Next Article in Journal
Aflatoxin Contamination of Milk Marketed in Pakistan: A Longitudinal Study
Next Article in Special Issue
The Development of a qPCR Assay to Measure Aspergillus flavus Biomass in Maize and the Use of a Biocontrol Strategy to Limit Aflatoxin Production
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Production of a Recombinant Hybrid Toxin to Raise Protective Antibodies against Loxosceles Spider Venom
Previous Article in Special Issue
Grape Seed Proanthocyanidin Extract Alleviates AflatoxinB1-Induced Immunotoxicity and Oxidative Stress via Modulation of NF-κB and Nrf2 Signaling Pathways in Broilers

Biocontrol of Aspergillus and Fusarium Mycotoxins in Africa: Benefits and Limitations

MYTOX-SOUTH, Centre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public health, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Centre for Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2019, 11(2), 109;
Received: 16 January 2019 / Revised: 1 February 2019 / Accepted: 6 February 2019 / Published: 13 February 2019
Fungal contamination and the consequent mycotoxin production is a hindrance to food and feed safety, international trade and human and animal health. In Africa, fungal contamination by Fusarium and Aspergillus is heightened by tropical climatic conditions that create a suitable environment for pre- and postharvest mycotoxin production. The biocontrol of Fusarium and its associated fusariotoxins has stagnated at laboratory and experimental levels with species of Trichoderma, Bacillus and atoxigenic Fusarium being tested as the most promising candidates. Hitherto, there is no impetus to upscale for field use owing to the inconsistent results of these agents. Non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus have been developed to create biocontrol formulations by outcompeting the aflatoxigenic strains, thus thwarting aflatoxins on the target produce by 70% to 90%. Questions have been raised on their ability to produce other mycotoxins like cyclopiazonic acid, to potentially exchange genetic material and to become aflatoxigenic with consequent deleterious effects on other organisms and environments. Other biocontrol approaches to mitigate aflatoxins include the use of lactic acid bacteria and yeast species which have demonstrated the ability to prevent the growth of Aspergillus flavus and consequent toxin production under laboratory conditions. Nevertheless, these strategies seem to be ineffective under field conditions. The efficacy of biological agents is normally dependent on environmental factors, formulations’ safety to non-target hosts and the ecological impact. Biocontrol agents can only be effectively evaluated after long-term use, causing a never-ending debate on the use of live organisms as a remedy to pests and diseases over the use of chemicals. Biocontrol should be used in conjunction with good agricultural practices coupled with good postharvest management to significantly reduce mycotoxins in the African continent. View Full-Text
Keywords: aflatoxins; fumonisins; biocontrol; Aspergillus; Fusarium; Africa aflatoxins; fumonisins; biocontrol; Aspergillus; Fusarium; Africa
MDPI and ACS Style

Kagot, V.; Okoth, S.; De Boevre, M.; De Saeger, S. Biocontrol of Aspergillus and Fusarium Mycotoxins in Africa: Benefits and Limitations. Toxins 2019, 11, 109.

AMA Style

Kagot V, Okoth S, De Boevre M, De Saeger S. Biocontrol of Aspergillus and Fusarium Mycotoxins in Africa: Benefits and Limitations. Toxins. 2019; 11(2):109.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kagot, Victor, Sheila Okoth, Marthe De Boevre, and Sarah De Saeger. 2019. "Biocontrol of Aspergillus and Fusarium Mycotoxins in Africa: Benefits and Limitations" Toxins 11, no. 2: 109.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop