Next Article in Journal
An Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition-Based Biosensor for Aflatoxin B1 Detection Using Sodium Alginate as an Immobilization Matrix
Previous Article in Journal
Occurrence of Fungi and Fungal Toxins in Fish Feed during Storage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Food Consumption Data as a Tool to Estimate Exposure to Mycoestrogens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Mycotoxin Exposure and Related Diseases

by
Ricardo Assunção
1,2,* and
Susana Viegas
3,4,5,*
1
Food and Nutrition Department, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Avenida Padre Cruz, 1649-016 Lisboa, Portugal
2
CESAM, Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
3
NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal
4
Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), 1150-090 Lisbon, Portugal
5
H&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL-Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1990-096 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(3), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030172
Submission received: 2 March 2020 / Revised: 5 March 2020 / Accepted: 9 March 2020 / Published: 11 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycotoxin Exposure and Related Diseases)
Mycotoxins are considered the most frequently occurring natural contaminants in the diet of humans and animals. These toxic secondary metabolites of low molecular weight and very stable compounds are produced by different genera of filamentous fungi that infect susceptible plants throughout the world [1,2]. Considering their particular vulnerability to fungi contamination, crops represent a special concern under mycotoxins context. Most fungal strains produce more than one type of mycotoxin, therefore, co-contamination of agricultural products with multiple mycotoxins is frequently observed, and the need to consider this aspect in the risk assessment process has been emphasized [3,4].
Animals can be exposed to mycotoxins through the consumption of contaminated feed, subsequently entering into the food chain, and thus constituting a source of exposure to humans [5]. Regarding human exposure, in addition to the dietary source, the workplace environment can also represent an exposure source. Dust containing mycotoxins is released during regular tasks involving high exposure to organic dust, such as storage work, loading, handling, or milling contaminated materials (grain, waste, and feed), and other tasks such as caring for animals in animal husbandry settings [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
The establishment of a disease is largely influenced by the magnitude of a given exposure. Consequently, every effort that contributes to properly characterizing the risk associated with human exposure assumes particular relevance.
The present Special Issue aims to shed light on the different perspectives of mycotoxins exposure and their implications for the establishment of a disease. The gathered studies include several important findings focusing on different perspectives and clues about the impact of human and animal exposure to mycotoxins. A broad spectrum of mycotoxins-related issues associated with mycotoxin exposure and related diseases are covered in the present Special Issue.
The detection and quantification of mycotoxins in food and feed, as an important aspect in the exposure characterization process, is focused on in two studies. An innovative detection methodology of aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in milk using interferometric biosensors has been developed, demonstrating that viable solutions for lab-on-chip devices for food safety analyses are possible and reliable [16]. Data on the individual and combined occurrence of Fusarium mycotoxins and ochratoxin A (OTA) in feedstuffs in Costa Rica were collected, highlighting the implications for all stakeholders linked to the feed industry as well as the potential measures that can be considered for the management of mycotoxins in animal production [17].
The risk assessment of human exposure to mycotoxins is also considered, applying different approaches for the general population [18] or to specific populations such as children [19] or swine production workers [6]. Regarding these studies, human biomonitoring strategies, as a direct measure of internal exposure, are considered [6,18]. The exposure to mycoestrogens, namely zearalenone (ZEN) and alternariol, was estimated through data modeling, assessing the burden regarding endocrine disruption [18]. The workplace environment also represents an important exposure source to mycotoxins, namely, in swine production [6]. Exposure of children to mycotoxins in Vietnam were assessed and revealed a high risk associated with high levels of exposure and exceedance of toxicological reference levels [19]. In order to clarify the potential role of the mycotoxin HT-2 in the Kashin–Beck disease, an in vitro approach using immortalized human chondrocyte cell line, C-28/I2, is considered [20]. The study reports a potentially negative effect led by HT-2 exposure and highlights the importance of future studies to provide a better understanding of the mechanism of HT-2 toxin cytotoxicity.
In addition to the human studies, several papers examine the role of mycotoxins in the establishment and/or development of different health effects in animals [21,22,23,24]. Interference of mycotoxins exposure in the gut microbiome and immunity are evaluated in gilts, turkeys, and rats [22,23,24]. In pre-pubertal gilts, a minimal anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) dose of ZEN stimulated the growth of specific strains of intestinal microbiota [22]. In turkeys, the effects of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) on the gastro-intestinal tract are investigated and show that, in addition to the hepatic transcriptome, animal resistance to this mycotoxin occurs in organ systems outside the liver [23]. In rats, and also focusing on the effects of AFB1, the findings suggest that AFB1 can alter the gut microbiota composition and that Lactobacillus casei Shirota can reduce the AFB1-induced dissimilarities in the gut microbiota profile [24]. Hepatoxicity associated with the exposure of piglets to fumonisin B1 (FB1) is also studied [21]. Results show that histology, cellular enzyme leakage, and hepatocellular membrane lipid fatty acid profile are affected after an exposure of 10 days to FB1.
Recognizing the potential negative impact associated to animal exposure to mycotoxins, the application of appropriate mitigation measures is also studied. The use of the yeast cell wall extract (YCWE) in chickens [25] and a novel modified hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate (HSCAS) in chicks [26] as adsorbents to mycotoxins are investigated. First, data showed a decrease of up to 30% in OTA deposits in the liver of broilers fed both OTA and YCWE [25]. Second, the results suggest that the modified HSCAS adsorbent can be used against T-2 toxin-induced toxicity in growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and hepatic and small intestinal injuries in chicks [26].
Altogether, and especially under an expected climate change scenario, which considers mycotoxins as an important driver of health consequences, the present Special Issue contributes with significant and impactful research that supports the anticipation of potential consequences of the exposure of humans and animals to mycotoxins, future risk assessments, and the establishment of preventive measures.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The Editors are grateful to all of the authors who contributed with their work to this Special Issue. Special thanks go to the rigorous evaluations of all of the submitted manuscripts by the expert peer reviewers who contributed to this Special Issue. Lastly, the valuable contributions, organization, and editorial support of the MDPI management team and staff are greatly appreciated. The Editors would like to acknowledge the support of the NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, and are grateful to FCT/MCTES for the support to CESAM (UID/AMB/50017/2019).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gruber-Dorninger, C.; Jenkins, T.; Schatzmayr, G. Global Mycotoxin Occurrence in Feed: A Ten-Year Survey. Toxins 2019, 11, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ingenbleek, L.; Sulyok, M.; Adegboye, A.; Hossou, S.E.; Koné, A.Z.; Oyedele, A.D.; Kisito, C.S.K.J.; Dembélé, Y.K.; Eyangoh, S.; Verger, P.; et al. Regional Sub-Saharan Africa Total Diet Study in Benin, Cameroon, Mali and Nigeria Reveals the Presence of 164 Mycotoxins and Other Secondary Metabolites in Foods. Toxins 2019, 11, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Assunção, R.; Silva, M.J.; Alvito, P. Challenges in risk assessment of multiple mycotoxins in food. World Mycotoxin J. 2016, 9, 791–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Eskola, M.; Altieri, A.; Galobart, J. Overview of the activities of the European Food Safety Authority on mycotoxins in food and feed. World Mycotoxin J. 2018, 11, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Viegas, S.; Assunção, R.; Twarużek, M.; Kosicki, R.; Grajewski, J.; Viegas, C. Mycotoxins feed contamination in a dairy farm—Potential implications for milk contamination and workers’ exposure in a One Health approach. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 1118–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Viegas, S.; Assunção, R.; Martins, C.; Nunes, C.; Osteresch, B.; Twarużek, M.; Kosicki, R.; Grajewski, J.; Ribeiro, E.; Viegas, C. Occupational Exposure to Mycotoxins in Swine Production: Environmental and Biological Monitoring Approaches. Toxins 2019, 11, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Viegas, S.; Assunção, R.; Nunes, C.; Osteresch, B.; Twarużek, M.; Kosicki, R.; Grajewski, J.; Martins, C.; Alvito, P.; Almeida, A.; et al. Exposure Assessment to Mycotoxins in a Portuguese Fresh Bread Dough Company by Using a Multi-Biomarker Approach. Toxins 2018, 10, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Viegas, S.; Viegas, C.; Oppliger, A. Occupational Exposure to Mycotoxins: Current Knowledge and Prospects. Ann. Work Expo. Health 2018, 62, 923–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Viegas, S.; Osteresch, B.; Almeida, A.; Cramer, B.; Humpf, H.-U.; Viegas, C. Enniatin B and ochratoxin A in the blood serum of workers from the waste management setting. Mycotoxin Res. 2018, 34, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Viegas, S.; Veiga, L.; Almeida, A.; dos Santos, M.; Carolino, E.; Viegas, C. Occupational Exposure to Aflatoxin B1 in a Portuguese Poultry Slaughterhouse. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2016, 60, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Viegas, S.; Veiga, L.; Figueiredo, P.; Almeida, A.; Carolino, E.; Viegas, C. Assessment of Workers’ Exposure to Aflatoxin B1 in a Portuguese Waste Industry. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2014, 59, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Viegas, S.; Veiga, L.; Figueredo, P.; Almeida, A.; Carolino, E.; Sabino, R.; Veríssimo, C.; Viegas, C. Occupational Exposure to Aflatoxin B 1 in Swine Production and Possible Contamination Sources. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2013, 76, 944–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Viegas, S.; Veiga, L.; Figueredo, P.; Almeida, A.; Carolino, E.; Sabino, R.; Veríssimo, C.; Viegas, C. Occupational exposure to aflatoxin B 1: The case of poultry and swine production. World Mycotoxin J. 2013, 6, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Viegas, S.; Veiga, L.; Malta-Vacas, J.; Sabino, R.; Figueredo, P.; Almeida, A.; Viegas, C.; Carolino, E. Occupational Exposure to Aflatoxin (AFB 1) in Poultry Production. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2012, 75, 1330–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Viegas, C.; Monteiro, A.; Ribeiro, E.; Caetano, L.A.; Carolino, E.; Assunção, R.; Viegas, S. Organic dust exposure in veterinary clinics: A case study of a small-animal practice in Portugal. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 2018, 69, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chalyan, T.; Potrich, C.; Schreuder, E.; Falke, F.; Pasquardini, L.; Pederzolli, C.; Heideman, R.; Pavesi, L. AFM1 Detection in Milk by Fab’ Functionalized Si3N4 Asymmetric Mach–Zehnder Interferometric Biosensors. Toxins 2019, 11, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Molina, A.; Chavarría, G.; Alfaro-Cascante, M.; Leiva, A.; Granados-Chinchilla, F. Mycotoxins at the Start of the Food Chain in Costa Rica: Analysis of Six Fusarium Toxins and Ochratoxin A between 2013 and 2017 in Animal Feed and Aflatoxin M1 in Dairy Products. Toxins 2019, 11, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Martins, C.; Torres, D.; Lopes, C.; Correia, D.; Goios, A.; Assunção, R.; Alvito, P.; Vidal, A.; De Boevre, M.; De Saeger, S.; et al. Food Consumption Data as a Tool to Estimate Exposure to Mycoestrogens. Toxins 2020, 12, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Huong, B.T.M.; Tuyen, L.D.; Madsen, H.; Brimer, L.; Friis, H.; Dalsgaard, A. Total Dietary Intake and Health Risks Associated with Exposure to Aflatoxin B1, Ochratoxin A and Fuminisins of Children in Lao Cai Province, Vietnam. Toxins 2019, 11, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, F.; Lammi, M.J.; Shao, W.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, H.; Guo, X. Cytotoxic Properties of HT-2 Toxin in Human Chondrocytes: Could T3 Inhibit Toxicity of HT-2? Toxins 2019, 11, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ali, O.; Szabó-Fodor, J.; Fébel, H.; Mézes, M.; Balogh, K.; Glávits, R.; Kovács, M.; Zantomasi, A.; Szabó, A. Porcine Hepatic Response to Fumonisin B1 in a Short Exposure Period: Fatty Acid Profile and Clinical Investigations. Toxins 2019, 11, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Cieplińska, K.; Gajęcka, M.; Dąbrowski, M.; Rykaczewska, A.; Lisieska-Żołnierczyk, S.; Bulińska, M.; Zielonka, Ł.; Gajęcki, M.T. Time-Dependent Changes in the Intestinal Microbiome of Gilts Exposed to Low Zearalenone Doses. Toxins 2019, 11, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Reed, K.; Mendoza, K.; Coulombe, R. Differential Transcriptome Responses to Aflatoxin B1 in the Cecal Tonsil of Susceptible and Resistant Turkeys. Toxins 2019, 11, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liew, W.; Mohd-Redzwan, S.; Than, L. Gut Microbiota Profiling of Aflatoxin B1-Induced Rats Treated with Lactobacillus casei Shirota. Toxins 2019, 11, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Vartiainen, S.; Yiannikouris, A.; Apajalahti, J.; Moran, C.A. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Efficiency of Yeast Cell Wall Extract to Adsorb Ochratoxin A and Mitigate Accumulation of the Toxin in Broiler Chickens. Toxins 2020, 12, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wei, J.; Wu, K.; Sun, H.; Khalil, M.M.; Dai, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, N.-Y.; Qi, D.-S.; Sun, L.-H. A Novel Modified Hydrated Sodium Calcium Aluminosilicate (HSCAS) Adsorbent Can Effectively Reduce T-2 Toxin-Induced Toxicity in Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Serum Biochemistry, and Small Intestinal Morphology in Chicks. Toxins 2019, 11, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Assunção, R.; Viegas, S. Mycotoxin Exposure and Related Diseases. Toxins 2020, 12, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030172

AMA Style

Assunção R, Viegas S. Mycotoxin Exposure and Related Diseases. Toxins. 2020; 12(3):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030172

Chicago/Turabian Style

Assunção, Ricardo, and Susana Viegas. 2020. "Mycotoxin Exposure and Related Diseases" Toxins 12, no. 3: 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12030172

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop