Next Article in Journal
Gender Differences in Post-Stroke Spasticity Patients Treated with OnabotulinumtoxinA: Insights from the BOTOX Economic Spasticity Trial (BEST)
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond Improvement of Motor Symptoms: Central Effects of Botulinum Toxin on Anxiety and Depression in Focal Dystonia, Hemifacial Spasm, and Blepharospasm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Cardioprotective Potential of Marine Venom and Toxins

by
Virginia Heaven Mariboto Siagian
1 and
Rina Fajri Nuwarda
2,*
1
Faculty of Pharmacy, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis and Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Padjadjaran University, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2026, 18(2), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins18020063
Submission received: 21 November 2025 / Revised: 14 January 2026 / Accepted: 17 January 2026 / Published: 26 January 2026

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be the primary cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, underscoring the urgent need for novel therapeutic alternatives. In recent years, marine ecosystems have garnered increasing attention as a promising source of bioactive compounds with unique structural and pharmacological properties. Marine-derived toxins and venoms, including tetrodotoxin, ω-conotoxins, anthopleurins, palytoxin, brevetoxin, aplysiatoxin, and asterosaponins, exert cardioprotective effects through diverse mechanisms such as modulation of ion channels, inhibition of sympathetic overactivity, antioxidative actions, and enhancement of myocardial contractility. These properties make them potential candidates for addressing various CVD manifestations, including arrhythmia, hypertension, ischemia–reperfusion injury, and heart failure. However, despite their therapeutic promise, the clinical application of these marine compounds remains limited due to poor tissue selectivity, narrow therapeutic indices, proinflammatory activity, and limited metabolic stability. Structural modifications, advanced drug delivery platforms, and in vivo validation studies are crucial for overcoming these challenges. This review highlights the pharmacological actions, molecular targets, and cardiovascular relevance of selected marine toxins and venoms while also addressing key translational barriers. Advances in biotechnology and peptide engineering are enabling the safer and more targeted use of these compounds. Collectively, marine-derived toxins and venoms represent a largely untapped but highly promising frontier in cardiovascular drug discovery. Strategic research focused on elucidating mechanisms, optimizing delivery, and translating clinical applications will be critical to unlocking their full therapeutic potential.
Key Contribution: This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of marine-derived toxins and venoms as emerging cardioprotective agents by highlighting their mechanisms of action, therapeutic relevance, and existing translational limitations. It also outlines current advancements that may facilitate their future clinical application.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2019, it accounted for 17.9 million deaths annually, representing 32% of all deaths worldwide. CVD encompasses a wide range of heart and blood vessel problems, such as coronary heart disease, heart attack, arrhythmia, heart failure, and several other conditions [1]. Four out of five deaths caused by CVD are related to heart attack and stroke, and one third of these deaths occur early in individuals under the age of 70 [2]. Global analyses likewise show a rising toll of CVD in younger adults between 1990 and 2019. The annual number of CVD deaths among people aged 15–49 increased from ~0.99 to 1.24 million, even as age-specific death rates declined [3]. In other words, heart attacks and strokes increasingly affect young and middle-aged people. This trend implies a significant loss of productive life-years and economic impact, underscoring the need for early interventions targeting risk factors and targeted prevention in younger populations.
Current CVD management relies on conventional therapies, including beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, antiplatelet agents, and reperfusion interventions. Although these approaches have significantly reduced mortality, their effectiveness is often limited by issues such as drug resistance, adverse effects, and incomplete cardioprotection, particularly in cases of myocardial infarction or heart failure [4,5]. Recognizing these limitations, researchers have turned to alternative sources for new therapeutic agents. The marine environment, which covers more than 70% of the Earth’s surface, harbors extraordinary biodiversity and is increasingly recognized as a promising source of bioactive compounds with diverse structures. Marine organisms from high-biodiversity regions are well known to yield novel bioactive compounds. Besides the Coral Triangle (Indonesia, Philippines, PNG), other marine-rich areas contribute significantly [6]. For instance, extensive exploration of the South China Sea (China) has produced hundreds of new marine metabolites with pharmacological activity. Furthermore, Japanese and Korean coastal waters harbor unique marine species; Japan alone has yielded many extraordinary natural products (e.g., palytoxin, halichondrin) with potent bioactivities. Therefore, countries such as China, Japan, and South Korea with extensive coastlines and diverse marine ecosystems are also important hotspots for marine drug discovery [7].
Marine-derived compounds often exhibit complex and unique molecular structures, characterized by high stereochemical complexity and the presence of rare functional groups such as halogenated indoles, guanidinium groups, and cyclic imines. These features enable selective and high-affinity interactions with molecular targets, such as ion channels, receptors, and enzymes [8]. Based on their chemical scaffolds, the marine cardiotoxins discussed in this review can be categorized into four main structural classes: cyclic guanidines, polyketides, peptides and saponins, as illustrated in Figure 1.
For instance, ω-conotoxin, a peptide from Conus magus, specifically blocks N-type calcium channels and has been approved as a drug. This compound has even been commercialized as the ziconotide drug, which is 100–1000 times more potent than morphine as an analgesic [9]. Similarly, trabectedin, derived from the tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata, targets DNA minor grooves and demonstrates antitumor activity [10]. Marine peptides, such as those isolated from Holothuroidea (sea cucumbers), have demonstrated angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition activity, which may contribute to their antihypertensive effects. These discoveries underscore the therapeutic potential of marine toxins and venoms, not only in oncology and neurology, but also in cardiovascular medicine [11].
Although toxins and venoms from marine organisms are frequently associated with adverse effects, such as neurotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, or cytotoxicity, these properties often arise from their high specificity and potency in targeting critical physiological systems, including ion channels, enzymes, and receptors [12]. However, recent research has shifted the perspective on these bioactive molecules, recognizing their therapeutic potential in the development of new drugs. Several marine-derived toxins have shown promise in preclinical and clinical studies for diverse medical applications. Conantokin-G has demonstrated anticonvulsant effects by acting as an NMDA receptor antagonist, and micropeptins from cyanobacteria have shown DPP-IV inhibition relevant to diabetes management [13,14].
In contrast to previous reviews that broadly categorize marine natural products, this work specifically provides a critical analysis of the molecular mechanisms, particularly ion channel modulation, underlying the cardioprotective effects of marine toxins. Furthermore, we integrate recent data connecting their mechanisms of activity with their structural chemistry and highlight the translational gap between preclinical success and clinical application, offering a novel perspective on overcoming stability and toxicity issues.

2. Methods

A literature search was conducted using PubMed databases to identify studies published between 2015 and 2025. The search employed keywords such as “marine toxins,” “venoms,” “cardioprotective,” and “marine pharmacology.” Inclusion criteria were limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English that reported original data on the cardiovascular effects of marine-derived compounds. Studies lacking full-text availability or those focusing solely on non-cardiovascular bioactivities were excluded. This review prioritizes studies that provide mechanistic insights into the cardioprotective potential of these compounds.

3. Marine Toxins and Venoms

Biochemically, marine toxins and venoms are distinct entities. Toxins are typically accumulated metabolites (often dietary) that enter the human body through the consumption of contaminated seafood or environmental exposure. In contrast, venoms are complex mixtures of bioactive compounds that are actively delivered into prey or predators via specialized apparatuses such as stingers, fangs, or spines. Despite these delivery differences, both groups possess potent biological activities targeting the nervous and cardiovascular systems. Based on their physicochemical properties, these compounds are broadly categorized into hydrophilic (water-soluble), lipophilic (fat-soluble), and amphipathic classes. This polarity dictates their bioavailability, distribution, and mechanism of action within the host. Table 1 summarizes the biochemical classification of these major marine compounds alongside their lethal toxicity profiles (LD50).
An analysis of the toxicological data presented in Table 1 reveals a significant disparity in potency across different biochemical classes. Compounds targeting voltage-gated ion channels, such as CTX and TTX, exhibit extreme lethality with LD50 values in the microgram range (<1 µg/kg). This high potency is attributed to their high-affinity binding to critical ion channels (e.g., NaV1.5) where even picomolar concentrations can disrupt electrochemical gradients essential for cardiac and neuronal function. In comparison, amino acid derivatives like DA demonstrate relatively lower acute toxicity (LD50 in the milligram range), suggesting a different threshold for lethality. Furthermore, the presence of amphipathic compounds such as PLTX, which possesses dual solubility properties, allows for unique interactions with cell membranes, resulting in catastrophic disruption of ion homeostasis. This toxicological profile highlights a critical challenge in drug discovery: while high-potency toxins offer precise molecular targeting for cardiac conditions, their narrow therapeutic index requires rigorous optimization to balance efficacy against the risk of lethal toxicity.

4. Cardioprotective Mechanisms of Marine Toxin Compounds

Toxic compounds produced by marine organisms have therapeutic potential in various cardiovascular diseases. These compounds work through various mechanisms, including ion channel modulation, inhibition of calcium channels, inotropic support, reperfusion therapy, and anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. The toxic compounds produced by these marine organisms show various similarities and differences in chemical structure, mechanism of action, and potential cardioprotective effects. One of the main similarities is their interaction with ion channels, which play a crucial role in the electrophysiological function of the heart [43,44,45].
Additionally, these toxic compounds exhibit significant differences in type and chemical structure. Conotoxins and TTX are peptides and small alkaloids, respectively, while PLTXs from Palythoa spp. and asterosaponins from Acanthaster planci are large molecules with complex chemical structures. Palytoxin is one of the world’s most toxic non-protein compounds, acting on sodium/potassium ion pumps to cause extreme cell depolarization. Meanwhile, asterosaponins, which belong to the triterpenoid glycoside family, have a distinct mechanism with anti-inflammatory and lipid-regulating potential that may aid in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases more broadly [46]. Another difference lies in the distribution of these compounds in nature. Some species, such as Conus magus and Anthopleura spp., produce toxins that are injected into their prey through specialized structures, including proboscises and nematocysts [47]. In contrast, some other species, such as Takifugu rubripes and Astropecten latespinosus, contain toxins that accumulate in body tissues, including the liver and skin, which are harmful when consumed [48]. The links between marine toxic compounds and various heart diseases are discussed below.

4.1. Ion Channel Modulation

Ion channel modulation represents an effective therapeutic strategy in cardiovascular pharmacology as ion channels are essential in generating and regulating action potentials in cardiac myocytes. By influencing the flow of ions such as sodium, potassium, and calcium across the cardiac cell membrane, these channels directly control heart excitability and rhythm. Disruption to ion channel function can lead to electrophysiological abnormalities, manifesting as arrhythmia, a condition characterized by irregular heart rhythms due to impaired impulse formation or conduction in the myocardium. Common causes of arrhythmia include ion imbalances, structural cardiac changes, and adverse drug reactions. Several toxic compounds derived from marine organisms have demonstrated the ability to modulate ion channel activity by selectively inhibiting specific ion pathways, offering potential as novel antiarrhythmic agents [49]. For instance, TTX binds to voltage-gated sodium channels (NaV) and blocks the fast inward sodium current (INa) that underlies rapid depolarization (phase 0) of the cardiac action potential. This inhibition prevents abnormal excitability and stabilizes electrical conduction, making TTX a potential candidate for managing certain types of ventricular arrhythmias [50]. However, the modulation of sodium channels is not limited to pore blockade; distinct mechanisms that alter channel gating kinetics can also yield significant cardioprotective effects.
In this context, sea anemones (Cnidaria) produce a rich array of polypeptide toxins known as anemonotoxins, which are potent modulators of NaV. Among these, ATX II, isolated from the snakelocks anemone (Anemonia sulcata), is of relevance to cardiovascular physiology. Unlike TTX, which occludes the channel pore, ATX II acts by delaying the inactivation of cardiac sodium channels (NaV1.5). Mechanistically, ATX II binds to the channel’s extracellular loop, preventing the conformational change required for fast inactivation. This results in a persistent sodium current (INaL), leading to a prolonged action potential duration (APD) and an increase in intracellular calcium via the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. While this mechanism is often used to model Long QT Syndrome type 3 (LQT3) and arrhythmias in research, it also highlights a potential therapeutic pathway: controlled enhancement of cytosolic calcium can exert a positive inotropic effect [51]. Thus, modified derivatives of anemonotoxins are being investigated as potential leads for treating heart failure, provided that their pro-arrhythmic risks can be minimized.
These bioactive compounds have attracted interest in their potential use as cardioprotective agents due to their ability to modulate specific molecular targets. Various marine toxins and venoms with cardioprotective potential, their source species, toxic compounds, and classification as either toxins or venoms in the cardiovascular system are listed in Table 2.
In parallel, ω-conotoxin MVIIA, a peptide derived from Conus magus, selectively targets N-type calcium channels (CaV2.2), which are predominantly located on sympathetic nerve terminals. Inhibition of these channels reduces calcium influx, thereby suppressing the release of norepinephrine, a key mediator of sympathetic overactivity. Through this mechanism, ω-conotoxin may attenuate excessive autonomic stimulation, thereby contributing to the control of blood pressure and rhythm disturbances [70,71]. Complementing this sympathetic inhibition, α-conotoxins target the opposing parasympathetic pathway by antagonizing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). This distinct mechanism modulates vagal tone, providing a comprehensive toolkit for restoring cardiac autonomic balance [72]. The structural features of representative α- and ω-conotoxins that underlie these functional differences are illustrated in Figure 2.
The mentioned instances highlight the mechanism of targeting specific ion channels, sodium channels in cardiac muscle cells, and calcium channels in autonomic neurons that enable precise modulation of cardiac excitability and neurohormonal signaling. These mechanisms offer promising alternatives for the development of antiarrhythmic agents derived from marine toxins. Figure 3 shows the chemical structure of TTX, highlighting its highly oxygenated, guanidinium-containing scaffold.
TTX is a potent marine neurotoxin characterized by a highly oxygenated tricyclic scaffold bearing a guanidinium moiety, which mimics hydrated Na+ and mediates high-affinity binding to NaV channels. These channels are essential membrane proteins that open in response to depolarization, allowing sodium ions to enter cells that are excitable, such as neurons and cardiomyocytes. TTX can inhibit the NaV1.4, NaV1.6, and NaV1.7 subtypes with remarkable potency and selectivity, thereby preventing the INa responsible for rapid depolarization. Through blocking Na+ influx into cardiomyocytes, TTX suppresses overexcitation and lowers the risk of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, thereby stabilizing the cardiac rhythm, especially in patients with long QT syndrome or sympathetic hyperactivity-induced arrhythmias [73]. Moreover, structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies confirmed that alterations to TTX’s guanidinium or hydroxyl groups markedly reduce its channel affinity, underscoring the critical role of its precise chemical structure [50,74].

4.2. Inhibition of Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs)

Inhibition of calcium channels plays a crucial role in cardiovascular therapy. While L-type blockade is commonly used for vasodilation and blood pressure management, targeting N-type calcium channels offers a different cardioprotective pathway. These channels are targeted by ω-conotoxins, neurotoxic peptides derived from the venom of Conus spp., such as Conus magus and Conus striatus. Among marine peptides, ω-conotoxins isolated from Conus magus are distinct for their highly specific action on voltage-gated calcium channels. Structurally, these are 25–27 amino acid peptides stabilized by three disulfide bridges, forming a rigid “inhibitor cystine knot” motif that confers high stability and selectivity. These channels open in response to membrane depolarization (threshold ≈ −40 mV) and permit Ca2+ influx (ICa) into presynaptic sympathetic nerve terminals. Inhibiting these channels diminishes calcium-triggered exocytosis of norepinephrine and acetylcholine, thereby attenuating sympathetic overstimulation, which can underlie atrial fibrillation and stress-related tachyarrhythmias [75]. Conversely, brevetoxin modulates NaV channels by prolonging their open state, thereby increasing initial excitation while preventing excessive repolarization that leads to arrhythmias. Such a dual effect may stabilize myocardial excitability under hypoxic or ischemic conditions [76].
Hypertension, or elevated blood pressure, is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease and stroke. Prolonged hypertension contributes to vascular endothelial damage, dysregulation of blood pressure control systems, and chronic inflammation, processes that can lead to atherosclerosis and reduced myocardial perfusion [77]. Blood pressure regulation is physiologically governed by vascular tone, blood volume, and neurohormonal control. Endothelial dysfunction, often present in individuals with hypertension, results in an imbalance between vasodilators, such as nitric oxide (NO), and vasoconstrictors, including angiotensin II [78]. Therefore, targeting calcium channels and restoring endothelial function represent key therapeutic approaches for the treatment of hypertension and coronary artery disease. Figure 4 illustrates the mechanism through which ω-conotoxin exerts its antihypertensive effect: selective inhibition of CaV2.2, followed by a reduction in calcium entry and neurotransmitter release.
The downstream effects include decreased stimulation of NADPH oxidase, resulting in reduced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and diminished vascular inflammation [79]. The mechanism differs from that of conventional calcium channel blockers, such as amlodipine, which directly inhibit L-type channels in vascular smooth muscle. In addition, the more specific therapeutic effect of ω-conotoxins lies in their selective inhibition of CaV2.2 channels within the autonomic nervous system, allowing for targeted suppression of excessive sympathetic stimulation that often occurs in hypertensive patients without directly altering vascular smooth muscle tone [80]. This mechanism holds promise in individuals whose hypertension is primarily driven by autonomic overactivity.
Research on Acanthaster planci, a crown-of-thorns starfish found in Vietnamese waters, led to the isolation of a novel asterosaponin called acanthaglycoside G, along with three previously known steroidal pentaglycosides. Acanthaglycoside G is classified as a rare asterosaponin due to its carbohydrate composition, which includes only two specific 6-deoxymonosaccharide units: β-D-fucopyranosyl and β-D-quinovopyranosyl. These sugar residues are structurally similar to those found in plant-derived cardiac glycosides such as digoxin and digitoxin, which interact with Na+/K+-ATPase and exert positive inotropic effects on the cardiovascular system [81].
However, the pharmacological activity of acanthaglycoside G cannot be attributed solely to the sugar content. Rather, its biological potential arises from the synergistic contribution of both the steroidal aglycone and glycosidic moieties. The sugar residues modulate solubility, receptor binding, and pharmacokinetic behavior, while the aglycone provides the core pharmacophore that likely interacts with Na+/K+-ATPase. SAR studies on similar glycosides have demonstrated that even minor alterations in sugar composition can significantly impact therapeutic efficacy [82]. Figure 5, which presents the chemical structure of acanthaglycoside G, highlights these functionally important glycosidic linkages.
The specific structural configuration of asterosaponins from Acanthaster planci, which includes a cardiotonic steroid aglycone core linked to selectively positioned oligosaccharides, supports the hypothesis that these compounds may act through mechanisms similar to those of classical cardiac glycosides. The combination of the steroid nucleus and the unique sugar moieties enables interaction with cardiac ion transporters, such as Na+/K+-ATPase, and contributes to the modulation of cardiovascular function. In addition, only two other asterosaponins with structurally comparable features have been reported to date: archasteroside B and C from the tropical starfish Archaster typicus, as described by Kicha et al. [83]. Further research into the structural diversity and bioactivity of asterosaponins from echinoderms could potentially pave the way for the development of novel cardioprotective agents.

4.3. Inotropic Support

Inotropic support plays a crucial role in managing impaired cardiac contractility by enhancing myocardial contraction force, thereby improving cardiac output in conditions where the heart struggles to meet circulatory demands. This mechanism is particularly relevant in heart failure, a condition in which the heart loses its ability to pump sufficient blood to the tissues, resulting in compromised perfusion and metabolic dysfunction. Heart failure typically begins with damage to the myocardium, followed by a decline in cardiac output. When the body’s metabolic demands are not met, the heart activates various compensatory mechanisms, including neurohormonal activation and structural remodeling, to maintain adequate perfusion. Structural remodeling refers to the long-term morphological and functional changes in cardiac tissue, including alterations in chamber size, wall thickness, fibrosis, and myocyte hypertrophy. While initially adaptive, these changes ultimately contribute to the progression of heart failure by reducing cardiac efficiency and increasing oxygen demand [84].
However, these adaptations, such as increased preload, afterload, and ventricular hypertrophy, can further exacerbate cardiac dysfunction over time. Increased preload, the volume of blood returning to the heart at the end of diastole, and elevated afterload, the resistance the heart must overcome during systolic ejection, are among the hemodynamic stressors that trigger these maladaptive responses. Chronic elevation of preload and afterload leads to ventricular dilation and hypertrophy, which impair contractility and promote further neurohormonal dysregulation [85]. One therapeutic approach for heart failure is to enhance cardiac contractility with positive inotropic agents, which can increase the heart’s pumping force without excessively increasing oxygen consumption. In this regard, several toxic compounds produced by marine organisms have shown potential as effective inotropic agents. Figure 6 illustrates the pathophysiological cycle of heart failure, highlighting how reduced cardiac output activates compensatory mechanisms, including sympathetic stimulation, fluid retention, and myocardial remodeling.
Over time, these compensations become detrimental, leading to worsening cardiac function, congestion, and systemic symptoms. The diagram serves as a visual summary of the interplay between hemodynamic burden, neurohormonal activation, and structural remodeling that underlie the progression of chronic heart failure.
Anthopleurin-A and anthopleurin-B, two peptide compounds found in Anthopleura spp., work by increasing the sensitivity of sodium channels in myocardial cells. This mechanism prolongs the action potential and increases cardiac contractility without increasing the risk of significant arrhythmias, in contrast to digitalis, which can trigger heart rhythm. Figure 7 shows the chemical structure of anthopleurin-A and B.
The positive inotropic effects of these compounds make them potential candidates in heart failure therapy, especially for conditions with systolic dysfunction. In addition, PLTXs from Palythoa spp. also exhibit positive inotropic activity through a different mechanism. This compound works by modulating the sodium/calcium ion pump (Na+/K+ ATPase), which in turn increases the sodium and calcium ion gradients within myocardial cells [86]. However, despite its therapeutic potential, PLTX has high toxicity and a narrow therapeutic range, so further research is needed to adjust the dose and reduce its side effects. Therefore, further research is still needed to explore how these compounds can be modified or used in safer heart failure therapy formulations. Figure 8 shows the chemical structure of PLTX.

4.4. Reperfusion Therapy

Reperfusion therapy, such as coronary angioplasty or thrombolysis, aims to restore blood flow to heart tissue that has been deprived of oxygen due to an obstruction in a coronary artery. While this intervention is essential to limit myocardial damage, it can paradoxically lead to reperfusion injury, a phenomenon characterized by oxidative stress, inflammation, and metabolic disturbances triggered by the sudden reintroduction of oxygen [87]. These pathological processes can further harm the myocardium. Such therapy is particularly relevant in the context of a heart attack or acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which occurs when a coronary blockage causes myocardial ischemia. Without prompt treatment, the oxygen-deprived cardiac tissue progresses to necrosis or irreversible cell death. Reperfusion injury is tissue damage that occurs when blood flow returns to the heart after a period of ischemia. This process is influenced by several major factors, such as free radical production, mitochondrial dysfunction, vascular endothelial dysfunction, and excessive inflammation [88]. Figure 9 illustrates these four interrelated mechanisms: (1) an explosion of ROS that causes oxidative stress and direct cell damage; (2) mitochondrial dysfunction, which disrupts ATP production and triggers apoptosis; (3) vascular endothelial dysfunction, which limits vasodilation and exacerbates ischemia; and (4) excessive inflammation, particularly neutrophil activation, which exacerbates tissue damage through the release of proteases and ROS [89]. Combined, these processes exacerbate myocardial damage even after blood flow has been restored.
In this context, some marine toxic compounds, such as TTX and aplysiatoxin, may have protective potential against reperfusion injury through specific mechanisms related to these factors. During reperfusion, increased calcium ions may stimulate free radical production in mitochondria. By reducing calcium accumulation, TTX may help mitigate oxidative stress and tissue damage caused by ROS [90]. Aplysiatoxin is a toxic compound produced by the cyanobacteria Lyngbya spp. that lives in marine ecosystems. Aplysiatoxin is known to have proinflammatory activity and tumor-promoting properties through activation of protein kinase C (PKC). However, studies have developed simple analogs (of aplysiatoxin) that exhibit antiproliferative activity against several cancer cell lines without significant proinflammatory effects. One such analog is 10-methyl-aplog-1. The development of 10-methyl-aplog-1 shows potential in suppressing excessive inflammation. This suggests that modification of the chemical structure of aplysiatoxin may reduce its proinflammatory effects, enhancing its therapeutic activity [91,92]. Figure 10 shows the chemical structure of aplysiatoxin.

5. Advances and Obstacles in Cardiovascular Drug Development

5.1. Development of Toxic Compounds as Cardiovascular Drugs

Marine toxins and venoms have been recognized for over half a century as a rich source of biologically active compounds with highly specific mechanisms of action. Since the 1960s, compounds such as tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin have been extensively studied for their ability to modulate ion channels. Through cardiovascular research, several peptides and small molecules derived from marine and terrestrial venoms have been shown to exhibit promising cardioprotective properties, including anti-arrhythmic effects, protection against ischemia–reperfusion injury, and blood pressure modulation [93]. These venom-derived compounds often exert their effects by modulating critical cardiac targets, such as ion channels, enzymes, or receptors, in ways that differ from those of conventional drugs. For instance, snake venom natriuretic peptides act via natriuretic peptide receptors to induce vasodilation and cGMP-mediated cardioprotection, while diverse peptide toxins selectively modulate voltage-gated NaV, CaV, and KV channels with greater specificity than traditional small-molecule blockers [94,95]. While some venom-derived agents, such as captopril, originally developed from Bothrops jararaca snake venom peptides, have been approved for cardiovascular treatment, only a few marine-based candidates have progressed beyond preclinical evaluation. To date, several marine compounds have demonstrated cardioprotective properties, but most remain in experimental stages, with only limited examples undergoing clinical investigation or being conditionally approved for non-cardiac uses [96,97,98]. Table 3 summarizes the main toxins under investigation for cardioprotection.

5.1.1. ω-Conotoxins

ω-Conotoxins are peptide neurotoxins that selectively inhibit CaV2.2 channels, which are predominantly expressed in neuronal tissues. These channels play a crucial role in regulating the release of neurotransmitters, particularly glutamate, at presynaptic terminals. By blocking CaV2.2 channels, ω-conotoxins significantly reduce calcium influx into neurons, thereby inhibiting the exocytosis of excitatory neurotransmitters and attenuating excitotoxicity, a pathological process implicated in chronic pain and neurodegenerative disorders. For instance, ω-conotoxin Bu8, isolated from Conus bullatus, demonstrated potent analgesic activity with fewer motor side effects compared to the clinically used ω-conotoxin MVIIA (ziconotide) [106].
Additionally, α-conotoxin Vc1.1 has been shown to suppress CaV2.2 channel activity indirectly through GABAB receptor activation and downstream Gi/o protein signaling, offering a mechanistically distinct pathway from direct channel blockade. Molecular dynamics simulations have further elucidated how ω-conotoxin GVIA interacts with the CaV2.2 channel, revealing key structural domains involved in its high-affinity binding and selectivity [107]. Figure 11 illustrates the extracellular binding of ω-conotoxin GVIA at the pore entrance of the channel, effectively acting as a physical barrier to calcium ion entry. This spatial blockade prevents depolarization-induced Ca2+ influx into sympathetic nerve terminals, thereby reducing neurotransmitter release and dampening sympathetic overactivity. The highly specific interaction depicted in the figure underscores the value of ω-conotoxins as precise modulators of autonomic neurotransmission, with potential cardiovascular applications.

5.1.2. Conantokin-G

Conantokin-G (Con-G), a peptide derived from Conus geographus venom, exerts its neuroprotective effects by selectively inhibiting N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), particularly those containing the GluN2B subunit. As shown in Figure 12, Con-G binds extracellularly to the NMDA receptor complex on neuronal membranes, resulting in the inhibition of receptor activity. This blockade reduces the excessive influx of calcium ions (Ca2+) into neurons, a critical step in preventing excitotoxicity, a major contributor to neuronal death during ischemic stroke [109].
By mitigating this pathological calcium overload, Con-G significantly reduces infarct size and promotes neuronal survival. Additionally, the GluN2B-selectivity of Con-G enhances its safety and efficacy profile by limiting the widespread inhibition of NMDA receptors, which is often associated with severe side effects. This mechanism also highlights its potential applicability beyond cerebral ischemia, such as in cardiac ischemic injury, where glutamate-mediated excitotoxic pathways similarly contribute to cell death. Figure 12 illustrates how conantokin-G binds selectively to the GluN2B subunit of the NMDA receptor, located on the extracellular domain of neuronal membranes [111]. This interaction sterically hinders the receptor’s calcium-permeable pore, thereby attenuating the pathological influx of Ca2+ ions during excitotoxic events. While NMDA receptors are primarily associated with central nervous system activity, their involvement in cardiac ischemia-related neuronal injury has become increasingly evident. The figure highlights how targeted modulation of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors may offer a dual neuro- and cardioprotective benefit by reducing calcium overload and subsequent oxidative stress [110].

5.1.3. Tetrodotoxin (TTX)

TTX is a potent neurotoxin known for its high affinity and selectivity in blocking NaV channels, particularly the NaV1.1–NaV1.7 subtypes, by binding to the extracellular pore region of the α-subunit. This binding prevents sodium influx during the depolarization phase of the action potential, thereby inhibiting electrical conduction in excitable tissues such as cardiac myocytes. In the context of ventricular arrhythmias, TTX’s selective inhibition of Na+ channels can suppress abnormal automaticity and conduction reentry circuits, both of which are central to the pathophysiology of these arrhythmias [112].
As illustrated in Figure 13, TTX binds to the extracellular vestibule of the NaV channel, forming a physical block that halts Na+ entry into the cell. This inhibition prevents rapid depolarization and decreases the upstroke velocity of the cardiac action potential. By stabilizing the channel’s inactive conformation, TTX reduces the likelihood of repetitive or ectopic excitation, key contributors to arrhythmogenesis. The visual emphasizes how reduced sodium influx underlies TTX’s electrophysiological suppression of abnormal cardiac impulses. Recent studies suggest that low doses of TTX can selectively target the late sodium current (INaL), which is often upregulated in diseased myocardium, without significantly impairing normal conduction, highlighting its therapeutic potential in drug-resistant ventricular arrhythmias [113,114].

5.1.4. Bradykinin-Potentiating Peptides (BPPs)

Although most clinically approved cardiovascular drugs derived from venomous species, such as captopril, originate from terrestrial sources like snake venom-derived BPPs, marine toxins represent a comparatively underexplored yet highly promising reservoir of bioactive compounds with therapeutic potential. BPPs and their synthetic analog captopril exert their antihypertensive effects predominantly by inhibiting ACE, a key regulator of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). ACE facilitates the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, a potent vasoconstrictor that mediates increased systemic vascular resistance, promotes sodium and water retention, stimulates sympathetic nervous activity, and induces pathological cardiac remodeling. Pharmacological inhibition of ACE leads to decreased angiotensin II bioavailability, thereby mitigating vasoconstriction and aldosterone-driven volume overload, ultimately resulting in blood pressure reduction [116]. In parallel, ACE inhibition enhances the endogenous levels of bradykinin by preventing its degradation. Elevated bradykinin concentrations enhance endothelial nitric oxide and prostacyclin synthesis, thereby contributing to vasodilation and the attenuation of vascular inflammation and fibrosis. This dual mechanism suppression of angiotensin II and potentiation of bradykinin underpins the therapeutic efficacy of ACE inhibitors not only in hypertension management, but also in delaying the progression of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis [117].
Figure 14 illustrates the multifactorial pathophysiological roles of angiotensin II in promoting cardiovascular dysfunction and highlights the counter-regulatory effects of ACE inhibition. Angiotensin II, a central effector peptide of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), induces a cascade of deleterious responses that contribute to hypertension and cardiac remodeling. It stimulates the release of norepinephrine and endothelin-1, thereby enhancing sympathetic tone and vasoconstriction, while concurrently promoting aldosterone secretion, which leads to sodium retention, volume overload, and myocardial fibrosis. The figure also emphasizes angiotensin II’s capacity to degrade bradykinin, reduce nitric oxide and prostaglandin production, and promote oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction [118]. These processes collectively increase arterial stiffness, promote vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, enhance leukocyte adhesion, and facilitate structural remodeling of the myocardium.
In contrast, the ACE inhibition panel (orange box) delineates the therapeutic blockade of these pathological mechanisms. ACE inhibitors prevent the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, attenuate vasoconstriction, and restore endothelial homeostasis. Moreover, by preserving bradykinin levels, ACE inhibitors enhance the production of nitric oxide and prostacyclin, promoting vasodilation and antithrombotic effects. The downstream outcomes include reduced vascular resistance, decreased afterload, and inhibition of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, the mechanistic foundations for their established role in managing heart failure and hypertension [119].

5.2. Challenges in the Use of Toxins as Cardiovascular Drugs

For over half a century, marine toxins and venoms have been recognized as a rich source of biologically active compounds with highly specific mechanisms of action. Since the 1960s, compounds such as tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin have been extensively studied for their ability to modulate ion channels with exceptional selectivity, leading to their use as pharmacological tools and templates for drug development. Cardiovascular research has shown that several peptides and small molecules derived from marine and terrestrial venoms exhibit promising cardioprotective properties, such as anti-arrhythmic effects, protection against ischemia–reperfusion injury, and ability to modulate blood pressure.
The use of toxins as cardioprotective agents presents both promising opportunities and significant obstacles. These compounds, often derived from marine organisms such as jellyfish, cone snails, or sponges, exhibit potent biological activities, including modulation of ion channels and strong anti-inflammatory effects. Despite their therapeutic potential, their inherent toxicity poses serious safety concerns if not properly modified or controlled. One major pharmacological challenge lies in their limited target specificity across tissue types. Although many marine toxins exhibit high molecular affinity due to their complex structures, they often lack functional selectivity when applied systemically, as they modulate ion channels or receptors that are also present in healthy, non-target tissues. This raises the risk of off-target effects such as unintended cardiac suppression or neurological symptoms, especially in cardiovascular applications where precise targeting is crucial [120].
Other obstacles in utilizing these toxic agents include narrow therapeutic windows, chemical instability in physiological environments, and difficulties in achieving safe drug formulation and targeted delivery. Additionally, the lack of clinical data and the risk of systemic side effects hinder their further development. Table 4 below lists several toxic marine compounds that have been investigated for cardioprotective effects, along with the associated obstacles and specific explanations. To date, the therapeutic exploration of marine-derived toxic compounds in cardiovascular medicine remains in its early stages.
However, the combination of unique structural complexity, high target affinity, and potent modulatory effects on key cardiovascular pathways, such as ion channels, neurohormonal regulation, and oxidative stress, positions these molecules as highly promising drug candidates. Several compounds, including ω-conotoxins, TTX, and conantokin-G, have already demonstrated selective pharmacological activity relevant to arrhythmia control, blood pressure regulation, and ischemia–reperfusion injury in preclinical models.
Moreover, the rich biodiversity of marine ecosystems offers an untapped reservoir of chemically diverse compounds, many of which have yet to be fully characterized or screened for cardiovascular activity. Advances in peptide engineering, targeted drug delivery, and structure-guided design are increasingly enabling the refinement of toxic peptides into safer, more selective therapeutic agents. Collectively, these factors highlight the significant potential of marine toxins as a novel class of cardioprotective therapeutics, particularly for conditions where conventional drugs are insufficient or nonselective.

6. Concluding Remark and Future Direction

Marine-derived toxins and venoms demonstrate substantial potential as cardioprotective agents due to their capacity to modulate ion channel function, mitigate oxidative stress, and prevent myocardial injury. Bioactive compounds such as tetrodotoxin, ω-conotoxin, anthopleurin-A and -B, palytoxin, brevetoxin, aplysiatoxin, and asterosaponin exhibit diverse pharmacological activities relevant to cardiovascular protection. Nevertheless, their translation into clinical practice remains constrained by inherent challenges, particularly their high toxicity and narrow therapeutic indices. Consequently, a detailed risk-benefit analysis is imperative to clearly distinguish therapeutic efficacy from potential toxicity. Future efforts must focus on defining precise safety margins, refining structural characteristics to enhance selectivity, and developing advanced delivery systems to minimize adverse effects.
Future research should incorporate sustainable biotechnological approaches to support environmentally responsible utilization of marine bioresources. The adoption of microalgae and cyanobacteria as alternative biosynthetic platforms offers a renewable and scalable approach to producing marine-derived bioactive compounds through blue biotechnology and metabolic engineering frameworks. Integrating sustainability principles with pharmacological innovation will not only facilitate the ethical and efficient production of these compounds but also strengthen the long-term potential of marine-derived cardioprotective agents in modern therapeutic development.

Author Contributions

V.H.M.S.: conceptualization, data curation, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. R.F.N.: conceptualization, data curation, writing—review and editing, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication charge is funded by UNPAD through the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) on behalf of the Indonesian Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology, and managed under the EQUITY Program (Contract No. 4303/B3/DT.03.08/2025 and 3927/UN6. RKT/HK.07.00/2025).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CVDCardiovascular Disease
WHOWorld Health Organization
ACEAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme
CaVVoltage-Gated Calcium Channel
NaVVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
PKCProtein Kinase C
NMDAN-Methyl-D-Aspartate
NMDARN-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor
NONitric Oxide
ATPaseAdenosine Triphosphatase
FDAFood and Drug Administration
CFDAChina Food and Drug Administration
INDInvestigational New Drug
RAASRenin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
SARStructure-Activity Relationship
BPPBradykinin-Potentiating Peptide
AMIAcute Myocardial Infarction

References

  1. Di Cesare, M.; Perel, P.; Taylor, S. The heart of the world. Glob. Heart 2024, 19, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Cardiovascular Diseases. 2025. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases (accessed on 28 March 2025).
  3. Lababidi, H.; Salerno, P.R.; Wass, S.Y.; Shafiabadi, H.N.; Bourges-Sevenier, B.; Al-Kindi, S. The global burden of premature cardiovascular disease, 1990–2019. Int. J. Cardiol. Cardiovasc. Risk Prev. 2023, 19, 200212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rizk, T.; Blankstein, R. Not all heart attacks are created equal: Thinking differently about acute myocardial infarction the young. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc. J. 2021, 17, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Singh, R.; Chandi, S.K.; Sran, S. Emerging therapeutic strategies in cardiovascular diseases. Cureus 2024, 16, 64388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nugraha, A.S.; Firli, L.N.; Rani, D.M. Indonesian marine and its medicinal contribution. Nat. Prod. Bioprospecting 2023, 13, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, K.; Su, L.; Chen, Z.; Qiu, Y. An extensive assessment of exploitation indicators for multispecies fisheries in the South China Sea to inform more practical and precise management in China. Ecol. Indic. 2025, 173, 113363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, J. Marine-derived compounds: A new horizon in cancer, renal, and metabolic disease therapeutics. Mar. Drugs 2025, 23, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Yu, S. A novel ω-conotoxin Bu8 inhibiting N-type voltage-gated calcium channels displays potent analgesic activity. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 2685–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. van Kesteren, C.; de Vooght, M.M.; López-Lázaro, L. Yondelis (trabectedin, ET-743): The development of an anticancer agent of marine origin. Anticancer Drugs 2003, 14, 487–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cunha, S.A.; Pintado, M.E. Bioactive peptides derived from marine sources: Biological and functional properties. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 119, 348–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, X.; Wang, H.; Chen, K.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, J.; Xie, W. Toxicological and pharmacological activities and potential medical applications of marine algal toxins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saeed, A.F.U.H.; Su, J.; Ouyang, S. Marine-derived drugs: Recent advances in cancer therapy and immune signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 134, 111091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Layer, R.T.; Wagstaff, J.D.; White, H.S. Conantokins: Peptide antagonists of NMDA receptors. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 3073–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stonik, V.; Stonik, I. Marine excitatory amino acids: Structure, properties, biosynthesis, and recent approaches to their syntheses. Molecules 2020, 25, 3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vieira, A.C.; Martínez, J.M.; Pose, R.B.; Queijo, Á.A.; Posadas, N.A.; López, L.M. Dose-response and histopathological study, with special attention to the hypophysis, of the differential effects of domoic acid on rats and mice. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2015, 78, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moran, Y.; Gordon, D.; Gurevitz, M. Sea anemone toxins affecting voltage-gated sodium channels-molecular and evolutionary features. Toxicon 2009, 54, 1089–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Habermann, E.; Beress, L. Iodine labelling of sea anemone toxin II, and binding to normal and denervated diaphragm. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1979, 309, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fu, Y.; Li, C.; Dong, S.; Wu, Y.; Zhangsun, D.; Luo, S. Discovery methodology of novel conotoxins from Conus species. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Boente-Juncal, A.; Otero, P.; Rodríguez, I.; Camiña, M.; Rodriguez-Vieytes, M.; Vale, C.; Botana, L.M. Oral chronic toxicity of the safe tetrodotoxin dose proposed by the european food safety authority and its additive effect with saxitoxin. Toxins 2020, 12, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suarez-Isla, B.A. Saxitoxin and Other Paralytic Toxins: Toxicological Profile; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 23–41. [Google Scholar]
  22. Finch, S.C.; Boundy, M.J.; Harwood, D.T. The acute toxicity of tetrodotoxin and tetrodotoxin–saxitoxin mixtures to mice by various routes of administration. Toxins 2018, 10, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mi, W.; Liu, S. Tetrodotoxin and the state-of-the-art progress of its associated analytical methods. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 22, 1413741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bacchiocchi, S.; Siracusa, M.; Campacci, D. Cyclic imines (CIs) in mussels from North-Central Adriatic Sea: First evidence of Gymnodimine A in Italy. Toxins 2020, 12, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. Scientific opinion on marine biotoxins in shellfish—Cyclic imines (spirolides, gymnodimines, pinnatoxins and pteriatoxins). Eur. Food Saf. Auth. J. 2010, 8, 1628. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kilcoyne, J.; Burrell, S.; Nulty, C. Improved isolation procedures for okadaic acid group toxins from shellfish (Mytilus edulis) and microalgae (Prorocentrum lima). Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Matias, W.G.; Traore, A.; Creppy, E.E. Variations in the distribution of okadaic acid in organs and biological fluids of mice related to diarrhoeic syndrome. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 1999, 18, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Loeffler, C.R.; Spielmeyer, A. Faster ciguatoxin extraction methods for toxicity screening. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 21715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Raposo-García, S.; Boente-Juncal, A.; Rodriguez-Vieytes, M. In vivo subchronic effects of ciguatoxin-related compounds, reevaluation of their toxicity. Arch. Toxicol. 2022, 96, 2621–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aune, T.; Sorby, R.; Yasumoto, T.; Ramstad, H.; Landsverk, T. Comparison of oral and intraperitoneal toxicity of yessotoxin towards mice. Toxicon 2002, 40, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aune, T.; Aasen, J.A.; Miles, C.O.; Larsen, S. Effect of mouse strain and gender on LD50 of yessotoxin. Toxicon 2008, 52, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Satake, M.; Ofuji, K.; Naoki, H.; James, K.J.; Furey, A.; McMahon, T.; Silke, J.; Yasumoto, T. Azaspiracid, a new marine toxin having unique spiro ring assemblies, isolated from Irish mussels, Mytilus edulis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9967–9968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tebben, J.; Zurhelle, C.; Tubaro, A. Structure and toxicity of AZA-59, an azaspiracid shellfish poisoning toxin produced by Azadinium poporum (Dinophyceae). Harmful Algae 2023, 124, 102388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Twiner, M.; Dechraoui Bottein, M.Y.; Wang, Z.; Mikulski, C.; Henry, M.; Pierce, R. Extraction and analysis of lipophilic brevetoxins from the red tide dinoflagellate Karenia brevis. Anal. Biochem. 2007, 369, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Costas, C.; Louzao, M.C.; Raposo-García, S. Acute toxicology report of the emerging marine biotoxin Brevetoxin 3 in mice: Food safety implications. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2023, 182, 114178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Butler, S.C.; Miles, C.O.; Karim, A.; Twiner, M.J. Inhibitory effects of pectenotoxins from marine algae on the polymerization of various actin isoforms. Toxicol. Vitr. 2012, 26, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Miles, C.O.; Wilkins, A.L.; Munday, R. Isolation of pectenotoxin-2 from Dinophysis acuta and its conversion to pectenotoxin-2 seco acid, and preliminary assessment of their acute toxicities. Toxicon 2004, 43, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mazzeo, A.; Varra, M.; Tartaglione, L. Toward isolation of palytoxins: Liquid chromatography coupled to low- or high-resolution mass spectrometry for the study on the impact of drying techniques, solvents, and materials. Toxins 2021, 13, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Riobó, P.; Paz, B.; Franco, J.M.; Vázquez, J.A.; Murado, M.A.; Cacho, E. Mouse bioassay for palytoxin. Specific symptoms and dose–response against dose–death time relationships. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 2639–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yan, X.; Ouyang, H.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Li, T.; Wu, B.; Yan, X.; He, S. Antimicrobial Terpenoids from South China Sea Soft Coral Lemnalia sp. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 294. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wen, M.; Fu, X.; Han, X.; Hu, X.; Dong, P.; Xu, J.; Xue, Y.; Wang, J.; Xue, C.; Wang, Y. Sea cucumber saponin echinoside A (EA) stimulates hepatic fatty acid β-oxidation and suppresses fatty acid biosynthesis coupling in a diurnal pattern. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2016, 62, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aminin, D.L.; Agafonova, I.G.; Kalinin, V.I. Immunomodulatory properties of frondoside A, a major triterpene glycoside from the north atlantic commercially harvested sea cucumber Cucumaria frondosa. J. Med. Food 2008, 11, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shangguan, F.; Ma, N.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Ma, T.; An, J.; Lin, J.; Yang, H. Fucoxanthin suppresses pancreatic cancer progression by inducing bioenergetics metabolism crisis and promoting SLC31A1-mediated sensitivity to DDP. Int. J. Oncol. 2025, 66, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Karthikeyan, A.; Joseph, A.; Nair, B.G. Promising bioactive compounds from the marine environment and their potential effects on various diseases. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2022, 20, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Patocka, J.; Gupta, R.C.; Wu, Q. Toxic potential of palytoxin. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 35, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kundu, P.; Thorat, S.A.; Kiran, A. Plant-derived triterpenoid saponins: Multifaceted roles and bioengineering prospects. Plant Cell Rep. 2025, 44, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kaas, Q.; Yu, R.; Jin, A.H.; Dutertre, S.; Craik, D.J. ConoServer: Updated content, knowledge, and discovery tools in the conopeptide database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, X.; Zong, J.; Chen, S.; Li, M.; Lu, Y.; Wang, R.; Xu, H. Accumulation and elimination of tetrodotoxin in the pufferfish Takifugu obscurus by dietary administration of the wild toxic gastropod Nassarius semiplicata. Toxins 2020, 12, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Orfali, R.; Gamal El-Din, A.H.; Karthick, V.; Lamis, E.; Xiao, V.; Ramanishka, A.; Alwatban, A.; Alkhamees, O.; Alaseem, A.; Nam, Y.-W. Modulation of redox-sensitive cardiac ion channels. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, C.H.; Ruben, P.C. Interaction between voltage-gated sodium channels and the neurotoxin, tetrodotoxin. Channels 2008, 2, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, Q.; Fu, J.; Yuan, L. Diversity analysis of sea anemone peptide toxins in different tissues of Heteractis crispa based on transcriptomics. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 7684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Albar, R.A.; Smith, H.L.; Sanches, K.; Wai, D.C.C.; Naseem, M.U.; Szanto, T.G. Structure and functional studies of Avt1, a novel peptide from the sea anemone Aulactinia veratra. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) 2025, 1873, 141050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liao, Y.; Peng, C.; Zhu, Y.; Fu, J.; Ruan, Z.; Shi, Q. High conopeptide diversity in Conus striatus: Revealed by integration of two transcriptome sequencing platforms. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 1060432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Asakawa, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Umezaki, K.; Kaneko, K.; Yu, X.; Gomez-Delan, G.; Tomano, S.; Noguchi, T.; Ohtsuka, S. Toxicity and toxin composition of the Greater Blue-Ringed Octopus Hapalochlaena lunulata from Ishigaki Island, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. Toxins 2019, 1, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tatsuno, R.; Miyata, Y.; Yoshikawa, H. Tetrodotoxin distribution in natural hybrids between the pufferfish species Takifugu rubripes and Takifugu porphyreus. Fish. Sci. 2019, 85, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kadota, N.; Narita, H.; Murakami, R.; Noguchi, T. The toxicity of starfishes, Astropecten genus, inhabiting the coast of Toyama Bay. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi 2008, 49, 422–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vlasenko, A.E.; Magarlamov, T.Y. Tetrodotoxin and its analogues in Cephalothrix cf. simula (Nemertea: Palaeonemertea) from the Sea of Japan (Peter the Great Gulf): Intrabody distribution and secretions. Toxins 2020, 12, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, L.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Mei, W.; Wang, C. Changes in growth, morphology, and levels of digestive enzymes and growth-related hormones in early ontogeny of black scraper, Thamnaconus modestus. Front. Mar. Sci. 2024, 11, 1344844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Norton, T.R.; Shibata, S.; Kashiwagi, M.; Bentley, J. Isolation and characterization of the cardiotonic polypeptide anthopleurin-A from the sea anemone Anthopleura xanthogrammica. J. Pharm. Sci. 1976, 65, 1368–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schulz, M.; Łoś, A.; Szabelak, A.; Strachecka, A. Inhalation poisoning with palytoxin from aquarium coral: Case description and safety advice. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 2019, 70, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ciminiello, P.; Dell’Aversano, C.; Fattorusso, E.; Forino, M.; Magno, G.S.; Tartaglione, L.; Grillo, C.; Melchiorre, N. The Genoa 2005 outbreak. Determination of putative palytoxin in Mediterranean Ostreopsis ovata by a new liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 6153–6159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hu, C.; Barnes, B.B.; Qi, L.; Corcoran, A.A. A harmful algal bloom of Karenia brevis in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico as revealed by MODIS and VIIRS: A comparison. Sensors 2015, 15, 2873–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hayashi, M.A.; Camargo, A.C. The Bradykinin-potentiating peptides from venom gland and brain of Bothrops jararaca contain highly site specific inhibitors of the somatic angiotensin-converting enzyme. Toxicon 2005, 45, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. McCall, J.R.; Sausman, K.T.; Keeler, D.M.; Brown, A.P.; Turrise, S.L. Immune modulating brevetoxins: Monocyte cytotoxicity, apoptosis, and activation of M1/M2 response elements Is dependent on reactive groups. Marine Drugs 2022, 20, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ashida, Y.; Yanagita, R.C.; Takahashi, C.; Kawanami, Y.; Irie, K. Binding mode prediction of aplysiatoxin, a potent agonist of protein kinase C, through molecular simulation and structure-activity study on simplified analogs of the receptor-recognition domain. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 4218–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, H.H.; Zhang, X.K.; Si, R.R. Chemical and biological study of novel aplysiatoxin derivatives from the marine Cyanobacterium lyngbya sp. Toxins 2020, 12, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tidgewell, K.; Clark, B.R.; Gerwick, W.H. The Natural Products Chemistry of Cyanobacteria; Elsevier: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2010; pp. 141–188. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ha, D.T.; Kicha, A.A.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Malyarenko, T.; Popov, R.S.; Malyarenko, O.S. Asterosaponins from the tropical starfish Acanthaster planci and their cytotoxic and anticancer activities in vitro. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 35, 548–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wada, N.; Yuasa, H.; Kajitani, R. A ubiquitous subcuticular bacterial symbiont of a coral predator, the crown-of-thorns starfish, in the Indo-Pacific. Microbiome 2020, 8, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Feng, Z.P.; Doering, C.J.; Winkfein, R.J.; Beedle, A.M.; Spafford, J.D.; Zamponi, G.W. Determinants of inhibition of transiently expressed voltage-gated calcium channels by ω-conotoxins GVIA and MVIIA. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 27, 20171–20178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ohashi, N.; Uta, D.; Ohashi, M.; Hoshino, R.; Baba, H. Omega-conotoxin MVIIA reduces neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury by inhibiting N-type voltage-dependent calcium channels on spinal dorsal horn. Front. Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1366829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Milne, T.J.; Abbenante, G.; Tyndall, J.D.; Halliday, J.; Lewis, R.J. Isolation and characterization of a cone snail protease with homology to CRISP proteins of the pathogenesis-related protein superfamily. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 31105–31110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Duff, H.J.; Sheldon, R.S.; Cannon, N.J. Tetrodotoxin: Sodium channel specific anti-arrhythmic activity. Cardiovasc. Res. 1988, 22, 800–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yamashita, M.Y.; Sugimoto, A.; Takai, A.; Yasumoto, T. Effects of specific modifications of several hydroxyls of tetrodotoxin on its affinity to rat brain membrane. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999, 289, 1688–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ma, T.; Cai, Z.; Xu, X. Calcium channel blockers increase the risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection. Nat. Commun 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Konoki, K.; Baden, D.G.; Scheuer, T.; Catterall, W.A. Molecular determinants of brevetoxin binding to voltage-gated sodium channels. Toxins 2019, 11, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fuchs, F.D.; Whelton, P.K. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Hypertension 2020, 75, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ma, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, X. Signaling pathways in vascular function and hypertension: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Adams, D.J.; Berecki, G. Mechanisms of conotoxin inhibition of N-type (Cav2.2) calcium channels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) 2013, 1828, 1619–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Schroeder, C.I.; Lewis, R.J. ω-Conotoxins GVIA, MVIIA and CVID: SAR and clinical potential. Mar. Drugs 2006, 4, 193–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Komori, T. Toxins from the starfish Acanthaster planci and Asterina pectinifera. Toxicon 1997, 35, 1537–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Křen, V.; Martinkova, L. Glycosides in medicine: The role of glycosidic residue in biological activity. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8, 1303–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kicha, A.A.; Ivanchina, N.V.; Huong, T.T.T.; Kalinovsky, A.I.; Dmitrenok, P.S.; Long, P.Q. Minor asterosaponin archasteroside C from the starfish Archaster typicus. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2010, 59, 2133–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bangash, M.N.; Kong, M.L.; Pearse, R.M. Use of inotropes and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 165, 2015–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Carabello, B.A. The pathophysiology of afterload mismatch and ventricular hypertrophy. Struct. Heart 2021, 5, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Habermann, E. Palytoxin acts through Na+, K+-ATPase. Toxicon 1989, 27, 1171–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Buske, M.; Desch, S.; Heusch, G.; Rassaf, T.; Eitel, I.; Thiele, H.; Feistritzer, H.-J. Reperfusion injury: How can we reduce it by pre-, per-, and postconditioning. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tong, C.; Zhou, B. Cardioprotective strategies in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: Implications for improving clinical translation. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. Plus 2025, 11, 100278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zimmer, T. Effects of tetrodotoxin on the mammalian cardiovascular system. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 741–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Checa, J.; Aran, J.M. Reactive oxygen species: Drivers of physiological and pathological processes. J. Inflamm. Res. 2020, 13, 1057–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Hanaki, Y.; Shikata, Y.; Kikumori, M.; Okamura, M.; Dan, S.; Imoto, M. In vivo anti-cancer activity of 10-methyl-aplog-1, a simplified analog of aplysiatoxin, and its possible signaling pathway associated with G1 arrest. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2023, 675, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hanaki, Y.; Kikumori, M.; Tokuda, H.; Okamura, M.; Dan, S.; Adachi, N.; Saito, N.; Yanagita, R.C.; Irie, K. Loss of the phenolic hydroxyl group and aromaticity from the side chain of anti-proliferative 10-methyl-aplog-1, a simplified analog of aplysiatoxin, enhances its tumor-promoting and proinflammatory activities. Molecules 2017, 22, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Adams, D.J.; Callaghan, B.; Berecki, G. Analgesic conotoxins: Block and G protein-coupled receptor modulation of N-type (Ca(V) 2.2) calcium channels. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 166, 486–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chen, N.; Xu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F. Animal protein toxins: Origins and therapeutic applications. Biophys. Rep. 2018, 4, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Messadi, E. Snake venom components as therapeutic drugs in ischemic heart disease. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Camargo, A.C.; Ianzer, D.; Guerreiro, J.R.; Serrano, S.M. Bradykinin-potentiating peptides: Beyond captopril. Toxicon 2012, 59, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Evangelista, I.L.; Martins, A.M.; Nascimento, N.R.; Havt, A.; Evangelista, J.S.; de Noroes, T.B.; Toyama, M.H.; Diz-Filho, E.B.; Toyama Dde, O.; Fonteles, M.C.; et al. Renal and cardiovascular effects of Bothrops marajoensis venom and phospholipase A2. Toxicon 2010, 55, 1061–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Coutinho-Neto, A.; Caldeira, C.A.; Souza, G.H. ESI-MS/MS identification of a bradykinin-potentiating peptide from Amazon Bothrops atrox snake venom using a hybrid Qq-oaTOF mass spectrometer. Toxins 2013, 5, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Marcil, J.; Walczak, J.S.; Guindon, J.; Ngoc, A.H.; Lu, S.; Beaulieu, P. Antinociceptive effects of tetrodotoxin (TTX) in Rodents. Br. J. Anaesth. 2006, 96, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Fu, L.Y.; Li, Y.; Cheng, L. Effect of sea anemone toxin anthopleurin-Q on sodium current in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2001, 22, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar]
  101. Dias-Kadambi, B.L.; Drum, C.L.; Hanck, D.A.; Blumenthal, K.M. Leucine 18, a hydrophobic residue essential for high affinity binding of anthopleurin B to the voltage-sensitive sodium channel. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 9422–9428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Gallagher, M.J.; Blumenthal, K.M. Cloning and expression of wild-type and mutant forms of the cardiotonic polypeptide anthopleurin B. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 13958–13963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yazawa, K.; Wang, J.W.; Hao, L.Y.; Onoue, Y.; Kameyama, M. Verrucotoxin, a stonefish venom, modulates calcium channel activity in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 151, 1198–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Noda, M.; Muramatsu, I.; Fujiwara, M.; Ashida, K. Effects of goniopora toxin on bullfrog atrial muscle are frequency-dependent. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1985, 330, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Nishio, M.; Muramatsu, I.; Kigoshi, S.; Fujiwara, M. Effects of goniopora toxin on the action potential and membrane currents of guinea-pig single ventricular cells. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1988, 337, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Olivera, B.M.; Gray, W.R.; Zeikus, R.; McIntosh, J.M.; Varga, J.; Rivier, J.; de Santos, V.; Cruz, L.J. Peptide neurotoxins from fish-hunting cone snails. Science 1985, 230, 1338–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Castro, J.; Harrington, A.M.; Garcia-Caraballo, S. α-Conotoxin Vc1.1 inhibits human dorsal root ganglion neuroexcitability and mouse colonic nociception via GABAB receptors. Gut 2017, 66, 1083–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Jobling, P. ω-conotoxin GVIA sensitive calcium channels on preganglionic nerve terminals in mouse pelvic and celiac ganglia. Auton. Neurosci. Basic Clin. 2009, 146, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Alex, A.B.; Baucum, A.J.; Wilcox, K.S. Effect of conantokin G on NMDA receptor-mediated spontaneous EPSCs in cultured cortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 96, 1084–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mody, I.; MacDonald, J.F. NMDA receptor-dependent excitotoxicity: The role of intracellular Ca2+ release. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1995, 16, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Balsara, R.; Dang, A.; Donahue, D.L.; Snow, T.; Castellino, F.J. Conantokin-G attenuates detrimental effects of NMDAR hyperactivity in an ischemic rat model of stroke. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 0122840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bucciarelli, G.M.; Lechner, M.; Fontes, A.; Kats, L.B.; Eisthen, H.L.; Shaffer, H.B. From poison to promise: The evolution of tetrodotoxin and its potential as a therapeutic. Toxins 2021, 13, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, X.; Qiao, K.; Cui, R.; Xu, M.; Cai, S.; Huang, Q.; Liu, Z. Tetrodotoxin: The state-of-the-art progress in characterization, detection, biosynthesis, and transport enrichment. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Boente-Juncal, A.; Vale, C.; Cifuentes, M.; Otero, P.; Camiña, M.; Rodriguez-Vieytes, M.; Botana, L.M. Chronic in vivo effects of repeated exposure to low oral doses of tetrodotoxin: Preliminary evidence of nephrotoxicity and cardiotoxicity. Toxins 2019, 11, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Nieto, F.R.; Cobos, E.J.; Tejada, M.A.; Sánchez-Fernández, C.; González-Cano, R.C.; Cendán, C.M. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) as a therapeutic agent for pain. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 281–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Murphey, L.; Vaughan, D.; Brown, N. Contribution of bradykinin to the cardioprotective effects of ACE inhibitors. Eur. Heart J. Suppl. 2003, 5, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Taddei, S.; Bortolotto, L. Unraveling the pivotal role of bradykinin in ACE inhibitor activity. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 2016, 16, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhou, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, W. Angiotensin II induces vascular endothelial dysfunction by promoting lipid peroxidation-mediated ferroptosis via CD36. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Borghi, C.; Rossi, F.; Force, S.T.; Force, S.I.F.T. Role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and its pharmacological inhibitors in cardiovascular diseases: Complex and critical issues. High Blood Press. Cardiovasc. Prev. 2015, 22, 429–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhao, Z.; Ukidve, A.; Kim, J.; Mitragotri, S. Targeting strategies for tissue-specific drug delivery. Cell 2020, 181, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Chekan, J.R.; Fallon, T.R.; Moore, B.S. Biosynthesis of marine toxins. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 59, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Su, S.C.; Seo, J.; Pan, J.Q. Regulation of N-type voltage-gated calcium channels and presynaptic function by cyclin-dependent kinase 5. Neuron 2012, 75, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Pelin, M.; Stocco, G.; Florio, C.; Sosa, S.; Tubaro, A. In vitro cell sensitivity to palytoxin correlates with high gene expression of the Na+/K+-ATPase β2 subunit isoform. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Raposo-Garcia, S.; Costas, C.; Louzao, M.C.; Vieytes, M.R.; Vale, C.; Botana, L.M. Synergistic effect of brevetoxin BTX-3 and ciguatoxin CTX3C in human voltage-gated Nav1.6 sodium channels. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2023, 36, 1990–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Kobayashi, T.; Yanagita, R.; Irie, K. Synthesis and biological activities of simplified aplysiatoxin analogs focused on the CH/π interaction. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Zhang, R.; Lu, Z.; Wang, D.; Yan, Z.; Sun, X.; Li, X.; Yin, X.; Li, K. Ecotoxicological hazards of sea star-derived asterosaponins: Mechanistic insights into embryotoxicity and cardiotoxicity in marine medaka. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 303, 118908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Main structural classes of marine venom and toxin.
Figure 1. Main structural classes of marine venom and toxin.
Toxins 18 00063 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structure of ω- and α-conotoxin.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of ω- and α-conotoxin.
Toxins 18 00063 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structure of tetrodotoxin (TTX).
Figure 3. Chemical structure of tetrodotoxin (TTX).
Toxins 18 00063 g003
Figure 4. Diagram of the mechanism of ω-conotoxin’s inhibition of hypertension.
Figure 4. Diagram of the mechanism of ω-conotoxin’s inhibition of hypertension.
Toxins 18 00063 g004
Figure 5. Chemical structure of acanthaglycoside-G.
Figure 5. Chemical structure of acanthaglycoside-G.
Toxins 18 00063 g005
Figure 6. Diagram of heart failure mechanisms.
Figure 6. Diagram of heart failure mechanisms.
Toxins 18 00063 g006
Figure 7. Chemical structure of anthopleurin-A and B.
Figure 7. Chemical structure of anthopleurin-A and B.
Toxins 18 00063 g007
Figure 8. Chemical structure of PLTX.
Figure 8. Chemical structure of PLTX.
Toxins 18 00063 g008
Figure 9. Diagram of the main factors causing reperfusion injury.
Figure 9. Diagram of the main factors causing reperfusion injury.
Toxins 18 00063 g009
Figure 10. Chemical structure of aplysiatoxin.
Figure 10. Chemical structure of aplysiatoxin.
Toxins 18 00063 g010
Figure 11. Mechanism of action of ω-conotoxin GVIA on the CaV2.2 channel. The red molecule represents ω-conotoxin blocking the calcium channel pore. The large black arrow pointing upward indicates the inhibition of Ca2+ ion influx into the intracellular space. (The figure was adapted from Jobling [108].)
Figure 11. Mechanism of action of ω-conotoxin GVIA on the CaV2.2 channel. The red molecule represents ω-conotoxin blocking the calcium channel pore. The large black arrow pointing upward indicates the inhibition of Ca2+ ion influx into the intracellular space. (The figure was adapted from Jobling [108].)
Toxins 18 00063 g011
Figure 12. Mechanism and neuroprotective effects of conantokin-G’s action on NMDA receptors. The purple sphere represents conantokin-G acting as an NMDA receptor antagonist. The large downward gradient arrow illustrates the reduction of excessive Ca2+ flow into the neuron to prevent excitotoxicity. (The figure was adapted from Mody & McDonald [110].)
Figure 12. Mechanism and neuroprotective effects of conantokin-G’s action on NMDA receptors. The purple sphere represents conantokin-G acting as an NMDA receptor antagonist. The large downward gradient arrow illustrates the reduction of excessive Ca2+ flow into the neuron to prevent excitotoxicity. (The figure was adapted from Mody & McDonald [110].)
Toxins 18 00063 g012
Figure 13. Mechanism of tetrodotoxin (TTX)’s action on NaV channels. The black cross (X) represents the blockade of Na+ ion entry by TTX, and the red arrow indicates the upstroke velocity of the action potential. (The figure was adapted from Nieto et al. [115].)
Figure 13. Mechanism of tetrodotoxin (TTX)’s action on NaV channels. The black cross (X) represents the blockade of Na+ ion entry by TTX, and the red arrow indicates the upstroke velocity of the action potential. (The figure was adapted from Nieto et al. [115].)
Toxins 18 00063 g013
Figure 14. Pathophysiological effects of angiotensin II and the therapeutic role of ACE inhibitors in cardiovascular disease. Green upward arrows indicate an increase in activity or production (e.g., free radical formation and aldosterone release). Red downward arrows represent a decrease in production (e.g., nitric oxide). Red cross signs in circles mark the specific points where ACE inhibition interrupts the pathway. (The figure was adapted from Borghi et al. [119].)
Figure 14. Pathophysiological effects of angiotensin II and the therapeutic role of ACE inhibitors in cardiovascular disease. Green upward arrows indicate an increase in activity or production (e.g., free radical formation and aldosterone release). Red downward arrows represent a decrease in production (e.g., nitric oxide). Red cross signs in circles mark the specific points where ACE inhibition interrupts the pathway. (The figure was adapted from Borghi et al. [119].)
Toxins 18 00063 g014
Table 1. Representative examples of marine toxins along with their biochemical classes and lethal dose.
Table 1. Representative examples of marine toxins along with their biochemical classes and lethal dose.
Compound Biochemical ClassChemical
Polarity
Lethal Dose
(LD50)
References
Domoic Acid (DA)Amino acid derivativeHydrophilic2.5 mg/kg (i.p., rat)[15,16]
ATX II ProteinHydrophilic25–50 ng/animal (i.c.v., mouse)[17,18]
ω-ConotoxinPeptideHydrophilic232 µg/kg (oral, mouse)[19,20]
Saxitoxin (STX)AlkaloidHydrophilic1 µg/kg (i.p., mouse)[21,22]
Tetrodotoxin (TTX)AlkaloidHydrophilic0.77 µg/kg (i.p., mouse)[23,22]
Cyclic Imines (CI)AlkaloidLipophilicNot available[24,25]
Okadaic Acid (OA)PolyetherLipophilic192 µg/kg (i.p., mouse)[26,27]
Ciguatoxin (CTX)PolyetherLipophilicP-CTX1B 0.32 µg/kg (i.p., mouse)[28,29]
CTX3C 1.6 µg/kg (i.p., mouse)
Yessotoxin (YTX)PolyetherLipophilic269–328 µg/kg (i.p., mouse)[30,31]
Azaspiracid (AZA)PolyetherLipophilic74 µg/kg (i.p., mouse)[32,33]
BrevetoxinPolyetherLipophilic875 µg/kg (i.p., mouse)[34,35]
PectenotoxinPolyketideLipophilic219 µg/kg (i.p., mouse)[36,37]
Palytoxin (PLTX)PolyketideAmphipathic0.31–1.5 µg/kg (i.p., mouse)[38,39]
Acanthaglycoside-GTerpenoidAmphipathicNot available; toxicity only evaluated in vitro[40]
Frondoside ASaponinAmphipathic9.9 mg/kg (i.p., mouse)[41,42]
Table 2. Types of toxic compounds with cardioprotective potential.
Table 2. Types of toxic compounds with cardioprotective potential.
CompoundSourceType Distribution RegionReference(s)
ω-conotoxinConus magusVenomIndo-Pacific
(Philippines, Indonesia, PNG)
[52]
ProteinsConus striatusVenomIndo-Pacific[53]
Tetrodotoxin (TTX)Hapalochlaena spp.ToxinAustralia, Western Pacific, Japan[54]
AlkaloidTakifugu rubripesToxinNorthwest Pacific (China, Korea, Japan)[55]
AlkaloidTakifugu porphyreusHydrophilic
AlkaloidAstropecten latespinosusToxinWestern Pacific (Japan coastal regions)[56]
PolyetherCephalothrix simulaToxinNorthwest Pacific [57]
PolyetherThamnaconus modestusToxin[58]
Anthopleurin-A & BAnthopleura spp. VenomPacific and Atlantic coasts [59]
Palytoxin (PLTXS)Palythoa spp. ToxinTropical Indo-Pacific, Hawaii, Red Sea[60,61]
BrevetoxinKarenia brevisToxinGulf of Mexico, Florida coast[62,63,64]
AplysiatoxinCyanobacterium lyngbyaToxinIndo-Pacific, Australia, Okinawa[65,66]
PolyketideNostoc muscorumAmphipathicIndo-Pacific [67]
AsterosaponinAcanthaster planciToxin[68,69]
Table 3. Status of toxic compounds being studied as cardiovascular drugs.
Table 3. Status of toxic compounds being studied as cardiovascular drugs.
CompoundSourceIndicationMechanismStatusTrade NameApproving BodyReference(s)
ω-conotoxins Conus magus (marine)Ischemic heart injury, neuropathic painN-type CaV2.2 channel blockerUnder studyPrialt®FDA[93]
Conantokin-GConus geographus (marine)Ischemic stroke, epilepsyNMDA receptor antagonistPreclinical--[93]
Tetrodotoxin (TTX)Takifugu spp. (marine)Ventricular arrhythmias, cancer pain NaV channel blockerPreclinical-CFDA/IND (USA)[93,99]
Acanthaglycoside GAcanthaster planci (marine)Heart failure (potential)Na+/K+-ATPase modulatorUnder study--[81]
Anthopleurin-A & BAnthopleura spp. (marine)Heart failure NaV channel sensitizerPreclinical--[100,101,102]
Verrucotoxin (VTX)Synanceia verrucosa (marine)Cardioprotective in ischemia modelsModulates CaV and KATP channelsUnder study--[103]
Goniopora toxin (GPT)Goniopora coral (marine)Positive inotropy Prolongs cardiac action potential (NaV inactivation)Preclinical--[104,105]
Table 4. Obstacles in the use of marine toxic compounds as cardioprotective agents.
Table 4. Obstacles in the use of marine toxic compounds as cardioprotective agents.
CompoundTypeLimitationStatusExplanationReference
Tetrodotoxin (TTX)ToxinHigh toxicityPreclinical TTX is highly toxic even in small doses, which makes it difficult to use therapeutically without modification or safe formulation.[121]
ω-conotoxinVenomTarget selectivityPreclinical It has specific effects on N-type calcium channels but can affect the nervous system and cause unwanted side effects.[122]
Anthopleurin-A & BVenomStability and formulationPreclinical This peptide can undergo rapid degradation in the body so it needs special formulation to extend its half-life.[102]
Palytoxin (PLTX)ToxinNarrow therapeutic rangePreclinicalPLTX is one of the most toxic compounds in the world so its therapeutic use requires further research into safe doses.[123]
BrevetoxinToxinRisk of neurotoxicityUnder studyDespite its beneficial sodium channel modulating effects, brevetoxin may also cause neurological disorders in humans.[124]
AplysiatoxinToxinProinflammatory activityPreclinicalSince inflammation accelerates atherosclerosis and exacerbates myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury, structural simplification (e.g., Aplog-1) is required to eliminate these cardiotoxic side effects.[125]
AsterosaponinToxinMechanism of action not fully understoodUnder studyMore research is needed on its pharmacological effects and potential toxicity before it can be developed into a drug.[126]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siagian, V.H.M.; Nuwarda, R.F. The Cardioprotective Potential of Marine Venom and Toxins. Toxins 2026, 18, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins18020063

AMA Style

Siagian VHM, Nuwarda RF. The Cardioprotective Potential of Marine Venom and Toxins. Toxins. 2026; 18(2):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins18020063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siagian, Virginia Heaven Mariboto, and Rina Fajri Nuwarda. 2026. "The Cardioprotective Potential of Marine Venom and Toxins" Toxins 18, no. 2: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins18020063

APA Style

Siagian, V. H. M., & Nuwarda, R. F. (2026). The Cardioprotective Potential of Marine Venom and Toxins. Toxins, 18(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins18020063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop