Next Article in Journal
Vitamin D as a Resilience Factor, Helpful for Survival of Potentially Fatal Conditions: A Hypothesis Emerging from Recent Findings of the ESTHER Cohort Study and the CHANCES Consortium
Next Article in Special Issue
The Potential for Zinc Stable Isotope Techniques and Modelling to Determine Optimal Zinc Supplementation
Previous Article in Journal
Fruit and Vegetable Intake Assessed by Food Frequency Questionnaire and Plasma Carotenoids: A Validation Study in Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Height, Zinc and Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in Schoolchildren: A Study in Cuba and Cambodia
Open AccessArticle

Determination of Zinc Status in Humans: Which Indicator Should We Use?

Institute of Research for Development (IRD), UMR Nutripass IRD-UM2-UM1, 911 Avenue d'Agropolis, 34394 Montpellier, France
Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports (NEXS), Copenhagen University, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
UNICEF, Maternal Child Health and Nutrition Section, No.11 street 75, 12200 Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2015, 7(5), 3252-3263;
Received: 17 February 2015 / Revised: 21 April 2015 / Accepted: 22 April 2015 / Published: 6 May 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Zinc and Human Health)
Zinc deficiency has serious wide-ranging health consequences and is thought to be one of the most prevalent micronutrient deficiencies in the world. However, reliable indicators or biomarkers to assess zinc status are not available at present. Indirect indicators such as the prevalence of stunting or anemia, iron deficiency, as well as more direct indicators such as plasma zinc concentrations are being used at present to estimate the prevalence of zinc deficiency in populations. However, as this paper shows by using data from a recent national micronutrient survey in Vietnam, the estimates of the prevalence of zinc deficiency using these different indicators can vary widely, leading to inconsistencies. In this paper, zinc deficiency among children is four times more prevalent than iron deficiency and 2.3 times more than stunting prevalence for example. This can lead not only to confusion concerning the real extent of the prevalence of zinc deficiency in populations, but also makes it hard to inform policy on whether action is needed or not. Moreover, evaluation of programs is hampered by the lack of a clear indicator. Efforts should be made to identify the most suitable indicator to evaluate the impact of programs aimed at improving zinc status and health of populations. View Full-Text
Keywords: zinc; biomarkers; stunting; anemia; dietary consumption; South East Asia; Vietnam zinc; biomarkers; stunting; anemia; dietary consumption; South East Asia; Vietnam
MDPI and ACS Style

Wieringa, F.T.; Dijkhuizen, M.A.; Fiorentino, M.; Laillou, A.; Berger, J. Determination of Zinc Status in Humans: Which Indicator Should We Use? Nutrients 2015, 7, 3252-3263.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop