Next Article in Journal
Time-Resolved Visualization of Cyanotoxin Synthesis via Labeling by the Click Reaction in the Bloom-Forming Cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa and Planktothrix agardhii
Previous Article in Journal
The Elias University Hospital Approach: A Visual Guide to Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection in Spasticity: Part II—Proximal Upper Limb Muscles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Harmful Cyanobacteria on Drinking Water Source Quality and Ecosystems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Ecotoxicological Effects of Cyanobacterial Crude Extracts on Native Tropical Cladocerans and Daphnia magna

by
Cesar Alejandro Zamora-Barrios
1,*,
Marcos Efrén Fragoso Rodríguez
1,
S. Nandini
2,* and
S. S. S. Sarma
2
1
Laboratory of Water Pollutants Removal Processes, Division of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, FES-Iztacala, Tlalnepantla 54090, State of Mexico, Mexico
2
Laboratory of Aquatic Zoology, Division of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, FES-Iztacala, Tlalnepantla 54090, State of Mexico, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2025, 17(6), 277; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17060277
Submission received: 1 May 2025 / Revised: 27 May 2025 / Accepted: 30 May 2025 / Published: 2 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prospective Studies on Harmful Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins)

Abstract

:
Freshwater cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (FCHABs) alter zooplankton communities, often adversely, through the production of cyanotoxins. While Daphnia magna is frequently used to evaluate the impact of toxicants, it is not commonly found in tropical waters; cladocerans from tropical and subtropical waterbodies should be used in bioassays. Here, we evaluated the impact of crude cyanobacteria extracts on three common, native species (Daphnia laevis, Ceriodaphnia dubia, and Simocephalus vetulus) based on acute and chronic bioassays. We analyzed the toxicity of cyanobacterial consortium collected from Lake Zumpango, Mexico. The FCHAB was dominated by Planktothrix agardhii (1.16 × 106 ind mL−1). A series of freeze/thaw/sonification cycles at 20 kHz was used to extract the toxic metabolites and the concentration of dissolved microcystin-LR equivalents was measured using an ELISA immunological kit. S. vetulus was the most sensitive species, with a median lethal concentration of 0.43 compared to 1.19 µg L−1 of D. magna at 48 h. S. vetulus was also the most sensitive in chronic evaluations, showing a negative rate of population increase (−0.10 d−1) in experiments with 20% crude extract.
Key Contribution: This study demonstrates that, although Daphnia magna was more tolerant in acute toxicity tests than native cladocerans, in chronic exposure tests, D. laevis showed greater tolerance (local adaptation) in all the demographic variables evaluated. In contrast, Simocephalus vetulus was very susceptible to crude cyanobacterial extracts. The study also highlights the value of incorporating non-model species into ecotoxicological assessments to improve the ecological relevance to local environments.

1. Introduction

Freshwater cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (FCHABs) are characterized based on their dominance over other primary producers and abundances exceeding 104 cells mL−1 [1,2]. Anthropogenic eutrophication, from excessive input of nitrogen and phosphorus compounds from wastewater, agriculture, and industry increases their densities [3,4]. Simultaneously, hydrological changes, nutrient-rich runoff, global warming, and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide levels enhance their growth rates, spread, and early inoculation of surface waters [5,6]. Long-term eutrophication has been related to plankton communities restructure, reducing cladoceran biomass with cascading effects disrupting aquatic food webs [7].
Cyanobacteria have the capacity to produce bioactive metabolites with diverse structures, finding applications in the food, cosmetics, agrochemical, and pharmaceutical industries [8]. However, among these metabolites, cyanotoxins, which are produced due to genetic and environmental factors, may have an adverse effect on the health of organisms [9,10]. Cyanotoxins encompass cyclic peptides such as microcystins and nodularins, alkaloids like anatoxin-a, cylindrospermopsin, and saxitoxins, as well as non-protein amino acids like BMAA and various lipopolysaccharides [11,12]. Microcystins-LR are considered the most common toxins in freshwater systems, posing risks due to their inhibition of protein phosphatases [13]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has established guidelines of <1 μg L−1 for drinking water sources, or >24 μg L−1 for recreational waters [14]. The adverse effects of cyanotoxins can be estimated by studying the effects of purified toxins [13] or crude extracts of cyanobacterial blooms [11]. Data from the latter permits a better extrapolation of results to field conditions since blooms rarely comprise a single cyanobacterium species. Such studies also take into consideration synergistic or antagonistic effects among the secondary metabolites of various species [15].
Cladocerans are primary consumers that control phytoplankton populations and bacteria from the microbial loop, serving as a trophic link for higher-level consumers [16]. Daphnia magna is globally used in ecotoxicological and environmental toxicology assessments, including those evaluating zooplankton–cyanobacteria interactions. However, its application in tropical and subtropical regions is questionable because this species is restricted to Holarctic regions [17]. D. magna is considered an exotic species, exhibiting higher tolerance to toxicants compared to native species [18]. A recent study shows its presence in a wetland in Mexico, probably having escaped from laboratory cultures during ecotoxicological tests [19]. It is, therefore, important to conduct ecotoxicological tests using native taxa in bioassays for a more reliable extrapolation of results to natural conditions and to avoid the introduction of exotic species [15]. They also help identify any synergistic or antagonistic effects of different chemicals present in cyanobacterial blooms. However, given the diversity of metabolites produced by cyanobacteria and the complexity of cyanobacterial communities, the use of multiple toxicological approaches is necessary [20]. Therefore, research in this field, specifically through bioassays, is essential for developing effective strategies for monitoring and managing cyanobacterial blooms and their impact on aquatic ecosystems and human health [15].
We hypothesized that native cladoceran species could be more sensitive to crude extracts (unpurified mixtures from the total lysis of a cyanobacterial bloom, containing all soluble compounds, including toxins), even if they have coexisted with the cyanobacterial species. These taxa can then be used in toxicity bioassays instead of the non-native Daphnia magna. The aim was, therefore, to determine and compare the LC50 of D. magna, D. laevis, S. vetulus, and C. dubia exposed to a crude extract of cyanobacteria from Lake Zumpango (Mexico) and evaluate their tolerance to the extract compared to D. magna. We also assessed the ecotoxicological effect of the extract in sub-lethal concentrations throughout their life cycle for the most tolerant and the most sensitive native species and compared them with D. magna.

2. Results

2.1. Cyanobacterial Abundance and Microcystin-LR Concentration in the FCHAB

Three species of cyanobacteria dominated the FCHAB, Planktothrix agardhii, Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, and Dolichospermum planctonicum. P. agardhii dominated, accounting for 99.99% of the total biomass and an abundance of 1,166,600 ind mL−1. On the other hand, D. planctonicum exhibited the lowest abundance at 3 ind mL−1. The concentration of microcystin-LR equivalents in the crude extract (100%) was 10.079 µg L−1.

2.2. Acute Toxicity and Relative Sensitivity of Native Cladocerans

The LC50 value for D. magna was 11.85% (1.19 µg L−1). D. leavis showed the highest tolerance to the crude extract among the native species, with an LC50 value of 9.50% (0.95 µg L−1), whereas C. dubia had an LC50 value of 5.56%, and S. vetulus was the most sensitive to the crude extract, with an LC50 value of 4.36% (Figure 1). Among the native species, D. laevis had a relative sensitivity (RS) value of −0.25 at 24 h, indicating greater tolerance to the extract as compared to D. magna. Nevertheless, after 48 h of exposure, this value was 0.097, indicating that with time it became less tolerant than D. magna. S. vetulus was found to be the most sensitive species in both test periods (24 and 48 h), with RS values of 0.41 and 0.44, respectively (Figure 2).

2.3. Sublethal Effects of Native Cladocerans and D. magna

A clear dose–response relationship was observed with a sustained decrease in survival as the concentration of the crude extract and the exposure time increased (Figure 3). It was evident that the adverse effects of the accumulated cyanotoxins were more pronounced with prolonged exposure. S. vetulus showed similar survivorship compared to the control at 5% concentration, although high mortality occurred in the first ten days. At the highest concentration (20%), the cladocerans showed reduced survival compared to the controls, and D. magna was also severely affected at the higher concentration, with a 67% decrease in survival compared to controls. In contrast, D. laevis showed only a 2.5% diminution at the same concentration.
Crude extracts had different effects on the reproduction of the exposed cladocerans. The number of offspring per clutch increased in D. laevis and D. magna with an increasing concentration as a response to stress. However, reproduction decreased in S. vetulus at the highest concentrations. S. vetulus showed maximum reproduction in the low-toxin treatments (5 and 10% crude extract), but there was a two-day delay in the onset of reproduction compared to the control (Figure 3). In the 20% extract, this variable was reduced and delayed, with the first reproduction occurring on day 15 and lasting only for five days. D. laevis had its highest reproductive output on day 72 under the 20% cyanotoxin treatment, with 7.5 neonates ind−1 d−1. On the other hand, D. magna showed its maximum reproductive output in the treatment with the lowest toxin concentration on day 77 of the experiment. In this case, the reproductive period lasted only 26 days, 70% less than in the control (Figure 3).
D. laevis had a life expectancy of 51 days in the control. In the treatment with 20% extract containing cyanotoxins, life expectancy was 40 days, which was statistically lower (p < 0.05, Tukey test). The gross and net reproductive rates had the same pattern, demonstrating higher reproduction when the cladocerans were exposed to the crude extract. Despite this, the treatment containing 10% toxin achieved the highest values, with 147 and 80 neonates female−1 in the net and gross reproductive rates, respectively, both being higher than the toxin-free treatment (Figure 4). The generation time among the treatments ranged from 28 to 40 days. The population growth rate (r, per day) indicated that cladocerans exposed to different proportions of the crude extract compensated for the stress by reproducing earlier. The population growth rate in the treatment with 20% of the crude extract was 0.25 d−1, while the control had a value of 0.16 d−1 (see Figure 4).
The experiment with S. vetulus showed a significant decrease in the average lifespan as the proportion of crude extract increased, reaching 9.5 days (half of that in controls) in the treatment with 20% of crude extract. The 5% treatment exhibited the highest offspring production, exceeding 69 neonates female−1, compared to the control, which produced 26.60 neonates female−1. However, in the 20% extract treatment, there was a significant reduction to 2.20 neonates female−1 (p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA). The net reproductive rate at 5% and 10% concentration of the extract had generation times of 23.74 and 25.76 days, respectively, with no statistical differences compared to the control (p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA); in the 20% treatment, the generation time was 8.65 days. S. vetulus was more sensitie to extract concentrations of 10% and 20%, with significantly lower population growth rates compared to the control and the 5% treatment, with values of 0.07 and −0.10 d−1, respectively.
D. magna had a lifespan of ~50 days when exclusively fed on S. acutus. However, in treatments with cyanotoxins, the lifespan decreased in the following order: 5% (38 days), 10% (27 days), and 20% (13 days). The gross reproductive rate showed a slight, but not statistically significant (p > 0.05, Tukey test), increase in the 5% and 10% treatments compared to the control.). The net reproductive rate in the 20% extract treatment reduced to 14.18 neonates female−1, which is 66% lower than the control. The generation time decreased as the extract percentage rose; the control averaged 40 days, whereas the highest proportion (20%) resulted in approximately 16 days. Population growth rates of D. magna in the presence of crude extracts were 0.22 and 0.24 d−1 for the 5% and 10% treatments, respectively, while the 20% treatment and control showed similar rates at 0.19 d−1 (Figure 4).

3. Discussion

FCHABs are dense and persistent in the tropics, especially in systems subject to anthropogenic eutrophication. The year-round dominance of toxin-producing FCHABs in Lake Zumpango, with dissolved microcystin-LR concentrations reaching up to 11.70 µg L−1, poses a risk to aquatic life. Our observations indicated that P. agardhii was the dominant species. However, other evaluations in the same aquatic system have shown even higher concentrations of microcystins, such as 62.4 µg L−1, with a dominance of Microcystis aeruginosa [21,22]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has established a provisional limit of 10 to 20 μg L−1 of MC-LR for recreational water, indicating that concentrations above this threshold pose a high risk to health [23]. The concentrations evaluated in our experiments are below these levels (0.69 to 3.25 μg L−1 of MC-LR equivalents); however, our results suggest that even these concentrations have an adverse effect on the survival and fecundity of cladocerans.
Various mechanisms explain how crude extracts alter the biological efficiency of the species under study. Notably, dissolved microcystins alone can adversely impact cladocerans, as shown by Rohrlack et al. [24], who detailed the intoxication process of Daphnia galeata upon consuming Microcystis strains producing microcystins. Symptoms included exhaustion leading to starvation, structural alterations in intestinal epithelia, and increased microcystin concentrations in the bloodstream.
In acute evaluations, D. laevis was the least sensitive to the crude extract among the native species. This aligns with the findings of Nandini et al. [25] and Ferrão-Filho et al. [26], who observed low mortality and no swimming paralysis in this cladoceran when it was exposed to two cyanobacteria strains (Microcystis aeruginosa and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii) in acute and chronic tests. This tolerance has also been demonstrated in other daphniids; for example, Pawlik-Skowrońska et al. [27] found that the 24 h LC50 for Daphnia pulex exposed to purified microcystin-LR was 3320 μg L−1. However, when exposed to crude extracts of P. agardhii, it was more sensitive, possibly due to the combination of multiple oligopeptides in the crude extracts that increase toxicity.
S. vetulus was the most sensitive tropical species to the crude extract, which can be attributed to its high filtration rate and non-selective feeding behavior, leading to greater cyanotoxin consumption [28]. Additionally, body size is crucial as it involves greater toxin retention in invertebrates [29,30]. C. dubia showed similar results to S. vetulus in LC50 tests, possibly due to smaller organisms having higher metabolic and filtration rates [31,32]. Both D. laevis and D. magna presented similar results, making them good options for ecotoxicological bioassays due to their taxonomic similarities.
In the chronic evaluations of D. laevis survival, no significant changes were observed between treatments. Nandini et al. [25] demonstrated that D. laevis can grow well on a toxic strain of M. aeruginosa. Additionally, Ferrão-Filho et al. [26] found this species had a high activity of the enzymes glutathione-S-transferase and catalase and promoted cellular detoxification and resistance in this cladoceran to toxic food. The tolerance of cladocerans to cyanotoxins depends on the strain of the species and its gut microbiota, as shown by Macke et al. [33].
D. magna and S. vetulus, showed high survival rates under low concentrations of crude extract; however, survival diminishes with increasing extract concentrations. Similar observations were made by Huang et al. [34], who documented decreased survival and offspring numbers in cladocerans due to reduced feeding rates attributed to toxicity. Our experiments with D. magna and S. vetulus, also show reduced fecundity in the higher concentration (20%). Similarly, Hulot et al. [35] conducted life history assays on this holarctic cladoceran exposed to extracts of P. agardhii, a microcystin-RR-producing, revealing accelerated life histories, altered fecundity, shortened generation times, and decreased survival rates. These results are similar to our findings, as demographic variables from life tables indicate that increased crude extract proportions lead to diminished life expectancy and longer generation times across all species. Elevated stress levels prompt organisms to adopt alternative life history strategies, investing more energy into reproduction. Nandini et al. [25] also showed that in two clones of the cladoceran Moina macrocopa, the clone isolated from environments with cyanobacteria exhibited earlier reproduction, increasing this variable by 15% and shorter generation times.
D. laevis exhibited high fecundity rates; Dao et al. [36] also reported increased fecundity but reduced survival in D. magna exposed to crude cyanobacterial extracts. Unfavorable environmental conditions stimulate increased fecundity, leading to substantial alterations in life expectancy [37]. Conversely, in the highest extract concentration treatment, D. magna achieved only a maximum fecundity of five individuals per day with elevated mortality rates. A similar outcome was observed with S. vetulus, which produced fewer neonates under the same conditions. This suggests that exposure to microcystins and other metabolites in cyanobacterial extracts adversely affects reproductive processes, as demonstrated by Pawlik-Skowrońska et al. [27] with Daphnia pulex exposed to cyanobacterial extracts containing high concentrations of microcystins, oligopeptides, anabaenopeptins, aeruginosamides, aeruginosins, and cyanopeptolins.
Choosing native species or standard bioassay organisms in ecotoxicological assessments is a decision that should be based on the specific purpose of the assessment. It is important to conduct ecotoxicological assays on native species as the use of D. magna, typically not from the tropics, may not have the same sensitivity as native species. Santos-Medrano and Rico-Martínez [16] have emphasized this concern, highlighting that the responses of D. magna might not be representative of the effects on native species. The use of local species offers the advantage of generating results that are specific and applicable to provincial ecosystems [38]. In contrast, the use of sentinel cladocerans such as D. magna, which has well-established laboratory protocols, offers a global perspective [39]. A key aspect that has prompted reconsideration of the organisms used in bioassays is the influence of local adaptation. Recent research has shown that, even within the same species, tolerance levels to contaminants can vary depending on the evolutionary history of populations [16,33]. This variability highlights the risk of extrapolating results obtained from non-local populations to predict ecological impacts in other aquatic systems. Ultimately, a combined approach using both established models and local taxa will be essential for advancing environmental protection and understanding eco-evolutionary processes.
The effects observed on native cladoceran species exposed to the cyanobacterial consortium dominated by microcystin-producing P. agardhii suggest possible alterations in the food web dynamics of the ecosystem. The pronounced sensitivity and population collapse of S. vetulus may lead to changes in zooplankton community structure, potentially favoring more resistant species such as D. laevis, which show compensatory reproductive responses even in the face of toxic stress. These changes in species composition could reduce grazing pressure on cyanobacteria, thus favoring their proliferation and hindering the transfer of carbon and polyunsaturated fatty acids to higher trophic levels [40]. The short generation time and higher fecundity of D. laevis make it a good option for further study on biomanipulation and the control of cyanobacterial blooms [41,42].

4. Conclusions

In acute tests, S. vetulus was the most sensitive compared to the standard cladoceran D. magna to the crude extract of microcystin-producing cyanobacteria. Based on the relative sensitivity obtained, it is highlighted that native species showed lower tolerance to the presence of the crude extract of cyanobacteria compared to D. magna. The crude extract had negative effects on all cladocerans evaluated in chronic bioassays, altering demographic variables associated with survival and fecundity. Among the native species, D. laevis was more tolerant to crude extracts. These suggest the need to include native cladocerans in ecotoxicological evaluations to protect local waterbodies.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Isolation and Maintenance of Bioassay Organisms

One parthenogenetic female from each of the three cladoceran species D. laevis, C. dubia, and S. vetulus was isolated from Lake Zumpango, a shallow lake (<4 m) located at a high altitude (2250 m) within the Hydrological Region of the Lacustrine Complex of the Basin of Mexico. As previously reported, this area presents eutrophication and toxic cyanobacterial dominance [22]. A population of D. magna was provided by the Mexican Institute of Water Technology (IMTA, Mexico, Morelos), and monoclonal cultures were established using U.S. EPA medium, and maintained under laboratory conditions over two years. All cladocerans were fed on green alga Scenedesmus acutus, which was grown on Bold basal medium [43].

5.2. Preparation of the Crude Extract of the Cyanobacterial Bloom

The cyanobacterial bloom sample was collected from the littoral zone of Lake Zumpango and placed in a 10 L plastic container. A subsample of 50 mL was preserved in 3% formalin to determine and quantify the abundances of the predominant species within the cyanobacterial consortium. In the laboratory, the samples were filtered to remove zooplankton (rotifers, copepods, or cladocerans) and were checked under a microscope (Nikon, Model: Eclipse E600, Tokyo, Japan) to guarantee that the sample contained only cyanobacteria. The sample was subjected to five cycles of freezing at −70 °C and thawing, and subsequently sonicated for 10 min at 20 KHz to ensure the cell lysis and cyanotoxins extraction [44]. Finally, the sample was centrifuged at 4000 rpm and filtered through a 0.45 µm pore-size Millipore filter to remove cell debris, including bacterial cells. The crude extract was kept frozen (−70 °C), until it was used in the bioassays with the cladocerans.
Microcystin concentration was determined using the commercial kit based on the ELISA assay “QuantiplateTMKit for Microcystins” from EnvirologixTM (Portland, Maine, USA), following the manufacturer’s specifications. Microcystin concentrations were expressed as microcystin-LR equivalents (µg L−1). Although the ELISA kit used is based on monoclonal antibodies directed against the ADDA fraction, it exhibits low levels of cross-reactivity with three microcystin variants (RR, YR, and LR). We interpolated the microcystin concentration in the bioassays developed. We did not evaluate other cyanotoxins; however, the extract could contain dissolved metabolites in addition to microcystins, which reflects the natural chemical complexity of the blooms and allows for a more realistic assessment of biological effects.

5.3. Identification and Quantification of Cyanobacteria

The preserved sample was photomicrographed using the computer application Motic images plus 3.0. Their morphological characteristics were used for species identification following standards in the literature [45]. Cyanobacterial species present in the samples were quantified by counting the entire surface of a Sedgwick–Rafter chamber at 100× magnification. For smaller or unicellular species, enumeration was performed using a Neubauer chamber at 200× magnification. Cyanobacterial density was expressed as the number of individuals per milliliter (individuals mL−1), calculated from the mean of three replicates.

5.4. Acute Toxicity Tests

Toxicity tests were conducted following the guidelines of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Twenty neonates (<24 h) of each cladoceran species were subjected to six concentrations of the crude extract (ranging from 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, to 40%) and U.S. EPA as mediums. These corresponded to the concentrations of microcystin-LR equivalents of 0.125, 0.25, 0.503, 1.007, 2.015, and 4.031 µg L−1. The experiments were conducted in borosilicate vessels containing 40 mL plus the chosen crude extract concentration. The test cladocerans were incubated at 20 ± 2 °C without food, and experiments were conducted in quadruplicate. The survival of the individuals was recorded after 48 h using a stereo microscope. Based on the survivorship data, the lethal concentration (LC50) was calculated using the Probit method. The relative sensitivity (RS) was calculated using the formula established by Von der Ohe and Liess [46].
Relative sensitivity, RS = log (LC50 D. magna/LC50i), where LC50 D. magna represents the LC50 value obtained for D. magna exposed to a toxicant. LC50i represents the LC50 value for species i (each native cladoceran species). A zero value indicates that the species sensitivity is equivalent to D. magna. A positive value indicates that D. magna is less sensitive, while a negative value indicates that D. magna is more sensitive.

5.5. Chronic Toxicity Test (Life Table)

Based on the data of LC50, we selected the most tolerant (D. laevis) and the most sensitive (S. vetulus) native species for chronic tests. Twenty neonates of each species were placed in a 40 mL volume, using three sublethal concentrations of 5, 10, and 20% of the average value of LC50 obtained from the four species. These concentrations also contained U.S. EPA medium as a diluent and Scenedesmus acutus as food (1 × 106 cells mL−1). Each experiment included a control free of toxicant, and each treatment had four replicates. Every day, the surviving individuals were quantified and transferred to fresh test jars with appropriate medium. Neonates and dead individuals were also counted but discarded. The experiment continued until all individuals of the initial cohort died. From the data of survival and fecundity, table parameters were calculated using the formulae proposed by Krebs [47]:
Life expectancy:
e x = T x n x
Gross reproductive rate:
= 0 m x
Net reproductive rate:
= 0 l x m x
Generation time:
T = l x m x x R 0
Rate of population increase (r), solved iteratively:
x = w n e r x l x m x = 1

5.6. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis of the data and graphs of both evaluations were performed with Sigma Plot 11.0 software (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Statistical analyses were performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s test to identify significant effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.Z.-B. and M.E.F.R.; methodology, C.A.Z.-B. and M.E.F.R.; software, C.A.Z.-B.; validation, C.A.Z.-B., M.E.F.R. and S.N.; formal analysis, C.A.Z.-B. and S.N.; investigation, C.A.Z.-B. and S.N.; resources, S.S.S.S. and S.N.; data curation, C.A.Z.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A.Z.-B.; writing—review and editing, C.A.Z.-B., M.E.F.R., S.N. and S.S.S.S.; visualization, C.A.Z.-B.; supervision, S.S.S.S.; project administration, C.A.Z.-B.; funding acquisition, S.N. and S.S.S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Secretaria de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (SECIHTI) (1145780) and DGAPA-PAPIIT (IN229523, IN211425 and IN211525).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

CAZB thanks SECIHTI Mexico (492558). SN and SSSS thank PAPIIT (UNAM) IN211425 and IN211525 and SECIHTI Mexico (20520 and 18723). All authors are grateful for the full waiver offered for the publication of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
RSRelative sensitivity
FCHABsFreshwater cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms
LC50Median Lethal concentration
ELISAEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

References

  1. Ger, K.A.; Urrutia-Cordero, P.; Frost, P.C.; Hansson, L.A.; Sarnelle, O.; Wilson, A.E.; Lürling, M. The interaction between cyanobacteria and zooplankton in a more eutrophic world. Harmful Algae 2016, 54, 128–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Churro, C.; Azevedo, J.; Vasconcelos, V.; Silva, A. Detection of a Planktothrix agardhii bloom in Portuguese marine coastal waters. Toxins 2017, 9, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Elmgren, R.; Larsson, U. Nitrogen and the Baltic Sea: Managing nitrogen in relation to phosphorus. Sci. World J. 2001, 1, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Paerl, H.W. Mitigating toxic planktonic cyanobacterial blooms in aquatic ecosystems facing increasing anthropogenic and climatic pressures. Toxins 2018, 10, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ullah, H.; Nagelkerken, I.; Goldenberg, S.U.; Fordham, D.A. Climate change could drive marine food web collapse through altered trophic flows and cyanobacterial proliferation. PLoS Biol. 2018, 16, e2003446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Burford, M.A.; Carey, C.C.; Hamilton, D.P.; Huisman, J.; Paerl, H.W.; Wood, S.A.; Wulff, A. Perspective: Advancing the research agenda for improving understanding of cyanobacteria in a future of global change. Harmful Algae 2020, 91, 101601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. King, L.; Wienhues, G.; Misra, P.; Tylmann, W.; Lami, A.; Bernasconi, S.M.; Matthews, B. Anthropogenic eutrophication drives major food web changes in Mwanza Gulf, Lake Victoria. Ecosystems 2024, 27, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jones, M.R.; Pinto, E.; Torres, M.A.; Dörr, F.; Mazur-Marzec, H.; Szubert, K.; Janssen, E.M.L. CyanoMetDB, a comprehensive public database of secondary metabolites from cyanobacteria. Water Res. 2021, 196, 117017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Testai, E.; Scardala, S.; Vichi, S.; Buratti, F.M.; Funari, E. Risk to human health associated with the environmental occurrence of cyanobacterial neurotoxic alkaloids anatoxins and saxitoxins. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2016, 46, 385–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vilar, M.C.; Rodrigues, T.F.; Silva, L.O.; Pacheco, A.B.F.; Ferrão-Filho, A.S.; Azevedo, S.M. Ecophysiological aspects and sxt genes expression underlying induced chemical defense in STX-producing Raphidiopsis raciborskii (cyanobacteria) against the zooplankter Daphnia gessneri. Toxins 2021, 13, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sazdova, I.; Keremidarska-Markova, M.; Chichova, M.; Uzunov, B.; Nikolaev, G.; Mladenov, M.; Gagov, H.S. Review of Cyanotoxicity Studies Based on Cell Cultures. J. Toxicol. 2022, 2022, 5647178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fontanillo, M.; Köhn, M. Microcystins: Synthesis and Structure–Activity Relationship Studies Toward PP1 and PP2A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 1118–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chorus, I.; Welker, M. Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring and Management; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2021; p. 858. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zamora-Barrios, C.A.; Nandini, S.; Sarma, S.S.S. Review of Potentially Harmful Cyanobacteria. Tecnol. Cienc. Agua 2023, 14, 250–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nandini, S.; Sarma, S.S.S. Experimental studies on zooplankton-toxic cyanobacteria interactions: A review. Toxics 2023, 11, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Porter, K.G. Integrating the Microbial Loop and the Classic Food Chain into a Realistic Planktonic Food Web. In Food Webs: Integration of Patterns & Dynamics; Polis, G.A., Winemiller, K.O., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1996; pp. 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  17. Santos-Medrano, G.E.; Rico-Martínez, R. Acute Sensitivity Comparison Among Daphnia magna Straus, 1820, Daphnia pulex Leydig, 1860 and Simocephalus vetulus Müller, 1776, Exposed to Nine Toxicants. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2019, 19, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Freitas, E.C.; Rocha, O. Acute Toxicity Tests with the Tropical Cladoceran Pseudosida ramosa: The Importance of Using Native Species as Test Organisms. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2011, 60, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Espinosa-Rodríguez, C.A.; Jiménez-Santos, M.A.; Martínez-Miranda, D.M.; Piedra-Ibarra, E.; Rivera-De la Parra, L.; Lugo-Vázquez, A. Daphnia magna (Crustacea: Anomopoda) in Central Mexico Wetlands: Implications of Escape from Ecotoxicological Laboratories. Biol. Invasions 2024, 26, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Metcalf, J.S.; Codd, G.A. Co-occurrence of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins with other environmental health hazards: Impacts and implications. Toxins 2020, 12, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vasconcelos, V.; Martins, A.; Vale, M.; Antunes, A.; Azevedo, J.; Welker, M.; Montejano, G. First report on the occurrence of microcystins in planktonic cyanobacteria from Central Mexico. Toxicon 2010, 56, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Figueroa-Sánchez, M.A.; Nandini, S.; Sarma, S.S.S. Zooplankton community structure in relation to microcystins in the eutrophic Lake Zumpango (State of Mexico). Fundam. Appl. Limnol. 2020, 196, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments: Coastal and Fresh Waters; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  24. Rohrlack, T.; Christoffersen, K.; Dittmann, E.; Nogueira, I.; Vasconcelos, V.; Börner, T. Ingestion of microcystins by Daphnia: Intestinal uptake and toxic effects. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2005, 50, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nandini, S.; Sarma, S.S.S.; Ramírez-García, P. Life table demography and population growth of Daphnia laevis (Cladocera, Anomopoda) under different densities of Chlorella vulgaris and Microcystis aeruginosa. Crustaceana 2000, 73, 1273–1286. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20106399 (accessed on 26 May 2025).
  26. Ferrão-Filho, A.; de Abreu, S.; Silva, D.; de Oliveira, T.A.; de Magalhães, V.F.; Pflugmacher, S.; da Silva, E.M. Single and combined effects of microcystin- and saxitoxin-producing cyanobacteria on the fitness and antioxidant defenses of cladocerans. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2017, 36, 2689–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pawlik-Skowrońska, B.; Toporowska, M.; Mazur-Marzec, H. Effects of secondary metabolites produced by different cyanobacterial populations on the freshwater zooplankters Brachionus calyciflorus and Daphnia pulex. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 11793–11804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fernandez, R.; Nandini, S.; Sarma, S.S.S. A comparative study on the ability of tropical micro-crustaceans to feed and grow on cyanobacterial diets. J. Plankton Res. 2012, 34, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Krantzberg, G. Metal accumulation by chironomid larvae: The effects of age and body weight on metal body burdens. In Environmental Bioassay Techniques and their Application: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference, Lancaster, UK, 11–14 July 1988; Wells, P.G., Lee, K., Blaise, C., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989; pp. 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gokul, T.; Kumar, K.R.; Veeramanikandan, V.; Arun, A.; Balaji, P.; Faggio, C. Impact of particulate pollution on aquatic invertebrates. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2023, 100, 104146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Williamson, P. Variables affecting body burdens of lead, zinc and cadmium in a roadside population of the snail Cepaea hortensis Müller. Oecologia 1980, 44, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dölger, J.; Kiørboe, T.; Andersen, A. Dense dwarfs versus gelatinous giants: The trade-offs and physiological limits determining the body plan of planktonic filter feeders. Am. Nat. 2019, 194, E30–E40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Macke, E.; Callens, M.; De Meester, L.; Decaestecker, E. Host-genotype dependent gut microbiota drives zooplankton tolerance to toxic cyanobacteria. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, J.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, L.; Lyu, K.; Yang, Z. Size-specific sensitivity of cladocerans to freshwater salinization: Evidences from the changes in life history and population dynamics. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 296, 118770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hulot, F.D.; Carmignac, D.; Legendre, S.; Yepremian, C.; Bernard, C. Effects of microcystin-producing and microcystin-free strains of Planktothrix agardhii on long-term population dynamics of Daphnia magna. Ann. Limnol. Int. J. Limnol. 2012, 48, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dao, T.S.; Do-Hong, L.C.; Wiegand, C. Chronic effects of cyanobacterial toxins on Daphnia magna and their offspring. Toxicon 2010, 55, 1244–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. MacArthur, R.H. Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rodgher, S.; Espíndola, E.L.G.; Lombardi, A.T. Suitability of Daphnia similis as an alternative organism in ecotoxicological tests: Implications for metal toxicity. Ecotoxicology 2010, 19, 1027–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tkaczyk, A.; Bownik, A.; Dudka, J.; Kowal, K.; Ślaska, B. Daphnia magna model in the toxicity assessment of pharmaceuticals: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 763, 143038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Feniova, I.Y.; Brzeziński, T.; Bednarska, A.; Dzialowski, A.R.; Petrosyan, V.G.; Zilitinkevich, N.; Dawidowicz, P. Effects of cyanobacteria on competitive interactions between different-sized cladoceran species. Water 2025, 17, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. MacKay, N.A.; Elser, J.J. Nutrient recycling by Daphnia reduces N₂ fixation by cyanobacteria. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1998, 43, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Declerck, S.A.; de Senerpont Domis, L.N. Contribution of freshwater metazooplankton to aquatic ecosystem services: An overview. Hydrobiologia 2023, 850, 2795–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Borowitzka, M.A.; Borowitzka, L.J. (Eds.) Dunaliella. In Microalgal Biotechnology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988; pp. 27–58. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pietsch, C.; Wiegand, C.; Amé, M.V.; Nicklisch, A.; Wunderlin, D.; Pflugmacher, S. The effects of a cyanobacterial crude extract on different aquatic organisms: Evidence for cyanobacterial toxin modulating factors. Environ. Toxicol. 2001, 16, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Komárek, J.; Johansen, J.R. Filamentous cyanobacteria. In Freshwater Algae of North America; Whitton, B.A., Potts, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 135–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Von der Ohe, P.C.; Liess, M. Relative sensitivity distribution of aquatic invertebrates to organic and metal compounds. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Krebs, C.J. Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 3rd ed.; Harper and Row: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. LC50 values of D. magna, D. laevis, C. dubia, and S. vetulus exposed to the crude extract of cyanobacteria collected from Lake Zumpango.
Figure 1. LC50 values of D. magna, D. laevis, C. dubia, and S. vetulus exposed to the crude extract of cyanobacteria collected from Lake Zumpango.
Toxins 17 00277 g001
Figure 2. Relative sensitivity values of native species (D. laevis, C. dubia, and S.vetulus) when exposed to cyanobacteria crude extract during 24 and 48 h test periods.
Figure 2. Relative sensitivity values of native species (D. laevis, C. dubia, and S.vetulus) when exposed to cyanobacteria crude extract during 24 and 48 h test periods.
Toxins 17 00277 g002
Figure 3. Survivorship and fecundity and patterns of D. laevis, D. magna, and S. vetulus populations exposed to different concentrations of cyanobacterial crude extracts (5, 10, and 20%) and a control group fed on S. acutus. The values represent the mean and ± standard error of four replicates (cohorts).
Figure 3. Survivorship and fecundity and patterns of D. laevis, D. magna, and S. vetulus populations exposed to different concentrations of cyanobacterial crude extracts (5, 10, and 20%) and a control group fed on S. acutus. The values represent the mean and ± standard error of four replicates (cohorts).
Toxins 17 00277 g003
Figure 4. Average lifespan, gross reproductive rates, net reproductive rates, generation time, and rate of population increase of D. laevis, D. magna, and S. vetulus exposed to cyanobacterial crude extracts (5, 10, and 20%). Data represent mean ± standard error of four replicates. For a given variable, different alphabets indicate significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey test).
Figure 4. Average lifespan, gross reproductive rates, net reproductive rates, generation time, and rate of population increase of D. laevis, D. magna, and S. vetulus exposed to cyanobacterial crude extracts (5, 10, and 20%). Data represent mean ± standard error of four replicates. For a given variable, different alphabets indicate significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey test).
Toxins 17 00277 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zamora-Barrios, C.A.; Rodríguez, M.E.F.; Nandini, S.; Sarma, S.S.S. Comparative Ecotoxicological Effects of Cyanobacterial Crude Extracts on Native Tropical Cladocerans and Daphnia magna. Toxins 2025, 17, 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17060277

AMA Style

Zamora-Barrios CA, Rodríguez MEF, Nandini S, Sarma SSS. Comparative Ecotoxicological Effects of Cyanobacterial Crude Extracts on Native Tropical Cladocerans and Daphnia magna. Toxins. 2025; 17(6):277. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17060277

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zamora-Barrios, Cesar Alejandro, Marcos Efrén Fragoso Rodríguez, S. Nandini, and S. S. S. Sarma. 2025. "Comparative Ecotoxicological Effects of Cyanobacterial Crude Extracts on Native Tropical Cladocerans and Daphnia magna" Toxins 17, no. 6: 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17060277

APA Style

Zamora-Barrios, C. A., Rodríguez, M. E. F., Nandini, S., & Sarma, S. S. S. (2025). Comparative Ecotoxicological Effects of Cyanobacterial Crude Extracts on Native Tropical Cladocerans and Daphnia magna. Toxins, 17(6), 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17060277

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop