Previous Article in Journal
Nanoporous Gold Nanoparticles-Modified Electrode for the Detection of Endotoxins
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 16
Issue 9
10.3390/mi16091017
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress of Powering IoT Based on Thermoelectric Technology

by
Jinhong Dai
1,
Haitao Deng
2,*,
Jingwen Huang
1 and
Xiaosheng Zhang
1,*
1
School of Integrated Circuit Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
2
Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(9), 1017; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091017
Submission received: 4 August 2025 / Revised: 25 August 2025 / Accepted: 27 August 2025 / Published: 31 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Progress in Energy Harvesters and Self-Powered Sensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of electronic devices, Internet of Things (IoT) technology has become increasingly integrated into everyday life. However, its broader development has been restricted by challenges related to long-term maintenance and the frequent need for power source replacements. Among the available power supply solutions, thermoelectric power generation has garnered significant interest due to its high reliability. Nevertheless, the widespread application of thermoelectric generators (TEGs) in IoT remains limited due to their relatively low conversion efficiency and structural fragility. This review systematically summarizes recent strategies aimed at enhancing the output performance and durability of TEGs through improvements in manufacturing processes and performance optimization techniques. It highlights several fabrication methods capable of endowing devices with superior flexibility and reliability, including screen printing, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and electrospray deposition. Additionally, we discuss two key approaches for improving power generation performance: advanced material selection and multi-mechanism hybridization. Finally, the article explores the applications of TEGs in thermal energy harvesting from wearable devices, ambient environments, and aerospace fields, demonstrating their substantial potential to provide sustainable energy for IoT devices.

1. Introduction

Since the concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) was introduced in 1999, the IoT market has been expanding at an unprecedented rate [1,2], playing a big role in our daily lives. With the continuous increase in the number of IoT nodes, their energy consumption is also rising rapidly [3,4,5]. Consequently, additional energy sources are required to power these nodes. In recent years, various methods for electricity generation, including wind, hydro, and solar energy [6,7,8,9,10,11,12], have been developed. However, not all power supply methods can adequately meet the complex demands of the IoT, particularly when portability and stability are essential. Additionally, the maintenance of IoT devices can be costly, and regular battery replacement often leads to substantial resource waste. Furthermore, pollution remains a critical concern [13,14]. A considerable amount of energy is wasted in daily life, making the harvesting and conversion of such energy into usable power a significant challenge [15,16,17]. Given these considerations, thermoelectric energy harvesting technology emerges as a promising and reliable source of electricity among various power generation methods [18,19].
The mutual conversion of thermal energy and electrical energy was discovered over two centuries ago, including the Seebeck effect, the Peltier effect, and the Thomson effect. Their fundamental principles are illustrated in Figure 1. When a temperature gradient exists between the two ends of a TEG, charge carriers migrate in a uniform direction. When p-type and n-type thermocouples are arranged and connected end-to-end, a voltage, referred to as the Seebeck voltage, can be generated between the hot and cold terminals, as depicted in Figure 1a.
When a current flows through two distinct materials, heat is absorbed at one end and released at the other, a phenomenon known as the Peltier effect, as illustrated in Figure 1b. Additionally, when a temperature gradient is applied to a uniform conductor carrying a current, further heat absorption or release occurs, referred to as the Thomson effect, as depicted in Figure 1c.
Among them, TEGs generate electricity mainly through the Seebeck effect. The Seebeck voltage can be expressed as:
V = α × T
where V represent the Seebeck voltage, α represents the Seebeck coefficient, T represents the absolute temperature.
Thermoelectric performance is not measured by the size of the Seebeck voltage, but by the thermoelectric figure of merit (ZT):
ZT = α 2 σ T κ
where α represents the Seebeck coefficient, T represents the absolute temperature, κ represents the thermal conductivity, and σ represents the electrical conductivity. κ can be divided into κe and κl. κe represents electron thermal conductivity, κl represents lattice thermal conductivity.
As shown in Figure 2, we overview the current progress of powering IoTs based on thermoelectric technology. The technical meaning can be summarized as follows: (1) We overviewed the development of TEGs from bulk-, film-, to yarn-shaped TEGs, and figured out the suitable materials and fabrication methods for realizing each shape of TEGs with good durability. (2) Two effective strategies to improve thermoelectric outputs are emphasized, including high-performance thermoelectric materials and mechanism hybridization with other power generation principles, such as photovoltaic, electrostatic, and piezoelectric effects. (3) Practical IoT applications of the bulk-, film-, and yarn-shaped TEGs in wearable devices, daily environments, and the military industry (such as aerospace) were summarized. Challenges and feasible technique solutions of future thermoelectric systems for sustainable powering the IoTs were discussed.

2. Fabrication Method of TEG

As illustrated in Figure 3, TEGs can be classified into three primary categories: bulk, film, and yarn. Since the 1950s, bismuth telluride has served as a fundamental thermoelectric material for the fabrication of bulk TEGs [26]. By the 1970s, manufacturing processes had progressively matured, resulting in the development of smaller and lighter bulk TEGs. Concurrently, there has been a growing focus on flexible TEGs. With advancements in micro-electromechanical systems after the year 2000, film- and yarn-based TEGs were introduced [27]. A significant number of thermoelectric materials have been developed and implemented in practical applications. These improvements have markedly enhanced the portability and reliability of TEGs, facilitating their use as power sources for increasingly compact Internet of Things (IoT) devices [28,29,30]. Consequently, an increasing number of fabrication methods are now being adopted in industrial and commercial production. In the following section, we provide an overview of several commonly used manufacturing techniques.

2.1. Sintering

Sintering is a traditional method initially employed for the fabrication of bulk TEGs [34,35,36]. However, due to the high costs and irreversible effects on materials during high-temperature processes, this technique has gradually phased out. Recent advancements have focused on enhancing the sintering method through various approaches, including plasma spark sintering, cold sintering, and pre-sintering.
In contrast to conventional sintering, Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) can significantly reduce the sintering temperature, processing time, and the adverse effects of high temperatures on materials. For instance, F. Giovannelli et al. successfully synthesized La7Mo7O30 [37] using the SPS process, which required only 10 min and resulted in ceramics with exceptionally low thermal conductivity, thereby greatly improving the efficiency of thermoelectric power generation.
The elevated temperatures associated with traditional sintering techniques can compromise the micro/nanostructure of thermoelectric materials and introduce chemical issues. Piyawat et al. demonstrated the fabrication of a dense sample at a temperature of 473 K using Cold Sintering Process (CSP) [38], achieving a density comparable to samples produced by hot pressing at higher temperatures. This method significantly reduces thermal conductivity, primarily through the inhibition of lattice thermal conductivity (κl), which enhances phonon scattering at grain boundaries due to restricted grain growth. The resulting ZT value reached 2.13, which is notably high compared to existing thermoelectric materials.

2.2. Screen Printing

Screen printing is a widely utilized technique for producing film-shaped items [39,40,41]. The working principle is illustrated in Figure 4a. These TEGs exhibit significantly low production costs and demonstrate considerable adaptability to various flexible environments. For instance, Wen et al. printed Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 (n-type) and Sb2Te3 (p-type) thermoelectric inks on a flexible polyimide (PI) substrate using screen printing, as depicted in Figure 4b. This method facilitates hybrid sensing functionality without complex preparation processes [42]. Additionally, devices fabricated through screen printing are highly suitable for large-scale manufacturing and commercialization. Zhang et al. successfully produced flexible Ag2Se/terpineol composite films via screen printing [43]. Furthermore, researchers are enhancing traditional screen-printing techniques to accommodate a broader range of materials. Liu et al. successfully printed TEGs [44] of In2O3 and ITO on polyimide substrates by refining traditional screen-printing methods. The TEG demonstrated an exceptionally high Seebeck coefficient of 175.8 μV/°C and maintained excellent operational stability even at temperatures of 199 °C.

2.3. Chemical Vapor Deposition

Due to the simple operation and easy access to raw materials, CVD is one of the primary fabrication methods for film preparation [46,47,48]. The working principle is illustrated in Figure 4c. CVD is widely utilized in the manufacturing of thermoelectric devices and can be employed to prepare various thermoelectric materials, including chalcogenides, tellurides, and oxides. The interfaces significantly influence the performance of thermoelectric devices, and CVD enables precise control over the interface properties between thin films and substrates, thus optimizing device performance.
Through CVD, we can prepare thermoelectric devices with nanoscale structures such as nanowires and nanoparticles. These nanostructures can enhance the thermoelectric properties of materials, improving both the efficiency and stability of devices. Recent advancements in traditional CVD methods have been made to obtain better thermoelectric characteristics. For example, Gyumin Lim et al. synthesized graphene using the CVD method [45], achieving a smaller grain size at low temperature and high pressure, which resulted in a higher nucleation density, as depicted in Figure 4d. The resultant graphene exhibits increased density and improved ZT characteristics. Additionally, Rositawati et al. incorporated gold to form an ohmic junction during the preparation of multilayer graphene via CVD [49]. This adjustment of carrier concentration subsequently increased the ZT value.

2.4. 3D Printing

3D printing technology is an advanced manufacturing process that enables users to create three-dimensional objects by layering materials [50]. This technology has a wide range of applications, including the production of customized products, bioprinting in the medical field, and construction within the construction industry. TEGs can also be produced by 3D printing techniques [51]. As illustrated in Figure 5a, Meng et al. utilized bismuth nanosheets (BiNS) to fabricate thermoelectric devices through UV-curing 3D printing [52]. While the Seebeck coefficient, ZT, does not show a significant increase, 3D printing facilitates the creation of more complex shapes.

2.5. Electrospray Technology

Other fabrication methods for thermoelectric devices have limitations in terms of shape. Electrospray technology offers a viable solution for producing thermoelectric fabrics. As illustrated in Figure 5b, Sun et al. utilized electrospraying to fabricate a carbon-nanotube-based TEGs [20]. In the initial step depicted in Figure 5b-step (i), the process begins with immersing carbon nanotube fibers (CNTF) into a commercial poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT: PSS) solution. A polypropylene mask (PP) is then applied to the substrate, followed by n-type hybridization through electrospray and oleamine doping, as shown in Figure 5b-step (ii). Subsequently, thermoelectric legs with alternating doping are formed, as indicated in Figure 5b-step (iii). To prevent short circuits, the doped CNTF is encapsulated in acrylic fibers using coverspinning technology, resulting in the desired TEG, with an output of 70 mW·m−2 at 44 K and notable bending resistance.

2.6. Sol-Gel Method

The sol-gel process is a unique method for the qualitative and quantitative synthesis of high-purity metal oxide nanomaterials characterized by ultra-fine structures and single-phase particles [54,55,56]. Zhao et al. utilized this sol-gel methodology to fabricate Bi2212 thin films on miscut single-crystal LaAlO3 substrates [53]. The resulting films displayed anisotropic properties, rendering them appropriate for applications in thermoelectric devices, as illustrated in Figure 5c.
The manufacturing process of TEG is continuously evolving, with a focus on increased flexibility and miniaturization. However, this evolution does not imply the abandonment of previous methodologies. For large-scale waste heat power generation applications, the low-cost and high-efficiency sintering route remains the preferred approach. In contrast, film printing technology is poised to lead in flexible manufacturing and micro-device applications. Additionally, specialized manufacturing processes such as combination of Nanosynthesis and SPS will be required for extreme conditions. Concurrently, cost-effective, large-scale laboratory advancements will emerge, promoting the large-scale commercial application of thermoelectric technology.

3. Performance Improvement

In addition to structural problems, the performance of TEGs needs to be improved to ensure a higher output. We introduce the optimization of the TEG in two ways: material selection and hybrid power generation.

3.1. Material Selection

Among all thermoelectric materials, bismuth telluride [57,58,59] remains the most widely utilized. Its ZT value is approximately 1 at 50 °C and decreases at higher temperatures. The manufacturing process for bismuth telluride has reached a mature stage.
Since the discovery of the Seebeck effect, researchers have actively investigated many thermoelectric materials. Recently, there has been a growing focus on various metal oxides, metal compounds, and novel materials. For example, Wan et al. developed a nano Fe2O3/carbon fiber (CF)/cement composite [60]. Figure 6a illustrates the fabrication process. The composite of nano Fe2O3, carbon fiber (CF), and polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether (TX10) disperser in the cement matrix endowed the cement composite with a high Seebeck coefficient (1.1234 mV/K), as well as good compressive strength and flexural strength. This demonstrates its practical application on the surfaces of urban buildings and sidewalks for urban energy harvesting. As depicted in Figure 6b, Klochko et al. developed a translucent solar thermoelectric generator based on ZnO/FTO [61]. Although this device achieves a Voc of 0.28 mV, a short-circuit current of 220 nA, and a maximum output power of 13 pW, it is capable of integration with glass windows to capture near-infrared and ambient heat from outdoor sunlight.
In addition to metal oxides, metal compounds exhibit superior thermoelectric performance. As shown in Figure 6c, Bel-Hadj et al. fabricated a thermocouple using Cu55Ni45 and Ni90Cr10. This metallic material effectively reduces the internal resistance of the TEG, achieving an output of 125 μW/cm2 [62]. Cu2Se is an efficient thermoelectric material that has garnered extensive attention due to its excellent thermoelectric properties, low toxicity, and abundant elemental reserves. As demonstrated in Figure 6d, Choo et al. prepared Cu2Se using a 3D printing method, a low-temperature process that preserves the microstructure of Cu2Se, resulting in a higher ZT value [21].
Micromachines 16 01017 g006
Figure 6. Thermoelectric materials for TEG. (a) Nano Fe2O3/carbon fiber (CF)/cement composite. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [60]. 2023, Elsevier. (b) TEG based on ZnO/FTO. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [61]. 2019, Elsevier. (c) TEG made out of Cu55Ni45 and Ni90Cr10. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. 2024, Springer Nature. (d) TEG made out of Cu2Se. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [21]. 2024, Springer Nature. (e) TEG based on graphite. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [63]. 2023, AIP. (f) Graphene based TEG. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [64]. 2023, Elsevier.
Figure 6. Thermoelectric materials for TEG. (a) Nano Fe2O3/carbon fiber (CF)/cement composite. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [60]. 2023, Elsevier. (b) TEG based on ZnO/FTO. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [61]. 2019, Elsevier. (c) TEG made out of Cu55Ni45 and Ni90Cr10. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. 2024, Springer Nature. (d) TEG made out of Cu2Se. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [21]. 2024, Springer Nature. (e) TEG based on graphite. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [63]. 2023, AIP. (f) Graphene based TEG. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [64]. 2023, Elsevier.
Micromachines 16 01017 g006
Besides metals, graphite and graphene [49,65] demonstrate excellent electrical and thermal conductivity. Graphite functions as a p-type semiconductor and exhibits n-type semiconductor behavior when combined with polyethylenimine (PEI). For instance, as illustrated in Figure 6e, Duan et al. developed a graphite-based foam through a mechanical foaming process [63]. The foam samples underwent compression treatment to transform the three-dimensional foam into a porous film, thereby enhancing power generation efficiency. As depicted in Figure 6f, Wei et al. fabricated a graphene nanoribbon (GNR)-based TEG [64]. The edge effect of GNR can reduce carrier concentration, which is inversely related to the Seebeck coefficient. Consequently, increasing the bandgap can enhance the Seebeck coefficient. The experimental results show a Seebeck coefficient of 6.76 μW·m−1K−2, which is significantly higher than that of traditional graphene-based TEGs. Furthermore, Table 1 provides a list of additional materials.
The introduction highlights that traditional thermoelectric materials like bismuth and tellurium, can achieve favorable output at room temperature. However, their high cost is driven by the scarcity of rare elements, the cost is extremely high, and the rare elements are harmful to the human body and cause pollution. Metal oxides are capable of operating at elevated temperatures, offering a cost-effective and non-toxic alternative. Nonetheless, they are challenged by low ZT values and fragile structures. While metal mixtures exhibit high performance and low thermal conductivity, their preparation methods are quite complex. It’s difficult to manufacture and commercialize on a large scale. Conductive polymers, although inexpensive and flexible, fall short in output capacity and do not meet the necessary stability requirements.

3.2. Mechanism Hybridization

To enhance output performance, TEGs can be integrated with other generators to improve power generation efficiency. Fuel cells can generate electricity and heat without moving parts, typically exhibiting high efficiency and low emissions; however, they also produce a significant amount of waste heat. The integration of TEGs with fuel cells can improve power generation efficiency. In Figure 7a, Wang et al. designed a hybrid power system [71] consisting of an alkaline fuel cell (AFC) module, a heat accumulator, a TEG unit, and a heat sink. This system enables the TEG to capture the waste heat generated by the AFC and convert it into electricity. The maximum power density of the hybrid system is 105.71% of that of the stand-alone AFC system. Triboelectric generators represent a less mature technology that can similarly be combined with TEGs. The photovoltaic thermal (PVT) system has emerged as a promising direction in recent years. The combination of a TEG with a photovoltaic generator can cool the PV panels and generate electricity while collecting waste heat from the PV panels. There are ongoing improvements to existing PVT systems. In Figure 7b, Wen et al. present a flexible hybrid photo-thermoelectric generator (PTEG) featuring a simple structure composed of a TEG and a light-to-thermal conversion layer, enabling simultaneous harvesting of thermal and radiation energies based on a single working mechanism [72]. By incorporating light-absorbing and reflective layers, the power generation efficiency is significantly enhanced. As illustrated in Figure 7c, Kim et al. achieved an output increase of 1.75 times by combining triboelectric and thermoelectric generators [73]. In Figure 7d, Kim et al. integrated a TEG with a piezoelectric generator (PEG) to power a wearable human sensing network [74]. This thermoelectric-piezoelectric hybrid generator (TPHG) was entirely monolithic and fabricated using a straightforward droplet-casting method. This power generation approach enables simultaneous energy harvesting from multiple sources without being limited to a specific condition. Additionally, the device demonstrated improved stability over 5000 cycles of durability testing.
Hybrid power generation has demonstrated its effectiveness in enhancing energy conversion efficiency. In the future, it will serve as a fundamental solution for diversifying power sources. This approach addresses the limitations of relying on a single power generation environment and facilitate a more stable energy supply. Although challenges such as microintegration, material compatibility, and cost management still exist, advancements in experimental research will lead to the emergence of more hybrid generators. This evolution will contribute to a new era of interconnected intelligent systems, fostering energy self-sufficiency.

4. Application of TEG in IoT

Due to the small size and good reliability, TEG is widely used in IoT. Based on energy consumption, we will introduce the application of TEGs in the following categories: wearable devices, waste heat recovery, and aerospace applications. In this section, we summarize these thermoelectric energy harvesting devices in detail.

4.1. Wearable Applications

Wearable electronics often require stable and continuous energy sources [75]. The human body is a constant source of heat. As mentioned in Chapter 1, most thermoelectric devices today are film-shaped using a planar process. Therefore, TEGs are suitable for wearable devices.
As illustrated in Figure 8a, Yuan et al. developed a highly efficient flexible thermoelectric generator (f-TEG) utilizing bismuth telluride grains assembled on a flexible polyimide substrate [76]. The self-powered bracelet is capable of continuously monitoring temperature, humidity, and acceleration, which can be further processed to calculate human stride frequency and analyze gait in motion. These measurements are processed in the microcontroller unit (MCU) and displayed in real time on an LCD. In Figure 8b, Tian et al. introduced a concept for a film-based thermoelectric generator (film-TEG) integrated with electronic skin [77]. Electronic skin holds significant market potential, with an estimated £1.7 billion market for wireless health monitoring systems alone. The TEG can be utilized to generate electricity, which can then power these electronic skins through power management circuits and high-efficiency energy storage units. Numerous studies on film-TEG have already been conducted. In Figure 8c, He et al. fabricated a three-dimensional flexible thermoelectric device featuring an inner rigid and outer flexible woven design [78]. This device has the potential for integration into everyday wearable garments; in this work, it was successfully incorporated into an N95 mask to monitor human breathing.
Despite these advantages, TEGs are not yet widely deployed at scale. This limitation arises from the inability of current TEG materials to simultaneously meet the demands for flexibility and output power. Additionally, the integration of the complete power generation system with power consumption equipment presents significant challenges. To date, simultaneous miniaturization and integration of TEG technology remain unachieved. These challenges will constitute the primary research directions for wearable TEG systems in the future.

4.2. Daily Environment Applications

In addition to the human body serving as a heat source, significant waste heat is generated in everyday life. Examples include automobile exhaust [79], road waste heat [80] and industrial waste heat [81]. These heat sources can be harnessed, and TEGs can be utilized to power Internet of Things (IoT) devices.
As illustrated in Figure 9a, this model features an automotive TEG equipped with hot and cold ends, thermoelectric modules (TEMs), and fastening structures [24]. The TEMs are bismuth-telluride-based devices arranged in a Π shape, comprising 126 pairs of thermoelectric legs. Sixty TEMs were assembled onto six hot surfaces, with ten TEMs allocated per surface. Li et al. proposed a genetic algorithm-back propagation (GA-BP) model based on this design, which enhances the accuracy of the TEG and provides both experimental and theoretical foundations for TEG design and numerical simulations. In Figure 9b, Xie et al. explored the installation of a thermoelectric module on a road surface [82]. This module absorbs heat from asphalt pavements while mitigating the urban heat island effect [83]. Their study analyzes the factors influencing thermoelectric generator utilization (TEGU) in pavement power generation, including burial depth, pavement defects, and the number of series modules. Temperature differentials are not only present outdoors but can also be harnessed indoors.
In Figure 9c, Zhang et al. fabricated a waste heat recovery device aimed at reducing the energy consumption of an electric water heater [84]. This device consists of a shell, a thermoelectric unit, and a working medium. The working medium captures heat from the heat source to create an artificial low-temperature zone. Compared to traditional heaters, the enhanced water heater effectively absorbs waste heat from the top of the unit. In addition to heat sources influenced by human activity, numerous natural heat sources exist, with geothermal energy being one of them. The hot springs in Thailand maintain high temperatures year-round, presenting an opportunity for energy regeneration. Mona et al. deployed a thermoelectric module under the base of a hot spring to leverage geothermal energy for powering an IoT detection unit [85]. This setup monitors various parameters, including air temperature, air humidity, water temperature, cooling water temperature, sulfur dioxide (SO2) levels, current, voltage, and the output of the TEG module.
TEG is designed to work for a long time once deployed, making it friendly for IoT devices that need to be maintained. But TEG is still not widely used on waste heat recovery, because the corresponding technology is not mature enough. Compared to batteries, TEG is not stable enough and requires additional power management circuits and energy storage components, which is a large work. After miniaturizing the entire system, there will be more IoT nodes in the future, and TEG can power these micro sensor nodes at low cost.

4.3. Aerospace Application

In the process of aerospace, it is inevitable to use thrusters with large energy consumption. A considerable amount of waste heat is generated during thruster operation, which is a significant source of energy. If harnessed effectively, this energy can lead to reduced energy consumption and minimized environmental pollution for aircraft. A survey conducted by Boeing indicated that TEGs could decrease fuel consumption by 0.5%, which translates into operating cost savings of tens of millions of dollars. Consequently, numerous researchers have dedicated their efforts to related studies. For example, Doragi et al. examined the performance of TEGs based on polymer nanocomposites during various flight phases [86]. They utilized a model, as illustrated in Figure 10a, where the cold end temperature ranged from −15 °C to 1 °C, and the hot end ranged from 63 °C to 41 °C. The output voltage varied between 67 mV and 116 mV, with measurements from simulation softwares showing significant consistency, indicating that TEGs in aerospace can be evaluated and simulated more effectively. In Figure 10b, Ziolkowski et al. explored the application of a TEG for jet engine nozzles through finite element modeling [87].
During thermal power generation, heat is continuously transferred to the cold end. Therefore, it is essential to consider the heat dissipation at this end. As illustrated in Figure 10c, Sarris et al. employed a vapor chamber coupled with a conventional circular needle-fin heat sink to enhance the output power of TEGs, effectively reducing the temperature of the cold junction [25]. A TEG integrated with a heat sink and vapor chamber demonstrates superior heat dissipation compared to a standalone TEG (Figure 10c(i)) or a TEG with a heat sink alone (Figure 10c(ii)). However, further research is necessary to explore the application of this method in aircraft engines, particularly under dynamic air conditions.
During space exploration, a significant portion of energy is inaccessible, and in extreme environments, even basic lighting cannot be guaranteed. Consequently, thermal energy is utilized for electricity generation. Radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) were first deployed in space for electricity generation in the 1950s. These generators do not rely on nuclear fusion or fission; instead, they harness the natural radioactive decay of plutonium-238, primarily in the form of plutonium dioxide (238PuO2), for thermal power generation. RTGs are characterized by low quality yet high reliability, enabling them to operate for years or even decades. They have been successfully utilized in missions such as Voyager 1 and Voyager 2, providing energy as they journey to the edge of the solar system. Ongoing optimizations are being made to RTGs; for instance, the Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMTRG) incorporates multiple nested layers, allowing it to function effectively in both atmospheric and vacuum conditions. Researchers are actively investigating the performance of RTGs in space. For example, Whiting et al. conducted a study examining the lifetime and performance of MMTRGs and analyzed their power variation behavior during exploration [88].
The extremely high lifespan makes RTGs capable of many space missions. But the lack of radioelement becomes a big problem. That’s why RTG is not widely used today. Another issue is the power output. RTGs can only provide a few hundred watts of power. For greater energy demands, we can only rely on better nuclear reactors.

5. Conclusions and Prospect

In recent years, researchers made efforts on developing thermoelectric technologies and reported meaningful research papers and reviews. There are many entry points to summarize thermoelectric generators (TEGs) and its applications for the fields of IoTs. For TEGs, the entry points include but not limited to thermoelectric materials (traditional, flexible or stretchable materials) [89,90,91], fabrication of TEGs in different shapes (bulk-, film-, and yarn-shapes) and how these structures affect the performance of TEGs in outputs, weight, user conformability and integrity, etc. [92,93,94], performance evaluation of the reported TEGs and discussion of how these key factors (materials, structures, and mechanism) affect TEG outputs and practical applications [95,96]. For IoT applications of TEGs, the entry points involve sustainable energy supplying and self-powered sensing [97,98]. Particularly in sustainable energy supplying, many related technologies are worthy of in-depth discussion, such as power management method for effectively storing and supplying to IoT components, construction of multifunctional TEG system for IoT powering and sensing, and AI-assisted TEG systems.
Differently from others, in this review, we focus on the current challenges of TEGs in device durability and output enhancement, summarize the recent development of TEGs from bulk-, film-, to yarn-shaped TEGs, figured out the suitable materials and fabrication methods for realizing each shape of TEGs with good durability, and emphasize two effective strategies (material selection and mechanism hybridization) to improve thermoelectric outputs. Finally, we summarized the practical IoT applications of the bulk-, film-, and yarn-shaped TEGs in wearable devices, daily environments, and the military industry (such as aerospace).
In the future, we believe more researches will focus on the development of TEGs with higher efficiency, more flexible applications, more intelligence system with AI technique, and multi-technology hybrid generation. In practice, further development of the fabrication methods and materials is required. Advanced manufacturing techniques lead to more reliable thermoelectric performance. New materials offer higher ZT values and lower thermal conductivity. Noticeably, organic thermoelectric materials are also emerging, adapting to various flexible conditions. Moreover, some environmental-friendly materials are taking place of the traditional thermoelectric material. The integration of TEG systems should improve to minimize. These factors are effective in improving TEG performance. Thus, playing a more important role in IoT.
In general, thermoelectric power generation devices for the IoT is an attractive direction. Attractive potential in wearable electronics, waste heat recovery, aerospace, etc. A dream of Battery-free IoT is in sight. As predicted by “Thermoelectric Generator Market Size & Share Report, 2030” from GRAND VIEW RESEARCH, the global thermoelectric generator market size was estimated at USD 813.38 million in 2023 and is projected to reach $1610.05 million by 2030, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 10.5% from 2024 to 2030. Undoubtedly, many IoT devices will take thermoelectric power generation as one uniform power supply in the future, which has great commercial potential, even though most TEGs are currently in the experimental stage and difficult to fully commercialize.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Z., H.D. and J.D.; methodology, X.Z., H.D. and J.D.; validation, X.Z., and H.D.; investigation, J.D. and J.H.; resources, X.Z.; data curation, J.D. and H.D.; writing—original draft preparation, J.D.; writing—review and editing, H.D. and X.Z.; visualization, J.D. and H.D.; supervision, X.Z.; project administration, X.Z.; funding acquisition, X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Authors would like to thank the funding support by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFB3206100), the Key R&D Program of Mianyang (No. 2023ZYDF019), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62271107), the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (Yi Zhang: No. 2025ZNSFSC0464), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. ZYGX2022YGRH007).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dange, S.; Nitnaware, P. Secure Share: Optimal Blockchain Integration in IoT Systems. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2024, 64, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gvozdenovic, S.; Becker, J.K.; Mikulskis, J.; Starobinski, D. IoT-Scan: Network Reconnaissance for Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 13091–13107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fayos-Jordan, R.; Felici-Castell, S.; Segura-Garcia, J.; Alcaraz-Calero, J.M. Cervello-Duato Exploiting Multihoming Capabilities in 5G-Enabled IoT Nodes. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 134940–134950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gharib, A.; Ibnkahla, M. Ibnkahla User Security-Oriented Information-Centric IoT Nodes Clustering With Graph Convolution Networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 8311–8326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xiao, H.; Qi, N.; Yin, Y.; Yu, S.; Sun, X.; Xuan, G.; Liu, J.; Xiao, S.; Li, Y.; Li, Y. Investigation of Self-Powered IoT Sensor Nodes for Harvesting Hybrid Indoor Ambient Light and Heat Energy. Sensors 2023, 23, 3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hernández-Gutiérrez, C.A.; Delgado-del-Carpio, M.; Zebadúa-Chavarría, L.A.; Hernández-de-León, H.R.; Escobar-Gómez, E.N.; Quevedo-López, M. IoT-Enabled System for Detection, Monitoring, and Tracking of Nuclear Materials. Electronics 2023, 12, 3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bhau, G.V.; Deshmukh, R.G.; kumar, T.R.; Chowdhury, S.; Sesharao, Y.; Abilmazhinov, Y. IoT Based Solar Energy Monitoring System. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 80, 3697–3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jang, K.B.; Baek, C.H.; Woo, T.H. Climate Resilience Analysis of Nuclear Energy by Big Data Associated with Internet of Things (IoT). Ann. Nucl. Energy 2024, 205, 110608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, F.; Zhao, J.; Li, F.; Chu, Y.; Du, H.; Sun, M.; Xi, Z.; Du, T.; Xu, M. High-Performance Coaxial Counter-Rotating Triboelectric Nanogenerator with Lift–Drag Hybrid Blades for Wind Energy Harvesting. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maio, M.; Marrasso, E.; Roselli, C.; Sasso, M.; Fontana, N.; Marini, G. An Innovative Approach for Optimal Selection of Pumped Hydro Energy Storage Systems to Foster Sustainable Energy Integration. Renew. Energy 2024, 227, 120533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krishna Rao, C.; Sahoo, S.K.; Yanine, F.F. An IoT-Based Intelligent Smart Energy Monitoring System for Solar PV Power Generation. Energy Harvest. Syst. 2024, 11, 20230015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Teimourian, H.; Teimourian, A.; Dimililer, K.; Al-Turjman, F. The Potential of Wind Energy via an Intelligent IoT-Oriented Assessment. J. Supercomput. 2022, 78, 5221–5240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alzahrani, A.I.A.; Chauhdary, S.H.; Alshdadi, A.A. Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Wastewater Management in Smart Cities. Electronics 2023, 12, 2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gabriel, A.; Cruz, F. Open Source IoT-Based Collection Bin Applied to Local Plastic Recycling. HardwareX 2023, 13, e00389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tabaghchi Milan, S.; Darbandi, M.; Jafari Navimipour, N.; Yalcın, S. An Energy-Aware Load Balancing Method for IoT-Based Smart Recycling Machines Using an Artificial Chemical Reaction Optimization Algorithm. Algorithms 2023, 16, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Di Persio, F.; Blecua, M.; Chaine, A.C.; Daue, T.; Mateo-Mateo, C.; Ezpeleta, I.; Pötschke, P.; Krause, B.; Inci, E.; Pionteck, J.; et al. Recyclability of Novel Energy Harvesting and Storage Technologies for IoT and Wireless Sensor Networks. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 435, 140525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. López, O.L.; Rosabal, O.M.; Ruiz-Guirola, D.E.; Raghuwanshi, P.; Mikhaylov, K.; Lovén, L.; Iyer, S. Energy-Sustainable IoT Connectivity: Vision, Technological Enablers, Challenges, and Future Directions. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2023, 4, 2609–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tuoi, T.T.K.; Van Toan, N.; Ono, T. Heat Storage Thermoelectric Generator as an Electrical Power Source for Wireless Iot Sensing Systems. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 15557–15568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Markiewicz, M.; Dziurdzia, P.; Skotnicki, T. Randomly Moving Thermoelectric Energy Harvester for Wearables and Industrial Internet of Things. Nano Energy 2024, 126, 109565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, T.; Zhou, B.; Zheng, Q.; Wang, L.; Jiang, W.; Snyder, G.J. Stretchable Fabric Generates Electric Power from Woven Thermoelectric Fibers. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Choo, S.; Lee, J.; Şişik, B.; Jung, S.-J.; Kim, K.; Yang, S.E.; Jo, S.; Nam, C.; Ahn, S.; Lee, H.S.; et al. Geometric Design of Cu2Se-Based Thermoelectric Materials for Enhancing Power Generation. Nat. Energy 2024, 9, 1105–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gharapetian, D.; Alian Fini, M.; Asgari, M.; Shabani, B. A Nanofluid-Based Hybrid Photovoltaic-Thermal -Thermoelectric Generator System for Combined Heat and Power Applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 301, 118066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, B.; Lin, Y.; Tian, Y.; Wei, W.; Xu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Li, K.; Hou, C.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Bioinspired Wearable Thermoelectric Device Constructed with Soft-Rigid Assembly for Personal Thermal Management. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2402319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, F.; Sun, P.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Liu, G.; Hu, H.; Hu, J.; Tan, X.; He, S.; et al. GA−BP Prediction Model for Automobile Exhaust Waste Heat Recovery Using Thermoelectric Generator. Processes 2023, 11, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sarris, A.; Bhatti, B.; Ciampa, F. Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting Using Vapour Chamber Coolers for Aerospace Applications. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2022, 33, 1602–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saleemi, M.; Toprak, M.S.; Li, S.; Johnsson, M.; Muhammed, M. Synthesis, Processing, and Thermoelectric Properties of Bulk Nanostructured Bismuth Telluride (Bi2Te3). J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 22, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kuang, N.; Zuo, Z.; Wang, W.; Liu, R. High Performance Flexible Thin-Film Thermoelectric Generator Heated by Methanol Catalytic Combustion. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 219, 119346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xie, H.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, P. Thermoelectric-Powered Sensors for Internet of Things. Micromachines 2023, 14, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Gou, W.; Geng, L.; Lian, Y. 83.9% Efficiency 100-mV Self-Startup Boost Converter for Thermoelectric Energy Harvester in IoT Applications. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2020, 67, 1654–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, X.; Cai, J.; Liu, M.; Ni, X.; Liu, W.; Guo, H.; Yu, J.; Wang, L.; Qin, X. Multifunctional, Wearable, and Wireless Sensing System via Thermoelectric Fabrics. Engineering 2024, 35, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yuan, J.; Zhu, R. A Fully Self-Powered Wearable Monitoring System with Systematically Optimized Flexible Thermoelectric Generator. Appl. Energy 2020, 271, 115250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Soleimani, Z.; Zoras, S.; Ceranic, B.; Cui, Y.; Shahzad, S. A Comprehensive Review on the Output Voltage/Power of Wearable Thermoelectric Generators Concerning Their Geometry and Thermoelectric Materials. Nano Energy 2021, 89, 106325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ding, T.; Chan, K.H.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, X.-Q.; Cheng, Y.; Li, T.; Ho, G.W. Scalable Thermoelectric Fibers for Multifunctional Textile-Electronics. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, Y.; Yan, M.; Jiang, E.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, H.; Duan, B.; Li, G.; Zhai, P. Thermoelectric Properties of Ag2Te Prepared by One-Step Hot-Pressing Method. Mater. Lett. 2023, 339, 134100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Grebennikov, A.; Bocharov, A.; Makagonov, V.; Kalyadin, O.; Yur’yev, V.; Korolev, K. Improving the Characteristics of Thermoelectric Generator Batteries Based on Bismuth Telluride by Optimizing the Parameters of Hot Pressing N-Bi 2 Te 2.4 Se 0.6. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1035, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Madavali, B.; Nguyen, V.D.; Jo, S.J.; Lee, C.; Hong, S.-J. Investigation of Anisotropy in Microstructure and Thermoelectric Properties of Large-Scaled p-Type Bi–Sb–Te Sintered Body Made by Hot Pressing. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 18168–18177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Giovannelli, F.; Sabarthes, E.; Delorme, F. Thermoelectric Properties of La7Mo7O30 Sintered by Reactive Spark Plasma Sintering. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 11921–11925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Piyasin, P.; Palaporn, D.; Kurosaki, K.; Pinitsoontorn, S. High-Performance Thermoelectric Properties of Cu2Se Fabricated via Cold Sintering Process. Solid State Sci. 2024, 149, 107448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, C.; Ran, C.; Yao, Q.; Wang, J.; Guo, C.; Gu, L.; Han, H.; Wang, X.; Chao, L.; Xia, Y.; et al. Screen-Printing Technology for Scale Manufacturing of Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2303992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gorjanc, M.; Gerl, A.; Kert, M. Screen Printing of pH-Responsive Dye to Textile. Polymers 2022, 14, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Q.; Ge, W.; Xie, X.; He, P.; Yin, H. Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)-Modified Colloidal Silicon Nanoparticles for Flexible Screen Printing Inks and Anticounterfeiting Applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 3129–3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wen, D.-L.; Deng, H.-T.; Liu, X.; Li, G.-K.; Zhang, X.-R.; Zhang, X.-S. Wearable Multi-Sensing Double-Chain Thermoelectric Generator. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2020, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, C.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wei, P.; Zhao, W.; Cai, K. Scalable Printing High-Performance and Self-Healable Ag2Se/Terpineol Nanocomposite Film for Flexible Thermoelectric Device. Energy 2024, 296, 131232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Z.; Tian, B.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhao, L.; Shi, P.; Lin, Q.; Jiang, Z. High-Performance Temperature Sensor by Employing Screen Printing Technology. Micromachines 2021, 12, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lim, G.; Kihm, K.D.; Kim, H.G.; Lee, W.; Lee, W.; Pyun, K.R.; Cheon, S.; Lee, P.; Min, J.Y.; Ko, S.H. Enhanced Thermoelectric Conversion Efficiency of CVD Graphene with Reduced Grain Sizes. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Daigo, Y.; Kurashima, K.; Ishii, S.; Mizushima, I. Observation and Suppression of Growth Pits Formed on 4H-SiC Epitaxial Films Grown Using Halide Chemical Vapor Deposition Process. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 2024, 37, 402–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kwok, F.M.; Du, X.; Sun, Z.; Ng, M.C.; Liu, Q.; Fan, L.L.; Yip, W.S.; Kwok, D.K.Y.; To, S. Fabrication of Diamond Film under Low Methane Concentration by Hot Filament Chemical Vapor Deposition with Magnetic Field Assistance. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2024, 483, 130802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, J. Parametric Dependence of CsPbI2Br Perovskite Film Growth Using a Mist Chemical Vapor Deposition Method. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2024, 60, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rositawati, D.N.; Widianto, E.; Suprapto; Sujitno, T.; Absor, M.A.U.; Sholihun; Triyana, K.; Santoso, I. Enhancing Thermoelectric Properties of Multilayer Graphene with Au Deposition. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2024, 319, 129295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cao, Z.; Li, P.; Deng, T.; Jia, K.; Shen, K.; Xi, K. 3D Printing Interdigital Lithium-Sulfur Micro-Batteries with High Areal Energy Density. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 489, 151292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bian, M.; Xu, Z.; Tang, X.; Jia, H.; Wang, Y.; Cabot, A. Solution-Based 3D Printed Thermoelectric Composite for Custom-Shaped Thermoelectric Generator Applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 976, 173202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Meng, Q.; Yang, Y.; Han, S.; Meng, F.; Liu, T. Preparation of High-Performance Bismuthene Thermoelectric Composites Doped with Graphene Using UV-Curing 3D Printing Technology. Polym. Compos. 2024, 45, 8176–8186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, X.; Zhou, H.; Qi, Y.; Lu, X.; Sun, M.; Wei, W.; Ma, D.; Wu, F.; Wang, T. The Growth Mechanism and Properties of Bi2212 Thin Films on Miscut Substrates by Sol-Gel Method. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 684, 133134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rafiq, F.; Govindsamy, P.; Periyasamy, S. Synthesis of a Novel Nanoparticle BaCoO2.6 through Sol-Gel Method and Elucidation of Its Structure and Electrical Properties. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 3877879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rasmi, T.; Malini, K.A. Synthesis of Thermoelectric Bismuth Telluride Alloys by Sol-Gel Auto-Combustion Method. AIP Conf. Proc. 2023, 2783, 020003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sulaiman, S.; Tuan Zahrin, T.M.; Md Yatim, N.; Mohd Sabri, M.F.; Mohamad Sharif, M.F. Effects of pH on Grain Size and Structure of ZnO Nanoparticle Synthesized via Sol–Gel Method for Enhanced Thermoelectric Materials. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Manufacturing and Mechatronics; Aziz, A.R., Ismail, Z., Iqbal, A.K.M.A., Ahmed, I., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 233–242. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kumar, A.; Rawat, P.; Kim, J.H.; Thoravat, S.; Park, J.; Jin, H.; Rhyee, J.-S. Enhancement of Thermoelectric Performance by Stacking Fault Control in (GeTe)1-x(Bi2Te3)x Compounds, Synthesized by Hot Press Sintering Method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2024, 322, 129532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vinoth, S.; Karthikeyan, V.; Roy, V.A.L.; Thilakan, P. Growth of High Carrier Mobility 2-Dimensional Hexagonal Bi2Te3-xSex Nanoplatelets and Its Thermoelectric Performance Studies. J. Cryst. Growth 2024, 625, 127442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, X.; Shang, H.; Gu, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, Q.; Zhang, L.; Feng, C.; Li, G.; Ding, F. High-Performance p-Type Bi2Te3-Based Thermoelectric Materials Enabled via Regulating Bi–Te Ratio. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 11678–11685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wan, Y.; Tan, S.; Li, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, L.; Li, H.; Han, Z. Fabrication and Thermoelectric Property of the Nano Fe2O3/Carbon Fiber/Cement-Based Composites for Potential Energy Harvesting Application. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 365, 130021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Klochko, N.P.; Klepikova, K.S.; Kopach, V.R.; Tyukhov, I.I.; Starikov, V.V.; Sofronov, D.S.; Khrypunova, I.V.; Zhadan, D.O.; Petrushenko, S.I.; Dukarov, S.V.; et al. Development of Semi-Transparent ZnO/FTO Solar Thermoelectric Nanogenerator for Energy Efficient Glazing. Sol. Energy 2019, 184, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Planar Micro-Thermoelectric Generators Based on Cu55Ni45 and Ni90Cr10 Thermocouples for IoT Applications | SpringerLink. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-21216-1_10#Sec5 (accessed on 12 June 2024).
  63. Duan, S.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Wu, M.; Wang, L.; Fang, M.; Huang, Z.; Luo, R. Printable Graphite-Based Thermoelectric Foam for Flexible Thermoelectric Devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 123, 063904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wei, T.; Li, H.; Fu, Y.; Zheng, X.; Huang, L.; Song, A. A Graphene-Nanoribbon-Based Thermoelectric Generator. Carbon 2023, 210, 118053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Juntunen, T.; Jussila, H.; Ruoho, M.; Liu, S.; Hu, G.; Albrow-Owen, T.; Ng, L.W.T.; Howe, R.C.T.; Hasan, T.; Sun, Z.; et al. Inkjet Printed Large-Area Flexible Few-Layer Graphene Thermoelectrics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1800480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, C.; de la Mata, M.; Li, Z.; Belarre, F.J.; Arbiol, J.; Khor, K.A.; Poletti, D.; Zhu, B.; Yan, Q.; Xiong, Q. Enhanced Thermoelectric Performance of Solution-Derived Bismuth Telluride Based Nanocomposites via Liquid-Phase Sintering. Nano Energy 2016, 30, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dai, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, K.; Li, G.; Wang, J.; Sun, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H. Joint-Free Single-Piece Flexible Thermoelectric Devices with Ultrahigh Resolution p–n Patterns toward Energy Harvesting and Solid-State Cooling. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 4355–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jiang, C.; Wei, P.; Ding, Y.; Cai, K.; Tong, L.; Gao, Q.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Chen, S. Ultrahigh Performance Polyvinylpyrrolidone/Ag2Se Composite Thermoelectric Film for Flexible Energy Harvesting. Nano Energy 2021, 80, 105488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ju, H.; Kim, J. Fabrication of Conductive Polymer/Inorganic Nanoparticles Composite Films: PEDOT:PSS with Exfoliated Tin Selenide Nanosheets for Polymer-Based Thermoelectric Devices. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 297, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rogl, G.; Rogl, P. Skutterudites, a Most Promising Group of Thermoelectric Materials. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2017, 4, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, M.; Ruan, J.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Gao, F.; Zhang, X.; Rahman, E.; Guo, J. Modeling, Thermodynamic Performance Analysis, and Parameter Optimization of a Hybrid Power Generation System Coupling Thermogalvanic Cells with Alkaline Fuel Cells. Energy 2024, 292, 130557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wen, D.-L.; Liu, X.; Bao, J.-F.; Li, G.-K.; Feng, T.; Zhang, F.; Liu, D.; Zhang, X.-S. Flexible Hybrid Photo-Thermoelectric Generator Based on Single Thermoelectric Effect for Simultaneously Harvesting Thermal and Radiation Energies. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 21401–21410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kim, S.-W.; Park, J.Y.; Kim, D.-H.; Song, H.-C.; Park, H.; Baik, J.M. Enhanced Output Voltage of Thermoelectric Generators Driven by Alternate Triboelectric Charges. Mater. Today Energy 2023, 37, 101394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kim, S.; Hyeon, D.Y.; Lee, D.; Bae, J.H.; Park, K.-I. Fully Flexible Thermoelectric and Piezoelectric Hybrid Generator Based on a Self-Assembled Multifunctional Single Composite Film. Mater. Today Phys. 2023, 35, 101103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Karthikeyan, V.; Surjadi, J.U.; Wong, J.C.K.; Kannan, V.; Lam, K.-H.; Chen, X.; Lu, Y.; Roy, V.A.L. Wearable and Flexible Thin Film Thermoelectric Module for Multi-Scale Energy Harvesting. J. Power Sources 2020, 455, 227983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Proto, A.; Penhaker, M.; Conforto, S.; Schmid, M. Nanogenerators for Human Body Energy Harvesting. Trends Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 610–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tian, R.; Liu, Y.; Koumoto, K.; Chen, J. Body Heat Powers Future Electronic Skins. Joule 2019, 3, 1399–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. He, X.; Shi, X.-L.; Wu, X.; Li, C.; Liu, W.-D.; Zhang, H.; Yu, X.; Wang, L.; Qin, X.; Chen, Z.-G. Three-Dimensional Flexible Thermoelectric Fabrics for Smart Wearables. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ali, K.; Mohamad, A.J.; Rifai, D.; Besar, M.B.; Ikhmal, M.A.; Mamat, N.H.; Raja Aris, R.S.N.A.; Siaw Paw, J.K.; Abdalla, A.N. IoT System Design of Thermoelectric Generator for Harvesting Motorcycle Exhaust Heat Energy. In Proceedings of the Control, Instrumentation and Mechatronics: Theory and Practice; Wahab; Wahab, N.A., Mohamed, Z., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 213–226. [Google Scholar]
  80. Dipon, W.H. Self-Sustaining Multi-Sensing and Wireless Communication System Powered by Efficient Energy Harvesting From Road Traffic and Heat. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  81. Li, Y.; de León, F.; Zhao, Y.; Yue, L.; Hu, Z.; Wang, R. Influence and Comprehensive Evaluation of Porous Metal Foam Filled Fins on the Performance of Power Cable Surface Waste Heat Recovery Thermoelectric Power Generation Device. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2024, 47, 102278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xie, Z.; Shi, K.; Song, L.; Hou, X. Experimental and Field Study of a Pavement Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting System Based on the Seebeck Effect. J. Electron. Mater. 2023, 52, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mohajerani, A.; Bakaric, J.; Jeffrey-Bailey, T. The Urban Heat Island Effect, Its Causes, and Mitigation, with Reference to the Thermal Properties of Asphalt Concrete. J. Environ. Manage. 2017, 197, 522–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, H.; Chen, G.; Mei, N. Performance Improvement of the Electric Water Heater by a Waste Heat Recovery Method with the Thermoelectric Effect. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 222, 119914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mona, Y.; Do, T.A.; Sekine, C.; Suttakul, P.; Chaichana, C. Geothermal Electricity Generator Using Thermoelectric Module for IoT Monitoring. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Doraghi, Q.; Żabnieńska-Góra, A.; Voto, G.; Krause, B.; Pötschke, P.; Ezpeleta, I.; Mateo-Mateo, C.; Jouhara, H. Experimental and Computational Thermoelectric Generator for Waste Heat Recovery for Aeronautic Application. Energy 2024, 297, 131286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ziolkowski, P.; Zabrocki, K.; Müller, E. TEG Design for Waste Heat Recovery at an Aviation Jet Engine Nozzle. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Whiting, C.E. Empirical Analysis of the Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator Qualification Unit Operated at a Low Thermal Inventory with Potential for Improved End-of-Life Power. Nucl. Technol. 2021, 207, 782–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hussain, W.; Algarni, S.; Rasool, G.; Shahzad, H.; Abbas, M.; Alqahtani, T.; Irshad, K. Advances in Nanoparticle-Enhanced Thermoelectric Materials from Synthesis to Energy Harvesting: A Review. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 11081–11109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Wu, P.; He, Z.; Yang, M.; Xu, J.; Li, N.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Ma, T.; Lu, X.; Zhang, H.; et al. A Review on Flexible Thermoelectric Technology: Material, Device, and Applications. Int. J. Thermophys. 2021, 42, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zadan, M.; Wertz, A.; Shah, D.; Patel, D.K.; Zu, W.; Han, Y.; Gelorme, J.; Mea, H.J.; Yao, L.; Malakooti, M.H.; et al. Stretchable Thermoelectric Generators for Self-Powered Wearable Health Monitoring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2404861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xu, Q.; Deng, B.; Zhang, L.; Lin, S.; Han, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Li, J.; Zhu, Y.; Jiang, F.; Li, Q.; et al. High-Performance, Flexible Thermoelectric Generator Based on Bulk Materials. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2022, 3, 100780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hong, M.; Sun, S.; Lyu, W.; Li, M.; Liu, W.; Shi, X.-L.; Chen, Z.-G. Advances in Printing Techniques for Thermoelectric Materials and Devices. Soft Sci. 2023, 3, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhang, P.; Deng, B.; Sun, W.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, W. Fiber-Based Thermoelectric Materials and Devices for Wearable Electronics. Micromachines 2021, 12, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhu, S.; Fan, Z.; Feng, B.; Shi, R.; Jiang, Z.; Peng, Y.; Gao, J.; Miao, L.; Koumoto, K. Review on Wearable Thermoelectric Generators: From Devices to Applications. Energies 2022, 15, 3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, Z.; Tian, B.; Li, Y.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Luo, Z.; Zhao, L.; Lin, Q.; Lee, C.; Jiang, Z. Evolution of Thermoelectric Generators: From Application to Hybridization. Small 2023, 19, 2304599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Park, H.; Lee, D.; Park, G.; Park, S.; Khan, S.; Kim, J.; Kim, W. Energy Harvesting Using Thermoelectricity for IoT (Internet of Things) and E-Skin Sensors. J. Phys. Energy 2019, 1, 042001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kucova, T.; Prauzek, M.; Konecny, J.; Andriukaitis, D.; Zilys, M.; Martinek, R. Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting for Internet of Things Devices Using Machine Learning: A Review. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 2023, 8, 680–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Micromachines 16 01017 g001
Figure 1. Three power generation principles of thermoelectric generators. (a) Seebeck effect. (b) Peltier effect. (c) Thomson effect.
Figure 1. Three power generation principles of thermoelectric generators. (a) Seebeck effect. (b) Peltier effect. (c) Thomson effect.
Micromachines 16 01017 g001
Micromachines 16 01017 g002
Figure 2. Overview of recent progress of powering IoT based on TEG, including fabrication method (i.e., screen printing, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), electrospray, reprinted with permission from Ref. [20]. 2023, Nature.), performance improvement (i.e., material selection, reprinted with permission from Ref. [21]. 2024, Nature. Hybrid generator, reprinted with permission from Ref. [22]. 2023, Elsevier.), application (wearable device, reprinted with permission from Ref. [23]. 2024, Wiley-VCH Verlag. Daily environment, reprinted with permission from Ref. [24]. 2023, Elsevier., Aerospace, reprinted with permission from Ref. [25]. 2023, SAGE.).
Figure 2. Overview of recent progress of powering IoT based on TEG, including fabrication method (i.e., screen printing, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), electrospray, reprinted with permission from Ref. [20]. 2023, Nature.), performance improvement (i.e., material selection, reprinted with permission from Ref. [21]. 2024, Nature. Hybrid generator, reprinted with permission from Ref. [22]. 2023, Elsevier.), application (wearable device, reprinted with permission from Ref. [23]. 2024, Wiley-VCH Verlag. Daily environment, reprinted with permission from Ref. [24]. 2023, Elsevier., Aerospace, reprinted with permission from Ref. [25]. 2023, SAGE.).
Micromachines 16 01017 g002
Micromachines 16 01017 g003
Figure 3. Structure configuration of TEGs (a) Bulk-shaped. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier (2020). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [31]. 2023, Nature. (b) Film-shaped. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [32]. 2021, Elsevier. (c) Yarn-shaped. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [33]. 2020, Springer Nature.
Figure 3. Structure configuration of TEGs (a) Bulk-shaped. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier (2020). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [31]. 2023, Nature. (b) Film-shaped. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [32]. 2021, Elsevier. (c) Yarn-shaped. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [33]. 2020, Springer Nature.
Micromachines 16 01017 g003
Micromachines 16 01017 g004
Figure 4. (a) Schematic of screen print process. (b) A flexible and reliable TEG prepared by screen printing. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [42]. 2020, Nature. (c) Schematic of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. (d) Synthesizing graphene with smaller grain size by CVD. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [45]. 2018, MDPI.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic of screen print process. (b) A flexible and reliable TEG prepared by screen printing. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [42]. 2020, Nature. (c) Schematic of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. (d) Synthesizing graphene with smaller grain size by CVD. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [45]. 2018, MDPI.
Micromachines 16 01017 g004
Micromachines 16 01017 g005
Figure 5. (a) TEG made out of 3D printing. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52]. 2024, John Wiley and Sons. (b) Fabrics using electrospray technology to harvest thermo energy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [20]. 2020, Springer Nature. (c) TEG based on Sol-gel method. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. 2024, Elsevier.
Figure 5. (a) TEG made out of 3D printing. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52]. 2024, John Wiley and Sons. (b) Fabrics using electrospray technology to harvest thermo energy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [20]. 2020, Springer Nature. (c) TEG based on Sol-gel method. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. 2024, Elsevier.
Micromachines 16 01017 g005
Micromachines 16 01017 g007
Figure 7. Hybrid generator. (a) Fuel cells combined with TEG. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. 2024, Elsevier. (b) TEG hybrid with a light-to-thermal conversion layer to simultaneously harvest thermal and radiation energies based on a single working mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [72]. 2021, ACS. (c) A triboelectric and thermoelectric hybrid generator. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [73]. 2023, Elsevier. (d) A piezoelectric and thermoelectric hybrid generator. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [74]. 2023, Elsevier.
Figure 7. Hybrid generator. (a) Fuel cells combined with TEG. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. 2024, Elsevier. (b) TEG hybrid with a light-to-thermal conversion layer to simultaneously harvest thermal and radiation energies based on a single working mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [72]. 2021, ACS. (c) A triboelectric and thermoelectric hybrid generator. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [73]. 2023, Elsevier. (d) A piezoelectric and thermoelectric hybrid generator. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [74]. 2023, Elsevier.
Micromachines 16 01017 g007
Micromachines 16 01017 g008
Figure 8. Wearable devices based on TEG in IoT. (a) Bulk-TEG made as watch. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [76]. 2020, Elsevier. (b) Film-TEG powered E-skin. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [77]. 2019, Elsevier. (c) Yarn-TEG-made cloth generator. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [78]. 2025, Springer Nature.
Figure 8. Wearable devices based on TEG in IoT. (a) Bulk-TEG made as watch. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [76]. 2020, Elsevier. (b) Film-TEG powered E-skin. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [77]. 2019, Elsevier. (c) Yarn-TEG-made cloth generator. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [78]. 2025, Springer Nature.
Micromachines 16 01017 g008
Micromachines 16 01017 g009
Figure 9. Waste heat recovery application. (a) exhausted heat recovery. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [24]. 2023, MDPI. (b) road wasted heat recovery. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [82]. 2022, Springer Nature. (c) daily heater with TEG to recover waste heat. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [84]. 2023, Elsevier.
Figure 9. Waste heat recovery application. (a) exhausted heat recovery. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [24]. 2023, MDPI. (b) road wasted heat recovery. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [82]. 2022, Springer Nature. (c) daily heater with TEG to recover waste heat. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [84]. 2023, Elsevier.
Micromachines 16 01017 g009
Micromachines 16 01017 g010
Figure 10. TEG applications in aerospace. (a) TEGs applied to plane engine. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [86]. 2024, Elsevier. (b) A schematic diagram of the TEG on an engine: (i) a standalone TEG; (ii) a TEG with a heat sink alone; (iii) A TEG integrated with a heat sink and vapor chamber. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [87]. 2018, MDPI. (c) TEG with vapor chamber in aerospace. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [25]. 2021, SAGE.
Figure 10. TEG applications in aerospace. (a) TEGs applied to plane engine. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [86]. 2024, Elsevier. (b) A schematic diagram of the TEG on an engine: (i) a standalone TEG; (ii) a TEG with a heat sink alone; (iii) A TEG integrated with a heat sink and vapor chamber. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [87]. 2018, MDPI. (c) TEG with vapor chamber in aerospace. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [25]. 2021, SAGE.
Micromachines 16 01017 g010
Table 1. Summary of different thermoelectric materials in thermoelectric performance.
Table 1. Summary of different thermoelectric materials in thermoelectric performance.
CompositionTemp. (°C)|α| (μV·K−1)ZTRef.
Bi2Te33401201.1[26]
Bi2Te2.7Se0.33701801.0[66]
CNTs 60 [67]
Ag2Se/PVP 140 [68]
PEDOT:PSS/SnSe 100 [69]
Skutterudites845 1.45[70]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dai, J.; Deng, H.; Huang, J.; Zhang, X. Recent Progress of Powering IoT Based on Thermoelectric Technology. Micromachines 2025, 16, 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091017

AMA Style

Dai J, Deng H, Huang J, Zhang X. Recent Progress of Powering IoT Based on Thermoelectric Technology. Micromachines. 2025; 16(9):1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dai, Jinhong, Haitao Deng, Jingwen Huang, and Xiaosheng Zhang. 2025. "Recent Progress of Powering IoT Based on Thermoelectric Technology" Micromachines 16, no. 9: 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091017

APA Style

Dai, J., Deng, H., Huang, J., & Zhang, X. (2025). Recent Progress of Powering IoT Based on Thermoelectric Technology. Micromachines, 16(9), 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16091017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop