# Experiments on Liquid Flow through Non-Circular Micro-Orifices

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Materials and Methods

^{3}/s and 1.1–11.1 cm

^{3}/s spans) that were calibrated end-to-end online prior to the tests (accuracy within ±1%). The water temperature inside the autoclave was measured (to within ±1 K) using direct immersion type-J thermocouples (not shown in Figure 2).

## 3. Results and Discussion

## 4. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Conflicts of Interest

## Appendix A

## References

- Gad-el-Hak, M. The fluid mechanics of micro devices. ASME J. Fluids Eng.
**1999**, 121, 5–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ho, C.M.; Tai, Y.C. Review: MEMS and its applications for flow control. ASME J. Fluids Eng.
**1996**, 118, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Epstein, A.H.; Senturia, S.D. Macro power from micro machinery. Science
**1997**, 276, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Abramson, A.R.; Tien, C.L. Recent developments in microscale thermophysical engineering. Microscale Thermophys. Eng.
**1999**, 3, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mehendale, S.S.; Jacobi, A.M.; Shah, R.K. Fluid flow and heat transfer at micro- and meso-scales with application to heat exchanger design. Appl. Mech. Rev.
**2000**, 53, 175–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hassan, I.; Phutthavong, P.; Abdelgawad, M. Microchannel heat sinks: An overview of the state-of-the-art. Microscale Thermophys. Eng.
**2004**, 8, 183–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Au, A.K.; Lai, H.; Utela, B.R.; Folch, A. Microvalves and Micropumps for BioMEMS. Micromachines
**2011**, 2, 179–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Laser, D.J.; Santiago, J.G. A review of micropumps. J. Micromech. Microeng.
**2004**, 14, R35–R64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nguyen, N.; Wu, Z. Micromixers-a review. J. Micromech. Microeng.
**2005**, 15, R1–R16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cai, G.; Xue, L.; Zhang, H.; Lin, J. A Review on Micromixers. Micromachines
**2017**, 8, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bhatia, S.N.; Ingber, D.E. Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat. Biotechnol.
**2014**, 32, 760–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Borenstein, J.T. Organs-on-chips: How microsystem technology can transform the drug development process. IEEE Pulse
**2016**, 7, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Yager, P.; Edwards, T.; Fu, E.; Helton, K.; Nelson, K.; Tam, M.R.; Weigl, B.H. Microfluidic diagnostic technologies for global public health. Nature
**2006**, 442, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Witters, D.; Sun, B.; Begolo, S.; Rodriguez-Manzano, J.; Robles, W.; Ismagilov, R.F. Digital biology and chemistry. Lab Chip
**2014**, 14, 3225–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Hou, H.W.; Bhagat, A.A.S.; Lee, W.C.; Huang, S.; Han, J.; Lim, C.T. Microfluidic Devices for Blood Fractionation. Micromachines
**2011**, 2, 319–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Deng, B.; Wang, H.; Tan, Z.; Quan, Y. Microfluidic Cell Trapping for Single-Cell Analysis. Micromachines
**2019**, 10, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Szczukiewicz, S.; Borhani, N.; Thome, J.R. Fine-resolution two-phase flow heat transfer coefficient measurements of refrigerants in multi-microchannel evaporators. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
**2013**, 67, 913–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jin, S.; Sung, T.; Seo, T.; Kim, J. Characteristics of R-123 two-phase flow through micro-scale short tube orifice for design of a small cooling system. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
**2011**, 35, 1484–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nilpueng, K.; Wongwises, S. A review of numerical modelling studies on short-tube orifice performance with application to air-conditioning systems. Int. J. Refrig.
**2012**, 35, 740–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - McGrady, J.; Duff, J.; Stevens, N.; Cioncolini, A.; Curioni, M.; Banks, A.; Scenini, F. Development of a microfluidic setup to study the corrosion product deposition in accelerated flow regions. Npj Mater. Degrad.
**2017**, 1, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - McGrady, J.; Scenini, F.; Duff, J.; Stevens, N.; Cassineri, S.; Curioni, M.; Banks, A. Investigation into the effect of water chemistry on corrosion product formation in areas of accelerated flow. J. Nucl. Mater.
**2017**, 493, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cassineri, S.; Duff, J.; Cioncolini, A.; Curioni, M.; Banks, A.; Scenini, F. Deposition of corrosion products under pressurized water nuclear reactor conditions: The effect of flow velocity and dissolved hydrogen. Corros. Sci.
**2019**, 159, 108113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cassineri, S.; Cioncolini, A.; Curioni, M.; Morrison, J.; Banks, A.; Stevens, N.; Scenini, F. Understanding the effect of Li and flow velocity on corrosion deposition at 230 C hydrogenated water. Corros. Sci.
**2020**, 168, 108588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Amnache, A.; Omri, M.; Fréchette, L.G. A silicon rectangular micro-orifice for gas flow measurement at moderate Reynolds number: Design, fabrication, and flow analyses. Microfluid. Nanofluid.
**2018**, 22, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hasegawa, T.; Ono, Y.; Ushida, A.; Goda, M. Continuous organic synthesis in water around micro-orifices after flows. Heliyon
**2020**, 6, e03630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Johansen, F.C. Flow through pipe orifices at low Reynolds numbers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A
**1930**, 126, 231–245. [Google Scholar] - Kojasoy, G.; Landis, F.; Kwame-Mensah, P.; Chang, C.T. Two-phase pressure drop in multiple thick and thin orifice plates. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
**1997**, 15, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, X.; Lin, Q.; Tai, Y. A parylene micro check valve. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Orlando, FL, USA, 21 January 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Mishra, C.; Peles, Y. Cavitation in flow through a micro-orifice inside a silicon microchannel. Phys. Fluids
**2005**, 17, 013601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Phares, D.J.; Smedley, G.T.; Zhou, J. Laminar flow resistance in short microtubes. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
**2005**, 26, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tu, X.; Hrnjak, P.S.; Bullard, C.W. Refrigerant R134a liquid flow through micro-scale short tube orifices with/without phase change. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
**2006**, 30, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ushida, A.; Hasegawa, T.; Narumi, T. Anomalous phenomena in pressure drops of water flows through micro-orifices. Microfluid. Nanofluid.
**2014**, 17, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cioncolini, A.; Scenini, F.; Duff, J. Micro-orifice single-phase liquid flow: Pressure drop measurements and prediction. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
**2015**, 65, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cioncolini, A.; Cassineri, S.; Duff, J.; Curioni, M.; Scenini, F. Micro-orifice single-phase flow at very high Reynolds number. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
**2018**, 91, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Szolcek, M.; Cioncolini, A.; Scenini, F.; Curioni, M. Effect of thickness to diameter ratio on micro-orifice single-phase liquid flow at low Reynolds number. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
**2018**, 97, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cioncolini, A.; Scenini, F.; Duff, J.; Szolcek, M.; Curioni, M. Choked cavitation in micro-orifices: An experimental study. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
**2016**, 74, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dagan, Z.; Weinbaum, S.; Pfeffer, R. An infinite-series solution for the creeping motion through an orifice of finite length. J. Fluid Mech.
**1982**, 115, 505–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Zhou, N.; Peng, R.L.; Pettersson, R. Surface characterization of austenitic stainless steel 304L after different grinding operations. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng.
**2017**, 12, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Chang, L.; Wang, Y.; Volpe, L.; Maurotto, A.; Lozano-Perez, S.; Tice, D.; Burke, M.G.; Scenini, F. Effect of machining on stress corrosion crack initiation on warm forged stainless steel in high temperature water. Acta Mater.
**2019**, 165, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Eaton, J.W.; Bateman, D.; Hauberg, S.; Wehbring, R. GNU Octave Version 4.2.1 Manual: A High-Level Interactive Language for Numerical Computations. 2017. Available online: https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/v4.2.1/ (accessed on 18 May 2020).
- Cassineri, S.; Duff, J.; Curioni, M.; Banks, A.; Scenini, F. CRUD deposition in accelerated high-temperature water: Investigation on the effect of substrate material and water chemistry. J. Nucl. Mater.
**2019**, 529, 151915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lemmon, E.W.; Bell, I.H.; Huber, M.L.; McLinden, M.O. NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 9.1; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standard Reference Data Program: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2013.
- Taylor, J.R. An Introduction to Error Analysis; University Science Books: Sausalito, CA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, R.; Peles, Y. The effect of fluid properties on cavitation in a micro domain. J. Micromech. Microeng.
**2009**, 19, 025009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yan, Y.; Thorpe, R.B. Flow regime transition due to cavitation in the flow through an orifice. Int. J. Multiph. Flow
**1990**, 16, 1023–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 2.**Schematic representation of the flow loop (

**left**) and 3D representation and drawing of the flow cell test section (

**right**).

**Figure 4.**Dimensionless pressure drop as a function of Reynolds number for the micro-orifices tested.

**Figure 5.**(

**a**) Dimensionless pressure drop as a function of Reynolds number for the micro-orifices tested in this study and from the literature; (

**b**) parity plot of measured dimensionless pressure drop vs. prediction of Equation (3) (the dashed lines are ±30% bounds).

Reference | ${\mathit{d}}_{\mathit{h}\mathit{y}\mathit{d}}\left(\mathsf{\mu}\mathbf{m}\right)$ | ${\mathit{d}}_{\mathit{h}\mathit{y}\mathit{d}}/\mathit{D}$ | $\mathit{t}/{\mathit{d}}_{\mathit{h}\mathit{y}\mathit{d}}$ | Fluid | Reynolds | Cross-Section |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Johansen [26] | 704; 1634 | 0.09; 0.209 | 0.083 | Oil | 0.1–150 | Circular |

Kojasoy et al. [27] | 1000; 2000 | 0.057; 0.114 | 1.0; 2.0 | R113 | 560–14,000 | Circular |

Wang et al. [28] | 150; 370 | NA | NA | Water | 800–4500 | Square |

Mishra and Peles [29] | 11.5 | 0.114 | 1.7 | Water | 160–550 | Square |

Phares et al. [30] | 81.7–59.2 | 0.008–0.016 | 2.65–5.16 | Water | 2.5–120 | Circular |

Tu et al. [31] | 31.0; 52.0 | 0.007; 0.012 | 2.5; 4.2 | R134a | 1600–6500 | Circular |

Ushida et al. [32] | 100; 400 | NA | 0.05; 0.2 | Water | 1.3–1300 | Circular |

Cioncolini et al. [33] | 150–600 | 0.015–0.06 | 1.87–6.93 | Water | 6000–26,000 | Circular |

Cioncolini et al. [34] | 300; 600 | 0.0306; 0.0612 | 1.67; 3.33 | Water | 18,000–220,000 | Circular |

Szolcek et al. [35] | 200 | 0.02 | 4.25–27.0 | Water | 5–4500 | Circular |

Cioncolini et al. [36] | 150; 300 | 0.015–0.03 | 3.53–6.93 | Water | 3425–30,043 | Circular |

This study | 326–510 | 0.05–0.08 | 2.29–3.62 | Water | 5883–212,030 | Square Rectangular |

Sample No. | ${\mathit{P}}_{\mathit{w}\mathit{e}\mathit{t}}\left(\mathsf{\mu}\mathbf{m}\right)$ | ${\mathit{A}}_{\mathit{f}\mathit{l}\mathit{o}\mathit{w}}\mathbf{\xb7}{\mathbf{10}}^{\mathbf{-}\mathbf{3}}\mathbf{\left(}\mathsf{\mu}{\mathbf{m}}^{2}\right)$ | ${\mathit{d}}_{\mathit{h}\mathit{y}\mathit{d}}\left(\mathsf{\mu}\mathbf{m}\right)$ | $\mathit{t}$ (mm) | $\mathit{t}/{\mathit{d}}_{\mathit{h}\mathit{y}\mathit{d}}$ | $\mathit{A}\mathit{R}{}^{\mathbf{a}}$ | Cross-Section |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | 927 ± 40 | 68.3 ± 4.6 | 295 ± 24 | 1.05 ± 0.01 | 3.56 | NA | Circular |

2 | 1210 ± 40 | 98.6 ± 6.0 | 326 ± 23 | 1.18 ± 0.01 | 3.62 | 1.06 | Square |

3 | 1209 ± 40 | 99.7 ± 6.0 | 330 ± 23 | 1.19 ± 0.01 | 3.61 | 1.05 | Square |

4 | 1958 ± 40 | 249.6 ± 9.8 | 510 ± 23 | 1.17 ± 0.01 | 2.29 | 1.00 | Square |

5 | 1571 ± 40 | 153.7 ± 7.8 | 391 ± 22 | 1.16 ± 0.01 | 2.97 | 1.58 | Rectangular |

6 | 1586 ± 40 | 155.6 ± 7.9 | 392 ± 22 | 1.24 ± 0.01 | 3.16 | 1.58 | Rectangular |

7 | 1946 ± 40 | 209.1 ± 9.7 | 430 ± 22 | 1.06 ± 0.01 | 2.46 | 2.23 | Rectangular |

8 | 1993 ± 40 | 221.9 ± 9.9 | 445 ± 22 | 1.11 ± 0.01 | 2.49 | 2.26 | Rectangular |

^{a}Aspect ratio of the micro-orifice cross-section: ratio of the long side length to the short side length.

Property | 298 K | 503 K |
---|---|---|

$\rho $ (kg/m^{3}) | 1002 | 835.9 |

$\mu $ (µPa s) | 891.6 | 118.7 |

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Cassineri, S.; Cioncolini, A.; Smith, L.; Curioni, M.; Scenini, F.
Experiments on Liquid Flow through Non-Circular Micro-Orifices. *Micromachines* **2020**, *11*, 510.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11050510

**AMA Style**

Cassineri S, Cioncolini A, Smith L, Curioni M, Scenini F.
Experiments on Liquid Flow through Non-Circular Micro-Orifices. *Micromachines*. 2020; 11(5):510.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11050510

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Cassineri, Stefano, Andrea Cioncolini, Liam Smith, Michele Curioni, and Fabio Scenini.
2020. "Experiments on Liquid Flow through Non-Circular Micro-Orifices" *Micromachines* 11, no. 5: 510.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11050510