Next Article in Journal
A Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer-Based Bone Conduction Microphone System for Enhancing Speech Recognition Accuracy
Previous Article in Journal
Kinetostatic Modeling and Performance Analysis of Redundant-Actuated 4-PSS&S Compliant Parallel 3-DOF Micro-Rotation Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Wide-Angle and Polarization-Insensitive Rectifying Metasurface for 5.8 GHz RF Energy Harvesting

1
School of Information Innovation and Big Data, Shanxi Jinzhong Institute of Technology, Jinzhong 030600, China
2
Department of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
3
Beijing Key Laboratory of Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Technology, School of Integrated Circuits and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(6), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060611
Submission received: 29 April 2025 / Revised: 21 May 2025 / Accepted: 22 May 2025 / Published: 23 May 2025

Abstract

:
This paper presents a rectifying metasurface (RMS) that enables wide-angle, polarization-insensitive wireless energy harvesting in the Wi-Fi frequency range. The RMS consists of a metasurface integrated with rectifying diodes, a low-pass filter (LPF), and a resistive load. In the structural design, the RMS incorporates four Schottky diodes placed on the bottom structure and connected to the top structure through four metallized vias. This configuration facilitates impedance matching between the metasurface and the diodes, omitting the need for conventional rectifier circuits or external matching networks and removing the impact of soldering variations. A 3 × 3 RMS prototype was manufactured and subjected to experimental validation. The measurements confirm that the RMS achieves a peak RF-to-DC conversion efficiency of 68.3% at 5.8 GHz with a 12.5 dBm input power, while maintaining stable performance across a wide range of incident angles and polarization states.

1. Introduction

Wireless communication technology has been remarkably developed in recent decades, bringing the Internet of Things into daily life through various sensors. Meanwhile, the proliferation of billions of wireless sensors also presents new challenges to energy supply systems. For portable use, small wireless electronic devices that run on batteries or require wired charging can be very inconvenient [1]. Therefore, exploiting ambient environmental energy has become a viable approach to ensure the long-term operation of wireless sensors. With the growing interest in sustainable power solutions, researchers have explored various ways to harvest energy from the ambient environment, including kinetic, thermal, and solar energy [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. However, these methods cannot provide continuous electrical supply due to the varying power levels required and the specific harvesting conditions for different types of energy. RF electromagnetic (EM) waves pervade the environment due to wireless communication technology, making it possible to harvest RF energy to supply electric energy for small wireless electronic devices [9,10,11,12,13].
Metasurfaces are artificially engineered structures comprising subwavelength unit cells arranged on a two-dimensional surface. Owing to their ability to locally manipulate electromagnetic wave properties, such as amplitude, phase, and polarization, metasurfaces have found extensive application in electromagnetic shielding and cloaking technologies [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Traditional metasurface absorbers achieve electromagnetic absorption by dissipating the incident energy as heat, typically within the dielectric substrate [20,21,22,23,24,25]. However, such absorbed energy is usually not reused for functional purposes. In recent studies, researchers have explored integrating metasurface absorbers into RF energy harvesting and wireless power transmission systems [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Compared with traditional wireless energy harvesting antennas, rectifying metasurfaces (RMSs) possess advantages such as wide-angle coverage, low-profile design, and high efficiency. Previous works have proposed various RMS, which can be mainly divided into three methods: (1) rectifier circuits combined with metasurface arrays using built-in channeling line [33,34,35], (2) rectifier circuits combined with metasurface arrays using matching network [36,37], and (3) rectifier diodes integrated with metasurface units [38,39]. The advantage of the first and second method are that it uses fewer diodes to achieve rectification at low energy densities and reduces the impact of manufacturing accuracy on performance. However, they both require additional rectifier circuit design and extra physical space for placing the rectifier circuit, which not only complicates the structural layout, but also introduces non-negligible energy losses during transmission. The third method avoids the need for rectifier circuit design, extra physical space, and a matching network. However, it typically incorporates diodes mounted directly on the surface structure, which makes the performance highly sensitive to manufacturing accuracy. Even minor deviations in diode positioning can lead to significant degradation in rectification efficiency and shifts in frequency response. The limitations associated with the three existing methods undermine the metasurface’s energy conversion capability and restrict its feasibility for compact integration and large-scale applicability in practical deployment scenarios.
To overcome these limitations, we propose a 5.8 GHz rectifying metasurface designed for wide-angle and polarization-insensitive wireless energy harvesting. The proposed RMS consists of a metasurface integrated with rectifying diodes, a low-pass filter (LPF), and a resistive load. To eliminate the impact of diode soldering on the surface structure, four Schottky diodes are placed on the bottom structure and connected to the top structure through four metalized vias. This approach also avoids the need for rectifier circuit design and a matching network. Meanwhile, energy harvesting efficiency is improved by achieving impedance matching between free space, the metasurface, and the rectifying diodes. Additionally, a 3 × 3 prototype array was fabricated and experimentally characterized to evaluate its RF energy harvesting capability. Experimental results indicate that the RMS maintains over 50% RF-to-DC conversion efficiency from 5.5 to 6.0 GHz, reaching a maximum of 68.3% at 5.8 GHz under an input power of 12.5 dBm. In addition, the proposed RMS demonstrates stable energy collection across diverse incident angles and polarization states, highlighting its applicability in wireless energy capture and ambient power utilization scenarios.

2. Rectifying Metasurface Design and Analysis

The schematic of the proposed RMS for wireless energy harvesting is illustrated in Figure 1a. The unit cell of RMS consists of three layers, where the top and bottom layers are made of 0.035 mm thick copper, as illustrated in Figure 1b. The top structure consists of hexagonal and square-shaped rings interconnected by four DC bias lines, enabling the absorption of arbitrarily polarized EM waves. To prevent interference from the diode on the top structure, four Schottky diodes are installed on the bottom structure. These are connected to the top structure through four metalized vias to rectify the absorbed electromagnetic energy. Additionally, the bottom structure can be used as the ground for the RMS. A 3-mm-thick F4B material ( ε r = 2.65 , tan δ = 0.0015 ) is used as the dielectric layer.
Figure 2 illustrates the system framework of the proposed RMS, which integrates a metasurface and rectifying diodes. The RF-to-DC efficiency of RMS is composed of the harvesting efficiency of metasurface ( η u n i t ) and the rectification efficiency of Schottky diodes ( η A C D C ). The harvesting efficiency can be formulated as follows:
η u n i t = P H P rad ,
where P r a d denotes the incident EM energy collected from the ambit environment and P H represents the energy absorbed by the RMS periodic structure and transmitted to the Schottky diodes. The rectification efficiency of Schottky diodes can be formulated as follows:
η A C D C = P A C P D C ,
where P A C is AC energy rectified by the Schottky diodes and P D C represents the out power of RMS. The RF-to-DC efficiency can be expressed as follows:
η R F t o D C = η u n i t · η A C D C ,
Achieving high RF-to-DC conversion efficiency requires effective impedance matching between the metasurface ( Z M S ) and free space ( Z 0 ) to maximize η unit . Additionally, the impedance ( Z E S ) of RMS must be conjugate matched with the impedance of the Schottky diodes ( Z R E C ) to ensure high η A C D C . The Z E S is related to Z R E C , which is primarily affected by frequency, input power, and load resistance. Therefore, selecting the appropriate input power and load resistance is crucial to achieving the optimal operating statement for the Schottky diode within the RMS.
Figure 3a presents the equivalent circuit of the Class-F rectifier, which consists of a branch and a LPF. The branch comprises a source and a rectifying diode. Compared with other rectifiers, the Class-F topology offers higher conversion efficiency with lower input power requirements [13], making it suitable for enhancing performance and enabling low-power operation in the RMS unit. The Schottky diode HSMS-2860 is selected as the rectifying component. In engineering practice, multiple parallel branches are employed to enhance rectification efficiency and system stability. To evaluate the impact of parallelization, different multi-branch configurations are simulated and analyzed in Advanced Design System (ADS). Figure 3b illustrates how the load resistance influences the rectification behavior of different parallel branches at an input power of 10 dBm. As more parallel branches are introduced, rectification efficiency improves slightly, while the load resistance decreases significantly. A maximum rectification efficiency of 71.9% is obtained by the four-branch configuration with a load resistance of 100 Ω . The lower load impedance facilitates impedance matching, making it suitable for low input power rectification. The four-branch parallel configuration is selected as the equivalent circuit model for the RMS unit, as it balances rectification efficiency and structural symmetry. Meanwhile, the resistance provided by the four diodes enables the metasurface impedance ( Z M S ) to efficiently match that of free space, thereby achieving high absorption. The impact of incident power on the rectification efficiency under optimal load conditions is shown in Figure 3c. According to the simulation, the maximum rectification efficiency reaches 73% at an input power of 12.8 dBm and a load resistance of 100 Ω . Finally, a rectifier consisting of four parallel Class-F branches is adopted in the RMS unit design, with a 100 Ω resistor selected as the load.
Figure 4 illustrates the equivalent circuit of the RMS unit, which consists of four Class-F rectifiers, a low-pass filter, and a load. Following the high-impedance rectenna design method, the Z R E C of the RMS does not need to match the standard 50 Ω source impedance. The RMS unit can achieve maximum efficiency by optimizing the input impedance R s + j X s . The simulated frequency responses of impedance and rectification efficiency for the equivalent circuit model under 12.8 dBm input and 100 Ω load are plotted in Figure 5. Figure 5a shows the real part of impedance gradually decreases, while the imaginary gradually increasing as the frequency rises from 1 to 7 GHz. The results show that the impedance is 56 − j81 Ω at 5.8 GHz. An impedance of 56 − j81 Ω is adopted as the input matching condition to achieve optimal rectification at 5.8 GHz. Figure 5b demonstrates that the rectification efficiency surpasses 70% from 5.5 to 6.3 GHz. Additionally, the low-pass filter is used to suppress harmonic waves, which consists of a 47 nH inductance and a 100 nF capacitor.
The impedance Z E s of RMS is set to 52.6 + j81 in RMS unit simulation to achieve conjugate matching with Z R E C . CST Microwave Studio 2020 is used to simulate the RMS unit. The operating frequency can be tuned by modifying the thickness of the dielectric layer and the parameters of hexagonal and square-shaped rings. The resistance introduced by the diodes is transmitted to the top structure through vias, and by adjusting the surface structure, impedance matching between the metasurface and free space can be achieved. Consequently, the placement of the diodes and the spacing between the hexagonal and square-shaped rings directly influence the absorption performance of the RMS. Finally, the structural parameters were iteratively optimized using the built-in PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization) algorithm in CST, allowing the metasurface to achieve high absorption at the target frequency of 5.8 GHz. The optimized design parameters of the RMS unit are detailed in Figure 1. Figure 6 illustrates the distribution of incident power absorption by the RMS, along with the corresponding power losses in the metallic layers, dielectric, and rectifying diodes. The results indicate that the RMS absorbs 99.8% of the incident power at 5.8 GHz, with the absorption remaining above 90% over the frequency range of 5.6 to 5.9 GHz. Notably, the harvesting efficiency ( η u n i t ) reaches 98.2% at 5.8 GHz and, similar to the absorption performance, remains above 90% within the 5.6–5.9 GHz range. The remaining power is dissipated within the dielectric.
To further analyze the absorption power flow and the operating mechanisms of the RMS unit, the electric field and power flow distributions at 5.8 GHz are simulated under y-polarized wave incidence along the z axis, as illustrated in Figure 7. Figure 7a shows a significantly high electric field near the upper and lower vias of the upper surface structure of the RMS. Moreover, the high electric field resonates on the upper and lower diodes of the bottom structure through the via transmission, as illustrated in Figure 7b. The strong resonance means that the diodes respond most strongly to incident waves, enhancing energy coupling to achieve highly effective absorption at 5.8 GHz. As illustrated in Figure 7c,d, the power flow at 5.8 GHz is primarily concentrated around the bottom diodes, indicating that the incident energy is efficiently directed toward the rectifying components.
Figure 8 shows the simulated absorption under varying incident and polarization angles. As illustrated in Figure 8a, the RMS demonstrates over 90% absorption at 5.8 GHz for incident angles ranging from 0° to 60°. In addition, Figure 8b presents the absorption under varying polarization directions, where the performance exceeds 98% for angles between 0° and 90°. These results confirm that the RMS achieves stable absorption performance across various incidence angles and polarization states.

3. Rectifying Metasurface Measurements and Discussion

To experimentally validate the proposed RMS design, a 3 × 3 array with overall dimensions of 70.0 × 70.0 mm was manufactured and tested, as illustrated in Figure 9. The RMS was manufactured by printed circuit board (PCB) technology by etching a 0.035 mm copper layer onto an F4B substrate ( ε r = 2.65 , tan δ = 0.0015 ) with a thickness of 3 mm. The diodes were installed on the bottom structure of metasurface through a standard soldering process. Figure 9 also illustrates the measurement process of the RMS in the experimental environment. The measurement setup consists of three parts. First, an RF signal is produced using a signal generator and amplified by a power amplifier. Second, a standard horn antenna, positioned 1 m in front of the RMS, transmits the amplified signal. Third, a digital multimeter is used to measure the DC output voltage across the load. The incident RF power density on the RMS is calculated as:
P i n = G t · G a · p · A S 4 π R 2 ,
where G t and G a denote the gains of the standard horn antenna and power amplifier, respectively, P denotes the input power from the signal generator, R is defined as the distance from the horn antenna to the RMS, and A s is the effective aperture area of the RMS. The effective receiving aperture A s corresponds to the physical dimensions of the 3 × 3 RMS array. Notably, increasing the size of the RMS array can improve the system’s sensitivity to electromagnetic energy density, as a larger surface area enables the collection of more energy under the same incident power conditions. Additionally, a 100 Ω load is selected.
Figure 10a shows the measured results for RF-to-DC efficiency of the RMS. The efficiency remained above 60% between 9.2 and 13.6 dBm, peaking at 68.3% at an input power of 12.5 dBm. The measured RF-to-DC efficiency of the RMS across various frequencies under an input power of 12.5 dBm is presented in Figure 10b. The efficiency exceeds 50% between 5.5 and 6.0 GHz, reaching a peak of 68.3% at 5.8 GHz. A slight discrepancy is observed between the measured and simulated results. This discrepancy may be attributed to several factors. First, the diode load used in the fabricated prototype may not exactly match the optimal value assumed in simulations, leading to reduced rectification efficiency and overall performance degradation. Second, measurement inaccuracies such as imperfect alignment or environmental noise can introduce deviations. Lastly, fabrication related imperfections, including etching tolerances or substrate warping, may also affect the electromagnetic response of the metasurface, especially in high-frequency applications. Nonetheless, the results confirm that the proposed RMS achieves highly RF-to-DC efficiency over a wider range of input power levels and frequencies.
As illustrated in Figure 11a, the proposed RMS maintains over 53.2% RF-to-DC conversion efficiency at 5.8 GHz as the incident angle varies from 0° to 60°. Similarly, Figure 11b demonstrates that the conversion efficiency remains above 62.5% at 5.8 GHz under varying polarization angles from 0° to 90°. These results confirm that the RMS enables wide-angle RF energy harvesting and exhibits robust polarization insensitivity.
Table 1 summarizes the performance comparison between the proposed RMS and existing RF energy harvesting designs reported in the literature. Compared to the previous reports, the proposed RMS maintains high RF-to-DC efficiency by integrating diodes with the metasurface, minimizing energy transmission loss from the lines. This integration also eliminates the need for additional matching networks, simplifying the design process. Moreover, the symmetrical design of the metasurface offers the advantage of polarization insensitivity, enhancing its ability to efficiently collect electromagnetic energy from the environment. In addition to the performance comparison in the table, the proposed RMS also demonstrates effective energy harvesting across a wide incident angle range from 0° to 60°. In conclusion, the proposed RMS demonstrates high RF energy harvesting performance from its surrounding environment.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we propose a wide-angle and polarization-insensitive rectifying metasurface designed to harvest RF energy. By adopting the design of placing Schottky diodes on the bottom structure and connecting them to the top structure through four metallized vias, the proposed RMS eliminates the impact of diode soldering on the surface structure and removes the need for a rectifier circuit and matching network. These strategies contribute to enhanced efficiency and structural simplification. Experimental results indicate that the manufactured RMS achieves an RF-to-DC conversion efficiency above 50% within the 5.5–6.0 GHz range, peaking at 68.3% at 5.8 GHz under an input power of 12.5 dBm. Furthermore, the RMS demonstrates stable performance across wide incident angles and polarization states, highlighting its applicability in wireless power transmission and ambient RF energy harvesting scenarios.

Author Contributions

Methodology and Formal Analysis, Z.G. and L.D.; Investigation, Z.G. and L.D.; Simulation Analysis, Z.G. and L.D.; Data Collection and Analysis, J.Y.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Z.G. and J.Y.; Writing—Review and Editing, Z.G., J.Y. and L.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sudevalayam, S.; Kulkarni, P. Energy harvesting sensor nodes: Survey and implications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2010, 13, 443–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, Y.; An, W.; Luo, Y.; Li, S.; Xiong, L.; Yu, S. Low-profile antenna integrated with solar cells for the 2.4 GHz band. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2021, 20, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, J.H.; Kim, B.; Kim, S.W.; Kang, H.W.; Park, M.C.; Park, D.H.; Ju, B.K.; Choi, W.K. High-performance coaxial piezoelectric energy generator (C-PEG) yarn of Cu/PVDF-TrFE/PDMS/Nylon/Ag. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 145401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gharapetian, D.; Fini, M.A.; Asgari, M.; Shabani, B. A nanofluid-based hybrid photovoltaic-thermal-thermoelectric generator system for combined heat and power applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 301, 118066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gharapetian, D.; Fini, M.A.; Bazargan, M. An exergy-economic analysis of a concentrated photovoltaic-thermal system with phase change materials cooled by a nanofluid in porous media. J. Energy Storage 2023, 72, 108336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dong, L.; Hu, G.; Tang, Q.; Zhao, C.; Yang, F.; Yang, Y. Advanced aerodynamics-driven energy harvesting leveraging galloping-flutter synergy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2414324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dong, L.; Ke, Y.; Liao, Y.; Wang, J.; Gao, M.; Yang, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, F. Rational modeling and design of piezoelectric biomolecular thin films toward enhanced energy harvesting and sensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2410566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, K.T.; Lin, H.; Yang, T.; Jia, B. Structured graphene metamaterial selective absorbers for high efficiency and omnidirectional solar thermal energy conversion. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sreelekshmi, S.; Sankar, S.P. A square ring and single split resonator based wearable antenna for microwave energy harvesting for IoT nodes. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 52, 102217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, X.; Xue, H.; Zhao, S.; Han, J.; Chang, M.; Liu, H.; Li, L. Accurate and efficient method for analyzing the transfer efficiency of metasurface-based wireless power transfer system. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 71, 783–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, H.; He, H.; Huang, J. Polarization-insensitive rectenna arrays with different power combining strategies. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2020, 19, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, P.; Zhang, X.; Li, L. An optically transparent metantenna for RF wireless energy harvesting. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2021, 70, 2550–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, X. Theoretical analysis of RF-DC conversion efficiency for class-F rectifiers. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2014, 62, 977–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ding, W.; Chen, J.; Wu, R.X. A generative meta-atom model for metasurface-based absorber designs. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 11, 2201959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Han, Y.; Che, W.; Christopoulos, C.; Xiong, Y.; Chang, Y. A fast and efficient design method for circuit analog absorbers consisting of resistive square-loop arrays. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 2016, 58, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kundu, D.; Mohan, A.; Chakrabarty, A. Single-layer wideband microwave absorber using array of crossed dipoles. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 1589–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fu, C.; Han, L.; Liu, C.; Lu, X.; Sun, Z. Combining Pancharatnam–Berry phase and conformal coding metasurface for dual-band RCS reduction. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2021, 70, 2352–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ha, T.D.; Zhu, L.; Alsaab, N.; Chen, P.Y.; Guo, J.L. Optically transparent metasurface radome for RCS reduction and gain enhancement of multifunctional antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 71, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abdullah, M.; Koziel, S. Supervised-learning-based development of multibit RCS-reduced coding metasurfaces. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2021, 70, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Landy, N.I.; Sajuyigbe, S.; Mock, J.J.; Smith, D.R.; Padilla, W.J. Perfect metamaterial absorber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 207402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhardwaj, A.; Singh, G.; Srivastava, K.V.; Ramkumar, J.; Ramakrishna, S.A. Polarization-insensitive optically transparent microwave metamaterial absorber using a complementary layer. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2021, 21, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Y.; Chen, K.; Zhang, D.; Li, S.; Xu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhuang, S. Ultrabroadband microwave absorber based on 3D water microchannels. Photonics Res. 2021, 9, 1391–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aydin, K.; Ferry, V.E.; Briggs, R.M.; Atwater, H.A. Broadband polarization-independent resonant light absorption using ultrathin plasmonic super absorbers. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Munk, B.A.; Munk, P.; Pryor, J. On designing Jaumann and circuit analog absorbers (CA absorbers) for oblique angle of incidence. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2007, 55, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, S.; Gao, J.; Cao, X.; Li, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, D. Wideband, thin, and polarization-insensitive perfect absorber based on the double octagonal rings metamaterials and lumped resistances. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 042002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, X.; Han, J.Q.; Li, G.X.; Xia, D.X.; Chang, M.Y.; Ma, X.J.; Xue, H.; Xu, P.; Li, R.J.; Zhang, K.Y.; et al. High-performance cost-efficient simultaneous wireless information and power transfers deploying jointly modulated amplifying programmable metasurface. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vinnakota, S.S.; Kumari, R.; Majumder, B. Metasurface-assisted broadband compact dual-polarized dipole antenna for RF energy harvesting. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2023, 22, 1912–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, L.; Si, L.; Liu, B.; Shen, Q.; Niu, R.; Bao, X.; Sun, H.; Zhu, W. An optically transparent rectifying metasurface for 2.4/5.8 GHz dual-band RF energy harvesting. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2025, 126, 012345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gui, H.; Xie, H.; Deng, L.; Huang, S.; Qiu, L.-L. Triple-band and polarization-insensitive rectifying metasurface with flexible substrate. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2024, 57, 165003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Amer, A.A.G.; Othman, N.; Sapuan, S.Z.; Alphones, A.; Hassan, M.F.; Al-Gburi, A.J.A.; Zakaria, Z. Dual-band, wide-angle, and high-capture efficiency metasurface for electromagnetic energy harvesting. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Eskandari, M.; Habibzadeh-Sharif, A.; Nazari, M. Design and full-wave analysis of ultra-broadband metamaterial absorbers based on ring resonators for solar energy harvesting. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Electr. Eng. 2023, 47, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tian, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Han, J.; Li, L. Recent advances in metamaterials for simultaneous wireless information and power transmission. Nanophotonics 2022, 11, 1697–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wei, Y.; Duan, J.; Jing, H.; Lyu, Z.; Hao, J.; Qu, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B. A multiband, polarization-controlled metasurface absorber for electromagnetic energy harvesting and wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2022, 70, 2861–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Erkmen, F.; Ramahi, O.M. A scalable, dual-polarized absorber surface for electromagnetic energy harvesting and wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2021, 69, 4021–4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, W.; Shen, T.; Zhang, B.; Wei, Y. A scalable, wide-angle metasurface array for electromagnetic energy harvesting. Micromachines 2024, 15, 904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Song, C.; Wei, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Qin, Y.; Duan, J. A wide-angle incidence, broadband rectified metasurface for radar frequency band EM energy harvesting and wireless power transfer. Opt. Laser Technol. 2024, 174, 110544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dinh, M.Q.; Le Hoang, T.; Vu, H.T.; Tung, N.T.; Le, M.T. Design, fabrication, and characterization of an electromagnetic harvester using polarization-insensitive metamaterial absorbers. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2021, 54, 345502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, L.; Zhang, X.; Song, C.; Zhang, W.; Jia, T.; Huang, Y. Compact dual-band, wide-angle, polarization-angle-independent rectifying metasurface for ambient energy harvesting and wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2020, 69, 1518–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ashoor, A.Z.; Ramahi, O.M. Polarization-independent cross-dipole energy harvesting surface. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2019, 67, 1130–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic overview of the proposed RMS. (b) 3D geometric model of the RMS unit cell. The corresponding structural dimensions are given as: a = 6.74 mm, b = 6.00 mm, c = 3.60 mm, d = 4.13 mm, l = 9.90 mm, p = 20.00 mm, h = 3.00 mm, e 1 = 4.20 mm, and e 2 = 2.20 mm.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic overview of the proposed RMS. (b) 3D geometric model of the RMS unit cell. The corresponding structural dimensions are given as: a = 6.74 mm, b = 6.00 mm, c = 3.60 mm, d = 4.13 mm, l = 9.90 mm, p = 20.00 mm, h = 3.00 mm, e 1 = 4.20 mm, and e 2 = 2.20 mm.
Micromachines 16 00611 g001
Figure 2. System framework of the proposed RMS and the corresponding input impedance of each module.
Figure 2. System framework of the proposed RMS and the corresponding input impedance of each module.
Micromachines 16 00611 g002
Figure 3. The equivalent circuit model and simulation results of the class rectifier. (a) The equivalent circuit of the Class-F rectifier. The rectification efficiency simulation of different parallel branches versus (b) load resistance and (c) input power.
Figure 3. The equivalent circuit model and simulation results of the class rectifier. (a) The equivalent circuit of the Class-F rectifier. The rectification efficiency simulation of different parallel branches versus (b) load resistance and (c) input power.
Micromachines 16 00611 g003
Figure 4. The equivalent circuit model of the proposed RMS unit.
Figure 4. The equivalent circuit model of the proposed RMS unit.
Micromachines 16 00611 g004
Figure 5. The simulation of the equivalent circuit model. (a) Simulated impedance versus frequency. (b) Simulated rectification efficiency versus frequency.
Figure 5. The simulation of the equivalent circuit model. (a) Simulated impedance versus frequency. (b) Simulated rectification efficiency versus frequency.
Micromachines 16 00611 g005
Figure 6. Simulation results of the incident power absorbed by the RMS and the corresponding distribution of power loss.
Figure 6. Simulation results of the incident power absorbed by the RMS and the corresponding distribution of power loss.
Micromachines 16 00611 g006
Figure 7. Simulations of (a) top view and (b) bottom view of the electric field of the RMS, and (c) top view and (d) bottom view of the power loss distribution of the RMS at 5.8 GHz.
Figure 7. Simulations of (a) top view and (b) bottom view of the electric field of the RMS, and (c) top view and (d) bottom view of the power loss distribution of the RMS at 5.8 GHz.
Micromachines 16 00611 g007
Figure 8. Simulated absorption performance of the proposed RMS. (a) Absorption under varying incident angles. (b) Absorption under varying polarization angles.
Figure 8. Simulated absorption performance of the proposed RMS. (a) Absorption under varying incident angles. (b) Absorption under varying polarization angles.
Micromachines 16 00611 g008
Figure 9. Photograph of the DC measurement setup for the RMS array prototype in an anechoic chamber.
Figure 9. Photograph of the DC measurement setup for the RMS array prototype in an anechoic chamber.
Micromachines 16 00611 g009
Figure 10. (a) Measured RF-to-DC efficiency versus different input power levels at 5.8 GHz. (b) Measured RF-to-DC efficiency versus frequency under an input power level of 12.5 dBm.
Figure 10. (a) Measured RF-to-DC efficiency versus different input power levels at 5.8 GHz. (b) Measured RF-to-DC efficiency versus frequency under an input power level of 12.5 dBm.
Micromachines 16 00611 g010
Figure 11. (a) Measured RF-to-DC efficiency across frequencies at varying incident angles. (b) Measured RF-to-DC efficiency across frequencies under different polarization conditions.
Figure 11. (a) Measured RF-to-DC efficiency across frequencies at varying incident angles. (b) Measured RF-to-DC efficiency across frequencies under different polarization conditions.
Micromachines 16 00611 g011
Table 1. Performance comparison of the proposed design with other related works.
Table 1. Performance comparison of the proposed design with other related works.
Ref.Frequency (GHz)Polarization InsensitiveOptimal Power LevelNeed Matching NetworkRF to DC Efficiency
[33]2.4, 5.2, 5.8No7 dBmYes46.4% (5.8 GHz)
[35]5.8No7 dBmYes72%
[36]5.3–6.6No5 dBmYes57%
[37]5.8Yes350 mw/ cm 2 Yes55%
[38]2.4, 5.8Yes10 dBmNo59.0% (5.8 GHz)
This Work5.8Yes12.5 dBmNo68.3%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, Z.; Yu, J.; Dong, L. A Wide-Angle and Polarization-Insensitive Rectifying Metasurface for 5.8 GHz RF Energy Harvesting. Micromachines 2025, 16, 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060611

AMA Style

Guo Z, Yu J, Dong L. A Wide-Angle and Polarization-Insensitive Rectifying Metasurface for 5.8 GHz RF Energy Harvesting. Micromachines. 2025; 16(6):611. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060611

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Zhihui, Juan Yu, and Lin Dong. 2025. "A Wide-Angle and Polarization-Insensitive Rectifying Metasurface for 5.8 GHz RF Energy Harvesting" Micromachines 16, no. 6: 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060611

APA Style

Guo, Z., Yu, J., & Dong, L. (2025). A Wide-Angle and Polarization-Insensitive Rectifying Metasurface for 5.8 GHz RF Energy Harvesting. Micromachines, 16(6), 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060611

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop