Next Article in Journal
Association between Dietary Phenolic Acids and Hypertension in a Mediterranean Cohort
Next Article in Special Issue
Food-Related Impulsivity in Obesity and Binge Eating Disorder—A Systematic Update of the Evidence
Previous Article in Journal
Cynanchum wilfordii Ameliorates Testosterone-Induced Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Regulating 5α-Reductase and Androgen Receptor Activities in a Rat Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cognitive Food Processing in Binge-Eating Disorder: An Eye-Tracking Study
Open AccessArticle

Explicit and Implicit Approach vs. Avoidance Tendencies towards High vs. Low Calorie Food Cues in Patients with Obesity and Active Binge Eating Disorder

1
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
2
University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Clinic and Policlinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2017, 9(10), 1068; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9101068
Received: 21 June 2017 / Revised: 16 September 2017 / Accepted: 20 September 2017 / Published: 27 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Binge Eating Disorder)
Patients with binge eating disorder (BED) suffer from regular food binges with loss of control. This may be due to dysfunctional approach vs. avoidance tendencies towards food in BED. We applied an approach-avoidance task (AAT), in which n = 24 patients with obesity and active BED (OB-BED), n = 32 patients with obesity without current BED (OB), and n = 25 healthy controls (CO) either approached (“pulled”) or avoided (“pushed”) high (HC) vs. low calorie (LC) food pictures. We tested the hypothesis that OB-BED patients would show an approach bias (measured as different response times RT) towards HC food compared to the other groups. While there was no main effect for group or direction of movement, a significant main effect for calorie (p < 0.001; RT for HC significantly slower than for LC) was found. Repeated measures ANOVA (rm-ANOVA) for comparison of OB-BED vs. OB vs. CO revealed a significant three-fold interaction group × direction × calorie (p = 0.02). Against our hypothesis, the OB-BED group showed an avoidance bias for LC. In explicit ratings, OB-BED reported a significantly reduced urge to consume LC food compared to the OB group. Similar to OB-BED, CO also showed an avoidance bias for LC. The implications of our results are discussed and future directions in this field of research are presented. View Full-Text
Keywords: approach avoidance task (AAT); binge eating disorder; explicit; implicit; psychotherapy; training approach avoidance task (AAT); binge eating disorder; explicit; implicit; psychotherapy; training
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Paslakis, G.; Kühn, S.; Grunert, S.; Erim, Y. Explicit and Implicit Approach vs. Avoidance Tendencies towards High vs. Low Calorie Food Cues in Patients with Obesity and Active Binge Eating Disorder. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1068.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop