Next Article in Journal
The Conclusive and Continuous Tool to Assess Severity and Improvement of Eating Disorders (CONTASI-ED): Development and Psychometric Properties
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Dietary Habits and Nutrition Knowledge on Harmful Alcohol Use and Nicotine Dependence Among Medical Students: A Single-Center, Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diet–Gene Interaction Between Fruit Intake and CMIP rs2925979 Polymorphism in Relation to Type 2 Diabetes: A Family-Based Study in Northern China

1
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
2
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
3
Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China
4
Beijing Fangshan District Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102446, China
5
Beijing Key Laboratory of Toxicological Research and Risk Assessment for Food Safety, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(11), 1789; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111789
Submission received: 25 April 2025 / Revised: 21 May 2025 / Accepted: 22 May 2025 / Published: 24 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Nutritional Epidemiology)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the association between dietary intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a rural northern Chinese population, and to explore potential gene–diet interactions that may influence T2DM susceptibility. Methods: A total of 1747 participants (1138 with T2DM and 609 without) were included, using baseline data from a family-based cohort study in rural northern China. Demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and medical history were collected via standardized questionnaires. Dietary intake was assessed using a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, and anthropometric measurements were conducted according to standardized protocols. Based on findings from previous genome-wide association studies, several T2DM-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms were selected for genotyping. Generalized linear models accounting for familial clustering were employed to examine the associations between dietary intake and T2DM risk, and to assess gene–diet interaction. Results: A significant inverse association was observed between fruit intake and T2DM risk. Furthermore, a significant interaction was found between fruit consumption and the CMIP rs2925979 polymorphism: the protective effect of higher fruit intake was evident among individuals carrying the T allele but not among those with the CC genotype. Conclusions: These findings suggest that genetic variation may modify metabolic responses to dietary factors, particularly fruit intake. The results underscore the importance of considering gene–diet interactions in the prevention of T2DM.

1. Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) accounts for over 90% of all diabetes cases globally, and is the most prevalent and fastest-growing form of the disease. Diagnosis of T2DM is based on criteria established by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) [1] and the World Health Organization (WHO), which include fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, 2-h plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5% [2].
According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), an estimated 537 million people worldwide are currently living with diabetes. This number is projected to rise to 643 million by 2030 and 783 million by 2045 [1]. In China, the number of people with diabetes increased from 90 million in 2011 to 118 million in 2021, representing a 56% increase [3,4,5,6]. Over the past three decades, five nationally representative cross-sectional studies have shown a steady upward trend in diabetes prevalence. In 1980, the prevalence of diabetes in China was less than 1%; by 2010, it had risen to 11.6%, surpassing the 10% threshold and placing China among the countries with the highest diabetes burden [3,4,5,6]. This persistent rise underscores the urgency of identifying modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors contributing to the growing T2DM epidemic [7,8,9,10].
In recent years, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 400 genetic loci associated with T2DM risk. One gene of particular interest is the c-Maf inducing protein (CMIP) gene, which plays a role in T-cell signaling, lipid metabolism, and insulin resistance pathways [11,12]. The single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2925979, located in an intronic region of the CMIP gene [11], has been identified as a susceptibility locus for T2DM in East Asian populations. Notably, studies have shown that although the T allele of rs2925979 is inversely associated with body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference, it is positively associated with T2DM risk in Chinese women, suggesting pleiotropic and sex-specific effects [13]. Moreover, rs2925979 has been linked to lipid metabolism and adiponectin levels, indicating a broader role in metabolic regulation [14,15,16].
Dietary factors, particularly fruit consumption, are well-established in the prevention of T2DM. Fruits are rich in dietary fiber, polyphenols, and antioxidants, which collectively improve insulin sensitivity and reduce systemic inflammation [17]. Large-scale cohort studies and meta-analyses have consistently demonstrated an inverse relationship between fruit intake and T2DM risk [18,19,20]. However, interindividual variability in metabolic responses to dietary factors suggests a possible gene–diet interaction. To date, few studies have examined the interaction between CMIP rs2925979 and fruit intake in relation to T2DM risk, particularly in nutritionally and genetically distinct populations such as rural Chinese residents.
This study examined the potential modifying effect of the CMIP rs2925979 polymorphism on the association between fruit intake and the risk of T2DM, using data from a large family-based cohort study conducted in rural northern China. Given the increasing burden of T2DM in rural populations with limited healthcare access, and the paucity of research on how genetic variation may influence dietary associations in these settings, this investigation addresses a critical knowledge gap by evaluating the interaction between genetic susceptibility and modifiable dietary factors. Exploring gene–diet interactions is essential for advancing precision nutrition and informing population-specific preventive strategies.
We hypothesize that higher fruit intake is associated with a lower risk of T2DM, and that this protective association is more pronounced among carriers of the T allele of the CMIP rs2925979 polymorphism, compared to individuals with the CC (homozygous major allele) genotype. This study investigates the independent and interactive associations of fruit intake and the CMIP rs2925979 polymorphism with T2DM risk, aiming to generate evidence to inform personalized dietary recommendations and targeted prevention strategies in rural Chinese populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Participants

This study used baseline data from the Family Cohort Study of Common Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases in Rural Northern China, as previously described. Nine administrative villages in Fangshan District, Beijing, were selected as study sites due to their demographic, economic, and geographical characteristics representative of northern China. From June 2005 to August 2017, a total of 8323 participants were recruited using a family-based recruitment approach. All participants completed standardized questionnaires, underwent physical measurements, and provided blood samples. The cohort was designed based on genetic relationships, facilitating a more effective assessment of environmental and lifestyle factors while controlling for genetic background differences. The inclusion criteria for this study were: (1) age ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment; (2) complete dietary survey data; (3) genetic testing data; and (4) voluntary participation with the completion of questionnaires, physical examinations, and biochemical tests. Exclusion criteria included: severe diseases or chronic conditions, such as malignant tumors or severe liver or kidney diseases, that hinder study participation. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1747 participants were enrolled, fulfilling the sample size requirement. All participants provided informed consent, and the study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Peking University (Approval No: IRB00001052-13027).

2.2. Dietary Assessment

The study employed a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) adapted from a validated simplified Chinese version developed for Chinese populations, and further modified to reflect the dietary characteristics of the study population. The questionnaire covered intake of key food groups, including staple foods (e.g., rice, noodles), vegetables, fruits, animal-based foods (e.g., unprocessed meat, processed meat, seafood, eggs), plant-based protein sources (e.g., tofu, nuts), and dairy products. It assessed both the frequency (e.g., days per week) and portion size (e.g., grams per day) of food consumption over the past 12 months. Additional questions addressed beverage intake (alcohol, tea, sugar-sweetened beverages), cooking oil types, salt consumption, and household eating patterns, enabling a comprehensive characterization of dietary behaviors relevant to chronic disease risk.

2.3. Genotyping and Basic Information on Polymorphic Loci

Based on previous GWAS conducted in European and East Asian populations, this study screened genetic susceptibility loci that reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10−8) for associations with T2DM and its major metabolic risk factors, including blood pressure, blood lipid levels [11,21,22], insulin resistance [23,24,25], and obesity [26,27,28,29]. Inclusion criteria for SNP selection were as follows: (1) SNPs identified with genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10−8) in GWAS for T2DM or its associated metabolic traits; (2) SNPs discovered in East Asian populations were prioritized to enhance population relevance, although variants from European GWAS were included due to the limited availability of East Asian-specific findings; and (3) SNPs previously associated with increased risk of T2DM (i.e., odds ratio [OR] or relative risk [RR] > 1), to facilitate risk-oriented analysis. Exclusion criteria included: (1) SNPs lacking replication in independent GWAS or validation cohorts; (2) SNPs with genotyping call rates below 95% or with >5% missing data; and (3) SNPs exhibiting high linkage disequilibrium (r2 > 0.8) with other selected loci, to reduce redundancy. After applying these criteria, SNP rs2925979 in the CMIP gene was selected for genotyping, based on its previously reported association with T2DM risk in East Asian populations. The distribution of CMIP rs2925979 genotypes was assessed for Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) using a chi-square test, and no significant deviation was detected (p = 0.514), suggesting that the genotype distribution was representative and free from genotyping bias.

2.4. Definition and Standards of Relevant Indicators

The covariate information for this study was obtained from a questionnaire, which included variables such as age, gender, marital status, education level, occupation, waist circumference, hip circumference, blood pressure, stroke history, hypertension history, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, and regular exercise. Waist and hip circumferences were measured with a precision of 0.1 cm. Blood pressure was measured three times with a 1-min interval between measurements, with the first measurement discarded and the average of the last two measurements used as the final value. All measurements were performed by the same researcher using the same blood pressure monitor. Stroke and hypertension histories were recorded as binary variables (‘yes’ or ‘no’). BMI was calculated from height and weight, with height measured to the nearest 0.1 cm and weight to the nearest 0.1 kg. Smoking status was categorized as “never smoked” or “smoked”, drinking status as “never drank” or “drank”, and regular exercise as ‘yes’ or ‘no’.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analyses were conducted on the study participants’ general demographic characteristics, physical measurements, lifestyle behaviors, and personal medical history. For continuous variables following a normal distribution, data were presented as means ± standard deviations; for non-normally distributed variables, medians and interquartile ranges (P25, P75) were used. Categorical variables were described as frequencies (percentages). Since the study participants were not statistically independent, intergroup comparisons were performed using generalized linear models that accounted for familial clustering. To control for potential confounding factors, a generalized linear regression model was constructed with T2DM status as the dependent variable (coded as 0 = no, 1 = yes) and various food categories as independent variables. The model was adjusted for age, sex, family structure, marital status, educational level, occupation, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular physical activity, hypertension, BMI, waist circumference, total cholesterol, and stroke history. Interaction terms between food categories and genetic loci were included in the model to evaluate the presence of interaction effects, as indicated by the statistical significance of the interaction terms (p-values). Stratified analyses were subsequently conducted according to genotype to assess the associations between individual food categories and T2DM, and to further evaluate the potential effect modification by gene polymorphisms on these associations. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.2.2).

3. Results

3.1. Basic Characteristics

Table 1 shows that 1747 participants were included in the study, comprising 1138 individuals diagnosed with T2DM and 609 without T2DM. Compared to those without T2DM, individuals in the T2DM group were significantly older and exhibited higher mean values for waist circumference, fasting blood glucose, and HbA1c levels. Furthermore, the prevalence of hypertension was significantly greater in the T2DM group (p < 0.05). In contrast, the proportions of participants who reported alcohol consumption and regular physical activity were significantly lower among individuals with T2DM (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sex, occupational status, educational attainment, marital status, hip circumference, BMI, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, history of stroke, or smoking status (p > 0.05). In terms of genetic distribution, the genotype frequencies of CMIP rs2925979 among all participants were as follows: CC, 32.81%; CT, 48.21%; and TT, 18.98%. The genotype distribution used Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (p = 0.514), supporting the validity of the genotyping results.

3.2. Association Between Dietary Intake and T2DM

The intake of each food group was categorized into quartiles (Q1–Q4) based on the amount taken (in grams per day), with the lowest quartile (Q1) serving as the reference group. To evaluate the relationship between dietary intake and the risk of T2DM, three generalized linear models were applied. Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex; Model 2 included additional adjustments for marital status, educational level, and occupation; and Model 3 further accounted for lifestyle and clinical variables, including smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular physical activity, hypertension, BMI, waist circumference, total cholesterol, and history of stroke. As presented in Table 2, fruit intake was inversely associated with the risk of T2DM across all adjusted models. In the fully adjusted Model 3, compared to the reference group (Q1), the odds ratios (ORs) for T2DM were 0.44 (95% CI: 0.33–0.60) for Q2, 0.46 (95% CI: 0.33–0.62) for Q3, and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.43–0.80) for Q4, all of which were statistically significant (p < 0.001).

3.3. Interaction Between Dietary Factors and Genetic Polymorphisms

As shown in Figure 1, the association between fruit intake and T2DM risk differed according to CMIP rs2925979 genotype (TT, CT, and CC). Among individuals with the TT genotype, higher fruit intake was significantly associated with a reduced risk of T2DM. Compared to the lowest quartile (Q1), the adjusted odds ratios (ORs, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 0.198 (0.079–0.491), 0.101 (0.040–0.250), and 0.263 (0.100–0.688), respectively (all p < 0.01), indicating a precise inverse dose–response trend. A similar protective pattern was observed among individuals with the CT genotype, with ORs (95% CIs) of 0.318 (0.203–0.498), 0.446 (0.281–0.709), and 0.477 (0.302–0.752) for Q2–Q4 versus Q1, respectively (all p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant associations were found among individuals with the CC genotype, with ORs of 0.749, 0.726, and 0.763 for Q2–Q4 (all p > 0.05; 95% CIs included 1.0).
Importantly, we also evaluated the independent association between CMIP rs2925979 and T2DM risk, irrespective under fruit intake. Compared to the CC genotype, carriers of the T allele (CT or TT) did not show a statistically significant association with T2DM in fully adjusted models (results available upon request), suggesting that the T allele alone may not confer increased risk. These findings indicate a potential gene–diet interaction, in which the T allele’s influence on T2DM risk appears to depend on fruit intake levels.

4. Discussion

This study identified a significant inverse association between fruit intake and the risk of T2DM in a rural northern Chinese population. Notably, a significant interaction was observed between fruit intake and the CMIP rs2925979 polymorphism. Specifically, the protective effect of higher fruit consumption was evident among individuals carrying the T allele (TT and CT genotypes). In contrast, no significant association was found among those with the CC genotype. These findings suggest a potential gene–diet interaction contributing to interindividual variability in T2DM susceptibility. The observed protective role under fruit intake is consistent with results from large-scale prospective cohort studies and meta-analyses, which have consistently demonstrated an inverse relationship between fruit consumption and T2DM risk [30,31]. Mechanistically, fruits are rich in dietary fiber, polyphenols, and essential micronutrients, all of which have been shown to enhance insulin sensitivity, reduce oxidative stress, and modulate inflammatory pathways [32,33,34]. Furthermore, the inverse association in our study remained robust even after adjusting for a comprehensive set of sociodemographic, lifestyle, and metabolic confounders, supporting an independent protective effect under fruit intake [13,35,36].
This study makes a novel contribution by identifying a significant interaction between fruit intake and the CMIP rs2925979 genotype in relation toT2DM risk. CMIP (c-Maf-inducing protein) is known to participate in insulin signaling and T-cell activation pathways, and its polymorphisms have been previously associated with insulin resistance and lipid metabolism abnormalities [31,37,38]. Our findings suggest that the stronger inverse association between fruit consumption and T2DM observed among individuals carrying the T allele may reflect differences in gene expression or metabolic responsiveness to dietary bioactive compounds such as flavonoids and dietary fiber. These results are consistent with a growing body of evidence indicating that genetic background can influence metabolic responses to diet, thereby supporting the rationale for precision nutrition strategies [39,40]. Notably, no significant association was found between fruit intake and T2DM risk among individuals with the CC genotype, suggesting that the protective effect of fruit consumption may be diminished by specific genetic factors [16,41,42,43]. These findings underscore the importance of integrating gene–environment interactions into public health nutrition strategies and tailoring dietary recommendations to accommodate genetic variability within populations.
The strengths of this study lie in its use of a family-based cohort design, which effectively reduces population stratification bias, and the comprehensive adjustment for a wide range of potential confounders. Moreover, conducting genotype-stratified analyses enabled the identification of significant gene–diet interactions that might be obscured in analyses of the general population. Despite these strengths, several limitations warrant consideration. First, the cross-sectional nature of the study precludes causal inference. Second, dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), which is prone to recall bias and measurement error. Third, the small sample size within the CC genotype subgroup may have limited the statistical power to detect modest associations. Finally, our analysis focused on a single SNP and one food group; thus, future studies should explore genome-wide interactions and incorporate a broader range of dietary exposures to enhance generalizability.
Overall, this study demonstrates a significant gene–diet interaction between fruit intake and the CMIP rs2925979 polymorphism in relation to T2DM risk. These findings underscore the need to consider genetic background in formulating dietary recommendations and contribute valuable evidence toward the development of precision nutrition strategies for diabetes prevention.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study presents novel evidence of a gene–diet interaction between fruit intake and the CMIP rs2925979 polymorphism in relation to the risk of T2DM in a rural northern Chinese population. The findings highlight the protective effect of fruit consumption and suggest that genetic variations may modify individual susceptibility to T2DM. By emphasizing differential metabolic responses to dietary components based on genetic background, our results strengthen the case for advancing precision nutrition strategies tailored to genetic profiles. These findings provide a scientific basis for more personalized dietary recommendations and contribute to the growing body of research supporting the integration of nutrigenetics into public health strategies aimed at diabetes prevention.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.K.; Methodology, L.K., M.W. and J.W.; Software, Y.T.; Formal analysis, L.K. and Y.T.; Resources, M.W., J.W. and Y.H.; Data curation, Y.T. and M.W.; Writing—original draft preparation, L.K.; Writing—review and editing, L.K., Y.T., Y.W., X.Q., H.G., Y.Z., T.W., D.C., M.W., J.W. and Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82204135, 81872695, 81230066, and 82473716), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFF1104203), the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (grant no. 7232237), the Shanxi Province Higher Education “Billion Project” Science and Technology Guidance Project (grant no. not applicable) and the School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University “233” Cooperation Project (grant no. not applicable).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University Health Science Center (IRB00001052-13027, 22 July 2013).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. The patient has obtained written informed consent to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to all the participants involved in this nationwide population-based study. Our heartfelt appreciation goes to the study participants and the dedicated staff for their invaluable contributions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. International Diabetes Federation. The IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th ed.; 2021. Available online: https://diabetesatlas.org/resources/previous-editions/ (accessed on 13 December 2024).
  2. Hu, C.; Jia, W. Diabetes in China: Epidemiology and Genetic Risk Factors and Their Clinical Utility in Personalized Medication. Diabetes 2017, 67, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, L.; Peng, W.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, M.; Shi, Z.; Song, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Huang, Z.; Sun, X.; et al. Prevalence and Treatment of Diabetes in China, 2013–2018. JAMA 2021, 326, 2498–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. International Diabetes Federation. The IDF Diabetes Atlas, Diabetes Country Report 2000–2050; 2021. Available online: https://diabetesatlas.org/data-by-location/country/china/?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 21 May 2025).
  5. Guo, Y.; Huang, Z.; Sang, D.; Gao, Q.; Li, Q. The Role of Nutrition in the Prevention and Intervention of Type 2 Diabetes. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 575442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Deng, W.; Zhao, L.; Chen, C.; Ren, Z.; Jing, Y.; Qiu, J.; Liu, D. National burden and risk factors of diabetes mellitus in China from 1990 to 2021: Results from the Global Burden of Disease study 2021. J. Diabetes 2024, 16, e70012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, D.; Zhou, D.; Li, N.; Han, B. Predicting Diabetes and Estimating Its Economic Burden in China Using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model. Int. J. Public Health 2021, 66, 1604449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.; Teng, D.I.; Shi, X.; Qin, G.; Qin, Y.; Quan, H.; Shi, B.; Sun, H.; Ba, J.; Chen, B.; et al. Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: National cross sectional study. BMJ 2020, 369, 997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. An, K.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Qiao, R.; An, Z. The burden of type 2 diabetes in China from 1990 to 2021: A comparative analysis with G20 countries using the global burden of disease study 2021. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2025, 224, 112188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, A.; Lyu, J.; Dong, Z.; Nie, L.; Xie, C.; Jiang, B.; Han, X.; Dong, J.; Zhao, Y.; Li, L. Trends of diabetes in Beijing, China. Chin. Med. J. 2025, 138, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, Z.; Pu, C.; Lin, L.; Ou, Q.; Quan, H. Genome-wide association study of blood lipid levels in Southern Han Chinese adults with prediabetes. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 14, 1334893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lagou, V.; Jiang, L.; Ulrich, A.; Zudina, L.; González, K.S.G.; Balkhiyarova, Z.; Faggian, A.; Maina, J.G.; Chen, S.; Todorov, P.V.; et al. GWAS of random glucose in 476,326 individuals provide insights into diabetes pathophysiology, complications and treatment stratification. Nat. Genet. 2023, 55, 1448–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cao, Y.; Wang, T.; Wu, Y.; Juan, J.; Qin, X.; Tang, X.; Wu, T.; Hu, Y. Opposite Genetic Effects of CMIP Polymorphisms on the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity: A Family-Based Study in China. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Adebo, D.O.; Olaniyan, M.F.; Ugege, C.O.; Odegbemi, O.B. Association between CAPN-10 gene variant and diabetes mellitus in Nigeria: A review. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 2025, 26, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ramos-Lopez, O. Genotype-based precision nutrition strategies for the prediction and clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J. Diabetes 2024, 15, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jia, X.; Xuan, L.; Dai, H.; Zhu, W.; Deng, C.; Wang, T.; Li, M.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, Y.; Lu, J.; et al. Fruit intake, genetic risk and type 2 diabetes: A population-based gene–diet interaction analysis. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 2769–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Niu, K.; Lyu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Wang, C.; Mao, Z.; Cui, S.; Gu, R.; Li, L. The dose-response relationship of fruit and vegetable intake and risk of type 2 diabetes among rural China: The Henan Rural Cohort study. Prim. Care Diabetes 2023, 17, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Geravand, F.; Montazer, M.; Mousavi, S.M.; Azadbakht, L. Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Risk of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Nutr. Rev. 2025, nuaf013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Halvorsen, R.E.; Elvestad, M.; Molin, M.; Aune, D. Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health 2021, 4, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, C.; Liu, P.; Yuan, Z. Prospective association between fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes amongst Chinese adults: The China Health and Nutrition Survey. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 75, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Biswas, S.; Hilser, J.R.; Woodward, N.C.; Wang, Z.; Gukasyan, J.; Nemet, I.; Schwartzman, W.S.; Huang, P.; Han, Y.; Fouladian, Z.; et al. Effect of Genetic and Dietary Perturbation of Glycine Metabolism on Atherosclerosis in Humans and Mice. medRxiv 2023, preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, L.; Yao, Y.; Jin, C.; Wu, S.; Liu, Q.; Li, J.; Ma, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhong, Y. Integrative genomic analysis identified common regulatory networks underlying the correlation between coronary artery disease and plasma lipid levels. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2019, 19, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Florez, J.C.; Udler, M.S.; Hanson, R.L. Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes. In Diabetes in America, 3rd ed.; Cowie, C.C., Ed.; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US): Bethesda, MD, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xu, P.; Wang, M.; Sharma, N.K.; Comeau, M.E.; Wabitsch, M.; Langefeld, C.D.; Civelek, M.; Zhang, B.; Das, S.K. Multi-omic integration reveals cell-type-specific regulatory networks of insulin resistance in distinct ancestry populations. Cell Syst. 2023, 14, 41–57.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. McAllan, L.; Baranasic, D.; Villicaña, S.; Brown, S.; Zhang, W.; Lehne, B.; Adamo, M.; Jenkinson, A.; Elkalaawy, M.; Mohammadi, B.; et al. Integrative genomic analyses in adipocytes implicate DNA methylation in human obesity and diabetes. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. del Bosque-Plata, L.; Martínez-Martínez, E.; Espinoza-Camacho, M.Á.; Gragnoli, C. The Role of TCF7L2 in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 2021, 70, 1220–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, Q.; Meng, X.-H.; Qiu, C.; Shen, H.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, L.-J.; Tian, Q.; Sun, C.-Q.; Deng, H.-W. Integrative analysis of multi-omics data to detect the underlying molecular mechanisms for obesity in vivo in humans. Hum. Genom. 2021, 16, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dos Santos, C.; Blanc, C.; Elahouel, R.; Prescott, M.; Carpentier, G.; Ori, A.; Courty, J.; Hamma-Kourbali, Y.; Fernig, D.G.; Delbé, J. Proliferation and migration activities of fibroblast growth factor-2 in endothelial cells are modulated by its direct interaction with heparin affin regulatory peptide. Biochimie 2014, 107 Pt B, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. The GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qian, X.; Liu, X.; Mao, Z.; Abdulai, T.; Dong, X.; Tu, R.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Luo, Z.; Qiao, D.; et al. Fruit and vegetable intake modifies the associations between suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 genetic variants and type 2 diabetes. Eur. J. Nutr. 2020, 59, 3441–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Unwin, D.; Khalid, A.A.; Unwin, J.; Crocombe, D.; Delon, C.; Martyn, K.; Golubic, R.; Ray, S. Insights from a general practice service evaluation supporting a lower carbohydrate diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes: A secondary analysis of routine clinic data including HbA1c, weight and prescribing over 6 years. BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health 2020, 3, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Santos, B.; Minho, L.A.C.; Silva, E.F.R.; Sauthier, M.C.d.S.; Caldas, J.d.C.; da Silva, E.G.P.; Santana, D.d.A.; dos Santos, W.N.L. Chemometric Tools Applied to Evaluation of Fruit Bioactive Compounds Extraction. Food Anal. Methods 2020, 13, 1176–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sheikhpour, M.; Abolfathi, H.; Khatami, S.; Meshkani, R.; Barghi, T.S. The interaction between gene profile and obesity in type 2 diabetes: A review. Obes. Med. 2020, 18, 100197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jiang, Z.; Sun, T.-Y.; He, Y.; Gou, W.; Zuo, L.-S.; Fu, Y.; Miao, Z.; Shuai, M.; Xu, F.; Xiao, C.; et al. Dietary fruit and vegetable intake, gut microbiota, and type 2 diabetes: Results from two large human cohort studies. BMC Med. 2020, 18, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gudise, V.; Chowdhury, B. Molecular mechanisms and the vital roles of resistin, TLR 4, and NF-κB in treating type 2 diabetic complications. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2020, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, X.; Liu, G.; Guo, J.; Su, Z. The PI3K/AKT pathway in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 1483–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Islam, S.; Wei, P.; Suzauddula; Nime, I.; Feroz, F.; Acharjee, M.; Pan, F. The interplay of factors in metabolic syndrome: Understanding its roots and complexity. Mol. Med. 2024, 30, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Park, G.; Jung, S.; Wellen, K.E.; Jang, C. The interaction between the gut microbiota and dietary carbohydrates in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Exp. Mol. Med. 2021, 53, 809–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Al-Sharshani, D.; Velayutham, D.; Samara, M.; Gazal, R.; Zen, A.A.H.; Ismail, M.A.; Ahmed, M.; Nasrallah, G.; Younes, S.; Rizk, N.; et al. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms with dyslipidemia and risk of metabolic disorders in the State of Qatar. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2023, 11, e2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wong, S.K.; Ramli, F.F.; Ali, A.; Ibrahim, N. Genetics of Cholesterol-Related Genes in Metabolic Syndrome: A Review of Current Evidence. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hindy, G.; Sonestedt, E.; Ericson, U.; Jing, X.-J.; Zhou, Y.; Hansson, O.; Renström, E.; Wirfält, E.; Orho-Melander, M. Role of TCF7L2 risk variant and dietary fibre intake on incident type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 2646–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Poosri, S.; Boonyuen, U.; Chupeerach, C.; Soonthornworasiri, N.; Kwanbunjan, K.; Prangthip, P. Association of FTO variants rs9939609 and rs1421085 with elevated sugar and fat consumption in adult obesity. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 25618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hosseinpour-Niazi, S.; Mirmiran, P.; Hosseini, S.; Hadaegh, F.; Ainy, E.; Daneshpour, M.S.; Azizi, F. Effect of TCF7L2 on the relationship between lifestyle factors and glycemic parameters: A systematic review. Nutr. J. 2022, 21, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Forest plot of the association between quartiles under fruit intake score and type 2 diabetes risk stratified by CMIP gene rs2925979 genotype.
Figure 1. Forest plot of the association between quartiles under fruit intake score and type 2 diabetes risk stratified by CMIP gene rs2925979 genotype.
Nutrients 17 01789 g001
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Study Subjects [n (%)].
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Study Subjects [n (%)].
Basic CharacteristicsTotal Number (n = 1747)T2DM
(n = 1138)
Non-T2DM
(n = 609)
p Value
Age, years, mean (SD)58.7 ± 8.659.1 ± 8.557.9 ± 8.80.006
Gender, n (%) 0.996
Male677 (38.8)441 (38.8)236 (38.8)
Female1070 (61.2)697 (61.2)373 (61.2)
Occupation, n (%) 0.306
Farmer538 (30.8)341 (30.0)197 (32.3)
Non-Farmer1209 (69.2)797 (70.0)412 (67.7)
Education level, n (%) 0.654
Junior high school and below1465 (83.9)951 (83.6)514 (84.4)
High school and above282 (16.1)187 (16.4)95 (15.6)
Marital status, n (%) 0.607
Married1522 (87.1)988 (86.8)534 (87.7)
Unmarried225 (12.9)150 (13.2)75 (12.3)
Waist circumference (cm), mean (SD)92.5 ± 9.493.4 ± 9.491.0 ± 9.3<0.001
Hip circumference (cm), mean (SD)99.7 ± 7.299.8 ± 7.499.6 ± 6.80.675
BMI (kg/m2), n (%) 0.534
<18.525 (1.4)15 (1.3)10 (1.6)
18.50~23.99446 (25.5)281 (24.7)165 (27.1)
24.00~27.99767 (43.9)506 (44.5)261 (42.9)
≥28.00509 (29.1)336 (29.5)173 (28.4)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), mean (SD)135.4 ± 19.0135.7 ± 18.7134.9 ± 19.60.356
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), mean (SD)80.0 ± 11.279.4 ± 11.181.2 ± 11.30.001
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L), mean (SD)6.0 ± 2.96.7 ± 3.14.7 ± 2.1<0.001
Total cholesterol (mmol/L), mean (SD)2.8 ± 1.22.8 ± 1.22.9 ± 1.10.154
HbA1c (%, mean (SD))7.2 ± 1.87.8 ± 1.76.0 ± 1.1<0.001
Stroke history, n (%) 0.202
Yes297 (17.0)184 (16.2)113 (18.6)
No1450 (83.0)954 (83.3)496 (81.4)
Hypertension, n (%) 0.002
Yes1222 (69.9)824 (72.4)398 (65.4)
No525 (30.1)314 (27.6)211 (34.6)
Smoking, n (%) 0.872
Never smoked1097 (62.8)713 (62.7)384 (63.1)
Smoking650 (37.2)425 (37.3)225 (36.9)
Drinking, n (%) 0.015
Never drank1148 (65.7)771 (67.8)377 (61.9)
Drank599 (34.3)367 (32.2)232 (38.1)
Regular exercise, n (%) 0.015
Yes308 (17.6)182 (16.0)126 (20.7)
No1439 (82.4)956 (84.0)483 (79.3)
Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation, categorical variables as frequency (percentage). p-values were calculated using t-tests (for continuous variables) or chi-square tests (for categorical variables).
Table 2. The Association Between Fruit Intake and the Risk of T2DM.
Table 2. The Association Between Fruit Intake and the Risk of T2DM.
Intake LevelModel 1Model 2Model 3
OR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p Value
Q11.00 1.00 1.00
Q20.45 (0.34, 0.61)<0.0010.45 (0.34, 0.61)<0.0010.44 (0.33, 0.60)<0.001
Q30.47 (0.35, 0.62)<0.0010.46 (0.40, 0.61)<0.0010.46 (0.33, 0.62)<0.001
Q40.60 (0.44, 0.81)<0.0010.59 (0.43, 0.79)<0.0010.58 (0.43, 0.80)<0.001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuo, L.; Tan, Y.; Wu, Y.; Qin, X.; Gong, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, T.; Chen, D.; Wang, M.; Wang, J.; et al. Diet–Gene Interaction Between Fruit Intake and CMIP rs2925979 Polymorphism in Relation to Type 2 Diabetes: A Family-Based Study in Northern China. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111789

AMA Style

Kuo L, Tan Y, Wu Y, Qin X, Gong H, Zhao Y, Wu T, Chen D, Wang M, Wang J, et al. Diet–Gene Interaction Between Fruit Intake and CMIP rs2925979 Polymorphism in Relation to Type 2 Diabetes: A Family-Based Study in Northern China. Nutrients. 2025; 17(11):1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuo, Liangchun, Yinxi Tan, Yiqun Wu, Xueying Qin, Haiying Gong, Yao Zhao, Tao Wu, Dafang Chen, Mengying Wang, Junbo Wang, and et al. 2025. "Diet–Gene Interaction Between Fruit Intake and CMIP rs2925979 Polymorphism in Relation to Type 2 Diabetes: A Family-Based Study in Northern China" Nutrients 17, no. 11: 1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111789

APA Style

Kuo, L., Tan, Y., Wu, Y., Qin, X., Gong, H., Zhao, Y., Wu, T., Chen, D., Wang, M., Wang, J., & Hu, Y. (2025). Diet–Gene Interaction Between Fruit Intake and CMIP rs2925979 Polymorphism in Relation to Type 2 Diabetes: A Family-Based Study in Northern China. Nutrients, 17(11), 1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop