Next Article in Journal
Calcium Absorption in Infants and Small Children: Methods of Determination and Recent Findings
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Functional Foods, Nutraceuticals, and Food Supplements in Intestinal Health
Previous Article in Journal
Capturing the Data: Nutrition Risk Screening of Adults in Hospital
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Effects of R- and S-equol and Implication of Transactivation Functions (AF-1 and AF-2) in Estrogen Receptor-Induced Transcriptional Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 2
Issue 4
10.3390/nu2040449
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Beneficial Effects of Probiotic and Food Borne Yeasts on Human Health

by
Saloomeh Moslehi-Jenabian
,
Line Lindegaard
and
Lene Jespersen
*
Department of Food Science, Food Microbiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 30, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2010, 2(4), 449-473; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2040449
Submission received: 28 January 2010 / Revised: 1 March 2010 / Accepted: 24 March 2010 / Published: 1 April 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food and Function 2009)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Besides being important in the fermentation of foods and beverages, yeasts have shown numerous beneficial effects on human health. Among these, probiotic effects are the most well known health effects including prevention and treatment of intestinal diseases and immunomodulatory effects. Other beneficial functions of yeasts are improvement of bioavailability of minerals through the hydrolysis of phytate, folate biofortification and detoxification of mycotoxins due to surface binding to the yeast cell wall.

1. Introduction

Fermentation is one of the oldest forms of food processing and preservation in the world. Since very early times, humans have been exploiting yeasts and their metabolic products, mainly for baking and brewing. Nowadays, the products of modern yeast biotechnology form the backbone of many commercially important sectors, including foods, beverages, pharmaceuticals, industrial enzymes and others. Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which according to EFSA (The European Food Safety Authority) has a QPS (Qualified Presumption of Safety) status [1], is the most common yeast used in food fermentation where it has shown various technological properties. Yeasts do also play a significant role in the spontaneous fermentation of many indigenous food products. A review on S. cerevisiae in African fermented foods has been provided by Jespersen [2]. Several beneficial effects on human health and well-being have been reported and there seems to be a need to understand the positive effects of yeasts, their mechanisms and employment of them. The present article reviews the major beneficial effects of yeasts, i.e., probiotic effects, biodegradation of phytate, folate biofortification and detoxification of mycotoxins, which has been summarized in Table 1. However, there are other reported effects such as enrichment of foods with prebiotics as fructooligosaccharides [3], lowering of serum cholesterol [4,5], antioxidative properties, antimutagenic and antitumor activities [6] etc. These topics will meanwhile not be the focus of the present review. Additional information on health significance and food safety of yeasts in foods and beverages can be obtained from Fleet and Balia [7].
Table
Table 1. Overview of the major beneficial effects of yeasts.
Table 1. Overview of the major beneficial effects of yeasts.
ActivityYeast species Heath effectsRef.
Probiotic effectSaccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardiiEffect on enteric bacterial pathogen[16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]
Maintenance of epithelial barrier integrity[21,22,31,36]
Anti-inflammatory effects[21,22,31,32,33,34,35,37,39,40,41]
Effects on immune response[42,43,44,45]
Trophic effects on intestinal mucosa[46,47,48,49,52,53]
Clinical effects on diarrheal diseases [62,63,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75]
Biodegradation of phytateSaccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyceskluyveri, Schwanniomyces castellii, Debaryomyces castellii, Arxula adeninivorans, Pichia anomala, Pichia rhodanensis, Pichia spartinae, Cryptococcus laurentii, Rhodotorula gracilis, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Kluyveromyces lactis Candida krusei (Issatchenkia orientalis) and Candida spp.Nutritional importance, i.e., bioavailability of divalent minerals such as iron, zink, calcium and magnesium[87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108]
Folate biofortificationS. cerevisiaePrevention of neural tube defects in the foetus, megaloblastic anaemia and reduction of the risk for cardiovascular disease, cancer and Alzheimer's disease[109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,130]
Saccharomyces bayanus, Saccharomyces paradoxus, Saccharomyces pastorianus, Metschnikowia lochheadii, Debaryomyces melissophilus, Debaryomyces vanrijiae var. vanrijiae, Debaryomyces hansenii, Pichia philogaea, Kodamaea anthophila, Wickerhamiella lipophilia, Candida cleridarum and Candida drosophilae[121]
Candida milleri and T. delbrueckii [126]
Saccharomyces exiguous and Candida lambica [128,129]
P. anomala and Candida glabrata[130]
Kluyveromyces marxianus and C. krusei (I. orientalis)[128,130]
Degradation of mycotoxinsS. cerevisiae Antitoxic in some degree[138,139,140,141]
Phaffia rhodozyma and Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous[142]
Absorption of mycotoxins S. cerevisiaeAntitoxic[143,144,145]

2. Beneficial Effects of Yeast as Probiotics

2.1. Taxonomic Characterization of Probiotic Yeasts

Probiotics are defined as ‘live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host’ [8]. Probiotics may be consumed either as food components or as non-food preparations. There is a great interest in finding yeast strains with probiotic potential. Different yeast species such as Debaryomyces hansenii, Torulaspora delbrueckii [9], Kluyveromyces lactis, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Kluyveromyces lodderae [10] have shown tolerance to passage through the gastrointestinal tract or inhibition of enteropathogens. However, Saccharomyces boulardii is the only yeast with clinical effects and the only yeast preparation with proven probiotic efficiency in double-blind studies [11]. S. boulardii, isolated from litchi fruit in Indochina by Henri Boulard in the 1920s, is commonly used as a probiotic yeast especially in the pharmaceutical industry and in a lyophilized form for prevention and treatment of diarrhoea. In a study conducted by van der Aa Kühle and Jespersen [12] on commercial strains of S. boulardii, it was found that the S. boulardii strains morphologically and physiologically could be characterized as S. cerevisiae. Sequences of the D1/D2 domain of the 26S rRNA gene were identical for all isolates examined and had 100 % similarity with the sequences of the type strain of S. cerevisiae (CBS 1171T) and the sequenced S. cerevisiae strain S288c. All S. boulardii isolates were found to have the same ITS1-5.8S rRNA-ITS2 sequence, which displayed a close resemblance with the sequences published for S288c (99.9%), CBS 1171T (99.3%) and other S. cerevisiae strains. Sequence analysis of the mitochondrial cytochrome-c oxidase II gene (COX2) also resulted in identical sequences for the S. boulardii strains and comparisons with available nucleotide sequences revealed close relatedness to strains of S. cerevisiae including S288c (99.5%) and CBS 1171T (96.6%). The electrophoretic karyotypes of the S. boulardii strains appeared quite uniform and although very typical of S. cerevisiae, they formed a cluster separate from other strains within this species. The results of the study strongly indicated a close relatedness of S. boulardii to S. cerevisiae and thereby support the recognition of S. boulardii as a member of S. cerevisiae and not as a separate species. The fact that strains of S.boulardii should be seen as a separate cluster within the S. cerevisiae species is further supported by the fact that strains of S. boulardii previously have been reported to differ from strains of S. cerevisiae due to a specific microsatellite allele [13] as well as trisomy of the chromosome IX and altered copy numbers of specific genes [14]. Others have reported S. boulardii strains to tolerate acidic stress better and grow faster at 37 °C than S. cerevisiae [15]. Due to the fact that S. boulardii from a taxonomic point of view should not be recognized as a separate species, S. boulardii will in the following be referred to as S. cerevisiae var. boulardii. It is worth to notice that contrary to e.g., probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria, apparently there seems not to be different strains within S. cerevisiae var. boulardii. Based on the similarity in different molecular analyses, all isolates appear to originate from the one isolated from litchi fruit in Indochina by Henri Boulard [12].

2.2. Experimental Effects of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii

2.2.1. Effects on enteric bacterial pathogens

Several studies have shown that S. cerevisiae var. boulardii confer beneficial effects against various enteric pathogens, involving different mechanisms as: (i) prevention of bacterial adherence and translocation in the intestinal epithelial cells, (ii) production of factors that neutralize bacterial toxins and (iii) modulation of the host cell signalling pathway associated with pro-inflammatory response during bacterial infection.
Prevention of bacterial adherence and translocation in the intestinal epithelial cells is due to the fact that the cell wall of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii has the ability to bind enteropathogens. S. cerevisiae var. boulardii cell wall has shown binding capacity to enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium [16]. Additionally, the yeast inhibits adherence of Clostridiumdifficile to Vero cells (derived from kidney epithelial cells). Pre-treatment of C. difficile or the Vero cells with S. cerevisiae var. boulardii or its cell wall particles results in lowering the adherence of bacteria to the Vero cells. Yeast cells or cell wall particles are able to modify the surface receptors involved in adhesion of C. difficile through a proteolytic activity and by steric hindrance [17]. Administration of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii reduces adherence of enterotoxigenic E. coli to mesenteric lymph node in pigs intestine [18]. S. cerevisiae var. boulardii has also beneficial effect on Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitis in mice, which is due to attenuating the adherence of C. rodentium to host epithelial cells, through reduction in EspB and Tir protein secretions, respectively a translocator and an effector protein implicated in the type III secretion system (TTSS) [19]. In a study on rats, ingestion of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii decreased the incidence of antibiotic-induced bacterial translocation. The total bacteria count of fecal flora and especially the number of Gram-negative bacteria were significantly lower after intake of the yeast in addition to antibiotic [20]. However, in other studies on enteropathogenic E. coli- or Shigella-infected T84 cells (human colonic adenocarcinoma cell line) and on mice infected with S. enterica serovar Typhimurium or Shigella flexneri, in which S. cerevisiae var. boulardii demonstrated beneficial effects, no effect on modifying the bacterial adherence was observed [21,22,23].
S. cerevisiae var. boulardii produces two proteins of 54 and 120 kDa being responsible for degradation or neutralisation of bacterial toxins. The 54 kDa protein is a serine protease that decrease the enterotoxic and cytotoxic activities of C. difficile by proteolysis of the toxin A and inhibition of binding of the toxin to its brush border membrane receptor. In vivo studies have shown that oral administration of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii or its supernatant decreases toxin A-induced intestinal secretion and permeability due to activity of this enzyme [24,25,26]. The 120 kDa protein has a non-proteolytic activity, competes specifically with the chloride secretion stimulated by the toxins of Vibrio cholera by reducing the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in the intestinal cells [27,28]. Both S. cerevisiae var. boulardii and S. cerevisiae W303 have the ability to protect Fisher rats against cholera toxin [29]. S. cerevisiae var. boulardii also synthesizes a protein phosphatase that dephosphorylates endotoxins such as lipopolysaccharide of E. coli 055B5 and inactivates its cytotoxic effects [30].
In vitro studies using mammalian cell cultures have shown that S. cerevisiae var. boulardii modifies host cell signalling pathways associated with pro-inflammatory response during bacterial infection. The mechanism is based on blocking activation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) which decreases the expression of inflammation-associated cytokines such as interleukin 8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) [22,31,32]. The exposure of mammalian cells to S. cerevisiae var. boulardii before addition of enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic E. coli reduces activation of NF-κB and MAPK, diminish production of TNF-α and secretion of IL-8 [21,31], delay enterohaemorrhagic E. coli -induced apoptosis (due to the reduction of TNF-α) and decline pro-inflammatory cytokine synthesis [32]. S. cerevisiae var. boulardii produces a 10 kDa protein that exerts anti-inflammatory effects after stimulation with C. difficile-toxin A due to decrease in secretion of IL-8 in human colonocytes and activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) in both human colonocytes and murine ileal loops [33]. Sougioultzis et al. [34] has shown that S. cerevisiae var. boulardii produces a low molecular weight soluble factor (< 1 kDa) which blocks NF-κB activation and NF-κB-mediated IL-8 gene expression in intestinal epithelial cells and monocytes. Expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1α also decreased in IPEC-J2 cells (porcine intestinal epithelial cell lines) exposed to enterohaemorrhagic E. coli, when cells were pre- and co-incubated with S. cerevisiae var. boulardii [35].
2.2.2 Maintenance of epithelial barrier integrity
Klingberg et al. [36] have shown that exposure of different strains of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii and S. cerevisiae to Caco-2 cells (human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines) increased the transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) across polarized monolayers of cells. In another study, infection of T84 cells with enteropathogenic E. coli reduced the monolayer transepithelial resistance and distribution of tight-junction-associated protein Zonula occludens (ZO-1) was altered, which caused disruption of epithelial barrier structure [21]. Presence of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii in the infection showed no alteration in the transepithelial resistance and ZO-1 protein distribution, suggesting a protective effect of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii on the tight-junctions structure of T84-infected cells. During bacterial infection, the myosin light chain protein (MLC) is phosphorilated and the tight-junctions are disrupted. Dahan et al. [31] have shown that S. cerevisiae var. boulardii abolished phosphorylation of MLC and thereby eliminated the reduction of TER after infection of cells with enterohaemorrhagic E. coli and in that way preserved the barrier function. In Shigella-infected T84 cells, the yeast positively affected tight-junctions proteins (claudin-1 and ZO-2) and significantly protected the barrier function [22]. Shigella-infected cellular monolayer had a dramatic decrease in claudin-1 and ZO-2 levels. In the presence of yeast, cellular monolayer exhibited larger amounts of these proteins. These results demonstrate that S. cerevisiae var. boulardii enhances the ability of intestinal epithelial cells to restore the tight-junction structure and the barrier permeability.

2.2.3. Anti-inflammatory effects

Besides reducing inflammation during bacterial infection by interfering with the host cell signalling pathways, S. cerevisiae var. boulardii also stimulates the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ) expression in human colonocytes and reduces the response of human colon cells to pro-inflammatory cytokines [37]. PPAR-γ is a nuclear receptor expressed by several cell types including intestinal epithelial cells, dendritic cells, T and B cells, and can act as a regulator of the inflammation [38]. S. cerevisiae var. boulardii has been reported to modify the migratory behaviour of lymphocytes. This was observed in a mice model of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), where inhibition of inflammation in the colon was detected in animals treated with S. cerevisiae var. boulardii. The inhibition was due to decrease in the production of IFN-γ and a modification of T cell distribution. There was a decrease in IFN-γ-producing CD4+ T cells within the colonic mucosa and an increase in IFN-γ-producing T cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes. In addition, S. cerevisiae var. boulardii supernatant modifies the capacity of endothelial cells to adhere to leucocytes, allowing better cell rolling and adhesion [39]. In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), production of high levels of nitric oxide (NO) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity is associated with inflammatory effects [40]. The inhibitory effect of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii on iNOS activity has been investigated by Girard et al. [41] in rats with castor oil-induced diarrhoea. Administration of yeast blocked the production of the citrulline (a marker of NO production). The iNOS inhibition by S. cerevisiae var. boulardii may be beneficial in the treatment of diarrhoea and/or IBD associated with overproduction of NO.

2.2.4. Effects on immune response

There are several studies indicating the stimulation of the host cell immunity, both innate and adaptive immunity, by S. cerevisiae var. boulardii in response to pathogen infections. Oral administration of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii in healthy volunteers revealed several cellular and humoral changes in peripheral blood. This contributes to the activation of the reticuloendothelial and complement system, demonstrating the stimulation of the innate immune system by the yeast [42]. Oral ingestion of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii stimulated secretion of immune factors, i.e., adaptive immunity. In a study by Buts et al. [43], the level of secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) increased 57% in the duodenal fluid and the secretory component of immunoglobulins enhanced 69% in villus cells and 80% in crypt cells of rats treated with the high dose of yeast. Application of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii to mice treated with C. difficile toxin A caused a 1.8-fold increase in total sIgA levels and a 4.4-fold increase in specific antitoxin A sIgA levels [44]. In another study, after intravenous administration of E. coli, germ-free mice mono-associated with S. cerevisiae var. boulardii showed higher clearance of the pathogen from the bloodstream compared to germ-free mice, which was correlated with earlier production of IFN-γ and IL-12 in the serum [45].

2.2.5. Trophic effects on intestinal mucosa

Several studies have shown that S. cerevisiae var. boulardii exerts trophic effects restoring the intestinal homeostasis. Oral administration of yeast by human volunteers or rats enhanced the activity of brush border membrane enzymes, e.g., sucrase-isomaltase, lactase, maltase-glucoamylase, α-glucosidase and alkaline phosphatase, which have a positive influence on nutrient degradation and absorption [46,47]. Oral administration of yeast after partial resection of the small bowel, increased disaccharidase activities and improved the absorption of D-glucose as well as the expression of the sodium/glucose cotransporter-1 (SGLT-1) in the brush border of the remaining intestinal segments [48]. Improvement of expression of SGLT-1 by S. cerevisiae var. boulardii, which is implicated in water and electrolyte re-absorption, could be beneficial in the treatment of diarrhoea and congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency. S. cerevisiae var. boulardii cells contain high level of polyamines and it has been suggested that endoluminal release of polyamines (mainly spermine and spermidin) by S. cerevisiae var. boulardii, may contribute to rise in expression of intestinal enzymes, i.e., increase in sucrase and maltase activity [49].
Modification of luminal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) concentration is another trophic effect of the yeast. SCFAs are among the most important metabolites produced by anaerobic bacteria in the colon and are involved in water and electrolyte absorption by the colonic mucosa [50]. Patients on long-term total enteral nutrition have a decrease in number of fecal anaerobic bacteria and in the level of fecal SCFAs [51]. Schneider et al. [52] have shown that administration of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii in these patients increased the level of total fecal SCFAs up to 9 days after termination of the treatment. However, yeast did not modify the fecal flora. This increase in fecal SCFAs concentration may explain the preventive effects of the yeast in enteral nutrition-induced diarrhoea.
S. cerevisiae var. boulardii further has the ability to prevent reactions to food antigens. In neonates and young infants, the quality of endoluminal proteolysis is very important in the absorption of completely or incompletely degraded proteins and antigens by the mucosal barrier with increased permeability. This is one of the fundamental mechanisms involved in food protein intolerance. Buts et al. [53] have shown the endoluminal release of a leucine aminopeptidase by S. cerevisiae var. boulardii in rats and thereby enhancement of N-terminal hydrolysis of oligopeptides in both endoluminal fluid and intestinal mucosa. Thus, they proposed that this function of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii could be important in preventing reactions to food antigens when mucosal permeability is increased.

