Next Article in Journal
Brain Invasion along Perivascular Spaces by Glioma Cells: Relationship with Blood–Brain Barrier
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of JAK1 Pseudokinase Domain in Cytokine Signaling
Previous Article in Journal
Prognostic and Predictive Value of PBRM1 in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
JAK-STAT Signaling: A Double-Edged Sword of Immune Regulation and Cancer Progression
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/cancers12010019
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

STAT3 Activation and Oncogenesis in Lymphoma

by
Fen Zhu
1,2,†,
Kevin Boyang Wang
3,† and
Lixin Rui
1,2,*
1
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USA
2
Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USA
3
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southeast Regional Hospital, Bega, NSW 2550, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2020, 12(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010019
Submission received: 21 November 2019 / Revised: 13 December 2019 / Accepted: 17 December 2019 / Published: 19 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue JAK-STAT Signalling Pathway in Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is an important and the most studied transcription factor in the Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT signaling pathway. STAT3 mediates the expression of various genes that play a critical role in many cellular and biological processes, such as cell proliferation, survival, differentiation, migration, angiogenesis, and inflammation. STAT3 and associated JAKs are activated and tightly regulated by a variety of cytokines and growth factors and their receptors in normal immune responses. However, abnormal expression of STAT3 leads to its constitutive activation, which promotes malignant transformation and tumor progression through oncogenic gene expression in numerous human cancers. Human lymphoma is a heterogeneous malignancy of T and B lymphocytes. Constitutive signaling by STAT3 is an oncogenic driver in several types of B-cell lymphoma and most of T-cell lymphomas. Aberrant STAT3 activation can also induce inappropriate expression of genes involved in tumor immune evasion such as PD-L1. In this review, we focus on the oncogenic role of STAT3 in human lymphoma and highlight potential therapeutic intervention by targeting JAK/STAT3 signaling.

1. Introduction

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) was discovered in 1993 by a biochemical study, in which STAT3 functions as an acute phase response factor and binds to its consensus DNA motif in nuclear extracts from the liver cell line HepG2 upon stimulation with the cytokine IL-6 [1]. In the following year, STAT3 was molecularly cloned and further characterized as a signal transduction molecule that can be phosphorylated by signaling from receptors of the IL-6 family cytokines [2,3,4]. Since then, STAT3 has been the most studied member of the STAT family, with a total of more than 20,000 publications based on the PubMed database. In addition to the IL-6 family cytokines, STAT3 can be activated by many other cytokines, such as the common γ chain (γc) receptor family and various growth factors as well as nonreceptor tyrosine kinases [5,6]. When a cytokine binds to its cognate receptor, the receptor is dimerized and phosphorylated on its intracellular tail. These receptor activation events induce cross-Janus kinase (JAK) tyrosine phosphorylation and create docking sites for STAT3, where the activated JAK phosphorylates STAT3 [5,6]. Phosphorylation of STAT3 on Tyr-705 in the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain facilitates STAT3 dimerization and nuclear translocation, where phosphorylated dimers directly bind to DNA consensus sequences for gene transcription [5,6]. STAT3 can recruit nuclear co-activators, possibly through a transactivation (TAD) domain, to enhance its transcriptional activity [5,6].
STAT3, a key transcription factor in the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, regulates expression of genes that control various cellular and biological processes, including cell proliferation, survival, differentiation, migration, angiogenesis, inflammation, and immune responses [7,8]. STAT3 activation is tightly controlled and only occurs within a short window of time during normal immune responses [8]. Accumulating evidence, however, demonstrates dysregulation and constitutive activation of STAT3 that are associated with several human diseases including cancer [5,8]. The mechanisms underlying aberrant STAT3 activation during tumor development include autocrine action of cytokines, cytokine receptor amplification and activating mutations, gain-of-function mutations in STAT3 and JAKs, and loss of function mutations in negative regulators (e.g., Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor Type T (PTPRT), SOCS1, and SOCS3), depending on the types an the stages of individual cancers [5,6,9,10,11]. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of STAT3 activation and oncogenesis in B- and T-cell lymphomas and discuss potential therapeutic intervention.

2. STAT3 Domains and Alternative Splicing Isoforms

STAT3 and other STAT proteins contain six domains: a conserved amino-terminus, a coiled-coil domain, a DNA-binding domain (DBD), a linker domain, the SH2 domain, and a carboxy-terminal TAD (Figure 1) [12]. The SH2 domain is a key functional domain, which mediates STAT3 transit binding to cytokine receptors, STAT3 dimerization, and consequent nuclear translocation [12]. This action is modulated by phosphorylation events close to the C-terminus of STAT3 [13]. Phosphorylation of Tyr-705 in the SH2 domain is well characterized as an early event for STAT3 activation, which is mediated by JAKs and nonreceptor kinases, such as Src and Abl [5,14] autoimmune diseasesions in lymphoma cells. AT3b through a high concerved acceptor site in exon 23, main for receptor binding a STAT3 transcriptional activity is enhanced by phosphorylation of serine (Ser)-727 on the TAD [15,16]. The underlying mechanism is less understood, but the serine phosphorylation can facilitate recruitment of co-activators to the STAT3 transcription site [17]. In addition, Thr-714 phosphorylation together with Ser-727 phosphorylation is required for STAT3 transcriptional activity and the serine/threonine kinases GSK3α and phosphorylate both Ser-727 and Thr-714 [18].
The STAT3 gene has two splice sites close to its 3′ end, which create four STAT3 splice variants, termed α, β, ΔS-α, and ΔS-β (Figure 1) [19,20]. A highly conserved acceptor site in exon 23 generates either STAT3 α that includes a 55-residue TAD or STAT3β, which contains seven unique residues at the C-terminus but lacks the TAD [19,20]. A short-range donor (5′) splice site results in ΔS-α and ΔS-β, in which three nucleotides that encode Ser-701 are excluded (Figure 1) [20,21]. We were able to detect expression of all four isoforms of STAT3 in eosinophils and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cells by qPCR analysis [20]. We found that the expression pattern is similar between the two types of cells. STAT3α is the most abundant isoform, accounting for ~75% [20]. STAT3β is expressed at ~10%, and STAT3ΔS-α and STAT3ΔS-β together contribute to the remaining ~15% of expression [20].
STAT3α plays a major role in STAT3-associated oncogenesis [12]. Expression of constitutively active STAT3α promotes proliferation, tumor growth, and metastasis in various tumor models [12,22,23]. An early elegant genetic study has demonstrated that activating mutations (A661C and N663C) within the C-terminal SH2 domain facilitate STAT3α dimerization, nuclear translocation, and gene transcription, leading to cellular transformation [24]. Phosphorylation of STAT3 on Ser-727 by protein kinase C in solid tumor cell lines leads to STAT3α activation, which induces expression of genes involved in cancer migration and invasion [25]. STAT3α is upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells when stimulated with G-CSF, which may enhance proliferation and block differentiation [26]. STAT3β has been suggested as a negative regulator of STAT3α and a tumor suppressor despite its functional enigma [12]. For example, STAT3β expression inhibits the survival and proliferation of human ovarian and breast cancer cells, in which STAT3 is constitutively activated [27,28]. Overexpression of STAT3β in B16 melanoma cells diminishes STAT3 DNA-binding activity, blocks STAT3-mediated gene expression and reduces cell proliferation [29]. The same group has also demonstrated antitumor effects of STAT3β in vivo [30]. The tumor suppressor function of STAT3β is further demonstrated in xenograft mouse models [31,32] and by a recent AML study [33].
STAT3ΔS-α and -ΔS-β are less studied, and biology of these two isoforms with a deletion of serine 701 is unknown. STAT3 is constitutively activated in the subtype of activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCL cells [34]. Constitutive activation of STAT3 is required for the survival and proliferation of ABC DLBCL cells [34,35]. We examined the function of STAT3 isoforms in ABC DLBCL using a knockdown/re-expression strategy and tested whether expression of STAT3ΔS-α or -ΔS-β is required for the survival of DLBCL cells [36]. We used a constitutively activated form of STAT3 (STAT3-C) as a positive control [24]. The results revealed that the best rescue effect was observed when all four isoforms were re-expressed [36]. A partial rescue was achieved with re-expression of STAT3α and STAT3ΔS-α or STAT3β and STAT3ΔS-β in pairs [36]. Re-expressing any of the four isoforms had very limited rescue effects [36]. These results suggest that expression of STAT3ΔS-α and -ΔS-β is not dispensable for optimal STAT3 function in ABC DLBCL cells.

3. The Role of STAT3 in Human Lymphoma

3.1. STAT3 Mutations

Somatic STAT3 mutations are largely restricted to hematological disorders (Table 1). STAT3 mutations have been discovered in 40% of patients with T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGL), a cytotoxic T-cell malignancy that is often associated with autoimmune diseases [38]. Highly frequent mutations of STAT3 are also present in large granular lymphocytic leukemia of natural killer cells (NK-LGL) (30%) [37]. STAT3 is mutated in 6% of natural killer/T-cell lymphomas (NKTCL) and 8% of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) [43]. STAT3 mutations are rare in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other T-cell malignancies [52,57,60]. Hot spots of STAT3 missense mutations are located in the SH2 domain, including Y640F, D661V, and D661Y (Table 1) [7]. STAT3 gain-of-function mutations have been assessed by an increase in its phosphorylation and transcriptional activity, which can promote the survival and proliferation of malignant cells (Table 1).

3.2. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

DLBCL is a type of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accounting for 30–40% of newly diagnosed cases [62]. Gene expression profiling has identified two main molecular subtypes termed activated B-cell-like (ABC) and germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) DLBCL cells [63,64,65]. ABC DLBCL cells bear genetic alterations in the Toll-like receptor (TLR) and B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathways [66,67,68]. These two hallmark oncogenic pathways lead to high NF-κB activity [69] that induces production of IL-6 and IL-10 in ABC DLBCL cells (Figure 2) [68]. Autocrine action of IL-6 and IL-10 results in constitutive activation of JAK1 [70] and STAT3 [34,36,71,72], which promotes the survival and proliferation of ABC DLBCL cells. In addition to a canonical pathway, we characterized an epigenetic mechanism of JAK1 in gene regulation [70,73,74]. JAK1 is transferred into the nucleus, where the kinase directly phosphorylates histone H3 to activate gene expression [70]. We identified ~3000 target genes by JAK1 through this mechanism, including NF-κB pathway genes [70]. These findings demonstrate a feed-forward regulatory mechanism between the JAK1 and NF-κB signaling pathways in gene expression, which may play an important role in the pathogenesis of ABC DLBCL.
In addition to promoting cell survival, STAT3 activation has been found to be associated with an inferior clinical outcome in DLBCL [75,76]. To investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying STAT3 oncogenesis in ABC DLBCL, we recently identified ~2000 STAT3 target genes in ABC DLBCL by genomic analysis [35]. These include NF-κB pathway genes (e.g., NFKB2, NFKBIA, NFKBIZ, CXCL13, and TRAF1), JAK/STAT pathway genes (e.g., IL-10, SOCS3, and STAT3), antiapoptotic pathway genes (e.g., BCL2, MCL1, BCL2L11, and CASP8), and PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 pathway genes (e.g., AKT2, SCL7A11, and ACSL3) (Figure 2) [35,77]. In addition, STAT3 functions as a transcriptional suppressor and inhibits transcription of genes in the type I interferon signaling pathway, including IRF7, IRF9, STAT1, and STAT2 [35,77]. Anti-type I interferon properties of STAT3 have been characterized as an antiviral defense mechanism [78,79,80]. The type I interferon pathway is lethal to ABC DLBCL cells, which can be also suppressed by the transcription complex IRF4/SPIB [81].
We also performed genome-wide analysis in both ABC DLBCL and normal activated B-cells and identified 1014 STAT3 targets that are specific for ABC DLBCL, including the immune checkpoint molecule PD-L1, the transcriptional activator MEF2B, the hematopoietic cell kinase (HCK), the Epstein–Barr virus-induced genes 3 (EBI3), and genes involved in regulating cellular metabolism (e.g., SCARB1) [77]. PD-L1 is a well-studied immune checkpoint molecule that binds to the inhibitory PD-1 receptor on T-cells and suppresses T-cell activation [82]. In DLBCL, PD-L1 overexpression has been found in ~25% of the ABC subtype but is rare in the GCB subtype [83]. High levels of PD-L1 expression are correlated with a poor survival outcome in DLBCL [83,84]. Several mechanisms underlying PD-L1 overexpression have been investigated, including genomic amplifications and translocations [85] and BCR-mediated NFATc1 activation through IL-10/STAT3 [86].
In conclusion, the JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway plays an important role in the pathogenesis of DLBCL. Constitutively active STAT3 regulates expression of genes that are involved in multiple oncogenic processes in ABC DLBCL, including promoting cell survival, proliferation, and migration, reprogramming metabolism and facilitating tumor immune evasion. Targeting JAK1/STAT3 signaling represents a promising therapeutic strategy in ABC DLBCL.

3.3. Mantle Cell Lymphoma

STAT3 is phosphorylated in 20–40% of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an aggressive, rare form of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma [87,88]. Constitutive activation of STAT3 can result from IL-6, which is produced by MCL cells or cells in tumor microenvironment [89]. SOCS3, a negatively regulator of the JAK–STAT signaling pathway, loses its expression in ~50% of MCL due to DNA methylation [90]. A recent study has revealed a unique role of STAT3 in MCL, which demonstrates that STAT3 represses expression of SOX11, a critical transcription factor that promotes lymphomagenesis in MCL [91]. This finding indicates that STAT3 may not be an ideal target in MCL given its negative role in SOX11 regulation.

3.4. Hodgkin Lymphoma and Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), a common cancer in young adults, is characterized by the presence of Reed-Sternberg cells, which harbor various recurrent genetic lesions, including chromosome 9p24 amplification (e.g., copy number gain of JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2) and mutations in genes in the JAK–STAT and NF-κB signaling pathways (e.g., STAT6, SOCS1, TNFAIP3, and NFKBIE) [92,93,94,95,96,97]. HL shares genetic and biological features and oncogenic mechanisms with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, a subtype of DLBCL [94,98]. These genetic alterations result in constitutive activations of the antiapoptotic and proinflammatory NF-κB and JAK–STAT signaling pathways, as well as tumor immune evasion [95,96]. STAT3 phosphorylation has been found in HL cell lines and primary Reed-Sternberg cells [99,100]. Inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 activation can trigger cell apoptosis in vitro [101] and inhibit tumor growth in an HL xenograft mouse model [102]. In addition to the genomic amplification, PD-L1 and PD-L2 can be upregulated by the co-amplified gene JAK2 in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and HL [94]. Targeting the PD-1/PD-L pathway can significantly improve progression-free survival time in 86% of patients with relapsed or treatment refractory HL [103].

3.5. Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of plasma cells (terminally differentiated B-cells) in the bone marrow, accounting for 10% of all hematological malignances [104]. Hallmark oncogenic signaling pathways in MM include JAK-STAT3, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and NF-κB [105,106], in which STAT3 is activated by the IL-6–JAK–STAT3 axis [107,108]. A positive feedback regulatory loop between STAT3 and phosphatase of regenerating liver 3 (PRL-3) is another mechanism underlying STAT3 activation in MM [107]. Hypermethylation and silencing of the negative regulators SOCS1 and SHP1 can also contribute to high STAT3 activity in MM [109,110]. Expression of antiapoptotic pathway genes such as MCL-1, BCL2, and BCL-XL due to STAT3 activation promotes MM cell survival [107,111]. STAT3 activity promotes expansion and activation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which mediate immunosuppression and facilitate tumor progression in the MM bone marrow microenvironment [112,113,114]. Expression of phosphorylated STAT3 is associated with poor prognosis and survival in MM patients [115]. Several preclinical studies have demonstrated that inhibition of JAK/STAT3 signaling alone or in combination with other antitumor reagents inhibits MM cell growth both in vitro and in vivo [116,117,118,119].

3.6. T-Cell Lymphomas

The JAK/STAT signaling pathway mediated by the common γc receptor-dependent cytokines IL-2, -4, -7, -9, -15, and -21 plays critical roles in T-cell immune responses [120]. Abnormal activation of the JAK/STAT pathway, which can be assessed by STAT3 and STAT5 phosphorylation, is pervasive in diverse T-cell malignancies [121]. In peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and extranodal NKTCL, recurrent mutations in STAT3 are most frequent, followed by JAK1, JAK3, and SOCS1 (Table 1) [44]. STAT3 mutations are activated and lead to increased phosphorylation and transcriptional activity of STAT3 [25]. In addition to promoting cell survival and proliferation, constitutive activation of STAT3 in cancer cells causes high levels of PD-L1 expression, which may facilitate tumor immune evasion (Figure 3) [44]. Activating STAT3 mutations are present in 50% of NK cell lines and 67% of γδ-T-cell lines (67%) but only in 5.9% of NKTCL and 8.3% of γδ-PTCL patient samples [43]. This suggests that these mutations are critical in cell survival independent of stromal components and therefore selectively enriched in cell lines. In anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), JAK1 and STAT3 are activated by high levels of cytokines, including IL-6 [122]. The treatment with the JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib reduces xenografted ALCL tumor growth [122].

4. Targeting JAK/STAT3 Signaling in Lymphoma

4.1. Direct STAT3 Inhibition

Aberrant expression and constitutive activation in several types of B-cell lymphoma and in almost all T-cell lymphomas render STAT3 as a promising potential therapeutic target. STAT3 inhibitors have been developed to interact with the STAT3 domains, with a major focus on the SH2 domain and the DBD [123]. The STAT three inhibitor compound (Stattic) is an SH2-domain inhibitor, discovered by a high-throughput chemical library screen [124]. Stattic inhibits STAT3 activation by binding to cysteine residues close to the phosphopeptide-binding area of the SH2 domain [124]. Other recently developed inhibitors targeting the SH2 domain of STAT3 include S3I-201 [125], its analog S3I-1757 [126], STA-21, and its derivatives LLL-3 and LLL-12 [127,128,129]. Effectiveness of these inhibitors in STAT3 inhibition has been tested in solid cancers [128,130,131,132]. The small peptide aptamer DBD-1 is an STAT3 DBD inhibitor, which prevents STAT3 from DNA binding but does not affect STAT3 activation [133]. InS3-54 is another DBD inhibitor, which demonstrates selectivity for STAT3 over STAT1 [134,135]. STAT3 SH2-domain inhibitors are slow to move into clinical medicine due to high homology of the SH2 domain between STAT3 and other family members as well as high concentrations required for disruption of protein–protein interactions, which increase off-target toxicities [123].
To date, no STAT3 inhibitors have yet been approved to treat cancer by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but many early-phase clinical trials are ongoing [136]. AZD9150, an antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of STAT3, inhibits STAT3 activation in ALCL and nonsmall cell lung cancer lines and demonstrates antitumor activity in lymphoma and lung cancer patient-derived xenograft models [137]. AZD9150 is currently under clinical trials for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NCT03527147) and nonsmall cell lung cancer (NCT03334617). Napabucasin (or BBI608), which can inhibit gene expression driven by STAT3 and cancer stemness [138], is being clinically evaluated in solid cancers [139].

4.2. Upstream Inhibition of STAT3

As STAT3 is downstream to several cytokine and growth factor receptors and their associated JAKs, blocking these receptors by monoclonal antibodies or inhibiting JAKs by small molecular inhibitors represents a promising therapeutic option in both B- and T-cell malignancies. Ruxolitinib has been approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis [140] and polycythemia vera [141]. Ruxolitinib has shown promising antitumor activity in preclinical studies of ABC DLBCL [35], ATLL [142], and MM [117]. Ruxolitinib is currently under a phase 2 clinical study in DLBCL and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NCT01431209), a phase 1 trial in MM (NCT03110822), and a clinical investigation in adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) (NCT01712659). Daclizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed to the IL-2 receptor subunit IL-2R, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of patients with chronic ATLL [143]. The therapeutic effectiveness of an anti-IL-6 antibody, Siltuximab (CNTO 328), has been clinically evaluated in Castleman’s disease and MM [144].

4.3. Combined Inhibition of JAK/STAT3 and Other Oncogenic Pathways

Because of the crosstalk between the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway and many other oncogenic pathways (e.g., NF-κB, PI3K, and BCL2) in B- and T-cell lymphoma [65,121], combination therapy that targets JAK/STAT3 and additional oncogenic signaling pathways may increase the effectiveness of treatments. The combination of Ruxolitinib and the BCL-2/BCL-XL inhibitor navitoclax dramatically inhibits growth of primary ATL cells in vitro as well as in an ATL xenograft mouse model [142]. IL-6-induced STAT3 or STAT5 activation is associated with the acquired resistance to PI3K inhibitors in T- and B-cell lymphoma cell lines, and co-targeting JAK/STAT3 and PI3K signaling resensitizes the lymphoma cell lines to a PI3K inhibitor [145].
Our recent studies suggest several potential combination therapeutic strategies in DLBCL [35,70,77]. In ABC DLBCL, the crosstalk between JAK1 and NF-κB signaling promotes cancer cell survival [70]. Co-inhibition of JAK1 and BTK, an early BCR pathway gene that activates NF-κB, by their selective inhibitors synergistically kills ABC DLBCL cells [70]. A phase 1 trial of the JAK1 inhibitor itacitinib and the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has been initiated in relapsed or refractory DLBCL (NCT02760485). As a transcriptional activator and repressor, STAT3 upregulates genes in multiple oncogenic pathways (e.g., PI3K, cell cycle, and NF-κB) while suppressing gene expression in the lethal type I interferon signaling pathway [35]. Co-treatment of Ruxolitinib and the type I interferon inducer lenalidomide inhibits growth of ABC DLBCL cells in vitro and in vivo [35]. Inhibition of SGK1, a target gene of STAT3, by its inhibitor synergizes with AKT inhibitors in the killing of ABC DLBCL cells [77].

5. Conclusions

Although STAT3 expression is properly controlled in normal immune responses, constitutive activation of STAT3 is common in human lymphoma. Aberrant activation of STAT3 promotes tumor cell survival, proliferation, and migration through regulating gene expression in multiple oncogenic pathways. In addition, constitutive signaling by STAT3 plays an important role in evasion of immune surveillance. Targeting JAK/STAT3 signaling inhibits tumor growth and enhances antitumor immune responses. Therefore, STAT3 is a promising therapeutic target in lymphoma. Despite significant efforts, no STAT3 inhibitors have yet been approved in the clinic setting. Future perspectives include developing more potent and selective STAT3 inhibitors for cancer therapy.

