Next Article in Journal
Change in Age at Diagnosis of Oropharyngeal Cancer in the United States, 1975–2016
Next Article in Special Issue
Predicting Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases in the BMBC Registry—Comparison of Three Different GPA Prognostic Scores
Previous Article in Journal
IL-2 and Anti-TGF-β Promote NK Cell Reconstitution and Anti-tumor Effects after Syngeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Blocking c-MET/ERBB1 Axis Prevents Brain Metastasis in ERBB2+ Breast Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients—Need for Improvement

by
Isabell Witzel
*,
Leticia Oliveira-Ferrer
and
Volkmar Müller
Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(11), 3190; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113190
Submission received: 23 October 2020 / Accepted: 26 October 2020 / Published: 30 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer)

1. Background

The incidence of brain metastases (BM) in breast cancer patients is increasing. This is probably a result of improved survival rates with long-lasting remissions even in metastatic breast cancer patients. BM are a sign of advanced disease with currently limited treatment strategies and usually short survival times. Although BM are a rare event after initial diagnosis of early breast cancer with a 5 year incidence of 1.7% [1], BM occur in 30–50% of patients with metastatic disease [2,3], and 7.2% of patients have BM at first diagnosis of metastatic disease [4]. Risk factors that were identified at initial diagnosis for the development of subsequent BM were larger tumor size, node-positive disease, no pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-positive or triple-negative subtype [5].

2. Open Questions and Future Directions of Clinical and Experimental Research

To improve treatment and possibly prevention of BM, better insights into mechanisms of brain tropism are required, and, therefore, research in this area is of high clinical relevance. The biology of BM is poorly understood. The ability to pass the blood–brain barrier and to survive and adapt within the new microenvironment may also determine the ability of tumor cells to metastasize to the brain in addition to a genetic predisposition of the tumor cell.
Treatment strategies for patients with BM are not well defined, as, until recently, these patients were excluded from many clinical trials. Therefore, evidence is based mostly on small cohort studies. As systemic treatments have limitations to be delivered through the blood–brain barrier, treatment of BM consists of neurosurgery and/or radiotherapy. Recently, various clinical trials have investigated the systemic treatment of BM in breast cancer patients with immunotherapeutic options and small molecules. With an increasing attention to the high clinical need for better evidence, some trials specifically allowed the inclusion of patients with active BM [6,7], and we hope to see more data from randomized trials in the future.
Finally, screening for BM, even in high-risk cohorts, has not been introduced into clinical routine. In addition, strategies to prevent patients from developing BM are unknown.

3. The Special Issue on Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer

In the context described above, it is the aim of this Special Issue to bundle current knowledge and new findings. This extends from basic research on the biology of BM in breast cancer to an overview about efforts to characterize features of breast cancer patients with BM in clinical cohorts and to updates about current and future treatment strategies. Therefore, this Special Issue should be of interest to basic researchers as well to clinicians involved in this emerging field.

Author Contributions

I.W., L.O.-F. and V.M. drafted the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

I.W. received speaker’s honoraria outside this work from Amgen, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre Pharme, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi-Aventis. V.M. received speaker honoraria from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Seattle Genetics and consultancy honoraria from Genomic Health, Hexal, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, ClinSol, Novartis, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, Tesaro, Seattle Genetics and Nektar, institutional research support from Novartis, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Genentech and travel grants from Roche, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo. L.O.-F. has no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Arvold, N.D.; Oh, K.S.; Niemierko, A.; Taghian, A.G.; Lin, N.U.; Abi-Raad, R.F.; Sreedhara, M.; Harris, J.R.; Alexander, B.M. Brain metastases after breast-conserving therapy and systemic therapy: Incidence and characteristics by biologic subtype. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012, 136, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lin, N.U.; Amiri-Kordestani, L.; Palmieri, D.; Liewehr, D.J.; Steeg, P.S. CNS metastases in breast cancer: Old challenge, new frontiers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 6404–6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Pestalozzi, B.C.; Holmes, E.; De Azambuja, E.; Metzger-Filho, O.; Hogge, L.; Scullion, M.; Lang, I.; Wardley, A.; Lichinitser, M.; Sanchez, R.I.L.; et al. CNS relapses in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who have and have not received adjuvant trastuzumab: A retrospective substudy of the HERA trial (BIG 1-01). Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Darlix, A.; Louvel, G.; Fraisse, J.; Jacot, W.; Brain, E.; Debled, M.; Mouret-Reynier, M.A.; Goncalves, A.; Dalenc, F.; Delaloge, S.; et al. Impact of breast cancer molecular subtypes on the incidence, kinetics and prognosis of central nervous system metastases in a large multicentre real-life cohort. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 121, 991–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Laakmann, E.; Witzel, I.; Fasching, P.A.; Rezai, M.; Schem, C.; Solbach, C.; Tesch, H.; Klare, P.; Schneeweiss, A.; Salat, C.; et al. Development of central nervous system metastases as a first site of metastatic disease in breast cancer patients treated in the neoadjuvant trials GeparQuinto and GeparSixto. Breast Cancer Res. 2019, 21, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lin, N.U.; Borges, V.; Anders, C.; Murthy, R.K.; Paplomata, E.; Hamilton, E.; Hurvitz, S.; Loi, S.; Okines, A.; Abramson, V.; et al. Intracranial Efficacy and Survival With Tucatinib Plus Trastuzumab and Capecitabine for Previously Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases in the HER2CLIMB Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2000, 38, JCO2000775. [Google Scholar]
  7. Murthy, R.K.; Murthy, R.K.; Loi, S.; Okines, A.; Paplomata, E.; Hamilton, E.; Hurvitz, S.A.; Lin, N.U.; Borges, V.; Abramson, V.; et al. Tucatinib, Trastuzumab, and Capecitabine for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Witzel, I.; Oliveira-Ferrer, L.; Müller, V. Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients—Need for Improvement. Cancers 2020, 12, 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113190

AMA Style

Witzel I, Oliveira-Ferrer L, Müller V. Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients—Need for Improvement. Cancers. 2020; 12(11):3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Witzel, Isabell, Leticia Oliveira-Ferrer, and Volkmar Müller. 2020. "Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients—Need for Improvement" Cancers 12, no. 11: 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop