Next Article in Journal
Fibroblast Growth Factor-23—A Potential Uremic Toxin
Next Article in Special Issue
Exon Shuffling and Origin of Scorpion Venom Biodiversity
Previous Article in Journal
Yeast Reporter Assay to Identify Cellular Components of Ricin Toxin A Chain Trafficking
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Tricky Trait: Applying the Fruits of the “Function Debate” in the Philosophy of Biology to the “Venom Debate” in the Science of Toxinology

Evolution of the Cytolytic Pore-Forming Proteins (Actinoporins) in Sea Anemones

Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Rd, Columbus, OH 43212, USA
Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., 373 Woodward Hall, Charlotte, NC 282233, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ronald A. Jenner
Toxins 2016, 8(12), 368;
Received: 14 September 2016 / Revised: 28 October 2016 / Accepted: 23 November 2016 / Published: 8 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Collection Evolution of Venom Systems)
Sea anemones (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, and Actiniaria) use toxic peptides to incapacitate and immobilize prey and to deter potential predators. Their toxin arsenal is complex, targeting a variety of functionally important protein complexes and macromolecules involved in cellular homeostasis. Among these, actinoporins are one of the better characterized toxins; these venom proteins form a pore in cellular membranes containing sphingomyelin. We used a combined bioinformatic and phylogenetic approach to investigate how actinoporins have evolved across three superfamilies of sea anemones (Actinioidea, Metridioidea, and Actinostoloidea). Our analysis identified 90 candidate actinoporins across 20 species. We also found clusters of six actinoporin-like genes in five species of sea anemone (Nematostella vectensis, Stomphia coccinea, Epiactis japonica, Heteractis crispa, and Diadumene leucolena); these actinoporin-like sequences resembled actinoporins but have a higher sequence similarity with toxins from fungi, cone snails, and Hydra. Comparative analysis of the candidate actinoporins highlighted variable and conserved regions within actinoporins that may pertain to functional variation. Although multiple residues are involved in initiating sphingomyelin recognition and membrane binding, there is a high rate of replacement for a specific tryptophan with leucine (W112L) and other hydrophobic residues. Residues thought to be involved with oligomerization were variable, while those forming the phosphocholine (POC) binding site and the N-terminal region involved with cell membrane penetration were highly conserved. View Full-Text
Keywords: Cnidaria; toxin; target recognition; cytolysins Cnidaria; toxin; target recognition; cytolysins
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Macrander, J.; Daly, M. Evolution of the Cytolytic Pore-Forming Proteins (Actinoporins) in Sea Anemones. Toxins 2016, 8, 368.

AMA Style

Macrander J, Daly M. Evolution of the Cytolytic Pore-Forming Proteins (Actinoporins) in Sea Anemones. Toxins. 2016; 8(12):368.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Macrander, Jason, and Marymegan Daly. 2016. "Evolution of the Cytolytic Pore-Forming Proteins (Actinoporins) in Sea Anemones" Toxins 8, no. 12: 368.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop