Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Starches, Sugars and Obesity
Previous Article in Journal
Antioxidant Activity of a Mediterranean Food Product: “Fig Syrup”
Review

Perceived Barriers to Application of Glycaemic Index: Valid Concerns or Lost in Translation?

1
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, 150 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3E2, Canada
2
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, 61 Queen Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2T2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2011, 3(3), 330-340; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu3030330
Received: 10 January 2011 / Revised: 17 February 2011 / Accepted: 23 February 2011 / Published: 28 February 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbohydrates)
The term glycaemic-index (GI) originally appeared in the literature in the early 1980s. GI categorizes carbohydrate according to glycaemic effect postprandially. Since its inception, GI has obtained and maintained interest of academics and clinicians globally. Upon review of GI literature, it becomes clear that the clinical utility of GI is a source of controversy. Can and should GI be applied clinically? There are academics and clinicians on both sides of the argument. Certainly, this controversy has been a stimulus for the evolution of GI methodology and application research, but may also negatively impact clinicians’ perception of GI if misunderstood. This article reviews two assessments of GI that are often listed as barriers to application; the GI concept is (1) too complex and (2) too difficult for clients to apply. The literature reviewed does not support the majority of purported barriers, but does indicate that there is a call from clinicians for more and improved GI education tools and clinician GI education. The literature indicates that the Registered Dietitian (RD) can play a key role in GI knowledge translation; from research to application. Research is warranted to assess GI education tool and knowledge needs of clinicians and the clients they serve. View Full-Text
Keywords: glycaemic-index; knowledge-translation; education; clinician; dietitian; barrier(s) glycaemic-index; knowledge-translation; education; clinician; dietitian; barrier(s)
MDPI and ACS Style

Grant, S.M.; Wolever, T.M.S. Perceived Barriers to Application of Glycaemic Index: Valid Concerns or Lost in Translation? Nutrients 2011, 3, 330-340. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu3030330

AMA Style

Grant SM, Wolever TMS. Perceived Barriers to Application of Glycaemic Index: Valid Concerns or Lost in Translation? Nutrients. 2011; 3(3):330-340. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu3030330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grant, Shannan M.; Wolever, Thomas M. S. 2011. "Perceived Barriers to Application of Glycaemic Index: Valid Concerns or Lost in Translation?" Nutrients 3, no. 3: 330-340. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu3030330

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop