the oncogenome by hardwiring signal transduction to gene expression. Transl. Oncogenomics 2007, 2, 49–65. [Google Scholar]
  52. Mordovkina, D.A.; Kim, E.R.; Buldakov, I.A.; Sorokin, A.V.; Eliseeva, I.A.; Lyabin, D.N.; Ovchinnikov, L.P. Transportin-1-dependent YB-1 nuclear import. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 480, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Reid, G.; Wallant, N.C.; Patel, R.; Antonic, A.; Saxon-Aliifaalogo, F.; Cao, H.; Webster, G.; Watson, J.D. Potent subunit-specific effects on cell growth and drug sensitivity from optimised siRNA-mediated silencing of ribonucleotide reductase. J. RNAi Gene Silenc. 2009, 5, 321–330. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kall, L.; Canterbury, J.D.; Weston, J.; Noble, W.S.; MacCoss, M.J. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 923–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Yang, J.; Yan, R.; Roy, A.; Xu, D.; Poisson, J.; Zhang, Y. The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods 2015, 12, 7–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Case, D.A.; Ben-Shalom, I.Y.; Brozell, S.R.; Cerutti, D.S.; Cheatham, T.E.; Cruzeiro, V.W.D.; Darden, T.A.; Duke, R.E.; Ghoreishi, D.; Gilson, M.K.; et al. AMBER; University of California: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  59. Maier, J.A.; Martinez, C.; Kasavajhala, K.; Wickstrom, L.; Hauser, K.E.; Simmerling, C. ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 3696–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Homeyer, N.; Horn, A.H.; Lanig, H.; Sticht, H. AMBER force-field parameters for phosphorylated amino acids in different protonation states: phosphoserine, phosphothreonine, phosphotyrosine, and phosphohistidine. J. Mol. Model. 2006, 12, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jorgensen, W.L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J.D.; Impey, R.W.; Klein, M.L. Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Darden, T.; York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle Mesh Ewald—An N.Log(N) Method for Ewald Sums in Large Systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 10089–10092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Miyamoto, S.; Kollman, P.A. Settle—An Analytical Version of the Shake and Rattle Algorithm for Rigid Water Models. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 952–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hubbard, S.J.; Thornton, J.M. NACCESS; University College London: London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  65. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. Model 1996, 14, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. De Lano, W. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System; DeLano Scientific: San Carlos, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
Cancers 12 00315 g001 550
Figure 1. Full length YB-1 is present in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. (A) Shows the nuclear and cytoplasmic location of HAYB-1FLAG in A549, H1299 and Saos-2 cells. Top row shows anti-HA which detects the N-terminus of HAYB-1FLAG, middle row shows anti-FLAG which detects the C-terminus of HAYB-1FLAG and the bottom row shows the merged image. The nucleus is stained with Hoechst, anti-HA (green) and anti-FLAG (red). (B) shows examples of the nuclear and cytoplasmic mask used to determine cellular location of HAYB-1FLAG. (C) the fluorescence intensity/area for anti-HA and anti-FLAG using this mask for > 100 cells in all three cell lines. Each dot represents the intensity/area for anti-HA and anti-FLAG for each cell and the slope of the line is indicated.
Figure 1. Full length YB-1 is present in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. (A) Shows the nuclear and cytoplasmic location of HAYB-1FLAG in A549, H1299 and Saos-2 cells. Top row shows anti-HA which detects the N-terminus of HAYB-1FLAG, middle row shows anti-FLAG which detects the C-terminus of HAYB-1FLAG and the bottom row shows the merged image. The nucleus is stained with Hoechst, anti-HA (green) and anti-FLAG (red). (B) shows examples of the nuclear and cytoplasmic mask used to determine cellular location of HAYB-1FLAG. (C) the fluorescence intensity/area for anti-HA and anti-FLAG using this mask for > 100 cells in all three cell lines. Each dot represents the intensity/area for anti-HA and anti-FLAG for each cell and the slope of the line is indicated.
Cancers 12 00315 g001
Cancers 12 00315 g002 550
Figure 2. Full length YB-1 is present in both compartments following DNA damage. (A) shows the nuclear and cytoplasmic location of HAYB-1FLAGin A549, H1299 and Saos-2 cells treated with DOX or PTX. Top row shows anti-HA which detects the N-terminus of tagged HAYB-1FLAG, middle row shows anti-FLAG which detects the C-terminus of tagged HAYB-1FLAG and the bottom row shows the merged image. The nucleus is stained with Hoechst, anti-HA (green) and anti-FLAG (red). (B) the fluorescence intensity/area for anti-HA and anti-FLAG using masks to differentiate the nucleus and the cytoplasmic compartments for > 100 cells in all three cell lines. Each dot represents the intensity/area for anti-HA and anti-FLAG for each cell. The red dotted line represents the line of best fit. The slope of the line is indicated. (C) shows example of the masks with either the presence or absence of cytoplasmic staining of HAYB-1FLAG using anti-HA and anti-FLAG in A549, H1299 and Saos-2 cells treated with DOX. (D) Shows the percentage of acytoplasmic cells; i.e. those that did not show cytoplasmic labelling with either anti-HA or anti-FLAG, indicating that YB-1 was not present in the cytoplasm of these cells. Chi-square test was used to determine significance, * p < 0.05, **** p <0.0001.
Figure 2. Full length YB-1 is present in both compartments following DNA damage. (A) shows the nuclear and cytoplasmic location of HAYB-1FLAGin A549, H1299 and Saos-2 cells treated with DOX or PTX. Top row shows anti-HA which detects the N-terminus of tagged HAYB-1FLAG, middle row shows anti-FLAG which detects the C-terminus of tagged HAYB-1FLAG and the bottom row shows the merged image. The nucleus is stained with Hoechst, anti-HA (green) and anti-FLAG (red). (B) the fluorescence intensity/area for anti-HA and anti-FLAG using masks to differentiate the nucleus and the cytoplasmic compartments for > 100 cells in all three cell lines. Each dot represents the intensity/area for anti-HA and anti-FLAG for each cell. The red dotted line represents the line of best fit. The slope of the line is indicated. (C) shows example of the masks with either the presence or absence of cytoplasmic staining of HAYB-1FLAG using anti-HA and anti-FLAG in A549, H1299 and Saos-2 cells treated with DOX. (D) Shows the percentage of acytoplasmic cells; i.e. those that did not show cytoplasmic labelling with either anti-HA or anti-FLAG, indicating that YB-1 was not present in the cytoplasm of these cells. Chi-square test was used to determine significance, * p < 0.05, **** p <0.0001.
Cancers 12 00315 g002
Cancers 12 00315 g003 550
Figure 3. YB-1 translocates into the nucleus in the late G2 phase of the cell cycle. (A) Mid z-stack slices (0.2 µm) showing cellular location of HAYB-1FLAG (yellow) in A549 cells. LaminB1 (magenta) marks the nuclear envelope. (B) Illustrates the cellular location of YB-1eBFP2 in different phases of the cell cycle in A549 FUCCI cells transfected with YB-1eBFP(blue); G1 marked by cdt1(red), S/G2 marked by geminin (green). The white arrow shows a mitotic cell where YB-1 (blue) fills the whole cell.
Figure 3. YB-1 translocates into the nucleus in the late G2 phase of the cell cycle. (A) Mid z-stack slices (0.2 µm) showing cellular location of HAYB-1FLAG (yellow) in A549 cells. LaminB1 (magenta) marks the nuclear envelope. (B) Illustrates the cellular location of YB-1eBFP2 in different phases of the cell cycle in A549 FUCCI cells transfected with YB-1eBFP(blue); G1 marked by cdt1(red), S/G2 marked by geminin (green). The white arrow shows a mitotic cell where YB-1 (blue) fills the whole cell.
Cancers 12 00315 g003
Cancers 12 00315 g004 550
Figure 4. Cellular location of YB-1 is dependent on cell cycle phase. The top row are z-projections of 0.2 µm slices of synchronised A549 cells at sequential phases of the cell cycle. The second row shows the top slice, the third row shows the middle slide and the last row shows the bottom slices of each stack respectively. YB-1 (shown in green) is cytoplasmic in G1, becomes increasingly perinuclear during G2 and moves into the nucleus during prophase and remains there until telophase when it appears to be outside the nucleus. Lamin B1 is shown in red. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Figure 4. Cellular location of YB-1 is dependent on cell cycle phase. The top row are z-projections of 0.2 µm slices of synchronised A549 cells at sequential phases of the cell cycle. The second row shows the top slice, the third row shows the middle slide and the last row shows the bottom slices of each stack respectively. YB-1 (shown in green) is cytoplasmic in G1, becomes increasingly perinuclear during G2 and moves into the nucleus during prophase and remains there until telophase when it appears to be outside the nucleus. Lamin B1 is shown in red. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Cancers 12 00315 g004
Cancers 12 00315 g005 550
Figure 5. Phosphorylation of serine residues affects both NLS and CRS accessibility. (A) the solvent accessible surface area (SASA; blue) of the nuclear localisation signal (NLS; residues 183–205) in (from left to right) YB-1unphos, where the serine residues are not phosphorylated; YB-1 with serine 102 mutated to an alanine (YB-1S102A); YB-1S165A; YB-1S176A. A model of the NLS SASA when all serine residues are phosphorylated (YB-1phos) is shown on the right. The graph on the far right shows the SASA range for each of the models generated with NACCESS. (B) the solvent accessible surface area (SASA; orange) of the cytoplasmic retention signal (CRS; residues 247–267) in (from left to right) YB-1unphos, where the serine residues are not phosphorylated; YB-1 with serine 102 mutated to an alanine (YB-1S102A); YB-1S165A; YB-1S176A. A model of the CRS SASA when all serine residues are phosphorylated (YB-1phos) is shown on the right. The graph on the far right shows the SASA range for each of the models generated with NACCESS. C, shows (from left to right) confocal images of HCT116 cells with HA-tagged wild type (wt)YB-1 (green); HA-tagged YB-1S102A; YB-1S165A and YB-1S176A. Cell nuclei are stained with Hoechst (blue). The graphs on the right-hand side show the quantification of the percentage of cells with nuclear YB-1 in both HCT119 and A549_FUCCI cells. Each circle represents one experiment where at least 100 cells were analysed. The increase in the percentage of cells with nuclear YB-1 between those transfected with wtYB-1 or with a plasmid containing serine to alanine mutations, in both cell lines is highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Figure 5. Phosphorylation of serine residues affects both NLS and CRS accessibility. (A) the solvent accessible surface area (SASA; blue) of the nuclear localisation signal (NLS; residues 183–205) in (from left to right) YB-1unphos, where the serine residues are not phosphorylated; YB-1 with serine 102 mutated to an alanine (YB-1S102A); YB-1S165A; YB-1S176A. A model of the NLS SASA when all serine residues are phosphorylated (YB-1phos) is shown on the right. The graph on the far right shows the SASA range for each of the models generated with NACCESS. (B) the solvent accessible surface area (SASA; orange) of the cytoplasmic retention signal (CRS; residues 247–267) in (from left to right) YB-1unphos, where the serine residues are not phosphorylated; YB-1 with serine 102 mutated to an alanine (YB-1S102A); YB-1S165A; YB-1S176A. A model of the CRS SASA when all serine residues are phosphorylated (YB-1phos) is shown on the right. The graph on the far right shows the SASA range for each of the models generated with NACCESS. C, shows (from left to right) confocal images of HCT116 cells with HA-tagged wild type (wt)YB-1 (green); HA-tagged YB-1S102A; YB-1S165A and YB-1S176A. Cell nuclei are stained with Hoechst (blue). The graphs on the right-hand side show the quantification of the percentage of cells with nuclear YB-1 in both HCT119 and A549_FUCCI cells. Each circle represents one experiment where at least 100 cells were analysed. The increase in the percentage of cells with nuclear YB-1 between those transfected with wtYB-1 or with a plasmid containing serine to alanine mutations, in both cell lines is highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Cancers 12 00315 g005
Cancers 12 00315 g006 550
Figure 6. Western Blots from A549 cells following release from double thymidine block. Timepoints at which cells were harvested are shown below each of the blots. (A) YB-1, as detected by rabbit anti-YB-1 polyclonal antibody is shown in green. β-actin, as detected with a mouse anti-β-actin antibody is shown in red. (B) YB-1S102, as detected by rabbit anti-phospho-YB1ser102 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) is shown in green. β-actin, as detected with a mouse anti-β-actin antibody is shown in red. The last two lanes show treatment with si-YB-1 5′-GGUCCUCCACGCAAUUACCAGCAAA-3′) or a scrambled si-Control 5’-CCACACGAGUCUUACCAAGUUGCUU-3 from Invitrogen. (C) Ratio of pYB-1S102/YB-1 in A549 cells post 2T block. Densitometries for these westerns is shown in Table S4 (Supplementary Materials).
Figure 6. Western Blots from A549 cells following release from double thymidine block. Timepoints at which cells were harvested are shown below each of the blots. (A) YB-1, as detected by rabbit anti-YB-1 polyclonal antibody is shown in green. β-actin, as detected with a mouse anti-β-actin antibody is shown in red. (B) YB-1S102, as detected by rabbit anti-phospho-YB1ser102 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) is shown in green. β-actin, as detected with a mouse anti-β-actin antibody is shown in red. The last two lanes show treatment with si-YB-1 5′-GGUCCUCCACGCAAUUACCAGCAAA-3′) or a scrambled si-Control 5’-CCACACGAGUCUUACCAAGUUGCUU-3 from Invitrogen. (C) Ratio of pYB-1S102/YB-1 in A549 cells post 2T block. Densitometries for these westerns is shown in Table S4 (Supplementary Materials).
Cancers 12 00315 g006
Cancers 12 00315 g007 550
Figure 7. Proposed model of YB-1 location during cell cycle phases. YB-1 is shown in yellow. The phosphorylation status of YB-1 is depicted by the orange blocks below the cell graphic. In G1 phosphorylated YB-1 is cytoplasmic and becomes increasingly perinuclear as the cell moves from G1/S/G2. Just prior to the breakdown of the nuclear membrane in late G2 (represented by the broken magenta line), YB-1 is dephosphorylated, increasing the accessibility of the NLS enabling its movement into the nucleus where it remains during mitosis until the nuclear envelope is re-established in late telophase. Following phosphorylation and increased accessibility of the CRS, YB-1 moves to the cytoplasmic compartment. The mitotic spindle is depicted in green; chromosomes in light blue.
Figure 7. Proposed model of YB-1 location during cell cycle phases. YB-1 is shown in yellow. The phosphorylation status of YB-1 is depicted by the orange blocks below the cell graphic. In G1 phosphorylated YB-1 is cytoplasmic and becomes increasingly perinuclear as the cell moves from G1/S/G2. Just prior to the breakdown of the nuclear membrane in late G2 (represented by the broken magenta line), YB-1 is dephosphorylated, increasing the accessibility of the NLS enabling its movement into the nucleus where it remains during mitosis until the nuclear envelope is re-established in late telophase. Following phosphorylation and increased accessibility of the CRS, YB-1 moves to the cytoplasmic compartment. The mitotic spindle is depicted in green; chromosomes in light blue.
Cancers 12 00315 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mehta, S.; McKinney, C.; Algie, M.; Verma, C.S.; Kannan, S.; Harfoot, R.; Bartolec, T.K.; Bhatia, P.; Fisher, A.J.; Gould, M.L.; et al. Dephosphorylation of YB-1 is Required for Nuclear Localisation During G2 Phase of the Cell Cycle. Cancers 2020, 12, 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12020315

AMA Style

Mehta S, McKinney C, Algie M, Verma CS, Kannan S, Harfoot R, Bartolec TK, Bhatia P, Fisher AJ, Gould ML, et al. Dephosphorylation of YB-1 is Required for Nuclear Localisation During G2 Phase of the Cell Cycle. Cancers. 2020; 12(2):315. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12020315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mehta, Sunali, Cushla McKinney, Michael Algie, Chandra S. Verma, Srinivasaraghavan Kannan, Rhodri Harfoot, Tara K. Bartolec, Puja Bhatia, Alistair J. Fisher, Maree L. Gould, and et al. 2020. "Dephosphorylation of YB-1 is Required for Nuclear Localisation During G2 Phase of the Cell Cycle" Cancers 12, no. 2: 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12020315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop