Next Article in Journal
LiDAR-Based Safety Envelope Detection with Accelerometer and DTW for Intrusion Localization in Roller Coasters
Previous Article in Journal
A Reconfigurable Low-Pass Filter Based on Polyurethane Substrate Inspired by the Origami Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation on the Interfacial Delamination of Glass Substrate Packaging Using Cohesive Zone Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polyurethane-Based Electronic Packaging: The Characterization of Natural Aging over a Decade

1
Southwest Technology and Engineering Research Institute, Chongqing 401329, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Energy and Information Polymer Materials, State Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices, School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(9), 1061; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091061
Submission received: 13 August 2025 / Revised: 15 September 2025 / Accepted: 16 September 2025 / Published: 18 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Packaging for Microsystem Applications, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

Electronic devices with polyurethane electronic packaging have been stored in Chinese tropical marine atmosphere environments for 10 years. The long-term natural aging mechanism was studied by comparing the appearance inspection, molecular structure, elemental content, and chemical functional groups of the surface and interior of polyurethane electronic potting. The results indicated that, despite evident chemical aging and physical changes in the encapsulant material, it continued to effectively protect the internal electronic devices, maintaining their performance within an acceptable range. The interior polyurethane potting of electronic devices was white, but the surface turned yellow with noticeable color change. On the surface, the content of tolylene diisocyanate was greatly decreased. The peak heights of the internal carbamate groups located at 1708 cm−1 and 1529 cm−1 were significantly higher than those at the surface. In addition, the internal C element content for the carbamate group at 289.5 eV was higher than that of the surface. It can be inferred that, under ambient temperature and trace oxygen conditions, the urethane groups on the polyurethane electronic potting surface undergo aging reactions. These groups slowly oxidize into the quinoid structure of the chromophore, causing the surface to turn yellow. Despite this discoloration, the potting still protects electronic devices. Therefore, polyurethane electronic potting is ideal for the long-term sealed storage of electronic devices.

1. Introduction

In the production of electronic components, electronic potting is the most important step in finishing the electronic components. It can be said that electronic potting has become an indispensable and important insulating material in the electronics industry, improving reliability [1,2]. Electronic potting can improve the seismic resistance and waterproof performance of electronic components, greatly improving the reliability of electronic components. Without the use of electronic potting, electronic products are easily subject to erosion of the natural environment, leading to rapid line aging and the reduced service life of electronic products. Therefore, the protective role of electronic potting for electronic components is enormous [3].
Polyurethane electronic potting has excellent mechanical properties and electrical insulation properties and is widely used in electronic components. It prevents moisture, dust, and harmful gases from electronic circuit erosion, while also protecting electronic components from impact, improving anti-vibration abilities, anti-harsh environmental capabilities, and insulation properties of electronic devices. In addition, when used as part of a structure, polyurethane electronic potting strengthens the overall structure and allows for size reduction [4]. For long-term natural storage, the electronic circuit is in a non-working state. The failure mode is not the wear failure of the components. Polyurethane electronic potting is chemically and physically aged due to various environmental factors, resulting in the partial or complete loss of the physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of the polyurethane electronic potting, which eventually leads to the loss of the use value of the electronic circuit; therefore, the reliability change in electronic circuit depends on the reliability of the polyurethane electronic potting. It is important to examine the package reliability of electronic circuits after long-term storage.
At present, research on polyurethane potting mainly focused on the synthesis of new polyurethane composites, such as thermally sensitive shape memory polyurethanes [5]. Melamine-based polyether polyol (HMMM–PG) was synthesized to prepare polyurethane foams with high flame-retardant properties [6]. A graphene oxide (GO)-AZO dye composite was incorporated into PU-based coating to provide long-term durability against UV irradiation [7]. Moreover, the addition of semi-crystalline polyester diols to foam formulations shows exceptional tensile and elastic properties [8]. There is no accepted classification of climates for the degradation of materials and the topic of the degradation of synthetic materials is in its infancy [9]. Due to outdoor experimental degradation tests being rather time-consuming, there are few studies on the damage mechanism of polyurethane electronic potting during actual storage [10,11,12], and “faster” artificial degradation setups which mimic real outdoor conditions with higher stress factor intensities [13,14,15]. Hesham et al. [16] investigated the performance of polyurethane foam infill bridge deck panels (PU sandwich panels) after being exposed to various environmental conditions (a series of freeze–thaw, mid-high temperatures, and mid-high relative humidity cycles), which was conducted in a computer-controlled environmental chamber to duplicate seasonal effects in Midwestern states. However, there is a difference between accelerated test conditions and the actual storage environment, and there is always a fear of deviation from the chemical pathways of degradation for natural exposure because “relatively small variations in weathering performance can lead to significant variations in failure rates at a given time in service” [17]. Thus, the long-term natural aging mechanism of polyurethane has practical value, which will improve the production process and storage reliability, and also can be used for laboratory accelerated aging test method validation.
Moreover, the standards for material degradation are not uniform due to different climates, and extrapolations from short-term accelerated aging models or summaries of published natural exposure data remain insufficient to reliably predict long-term behavior [18]. Such methods cannot fully capture the complex, synergistic effects of multi-factor environmental exposure over extended periods, nor can they account for localized climatic variations and micro-environmental conditions. There is always a concern that accelerated testing may deviate from actual chemical degradation pathways, potentially leading to inaccurate lifetime predictions. Therefore, the use of actual ten-year storage samples is not merely preferable but necessary to provide unequivocal evidence of material performance.
In this paper, polyurethane electronic potting sealants for electronic components stored in a warehouse of tropical maritime climate conditions for 10 years were examined. The appearance, thermal decomposition, molecular structure, elemental content, and chemical functional groups on the surface and internally were compared using gray scale analysis, pyrolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. These analyses revealed the long-term natural aging mechanism of polyurethane electronic potting.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The polyurethane electronic potting provided by Xi’an Oriental Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an, China was used to conduct long-term natural storage tests. According to the material list provided by the manufacturer, the composition of polyurethane electronic potting material includes trimethylolpropane, toluene diisocyanate (TDI-80), and antioxidant D. The specific compound formulation and technological process were not disclosed because of commercial reasons. The materials were manufactured into electronic potting to improve the anti-vibration electronic components and anti-high overload impact.

2.2. Method

The water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) and oxygen transmission rate (OTR) of the packaging material were <0.02 g/m2/24 h and <0.05 cm3/m2/24 h/atm, respectively (test conditions: 38 °C, 90% RH). The pouches were heat sealed without vacuum or nitrogen purging, thereby encapsulating ambient air at the time of sealing. The high-barrier nature of the packaging material effectively shielded the samples from direct moisture ingress and significant humidity fluctuations. As a result, the aging process was predominantly influenced by long-term exposure to the trapped oxygen and trace moisture within the sealed environment, in combination with the ambient temperature.

2.3. Characterization

The color difference between the surface and interior of the polyurethane electronic potting material was visually evaluated in accordance with ASTM D1729 [19] under controlled diffuse illumination conditions.
In accordance with manufacturing and acceptance norms and product drawing requirements, sealing of electronic components, insulation resistance, and functional testing were carried out.
The information of molecular fragments was detected by AGILENT (6890N-5975C) pyrolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry from Agilent technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the molecular structure was deduced. Test method—Pyrolysis Program Setup: preheat to 150 °C (1 min) → purge for 0.5 min→ pyrolysis temperature 550 °C (0.5 min) → cleaning temperature 600 °C (0.5 min) → cool to 50 °C. Then, a HP-5MS fused sintered quartz capillary chromatographic column (inner diameter 0.32 mm) was used with high-purity helium gas as the carrier gas. The total carrier gas flow rate was 25 mL/min. The capillary carrier gas flow rate is 1.5 mL/min. EI mass spectrometry was employed, with an ion source temperature of 230 °C, a mass filter temperature of 150 °C, and an interface temperature of 250 °C.
XPS analysis was performed using the ESCALAB 250 analyzer (Thermo Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), equipped with an achromatic Al Ka X-ray source, and the excitation power was 150 W. The pressure during the analysis was 4.0 × 10−8 Pa. The survey spectra in the range of 0–1200 eV were recorded in 1 eV step for each sample. Atomic concentrations of each element were carried out by determining the relevant integral peak intensities. Fine narrow scans with step size 0.1 eV for C1s, O1s, N1s, and Si2p were recorded. The binding energies were corrected by referencing to the hydrocarbon component at 284.6 eV [20,21]. XPS provides information from the extreme outermost surface (~5–10 nm), revealing severe chemical changes such as oxidation and chain scission [20,21].
ATR-FTIR analysis was carried out using a Nicolet 470 Instrument (Nicolet Inc., Madison, WI, USA) in the range 420–3800 cm−1. ATR-FTIR spectra of the samples were taken at room temperature using the infrared radiation (IR) penetrates the surfaces of samples to approximately 1 μm. The average of three scans for each sample was taken for peak identification, with diamond as the ATR crystal. The sampling depths of different analytical methods are shown in Table 1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Appearance Inspection and Electrical Properties Test of Electronic Components

The appearance of polyurethane electronic potting sealants for electronic components stored in China’s tropical marine atmosphere environment for 10 years is shown in Figure 1. It can be seen that the surface of the polyurethane potting material turned yellow, while the interior remained white. Degradation of polymers typically begins at the outer surface and gradually penetrates into the bulk material [21]. In accordance with ASTM D1729 [22], the color difference between the surface and the interior was visually assessed under controlled illumination conditions. The results indicated a perceptible color difference equivalent to a slight but clearly visible contrast grade between the surface and the interior.
Electronic components are located inside the packaging tube, hardly exposed to external temperature and humidity [23]. Therefore, polyurethane electronic potting is subject to the long-term impact of high temperature. Polyurethane electronic potting uses TDI as the raw material, in which the benzene ring is directly connected to the isocyanate group. The delocalized π-system on the benzene ring and the adjacent isocyanate group form a conjugate. Under the coupling action of heat and oxygen, the urethane bond is initiated to decompose and generate aromatic amines. Aromatic amine benzene nuclei are rearranged by oxidation, resulting in a quinone–imide structure which is a strong chromophore. Therefore, polyurethane electronic potting storage for 10 years tends to yellow and does not remain white long-term in water. Many papers on this subject showed that the yellowing of polyurethane electronic potting is a complex mechanism involving a series of reactions producing quinonoid-type structures [24,25].
The interior of polyurethane electronic potting is still white, which means that the degree of yellowing is not high, and then the oxidation has little effect on the physical properties of polyurethane. We conducted basic tests on the performance of electronic components. A total of five samples of electronic components were stored naturally in the tropical marine atmosphere for 10 years. The test results of their sealing performance, insulation resistance, and five key functional parameters are shown in Table 2. The standard deviation and coefficient of variation in these seven performance test results were calculated in accordance with GB/T 6379.2-2004 [26]. As can be seen from Table 2, the test results of the sealing performance, insulation resistance, and functional key parameters of the five electronic components did not exceed their respective technical index requirements. Moreover, from the calculation results of the coefficient of variation, the coefficients of variation in the seven performance parameters did not exceed 15%, with small volatility and good repeatability. This indicates that after long-term storage for 10 years, this type of electronic component, its sealing performance, insulation resistance, and functional parameters can still meet the technical index requirements.
Py-GC/MS analysis was conducted to characterize the chemical composition of both the surface and interior of the polyurethane electronic potting material after 10 years of aging (Figure 2). The total ion chromatogram (TIC) peak area Normalization method was adopted to compare the changes in the mass fractions of the main components on the surface and inside, as shown in Table 3. The pyrogram revealed that fragments eluting between 2.2 and 6.5 min were primarily attributed to polyol-derived segments, while those between 6.5 and 7.0 min were indicative of isocyanate-related products.
The comparative analysis in Table 3 shows that the surface region exhibited a notable increase in the abundance of various polyol morphologies, along with elevated levels of phthalimide and 2-penten-1-ol. It is hypothesized that phthalimide may originate from the degradation of phthalate-based plasticizers or additives commonly used in polyurethane formulations, while 2-penten-1-ol likely results from oxidation and chain scission of polyol soft segments [25]. These changes are consistent with advanced surface degradation.

3.2. Elemental Content Analysis

XPS spectra of the surface and the interior of polyurethane electronic potting stored for 10 years were displayed in Figure 3. It showed that the surface of polyurethane electronic potting compound mainly contains element carbon, oxygen, and silicon, but the interior of polyurethane electronic potting compound mainly contains elements such as carbon, oxygen, silicon, and nitrogen. A fine narrow scan of each element peak was carried out, and then Gaussian distribution was used to fit the C1s curve. The fitting principle was to make the fitting spectrum agree with the experimental spectrum, as shown in Figure 4. It showed that C1s peak on the surface and the interior of the polyurethane electronic potting are, respectively, superposed by four small peaks, indicating that there are four chemical environments for element carbon in the polyurethane electronic potting; that is, there are four chemical groups. Binding energy for four kinds of C1s fitting peaks were 284.9 eV, 285.7 eV 286.3 eV, and 289.5 eV, respectively. Based on the elemental standard chromatograms and their binding energy data in the compounds, four kinds of fitting peaks correspond to CH2-C6H6 (284.9 eV), C6H6-NH (285.7 eV), C–O–C (286.3 eV), and NHCOO (289.5 eV) [27,28]. According to the peak area of each element, the relative atomic content was calculated by using the sensitivity factor method, listed in Table 4. The charge correction was carried out based on the carbon–hydrogen pollution peak of 284.8 eV, and the Shirley mode was selected for background subtraction. Subsequently, the GL mixed peak type was chosen to fit the C1s curve. The fitting results are shown in Table 5.
The comparison of the relative atomic content obtained from C1s and N1s spectra (Table 4) reveals a noticeable decrease in the intensities of the NHCOO group (located at 289.5 eV) and the C–O–C group (located at 286.3 eV) on the surface. The nitrogen content in the interior is significantly higher than that on the surface, while the surface N1s signal falls below the detection limit, which may be attributed to possible siloxane contamination or carbon layer formation. Therefore, after 10 years of storage in a high-temperature environment, the polyurethane electronic potting material undergoes degradation primarily at the NHCOO groups, with more pronounced aging on the surface. This leads to reduced heat resistance and surface yellowing [28,29].

3.3. Chemical Functional Groups Analysis

ATR-FTIR spectra of the surface and the interior of polyurethane electronic potting stored for 10 years were displayed in Figure 5. The peaks at 1026 cm−1 and 1046 cm−1 correspond to the stretching vibrations of aliphatic alcohol (C–OH), while those at 2953 cm−1 and 2928 cm−1 correspond to the stretching vibrations of aliphatic hydrocarbon (CH2). The peak at 1708 cm−1 is attributed to the stretching vibration of the carbonyl group in carbamate (C=O), 1218 cm−1 and 1222 cm−1 to the stretching vibration of carbamate (C–O–C), and 1529 cm−1 to the stretching vibration of carbamate (NHCOO) [30].
Due to the presence of a large amount of aliphatic alcohol (C–OH) in polyurethane electronic potting, the total amount does not change significantly even if the number of aliphatic alcohol group changes slightly, so the stretching vibration peak of aliphatic alcohol (C–OH) in 1026 cm−1 and 1046 cm−1 can be selected as the internal standard peak. The remaining peak height was compared with the internal standard peak height to study peak change characteristics of polyurethane electronic potting on the surface and interior, shown in Table 6.
Table 6 shows that the internal carbamate group located at 1708 cm−1 and 1529 cm−1 are much higher than surface carbamate group, indicating that aging degradation reaction occurs on the surface of polyurethane electronic potting stored for 10 years. The location of the degradation reaction at the carbamate group [31] results in the cross-linking density decreased and heat resistance reduced, which can powerfully support the conclusions of appearance inspection, Py-GC/MS, and XPS analysis.

3.4. Aging Mechanism Analysis

Multiple analytical techniques were used to compare the microstructural changes on the surface and in the interior of the polyurethane electronic potting material after 10 years of storage in a tropical marine atmosphere. The results indicate that long-term aging involves the combined effects of oxygen, temperature, and ultraviolet (UV) radiation.
Although the electronic components are sealed and hardly exposed to atmospheric humidity, the polyurethane surface remains exposed to atmospheric oxygen and sunlight. Under prolonged elevated temperature, the thermal energy facilitates the scission of the C–O bonds in the carbamate groups, initiating radical chain reactions. This leads to the formation of alkoxy and carbamoyl radicals, with the latter further decomposing into amino radicals and CO2. These reactions result in a noticeable decrease in carbonyl and carbamate content [31,32].
Simultaneously, UV radiation promotes surface cross-linking and oxidation processes. Amino radicals adjacent to aromatic rings undergo oxidation, forming large π-conjugated systems, such as quinone imine and other chromophores. These structures reduce molecular vibrational frequency, leading to a redshift in light absorption. When absorption occurs in the blue–violet region (∼400–450 nm) of the visible spectrum, yellow light is reflected, resulting in surface yellowing [33,34]. The decomposition of urethane bonds (hard segment disruption) is now explicitly linked to the observed decrease in the C1s component at 289.5 eV (XPS) and the reduction in IR absorption bands at approximately 1708 cm−1 (C=O stretch) and 1529 cm−1 (N–H bend coupled with C–N stretch). The subsequent formation of quinone-imine structures, which are responsible for yellowing, and the free radical chain aging reaction of polyurethane electronic packaging are shown in Figure 6. However, because the aging degree of thermal degradation for internal carbamate group is lower, it does not turn yellow by chemical action with oxygen, and the appearance is still white. At the same time, the macroscopic performance parameters of the electronic components are still within the specified range, indicating that the polyurethane electronic packaging still has the potting protection effect on electronic components after being stored for 10 years.

4. Conclusions

Polyurethane electronic packaging used for sealed storage of electronic components is not affected by ultraviolet light or humidity, with ambient temperature being the only influencing factor. Its weather resistance is good, and although surface yellowing occurs, the price is low and it is convenient to source, making it very suitable for the long-term sealed storage of electronic components. It should be noted that this study primarily focused on the chemical and morphological changes of aged polyurethane. Future work will include a systematic evaluation of mechanical properties—such as hardness, elastic modulus, and adhesion strength to comprehensively correlate chemical degradation with mechanical performance evolution

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.W.; methodology, X.W. and H.L.; software, X.W.; validations, X.W. and H.N.; formal analysis, X.W.; investigation, X.W. and C.X.; resources, H.L. and R.Z.; data curation, X.W.; writing—original draft preparation, X.W.; writing—review and editing, X.W., R.Z. and H.L.; visualization, X.W.; supervision, H.L.; project administration, H.L. and C.X.; funding acquisition, H.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by HDH Cooperative Fund Project of Southwest Technology and Engineering Research Institute, China South Industries Group Corporation (HDHDW59A020301).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, W.; Luo, S.; Zhuo, Q.; Liang, Y.; Li, Y.; Dong, H.; Qin, L.; Li, Y. A comprehensive study on the degradation behavior and mechanism of expanded thermoplastic polyurethane. Polymers 2025, 17, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lattuati-Derieux, A.; Thao-Heu, S.; Lavédrine, B. Assessment of the degradation of polyurethane foams after artificial and natural ageing by using pyrolysis-GC/MS and HS SPME-GC/MS. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 4498–4508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hu, J.; Huang, M.; Zhou, X.; Luo, R.; Li, L.; Li, X. Research Status of Lignin-Based Polyurethane and Its Application in Flexible Electronics. Polymers 2024, 16, 2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ji, F.L.; Hu, J.L. Comparison of Shape Memory Polyurethanes and Polyurethane-Ureas Having Crystalline Reversible Phase. High Perform. Polym. 2011, 23, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.L.; He, J.Y.; Yang, R.J. The Synthesis of Melamine-Based Polyether Polyol and Its Effects on the Flame Retardancy and Physical-Mechanical Property of Rigid Polyurethane Foam. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 4700–4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Miraftab, R.; Ramezanzadeh, B.; Bahlakeh, G.; Mahdavian, M. An Advanced Approach for Fabricating a Reduced Graphene Oxide-AZO Dye/Polyurethane Composite with Enhanced Ultraviolet (UV) Shielding Properties: Experimental and First-Principles QM Modeling. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 321, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sonnenschein, M.F.; Lysenko, Z.; Brune, D.A.; Wendt, B.L.; Schrock, A.K. Enhancing Polyurethane Properties via Soft Segment Crystallization. Polymer 2005, 46, 10158–10166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feldman, D. Polymer Weathering: Photo-Oxidation. J. Polym. Environ. 2002, 10, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, L.H.; Hu, X.H. Marine Environmental Effect of a Few Encapsulating Materials in Xisha. Equip. Environ. Eng. 2017, 14, 55–64. [Google Scholar]
  10. Middleton, J.; Burks, B.; Wells, T.; Setters, A.M.; Jasiuk, I.; Predecki, P.; Hoffman, J.; Kumosa, M. The Effect of Ozone and High Temperature on Polymer Degradation in Polymer Core Composite Conductors. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 2282–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ravari, F.; Omrani, A.; Rostami, A.A.; Ehsani, M. Ageing Effects on Electrical, Morphological, and Mechanical Properties of a Low Viscosity Epoxy Nanocomposite. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 929–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rabea, A.M.; Mohseni, M.; Mirabedini, S.M.; Tabatabaei, M.H. Surface Analysis and Anti-Graffiti Behavior of a Weathered Polyurethane-Based Coating Embedded with Hydrophobic Silica. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 4391–4396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rossi, S.; Fedel, M.; Petrolli, S.; Deflorian, F. Accelerated Weathering and Chemical Resistance of Polyurethane Powder Coatings. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2016, 13, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tuwair, H.; Volz, J.; Elgawady, M.; Mohamed, M.; Chandrashekhara, K.; Birman, V. Behavior of GFRP Bridge Deck Panels Infilled with Polyurethane Foam Under Various Environmental Exposure. Structures 2016, 5, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, X.F.; Vang, C.; Tallman, D.E.; Bierwagen, G.P.; Croll, S.G.; Rohlik, S. Weathering Degradation of a Polyurethane Coating. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2001, 74, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, X.F.; Tallman, D.E.; Bierwagen, G.P.; Croll, S.G.; Rohlik, S. Blistering and Degradation of Polyurethane Coatings Under Different Accelerated Weathering Tests. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2002, 77, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bauer, D.R. Interpreting Weathering Acceleration Factors for Automotive Coatings Using Exposure Models. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2000, 69, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Han, H.; Yan, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, K.; Huang, J.; Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; Verlinden, P.J.; Altermatt, P.; Liang, Z.; et al. Analysis of the degradation of encapsulant materials used in photovoltaic modules exposed to different climates in China. Sol. Energy 2019, 194, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. ASTM D1729; Standard Practice for Visual Appraisal of Colors and Color Differences of Diffusely-Illuminated Opaque Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2022.
  20. Sandten, C.S.; Kreyenschmidt, M.; Albach, R.; Fittschen, U.E.A. The Thermo-Oxidative Degradation of Polyurethane Open-Cell Soft Foam Investigated Through Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry of Volatile Organic Compounds. Polymers 2024, 16, 3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, G.; Zhu, D.; Jia, W.; Zhang, F. Analysis of the aging mechanism and life evaluation of elastomers in simulated proton exchange membrane fuel cell environments. e-Polymers 2021, 21, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Blaga, A. Deterioration mechanisms in weathering of plastic materials. In Durability of Building Materials and Components; Sereda, P.J., Litvan, G.G., Eds.; ASTM STP 691; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1980; pp. 827–837. [Google Scholar]
  23. Shaafaey, M.; Bahrololoumi, A.; Mohammadi, H.; Alazhary, S.; Dargazany, R. Investigation of Hygrothermal Aging on Polyurethane-Based (PUB) Adhesive: Substantiating Competition Scenario Between Sub-Aging Thermo-Oxidation and Hydrolytic Phenomena. J. Polym. Res. 2021, 28, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wilhelm, C.; Gardette, J.L. Infrared Analysis of the Photochemical Behavior of Segmented Polyurethanes: 1. Aliphatic Poly (Ester-Urethane). Polymer 1997, 38, 4019–4031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rosu, D.; Rosu, L.; Cascaval, C.N. IR-Change and Yellowing of Polyurethane as a Result of UV Irradiation. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2009, 94, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. GB/T 6379.2-2004; Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results—Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method. Standardization Administration of China (SAC): Beijing, China, 2004.
  27. Fang, D.; He, F.; Xie, J.; Yu, J.; Hu, Y. Calibration of Binding Energy Positions with C1s for XPS Results. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mat. Sci. Edit. 2020, 35, 711–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Karroum, H.; Chenakin, S.; Alekseev, S.; Iablokov, V.; Xiang, Y.; Dubois, V.; Kruse, N. Terminal Amines, Nitriles, and Olefins through Catalytic CO Hydrogenation in the Presence of Ammonia. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 9566–9577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Oliveira, M.C.L.; Antunes, R.A.; Costa, I. Effect of the NCO/OH Molar Ratio on the Physical Aging and on the Electrochemical Behavior of Polyurethane-Urea Hybrid Coatings. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 4679–4689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, F.; Chen, P.; Feng, Y.; Xie, Z.; Liu, Y.; Su, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yao, K.; Lv, W.; et al. Facile synthesis of N-doped carbon dots/g-C3N4 photocatalyst with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for the degradation of indomethacin. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 202, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mayer-Trzaskowska, P.; Robakowska, M.; Gierz, Ł.; Pach, J.; Mazur, E. Observation of the Effect of Aging on the Structural Changes of Polyurethane/Polyurea Coatings. Polymers 2024, 16, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Johannes, C.; Hartung, M.; Heim, H.P. Weathering of a Polyurethane-Based Gel Electrolyte. Polymers 2023, 15, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nowak, K.; Wiśniewski, M.; Kowalska, J. Flavonoids as Natural Stabilizers and Color Indicators of Ageing for Polymeric Materials. Polymers 2015, 7, 1125–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schmitz, V.; Lublóy, É.; Gyurkó, Z. Evaluation of the Composition, Thermal and Mechanical Behavior, and Color Changes of Artificially and Naturally Aged Polymers for the Conservation of Stained Glass Windows. Polymers 2023, 15, 2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Appearance of polyurethane electronic potting sealants for electronic components stored in China tropical marine atmosphere environments for 10 years.
Figure 1. Appearance of polyurethane electronic potting sealants for electronic components stored in China tropical marine atmosphere environments for 10 years.
Micromachines 16 01061 g001
Figure 2. Py-GC/MS spectrum of polyurethane electronic potting stored for 10 years: (A) surface spectrum, (B) interior spectrum.
Figure 2. Py-GC/MS spectrum of polyurethane electronic potting stored for 10 years: (A) surface spectrum, (B) interior spectrum.
Micromachines 16 01061 g002
Figure 3. XPS full spectrum of polyurethane electronic potting: (A) Original sample; (B) Surface after 10 years of storage; (C) Interior after 10 years of storage.
Figure 3. XPS full spectrum of polyurethane electronic potting: (A) Original sample; (B) Surface after 10 years of storage; (C) Interior after 10 years of storage.
Micromachines 16 01061 g003
Figure 4. C1s peak fitting spectrogram of polyurethane electronic potting: (A) Original sample; (B) Surface after 10 years of storage; (C) Interior after 10 years of storage.
Figure 4. C1s peak fitting spectrogram of polyurethane electronic potting: (A) Original sample; (B) Surface after 10 years of storage; (C) Interior after 10 years of storage.
Micromachines 16 01061 g004
Figure 5. ATR-FTIR spectra of polyurethane electronic potting stored for 10 years (Spectrum vertically offset for clarity): interior and surface.
Figure 5. ATR-FTIR spectra of polyurethane electronic potting stored for 10 years (Spectrum vertically offset for clarity): interior and surface.
Micromachines 16 01061 g005
Figure 6. Long-term natural aging storage reaction of polyurethane electronic potting.
Figure 6. Long-term natural aging storage reaction of polyurethane electronic potting.
Micromachines 16 01061 g006
Table 1. Sampling depth table of different information detection methods.
Table 1. Sampling depth table of different information detection methods.
Detection SiteInformation Depth Range
XPSATR-FTIRPy-GC/MS
Surface sampling depthOutermost Outside to the near surface
atomic layer: 5–10 nm
0.5–3 μmOuter surface sample
Inner sampling depthNear-component innerThe inner surface;
depth: 5–10 nm
0.5–3 μmInner sample
Table 2. Key performance test results of electronic components before and after aging.
Table 2. Key performance test results of electronic components before and after aging.
ParameterLeak (Pa·m3/s)IR (GΩ)I_l (A)T_d (s)I_sb (mA)V_a (V)I_max (mA)
Requirement1.0 × 10−5≥0.045≥0.50.4~1 s≤50≤0.8≤250
Sample 1 (Original)8.1 × 10−799 GΩ0.70.6630.70.46148.3
Sample 2 (Original)8.6 × 10−799 GΩ0.70.68300.45146.9
Sample 3 (Original)7.3 × 10−799 GΩ0.70.6829.20.44146.9
Sample 4 (Original)7.5 × 10−799 GΩ0.80.6530.10.47148.4
Sample 5 (Original)6.9 × 10−799 GΩ0.70.6530.90.44147.5
Mean7.68 × 10−799 GΩ0.720.66430.180.452147.6
Std Dev (S)6.01 × 10−800.040.01360.59800.01170.6512
CV7.83%0.00%5.56%2.04%1.98%2.58%0.44%
Sample 1 (10 years)3.8 × 10−6990.70.6429.80.43177.5
Sample 2 (10 years)3.9 × 10−6990.70.6825.40.47159.2
Sample 3 (10 years)4.7 × 10−6990.60.6727.90.40145.6
Sample 4 (10 years)4.2 × 10−6990.80.5924.30.41128.2
Sample 5 (10 years)3.7 × 10−6990.60.6030.90.45135.7
Mean 4.1 × 10−6990.680.63627.660.432149.24
Std Dev (S)0.000000400.07480.03612.51130.025617.5334
CV9.94%0%11%5.68%9.08%5.93%11.75%
Note: Parameter names are abbreviated in the table for clarity: Leak: Sealing property; IR: Insulation Resistance; I_l: Load current; T_d: Delay time; I_sb: Standby current; V_a: Closing voltage; I_max: Maximum operating current; Std Dev (S): standard deviation; CV: coefficient of variation.
Table 3. The mass fraction results of typical components of polyurethane potting compound.
Table 3. The mass fraction results of typical components of polyurethane potting compound.
ComponentToluene DiisocyanatePhthalimide2-Penten-1-ol
Surface0.4%27.5%0.5%
Interior1.1%20.2%0.1%
Table 4. Analysis results of relative atomic content of elements in polyurethane potting compound.
Table 4. Analysis results of relative atomic content of elements in polyurethane potting compound.
Aging TimeElementCNOSi
Binding Energy/eV285400.4532102.2
0 yearOntology/%51.083.4526.5218.95
10 yearsInterior/%58.873.5122.3315.29
10 yearsSurface/%56.73020.2323.04
Table 5. The peak division fitting (GL mixed type) result of polyurethane potting compound C1s.
Table 5. The peak division fitting (GL mixed type) result of polyurethane potting compound C1s.
Aging TimeBinding Energy/eV284.9285.7286.3289.5
Belonging GroupCH2-C6H6C6H6-NHO-CH2(CH2)2CH2-OHN-COO
0 yearOntology/%56.8716.3118.078.75
10 yearsInterior/%65.0410.31 19.16 5.49
10 yearsSurface/%81.0012.06 5.76 1.18
Table 6. The ratio of peak areas of the characteristic peaks of polyurethane potting compound in FTIR.
Table 6. The ratio of peak areas of the characteristic peaks of polyurethane potting compound in FTIR.
Position1046 cm−11708 cm−11529 cm−11222 cm−12953 cm−1
C–OHC=ONHCOOC–O–CCH2
Interior10281352591444100
Surface1067220335517100
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, X.; Li, H.; Zhou, R.; Xie, C.; Ning, H. Polyurethane-Based Electronic Packaging: The Characterization of Natural Aging over a Decade. Micromachines 2025, 16, 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091061

AMA Style

Wei X, Li H, Zhou R, Xie C, Ning H. Polyurethane-Based Electronic Packaging: The Characterization of Natural Aging over a Decade. Micromachines. 2025; 16(9):1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Xiaoqin, Han Li, Rui Zhou, Changcheng Xie, and Honglong Ning. 2025. "Polyurethane-Based Electronic Packaging: The Characterization of Natural Aging over a Decade" Micromachines 16, no. 9: 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091061

APA Style

Wei, X., Li, H., Zhou, R., Xie, C., & Ning, H. (2025). Polyurethane-Based Electronic Packaging: The Characterization of Natural Aging over a Decade. Micromachines, 16(9), 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop