Next Article in Journal
Xanthohumol: Mechanistic Actions and Emerging Evidence as a Multi-Target Natural Nutraceutical
Previous Article in Journal
Content of Fatty Acid and Eicosanoids in Muscle and Intestinal Tissue of C57BL/6 Mice Subjected to Long-Term Caloric Restriction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Systemic Factors Fuel Food Insecurity Among Collegiate Student-Athletes: Qualitative Findings from the Running on Empty Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 18
Issue 3
10.3390/nu18030519
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Energy Availability, Body Composition, and Phase Angle Among Adolescent Artistic Gymnasts During a Competitive Season

by
Anneta Grompanopoulou
1,
Antigoni Kypraiou
2,
Dimitrios C. Milosis
2,
Michael Chourdakis
1 and
Anatoli Petridou
2,*
1
Laboratory of Hygiene, Social & Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Laboratory of Evaluation of Human Biological Performance, School of Physical Education and Sport Science at Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2026, 18(3), 519; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030519
Submission received: 20 December 2025 / Revised: 30 January 2026 / Accepted: 1 February 2026 / Published: 3 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Deficiency and Nutritional Supplementation in Sports and Exercise)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Energy availability (EA) is associated with Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport syndrome. This study assessed the EA, body composition, and phase angle (φ) of adolescent artistic gymnasts during a competitive season. Methods: Thirty non-elite artistic gymnasts aged 11–14 years participated in this cross-sectional study. Anthropometric data were collected and body mass index (BMI) was assessed using the World Health Organization growth charts. Bioelectrical impedance analysis was performed and diet and physical activity were recorded for three days. Dietary and physical activity records were analyzed to estimate energy intake, total energy expenditure (TEE), and exercise energy expenditure, from which energy balance (EB) and EA were calculated. The 95% confidence ellipses of the impedance (Z) vectors were compared with a reference population using the two-sample Hotelling’s T2 test. Correlations between variables were examined by Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation analysis. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. Results: All participants were classified within the normal BMI category, except for one who was classified as being overweight. Mean (± SD) fat mass, fat-free mass (FFM), and φ were 16.1 ± 3.4%, 83.9 ± 3.4%, and 6.0 ± 0.6°, respectively. The 95% confidence ellipses of Z vectors differed significantly from the reference population. Energy balance was 32 ± 223 kcal/day and EA was 49.2 ± 11.4 kcal/kg FFM/day. Energy availability was significantly correlated with EB, TEE, and body composition variables. Conclusions: Adolescent non-elite artistic gymnasts showed no clear indications of LEA and exhibited a normal body composition and φ during the competitive season, consistent with their EA.

1. Introduction

Energy availability (EA) is the amount of dietary energy intake (EI), relative to fat-free mass (FFM), that remains available to support physiological functions after accounting for exercise energy expenditure (EEE) [1]. In healthy, physically active individuals, an EA of ≥45 kcal/kg FFM/day is considered adequate [1,2]. Low energy availability (LEA), defined as an EA of ≤30 kcal/kg FFM/day, is considered to be the primary cause of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) syndrome [1]. REDs is a major health concern in athletes, as it can impair several physiological, psychological, and bodily functions [1,3].
Apart from EA, the magnitude of total energy expenditure (TEE) may also impact physiological functions. Studies of athletic and non-athletic adults suggest a maximal level of long-term sustained energy expenditure corresponding to a physical activity level (PAL) of approximately 2.5 [4,5,6], beyond which body mass loss commonly occurs. This upper limit has been attributed to constraints in habitual EI capacity [4,5]. A study of adolescent athletes reported a PAL of 1.90—similar to non-athletic adolescents (1.84) [7] and lower than the sustained energy expenditure found in adults.
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used method of assessing body composition. BIA measures the resistance (R) of body tissues and reactance (Xc) to a low-intensity electrical current (≈800 μA) to estimate body composition based on tissue conductivity [8]. Lean tissue, rich in water and electrolytes, conducts electricity well, whereas adipose tissue is a poor conductor. Together, R and Xc are used to calculate impedance (Z), as the vector resultant of R and Xc, and phase angle (φ), as the arctangent of Xc/R [8]. Phase angle serves as an indicator of cellular integrity [9], as intact and well-structured membranes effectively impede and store the electrical charge, resulting in a higher Xc, and consequently, φ. Also, φ values have been positively associated with better cellular health [9], greater muscle mass [10,11,12], and muscle strength [13]. In contrast, lower φ values have been linked to a compromised nutritional status in the pediatric population [14] and malnutrition [15], as well as to various pathological conditions [16,17]. Moreover, by plotting height-standardized R and Xc values, bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) provides a non-invasive method for assessing body cell mass and hydration status. In the context of a REDs risk assessment in adolescent athletes, φ and bioelectrical vector position may reflect the nutritional and cellular status resulting from LEA.
Artistic gymnastics is a popular Olympic sport, in which optimal performance requires speed, a high power-to-body mass ratio, strength, flexibility, coordination, and precise technical execution [18]. To develop these attributes, athletes begin intensive training at a young age, during which major physical and physiological changes take place [19]. Early adolescent competitive artistic gymnasts (≈11 years of age) typically train 20 h per week, with training volume increasing to around 30 h per week in older adolescents (≈17 years of age) [20,21,22,23,24]. Adolescent female artistic gymnasts can expend up to 768 kcal during a 4 h session [24]. The combination of high training loads, increased energy demands for optimal growth, and emphasis on maintaining a low body mass may increase the risk of LEA in this population [25,26,27,28,29].
To our knowledge, few studies have assessed EA in pre-adolescent and adolescent gymnasts and none in artistic gymnasts. Studies on rhythmic and acrobatic gymnasts have reported EA values of below 30 kcal/kg FFM/day [29,30] or between 30 and 45 kcal/kg FFM/day [27,28,29], indicating a potential risk of LEA. These athletes also tend to have a low body mass index (BMI) and fat mass (FM) percentage [27,29,31]. In contrast, studies in adolescents artistic gymnasts have reported a wide range of body composition values [25,26], likely reflecting differences in training status, as well as high φ values (around 7°) [25].
The presentation above shows that no studies have evaluated EA in adolescent artistic gymnasts, while research examining body composition and φ in this population remains limited. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to estimate EI, TEE, and EEE, and consequently assess EB and EA in non-elite adolescent artistic gymnasts during a competitive season. Additionally, this study aimed to assess body composition and φ, as complementary indicators of nutritional status, and to examine their associations with EA. We hypothesized that EA would vary among adolescent artistic gymnasts and that a proportion of athletes might present values below the proposed adequacy thresholds. Furthermore, we hypothesized that EA would be associated with body composition variables and φ.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants and Ethics

This study included 30 adolescents artistic gymnasts (24 girls and 6 boys) from various sport clubs in Thessaloniki, Greece. The sample size was determined through an a priori power analysis conducted using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.2, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany). The analysis indicated that, assuming a statistical power of 0.8, a significance level of α = 0.05, low data variability, and a moderate-to-high correlation coefficient (r > 0.4), a total of 30 athletes were required. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age between 11 and 14 years, (2) at least two years of continuous training in artistic gymnastics, (3) participation in national-level competitions, and (4) preparation for competition during the study period. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) any chronic disease affecting EI or expenditure or (2) musculoskeletal injuries that could limit training during competitive preparation.
All participants were classified as Tier 2 (trained/developmental), based on training age, weekly training volume, and participation in national-level competitions, following the framework proposed by McKay et al. [32]. Competitive level was further characterized by using individual all-around scores derived from the FIG Code of Points [33] regulations specific to each age category. Scores were obtained from an international club competition held after the competitive preparation period in which the artistic gymnasts of this study participated. Mean scores of the study participants were 37.00 for girls and 60.24 for boys, whereas the maximum scores achieved by the participants in this competition were 46.25 for girls and 68.77 for boys.
Participants and their parents received oral and written information about the purpose of the study, procedures, potential benefits of participation, and data-protection measures, after which written informed consent was obtained. The research was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (approval number 82/2024).

2.2. Study Design

This was an observational, cross-sectional study conducted during a competitive season. Demographic and anthropometric data were collected, and body composition was assessed using the BIA. Participants also recorded their dietary intake, including supplements, and physical activity for three days.

2.3. Demographic Characteristics

Demographic data were collected through interviews, during which a structured questionnaire was completed. Recorded information included date of birth, training age, weekly training hours, and for girls, age at menarche. Apart from age at menarche in girls, biological maturation status (e.g., pubertal stage or hormonal markers) was not directly assessed.

2.4. Anthropometrics and Body Composition

Body mass was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg with minimal clothing using an electronic scale (Seca, Hamburg, Germany). Body height was measured to the nearest 0.01 m without shoes using a stadiometer. BMI was then calculated and evaluated using the BMI-for-age growth charts for children and adolescents aged 5–19 years, provided by the World Health Organization (WHO).
Body composition was assessed through a multi-frequency BIA using a Bodystat QuadScan 4000 device (Douglas, UK). Measurements were carried out with participants lying supine, with arms and legs slightly apart. Electrodes were placed on the right hand (at the wrist and above the middle finger) and right foot (at the ankle and above the second toe), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. An electrical current at 5, 50, 100, and 200 kHz was applied. The following variables were obtained: FM (kg and %), FFM (kg and %), total body water (TBW, L and %), extracellular water (ECW, L and %), intracellular water (L and %), third-space water (L), body cell mass (BCM, kg), R (Ω), Xc (Ω), φ (°), and Z (Ω). Resistance and Xc were standardized for the participants’ height and BIVA was performed. All measurements were conducted prior to training sessions, after at least 12 h without vigorous exercise and at least three hours in the fasted state.

2.5. Analysis of Energy Intake

Energy intake was estimated through three-day food diaries (two weekdays and one weekend day) completed by the participants with parental assistance. Parents received online training on accurate dietary recording and written instructions with portion-size guidance. Additionally, an example of a completed daily food record was included in the food diaries to facilitate proper reporting.
The dietary records were analyzed using the online Cronometer application (Revelstoke, BC, Canada, https://cronometer.com/index.html, accessed on 31 January 2026) with nutritional data sourced from the FoodData Central database provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Energy contribution from supplements was verified and calculated based on product label information.

2.6. Analysis of Energy Expenditure

Resting energy expenditure (REE) was estimated using the age- and sex-specific Schofield equation [34].
Physical-activity energy expenditure was determined from three-day physical activity diaries completed concurrently with the dietary records. Participants, with parental assistance, recorded all daily activities and the duration of each over 24 h. Detailed instructions for accurate recording were provided during an online session with parents and in-person meetings with coaches. Furthermore, an example of a completed daily physical activity record was included in the diaries. Activity data were analyzed using the youth metabolic equivalent of task (MET) values from the Youth Compendium of Physical Activities [35]. Although this database includes a smaller variety of activities than the Compendium of Physical Activities for adults [36], it provides age-specific data, ensuring greater accuracy in estimation. When a recorded activity was not listed in the youth database, a comparable activity was selected.
Total energy expenditure was calculated by determining a weighted average MET, based on the duration and MET value of each activity, multiplying this value by REE, and adding 10% to account for energy expenditure from diet-induced thermogenesis.
To verify EEE, two researchers independently observed and recorded one training session of four randomly selected athletes from different sport clubs. The observations were conducted under blinded conditions; neither the athletes nor the coaches were aware that the training session was being observed and recorded. Each researcher independently observed one athlete at a time, recording the exact duration of each exercise, estimated intensity, and duration of rest intervals. EEE values derived from direct observation were lower and were therefore taken into account, as in practice there are inevitably periods of inactivity during training sessions.

2.7. Energy Balance and Energy Availability

The energy balance (EB) on each of the three days of dietary and physical activity recording was calculated as the difference between EI and TEE. Energy availability was calculated according to the formula provided by the International Olympic Committee [1], using the average EI and EEE of the two weekdays that included gymnastics training: EA = (EI − EEE)/FFM.

2.8. Assessment of Dietary Underreporting

To assess potential underreporting of dietary intake, the difference between each participant’s estimated EI and the reference EI values provided by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)—based on age, sex, and Physical Activity Level (PAL) [37]—was calculated. The PAL for each participant was determined as the mean ratio of TEE to REE across the three days of dietary and physical activity recording. When underreporting (defined as a negative difference between estimated and reference EI) was identified, the participant’s EI was adjusted to the reference EI. Subsequently, EB (calculated as the corrected EI minus TEE) and EA (using the corrected EI in the corresponding formula) were recalculated.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Correlations between conceptually relevant study variables were examined by Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation analysis, depending on whether data distribution did not differ or differed from normal based on the Shapiro–Wilk test. For BIVA, Xc and R, measured at 50 kHz, were standardized to the participants’ height. Subsequently, the 95% confidence ellipses of the participants in the present study were compared with those of a reference population [38] using the two-sample Hotelling’s T2 test. Vector analysis was performed using the BIVA 2002 software [39]. The level of statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 29.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

A total of 35 gymnasts were approached and assessed for eligibility to participate in the study. Five were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria related to gymnastics type and age or met the exclusion criteria such as injury or illness. Anthropometric and body composition measurements were conducted on the remaining 30 athletes (24 girls and 6 boys). As descriptive comparisons of the study variables between girls and boys did not reveal meaningful differences, both were included in the analyses. Of those 30 athletes, 24 (20 girls and 4 boys) completed the three-day dietary and physical activity records, while the remaining 6 did not return their records and were therefore included in the anthropometric and body composition analysis only (Figure 1).

3.1. Demographic Characteristics

The demographic characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. Of the 24 girls, 10 reported having reached menarche at the age of 12.6 ± 0.7 years. The age of the 10 athletes who had menstruated was 13.3 ± 0.7 years, while the mean age of those who had not yet menstruated was 11.9 ± 0.9 years.

3.2. Anthropometrics and Body Composition

Table 2 presents the anthropometric and body composition variables of the participants.
All participants were classified as being in the normal BMI category according to the WHO growth charts, except for one girl who was classified as being overweight. The BMI z-score value was 0.10 ± 0.70 for all participants (n = 30) and 0.11 ± 0.75 for the participants with complete energy data (n = 24, Figure 2).
A statistically significant difference was found between the Z vectors of the participants in the present study and those of a reference population [38] (T2 = 16.3, F = 8.1, p = 0.0004, Mahalanobis D = 0.82, Figure 3).

3.3. Energy Balance and Energy Availability

Underreporting of dietary intake was identified in 63% of the participants, with an average underreporting level of 17%. The participants’ total daily EI was 1865 ± 295 kcal (Figure 4a) and increased to 2033 ± 148 kcal after adjustment for underreporting (Figure 4b). The daily REE was 1290 ± 134 kcal, EEE was 396 ± 87 kcal, and TEE reached 2001 ± 204 kcal (Figure 4a,b). The PAL was 1.56 ± 0.06.
The daily EB was initially negative (–135 ± 374 kcal, Figure 4a) but became positive after adjustment for underreporting (32 ± 223 kcal, Figure 4b). Specifically, 14 out of the 24 athletes (58%) initially exhibited a negative EB (Figure 4c), whereas, after adjustment for underreporting, 8 of the 24 athletes (33%) retained a negative EB (Figure 4d).
The participants’ EA was 43.7 ± 14.4 kcal/kg FFM/day (Figure 5a) and increased to 49.2 ± 11.4 kcal/kg FFM/day after adjusting EI for underreporting (Figure 5c). Before adjustment for underreporting, two girls and one boy had EA values below 30 kcal/kg FFM/day, and eleven girls had values below 45 kcal/kg FFM/day (Figure 5b). Following adjustment for underreporting, one girl remained below 30 kcal/kg FFM/day, whereas six girls and one boy had EA values below 45 kcal/kg FFM/day (Figure 5d).

3.4. Correlations

Correlation analysis revealed significant correlations between EA and BCM, R, Xc, EB (averaged over the two weekdays with gymnastics training), and TEE (averaged over the two weekdays with gymnastics training), both before and after adjustment for the underreporting of dietary intake (Table 3 and Table 4, respectively). Additionally, after adjustment for underreporting, EA was significantly correlated with FM in kg (Table 4). Phase angle was significantly correlated with body weight, BMI, FM (kg), FFM (kg), TBW, and ECW (Table 5).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we found no clear indications of LEA in non-elite adolescent artistic gymnasts during a competitive season. Additionally, anthropometric and body composition variables, as well as φ, were within the normal range. Within the range of normal EA observed in the present study, φ did not appear to be associated with EA.
One of the consequences of LEA, and a severe indicator of REDs syndrome, is primary amenorrhea [1]. In the present study, around half of the girls had reached menarche at a mean age of 12.6 years, which is slightly earlier than that reported in adolescent rhythmic gymnasts [41,42]. Additionally, BMI values were within the normal range, further supporting appropriate physical development. These findings are consistent with the BMI values reported in similar populations [27,29,30,41,43].
Regarding body composition, no specific and widely accepted normative values exist for children and adolescents. The FM percentage observed in the present study (16.1%) was similar to values reported in healthy Polish and Greek adolescents [44,45] and Bulgarian female artistic gymnasts [43]. Lower FM percentages have been reported in elite artistic [46], acrobatic [27], and rhythmic gymnasts [29,31], likely reflecting higher training volumes and lower EI. In contrast, higher values (up to 22.9%) have been described in artistic and acrobatic gymnasts [23,30], possibly attributable to the different training level and/or body composition method used (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry). Concerning FFM, only two studies have reported the FFM percentage in gymnastic athletes [29,30]: Villa et al. found values comparable to those in the present study [29], whereas Besor et al. reported values that were approximately 5% lower [30].
Regarding φ, it was slightly higher (by 0.2–0.3°) than values reported in healthy Caucasian children of a similar age [38] and lower than those reported in adolescent rhythmic gymnasts [41], possibly due to the older age of the participants (≈15 years). BIVA further demonstrated a leftward shift of the impedance vector relative to reference data of healthy 12-year-old children [38], consistent with studies in youth athletes from various sports [47,48,49], suggesting an increased BCM [50]. Indeed, we found a BCM of about 20 kg, which is about 4 kg higher than the values reported in healthy adolescents of a similar age [51].
The percentage of dietary underreporting identified in this study aligns with findings from studies involving children, adolescents, and adults [52,53,54]. Underreporting may arise from unconscious reasons, such as difficulty in estimating portion sizes, inaccurate measurements, or forgetting to record consumed foods, and conscious reasons, including feelings of guilt, the desire to present a more disciplined image, or a lack of motivation.
Our findings indicate that the adolescent artistic gymnasts had no clear indications of LEA, as reflected by the adequate EA and the nearly neutral EB. This contrasts with reports of low EB, LEA, and, in some cases, menstrual irregularities in adolescent athletes participating in rhythmic and acrobatic gymnastics [27,29,30,41]. This discrepancy may be partly explained by the younger age and the lower training load of the participants in the present study, differences in the type of gymnastics, as well as methodological issues related to dietary intake assessment. Importantly, when EI was not adjusted for underreporting, EB was negative and most participants exhibited EA values slightly below the proposed adequate reference value for sedentary and recreationally active adults [1,2]. This finding highlights the sensitivity of EB and EA estimates to dietary reporting accuracy and indicates that these results should be interpreted with caution. Training characteristics further support the observed differences between studies: Gοulart et al. [24] reported a training volume of approximately 20 h per week in artistic gymnasts aged around 11 years, which is consistent with the training volume of the athletes in the present study, whereas studies of older adolescent artistic gymnasts (15–17 years) have reported higher training volumes, at around 30 h per week [20,21,22,23]. In line with this, the relatively low PAL (1.6) observed in our athletes is well below the PAL of 2.5, which is generally considered the upper limit at which it becomes difficult to fully compensate for energy expenditure through EI [4,5,6].
Τhe negative correlation between EA and FM (kg) could partly reflect the impact of LEA on energy metabolism and regulation. Specifically, sustained LEA can reduce the resting metabolic rate, induce hypothyroidism, and increase cortisol [55], all of which may negatively affect physiological function. Indeed, studies have reported a higher FM in female adolescent athletes with EA of <30 kcal/kg FFM/day than those whose EA exceeded this threshold [56,57]. One possible explanation is that individuals with higher body fat have been reported to exhibit greater dietary underreporting compared with individuals with lower body fat [56].
The negative correlation between EA and BCM may partly reflect the mathematical expression of EA relative to FFM, given that BCM represents the protein-rich, metabolically active compartment of FFM [8]. Thus, for similar EI and EEE, athletes with higher BCM may present a lower EA due to a larger denominator. A physiological interpretation consistent with the observed negative correlation is also plausible, as athletes with a higher BCM may have greater overall energy requirements and/or EEE; if EI does not increase proportionally, EA may be lower. Similarly, the positive correlation between EA and R may partly reflect the inverse relationship between R and FFM, as R decreases with increasing FFM. The positive correlation between EA and Xc may indicate the influence of EA on cellular integrity, as adequate EI is required to support cell membrane structure and function. Finally, the negative correlation between EA and TEE and its positive correlation with EB are largely influenced by shared calculation components and should therefore be interpreted with caution.
Regarding φ, its significant correlations with other anthropometric and body composition variables are consistent with the findings of previous research. Specifically, body weight, BMI, FM, FFM, TBW, and ECW have all been identified as determinants of φ [58,59]. In contrast, the absence of an association between φ and EA—both before and after adjustment for dietary underreporting—suggests that φ may not be directly linked to EA, at least within the range of normal EA observed in the present study. Given the absence of correction for multiple correlation tests and the cross-sectional design of the study, all of the aforementioned associations do not allow causal interpretation, and the findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis generating.
The main limitations of the present study are as follows: First, the sample included a small number of boys, as participation in most sport clubs in Thessaloniki, Greece is predominately girls. Consequently, the findings primarily represent girls, limiting the interpretation of results by sex. Second, biological maturation stage and hormonal status were not assessed, which limits the ability to disentangle the effects of dietary intake from those related to growth and pubertal development. However, EA was expressed relative to FFM, which partially accounts for individual differences in growth-related lean tissue accretion and metabolic demand. Third, 20% of the athletes did not complete the three-day dietary intake and physical activity records, reducing the available data for estimating EB and EA. In addition, dietary intake assessment is subject to reporting inaccuracies. To address this issue, adjustments were applied in cases of dietary underreporting, assuming the underestimation of portion sizes rather than omission of foods. Moreover, the adjustment of EI based on EFSA reference values relies on assumptions about underreporting that may not apply to all participants. To allow transparent interpretation, we present both unadjusted and adjusted EB and EA values. Fourth, EEE was estimated based on the observations of a representative subset of athletes and training sessions, rather than all participants and sessions. Additionally, energy expenditure during gymnastics apparatus exercises was estimated using standardized MET values, which may not fully reflect the intensity of all movements; however, these exercises represented a small proportion of the total training time and were therefore unlikely to substantially affect EA estimates.
The importance of the present study lies in the first-time estimation of EA in adolescent artistic gymnasts, particularly non-elite athletes—a population that represents a large segment of the sporting community but remains underrepresented in the predominantly elite-focused literature. From a practical perspective, the observed interindividual variability in EB and EA supports a personalized approach to nutritional and training strategies. Such an approach may assist coaches, practitioners, and parents in monitoring energy intake relative to training demands and in identifying athletes who may require closer nutritional supervision during the competitive season. Further studies are recommended in young and older athletes who typically engage in more demanding training programs, since there are no proposed EA reference values for non-adults, competitive athletes, or sport-specific contexts. Moreover, future research should address not only EA, but also additional factors proposed to contribute to the risk of developing REDs syndrome [60].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, adolescent non-elite artistic gymnasts showed no clear indications of LEA and exhibited normal BMI and body composition values during a competitive season. After adjustment for estimated dietary underreporting, EB and EA were within the ranges considered sufficient to support physiological functions in all but one athlete. Also, φ was not directly associated with EA, at least within the range of normal EA observed in the present study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.C.M. and A.P.; methodology, D.C.M., M.C. and A.P.; formal analysis, A.G., A.K. and A.P.; investigation, A.G., A.K., D.C.M. and A.P.; resources, A.P.; data curation, A.G., A.K. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G. and A.K.; writing—review and editing, D.C.M., M.C. and A.P.; visualization, A.G. and A.K.; supervision, A.P.; project administration, D.C.M., M.C. and A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (approval number 82/20-12-2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are openly available in the repository of Hellenic Academic Research Data Management Initiative at https://doi.org/10.26255/heal.3hns-8f0a.

Acknowledgments

We thank the participants and their parents for their adherence to the requirements of the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BCMBody cell mass
BIABioelectrical impedance analysis
BIVABioelectrical impedance vector analysis
BMIBody mass index
EAEnergy availability
EBEnergy balance
ECWExtracellular water
EEEExercise energy expenditure
EFSAEuropean Food Safety Authority
EIEnergy intake
FFMFat-free mass
FMFat mass
LEALow energy availability
METMetabolic equivalent of task
PALPhysical activity level
RResistance
REDsRelative Energy Deficiency in Sport
REEResting energy expenditure
SDStandard deviation
TBWTotal body water
TEETotal energy expenditure
WHOWorld Health Organization
XcReactance
ΖImpedance
φPhase angle

References

  1. Mountjoy, M.; Ackerman, K.E.; Bailey, D.M.; Burke, L.M.; Constantini, N.; Hackney, A.C.; Heikura, I.A.; Melin, A.; Pensgaard, A.M.; Stellingwerff, T.; et al. 2023 International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) Consensus Statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs). Br. J. Sports Med. 2023, 57, 1073–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Areta, J.L.; Taylor, H.L.; Koehler, K. Low Energy Availability: History, Definition and Evidence of Its Endocrine, Metabolic and Physiological Effects in Prospective Studies in Females and Males. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2021, 121, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dipla, K.; Kraemer, R.R.; Constantini, N.W.; Hackney, A.C. Relative Energy Deficiency in Sports (RED-S): Elucidation of Endocrine Changes Affecting the Health of Males and Females. Hormones 2021, 20, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cooper, J.A.; Nguyen, D.D.; Ruby, B.C.; Schoeller, D.A. Maximal Sustained Levels of Energy Expenditure in Humans during Exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011, 43, 2359–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Thurber, C.; Dugas, L.R.; Ocobock, C.; Carlson, B.; Speakman, J.R.; Pontzer, H. Extreme Events Reveal an Alimentary Limit on Sustained Maximal Human Energy Expenditure. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaw0341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Van Hooren, B.; Rietjens, G.; Plasqui, G. Longitudinal Assessment of Total Daily Energy Expenditure in Professional Cyclists Supports a Maximal Sustainable Metabolic Ceiling. Curr. Biol. 2026, 36, 151–160.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carlsohn, A.; Scharhag-Rosenberger, F.; Cassel, M.; Weber, J.; Guzman, A.d.G.; Mayer, F. Physical Activity Levels to Estimate the Energy Requirement of Adolescent Athletes. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2011, 23, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kyle, U.G.; Bosaeus, I.; De Lorenzo, A.D.; Deurenberg, P.; Elia, M.; Gómez, J.M.; Heitmann, B.L.; Kent-Smith, L.; Melchior, J.C.; Pirlich, M.; et al. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis—Part I: Review of Principles and Methods. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 23, 1226–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. da Silva, B.R.; Gonzalez, M.C.; Cereda, E.; Prado, C.M. Exploring the Potential Role of Phase Angle as a Marker of Oxidative Stress: A Narrative Review. Nutrition 2022, 93, 111493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fernández-Jiménez, R.; Dalla-Rovere, L.; García-Olivares, M.; Abuín-Fernández, J.; Sánchez-Torralvo, F.J.; Doulatram-Gamgaram, V.K.; Hernández-Sanchez, A.M.; García-Almeida, J.M. Phase Angle and Handgrip Strength as a Predictor of Disease-Related Malnutrition in Admitted Patients: 12-Month Mortality. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Silva, A.A.; de Melo, G.F.; de Almeida Filho, E.J.B.; Silvino, V.O.; de Albuquerque Neto, S.L.; Ribeiro, S.L.G.; Silva, A.S.; dos Santos, M.A.P. Correlation between Phase Angle and Muscle Mass, Muscle Function, and Health Perception in Community-Dwelling Older Women. Sport Sci. Health 2023, 19, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Samadinian, F.; Eshaghian, N.; Tarrahi, M.J.; Amani, R.; Akbari, M.; Shirani, F. Phase Angle as an Indicator of Nutritional Status: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Iranian Population. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2025, 44, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cirillo, E.; Pompeo, A.; Cirillo, F.T.; Vilaça-Alves, J.; Costa, P.; Ramirez-Campillo, R.; Dourado, A.C.; Afonso, J.; Casanova, F. Relationship between Bioelectrical Impedance Phase Angle and Upper and Lower Limb Muscle Strength in Athletes from Several Sports: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sports 2023, 11, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Franco-Oliva, A.; Ávila-Nava, A.; Rodríguez-Aguilar, E.A.; Trujillo-Mercado, A.; García-Guzmán, A.D.; Pinzón-Navarro, B.A.; Fuentes-Servín, J.; Guevara-Cruz, M.; Medina-Vera, I. Association between Phase Angle and the Nutritional Status in Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1142545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Popiolek-Kalisz, J.; Kalisz, G. Malnutrition Assessed with Phase Angle and Mortality Risk in Heart Failure—A Meta-Analysis. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2025, 35, 104222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Langer, R.D.; Ward, L.C.; Larsen, S.C.; Heitmann, B.L. Can Change in Phase Angle Predict the Risk of Morbidity and Mortality during an 18-Year Follow-up Period? A Cohort Study among Adults. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1157531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Han, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, L.; Tang, F.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y. Lower Phase Angle as a Marker for Poor Prognosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cohort Study. Front. Nutr. 2025, 12, 1580037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moeskops, S.; Oliver, J.L.; Read, P.J.; Cronin, J.B.; Myer, G.D.; Lloyd, R.S. The Physiological Demands of Youth Artistic Gymnastics: Applications to Strength and Conditioning. Strength Cond. J. 2019, 41, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sundgot-Borgen, J.; Garthe, I.; Meyer, N. Energy Needs and Weight Management for Gymnasts. In Gymnastics; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  20. Georgopoulos, N.A.; Markou, K.B.; Theodoropoulou, A.; Benardot, D.; Leglise, M.; Vagenakis, A.G. Growth Retardation in Artistic Compared with Rhythmic Elite Female Gymnasts. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 3169–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Markou, K.B.; Mylonas, P.; Theodoropoulou, A.; Kontogiannis, A.; Leglise, M.; Vagenakis, A.G.; Georgopoulos, N.A. The Influence of Intensive Physical Exercise on Bone Acquisition in Adolescent Elite Female and Male Artistic Gymnasts. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 4383–4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Theodoropoulou, A.; Markou, K.B.; Vagenakis, G.A.; Benardot, D.; Leglise, M.; Kourounis, G.; Vagenakis, A.G.; Georgopoulos, N.A. Delayed but Normally Progressed Puberty Is More Pronounced in Artistic Compared with Rhythmic Elite Gymnasts Due to the Intensity of Training. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 6022–6027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jakše, B.; Jakše, B.; Čuk, I.; Šajber, D. Body Composition, Training Volume/Pattern and Injury Status of Slovenian Adolescent Female High-performance Gymnasts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Goulart, K.N.d.O.; Vieira, M.M.; Aleixo, I.M.S.; Wilke, C.F.; Wanner, S.P. Estimated Energy Expenditure and Training Intensity in Young Female Artistic Gymnasts. Mot. Rev. Educ. Fís. 2022, 28, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Carvajal Veitia, W.; Campos, Y.D. Body Composition Analysis Using Bioelectrical Parameters in the Cuban Sporting Population. Arch. Med. Deporte 2017, 34, 207–215. [Google Scholar]
  26. Aguilo, A.; Lozano, L.; Tauler, P.; Nafría, M.; Colom, M.; Martínez, S. Nutritional Status and Implementation of a Nutritional Education Program in Young Female Artistic Gymnasts. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Silva, M.R.G.; Silva, H.H.; Paiva, T. Sleep Duration, Body Composition, Dietary Profile and Eating Behaviours among Children and Adolescents: A Comparison between Portuguese Acrobatic Gymnasts. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2018, 177, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Silva, M.R.G.; Paiva, T. Low Energy Availability and Low Body Fat of Female Gymnasts before an International Competition. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2015, 15, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Villa, M.; Villa-Vicente, J.G.; Seco-Calvo, J.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Collado, P.S. Body Composition, Dietary Intake and the Risk of Low Energy Availability in Elite-Level Competitive Rhythmic Gymnasts. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Besor, O.; Redlich, N.; Constantini, N.; Weiler-Sagie, M.; Monsonego Ornan, E.; Lieberman, S.; Bentur, L.; Bar-Yoseph, R. Assessment of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) Risk among Adolescent Acrobatic Gymnasts. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Purenović-Ivanović, T.; Popović, R.; Bubanj, S.; Stanković, R. Body Composition in High-Level Female Rhythmic Gymnasts of Different Age Categories. Sci. Sports 2019, 34, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. McKay, A.K.A.; Stellingwerff, T.; Smith, E.S.; Martin, D.T.; Mujika, I.; Goosey-Tolfrey, V.L.; Sheppard, J.; Burke, L.M. Defining Training and Performance Caliber: A Participant Classification Framework. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2022, 17, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique (FIG). 2025–2028 Code of Points. Available online: https://www.gymnastics.sport/site/ (accessed on 30 January 2026).
  34. Schofield, W.N. Predicting Basal Metabolic Rate, New Standards and Review of Previous Work. Hum. Nutr. Clin. Nutr. 1985, 39, 5–41. [Google Scholar]
  35. Butte, N.F.; Watson, K.B.; Ridley, K.; Zakeri, I.F.; McMurray, R.G.; Pfeiffer, K.A.; Crouter, S.E.; Herrmann, S.D.; Bassett, D.R.; Long, A.; et al. A Youth Compendium of Physical Activities: Activity Codes and Metabolic Intensities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2018, 50, 246–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Herrmann, S.D.; Willis, E.A.; Ainsworth, B.E. The 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities and Its Expansion. J. Sport Health Sci. 2024, 13, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Dietary Reference Values for Nutrients Summary Report. EFSA Support. Public. 2017, 14, e15121E. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Palo, T.; Messina, G.; Edefonti, A.; Perfumo, F.; Pisanello, L.; Peruzzi, L.; Di Iorio, B.; Mignozzi, M.; Vienna, A.; Conti, G.; et al. Normal Values of the Bioelectrical Impedance Vector in Childhood and Puberty. Nutrition 2000, 16, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Piccoli, A.; Pillon, L.; Dumler, F. Impedance Vector Distribution by Sex, Race, Body Mass Index, and Age in the United States: Standard Reference Intervals as Bivariate Z Scores. Nutrition 2002, 18, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. WHO (World Health Organization). Growth Reference Data for 5–19 Years. Available online: http://www.who.int/growthref/en/ (accessed on 12 May 2025).
  41. D’Alessandro, C.; Morelli, E.; Evangelisti, I.; Galetta, F.; Franzoni, F.; Lazzeri, D.; Piazza, M.; Cupisti, A. Profiling the Diet and Body Composition of Subelite Adolescent Rhythmic Gymnasts. Hum. Kinet. 2007, 19, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jürimäe, J.; Remmel, L.; Tamm, A.L.; Purge, P.; Maasalu, K.; Tillmann, V. Associations of Circulating Irisin and Fibroblast Growth Factor-21 Levels with Measures of Energy Homeostasis in Highly Trained Adolescent Rhythmic Gymnasts. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kolimechkov, S.; Yanev, I.; Kiuchukov, I.; Petrov, L.; Alexandrova, A.; Zaykova, D.; Stoimenov, E. Nutritional Status and Body Composition of Young Artistic Gymnasts from Bulgaria. J. Appl. Sports Sci. 2019, 3, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kobylińska, M.; Antosik, K.; Decyk, A.; Kurowska, K.; Skiba, D. Body Composition and Anthropometric Indicators in Children and Adolescents 6–15 Years Old. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Papadopoulou, S.K.; Feidantsis, K.G.; Hassapidou, M.N.; Methenitis, S. The Specific Impact of Nutrition and Physical Activity on Adolescents’ Body Composition and Energy Balance. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2021, 92, 736–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Deutz, R.C.; Benardot, D.; Martin, D.E.; Cody, M.M. Relationship between Energy Deficits and Body Composition in Elite Female Gymnasts and Runners. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000, 32, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Meleleo, D.; Bartolomeo, N.; Cassano, L.; Nitti, A.; Susca, G.; Mastrototaro, G.; Armenise, U.; Zito, A.; Devito, F.; Scicchitano, P.; et al. Evaluation of Body Composition with Bioimpedence. A Comparison between Athletic and Non-Athletic Children. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2017, 17, 710–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Carrasco-Marginet, M.; Castizo-Olier, J.; Rodríguez-Zamora, L.; Iglesias, X.; Rodríguez, F.A.; Chaverri, D.; Brotons, D.; Irurtia, A. Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) for Measuring the Hydration Status in Young Elite Synchronized Swimmers. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Koury, J.C.; Trugo, N.M.F.; Torres, A.G. Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Vectors in Adolescent and Adult Male Athletes. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2014, 9, 798–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. de la Cruz Marcos, S.; Redondo Del Río, M.P.; de Mateo Silleras, B. Applications of Bioelectrical Impedance Vector Analysis (Biva) in the Study of Body Composition in Athletes. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kaczmarek, M.; Durda-Masny, M.; Hanć, T. Reference Data for Body Composition Parameters in Normal-Weight Polish Adolescents: Results from the Population-Based ADOPOLNOR Study. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2024, 183, 5021–5031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lioret, S.; Touvier, M.; Balin, M.; Huybrechts, I.; Dubuisson, C.; Dufour, A.; Bertin, M.; Maire, B.; Lafay, L. Characteristics of Energy Under-Reporting in Children and Adolescents. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 105, 1671–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Burrows, T.L.; Ho, Y.Y.; Rollo, M.E.; Collins, C.E. Validity of Dietary Assessment Methods When Compared to the Method of Doubly Labeled Water: A Systematic Review in Adults. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Petridou, A.; Rodopaios, N.E.; Mougios, V.; Koulouri, A.A.; Vasara, E.; Papadopoulou, S.K.; Skepastianos, P.; Hassapidou, M.; Kafatos, A. Effects of Periodic Religious Fasting for Decades on Nutrient Intakes and the Blood Biochemical Profile. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jeppesen, J.S.; Hellsten, Y.; Melin, A.K.; Hansen, M. Short-Term Severe Low Energy Availability in Athletes: Molecular Mechanisms, Endocrine Responses, and Performance Outcomes—A Narrative Review. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2025, 35, e70089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Koehler, K.; Achtzehn, S.; Braun, H.; Mester, J.; Schaenzer, W. Comparison of Self-Reported Energy Availability and Metabolic Hormones to Assess Adequacy of Dietary Energy Intake in Young Elite Athletes. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2013, 38, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kinoshita, N.; Uchiyama, E.; Ishikawa-Takata, K.; Yamada, Y.; Okuyama, K. Association of Energy Availability with Resting Metabolic Rates in Competitive Female Teenage Runners: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2021, 18, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ferreira, G.O.C.; Ferrari, G.; Langer, R.D.; Cossio-Bolaños, M.; Gomez-Campos, R.; Lázari, E.; Moraes, A.M. Phase Angle and Its Determinants among Adolescents: Influence of Body Composition and Physical Fitness Level. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 13697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gonzalez, M.C.; Barbosa-Silva, T.G.; Bielemann, R.M.; Gallagher, D.; Heymsfield, S.B. Phase Angle and Its Determinants in Healthy Subjects: Influence of Body Composition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 712–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Jeukendrup, A.E.; Areta, J.L.; Van Genechten, L.; Langan-Evans, C.; Pedlar, C.R.; Rodas, G.; Sale, C.; Walsh, N.P. Does Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) Syndrome Exist? Sports Med. 2024, 54, 2793–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 18 00519 g001
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram.
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram.
Nutrients 18 00519 g001
Nutrients 18 00519 g002
Figure 2. Position of participants on the WHO BMI-for-age growth charts: (a) girls (n = 24) and (b) boys (n = 6) [40]. Pink dots represent female adolescent artistic gymnasts, and blue dots represent male adolescent artistic gymnasts.
Figure 2. Position of participants on the WHO BMI-for-age growth charts: (a) girls (n = 24) and (b) boys (n = 6) [40]. Pink dots represent female adolescent artistic gymnasts, and blue dots represent male adolescent artistic gymnasts.
Nutrients 18 00519 g002
Nutrients 18 00519 g003
Figure 3. 95% confidence ellipses for the mean bioelectrical impedance vectors of participants in the present study (dashed line) and the reference population (solid line) [38]. Xc: reactance, R: resistance. Analysis was performed using Hotelling’s T2 test. * Significant difference, p = 0.0004.
Figure 3. 95% confidence ellipses for the mean bioelectrical impedance vectors of participants in the present study (dashed line) and the reference population (solid line) [38]. Xc: reactance, R: resistance. Analysis was performed using Hotelling’s T2 test. * Significant difference, p = 0.0004.
Nutrients 18 00519 g003
Nutrients 18 00519 g004
Figure 4. (a,b) Boxplots of daily energy intake (EI), total energy expenditure (TEE), and energy balance (EB) of the participants (n = 24), averaged over 3 days, (a) before adjustment for dietary underreporting and (b) after adjustment for dietary underreporting. Each box represents the interquartile range, and the center line represents the median. Whiskers are extended to the most extreme data point that is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the edge of the box (Tukey style). Dots represent individual values. (c,d) Individual EB of the participants, (c) before adjustment for dietary underreporting and (d) after adjustment for dietary underreporting.
Figure 4. (a,b) Boxplots of daily energy intake (EI), total energy expenditure (TEE), and energy balance (EB) of the participants (n = 24), averaged over 3 days, (a) before adjustment for dietary underreporting and (b) after adjustment for dietary underreporting. Each box represents the interquartile range, and the center line represents the median. Whiskers are extended to the most extreme data point that is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the edge of the box (Tukey style). Dots represent individual values. (c,d) Individual EB of the participants, (c) before adjustment for dietary underreporting and (d) after adjustment for dietary underreporting.
Nutrients 18 00519 g004
Nutrients 18 00519 g005
Figure 5. (a,c) Energy availability (EA) of the participants (n = 24), averaged over 2 days, (a) before adjustment for dietary underreporting and (c) after adjustment for dietary underreporting. Each box represents the interquartile range, and the center line represents the median. Whiskers are extended to the most extreme data point that is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the edge of the box (Tukey style). Dots represent individual values. (b,d) Individual EA of the participants, (b) before adjustment for dietary underreporting and (d) after adjustment for dietary underreporting. Red bars represent participants with EA below the defined threshold for low energy availability (red line), orange bars represent participants with EA between the low and adequate EA thresholds (green line), and green bars represent participants with adequate EA.
Figure 5. (a,c) Energy availability (EA) of the participants (n = 24), averaged over 2 days, (a) before adjustment for dietary underreporting and (c) after adjustment for dietary underreporting. Each box represents the interquartile range, and the center line represents the median. Whiskers are extended to the most extreme data point that is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the edge of the box (Tukey style). Dots represent individual values. (b,d) Individual EA of the participants, (b) before adjustment for dietary underreporting and (d) after adjustment for dietary underreporting. Red bars represent participants with EA below the defined threshold for low energy availability (red line), orange bars represent participants with EA between the low and adequate EA thresholds (green line), and green bars represent participants with adequate EA.
Nutrients 18 00519 g005
Table 1. Demographic characteristics (mean ± SD) of all participants (n = 30) and of those with complete energy intake and energy expenditure data (n = 24).
Table 1. Demographic characteristics (mean ± SD) of all participants (n = 30) and of those with complete energy intake and energy expenditure data (n = 24).
Variablen = 30n = 24
Age (years)12.4 ± 1.112.4 ± 1.1
Training age (years)7.6 ± 1.77.7 ± 1.7
Training duration (h/week)17.1 ± 3.917.4 ± 3.9
Table 2. Anthropometrics, body composition, and φ of all participants (n = 30) and of those with complete energy intake and energy expenditure data (n = 24).
Table 2. Anthropometrics, body composition, and φ of all participants (n = 30) and of those with complete energy intake and energy expenditure data (n = 24).
Variablen = 30n = 24
Weight (kg)42.5 ± 8.942.6 ± 9.3
Height (m)1.50 ± 0.091.50 ± 0.09
Body mass index (kg/m2)18.7 ± 2.218.8 ± 2.4
Fat mass (kg)7.0 ± 2.56.9 ± 2.6
Fat mass (%)16.1 ± 3.416.0 ± 3.7
Fat-free mass (kg)35.5 ± 7.135.7 ± 7.4
Fat-free mass (%)83.9 ± 3.484.0 ± 3.7
Total body water (L)27.0 ± 5.227.1 ± 5.5
Total body water (%)63.7 ± 2.763.8 ± 2.9
Extracellular water (L)12.7 ± 1.812.7 ± 1.9
Extracellular water (%)30.3 ± 2.430.3 ± 2.5
Intracellular water (L)13.9 ± 2.813.9 ± 2.9
Intracellular water (%)33.1 ± 3.632.8 ± 3.3
Third-space water (L)0.3 ± 1.70.5 ± 1.6
Body cell mass (kg)19.9 ± 3.919.9 ± 4.1
Resistance (Ω)589 ± 59586 ± 63
Reactance (Ω)62.0 ± 5.661.9 ± 6.2
Phase angle (°)6.0 ± 0.66.1 ± 0.6
Impedance at 5 kHz (Ω)669 ± 62666 ± 66
Impedance at 50 kHz (Ω)593 ± 59589 ± 63
Impedance at 100 kHz (Ω)562 ± 57559 ± 61
Impedance at 200 kHz (Ω)535 ± 56531 ± 59
Table 3. Correlation analysis between energy availability and other conceptually relevant study variables before adjustment for underreporting of dietary intake in adolescent artistic gymnasts during the competitive season (n = 24).
Table 3. Correlation analysis between energy availability and other conceptually relevant study variables before adjustment for underreporting of dietary intake in adolescent artistic gymnasts during the competitive season (n = 24).
r or ρp
Fat mass (kg)−0.365 a0.080
Fat mass (%)0.0020.993
Body cell mass (kg)−0.5760.003
Resistance (Ω)0.643<0.001
Reactance (Ω)0.4760.019
Phase angle (°)−0.2310.276
Total energy expenditure (kcal)−0.4900.015
Energy balance (kcal)0.912<0.001
Boldface indicates significant correlations (p < 0.05). a Spearman’s ρ. All other values are Pearson’s r.
Table 4. Correlation analysis between energy availability and other conceptually relevant study variables after adjustment for underreporting of dietary intake in adolescent artistic gymnasts during the competitive season (n = 24).
Table 4. Correlation analysis between energy availability and other conceptually relevant study variables after adjustment for underreporting of dietary intake in adolescent artistic gymnasts during the competitive season (n = 24).
r or ρp
Fat mass (kg)−0.418 a0.042
Fat mass (%)−0.0230.913
Body cell mass (kg)−0.659<0.001
Resistance (Ω)0.770<0.001
Reactance (Ω)0.4970.014
Phase angle (°)−0.3450.099
Total energy expenditure (kcal)−0.5710.004
Energy balance (kcal)0.836<0.001
Boldface indicates significant correlations (p < 0.05). a Spearman’s ρ. All other values are Pearson’s r.
Table 5. Correlation analysis of phase angle with anthropometric and body composition variables in adolescent artistic gymnasts during the competitive season (n = 30).
Table 5. Correlation analysis of phase angle with anthropometric and body composition variables in adolescent artistic gymnasts during the competitive season (n = 30).
r or ρp
Weight (kg)0.4630.010
Body mass index (kg/m2)0.588 a<0.001
Fat mass (kg)0.428 a0.018
Fat mass (%)0.3510.057
Fat-free mass (kg)0.4000.029
Fat-free mass (%)−0.3510.057
Total body water (L)0.3950.031
Total body water (%)−0.4090.025
Extracellular water (L)0.3640.048
Extracellular water (%)−0.4970.005
Intracellular water (L)0.3410.065
Intracellular water (%)−0.230 a0.221
Body cell mass (kg)0.3400.066
Boldface indicates significant correlations (p < 0.05). a Spearman’s ρ. All other values are Pearson’s r.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grompanopoulou, A.; Kypraiou, A.; Milosis, D.C.; Chourdakis, M.; Petridou, A. Energy Availability, Body Composition, and Phase Angle Among Adolescent Artistic Gymnasts During a Competitive Season. Nutrients 2026, 18, 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030519

AMA Style

Grompanopoulou A, Kypraiou A, Milosis DC, Chourdakis M, Petridou A. Energy Availability, Body Composition, and Phase Angle Among Adolescent Artistic Gymnasts During a Competitive Season. Nutrients. 2026; 18(3):519. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030519

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grompanopoulou, Anneta, Antigoni Kypraiou, Dimitrios C. Milosis, Michael Chourdakis, and Anatoli Petridou. 2026. "Energy Availability, Body Composition, and Phase Angle Among Adolescent Artistic Gymnasts During a Competitive Season" Nutrients 18, no. 3: 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030519

APA Style

Grompanopoulou, A., Kypraiou, A., Milosis, D. C., Chourdakis, M., & Petridou, A. (2026). Energy Availability, Body Composition, and Phase Angle Among Adolescent Artistic Gymnasts During a Competitive Season. Nutrients, 18(3), 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030519

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop