Next Article in Journal
The Growth Mechanism of Boron-Doped Diamond in Relation to the Carbon-to-Hydrogen Ratio Using the Hot-Filament Chemical Vapor Deposition Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Simulation of Thermal Cycling and Vibration Effects on Solder Layer Reliability in High-Power Diode Lasers for Space Applications
Previous Article in Journal
An Organ-on-a-Chip Modular Platform with Integrated Immunobiosensors for Monitoring the Extracellular Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis and Optimization of Vertical NPN BJT for Strong Magnetic Fields
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A High Dynamic Range and Fast Response Logarithmic Amplifier Employing Slope-Adjustment and Power-Down Mode

by
Yanhu Wang
1,
Rui Teng
1,*,
Yuanjie Zhou
2,
Mengchen Lu
2,
Wei Ruan
1 and
Jiapeng Li
1
1
Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
China Electronics Technology Group Corporation 24th Research Institute, Chongqing 400060, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(7), 741; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16070741
Submission received: 5 June 2025 / Revised: 21 June 2025 / Accepted: 23 June 2025 / Published: 25 June 2025

Abstract

Based on the GSMC 180 nm SiGe BiCMOS process, a parallel-summation logarithmic amplifier is presented in this paper. The logarithmic amplifier adopts a cascaded structure of nine-stage fully-differential limiting amplifiers (LA) to achieve high dynamic range. The ten-stage rectifier completes the conversion of amplified voltage to a logarithmic current signal. A log slope adjuster is proposed. It can provide slopes of 17–30 mV/dB by configuring an off-chip resistor to meet the detection requirements of different input power. Meanwhile, a power-down control unit is designed to reduce the power consumption to only 162 μW in standby mode. The post-simulation results show that under 5 V power supply voltage, the dynamic range exceeds 80 dB and the 3 dB bandwidth is 20 MHz–4 GHz. It also has a fast response time of 42 ns with a power consumption of 109 mW in normal operation mode.

1. Introduction

In high-precision electromagnetic measurement systems such as radar, optical receiver and field strength meters, the input signal power is extremely weak. In order to achieve high-precision signal amplification within a wide dynamic range, logarithmic amplifiers have replaced automatic gain control loops (AGC) as a more effective solution in recent years [1,2,3,4]. Early logarithmic amplifiers have mostly adopted segmented detection architectures, which rely on multi-stage diode detectors in series to achieve signal compression. These circuits have a simple structure and high reliability, but they have defects such as large temperature drift and complex calibration. In addition, due to the disadvantages of limited dynamic range, large area, and insufficient compatibility with integrated circuit technology, further development cannot be achieved [5,6,7,8].
With the advancement of the CMOS and SiGe processes, the logarithmic amplifier has also developed rapidly. Its technological evolution mainly revolves around three core challenges: dynamic range expansion, temperature stability improvement, and bandwidth breakthrough. Lakshminarayanan et al. proposed an RF power detector that achieves a dynamic range of 52 dB with bandwidths of 100 MHz–4 GHz and logarithmic linearity of ±1 dB. It realized a good compromise between logarithmic accuracy and dynamic range [9]. Yong et al. presented a high dynamic range logarithmic amplifier using four channel amplification and current summation techniques with a dynamic range of 70 dB and power consumption of only 19 mW. However, its bandwidth is only 1 MHz, which makes it unsuitable for RF systems and only suitable for low-frequency signal analysis [10]. Ahuja et al. presented an ultra-low power CMOS logarithmic amplifier for low-frequency IoT sensing. This circuit has a dynamic range of 50 dB with a power supply of 1.5 V, while consuming only 14.63 μW. But its bandwidth is limited to 10 Hz–40 kHz. Hence, it is mainly used in physiological signal detection systems, and cannot adapt to the frequency response requirements of field strength meters [11]. Wongnamkam et al. designed a fully-differential logarithmic amplifier for 2.4 GHz ISM applications, which realized a voltage gain of 43 dB under a single 2.5 V power supply. However, it consumes a static current of 73.5 mA that results in power consumption of up to 183.75 mW. Hence, it has significant limitations in its energy efficiency [12]. Chuang et al. proposed a logarithmic amplifier using InP InGaAs double heterojunction technology, with a bandwidth of 22 GHz. However, its power consumption is as high as 650 mW [13].
In response to the collaborative design challenges of dynamic range, bandwidth, and energy efficiency, this paper proposes a logarithmic amplifier that integrates power-down mode and log slope adjuster. By implementing a dynamic power management strategy, the static power consumption can be reduced to 162 μW. The logarithmic amplifier is implemented based on a parallel-summation structure of 9-stage limiting amplifiers with dynamic range of over 80 dB and 3 dB bandwidth of 20 MHz–4 GHz. At the same time, to meet the detection requirements of different input power, a logarithmic slope adjustment scheme is proposed. By configuring off-chip resistors, the slope can be effectively adjusted to achieve signal detection over a large input range.

2. Circuit Architecture and Design

The logarithmic amplifier adopts a parallel-summation structure. As shown in Figure 1, it consists of nine-stage fully-differential limiting amplifiers (LA), ten-stage full-wave rectifiers, bandgap, log slope adjuster and output stage.
Nine cascade limiting amplifiers are used to achieve signal gain expansion, and each amplifier output is equipped with a rectifier. The input dynamic range is determined by the gain and the number of cascaded logarithmic amplifier stages. The more stages there are, the larger the dynamic range which can be obtained [14]. Each limiting amplifier provides 10 dB gain and expands the input dynamic range through step-by-step gain compression. The voltage output by each limiting amplifier is input into the rectifier. The rectifier converts the output of each stage into current and sums them up at the input of output stage. The summed current signal is finally converted into a single-ended voltage through the output stage for output. The log slope adjuster introduces an off-chip adjustable resistor, combined with an internal bias adjustment circuit, to dynamically control the weight of the superimposed current, ultimately achieving adjustable slope. Two bandgaps provide bias to limiting amplifiers and rectifiers, respectively, which can avoid crosstalk between the two. The Bandgap_LA is controlled by the external power-down signal PWDN_in, which outputs signal PWDN_Rec to control the Bandgap_Rec and itself to be in normal operation or low-power standby mode, respectively. Cascaded limiting amplifiers can effectively expand the output dynamic range. However, due to the inter-stage DC coupling, when the common-mode voltage drifts, it is easy to cause oscillation [15]. Therefore, this design adds an offset correction circuit composed of Cos1/Cos2 and Ros1/Ros2. Capacitors Cos1 and Cos2, along with resistors Ros1 and Ros2, form a low-pass filter to filter out high-frequency components in feedback signals. The DC component of the voltage in the offset is fed back to the first limiting amplifier, thereby reducing the inter-stage offset caused by DC coupling.
The first to ninth limiting amplifiers use an A/0 structure, as shown in Figure 2. The input is Vin and the output is Vout. When Vin is small, Vout is amplified by A times. While Vin can reach or become larger than V1, Vout is limited to the maximum value of AV1.
When the input Vin is less than V1, the limiting amplifier exhibits a linear amplification trend with an amplification factor of A. When Vin is greater than V1, the amplifier enters a limiting state and outputs a fixed value [16,17]. The voltage transfer characteristic (VTC) of the A/0 limiting amplifier can be obtained as
V o u t = A V i n 0 < V i n < V 1 A V 1 V i n > V 1
Figure 3 shows the bias circuit of the first limiting amplifier that is mainly composed of the bias transistor Qbias and resistors Rb1 and Rb2. To simplify the design, the bias is directly generated by connecting Qbias and resistors Rb1/Rb2 in series from the power supply. The main purpose of Qbias is to reduce the temperature coefficient of the bias and obtain a more stable input common-mode bias. The common-mode operating voltage is set at 3.9 V.
Figure 4 shows the first limiting amplifier. This circuit adopts a single-stage common-emitter structure. The tail current source transistor Q3 is biased by the bias Vbias_LA output from the Bandgap_LA, and the parallel capacitor C1 serves as a decoupling element to filter out high-frequency noise. The collector current of Q3 is determined by the bias network composed of R3 and R4. This current directly constrains the transconductance of Q1 and Q2, which determines the log amplifier’s bandwidth and gain. In order to further improve gain, a cross-coupled resistor composed of Q4 and Q5 is introduced. Because the output resistance is −2Rout, it effectively increases the voltage gain by increasing the equivalent output impedance. Transistors Q8 and Q9 form a common-mode voltage extractor, which is used to extract the common-mode output from the limiting amplifier to the rectifier. Because the gain of the first limiting amplifier is 10 dB (3.16), the output Vout is:
V O U T N V O U T P = 3.16 · ( I N N 1 I N P 1 )
The first limiting amplifier embeds two rectifiers, which respectively detect the input/output of the limiting amplifier and generate differential output currents that are logarithmically related to them. The rectifier adopts a three-port common-emitter structure, in which the differential and common-mode input are connected to rectifier2, while the differential-mode output of the first limiting amplifier and its common-mode output are connected to rectifier1 [18]. The bias of the rectifier is provided by the Bandgap_Rec, and the stability of its static operating current directly determines the logarithmic conversion accuracy. This design effectively expands the dynamic response range by simultaneously feeding differential voltage components into the multi-stage rectifier. Its working principle is that the multi-stage structure can process signals of different power in segments, while maintaining linearity and expanding the detection range [19].
In rectifier1, the output common-mode voltage of the limiting amplifier is Vcm, the output differential-mode voltage is Vid, and Ic21, Ic22, and Ic23 are the collector currents of Q21, Q22, and Q23, respectively. The mathematical proof is as below:
V c m + V i d 2 V b e 21 = V c m V b e 23
V c m V i d 2 V b e 22 = V c m V b e 23
And I c = I s · e V b e V T , so
V T ln I c 21 I s 21 V T ln I c 23 I s 23 = V i d 2
V T ln I c 23 I s 23 V T ln I c 22 I s 22 = V i d 2
Choose Q23 emitter area to be twice the emitter area of Q21 and Q22,
I s 23 = 2 I s 22 = 2 I s 21
And
I c 21 + I c 22 + I c 23 = I c 24
combine (5), (7) and (6), (8), respectively.
I c 21 I c 23 = 1 2 e V i d 2 V T
I c 23 I c 22 = 2 e V i d 2 V T
Combine (8), (9), (10), so
I c 21 = 1 2 · I c 24 · e V i d 2 V T 1 + 1 2 ( e V i d 2 V T + e V i d 2 V T )
I c 22 = 1 2 · I c 24 · e V i d 2 V T 1 + 1 2 ( e V i d 2 V T + e V i d 2 V T )
I c 23 = I c 24 1 + 1 2 ( e V i d 2 V T + e V i d 2 V T )
Then the output current of the rectifier is
Δ I = I O U T 1 I O U T 2 = I c 21 + I c 22 I c 23 = I c 24 · tanh 2 ( V O U T N V O U T P 4 V T )
The intermediate seven limiting amplifiers adopt a structure similar to the first one, as shown in Figure 5. An emitter follower is added between the main limiting amplifier and the common-mode extractor as a buffer to isolate inter-stage interference. The input of the emitter follower is coupled to the output of the main limiting amplifier, and the common-mode component of buffer output is made to be consistent with the common-mode of the main amplifier by adjusting the Vce of Q4 and Q6. The rectifier synchronously extracts the common-mode voltage and differential output by the limiting amplifier to generate output current that is logarithmic to the input voltage.
The ninth limiting amplifier is basically the same as that of the previous stage, as shown in Figure 6. This limiting amplifier adds an offset amplifier to extract the output offset of the nine-stage limiting amplifiers, which is fed back to the first limiting amplifier in the form of a current to reduce the inter-stage offset [20,21].
As shown in Figure 7, the output stage is a current mirror that converts differential input current to single-ended output voltage. By neglecting the base current and the Early effect, for node A and node B, respectively,
V D D V A R 1 + I O U T 2 = I o u t + I 1
V D D V B R 2 + I O U T 1 = I 2
By setting transistors Q1 and Q2 to be exactly the same, with resistors R1 = R2, and combining (15) and (16)
V B V A R 1 = I o u t + I O U T 1 I O U T 2
For the voltage of node C
V A I 1 · R 4 + V b e 4 = V B I 2 · R 5 + V b e 5     V A = V B
Put (18) into (17), then
I o u t = I O U T 2 I O U T 1
Finally, it can be obtained
V o u t = I o u t · R 6 = ( I O U T 2 I O U T 1 ) · R 6
It can be seen from (20) that the difference in output current of rectifier is converted into a single-ended output voltage. The value of resistor R6 needs to be carefully designed. On one hand, it is necessary to ensure that the output voltage has sufficient amplification gain; and on the other hand, it is necessary to ensure that I1 is small and will not generate excessive power consumption in the output stage.
The log slope adjuster is shown in Figure 8, which is a two-stage amplifier and constructs a feedback loop with the output stage through an external adjustable resistor Roff-chip. The output current of rectifiers has inherent deviation, and if directly fed into the output stage, it will cause saturation. The log slope adjuster adjusts the base voltage of Q4. Hence, the base voltage of Q10 varies, thereby controlling the difference between the output currents IOUT1 and IOUT2. When Roff-chip increases, Vbe,Q4 decreases. Then Ic,Q4 and the gain of amplifier increases, which improves output voltage. Therefore, Vbe,Q10 rises to increase the output current IOUT1/IOUT2 and the log slope. However, if the Roff-chip decreases, the amplifier gain and output voltage also reduce. Therefore, Vbe,Q10 and the output current IOUT1/IOUT2 decrease, which finally reduces the log slope. This scheme dynamically injects the compensation current into the input of the output stage to calibrate the logarithmic transfer function. This mechanism achieves an adjustable log slope while avoiding output stage saturation.
In Figure 9, the power-down circuit is actually a comparator. Because R1 = R2, it compares the input PWDN with VDD/2. If PWDN is high, then the base voltage of transistor Q5 becomes low. Hence, the bias current will be nullified and the Bandgap_LA will be turned off. At the same time, the output PWDN_Rec also becomes low, and the Bandgap_Rec circuit is also turned off. At this point, the overall logarithmic amplifier enters low-power standby mode. When PWDN is low, the Startup circuit works normally and starts the Bandgap core. During the power-on process, capacitor C2 is charged to remove the Bandgap from the dead zone, ensuring that the circuit can start normally. Because
I R 12 · R 12 = Δ V b e = V b e 14 V b e 16 = V T · ln n
Δ V b e has a positive temperature coefficient, and
V A = Δ V b e + V b e , Q 16 = V T · ln n + V b e , Q 16
Since V b e , Q 16 has a negative temperature coefficient, V A with a zero temperature coefficient is achieved to bias Q19. In addition, the currents of R15 and R16 also have a positive temperature coefficient. At the output node, due to the negative temperature dependence of V b e , 22 , it can be obtained
V o u t = I R 16 · R 16 + V b e 23
We thus obtained the output Vout with zero temperature coefficient. To compensate for high-order nonlinearity of V b e , resistor R9 is connected in series with the output terminal and fed back to the base of two transistors Q14/Q16. Due to the positive temperature dependence of resistors, by superimposing the parabolic curve of first-order compensation with the positive temperature curve of the resistor, and adjusting the value of resistor R9, a reference of high-order compensation can be obtained.

3. Post Simulation Results

The logarithmic amplifier is realized using 180 nm 1P6M SiGe BiCMOS technology. The power supply voltage is 5 V, and the power consumption during normal operation is 109 mW. The power consumption in power-down mode is reduced to 162 μW. The layout is shown in Figure 10, with an area of 1230 μm × 1010 μm.
As shown in Figure 11, under the temperature of 25 °C, when the input frequency is 50 MHz, 2.5 GHz, and 4 GHz, the dynamic ranges are 85 dB, 83 dB, and 82 dB, respectively. The log slopes are 16.8 mV/dB, 16.9 mV/dB, and 17.1 mV/dB, respectively, and the minimum detectable input power is −85 dBm, which is also the noise floor. Within the dynamic range, the log error range is as shown in Figure 12, and the overall range is within ±1 dB.
The AC response of the logarithmic amplifier is shown in Figure 13. With a power supply voltage of 5 V, the 3 dB bandwidth is 20 MHz–4 GHz, and the overall gain reaches 90 dB.
Figure 14 shows the logarithmic output results of adjusting Roff-chip at different values. The value varies within the range of 1 kΩ–18 kΩ, and the log slope range is 16.8 mV/dB to 30.1 mV/dB. The output voltage also increases with the increase of resistance.
When the input frequencies are 50 MHz and 4 GHz respectively, the output is as shown in Figure 15. The response times for the output to rise from 10% to 90% amplitude are 42 ns and 44 ns, respectively, which means it has fast response to sudden input.
A comparison results of this work with others is shown in Table 1. Due to the use of the nine-stage limiting amplifier with 10 dB-gain each, a largest dynamic range has been achieved. Meanwhile, the sum of current of each stage improves the response time. Compared with previous achievements in parameters such as bandwidth, log error, and response time, it has realized a good compromise. At the same time, with a power supply of 5 V, our design also has a log slope adjuster and a power-down mode, which has more completed functions than other works. Because more limiting amplifiers are cascaded, a portion of power consumption is sacrificed to achieve performance improvement. The figure of merit (FoM) can be expressed as the ratio of power consumption to dynamic range and bandwidth, i.e., mW/(dBm × GHz). The smaller the FoM, the better the performance.

4. Conclusions

Based on the GSMC 180 nm SiGe BiCMOS 1P6M process, a high dynamic range and fast response logarithmic amplifier is presented. In order to meet the detection requirements of different input power, a log slope adjuster is proposed, which can adjust the slope of the logarithmic output by adjusting the off-chip resistor. Meanwhile a power-down function is also added, which can significantly reduce power consumption in standby mode. The post-simulation results show that at a power supply voltage of 5 V, 3 dB bandwidth of 4 GHz is achieved, while the logarithmic error is only ±1 dB. The dynamic range can reach over 80 dB with a response time of 42 ns. Meanwhile the adjustable log slope range is 16.8–30.1 mV/dB. Under normal operation and power-down modes, the power consumption is 109 mW and 162 μW, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W. and R.T.; software simulation and parameter optimization, W.R. and Y.Z.; data processing, M.L. and R.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W. and R.T.; writing—review and editing, R.T. and J.L.; supervision, R.T. and W.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are reported/cited in the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Yuanjie Zhou, Mengchen Lu were employed by the company China Electronics Technology Group Corporation 24th Research Institute. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, J.; Li, K. A 1.3 GHz wideband successive detection logarithmic amplifier. In Proceedings of the 2007 7th International Conference on ASIC, Gulin, China, 22–25 October 2007; pp. 481–484. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gu, M.; Chakrabartty, S. Design of a Programmable Gain, Temperature Compensated Current-Input Current-Output CMOS Logarithmic Amplifier. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuit Syst. 2014, 8, 423–431. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cho, M.; Kenney, J. A fast accurate and digitally calibrate-able logarithmic amplifier for analog predistortion power amplifiers. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, Sendai, Japan, 4–7 November 2014; pp. 113–115. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alessandro, L.; Palomba, M.; Colangeli, S.; Limiti, E. Robust GaN Successive-Detection Logarithmic Video-Amplifier for EW Applications. In Proceedings of the Integrated Nonlinear Microwave and Millimeter wave Circuits Workshop, Taormina, Italy, 10–11 April 2015; pp. 66–68. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, D.; Li, L.; Chen, K. Design of a 18–40 GHz Successive Detection Logarithmic Video Amplifier. In Proceedings of the Microwave circuits Radio frequency Detectors Dynamic range Noise measurement Europe Conferences, Hangzhou, China, 5–7 September 2018; pp. 4–7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ravi, G.; Reddy, S.; Bharathi, A. Successive Detection Logarithmic Amplifier for ECCM features of RADAR. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT), Karnataka, India, 23–25 June 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Miri, D.; Moezzi, M. An Ultra Wideband Low Power Detector Logarithmic Video Amplifier in 0.15 μm GaAs. In Proceedings of the Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE2019), Yazd, Iran, 30 April 2019; pp. 135–140. [Google Scholar]
  8. Holdenried, D.; Haslett, W.; McRory, G.; Beard, D.; Bergsma, J. A DC-4 GHz true logarithmic amplifier: Theory and implemenation. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2002, 10, 1290–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lakshminarayanan, S.; Hofmann, K. A Wideband Large Dynamic Range Logarithmic RF Power Detector With 50 mV Input Offset Cancellation Range. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS), Bangkok, Thailand, 11–14 November 2019; pp. 85–88. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Lai, Z. A parallel-amplification parallel-summation logarithmic amplifier for UHF RFID reader. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE 8th International Conference on ASIC, Changsha, China, 20–23 October 2009; pp. 1121–1124. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ahuja, A.; Mehta, D. Design and Simulation of Ultra-Low-Power Parallel Summation Logarithmic Amplifier. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference of Electron Devices Society Kolkata Chapter (EDKCON), 26–27 November 2022; pp. 324–327. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wongnamkam, S.; Thanachayanont, A.; Krairiksh, M. A 2.4-GHz 43-dB CMOS Logarithmic Amplifier for RF Signal Level Detection. In Proceedings of the 2008 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, Krabi, Thailand, 28 February–2 March 2008; pp. 725–728. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chuang, Y.; Cimino, K.; Stuenkel, M.; Feng, M.; Le, M.; Milano, R. A wideband InP DHBT True Logarithmic Amplifier. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2006, 11, 3843–3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, K.; Kwon, Y. A Broadband Logarithmic Power Detector in 0.13-um CMOS. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2013, 9, 498–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ramos, J.; AUSÍN, J.; Duque-Carrillo, J.; Torelli, G. Design of limiting/logarithmic amplifier for wideband bioimpedance measuring devices. In Proceedings of the 2010 Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS), Paphos, Cyprus, 3–5 November 2010; pp. 290–293. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zareie, M.; Hosseinnejad, M.; Azhari, J. Ultra-Low-Power, Wide Dynamic Range Front-End Logarithmic Amplifier for Biomedical Applications. In Proceedings of the Conference on Knowledge Based Engineering and Innovation (KBEI), Tehran, Iran, 28 February 2019; pp. 548–552. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shaterian, M.; Abrishamifar, A.; Shamsi, H. Analysis and Design of The True Piecewise Approximation Logarithmic Amplifiers. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process 2012, 1, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Derafshi, Z.; Frounchi, J. Low-noise low-power front-end logarithmic amplifier for neural recording system. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 2014, 5, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morozov, D.N.; Repin, V.V.; Mukhin, I.I. A 70 dB SiGe Adjustable True Logarithmic Amplifier. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus), St. Petersburg and Moscow, Russia, 27–30 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lin, C.; Huang, H.; Wang, K. A 15 mW 280 MHz 80 dB gain CMOS limiting/logarithmic amplifier with active cascode gain–enhancement. In Proceedings of the Solid-State Circuits Conference, Florence, Italy, 24–26 September 2002; pp. 311–314. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chokchalermwat, P.; Supmonchai, B. Design of a CMOS Low-Power Limiting Amplifier with RSSI Integrated Circuit for Low-Frequency Wake-Up Receivers. In Proceedings of the International Electrical Engineering Congress, Krabi, Thailand, 7–9 March 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  22. Shieh, L.; Lai, J.; Li, S.; Chiang, L.; Wu, H.; Xsieh, C.; Tu, H.; Chen, W.; Wu, W. Linear radio frequency power detector. In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, Singapore, 7–10 December 2009; pp. 2316–2319. [Google Scholar]
  23. Townsend, A.; Haslett, W. A wideband power detection system optimized for the UWB spectrum. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2009, 2, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Architecture of proposed logarithmic amplifier.
Figure 1. Architecture of proposed logarithmic amplifier.
Micromachines 16 00741 g001
Figure 2. The basis of A/0 limiting amplifier.
Figure 2. The basis of A/0 limiting amplifier.
Micromachines 16 00741 g002
Figure 3. Input common-mode bias circuit.
Figure 3. Input common-mode bias circuit.
Micromachines 16 00741 g003
Figure 4. Limiting amplifier #1 and rectifiers.
Figure 4. Limiting amplifier #1 and rectifiers.
Micromachines 16 00741 g004
Figure 5. Limiting amplifiers from #2 to #8 and rectifier.
Figure 5. Limiting amplifiers from #2 to #8 and rectifier.
Micromachines 16 00741 g005
Figure 6. Limiting amplifier #9, offset amplifier, and rectifier.
Figure 6. Limiting amplifier #9, offset amplifier, and rectifier.
Micromachines 16 00741 g006
Figure 7. Output stage.
Figure 7. Output stage.
Micromachines 16 00741 g007
Figure 8. The log slope adjuster.
Figure 8. The log slope adjuster.
Micromachines 16 00741 g008
Figure 9. Bandgap_LA.
Figure 9. Bandgap_LA.
Micromachines 16 00741 g009
Figure 10. Layout of logarithmic amplifier.
Figure 10. Layout of logarithmic amplifier.
Micromachines 16 00741 g010
Figure 11. Output versus Vin.
Figure 11. Output versus Vin.
Micromachines 16 00741 g011
Figure 12. Log Conformance versus Vin.
Figure 12. Log Conformance versus Vin.
Micromachines 16 00741 g012
Figure 13. AC response.
Figure 13. AC response.
Micromachines 16 00741 g013
Figure 14. Vout Versus Roff-chip.
Figure 14. Vout Versus Roff-chip.
Micromachines 16 00741 g014
Figure 15. Response Time of 50 MHz and 4 GHz.
Figure 15. Response Time of 50 MHz and 4 GHz.
Micromachines 16 00741 g015
Table 1. Performance comparison.
Table 1. Performance comparison.
Parameter[10][12][14][22][23]This Work
Process180 nm
CMOS
350 nm
CMOS
130 nm
CMOS
180 nm
CMOS
180 nm
CMOS
180 nm
SiGe BiCMOS
Power supply
(V)
3.32.5  2  1.8  1.85
Bandwidth
(GHz)
0.0012.4  16  1.8  10.64
Dynamic range
(dB)
7043  43  29  2085
Log error
(dB)
N/A *N/A±1.5±1±2.4±1
Response Time
(ns)
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A42
log slope adjustmentN/AN/ANoNoNoYes
Pdc
(mW)
1918435.21610.870
FoM
(mW/(dBm × GHz))
271.41.780.0510.310.0510.21
* “N/A” means the parameter is not listed in the paper.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Teng, R.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, M.; Ruan, W.; Li, J. A High Dynamic Range and Fast Response Logarithmic Amplifier Employing Slope-Adjustment and Power-Down Mode. Micromachines 2025, 16, 741. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16070741

AMA Style

Wang Y, Teng R, Zhou Y, Lu M, Ruan W, Li J. A High Dynamic Range and Fast Response Logarithmic Amplifier Employing Slope-Adjustment and Power-Down Mode. Micromachines. 2025; 16(7):741. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16070741

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yanhu, Rui Teng, Yuanjie Zhou, Mengchen Lu, Wei Ruan, and Jiapeng Li. 2025. "A High Dynamic Range and Fast Response Logarithmic Amplifier Employing Slope-Adjustment and Power-Down Mode" Micromachines 16, no. 7: 741. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16070741

APA Style

Wang, Y., Teng, R., Zhou, Y., Lu, M., Ruan, W., & Li, J. (2025). A High Dynamic Range and Fast Response Logarithmic Amplifier Employing Slope-Adjustment and Power-Down Mode. Micromachines, 16(7), 741. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16070741

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop