Next Article in Journal
A Prominent Cell Manipulation Technique in BioMEMS: Dielectrophoresis
Next Article in Special Issue
Melt Blown Fiber-Assisted Solvent-Free Device Fabrication at Low-Temperature
Previous Article in Journal
Laser-Based Synthesis of Au Nanoparticles for Optical Sensing of Glyphosate: A Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells Integrated with Subwavelength Structured Cover Glass Fabricated by One-Step Self-Masked Etching
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Monolithic 1 × 8 DWDM Silicon Optical Transmitter Using an Arrayed-Waveguide Grating and Electro-Absorption Modulators for Switch Fabrics in Intra-Data-Center Interconnects

1
School of Electrical Engineering, Korea University, Anam-Dong, Seongbuk Gu, Seoul 02841, Korea
2
MClavis Co., Ltd., Dongsan-ro, Seocho-Gu, Seoul 06784, Korea
3
Institution of Convergence Technology KT, Taebong-ro, Seocho-Gu, Seoul 06764, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2020, 11(11), 991; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11110991
Submission received: 25 September 2020 / Revised: 31 October 2020 / Accepted: 31 October 2020 / Published: 3 November 2020

Abstract

:
In this study, we propose an eight-channel monolithic optical transmitter using silicon electro-absorption modulators (EAMs) based on free-carrier injection by Schottky junctions. The transmitter consists of a 1 × 8 silicon arrayed-waveguide grating (AWG) and eight 500-μm-long EAMs on a 5.41 × 2.84 mm2 footprint. It generates eight-channel dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) outputs with 1.33 nm channel spacing (Δλ) in the C-band from a single broadband light source and modulates each channel with over 3 dB modulation depth at 6 V peak-to-peak. The experimental results showed that the feasibility of a homogeneous silicon DWDM transmitter with a single light source for switch fabrics in intra-data-center interconnects over heterogeneous integration with regards to more complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) compatibility.

1. Introduction

Intra-data-center interconnects (up to 10 km) play a key role in determining the performance and scalability of these data centers. Intra-data-center traffic has been growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27% between 2015 and 2020 [1], mostly due to video services and associated machine-learning applications. Notably, cloud traffic has nearly quadrupled, representing 92% of data-center traffic in 2020 [2]. As the number of hosted applications and the amount of traffic in data centers continuously grow, the intra-data-center network faces the problems of power consumption and high cost created by the increasing traffic. Researchers are now looking for an interconnect solution that supports an ever-larger number of servers at an ever-higher bit rate [3]. Compared with electrical interconnects, optical interconnects offer the key merits of a high data rate, low latency, and a compact size. They have been viewed as a promising way to overcome the bottleneck of traditional electrical links in short-reach data-intensive applications regarding data centers.
Most of today’s commercial short-reach (<300 m) optical interconnects employ GaAs-based vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs) emitting at 850 nm. VCSELs commonly apply a direct modulation scheme as a single-wavelength point-to-point photonic link. Recently, discrete multitone (DMT) modulation schemes have achieved 161 and 135 Gb/s transmission over 10 and 550 m multimode fiber (MMF), respectively [4]. This would impose a high price premium on VCSEL wavelength selection and complicate fiber coupling schemes for MMF. Moreover, it could significantly increase cost, footprint, and power consumption [5].
The introduction of wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) functionality in intra-data-center interconnects plays a key role in overcoming VCSEL-based limitations and achieving cost-effective operation and low power consumption. To process a large amount of intra-data-center traffic in terms of switch architecture level, the large-scale optical circuit architecture networking solutions have been proposed, adopting wavelength routing that relies upon laser- or filter-based wavelength tunability [6]. In the case of optical packet switches (OPSs), bufferless OPSs using the wavelength conversion to solve the output packet contentions offer power consumption reduction [7]. Similarly, the use of integrated optical transport network (OTN)/WDM switch architecture was cost-effective, with low power consumption compared to conventional OTN switch architectures [8]. For this reason, WDM-based switch architecture is very important for the enhanced performance of intra-data-center interconnects with reference to cost and power consumption.
Currently, photonic integration circuits (PICs) have been developed in a much more compact, efficient, and cost-effective way by integrating the required WDM functionality on a single chip. The PICs can significantly reduce the device sizes and simplify the packaging procedures for intra-data-center applications. In regards to this, silicon photonics is seen as one of the most promising techniques due to its extra benefits of utilization of the existing complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) infrastructures and integration with microelectronics [9,10,11]. There are hybrid silicon PICs and monolithic silicon devices that enhance the characteristics considered to be key requirements for intra-data-center applications. Various hybrid PICs have been developed to demonstrate coherent transmitters and receivers. For example, silica or silicon planar photonic circuits have been copackaged with LiNbO3 [12] or InP modulators [13] for transmitters or assembled with Ge photodetectors [14,15,16] for receivers. Although hybrid PICs drive toward realizing low power consumption and direct modulation, the expensive packaging cost and device sizes in terms of CMOS compatibility still remain the major concerns [5]. Monolithic silicon PICs are commonly used in configurations of high-port-count N-by-N switch fabrics using Mach–Zehnder (MZ) interferometers and ring resonators as switch elements, leading to higher-order modulation formats for high data rate [3,17]. These modulators are still a concern as MZ type modulators require longer modulation length and larger driving voltage for modulation efficiency. While ring-resonator-type modulators reduce the modulation length, they increase the sensitivity to temperature, which could significantly increase cost, footprint, and power consumption with respect to modulator performance [18]. The electro-absorption modulator (EAM) is a good candidate as a switch element for optical modulation, providing a small device footprint, high speed, low driving voltages, and broad optical bandwidth operation. However, many EAMs based on silicon depend on SiGe multiple quantum wells (MQW) or III-V hybrid structure or graphene for variation of absorption coefficient (α;). They suffer from complex designs and fabrications [19,20]. In the context of laser integration into monolithic silicon PICs systems, a number of options are available for the choice of an adequate light source. One possibility is to use a single broadband light source in place of laser arrays for the feasibility of cost-effective and low-power-consumption switch fabrics in intra-data-center interconnects.
In this study, we propose a monolithic silicon optical transmitter consisting of an arrayed-waveguide grating and eight EAMs for switch fabrics in intra-data-center interconnects. Unlike the reported WDM devices with the arrayed-waveguide gratings [21], Mach–Zehnder interferometers [22], ring resonators [23], directional couplers [24], or an array of single-wavelength lasers [25], we incorporated homogeneous EAMs based on free-carrier plasma dispersion effect (FCPD) and a 1 × 8 arrayed-waveguide grating using star couplers. An arrayed-waveguide grating (AWG) of eight channels with 1550 nm center wavelength (λc) and 1.6 nm channel spacing (Δλ) was designed. The device also employed a compact electro-absorption modulator utilizing a Schottky diode. Optical modulation using a Schottky diode was achieved by the intensity change of guiding light due to the free-carrier absorption in the semiconductor to change its absorption coefficient, but not conventional interference effects. Each channel output of the fabricated device on a 5.41 × 2.84 mm2 footprint showed −47 dBm with over 3 dB modulation depth at 6 V peak-to-peak, experimentally. It showed the feasibility of achieving cost-effectiveness and small footprint using homogeneous silicon EAMs and an AWG with a single broadband light source with regards to more CMOS compatibility. Section 2 describes the device design and fabrication. The characteristics of the fabricated silicon transmitter chip are presented in Section 3.

2. Device Design and Fabrication

2.1. Silicon Waveguide and Electro-Absorption Modulator Using a Schottky Diode

First, the silicon rib waveguides were designed on the 250 nm silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform as shown in Figure 1a. The rib waveguide dimensions were a height of 250 nm, an etch depth of 150 nm, and a width of 4.8 μm for low-loss waveguiding in the C-band. We added a SiON layer to passivate the device and reduce coupling loss. For comparison between waveguides with and without the SiON insertion layer, the optical power from each waveguide was measured at the length of the waveguides from 5 to 25 mm by a cut-back method as shown in Figure 1b. Propagation loss was 0.92 and 0.9 dB/cm for the waveguides with and without the SiON insertion layer, respectively. However, the coupling loss was 16.2 dB/cm for the waveguide with the SiON insertion layer and 18.1 dB/cm that without. The waveguide with the SiON insertion layer had a coupling loss of 1.9 dB, which was lower than that without the SiON insertion layer. The incident light was mostly confined to the SiON insertion layer having a higher refractive index than the refractive index of the SiO2 cladding. As a result, a larger percentage of the main optical field is concentrated in the core, reducing the coupling loss [26,27,28].
Based on the measured silicon waveguide characteristics, we designed the silicon EAM without utilizing conventional interference effects, which are used in Mach–Zehnder and ring resonator optical structures to reduce the device size. The proposed EAM had lateral metal–semiconductor (MS) junctions to maximize the free-carrier injection and depletion by a Schottky contact on the rib waveguide center. Optical modulation was achieved by the change in intensity of guiding light due to free-carrier absorption in the semiconductor to change its absorption coefficient. The change of absorption coefficient due to the changes in the electron and hole concentration was calculated using the following Equation (1) [29]:
Δαe = 8.5 × 10−18 × ΔNe, Δαh = 6 × 10−18 × ΔNh
where Δαe and Δαh are the changes in absorption coefficients resulting from changes in the free-electron and free-hole carrier concentrations (ΔN), respectively. Based on Equation (1), the n+–n–n+ junction was more efficient for modulation than the p+–p–p+ junction. The silicon EAM was designed on a rib waveguide of 4.8 μm width embedded with a lateral n+–n–n+ junction as shown in Figure 2c. The sides were heavily doped with 1019 cm−3 phosphorus to enhance the optical absorption change in the center. The center of the rib waveguide was lightly doped with 1015 cm−3 phosphorus. This design allowed a large overlap between the optical mode and carrier density variations in the center of the waveguide. The optical modulation depth was estimated by the following Equation (2):
Modulation depth [dB] = 10 log (T0/(T0 · exp(Δαe · L))
where L is the modulation length and T0 is the initial propagated optical intensity. According to Equation (2), the intensity modulation of the propagating light depends on the modulation length (L) and optical absorption coefficient change (Δαe) due to the change in the free electron concentration. For a 500 μm modulation length with 3 Vpp of driving voltage, the simulation results demonstrated a 3.3 dB modulation depth, which meets the requirement for short-reach optical interconnects in the C-band [30]. In addition, the EAM employed a traveling-wave-type electrode running on the modulation length—known as coplanar waveguide (CPW) electrode—as shown in Figure 2b.

2.2. Silicon DWDM Transmitter for Switch Fabrics in Intra-Data-Center Interconnects

For use with a single incident light source operating in the C-band, we introduced a silicon 1 × 8 AWG using star couplers as shown in Figure 2a. An optical field (Ein) containing multiple wavelengths (λ1 ~ λn) was coupled into the input waveguide. In the input star coupler, the light beam became divergent and was coupled into the array of waveguides. Their length difference (ΔL) was such that their optical path length difference equaled an integral multiple of the center wavelength, ΔL = m·λc/neff. The fields in the individual arrayed-waveguides arrived at the input aperture of the output coupler with equal phases. In the output star coupler, the light beam interfered constructively and was focused at one single focal point of the focal line. The outgoing beam was shifted along the image plane. Each output waveguide was placed along this image plane for capturing a different wavelength in the spatially separated spectrum. The AWG footprint reduction allowed the integration of more components on a single chip. However, the fabrication tolerances could be a concern. To optimize footprint and fabrication tolerances, the design parameters were chosen as listed in Table 1 so as to fabricate the device with a smaller footprint. Particularly, we focused on AWG for dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM) with 1.6 nm narrow channel spacing widely used in short-reach optical interconnects. For the AWG with narrow channel spacing (Δλ < 1.6 nm), the spectral full width at half maximum (FWHM) is the important parameter compared to the crosstalk [31]. The waveguide separations (Di and Do) were set as variables from 4 to 10 μm for narrow FWHM and small crosstalk.
For the evaluation of the designed AWG, the characteristics of wavelength distribution were simulated with BeamPROP software, which is based upon beam propagation method (BPM) analysis. The crosstalks were approximately −24 dB for the designed AWGs. The FWHMs were 1, 0.75, 0.54, and 0.49 nm for the 4, 6, 8, and 10 μm waveguide separations, respectively. Although the FWHM reduced as the waveguide separation increased, the footprint of AWG increased almost linearly with the waveguide separation, as shown in Figure 3a.
For a suitable footprint and narrow FWHM of AWG, Di and Do were chosen as 8 μm. The footprint of the designed AWG was 5.41 × 2.84 mm2. As shown in Figure 3b, the AWG operates in the range of 1542 to 1556 nm with 1.6 nm channel spacing (Δλ), and it can be applied to a silicon transmitter for short-reach optical interconnects in the C-band. Finally, the Si transmitter was designed by inserting the proposed EAM into each output channel of the AWG.
The device was fabricated using a 250 nm silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer, which had 2-μm-thick buried oxide. During the monolithic fabrication using the CMOS process, the reduction of sidewall roughness was intensively studied for low-loss silicon waveguides. As a result, the trim etching technique with SiO2 hard mask was used in the RIE process [32]. For the ion implantation process, the SiO2 layer with a thickness of 600 nm was deposited on the SOI wafer. The SiO2 hard mask was patterned on the top silicon layer through a photolithographic process, and phosphorus ions were implanted to both sides of the ribs to achieve a doping concentration of 1019 cm−3. Then, the 250 nm top silicon layer was etched by RIE using SF6 and CF4 gases to form the silicon waveguide and AWG. Both sides of the rib were etched to 150 nm at a rate of 1 μm/min using RIE with the SiO2 mask. The SiON layer was deposited to passivate the device and reduce coupling loss as mentioned in Section 2.1. SiO2 was deposited on the entire surface of the device as a top cladding. Holes were formed on the top silicon layer for the metal contacts, and aluminum (Al) electrodes with thicknesses of 200 nm were formed. Annealing was performed at 700 °C to form an ohmic contact. Finally, a gold (Au) electrode with a thickness of 200 nm was formed for the n-type Schottky contact. The fabricated eight-channel silicon optical transmitter was as shown in Figure 4a. All the main parts of the fabricated optical transmitter were made of silicon monolithically, as compared to the many reported works [33].

3. Experimental Results

3.1. Characteristics of a Silicon EAM Using a Schottky Diode

To examine the intensity modulation of the silicon EAM with a modulation length of 500 μm as a function of wavelength, we used an experimental setup as shown in Figure 5.
First, continuous-wave (CW) light from an optical vector analyzer (OVA) was coupled into the device using a 5-μm-diameter lensed fiber, while the OVA (Luna Technology OVA5000) was controlled by a polarization controller (PC).
We measured insertion losses and modulation depths based on the bias using an OVA wavelength ranging from 1542 to 1558 nm as shown in Figure 6a. The insertion loss of an EAM with a 500 μm modulation length was −33 ± 1.5 dB at 0 V. The fluctuation of insertion loss as a function of wavelength was ±1.5 dB, which is sufficient for short-reach optical interconnects [34]. In addition, the modulation depth was measured as 4.2 dB for a 500 μm modulation length with 6 Vpp driving voltage in the wavelength range of 1542 to 1558 nm. The value of the modulation depth of the EAM was consistent in the operating wavelength range. Since the free carriers associated with the absorption coefficient were fully injected into the center of the waveguide at 6 V, the modulation depth reached its saturation. As mentioned in Section 2.1, the measured modulation depth of over 3 dB is sufficient for use as optical interconnects in the C-band. The experimental RF electrode output S21 (dB) showed a 6 dB electrical bandwidth of ~4 GHz as shown in Figure 6b. The traveling-wave-type electrodes enabled the modulator to operate to up to 4 GHz. The RF 6.4 dB bandwidth is close to the EO response 3 dB bandwidth without velocity mismatch and other nonideal RF effects (such as reflection or multimodal behavior) [35].

3.2. Characteristics of a Silicon Transmitter with Eight EAMs

To evaluate the optical spectrums of the 1 × 8 silicon transmitter using the EAMs with a 500 μm modulation length, a superluminescent diode (SLD, Thorlabs S5FC1005S-A2) light source (1500–1600 nm wavelengths) and an optical spectrum analyzer (Ando AQ6319) were used as shown in Figure 7. First, we measured the optical spectrums as shown in Figure 8 below.
The measured FWHM was 0.54 nm, which is in good agreement with the simulated result. The maximum optical power from each channel was approximately −47 dBm using a 2.5 mW SLD as a light source. The total insertion loss was approximately −51 dB, including the coupling loss and the transmitter loss. The center wavelength (λc) was 1552.8 nm, and channel spacing (Δλ) in the wavelength was 1.33 nm. The differences in the center wavelength and the channel spacing were 2.8 and 0.27 nm, respectively, compared to the simulated results in Figure 2b. The crosstalk of the transmitter was measured as −12 dB; however, it depends on the quality of the fabrication process, device size, channel spacing, number of channels, etc. Although the crosstalk increase is mainly due to the phase errors caused by waveguide fabrication imperfections [36,37], measured crosstalk of −12 dB is acceptable for optical interconnects [31].
The current–voltage (I–V) characteristic of the Schottky junction at each EAM was measured for the bias voltage from −6 to 6 V as shown in Figure 9a. In the reverse bias, a very small leakage current of 10−7 A or less was observed. According to Equations (1) and (2), a small leakage current has no significant effect on the change of the absorption coefficient in the rib center. In the forward bias, an average current of 20 mA flows at 6 V. A large current can enhance the modulation depth as a result of the optical modulation mechanism of the free-carrier plasma dispersion effect in silicon [20,29]. The results are consistent with the Schottky I–V characteristics due to the injection and depletion of free carriers through the change of bias. The measured modulation depths of eight channels were from 3.22 to 4 dB as shown in Figure 9b. These results showed modulation depth characteristics of the single EAM similar to those mentioned in Section 3.1. Despite the small variation in modulation depth of each channel due to the fabrication tolerances, the 1 × 8 channel transmitter based on silicon EAM shows the possibility of operation for switch fabrics in intra-data-center interconnects in terms of cost-effectiveness and small footprint. Our device similarly demonstrated 6 Vpp driving voltage and small footprint as compared with an N-by-N DWDM transmitter with MZ modulators as switch elements with regards to more CMOS compatibility [38].

4. Conclusions

In this study, we proposed an eight-channel silicon DWDM transmitter on a 5.41 × 2.84 mm2 footprint with a single SLD as a light source. The device homogeneously integrated a 1 × 8 silicon AWG using a 32-waveguide array, two star-couplers, and eight silicon EAMs based on free-carrier injection and depletion by Schottky diodes. We successfully achieved the optical intensity modulation of the device through free-carrier absorption change, rather than through conventional interference effects. Therefore, it did not require a Mach–Zehnder-type structure, which uses a large footprint to obtain modulated signals. The AWG separates eight DWDM wavelengths from an output of SLD with 0.54 nm of FWHM and 1.33 nm of channel spacing at 1552.8 nm of center wavelength. Each 500-μm-long EAM demonstrated over 3 dB modulation depth at 6 Vpp from 1542 to 1558 nm. This study proposed and demonstrated the use of a DWDM transmitter for switch fabrics in the intra-data-center interconnects using a homogeneous integration of Si AWG and Si EAMs. The proposed device can be a promising alternative for DWDM in short-reach optical interconnects over heterogeneous/hybrid integration with regards to more CMOS compatibility with a single light source. It is expected to contribute to switch fabrics in intra-data-center interconnects in terms of cost-effectiveness and small footprint.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.J. and D.H.L.; methodology, U.J.; software, D.H.L.; validation, K.L., D.H.L. and J.H.P.; formal analysis, U.J.; investigation, U.J. and D.H.L.; resources, K.L.; data curation, U.J. and D.H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, U.J.; writing—review and editing, J.H.P.; visualization, K.L.; supervision, J.H.P.; project administration, J.H.P.; funding acquisition, J.H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program (IITP-2019-2015-0-00385) supervised by the IITP (Institute for Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation), and the Seoul R&BD Program (WR080951).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Cisco. Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2016–2021. 2017. Available online: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/complete-white-paper-c11-481360.html (accessed on 1 November 2020).
  2. Cisco. Global Cloud Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2015–2020. 2016. Available online: https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/global-cloud-index-gci/white-paper-c11-738085.pdf (accessed on 1 November 2020).
  3. Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Silicon and hybrid silicon photonic devices for intra-datacenter applications: State of the art and perspectives. Photonics Res. 2015, 3, B10–B27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kottke, C.; Caspar, C.; Jungnickel, V.; Freund, R.; Agustin, M.; Ledentsov, N.N. High Speed 160 Gb/s DMT VCSEL Transmission Using Pre-equalization. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 19–23 March 2017; p. W4I.7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dong, P.; Chen, Y.-K.; Duan, G.-H.; Neilson, D.T. Silicon photonic devices and integrated circuits. Nanophotonics 2014, 3, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mori, Y.; Sato, K.-I. Large-Scale Optical Circuit Switch Architecture for Intra-Datacenter Networking. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 11–15 March 2018; p. Th3H.3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Eramo, V. Comparison in Power Consumption of Synchronous and Asynchronous Optical Packet Switches. J. Light. Technol. 2010, 28, 847–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eramo, V.; Listanti, M.; Sabella, R.; Testa, F. Integrated OTN/WDM Switching Architecture Equipped with the Minimum Number of OTN Switches. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2014, 6, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jalali, B. Silicon photonics. Optoelectron. High-Power Laser Appl. 1997, 3290, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jahani, S.; Kim, S.; Atkinson, J.; Wirth, J.C.; Kalhor, F.; Al Noman, A.; Newman, W.D.; Shekhar, P.; Han, K.; Van, V.; et al. Controlling evanescent waves using silicon photonic all-dielectric metamaterials for dense integration. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stojanovic, V.; Ram, R.J.; Popović, M.; Lin, S.; Moazeni, S.; Wade, M.; Sun, C.; Alloatti, L.; Atabaki, A.; Pavanello, F.; et al. Monolithic silicon-photonic platforms in state-of-the-art CMOS SOI processes. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 13106–13121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Yamazaki, H.; Yamada, T.; Suzuki, K.; Goh, T.; Kaneko, A.; Sano, A.; Yamada, E.; Miyamoto, Y. Integrated 100-Gb/s PDM-QPSK modulator using a hybrid assembly technique with silica-based PLCs and LiNbO3 phase modulators. In Proceedings of the 34th European Conference on Optical Communication, Brussels, Belgium, 21–25 September 2008; pp. 1642–1662. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yamada, E.; Kanazawa, S.; Ohki, A.; Watanabe, K.; Nasu, Y.; Kikuchi, N.; Shibata, Y.; Iga, R.; Ishii, H. 112-Gb/s InP DP-QPSK Modulator Integrated with a Silica-PLC Polarization Multiplexing Circuit. In Proceedings of the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 4–8 March 2012; p. PDP5A-9. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kurata, Y.; Nasu, Y.; Tamura, M.; Kasahara, R.; Aozasa, S.; Mizuno, T.; Yokoyama, H.; Tsunashima, S.; Muramoto, Y.; Tsunashiama, S. Silica-Based PLC with Heterogeneously-Integrated PDs for One-Chip DP-QPSK Receiver. Eur. Conf. Exhib. Opti. Comm. 2012, 20, B264–B269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, J.; Kroh, M.; Theurer, A.; Zawadzki, C.; Schmidt, D.; Ludwig, R.; Lauermann, M.; Zhang, Z.; Beling, A.; Matiss, A.; et al. Dual-quadrature coherent receiver for 100G Ethernet applications based on polymer planar lightwave circuit. Opt. Express 2011, 19, B166–B172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nasu, Y.; Mizuno, T.; Kasahara, R.; Saida, T. Temperature insensitive and ultra wideband silica-based dual polarization optical hybrid for coherent receiver with highly symmetrical interferometer design. Opt. Express 2011, 19, B112–B118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiong, C.; Gill, D.M.; Proesel, J.E.; Orcutt, J.S.; Haensch, W.; Green, W.M.J. Monolithic 56 Gb/s silicon photonic pulse-amplitude modulation transmitter. Optica 2016, 3, 1060–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marris-Morini, D.; Rasigade, G.; Vivien, L.; Thomson, D.J.; Gardes, F.Y.; Reed, G.T.; Fedeli, J.-M.; Crozat, P.; Cassan, E. Carrier depletion based silicon optical modulators. Photonics Eur. 2010, 7719, 771903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ning, F.; Shirong, L.; Dazeng, F.; Xin, W.; Po, D.; Hong, L.; Cheng, K.; Wei, Q.; Yong, L.; Joan, F.; et al. Design and fabrication of 3μm silicon-on-insulator waveguide integrated Ge electroabsorption modulator. Optics Express. 2011, 19, 8715–8720. [Google Scholar]
  20. Elshaari, A.W.; Preble, S.F. 10 Gb/s broadband silicon electro-optic absorption modulator. Opt. Commun. 2010, 283, 2829–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pan, P.; An, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Qi, Y.; Han, Q.; Hu, X. Compact 4-channel AWGs for CWDM and LAN WDM in data center monolithic applications. Opt. Laser Technol. 2015, 75, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, H.; Shi, Y. Flat-Top CWDM (De)Multiplexer Based on MZI With Bent Directional Couplers. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2017, 30, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, C.-H.; Seyedi, M.A.; Fiorentino, M.; Livshits, D.; Gubenko, A.; Mikhrin, S.; Mikhrin, V.; Beausoleil, R.G. A comb laser-driven DWDM silicon photonic transmitter based on microring modulators. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 21541–21548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gupta, R.K.; Chandran, S.; Krishna, B. Integrated silicon photonics directional couplers for WDM applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 3rd International Conference on Microwave and Photonics (ICMAP), Dhanbad, India, 9–11 February 2018; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kanakis, G.; Iliadis, N.; Soenen, W.; Moeneclaey, B.; Argyris, N.; Kalavrouziotis, D.; Spiga, S.; Bakopoulos, P.; Avramopoulos, H. High-Speed VCSEL-Based Transceiver for 200 GbE Short-Reach Intra-Datacenter Optical Interconnects. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hiraki, T.; Aihara, T.; Nishi, H.; Tsuchizawa, T. Deuterated SiN/SiON Waveguides on Si Platform and Their Application to C-Band WDM Filters. IEEE Photonics J. 2017, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fang, Q.; Song, J.F.; Tao, S.H.; Yu, M.B.; Lo, G.Q.; Kwong, D.L. Low loss (~6.45 dB/cm) sub-micron polycrystalline silicon waveguide integrated with efficient SiON waveguide coupler. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 6425–6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vivien, L.; Grillot, F.; Cassan, E.; Pascal, D.; Lardenois, S.; Lupu, A.; Laval, S.; Heitzmann, M.; Fedeli, J.-M. Comparison between strip and rib SOI microwaveguides for intra-chip light distribution. Opt. Mater. 2005, 27, 756–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Soref, R.; Bennett, B. Electrooptical effects in silicon. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1987, 23, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gosciniak, J.; Tan, D.T.H. Theoretical investigation of graphene-based photonic modulators. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, srep01897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gatkine, P.; Veilleux, S.; Hu, Y.; Bland-Hawthorn, J.; Dagenais, M. Arrayed waveguide grating spectrometers for astronomical applications: New results. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 17918–17935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lee, D.H.; Choo, S.J.; Jung, U.; Lee, K.W.; Kim, K.W.; Park, J.H. Low-loss silicon waveguides with sidewall roughness reduction using a SiO2 hard mask and fluorine-based dry etching. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2014, 25, 15003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dong, P.; Liu, X.; Chandrasekhar, S.; Buhl, L.L.; Aroca, R.; Chen, Y.-K. Monolithic Silicon Photonic Integrated Circuits for Compact 100 +Gb/s Coherent Optical Receivers and Transmitters. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2014, 20, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zepeng, P.; Songnian, F.; Luluzi, L.; Dongyu, L.; Weijie, C.; Deming, L.; Mingming, Z. On-chip cyclic-AWG-based 12 × 12 silicon wavelength routing switches with minimized port-to-port insertion loss fluctuation. Photonics Res. 2018, 6, 380–384. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ding, R.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q.; Yang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Padmaraju, K.; Lim, A.E.-J.; Lo, G.-Q.; Bergman, K.; Baehr-Jones, T.; et al. Design and characterization of a 30-GHz bandwidth low-power silicon traveling-wave modulator. Opt. Commun. 2014, 321, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dragone, C. Crosstalk caused by fabrication errors in a generalized Mach-Zehnder interferometer. IEEE Electron. Lett. 1997, 33, 1326–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Takada, K.; Yamada, H.; Inoue, Y. Origin of channel crosstalk in 100 GHz-spaced silica-based arrayed-waveguide grating multiplexer. Electron. Lett. 1995, 31, 1176–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, L.; Doerr, C.R.; Dong, P.; Chen, Y.-K. Monolithic silicon chip with 10 modulator channels at 25 Gbps and 100-GHz spacing. Opt. Express 2011, 19, B946–B951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The optical waveguide cross-section; (b) the insertion losses of two waveguides (square: SiO2/SiON/Si/SiO2 waveguide; circle: SiO2/Si/SiO2 waveguide).
Figure 1. (a) The optical waveguide cross-section; (b) the insertion losses of two waveguides (square: SiO2/SiON/Si/SiO2 waveguide; circle: SiO2/Si/SiO2 waveguide).
Micromachines 11 00991 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic view of 1 × 8 channel silicon transmitter with electro-absorption modulators (EAMs); (b) top view of the silicon EAM with coplanar waveguide (CPW); (c) cross-section view of the EAM.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic view of 1 × 8 channel silicon transmitter with electro-absorption modulators (EAMs); (b) top view of the silicon EAM with coplanar waveguide (CPW); (c) cross-section view of the EAM.
Micromachines 11 00991 g002
Figure 3. Simulated optical spectrums of AWG: (a) trade-off between FWHM and footprint of designed AWGs; (b) transmission spectrum for optimized waveguide separation (Di, Do) of 8 μm.
Figure 3. Simulated optical spectrums of AWG: (a) trade-off between FWHM and footprint of designed AWGs; (b) transmission spectrum for optimized waveguide separation (Di, Do) of 8 μm.
Micromachines 11 00991 g003
Figure 4. Microscope images of fabricated devices: (a) 1 × 8 channel silicon transmitter with EAMs; (b) a silicon EAM with a modulation length of 500 μm.
Figure 4. Microscope images of fabricated devices: (a) 1 × 8 channel silicon transmitter with EAMs; (b) a silicon EAM with a modulation length of 500 μm.
Micromachines 11 00991 g004
Figure 5. Schematic view of the experimental setup employed to characterize the Si EAM.
Figure 5. Schematic view of the experimental setup employed to characterize the Si EAM.
Micromachines 11 00991 g005
Figure 6. Experimental characteristics of a silicon EAM: (a) insertion losses and modulation depths of the EAM; (b) electrical response.
Figure 6. Experimental characteristics of a silicon EAM: (a) insertion losses and modulation depths of the EAM; (b) electrical response.
Micromachines 11 00991 g006
Figure 7. Schematic view of the experimental setup employed to characterize the Si transmitter.
Figure 7. Schematic view of the experimental setup employed to characterize the Si transmitter.
Micromachines 11 00991 g007
Figure 8. The experimental optical spectra of the silicon transmitter.
Figure 8. The experimental optical spectra of the silicon transmitter.
Micromachines 11 00991 g008
Figure 9. The experimental correlation of current–voltage (I–V) characteristics and modulation depths: (a) I–V characteristics; (b) modulation depths of the silicon transmitter.
Figure 9. The experimental correlation of current–voltage (I–V) characteristics and modulation depths: (a) I–V characteristics; (b) modulation depths of the silicon transmitter.
Micromachines 11 00991 g009
Table 1. The designed parameters and values for silicon arrayed-waveguide grating (AWG).
Table 1. The designed parameters and values for silicon arrayed-waveguide grating (AWG).
ParameterDescriptionValue
wwidth of rib waveguide 4.8 μm
λccenter wavelength1.55 μm
Δλchannel spacing (in wavelength)1.6 nm
Mnumber of waveguides in array32
Nchnumber of output channels8
Raw1radius of ith innermost waveguide bend in array2500 μm
Diwaveguide separation at input circle4, 6, 8, 10 μm
Dowaveguide separation at output circle4, 6, 8, 10 μm
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeong, U.; Lee, D.H.; Lee, K.; Park, J.H. Monolithic 1 × 8 DWDM Silicon Optical Transmitter Using an Arrayed-Waveguide Grating and Electro-Absorption Modulators for Switch Fabrics in Intra-Data-Center Interconnects. Micromachines 2020, 11, 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11110991

AMA Style

Jeong U, Lee DH, Lee K, Park JH. Monolithic 1 × 8 DWDM Silicon Optical Transmitter Using an Arrayed-Waveguide Grating and Electro-Absorption Modulators for Switch Fabrics in Intra-Data-Center Interconnects. Micromachines. 2020; 11(11):991. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11110991

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeong, Uiseok, Dong Ho Lee, Kyungwoon Lee, and Jung Ho Park. 2020. "Monolithic 1 × 8 DWDM Silicon Optical Transmitter Using an Arrayed-Waveguide Grating and Electro-Absorption Modulators for Switch Fabrics in Intra-Data-Center Interconnects" Micromachines 11, no. 11: 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11110991

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop