Next Article in Journal
Characterization and Evaluation of 3D-Printed Connectors for Microfluidics
Next Article in Special Issue
Modified Hexagonal Split Ring Resonator Based on an Epsilon-Negative Metamaterial for Triple-Band Satellite Communication
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling, Validation, and Performance of Two Tandem Cylinder Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters in Water Flow
Previous Article in Special Issue
Compact Full Ka-Band Waveguide Directional Coupler Based on Rectangular Aperture Array with Stairs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Slotted E-Shaped Meta-Material Decoupling Slab for Densely Packed MIMO Antenna Arrays

1
Electrical Department, College of Engineering, Horus University Egypt, New Damietta 34518, Egypt
2
Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
3
Electrical Engineering Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21421, Egypt
4
Electrical Department, College of Engineering, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
5
Electrical Department, College of Engineering, Alexandria Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, Alexandria 21421, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2021, 12(8), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12080873
Submission received: 26 June 2021 / Revised: 15 July 2021 / Accepted: 22 July 2021 / Published: 25 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Miniaturized Microwave Components and Devices)

Abstract

:
In contemporary wireless communication systems, the multiple-input and multiple-output systems are extensively utilized due to their enhanced spectral efficiency and diversity. Densely packed antenna arrays play an important role in such systems to enhance their spatial diversity, array gain, and beam scanning capabilities. In this article, a slotted meta-material decoupling slab (S-MTM-DS) with dual reflexes slotted E-shapes and an inductive stub is proposed. Its function was validated when located between two microstrip patch antenna elements to reduce the inter-element spacing, the mutual coupling, the return losses, and manufacturing costs due to size reduction. A prototype is simply fabricated in a volume of 67.41 × 33.49 × 1.6 mm3 and frequency-span measured from 8.4:11 GHz. At 9.4 GHz frequency, the spaces between the transmitting elements are decreased to 0.57 of the free space wavelength. When the proposed isolation S-MTM-DS is applied, the average isolation among them is measured to be −36 dB, the operational bandwidth is enhanced to be 1.512 GHz, the fractional bandwidth improved to be 16.04%, and the return losses are decreased to be −26.5 dB at 9.4 GHz center frequency. Consequently, the proposed design has the potential to be implemented simply in wireless contemporary communication schemes.

1. Introduction

A compact printed Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) antenna is used in wireless communication and radar application, especially in the ultra-wideband waveform transmission application. It has the advantage of having multiple transmission and reception channels that magnifies the need of it [1]. The MIMO antenna may be a single band MIMO antenna such as a USB dongle MIMO and mobile handset antenna system. In addition, it can be a multi-band MIMO such as multi-band mobile handset and tablet PC MIMO antenna system [2]. The advantages of using a MIMO antenna are increasing the channel capacity, improving the spectrum efficiency, and gaining a more reliable network [3]. The MIMO antenna can be easily fabricated and integrated with small communication systems such as cell phones. For example, an eight MIMO antenna operating at a frequency band from 2.6 to 3.5 GHz was fabricated for 5G mobile applications [4]. One of the methods that increases the channel capacity in the 5G mobile systems is to use a massive MIMO antenna. The large number of the receiving and transmitting elements increases the spectral efficiency and reduces the inter-cell interference [2].
Although the MIMO antenna design and implementation are simpler than the array of antenna fabrication, the cost of simplicity is paid in multipath propagation problems and the mutual coupling degradation [5]. Mutual coupling is the effect of not isolating the transmitting or receiving elements from each other. It degrades the angle of arrival estimation and increases the signal to interference noise, which has an adverse effect on the channel capacity and bit error rate in digital transmission and reception systems [5]. Mutual coupling happens due to interaction between the system elements or different radiation in free space on surface tracks. Therefore, the problem of massive MIMO antenna fabrication with low mutual coupling is very important and shall be considered [6].
The mutual coupling in a MIMO antenna can be reduced by minimizing the surface current flow using decoupling networks, etched parasitic elements, split rings resonators, electromagnetic bandgap structures, and defected ground structures [5]. Another method to reduce the mutual coupling is using dielectric resonator antenna or meta-materials [7]. A brief study on the mutual coupling effect on MIMO antenna is in [5,8,9]. The meta-material decoupling slab (MTM-DS) was used between antenna elements to reduce the effect of the mutual coupling. In 9–11 GHz frequency band, the average isolation between elements improved 11 dB with an average gain of around 5 dBi [10]. MTM-DS beat the other decoupling methods in enhancing the undesired front-to-back beam ratio and it is simple to be implemented [11].
In this article, a slotted meta-material decoupling slab (S-MTM-DS) with dual reflexes slotted E-shapes extended with an inductive stub is proposed. Its function was validated when located between two microstrip patch antenna elements to reduce the inter-element spacing, the mutual coupling, the return losses, and manufacturing costs due to size reduction. A prototype is simply fabricated in a volume of FR4 substrate material and the frequency-span is measured in the band 8.4:11 GHz. At 10 GHz frequency, the spaces between each transmitting elements are decreased to 0.57 λ0. When the proposed isolation S-MM-DS is applied, the average isolation among them is measured to be −36 dB, the operational bandwidth is enhanced to 1.512 GHz, the fractional bandwidth improved to 16.04%, and the return losses are decreased to −26.5 dB at a center frequency of 9.4 GHz. The design is simple and evacuates the disadvantage of inferior front-to-back proportion, which is recently announced in other decoupling methods. Therefore, this design is suitable for multiple applications that require stringent execution necessities.
The paper is organized in the following manner: Section 2 is the methodology of design and the measurements analysis. Section 3 presents the fabrication and validation measurements. Section 4 demonstrates the simulation results compared with related works. Finally, Section 5 is the conclusion.

2. Methodology of Design and Measurement Analysis

In this section, the coupling conduct of the array components is investigated in detail. The two sorts of coupling phenomenon are: the surface wave phenomena that is limited inside the substrate, and the space wave phenomena that is identified with the near-field or the reactive field coupling and is confined outside the substrate over the coupled patches. The coupling conduct is explored for three distinct arrangements, which are without Decoupling Slab (DS), with Meta-material DS (MM-DS), and with Slotted MM_DS (S-MM-DS).

2.1. Antenna Array without Decoupling Slab

Utilizing CST Microwave studio, Figure 1a shows a 2 × 1 microstrip patch without DS that comprises one cell of the array of antenna. The impedance bandwidth of the two elements is enhanced by truncating the ground plane as shown in Figure 1b. The dimensions of the two same patch antennas are: L = 17 mm, W = 20.5 mm, and the gap between the two radiators antenna is 18.31 mm. The design will be implemented on FR-4 lossy substrate with thickness (h) equal to 1.6 mm, dielectric constant ( ε r ) equal to 4.5, and tangent loss (tan δ) equal to 0.025.
It was found that the current density distributed over the antenna array surface is higher without DS. Figure 2 shows high surface current density.
A computer aid design tool, which is CST Microwave studio, was used to calculate the simulation results. Figure 3a shows the maximum isolation is −23.7 dB and the operating frequency is from 9.22:10.5 GHz with a bandwidth equal to 1.28 GHz. Figure 3b shows a real photo for the fabricated antenna array.
It was assumed in the simulation that the external conditions are absent, that the boundary absorber material is perfectly matched and supporting the concept of putting the array in open space.

2.2. Antenna Array with Metamaterial Decoupling Slab

The slotted patch antenna was fabricated using meta-material with negative permittivity and permeability [12,13,14]. It was constructed by using 2 E-shaped slits etched in a rectangular microstrip patch. The patch has an open circuited stub with a high impedance at the bottom. The two E-shaped slits are designed to be at an identical distance from a vertical axis at the center of the distance between them [15]. The capacitive nature of the E-shaped slit and the inductance of ¼ wavelength impedance stub can be used in the slotted E-shaped metamaterial decoupling slab for densely packed MIMO antenna. Figure 4 shows the design of the MTM-DS that is proposed in this research. Dimensions are given in Figure 4 and each patch is individually fed by a microstrip feedline.
Figure 5 shows the isolation improves with MTM-DS, which limits the mutual coupling between the two radiators. MTM-DS was implemented on FR-4 lossy substrate with h = 1.6 mm, ε r = 4.5, and tan δ = 0.025.
Figure 6a shows the simulated and measurements parameters of the MTM-DS antenna array. The isolation is −27.5 dB and the operating frequency is from 9.3:10.5 GHz with a bandwidth equal to 1.2 GHz. Figure 6b shows the fabricated array of antenna.

2.3. Antenna Array with Slotted Meta-Material Decoupling Slab

A slotted meta-material decoupling slab (S-MTM-DS) with dual reflexes, slotted E-shapes extended with an inductive stub is proposed. Its function was validated when located between two microstrip patch antenna elements to reduce the inter-element spacing, the mutual coupling, and the return losses. Figure 7 shows the slotted MTM-DS antenna array equivalent circuit. The radiator is presented in the equivalent circuit by a resonant circuit with resistance Re, capacitance Ce, and inductance Le. The slotted MTM-DS has inductance Ls and the capacitance Cs.
Slotted MTM-DS in the middle of the array connecting the two antenna elements sections is modelled by inductance Lc. The coupling between the Slotted MTM-DS and the patch is through the dominant capacitance Cc because the coupling between the patch and the Slotted MTM-DS is via the patch antenna non-radiating edge. The resonance frequency ( f r ) of the slotted MTM-DS is dependent on the magnitude of Lc and Cs and is presented as follows:
f r = 1 2 π L s C s
The effectiveness of the slotted MTM-DS was determined by the simplified equivalent circuit model. Optimized values of the equivalent circuit model were determined by using an optimization tool in full-wave electromagnetic solver simulation by AWR. The magnitudes of these parameters are given in Table 1.
From the previous simulations and measurements, it was necessary to insert the slotted MTM-DS between the two radiators as shown in Figure 8 to enhance the mutual coupling. The MTM-DS microstrip configuration has ground slots on each arm. By using this configuration, the gain and the bandwidth of the array of elements is not affected by the presence of the slots.
The importance of the new designed slotted MTM-DS appears in suppressing the induced surface current that results from interaction between the two patches. It is observable in Figure 9 that strong current is induced on the array of the antenna that guarantees the effectiveness of the slotted MTM-DS. The distance between the two patch elements is 0.57λ0, where λ0 is wavelength in free space at 9.4 GHz.
MTM-DS was designed and implemented as previous on FR-4 lossy substrate with h = 1.6 mm, ε r = 4.5, and tan δ = 0.025 as shown in Figure 10. The simulated and measured results isolation and return loss response of the MTM-DS array of antenna is shown in Figure 11. In Figure 11 the frequency bandwidth is 1.51 GHz from 8.67:10.18 GHz, and the maximum isolation is −43.7 dB.
S-parameter results are measured the three types of the array of antenna: MTM without DS, MTM-DS, and slotted MTM-DS are summarized in Table 2. For the first configuration (without DS), the average isolation over the proposed band width is −18 dB. For the second (MTM-DS), it is −23.85 dB, and for the last one (slotted MTM-DS), it is −36 dB. On average the isolation is improved by 18 dB.

3. Radiation Pattern of the Antenna Arrays

The simulated 2D polar plots of the three types of the array of antenna: MTM without DS, MTM-DS, and slotted MTM-DS at 9.5 GHz are shown in Figure 12. A good pattern correlation in 2D is observed for the three types of the antenna array. Although the electric plane for the three types is slightly the same, the magnetic plane for the slotted MTM-DS is minimal, and the gain is improved at the selected frequency 9.5 GHz.

4. Results and Discussion

The proposed algorithm is compared with previously published research in designing and implementing the array of antennas in the same frequency band. Table 3 shows the measurements results of three parameters: maximum isolation, patch separation, operating bandwidth reduction, design complexity, and cost for the three isolating techniques discussed in this work. A merit was adjusted for each parameter where the best value takes 100% and the worst value take (worst/best) × 100. The average percentage was calculated for each technique. The average percentage for the complementary split-ring resonators [16] is the best (88%); however, the design complexity and the cost are high, which makes it an unprovable solution for the design and implementation problem. The second in the rank is both: the complementary split-ring resonator [17] and the meta-material decoupling slab [18]. In [17], the maximum isolation was low compared to the slotted MTM-DS, and in [15], although the maximum isolation was better than slotted MTM-DS, the average isolation was worse than it. Additionally, the separation between the patches is 0.66 λ0, which is worse than it in the slotted MTM-DS which is 0.57 λ0. Although the presented technique in this research (slotted MTM-DS) has the third rank in the average percentage merit, it outperforms the other three techniques in [16,17], and [18] in the average isolation and the parameter value, design complexity, and cost forms a wonderful assembly to design and implement easily.

5. Conclusions

A proficient method of including S-MM-DS is proposed for mutual coupling concealment in dense arrays with edge partition of 0.575 λ0. The S-MTM-DS structure was carved, drilled, and plated on a section between the radiating elements. The S-MM-DS is equipped for representing mutual coupling brought about by surface waves just as space waves. For 1.6 thick and 4.5 permittivity substrate the mutual coupling decrease of −43.7 dB was accomplished with the decoupling slab set between array components. The structure is effectively feasible and can be utilized in all respects viably in beam scanning applications. The real advantage of this plan is that it tends to be effectively created and can be strategically located where the mutual coupling concealment is wanted. The S-MTM-DS is created from a similar material as that of exhibit components consequently making this system exceptionally adaptable in wording of its advantages and applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.H.M. and H.G.M.; methodology K.H.M. and H.G.M.; software, K.H.M., A.S.I.A., M.M. and H.G.M.; validation, K.H.M., A.S.I.A., M.M. and H.G.M.; writing—review and editing, K.H.M., A.S.I.A., M.M. and H.G.M.; supervision, H.G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-Track Research Funding Program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ren, J.; Hu, W.; Yin, Y.; Fan, R. Compact Printed MIMO Antenna for UWB Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2014, 13, 1517–1520. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sharawi, M.S.; Rajo-Iglesias, E. MIMO antennas. In Wideband, Multiband, and Smart Reconfigurable Antennas for Modern Wireless Communications, Dauphin; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2015; pp. 145–175. [Google Scholar]
  3. Katalinic, A.; Nagy, R.; Zentner, R. Benefits of MIMO Systems in Practice: Increased Capacity, Reliability and Spectrum Efficiency. In Proceedings of the 48th International Symposium ELMAR-2006 Focused on Multimedia Signal Processing and Communications, Zadar, Croatia, 7–9 June 2006. [Google Scholar]
  4. Abdullah, M.; Kiani, S.H.; Iqbal, A. Eight Element Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) Antenna for 5G Mobile Applications. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 134488–134495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nadeem, I.; Choi, D. Study on Mutual Coupling Reduction Technique for MIMO Antennas. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 563–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, B.; Jornet, J.M.; Akyildiz, I.F.; Wu, Z.P. Mutual Coupling Reduction for Ultra-Dense Multi-Band Plasmonic Nano-Antenna Arrays Using Graphene-Based Frequency Selective Surface. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 33214–33225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roy, S.; Chakraborty, U. Mutual Coupling Reduction in a Multi-band MIMO Antenna Using Meta-Inspired Decoupling Network. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2020, 114, 3231–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, Q. Review of mutual coupling in MIMO ystems. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 24706–24719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chouhan1, S.; Panda2, D.K.; Gupta, M.; Singhal, S. Multiport MIMO antennas with mutual coupling reductiontechniques for modern wireless transreceive operations: A review. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 2017, 28, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kou, N.; Shi, Y.; Li, L. New equivalent circuit analysis and synthesis for broadband composite right/left-handed transmission line metamaterials. ACES. J. 2016, 31, 884–893. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, Q.; Jin, Y.; Feng, J.; Lv, X.; Si, L. Mutual coupling reduction of microstrip antenna array using metamaterial absorber. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Advanced Materials and Processes for RF and THz Applications (IMWS-AMP), Suzhou, China, 1–3 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
  12. Paul, L.C.; Haque, M.A.; Haque, M.A.; Rashid MM, U.; Islam, M.F.; Rahman, M.M. Design a slotted metamaterial microstrip patch antenna by creating three dual isosceles triangular slots on the patch and bandwidth enhancement. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technology (EICT), Khulna, Bangladesh, 7–9 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pyo, S.; Baik, J.-W.; Cho, S.-H.; Kim, Y.-S. Metamaterial-based antenna with triangular slotted ground for efficiency improvement. Electron. Lett. 2009, 45, 144–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, B.; Li, Q.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Yang, G. Metamaterial-based low-profile broadband hexagonal-grid-slotted patch antenna. In Proceedings of the International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium (ACES), Suzhou, China, 1–4 August 2017. [Google Scholar]
  15. Islam, M.; Adel, A.A.; Mimi, A.; Yasmin, M.; Norun, F. Design of Dual Band Microstrip Patch Antenna using Metamaterial. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 260, 012037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shafique, M.F.; Qamar, Z.; Riaz, L.; Saleem, R.; Khan, S.A. Coupling suppression in densely packed microstrip array using metamaterial structure. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2015, 57, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Qamar, Z.; Naeem, U.; Khan, S.A.; Chongcheawchamnan, M.; Shafique, M.F. Mutual coupling reduction for high-performance densely packed patch antenna arrays on finite substrate. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2016, 64, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Alibakhshikenari, M.; Virdee, B.S.; Shukla, P.; See, C.H.; Abd-Alhameed, R.; Khalily, M.; Falcone, F.; Limiti, E. Interaction Between Closely Packed Array Antenna Elements Using Meta-Surface for Applications Such as MIMO Systems and Synthetic Aperture Radars. Radio Sci. 2018, 53, 1368–1381. [Google Scholar]
  19. Amendola, G.; Boccia, L.; Massa, G. Shorted elliptical patch antennas with reduced surface waves on two frequency bands. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2005, 53, 1946–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jackson, D.R.; Williams, J.T.; Bhattacharyya, A.K.; Smith, R.L.; Buchheit, S.J.; Long, S.A. Microstrip patch designs that do not excite surface waves. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 1993, 41, 1026–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alibakhshikenari, M.; Virdee, B.S.; Shukla, P.; See, C.H.; Abd-Alhameed, R.; Falcone, F.; Limiti, E. Meta-surface wall suppression of mutual coupling between microstrip patch antenna arrays for THz-band applications. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 2018, 75, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Farsi, S.; Aliakbarian, H.; Schreurs, D.; Nauwelaers, B.; Vandenbosch, G.A. Mutual coupling reduction between planar antennas by using a simple microstrip U-section. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2012, 11, 1501–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tang, M.C.; Xiao, S.; Wang, B.; Guan, J.; Deng, T. Improved performance of a microstrip phased array using broadband and ultra-low loss metamaterial slabs. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2011, 53, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of 2 × 1 microstrip patch array of antenna without decoupling slab (a) front view (b) back view.
Figure 1. Structure of 2 × 1 microstrip patch array of antenna without decoupling slab (a) front view (b) back view.
Micromachines 12 00873 g001
Figure 2. Surface current density of 2 × 1 microstrip patch antenna array without decoupling slab.
Figure 2. Surface current density of 2 × 1 microstrip patch antenna array without decoupling slab.
Micromachines 12 00873 g002
Figure 3. The fabricated 2 × 1 antenna microstrip patch antenna array without decoupling slab. (a) Simulated and measured S-parameters results. (b) Array photo.
Figure 3. The fabricated 2 × 1 antenna microstrip patch antenna array without decoupling slab. (a) Simulated and measured S-parameters results. (b) Array photo.
Micromachines 12 00873 g003
Figure 4. Geometry of 2 × 1 microstrip patch antenna array with MTM-DS.
Figure 4. Geometry of 2 × 1 microstrip patch antenna array with MTM-DS.
Micromachines 12 00873 g004
Figure 5. Current density of 2 × 1 microstrip patch antenna array with MTM-DS.
Figure 5. Current density of 2 × 1 microstrip patch antenna array with MTM-DS.
Micromachines 12 00873 g005
Figure 6. The fabricated 2 × 1 antenna microstrip patch antenna array with MTM-DS. (a) Simulated and measured S-parameters results. (b) Connected antenna array photo with decoupling slab.
Figure 6. The fabricated 2 × 1 antenna microstrip patch antenna array with MTM-DS. (a) Simulated and measured S-parameters results. (b) Connected antenna array photo with decoupling slab.
Micromachines 12 00873 g006
Figure 7. Slotted MTM-DS antenna array equivalent circuit.
Figure 7. Slotted MTM-DS antenna array equivalent circuit.
Micromachines 12 00873 g007
Figure 8. Geometry of 2 × 1 microstrip patch antenna array with slotted MTM-DS.
Figure 8. Geometry of 2 × 1 microstrip patch antenna array with slotted MTM-DS.
Micromachines 12 00873 g008
Figure 9. Current density of 2 × 1 microstrip patch antenna array with slotted MTM-DS.
Figure 9. Current density of 2 × 1 microstrip patch antenna array with slotted MTM-DS.
Micromachines 12 00873 g009
Figure 10. Photograph of the fabricated antenna array with slotted MTM-DS.
Figure 10. Photograph of the fabricated antenna array with slotted MTM-DS.
Micromachines 12 00873 g010
Figure 11. Simulated and measured S-parameters results of the fabricated 2 × 1 antenna microstrip patch antenna array with slotted MTM-DS.
Figure 11. Simulated and measured S-parameters results of the fabricated 2 × 1 antenna microstrip patch antenna array with slotted MTM-DS.
Micromachines 12 00873 g011
Figure 12. Simulated polar plots of the antenna array without DS, with MTM-DS, and with slotted MTM-DS (a) Antenna element #1 (b) Antenna element #2.
Figure 12. Simulated polar plots of the antenna array without DS, with MTM-DS, and with slotted MTM-DS (a) Antenna element #1 (b) Antenna element #2.
Micromachines 12 00873 g012
Table 1. Optimized values of the equivalent model representing the 2 × 1 antenna microstrip patch antenna array with slotted MTM-DS.
Table 1. Optimized values of the equivalent model representing the 2 × 1 antenna microstrip patch antenna array with slotted MTM-DS.
ParameterValues
Rf54 Ohm
Re1.9 Ohm
Ce0.65 pF
Le4.29 nH
Lc0.18 nH
Cc2.66 pF
Ls0.68 nH
Cs4.05 pF
Table 2. Measurements resulted from the three isolating techniques.
Table 2. Measurements resulted from the three isolating techniques.
CaseOperation BW (GHz)BW (GHz)
S11 < 10 dB
Fraction BW (%)Mutual Coupling Suppression between Antenna Array(dB)
MinAveMax
Without DS9.22–10.51.2812.98−14.5−18−23.7
With MTM-DS9.3–10.51.212.12−20.2−23.8−27.5
With slotted MTM-DS8.67–10.181.5116.08−28.5−36−43.7
Table 3. Measurements resulted from the Three Isolating Techniques against previously presented work in the literature.
Table 3. Measurements resulted from the Three Isolating Techniques against previously presented work in the literature.
RefMethodMax. Isolation
Improvement
Patch Separation (λ0)Operating Bandwidth
Reduction (%)
Average PercentageDesign ComplexityCost
[19]Shorted annular
elliptical patch
8 (14%)0.75 (16%)81%37%ModerateMedium
[20]Ring of magnetic
current
10 (18%)0.5 (25%)87%40%ModerateMedium
[16]Complementary
split-ring
resonators
37 (65%)0.125 (100%)100%88%HighHigh
[21]meta-surface
wall isolator
13.5 (24%)1.16 (11%)100%45%LowLow
[17]Complementary
split-ring
resonator
27 (47%)0.125 (100%)71%73%LowLow
[22]U-shaped
microstrip line
17 (30%)0.75 (16%)88%45%ModerateMedium
[23]Periodically
grounded
edge-coupled
split-ring
resonators
18 (32%)0.5 (25%)100%52%HighHigh
[18]meta-material decoupling slab57 (100%)0.66 (19%)100%73%LowLow
Proposed Workslotted meta-material decoupling slab43.7 (76%)0.57 (22%)100%66%ModerateLow
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moussa, K.H.; Amar, A.S.I.; Mabrouk, M.; Mohamed, H.G. Slotted E-Shaped Meta-Material Decoupling Slab for Densely Packed MIMO Antenna Arrays. Micromachines 2021, 12, 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12080873

AMA Style

Moussa KH, Amar ASI, Mabrouk M, Mohamed HG. Slotted E-Shaped Meta-Material Decoupling Slab for Densely Packed MIMO Antenna Arrays. Micromachines. 2021; 12(8):873. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12080873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moussa, Karim H., Ahmed S. I. Amar, Mohamed Mabrouk, and Heba G. Mohamed. 2021. "Slotted E-Shaped Meta-Material Decoupling Slab for Densely Packed MIMO Antenna Arrays" Micromachines 12, no. 8: 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12080873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop