Validity of Interviewer-Administered 24-h Dietary Recalls in Older Korean Women: A Pilot Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Participants
2.3. Diet
2.4. Interviewer-Administered 24-h Dietary Recall
2.5. Recall Accuracy of Food Items and Portions Sizes
2.6. Recall Accuracy of Nutrient Intake
2.7. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Participant Characteristics
3.2. Accuracy of Food Items Reported
3.3. Accuracy of Portion Size Estimates
3.4. Comparison of Actual and Reported Intakes for Energy and Nutrients
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Website. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm (accessed on 25 January 2019).
- Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Subar, A.F.; Douglass, D.; Zimmerman, T.P.; Thompson, F.E.; Kahle, L.L.; George, S.M.; Dodd, K.W.; Potischman, N. Performance of the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall relative to a measure of true intakes and to an interviewer-administered 24-h recall. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Conway, J.M.; Ingwersen, L.A.; Moshfegh, A.J. Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: An observational validation study. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2004, 104, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moshfegh, A.J.; Rhodes, D.G.; Baer, D.J.; Murayi, T.; Clemens, J.C.; Rumpler, W.V.; Paul, D.R.; Sebastian, R.S.; Kuczynski, K.J.; Ingwersen, L.A. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Johnson, R.K.; Driscoll, P.; Goran, M.I. Comparison of multiple-pass 24-hour recall estimates of energy intake with total energy expenditure determined by the doubly labeled water method in young children. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1996, 96, 1140–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, C.; Spiegelman, D.; Rimm, E.B.; Rosner, B.A.; Stampfer, M.J.; Barnett, J.B.; Chavarro, J.E.; Rood, J.C.; Harnack, L.J.; Sampson, L.K.; et al. Relative Validity of Nutrient Intakes Assessed by Questionnaire, 24-Hour Recalls, and Diet Records as Compared With Urinary Recovery and Plasma Concentration Biomarkers: Findings for Women. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 187, 1051–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jonnalagadda, S.S.; Mitchell, D.C.; Smiciklas-Wright, H.; Meaker, K.B.; Van Heel, N.; Karmally, W.; Ershow, A.G.; Kris-Etherton, P.M. Accuracy of energy intake data estimated by a multiplepass, 24-hour dietary recall technique. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2000, 100, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanton, C.A.; Moshfegh, A.J.; Baer, D.J.; Kretsch, M.J. The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method accurately estimates group total energy and nutrient intake. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 2594–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Conway, J.M.; Ingwersen, L.A.; Vinyard, B.T.; Moshfegh, A.J. Effectiveness of the US Department of Agriculture 5-step multiple-pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 77, 1171–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kirkpatrick, S.I.; Guenther, P.M.; Douglass, D.; Zimmerman, T.; Kahle, L.L.; Atoloye, A.; Marcinow, M.; Savoie-Roskos, M.R.; Dodd, K.W.; Durward, C. The Provision of Assistance Does Not Substantially Impact the Accuracy of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-H Dietary Assessment Tool among Women with Low Incomes. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jung, S.; Park, S.; Kim, J.Y. Comparison of dietary share of ultra-processed foods assessed with a FFQ against a 24-h dietary recall in adults: Results from KNHANES 2016. Public Health Nutr. 2022, 25, 1166–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeon, J.-H.; Go, N.-Y.; Lee, M.-R.; Ndahimana, D.; Kim, E.-K. Accuracy of 24-hour Diet Recalls for Estimating Energy Intake in Elderly Men using the Doubly Labeled Water Method. Korean J. Community Nutr. 2018, 23, 516–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, K.-W.; Go, N.-Y.; Jeon, J.-H.; Ndahimana, D.; Ishikawa-Takata, K.; Park, J.; Kim, E.-K. Accuracy of the 24-hour diet recall method to determine energy intake in elderly women compared with the doubly labeled water method. J. Nutr. Health 2020, 53, 476–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.-Y.; Chung, S.-J. Validity of Estimating Sodium Intake using a Mobile Phone Application of 24-hour Dietary Recall with Meal Photos. Korean J. Community Nutr. 2020, 25, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.; Lee, B.; Park, C.Y. A short education session increases the accuracy of estimated food records in young Korean women during a controlled-feeding study. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2021, 15, 613–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baxter, S.D.; Hitchcock, D.B.; Royer, J.A.; Smith, A.F.; Guinn, C.H. Fourth-Grade Children’s Reporting Accuracy for Amounts Eaten at School-Provided Meals: Insight from a Reporting-Error-Sensitive Analytic Approach Applied to Validation Study Data. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2016, 116, 1932–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smith, A.F.; Domel Baxter, S.; Hardin, J.W.; Nichols, M.D. Conventional analyses of data from dietary validation studies may misestimate reporting accuracy: Illustration from a study of the effect of interview modality on children’s reporting accuracy. Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10, 1247–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yun, H.; Lee, B.; Lee, S.J.; Park, C.Y. Marine Healing, but Not Additional Intake of Undaria pinnatifida, Benefits Physical and Emotional Exhaustion Symptoms of Menopause. Clin. Nutr. Res. 2020, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ministry of Health & Welfare and The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans; Ministry of Health & Welfare: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2015.
- Wright, J.D.; Ervin, B.; Briefel, R.R. Consensus Workshop on Dietary Assessment: Nutrition Monitoring and Tracking the Year 2000 Objectives; US Department of Health and Human Services: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 1994.
- The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Website. Korea, Chungcheongbuk-do, Cheongju (28159): Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online: https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/sub04/sub04_02_02.do?classType=4 (accessed on 23 December 2022).
- Steinfeldt, L.; Anand, J.; Murayi, T. Food Reporting Patterns in the USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method. Procedia Food Sci. 2013, 2, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Measuring Guides for the Dietary Recall Interview. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/measuring_guides_dri/measuringguides.htm (accessed on 25 October 2020).
- Lee, Y.; Kim, C.; Chang, Y.; Lee, H.; Moon, J.; Han, K.; Son, J. Development of Food and Nutrient Database: Food Portion/Weight Database; Annual Report of KHIDI; Korea Health Industry Development Institute: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2007; pp. 63–167.
- Kerr, D.A.; Wright, J.L.; Dhaliwal, S.S.; Boushey, C.J. Does an Adolescent’s Accuracy of Recall Improve with a Second 24-h Dietary Recall? Nutrients 2015, 7, 3557–3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lafrenière, J.; Lamarche, B.; Laramée, C.; Robitaille, J.; Lemieux, S. Validation of a newly automated web-based 24-hour dietary recall using fully controlled feeding studies. BMC Nutr. 2017, 3, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lafay, L.; Mennen, L.; Basdevant, A.; Charles, M.; Borys, J.; Eschwege, E.; Romon, M. Does energy intake underreporting involve all kinds of food or only specific food items? Results from the Fleurbaix Laventie Ville Sante (FLVS) study. Int. J. Obes. 2000, 24, 1500–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Johansson, G.; Wikman, Å.; Åhrén, A.-M.; Hallmans, G.; Johansson, I. Underreporting of energy intake in repeated 24-hour recalls related to gender, age, weight status, day of interview, educational level, reported food intake, smoking habits and area of living. Public Health Nutr. 2001, 4, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Subar, A.F.; Kipnis, V.; Troiano, R.P.; Midthune, D.; Schoeller, D.A.; Bingham, S.; Sharbaugh, C.O.; Trabulsi, J.; Runswick, S.; Ballard-Barbash, R.; et al. Using Intake Biomarkers to Evaluate the Extent of Dietary Misreporting in a Large Sample of Adults: The OPEN Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 158, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Meal | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Breakfast |
|
|
|
|
Lunch |
|
|
|
|
Afternoon snack |
|
|
|
|
Dinner |
|
|
|
|
Evening snack |
|
|
|
|
Variables | Mean ± SD or n (%) |
---|---|
Age (years) | 55.5 ± 5.2 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 23.1 ± 3.7 |
Residence | |
City | 16 (72.7) |
Rural areas | 6 (27.3) |
Monthly family income (KRW) 1 | |
<2,000,000 | 2 (9.1) |
2,000,000–4,000,000 | 9 (40.9) |
>4,000,000 | 9 (40.9) |
Education | |
Middle school graduate | 3 (13.6) |
High school graduate | 10 (45.5) |
≥College graduate | 9 (40.9) |
Employed | 6 (27.3) |
Physically active | 11 (50.0) |
Type of Dish | Mean Number of Items Served | Accuracy of Food Items | Accuracy of Portion Size | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Matches (%) | Exclusions | Intrusions 2 | Corresponding (%) | Overreport (%) | Underreport (%) | Missing (%) | |||||
Total | Exact | Close | Far | (%) | |||||||
Rice | 2.5 | 100 a | 67.4 a | 30.3 a | 2.3 a | 0 a | 0 | 28.0 a | 40.9 | 31.1 ab | 0.0 a |
Soup | 2.3 | 97.7 a | 59.1 ab | 34.8 a | 3.8 ab | 2.3 a | 0 | 12.1 a | 27.3 | 58.3 ac | 2.3 a |
Kimchi | 2.3 | 95.5 ab | 90.9 a | 0 b | 4.5 ab | 4.5 ab | 1 | 8.3 a | 15.2 | 72.0 c | 4.5 a |
Banchans | 6.0 | 95.6 ab | 73.5 a | 17.8 ab | 4.3 ab | 4.4 ab | 1 | 6.5 a | 31.7 | 57.4 ac | 4.4 a |
Sauce | 1.5 | 81.8 b | 34.1 b | 29.5 a | 18.2 b | 18.2 b | 0 | 15.9 a | 18.2 | 40.9 a | 25.0 b |
Snacks | 4.7 | 99.4 ab | 84.8 a | 13.0 ab | 1.5 a | 0.6 a | 1 | 31.4 a | 33.3 | 34.7 ab | 0.6 a |
Beverages | 1.2 | 95.5 ab | 65.9 a | 29.5 a | 0 a | 4.5 ab | 0 | 65.9 b | 18.2 | 6.8 b | 9.1 ab |
All foods | 20.4 | 95.1 | 68.0 | 22.2 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 3 | 24.0 | 26.4 | 43.0 | 6.6 |
Food Group | Mean Number of Items Served | Accuracy of Food Items | Accuracy of Portion Size | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Matches (%) | Exclusions (%) | Intrusions 2 | Corresponding (%) | Overreport (%) | Underreport (%) | Missing (%) | |||||
Total | Exact | Close | Far | ||||||||
Grains | 4.8 | 97.0 | 70.9 a | 23.2 a | 3.0 ab | 3.0 | 0 | 24.5 ab | 35.5 ab | 37.0 ab | 3.0 |
Protein foods | 2.7 | 97.0 | 80.3 abc | 15.2 ab | 1.5 ac | 3.0 | 1 | 6.4 b | 49.6 a | 40.9 ab | 3.0 |
Vegetables | 9.0 | 97.3 | 75.4 ab | 14.9 ab | 7.1 a | 2.6 | 2 | 8.8 b | 21.8 ab | 64.7 b | 4.7 |
Fruits | 1.8 | 98.5 | 97.0 bc | 1.5 b | 0 bc | 1.5 | 0 | 25.8 ab | 37.9 ab | 33.3 ac | 3.0 |
Dairy | 1.0 | 100 | 68.2 a | 31.8 a | 0 bc | 0 | 1 | 77.3 c | 18.2 b | 4.5 c | 0 |
Fats & sweets | 0.7 | 100 | 100 c | 0 b | 0 bc | 0 | 0 | 43.8 a | 25.0 ab | 31.3 ac | 0 |
All foods 3 | 20.0 | 98.2 | 81.1 | 15.1 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 4 | 30.5 | 31.6 | 35.5 | 2.4 |
Nutrient | Served Intake | Reported Intake | Mean Difference (95% CI) | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Energy (kcal) | 1715 ± 253 | 1704 ± 384 | −11 (−162, 140) | 0.88 |
Carbohydrate (g) | 244.5 ± 30.0 | 256.5 ± 56.8 | 12.0 (−11.8, 35.7) | 0.31 |
Protein (g) | 78.2 ± 10.6 | 85.4 ± 24.4 | 7.2 (−3.4, 17.8) | 0.17 |
Fat (g) | 47.0 ± 21.6 | 36.3 ± 15.7 | −10.7 (−16.3, −5.0) | 0.001 |
Calcium (mg) | 468.0 ± 49.6 | 433.8 ± 105.2 | −34.2 (−83.1, 14.7) | 0.16 |
Sodium (mg) | 3271 ± 306 | 1989 ± 726 | −1282 (−1655, −909) | <0.001 |
Potassium (mg) | 3094 ± 615 | 3052 ± 793 | −42 (−315, 230) | 0.75 |
Iron (mg) | 21.8 ± 7.5 | 25.2 ± 17.6 | 3.3 (−5.2, 11.9) | 0.77 |
Folate (μg) | 554 ± 164 | 511 ± 207 | −43 (−101, 15) | 0.14 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, S.; Park, C.Y. Validity of Interviewer-Administered 24-h Dietary Recalls in Older Korean Women: A Pilot Study. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15071757
Kim S, Park CY. Validity of Interviewer-Administered 24-h Dietary Recalls in Older Korean Women: A Pilot Study. Nutrients. 2023; 15(7):1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15071757
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Seunghee, and Clara Y. Park. 2023. "Validity of Interviewer-Administered 24-h Dietary Recalls in Older Korean Women: A Pilot Study" Nutrients 15, no. 7: 1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15071757
APA StyleKim, S., & Park, C. Y. (2023). Validity of Interviewer-Administered 24-h Dietary Recalls in Older Korean Women: A Pilot Study. Nutrients, 15(7), 1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15071757