Author Contributions

L.R. conceived the project and wrote the manuscript. F.Z. searched the literature and generated Table 1. K.B.W. searched the literature and summarized data of clinical studies. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported for L.R. by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) (grant number: R01 CA187299).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wegenka, U.M.; Buschmann, J.; Lutticken, C.; Heinrich, P.C.; Horn, F. Acute-phase response factor, a nuclear factor binding to acute-phase response elements, is rapidly activated by interleukin-6 at the posttranslational level. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993, 13, 276–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Akira, S.; Nishio, Y.; Inoue, M.; Wang, X.J.; Wei, S.; Matsusaka, T.; Yoshida, K.; Sudo, T.; Naruto, M.; Kishimoto, T. Molecular cloning of APRF, a novel IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 p91-related transcription factor involved in the gp130-mediated signaling pathway. Cell 1994, 77, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhong, Z.; Wen, Z.; Darnell, J.E., Jr. Stat3: A STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Science 1994, 264, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Taga, T.; Kishimoto, T. Gp130 and the interleukin-6 family of cytokines. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1997, 15, 797–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bowman, T.; Garcia, R.; Turkson, J.; Jove, R. STATs in oncogenesis. Oncogene 2000, 19, 2474–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Benekli, M.; Baer, M.R.; Baumann, H.; Wetzler, M. Signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins in leukemias. Blood 2003, 101, 2940–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Leonard, W.J.; O’Shea, J.J. Jaks and STATs: Biological implications. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1998, 16, 293–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. O’Shea, J.J.; Holland, S.M.; Staudt, L.M. JAKs and STATs in immunity, immunodeficiency, and cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, P.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, X.; Sedwick, D.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z. Cross-talk between phospho-STAT3 and PLCgamma1 plays a critical role in colorectal tumorigenesis. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 2011, 9, 1418–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Chen, E.; Staudt, L.M.; Green, A.R. Janus kinase deregulation in leukemia and lymphoma. Immunity 2012, 36, 529–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Zhang, X.; Guo, A.; Yu, J.; Possemato, A.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, W.; Polakiewicz, R.D.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B.; Velculescu, V.E.; et al. Identification of STAT3 as a substrate of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 4060–4064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Aigner, P.; Just, V.; Stoiber, D. STAT3 isoforms: Alternative fates in cancer? Cytokine 2019, 118, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stahl, N.; Farruggella, T.J.; Boulton, T.G.; Zhong, Z.; Darnell, J.E., Jr.; Yancopoulos, G.D. Choice of STATs and other substrates specified by modular tyrosine-based motifs in cytokine receptors. Science 1995, 267, 1349–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Song, L.; Rawal, B.; Nemeth, J.A.; Haura, E.B. JAK1 activates STAT3 activity in non-small-cell lung cancer cells and IL-6 neutralizing antibodies can suppress JAK1-STAT3 signaling. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2011, 10, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Wen, Z.; Darnell, J.E., Jr. Mapping of Stat3 serine phosphorylation to a single residue (727) and evidence that serine phosphorylation has no influence on DNA binding of Stat1 and Stat3. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 2062–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wen, Z.; Zhong, Z.; Darnell, J.E., Jr. Maximal activation of transcription by Stat1 and Stat3 requires both tyrosine and serine phosphorylation. Cell 1995, 82, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Decker, T.; Kovarik, P. Transcription factor activity of STAT proteins: Structural requirements and regulation by phosphorylation and interacting proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1999, 55, 1535–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Waitkus, M.S.; Chandrasekharan, U.M.; Willard, B.; Tee, T.L.; Hsieh, J.K.; Przybycin, C.G.; Rini, B.I.; Dicorleto, P.E. Signal integration and gene induction by a functionally distinct STAT3 phosphoform. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014, 34, 1800–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Maritano, D.; Sugrue, M.L.; Tininini, S.; Dewilde, S.; Strobl, B.; Fu, X.; Murray-Tait, V.; Chiarle, R.; Poli, V. The STAT3 isoforms alpha and beta have unique and specific functions. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Turton, K.B.; Annis, D.S.; Rui, L.; Esnault, S.; Mosher, D.F. Ratios of Four STAT3 Splice Variants in Human Eosinophils and Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Cells. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Schaefer, T.S.; Sanders, L.K.; Nathans, D. Cooperative transcriptional activity of Jun and Stat3 beta, a short form of Stat3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 9097–9101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Tang, J.Z.; Kong, X.J.; Banerjee, A.; Muniraj, N.; Pandey, V.; Steiner, M.; Perry, J.k.; Zhu, T.; Liu, D.X.; Lobie, P.E. STAT3alpha is oncogenic for endometrial carcinoma cells and mediates the oncogenic effects of autocrine human growth hormone. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 4133–4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Schaefer, L.K.; Ren, Z.; Fuller, G.N.; Schaefer, T.S. Constitutive activation of Stat3alpha in brain tumors: Localization to tumor endothelial cells and activation by the endothelial tyrosine kinase receptor (VEGFR-2). Oncogene 2002, 21, 2058–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Bromberg, J.F.; Wrzeszczynska, M.H.; Devgan, G.; Zhao, Y.; Pestell, R.G.; Albanese, C.; Darnell, J.E. Stat3 as an oncogene. Cell 1999, 98, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Aziz, M.H.; Hafeez, B.B.; Sand, J.M.; Pierce, D.B.; Aziz, S.W.; Dreckschmidt, N.E.; Verma, A.K. Protein kinase Cvarepsilon mediates Stat3Ser727 phosphorylation, Stat3-regulated gene expression, and cell invasion in various human cancer cell lines through integration with MAPK cascade (RAF-1, MEK1/2, and ERK1/2). Oncogene 2010, 29, 3100–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Chakraborty, A.; White, S.M.; Schaefer, T.S.; Ball, E.D.; Dyer, K.F.; Tweardy, D.J. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor activation of Stat3 alpha and Stat3 beta in immature normal and leukemic human myeloid cells. Blood 1996, 88, 2442–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Burke, W.M.; Jin, X.; Lin, H.J.; Huang, M.; Liu, R.; Reynolds, R.K.; Lin, J. Inhibition of constitutively active Stat3 suppresses growth of human ovarian and breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2001, 20, 7925–7934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Xu, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J. Dominant negative STAT3 suppresses the growth and invasion capability of human lung cancer cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2009, 2, 819–824. [Google Scholar]
  29. Niu, G.; Shain, K.H.; Huang, M.; Ravi, R.; Bedi, A.; Dalton, W.S.; Jove, R.; Yu, H. Overexpression of a dominant-negative signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 variant in tumor cells leads to production of soluble factors that induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 3276–3280. [Google Scholar]
  30. Niu, G.; Heller, R.; Catlett-Falcone, R.; Coppola, D.; Jaroszeski, M.; Dalton, W.; Jove, R.; Yu, H. Gene therapy with dominant-negative Stat3 suppresses growth of the murine melanoma B16 tumor in vivo. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 5059–5063. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, H.F.; Chen, Y.; Wu, C.; Wu, Z.Y.; Tweardy, D.J.; Alshareef, A.; Liao, L.D.; Xue, Y.J.; Wu, J.Y.; Chen, B. The Opposing Function of STAT3 as an Oncoprotein and Tumor Suppressor Is Dictated by the Expression Status of STAT3beta in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 691–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Zammarchi, F.; de Stanchina, E.; Bournazou, E.; Supakorndej, T.; Martires, K.; Riedel, E.; Corben, A.D.; Bromberg, J.F.; Cartegni, L. Antitumorigenic potential of STAT3 alternative splicing modulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 17779–17784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Aigner, P.; Mizutani, T.; Horvath, J.; Eder, T.; Heber, S.; Lind, K.; Just, V.; Moll, H.P.; Yeroslaviz, A.; Fischer, M.J.M.; et al. STAT3beta is a tumor suppressor in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 1989–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Lam, L.T.; Wright, G.; Davis, R.E.; Lenz, G.; Farinha, P.; Dang, L.; Chan, J.W.; Rosenwald, A.; Gascoyne, R.D.; Staudt, L.M. Cooperative signaling through the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and nuclear factor-{kappa}B pathways in subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2008, 111, 3701–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Lu, L.; Zhu, F.; Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Drennan, A.C.; Kimpara, S.; Rumball, I.; Selzer, C.; Cameron, H.; Kellicut, A.; et al. Gene regulation and suppression of type I interferon signaling by STAT3 in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E498–E505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zheng, M.; Turton, K.B.; Zhu, F.; Li, Y.; Grindle, K.M.; Annis, D.S.; Lu, L.; Drennan, A.C.; Tweardy, D.J.; Bharadwaj, U.; et al. A mix of S and DeltaS variants of STAT3 enable survival of activated B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells in culture. Oncogenesis 2016, 4, e184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jerez, A.; Clemente, M.J.; Makishima, H.; Koskela, H.; Leblanc, F.; Ng, K.P.; Olson, T.; Przychodzen, B.; Afable, M.; Gomez-Segui, I.; et al. STAT3 mutations unify the pathogenesis of chronic lymphoproliferative disorders of NK cells and T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Blood 2012, 120, 3048–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Koskela, H.L.; Eldfors, S.; Ellonen, P.; van Adrichem, A.J.; Kuusanmaki, H.; Andersson, E.I.; Lagstrom, S.; Clemente, M.J.; Olson, T.; Jalkanen, S.E.; et al. Somatic STAT3 mutations in large granular lymphocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 1905–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Qiu, Z.Y.; Fan, L.; Wang, L.; Qiao, C.; Wu, Y.J.; Zhou, J.F.; Xu, W.; Li, J.Y. STAT3 mutations are frequent in T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia with pure red cell aplasia. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2013, 6, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ohgami, R.S.; Ma, L.; Monabati, A.; Zehnder, J.L.; Arber, D.A. STAT3 mutations are present in aggressive B-cell lymphomas including a subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with CD30 expression. Haematologica 2014, 99, e105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Couronne, L.; Scourzic, L.; Pilati, C.; Della Valle, V.; Duffourd, Y.; Solary, E.; Vainchenker, W.; Merlio, J.P.; Beylot-Barry, M.; Damm, F.; et al. STAT3 mutations identified in human hematologic neoplasms induce myeloid malignancies in a mouse bone marrow transplantation model. Haematologica 2013, 98, 1748–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Kristensen, T.; Larsen, M.; Rewes, A.; Frederiksen, H.; Thomassen, M.; Moller, M.B. Clinical relevance of sensitive and quantitative STAT3 mutation analysis using next-generation sequencing in T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia. J. Mol. Diagn. 2014, 16, 382–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kucuk, C.; Jiang, B.; Hu, X.; Zhang, W.; Chan, J.K.; Xiao, W.; Lack, N.; Alkan, C.; Williams, J.C.; Avery, K.N.; et al. Activating mutations of STAT5B and STAT3 in lymphomas derived from gammadelta-T or NK cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Song, T.L.; Nairismagi, M.L.; Laurensia, Y.; Lim, J.Q.; Tan, J.; Li, Z.M.; Pang, W.L.; Kizhakeyil, A.; Wijaya, G.C.; Huang, D.C.; et al. Oncogenic activation of the STAT3 pathway drives PD-L1 expression in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2018, 132, 1146–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Shi, M.; He, R.; Feldman, A.L.; Viswanatha, D.S.; Jevremovic, D.; Chen, D.; Morice, W.G. STAT3 mutation and its clinical and histopathologic correlation in T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia. Hum. Pathol. 2018, 73, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Teramo, A.; Barila, G.; Calabretto, G.; Ercolin, C.; Lamy, T.; Moignet, A.; Roussel, M.; Pastoret, C.; Leoncin, M.; Gattazzo, C.; et al. STAT3 mutation impacts biological and clinical features of T-LGL leukemia. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 61876–61889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Crescenzo, R.; Abate, F.; Lasorsa, E.; Tabbo, F.; Gaudiano, M.; Chiesa, N.; Di Giacomo, F.; Spaccaretella, E.; Barbarossa, L.; Ercole, E.; et al. Convergent mutations and kinase fusions lead to oncogenic STAT3 activation in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell 2015, 27, 516–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Dufva, O.; Kankainen, M.; Kelkka, T.; Sekiguchi, N.; Awad, S.A.; Eldfors, S.; Yadav, B.; Kuusanmaki, H.; Malani, D.; Andersson, E.I.; et al. Aggressive natural killer-cell leukemia mutational landscape and drug profiling highlight JAK-STAT signaling as therapeutic target. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fasan, A.; Kern, W.; Grossmann, V.; Haferlach, C.; Haferlach, T.; Schnittger, S. STAT3 mutations are highly specific for large granular lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2013, 27, 1598–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Loughran, T.P., Jr.; Zickl, L.; Olson, T.L.; Wang, V.; Zhang, D.; Rajala, H.L.; Hasanali, Z.; Bennett, J.M.; Lazarus, H.M.; Litzow, M.R.; et al. Immunosuppressive therapy of LGL leukemia: Prospective multicenter phase II study by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E5998). Leukemia 2015, 29, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Nicolae, A.; Xi, L.; Pham, T.H.; Pham, T.A.; Navarro, W.; Meeker, H.G.; Pittaluga, S.; Jaffe, E.S.; Raffeld, M. Mutations in the JAK/STAT and RAS signaling pathways are common in intestinal T-cell lymphomas. Leukemia 2016, 30, 2245–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Hu, G.; Witzig, T.E.; Gupta, M. A novel missense (M206K) STAT3 mutation in diffuse large B cell lymphoma deregulates STAT3 signaling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Haapaniemi, E.M.; Kaustio, M.; Rajala, H.L.; van Adrichem, A.J.; Kainulainen, L.; Glumoff, V.; Doffinger, R.; Kuusanmaki, H.; Heiskanen-Kosma, T.; Trotta, L.; et al. Autoimmunity, hypogammaglobulinemia, lymphoproliferation, and mycobacterial disease in patients with activating mutations in STAT3. Blood 2015, 125, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Nabhani, S.; Schipp, C.; Miskin, H.; Levin, C.; Postovsky, S.; Dujovny, T.; Koren, A.; Harlev, D.; Bis, A.M.; Auer, F.; et al. STAT3 gain-of-function mutations associated with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome like disease deregulate lymphocyte apoptosis and can be targeted by BH3 mimetic compounds. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 181, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chandrasekaran, P.; Zimmerman, O.; Paulson, M.; Sampaio, E.P.; Freeman, A.F.; Sowerwine, K.J.; Hurt, D.; Alcantara-Montiel, J.C.; Hsu, A.P.; Holland, S.M. Distinct mutations at the same positions of STAT3 cause either loss or gain of function. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 138, 1222–1224.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Milner, J.D.; Vogel, T.P.; Forbes, L.; Ma, C.A.; Stray-Pedersen, A.; Niemela, J.E.; Lyons, J.J.; Engelhardt, K.R.; Zhang, Y.; Topcagic, N.; et al. Early-onset lymphoproliferation and autoimmunity caused by germline STAT3 gain-of-function mutations. Blood 2015, 125, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Morin, R.D.; Mendez-Lago, M.; Mungall, A.J.; Goya, R.; Mungall, K.L.; Corbett, R.D.; Johnson, N.A.; Severson, T.M.; Chiu, R.; Field, M.; et al. Frequent mutation of histone-modifying genes in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Nature 2011, 476, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Odejide, O.; Weigert, O.; Lane, A.A.; Toscano, D.; Lunning, M.A.; Kopp, N.; Kim, S.; van Bodegom, D.; Bolla, S.; Schatz, J.H.; et al. A targeted mutational landscape of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2014, 123, 1293–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Andersson, E.; Kuusanmaki, H.; Bortoluzzi, S.; Lagstrom, S.; Parsons, A.; Rajala, H.; van Adrichem, A.; Eldfors, S.; Olson, T.; Clemente, M.J.; et al. Activating somatic mutations outside the SH2-domain of STAT3 in LGL leukemia. Leukemia 2016, 30, 1204–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lohr, J.G.; Stojanov, P.; Lawrence, M.S.; Auclair, D.; Chapuy, B.; Sougnez, C.; Cruz-Gordillo, P.; Knoechel, B.; Asmann, Y.W.; Slager, S.L.; et al. Discovery and prioritization of somatic mutations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by whole-exome sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3879–3884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Kim, M.S.; Lee, S.H.; Yoo, N.J.; Lee, S.H. STAT3 exon 21 mutation is rare in common human cancers. Acta Oncol. 2013, 52, 1221–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Xie, Y.; Pittaluga, S.; Jaffe, E.S. The histological classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Semin Hematol. 2015, 52, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Alizadeh, A.A.; Eisen, M.B.; Davis, R.E.; Ma, C.; Lossos, I.S.; Rosenwald, A.; Boldrick, J.C.; Sabet, H.; Tran, T.; Yu, X.; et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000, 403, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lenz, G.; Staudt, L.M. Aggressive lymphomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 1417–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rui, L.; Schmitz, R.; Ceribelli, M.; Staudt, L.M. Malignant pirates of the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Davis, R.E.; Ngo, V.N.; Lenz, G.; Tolar, P.; Young, R.M.; Romesser, P.B.; Kohlhammer, H.; Lamy, L.; Zhao, H.; Yang, Y.; et al. Chronic active B-cell-receptor signalling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nature 2010, 463, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Compagno, M.; Lim, W.K.; Grunn, A.; Nandula, S.V.; Brahmachary, M.; Shen, Q.; Bertoni, F.; Ponzoni, M.; Scandurra, M.; Califano, A.; et al. Mutations of multiple genes cause deregulation of NF-kappaB in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nature 2009, 459, 717–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ngo, V.N.; Young, R.M.; Schmitz, R.; Jhavar, S.; Xiao, W.; Lim, K.H.; Kohlhammer, H.; Xu, W.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, H.; et al. Oncogenically active MYD88 mutations in human lymphoma. Nature 2011, 470, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Staudt, L.M. Oncogenic activation of NF-kappaB. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a000109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rui, L.; Drennan, A.C.; Ceribelli, M.; Zhu, F.; Wright, G.W.; Huang, D.W.; Xiao, W.; Li, Y.; Grindle, K.M.; Lu, L.; et al. Epigenetic gene regulation by Janus kinase 1 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E7260–E7267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Ding, B.B.; Yu, J.J.; Yu, R.Y.; Mendez, L.M.; Shaknovich, R.; Zhang, Y.; Cattoretti, G.; Ye, B.H. Constitutively activated STAT3 promotes cell proliferation and survival in the activated B-cell subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Blood 2008, 111, 1515–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Scuto, A.; Kujawski, M.; Kowolik, C.; Krymskaya, L.; Wang, L.; Weiss, L.M.; Digiusto, D.; Yu, H.; Forman, S.; Jove, R. STAT3 inhibition is a therapeutic strategy for ABC-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 3182–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Zhu, F.; Hwang, B.; Miyamoto, S.; Rui, L. Nuclear Import of JAK1 Is Mediated by a Classical NLS and Is Required for Survival of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma. Mol. Cancer Res. 2017, 15, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Drennan, A.C.; Rui, L. HiJAKing the epigenome in leukemia and lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2017, 58, 2540–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Huang, X.; Meng, B.; Iqbal, J.; Ding, B.B.; Perry, A.M.; Cao, W.; Smith, L.M.; Bi, C.; Jiang, C.; Greiner, T.C.; et al. Activation of the STAT3 signaling pathway is associated with poor survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 4520–4528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ok, C.Y.; Chen, J.; Xu-Monette, Z.Y.; Tzankov, A.; Manyam, G.C.; Li, L.; Visco, C.; Montes-Moreno, S.; Dybkær, K.; Chiu, A.; et al. Clinical implications of phosphorylated STAT3 expression in De Novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 5113–5123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Lu, L.; Zhu, F.; Li, Y.; Kimpara, S.; Hoang, N.M.; Pourdashti, S.; Rui, L. Inhibition of the STAT3 target SGK1 sensitizes diffuse large B cell lymphoma cells to AKT inhibitors. Blood Cancer J. 2019, 9, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Qing, Y.; Stark, G.R. Alternative activation of STAT1 and STAT3 in response to interferon-gamma. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 41679–41685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Costa-Pereira, A.P.; Tininini, S.; Strobl, B.; Alonzi, T.; Schlaak, J.F.; Is’harc, H.; Gesualdo, I.; Newman, S.J.; Kerr, I.M.; Poli, V. Mutational switch of an IL-6 response to an interferon-gamma-like response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 8043–8047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Mahony, R.; Gargan, S.; Roberts, K.L.; Bourke, N.; Keating, S.E.; Bowie, A.G.; O’Farrelly, C.; Stevenson, N.J. A novel anti-viral role for STAT3 in IFN-alpha signalling responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 1755–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yang, Y.; Shaffer, A.L., 3rd; Emre, N.C.; Ceribelli, M.; Zhang, M.; Wright, G.; Xiao, W.; Powell, J.; Platig, J.; Kohlhammer, H.; et al. Exploiting synthetic lethality for the therapy of ABC diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell 2012, 21, 723–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Xu-Monette, Z.Y.; Zhou, J.; Young, K.H. PD-1 expression and clinical PD-1 blockade in B-cell lymphomas. Blood 2018, 131, 68–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Boussiotis, V.A. Cell-specific PD-L1 expression in DLBCL. Blood 2015, 126, 2171–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Kiyasu, J.; Miyoshi, H.; Hirata, A.; Arakawa, F.; Ichikawa, A.; Niino, D.; Sugita, Y.; Yufu, Y.; Choi, I.; Abe, Y.; et al. Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 is associated with poor overall survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2015, 126, 2193–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Georgiou, K.; Chen, L.; Berglund, M.; Ren, W.; de Miranda, N.F.; Lisboa, S.; Fangazio, M.; Zhu, S.; Hou, Y.; Wu, K.; et al. Genetic basis of PD-L1 overexpression in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Blood 2016, 127, 3026–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Xu-Monette, Z.Y.; Miao, Y.; Xiao, M.; Young, K.H.; Wang, S.; Medeiros, L.J.; Wang, M.; et al. B-cell receptor-mediated NFATc1 activation induces IL-10/STAT3/PD-L1 signaling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2018, 132, 1805–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yared, M.A.; Khoury, J.D.; Medeiros, L.J.; Rassidakis, G.Z.; Lai, R. Activation status of the JAK/STAT3 pathway in mantle cell lymphoma. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2005, 129, 990–996. [Google Scholar]
  88. Lai, R.; Rassidakis, G.Z.; Medeiros, L.J.; Leventaki, V.; Keating, M.; McDonnell, T.J. Expression of STAT3 and its phosphorylated forms in mantle cell lymphoma cell lines and tumours. J. Pathol. 2003, 199, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, L.; Yang, J.; Qian, J.; Li, H.; Romaguera, J.E.; Kwak, L.W.; Wang, M.; Yi, Q. Role of the microenvironment in mantle cell lymphoma: IL-6 is an important survival factor for the tumor cells. Blood 2012, 120, 3783–3792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Molavi, O.; Wang, P.; Zak, Z.; Gelebart, P.; Belch, A.; Lai, R. Gene methylation and silencing of SOCS3 in mantle cell lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. 2013, 161, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mohanty, A.; Sandoval, N.; Phan, A.; Nguyen, T.V.; Chen, R.W.; Budde, E.; Wei, M.; Popplewell, L.; Pham, L.V.; Kwak, L.W.; et al. Regulation of SOX11 expression through CCND1 and STAT3 in mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 2019, 133, 306–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Mathas, S.; Hartmann, S.; Kuppers, R. Hodgkin lymphoma: Pathology and biology. Semin. Hematol. 2016, 53, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Rui, L.; Goodnow, C.C. Lymphoma and the control of B cell growth and differentiation. Curr. Mol. Med. 2006, 6, 291–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Rui, L.; Emre, N.C.; Kruhlak, M.J.; Chung, H.J.; Steidl, C.; Slack, G.; Wright, G.W.; Lenz, G.; Ngo, V.N.; Shaffer, A.L.; et al. Cooperative epigenetic modulation by cancer amplicon genes. Cancer Cell 2010, 18, 590–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Tiacci, E.; Ladewig, E.; Schiavoni, G.; Penson, A.; Fortini, E.; Pettirossi, V.; Wang, Y.; Rosseto, A.; Venanzi, A.; Vlasevska, S.; et al. Pervasive mutations of JAK-STAT pathway genes in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2018, 131, 2454–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Reichel, J.; Chadburn, A.; Rubinstein, P.G.; Giulino-Roth, L.; Tam, W.; Liu, Y.; Gaiolla, R.; Eng, K.; Brody, J.; Inghirami, G.; et al. Flow sorting and exome sequencing reveal the oncogenome of primary Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells. Blood 2015, 125, 1061–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Steidl, C.; Shah, S.P.; Woolcock, B.W.; Rui, L.; Kawahara, M.; Farinha, P.; Johnson, N.A.; Zhao, Y.; Telenius, A.; Neriah, S.B.; et al. MHC class II transactivator CIITA is a recurrent gene fusion partner in lymphoid cancers. Nature 2011, 471, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Rosenwald, A.; Wright, G.; Leroy, K.; Yu, X.; Gaulard, P.; Gascoyne, R.D.; Chan, W.C.; Zhao, T.; Haioun, C.; Greiner, T.C.; et al. Molecular diagnosis of primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma identifies a clinically favorable subgroup of diffuse large B cell lymphoma related to Hodgkin lymphoma. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Kube, D.; Holtick, U.; Vockerodt, M.; Ahmadi, T.; Haier, B.; Behrmann, I.; Heinrich, P.C.; Diehl, V.; Tesch, H. STAT3 is constitutively activated in Hodgkin cell lines. Blood 2001, 98, 762–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Garcia, J.F.; Camacho, F.I.; Morente, M.; Fraga, M.; Montalban, C.; Alvaro, T.; Bellas, C.; Castano, A.; Diez, A.; Flores, T.; et al. Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells harbor alterations in the major tumor suppressor pathways and cell-cycle checkpoints: Analyses using tissue microarrays. Blood 2003, 101, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Mackenzie, G.G.; Queisser, N.; Wolfson, M.L.; Fraga, C.G.; Adamo, A.M.; Oteiza, P.I. Curcumin induces cell-arrest and apoptosis in association with the inhibition of constitutively active NF-kappaB and STAT3 pathways in Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells. Int. J. Cancer 2008, 123, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ju, W.; Zhang, M.; Wilson, K.M.; Petrus, M.N.; Bamford, R.N.; Zhang, X.; Guha, R.; Ferrer, M.; Thomas, C.J.; Waldmann, T.A. Augmented efficacy of brentuximab vedotin combined with ruxolitinib and/or Navitoclax in a murine model of human Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 1624–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Ansell, S.M.; Lesokhin, A.M.; Borrello, I.; Halwani, A.; Scott, E.C.; Gutierrez, M.; Schuster, S.J.; Millenson, M.M.; Cattry, D.; Freeman, G.J.; et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Walker, R.E.; Lawson, M.A.; Buckle, C.H.; Snowden, J.A.; Chantry, A.D. Myeloma bone disease: Pathogenesis, current treatments and future targets. Br. Med. Bull. 2014, 111, 117–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Hu, J.; Hu, W.X. Targeting signaling pathways in multiple myeloma: Pathogenesis and implication for treatments. Cancer Lett. 2018, 414, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Podar, K.; Chauhan, D.; Anderson, K.C. Bone marrow microenvironment and the identification of new targets for myeloma therapy. Leukemia 2009, 23, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Chong, P.S.Y.; Chng, W.J.; de Mel, S. STAT3: A Promising Therapeutic Target in Multiple Myeloma. Cancers (Basel) 2019, 11, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Chong, P.S.Y.; Zhou, J.; Lim, J.S.L.; Hee, Y.T.; Chooi, J.Y.; Chung, T.H.; Tan, Z.T.; Zeng, Q.; Waller, D.D.; Sebag, M.; et al. IL6 Promotes a STAT3-PRL3 Feedforward Loop via SHP2 Repression in Multiple Myeloma. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 4679–4688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chim, C.S.; Fung, T.K.; Cheung, W.C.; Liang, R.; Kwong, Y.L. SOCS1 and SHP1 hypermethylation in multiple myeloma: Implications for epigenetic activation of the Jak/STAT pathway. Blood 2004, 103, 4630–4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Galm, O.; Yoshikawa, H.; Esteller, M.; Osieka, R.; Herman, J.G. SOCS-1, a negative regulator of cytokine signaling, is frequently silenced by methylation in multiple myeloma. Blood 2003, 101, 2784–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Sansone, P.; Bromberg, J. Targeting the interleukin-6/Jak/stat pathway in human malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 1005–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Wang, J.; De Veirman, K.; De Beule, N.; Maes, K.; De Bruyne, E.; Van Valckenborgh, E.; Vanderkerken, K.; Menu, E. The bone marrow microenvironment enhances multiple myeloma progression by exosome-mediated activation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 43992–44004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Yang, H.; Bi, Y.; Han, F.; Lu, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, G. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in immunity and autoimmunity. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2015, 11, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Wang, J.; De Veirman, K.; Faict, S.; Frassanito, M.A.; Ribatti, D.; Vacca, A.; Menu, E. Multiple myeloma exosomes establish a favourable bone marrow microenvironment with enhanced angiogenesis and immunosuppression. J. Pathol. 2016, 239, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Jung, S.H.; Ahn, S.Y.; Choi, H.W.; Shin, M.G.; Lee, S.S.; Yang, D.H.; Ahn, J.S.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, J.J. STAT3 expression is associated with poor survival in non-elderly adult patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Res. 2017, 52, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Nelson, E.A.; Walker, S.R.; Kepich, A.; Gashin, L.B.; Hideshima, T.; Ikeda, H.; Chauhan, D.; Anderson, K.C.; Frank, D.A. Nifuroxazide inhibits survival of multiple myeloma cells by directly inhibiting STAT3. Blood 2008, 112, 5095–5102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. de Oliveira, M.B.; Fook-Alves, V.L.; Eugenio, A.I.P.; Fernando, R.C.; Sanson, L.F.G.; de Carvalho, M.F.; Braga, W.M.T.; Davies, F.E.; Colleoni, G.W.B. Anti-myeloma effects of ruxolitinib combined with bortezomib and lenalidomide: A rationale for JAK/STAT pathway inhibition in myeloma patients. Cancer Lett. 2017, 403, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Monaghan, K.A.; Khong, T.; Burns, C.J.; Spencer, A. The novel JAK inhibitor CYT387 suppresses multiple signalling pathways, prevents proliferation and induces apoptosis in phenotypically diverse myeloma cells. Leukemia 2011, 25, 1891–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Li, J.; Favata, M.; Kelley, J.A.; Caulder, E.; Thomas, B.; Wen, X.; Sparks, R.B.; Arvanitis, A.; Rogers, J.D.; Combs, A.P.; et al. INCB16562, a JAK1/2 selective inhibitor, is efficacious against multiple myeloma cells and reverses the protective effects of cytokine and stromal cell support. Neoplasia 2010, 12, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Kovanen, P.E.; Leonard, W.J. Cytokines and immunodeficiency diseases: Critical roles of the gamma(c)-dependent cytokines interleukins 2, 4, 7, 9, 15, and 21, and their signaling pathways. Immunol. Rev. 2004, 202, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Waldmann, T.A.; Chen, J. Disorders of the JAK/STAT Pathway in T Cell Lymphoma Pathogenesis: Implications for Immunotherapy. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 35, 533–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Petrus, M.N.; Xiao, W.; Nicolae, A.; Raffeld, M.; Pittaluga, S.; Bamford, R.N.; Nakagawa, M.; Ouyang, S.T.; et al. Cytokine receptor signaling is required for the survival of ALK- anaplastic large cell lymphoma, even in the presence of JAK1/STAT3 mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3975–3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Furtek, S.L.; Backos, D.S.; Matheson, C.J.; Reigan, P. Strategies and Approaches of Targeting STAT3 for Cancer Treatment. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kraskouskaya, D.; Duodu, E.; Arpin, C.C.; Gunning, P.T. Progress towards the development of SH2 domain inhibitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3337–3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Siddiquee, K.; Zhang, S.; Guida, W.C.; Blaskovich, M.A.; Greedy, B.; Lawrence, H.R.; Yip, M.L.; Jove, R.; McLaughlin, M.M.; Lawrence, N.J.; et al. Selective chemical probe inhibitor of Stat3, identified through structure-based virtual screening, induces antitumor activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 7391–7396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Urlam, M.K.; Pireddu, R.; Ge, Y.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.; Lawrence, H.R.; Guida, W.C.; Sebti, S.M.; Lawrence, N.J. Development of new N-Arylbenzamides as STAT3 Dimerization Inhibitors. Medchemcomm 2013, 4, 932–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Song, H.; Wang, R.; Wang, S.; Lin, J. A low-molecular-weight compound discovered through virtual database screening inhibits Stat3 function in breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 4700–4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Lin, L.; Benson, D.M., Jr.; DeAngelis, S.; Bakan, C.E.; Li, P.K.; Li, C.; Lin, J. A small molecule, LLL12 inhibits constitutive STAT3 and IL-6-induced STAT3 signaling and exhibits potent growth suppressive activity in human multiple myeloma cells. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 130, 1459–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Lin, L.; Hutzen, B.; Li, P.K.; Ball, S.; Zuo, M.; DeAngelis, S.; Foust, E.; Sobo, M.; Friedman, L.; Bhasin, D.; et al. A novel small molecule, LLL12, inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation and activities and exhibits potent growth-suppressive activity in human cancer cells. Neoplasia 2010, 12, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, C.; He, J.; Guo, Q.; Hu, D.; Yang, X.; Wang, J.; Kang, Y.; She, R.; Wang, Z.; et al. STAT3 inhibitor stattic enhances radiosensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 2135–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ji, T.; Gong, D.; Han, Z.; Wei, X.; Yan, Y.; Ye, F.; Ding, W.; Wang, J.; Xia, X.; Li, F.; et al. Abrogation of constitutive Stat3 activity circumvents cisplatin resistant ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett. 2013, 341, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Bhasin, D.; Cisek, K.; Pandharkar, T.; Regan, N.; Li, C.; Pandit, B.; Lin, J.; Li, P.K. Design, synthesis, and studies of small molecule STAT3 inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Nagel-Wolfrum, K.; Buerger, C.; Wittig, I.; Butz, K.; Hoppe-Seyler, F.; Groner, B. The interaction of specific peptide aptamers with the DNA binding domain and the dimerization domain of the transcription factor Stat3 inhibits transactivation and induces apoptosis in tumor cells. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 2004, 2, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  134. Huang, W.; Dong, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, C.J.; Peng, H.; He, Y.; Hangoc, G.; Pollok, K.; Sandusky, G.; et al. Small-molecule inhibitors targeting the DNA-binding domain of STAT3 suppress tumor growth, metastasis and STAT3 target gene expression in vivo. Oncogene 2016, 35, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Huang, W.; Dong, Z.; Wang, F.; Peng, H.; Liu, J.Y.; Zhang, J.T. A small molecule compound targeting STAT3 DNA-binding domain inhibits cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 1188–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Beebe, J.D.; Liu, J.Y.; Zhang, J.T. Two decades of research in discovery of anticancer drugs targeting STAT3, how close are we? Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 191, 74–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Reilley, M.J.; McCoon, P.; Cook, C.; Lyne, P.; Kurzrock, R.; Kim, Y.; Woessner, R.; Younes, A.; Nemunaitis, J.; Fowler, N.; et al. STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide AZD9150 in a subset of patients with heavily pretreated lymphoma: Results of a phase 1b trial. J. Immunother. Cancer 2018, 6, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Li, Y.; Rogoff, H.A.; Keates, S.; Gao, Y.; Murikipudi, S.; Mikule, K.; Leggett, D.; Li, W.; Pardee, A.B.; Li, C.J. Suppression of cancer relapse and metastasis by inhibiting cancer stemness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 1839–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Yang, L.; Lin, S.; Xu, L.; Lin, J.; Zhao, C.; Huang, X. Novel activators and small-molecule inhibitors of STAT3 in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2019, 49, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Mascarenhas, J.; Hoffman, R. Ruxolitinib: The first FDA approved therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 3008–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Vannucchi, A.M.; Kiladjian, J.J.; Griesshammer, M.; Masszi, T.; Durrant, S.; Passamonti, F.; Harrison, C.N.; Pane, F.; Zachee, P.; Mesa, R.; et al. Ruxolitinib versus standard therapy for the treatment of polycythemia vera. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 426–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Zhang, M.; Mathews Griner, L.A.; Ju, W.; Duveau, D.Y.; Guha, R.; Petrus, M.N.; Wen, B.; Maeda, M.; Shinn, P.; Ferrer, M.; et al. Selective targeting of JAK/STAT signaling is potentiated by Bcl-xL blockade in IL-2-dependent adult T-cell leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 12480–12485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Berkowitz, J.L.; Janik, J.E.; Stewart, D.M.; Jaffe, E.S.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; Shih, J.H.; Fleisher, T.A.; Turner, M.; Urguhart, N.E.; Wharfe, G.H.; et al. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of daclizumab (anti-CD25) in patients with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 155, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Chen, R.; Chen, B. Siltuximab (CNTO 328): A promising option for human malignancies. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015, 9, 3455–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Kim, J.H.; Kim, W.S.; Park, C. Interleukin-6 mediates resistance to PI3K-pathway-targeted therapy in lymphoma. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cancers 12 00019 g001 550
Figure 1. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) functional domains and alternative splicing isoforms. Shown are six STAT3 domains: the N-terminus, the coiled-coil domain, the DNA-binding domain, the linker domain, the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, and the C-terminal transactivation (TAD) domain in STAT3α or unique seven residues in STAT3β. Two splice sites near the 3′ end of the STAT3 gene produce four STAT3 isoforms: α (the longest isoform with the TAD domain at the C-terminus), β (a shorter isoform with distinct seven residues at the C-terminus), Ser-701-deleted α (ΔS-α), and Ser-701-deleted β (ΔS-β). White boxes indicate the noncoding 3′ UTR, and light blue boxes depict coding sequences due to alternative splicing [20] (see details in the text).
Figure 1. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) functional domains and alternative splicing isoforms. Shown are six STAT3 domains: the N-terminus, the coiled-coil domain, the DNA-binding domain, the linker domain, the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, and the C-terminal transactivation (TAD) domain in STAT3α or unique seven residues in STAT3β. Two splice sites near the 3′ end of the STAT3 gene produce four STAT3 isoforms: α (the longest isoform with the TAD domain at the C-terminus), β (a shorter isoform with distinct seven residues at the C-terminus), Ser-701-deleted α (ΔS-α), and Ser-701-deleted β (ΔS-β). White boxes indicate the noncoding 3′ UTR, and light blue boxes depict coding sequences due to alternative splicing [20] (see details in the text).
Cancers 12 00019 g001
Cancers 12 00019 g002 550
Figure 2. The role of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1)/STAT3 signaling in DLBCL. In ABC DLBCL, JAK1 and STAT3 are constitutively activated by autocrine production of IL-6 and/or IL-10 as a result of MYD88 mutations (mainly L265P) and other NF-κB activation mechanisms. Constitutive activation of JAK1 and STAT3 promotes cell survival and proliferation, modulates the tumor microenvironment and promotes tumor immune evasion through the canonical STAT3 pathway as well as the noncanonical chromatin modification mechanism by JAK1 (see details in the text).
Figure 2. The role of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1)/STAT3 signaling in DLBCL. In ABC DLBCL, JAK1 and STAT3 are constitutively activated by autocrine production of IL-6 and/or IL-10 as a result of MYD88 mutations (mainly L265P) and other NF-κB activation mechanisms. Constitutive activation of JAK1 and STAT3 promotes cell survival and proliferation, modulates the tumor microenvironment and promotes tumor immune evasion through the canonical STAT3 pathway as well as the noncanonical chromatin modification mechanism by JAK1 (see details in the text).
Cancers 12 00019 g002
Cancers 12 00019 g003 550
Figure 3. Oncogenic activation of the STAT3 pathway in T-cell lymphoma. Constitutive activation of STAT3 and STAT5, which can be driven by the common gamma chain (γc) receptor-dependent cytokines IL-2, -4, -7, -9, -15, and -21, is pervasive in diverse T-cell malignancies [121]. In PTCL and NKTCL, activating mutations in STAT3, JAK1, and JAK3, and loss of function mutations in SOCS-1 and p53 enhance oncogenic effects of STAT3 and STAT5 by promoting cancer cell survival, modulating the tumor microenvironment and facilitating tumor immune evasion [44].
Figure 3. Oncogenic activation of the STAT3 pathway in T-cell lymphoma. Constitutive activation of STAT3 and STAT5, which can be driven by the common gamma chain (γc) receptor-dependent cytokines IL-2, -4, -7, -9, -15, and -21, is pervasive in diverse T-cell malignancies [121]. In PTCL and NKTCL, activating mutations in STAT3, JAK1, and JAK3, and loss of function mutations in SOCS-1 and p53 enhance oncogenic effects of STAT3 and STAT5 by promoting cancer cell survival, modulating the tumor microenvironment and facilitating tumor immune evasion [44].
Cancers 12 00019 g003
Table
Table 1. STAT3 mutations in lymphoma and related autoimmune diseases.
Table 1. STAT3 mutations in lymphoma and related autoimmune diseases.
LocationDiseaseReference
Gain of function mutations
Y640FT-LGL and NK-LGL, DLBCL, T-cell neoplasm, PTCL, ALCL, ANKL, and NKTCL[37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]
D661YT-LGL and NK-LGL, T-cell neoplasm, NKTCL, PTCL, ALCL, ITCL, NKTCL, and CLPD-NK[37,38,39,41,42,43,44,46,47,48,49,50,51]
D661VT-LGL and CLPD-NK[37,38,42,46,49,50]
M206KDLBCL[52]
K392RMultisystemic autoimmunity and mycobacterial disease[53]
M394TMultisystemic autoimmunity and mycobacterial disease and ALPS[53,54]
K658NMultisystemic autoimmunity and mycobacterial disease[53,55]
R152WLymphoproliferation and autoimmunity[56]
Q344HLymphoproliferation, autoimmunity, and PTCL[45,56]
V353FLymphoproliferation and autoimmunity[56]
E415KLymphoproliferation and autoimmunity[56]
N420KLymphoproliferation and autoimmunity[56]
G421RLymphoproliferation and autoimmunity[56]
T663ILymphoproliferation, autoimmunity, and BCLU-DLBCL/B[40,56]
A703TLymphoproliferation and autoimmunity[56]
T716MLymphoproliferation and autoimmunity[56]
A702TNKTCL[43]
G618RPTCL, NK-LGL, T-LGL, and ANKL[37,42,43,44,48,55]
S614RT-LGL, NKTCL, DLBCL and other NHL cases, PTCL, AITL, and ITCL[37,39,43,44,51,55,57,58]
N647IT-LGL, NK-LGL, and PTCL[37,38,44,45,46,49,50,55]
H410RT-LGL and PTCL[44,59]
F174ST-LGL[23]
D427HPTCL[44]
E616GPTCL, DLBCL, and ITCL[40,44,51]
E616KPTCL, DLBCL, and other NHL cases[44,57]
E696KPTCL[44]
R278HPTCL and ALPS[44,54]
A662VALCL[47]
Function to Be Investigated
K658MT-LGL[37,55]
D661INK-LGL[37]
D661HT-LGL[38,50]
Y657_K658insYT-LGL[38]
N567KDLBCL and other NHL cases[57]
D566NDLBCL, other NHL cases, and PTCL[44,57]
R152WDLBCL[60]
K658RDLBCL and T-LGL[42,46,60]
H447YDLBCL[60]
R278HDLBCL[60]
E616delDLBCL, AITL, and ANKL[41,48,58,60]
G617RDLBCL[40,55]
E616VT-LGL[39]
V671FT-LGL[39]
S649LBCLU-DLBCL/B[40]
Y657insT-cell neoplasm and γδ T lymphoma[41,55]
D661insT-cell neoplams[41]
Y657dupT-LGL and CLPD-NK[42,49,55]
K658insYLGLL[55]
D171NPTCL[44]
V667LPTCL[44]
P715LPTCL[44]
E638QT-LGL[45]
I659LT-LGL[45,49]
K657RT-LGL[45]
C550RAITL[58]
I659_M660insLT-LGL[46]
A662_N663delinsHT-LGL[46]
G656_Y657insYT-LGL[46]
C614RNKTCL[48]
V393ANKTCL[48]
H301PNKTCL[48]
G656DPTCL[61]
Y658MT-LGL[49]
Abbreviations: T-LGL: T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia; NK-LGL: large granular lymphocytic leukemia of natural killer (NK) cells; LGLL: large granular lymphocytic leukemia; DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; NHL: non-Hodgkin lymphoma; BCLU-DLBCL/B: B-cell lymphoma unclassifiable with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma; NKTCL: NK/T-cell lymphomas; PTCL: peripheral T-cell lymphoma; ALPS: autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome; ALCL: anaplastic large cell lymphomas; ITCL: intestinal T-cell lymphomas; CLPD-NK: chronic lymphoproliferative disorder of NK cells.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, F.; Wang, K.B.; Rui, L. STAT3 Activation and Oncogenesis in Lymphoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010019

AMA Style

Zhu F, Wang KB, Rui L. STAT3 Activation and Oncogenesis in Lymphoma. Cancers. 2020; 12(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Fen, Kevin Boyang Wang, and Lixin Rui. 2020. "STAT3 Activation and Oncogenesis in Lymphoma" Cancers 12, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop