Next Article in Journal
Elemental Influence: The Emerging Role of Zinc, Copper, and Selenium in Osteoarthritis
Previous Article in Journal
Does Protein Ingestion Timing Affect Exercise-Induced Adaptations? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Probiotics on Health in Pregnancy and Infants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Intestinal Microbiota in Early Life: Latest Findings Regarding the Role of Probiotics as a Treatment Approach for Dysbiosis

by
Gabriel Florin Răzvan Mogoş
1,†,
Monica Manciulea (Profir)
2,3,†,
Robert-Mihai Enache
4,†,
Luciana Alexandra Pavelescu
2,
Oana Alexandra Popescu (Roşu)
2,3,
Sanda Maria Cretoiu
2,* and
Ileana Marinescu
5,6
1
Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
2
Department of Morphological Sciences, Cell and Molecular Biology and Histology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Oncology, Elias University Emergency Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
5
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
6
Psychiatry Clinic, Craiova Clinical Hospital for Neuropsychiatry, 200615 Craiova, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2025, 17(13), 2071; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17132071
Submission received: 29 May 2025 / Revised: 18 June 2025 / Accepted: 19 June 2025 / Published: 21 June 2025

Abstract

The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in early-life development, influencing various aspects of health and disease. Dysbiosis, an imbalance in the gut microbiota, has been linked to multiple health conditions, including allergies, asthma, and obesity. In early life, the gut microbiota plays a key role in the development and maturation of the immune system. Probiotics, live microorganisms that confer health benefits when administered in adequate amounts, have emerged as a potential treatment approach for dysbiosis in early life. Dysbiosis can alter the resistance to pathogens, promoting atopic diseases, food sensitization, and infections such as necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Probiotics have been shown to modulate the composition and function of the gut microbiota in the perinatal and infant periods. They can increase the abundance of beneficial bacteria, such as Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli, and reduce the levels of potentially harmful bacteria. Not all probiotics are created equal. The effects of probiotics can vary depending on the specific strain used. Probiotics have also been investigated for their potential benefits in other areas of infant health, such as reducing the risk of respiratory infections and improving growth and development. This review aims to analyze the current data in the literature and to evaluate the health benefits of probiotic administration in early life. Several studies have investigated the use of probiotics in preventing or treating allergic diseases, such as eczema and food allergies. While some studies have shown promising results, more research is needed to fully understand the benefits and risks of probiotics in early life. In conclusion, using probiotics to prevent dysbiosis-related conditions may be considered a method of ‘programming’ the individual for optimal health maintenance.

1. Introduction

The human gut microbiota plays a pivotal role in maintaining health and contributing to disease, beginning as early as the perinatal period. A complex interplay of factors, including maternal diet, gestational age, the mode of delivery, feeding practices, and exposure to antibiotics, influences its composition and development [1,2,3,4]. Disruptions to this balance, known as dysbiosis, have been implicated in a wide range of pediatric conditions, such as allergies, autoimmune disorders (e.g., type 1 diabetes mellitus—T1DM), obesity, autism spectrum disorder, and inflammatory bowel disease [5,6,7,8]. Gut colonization begins at birth, and during the first three years of life, the infant microbiota undergoes dynamic changes. While an adult-like microbial composition begins to emerge around one year of age, a stable community similar to that of adults is typically established by 2.5–3 years [9,10,11]. Research has identified three developmental stages of the early gut microbiota: the developmental stage (3–14 months), dominated by Bifidobacteria; the transition stage (15–30 months), characterized by an increase in Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes; and the stability stage (≥31 months), where Firmicutes become predominant [11,12,13,14].
Several key factors influence the gut microbiota in early life. The mode of delivery is particularly important—vaginally delivered infants show higher levels of Prevotella spp. and Lactobacillus. In contrast, those born via cesarean section exhibit increased levels of Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, and Propionibacterium spp. [15]. Feeding type also has a marked impact: breastfed infants tend to harbor more Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria, while formula-fed infants display greater abundance of Bacteroides, Clostridia, Staphylococci, Enterococci, and Atopobium [15,16]. The introduction of solid foods further increases microbial diversity, favoring Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria while decreasing Bifidobacteria [15,17]. Other influential variables include gestational age—preterm infants often present increased levels of Enterococcus, Enterobacteriaceae, and other opportunistic pathogens—as well as geographical region, family lifestyle (e.g., pet exposure), host genetics, and antibiotic use. For example, Northern European infants typically exhibit higher Bifidobacterium levels, whereas Southern European infants have more diverse gut profiles [18]. Genetic polymorphisms, such as those affecting lactase-phlorizin hydrolase expression, also correlate with microbial patterns [15,18,19,20]. Figure 1 synthesizes the development and influencing factors of the gut microbiota during the first years of life.
The gut microbiota communicates bidirectionally with multiple organs via established axes, influencing local and systemic health. The gut–brain axis plays a crucial role in neurodevelopment and microglial function, with microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) contributing to CNS homeostasis [21]. Pathogens like Escherichia coli and Campylobacter jejuni have been linked to alterations in behavior and cognitive development [22,23,24]. Emerging evidence also supports an enterothymic communication axis, where early microbial cues influence thymic lymphocyte development via plasmacytoid dendritic cells, with potential long-term implications for immune regulation and colitis risk in adulthood [25,26]. The gut–lung axis modulates respiratory health, with SCFAs reducing pulmonary inflammation and infections like pneumonia, impairing gut epithelial integrity [26,27]. The gut–liver axis is implicated in early-life obesity, where antibiotic-induced shifts in bile acid metabolism negatively affect energy regulation [28,29,30].
Importantly, the infant gut microbiota is highly plastic and adaptable, providing a window of therapeutic opportunity. Antibiotics, dietary modulation, probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) are being explored to restore or optimize microbial balance. Among these, probiotics have gained particular attention due to their capacity to promote beneficial bacteria, modulate immune responses, and potentially prevent or mitigate disease [28,31].

2. Gut Colonization and Microbial Composition During the First 1000 Days of Life

The microbial colonization and immune system development are shaped during the first 1000 days of life, from the fetal period until two years of age—a critical window characterized by high plasticity that plays a pivotal role in long-term health outcomes [32]. In the first days after birth, bidirectional communication between the immune system and the microbiota is essential for maintaining microecological balance and immune homeostasis [32,33]. During pregnancy, the maternal oral, intestinal, and vaginal microbiota change due to the altered immune status, which enables maternal tolerance of fetal cells and prevents immune rejection. These changes also modulate fetal metabolic responses and contribute to the initial colonization of the fetal microbiota [34,35].
Early gut colonization influences subsequent microbial development with long-term effects through competition for binding sites, nutrient utilization, antimicrobial production, and environmental changes [36]. This colonization is shaped by maternal and infant-related factors, which are explored in the following section, resulting in differences in oral and intestinal microbiota development [37,38]. Some of the earliest colonizers are Streptococcus spp., which populate the infant’s mouth—the gateway to the gastrointestinal tract—thereby influencing gut microbiota colonization [39,40]. Other early colonizers include facultative anaerobic bacteria, with Enterobacterales, Enterococci, and Staphylococci dominating in the first weeks, followed by an increased abundance of Clostridium leptum, Bifidobacterium, and Bacteroides fragilis [41]. The introduction of solid foods further shifts the gut microbiota toward dominance by Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes [42].
Fetal colonization of the oral and gut microbiota begins before birth, via exposure to microorganisms from the placenta, amniotic fluid, and meconium, influenced by the maternal microbiota [32,43]. Changes in the maternal gut microbiota may reach the placenta and amniotic fluid through bloodstream dissemination, mediated by dendritic cells that translocate microbes from the intestinal lumen, ultimately affecting the fetus via the umbilical cord [32,44,45]. Older studies analyzing meconium samples using triplicates for fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with 16S rRNA-targeted probes, qPCR/RT qPCR or 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing, quantitative PCR, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis have detected low bacterial loads, mostly Staphylococcus, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium, suggesting limited colonization at birth [16,32,46,47]. A 2023 recent study by Qiuwen He et al., using 16S rRNA sequencing on samples from 39 pregnant women, found high levels of Lactobacillus and Curvibacter in amniotic and vaginal fluids, Bacillus, Escherichia, and Shigella in meconium, Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium in maternal feces, and Streptococcus and Prevotella in maternal saliva. Notably, the meconium microbiota was most strongly influenced by the amniotic fluid microbiota [48].
Prenatal antibiotic exposure also affects fetal oral and gut colonization, with downstream effects on the infant immune system [32]. A 2018 study by Zou et al. analyzed fecal samples from 28 preterm infants—12 exposed and 12 unexposed to prenatal antibiotics—on days 7 and 14 postnatally, using 16S rRNA sequencing. The results showed decreased Bacteroidetes and Bifidobacterium and increased Escherichia-Shigella in the antibiotic-exposed group [49]. A 2021 meta-analysis by Grech et al., which reviewed 76 studies examining pre-pregnancy and pregnancy exposures affecting the infant microbiome—including maternal antibiotic and probiotic use, diet, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain (GWG), diabetes, and mood—found that prenatal antibiotic exposure was associated with a reduction in Actinobacteria and an increase in Firmicutes and Proteobacteria in the fetal microbiota [50].
Although fetal colonization begins in utero, the most impactful moment for microbiota establishment is delivery—either vaginal or cesarean—when the commensal microbiota is seeded [32,51]. Vaginally delivered infants acquire healthier oral and gut microbiota, enriched in Lactobacillus, Prevotella, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Lachnospiraceae, and Escherichia coli [51,52,53,54]. In contrast, cesarean-born infants show a higher abundance of Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Enterococcaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Propionibacterium, and pathogenic species like Clostridium perfringens and Escherichia coli, with lower Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides levels [53,55,56,57,58].
Feeding mode further influences early microbiota development, having long-term effects on the oral and intestinal microbiota [32,59]. From birth to around 6 months, breastfeeding, through human milk oligosaccharides, increases the abundance of Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium spp. (bifidum, breve, longum), Propionibacterium, and Lactobacillus, with Streptococcus being dominant [60,61]. Breastfeeding also helps shape the immune system and gut health through the “gut–breast axis”—a bidirectional interaction where maternal gut microbiota influence the composition of breast milk, including its microbial content, immune factors, and metabolites, which in turn shape the infant’s gut microbiome and immune development [53,62,63]. In contrast, formula-fed infants show elevated Actinomyces and Prevotella and reduced Bifidobacterium, which is not fully restored by supplementation [64,65].
The introduction of solid foods increases gut microbiota diversity and promotes communities adapted to fiber and protein, including Enterococci, Enterobacteria, Clostridia, Bacteroides, Lachnospiraceae, and Ruminococcaceae spp. [66,67,68]. A 2020 study by Differding et al. comparing early (<3 months) vs. later solid food introduction and assessing the differential abundance of microbial taxa (measured by 16S rRNA gene sequencing) revealed increased Bilophila wadsworthia and Roseburia in early-fed infants, associated with elevated butyric acid and linked to immune dysregulation, oxidative stress, and childhood obesity [69]. Another 2017 prospective longitudinal study by Pannaraj et al. that evaluated bacterial composition using sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene in breast milk, areolar skin, and infant stool samples of 107 healthy mother–infant pairs found that early solids accelerate microbiota maturation, reduce Bifidobacterium, and increase adult-associated taxa like Bacteroides [70]. Although the microbiota becomes more adult-like by age two, recent evidence suggests that complete maturation continues until adolescence [71,72]. The most important stages in the colonization and development of the microbiota and the main microbial groups during the first 1000 days are illustrated in Figure 2.
Global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures may have long-lasting impacts on the human microbiota, including decreased diversity and increased pathogenic bacteria, potentially disrupting maternal–fetal microbiota transmission. This underlines the need for future research focused on supporting healthy oral and gut microbiota development during this critical 1000-day window [32,73].

3. Factors Influencing the Early Gut Microbiota

A convergence of prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal effects contributes to the establishment of the microbiota found in the newborn’s gut. Figure 3 illustrates the key influences on gut microbiota development during the perinatal period.

3.1. Prenatal Factors

The early microbial exposure of a newborn can be affected by factors such as the mother’s nutrition, obesity, smoking habits, and antibiotic usage during pregnancy [37]. The mother’s gut microbiota may change as a result of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), which may subsequently impact the newborn’s microbiota [74,75]. Women with GDM give birth to babies with different gut microbiota compositions [75,76,77,78]. These changes are characterized by increased concentrations of possibly pro-inflammatory bacteria and less beneficial bacteria like Lactobacillus and Prevotella. These alterations may put neonates at greater risk for metabolic disorders in the future [79,80,81]. Pregnant women with T1DM exhibit distinct gut microbiota profiles characterized by a decrease in beneficial microbes and an elevation in pro-inflammatory bacteria. These shifts in the perinatal environment may influence the formation of the newborn’s microbiota [82].
A mother’s dietary decisions have a significant influence on the microbiota that is present in her gut, which in turn affects the microbiota that is present in the germs of the developing child. There is a correlation between diets that are high in fiber and low in saturated fat and a more diverse and healthier maternal microbiota, which may result in healthier microbial colonization in infants [83]. This correlation has been shown in studies that have been conducted so far. Compared to other women, the gut microbiota profiles of pregnant women with T1DM are unique. A decrease in beneficial microorganisms and an increase in germs that promote inflammation are the defining characteristics of these cases. There is a possibility that these alterations in the prenatal environment will impact the population of microorganisms generated in the infant [84,85,86].
Variations in the mother’s microbiota have been connected to smoking on the part of the mother. These variations have the potential to influence the microbial colonization of the newborn and raise the likelihood of health problems [87].
Excessive stress levels during pregnancy can influence the microbiota of the mother and the environment inside the uterus, which may have repercussions for the development of the newborn’s microbiota [88,89,90].
The administration of antibiotics by mothers may influence gut microbiota, potentially resulting in a decrease in the diversity of microorganisms. This disruption may affect the early microbial exposure of the baby, potentially impacting the development of the immune system and heightening the risk of certain diseases [55,91].
Although the intrauterine environment was traditionally considered sterile, recent studies have challenged this view, suggesting that microbial DNA may be detected in placental tissues, amniotic fluid, or meconium [47,92,93]. However, the existence of a functional placental microbiota remains controversial, as some findings could be explained by contamination during sampling or sequencing [94,95,96]. Despite this, several studies propose that maternal conditions, such as GDM, may influence the microbial signals in utero and potentially impact early immune and gut development [80,97,98].

3.2. Perinatal Factors

Infants that are born vaginally are subjected to the microbiota of their mother’s vaginal and intestinal tracts, which leads to the colonization of beneficial bacteria like Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Neonatal infants who are delivered via cesarean section, on the other hand, have a greater likelihood of being colonized by skin-associated and ambient bacteria, which may hinder the development of their immune systems [99,100].
Premature newborns generally exhibit reduced bacterial diversity and a diminished presence of beneficial bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium, which may influence the development of their immune system and metabolic functions [101]. Gestational age markedly affects the development of the baby’s gut microbiota. Preterm newborns, particularly those born extremely preterm (<28 weeks), demonstrate unique microbial colonization patterns compared to term infants. Compared to term newborns, preterm infants often have a lower variation in microorganisms in their gut. An increasing prevalence of potentially harmful bacteria, such as Enterobacteriaceae, and a decreased abundance of beneficial bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides, are both positively correlated with the reduced diversity [102,103].
The establishment of gut microbiota in preterm neonates transpires in certain stages, commencing with the predominance of Staphylococcus, followed by Enterococcus, then Enterobacter, and ultimately concluding with Bifidobacterium. A link exists between the gestational age of the infant and the duration of each phase, with severely premature infants experiencing prolonged early phases [104,105].
The gut microbiota of preterm infants often aligns with that of term infants by 24 weeks, despite initial differences between the two cohorts. Nonetheless, under certain settings, significant disparities may persist [19].

3.3. Postnatal Factors

Breastfeeding promotes the proliferation of a gut microbiota predominantly composed of Bifidobacterium. This occurs because prebiotics, specifically human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), are generated during a mother’s child’s breastfeeding. Infants who receive formula feeding typically exhibit a more diversified microbiota, characterized by a range of distinct bacterial compositions. This is due to the formula introducing a novel array of microorganisms into the environment [28,37].
The administration of antibiotics throughout the early years of life has the potential to disrupt the microbiota that is growing in the gut, resulting in a reduction in the variety of microorganisms and possibly increasing the risk of conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [106,107,108,109,110].
Exposing young children to diverse environmental microbes throughout early infancy can enhance microbial diversity and bolster immune system development. These bacteria may be located in natural habitats or through encounters with pets and siblings. This concept is fundamental to the development of the “biodiversity hypothesis” [111,112,113].
A wider variety of bacteria can be introduced to a child through the presence of older siblings and pets, which has the potential to influence the composition of the microbiota in the infant’s gut tissue [16,114].

3.4. Genetic and Biological Factors

The genetic makeup of a newborn can affect the composition of the gut microbiota. There have been studies that have demonstrated that male and female babies exhibit distinct variances in microbial diversity and specific bacterial abundances [115,116].
Recent research indicates that an offspring’s microbiota and health outcomes may be affected by the father’s gut health at the time of conception. This observation suggests that paternal influences contribute to the child’s growth [117].
Emerging research underscores the significant role of paternal gut microbiota in shaping the early-life microbiota and health outcomes of offspring. Mouse studies indicate that disruptions in paternal gut microbiota at conception can negatively impact the offspring. Male mice given antibiotics to alter their gut microbiota exhibited offspring with reduced birth weights, increased postnatal mortality, and placental abnormalities. Alterations in testicular metabolites and hormonal signaling, particularly involving leptin, are implicated, indicating a connection known as a “gut–germline axis” that associates a father’s gastrointestinal health with fertility [118].
Crucially, when the paternal gut microbiota was given time to heal prior to conception, these adverse effects were reversed, indicating that the impacts are temporary and can be lessened by restoring the microbiota.
Additional studies have demonstrated that the father’s gut microbiota might affect his children’s behavior through epigenetic pathways. One study found that sperm short RNAs, essential for gene regulation, changed when male mice’s gut microbiota was reduced. These males’ offspring showed decreased body weight, changed gut shape, and, in the case of females, elevated anxiety and depressive-like behaviors [119].
In addition to genetic and epigenetic influences, fathers directly introduce microorganisms to their offspring. Longitudinal research indicates paternal microbiota can colonize the infant intestine, with the father’s contribution matching the mother’s by the first birthday. In cesarean deliveries, maternal microbial transmission is hindered, rendering paternal seeding essential [120,121].
The relevance of paternal health, particularly the health of the gastrointestinal tract, to reproduction and the well-being of children is brought to light by these latest discoveries. The gut flora of future generations may be influenced by factors such as nutrition, antibiotic medication, and lifestyle decisions that affect the father. Therefore, men interested in conceiving should make sure to keep their gut flora healthy by eating a balanced diet, using antibiotics responsibly, and maintaining general wellness.

4. The Gut–Extraintestinal Organ Axes and Later-Life Effects on Human Health

The gut microbiota plays a key role in many physiological processes essential for maintaining homeostasis. These processes include the digestion and absorption of nutrients, the development and regulation of the immune system, and even the modulation of distant organs. Thus, the gut influences host health through complex bidirectional communication networks known as the gut–extraintestinal organ axes. These intricate pathways involve numerous mechanisms and signaling molecules that link the gut to vital organs such as the brain, liver, kidneys, lungs, and heart. Understanding these networks is crucial for a comprehensive appreciation of the gut microbiota’s impact on general health and various diseases [122,123]. The early-life period is essential for properly developing these gut–organ axes. The “Developmental Origins of Health and Disease” hypothesis, which evolved from epidemiological studies of infant and adult mortality, highlights the importance of early environmental exposures in shaping long-term disease susceptibility [124]. The gut microbiota is increasingly recognized as a pivotal mediator within this framework [101].
The first years of life play a major role in the development of the gut microbiota and the gut–organ networks through dietary and environmental factors [125,126]. Disruptions during this critical period, such as antibiotic administration or suboptimal nutrition, can lead to dysbiosis, which is defined as imbalances in the gut microbial community. Figure 4 illustrates the bidirectional networks between the gut and extraintestinal organs and their early environmental factors.

4.1. The Gut–Brain Axis and Later-Life Neurological Health

The gut–brain axis, which integrates the GI tract and the central nervous system (CNS), is a prime example of these intricate bidirectional communication systems. This network facilitates a continuous exchange of information between the brain and the gut, influencing several physiological and behavioral processes crucial for maintaining homeostasis [122]. The gut microbiota modulates this axis, impacting brain development, behavior, and neural functions [123].
Several interconnected pathways, such as neural, endocrine, immune, or metabolic pathways, facilitate communication within the gut–brain axis. Neural pathways, mainly via the vagus nerve, serve as bidirectional routes for transmitting signals between the gut and the brain, modulating brain activity and bodily functions [123]. The enteric nervous system (ENS) is a complex network of neurons found in the gut wall that communicates with the CNS, modulating motility, secretion, and other functions [127]. Endocrine pathways involve the secretion of numerous gut hormones, such as glucagon-like peptide (GLP1) and peptide YY, which enter the bloodstream and exert effects on brain regions involved in functions such as appetite, mood, and cognition [123].
Another key communication pathway between the brain and the gut is represented by the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, a central component of the body’s stress response system [128]. Immune pathways are also extensively involved, and the gut microbiota plays a key role in developing and regulating the host’s immune system. Dysbiosis can trigger the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and other immune mediators that can cross the blood–brain barrier or influence its permeability [129]. This can lead to neuroinflammation, which plays a major role in several neurological disorders [130].
Metabolic pathways are also critical, with microbial metabolites, particularly SCFAs produced through the fermentation of dietary fibers by gut bacteria, acting as key signaling molecules along the gut–brain axis, influencing the immune system, epigenetics, and neuroplasticity in the CNS [131]. Imbalances in the tryptophan metabolism via the serotonergic and kynurenine pathways have been linked to several CNS pathologies, such as dementia, Huntigton’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [132]. Dysregulations in this pathway can lead to imbalances between neurotoxic and neuroprotective factors, potentially contributing to neurodegeneration [132,133]. Furthermore, the gut microbiota has the remarkable ability to produce a variety of neuroactive substances, including neurotransmitters such as serotonin, dopamine, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which can directly or indirectly influence brain function and behavior [130]. Notably, this communication is inherently bidirectional, with the brain also exerting significant control over gut physiology, including motility, secretion, and immune responses, which can profoundly influence the composition and functional activity of the gut microbiota.
Emerging research has established a relationship between alterations in the early-life gut microbiota and the development of several neurodevelopmental disorders, including Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [101]. Numerous studies have observed differences in the gut microbiota populations of children with ASD compared to neurotypical children, including differences in the abundance of bacterial genera such as Bacteroides, Clostridium, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium [101]. In addition, preclinical studies have suggested that targeted interventions aimed at modulating the gut microbiota, such as administering Limosilactobacillus reuteri probiotics, may improve social behavior in children diagnosed with ASD. Moreover, several studies have demonstrated that the administration of multispecies probiotics during pregnancy can have beneficial effects on the neurodevelopment of children [101].
Similarly, the early-life gut microbiota has been increasingly implicated in the etiology and progression of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) [128]. Research has demonstrated that alterations in the infant gut microbiota composition, including a reduction in phylogenetic diversity and specific changes in the abundance of bacterial taxa belonging to the order Lactobacillalus and the genus Bifidobacterium, are associated with the subsequent development of ADHD [134]. In addition, other studies have shown that the microbiota of ADHD patients is characterized by decreased diversity and bacterial richness [135,136]. The genera dominating the gut microbiota population of subjects with ADHD are represented by Agathobacter, Akkermansia, Anaerostipes, Bifidobacterium, Blautia, Collinsella, Dorea, Eggerthella, Escherichia/Shigella, Fusobacterium, Intestinibacter, Megamonas, Neisseria, Odoribacter, Phascolarctobacterium, and Roseburia according to one review paper [135]. Moreover, a randomized controlled trial involving the supplementation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG during the first six months of life reported a complete absence of ADHD diagnoses in the probiotic-treated group by the age of 13 years, suggesting a potential protective role for early probiotic intervention [137].
In addition, alterations in the early-life gut microbiota have also been observed in association with other neurodevelopmental disorders, including Tourette Syndrome, Cerebral Palsy, and Rett Syndrome [135]. For instance, patients suffering from Rett Syndrome often exhibit altered gastrointestinal homeostasis and specific changes in the abundance of bacterial genera such as Actinomyces, Bifidobacterium, and Clostridium [138].
Recent research also suggests a potential link between early gut health and neurodegenerative diseases in adults, such as AD and Parkinson’s disease (PD) [139,140]. Although longitudinal studies are lacking, cross-sectional studies and animal studies have shown that there is a relationship between dysbiosis and neurodegenerative diseases [101]. Disruptions in the gut microbiota in early life lead to low-grade inflammation and altered production of neuroactive metabolites, which may contribute to an increased vulnerability of the brain to age-related neurodegenerative processes [101]. The gut–brain axis is believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of both AD and PD, with alterations in the gut microbiota potentially influencing neuroinflammation, the accumulation of amyloidogenic proteins in AD, and the misfolding of α-synuclein in PD, via increased trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) levels [141]. The concept of “inflammaging,” a state of chronic, low-grade inflammation associated with aging, may provide a mechanistic link between early gut microbial imbalances and the later development of neurodegenerative conditions [142].
Recent research has begun to elucidate how the gut microbiota and metabolome influence early neurodevelopmental processes. Animal studies have demonstrated that the hippocampal development is greater in germ-free mice. The transfer of gut microbes from conventional mice did not affect the process, suggesting that the gut microbiota influences neurogenesis from an early stage. In addition, researchers have demonstrated that the administration of specific microbial strains can counteract deficient neurogenesis [143].

4.2. The Gut–Liver Axis and Long-Term Metabolic Health

The gut–liver axis represents an important bidirectional communication pathway that involves the gut microbiota, the intestinal barrier, the portal vein, and the liver. The early-life microbiota highly influences the liver’s development and function. Gut microbes and their diverse array of metabolites are transported directly to the liver via the portal vein, which influences hepatic lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, and immune responses within the liver [144].
Structural and functional differences in the neonatal gut barrier influence gut–liver interactions and may shape long-term immune and metabolic health. For example, in full-term infants, the small intestinal epithelium is already organized into crypts and villi, unlike in mammals such as mice, where this structure forms after birth. Neonates also show increased macromolecular uptake, facilitated by mechanisms like FcRn-mediated IgG transport and immature tight junctions, which support early immune development but decline after weaning [145].
The gut–liver axis is influenced by early-life environmental exposures, including nutrition, pollutants, and microbiota composition, which can epigenetically reprogram this bidirectional pathway, with lasting effects on metabolic health. Since the gut, liver, and immune system are still maturing during early life, this period is especially sensitive to environmental influences that can shape long-term health. One example is neonatal exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ether-99 (BDE-99), a persistent flame retardant commonly detected in breast milk. Studies on rodents have shown that early-life exposure to BDE-99 alters hepatic gene expression patterns, particularly those involved in lipid metabolism and inflammatory signaling, ultimately promoting a pro-inflammatory metabolic phenotype in male adults, via increased intestinal levels of Akkermansia muciniphila and its metabolites acetate and succinate [146]. This demonstrates that harmful environmental chemicals can modulate the liver metabolism, possibly by affecting gut bacteria, how the gut lining works, or how signals travel between the gut and liver.
The gut microbiota composition is highly influenced by maternal nutrition during pregnancy and by the delivery mode [147]. Moreover, early microbial communities regulate host energy storage and bile acid metabolism, both main components of the gut–liver axis. For instance, a 2015 study by Bäckhed et al. that evaluated the fecal samples from a cohort of 98 Swedish infants and their mothers using metagenomic analysis demonstrated that germ-free mice colonized with gut microbiota showed increased fat storage and altered bile acid profiles, highlighting how microbial signals can direct metabolic outcomes [51]. Recent studies have also linked gut dysbiosis associated with maternal obesity during early life to increased intestinal permeability and the initiation of pathological pathways that can lead to the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [148]. Importantly, the liver also contributes to gut homeostasis, completing the bidirectional nature of this axis. Bile acids synthesized in the liver are secreted into the intestine, where they aid in lipid absorption and shape the composition and function of the gut microbiota by acting as signaling molecules through receptors such as FXR and TGR5. Additionally, hepatically derived immune mediators and metabolic products can influence intestinal epithelial integrity and immune responses, thereby maintaining gut barrier function and microbial balance [149]. Altogether, these early-life influences on the gut–liver connection can shape how the immune system develops and increases the risk of health problems later on, including obesity, fatty liver disease, and type 2 diabetes. Establishing a healthy gut microbiota in early life is likely crucial for proper liver development and long-term metabolic health [148].

4.3. The Gut–Kidney Axis and Long-Term Renal Health

The gut–kidney axis represents a bidirectional communication pathway between the gastrointestinal tract and the kidneys, primarily mediated by the gut microbiota and metabolites. This intricate interplay is crucial for maintaining homeostasis and has gained attention for its role in the pathogenesis of kidney diseases, including chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury [150]. As observed in the other bidirectional axes between the gut microbiota and vital organs, early-life factors such as mother nutrition during pregnancy, delivery mode, breastfeeding, antibiotic exposure, and environmental factors highly influence gut microbiota development and thus the gut–kidney axis [151]. Disruptions during early life can lead to dysbiosis and predispose individuals to kidney dysfunction later in life [152]. Some of the main modulators of gut health are SCFAs, metabolites produced via the metabolization of fiber products, which play a major role in maintaining gut barrier integrity and function and play a protective role in modulating immune responses [152]. Dysbiosis can compromise intestinal barrier integrity and lead to increased gut permeability, also known as “leaky gut”. This condition allows the translocation of endotoxins such as lipopolysaccharides into the systemic circulation, triggering systemic inflammation, which can lead to kidney injury via pro-inflammatory and oxidative pathways [150]. In addition, an altered gut microbiota can produce uremic toxins like indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate, which accumulate in CKD due to reduced renal clearance, exacerbating oxidative stress and inflammation [153]. Another interaction mechanism between the gut and the kidney is represented by advanced glycation products (AGEs). AGEs, formed endogenously or through high-heat cooking and processing of foods, accumulate in CKD due to impaired clearance. By binding to RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products), AGEs trigger inflammation, oxidative stress, and fibrosis, worsening renal damage and contributing to gut permeability and vascular dysfunction. Reducing dietary AGE intake may offer a therapeutic approach to slowing CKD progression by mitigating systemic inflammation and kidney injury [150].
One recent article showed how the microbiota, via the modulation of systemic inflammation and metabolic regulation, interacts with adipose tissue, particularly brown adipose tissue, to impact kidney function. Disruptions in the gut microbiota can impair brown adipose tissue activity, reduce energy expenditure, and exacerbate glucose dysregulation, all of which contribute to diabetic kidney disease progression [154].
Conversely, kidney dysfunction can negatively impact gut homeostasis, reinforcing the bidirectional nature of this axis. In chronic kidney disease, uremia alters the intestinal environment, leading to changes in pH, an increased urea concentration in the gut lumen, and compromised epithelial barrier function. These changes promote dysbiosis, reduce beneficial SCFA-producing bacteria, and enhance the growth of pathogenic species. Additionally, systemic inflammation and accumulation of uremic toxins in CKD can disrupt intestinal tight junctions and increase gut permeability, further amplifying the cycle of gut–kidney dysfunction [155,156].
Therapeutic strategies targeting the gut–kidney axis are being explored, including prebiotics, probiotics, and dietary modifications for restoring a healthy microbiota balance. Early-life interventions, such as promoting breastfeeding and cautious use of antibiotics, may also play a role in establishing a beneficial gut microbiota, potentially reducing the risk of kidney diseases in later life [150].
In conclusion, the gut–kidney axis is a pivotal component in the development and progression of kidney diseases. Understanding its mechanisms, especially during early life, opens avenues for preventive and therapeutic strategies to preserve renal health through the modulation of the gut microbiota.

4.4. The Gut–Lung Axis and Long-Term Respiratory Health

The gut–lung axis describes the bidirectional communication pathway between the gut and the lungs, involving the gut microbiota and the pulmonary system. The lung and gut microbiotas are integral to maintaining respiratory and gastrointestinal health, respectively, and they engage in dynamic interactions through the gut–lung axis. The lung microbiota was initially thought to be sterile. However, recent research has shown that it comprises diverse microbial communities that influence pulmonary immunity and disease susceptibility [157]. Similarly, the gut microbiota plays a crucial role in immune system development and function [158]. These two microbiotas communicate bidirectionally via immune signaling pathways and microbial metabolites, such as SCFAs, which can modulate inflammatory responses in the lungs and the gut. Disruptions in either microbiota can lead to dysbiosis, contributing to the development and progression of diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and inflammatory bowel disease [159]. Understanding the interplay between the lung and gut microbiotas is essential for developing holistic approaches to preventing and treating these interconnected conditions.
The early-life gut microbiota plays a pivotal role in the development and maturation of the host’s immune system, which has profound implications for respiratory health throughout the lifespan [159]. The initial colonization of the gut, established within the first one to three years of life, plays a critical role in shaping the lung immune system and fostering immune tolerance to airborne antigens. This early period is considered a “critical window” for immune programming that can affect global health status for a lifetime, including susceptibility to respiratory diseases [160].
Dysbiosis associated with disruptions in the gut microbiota during this crucial early period has been consistently associated with an increased risk of developing various respiratory conditions [161]. For example, a systematic review of human studies found evidence that low alpha-diversity and reduced relative abundance of specific gut–commensal bacteria genera, including Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus, and Roseburia, are associated with childhood respiratory diseases such as respiratory infections, recurrent wheezing, and asthma [162]. Specifically, research has shown a correlation between low levels of intestinal Bifidobacterium microbiota during infancy and an increased susceptibility to atopy, a predisposition to allergic reactions, including asthma, later in life [163].
The mode of delivery is known to play a crucial role in the development of the gut microbiota, and it has been shown that infants born by cesarean section tend to have a higher abundance of opportunistic pathogens during the neonatal period compared to those born vaginally [54]. This disturbance in early microbiota development has been suggested to contribute to an increased risk of immune-mediated conditions like asthma and allergies later in life [164]. Beyond asthma, early-life gut dysbiosis has also been linked to other severe respiratory conditions, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung disease affecting premature babies [165]. Studies have observed lower diversity of airway microbiota and specific shifts in bacterial populations (e.g., decreased Firmicutes and Fusobacteria, increased Proteobacteria) in infants with BPD [166].
Emerging evidence also suggests lung inflammation and respiratory infections can reciprocally influence gut homeostasis. Inflammatory cytokines released during lung infections, such as influenza or pneumonia, can enter the systemic circulation and alter gut permeability, epithelial function, and microbiota composition. For example, animal studies have shown that lung inflammation reduces the expression of tight junction proteins in the gut and decreases SCFA-producing bacteria, promoting gut dysbiosis. In addition, respiratory viral infections such as SARS-CoV2 have been associated with gastrointestinal symptoms and gut microbiota alterations, highlighting how pulmonary immune responses can extend their impact to the intestinal environment [167,168,169].
Given the profound impact of early-life gut microbiota on respiratory health, interventions aimed at modulating the gut microbiota, such as the administration of probiotics, are being explored as potential strategies to prevent or mitigate these conditions. Probiotics, particularly species from the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium genera, are recognized for their role in restoring microbial balance and have shown promise in maintaining the balance of microorganisms in the respiratory tract, suggesting a potential therapeutic avenue through the gut–lung axis [166,170].

4.5. The Gut–Heart Axis and Long-Term Cardiovascular Health

Mounting research suggests that our cardiovascular health may begin in the gut. The heart and gastrointestinal tract are connected through a dynamic network of microbial, immune, and metabolic signals, known as the gut–heart axis. This intricate network begins developing early in life, as the gut microbiota takes shape during the first months after birth. As previously observed, the microbial communities that establish during infancy not only are influenced by factors like birth mode, early feeding practices, and antibiotic exposure, but also leave lasting marks on host metabolism and immune regulation. When imbalances occur during critical developmental periods, it may set the stage for inflammation, metabolic dysfunction, and increased cardiovascular risk later in life [171,172].
Recent advances in metagenomics and metabolomics analysis have enabled researchers to identify specific gut microbiota profiles and microbial-derived metabolites that contribute to the development of various cardiovascular diseases [172,173]. In particular, shifts in the gut microbiota composition, such as an altered Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio, have been consistently associated with metabolic disturbances contributing to cardiovascular disease. Increased levels of Firmicutes have been linked to increased nutrient uptake and low-grade inflammation, while a reduction in Bacteroidetes can disrupt the production of beneficial microbial metabolites [174]. This imbalance affects key compounds like SCFAs, which normally help regulate blood pressure, vascular tone, and immune responses. At the same time, the microbial conversion of dietary nutrients like choline and L-carnitine into TMAO has emerged as a critical pro-atherogenic pathway, with higher TMAO levels being predictive of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in both animal models and humans [175,176]. These metabolic shifts, driven by early-life microbial development, underscore the gut microbiota’s role as a key determinant in long-term cardiovascular health. Elevated TMAO levels are linked to increased platelet reactivity, vascular inflammation, and atherosclerotic plaque development [177,178]. Bacteria such as Clostridium spp. and Escherichia spp. are known TMA producers and have been associated with detrimental cardiovascular outcomes [179]. Conversely, certain microbial taxa have protective cardiovascular effects. For example, bacteria that produce SCFAs, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia spp., and Akkermansia muciniphila, have been associated with anti-inflammatory effects, improved endothelial function, and lower blood pressure [180,181,182]. SCFAs maintain gut barrier integrity and modulate systemic immunity and metabolic signaling, offering protection against cardiovascular diseases, such as hypertension and atherosclerosis [178,183]. Research has shown that increased dietary fiber intake, especially early in life, fosters these SCFA-producing bacteria and is linked to lower long-term cardiovascular risk [182].
Animal studies have helped clarify causal relationships. For example, germ-free mice colonized with microbiota from hypertensive human donors develop higher blood pressure themselves, directly linking microbial composition to disease traits [184]. Similarly, microbiota from individuals with atherosclerosis have been shown to increase plaque development in animal models [185]. These findings are now being mirrored in human cohort studies, such as the Framingham Heart Study, which identified microbial pathways involving the Oscillobacter genus, which plays a major role in cholesterol metabolism and is associated with heart disease [186].
Early life significantly impacts the development of these microbial patterns, which early interventions can shape. Breastfeeding, for example, promotes the growth of Bifidobacteria, which have anti-inflammatory properties and support mucosal immunity. On the other hand, early-life antibiotic exposure or formula feeding may favor the development of pro-inflammatory microbes, setting the stage for metabolic and cardiovascular dysfunction later in life [179]. Thus, the gut–heart axis represents a promising frontier for understanding and potentially preventing cardiovascular disease. A balanced, fiber-rich diet starting early in life and strategies to support a healthy microbiota may help reduce lifetime cardiovascular risk. Continued research is needed to understand fully how gut microbes and their metabolites interact with the cardiovascular system over a lifespan.

5. Modulating Gut Microbiota During Perinatal Life

The child’s microbiota develops and matures throughout the perinatal period, significantly influencing the newborn’s future health. Variables including the mode of delivery, maternal nutrition, antibiotic exposure, and infant feeding practices significantly influence the composition and diversity of the newborn gut microbiota. The first microbial communities significantly influence infants’ immune systems, metabolism, and neurodevelopment.
During pregnancy, the mother’s microbiota alters in a variety of ways. These changes are being made to accommodate and sustain the developing baby while preparing the body for birthing. The first findings of the research suggest that a microbiota adaptation transpires during pregnancy, marked by an augmentation in bacterial diversity [187,188].
Because each bacterium in the microbiota has a distinct role in maintaining health and equilibrium, the variety of the microbiota is critical to its functioning. The gut microbiota is dynamic; it evolves during a person’s lifespan, starting at birth and continuing throughout their whole life [189,190].
The microbiota that lives in the gut is very important to human health because it has a substantial impact on the maturation of the immune system, metabolic programming, the formation of the intestinal barrier, brain development, and long-term health effects [122,123,191,192,193].
The enormous and complex ecosystem of the human abdominal cavity may include a basic collection of microbial species known as the native core microbiota. This collection of microbes is expected to be found inside the human abdominal cavity [194]. This essential assemblage of bacteria begins to inhabit the gut at a young age, establishing the foundation for an individual’s microbiota composition [194].
Recent studies challenge the notion of a universal “core microbiota” shared equally among all humans. While certain bacterial taxa—such as Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes—are commonly found across populations, their relative abundances vary widely, and many species are unique to individuals depending on their diet, lifestyle, and genetics [195,196,197,198]. Longitudinal analyses show that even within a single person, gut microbial composition fluctuates over time (intra-individual variation, ~20–40%), though this is substantially smaller than the differences observed between different individuals (inter-individual variation, ~75%) [199]. Genetic factors, including human gene variants such as ABO or FUT2, further shape microbiota composition in specific taxa like Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Therefore, rather than a one-size-fits-all core microbiota, each person harbors a dynamic and personalized microbial signature, influenced by environment, diet, and host biology [198,200].
Immunological and metabolic programming occur during the perinatal period, when the native core microbiota plays a pivotal role. Ten thousand nine hundred thirty-five shotgun metagenomic datasets were analyzed using taxonomical and functional classifications to investigate microbial diversity over the first three years of human life. The distribution of microbiological species in infants is regulated by variables like their health status and area of origin. Among the eight main Infant Community State Types, 17 bacterial species were predominant [201].
A variety of variables impact the formation of the core microbiota in neonates, most notably the mother’s microbiota, the delivery process, and the nourishment provided to the newborn [201,202].
Full-term newborns generally exhibit greater gut microbiota diversity than preterm infants, which underscores the strong influence of birth conditions such as gestational age, the mode of delivery, and early-life exposures. For instance, in a 2019 study by Fouhy et al. that sequenced DNA from fecal samples of 159 children over the first four years, the authors demonstrated that gestational age significantly impacts microbiota composition up to four years of age, with term-born infants showing more stable, diverse microbial communities compared to their preterm counterparts [202]. While interventions like breastfeeding and minimizing antibiotic use confer clear early benefits—including promoting beneficial taxa such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus—emerging evidence suggests that well-timed dietary and probiotic interventions may have an even greater long-term impact. For example, corrections applied in infancy via probiotic supplementation during antibiotic exposure or following caesarean birth helped reshape microbial composition toward patterns seen in healthy term infants [203,204,205,206,207]. Moreover, the core microbiota influences metabolic programming, potentially modifying an individual’s susceptibility to metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes in later life. The microbiota influences energy balance and metabolic processes throughout time [208].
When it comes to the establishment of the native core microbiota, the perinatal period is marked by greater vulnerability, and any disruptions that occur during this phase have the potential to yield long-term health implications [209,210,211].
The mode of administration has a considerable impact on the microbiota of the newborn gut. Techniques such as maternal vaginal seeding have lately been investigated as potential means of mitigating the impact of this effect. The administration of mother vaginal fluids to neonates who were delivered by the cesarean section is known as maternal vaginal seeding. This technique can resolve the disparities in the development of microbiota that exist between infants who were born vaginally and those who were born after cesarean delivery was performed [212,213,214,215].
Taking extra probiotics while pregnant has been shown to help the mother’s vaginal bacteria. It was clear that this action greatly reduced the number of dangerous germs, creating a better microbiota for the baby. Still, there is not much proof that this action changes the variety of microbiotas in newborns or sets up long-term infection [216,217,218,219,220].
The microbiota of formula-fed infants may resemble that of older infants in composition; however, it may lack the beneficial bacteria present in breast milk [221,222].
The absence of HMOs and other bioactive chemicals in formula may lead to a unique pattern of microbial colonization and metabolic activity in the gastrointestinal system [223]. HMOs are one of the most important prebiotics for keeping an infant’s gut bacteria healthy. By adding these oligosaccharides to baby formula, the benefits of breast milk have been copied [224,225].
The baby’s immune system and metabolic setting could be affected by changes in microbial contact and the lack of biological protection from breast milk. To make up for the difference between breast milk and formula, enriched formulas with HMOs, probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics have been made. The goal is to replicate the gut bacteria of nursing children and support strong immune development [223,226,227,228].
The delivery process significantly impacts the baby’s microbiota’s first colonization. There are significant variations between vaginal births and cesarean deliveries (C-sections). During vaginal birth, the baby may be exposed to microbiota from the mother’s vagina and feces. This encourages introducing beneficial bacteria, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species, into the infant’s digestive tract [212,229,230].
The growing body of research sheds insight into the potential for targeted therapeutics to improve microbiota development. These therapies might include dietary modifications, probiotic and prebiotic supplements, and innovative approaches.

6. Future Considerations Regarding Intestinal-Microbiota-Based Therapeutic Methods in Pediatric Disease

The burgeoning field of microbiota-based therapies offers promising avenues for addressing pediatric diseases associated with gut dysbiosis. Recent research highlights the potential of probiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, and intestinal microbiota transplantation (IMT)—formerly known as FMT—in modulating the gut microbiota to improve health outcomes in children [231,232]. Figure 5 summarizes emerging microbiota-based therapies used to prevent and manage pediatric diseases linked to gut dysbiosis.
Probiotics have demonstrated efficacy in managing various gastrointestinal conditions in children. A narrative review including 39 studies (25 single-strain and 14 multi-strain) found that both formulations effectively treated disorders such as NEC, acute gastroenteritis, and ulcerative colitis in pediatric patients under 18. Multi-strain probiotics showed consistently positive outcomes, with a low incidence of adverse effects for both types. These findings highlight the need for further studies to determine the optimal strains and dosages for specific conditions and age groups, ultimately integrating probiotics into clinical practice to reduce the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal disorders [233]. In gastrointestinal tract infections (GITIs), a systematic review and meta-analysis reported that probiotic supplementation reduced the risk of GITI episodes by 26% among children attending childcare centers. Specific strains, such as Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, were particularly effective, while the effects of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. Lactis BB-12 require further study [233,234].
Meta-analyses assessing the impact of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on pediatric atopic dermatitis have shown mixed results. Some studies demonstrated beneficial effects, while others did not find significant differences [235,236,237,238]. However, a more recent umbrella meta-analysis that included 38 meta-analyses concluded that specific strains of pre-, pro-, and synbiotics could significantly reduce the incidence and severity of atopic dermatitis (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.70–0.79). Multi-strain probiotics, Lactobacillus species, and synbiotic formulations showed the greatest efficacy in reducing SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) indices, whereas Bifidobacterium and prebiotics alone did not yield significant improvements [239].
The gut–lung axis is increasingly recognized in the pathogenesis of asthma. An expanding body of research is mapping the normal composition and influencing factors of lung and gut microbiota across developmental stages better to understand their roles in asthma phenotypes and endotypes [240]. A systematic review of 18 randomized controlled trials found that probiotics—particularly strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium—reduced asthma exacerbations and improved pulmonary function in children. Synbiotics decreased the incidence of viral respiratory infections and healthcare utilization, while postbiotics (including bacterial lysates) were shown to attenuate airway hyperresponsiveness and systemic inflammation [231,241,242,243,244]. The proposed mechanisms include immune modulation and the suppression of Th2 cytokines [245,246]. Despite these findings, the effects of prebiotics on pediatric asthma remain under-investigated and warrant further study [231].
FMT has emerged as a potential therapy for pediatric Crohn’s disease. In a prospective trial involving 33 children with active Crohn’s disease, those treated with IMT capsules combined with partial enteral nutrition showed improved clinical outcomes and restored gut microbiota diversity compared to those receiving partial enteral nutrition with immunosuppressants. Post-treatment analysis revealed increased levels of beneficial genera such as Agathobacter, Akkermansia, Roseburia, Blautia, Subdoligranulum, and Faecalibacterium, along with elevated interleukin-10 (IL-10), an anti-inflammatory marker. These microbial changes may serve as future biomarkers for disease identification and monitoring [247].
An innovative therapeutic approach involves using genetically engineered commensal bacteria to deliver therapeutic agents directly to the gastrointestinal tract, a method known as microbial drug delivery. This strategy has shown promise in treating IBD by enabling localized production of anti-inflammatory molecules, thereby reducing systemic side effects [248]. For instance, Lactococcus lactis has been engineered to secrete interleukin-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine. In murine models, oral administration of interleukin-10-producing L. lactis led to a significant reduction in colitis symptoms, demonstrating the potential of this approach for localized therapy [249].
In the case of T1DM, the interplay between gut microbiota and metabolic regulation is becoming increasingly evident. While standard treatment involves insulin therapy, the role of microbiota-based interventions is being explored. A systematic review and meta-analysis involving 388 pediatric and adolescent patients found no statistically significant improvement in glycemic control following probiotic supplementation. A trend toward worsened glycemic outcomes was observed, underscoring the need for better-designed studies with extended follow-up and appropriate strain selection [250]. However, a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study by Kumar et al. involving 90 newly diagnosed T1DM children showed that a multi-strain probiotic significantly decreased HbA1c levels and insulin requirements over a 3-month period [251]. In contrast, another randomized controlled trial by Groele et al. found that supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 did not preserve residual beta-cell function in children newly diagnosed with T1DM [252].
Integrating microbiota-based therapies into pediatric healthcare holds significant promise for preventing and managing a wide range of dysbiosis-related diseases. Ongoing research is essential to determine optimal microbial strains, dosages, and treatment durations, as well as to elucidate the long-term implications of such interventions. Collaborative efforts between researchers, clinicians, and regulatory agencies will be crucial in translating these findings into safe, effective, and widely accessible clinical practices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.F.R.M., M.M. and S.M.C.; methodology, I.M. and R.-M.E.; software, O.A.P.; validation, M.M., S.M.C. and L.A.P.; formal analysis, R.-M.E.; investigation, L.A.P.; resources, O.A.P.; data curation, S.M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, G.F.R.M. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, R.-M.E.; visualization, I.M.; supervision, S.M.C.; project administration, G.F.R.M. and I.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADAlzheimer’s disease
ADHDAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
AGEsadvanced glycation products
ASDautism spectrum disorder
BMIbody mass index
BPDbronchopulmonary dysplasia
CKDchronic kidney disease
CNScentral nervous system
ENSenteric nervous system
FISHfluorescent in situ hybridization
FMTfecal microbiota transplantation
GABAgamma-aminobutyric acid
GDMgestational diabetes mellitus
GLP1glucagon-like peptide
GWGgestational weight gain
HMOshuman milk oligosaccharides
IBDinflammatory bowel disease
IMTintestinal microbiota transplantation
NECnecrotizing enterocolitis
PDParkinson’s disease
RAGEreceptor for advanced glycation end products
SCFAsshort-chain fatty acids
T1DMtype 1 diabetes mellitus
TMAOtrimethylamine N-oxide

References

  1. Lv, H.; Zhang, L.; Han, Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, B. The Development of Early Life Microbiota in Human Health and Disease. Engineering 2022, 12, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, B.; Yao, M.; Lv, L.; Ling, Z.; Li, L. The Human Microbiota in Health and Disease. Engineering 2017, 3, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Milani, C.; Duranti, S.; Bottacini, F.; Casey, E.; Turroni, F.; Mahony, J.; Belzer, C.; Palacio, S.D.; Montes, S.A.; Mancabelli, L.; et al. The First Microbial Colonizers of the Human Gut: Composition, Activities, and Health Implications of the Infant Gut Microbiota. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017, 81, e00036-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhu, D.; Xiao, S.; Yu, J.; Ai, Q.; He, Y.; Cheng, C.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, Y. Effects of One-Week Empirical Antibiotic Therapy on the Early Development of Gut Microbiota and Metabolites in Preterm Infants. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dugas, L.R.; Lie, L.; Plange-Rhule, J.; Bedu-Addo, K.; Bovet, P.; Lambert, E.V.; Forrester, T.E.; Luke, A.; Gilbert, J.A.; Layden, B.T. Gut microbiota, short chain fatty acids, and obesity across the epidemiologic transition: The METS-Microbiome study protocol. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dzidic, M.; Abrahamsson, T.R.; Artacho, A.; Collado, M.C.; Mira, A.; Jenmalm, M.C. Oral microbiota maturation during the first 7 years of life in relation to allergy development. Allergy 2018, 73, 2000–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Martínez-González, A.E.; Andreo-Martínez, P. The Role of Gut Microbiota in Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Children with ASD. Medicina 2019, 55, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hirata, Y.; Ihara, S.; Koike, K. Targeting the complex interactions between microbiota, host epithelial and immune cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 113, 574–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yassour, M.; Vatanen, T.; Siljander, H.; Hämäläinen, A.-M.; Härkönen, T.; Ryhänen, S.J.; Franzosa, E.A.; Vlamakis, H.; Huttenhower, C.; Gevers, D.; et al. Natural history of the infant gut microbiome and impact of antibiotic treatment on bacterial strain diversity and stability. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 343ra381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kostic, A.D.; Gevers, D.; Siljander, H.; Vatanen, T.; Hyötyläinen, T.; Hämäläinen, A.-M.; Peet, A.; Tillmann, V.; Pöhö, P.; Mattila, I.; et al. The Dynamics of the Human Infant Gut Microbiome in Development and in Progression toward Type 1 Diabetes. Cell. Host. Microbe. 2015, 17, 260–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bergström, A.; Skov, T.H.; Bahl, M.I.; Roager, H.M.; Christensen, L.B.; Ejlerskov, K.T.; Mølgaard, C.; Michaelsen, K.F.; Licht, T.R. Establishment of Intestinal Microbiota during Early Life: A Longitudinal, Explorative Study of a Large Cohort of Danish Infants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 2889–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stewart, C.J.; Ajami, N.J.; O’Brien, J.L.; Hutchinson, D.S.; Smith, D.P.; Wong, M.C.; Ross, M.C.; Lloyd, R.E.; Doddapaneni, H.; Metcalf, G.A.; et al. Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study. Nature 2018, 562, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yatsunenko, T.; Rey, F.E.; Manary, M.J.; Trehan, I.; Dominguez-Bello, M.G.; Contreras, M.; Magris, M.; Hidalgo, G.; Baldassano, R.N.; Anokhin, A.P.; et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 2012, 486, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ringel-Kulka, T.; Cheng, J.; Ringel, Y.; Salojärvi, J.; Carroll, I.; Palva, A.; de Vos, W.M.; Satokari, R. Intestinal Microbiota in Healthy U.S. Young Children and Adults—A High Throughput Microarray Analysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhuang, L.; Chen, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhuang, J.; Li, Q.; Feng, Z. Intestinal Microbiota in Early Life and Its Implications on Childhood Health. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2019, 17, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martin, R.; Makino, H.; Cetinyurek Yavuz, A.; Ben-Amor, K.; Roelofs, M.; Ishikawa, E.; Kubota, H.; Swinkels, S.; Sakai, T.; Oishi, K.; et al. Early-Life Events, Including Mode of Delivery and Type of Feeding, Siblings and Gender, Shape the Developing Gut Microbiota. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fallani, M.; Amarri, S.; Uusijarvi, A.; Adam, R.; Khanna, S.; Aguilera, M.; Gil, A.; Vieites, J.M.; Norin, E.; Young, D.; et al. Determinants of the human infant intestinal microbiota after the introduction of first complementary foods in infant samples from five European centres. Microbiology 2011, 157, 1385–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fallani, M.; Young, D.; Scott, J.; Norin, E.; Amarri, S.; Adam, R.; Aguilera, M.; Khanna, S.; Gil, A.; Edwards, C.A.; et al. Intestinal microbiota of 6-week-old infants across Europe: Geographic influence beyond delivery mode, breast-feeding, and antibiotics. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2010, 51, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hill, C.J.; Lynch, D.B.; Murphy, K.; Ulaszewska, M.; Jeffery, I.B.; O’Shea, C.A.; Watkins, C.; Dempsey, E.; Mattivi, F.; Tuohy, K.; et al. Evolution of gut microbiota composition from birth to 24 weeks in the INFANTMET Cohort. Microbiome 2017, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nermes, M.; Endo, A.; Aarnio, J.; Salminen, S.; Isolauri, E. Furry pets modulate gut microbiota composition in infants at risk for allergic disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 1688–1690.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Erny, D.; Hrabě de Angelis, A.L.; Jaitin, D.; Wieghofer, P.; Staszewski, O.; David, E.; Keren-Shaul, H.; Mahlakoiv, T.; Jakobshagen, K.; Buch, T.; et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 965–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Osadchiy, V.; Martin, C.R.; Mayer, E.A. The Gut–Brain Axis and the Microbiome: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Goehler, L.E.; Park, S.M.; Opitz, N.; Lyte, M.; Gaykema, R.P.A. Campylobacter jejuni infection increases anxiety-like behavior in the holeboard: Possible anatomical substrates for viscerosensory modulation of exploratory behavior. Brain Behav. Immun. 2008, 22, 354–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bilbo, S.D.; Levkoff, L.H.; Mahoney, J.H.; Watkins, L.R.; Rudy, J.W.; Maier, S.F. Neonatal infection induces memory impairments following an immune challenge in adulthood. Behav. Neurosci. 2005, 119, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ennamorati, M.; Vasudevan, C.; Clerkin, K.; Halvorsen, S.; Verma, S.; Ibrahim, S.; Prosper, S.; Porter, C.; Yeliseyev, V.; Kim, M.; et al. Intestinal microbes influence development of thymic lymphocytes in early life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 2570–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ronan, V.; Yeasin, R.; Claud, E.C. Childhood Development and the Microbiome-The Intestinal Microbiota in Maintenance of Health and Development of Disease During Childhood Development. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Young, R.P.; Hopkins, R.J.; Marsland, B. The Gut-Liver-Lung Axis. Modulation of the Innate Immune Response and Its Possible Role in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2016, 54, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jian, C.; Carpén, N.; Helve, O.; de Vos, W.M.; Korpela, K.; Salonen, A. Early-life gut microbiota and its connection to metabolic health in children: Perspective on ecological drivers and need for quantitative approach. eBioMedicine 2021, 69, 103475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Korpela, K.; Salonen, A.; Virta, L.J.; Kekkonen, R.A.; Forslund, K.; Bork, P.; de Vos, W.M. Intestinal microbiome is related to lifetime antibiotic use in Finnish pre-school children. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, M.; Huang, F.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, W.; Wang, S.; Li, M.; Han, X.; Ge, K.; Qu, C.; et al. A dysregulated bile acid-gut microbiota axis contributes to obesity susceptibility. eBioMedicine 2020, 55, 102766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Derrien, M.; Alvarez, A.S.; de Vos, W.M. The Gut Microbiota in the First Decade of Life. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 997–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhu, J.; He, M.; Li, S.; Lei, Y.; Xiang, X.; Guo, Z.; Wang, Q. Shaping oral and intestinal microbiota and the immune system during the first 1,000 days of life. Front. Pediatr. 2025, 13, 1471743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Westaway, J.A.F.; Huerlimann, R.; Kandasamy, Y.; Miller, C.M.; Norton, R.; Watson, D.; Infante-Vilamil, S.; Rudd, D. To Probiotic or Not to Probiotic: A Metagenomic Comparison of the Discharge Gut Microbiome of Infants Supplemented with Probiotics in NICU and Those Who Are Not. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 838559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Steegers-Theunissen, R.P.M.; Twigt, J.; Pestinger, V.; Sinclair, K.D. The periconceptional period, reproduction and long-term health of offspring: The importance of one-carbon metabolism. Hum. Reprod. Update 2013, 19, 640–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mor, G. Introduction to the immunology of pregnancy. Immunol. Rev. 2022, 308, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Blum, J.; Silva, M.; Byrne, S.J.; Butler, C.A.; Adams, G.G.; Reynolds, E.C.; Dashper, S.G. Temporal development of the infant oral microbiome. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 48, 730–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vandenplas, Y.; Carnielli, V.P.; Ksiazyk, J.; Luna, M.S.; Migacheva, N.; Mosselmans, J.M.; Picaud, J.C.; Possner, M.; Singhal, A.; Wabitsch, M. Factors affecting early-life intestinal microbiota development. Nutrition 2020, 78, 110812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Raspini, B.; Vacca, M.; Porri, D.; De Giuseppe, R.; Calabrese, F.M.; Chieppa, M.; Liso, M.; Cerbo, R.M.; Civardi, E.; Garofoli, F.; et al. Early Life Microbiota Colonization at Six Months of Age: A Transitional Time Point. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 590202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Choo, S.W.; Mohammed, W.K.; Mutha, N.V.R.; Rostami, N.; Ahmed, H.; Krasnogor, N.; Tan, G.Y.A.; Jakubovics, N.S. Transcriptomic Responses to Coaggregation between Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus oralis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e0155821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kaan, A.M.M.; Kahharova, D.; Zaura, E. Acquisition and establishment of the oral microbiota. Periodontology 2000 2021, 86, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nagpal, R.; Tsuji, H.; Takahashi, T.; Nomoto, K.; Kawashima, K.; Nagata, S.; Yamashiro, Y. Ontogenesis of the Gut Microbiota Composition in Healthy, Full-Term, Vaginally Born and Breast-Fed Infants over the First 3 Years of Life: A Quantitative Bird’s-Eye View. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mohajeri, M.H.; Brummer, R.J.M.; Rastall, R.A.; Weersma, R.K.; Harmsen, H.J.M.; Faas, M.; Eggersdorfer, M. The role of the microbiome for human health: From basic science to clinical applications. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ansari, A.; Bose, S.; You, Y.; Park, S.; Kim, Y. Molecular Mechanism of Microbiota Metabolites in Preterm Birth: Pathological and Therapeutic Insights. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Schoenmakers, S.; Steegers-Theunissen, R.; Faas, M. The matter of the reproductive microbiome. Obstet. Med. 2019, 12, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hoo, R.; Nakimuli, A.; Vento-Tormo, R. Innate Immune Mechanisms to Protect Against Infection at the Human Decidual-Placental Interface. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hansen, R.; Scott, K.P.; Khan, S.; Martin, J.C.; Berry, S.H.; Stevenson, M.; Okpapi, A.; Munro, M.J.; Hold, G.L. First-Pass Meconium Samples from Healthy Term Vaginally-Delivered Neonates: An Analysis of the Microbiota. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Collado, M.C.; Rautava, S.; Aakko, J.; Isolauri, E.; Salminen, S. Human gut colonisation may be initiated in utero by distinct microbial communities in the placenta and amniotic fluid. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. He, Q.; Lai-Yu, K.; Xiaoxia, X.; Zhi, Z.; Teng, M.; Haiyan, X.; Haixia, M.; Fangqing, Z.; Zhang, H. The meconium microbiota shares more features with the amniotic fluid microbiota than the maternal fecal and vaginal microbiota. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1794266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zou, Z.-H.; Liu, D.; Li, H.-D.; Zhu, D.-P.; He, Y.; Hou, T.; Yu, J.-L. Prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure influences the gut microbiota of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2018, 17, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grech, A.; Collins, C.E.; Holmes, A.; Lal, R.; Duncanson, K.; Taylor, R.; Gordon, A. Maternal exposures and the infant gut microbiome: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bäckhed, F.; Roswall, J.; Peng, Y.; Feng, Q.; Jia, H.; Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Li, Y.; Xia, Y.; Xie, H.; Zhong, H.; et al. Dynamics and Stabilization of the Human Gut Microbiome during the First Year of Life. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 17, 690–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Xiao, L.; Zhao, F. Microbial transmission, colonisation and succession: From pregnancy to infancy. Gut 2023, 72, 772–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Indrio, F.; Marchese, F. Microbiota in the first 1000 days: Effect on health and diseases. Glob. Pediatr. 2024, 8, 100162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, C.; Li, L.; Jin, B.; Xu, X.; Zuo, X.; Li, Y.; Li, Z. The Effects of Delivery Mode on the Gut Microbiota and Health: State of Art. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 724449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dierikx, T.H.; Visser, D.H.; Benninga, M.A.; van Kaam, A.H.L.C.; de Boer, N.K.H.; de Vries, R.; van Limbergen, J.; de Meij, T.G.J. The influence of prenatal and intrapartum antibiotics on intestinal microbiota colonisation in infants: A systematic review. J. Infect. 2020, 81, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pivrncova, E.; Kotaskova, I.; Thon, V. Neonatal Diet and Gut Microbiome Development After C-Section During the First Three Months After Birth: A Systematic Review. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 941549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mueller, N.; Differding, M.; Østbye, T.; Hoyo, C.; Benjamin-Neelon, S. Association of birth mode of delivery with infant faecal microbiota, potential pathobionts, and short chain fatty acids: A longitudinal study over the first year of life. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2021, 128, 1293–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. García-Serna, A.M.; Martín-Orozco, E.; Hernández-Caselles, T.; Morales, E. Prenatal and Perinatal Environmental Influences Shaping the Neonatal Immune System: A Focus on Asthma and Allergy Origins. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dzidic, M.; Collado, M.C.; Abrahamsson, T.; Artacho, A.; Stensson, M.; Jenmalm, M.C.; Mira, A. Oral microbiome development during childhood: An ecological succession influenced by postnatal factors and associated with tooth decay. ISME J. 2018, 12, 2292–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Damaceno, Q.S.; Gallotti, B.; Reis, I.M.M.; Totte, Y.C.P.; Assis, G.B.; Figueiredo, H.C.; Silva, T.F.; Azevedo, V.; Nicoli, J.R.; Martins, F.S. Isolation and Identification of Potential Probiotic Bacteria from Human Milk. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2023, 15, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Robertson, R.C.; Manges, A.R.; Finlay, B.B.; Prendergast, A.J. The human microbiome and child growth–first 1000 days and beyond. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Lv, W.; Wang, T.; He, S.; Zhang, W.; Tong, Y.; Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Chen, R.; Jin, W.; Ma, Y.; et al. Microbiota regulated by Shenling Baizhu powder maintains intestinal homeostasis via the gut-breast axis. Phytomedicine 2025, 139, 156528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Van den Elsen, L.J.W.; Rekima, A.; Lynn, M.A.; Isnard, C.; Machado, S.; Divakara, N.; Patalwala, D.; Middleton, A.; Stevens, N.; Servant, F.; et al. Diet at birth is critical for healthy growth, independent of effects on the gut microbiota. Microbiome 2024, 12, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Oba, P.M.; Holscher, H.D.; Mathai, R.A.; Kim, J.; Swanson, K.S. Diet Influences the Oral Microbiota of Infants during the First Six Months of Life. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bazanella, M.; Maier, T.V.; Clavel, T.; Lagkouvardos, I.; Lucio, M.; Maldonado-Gòmez, M.X.; Autran, C.; Walter, J.; Bode, L.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; et al. Randomized controlled trial on the impact of early-life intervention with bifidobacteria on the healthy infant fecal microbiota and metabolome. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 106, 1274–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Notarbartolo, V.; Carta, M.; Accomando, S.; Giuffrè, M. The First 1000 Days of Life: How Changes in the Microbiota Can Influence Food Allergy Onset in Children. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Di Costanzo, M.; De Paulis, N.; Capra, M.E.; Biasucci, G. Nutrition during Pregnancy and Lactation: Epigenetic Effects on Infants’ Immune System in Food Allergy. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Laursen, M.F. Gut Microbiota Development: Influence of Diet from Infancy to Toddlerhood. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2021, 77, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Differding, M.K.; Benjamin-Neelon, S.E.; Hoyo, C.; Østbye, T.; Mueller, N.T. Timing of complementary feeding is associated with gut microbiota diversity and composition and short chain fatty acid concentrations over the first year of life. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pannaraj, P.S.; Li, F.; Cerini, C.; Bender, J.M.; Yang, S.; Rollie, A.; Adisetiyo, H.; Zabih, S.; Lincez, P.J.; Bittinger, K.; et al. Association Between Breast Milk Bacterial Communities and Establishment and Development of the Infant Gut Microbiome. JAMA Pediatr. 2017, 171, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Molloy, J.; Allen, K.; Collier, F.; Tang, M.L.; Ward, A.C.; Vuillermin, P. The potential link between gut microbiota and IgE-mediated food allergy in early life. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 7235–7256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rey-Mariño, A.; Francino, M.P. Nutrition, Gut Microbiota, and Allergy Development in Infants. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Finlay, B.B.; Amato, K.R.; Azad, M.; Blaser, M.J.; Bosch, T.C.G.; Chu, H.; Dominguez-Bello, M.G.; Ehrlich, S.D.; Elinav, E.; Geva-Zatorsky, N.; et al. The hygiene hypothesis, the COVID pandemic, and consequences for the human microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2010217118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Su, M.; Nie, Y.; Shao, R.; Duan, S.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, M.; Xing, Z.; Sun, Q.; Liu, X.; Xu, W. Diversified gut microbiota in newborns of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Singh, P.; Elhaj, D.A.I.; Ibrahim, I.; Abdullahi, H.; Al Khodor, S. Maternal microbiota and gestational diabetes: Impact on infant health. J. Transl. Med. 2023, 21, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sokou, R.; Moschari, E.; Palioura, A.E.; Palioura, A.-P.; Mpakosi, A.; Adamakidou, T.; Vlachou, E.; Theodoraki, M.; Iacovidou, N.; Tsartsalis, A.N. The Impact of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) on the Development and Composition of the Neonatal Gut Microbiota: A Systematic Review. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Soderborg, T.K.; Carpenter, C.M.; Janssen, R.C.; Weir, T.L.; Robertson, C.E.; Ir, D.; Young, B.E.; Krebs, N.F.; Hernandez, T.L.; Barbour, L.A.; et al. Gestational Diabetes Is Uniquely Associated with Altered Early Seeding of the Infant Gut Microbiota. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 603021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ionescu, R.F.; Enache, R.M.; Cretoiu, S.M.; Gaspar, B.S. Gut Microbiome Changes in Gestational Diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Medici Dualib, P.; Ogassavara, J.; Mattar, R.; Mariko Koga da Silva, E.; Atala Dib, S.; de Almeida Pititto, B. Gut microbiota and gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A systematic review. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2021, 180, 109078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Farhat, S.; Hemmatabadi, M.; Ejtahed, H.S.; Shirzad, N.; Larijani, B. Microbiome alterations in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their offspring: A systematic review. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 1060488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, K.; Jin, J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, C.; Huang, L.; Sun, Y. Dysbiosis of infant gut microbiota is related to the altered fatty acid composition of human milk from mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study. Gut Microbes 2025, 17, 2455789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Roth-Schulze, A.J.; Penno, M.A.S.; Ngui, K.M.; Oakey, H.; Bandala-Sanchez, E.; Smith, A.D.; Allnutt, T.R.; Thomson, R.L.; Vuillermin, P.J.; Craig, M.E.; et al. Type 1 diabetes in pregnancy is associated with distinct changes in the composition and function of the gut microbiome. Microbiome 2021, 9, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Pheiffer, C.; Riedel, S.; Dias, S.; Adam, S. Gestational Diabetes and the Gut Microbiota: Fibre and Polyphenol Supplementation as a Therapeutic Strategy. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Maher, S.E.; O’Brien, E.C.; Moore, R.L.; Byrne, D.F.; Geraghty, A.A.; Saldova, R.; Murphy, E.F.; Van Sinderen, D.; Cotter, P.D.; McAuliffe, F.M. The association between the maternal diet and the maternal and infant gut microbiome: A systematic review. Br. J. Nutr. 2023, 129, 1491–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Miko, E.; Csaszar, A.; Bodis, J.; Kovacs, K. The Maternal–Fetal Gut Microbiota Axis: Physiological Changes, Dietary Influence, and Modulation Possibilities. Life 2022, 12, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lu, X.; Shi, Z.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, S. Maternal gut microbiota in the health of mothers and offspring: From the perspective of immunology. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1362784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Karur, O.; Gutvirtz, G.; Wainstock, T.; Sheiner, E. Maternal prenatal smoking and long-term gastrointestinal morbidity of the offspring: A population-based cohort analysis. Reprod. Toxicol. 2021, 103, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yeramilli, V.; Cheddadi, R.; Shah, J.; Brawner, K.; Martin, C. A Review of the Impact of Maternal Prenatal Stress on Offspring Microbiota and Metabolites. Metabolites 2023, 13, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rojas, L.; Van de Wouw, M.; Wang, Y.; Vaghef-Mehrabani, E.; Dewey, D.; Reimer, R.A.; Letourneau, N.; Campbell, T.; Arrieta, M.-C.; Giesbrecht, G.F. Long-term and trimester-specific effects of prenatal stress on the child gut microbiota. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2023, 158, 106380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jašarević, E.; Howard, C.D.; Misic, A.M.; Beiting, D.P.; Bale, T.L. Stress during pregnancy alters temporal and spatial dynamics of the maternal and offspring microbiome in a sex-specific manner. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Madany, A.M.; Hughes, H.K.; Ashwood, P. Prenatal Maternal Antibiotics Treatment Alters the Gut Microbiota and Immune Function of Post-Weaned Prepubescent Offspring. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Stinson, L.F.; Boyce, M.C.; Payne, M.S.; Keelan, J.A. The Not-so-Sterile Womb: Evidence That the Human Fetus Is Exposed to Bacteria Prior to Birth. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rackaityte, E.; Halkias, J.; Fukui, E.M.; Mendoza, V.F.; Hayzelden, C.; Crawford, E.D.; Fujimura, K.E.; Burt, T.D.; Lynch, S.V. Viable bacterial colonization is highly limited in the human intestine in utero. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. De Goffau, M.C.; Lager, S.; Sovio, U.; Gaccioli, F.; Cook, E.; Peacock, S.J.; Parkhill, J.; Charnock-Jones, D.S.; Smith, G.C.S. Human placenta has no microbiome but can contain potential pathogens. Nature 2019, 572, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Perez-Muñoz, M.E.; Arrieta, M.-C.; Ramer-Tait, A.E.; Walter, J. A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: Implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome 2017, 5, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Blaser, M.J.; Dominguez-Bello, M.G. The Human Microbiome before Birth. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 20, 558–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Xie, Z.; Chen, Z.; Chai, Y.; Yao, W.; Ma, G. Unveiling the placental bacterial microbiota: Implications for maternal and infant health. Front. Physiol. 2025, 16, 1544216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Basak, S.; Mallick, R.; Navya Sree, B.; Duttaroy, A.K. Placental Epigenome Impacts Fetal Development: Effects of Maternal Nutrients and Gut Microbiota. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Munyaka, P.M.; Khafipour, E.; Ghia, J.E. External influence of early childhood establishment of gut microbiota and subsequent health implications. Front. Pediatr. 2014, 2, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Danone Nutricia Academy. Available online: https://danonenutriciaacademy.in/prebiotics/hmocentreofexcellence/expert-article/factors-impacting-the-developing-gut-microbiota/ (accessed on 15 May 2025).
  101. Sarkar, A.; Yoo, J.Y.; Valeria Ozorio Dutra, S.; Morgan, K.H.; Groer, M. The Association between Early-Life Gut Microbiota and Long-Term Health and Diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sim, K.; Powell, E.; Cornwell, E.; Simon Kroll, J.; Shaw, A.G. Development of the gut microbiota during early life in premature and term infants. Gut Pathog. 2023, 15, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Li, F.; Hooi, S.L.; Choo, Y.M.; Teh, C.S.J.; Toh, K.Y.; Lim, L.W.Z.; Lee, Y.Q.; Chong, C.W.; Ahmad Kamar, A. Progression of gut microbiome in preterm infants during the first three months. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 12104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Korpela, K.; Blakstad, E.W.; Moltu, S.J.; Strømmen, K.; Nakstad, B.; Rønnestad, A.E.; Brække, K.; Iversen, P.O.; Drevon, C.A.; de Vos, W. Intestinal microbiota development and gestational age in preterm neonates. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chen, X.; Shi, Y. Determinants of microbial colonization in the premature gut. Mol. Med. 2023, 29, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Huang, H.; Jiang, J.; Wang, X.; Jiang, K.; Cao, H. Exposure to prescribed medication in early life and impacts on gut microbiota and disease development. eClinicalMedicine 2024, 68, 102428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Faye, A.S.; Allin, K.H.; Iversen, A.T.; Agrawal, M.; Faith, J.; Colombel, J.F.; Jess, T. Antibiotic use as a risk factor for inflammatory bowel disease across the ages: A population-based cohort study. Gut 2023, 72, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Li, S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Gu, Q.; Wu, Y.; Tao, X.; Tian, T.; Pan, G.; Chu, M. The Potential Impact of Antibiotic Exposure on the Microbiome and Human Health. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Patangia, D.V.; Anthony Ryan, C.; Dempsey, E.; Paul Ross, R.; Stanton, C. Impact of antibiotics on the human microbiome and consequences for host health. Microbiologyopen 2022, 11, e1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jeong, S. Early Life Events and Development of Gut Microbiota in Infancy. Korean J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 78, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Haahtela, T. A biodiversity hypothesis. Allergy 2019, 74, 1445–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tischer, C.; Kirjavainen, P.; Matterne, U.; Tempes, J.; Willeke, K.; Keil, T.; Apfelbacher, C.; Täubel, M. Interplay between natural environment, human microbiota and immune system: A scoping review of interventions and future perspectives towards allergy prevention. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 821, 153422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Selway, C.A.; Mills, J.G.; Weinstein, P.; Skelly, C.; Yadav, S.; Lowe, A.; Breed, M.F.; Weyrich, L.S. Transfer of environmental microbes to the skin and respiratory tract of humans after urban green space exposure. Environ. Int. 2020, 145, 106084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Azad, M.B.; Konya, T.; Maughan, H.; Guttman, D.S.; Field, C.J.; Sears, M.R.; Becker, A.B.; Scott, J.A.; Kozyrskyj, A.L. Infant gut microbiota and the hygiene hypothesis of allergic disease: Impact of household pets and siblings on microbiota composition and diversity. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2013, 9, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ma, G.; Shi, Y.; Meng, L.; Fan, H.; Tang, X.; Luo, H.; Wang, D.; Zhou, J.; Xiao, X. Factors affecting the early establishment of neonatal intestinal flora and its intervention measures. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1295111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Gao, S.; Wang, J. Maternal and infant microbiome: Next-generation indicators and targets for intergenerational health and nutrition care. Protein Cell 2023, 14, 807–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Argaw-Denboba, A.; Schmidt, T.S.B.; Di Giacomo, M.; Ranjan, B.; Devendran, S.; Mastrorilli, E.; Lloyd, C.T.; Pugliese, D.; Paribeni, V.; Dabin, J.; et al. Paternal microbiome perturbations impact offspring fitness. Nature 2024, 629, 652–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Father’s Gut Microbes Affect the Next Generation. Available online: https://www.embl.org/news/science-technology/fathers-gut-microbes-affect-the-next-generation/ (accessed on 15 May 2025).
  119. Masson, B.A.; Kiridena, P.; Lu, D.; Kleeman, E.A.; Reisinger, S.N.; Qin, W.; Davies, W.J.; Muralitharan, R.R.; Jama, H.A.; Antonacci, S.; et al. Depletion of the paternal gut microbiome alters sperm small RNAs and impacts offspring physiology and behavior in mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2025, 123, 290–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Dubois, L.; Valles-Colomer, M.; Ponsero, A.; Helve, O.; Andersson, S.; Kolho, K.L.; Asnicar, F.; Korpela, K.; Salonen, A.; Segata, N.; et al. Paternal and induced gut microbiota seeding complement mother-to-infant transmission. Cell Host Microbe 2024, 32, 1011–1024.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Infant Microbiota Also Passed Down by Father. Available online: https://www.biocodexmicrobiotainstitute.com/en/pro/infant-microbiota-also-passed-down-father (accessed on 15 May 2025).
  122. Cong, X.; Henderson, W.A.; Graf, J.; McGrath, J.M. Early Life Experience and Gut Microbiome: The Brain-Gut-Microbiota Signaling System. Adv. Neonatal Care 2015, 15, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ullah, H.; Arbab, S.; Tian, Y.; Liu, C.-q.; Chen, Y.; Qijie, L.; Khan, M.I.U.; Hassan, I.U.; Li, K. The gut microbiota–brain axis in neurological disorder. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1225875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wadhwa, P.D.; Buss, C.; Entringer, S.; Swanson, J.M. Developmental origins of health and disease: Brief history of the approach and current focus on epigenetic mechanisms. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2009, 27, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Laue, H.E.; Coker, M.O.; Madan, J.C. The Developing Microbiome from Birth to 3 Years: The Gut-Brain Axis and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 815885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ratsika, A.; Codagnone, M.C.; O’Mahony, S.; Stanton, C.; Cryan, J.F. Priming for Life: Early Life Nutrition and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Nutrients 2021, 13, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Carabotti, M.; Scirocco, A.; Maselli, M.A.; Severi, C. The gut-brain axis: Interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2015, 28, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
  128. Cryan, J.F.; O’Riordan, K.J.; Cowan, C.S.M.; Sandhu, K.V.; Bastiaanssen, T.F.S.; Boehme, M.; Codagnone, M.G.; Cussotto, S.; Fulling, C.; Golubeva, A.V.; et al. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1877–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Rutsch, A.; Kantsjö, J.B.; Ronchi, F. The Gut-Brain Axis: How Microbiota and Host Inflammasome Influence Brain Physiology and Pathology. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 604179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Nakhal, M.M.; Yassin, L.K.; Alyaqoubi, R.; Saeed, S.; Alderei, A.; Alhammadi, A.; Alshehhi, M.; Almehairbi, A.; Al Houqani, S.; BaniYas, S.; et al. The Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis and Neurological Disorders: A Comprehensive Review. Life 2024, 14, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Mayer, E.A.; Tillisch, K.; Gupta, A. Gut/brain axis and the microbiota. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 926–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Gaspar, B.S.; Profir, M.; Cretoiu, S.M. Tryptophan Metabolites and the Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis in Major Gut Disorders. In WeightLoss-A Multidisciplinary Perspective; Himmerich, H., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ruddick, J.P.; Evans, A.K.; Nutt, D.J.; Lightman, S.L.; Rook, G.A.; Lowry, C.A. Tryptophan metabolism in the central nervous system: Medical implications. Expert. Rev. Mol. Med. 2006, 8, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Aarts, E.; Ederveen, T.H.A.; Naaijen, J.; Zwiers, M.P.; Boekhorst, J.; Timmerman, H.M.; Smeekens, S.P.; Netea, M.G.; Buitelaar, J.K.; Franke, B.; et al. Gut microbiome in ADHD and its relation to neural reward anticipation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Borrego-Ruiz, A.; Borrego, J.J. Neurodevelopmental Disorders Associated with Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis in Children. Children 2024, 11, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Kumar, A.; Sivamaruthi, B.S.; Dey, S.; Kumar, Y.; Malviya, R.; Prajapati, B.G.; Chaiyasut, C. Probiotics as modulators of gut-brain axis for cognitive development. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1348297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Pärtty, A.; Kalliomäki, M.; Wacklin, P.; Salminen, S.; Isolauri, E. A possible link between early probiotic intervention and the risk of neuropsychiatric disorders later in childhood: A randomized trial. Pediatr. Res. 2015, 77, 823–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Wang, Q.; Yang, Q.; Liu, X. The microbiota–gut–brain axis and neurodevelopmental disorders. Protein Cell 2023, 14, 762–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Nagu, P.; Parashar, A.; Behl, T.; Mehta, V. Gut Microbiota Composition and Epigenetic Molecular Changes Connected to the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2021, 71, 1436–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Czarnik, W.; Fularski, P.; Gajewska, A.; Jakubowska, P.; Uszok, Z.; Młynarska, E.; Rysz, J.; Franczyk, B. The Role of Intestinal Microbiota and Diet as Modulating Factors in the Course of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases. Nutrients 2024, 16, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Caradonna, E.; Nemni, R.; Bifone, A.; Gandolfo, P.; Costantino, L.; Giordano, L.; Mormone, E.; Macula, A.; Cuomo, M.; Difruscolo, R.; et al. The Brain-Gut Axis, an Important Player in Alzheimer and Parkinson Disease: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ferrucci, L.; Fabbri, E. Inflammageing: Chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018, 15, 505–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ogbonnaya, E.S.; Clarke, G.; Shanahan, F.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F.; O’Leary, O.F. Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis Is Regulated by the Microbiome. Biol. Psychiatry 2015, 78, e7–e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Albillos, A.; De Gottardi, A.; Rescigno, M. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: Pathophysiological basis for therapy. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 558–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Pabst, O.; Hornef, M.W.; Schaap, F.G.; Cerovic, V.; Clavel, T.; Bruns, T. Gut–liver axis: Barriers and functional circuits. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 20, 447–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Lim, J.J.; Dutta, M.; Dempsey, J.L.; Lehmler, H.J.; MacDonald, J.; Bammler, T.; Walker, C.; Kavanagh, T.J.; Gu, H.; Mani, S.; et al. Neonatal Exposure to BPA, BDE-99, and PCB Produces Persistent Changes in Hepatic Transcriptome Associated with Gut Dysbiosis in Adult Mouse Livers. Toxicol. Sci. 2021, 184, 83–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Chu, D.M.; Ma, J.; Prince, A.L.; Antony, K.M.; Seferovic, M.D.; Aagaard, K.M. Maturation of the infant microbiome community structure and function across multiple body sites and in relation to mode of delivery. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 314–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Tzeng, H.-T.; Lee, W.-C. Impact of Transgenerational Nutrition on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Development: Interplay between Gut Microbiota, Epigenetics and Immunity. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Tripathi, A.; Debelius, J.; Brenner, D.A.; Karin, M.; Loomba, R.; Schnabl, B.; Knight, R. The gut–liver axis and the intersection with the microbiome. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 15, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Tsuji, K.; Uchida, N.; Nakanoh, H.; Fukushima, K.; Haraguchi, S.; Kitamura, S.; Wada, J. The Gut-Kidney Axis in Chronic Kidney Diseases. Diagnostics 2024, 15, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Stavropoulou, E.; Kantartzi, K.; Tsigalou, C.; Konstantinidis, T.; Romanidou, G.; Voidarou, C.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Focus on the Gut–Kidney Axis in Health and Disease. Front. Med. 2021, 7, 620102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Mocanu, A.; Bogos, R.A.; Lazaruc, T.I.; Trandafir, L.M.; Lupu, V.V.; Ioniuc, I.; Alecsa, M.; Ivanov, A.; Lupu, A.; Starcea, I.M. Exploring a Complex Interplay: Kidney–Gut Axis in Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Evenepoel, P.; Poesen, R.; Meijers, B. The gut–kidney axis. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2017, 32, 2005–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. He, Y.; Jia, D.; Chen, W.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; Shi, X. Discussion on the treatment of diabetic kidney disease based on the gut-fat-kidney axis. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2025, 57, 1233–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ramezani, A.; Raj, D.S. The gut microbiome, kidney disease, and targeted interventions. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 25, 657–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Vaziri, N.D.; Wong, J.; Pahl, M.; Piceno, Y.M.; Yuan, J.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Ni, Z.; Nguyen, T.-H.; Andersen, G.L. Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora. Kidney Int. 2013, 83, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Charlson, E.S.; Bittinger, K.; Haas, A.R.; Fitzgerald, A.S.; Frank, I.; Yadav, A.; Bushman, F.D.; Collman, R.G. Topographical continuity of bacterial populations in the healthy human respiratory tract. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 184, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Kamada, N.; Núñez, G. Role of the gut microbiota in the development and function of lymphoid cells. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Enaud, R.; Prevel, R.; Ciarlo, E.; Beaufils, F.; Wieërs, G.; Guery, B.; Delhaes, L. The Gut-Lung Axis in Health and Respiratory Diseases: A Place for Inter-Organ and Inter-Kingdom Crosstalks. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Suárez-Martínez, C.; Santaella-Pascual, M.; Yagüe-Guirao, G.; García-Marcos, L.; Ros, G.; Martínez-Graciá, C. The Early Appearance of Asthma and Its Relationship with Gut Microbiota: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Sun, M.; Lu, F.; Yu, D.; Wang, Y.; Chen, P.; Liu, S. Respiratory diseases and gut microbiota: Relevance, pathogenesis, and treatment. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1358597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Alcazar, C.G.; Paes, V.M.; Shao, Y.; Oesser, C.; Miltz, A.; Lawley, T.D.; Brocklehurst, P.; Rodger, A.; Field, N. The association between early-life gut microbiota and childhood respiratory diseases: A systematic review. Lancet Microbe 2022, 3, e867–e880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Valverde-Molina, J.; García-Marcos, L. Microbiome and Asthma: Microbial Dysbiosis and the Origins, Phenotypes, Persistence, and Severity of Asthma. Nutrients 2023, 15, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Sassin, A.M.; Johnson, G.J.; Goulding, A.N.; Aagaard, K.M. Crucial nuances in understanding (mis)associations between the neonatal microbiome and Cesarean delivery. Trends Mol. Med. 2022, 28, 806–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Thébaud, B.; Goss, K.N.; Laughon, M.; Whitsett, J.A.; Abman, S.H.; Steinhorn, R.H.; Aschner, J.L.; Davis, P.G.; McGrath-Morrow, S.A.; Soll, R.F.; et al. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2019, 5, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Yuksel, N.; Gelmez, B.; Yildiz-Pekoz, A. Lung Microbiota: Its Relationship to Respiratory System Diseases and Approaches for Lung-Targeted Probiotic Bacteria Delivery. Mol. Pharm. 2023, 20, 3320–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Zuo, T.; Zhang, F.; Lui, G.C.Y.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Li, A.Y.L.; Zhan, H.; Wan, Y.; Chung, A.C.K.; Cheung, C.P.; Chen, N.; et al. Alterations in Gut Microbiota of Patients With COVID-19 During Time of Hospitalization. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 944–955.E8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Groves, H.T.; Higham, S.L.; Moffatt, M.F.; Cox, M.J.; Tregoning, J.S. Respiratory Viral Infection Alters the Gut Microbiota by Inducing Inappetence. MBio 2020, 11, e03236-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Du, L.; Hou, L.; Yu, X.; Cheng, H.; Chen, J.; Zheng, Q.; Hou, J. Pattern-Recognition Receptor Agonist-Containing Immunopotentiator CVC1302 Boosts High-Affinity Long-Lasting Humoral Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 697292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Chandrasekaran, P.; Weiskirchen, S.; Weiskirchen, R. Effects of Probiotics on Gut Microbiota: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Aron-Wisnewsky, J.; Warmbrunn, M.V.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Clément, K. Metabolism and Metabolic Disorders and the Microbiome: The Intestinal Microbiota Associated with Obesity, Lipid Metabolism, and Metabolic Health-Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Strategies. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 573–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Ionescu, R.F.; Enache, R.M.; Cretoiu, S.M.; Cretoiu, D. The Interplay Between Gut Microbiota and miRNAs in Cardiovascular Diseases. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 856901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Feng, Q.; Liu, Z.; Zhong, S.; Li, R.; Xia, H.; Jie, Z.; Wen, B.; Chen, X.; Yan, W.; Fan, Y.; et al. Integrated metabolomics and metagenomics analysis of plasma and urine identified microbial metabolites associated with coronary heart disease. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Murphy, K.; O’Donovan, A.N.; Caplice, N.M.; Ross, R.P.; Stanton, C. Exploring the Gut Microbiota and Cardiovascular Disease. Metabolites 2021, 11, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wang, Z.; Klipfell, E.; Bennett, B.J.; Koeth, R.; Levison, B.S.; DuGar, B.; Feldstein, A.E.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Chung, Y.-M.; et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature 2011, 472, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Tang, W.H.; Wang, Z.; Levison, B.S.; Koeth, R.A.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Wu, Y.; Hazen, S.L. Intestinal microbial metabolism of phosphatidylcholine and cardiovascular risk. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1575–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Tang, W.H.W.; Nemet, I.; Li, X.S.; Wu, Y.; Haghikia, A.; Witkowski, M.; Koeth, R.A.; Demuth, I.; König, M.; Steinhagen-Thiessen, E.; et al. Prognostic value of gut microbe-generated metabolite phenylacetylglutamine in patients with heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2024, 26, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Cretoiu, D.; Ionescu, R.F.; Enache, R.M.; Cretoiu, S.M.; Voinea, S.C. Gut Microbiome, Functional Food, Atherosclerosis, and Vascular Calcifications-Is There a Missing Link? Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Belli, M.; Barone, L.; Longo, S.; Prandi, F.R.; Lecis, D.; Mollace, R.; Margonato, D.; Muscoli, S.; Sergi, D.; Federici, M.; et al. Gut Microbiota Composition and Cardiovascular Disease: A Potential New Therapeutic Target? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Fusco, W.; Lorenzo, M.B.; Cintoni, M.; Porcari, S.; Rinninella, E.; Kaitsas, F.; Lener, E.; Mele, M.C.; Gasbarrini, A.; Collado, M.C.; et al. Short-Chain Fatty-Acid-Producing Bacteria: Key Components of the Human Gut Microbiota. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Wilck, N.; Matus, M.G.; Kearney, S.M.; Olesen, S.W.; Forslund, K.; Bartolomaeus, H.; Haase, S.; Mähler, A.; Balogh, A.; Markó, L.; et al. Salt-responsive gut commensal modulates T(H)17 axis and disease. Nature 2017, 551, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Xu, C.; Marques, F.Z. How Dietary Fibre, Acting via the Gut Microbiome, Lowers Blood Pressure. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2022, 24, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Rivera, K.; Gonzalez, L.; Bravo, L.; Manjarres, L.; Andia, M.E. The Gut–Heart Axis: Molecular Perspectives and Implications for Myocardial Infarction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Li, J.; Zhao, F.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Tao, J.; Tian, G.; Wu, S.; Liu, W.; Cui, Q.; Geng, B.; et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of hypertension. Microbiome 2017, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Trøseid, M.; Andersen, G.; Broch, K.; Hov, J.R. The gut microbiome in coronary artery disease and heart failure: Current knowledge and future directions. EBioMedicine 2020, 52, 102649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Li, C.; Stražar, M.; Mohamed, A.M.T.; Pacheco, J.A.; Walker, R.L.; Lebar, T.; Zhao, S.; Lockart, J.; Dame, A.; Thurimella, K.; et al. Gut microbiome and metabolome profiling in Framingham heart study reveals cholesterol-metabolizing bacteria. Cell 2024, 187, 1834–1852.e1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Nuriel-Ohayon, M.; Neuman, H.; Koren, O. Microbial Changes during Pregnancy, Birth, and Infancy. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Catassi, G.; Mateo, S.G.; Occhionero, A.S.; Esposito, C.; Giorgio, V.; Aloi, M.; Gasbarrini, A.; Cammarota, G.; Ianiro, G. The importance of gut microbiome in the perinatal period. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2024, 183, 5085–5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Anwar, H.; Iftikhar, A.; Muzaffar, H.; Almatroudi, A.; Allemailem, K.S.; Navaid, S.; Saleem, S.; Khurshid, M. Biodiversity of Gut Microbiota: Impact of Various Host and Environmental Factors. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 5575245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Rinninella, E.; Raoul, P.; Cintoni, M.; Franceschi, F.; Miggiano, G.A.D.; Gasbarrini, A.; Mele, M.C. What is the Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition? A Changing Ecosystem across Age, Environment, Diet, and Diseases. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Zheng, D.; Liwinski, T.; Elinav, E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 492–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Rowland, I.; Gibson, G.; Heinken, A.; Scott, K.; Swann, J.; Thiele, I.; Tuohy, K. Gut microbiota functions: Metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Zhang, Y.J.; Li, S.; Gan, R.Y.; Zhou, T.; Xu, D.P.; Li, H.B. Impacts of gut bacteria on human health and diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 7493–7519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Neu, A.T.; Allen, E.E.; Roy, K. Defining and quantifying the core microbiome: Challenges and prospects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2104429118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Wagner Mackenzie, B.; Waite, D.W.; Taylor, M.W. Evaluating variation in human gut microbiota profiles due to DNA extraction method and inter-subject differences. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Kedia, S.; Ahuja, V. Human gut microbiome: A primer for the clinician. JGH Open 2023, 7, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Lazarevic, V.; Whiteson, K.; Hernandez, D.; François, P.; Schrenzel, J. Study of inter- and intra-individual variations in the salivary microbiota. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Olsson, L.M.; Boulund, F.; Nilsson, S.; Khan, M.T.; Gummesson, A.; Fagerberg, L.; Engstrand, L.; Perkins, R.; Uhlén, M.; Bergström, G.; et al. Dynamics of the normal gut microbiota: A longitudinal one-year population study in Sweden. Cell Host Microbe 2022, 30, 726–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Senina, A.; Markelova, M.; Khusnutdinova, D.; Siniagina, M.; Kupriyanova, O.; Synbulatova, G.; Kayumov, A.; Boulygina, E.; Grigoryeva, T. Two-Year Study on the Intra-Individual Dynamics of Gut Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids Profiles in Healthy Adults. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Zhernakova, D.V.; Wang, D.; Liu, L.; Andreu-Sánchez, S.; Zhang, Y.; Ruiz-Moreno, A.J.; Peng, H.; Plomp, N.; Del Castillo-Izquierdo, Á.; Gacesa, R.; et al. Host genetic regulation of human gut microbial structural variation. Nature 2024, 625, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Lugli, G.A.; Mancabelli, L.; Milani, C.; Fontana, F.; Tarracchini, C.; Alessandri, G.; van Sinderen, D.; Turroni, F.; Ventura, M. Comprehensive insights from composition to functional microbe-based biodiversity of the infant human gut microbiota. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2023, 9, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Fouhy, F.; Watkins, C.; Hill, C.J.; O’Shea, C.A.; Nagle, B.; Dempsey, E.M.; O’Toole, P.W.; Ross, R.P.; Ryan, C.A.; Stanton, C. Perinatal factors affect the gut microbiota up to four years after birth. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Catassi, G.; Aloi, M.; Giorgio, V.; Gasbarrini, A.; Cammarota, G.; Ianiro, G. The Role of Diet and Nutritional Interventions for the Infant Gut Microbiome. Nutrients 2024, 16, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Navarro-Tapia, E.; Sebastiani, G.; Sailer, S.; Almeida Toledano, L.; Serra-Delgado, M.; García-Algar, Ó.; Andreu-Fernández, V. Probiotic Supplementation during the Perinatal and Infant Period: Effects on gut Dysbiosis and Disease. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Westaway, J.A.F.; Huerlimann, R.; Kandasamy, Y.; Miller, C.M.; Norton, R.; Staunton, K.M.; Watson, D.; Rudd, D. The bacterial gut microbiome of probiotic-treated very-preterm infants: Changes from admission to discharge. Pediatr. Res. 2022, 92, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Buffet-Bataillon, S.; Bellanger, A.; Boudry, G.; Gangneux, J.-P.; Yverneau, M.; Beuchée, A.; Blat, S.; Le Huërou-Luron, I. New Insights Into Microbiota Modulation-Based Nutritional Interventions for Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 676622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Arboleya, S.; Sánchez, B.; Solís, G.; Fernández, N.; Suárez, M.; Hernández-Barranco, A.M.; Milani, C.; Margolles, A.; De los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Ventura, M.; et al. Impact of Prematurity and Perinatal Antibiotics on the Developing Intestinal Microbiota: A Functional Inference Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Enav, H.; Bäckhed, F.; Ley, R.E. The developing infant gut microbiome: A strain-level view. Cell Host Microbe 2022, 30, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Paglia, L. From native core micriobiome to milk-oriented microbiome. Eur. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2021, 22, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Yao, Y.; Cai, X.; Ye, Y.; Wang, F.; Chen, F.; Zheng, C. The Role of Microbiota in Infant Health: From Early Life to Adulthood. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 708472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Di Vincenzo, F.; Del Gaudio, A.; Petito, V.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Scaldaferri, F. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: A narrative review. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2024, 19, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Korpela, K. Impact of Delivery Mode on Infant Gut Microbiota. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2021, 77, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Akagawa, S.; Tsuji, S.; Onuma, C.; Akagawa, Y.; Yamaguchi, T.; Yamagishi, M.; Yamanouchi, S.; Kimata, T.; Sekiya, S.I.; Ohashi, A.; et al. Effect of Delivery Mode and Nutrition on Gut Microbiota in Neonates. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2019, 74, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Mueller, N.T.; Differding, M.K.; Sun, H.; Wang, J.; Levy, S.; Deopujari, V.; Appel, L.J.; Blaser, M.J.; Kundu, T.; Shah, A.A.; et al. Maternal Bacterial Engraftment in Multiple Body Sites of Cesarean Section Born Neonates after Vaginal Seeding-a Randomized Controlled Trial. MBio 2023, 14, e0049123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Limaye, M.A.; Ratner, A.J. ‘Vaginal seeding’ after a caesarean section provides benefits to newborn children: AGAINST: Vaginal microbiome transfer-a medical procedure with clear risks and uncertain benefits. BJOG. 2020, 127, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Sanz, Y. Gut microbiota and probiotics in maternal and infant health. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 94, 2000s–2005s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Zaidi, A.Z.; Moore, S.E.; Okala, S.G. Impact of Maternal Nutritional Supplementation during Pregnancy and Lactation on the Infant Gut or Breastmilk Microbiota: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Dotterud, C.K.; Avershina, E.; Sekelja, M.; Simpson, M.R.; Rudi, K.; Storrø, O.; Johnsen, R.; Øien, T. Does maternal perinatal probiotic supplementation alter the intestinal microbiota of mother and child? J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2015, 61, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Horigome, A.; Hisata, K.; Odamaki, T.; Iwabuchi, N.; Xiao, J.Z.; Shimizu, T. Colonization of Supplemented Bifidobacterium breve M-16V in Low Birth Weight Infants and Its Effects on Their Gut Microbiota Weeks Post-administration. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 610080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Yan, W.; Luo, B.; Zhang, X.; Ni, Y.; Tian, F. Association and Occurrence of Bifidobacterial Phylotypes Between Breast Milk and Fecal Microbiomes in Mother-Infant Dyads During the First 2 Years of Life. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 669442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Ma, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Mei, H.; Zhuo, N.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Wu, D. Comparison of gut microbiota in exclusively breast-fed and formula-fed babies: A study of 91 term infants. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Chichlowski, M.; van Diepen, J.A.; Prodan, A.; Olga, L.; Ong, K.K.; Kortman, G.A.M.; Dunger, D.B.; Gross, G. Early development of infant gut microbiota in relation to breastfeeding and human milk oligosaccharides. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1003032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Fabiano, V.; Indrio, F.; Verduci, E.; Calcaterra, V.; Pop, T.L.; Mari, A.; Zuccotti, G.V.; Cullu Cokugras, F.; Pettoello-Mantovani, M.; Goulet, O. Term Infant Formulas Influencing Gut Microbiota: An Overview. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Dinleyici, M.; Barbieur, J.; Dinleyici, E.C.; Vandenplas, Y. Functional effects of human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs). Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2186115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Turroni, F.; Serafini, F.; Foroni, E.; Duranti, S.; O’Connell Motherway, M.; Taverniti, V.; Mangifesta, M.; Milani, C.; Viappiani, A.; Roversi, T.; et al. Role of sortase-dependent pili of Bifidobacterium bifidum PRL2010 in modulating bacterium-host interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 11151–11156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Lee, H.; Li, Z.; Christensen, B.; Peng, Y.; Li, X.; Hernell, O.; Lönnerdal, B.; Slupsky, C.M. Metabolic Phenotype and Microbiome of Infants Fed Formula Containing Lactobacillus paracasei Strain F-19. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 856951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Stuebe, A. The risks of not breastfeeding for mothers and infants. Rev. Obs. Gynecol. 2009, 2, 222–231. [Google Scholar]
  228. Hascoët, J.M.; Hubert, C.; Rochat, F.; Legagneur, H.; Gaga, S.; Emady-Azar, S.; Steenhout, P.G. Effect of formula composition on the development of infant gut microbiota. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2011, 52, 756–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Prince, A.L.; Chu, D.M.; Seferovic, M.D.; Antony, K.M.; Ma, J.; Aagaard, K.M. The perinatal microbiome and pregnancy: Moving beyond the vaginal microbiome. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a023051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Reyman, M.; van Houten, M.A.; van Baarle, D.; Bosch, A.; Man, W.H.; Chu, M.; Arp, K.; Watson, R.L.; Sanders, E.A.M.; Fuentes, S.; et al. Impact of delivery mode-associated gut microbiota dynamics on health in the first year of life. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Fan, D.; Hu, J.; Lin, N. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and postbiotics on pediatric asthma: A systematic review. Front. Nutr. 2025, 12, 1586129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Montrose, J.A.; Kurada, S.; Fischer, M. Current and future microbiome-based therapies in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2024, 40, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Siddiqui, A.; Haider, R.; Aaqil, S.I.; Vohra, L.I.; Qamar, K.; Jawed, A.; Fatima, N.; Adnan, A.; Parikh, V.; Ochani, S.; et al. Probiotic formulations and gastro-intestinal diseases in the paediatric population: A narrative review. Ann. Med. Surg. 2024, 86, 2836–2847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Ahmad, H.H.; Peck, B.; Terry, D. The influence of probiotics on gastrointestinal tract infections among children attending childcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 1636–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Cao, L.; Lei, W.; Lijia, Y.; Shiqin, T.; Rushan, X.; Fan, W. Long-term effect of early-life supplementation with probiotics on preventing atopic dermatitis: A meta-analysis. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2015, 26, 537–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Lee, J.; Seto, D.; Bielory, L. Meta-analysis of clinical trials of probiotics for prevention and treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 121, 116–121.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Szajewska, H.; Horvath, A. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the Primary Prevention of Eczema in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Osborn, D.A.; Sinn, J.K. Prebiotics in infants for prevention of allergic disease and food hypersensitivity. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007, CD006474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Wang, L.; Xu, L. The impact of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics on the prevention and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children: An umbrella meta-analysis. Front. Pediatr. 2025, 13, 1498965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Liu, L.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, H.; Shang, Y.; Huang, W.; Cheng, Q. Relationship between pediatric asthma and respiratory microbiota, intestinal microbiota: A narrative review. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1550783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Spacova, I.; Wannes, V.B.; Sven, S.; Fien, D.; Jeroen, V.; Jozef, V.; Jan, C.; Mariya, P.; Lebeer, S. Lactobacillus rhamnosus probiotic prevents airway function deterioration and promotes gut microbiome resilience in a murine asthma model. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 1729–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Chiu, C.-J.; Huang, M.-T. Asthma in the Precision Medicine Era: Biologics and Probiotics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Hassanzad, M.; Maleki Mostashari, K.; Ghaffaripour, H.; Emami, H.; Rahimi Limouei, S.; Velayati, A.A. Synbiotics and Treatment of Asthma: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Galen. Med. J. 2019, 8, e1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Ahanchian, H.; Jafari, S.A.; Ansari, E.; Ganji, T.; Kiani, M.A.; Khalesi, M.; Momen, T.; Kianifar, H. A multi-strain Synbiotic may reduce viral respiratory infections in asthmatic children: A randomized controlled trial. Electron. Physician 2016, 8, 2833–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Henrick, B.M.; Rodriguez, L.; Lakshmikanth, T.; Pou, C.; Henckel, E.; Arzoomand, A.; Olin, A.; Wang, J.; Mikes, J.; Tan, Z.; et al. Bifidobacteria-mediated immune system imprinting early in life. Cell 2021, 184, 3884–3898.E11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Venter, C.; Meyer, R.W.; Greenhawt, M.; Pali-Schöll, I.; Nwaru, B.; Roduit, C.; Untersmayr, E.; Adel-Patient, K.; Agache, I.; Agostoni, C.; et al. Role of dietary fiber in promoting immune health—An EAACI position paper. Allergy 2022, 77, 3185–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Zou, B.; Liu, S.; Dong, C.; Shen, H.; Lv, Y.; He, J.; Li, X.; Ruan, M.; Huang, Z.; Shu, S. Fecal microbiota transplantation restores gut microbiota diversity in children with active Crohn’s disease: A prospective trial. J. Transl. Med. 2025, 23, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Pesce, M.; Seguella, L.; Del Re, A.; Lu, J.; Palenca, I.; Corpetti, C.; Rurgo, S.; Sanseverino, W.; Sarnelli, G.; Esposito, G. Next-Generation Probiotics for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Steidler, L.; Hans, W.; Schotte, L.; Neirynck, S.; Obermeier, F.; Falk, W.; Fiers, W.; Remaut, E. Treatment of Murine Colitis by Lactococcus lactis Secreting Interleukin-10. Science 2000, 289, 1352–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Stefanaki, C.; Rozou, P.; Efthymiou, V.; Xinias, I.; Mastorakos, G.; Bacopoulou, F.; Papagianni, M. Impact of Probiotics on the Glycemic Control of Pediatric and Adolescent Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; Rohilla, L.; Jacob, N.; Yadav, J.; Sachdeva, N. A high potency multi-strain probiotic improves glycemic control in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled pilot study. Pediatr. Diabetes 2021, 22, 1014–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Groele, L.; Szajewska, H.; Szalecki, M.; Świderska, J.; Wysocka-Mincewicz, M.; Ochocińska, A.; Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, A.; Demkow, U.; Szypowska, A. Lack of effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 on beta-cell function in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2021, 9, e001523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. This infographic summarizes the development and influence of the gut microbiota during the first years of life. Key early-life factors—such as delivery mode, feeding type, antibiotic exposure, and environmental conditions—shape microbial colonization from birth. The timeline illustrates a gradual maturation of the microbiota, from low diversity at birth to a stable, adult-like composition by age 3. Gut–organ axes (brain, liver, lung, kidney, heart) represent the systemic impact of microbial signals on long-term health, including risks of allergies, autoimmune diseases, obesity, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Crucially, the infant gut is highly plastic and responsive to interventions, marking early life as a window of opportunity for microbiota-based therapies such as probiotics, prebiotics, or dietary strategies to restore microbial balance and promote lifelong health. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 4 May 2025).
Figure 1. This infographic summarizes the development and influence of the gut microbiota during the first years of life. Key early-life factors—such as delivery mode, feeding type, antibiotic exposure, and environmental conditions—shape microbial colonization from birth. The timeline illustrates a gradual maturation of the microbiota, from low diversity at birth to a stable, adult-like composition by age 3. Gut–organ axes (brain, liver, lung, kidney, heart) represent the systemic impact of microbial signals on long-term health, including risks of allergies, autoimmune diseases, obesity, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Crucially, the infant gut is highly plastic and responsive to interventions, marking early life as a window of opportunity for microbiota-based therapies such as probiotics, prebiotics, or dietary strategies to restore microbial balance and promote lifelong health. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 4 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 02071 g001
Figure 2. Key stages of microbiota colonization and development in the first 1000 days of life. This infographic highlights the timeline of microbiota establishment from the prenatal period to early childhood, outlining the main influencing factors and the dominant microbial genera associated with each stage. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 20 May 2025).
Figure 2. Key stages of microbiota colonization and development in the first 1000 days of life. This infographic highlights the timeline of microbiota establishment from the prenatal period to early childhood, outlining the main influencing factors and the dominant microbial genera associated with each stage. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 20 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 02071 g002
Figure 3. Factors influencing the early gut microbiota. This infographic summarizes the main prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal factors that shape gut microbiota development during the perinatal period. It highlights maternal influences (such as health, diet, stress, and antibiotic use), the mode of delivery, gestational age, feeding practices, early-life antibiotic exposure, environmental and household exposures, and genetic and paternal contributions. Together, these elements influence early microbial colonization, which is critical in shaping immune function, metabolic health, and long-term well-being. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 23 May 2025).
Figure 3. Factors influencing the early gut microbiota. This infographic summarizes the main prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal factors that shape gut microbiota development during the perinatal period. It highlights maternal influences (such as health, diet, stress, and antibiotic use), the mode of delivery, gestational age, feeding practices, early-life antibiotic exposure, environmental and household exposures, and genetic and paternal contributions. Together, these elements influence early microbial colonization, which is critical in shaping immune function, metabolic health, and long-term well-being. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 23 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 02071 g003
Figure 4. The gut–organ axes. This image illustrates how the early-life gut microbiota establishes critical communication pathways with major organs—the brain, liver, kidneys, and lungs—through what are known as the gut–organ axes. These bidirectional networks are shaped by early environmental exposures like nutrition, antibiotics, and delivery mode, influencing lifelong outcomes such as neurological development, metabolic health, kidney function, and respiratory resilience. Disruptions during this sensitive window can predispose individuals to chronic diseases later in life, highlighting the gut’s foundational role in systemic health. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 25 May 2025).
Figure 4. The gut–organ axes. This image illustrates how the early-life gut microbiota establishes critical communication pathways with major organs—the brain, liver, kidneys, and lungs—through what are known as the gut–organ axes. These bidirectional networks are shaped by early environmental exposures like nutrition, antibiotics, and delivery mode, influencing lifelong outcomes such as neurological development, metabolic health, kidney function, and respiratory resilience. Disruptions during this sensitive window can predispose individuals to chronic diseases later in life, highlighting the gut’s foundational role in systemic health. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 25 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 02071 g004
Figure 5. Microbiota-based therapies in pediatric health. This infographic summarizes emerging microbiota-based therapies used to prevent and manage pediatric diseases linked to gut dysbiosis. It highlights the roles of probiotics, synbiotics, prebiotics, IMT, and genetically engineered bacteria in treating conditions such as atopic dermatitis, asthma, gastrointestinal infections, Crohn’s disease, type 1 diabetes, etc. It also emphasizes the importance of selecting specific microbial strains and optimizing treatment protocols and the potential of innovative strategies like microbial drug delivery. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 25 May 2025).
Figure 5. Microbiota-based therapies in pediatric health. This infographic summarizes emerging microbiota-based therapies used to prevent and manage pediatric diseases linked to gut dysbiosis. It highlights the roles of probiotics, synbiotics, prebiotics, IMT, and genetically engineered bacteria in treating conditions such as atopic dermatitis, asthma, gastrointestinal infections, Crohn’s disease, type 1 diabetes, etc. It also emphasizes the importance of selecting specific microbial strains and optimizing treatment protocols and the potential of innovative strategies like microbial drug delivery. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 25 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 02071 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mogoş, G.F.R.; Manciulea, M.; Enache, R.-M.; Pavelescu, L.A.; Popescu, O.A.; Cretoiu, S.M.; Marinescu, I. Intestinal Microbiota in Early Life: Latest Findings Regarding the Role of Probiotics as a Treatment Approach for Dysbiosis. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17132071

AMA Style

Mogoş GFR, Manciulea M, Enache R-M, Pavelescu LA, Popescu OA, Cretoiu SM, Marinescu I. Intestinal Microbiota in Early Life: Latest Findings Regarding the Role of Probiotics as a Treatment Approach for Dysbiosis. Nutrients. 2025; 17(13):2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17132071

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mogoş, Gabriel Florin Răzvan, Monica Manciulea (Profir), Robert-Mihai Enache, Luciana Alexandra Pavelescu, Oana Alexandra Popescu (Roşu), Sanda Maria Cretoiu, and Ileana Marinescu. 2025. "Intestinal Microbiota in Early Life: Latest Findings Regarding the Role of Probiotics as a Treatment Approach for Dysbiosis" Nutrients 17, no. 13: 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17132071

APA Style

Mogoş, G. F. R., Manciulea, M., Enache, R.-M., Pavelescu, L. A., Popescu, O. A., Cretoiu, S. M., & Marinescu, I. (2025). Intestinal Microbiota in Early Life: Latest Findings Regarding the Role of Probiotics as a Treatment Approach for Dysbiosis. Nutrients, 17(13), 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17132071

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop