Next Article in Journal
Deciphering the Mechanism of Action Involved in Enhanced Suicide Gene Colon Cancer Cell Killer Effect Mediated by Gef and Apoptin
Next Article in Special Issue
Multiplexed Immunohistochemistry for Molecular and Immune Profiling in Lung Cancer—Just About Ready for Prime-Time?
Previous Article in Journal
Loss of Stromal Galectin-1 Enhances Multiple Myeloma Development: Emphasis on a Role in Osteoclasts
Previous Article in Special Issue
The OncoAge Consortium: Linking Aging and Oncology from Bench to Bedside and Back Again
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Cancers 2019, 11(2), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020262

Review
Circulating Tumor Cell Detection in Lung Cancer: But to What End?
1
Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, University Côte d’Azur, 06100 Nice, France
2
Team 4, IRCAN, FHU OncoAge, University Côte d’Azur, CNRS, INSERM, 06107 Nice CEDEX 02, France
3
Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, University Côte d’Azur, 06100 Nice, France
4
Department of Pneumology and Oncology, CHU Nice, FHU OncoAge, University Côte d’Azur, 06100 Nice, France
*
Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-4-9203-8855
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 22 January 2019 / Accepted: 18 February 2019 / Published: 23 February 2019

Abstract

:
The understanding of the natural history and biology of lung cancer has been enhanced by studies into circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Fundamental and translational research, as well as clinical trials in the characterization and behavior of these cells, have constantly contributed to improving understanding within the domain of thoracic oncology. However, the use of these CTCs as prognostic and predictive biomarkers has not been adopted to the same extent as circulating free DNA (cf-DNA) in plasma, in the daily practice of thoracic oncologists. However, recent technological advances have firmly put the detection and characterization of CTCs in thoracic oncology back on the agenda, and have opened up perspectives for their routine clinical use. This review discusses the major advances of using CTCs in the domain of thoracic oncology, as well as the envisaged short- and long-term prospects.
Keywords:
circulating tumor cells; liquid biopsy; lung cancer; personal medicine; techniques; xenograft

1. Introduction

Liquid biopsy (LB) plays a major role in thoracic oncology [1,2]. A number of recent publications and developments within this domain testify to the increasing importance of LB. These studies concern not only fundamental translational and clinical research, but also technological advances [3,4,5,6,7]. They have provided a better understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms, the progression of lung cancer, and the treatment of patients. Among these studies, research into mutations in EGFR using plasma circulating free DNA (cf-DNA) have led to the use of LB in the clinical routine for patients with advanced stage or metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) [2,8,9,10]. This approach is now used in a large number of hospitals.
The number of detectable biological targets in an LB that are potentially accessible to treatment has increased, and future application of different biomarkers can be envisaged in the short-term [11]. The complexity of molecules for detection in the blood of patients with lung cancer has increased with advances in our understanding of the biology of the different components circulating in the blood. These components include free or complexed nucleic acids, microparticles including exosomes, circulating “non-hematological” cells including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and proteins of serum and plasma [12,13,14,15,16]. The addition to these analyses of different circulating hematological normal cells (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets), constituting a “liquid microenvironment”, has progressively been envisaged [17,18].
While taking into account the increasing complexity, a number of biomarkers have been developed for use, particularly in the clinic, for the interests of patients with advanced or metastatic lung cancer. Thus, the possibility of detecting activating or resistance mutations induced by molecular therapeutics in plasma cf-DNA has been associated with an explosion in the number of exploratory methods and applications in thoracic oncology [2,19,20,21,22]. One of the consequences of these rapid developments concerns the progressive decrease in the interest shown in the analysis of CTCs in thoracic oncology, at least for routine daily practice [23]. However, cf-DNA and CTCs are complementary, and can serve to answer different questions [24]. While genetic assessment might be suitable with both cf-DNA and CTCs, only CTCs might be able to give insights into the seeding of metastases and interactions of CTCs with other circulating blood cells, endothelial cells and, subsequently, different parenchyma [25,26]. cf-DNA and CTCs can be successfully simultaneously assessed in the same patient for a broader insight of tumor burden [27,28,29]. The absence of robust approaches for the detection of CTCs in clinical routine practice, in the context of the healthcare of these patients, probably explains the decline in interest. This is also due to the facts that CTCs are rarely found in blood, for capture, and that the capturing techniques, which are both very sensitive and specific, still require validation to provide optimal results for use in daily practice [30,31]. A selection of key studies on CTC isolation techniques have been summarized in Table 1. In this regard, the fact that different methods of CTC isolation give conflicting results for the same series of patients has certainly slowed the interest shown in this domain by many investigators [32,33]. Fewer groups around the world study CTC detection compared to groups working on detection of cf-DNA in the area of thoracic oncology. A number of review articles have discussed the advantages and limits of using CTCs or plasma cf-DNA in oncology [34,35,36,37]. The majority underline the difficulty of using CTCs as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in daily practice. Where, then, lies the interest in—and the role of—projects aimed at detecting and characterizing CTCs in thoracic oncology? Is it possible to envisage, in the future, the routine use of this type of analysis in the clinic?
This review aims to outline how the study of CTCs in an LB can provide unique and indispensable information in thoracic oncology, and to present the future long- and short-term developments in this domain.

2. Opportunities Offered by Studying CTCs in Thoracic Oncology

A couple of opportunities can be specifically associated with CTC detection programs only (Table 2).

2.1. Developing Xenografts from Circulating Tumor Cells and Cells Cultured In Vitro

Different enrichment techniques allow for the isolation of “viable” CTCs from patients with lung cancer (ClearCell® FX System, VTX-1 Liquid Biopsy System, Parsortix™ Cell Separation System) [72,73,74] (Figure 1). These techniques represent a crucial development in the use of LB in thoracic oncology. By injecting CTCs into mice, CTC-derived xenograft (CDX) models can be obtained, and the biology of these cells can be studied in vivo. This approach allows for analysis of the proliferation and level of “aggressiveness” of CTCs, their behavior once extravasated from blood and, thus, their metastatic potential. CDX can be developed to examine the response of tumors to different therapeutic molecules and protocols. In theory, these studies can anticipate the response of tumors to certain treatments, depending on the patient, and thus allow the most effective treatment to be proposed. Additionally, CDX can also be used to study primary and secondary mechanisms of resistance to therapeutic molecules. However, the setup of the methodology of CDX is difficult, and the systems of cell enrichment for the isolation of CTCs show variable sensitivity (ClearCell® FX System, VTX-1 Liquid Biopsy System, Parsortix™ Cell Separation System) [72,73,74]. Finally, the rate of successful development of CDX depends on the number of cells isolated and their ability to proliferate.
At present, the development of CDX in thoracic oncology concerns predominantly small cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs), as shown by several publications in this domain on this type of histology [51,52,53,75]. One reason for this is the high number of CTCs in the blood of patients with SCLC when at a metastatic phase (mean ± SD = 1589 ± 5565 in 7.5 mL of blood), and another is due to the capacity of these CTCs to proliferate [59]. Using these model systems, it is possible to envisage treating patients according to the response of the xenografts to different tested molecules [54,76,77,78]. Complementary analyses can be performed using cells cultured after dissociation of the CDX tumor [54]. This method allows several million tumor cells to be cultured and tested with different therapeutic molecules [54]. By contrast, few studies concern CDX obtained from NSCLC. Fewer cells are isolated in NSCLC, and their ability to proliferate is lower in comparison to SCLC. Methods have been developed to culture, in vitro, the CTCs, and to thus to analyze their potential to proliferate, their biology, and their sensitivity to different molecules [79]. These approaches are not as advanced as CDX for clinical application.

2.2. Single-Cell Analysis and Functional Studies

In contrast to studies on circulating nucleic acids, exosomes, or other blood biomarkers, the analysis of CTCs can define their molecular genetics, epigenetics, transcriptomics, and protein profile [55,56,58]. Thus, a very precise tumor profile and characterization of the phenotype of cells with invasive potential can be studied and can contribute to analyses concerning tumor heterogeneity [30]. Single-cell comparative analyses can be performed with primitive tumors, CTCs, and metastatic tumors from the same patient and thereby provide complementary information concerning the biological mechanisms associated with the progression and dissemination of lung cancers. Using isolated or cultured live cells, these functional studies identify the proteins secreted by CTCs [55]. The EPISPOT technology applied to these live isolated cells is particularly sensitive for the study of the expression and secretion of proteins by CTCs [55]. It has also been demonstrated that CTCs might be directly cultured on microfilters that are used for CTC isolation. This might facilitate CTC culture as it avoids the complicated transfer of CTCs onto cell culture plates, and might strongly increase the time from CTC isolation to plating in a culture medium for growth [80].
Additionally, the development of new technologies, such as the DEPArrayTM (Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Bologna, Italy), allows the separation of single cells from a pool of isolated CTCs to get further insight into single-cell dynamics [81,82]. This has been used to determine copy number variations (CNVs) in SCLC patients upon single-cell DNA sequencing [39]. Additionally, NanoArrays have been developed for the single-cell analysis of NSCLC [83].
Finally, single-cell RNAseq approaches from CTCs have been successfully implemented for different solid tumors, like breast and prostatic carcinoma [84,85], and should probably be in use also for lung cancer in the near future [86].

2.3. Correlation between Cytopathological and Molecular Phenotypic Analyses

Some methods of detection of CTCs can visualize and identify the classical cytological criteria of cancer cells that are routinely used in the laboratory for different cytological samples [60,61,87]. The identification of different diagnostic biomarkers (TTF1, p40) or of the predictive response to a therapeutic (ALK, ROS1, PD-L1) can be correlated to these cytomorphological criteria, which considerably increase the specificity and reliability of these methodological approaches [42,62,63,64,65,66,67,87]. Several studies have reported the extensive morphological heterogeneity of NSCLC CTCs. All the cytological criteria of malignant cells, as well as other criteria and circulating “non-hematological” cells without cytonuclear anomalies were identified. While considering the latter cells, the following questions can be raised: Are they tumor cells? Are they cells with an invasive potential? Or are they normal epithelial cells associated, or not, with CTCs [58,60,87]?
It has been therefore proposed to further categorize CTC in different classes, like disseminated tumor cells (DTC), CTCs undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (EMTCTCs), and cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs), which will further challenge the precise detection and characterization of CTCs [43,88,89,90,91].
While the heterogeneity is challenging for the successful identification of CTCs, it also has strong implications on the prognosis, as especially CTCs with a mesenchymal phenotype might have a more severe impact on spreading disease than CTCs with an epithelial phenotype [92,93,94].

3. What Are the Prospects?

One of the main hurdles facing the analysis of CTCs concerns the large number of methods that have been developed to isolate and characterize CTCs. The number of techniques makes it difficult for an operator to understand and choose a technique, particularly for routine clinical use. The selection by an investigator of a technique is guided by several parameters: (i) the sensitivity and specificity, (ii) the ease of use, (iii) a rapid turnaround time for getting results, (iv) the reproducibility, and (v) the cost. To date, no method answers all these parameters to analyze CTCs in daily practice in the domain of thoracic oncology. Hence, some one concern is improving the methods of detection and characterization of CTCs to make them as competitive as the detection and characterization of cf-DNA, which has been widely adopted in routine clinical practice. Since CTCs in blood are rare occurrences (particularly in NSCLC patients), the optimization of CTC enrichment is essential. Progress in this area will be achieved through a better understanding of the biology of CTCs and the discovery of new specific biomarkers of CTCs, in particular, if they identify “viable” CTCs with aggressive and metastatic potential.
A new avenue of biological investigation has recently emerged with the study of active interactions between circulating hematological cells and CTCs [68,95]. These studies should lead to the discovery of new mechanisms of resistance to cell death by CTCs and, thus, to novel therapeutic targets that induce cell death [68,95].
As for the analyses performed with cf-DNA in plasma (analysis of mutations or of methylation), or other blood biomarkers (plasma microRNA, auto-antibodies, fragments of complement, and plasma proteins), some recent studies suggest that CTCs may be early markers of lung cancer, which may even be detected several months before radiographic emergence of the cancer [69,70,71,96]. However, these approaches require (i) optimization of the cellular enrichment methods and characterization, (ii) several independent studies, and (iii) inclusion of a large number of patients for validation.
Single-cell genetic and transcriptomic analyses must provide new information on very specific molecular targets for novel therapeutics to be used in the context of personal medicine. Recently developed technological approaches that are being evaluated may contribute to better characterization of CTCs at the single-cell level [58,97]. These complex methodological developments should allow for better understanding of the heterogeneity of CTCs among patients and for the same patient, as well as for identification of CTCs from either primary or metastatic tumors. The molecular characterization of CTCs may compete with or, more likely, provide important complementary information to that obtained from circulating free nucleic acids. One of the obstacles lies in the heterogeneity of CTCs and the variable expression of molecular markers depending on the cell (or cells) isolated [30,39].
Several studies indicate that comparison of the quantity of patient CTCs—at baseline and after treatment—may be a good indicator of prognosis in SCLC [51,98]. Thus, for this pathology, aside from the quantification of cf-DNA in plasma or, as reported more recently, of the tumor mutation load, CTCs may be used, in routine practice as an indicator of the response of tumors to treatment. The possibility of establishing CDX or cells in culture originating from CTCs, and thus of testing therapeutic molecules ex vivo, may benefit the clinical follow-up and care of patients [54,77,78,98]. In a similar manner, cell cultures of millions of cells obtained from CDX should facilitate their molecular analysis [54]. One of the limitations of this approach is the time required to obtain CDX, which is not compatible with care of the majority of patients from whom the CTCs were obtained.
Despite the number of promising studies on NSCLC, the use of CTCs in routine practice remains hypothetical, in particular, for use as a prognostic biomarker. In fact, the quantification of CTCs in this pathology strongly varies according to the techniques used for the same patient, which makes this approach ineffective [33,38,45,99,100,101,102]. Moreover, the establishment of CDX is rather challenging for NSCLC [102].
New techniques for detection and characterization of CTCs need to be continually evaluated and examined, which may be difficult for an individual cohort of patients. The standardization of protocols for the isolation, preparation, enrichment, and characterization of CTCs is a prerequisite to presenting international ISO (International Organization for Standardization) norms before their routine clinical use by thoracic oncologists.

4. Conclusions

In thoracic oncology, the use of CTCs is often associated with issues concerning translational research that does not involve immediate use in routine practice. Thus, projects developed with CTCs contrast with applications using plasma cf-DNA that have been employed for a number of years for the care of patients, in particular, in the detection of activating mutations or mutations conferring resistance in EGFR [2,8,9,10]. Until now, a number of technological hurdles prevented the transfer of applications using CTCs into daily practice in thoracic oncology. Transfer to routine practice in real life can only be achieved if solid benefit to the patients is demonstrated, such as choice of therapy according to the number and type of CTCs as well as the expression of certain biomarkers of interest and, more importantly, real benefit in terms of overall survival of patients.
Technological progress on the analysis of CTCs should lead not only to the discovery of novel molecular targets for early diagnosis, but also to new prognostic and predictive biomarkers of the response or resistance to therapeutics. One promising direction concerns the development of CDX, allowing the expansion of tumor cells and their analysis in vivo, as well as the possibility of testing new therapeutic strategies. However, the success of CDX depends on the number of isolated CTCs, which is very low for certain histological types of lung cancer.
The combined and simultaneous study of several elements of LB (CTCs, free circulating nucleic acids, exosomes, proteins, etc.) may permit better assessment of the different phenotypes found using LB, and the associated individual approaches to define reliable diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive parameters [103,104]. Technological progress will permit the combination of different biomarkers at the single-cell level, and will increase our knowledge of CTCs [105,106]. A continual increase in different biomarkers for studying individual patients will evolve from more and more complex studies. In addition, as recently emerging in other areas of medicine, artificial intelligence should rapidly emerge and could integrate the different elements of LB, including CTCs [107,108]. Consequently, CTCs certainly play a key role in this context but, operationally, require further development before coming into daily routine use in thoracic oncology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.H. and V.H.; methodology, V.H., S.H., C.-H.M., M.I., P.H., writing—original draft preparation, V.H. and P.H.; writing—review and editing, S.H., C.-H.M., M.I.; visualization, S.H. and P.H.

Funding

This research was funded by the Cancéropole PACA, la Ligue Départementale 06 de Lutte contre le Cancer, le Conseil Départemental 06, le Cancéropôle PACA and the French Government (# ANR-11-LABX-0028-01).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bracht, J.W.P.; Mayo-de-Las-Casas, C.; Berenguer, J.; Karachaliou, N.; Rosell, R. The Present and Future of Liquid Biopsies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Combining Four Biosources for Diagnosis, Prognosis, Prediction, and Disease Monitoring. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 20, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hofman, P. Liquid Biopsy and Therapeutic Targets: Present and Future Issues in Thoracic Oncology. Cancers 2017, 9, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alix-Panabières, C.; Mader, S.; Pantel, K. Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in circulating tumor cells. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 95, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bardelli, A.; Pantel, K. Liquid Biopsies, What We Do Not Know (Yet). Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, W.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Z.; Gao, H.; Liu, C.; Zhu, L.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y. Emerging Nanotechnologies for Liquid Biopsy: The Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells and Extracellular Vesicles. Adv. Mater. 2018, e1805344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Siravegna, G.; Marsoni, S.; Siena, S.; Bardelli, A. Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 14, 531–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sorber, L.; Zwaenepoel, K.; De Winne, K.; Van Casteren, K.; Augustus, E.; Jacobs, J.; Zhang, X.H.; Galdermans, D.; De Droogh, E.; Lefebure, A.; et al. A Multicenter Study to Assess EGFR Mutational Status in Plasma: Focus on an Optimized Workflow for Liquid Biopsy in a Clinical Setting. Cancers 2018, 10, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ntzifa, A.; Kroupis, C.; Haliassos, A.; Lianidou, E. A pilot plasma-ctDNA ring trial for the Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rolfo, C.; Mack, P.C.; Scagliotti, G.V.; Baas, P.; Barlesi, F.; Bivona, T.G.; Herbst, R.S.; Mok, T.S.; Peled, N.; Pirker, R.; et al. IASLC Statement Paper: Liquid Biopsy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). J. Thorac. Oncol. 2018, 13, 1248–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sacher, A.G.; Alden, R.S.; Oxnard, G.R. Early Intervention in Lung Cancers With Rapid Plasma Genotyping for EGFR and KRAS Mutations-Reply. JAMA Oncol. 2016, 2, 1096–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Reimers, N.; Pantel, K. Liquid biopsy: Novel technologies and clinical applications. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Afrifa, J.; Zhao, T.; Yu, J. Circulating mitochondria DNA, a non-invasive cancer diagnostic biomarker candidate. Mitochondrion 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Anfossi, S.; Babayan, A.; Pantel, K.; Calin, G.A. Clinical utility of circulating non-coding RNAs—An update. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 541–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Integrative Analysis of Lung Cancer Etiology and Risk (INTEGRAL) Consortium for Early Detection of Lung Cancer; Guida, F.; Sun, N.; Bantis, L.E.; Muller, D.C.; Li, P.; Taguchi, A.; Dhillon, D.; Kundnani, D.L.; Patel, N.J.; et al. Assessment of Lung Cancer Risk on the Basis of a Biomarker Panel of Circulating Proteins. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, e182078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mader, S.; Pantel, K. Liquid Biopsy: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Oncol. Res. Treat. 2017, 40, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vaidyanathan, R.; Soon, R.H.; Zhang, P.; Jiang, K.; Lim, C.T. Cancer diagnosis: From tumor to liquid biopsy and beyond. Lab Chip 2018, 19, 11–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Leone, K.; Poggiana, C.; Zamarchi, R. The Interplay between Circulating Tumor Cells and the Immune System: From Immune Escape to Cancer Immunotherapy. Diagnostics 2018, 8, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, W.-W.; Rong, Y.; Liu, Q.; Luo, C.-L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F.-B. Integrative diagnosis of cancer by combining CTCs and associated peripheral blood cells in liquid biopsy. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cabanero, M.; Tsao, M.S. Circulating tumour DNA in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2018, 25, S38–S44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kuang, Y.; O’Connell, A.; Sacher, A.G.; Feeney, N.; Alden, R.S.; Oxnard, G.R.; Paweletz, C.P. Monitoring of Response and Resistance in Plasma of EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer Using Droplet Digital PCR. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1768, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Sacher, A.G.; Komatsubara, K.M.; Oxnard, G.R. Application of Plasma Genotyping Technologies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Practical Review. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2017, 12, 1344–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schrock, A.B.; Welsh, A.; Chung, J.H.; Pavlick, D.; Bernicker, E.H.; Creelan, B.C.; Forcier, B.; Ross, J.S.; Stephens, P.J.; Ali, S.M.; et al. Hybrid Capture-Based Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA from Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2019, 14, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Duréndez-Sáez, E.; Azkárate, A.; Meri, M.; Calabuig-Fariñas, S.; Aguilar-Gallardo, C.; Blasco, A.; Jantus-Lewintre, E.; Camps, C. New insights in non-small-cell lung cancer: Circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA. J. Thorac. Dis. 2017, 9, S1332–S1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, L.; Dumenil, C.; Julié, C.; Giraud, V.; Dumoulin, J.; Labrune, S.; Chinet, T.; Emile, J.-F.; He, B.; Leprieur, E.G. Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in lung cancer: Moving beyond enumeration. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 109818–109835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pantel, K. Blood-Based Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Tumor Cells for Early Cancer Detection. PLoS Med. 2016, 13, e1002205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Szczerba, B.M.; Castro-Giner, F.; Vetter, M.; Krol, I.; Gkountela, S.; Landin, J.; Scheidmann, M.C.; Donato, C.; Scherrer, R.; Singer, J.; et al. Neutrophils escort circulating tumour cells to enable cell cycle progression. Nature 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rossi, G.; Mu, Z.; Rademaker, A.W.; Austin, L.K.; Strickland, K.S.; Costa, R.L.B.; Nagy, R.J.; Zagonel, V.; Taxter, T.J.; Behdad, A.; et al. Cell-Free DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells: Comprehensive Liquid Biopsy Analysis in Advanced Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Morbelli, S.; Alama, A.; Ferrarazzo, G.; Coco, S.; Genova, C.; Rijavec, E.; Bongioanni, F.; Biello, F.; Dal Bello, M.G.; Barletta, G.; et al. Circulating Tumor DNA Reflects Tumor Metabolism Rather Than Tumor Burden in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients with Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: 18 F-FDG PET/CT Study. J. Nucl. Med. 2017, 58, 1764–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sundaresan, T.K.; Sequist, L.V.; Heymach, J.V.; Riely, G.J.; Jänne, P.A.; Koch, W.H.; Sullivan, J.P.; Fox, D.B.; Maher, R.; Muzikansky, A.; et al. Detection of T790M, the acquired resistance EGFR mutation, by tumor biopsy versus noninvasive blood-based analyses. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 1103–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Brown, H.K.; Tellez-Gabriel, M.; Cartron, P.-F.; Vallette, F.M.; Heymann, M.-F.; Heymann, D. Characterization of circulating tumor cells as a reflection of the tumor heterogeneity: Myth or reality? Drug Discov. Today 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hofman, V.; Ilie, M.; Long, E.; Guibert, N.; Selva, E.; Washetine, K.; Mograbi, B.; Mouroux, J.; Vénissac, N.; Reverso-Meinietti, J.; et al. Detection of circulating tumor cells from lung cancer patients in the era of targeted therapy: Promises, drawbacks and pitfalls. Curr. Mol. Med. 2014, 14, 440–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Farace, F.; Massard, C.; Vimond, N.; Drusch, F.; Jacques, N.; Billiot, F.; Laplanche, A.; Chauchereau, A.; Lacroix, L.; Planchard, D.; et al. A direct comparison of CellSearch and ISET for circulating tumour-cell detection in patients with metastatic carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer 2011, 105, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  33. Hofman, V.; Ilie, M.I.; Long, E.; Selva, E.; Bonnetaud, C.; Molina, T.; Vénissac, N.; Mouroux, J.; Vielh, P.; Hofman, P. Detection of circulating tumor cells as a prognostic factor in patients undergoing radical surgery for non-small-cell lung carcinoma: Comparison of the efficacy of the CellSearch AssayTM and the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cell method. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 129, 1651–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fici, P. Cell-Free DNA in the Liquid Biopsy Context: Role and Differences Between ctDNA and CTC Marker in Cancer Management. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1909, 47–73. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Ilie, M.; Hofman, V.; Long, E.; Bordone, O.; Selva, E.; Washetine, K.; Marquette, C.H.; Hofman, P. Current challenges for detection of circulating tumor cells and cell-free circulating nucleic acids, and their characterization in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients. What is the best blood substrate for personalized medicine? Ann. Transl. Med. 2014, 2, 107. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Lianidou, E.; Pantel, K. Liquid Biopsies. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2019, 58, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lim, M.; Kim, C.-J.; Sunkara, V.; Kim, M.-H.; Cho, Y.-K. Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer: Clinical Applications of Circulating Biomarkers (CTCs and ctDNA). Micromachines 2018, 9, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hofman, V.; Bonnetaud, C.; Ilie, M.I.; Vielh, P.; Vignaud, J.M.; Fléjou, J.F.; Lantuejoul, S.; Piaton, E.; Mourad, N.; Butori, C.; et al. Preoperative circulating tumor cell detection using the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cell method for patients with lung cancer is a new prognostic biomarker. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Carter, L.; Rothwell, D.G.; Mesquita, B.; Smowton, C.; Leong, H.S.; Fernandez-Gutierrez, F.; Li, Y.; Burt, D.J.; Antonello, J.; Morrow, C.J.; et al. Molecular analysis of circulating tumor cells identifies distinct copy-number profiles in patients with chemosensitive and chemorefractory small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Drapkin, B.J.; George, J.; Christensen, C.L.; Mino-Kenudson, M.; Dries, R.; Sundaresan, T.; Phat, S.; Myers, D.T.; Zhong, J.; Igo, P.; et al. Genomic and functional fidelity of small cell lung cancer patient-derived xenografts. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 600–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tan, C.L.; Lim, T.H.; Lim, T.K.; Tan, D.S.-W.; Chua, Y.W.; Ang, M.K.; Pang, B.; Lim, C.T.; Takano, A.; Lim, A.S.-T.; et al. Concordance of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements between circulating tumor cells and tumor in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 23251–23262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  42. Ilié, M.; Szafer-Glusman, E.; Hofman, V.; Chamorey, E.; Lalvée, S.; Selva, E.; Leroy, S.; Marquette, C.-H.; Kowanetz, M.; Hedge, P.; et al. Detection of PD-L1 in circulating tumor cells and white blood cells from patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 2018, 29, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Adams, D.L.; Adams, D.K.; He, J.; Kalhor, N.; Zhang, M.; Xu, T.; Gao, H.; Reuben, J.M.; Qiao, Y.; Komaki, R.; et al. Sequential Tracking of PD-L1 Expression and RAD50 Induction in Circulating Tumor and Stromal Cells of Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 5948–5958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  44. Chudziak, J.; Burt, D.J.; Mohan, S.; Rothwell, D.G.; Mesquita, B.; Antonello, J.; Dalby, S.; Ayub, M.; Priest, L.; Carter, L.; et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel microfluidic device for epitope-independent enrichment of circulating tumour cells in patients with small cell lung cancer. Analyst 2016, 141, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Krebs, M.G.; Hou, J.-M.; Sloane, R.; Lancashire, L.; Priest, L.; Nonaka, D.; Ward, T.H.; Backen, A.; Clack, G.; Hughes, A.; et al. Analysis of circulating tumor cells in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using epithelial marker-dependent and -independent approaches. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2012, 7, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gorges, T.M.; Penkalla, N.; Schalk, T.; Joosse, S.A.; Riethdorf, S.; Tucholski, J.; Lücke, K.; Wikman, H.; Jackson, S.; Brychta, N.; et al. Enumeration and Molecular Characterization of Tumor Cells in Lung Cancer Patients Using a Novel In Vivo Device for Capturing Circulating Tumor Cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 2197–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yu, M.; Bardia, A.; Aceto, N.; Bersani, F.; Madden, M.W.; Donaldson, M.C.; Desai, R.; Zhu, H.; Comaills, V.; Zheng, Z.; et al. Cancer therapy. Ex vivo culture of circulating breast tumor cells for individualized testing of drug susceptibility. Science 2014, 345, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wang, R.; Chu, G.C.Y.; Mrdenovic, S.; Annamalai, A.A.; Hendifar, A.E.; Nissen, N.N.; Tomlinson, J.S.; Lewis, M.; Palanisamy, N.; Tseng, H.-R.; et al. Cultured circulating tumor cells and their derived xenografts for personalized oncology. Asian J. Urol. 2016, 3, 240–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  49. Kulasinghe, A.; Perry, C.; Warkiani, M.E.; Blick, T.; Davies, A.; O’Byrne, K.; Thompson, E.W.; Nelson, C.C.; Vela, I.; Punyadeera, C. Short term ex-vivo expansion of circulating head and neck tumour cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 60101–60109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  50. Grillet, F.; Bayet, E.; Villeronce, O.; Zappia, L.; Lagerqvist, E.L.; Lunke, S.; Charafe-Jauffret, E.; Pham, K.; Molck, C.; Rolland, N.; et al. Circulating tumour cells from patients with colorectal cancer have cancer stem cell hallmarks in ex vivo culture. Gut 2017, 66, 1802–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Foy, V.; Fernandez-Gutierrez, F.; Faivre-Finn, C.; Dive, C.; Blackhall, F. The clinical utility of circulating tumour cells in patients with small cell lung cancer. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2017, 6, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  52. Hodgkinson, C.L.; Morrow, C.J.; Li, Y.; Metcalf, R.L.; Rothwell, D.G.; Trapani, F.; Polanski, R.; Burt, D.J.; Simpson, K.L.; Morris, K.; et al. Tumorigenicity and genetic profiling of circulating tumor cells in small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tellez-Gabriel, M.; Cochonneau, D.; Cadé, M.; Jubellin, C.; Heymann, M.-F.; Heymann, D. Circulating Tumor Cell-Derived Pre-Clinical Models for Personalized Medicine. Cancers 2018, 11, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lallo, A.; Gulati, S.; Schenk, M.W.; Khandelwal, G.; Berglund, U.W.; Pateras, I.S.; Chester, C.P.E.; Pham, T.M.; Kalderen, C.; Frese, K.K.; et al. Ex vivo culture of cells derived from circulating tumour cell xenograft to support small cell lung cancer research and experimental therapeutics. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 436–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Alix-Panabières, C.; Pantel, K. Characterization of single circulating tumor cells. FEBS Lett. 2017, 591, 2241–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  56. Heymann, D.; Téllez-Gabriel, M. Circulating Tumor Cells: The Importance of Single Cell Analysis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1068, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Miyamoto, D.T.; Ting, D.T.; Toner, M.; Maheswaran, S.; Haber, D.A. Single-Cell Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells as a Window into Tumor Heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2016, 81, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  58. Palmirotta, R.; Lovero, D.; Silvestris, E.; Felici, C.; Quaresmini, D.; Cafforio, P.; Silvestris, F. Next-generation Sequencing (NGS) Analysis on Single Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) with No Need of Whole-genome Amplification (WGA). Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2017, 14, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  59. Hou, J.-M.; Krebs, M.G.; Lancashire, L.; Sloane, R.; Backen, A.; Swain, R.K.; Priest, L.J.C.; Greystoke, A.; Zhou, C.; Morris, K.; et al. Clinical significance and molecular characteristics of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor microemboli in patients with small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lowe, A.C. Circulating Tumor Cells: Applications in Cytopathology. Surg. Pathol. Clin. 2018, 11, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sundling, K.E.; Lowe, A.C. Circulating Tumor Cells: Overview and Opportunities in Cytology. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2019, 26, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Catelain, C.; Pailler, E.; Oulhen, M.; Faugeroux, V.; Pommier, A.-L.; Farace, F. Detection of Gene Rearrangements in Circulating Tumor Cells: Examples of ALK-, ROS1-, RET-Rearrangements in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and ERG-Rearrangements in Prostate Cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 994, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Ilie, M.; Long, E.; Butori, C.; Hofman, V.; Coelle, C.; Mauro, V.; Zahaf, K.; Marquette, C.H.; Mouroux, J.; Paterlini-Bréchot, P.; et al. ALK-gene rearrangement: A comparative analysis on circulating tumour cells and tumour tissue from patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 2012, 23, 2907–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kang, Y.-T.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, T.H.; Cho, Y.-H.; Chang, H.J.; Lee, H.-M. Cytopathological Study of the Circulating Tumor Cells filtered from the Cancer Patients’ Blood using Hydrogel-based Cell Block Formation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pailler, E.; Adam, J.; Barthélémy, A.; Oulhen, M.; Auger, N.; Valent, A.; Borget, I.; Planchard, D.; Taylor, M.; André, F.; et al. Detection of circulating tumor cells harboring a unique ALK rearrangement in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2273–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pailler, E.; Auger, N.; Lindsay, C.R.; Vielh, P.; Islas-Morris-Hernandez, A.; Borget, I.; Ngo-Camus, M.; Planchard, D.; Soria, J.-C.; Besse, B.; et al. High level of chromosomal instability in circulating tumor cells of ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 2015, 26, 1408–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  67. Pailler, E.; Faugeroux, V.; Oulhen, M.; Catelain, C.; Farace, F. Routine clinical use of circulating tumor cells for diagnosis of mutations and chromosomal rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer-ready for prime-time? Transl. lung cancer Res. 2017, 6, 444–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  68. Nicolazzo, C.; Gradilone, A.; Carpino, G.; Gazzaniga, P.; Raimondi, C. Molecular Characterization of Circulating Tumor Cells to Study Cancer Immunoevasion. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1884, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Hofman, P. Liquid biopsy for early detection of lung cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2017, 29, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ilie, M.; Hofman, V.; Long-Mira, E.; Selva, E.; Vignaud, J.-M.; Padovani, B.; Mouroux, J.; Marquette, C.-H.; Hofman, P. “Sentinel” circulating tumor cells allow early diagnosis of lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Leroy, S.; Benzaquen, J.; Mazzetta, A.; Marchand-Adam, S.; Padovani, B.; Israel-Biet, D.; Pison, C.; Chanez, P.; Cadranel, J.; Mazières, J.; et al. Circulating tumour cells as a potential screening tool for lung cancer (the AIR study): Protocol of a prospective multicentre cohort study in France. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e018884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lee, Y.; Guan, G.; Bhagat, A.A. ClearCell® FX, a label-free microfluidics technology for enrichment of viable circulating tumor cells. Cytometry A 2018, 93, 1251–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Miller, M.C.; Robinson, P.S.; Wagner, C.; O’Shannessy, D.J. The ParsortixTM Cell Separation System-A versatile liquid biopsy platform. Cytometry A 2018, 93, 1234–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sollier-Christen, E.; Renier, C.; Kaplan, T.; Kfir, E.; Crouse, S.C. VTX-1 Liquid Biopsy System for Fully-Automated and Label-Free Isolation of Circulating Tumor Cells with Automated Enumeration by BioView Platform. Cytometry A 2018, 93, 1240–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Williamson, S.C.; Metcalf, R.L.; Trapani, F.; Mohan, S.; Antonello, J.; Abbott, B.; Leong, H.S.; Chester, C.P.E.; Simms, N.; Polanski, R.; et al. Vasculogenic mimicry in small cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  76. Khandelwal, G.; Miller, C. Improved PDX and CDX Data Processing-Response. Mol. Cancer Res. 2018, 16, 1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Lallo, A.; Schenk, M.W.; Frese, K.K.; Blackhall, F.; Dive, C. Circulating tumor cells and CDX models as a tool for preclinical drug development. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2017, 6, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lallo, A.; Frese, K.K.; Morrow, C.J.; Sloane, R.; Gulati, S.; Schenk, M.W.; Trapani, F.; Simms, N.; Galvin, M.; Brown, S.; et al. The Combination of the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib and the WEE1 Inhibitor AZD1775 as a New Therapeutic Option for Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 5153–5164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Sharma, S.; Zhuang, R.; Long, M.; Pavlovic, M.; Kang, Y.; Ilyas, A.; Asghar, W. Circulating tumor cell isolation, culture, and downstream molecular analysis. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 1063–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Makarova, O.V.; Adams, D.L.; Divan, R.; Rosenmann, D.; Zhu, P.; Li, S.; Amstutz, P.; Tang, C.-M. Polymer microfilters with nanostructured surfaces for the culture of circulating cancer cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 66, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Fabbri, F.; Carloni, S.; Zoli, W.; Ulivi, P.; Gallerani, G.; Fici, P.; Chiadini, E.; Passardi, A.; Frassineti, G.L.; Ragazzini, A.; et al. Detection and recovery of circulating colon cancer cells using a dielectrophoresis-based device: KRAS mutation status in pure CTCs. Cancer Lett. 2013, 335, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Fernandez, S.V.; Bingham, C.; Fittipaldi, P.; Austin, L.; Palazzo, J.; Palmer, G.; Alpaugh, K.; Cristofanilli, M. TP53 mutations detected in circulating tumor cells present in the blood of metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. 2014, 16, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Park, S.-M.; Wong, D.J.; Ooi, C.C.; Kurtz, D.M.; Vermesh, O.; Aalipour, A.; Suh, S.; Pian, K.L.; Chabon, J.J.; Lee, S.H.; et al. Molecular profiling of single circulating tumor cells from lung cancer patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E8379–E8386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  84. Ting, D.T.; Wittner, B.S.; Ligorio, M.; Vincent Jordan, N.; Shah, A.M.; Miyamoto, D.T.; Aceto, N.; Bersani, F.; Brannigan, B.W.; Xega, K.; et al. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Identifies Extracellular Matrix Gene Expression by Pancreatic Circulating Tumor Cells. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 1905–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  85. Miyamoto, D.T.; Lee, R.J.; Kalinich, M.; LiCausi, J.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, T.; Milner, J.D.; Emmons, E.; Ho, U.; Broderick, K.; et al. An RNA-based digital circulating tumor cell signature is predictive of drug response and early dissemination in prostate cancer. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 288–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Marjanovic, N.D.; Ng, S.R.; Regev, A.; Jacks, T. Abstract A24: Using single-cell RNA-seq approaches to decipher heterogeneity in autochthonous mouse models of small cell lung cancer. In Proceedings of the Fifth AACR-IASLC International Joint Conference: Lung Cancer Translational Science from the Bench to the Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA, 8–11 January 2018; American Association for Cancer Research: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018; p. A24. [Google Scholar]
  87. Hofman, V.J.; Ilie, M.; Hofman, P.M. Detection and characterization of circulating tumor cells in lung cancer: Why and how? Cancer Cytopathol. 2016, 124, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Adams, D.L.; Alpaugh, R.K.; Tsai, S.; Tang, C.-M.; Stefansson, S. Multi-Phenotypic subtyping of circulating tumor cells using sequential fluorescent quenching and restaining. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  89. Pillai, S.G.; Zhu, P.; Siddappa, C.M.; Adams, D.L.; Li, S.; Makarova, O.V.; Amstutz, P.; Nunley, R.; Tang, C.-M.; Watson, M.A.; et al. Enrichment and Molecular Analysis of Breast Cancer Disseminated Tumor Cells from Bone Marrow Using Microfiltration. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Tang, C.-M.; Zhu, P.; Li, S.; Makarova, O.V.; Amstutz, P.T.; Adams, D.L. Filtration and Analysis of Circulating Cancer Associated Cells from the Blood of Cancer Patients. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1572, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  91. Tang, C.; Zhu, P.; Li, S.; Makarova, O.V.; Amstutz, P.T.; Adams, D.L. Blood-based biopsies—clinical utility beyond circulating tumor cells. Cytom. Part A 2018, 93, 1246–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Milano, A.; Mazzetta, F.; Valente, S.; Ranieri, D.; Leone, L.; Botticelli, A.; Onesti, C.E.; Lauro, S.; Raffa, S.; Torrisi, M.R.; et al. Molecular Detection of EMT Markers in Circulating Tumor Cells from Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Potential Role in Clinical Practice. Anal. Cell. Pathol. 2018, 2018, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  93. Li, S.; Chen, Q.; Li, H.; Wu, Y.; Feng, J.; Yan, Y. Mesenchymal circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and OCT4 mRNA expression in CTCs for prognosis prediction in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2017, 19, 1147–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhang, X.; Wei, L.; Li, J.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype of circulating tumor cells is associated with distant metastasis in patients with NSCLC. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 19, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, W.-C.; Zhang, X.-F.; Peng, J.; Li, X.-F.; Wang, A.-L.; Bie, Y.-Q.; Shi, L.-H.; Lin, M.-B.; Zhang, X.-F. Survival Mechanisms and Influence Factors of Circulating Tumor Cells. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 6304701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Seijo, L.M.; Peled, N.; Ajona, D.; Boeri, M.; Field, J.K.; Sozzi, G.; Pio, R.; Zulueta, J.J.; Spira, A.; Massion, P.P.; et al. Biomarkers in lung cancer screening: Achievements, promises and challenges. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2019, 14, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Di Trapani, M.; Manaresi, N.; Medoro, G. DEPArrayTM system: An automatic image-based sorter for isolation of pure circulating tumor cells. Cytometry A 2018, 93, 1260–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Blackhall, F.; Frese, K.K.; Simpson, K.; Kilgour, E.; Brady, G.; Dive, C. Will liquid biopsies improve outcomes for patients with small-cell lung cancer? Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, e470–e481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kapeleris, J.; Kulasinghe, A.; Warkiani, M.E.; Vela, I.; Kenny, L.; O’Byrne, K.; Punyadeera, C. The Prognostic Role of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) in Lung Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Kulasinghe, A.; Kapeleris, J.; Kimberley, R.; Mattarollo, S.R.; Thompson, E.W.; Thiery, J.-P.; Kenny, L.; O’Byrne, K.; Punyadeera, C. The prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in head and neck and non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Med. 2018, 7, 5910–5919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Lindsay, C.R.; Faugeroux, V.; Michiels, S.; Pailler, E.; Facchinetti, F.; Ou, D.; Bluthgen, M.V.; Pannet, C.; Ngo-Camus, M.; Bescher, G.; et al. A prospective examination of circulating tumor cell profiles in non-small-cell lung cancer molecular subgroups. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 2017, 28, 1523–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Morrow, C.J.; Trapani, F.; Metcalf, R.L.; Bertolini, G.; Hodgkinson, C.L.; Khandelwal, G.; Kelly, P.; Galvin, M.; Carter, L.; Simpson, K.L.; et al. Tumourigenic non-small-cell lung cancer mesenchymal circulating tumour cells: A clinical case study. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 2016, 27, 1155–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. De Wit, S.; Rossi, E.; Weber, S.; Tamminga, M.; Manicone, M.; Swennenhuis, J.F.; Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C.G.M.; Vidotto, R.; Facchinetti, A.; Zeune, L.L.; et al. Single tube liquid biopsy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rothwell, D.G.; Smith, N.; Morris, D.; Leong, H.S.; Li, Y.; Hollebecque, A.; Ayub, M.; Carter, L.; Antonello, J.; Franklin, L.; et al. Genetic profiling of tumours using both circulating free DNA and circulating tumour cells isolated from the same preserved whole blood sample. Mol. Oncol. 2016, 10, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ortiz, V.; Yu, M. Analyzing Circulating Tumor Cells One at a Time. Trends Cell Biol. 2018, 28, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Salvianti, F.; Pazzagli, M.; Pinzani, P. Single circulating tumor cell sequencing as an advanced tool in cancer management. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2016, 16, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ko, J.; Baldassano, S.N.; Loh, P.-L.; Kording, K.; Litt, B.; Issadore, D. Machine learning to detect signatures of disease in liquid biopsies—A user’s guide. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. La Porta, C.A.M.; Zapperi, S. Explaining the dynamics of tumor aggressiveness: At the crossroads between biology, artificial intelligence and complex systems. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018, 53, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Overview of the different isolation techniques and possibilities in CTC research. Different devices have been developed with Parsortix (Angle PLC, Guildford, UK), ClearCell FX1 (Biolidics, Singapore), and Vortex VTX-1 (Vortex Biosciences, Pleasanton, CA, USA) being the most prominent. However, other CTC isolation systems, like GILUPI (Potsdam, Germany), can also be used for the isolation of viable CTCs. Isolation of viable CTCs then allows for the processing and analysis of cells using numerous approaches.
Figure 1. Overview of the different isolation techniques and possibilities in CTC research. Different devices have been developed with Parsortix (Angle PLC, Guildford, UK), ClearCell FX1 (Biolidics, Singapore), and Vortex VTX-1 (Vortex Biosciences, Pleasanton, CA, USA) being the most prominent. However, other CTC isolation systems, like GILUPI (Potsdam, Germany), can also be used for the isolation of viable CTCs. Isolation of viable CTCs then allows for the processing and analysis of cells using numerous approaches.
Cancers 11 00262 g001
Table 1. Technical advancements in circulating tumor cell (CTC) research for lung cancer.
Table 1. Technical advancements in circulating tumor cell (CTC) research for lung cancer.
StudyHistologyApproachMethodResultsRef
Hofman et al.NSCLCAnalysis of preoperative CTCs to predict relapse in early stage NSCLC patients.ISET™ (Rarecells, Paris, France)Circulating non-hematologic cells were detected in 102/208 patients with patients with >50 cells having worse prognosis[38]
Hofman et al.NSCLCAssessment of CTCs before radical surgery as prognostic factor.ISET (Rarecells) and CellSearch™ (Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Bologna, Italy)CTCs were detected in 69% (144/210) of patients but only in 20% (42/210) of patients with both ISET and CellSearch. Patients where CTCs were detected with both methods had worse prognosis[33]
Carter et al.SCLCAssessment of copy number alterations in CTCs to distinguish chemosensitive from chemorefractory patientsCellSearch™ (Menarini Silicon Biosystems)31 patients tested. 27–20,815 CTCs per 7.5 mL of blood (median, 836). 83.3% correctly classified cases[39]
Drapkin et al.SCLCGeneration of CTC-derived Xenografts.CTC-iChipneg device CDX could be obtained with an efficiency of 38%[40]
Tan et al.NSCLCComparison of EML4-ALK FISH in CTCs and tumor tissuesClearCell FX™ (ClearBridge Biomedics, Singapore, Singapore)>90% of concordance. More CTCs in EML4-ALK positive patients (3–15/1.88 mL blood) than in negative patients (0–2).[41]
Ilie et al.NSCLCAnalysis of PD-L1 expression on CTCs and white blood cells compared to tumor tissue.ISET™ (Rarecells)PD-L1 in CTCs can be detected at 93% concordance to tumor tissue and 73% in white blood cells[42]
Adams et al.NSCLCSequential analysis of PD-L1 and RAD50 expression in patient undergoing radiotherapy. CellSieve™ (Creatv MicroTech, Rockville, MD, USA)CTCs and cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) were detected in up to 100% of 41 patients and presence increased during treatment. RAD50 and PD-L1 expression also increased over time[43]
Chudziak et al.SCLCComparison of Parsortix™ and CellSearch™ devices for clinical evaluation.Parsortix™ (Angle PLC. Guildford, UK) and CellSearch™
(Menarini Silicon Biosystems)
1–3780 CTCs per 7.5 mL of blood in CellSearch™ (10/12 samples) and 20–1474 using Parsortix™ (12/12 patients)[44]
Krebs et al.NSCLCComparison of ISET™ with CellSearch™ISET (Rarecells) and CellSearch™ (Menarini Silicon Biosystems)80% positive patients using ISET™ (0–1045, mean = 71 cells) compared to 23% in CellSearch™ (0–78, mean = 4 cells)[45]
Gorges et al.NSCLCComparison of CellSearch™ with GILUPI CellCollector™GILUPI CellCollector™ (GILUPI, Potsdam, Germany) and
CellSearch™ (Menarini Silicon Biosystems)
58% positive patients with GILUPI™ (1–56, median = 5 cells) compared to 27% with CellSearch™ (1–300 cells)[46]
The CTC-iChipneg is not commercially available. Abbreviations: non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC).
Table 2. Methodological approaches in CTC research and main issues.
Table 2. Methodological approaches in CTC research and main issues.
ApproachesInterestsIssuesRef
CTCs cultured ex vivo
  • Drug testing
  • Genomic/transcriptomic profiling
  • Assessment of metastatic cells
  • Depends on the number of viable isolated cells
  • Lack of microenvironment
[47,48,49,50]
CDX
  • Drug testing
  • Genomic/transcriptomic profiling
  • Lack of human immune cells in microenvironment
  • Long duration to obtain xenograft
[40,51,52,53]
CTC-derived explant
  • Expanding tumor-derived cells
  • Large potential for drug screening
  • Lack of microenvironment
  • Long duration to establish
[54]
Single-cell analyses
  • Genomic/transcriptomic profiling
  • Tumor heterogeneity studies
  • Functional studies (secretion)
  • Difficult to get isolated viable CTCs
  • Technologically challenging
[55,56,57,58]
Microemboli tumor cells
  • Impact on prognosis
  • Cell–cell contact interaction studies
  • Heterogeneity studies
  • Difficulty to separate the different CTCs from a cluster
[59]
CTCs & circulating immune cells interaction
  • Mechanisms of crosstalk between cells
  • Different populations of immune cells
  • Lack of ex vivo models
[17]
Cytomorphological assessment
  • Identification and characterization of specific populations of interest
  • In situ protein and RNA assessment linking to the cell morphology
  • Highly dependent on the isolation technique
[42,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]
CTCs quantification at baseline and monitoring
  • Real time monitoring of systemic anticancer therapies
  • No FDA approved test for lung cancer
[69,70,71]
CDX = CTC-derived xenograft.

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Cancers EISSN 2072-6694 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top