2.3. Application of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii in Clinical Trails

S. cerevisiae var. boulardii has been used in different clinical trails against different diarrhoeal diseases and has shown promising results. Treatment with S. cerevisiae var. boulardii is well tolerated, except for sporadic reports of fungemia, in immune-compromised patients or patients with severe general or intestinal diseases in most cases infected through an indwelling central venous catheter [54,55,56]. One of the benefits of using S. cerevisiae var. boulardii as a probiotic is the natural resistance of that to antibacterial antibiotics, thus it can be prescribed to patients receiving antibacterial antibiotic therapy.
Antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD) is a common complication of treatment with antibiotics caused by disruption of normal gut microbiota and colonization of pathogenic bacteria which results in an acute inflammation of the intestinal mucosa. The most common opportunistic pathogen related to AAD is C. difficile [57,58,59]. Among other infectious organisms Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Klebsiella oxytoca, Candida species, E. coli and Salmonella species can be mentioned [60,61]. S. cerevisiae var. boulardii has been comprehensively evaluated for the prevention of AAD and the potential effect of the yeast in decreasing the ADD in adults and children has been proven [62,63].
Traveller’s diarrhoea is a common health complaint among persons travelling from low risk regions to developing countries where enteric infection is hyper-endemic. Enterotoxigenic E. coli, Shigella and Salmonella account for about 80% of the cases with an identified pathogen [64]. In a meta-analysis study performed by McFarland [65], it has been concluded that S. cerevisiae var. boulardii has a significant efficacy on the prevention of Traveller’s diarrhoea.
Several randomized placebo-controlled studies have proven the efficacy of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii in the treatment and prevention of acute infectious [66,67]. Intestinal disorder and diarrhoea are also common complications in critically ill patients with enteral nutrition which is caused by alteration in the colonic microbiota [51]. The effect of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii to prevent and reduce the incidence of diarrhoea and to decrease the length of this disease has been demostrated [68]. In the patient with AIDS-associated diarrhoea, the efficacy of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii has been proven by a randomized, double-blind trail [69,70].
S. cerevisiae var. boulardii has also shown positive results in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, performed on patients with diarrhoea-predominant IBS, administration of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii decreased the daily number of stools and improved the consistency of the stools [71]. A double-blind study on the patients with Crohn's disease with moderate activity showed that the addition of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii to conventional therapy considerably reduced bowel movements [72]. In patients with Crohn's disease of the ileum or colon who had been in remission for more than 3 months, treatment with S. cerevisiae var. boulardii together with the conventional therapy was more efficient in preventing relapse, compared to conventional therapy alone [73]. In patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis, addition of yeast to the conventional therapy resulted in clinical remission for 68% of patients [74]. In a randomized-placebo study on the patients with Crohn’s disease in remission, addition of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii to the baseline medications improved intestinal permeability with a decrease in the lactulose/mannitol ratio [75].

3. Beneficial Effects of Yeasts on Bioavailability of Nutrients

3.1. Biodegradation of Phytate by Yeasts

3.1.1. Antinutritional effects of phytate

Phytic acid or phytate (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate, IP6) is the primary storage form of phosphorus in mature seeds of plants and it is particularly abundant in many cereal grains, oilseeds, legumes, flours and brans. Phytate has a strong chelating capacity and forms insoluble complexes with divalent minerals of nutritional importance such as iron, zink, calcium and magnesium [76,77,78]. Human as well as monogastric animals like poultry and pigs, lack the required enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract for degradation and dephosphorylation of the phytate complex. Besides, lowering the bioavailability of divalent ions, phytate may have negative influence on the functional and nutritional properties of proteins such as digesting enzymes [79]. In addition, lower inositol phosphates attained from degradation of phytate have a positive role in cancer prevention and treatment [80,81].
Dephosphorylation of phytate is catalyzed by phytases (myo-inositol-hexakisphosphate 6-phosphohydrolases). Characterized phytases are nonspecific phosphatase enzymes, which release free inorganic phosphate (Pi) and inositol phosphate esters with a lower number of phosphate groups. Organisms such as plants and microorganisms extensively produce phytase enzymes and make the minerals and phosphorus present in the phytates available through a stepwise phytate hydrolysis [82]. In food processing, degradation of phytate can be catalyzed either by endogenous enzymes, naturally present in cereals, or by microbial enzymes produced by e.g., yeasts or/and lactic acid bacteria naturally present in flour or added as starter cultures [83]. Accordingly, improved adsorption of iron, zinc, magnesium and phosphorus can be achieved by degradation of phytate during food processing [84,85] or by degradation of phytate in the intestine [86].

3.1.2. Phytase activity by yeasts

Phytases are widespread in various microorganisms including filamentous fungi, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts [87]. Among yeasts, Candida krusei (Issatchenkia orientalis) [88], Schwanniomyces castellii [89], Debaryomyces castellii [90], Arxula adeninivorans [91,92], Pichia anomala [92,93], Pichia rhodanensis, Pichia spartinae [94], Cryptococcus laurentii [95], Rhodotorula gracilis [96], S. cerevisiae [97,98,99,100], Saccharomyceskluyveri, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Candida spp. and Kluyveromyces lactis [94] have been identified as phytase producers. In a study by Olstorpe et al. [92] on the ability of different yeast strains (122 strains from 61 species) to utilize phytic acid as sole phosphorus source, strains of A. adeninivorans and P. anomala showed the highest volumetric phytase activities.
Production of phytase by S. cerevisiae has been investigated in different studies [83,99]. The phytase activity of S. cerevisiae is partly due to the activity of the secretory acid phosphatases (SAPs), which are secreted by the cells to the growth media and are repressed by inorganic phosphate (Pi) [99]. However, the phytase activity of yeasts, e.g., during bread leavening, is relatively low [83,101,102]. This could be due to the repression of the SAPs by Pi[99]. Besides, repression of phytate-degrading enzymes is dependent on the pH and the medium composition. Andlid et al. [99] have shown that repression of phytate-degrading enzymes is weak in complex medium with pH 6.0 and high amount of phosphate. Regardless of Pi addition, the capacity to degrade phytase is highest at the pH far from the optimum pH for the SAPs, suggesting that pH has more effect on the expression of the enzyme that on the enzyme activity.
S. cerevisiae as a phytase carrier in the gastrointestinal tract and hydrolysis of phytate after digestion has also been investigated. In a study using a high-phytase producing recombinant yeast strain at simulated digestive conditions, a strong reduction of phytate (up to 60%) in the early gastric phase was observed as compared to no degradation by wild-type strains. The phytase activity during digestion was influenced by the type of yeast strain, cell density, and phytate concentration. However, degradation in the late gastric and early intestinal phases was insignificant, in spite of high phytate solubility, high resistance against proteolysis by pepsin, and high cell survival [103]. This study also showed the importance of pH as a limiting factor for phytase expression and/or activity, as observed by Andlid et al. [99].

3.1.3. Application of yeast phytases in foods

Yeasts or yeast phytases can be applied for pre-treatment of foods to reduce the phytate contents or they can be utilized as food supplement in order to hydrolysis the phytate after digestion. The phytase activity of yeast during bread making for reduction of phytate content of bread have been examined. However, it seems to be too low to significantly influence the iron absorption [99]. Nevertheless, as explained earlier, during bread making, the content of phytic acid decreases. This is due to the action of phytases in the dough (cereal) and the activity of starter culture [83,104,105,106]. Chaoui et al. [106] have shown that phytase activity in sourdough bread is highest using combinations of yeasts and lactic acid bacteria as starter culture. The same result was found by Lopez et al. [105]. They found that phytate contents in yeast and sourdough bread were lower than in reconstituted whole-wheat flour and that mineral bioavailability could be improved by bread making especially using both yeast and lactic acid bacteria. Therefore a high-phytase S. cerevisiae strain, may be suitable for the production of food-grade phytase and for direct use in food production [98]. Increasing the bioavailability of minerals is especially of importance in low-income countries. Therefore it is important to notice that apart from bread, reduction of phytates by yeast phytases have been observed in other plant-derived foods such as in ‘Icacina mannii paste’, a traditional food in Senegal, during fermentation with S. cerevisiae [107] and in ‘Tarhana’, a traditional Turkish fermented food, using baker's yeast as a phytase source [108].

3.2. Folate Biofortification by Yeasts

3.2.1. Importance of folate in the human diet

Folates (vitamin B9) are essential cofactors in the biosynthesis of nucleotides and therefore crucial for cellular replication and growth [109,110]. Plants, yeast and some bacterial species contain the folate biosynthesis pathway and produce natural folates, but mammals lack the ability to synthesize folate and they are therefore dependent on sufficient intake from the diet [111]. During the last years, folates have drawn much attention due to the various beneficial health effects following an increased intake. The role of folate in the prevention of neural tube defects in the foetus has been established [112,113] and sufficient folate intake may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease [112,114], cancer [112,115] and even Alzheimer's disease [116]. The recommended dietary intake (RDI) for the adult population is between 200-300 µg/day for males and between 170-300 µg/day for females according to the FAO/WHO in the USA and several European countries [117]. Insufficient folate levels result in prolonged cell division, which leads to megaloblastic anaemia [118].

3.2.2. Folate production by yeasts

S. cerevisiae is a rich dietary source of native folate and produces high levels of folate per weight [119]. Besides the role as a biofortificant in fermented foods, high producing strains may be used as biocatalysts for biotechnological production of natural folates. The folate level can be considerably augmented in fermented foods using an appropriate yeast strain and by optimizing the growth phase and cultivation conditions for the selected strain. Hjortmo et al. [120] have found that the growth medium and physiological state of cells are important factors in folate production. In synthetic growth medium, high growth rate subsequent to respiro-fermentative growth resulted in the highest specific folate content (folate per unit biomass). In complex media, the level of folate was much lower and less related to growth phase. The specific content of folate in yeast is not only species-specific but also dependents on the yeast strain. In another study, Hjortmo et al. [121] investigated the folate content and composition and the dominating forms of folate found in 44 different strains of yeasts belonging to 13 different yeast species cultivated in a synthetic medium at standard conditions. There was a large diversity in relative amounts of folate content among the studied yeasts. Tetrahydrofolate (H4folate) and 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate (5-CH3-H4folate) were the dominating forms, which were varying extensively in relative amounts between different strains. Several strains showed a 2-fold or higher folate content as compared to the control strain, i.e., a commercial strain of Baker's yeast. This indicates that by choosing an appropriate strain, the folate content in yeast-fermented foods may be enhanced more than 2-fold. These scientists have shown that using a specific strain of S. cerevisiae cultured in defined medium and harvested in the respiro-fermentative phase of growth prior to dough preparation the folate content increased 3 to 5-fold (135-139 µg/100 g dry matter) in white wheat bread, compared to white wheat bread industrially processed with commercial S. cerevisiae (27-43 µg/100 g dry matter) [122].

3.2.3. Effect of yeasts on folate biofortification of food

Cereals, especially whole grain products, are the main supplier of folate in the diet. Yeast has crucial effects on the folate contents of breads. Breads prepared with baking powder have the lowest folate contents, while addition of yeast results in higher folate content in bread [123]. The variety of sourdoughs and baking processes obviously lead to great variation in folate content of breads. Total folate content increases considerably during sourdough fermentation due to the growth of yeasts [123,124]. However, there would be some losses (about 25%) in the amount of folate following the baking [123]. Final folate content is dependent on the microflora and amylolytic activity of flour, starter cultures and baking conditions [125]. Other microorganisms present in the sourdough like lactic acid bacteria may also influence the folate content. In a study, Kariluoto et al. [126] investigated the ability of typical sourdough yeasts (S. cerevisiae, Candida milleri, and T. delbrueckii) and lactic acid bacteria to produce or consume folates during sourdough fermentation. Yeasts increased the folate contents of sterilised rye flour-water mixtures to about 3-fold after 19 h, whereas lactobacilli not only did not produce folates but also decreased it to ultimately half amount. Although the lactobacilli consumed folates, their effect on folate contents in co-cultivations with yeasts was minimal.
In beer, the amount of folate enhances due to synthesis by the yeast during the initial period of the fermentation. However, since yeast folate is intracellular, after cropping the yeast, folate will be eliminated from the beer and this is regardless the type of yeast. Some beer brands, which have a secondary fermentation step (often in the bottle), contain higher level of folate [125].
Production of folate in kefir has also been investigated. Kefir is a fermented milk beverage that originated in Eastern Europe and regarded as a natural probiotic product, i.e., a health promoting product [127]. It is produced by the fermentation of milk with kefir granules (grains) and contains different vitamins and minerals. Kefir granules have a varying and complex microbial composition including species of lactic acid bacteria (as the largest portion of microorganism), acetic acid bacteria, yeasts and mycelial fungi. Yeasts isolated from Kefir grains include Kluyveromyces marxianus, Saccharomyces exiguus, Candida lambica and C. krusei (I. orientalis) [128]. Kefir contains high folate content, which is produced by the yeast and not the lactic acid bacteria [129]. In a study, Patring et al. [129] investigated the folate content of different yeast strains isolated from Russian kefir granules, belonging to different Saccharomyces and Candida species. Kefir yeast strains showed high folate-producing capacity. The most abundant folate forms were 5-CH3-H4folate (43-59%) and 5-formyltetrahydrofolate (5-HCO-H4folate, 23-38%), whereas H4folate occurred in a minor proportion (19-23%). By choosing yeast strains that produce a higher proportion of the most stable folate forms such as 5-HCO-H4folate and 5-CH3-H4folate, it is possible to improve the stability of folates during fermentation and storage, and thus to increase the folate content in kefir products.
Recently, the folate content of a traditionally fermented maize-based porridge, called togwa, consumed in rural areas in Tanzania has been investigated by Hjortmo et al. [130]. The yeasts strains belonged to C. krusei (I. orientalis), P. anomala, S. cerevisiae, K. marxianus and Candida glabrata. The major folate forms found during the fermentations were 5-CH3-H4folate and H4folate. The content of H4folate, per unit togwa, remained quite stable at a low level throughout the experiment for all strains, while the concentration of 5-CH3-H4folate was highly strain- and time-dependent. The highest folate concentration was found after 46 h of fermentation with C. glabrata, corresponding to a 23-fold increase compared with unfermented togwa. As for degradation of phytate, selection of appropriate yeast strains as starter cultures in indigenous fermented foods appears to have high potential in especially developing countries where the vitamin intake generally is lower. Compared to e.g., lactic acid bacteria yeast are much more robust and may therefore more easily be distributed as starter cultures.

4. Beneficial Effects of Yeasts on Detoxification of Mycotoxins

4.1. Prevention of Toxic Effects of Mycotoxins

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by fungi belonging mainly to the Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium genera. Agricultural products, food and animal feeds can be contaminated by these toxins and lead to various diseases in humans and livestocks [131]. Contamination of agricultural products by mycotoxins is a worldwide dilemma, however it is rigorous in tropical and subtropical regions [132]. The most important mycotoxins are the aflatoxins, ochratoxins, fumonisins, deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEA) and trichothecenes [133,134]. There are three general strategies in order to prevent the toxic effects of mycotoxins in foods: (i) prevention of mycotoxin contamination (ii) decontamination/detoxification of foods contaminated with mycotoxins and (iii) inhibition of absorption of consumed mycotoxin in the gastrointestinal tract [135]. The ideal solution to reduce the health risk of mycotoxins is to prevent contamination of foods with them. Unfortunately, this can not be completely avoided and sporadically mycotoxin contamination is reported in food products, especially in the developing world [136]. Therefore, there is an increased focus on effective methods for detoxification of mycotoxins present in foods and also on the inhibition of mycotoxin absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. Various physical and chemical methods are available for the detoxification of food products contaminated with mycotoxins. However, due to disadvantages of these methods, such as possible losses in the nutritional quality of treated commodities, limited efficacy, reduction of sensory quality and high cost of equipment, their application has been restricted [135]. An alternative strategy could be utilization of microorganisms capable of detoxifying mycotoxins in contaminated foods and feeds.

4.2. Biodegradation of Mycotoxins by Yeasts

Interests in biodegradation of mycotoxins have been increased significantly, since it is specific and environmentally friendly to reduce or eliminate the possible contaminations of mycotoxins in foods. Various microorganisms such as soil or water bacteria, fungi, and protozoa as well as specific enzymes isolated from microbial systems are able to some extent and with varied efficiency to degrade mycotoxins to less- or non-toxic products [137]. Degradation of mycotoxins subsequent to yeast fermentation has been reported in different studies. Degradation of patulin during fermentation of apple juice by S. cerevisiae with E-ascladiol and Z-ascladiol as major metabolites [138] and degredation of zearalenone by several yeast strains has been observed [139]. However, degradation of zearalenone leads to conversion of that to α- and β-zearalenol, which are still toxic. Degradation of ochratoxin A, fumonisins B1 and B2[140], deoxynivalenol and T-2 toxin [141] by S. cerevisiae has been reported. Two yeast strains, Phaffia rhodozyma and Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, have also been shown to have ochratoxin A (OTA) degrading activity by converting OTA to ochratoxin α possibly mediated by an enzyme related to carboxypeptidases [142].

4.3. Mycotoxin Absorption by Yeasts

Inhibition of mycotoxin absorption in the gastrointestinal tract is another way to prevent the toxic effects of mycotoxins. There has been increased interest in the use of mycotoxin binding agents, e.g., yeasts and yeast-derived products, which can be added to the diet to bind mycotoxins. S. cerevisiae has the ability to bind mycotoxins as reviewed by Shetty and Jespersen [143]. The mechanism of detoxification by yeast is due to the adhesion of mycotoxins to cell-wall components. As for binding of pathogenic bacteria [16], mannan components of the cell wall play a major role in mycotoxin binding [144]. In vitro efficacy of esterified glucomannan to bind aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A and T-2 toxin, when present alone or in combination, was assessed in toxin-contaminated feed. Esterified glucomannan showed significantly higher binding ability to aflatoxin B1 than to ochratoxin A and T-2 toxin in a dose dependent manner [145]. In a study by Aravind et al. [146] performed on broiler chicks to determine the efficacy of esterified glucomannan in counteracting the toxic effects of mycotoxins in naturally contaminated diet (aflatoxin, ochratoxin, zearalenone and T-2 toxin), it was observed that esterified glucomannan effectively improved the growth depression caused by mycotoxins. Strains of S. cerevisiae have been shown to bind ochratoxin A [147] and zearalenone as well [148]. Ochratoxin A and T-2 toxins also bind to glucomannan component of cell wall [145,149]. However, zearalenone bind to β-d-glucans of yeast cell wall [148]. It has been shown that yeast cell wall derived products efficiently adsorbed zearalenone (>70%) in an in vitro model that resembled the different pH conditions in the pig gastrointestinal tract, but they were not able to bind deoxynivalenol in a considerable percentage [150]. In study on mice, when dried yeast and yeast cell walls were added to the diet along with aflatoxin B1, a significant reduction in the toxicity was observed [151]. Similarly, Madrigal-Santillán et al. [152] described the potential of S. cerevisiae to improve weight gain and reduce genotoxicity of aflatoxin B1 in mice fed with contaminated corn.
Even though several trials have been made for decontamination of animal feeds by yeast, very little have so far been conducted on decontamination of foods and beverages. Binding of mycotoxins to yeast has especially been investigated during winemaking. It has been shown that yeasts can bind to ochratoxin A and remove it from the white and red wine. Ochratoxin A removal from grape must was due to binding of the toxin to the yeast cell wall, and mannoproteins were involved in the mycotoxin absorption during winemaking. The implication of this finding could be very important in the winemaking of must contaminated with ochratoxin A [153,154]. Oenological strains of Saccharomyces yeasts can also be used for the decontamination of ochratoxin A in synthetic and natural grape juice. Heat-treated cells showed higher absorption (90% w/w) compared to viable cells (35% w/w) showing the involvement of physical binding, and cell density played an important role in absorption efficiency. Dead yeasts do not pose any quality or safety problems and can be potentially used for detoxification of the grape juice [147]. S. cerevisiae is one of the most important microorganisms involved in food fermentations in tropical countries with high level of mycotoxin contamination in the foods. Shetty et al. [155] have investigated Aflatoxin B1 binding abilities of S. cerevisiae strains isolated from fermented maize dough (Kenkey) and sorghum beer (Pito), indigenous fermented foods from Ghana, West Africa. They showed that aflatoxin binding was strain specific and strains were found to bind 10-40% and some of them more than 40% of the added aflatoxin B1 at standard condition. Highest binding capacity was observed at the exponential growth phase with 53% binding of the total toxin and the binding reduced towards the stationary phase. Aflatoxin B1 binding increased in a dose dependent manner after addition of aflatoxin, regardless to the temperatures ranging from 20 to 37 °C, but was significantly reduced at 15 °C. Heat and acid treated cells showed higher binding capacity, i.e., up to 78% binding of the total added toxin [155]. Following this study unpublished results by Jespersen et al. have shown the yeast-aflatoxin B1 complex to be stable during the passage of an in vitro gastrointestinal tract model indicating that the aflatoxin will not be absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract but excreted together with the yeast cells in the human feces. Additionally, strains of S. cerevisiae isolated from indigenous fermented foods which are effective aflatoxin binders have been proven to be usable as starter cultures with additional capacities to decontaminate mycotoxins in fermented maize products.

5. Conclusions

Yeasts are used in preparation of human foods and beverages, where they besides having technological functions, confer different beneficial effects on human health and well-being. Among these, the most well known is the probiotic effect, which has been proven for S. cerevisiae var. boulardii. This is the only yeast produced and used as a pharmaceutical product offering numerous valuable effects such as prevention and treatment of intestinal diseases and immunomodulatory effects. Since S. cerevisiae var. boulardii is recognised as a member of the species S. cerevisiae, it is most likely that also other strains within S. cerevisiae might show probiotics properties. Even though to date, most efforts have been focused on analysing the probiotic effects of S. cerevisiae var. boulardii isolates. Similarly, other yeast species might have probiotic effects and confer positive effects on human health. Therefore, it is recommended that additional attempts are placed on discovering the probiotic properties among other yeast species and strains.
Besides the role as probiotics, yeasts have other beneficial functions such as dephosphorylation of phytate and folate biofortification of foods. By choosing appropriate yeast strains as starter cultures and using optimized food processing techniques, it is possible to improve the nutritional value of foods in general. In low-income areas such as the developing countries, application of yeast strains with high phytase and/or folate producing capacity in indigenous food fermentation will increase the bioavailability of minerals and folate content in the foods and will reduce the risk of different diseases such as neural tube defects and anaemia. Therefore, investigation of potential yeast strains isolated from indigenous native foods with high phytase activity and/or high folate content is encouraged.
Contamination of agricultural products by mycotoxins causes severe threat to both livestock productivity and human health and brings huge worldwide economic losses each year. This is especially a rigorous problem in tropical and subtropical regions. For this reason, isolation and application of yeast strains with high mycotoxin binding capacity from indigenous fermented foods would be a valuable alternative for decontamination of mycotoxins in food. Strains of yeast, e.g., S. cerevisiae with high mycotoxin binding abilities can be used as part of the starter cultures in the fermentation of food and beverages, and heat treated cell walls or purified components can be applied as additives in small quantities without compromising the characteristics of the final product. The application of S. cerevisiae as mycotoxin binders in human foods highly depends on stability of the yeast-mycotoxin complex through the passage of the gastrointestinal tract. Additional research efforts are required in this area to explore the great potential of using S. cerevisiae as a detoxifying agent in contaminated foods.
So far, tremendous efforts have been placed on utilising the probiotic effects of especially lactic acid bacteria, whereas rather limited emphasis has been placed on the beneficial effects offered by yeast. Yeasts do meanwhile offer several advantages compared to lactic acid bacteria. They do have a more diverse enzymatic profile, they appear to have a more versatile effect on the immune system, they do provide protection against pathogenic bacteria and toxic compounds by surface binding and appear to be better suited for nutritional enrichment and delivery of bio-active molecules. Besides yeast are much more robust than lactic acid bacteria which make them easier to produce and to distribute, especially in less developed areas. It is therefore encouraged that additional efforts are placed on exploring the health beneficial effects of yeasts, especially those properties that can not be replaced by lactic acid bacteria.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

References

  1. Qualified Presumption of Safety of Micro-organisms in Food and Feed of Micro-organisms in Food and Feed. In The EFSA's 2nd Scientific Colloquium Report; European Food Safety Authority: Parma, Italy, 2005.
  2. Jespersen, L. Occurrence and taxonomic characteristics of strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae predominant in African indigenous fermented foods and beverages. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003, 3, 191–200. [Google Scholar]
  3. Maugeri, F.; Hernalsteens, S. Screening of yeast strains for transfructosylating activity. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2007, 49, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  4. Psomas, E.I.; Fletouris, D.J.; Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E.; Tzanetakis, N. Assimilation of cholesterol by yeast strains isolated from infant feces and Feta cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 3416–3422. [Google Scholar]
  5. Klimek, M.; Wang, S.; Ogunkanmi, A. Safety and efficacy of red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus) as an alternative therapy for hyperlipidemia. P. T. 2009, 34, 313–327. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kogan, G.; Pajtinka, M.; Babincova, M.; Miadokova, E.; Rauko, P.; Slamenova, D.; Korolenko, T. A. Yeast cell wall polysaccharides as antioxidants and antimutagens: Can they fight cancer? Minireview. Neoplasma 2008, 55, 387–393. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fleet, G.H.; Balia, R. Yeasts in Food and Beverages; Querol A.;, Fleet, G.H., Eds., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; Volume 2, pp. 381–398. [Google Scholar]
  8. Evaluation of health and nutritional properties of powder milk and live lactic acid bacteria. In Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Expert Consultation Report; FAO/WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
  9. Psani, M.; Kotzekidou, P. Technological characteristics of yeast strains and their potential as starter adjuncts in Greek-style black olive fermentation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 22, 1329–1336. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumura, H.; Tanoue, Y.; Tsukahara, M.; Tanaka, T.; Shimazaki, K. Screening of dairy yeast strains for probiotic applications. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 4050–4056. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sazawal, S.; Hiremath, G.; Dhingra, U.; Malik, P.; Deb, S.; Black, R.E. Efficacy of probiotics in prevention of acute diarrhoea: a meta-analysis of masked, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2006, 6, 374–382. [Google Scholar]
  12. van der Aa Kühle, A.; Jespersen, L. The taxonomic position of Saccharomyces boulardii as evaluated by sequence analysis of the D1/D2 domain of 26S rDNA, the ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 region and the mitochondrial cytochrome-c oxidase II gene. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 26, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hennequin, C.; Thierry, A.; Richard, G.F.; Lecointre, G.; Nguyen, H.V.; Gaillardin, C.; Dujon, B. Microsatellite typing as a new tool for identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 551–559. [Google Scholar]
  14. Edwards-Ingram, L.; Gitsham, P.; Burton, N.; Warhurst, G.; Clarke, I.; Hoyle, D.; Oliver, S. G.; Stateva, L. Genotypic and physiological characterization of Saccharomyces boulardii, the probiotic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 2458–2467. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fietto, J.L.; Araujo, R.S.; Valadao, F.N.; Fietto, L.G.; Brandao, R.L.; Neves, M.J.; Gomes, F.C.; Nicoli, J.R.; Castro, I.M. Molecular and physiological comparisons between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces boulardii. Can. J. Microbiol. 2004, 50, 615–621. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gedek, B.R. Adherence of Escherichia coli serogroup 0 157 and the Salmonella Typhimurium mutant DT 104 to the surface of Saccharomyces boulardii. Mycoses 1999, 42, 261–264. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tasteyre, A.; Barc, M.C.; Karjalainen, T.; Bourlioux, P.; Collignon, A. Inhibition of in vitro cell adherence of Clostridium difficile by Saccharomyces boulardii. Microb. Pathog. 2002, 32, 219–225. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lessard, M.; Dupuis, M.; Gagnon, N.; Nadeau, E.; Matte, J.J.; Goulet, J.; Fairbrother, J.M. Administration of Pediococcus acidilactici or Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii modulates development of porcine mucosal immunity and reduces intestinal bacterial translocation after Escherichia coli challenge. J. Anim Sci. 2009, 87, 922–934. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wu, X.; Vallance, B.A.; Boyer, L.; Bergstrom, K.S.B.; Walker, J.; Madsen, K.; O'Kusky, J.R.; Buchan, A.M.; Jacobson, K. Saccharomyces boulardii ameliorates Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitis through actions on bacterial virulence factors. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 294, G295–G306. [Google Scholar]
  20. Herek, O.; Kara, I.G.; Kaleli, I. Effects of antibiotics and Saccharomyces boulardii on bacterial translocation in burn injury. Surg. Today 2004, 34, 256–260. [Google Scholar]
  21. Czerucka, D.; Dahan, S.; Mograbi, B.; Rossi, B.; Rampal, P. Saccharomyces boulardii preserves the barrier function and modulates the signal transduction pathway induced in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli-infected T84 cells. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 5998–6004. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mumy, K.L.; Chen, X.H.; Kelly, C.P.; McCormick, B.A. Saccharomyces boulardii interferes with Shigella pathogenesis by postinvasion signaling events. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 294, G599–G609. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rodrigues, A.C.; Nardi, R.M.; Bambirra, E.A.; Vieira, E.C.; Nicoli, J.R. Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii against experimental oral infection with Salmonella typhimurium and Shigella flexneri in conventional and gnotobiotic mice. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1996, 81, 251–256. [Google Scholar]
  24. Castagliuolo, I.; LaMont, J.T.; Nikulasson, S.T.; Pothoulakis, C. Saccharomyces boulardii protease inhibits Clostridium difficile toxin A effects in the rat ileum. Infect. Immun. 1996, 64, 5225–5232. [Google Scholar]
  25. Castagliuolo, I.; Riegler, M.F.; Valenick, L.; LaMont, J.T.; Pothoulakis, C. Saccharomyces boulardii protease inhibits the effects of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in human colonic mucosa. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 302–307. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pothoulakis, C.; Kelly, C.P.; Joshi, M.A.; Gao, N.; O'Keane, C.J.; Castagliuolo, I.; LaMont, J.T. Saccharomyces boulardii inhibits Clostridium difficile toxin A binding and enterotoxicity in rat ileum. Gastroenterol. 1993, 104, 1108–1115. [Google Scholar]
  27. Czerucka, D.; Roux, I.; Rampal, P. Saccharomyces boulardii inhibits secretagogue-mediated adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate induction in intestinal cells. Gastroenterol. 1994, 106, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  28. Czerucka, D.; Rampal, P. Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii on cAMP- and Ca2+ -dependent Cl- secretion in T84 cells. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1999, 44, 2359–2368. [Google Scholar]
  29. Brandão, R.L.; Castro, I.M.; Bambirra, E.A.; Amaral, S.C.; Fietto, L.G.; Tropia, M.J.; Neves, M.J.; Dos Santos, R.G.; Gomes, N.C.; Nicoli, J.R. Intracellular signal triggered by cholera toxin in Saccharomyces boulardii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 564–568. [Google Scholar]
  30. Buts, J.P.; Dekeyser, N.; Stilmant, C.; Delem, E.; Smets, F.; Sokal, E. Saccharomyces boulardii produces in rat small intestine a novel protein phosphatase that inhibits Escherichia coli endotoxin by dephosphorylation. Pediatr. Res. 2006, 60, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dahan, S.; Dalmasso, G.; Imbert, V.; Peyron, J.F.; Rampal, P.; Czerucka, D. Saccharomyces boulardii interferes with enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli-induced signaling pathways in T84 cells. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 766–773. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dalmasso, G.; Loubat, A.; Dahan, S.; Calle, G.; Rampal, P.; Czerucka, D. Saccharomyces boulardii prevents TNF-α-induced apoptosis in EHEC-infected T84 cells. Res. Microbiol. 2006, 157, 456–465. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen, X.; Kokkotou, E.G.; Mustafa, N.; Bhaskar, K.R.; Sougioultzis, S.; O'Brien, M.; Pothoulakis, C.; Kelly, C.P. Saccharomyces boulardii inhibits ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation both in vitro and in vivo and protects against Clostridium difficile toxin A-induced enteritis. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 24449–24454. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sougioultzis, S.; Simeonidis, S.; Bhaskar, K.R.; Chen, X.; Anton, P.M.; Keates, S.; Pothoulakis, C.; Kelly, C.P. Saccharomyces boulardii produces a soluble anti-inflammatory factor that inhibits NF-κB-mediated IL-8 gene expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 343, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  35. van der Aa Kühle, A.; Skovgaard, K.; Jespersen, L. In vitro screening of probiotic properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii and food-borne Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 101, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Klingberg, T.D.; Lesnik, U.; Arneborg, N.; Raspor, P.; Jespersen, L. Comparison of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains of clinical and nonclinical origin by molecular typing and determination of putative virulence traits. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8, 631–640. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, S.K.; Kim, H.J.; Chi, S.G.; Jang, J.Y.; Nam, K.D.; Kim, N.H.; Joo, K.R.; Dong, S.H.; Kim, B.H.; Chang, Y.W.; Lee, J.I.; Chang, R. Saccharomyces boulardii activates expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma in HT-29 cells. Korean J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 45, 328–334. [Google Scholar]
  38. Su, C.G.; Wen, X.; Bailey, S.T.; Jiang, W.; Rangwala, S.M.; Keilbaugh, S.A.; Flanigan, A.; Murthy, S.; Lazar, M.A.; Wu, G.D. A novel therapy for colitis utilizing PPAR-gamma ligands to inhibit the epithelial inflammatory response. J. Clin. Invest. 1999, 104, 383–389. [Google Scholar]
  39. Dalmasso, G.; Cottrez, F.; Imbert, V.; Lagadec, P.; Peyron, J.F.; Rampal, P.; Czerucka, D.; Groux, H.; Foussat, A.; Brun, V. Saccharomyces boulardii inhibits inflammatory bowel disease by trapping T cells in mesenteric lymph nodes. Gastroenterol. 2006, 131, 1812–1825. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dijkstra, G.; Moshage, H.; van Dullemen, H.M.; de Jager-Krikken, A.; Tiebosch, A.T.; Kleibeuker, J.H.; Jansen, P.L.; van, G.H. Expression of nitric oxide synthases and formation of nitrotyrosine and reactive oxygen species in inflammatory bowel disease. J. Pathol. 1998, 186, 416–421. [Google Scholar]
  41. Girard, P.; Pansart, Y.; Gillardin, J.M. Inducible nitric oxide synthase involvement in the mechanism of action of Saccharomyces boulardii in castor oil-induced diarrhoea in rats. Nitric. Oxide. 2005, 13, 163–169. [Google Scholar]
  42. Caetano, J.A.; Parames, M.T.; Babo, M.J.; Santos, A.; Ferreira, A.B.; Freitas, A.A.; Coelho, M.R.; Mateus, A.M. Immunopharmacological effects of Saccharomyces boulardii in healthy human volunteers. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1986, 8, 245–259. [Google Scholar]
  43. Buts, J.P.; Bernasconi, P.; Vaerman, J.P.; Dive, C. Stimulation of secretory IgA and secretory component of immunoglobulins in small intestine of rats treated with Saccharomyces boulardii. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1990, 35, 251–256. [Google Scholar]
  44. Qamar, A.; Aboudola, S.; Warny, M.; Michetti, P.; Pothoulakis, C.; LaMont, J.T.; Kelly, C.P. Saccharomyces boulardii stimulates intestinal immunoglobulin A immune response to Clostridium difficile toxin A in mice. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 2762–2765. [Google Scholar]
  45. Rodrigues, A.C.; Cara, D.C.; Fretez, S.H.; Cunha, F.Q.; Vieira, E.C.; Nicoli, J.R.; Vieira, L.Q. Saccharomyces boulardii stimulates sIgA production and the phagocytic system of gnotobiotic mice. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 89, 404–414. [Google Scholar]
  46. Buts, J.P.; Bernasconi, P.; Van Craynest, M.P.; Maldague, P.; De, M.R. Response of human and rat small intestinal mucosa to oral administration of Saccharomyces boulardii. Pediatr. Res. 1986, 20, 192–196. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jahn, H.U.; Ullrich, R.; Schneider, T.; Liehr, R.M.; Schieferdecker, H.L.; Holst, H.; Zeitz, M. Immunological and trophical effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on the small intestine in healthy human volunteers. Digestion 1996, 57, 95–104. [Google Scholar]
  48. Buts, J.P.; De, K.N.; Marandi, S.; Hermans, D.; Sokal, E.M.; Chae, Y.H.; Lambotte, L.; Chanteux, H.; Tulkens, P.M. Saccharomyces boulardii upgrades cellular adaptation after proximal enterectomy in rats. Gut 1999, 45, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  49. Buts, J.P.; De, K.N.; De, R.L. Saccharomyces boulardii enhances rat intestinal enzyme expression by endoluminal release of polyamines. Pediatr. Res. 1994, 36, 522–527. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bowling, T.E.; Raimundo, A.H.; Grimble, G.K.; Silk, D.B. Reversal by short-chain fatty acids of colonic fluid secretion induced by enteral feeding. Lancet 1993, 342, 1266–1268. [Google Scholar]
  51. Schneider, S.M.; Le Gall, P.; Girard-Pipau, E.; Piche, T.; Pompei, A.; Nano, J.L.; Hebuterne, X.; Rampal, P. Total artificial nutrition is associated with major changes in the fecal flora. Eur. J. Nutr. 2000, 39, 248–255. [Google Scholar]
  52. Schneider, S.M.; Girard-Pipau, F.; Filippi, J.; Hebuterne, X.; Moyse, D.; Hinojosa, G.C.; Pompei, A.; Rampal, P. Effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on fecal short-chain fatty acids and microflora in patients on long-term total enteral nutrition. World J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 11, 6165–6169. [Google Scholar]
  53. Buts, J.P.; De, K.N.; Stilmant, C.; Sokal, E.; Marandi, S. Saccharomyces boulardii enhances N-terminal peptide hydrolysis in suckling rat small intestine by endoluminal release of a zinc-binding metalloprotease. Pediatr. Res. 2002, 51, 528–534. [Google Scholar]
  54. De Llanos, R.; Querol, A.; Peman, J.; Gobernado, M.; Fernandez-Espinar, M.T. Food and probiotic strains from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae species as a possible origin of human systemic infections. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 110, 286–290. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hennequin, C.; Kauffmann-Lacroix, C.; Jobert, A.; Viard, J.P.; Ricour, C.; Jacquemin, J.L.; Berche, P. Possible role of catheters in Saccharomyces boulardii fungemia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2000, 19, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  56. Lherm, T.; Monet, C.; Nougiere, B.; Soulier, M.; Larbi, D.; Le Gall, C.; Caen, D.; Malbrunot, C. Seven cases of fungemia with Saccharomyces boulardii in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002, 28, 797–801. [Google Scholar]
  57. Katz, J.A. Probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile diarrhea. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2006, 40, 249–255. [Google Scholar]
  58. McFarland, L.V. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhea and the treatment of Clostridium difficile disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 101, 812–822. [Google Scholar]
  59. Rohde, C.L.; Bartolini, V.; Jones, N. The use of probiotics in the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea with special interest in Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2009, 24, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  60. Beaugerie, L.; Petit, J.C. Antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2004, 18, 337–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Asha, N.J.; Tompkins, D.; Wilcox, M.H. Comparative analysis of prevalence, risk factors, and molecular epidemiology of antibiotic-associated diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 2785–2791. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Kotowska, M.; Albrecht, P.; Szajewska, H. Saccharomyces boulardii in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in children: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 21, 583–590. [Google Scholar]
  63. Surawicz, C.M.; McFarland, L.V.; Greenberg, R.N.; Rubin, M.; Fekety, R.; Mulligan, M. E.; Garcia, R. J.; Brandmarker, S.; Bowen, K.; Borjal, D.; Elmer, G. W. The search for a better treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile disease: Use of high-dose vancomycin combined with Saccharomyces boulardii. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 31, 1012–1017. [Google Scholar]
  64. Sanders, J.W.; Tribble, D.R. Diarrhea in the returned traveler. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2001, 3, 304–314. [Google Scholar]
  65. McFarland, L.V. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of traveler's diarrhea. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 2007, 5, 97–105. [Google Scholar]
  66. Szajewska, H.; Skorka, A.; Dylag, M. Meta-analysis: Saccharomyces boulardii for treating acute diarrhoea in children. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 25, 257–264. [Google Scholar]
  67. Szajewska, H.; Ruszczynski, M.; Radzikowski, A. Probiotics in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Pediatr. 2006, 149, 367–372. [Google Scholar]
  68. Bleichner, G.; Blehaut, H.; Mentec, H.; Moyse, D. Saccharomyces boulardii prevents diarrhea in critically ill tube-fed patients - A multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 1997, 23, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. James, J.S. Diarrhea, and the experimental treatment Saccharomyces boulardii. AIDS Treat. News 1995, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  70. Maupas, J.; Champemont, P.; Delforge, M. Efficacy of Saccharomyces boulardii in the treatment of diarrhea in AIDS. Ann. Med. Interne (Paris) 1991, 142, 64–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  71. Maupas, J.; Champemont, P.; Delforge, M. Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with Saccharomyces boulardii: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Med. Chir. Dig. 1983, 12, 77–79. [Google Scholar]
  72. Plein, K.; Hotz, J. Therapeutic effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on mild residual symptoms in a stable phase of Crohns-disease with special respect to chronic diarrhea - a pilot-study. Z. Gastroenterol. 1993, 31, 129–134. [Google Scholar]
  73. Guslandi, M.; Mezzi, G.; Sorghi, M.; Testoni, P.A. Saccharomyces boulardii in maintenance treatment of Crohn's disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2000, 45, 1462–1464. [Google Scholar]
  74. Guslandi, M.; Giollo, P.; Testoni, P.A. A pilot trial of Saccharomyces boulardii in ulcerative colitis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2003, 15, 697–698. [Google Scholar]
  75. Vilela, E.G.; Ferrari, M.D.D.; Torres, H.O.D.; Pinto, A.G.; Aguirre, A.C.C.; Martins, F.P.; Goulart, E.M.A.; Da Cunha, A.S. Influence of Saccharomyces boulardii on the intestinal permeability of patients with Crohn's disease in remission. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 43, 842–848. [Google Scholar]
  76. Lopez, H.W.; Leenhardt, F.; Coudray, C.; Remesy, C. Minerals and phytic acid interactions: is it a real problem for human nutrition? Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 37, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Maga, J.A. Phytate - Its Chemistry, Occurrence, Food Interactions, Nutritional Significance, and Methods of Analy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1982, 30, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  78. Vohra, A.; Satyanarayana, T. Phytases: Microbial sources, production, purification, and potential biotechnological application. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2003, 23, 29–60. [Google Scholar]
  79. Reddy, N.R.; Pierson, M.D. Reduction in antinutritional and toxic components in plant foods (A) by fermentation. Food Res. Int. 1994, 27, 281–290. [Google Scholar]
  80. Vucenik, I.; Shamsuddin, A.M. Cancer inhibition by inositol hexaphosphate (IP6) and inositol: From laboratory to clinic. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 3778S–3784S. [Google Scholar]
  81. Vucenik, I.; Shamsuddin, A.M. Protection against cancer by dietary IP6 and inositol. Nutr. Cancer 2006, 55, 109–125. [Google Scholar]
  82. Konietzny, U.; Greiner, R. Molecular and catalytic properties of phytate-degrading enzymes (phytases). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 37, 791–812. [Google Scholar]
  83. Türk, M.; Carlsson, N.G.; Sandberg, A.S. eduction in the levels of phytate during wholemeal bread making; Effect of yeast and wheat phytases. J. Cereal Sci. 1996, 23, 257–264. [Google Scholar]
  84. Sandberg, A.S. The effect of food processing on phytate hydrolysis and availability of iron and zinc. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1991, 289, 499–508. [Google Scholar]
  85. Navert, B.; Sandstrom, B.; Cederblad, A. Reduction of the phytate content of bran by leavening in bread and its effect on zinc absorption in man. Br. J. Nutr. 1985, 53, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  86. Sandberg, A.S.; Hasselblad, C.; Hasselblad, K.; Hulten, L. The effect of wheat bran on the absorption of minerals in the small intestine. Br. J. Nutr. 1982, 48, 185–191. [Google Scholar]
  87. Haefner, S.; Knietsch, A.; Scholten, E.; Braun, J.; Lohscheidt, M.; Zelder, O. Biotechnological production and applications of phytases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 68, 588–597. [Google Scholar]
  88. Quan, C.S.; Fan, S.D.; Zhang, L.H.; Wang, Y.J.; Ohta, Y. Purification and properties of a phytase from Candida krusei WZ-001. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2002, 94, 419–425. [Google Scholar]
  89. Segueilha, L.; Lambrechts, C.; Boze, H.; Moulin, G.; Galzy, P. Purification and properties of the phytase from Schwanniomyces castellii. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1992, 74, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ragon, M.; Aumelas, A.; Chemardin, P.; Galvez, S.; Moulin, G.; Boze, H. Complete hydrolysis of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate by a novel phytase from Debaryomyces castellii CBS 2923. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 78, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  91. Sano, K.; Fukuhara, H.; Nakamura, Y. Phytase of the yeast Arxula adeninivorans. Biotechnol. Lett. 1999, 21, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  92. Olstorpe, M.; Schnurer, J.; Passoth, V. Screening of yeast strains for phytase activity. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009, 9, 478–488. [Google Scholar]
  93. Vohra, A.; Satyanarayana, T. Phytase production by the yeast, Pichia anomala. Biotechnol. Lett. 2001, 23, 551–554. [Google Scholar]
  94. Nakamura, Y.; Fukuhara, H.; Sano, K. Secreted phytase activities of yeasts. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2000, 64, 841–844. [Google Scholar]
  95. van Staden, J.; den Haan, R.; van Zyl, W. H.; Botha, A.; Viljoen-Bloom, M. Phytase activity in Cryptococcus laurentii ABO 510. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007, 7, 442–448. [Google Scholar]
  96. Bindu, S.; Somashekar, D.; Joseph, R. A comparative study on permeabilization treatments for in situ determination of phytase of Rhodotorula gracilis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 27, 336–340. [Google Scholar]
  97. Lim, M.H.; Lee, O.H.; Chin, J.E.; Ko, H.M.; Kim, I.C.; Lee, H.B.; Im, S.Y.; Bai, S. Simultaneous degradation of phytic acid and starch by an industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae producing phytase and alpha-amylase. Biotechnol. Lett. 2008, 30, 2125–2130. [Google Scholar]
  98. Veide, J.; Andlid, T. Improved extracellular phytase activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by modifications in the PHO system. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 108, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  99. Andlid, T.A.; Veide, J.; Sandberg, A.S. Metabolism of extracellular inositol hexaphosphate (phytate) by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 97, 157–169. [Google Scholar]
  100. Türk, M.; Sandberg, A. S.; Carlsson, N. G.; Andlid, T. Inositol hexaphosphate hydrolysis by Baker's yeast. Capacity, kinetics, and degradation products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  101. Harland, B. F.; Frolich, W. Effects of phytase from 3 yeasts on phytate reduction in Norwegian whole wheat-flour. Cereal Chem. 1989, 66, 357–358. [Google Scholar]
  102. Türk, M.; Sandberg, A.S. Phytate Degradation During Breadmaking-Effect of Phytase Addition. J. Cereal Sci. 1992, 15, 281–294. [Google Scholar]
  103. Haraldsson, A.K.; Veide, J.; Andlid, T.; Alminger, M.L.; Sandberg, A.S. Degradation of phytate by high-phytase Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains during simulated gastrointestinal digestion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 5438–5444. [Google Scholar]
  104. Reale, A.; Mannina, L.; Tremonte, P.; Sobolev, A.P.; Succi, M.; Sorrentino, E.; Coppola, R. Phytate degradation by lactic acid bacteria and yeasts during the wholemeal dough fermentation: a P-31 NMR study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 6300–6305. [Google Scholar]
  105. Lopez, H.W.; Duclos, V.; Coudray, C.; Krespine, V.; Feillet-Coudray, C.; Messager, A.; Demigne, C.; Remesy, C. Making bread with sourdough improves mineral bioavailability from reconstituted whole wheat flour in rats. Nutrition 2003, 19, 524–530. [Google Scholar]
  106. Chaoui, A.; Faid, M.; Belhcen, R. Effect of natural starters used for sourdough bread in Morocco on phytate biodegradation. East Mediterr. Health J. 2003, 9, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  107. Antai, S.P.; Nkwelang, G. Reduction of some toxicants in Icacina mannii by fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 1999, 53, 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  108. Bilgicli, N.; Elgun, A.; Turker, S. Effects of various phytase sources on phytic acid content, mineral extractability and protein digestibility of tarhana. Food Chem. 2006, 98, 329–337. [Google Scholar]
  109. Gregory, J.F. Chemical and nutritional aspects of folate research: analytical procedures, methods of folate synthesis, stability, and bioavailability of dietary folates. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 1989, 33, 1–101. [Google Scholar]
  110. Hanson, A.D.; Roje, S. One-carbon metabolism in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 52, 119–137. [Google Scholar]
  111. Scott, J.; Rebeille, F.; Fletcher, J. Folic acid and folates: the feasibility for nutritional enhancement in plant foods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 795–824. [Google Scholar]
  112. Bailey, L.B.; Rampersaud, G.C.; Kauwell, G.P. A. Folic acid supplements and fortification affect the risk for neural tube defects, vascular disease and cancer: Evolving science. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 1961S–1968S. [Google Scholar]
  113. Cordero, J.F.; Do, A.; Berry, R.J. Review of interventions for the prevention and control of folate and vitamin B-12 deficiencies. Food Nutr. Bull. 2008, 29, S188–S195. [Google Scholar]
  114. Ward, M. Homocysteine, folate, and cardiovascular disease. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2001, 71, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
  115. Duthie, S.J. Folic acid deficiency and cancer: mechanisms of DNA instability. Br. Med. Bull. 1999, 55, 578–592. [Google Scholar]
  116. Wang, H.X. Vitamin B-12, folate, and Alzheimer's disease. Drug Dev. Res. 2002, 56, 111–122. [Google Scholar]
  117. de Bree, A.; van, D.M.; Brouwer, I.A.; van het Hof, K.H.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.P. Folate intake in Europe: recommended, actual and desired intake. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997, 51, 643–660. [Google Scholar]
  118. Letsky, E.A. Erythropoiesis in Pregnancy. J. Perinat. Med. 1995, 23, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  119. Patring, J.D.; Jastrebova, J.A.; Hjortmo, S.B.; Andlid, T.A.; Jagerstad, I.M. Development of a simplified method for the determination of folates in baker's yeast by HPLC with ultraviolet and fluorescence detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 2406–2411. [Google Scholar]
  120. Hjortmo, S.; Patring, J.; Andlid, T. Growth rate and medium composition strongly affect folate content in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 123, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  121. Hjortmo, S.; Patring, J.; Jastrebova, J.; Andlid, T. Inherent biodiversity of folate content and composition in yeasts. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 16, 311–316. [Google Scholar]
  122. Hjortmo, S.; Patring, J.; Jastrebova, J.; Andlid, T. Biofortification of folates in white wheat bread by selection of yeast strain and process. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 127, 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  123. Kariluoto, S.; Vahteristo, L.; Salovaara, H.; Katina, K.; Liukkonen, K.H.; Piironen, V. Effect of baking method and fermentation on folate content of rye and wheat breads. Cereal Chem. 2004, 81, 134–139. [Google Scholar]
  124. Osseyi, E.S.; Wehling, R.L.; Albrecht, J.A. HPLC determination of stability and distribution of added folic acid and some endogenous folates during breadmaking. Cereal Chem. 2001, 78, 375–378. [Google Scholar]
  125. Jägerstad, M.; Piironen, V.; Walker, C.; Ros, G.; Carnovale, E.; Holasova, M.; Nau, H. Increasing natural-food folates through bioprocessing and biotechnology. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 16, 298–306. [Google Scholar]
  126. Kariluoto, S.; Aittamaa, M.; Korhola, M.; Salovaara, H.; Vahteristo, L.; Piironen, V. Effects of yeasts and bacteria on the levels of folates in rye sourdoughs. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 106, 137–143. [Google Scholar]
  127. Zubillaga, M.; Weill, R.; Postaire, E.; Goldman, C.; Caro, R.; Boccio, J. Effect of probiotics and functional foods and their use in different diseases. Nutr. Res. 2001, 21, 569–579. [Google Scholar]
  128. Witthuhn, R.C.; Schoeman, T.; Britz, T.J. Characterisation of the microbial population at different stages of Kefir production and Kefir grain mass cultivation. Int. Dairy J. 2005, 15, 383–389. [Google Scholar]
  129. Patring, J.D.M.; Hjortmo, S.B.; Jastrebova, J.A.; Svensson, U.K.; Andlid, T.A.; Jägerstad, I.M. Characterization and quantification of folates produced by yeast strains isolated from kefir granules. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 223, 633–637. [Google Scholar]
  130. Hjortmo, S.B.; Hellstrom, A.M.; Andlid, T.A. Production of folates by yeasts in Tanzanian fermented togwa. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8, 781–787. [Google Scholar]
  131. Sweeney, M.J.; Dobson, A.D. Mycotoxin production by Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium species. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 43, 141–158. [Google Scholar]
  132. Bhat, R.V. Mould deterioration of agricultural commodities during transit: problems faced by developing countries. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1988, 7, 219–225. [Google Scholar]
  133. Schatzmayr, G.; Zehner, F.; Taubel, M.; Schatzmayr, D.; Klimitsch, A.; Loibner, A.P.; Binder, E. M. Microbiologicals for deactivating mycotoxins. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2006, 50, 543–551. [Google Scholar]
  134. Galvano, F.; Piva, A.; Ritieni, A.; Galvano, G. Dietary strategies to counteract the effects of mycotoxins: a review. J. Food Prot. 2001, 64, 120–131. [Google Scholar]
  135. Kabak, B.; Dobson, A.D.; Var, I. Strategies to prevent mycotoxin contamination of food and animal feed: a review. Crit Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 593–619. [Google Scholar]
  136. Shephard, G.S. Impact of mycotoxins on human health in developing countries. Food Addit. Contam. 2008, 25, 146–151. [Google Scholar]
  137. Wu, Q.; Jezkova, A.; Yuan, Z.; Pavlikova, L.; Dohnal, V.; Kuca, K. Biological degradation of aflatoxins. Drug Metab. Rev. 2009, 41, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  138. Moss, M.O.; Long, M.T. Fate of patulin in the presence of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Addit. Contam. 2002, 19, 387–399. [Google Scholar]
  139. Böswald, C.; Engelhardt, G.; Vogel, H.; Wallnofer, P.R. Metabolism of the Fusarium mycotoxins zearalenone and deoxynivalenol by yeast strains of technological relevance. Nat. Toxins. 1995, 3, 138–144. [Google Scholar]
  140. Scott, P.M.; Kanhere, S.R.; Lawrence, G.A.; Daley, E.F.; Farber, J.M. Fermentation of wort containing added ochratoxin A and fumonisins B1 and B2. Food Addit. Contam. 1995, 12, 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  141. Garda, J.; Macedo, R.M.; Faria, R.; Bernd, L.; Dors, G.C.; Badiale-Furlong, E. Alcoholic fermentation effects on malt spiked with trichothecenes. Food Control. 2005, 16, 423–428. [Google Scholar]
  142. Péteri, Z.; Teren, J.; Vagvolgyi, C.; Varga, J. Ochratoxin degradation and adsorption caused by astaxanthin-producing yeasts. Food Microbiol. 2007, 24, 205–210. [Google Scholar]
  143. Shetty, P.H.; Jespersen, L. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and lactic acid bacteria as potential mycotoxin decontaminating agents. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
  144. Girish, C.K.; Devegowda, C. Efficacy of glucomannan-containing yeast product (Mycosorb (R)) and hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate in preventing the individual and combined toxicity of aflatoxin and T-2 toxin in commercial broilers. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 19, 877–883. [Google Scholar]
  145. Raju, M.V.L.N.; Devegowda, G. Esterified-glucomannan in broiler chicken diets-contaminated with aflatoxin, ochratoxin and T-2 toxin: Evaluation of its binding ability (in vitro) and efficacy as immunomodulator. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 15, 1051–1056. [Google Scholar]
  146. Aravind, K.L.; Patil, V.S.; Devegowda, G.; Umakantha, B.; Ganpule, S.P. Efficacy of esterified glucomannan to counteract mycotoxicosis in naturally contaminated feed on performance and serum biochemical and hematological parameters in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2003, 82, 571–576. [Google Scholar]
  147. Bejaoui, H.; Mathieu, F.; Taillandier, P.; Lebrihi, A. Ochratoxin A removal in synthetic and natural grape juices by selected oenological Saccharomyces strains. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97, 1038–1044. [Google Scholar]
  148. Yiannikouris, A.; Francois, J.; Poughon, L.; Dussap, C.G.; Bertin, G.; Jeminet, G.; Jouany, J.P. Adsorption of Zearalenone by beta-D-glucans in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar]
  149. Raju, M.V.; Devegowda, G. Influence of esterified-glucomannan on performance and organ morphology, serum biochemistry and haematology in broilers exposed to individual and combined mycotoxicosis (aflatoxin, ochratoxin and T-2 toxin. Br. Poult. Sci. 2000, 41, 640–650. [Google Scholar]
  150. Sabater-Vilar, M.; Malekinejad, H.; Selman, M.H.; van der Doelen, M.A.; Fink-Gremmels, J. In vitro assessment of adsorbents aiming to prevent deoxynivalenol and zearalenone mycotoxicoses. Mycopathologia 2007, 163, 81–90. [Google Scholar]
  151. Baptista, A.S.; Horii, J.; Calori-Domingues, M.A.; da Gloria, E.M.; Salgado, J.M.; Vizioli, M.R. The capacity of manno-oligosaccharides, thermolysed yeast and active yeast to attenuate aflatoxicosis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 20, 475–481. [Google Scholar]
  152. Madrigal-Santillán, E.; Madrigal-Bujaidar, E.; Márquez-Márquez, R.; Reyes, A. Antigenotoxic effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the damage produced in mice fed with aflatoxin B1 contaminated corn. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 2058–2063. [Google Scholar]
  153. Caridi, A.; Galvano, F.; Tafur, A.; Ritieni, A. In-vitro screening of Saccharomyces strains for ochratoxin A removal from liquid medium. Ann. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 135–137. [Google Scholar]
  154. Caridi, A. New perspectives in safety and quality enhancement of wine through selection of yeasts based on the parietal adsorption activity. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 120, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  155. Shetty, P.H.; Hald, B.; Jespersen, L. Surface binding of aflatoxin B1 by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with potential decontaminating abilities in indigenous fermented foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 113, 41–46. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moslehi-Jenabian, S.; Lindegaard, L.; Jespersen, L. Beneficial Effects of Probiotic and Food Borne Yeasts on Human Health. Nutrients 2010, 2, 449-473. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2040449

AMA Style

Moslehi-Jenabian S, Lindegaard L, Jespersen L. Beneficial Effects of Probiotic and Food Borne Yeasts on Human Health. Nutrients. 2010; 2(4):449-473. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2040449

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moslehi-Jenabian, Saloomeh, Line Lindegaard, and Lene Jespersen. 2010. "Beneficial Effects of Probiotic and Food Borne Yeasts on Human Health" Nutrients 2, no. 4: 449-473. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2040449

APA Style

Moslehi-Jenabian, S., Lindegaard, L., & Jespersen, L. (2010). Beneficial Effects of Probiotic and Food Borne Yeasts on Human Health. Nutrients, 2(4), 449-473. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu2040449

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop