Next Article in Journal
Targeting Irritable Bowel Syndrome Through Diet and Mechanism-Based Therapies: A Pathophysiological Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Pro-Cognitive Effect of Royal Jelly Is Linked with Increased Burst Activity of Mesocorticolimbic Dopaminergic Neurons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Narrative Review on the Functional Applications, Safety, and Probiotic Characteristics of Pichia

1
Department of Dermatology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
2
Center for Medical Mycology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(22), 3594; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223594 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 20 October 2025 / Revised: 10 November 2025 / Accepted: 13 November 2025 / Published: 17 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Prebiotics and Probiotics)

Abstract

The projected increase in the global probiotics market is driven by growing consumer awareness of gut health and the potential benefits of microbial supplements. However, the market currently exhibits a significant gap in probiotic yeast options, with Saccharomyces boulardii being the predominant probiotic yeast available. This limitation restricts diversity and potential tailored applications of alternative probiotic yeast strains. Pichia, a genus of yeast, has emerged as a promising candidate. This review explores the safety profile and probiotic attributes of Pichia strains, which collectively highlight its potential as an effective probiotic yeast. Evidence indicates that Pichia exhibits beneficial characteristics such as resilience in harsh gastrointestinal (GI) conditions, antimicrobial activity against pathogens, and immunomodulatory effects that could contribute to gut health. Additionally, the non-pathogenic nature of Pichia and its history of safe and wide use in food and beverage fermentation processes increases confidence in its safety for human consumption. Given its potential, Pichia may diversify the probiotic yeast market and present an alternative beneficial organism that may contribute to general health and well-being.

1. Introduction

Probiotics are live microorganisms that provide health benefits when taken in sufficient amounts [1]. They are commonly used to improve or restore microbial balance and are administered primarily to support digestive health and manage gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and disorders [2]. Growing interest in the health applications of probiotics has driven exploration of novel microbial strains with improved resilience and therapeutic efficacy. When selecting probiotic strains, certain standards must be considered to ensure efficacy and safety for human use. In general, candidate probiotic species must be well characterized at the strain level and must have substantial evidence for non-pathogenicity and safety, usually referred to as Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) for human consumption [3]. Strains should be able to survive and grow in acidic and bile-rich environments, adhere to the GI tract, and remain viable in adequate doses throughout their shelf life [4]. In practice, both industry and regulatory bodies such as the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) and food safety authorities (e.g., European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)) further specify that candidate probiotic strains must undergo thorough genomic characterization to confirm identity and exclude acquisition of undesirable genes including virulence factors and resistance. They must also demonstrate functional properties (e.g., adherence, immunomodulatory, or antimicrobial activity) using in both in vitro and in vivo models, and in addition to ensuring safety, should preferably demonstrate efficacy through well-designed human clinical trials. In fact, industry as well as consumers expect that a new probiotic strain should undergo one human clinical trial.
Probiotics comprise both bacterial and yeast-based organisms. Bacterial probiotics have been extensively studied, with the most common being lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacteria, and Lactococcus species. Their gut health benefits and protective roles against several inflammatory and metabolic disorders have been well documented [5]. However, challenges regarding bacterial viability within the GI tract, particularly the stomach [6], and the risk of transferring antibiotic resistance genes [7] has led yeast-based probiotics to emerge as valuable alternatives. The first probiotic yeast, isolated in the early 20th century, is Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii (often referred to as simply S. boulardii), and has become widely used since the 1950s for treatment of diarrhea [8]. Recent research has demonstrated the effectiveness of this probiotic yeast strain in addressing a range of GI diseases such as Traveler’s diarrhea, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Crohn’s disease [9], acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-associated diarrhea, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) [10]. As a result of these advantages, non-conventional yeasts with probiotic properties such as strains of the Pichia genus are actively being explored to expand the application of probiotic yeasts beyond S. boulardii [11]. The growing interest in non-Saccharomyces yeasts warrants further exploration to characterize their probiotic potential, mechanisms of action, and safety profiles.
Probiotic yeasts have been gaining attention due to certain advantages as outlined above over bacterial probiotics. Unlike many bacteria, yeasts are naturally resistant to antibiotics, allowing them to survive antibiotic treatment while minimizing the risk of transferring antibiotic resistance genes to pathogens [12]. Yeasts are more resilient against low pH and bile-rich conditions within the GI tract, enhancing their survival and colonization within the gut [13]. Moreover, as eukaryotic microorganisms, yeasts are much larger than bacteria and can act as a steric hindrance against pathogenic bacteria [14]. Various yeast species are also known to produce bioactive compounds with antimicrobial [15], antioxidant [16], and immunomodulatory properties [17]. However, potential risks must also be considered such as potential allergenicity and pathogenicity in immunocompromised individuals. There is also a need for more extensive clinical and mechanistic studies to characterize the safety and therapeutic efficacy of emerging yeast probiotics [18]. The present review aims to gather information regarding different attributes of Pichia that support its probiotic potential for human health.

2. The Characteristics of Pichia as a Genus

2.1. Taxonomy and History

The history of the genus Pichia begins in 1904 when Hansen first established the genus based on distinct morphological characteristics (Figure 1). Early key species identified were Pichia manshurica (1914) [19] and Pichia pastoris (1919) [20]. The genus continued to expand with the discovery of Pichia fermentans in 1932 and the reclassification of Issatchenkia orientalis as Pichia kudriavzevii in 1965 [19]. The 1970s marked a turning point for Pichia pastoris, which was explored for its potential in single-cell protein production and gained prominence as a system for expressing heterologous proteins, becoming a valuable workhorse in biotechnology in the 1980s [21]. Taxonomic refinements occurred in 1984 when the genus Hansenula was reclassified under Pichia [22]. Later, in 1995, P. pastoris was reclassified into the genus Komagataella [20]. That same year, Pichia anomala and Pichia guilliermondii began to be investigated for their biocontrol applications against mold [23]. By 2005, P. fermentans was applied as a starter culture in wine fermentation, further strengthening the diverse applications of Pichia species across food and biotechnology sectors [24].
Pichia has traditionally been distinguished by its unique modes of asexual and sexual reproduction and by characteristic morphological features such as multilateral budding and the production of spheroidal, hat-shaped, or hemispheroidal ascospores. In asexual reproduction, Pichia undergo multilateral budding, which distinguishes its budding behavior from other genera [25]. Pseudohyphae occurrence, while occasional, is also an identifier of the Pichia genus [19,26]. During sexual reproduction, one to four ascospores can be found in unconjugated asci, which may be either persistent or deliquescent [25]. Pichia can be identified through ascospore morphology, which can be either spheroidal, hat-shaped, or hemispheroidal, and may or may not have a ledge [19,26]. Currently, the genus Pichia is taxonomically classified under subphylum Saccharomycotina, class Pichiomycetes, order Pichiales and family Pichiaceae [27]. Its phylogenetic classification has been widely discussed, with major taxonomic reclassifications occurring following the emergence of DNA analysis tools, which revealed that traditional morphological characters often failed to delimit monophyletic groups. Many species previously assigned to other genera, such as Saccharomyces and Willia, are now classified under the Pichia genus [25]. Similarly, many species formerly placed in Pichia based on ascospore morphology and multilateral budding have since been transferred to newly circumscribed genera such as Wickerhamomyces, Meyerozyma, Barnettozyma, Ogataea, and Candida, resulting in a more narrowly defined Pichia [27].
The Pichia genus can also be distinguished through genomic analysis. The translation elongation factor-1a (Tef-1a) gene, as well as large and small subunit rRNA genes, can accurately determine whether an organism belongs to Pichia [26,28]. In a recent study, Zhu et al. [29] used the D1/D2 domains in the large subunit rRNA gene and the ITS region to reclassify species under the Candida genus to the Pichia genus. In addition to genomic markers, functional traits can also be used as indicators of Pichia. Species within the Pichia genus are able to ferment glucose [19,26], but cannot assimilate nitrate and seldom ferment other sugars [25].
Within the Pichia genus, there are 41 known species at the time of writing [26]. This genus is notable for its adaptability, with species isolated from a wide range of environments [30]. For example, Pichia has been found in diverse habitats such as marine sediment [26,29], bark [26], decayed wood, soil [31], flowers [32], insect larvae gut [33], rotting wood [34], columnar cacti necrotic tissue [35], and deteriorated strawberry soft drinks [26,29]. Geographically, Pichia species have been isolated in multiple countries including China [36], Columbia, Brazil, UK [29], Japan [37], Mexico [38], Thailand [39], Indonesia [31], The Netherlands [40], India [41], Caribbean [35], Spain [42], and Borneo [32]. As for their ecological tolerance, Pichia species can survive at temperatures of up to 42 °C [43]; however, one P. kudriavzevii strain has been found to survive at 45 °C [43]. Ecologically, some species act as plant endophytes, where their antifungal properties contribute to the plant’s defense responses [30,44]. For example, P. kudriavzevii isolated from Golden Delicious apples inhibits the growth of the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea, effectively controlling gray mold disease [30].

2.2. Historical Uses of Pichia Species

Different Pichia species have had varying scientific and industrial uses depending on their properties. Common Pichia species that have been utilized in the fields of biotechnology and molecular biology include Pichia kluyveri, P. fermantans, P, anomala, Pichia stipitis, P. pastoris, and P. kudriavzevii [25]. P. pastoris is commonly used for synthesizing recombinant proteins because of its effective and versatile system [45,46]. The methylotrophic yeast can accurately fold proteins, undergo glycosylation, and form disulfide bonds, thus ensuring proper functionality of expressed proteins [46]. It has a co-translational expression system and can secrete recombinant proteins into the supernatant [46,47,48]. Furthermore, the genetic alterations of P. pastoris are tractable, possess strong promoters, and can be cultivated to high cell densities, facilitating large-scale protein production. Recombinant P. pastoris proteins are used to produce cellulase, an important enzyme that degrades cellulosic biomass for biofuel production. Additionally, P. pastoris is utilized across the industrial and pharmaceutical sectors to produce enzymes such as xylanases, lipases, xanthophylls, and glucaric acid [46,49].
Several Pichia species, including P. anomala, P. fermentans, P. guiliermondii, P. kudriavzevii, P. pastoris, P. membranifaciens, and P. stipitis are commonly used in winemaking due to their capacity to enhance aroma and ethanol yield [25,50]. Among them, P. kluyveri is widely studied for its commercial applications in the fermentation process of no-alcohol and low-alcohol beer (NALAB) and kombucha [51,52]. P. kluyveri produces low amounts of ethanol due to its inability to metabolize complex sugars, only metabolizing monosaccharides [51,53]. In NALAB fermentation, P. kluyveri is being used in the production process due to its high production of isoamyl acetate, which results in a fruity-banana flavor to the beverage [51,54]. Similarly, P. kluyveri can also produce a fruity flavor to kombucha as the yeast accelerates the kombucha fermentation process [52]. Collectively, the Pichia genus demonstrates proven utility both in the context of research and commercial applications.

3. Regulatory and Safety Profile of Pichia

In probiotic development, safety is a paramount necessity, and regulatory frameworks are crucial for directing microbial usage in food and feed. Several Pichia strains have been used in the food and beverage industry, often with self-declared GRAS status. For example, P. pastoris, P. anomala, and P. kluyveri have been widely used in wine fermentation. At the time of writing, P. kluyveri DSM 33235 is the only Pichia strain to be granted GRAS status, primarily for use as a starter culture in the production of alcohol-free and low-alcohol beer, as well as in fermented vegetables, fruit juices, and tea for flavor and aroma enhancement [55]. The FDA concluded that there were no questions regarding the safety of P. kluyveri DSM 33235 under its intended use, based on its history of safe presence in various fermented foods, non-pathogenic profile, and absence of toxin production.
In Europe, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) awards Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) status, which is a system for considering the safety of microorganisms approved for use in the food chain [56]. The QPS list is based on a rigorous review of critical criteria such as taxonomic clarity, complete scientific understanding, lack of pathogenicity, and a track record of safe use. Several species of the genus Pichia, including Pichia jadinii, Pichia hansenii, P. pastoris, Pichia angusta, and P. anomala, have been included to the updated EFSA QPS list [57]. This validation highlights their established importance in various traditional fermentation techniques and food biotechnology, as well as a significant step forward in their transition to probiotic applications. The EFSA’s recognition confirms their general safety and encourages the use of Pichia as a probiotic yeast, especially given its established functional features like GI survival, stress resistance, and antibacterial activity. The QPS status thus provides a solid regulatory base, increasing the practicality of adding Pichia strains into functional food products and broadening the probiotic repertoire beyond traditional bacteria and Saccharomyces species. However, not all species within the Pichia genus qualify for this status. In particular, P. kudriavzevii (syn. Candida krusei), although frequently studied for its promising probiotic features is excluded from both GRAS and QPS due to known safety risks, particularly in immunocompromised individuals [58,59]. Clinical and environmental isolates of P. kudriavzevii are genetically identical and both consistently exhibit high resistance to fluconazole [43,60]. P. kudriavzevii is recognized as one of the Candida spp. that cause systemic infections resulting in morbidity and mortality in hospital settings [59,61]. These findings highlight the necessity for careful strain selection and rigorous safety and resistance evaluation prior to it being used as a probiotic or commercially deploying Pichia strains, with particular emphasis on avoiding use in high-risk individuals and close monitoring for opportunistic infections.

4. Probiotic Attributes of Pichia

Given the robust status of yeast-based probiotics, identifying and characterizing novel yeast strains with probiotic potential is desirable for expanding their applications. While S. boulardii is currently the most widely used and studied probiotic yeast, yeasts such as Pichia species have also shown promising probiotic properties including high tolerability in GI environments, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity, and immunomodulatory effects.

4.1. Gastric Survival and Bile Tolerance

Probiotic microorganisms encounter various environmental conditions upon ingestion by the host and during transit in the GI tract. To be an effective probiotic, microorganisms must be able to demonstrate resistance to two critical physiological barriers. Firstly, they need to tolerate conditions of the stomach where pH may decrease to as low as 1.5 to 3.5 and fluctuate to pH 3 to 5 during food intake [62]. Acid tolerance for at least 90 min is a preferable trait for probiotic supplements [63].
Bile tolerance represents a second barrier. The small intestines contain bile secreted from the liver and pancreatic juice to aid digestion [64], with the optimal bile concentration ranging from 0.2% to 0.6% [65]. Bile salts possess detergent properties, which can damage the human GI tract and exert antimicrobial effects on yeast [66]. Therefore, resistance to both gastric acid and bile conditions represent critical criterion for Pichia to successfully navigate the GI landscape (Figure 2).
A number of Pichia species have been reported to survive in low pH and tolerate bile conditions (Table 1). Wang et al. [67] isolated an efficient acetic acid-tolerant P. kudriavzevii Y2 from the water of baijiu brewing waste. This strain was reported to tolerate 12 g/L of acetic acid, which has a pH of approximately 2.72. In another study, two P. kudriavzevii strains, NBRC1279 and NBRC1664, were cultured and compared for growth in highly acidic conditions (SCD medium containing 15 mM formic acid, 35 mM sulfuric acid, 60 mM hydrochloric acid, 100 mM acetic acid, or 550 mM lactic acid), where only strain NBRC1664 could tolerate low pH conditions [68]. P. kudriavzevii isolated from the gut of Pila globosa (an edible freshwater snail) also showed strong gastric survival (pH 1.5–10) and bile tolerance (1.2%), together with bile salt hydrolase (BSH) activity, supporting its survival in the GI tract [69]. In another study by Lata et al. [70], it was shown that P. kudriavzevii Y33 isolated from traditional mango pickle maintain 88.6% viability at pH 2 and over 95% in 2% bile, suggesting excellent gastric and bile tolerance under harsh GI conditions. Helmy et al. [71] observed P. kudriavzeviil QLB isolated from Karish cheese showed tolerance to bile concentration of 2%. In another work by Menezes et al. [62], one strain of P. membranifaciens and P. guillermondii and two strains of P. kudriavzevii survived in the GI tract by tolerating the acidic pH in gastric conditions and bile salts.
Lucena et al. [72] demonstrated that yeasts have been able to modify the components of their cell walls for survival in low pH levels by activating the cell wall integrity pathway. A study by Fletcher et al. [73] demonstrated that P. anomala has low acid tolerance due to its strong expression of H+-ATPases in the plasma and vacuolar membranes which expel protons to maintain cytosolic pH balance. This process is aided by increased mitochondrial respiration, including the expression of Complex I subunits, allowing for more ATP generation. Unlike S. cerevisiae, P. anomala respires rather than ferments during stressful conditions, resulting in increased biomass yield and growth at low pH. Together, these strategies enable P. anomala to thrive and survive in low acidic conditions.

4.2. Cholesterol Assimilation

Another important health benefit attributed to Pichia is its well-documented ability to assimilate and sequester cholesterol from the surrounding environment. Lowering cholesterol levels is critical to prevent coronary artery disease and previous use of probiotic bacteria to reduce serum cholesterol levels has attracted attention [74]. Similarly, yeasts are also known to assimilate cholesterol through different mechanisms. Lata et al. [70] demonstrated the physical incorporation of cholesterol into the cell membrane during growth. This process reduces cholesterol levels in the surrounding environment without metabolizing it as a carbon source. On the other hand, bile salt hydrolase (BSH) produced by Pichia also plays a role in promoting bile salt detoxification and enhancing cholesterol elimination through increased fecal bile acid secretion [69]. Alkalbani et al. [14] proposed an additional mechanism involving the attachment of cholesterol to the yeast cell wall, enzymatic reduction of cholesterol to coprostanol, and the disruption of cholesterol micelles facilitated by BSH activity.
Studies on P. kudriavzevii have reported cholesterol assimilation rates ranging from approximately 40% to over 97% (Table 1), depending on the substrate and experimental conditions. P. kudriavzevii isolated from the gut of freshwater snail showed a moderate cholesterol assimilation rate of around 20%, alongside other probiotic properties such as BSH activity and pathogen inhibition, implying its potential as a cholesterol-lowering probiotic [69]. Another strain, P. kudriavzevii O21, demonstrated exceptionally high cholesterol assimilation rates (95.02% ± 1.43%) in vitro [75]. Importantly, in vivo evidence reinforces these in vitro findings. Supplementation with a P. kudriavzevii-fermented cereal mix in mice fed a high-cholesterol diet significantly reduced serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) [76]. The improved lipid profile corresponded with a notably lower atherogenic index, suggesting the potential role of Pichia as a functional probiotic yeast in supporting cardiovascular health through cholesterol assimilation.
Table 1. Probiotic characteristics of selected Pichia species, including physiological traits, resistance to gastrointestinal conditions, and potential mechanisms of action underlying their beneficial effects.
Table 1. Probiotic characteristics of selected Pichia species, including physiological traits, resistance to gastrointestinal conditions, and potential mechanisms of action underlying their beneficial effects.
StrainOriginCholesterol AssimilationSurvival pHSurvival BileOptimal Growth TemperatureAuto
Aggregation
Reference
P. cecembensis AA19Addis Ababa89.0%95.77% survival at pH 290.43% survival at 0.3% bile15 °C and 37 °C69.36–89.39% (after 24 h)[77]
P. kudriavzevii HJ2Marine medicinal mangroves79.98% degradation at 24 h2.0 (83.28% biomass at 24 h)3% bile (81.25% biomass at 12 h)Tolerates extreme temperatures 92.41% at 180 min[78]
P. kudriavzevii BY10Raw milk (China)43.2% at 72 hSurvives at pH 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 5.016.1% survival at 0.5% bileNot reportedHigh adhesion (62 cells/100 HT-29)[79]
P. kudriavzevii BY15Raw milk (China)44.4% at 72 hSurvives at pH 3.0, 5.0; viable at pH 218.9% at 0.5% bileNot reportedModerate adhesion
P. fermentans BY5Raw milk (China)40.3% at 72 hpH 3.0 and 5.09.5% at 0.5% bileNot reportedModerate adhesion
P. guilliermondii BY31Raw milk (China) 81.4% at 0.5% bile Moderate
P. kudriavzevii Y33Traditional home-made mango pickleHigh cholesterol assimilation of bile and taurocholate, at 88.58 and 86.83%, respectively88.62% survival at pH 2 95% at 2% of bile High auto-aggregation ability of 87% after 24 h and 72.45% after 3 h of incubation[70]
P. kudriavzevii OG32Cereal-based functional food (fermented)Reduced serum TC, TG, LDL-C; increased HDL-C; lowered atherogenic indexTolerated gut-like pHTolerated bile-rich dietSurvived in rat gut (37 °C)Not reported[76]
P. kudriavzevii YGM091Fermented goat milkNot directly reported; potential implied via bile toleranceSurvived pH 2.0 (80.73%) and pH 3.0 (247.13%) after 3 hTolerated 2.0% bile salts with >110% survival after 5 hGrew well at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 42 °C (growth at all tested temperatures)88.64% at 60 min; 89.91% at 90 min[80]
P. kudriavzevii OG32Ogi (Nigeria)74.05% at 48 hSurvives pH 2.0 (100% at 3 h)100% survival in 2% bile (3 h)Grows at 37 °C (μ = 0.29 h−1)91.85% at 24 h[81]
P. guilliermondii CCMA 1753Fermented table olives (Brazil)Not reportedSurvived pH 2.0 for 3 h (92.23%)Survived 0.3% bile for 3 h (92.73%)37 °C (tested temp)Intermediate (~65%)[82]
P. kudriavzevii QAUPK01Human feces66.7%7.2Tolerant37Not reported[83]
P. kudriavzevii QAUPK02Human feces68.2%7.2Tolerant37
P. kudriavzevii QAUPK03Human feces83.6%7.2Tolerant37
P. kudriavzevii QAUPK04Human feces79.3%7.2Tolerant37
P. kudriavzevii QAUPK05Human feces85.2%7.2Tolerant37
P. kudriavzevii GBT37Dadih (West Sumatra)High (exact % not stated)pH 2–6 37 °CNot specified[84]
P. occidentalis GBT30
P. kudriavzevii M26, M28, M29, O9, G6, G5, M30, M31Fermented cereal foods (African origin)Not reportedTolerated pH 2 (≈31% of isolates survived this stress)Tolerated 0.3% bile (≈99% of isolates)Tolerated pH 2 (≈31% of isolates survived this stress)12.7–40.9%[85]
P. kudriavzevii O21Fermented dairy/non-dairy product91.5%High (OD ~0.85)Oxgall: ~85%, Cholic: ~89%, Taurocholic: ~91%Tolerated 60 °C for 5 min~85%[14]
P. kudriavzevii O2692.3%High (OD ~0.83)Oxgall: ~88%, Cholic: ~90%, Taurocholic: ~90%Tolerated 60 °C for 5 min~83%
P. kudriavzevii SH5596.5%High~90.5% (24 h, mixed bile salts)Tolerated 60 °C for 5 min~84%
P. kudriavzevii O1287.2%High~87.4% (oxgall), ~86% (others)Tolerated 60 °C for 5 min~78%
P. kudriavzevii KT000037/URCS7Cryopreserved food sampleNot directly testedpH 1.5–11; Survives >70% at pH 2 for 120 h0.1%: 99%; 0.3%: 84%; 0.5%: 70% after 4 h at 37 °CSurvives 95 °C (2 h), 121 °C (15 min)59.12% (5 h), 81.23% (24 h)[86]
P. kudriavzevii YGM091Fermented goat milkNot specifiedpH 3.0 (247.13%), pH 2.0 (80.73%)0.5% (145.03%), 1% & 2% bile (up to 110%)25, 37, 42 °C66.56% after 45[80]
P. kudriavzevii MYSSBYPS10Fermented green gram dosa batterNot reportedpH 2.0
83.79% survival at 2 h
68.31% at 4 h
0.3% bile
92.95% survival at 2 h
89.65% at 4 h
Broad temp range97.2% at 24 h[12]

4.3. Auto-Aggregation, Co-Aggregation, and Hydrophobicity

Optimal probiotics must not only survive the upper digestive system but also adhere to host intestinal cells to facilitate colonization and proliferation in the intestinal tract [87,88]. Common properties of probiotic strains that encourage colonization include auto-aggregation, co-aggregation and hydrophobicity, required for attachment to intestinal epithelial cells [89]. It has been observed that auto-aggregation with a potential of more than 80% is considered durable and strains having high hydrophobicity exhibit upright (more durable) adhesion to intestinal cell lines [90]. Microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons has been widely used to measure the cell surface hydrophobicity of probiotics. In vitro evaluation of auto-aggregation and ability to co-aggregate with potential enteric pathogens has been used previously as a preliminary screening and selection tool for probiotics [11,91]. These important probiotic properties in different Pichia species have been observed in a number of studies; P. kudriavzevii [11,12,14,80,86,92,93], P. stutzeri XL-2 [94], P. fermentans [93], P. cactophila, P. jadinii [95], P. barkeri VIT-SJSN01 [90], and P. guilliermondii CCMA 1753 [82], each indicating that various Pichia species exhibit efficient auto-aggregation, hydrophobicity, and co-aggregation with pathogens.
For example P. kudriavzevii isolated from Pila globosa demonstrated high auto-aggregation (93%) and hydrophobicity (76.9%), suggesting a strong adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells, which increased protection by forming a physical barrier against pathogens [69]. In another study, Pichia sp. DU2 (similar to Pichia cactophila ~99.67%) showed co-aggregation (21.8–46.78%), auto-aggregation (18.21 to 71.92%), and hydrophobicity-like (43.3%) characteristics implying the probiotic potential of Pichia [96]. Merchan et al. [95] reported different probiotic attributes of P. cactophila strains which were isolated from traditional soft cheese, like survival in acidic conditions (pH 2.5), tolerating bile salts (0.3%), auto-aggregation (38.75–50.83%), and hydrophobicity (33.07–55.11%). The co-aggregation ability of Pichia kluyveri has been demonstrated in a study by Yildiran et al. [97] where it co-aggregated with S. aureus, E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella typhimurium. Collectively, these findings emphasize the auto-aggregation, co-aggregation, and hydrophobicity potential of different Pichia species from diverse sources, implying their promising role as probiotic.

4.4. Epithelial Barrier Function

Intestinal epithelial cells form a monolayer that serves as a physical barrier between the host’s immune system and the external environment of the gut lumen [98]. Tight junctions (TJ), adherent junctions, gap junctions, and desmosomes secure the integrity of this epithelial barrier. TJs are located towards the apical side of the intestine and are made up of transmembrane proteins such as occludin, claudin, and junctional adhesion molecules, which all interact extracellularly with different comparable TJ proteins in neighboring cells, and intracellularly with the cell’s own cytoskeleton via zonula occludens (ZO) proteins and filamentous actin [99]. Various chronic inflammatory diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), have been linked to TJ integrity loss [100].
Numerous studies have demonstrated that Pichia species can regulate the function of TJ in various organisms. It has been shown that selenium-enriched P. kudriavzevii (HSeY) strengthened intestinal barrier function in murine models by increasing goblet cell numbers, upregulating MUC2 expression, and enhancing expression of tight junction proteins like ZO-1, claudin-1, and occludin, thus alleviating dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis [92]. HSeY also alleviated gut microbiota dysbiosis by promoting the colonization of beneficial bacteria such as norank-f-Muribaculaceae and Bacteroides while suppressing harmful microorganisms such as norank-f-norank-o-Clostridia-UCG-014. This probiotic strain and its cell-free supernatant have also been reported to considerably increase the mRNA expression level of zonulin-1, occludin-1 and claudin-1 in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenged Caco-2 cells, suggesting a protective effect on the intestinal barrier [101]. P. manshurica also showed promising probiotic potential by considerably reducing the association of Salmonella enteritidis with intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2/TC-7), where pretreatment with P. manshurica decreased pathogen adhesion by 30% possibly through a barrier effect [91]. In addition, co-culture of Pichia with the S. enteritidis led to an even greater reduction (67–82%) in its attachment to cells, emphasizing the importance of live yeast cells. Zhang et al. [102] found that by upregulating the expression of TJ proteins like occludin, ZO-1, and claudin-1, modified P. pastoris expressing surface-displayed pectinase PG5, a subtype of pectinase that degrades pectin into beneficial pectin oligosaccharides, enhanced gut barrier function. In vivo, the production of these oligosaccharides promotes mucosal healing and reduces inflammation. Compared to the free enzyme, whole-cell pectinase PG5 exhibited superior enzymatic stability and activity within the GI tract, resulting in more effective restoration of epithelial integrity in DSS-induced colitis models. P. anomala AR2016 had a favorable effect on gut barrier function as it promotes the expression of ZO-1 and occludin. The strain also upregulates the expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), which dephosphorylates bacterial LPS and reduces inflammation. Furthermore, P. anomala also reduces hazardous amino acid decarboxylase activities like histidine decarboxylase, lysine decarboxylase and tryptophan decarboxylase, which are linked to diarrhea and gut toxicity. These combined effects contribute to healthier intestinal barriers, particularly during stress [103]. These findings indicate that distinct Pichia species can play immunomodulatory and protective roles in the context of host organisms by altering the integrity and function of TJs, particularly in the gut. This supports Pichia’s potential use in supplements aimed at improving gut health.

4.5. Antimicrobial Properties

Suppressing the growth of pathogenic organisms is considered one of the most important characteristics of probiotic microorganisms. Yeasts are known to inhibit pathogens from binding to enterocytes by exerting a direct antagonistic impact and/or secreting different metabolites and enzymes for survival. S. boulardii was previously shown to compete with pathogenic microbes for food and mucosal receptors in the GI tract, thus preventing pathogens from colonizing and dominating the gut of the host [104].
Similarly, various Pichia species have demonstrated strong antimicrobial activities against a range of pathogenic organisms (Table 2). Lata et al. [70] reported that P. kudriavzevii Y33, isolated from traditional homemade mango pickle, exhibited significant inhibition zones against Salmonella typhi, Escherichia coli, Shigella, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Aeromonas hydrophila, and L. monocytogenes. Other strains, such as P. guilliermondii CCMA 1753 from Brazilian table olive fermentation [82], P. kudriavzevii GBT37 and Pichia occidentalis GBT30 from Dadih (West Sumatra) [84], and Pichia norvegensis WSYC 592 [105] from dairy products have also shown varying degrees of antibacterial activity, particularly against Staphylococcus aureus, L. monocytogenes, and B. cereus. P. fermentans and P. anomala have produced anti-listerial peptides that reduce Listeria populations in cheese models. Multiple strains of P. kudriavzevii isolated from fermented dairy and non-dairy foods exhibit strain-dependent antimicrobial effects on pathogens such as E. coli O157:H7, S. aureus, S. typhimurium, and L. monocytogenes. Other notable strains include Pichia cecembensis AA19 from Ethiopia, P. kudriavzevii KT000037 [86], and P. pastoris X-33 used as a feed additive, all reported to inhibit various human and animal pathogens. Moreover, P. kudriavzevii YGM091 from fermented goat milk and P. kudriavzevii MYSSBYPS10 from fermented green gram dosa batter demonstrated significant inhibition of pathogens and phytopathogens, respectively. P. kudriavzevii C-1 from traditional Kazakh dairy products [106] and P. kudriavzevii MH458240 (M9) from fermented ogi in Nigeria [107] also showed antimicrobial activity against a range of pathogens. Utama et al. (2021) [108] studied the antifungal and aflatoxin-reducing activity of β-glucan isolated from P. norvegensis grown on tofu wastewater and reported that P. norvegensis and its β-glucan showed an inhibition zone against Aspergillus flavus.
Table 2. Reported antimicrobial activities and measurement types for different Pichia species.
Table 2. Reported antimicrobial activities and measurement types for different Pichia species.
StrainOriginTarget
Organism
Inhibition (mm)Reference
P. kudriavzevii Y33Traditional home-made mango pickleS. typhi10.50 ± 1.50[70]
E. coli10.00 ± 2.00
Shigella13.50 ± 1.50
P. aeruginosa14.00 ± 1.00
B. cereus12.50 ± 0.50
S. aureus13.50 ± 0.50
A. hydrophilla22.00 ± 2.00
L. monoctyogenes10.50 ± 1.50
P. guilliermondii CCMA 1753Table olive fermentation (Brazil)S. aureus<10[82]
S. enteritidisBetween 20 and 30
L. monocytogenesBetween 20 and 30
P. kudriavzevii GBT37Dadih (West Sumatra)B. cereus4.55 ± 0.20[84]
S. aureus4.20 ± 0.33
EPEC K.1.13.68 ± 0.27
Listeria sp.5.50 ± 0.19
P. occidentalis GBT30B. cereus2.50 ± 0.17
S. aureus3.40 ± 0.32
EPEC K.1.14.00 ± 0.25
Listeria sp.7.67 ± 0.17
P. cecembensis AA19Addis Ababa EthiopiaE. coli19[77]
S. aureus17
Salmonella typhi15
B. cereus18
P. kudriavzevii KT000037Xylose-utilizing yeast from cryopreserved food sampleE. coli13[86]
S. aureus19
E. faecalis26
M. luteus22
K. pneumoniae21
S. typhi22
P. aeruginosa22
S. paratyphi B23
P. mirabilis21
V. cholerae19
S. flexneri17
P. kudriavzevii C-1Traditional Kazakh dairy productE. coli11[106]
S. aureus15
Studies with inhibition expressed as %
P. pastoris X-33Feed additiveS. typhimurium in LB43[109]
S. typhimurium in YPD86
P. kudriavzevii YGM091Fermented goat milkE. coli88.75[80]
S. aureus88.34
S. typhimurium79.4
P. kudriavzevii MYSSBYPS10Fermented green gram dosa batterM. phaseolina69.41[12]
A. niger64.72
F. oxysporum68.6
P. anomalaNot specifiedC. gloeosporioides79.63[110]
Qualitative Studies
P. kudriavzevii G1, O12, O13, O21, O26, O36, 066, SH40, SH45Fermented dairy and non-dairy foodsE. coli O157:H7
S. aureus
S. typhimurium
L. monocytogenes
Strong to moderate (strain-dependent)[75]
P. kudriavzevii MH458240 (M9)Fermented ogi (Nigeria)E. coli
Pseudomonas sp.
S. aureus
Klebsiella sp.
Proteus sp.
Not reported (qualitative)[107]
P. kudriavzevii MH458239 (M5)
P. norvegensis WSYC 592Dairy product (milk)Listeria7-log reduction in co-culture and ~1.5 log on Tilsit cheese[105]
P. fermentansDairy product (cheese)ListeriaReduced Listeria by ~3-log in Camembert curd model[15]
P. anomala
(Wickerhamomyces anomalus)
Dairy (Camembert curd)ListeriaProduced heat-stable anti-listerial peptides; caused pore formation and bacterial cell lysis
P. farinosaHuman oral cavityCandida albicansNutrient competition and protein-mediated virulence inhibition.[111]
Aspergillus
Fusarium
A more comprehensive study on the antimicrobial properties of Pichia has been shown in a study by Mukherjee et al. [111]. An inverse relationship between Pichia and Candida abundance was initially observed in the oral microbiome of HIV-infected individuals, suggesting a natural antagonism. Further in vitro experiments confirmed that Pichia spent medium (PSM), the fluid remaining after culturing Pichia, significantly inhibited the growth of Candida, Aspergillus, and Fusarium. PSM also suppressed vital Candida pathogenic traits such as biofilm formation, germination, and adhesion to surfaces. The antifungal effect appeared to result from nutrient competition and secreted heat-stable, non-glycosylated proteinaceous factors. A candidiasis mouse model was also used to show that topical PSM treatment dramatically reduced infection severity and fungal burden (p ≤ 0.029), even showing better results compared to the polyene antifungal nystatin-treated controls.
These findings emphasize the broad-spectrum antimicrobial potential of different Pichia species and strains derived from diverse fermented foods, underscoring their promising role as probiotic agents in combating pathogenic bacteria.

4.6. Antibiotic Resistance

To function properly, probiotics must be viable and capable of generating an equilibrium within the host GI tract [112]. Yeasts, in particular, are advantageous in this context as they are innately resistant to bactericidal antibiotics, which is a trait common to all fungi [113]. This antibiotic resistance is a beneficial characteristic for probiotic organisms since it allows them to withstand antibiotic treatments that typically kill beneficial bacterial probiotics. Unlike antibiotic-resistant Lactobacillus strains, which can transfer resistance genes to harmful bacteria [7,114], horizontal gene transfer between yeasts and bacteria is highly unlikely [115,116]. This property favors yeast-based probiotics like Pichia during or following antibiotic therapy. Numerous studies have reported the antibiotic-resistant properties of Pichia species. For example, Wang et al. [117] evaluated the probiotic potential of yeast strains P. kudraivzevii GBY1 and S. cerevisiae GBY2 isolated from kombucha in New Zealand and demonstrated that the yeast were resistant to eight tested antibiotics (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, colistin sulfate, kanamycin, nalidixic acid, nitrofurantoin, streptomycin, and tetracycline), with high levels of antioxidant activities (>90%). Lata et al. [70] evaluated the probiotic potential of P. kudriavzevii Y33 isolated from traditional home-made mango pickle and reported that it was resistant to different antibiotics including vancomycin, penicillin, clindamycin, and ampicillin. In another study by Kathade et al. [69], it was demonstrated that P. kudriavzevii was resistant to ampicillin (10 mcg), chloramphenicol (25 mcg), streptomycin (10 mcg), sulphatriad (300 mcg), tetracycline (25 mcg), and penicillin-G (1 unit) as per the interpretation of zones of inhibition for Kirby-Bauer antibiotic susceptibility testing.

4.7. Immunomodulatory Properties

Immunomodulation is one of the modes of action used by probiotic yeasts to control pathogens. It has been reported that β-glucans ((1→3)-β-d-linked polymers of glucose) present in yeast cell walls have modulating effects on innate immune cell activity and cytokine production [118]. Alvarez et al. [91] studied the probiotic potential of yeasts isolated from fermented beverages and reported that all yeast strains analyzed were capable of inhibiting flagellin-induced activation of innate inflammatory immune response, with strains from the Kluyveromyces and Pichia genera being the most immunomodulatory. In another study by Zhu et al. [119], it was shown that yeast-derived β-glucan (from P. kudriavzevii DPUL-51–6Y, Kluyveromyces marxianus DPUL-F15, and S. cerevisiae DPUL-C6 strains) played a significant role in mitigating the inflammatory response and alleviated ulcerative colitis by reshaping the microbial community and metabolite profiles (including indole-3-lactic acid, indole-3-β-acrylic acid, tryptophol, and short-chain fatty acids (acetic, propionic, and butyric acids)) in the host intestinal tract by suppressing NF-κB signaling through the reduction in p65 and IκB-α while simultaneously activating the Nrf2 and AHR pathways.
Probiotic yeasts interact with immune cells in the gut lining, stimulating the production of cytokines and other immune-mediated proteins like interleukin (IL)-10 and interferon (IFN)-γ, which enhance the body’s overall immune response against invading pathogenic microbes (Figure 3) [120,121]. Numerous studies have documented immune modulation following the administration of Pichia species as a probiotic in vivo. For example, in weaned pigs, when P. anomala AR2016 was orally administered, it increased mRNA levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), toll-like receptors 2 (TLR-2), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) in the jejunal and ileal mucosa and also enhanced the antioxidant defense by upregulating SOD (superoxide dismutase), GSH-Px (glutathione peroxidase) and T-AOC (total antioxidative capacity), thus resulting in improved daily and average growth performance of weaned pigs [103]. When selenium-enriched P. kudriavzevii was administered to mice, it downregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17 and oxidative stress markers like MPO, MDA, whereas it upregulated the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GPX) and suppressed the NF-κB inflammatory pathway [92]. In human colonic epithelial cells, a probiotic yeast, P. kudriavzevii (Y1) and its cell-free supernatant (CFS-Y1), downregulated the expression level of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, whereas the anti-inflammatory cytokine TGF-β was upregulated. This observation suggests this yeast is more potent in modulating immune responses and could have potential therapeutic benefits for regulating inflammation and enhancing epithelial defense mechanisms in the gut [101]. Moreover, supplementation with P. kudriavzevii solid culture considerably reduced the concentration of pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8) and increased the concentration of anti-inflammatory factors (IL-10, IL-22) in the small intestines, resulting in improved growth performance of weaned piglets [122]. Together, these results demonstrated the multifaceted role of different Pichia species, as it exhibited promising immunomodulatory and probiotic characteristics.

4.8. Production of Volatile Organic Compounds

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are small flavor-active metabolic products < 300 Da, of organic compounds in living cells, that exhibit a high vapor pressure (vaporization at 0.01 kPa at a temperature of ~20 °C), low solubility in water, but high solubility in lipids [123,124,125]. VOCs such as esters, organic acids, and higher alcohols, determine the characteristic bouquet of fermented products [126]. In addition to enhancing scent, VOCs also include various molecules such as alcohols, thioesters, thioalcohols, cyclohexanes, hydrocarbons, aldehydes, heterocyclic compounds, phenols, ketones, and benzene derivatives that have significant potential against pathogens [127,128,129,130]. Fungal VOCs are derived from primary and secondary metabolism pathways [131]. Many recent studies have indicated that yeast volatiles play an important role in yeast-pathogen interactions. Examples of VOCs produced by probiotic yeast isolates to combat fungal infections include (2-phenylethanol) produced by P. kudriavzevii that reduced the growth of Monascus purpureus by significantly inhibiting conidium germination and mycelial growth [132]. In another study by Choińska et al. [133], P. kudriavzevii and P. occidentalis caused more than 50% inhibition of Penicillium chrysogenum, Penicillium expansum, A. flavus, Fusarium cereals, Fusarium poae, as well as Botrytis cinerea by producing ethyl esters of medium chain fatty acids, phenyl ethyl alcohol, and acetate esters. Another Pichia species, Pichia galeiformis, produced VOCs including ethanol, 3 methyl 1-butanol, phenyl ethyl alcohol, benzaldehyde, benzene acetaldehyde, acetic acid, esters which resulted in 60% inhibition of Penicillium digitatum by inhibiting mycelial growth and spore germination [79]. P. kudriavzevii MBELGA61 has been used as a biocontrol agent against Aspergillus species through the production of soluble and volatile bioactive antifungal compounds like phenylethanol, 2-phenylethyl acetate, and benzyl alcohol [134]. Pichia membranaefaciens significantly reduced the rot incidence (percentage of plums that develop brown rot symptoms) produced by Monilinia fructicola by inhibiting its spore germination and mycelial growth and by producing volatile compounds [135]. Masoud et al. [136] demonstrated that P. anomala and P. kluyveri strongly inhibited the growth of Aspergillus ochraceus by producing different volatile compounds during coffee processing including ethyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, 2-phenyl ethyl acetate, ethyl propionate and isoamyl alcohol. Taken together, these studies indicate the antifungal potential of VOCs produced by different probiotic species of Pichia.

5. Pichia in Health

Pichia is also gaining attention in health and disease research. As the understanding of the human microbiome deepens, the role of Pichia in promoting health and preventing disease is becoming a dynamic area of scientific study. For example, P. kudriavzevii YS711 demonstrated the ability to degrade uric acid by 31.2% within 24 h, facilitated by a complete uric acid metabolic pathway [36]. This ability may prove beneficial to humans as it has preventative effects against chronic kidney disease and tumorigenesis previously linked to uric acid build-up [36,137,138,139]. In an in vitro study by Ezekiel et al. [140], four P. kudriavzevii strains were found to have a 97% gut colonization potential due to their adherence to hydrocarbons, auto-aggregation, and co-aggregation. Moreover, these strains have been able to decrease free radicals, as shown in a decrease of 31 mycotoxins by 1-87% in a 48 h period [140]. Rahbar Saadat et al. [141] investigated the inhibitory role of exopolysaccharides (EPSs) of P. kudriavzevii on different colon cancer cell lines and found that the EPSs induced apoptosis in colon cancer cell lines (SW-480, HT-29, HCT-116) by upregulating pro-apoptotic genes (BAX, Caspase-3, Caspase-8) and downregulating the anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-2. Additionally, they suppressed key cancer-promoting signaling pathways, including AKT1, JAK1, and mTOR, with minimal toxicity to normal cells. Although Pichia EPSs upregulated antioxidant regulator Nrf-2, it did not induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, ferroptosis, or alter glutathione and iron levels, suggesting a selective, non-toxic anticancer mechanism which highlighted the potential of P. kudriavzevii EPSs as safe, effective postbiotic agents in gut health and colon cancer prevention.
Saber et al. [142] studied the anticancer activity of P. kudriavzevii AS-12 secretion metabolites against human colorectal cancer cell lines (HT-29 and Caco-2) and reported that methanolic extract of P. kudriavzevii AS-12 supernatant significantly inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis through an increase (BAD, CASP-3, CASP-8, CASP-9, and Fas-R) or decrease (Bcl-2) in expression level of pro-/anti-apoptotic genes in the human colon cancer cells (HT-29 and Caco-2). In another study by Ma et al. [103], oral administration of P. anomala isolated from traditional solid wine koji and its effects on the growth and health of weaned pigs showed that oral administration of P. anomala AR2016 enhanced the growth performance by improving the microflora through increasing beneficial bacteria like Lactobacillaceae, Bacteroidetes, and Lachnospiraceae, while reducing harmful bacteria levels such as Clostridiaceae in weaned pigs, enhancing the intestinal barrier function and reducing the incidence of diarrhea. Accumulating evidence shows that Pichia spp. exhibits a wide range of beneficial effects in both health and disease contexts. Collectively, these findings highlight the versatile role of Pichia spp. in promoting health, modulating microbiota, and contributing to the prevention and potential treatment of various diseases.

6. Potential Pichia Species as Probiotics

Research advancements and substantial screening efforts have emphasized the probiotic potential of diverse Pichia species (Table 3). A literature review showed that numerous strains exhibit key probiotic characteristics including cholesterol assimilation, acid and bile tolerance, hydrophobicity, auto-aggregation, antimicrobial activity, and are safe in in vivo studies. P. kudriavzevii, P. guilliermondii, P. manshurica, P. fermentans, P. norvegensis, and P. kluyveri have all exhibited promising results in a variety of investigations, both in vitro and in food-based systems. These findings show that members of the Pichia genus can tolerate GI conditions while also contributing to host health, either directly through bioactive metabolite synthesis or indirectly through gut microbiota modification. Pichia species constitute an important and underexplored category of functional food and biotherapeutic applications as interest in non-conventional probiotic yeasts develops. According to FAO/WHO recommendations, a preliminary in vitro assessment is required before evaluating the probiotic qualities of different microorganisms, such as their ability to survive during passage through the GI tract and to ensure they also tolerate bile.
Table 3. Summary of probiotic attributes and industrial uses of selected Pichia strains.
Table 3. Summary of probiotic attributes and industrial uses of selected Pichia strains.
Pichia StrainBenefitsReference
P. anomola AR2016
  • Decreases incidence of diarrhea
  • Increases relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, Lachnospiraceae, and Succinivibrionaceae in pig cecum
  • Decreases relative abundance of Proteobacteria, Clostridiaceae, Campylobacteraceae, Vibrionaceae, Bacillus, and Pseudon in pig cecum
  • Increases intestinal digestive enzyme activity and improves digestion and absorption of intestinal nutrients in pigs
  • Increases concentration of tight junction proteins occludin and ZO-1, enhancing intestinal barrier function
[103]
P. anomala NCYC 432
  • Secretes killer toxin that inhibits growth of pathogenic Candida species
[143]
P. guilliermondii 25A
  • Moderate antioxidant activity
[144]
P. kluyveri LAR001
  • Antimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, E. coli, and Klebsiella species
[145]
P. kudriavzevii GBT37
  • Proteolytic and lipolytic activity which facilitates digestion
  • Antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, B. cereus, EPEC K1.1, and Listeria species
  • No antibiotic resistance genes
  • No hemolytic activity
[84]
P. kudriavzevii HJ2
  • Produces short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)
  • High antioxidant capacity
  • Contains no antimicrobial resistance genes or virulence genes
  • Produces extracellular hydrolases that increase nutrient availability
[78]
P. kudriavzevii M28Produces folate and phytases to increase nutritional quality of foods[85]
P. kudriavzevii TS2
  • Produces phytase to increase nutritional quality of foods
  • No hemolytic activity and non-pathogenic
[11]
P. kudriavzevii YGM091
  • High antioxidant capacity
  • Produces extracellular hydrolases that increase nutrient availability
  • No hemolytic activity
[80]
P. kudriavzevii YS711
  • Degrades uric acid
  • No virulence factors associated with human pathogenesis
[36]
P. kudriavzevii Y33
  • Strong antimicrobial activity against S. typhi, E. coli, Shigella, P. aeruginosa, B. cereus, S. aureus, A. hydrophila, and L. monocytogenes
  • Decreases blood cholesterol levels through cholesterol assimilation
  • Produces extracellular hydrolases that increase nutrient availability
  • No hemolytic activity
[70]
P. manshurica 2A
  • High catalase activity which is linked to antioxidant capacity
[144]
P. manshurica PB54
  • Antimicrobial activity against Salmonella enterica
  • Anti-inflammatory capacity in intestinal epithelial cells
[91]
P. norvegensis NYI
  • Antifungal activity against A. flavus
  • Aflatoxin-reducing activity towards aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and B2 (AFB2)
[108]
P. occidentalis GBT30
  • Proteolytic activity which facilitates digestion
  • Antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, B. cereus, EPEC K1.1, and Listeria species
  • No hemolytic activity
[84]
P. pastoris X-33
  • Inhibits S. typhimurium growth
  • Reduces adhesion of pathogenic bacteria to intestinal cells
[109]

7. Gaps in the Literature Regarding Pichia

We have summarized promising evidence supporting the probiotic potential of Pichia and particularly its safety profile. Most of the available evidence comes from preclinical studies, including both in vitro and animal model experiments, which have elucidated mechanisms by which Pichia strains may benefit the host. However, several significant gaps must still be addressed before Pichia can be reliably established as a probiotic for human consumption.
The most evident limitation in the literature is the lack of clinical safety research involving human subjects. Current findings gathered from preclinical data make it difficult to predict how these benefits will translate to human health outcomes. Additionally, even though certain mechanisms of action have been described, it is important to recognize that not all Pichia strains necessarily function in the same way. Thus, more research is needed to distinguish and characterize strain-specific differences in both safety and efficacy studies designed to identify the most suitable strains for health applications.
Another notable gap is the lack of evidence-based recommendations regarding dosage regimens and duration of use. At present, there is insufficient high-quality data to inform practical guidelines on how much Pichia should be administered, in what form, and for how long in order to confer expected health benefits. Well-designed and controlled clinical trials will be able to establish the effectiveness and safety of Pichia as a probiotic for human consumption and also confirm its safety in diverse human populations. This will provide value to regulatory agencies, industrial developers and consumers.
Beyond clinical research, formulation and regulatory challenges represent further barriers to the widespread adoption of Pichia as a probiotic. Technical issues around the development of stable, effective commercial products such as optimizing conditions, maximizing shelf life, and designing delivery systems that ensure high viability and activity of Pichia strains, still need to be addressed. Furthermore, while P. kluyveri has garnered some regulatory recognition; most other species within the genus have not, due to limited research and safety data. It is critical to deepen our understanding of the attributes and potential of other Pichia species so that a broader range of strains can be considered for safe and effective use.

8. Conclusions

The genus Pichia is increasingly recognized as a promising group of probiotic yeasts, offering physiological and functional beneficial characteristics that set it apart from the more widely used bacterial probiotics. Pichia species exhibit remarkable resilience to GI stressors, such as low pH and bile salt conditions, which enhances their survival and adherence within the gut. There are also many strains that demonstrate robust auto-aggregation and adhesion characteristics, which are crucial for effective colonization and for providing a barrier against pathogens. In addition to these traits, several Pichia species can assimilate cholesterol, produce a range of bioactive metabolites, and display significant antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities. These mechanisms contribute to improved gut epithelial barrier integrity, upregulation of tight junction proteins, support for mucosal healing, and attenuation of inflammation. Most importantly, the majority of tested Pichia strains display a favorable safety profile for being non-pathogenic.
Several Pichia strains have emerged as leading candidates for further research and probiotic application due to their compelling probiotic attributes. Within the species P. kudriavzevii, strain Y33 is distinguished by its high cholesterol assimilation, strong survival under gut-like conditions such as low pH and bile salts, superior auto-aggregation, broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, and a favorable safety profile [70]. Similarly, P. kudriavzevii GBT37 exhibits notable proteolytic, lipolytic, and antimicrobial functions while demonstrating no antibiotic resistance or hemolytic activity [84]. Another P. kudriavzevii strain, HJ2, combines the production of short-chain fatty acids with antioxidant activity and confirmed safety, lacking virulence factors and resistance genes [78]. Additional P. kudriavzevii isolates, including O21, O26, SH55, and O12, display strong GI resilience, metabolic versatility, heat tolerance, auto-aggregation, and safety [14]. In the species P. anomala, strain AR2016 has been shown to markedly improve gut barrier function by upregulating tight junction proteins, increasing intestinal digestive enzyme activity, enriching beneficial gut microbiota, reducing diarrhea, and lowering populations of potentially pathogenic bacteria [103]. Lastly, P. occidentalis strain GBT30 possesses proteolytic activity, effective antimicrobial properties, and a favorable safety profile, making it another strong candidate for probiotic development [84].
While numerous Pichia strains show potential as food-related probiotics, major challenges remain, including the requirement for complete genetic and functional characterization of the strain under development to meet next-generation probiotic criteria. Validating strain-specific advantages, conducting effective human clinical studies, optimizing dosage regimens, and dealing with formulation and regulatory challenges are among the top research priorities. Since some Pichia strains can act as opportunistic pathogens in immunocompromised patients and have been linked to hospital-acquired invasive candidiasis, rigorous strain selection and comprehensive safety assessment are needed when considering Pichia for probiotic applications. Successful completion of these research efforts will enable an informed decision on the ability of a given Pichia strain to be used as a reliable, validated, and broadly accepted probiotic yeast.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G. and T.S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, F.S., E.M.D.S.V., G.L., and M.B.; writing—review and editing, F.S., E.M.D.S.V., and M.G.; visualization, M.G. and F.S.; supervision, M.G. and T.S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

GIGastrointestinal
GRASGenerally Regarded as Safe
ISAPPInternational Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics
EFSAEuropean Food Safety Authority
IBSIrritable bowel syndrome
TJTight junction
ZOZonula occluden
IBDInflammatory bowel disease
DSSDextran sodium sulfate
LPSLipopolysaccharide
ILinterleukin
IFNinterferon
ALPAlkaline phosphatase
TLR-2Toll-like receptors 2
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor-α
T-AOCTotal antioxidative capacity
GSH-PxGlutathione peroxidase
SODSuperoxide dismutase
CFS-Y1Cell-free supernatant
VOCVolatile organic compound

References

  1. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wilkins, T.; Sequoia, J. Probiotics for Gastrointestinal Conditions: A Summary of the Evidence. Am. Fam. Physician 2017, 96, 170–178. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sanders, M.E.; Akkermans, L.M.; Haller, D.; Hammerman, C.; Heimbach, J.; Hörmannsperger, G.; Huys, G.; Levy, D.D.; Lutgendorff, F.; Mack, D.; et al. Safety assessment of probiotics for human use. Gut Microbes 2010, 1, 164–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Binda, S.; Hill, C.; Johansen, E.; Obis, D.; Pot, B.; Sanders, M.E.; Tremblay, A.; Ouwehand, A.C. Criteria to Qualify Microorganisms as "Probiotic" in Foods and Dietary Supplements. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Luo, G.; Li, B.; Yang, C.; Wang, Y.; Bian, X.; Li, W.; Liu, F.; Huo, G. Major Traditional Probiotics: Comparative Genomic Analyses and Roles in Gut Microbiome of Eight Cohorts. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Naissinger da Silva, M.; Tagliapietra, B.L.; Flores, V.D.A.; Pereira Dos Santos Richards, N.S. In vitro test to evaluate survival in the gastrointestinal tract of commercial probiotics. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2021, 4, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shahali, A.; Soltani, R.; Akbari, V. Probiotic Lactobacillus and the potential risk of spreading antibiotic resistance: A systematic review. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 18, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Staniszewski, A.; Kordowska-Wiater, M. Probiotic and Potentially Probiotic Yeasts-Characteristics and Food Application. Foods 2021, 10, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abid, R.; Waseem, H.; Ali, J.; Ghazanfar, S.; Muhammad Ali, G.; Elasbali, A.M.; Alharethi, S.H. Probiotic Yeast Saccharomyces: Back to Nature to Improve Human Health. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ansari, F.; Alian Samakkhah, S.; Bahadori, A.; Jafari, S.M.; Ziaee, M.; Khodayari, M.T.; Pourjafar, H. Health-promoting properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii as a probiotic; characteristics, isolation, and applications in dairy products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 457–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ganapathiwar, S.; Bhukya, B. In vitro assessment for the probiotic potential of Pichia kudriavzevii. Bioinformation 2023, 19, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shruthi, B.; Deepa, N.; Somashekaraiah, R.; Adithi, G.; Divyashree, S.; Sreenivasa, M.Y. Exploring biotechnological and functional characteristics of probiotic yeasts: A review. Biotechnol. Rep. 2022, 34, e00716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tamang, J.P.; Lama, S. Probiotic properties of yeasts in traditional fermented foods and beverages. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 3533–3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alkalbani, N.S.; Osaili, T.M.; Al-Nabulsi, A.A.; Olaimat, A.N.; Liu, S.Q.; Shah, N.P.; Apostolopoulos, V.; Ayyash, M.M. Assessment of Yeasts as Potential Probiotics: A Review of Gastrointestinal Tract Conditions and Investigation Methods. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hatoum, R.; Labrie, S.; Fliss, I. Antimicrobial and probiotic properties of yeasts: From fundamental to novel applications. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kanak, E.K.; Öztürk Yılmaz, S. Determination of the Probiotic and Functional Properties of Yeasts Isolated from Different Dairy Products. Fermentation 2025, 11, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vergara, S.C.; Leiva, M.J.; Mestre, M.V.; Vazquez, F.; Nally, M.C.; Maturano, Y.P. Non-saccharomyces yeast probiotics: Revealing relevance and potential. FEMS Yeast Res. 2023, 23, foad041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tullio, V. Probiotic Yeasts: A Developing Reality? J. Fungi 2024, 10, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kurtzman, C.P. Pichia—E.C. Hansen (1904). In The Yeasts, 5th ed.; Kurtzman, C.P., Fell, J.W., Boekhout, T., Eds.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2011; pp. 685–707. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zahrl, R.J.; Peña, D.A.; Mattanovich, D.; Gasser, B. Systems biotechnology for protein production in Pichia pastoris. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017, 17, fox068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmad, M.; Hirz, M.; Pichler, H.; Schwab, H. Protein expression in Pichia pastoris: Recent achievements and perspectives for heterologous protein production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 5301–5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Passoth, V.; Fredlund, E.; Druvefors, U.Ä.; Schnürer, J. Biotechnology, physiology and genetics of the yeast Pichia anomala. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006, 6, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Petersson, S.; Schnürer, J. Biocontrol of mold growth in high-moisture wheat stored under airtight conditions by Pichia anomala, Pichia guilliermondii, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1027–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Clemente-Jimenez, J.M.; Mingorance-Cazorla, L.; Martínez-Rodríguez, S.; Las Heras-Vázquez, F.J.; Rodríguez-Vico, F. Influence of sequential yeast mixtures on wine fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 98, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shrivastava, A.; Pal, M.; Sharma, R.K. Pichia as yeast cell factory for production of industrially important bio-products: Current trends, challenges, and future prospects. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2023, 8, 108–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, L.C.; Hu, S.; Zhu, H.Y.; Shang, Y.J.; Qiu, Y.J.; Wen, Z.; Chen, S.X.; Bai, F.Y.; Han, P.J. Four new species of Pichia (Pichiales, Pichiaceae) isolated from China. MycoKeys 2025, 114, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Groenewald, M.; Hittinger, C.T.; Bensch, K.; Opulente, D.A.; Shen, X.X.; Li, Y.; Liu, C.; LaBella, A.L.; Zhou, X.; Limtong, S.; et al. A genome-informed higher rank classification of the biotechnologically important fungal subphylum Saccharomycotina. Stud. Mycol. 2023, 105, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kurtzman, C.P.; Robnett, C.J.; Basehoar-Powers, E. Phylogenetic relationships among species of Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined from multigene sequence analysis, and the proposal of Barnettozyma gen. Nov., Lindnera gen. Nov. and Wickerhamomyces gen. Nov. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8, 939–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, H.Y.; Guo, L.C.; Hu, S.; Wei, Y.H.; Hui, F.L.; Liu, X.Z.; Bai, F.Y. Pichia kurtzmaniana f.a. sp. nov., with the transfer of eight Candida species to Pichia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2024, 74, 6306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Elkhairy, B.M.; Salama, N.M.; Desouki, A.M.; Abdelrazek, A.B.; Soliman, K.A.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Khalil, H.B. Towards unlocking the biocontrol potential of Pichia kudriavzevii for plant fungal diseases: In vitro and in vivo assessments with candidate secreted protein prediction. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kobayashi, R.; Kanti, A.; Kawasaki, H. Pichia chibodasensis sp. nov., isolated in Indonesia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1024–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sipiczki, M. Pichia bruneiensis sp. nov., a biofilm-producing dimorphic yeast species isolated from flowers in Borneo. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 3099–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ren, Y.C.; Liu, S.T.; Li, Y.; Hui, F.L. Pichia dushanensis sp. nov. and Hyphopichia paragotoi sp. nov., two sexual yeast species associated with insects and rotten wood. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 2875–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gao, W.L.; Liu, K.F.; Yao, L.G.; Hui, F.L. Pichia nanzhaoensis sp. nov. and Pichia paraexigua f.a., sp. nov., two yeast species isolated from rotting wood. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 3311–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ganter, P.F.; Cardinali, G.; Boundy-Mills, K. Pichia insulana sp. nov., a novel cactophilic yeast from the Caribbean. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 1001–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, C.; Sun, Y.; Chen, H.; Yin, G.; Song, Y. Identification and assessment of Pichia kudriavzevii YS711 isolated from “Jiangshui” with the capacity for uric acid metabolism. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 298, 128200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ninomiya, S.; Mikata, K.; Nakagiri, A.; Nakase, T.; Kawasaki, H. Pichia porticicola sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast related to Pichia acaciae isolated from galleries of ambrosia beetles in Japan. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 56, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chai, C.; Lu, D.; Liu, J.; Wang, E.; Han, X.; Hui, F. Three novel Ascomycota (Saccharomycetes, Saccharomycetales) yeast species derived from the traditional Mexican alcoholic beverage Pulque. MycoKeys 2024, 109, 187–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Limtong, S.; Yongmanitchai, W.; Kawasaki, H.; Fujiyama, K. Wickerhamomyces edaphicus sp. nov. and Pichia jaroonii sp. nov., two ascomycetous yeast species isolated from forest soil in Thailand. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009, 9, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Groenewald, M.; Lombard, L.; de Vries, M.; Lopez, A.G.; Smith, M.; Crous, P.W. Diversity of yeast species from Dutch garden soil and the description of six novel Ascomycetes. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018, 18, foy076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bhadra, B.; Sreenivas Rao, R.; Naveen Kumar, N.; Chaturvedi, P.; Sarkar, P.K.; Shivaji, S. Pichia cecembensis sp. nov. isolated from a papaya fruit (Carica papaya L., Caricaceae). FEMS Yeast Res. 2007, 7, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Florez, A.B.; Belloch, C.; Alvarez-Martin, P.; Querol, A.; Mayo, B. Candida cabralensis sp. nov., a yeast species isolated from traditional Spanish blue-veined Cabrales cheese. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 2671–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Opulente, D.A.; Langdon, Q.K.; Jarzyna, M.; Buh, K.V.; Haase, M.A.B.; Groenewald, M.; Hittinger, C.T. Taxogenomic analysis of a novel yeast species isolated from soil, Pichia galeolata sp. nov. Yeast 2023, 40, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chu, Y.; Li, M.; Jin, J.; Dong, X.; Xu, K.; Jin, L.; Qiao, Y.; Ji, H. Advances in the Application of the Non-Conventional Yeast Pichia kudriavzevii in Food and Biotechnology Industries. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pan, Y.; Yang, J.; Wu, J.; Yang, L.; Fang, H. Current advances of Pichia pastoris as cell factories for production of recombinant proteins. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1059777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Muzaffar, N.; Raziq, A.; Khan, M.W.; Khan, N.M.; Shahid, B.; Gul, A.; Ullah, H. Recent Developments in Heterologous Expression of Cellulases Using the Pichia pastoris Expression System: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Byrne, B. Pichia pastoris as an expression host for membrane protein structural biology. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2015, 32, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tachioka, M.; Sugimoto, N.; Nakamura, A.; Sunagawa, N.; Ishida, T.; Uchiyama, T.; Igarashi, K.; Samejima, M. Development of simple random mutagenesis protocol for the protein expression system in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kang, Z.; Huang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Du, G.; Chen, J. Recent advances of molecular toolbox construction expand Pichia pastoris in synthetic biology applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vicente, J.; Calderon, F.; Santos, A.; Marquina, D.; Benito, S. High Potential of Pichia kluyveri and Other Pichia Species in Wine Technology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Miguel, G.A.; Carlsen, S.; Almeida-Faria, R.; Saerens, S.; Arneborg, N. Amino acid preference and fermentation performance of Pichia kluyveri strains in a synthetic wort. LWT 2024, 199, 116059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. van Wyk, N.; Binder, J.; Ludszuweit, M.; Kohler, S.; Brezina, S.; Semmler, H.; Pretorius, I.S.; Rauhut, D.; Senz, M.; von Wallbrunn, C. The Influence of Pichia kluyveri Addition on the Aroma Profile of a Kombucha Tea Fermentation. Foods 2023, 12, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Vastik, P.; Rosenbergova, Z.; Furdikova, K.; Klempova, T.; Sismis, M.; Smogrovicova, D. Potential of non-Saccharomyces yeast to produce non-alcoholic beer. FEMS Yeast Res. 2022, 22, foac039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Holt, S.; Mukherjee, V.; Lievens, B.; Verstrepen, K.J.; Thevelein, J.M. Bioflavoring by non-conventional yeasts in sequential beer fermentations. Food Microbiol. 2018, 72, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. GRAS Notice No. GRN 938: Pichia kluyveri DSM 33235. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/152290/download (accessed on 5 October 2005).
  56. European Food Safety Authority. Qualified Presumtion of Safety. Available online: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/qualified-presumption-safety-qps (accessed on 3 October 2025).
  57. Hazards, E.P.o.B.; Koutsoumanis, K.; Allende, A.; Alvarez-Ordonez, A.; Bolton, D.; Bover-Cid, S.; Chemaly, M.; De Cesare, A.; Hilbert, F.; Lindqvist, R.; et al. Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 20: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2024. EFSA J. 2024, 22, e8882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jain, K.; Wang, Y.; Jain, P.; Kalita, B.; Shivarathri, R.; Chauhan, M.; Kaur, H.; Chauhan, N.; Xu, J.; Chowdhary, A. Genomic analyses reveal high diversity and rapid evolution of Pichia kudriavzevii within a neonatal intensive care unit in Delhi, India. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2025, 69, e01709-01724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Douglass, A.P.; Offei, B.; Braun-Galleani, S.; Coughlan, A.Y.; Martos, A.A.R.; Ortiz-Merino, R.A.; Byrne, K.P.; Wolfe, K.H. Population genomics shows no distinction between pathogenic Candida krusei and environmental Pichia kudriavzevii: One species, four names. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pelletier, R.; Alarie, I.; Lagacé, R.; Walsh, T.J. Emergence of disseminated candidiasis caused by Candida krusei during treatment with caspofungin: Case report and review of literature. Med. Mycol. 2005, 43, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nguyen, T.A.; Kim, H.Y.; Stocker, S.; Kidd, S.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Dao, A.; Harrison, T.; Wahyuningsih, R.; Rickerts, V.; Perfect, J.; et al. Pichia kudriavzevii (Candida krusei): A systematic review to inform the World Health Organisation priority list of fungal pathogens. Med. Mycol. 2024, 62, myad132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Menezes, A.G.T.; Ramos, C.L.; Cenzi, G.; Melo, D.S.; Dias, D.R.; Schwan, R.F. Probiotic Potential, Antioxidant Activity, and Phytase Production of Indigenous Yeasts Isolated from Indigenous Fermented Foods. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chou, L.S.; Weimer, B. Isolation and characterization of acid- and bile-tolerant isolates from strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Dairy. Sci. 1999, 82, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sturkie, P.D. Secretion of Gastric and Pancreatic Juice, pH of Tract, Digestion in Alimentary Canal, Liver and Bile, and Absorption. In Avian Physiology; Sturkie, P.D., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1976; pp. 196–209. [Google Scholar]
  65. Dawson, P.A.; Karpen, S.J. Intestinal transport and metabolism of bile acids. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 1085–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bustos, A.Y.; Font de Valdez, G.; Fadda, S.; Taranto, M.P. New insights into bacterial bile resistance mechanisms: The role of bile salt hydrolase and its impact on human health. Food Res. Int. 2018, 112, 250–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, N.; Zhang, P.; Zhou, X.; Zheng, J.; Ma, Y.; Liu, C.; Wu, T.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; et al. Isolation, Identification, and Characterization of an Acid-Tolerant Pichia kudriavzevii and Exploration of Its Acetic Acid Tolerance Mechanism. Fermentation 2023, 9, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Akita, H.; Matsushika, A. Transcription Analysis of the Acid Tolerance Mechanism of Pichia kudriavzevii NBRC1279 and NBRC1664. Fermentation 2023, 9, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kathade, S.; Aswani, M.; kaur Anand, P.; Nirichan, B. Probiotic characterization and cholesterol assimilation ability of Pichia kudriavzevii isolated from the gut of the edible freshwater snail “Pila globosa”. Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. 2020, 24, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lata, P.; Kumari, R.; Sharma, K.B.; Rangra, S.; Savitri. In vitro evaluation of probiotic potential and enzymatic profiling of Pichia kudriavzevii Y33 isolated from traditional home-made mango pickle. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2022, 20, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Helmy, E.A.M. Detoxification and anti-mycotoxigenic effect of Ochratoxin A produced by Penicillium expansum species utilizing probiotic Pichia kudriavzevii and biogenic-selenium nano-formulations. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  72. Lucena, R.M.; Dolz-Edo, L.; Brul, S.; de Morais, M.A., Jr.; Smits, G. Extreme Low Cytosolic pH Is a Signal for Cell Survival in Acid Stressed Yeast. Genes 2020, 11, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fletcher, E.; Feizi, A.; Kim, S.; Siewers, V.; Nielsen, J. RNA-seq analysis of Pichia anomala reveals important mechanisms required for survival at low pH. Microb. Cell Fact. 2015, 14, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kumar, M.; Nagpal, R.; Kumar, R.; Hemalatha, R.; Verma, V.; Kumar, A.; Chakraborty, C.; Singh, B.; Marotta, F.; Jain, S.; et al. Cholesterol-lowering probiotics as potential biotherapeutics for metabolic diseases. Exp. Diabetes Res. 2012, 2012, 902917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Alkalbani, N.S.; Osaili, T.M.; Al-Nabulsi, A.A.; Obaid, R.S.; Olaimat, A.N.; Liu, S.-Q.; Ayyash, M.M. In Vitro Characterization and Identification of Potential Probiotic Yeasts Isolated from Fermented Dairy and Non-Dairy Food Products. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ogunremi, O.R.; Sanni, A.I.; Agrawal, R. Hypolipidaemic and antioxidant effects of functional cereal-mix produced with probiotic yeast in rats fed high cholesterol diet. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 17, 742–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gebre, T.S.; Emire, S.A.; Chelliah, R.; Aloo, S.O.; Oh, D.-H. Isolation, functional activity, and safety of probiotics from Ethiopian traditional cereal-based fermented beverage, “Borde”. LWT 2023, 184, 115076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Li, Y.; Mo, X.; Xiong, J.; Huang, K.; Zheng, M.; Jiang, Q.; Su, G.; Ou, Q.; Pan, H.; Jiang, C. Deciphering the probiotic properties and safety assessment of a novel multi-stress-tolerant aromatic yeast Pichia kudriavzevii HJ2 from marine mangroves. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, O.; Yi, L.; Deng, L.; Ruan, C.; Zeng, K. Screening antagonistic yeasts against citrus green mold and the possible biocontrol mechanisms of Pichia galeiformis (BAF03). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 3812–3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tran, K.D.; Le-Thi, L.; Vo, H.H.; Dinh-Thi, T.V.; Nguyen-Thi, T.; Phan, N.H.; Nguyen, K.U. Probiotic Properties and Safety Evaluation in the Invertebrate Model Host Galleria mellonella of the Pichia kudriavzevii YGM091 Strain Isolated from Fermented Goat Milk. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2024, 16, 1288–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ogunremi, O.R.; Sanni, A.I.; Agrawal, R. Probiotic potentials of yeasts isolated from some cereal-based Nigerian traditional fermented food products. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 797–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Simões, L.A.; Cristina de Souza, A.; Ferreira, I.; Melo, D.S.; Lopes, L.A.A.; Magnani, M.; Schwan, R.F.; Dias, D.R. Probiotic properties of yeasts isolated from Brazilian fermented table olives. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 1983–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Madeeha, I.R.; Ikram, A.; Imran, M. A preliminary insight of correlation between human fecal microbial diversity and blood lipid profile. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 67, 865–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chihombori, T.; Mustopa, A.; Astuti, R.; Mutiara, I.; Refli, R.; Umami, R.; Fatimah, F.; Irawan, H.; Ekawati, N.; Trinugroho, J.; et al. Potential Probiotic Yeasts of the Pichia Genus Isolated from ‘Dadih’, a Traditional Fermented Food of West Sumatra, Indonesia. HAYATI J. Biosci. 2025, 32, 320–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Greppi, A.; Saubade, F.; Botta, C.; Humblot, C.; Guyot, J.P.; Cocolin, L. Potential probiotic Pichia kudriavzevii strains and their ability to enhance folate content of traditional cereal-based African fermented food. Food Microbiol. 2017, 62, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chelliah, R.; Ramakrishnan, S.R.; Prabhu, P.R.; Antony, U. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity and probiotic properties of wild-strain Pichia kudriavzevii isolated from frozen idli batter. Yeast 2016, 33, 385–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Orłowski, A.; Bielecka, M. Preliminary Characteristics Of Lactobacillus And Bifidobacterium Strains As Probiotic Candidates. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2006, 56, 269–275. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kos, B.; Susković, J.; Vuković, S.; Simpraga, M.; Frece, J.; Matosić, S. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 981–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Alander, M.; Satokari, R.; Korpela, R.; Saxelin, M.; Vilpponen-Salmela, T.; Mattila-Sandholm, T.; von Wright, A. Persistence of Colonization of Human Colonic Mucosa by a Probiotic Strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosusGG, after Oral Consumption. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 351–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Suvarna, S.; Dsouza, J.; Ragavan, M.L.; Das, N. Potential probiotic characterization and effect of encapsulation of probiotic yeast strains on survival in simulated gastrointestinal tract condition. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 745–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Alvarez, S.C.V.; Pendón, M.D.; Bengoa, A.A.; Leiva Alaniz, M.J.; Maturano, Y.P.; Garrote, G.L. Probiotic Potential of Yeasts Isolated from Fermented Beverages: Assessment of Antagonistic Strategies Against Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Yue, T. Novel selenium-enriched Pichia kudriavzevii as a dietary supplement to alleviate dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice by modulating the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Food Funct. 2024, 15, 10698–10716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Das, R.; Tamang, B.; Najar, I.N.; Bam, M.; Rai, P.K. Probiotic yeast characterization and fungal amplicon metagenomics analysis of fermented bamboo shoot products from Arunachal Pradesh, northeast India. Heliyon 2024, 10, e39500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wu, D.q.; Ding, X.S.; Zhao, B.; An, Q.; Guo, J.S. The essential role of hydrophobic interaction within extracellular polymeric substances in auto-aggregation of P. stutzeri strain XL-2. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2022, 171, 105404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Merchán, A.V.; Benito, M.J.; Galván, A.I.; Ruiz-Moyano Seco de Herrera, S. Identification and selection of yeast with functional properties for future application in soft paste cheese. LWT 2020, 124, 109173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Salimi, F.; Imanparast, S. Characterization of Probiotic Pichia sp. DU2-Derived Exopolysaccharide with Oil-in-Water Emulsifying and Anti-biofilm Activities. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2023, 195, 3345–3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yildiran, H.; Kiliç, G.B.; Çakmakçi, A.G.K. Characterization and comparison of yeasts from different sources for some probiotic properties and exopolysaccharide production. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 39, 646–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Takiishi, T.; Fenero, C.I.M.; Câmara, N.O.S. Intestinal barrier and gut microbiota: Shaping our immune responses throughout life. Tissue Barriers 2017, 5, e1373208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Garcia, M.A.; Nelson, W.J.; Chavez, N. Cell-Cell Junctions Organize Structural and Signaling Networks. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, a029181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Edelblum, K.L.; Turner, J.R. The tight junction in inflammatory disease: Communication breakdown. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2009, 9, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Maione, A.; Imparato, M.; Buonanno, A.; Galdiero, M.; de Alteriis, E.; Guida, M.; Galdiero, E. Protective and immunomodulatory effects of the novel probiotic yeast Pichia kudriavzevii isolated from a home-made kefir during infection in human colon epithelial cells: An exploratory study. J. Funct. Foods 2025, 125, 106666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhang, L.; Ren, J.; Yu, T.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Lu, S.; Guo, X. Supplementation of citrus pectin with whole-cell pectinase PG5 on Pichia pastoris promotes recovery of colitis and enhances intestinal barrier function in DSS-treated mice. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 264, 130476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ma, Y.; Sun, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Hu, P.; Sun, W.; Liu, Y.; Hu, H.; Rao, Z.; Tang, Z. Isolation, Identification and Function of Pichia anomala AR(2016) and Its Effects on the Growth and Health of Weaned Pigs. Animals 2021, 11, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Filho-Lima, J.V.; Vieira, E.C.; Nicoli, J.R. Antagonistic effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Saccharomyces boulardii and Escherichia coli combinations against experimental infections with Shigella flexneri and Salmonella enteritidis subsp. typhimurium in gnotobiotic mice. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Goerges, S.; Koslowsky, M.; Velagic, S.; Borst, N.; Bockelmann, W.; Heller, K.J.; Scherer, S. Anti-listerial potential of food-borne yeasts in red smear cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2011, 21, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Anuarbekova, S.; Bekshin, Z.; Shaikhin, S.; Alzhanova, G.; Sadykov, A.; Temirkhanov, A.; Sarmurzina, Z.; Kanafin, Y. Exploring the Antimicrobial and Probiotic Potential of Microorganisms Derived from Kazakh Dairy Products. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 15, 1298–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Alakeji, T.P.; Oloke, J.K. Association of probiotic potential of strains of Pichia kudriavzevii isolated from ogi with the number of open reading frame (ORF) in the nucleotide sequences. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 19, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Utama, G.L.; Suraloka, M.P.A.; Rialita, T.; Balia, R.L. Antifungal and Aflatoxin-Reducing Activity of β-Glucan Isolated from Pichia norvegensis Grown on Tofu Wastewater. Foods 2021, 10, 2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. França, R.C.; Conceição, F.R.; Mendonça, M.; Haubert, L.; Sabadin, G.; de Oliveira, P.D.; Amaral, M.G.; Silva, W.P.; Moreira, Â.N. Pichia pastoris X-33 has probiotic properties with remarkable antibacterial activity against Salmonella typhimurium. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 7953–7961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Sharma, A.; Sharma, I.M.; Sharma, M.; Sharma, K.; Sharma, A. Effectiveness of fungal, bacterial and yeast antagonists for management of mango anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides). Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2021, 31, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mukherjee, P.K.; Chandra, J.; Retuerto, M.; Sikaroodi, M.; Brown, R.E.; Jurevic, R.; Salata, R.A.; Lederman, M.M.; Gillevet, P.M.; Ghannoum, M.A. Oral mycobiome analysis of HIV-infected patients: Identification of Pichia as an antagonist of opportunistic fungi. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1003996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sarita, B.; Samadhan, D.; Hassan, M.Z.; Kovaleva, E.G. A comprehensive review of probiotics and human health-current prospective and applications. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1487641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Caetano, C.F.; Gaspar, C.; Martinez-de-Oliveira, J.; Palmeira-de-Oliveira, A.; Rolo, J. The Role of Yeasts in Human Health: A Review. Life 2023, 13, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Anisimova, E.; Gorokhova, I.; Karimullina, G.; Yarullina, D. Alarming Antibiotic Resistance of Lactobacilli Isolated from Probiotic Preparations and Dietary Supplements. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Moriguchi, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Tanaka, K.; Kurata, N.; Suzuki, K. Trans-Kingdom Horizontal DNA Transfer from Bacteria to Yeast Is Highly Plastic Due to Natural Polymorphisms in Auxiliary Nonessential Recipient Genes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Gonçalves, P.; Gonçalves, C. Horizontal gene transfer in yeasts. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2022, 76, 101950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, B.; Rutherfurd-Markwick, K.; Liu, N.; Zhang, X.X.; Mutukumira, A.N. Evaluation of the probiotic potential of yeast isolated from kombucha in New Zealand. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2024, 8, 100711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jang, S.-A.; Park, S.-K.; Lim, J.-D.; Kang, S.-C.; Yang, K.-H.; Pyo, S.-K.; Sohn, E.-H. The Comparative Immunomodulatory Effects of β-Glucans from Yeast, Bacteria, and Mushroom on the Function of Macrophages. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2009, 14, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhu, Y.; He, D.; Gao, X.; Wang, A.; Yu, J.; Wang, S.; Cui, B.; Mu, G.; Ma, C.; Tuo, Y. β-Glucan Extracted from Pichia kudriavzevii DPUL-51–6Y, Kluyveromyces marxianus DPUL-F15, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae DPUL-C6 Shows Ameliorating Effects on DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis on BALB/c Mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 10265–10278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Yan, F.; Polk, D.B. Probiotics and immune health. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2011, 27, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Aziz, N.; Bonavida, B. Activation of Natural Killer Cells by Probiotics. For. Immunopathol. Dis. Therapy 2016, 7, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhang, Z.; Guo, Q.; Wang, J.; Tan, H.; Jin, X.; Fan, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhao, S.; Zheng, J.; Peng, N. Postbiotics from Pichia kudriavzevii promote intestinal health performance through regulation of Limosilactobacillus reuteri in weaned piglets. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 3463–3474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Freimoser, F.M.; Rueda-Mejia, M.P.; Tilocca, B.; Migheli, Q. Biocontrol yeasts: Mechanisms and applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Grondin, E.; Shum Cheong Sing, A.; James, S.; Nueno-Palop, C.; François, J.M.; Petit, T. Flavour production by Saprochaete and Geotrichum yeasts and their close relatives. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Pagans, E.; Font, X.; Sánchez, A. Emission of volatile organic compounds from composting of different solid wastes: Abatement by biofiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 131, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ogunremi, O.R.; Agrawal, R.; Sanni, A. Production and characterization of volatile compounds and phytase from potentially probiotic yeasts isolated from traditional fermented cereal foods in Nigeria. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2020, 18, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Morath, S.U.; Hung, R.; Bennett, J.W. Fungal volatile organic compounds: A review with emphasis on their biotechnological potential. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2012, 26, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ortíz-Castro, R.; Contreras-Cornejo, H.A.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.; López-Bucio, J. The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development. Plant Signal Behav. 2009, 4, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Roy, S.; Banerjee, D. Volatile Organic Compounds from Endophytic Fungi. In Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology Through Fungi: Perspective for Value-Added Products and Environments; Yadav, A.N., Singh, S., Mishra, S., Gupta, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 2, pp. 149–175. [Google Scholar]
  130. Stotzky, G.; Schenck, S. Volatile organic compounds and microorganisms. CRC Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1976, 4, 333–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Korpi, A.; Järnberg, J.; Pasanen, A.L. Microbial volatile organic compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2009, 39, 139–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhang, H.; Du, H.; Xu, Y. Volatile Organic Compound-Mediated Antifungal Activity of Pichia spp. and Its Effect on the Metabolic Profiles of Fermentation Communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e02992-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Choińska, R.; Piasecka-Jóźwiak, K.; Chabłowska, B.; Dumka, J.; Łukaszewicz, A. Biocontrol ability and volatile organic compounds production as a putative mode of action of yeast strains isolated from organic grapes and rye grains. Antonie Van. Leeuwenhoek 2020, 113, 1135–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sampaolesi, S.; Pérez-Través, L.; Briand, L.E.; Querol, A. Bioactive volatiles of brewer’s yeasts: Antifungal action of compounds produced during wort fermentation on Aspergillus sp. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024, 417, 110692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, J.; Xie, J.; Zhou, Y.; Deng, L.; Yao, S.; Zeng, K. Inhibitory effect of Pichia membranaefaciens and Kloeckera apiculata against Monilinia fructicola and their biocontrol ability of brown rot in postharvest plum. Biol. Control. 2017, 114, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Masoud, W.; Poll, L.; Jakobsen, M. Influence of volatile compounds produced by yeasts predominant during processing of Coffea arabica in East Africa on growth and ochratoxin A (OTA) production by Aspergillus ochraceus. Yeast 2005, 22, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Roman, Y.M. The Role of Uric Acid in Human Health: Insights from the Uricase Gene. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Lee, I.R.; Yang, L.; Sebetso, G.; Allen, R.; Doan, T.H.; Blundell, R.; Lui, E.Y.; Morrow, C.A.; Fraser, J.A. Characterization of the complete uric acid degradation pathway in the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Karasawa, Y. Ammonia production from uric acid, urea, and amino acids and its absorption from the ceca of the cockerel. J. Exp. Zool. 1989, 252, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ezekiel, C.N.; Adeseluka, O.Y.; Ogunremi, O.R.; Ayeni, K.I.; Banwo, K.; Šarkanj, B.; Kovač, T.; Adetunji, M.C.; Akinyemi, M.O.; Mwanza, M.; et al. Probiotic and mycotoxin reduction potentials of heat-tolerant Pichia kudriavzevii strains from maize- and sorghum-pap. World Mycotoxin J. 2025, 18, 31–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Rahbar Saadat, Y.; Yari, A.; Movassaghpour, A.; Talebi, M.; Pourghassem Gargari, B. Modulatory role of exopolysaccharides of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Pichia kudriavzevii as probiotic yeasts from dairy products in human colon cancer cells. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 64, 103675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Saber, A.; Alipour, B.; Faghfoori, Z.; Mousavi Jam, A.; Yari Khosroushahi, A. Secretion metabolites of probiotic yeast, Pichia kudriavzevii AS-12, induces apoptosis pathways in human colorectal cancer cell lines. Nutr. Res. 2017, 41, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. İzgü, F.; Altınbay, D.; Acun, T. Killer toxin of Pichia anomala NCYC 432; purification, characterization and its exo-β-1,3-glucanase activity. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2006, 39, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Oliveira, T.; Ramalhosa, E.; Nunes, L.; Pereira, J.A.; Colla, E.; Pereira, E.L. Probiotic potential of indigenous yeasts isolated during the fermentation of table olives from Northeast of Portugal. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 44, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Piraine, R.E.A.; Retzlaf, G.; Gonçalves, V.; Cunha, R.; Leite, F.P.L. Brewing and Probiotic Potential Activity of Wild Yeasts Hanseniaspora uvarum PIT001, Pichia kluyveri LAR001 and Candida intermedia ORQ001. Res. Sq. 2021, 249, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Timeline of taxonomic history and biotechnological advancements of the genus Pichia. Organisms within this genus has been extensively utilized in food and beverage production, with recent recognition of its probiotic potential driving renewed scientific interest.
Figure 1. Timeline of taxonomic history and biotechnological advancements of the genus Pichia. Organisms within this genus has been extensively utilized in food and beverage production, with recent recognition of its probiotic potential driving renewed scientific interest.
Nutrients 17 03594 g001
Figure 2. Favorable factors found in Pichia that contribute toward probiotic potential. The schematic highlights important characteristics of Pichia that facilitate survival including low pH tolerance, bile acid resistance, and the ability to adhere, auto-aggregate, and interact beneficially within host environments, supporting their potential as probiotic agents. The use of Pichia as a probiotic also enhances epithelial barrier function by upregulating tight junction proteins. Created using BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Favorable factors found in Pichia that contribute toward probiotic potential. The schematic highlights important characteristics of Pichia that facilitate survival including low pH tolerance, bile acid resistance, and the ability to adhere, auto-aggregate, and interact beneficially within host environments, supporting their potential as probiotic agents. The use of Pichia as a probiotic also enhances epithelial barrier function by upregulating tight junction proteins. Created using BioRender.com.
Nutrients 17 03594 g002
Figure 3. Immunomodulatory properties of Pichia increase anti-inflammatory cytokines and antioxidant enzymes and decrease pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Figure 3. Immunomodulatory properties of Pichia increase anti-inflammatory cytokines and antioxidant enzymes and decrease pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Nutrients 17 03594 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Samiksha, F.; San Valentin, E.M.D.; Li, G.; Blazer, M.; McCormick, T.S.; Ghannoum, M. A Narrative Review on the Functional Applications, Safety, and Probiotic Characteristics of Pichia. Nutrients 2025, 17, 3594. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223594

AMA Style

Samiksha F, San Valentin EMD, Li G, Blazer M, McCormick TS, Ghannoum M. A Narrative Review on the Functional Applications, Safety, and Probiotic Characteristics of Pichia. Nutrients. 2025; 17(22):3594. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223594

Chicago/Turabian Style

Samiksha, Fnu, Erin Marie D. San Valentin, Grace Li, Maya Blazer, Thomas S. McCormick, and Mahmoud Ghannoum. 2025. "A Narrative Review on the Functional Applications, Safety, and Probiotic Characteristics of Pichia" Nutrients 17, no. 22: 3594. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223594

APA Style

Samiksha, F., San Valentin, E. M. D., Li, G., Blazer, M., McCormick, T. S., & Ghannoum, M. (2025). A Narrative Review on the Functional Applications, Safety, and Probiotic Characteristics of Pichia. Nutrients, 17(22), 3594. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17223594

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop