Next Article in Journal
Forming the Perception of WIC Infant Feeding Recommendations: A Qualitative Study
Previous Article in Journal
Is Generation Z Ready to Engage in Entomophagy? A Segmentation Analysis Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/nu15030526
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thwarting Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) with Common Bean: Dose- and Sex-Dependent Protection against Hepatic Steatosis

by
Tymofiy Lutsiv
1,
John N. McGinley
1,
Elizabeth S. Neil
1,
Michelle T. Foster
2 and
Henry J. Thompson
1,*
1
Cancer Prevention Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
2
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(3), 526; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15030526
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 17 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Nutrition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hepatic steatosis signifies onset of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) caused by disrupted metabolic homeostasis compromising liver function. Regular consumption of common beans reduces the risk of metabolic impairment, but its effective dose, the impact of biological sex, and underlying mechanisms of action are unknown. We fed female and male C57BL6/J mice with obesogenic yet isocaloric diets containing 0%, 17.5%, 35%, and 70% of total dietary protein derived from cooked whole common beans. Liver tissue was collected for histopathology, lipid quantification, and RNA-seq analyses. Beans qualitatively and quantitatively diminished hepatic fat deposition at the 35% dose in female and 70% dose in male mice. Bean-induced differentially expressed genes (DEGs) most significantly mapped to hepatic steatosis and revealed dose-responsive inhibition of de novo lipogenesis markers (Acly, Acaca, Fasn, Elovl6, Scd1, etc.) and triacylglycerol biosynthesis, activation of triacylglycerol degradation, and downregulation of sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1 (SREBF1) signaling. Upregulated fatty acid β-oxidation was more prominent in females, while suppression of Cd36-mediated fatty acid uptake—in males. Sex-dependent bean effects also involved DEGs patterns downstream of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) and MLX-interacting protein-like (MLXIPL). Therefore, biological sex determines amount of common bean in the diet required to prevent hepatic lipid accumulation.

1. Introduction

The 21st century is distinguished by globalization of sedentary lifestyle (owing to mechanization, automation, and computerization of labor), dietary patterns (especially the unbalanced Western-type), and the consequential upsurge in the burden of non-communicable diseases (such as obesity, type II diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer) which account for more than 70% of deaths per annum globally [1,2,3]. Despite their multifactorial etiology, disrupting the organism’s metabolic homeostasis is fundamental to their pathogenesis [3,4]. The liver plays a central role in regulating whole-body metabolism in mammals, and the dietary-induced chronic liver disorder is referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, or MAFLD—formerly known in the biomedical literature as “non-alcoholic fatty liver disease” (NAFLD). In 2020, an international group of experts from 22 countries reached a consensus to adopt the new terminology—MAFLD—thereby emphasizing dysregulation of metabolism as the leading pathophysiological mechanism of the disease [5,6,7]. This terminology will be used henceforth.
As it progresses, MAFLD encompasses a broad continuum of chronic and heterogenous liver comorbidities. Phenotypically, hepatic steatosis [8]—the abnormal intrahepatic retention of lipids in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes—is observed. Approximately 1 in 5 individuals with hepatic steatosis progress to ectopic lipid deposition with concurrent hepatocyte damage, inflammation, and early-stage fibrosis, which signifies metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) [9]. In turn, 20–25% of people with MASH within ten years develop advanced fibrosis with severely impaired liver function termed cirrhosis, the end-stage liver disease, markedly increasing the probability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development [5,9]. By 2030, MAFLD-induced HCC will be the leading reason for liver transplantation, exceeding hepatitis C [10,11]. Today, the overall prevalence of MAFLD worldwide is 32.4% (with a 95% confidence interval of [29.9%, 34.9%]) [12]. Around 70–90% of overweight or obese individuals as well as people with type II diabetes also suffer from MAFLD and exhibit dyslipidemia, lipotoxicity, insulin resistance, and hypertension as features of MAFLD [8,13]. Therefore, to tackle such a complex systemic challenge such as MAFLD, there is an urgent need for effective preventative strategies, such as adopting food patterns to improve whole-body health status.
Pulses are dry seeds of grain legumes unique in their content of small molecules, dietary fiber, and protein and their negligible content of lipids [14]. Owing to their profile of nutrients and bioactive compounds, pulses can be termed superfoods. However, their regular consumption has practically disappeared from the dietary patterns of developed countries and beyond—a change that has occurred concomitantly with the global increase in chronic disease burden. As discussed in [15], incorporating pulses into the diet can improve the quality of food patterns, and population data have reported reduced occurrences of diseases associated with metabolic dysfunction in high pulse consumers [16,17,18]. These reports are consistent with our findings that pulse consumption has an anti-obesogenic activity in rodent models of polygenic and dietary-induced obesity, including effects on liver lipid metabolism [19,20,21,22,23,24]. However, the minimal pulse dose required to elicit discernible effects on the hepatic phenotype, the impact of biological sex, and underlying molecular mechanisms have not been extensively elucidated.
Therefore, we focused on the most consumed type of pulse—common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L., to assess its effects on the development of high fat diet induced MAFLD. The objectives of this study were: (1) to quantify hepatic lipid content and determine the liver histopathological response to increasing dose of dietary bean consumption; (2) to characterize the impact of the biological sex on the bean-induced outcomes; and (3) to analyze the liver transcriptomic signature to deduce candidate molecular mechanisms underlying observed bean-induced phenotypes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Feeding Study

C57BL6/J female and male mice (stock #000664) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Barr Harbor, ME, USA) at twenty days of age. Standard husbandry conditions were applied: polycarbonate rodent cages with a solid bottom, ad libitum access to distilled water and food, a 12-h light/dark cycle, 27.5 ± 2 °C room temperature. Adaptation to the housing routine and a purified diet containing 32.5% kcal fat based on the formulation D12266B (Research Diets Inc., New Brunswick, NJ, USA), as described in [21], continued until eight weeks of age, after which 20 animals were assigned by staggered randomization by body weight to each experimental diet group and fed their respective experimental diet formulations for 12–14 weeks (see Section 2.2). Animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation following isoflurane-induced anesthesia. Liver was excised, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and samples stored at −70 °C until evaluated. All the procedures performed on animals complied with the Colorado State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines (protocol KP 1431).

2.2. Diet Formulations

Experimental diets were formulated so as to remain equal in total dietary energy content enabling evaluation of the direct effects from the bean. All diets were composed of equal macronutrient proportions weight by weight, i.e., 58.6% total carbohydrate, 15.5% total fat, 20% total protein, and 5.9% micronutrients, according to the AIN-93G recommendations. Mice received 32.5% kcal derived from fat, which is within the range for both total lipid dietary practice in humans [25] and simultaneously for obesogenic studies using the C57BL6/J animal model [26]. Diet containing 11% dietary fat energy was used as a low-fat and bean-free control. All diets were comprised of purified ingredients, with the exception of bean. White kidney beans were cooked as a whole food, processed with leachate, freeze-dried, and then homogenized into a fine powder. Bean doses were calculated as 0% (bean-free control), 17.5%, 35%, and 70% of total dietary protein derived from bean. Total dietary fiber concentration of bean was 23.5 g/100 g bean powder [27]. The formulation of the experimental diets is shown in Supplemental Table S1.

2.3. Histopathology

A small portion of frozen liver from each animal (n = 2 per group) was embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA) on a cryostat chuck and quickly frozen in the cryostat (Leica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL, USA) using a heat sink. Frozen sections of liver were cut at 10 µm, mounted on Histobond slides (Statlab Medical Products, McKinney, TX, USA), placed in pre-cooled plastic slide boxes, and stored at −70 °C until ready for staining.

2.3.1. Fixation

Frozen section slides were removed from the −70 °C freezer, one stain set at a time, placed in a vertical slide rack and allowed to thaw at room temperature for 5 min prior to immersion in fixative, 10% neutral buffered formalin for 5 min.

2.3.2. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) Staining

Formalin-fixed slides were rinsed in deionized water, stained with Harris hematoxylin for 2 min, rinsed in deionized water, and counterstained in eosin Y for 1 min. Slides were dehydrated in a series of graded ethanols, starting with two changes of 95% ethanol, two changes of 100% ethanol, and one change of isopropanol, then cleared in four changes of xylene before mounting with MM24 mounting media (Leica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL, USA) and glass coverslips.

2.3.3. Trichrome Staining

Formalin-fixed slides were rinsed in deionized water and stained using the Gomori one step aniline blue trichrome stain kit (Newcomer Supply, Middleton, WI, USA). Briefly, slides were immersed in Bouin’s solution and incubated at 60 °C for 1 h. Slides were allowed to cool to room temperature for 10 min, rinsed well in running tap water, and rinsed in deionized water. Slides were immersed in freshly prepared Weigert’s iron hematoxylin for 10 min, washed in running tap water, and rinsed in deionized water. Slides were immersed in the Gomori one-step aniline blue trichrome solution for 20 min followed by differentiation in 0.5% acetic acid for 2 min and quickly rinsed in deionized water before dehydration, clearing, and mounting, as listed above.

2.3.4. Oil Red O (ORO) Staining

Formalin-fixed slides were rinsed in deionized water. Excess water was blotted from each slide prior to being immersed in 100% propylene glycol on a shaker with gentle, continuous agitation for 5 min. Slides were transferred directly to Oil Red O propylene glycol solution (Newcomer Supply, Middleton, WI, USA) and stained with gentle, continuous agitation for 1 h. Slides were differentiated in 85% propylene glycol with gentle, continuous agitation for 3 min followed by gentle rinsing in two changes of deionized water. Slides were counterstained in hematoxylin for 2 min, gently washed in tap water, blued in Scott’s tap water for 1 min, gently rinsed in two changes of deionized water, and mounted with Gel/Mount aqueous mounting media (Biomeda, San Jose, CA, USA) and a glass coverslip. Edges of the glass coverslip were sealed with clear fingernail polish to prevent evaporation of the aqueous mounting media.

2.4. Quantification of Liver Lipid Content

Lipid was isolated from the dried liver samples (n = 10 per group) using a methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) biphasic extraction method [28]. Weights collected throughout sample processing (fresh tissue, desiccation, extraction, lipid isolation, and dry matter) were used to quantify lipid content expressed as mg of lipid per mg of dry liver weight.

2.5. RNA Isolation and RNA-Seq Analysis

Frozen liver samples (n = 10 per group) were ground to a fine powder using ceramic pestles in ceramic mortars filled with liquid nitrogen. RNA samples were extracted using the RNeasy mini-kit (QIAGEN, Inc., Germantown, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer protocol. RNA integrity was determined with Experion automated electrophoresis station (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Samples were diluted to a concentration of 4 ng/µL in the 50 µL of RNase-free water and under dry ice shipped to the Genomics and Microarray Core at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center (Aurora, CO, USA) for the cDNA library construction and preparation using Nugen Universal mRNA kit (Tecan Genomics, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) and subsequent paired-end (2 × 150 bp) RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq hereafter) using a NovaSEQ 6000 sequencer (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The sequencing data were further processed using QIAGEN CLC Genomics Workbench, version 21.0.3 (QIAGEN, Redwood City, CA, USA), https://digitalinsights.qiagen.com (accessed on 24 April 2021). Raw reads were trimmed using quality scores (quality limit = 0.05) for removal of ambiguous nucleotides and read-through adapters. The resulting high-quality reads were mapped to Mus musculus genome reference, version GRCm38, using gene ontology associations to generate transcript level expression tracks. The transcript expression data containing 66,624 genes were subjected to the differential abundance analysis (see Section 2.6) producing output datasets of pairwise comparison pairs (35% vs. 0%, 70% vs. 0%, and 70% vs. 35% bean diet groups). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), their p-values, p-values corrected for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni method and Benjamini–Hochberg procedure controlling the false discovery rate (FDR; q-values), expression fold change, expression log2 ratios, and the values for the maximum of the two average reads per kilobase million (RPKMs) per diet group in a comparison pair comprised each comparison table. DEGs containing at least 10 RPKMs for each comparison pair were uploaded to QIAGEN Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software, v81348237 (QIAGEN, Redwood City, CA, USA), https://digitalinsights.qiagen.com/IPA (accessed on 13 July 2022) [29], for further analysis.
Within IPA, each comparison dataset was subjected to the Core Analysis with Ingenuity Knowledge Base (Genes only) as a reference set and relaxed integral filters for species, tissues, and cell lines. Expression log2 ratio was selected as a measurement to calculate directionality in the analysis. To maximize the biological interpretation, the list of DEGs was further quality-filtered by the p-value < 0.05 to keep each comparison pair dataset within recommended by IPA limits (Table 1). IPA mapped DEGs to identifiers (IDs); 9 IDs in each group were unmapped and discarded. Identifiers that mapped to the same molecule were resolved to one data measurement by the expression p-value.
Canonical Pathways, Upstream Analysis, and Diseases and Functions engines were used to analyze DEGs. Briefly, expression patterns of the DEGs were cross-referenced with the published studies worldwide from the QIAGEN Ingenuity Knowledge Base, and p-values of overlap between the observed DEGs patterns and their associations were calculated. Activation z-scores measuring the prediction strength of the DEGs effects (activation or inhibition) were calculated based on direction of DEGs expression changes. Mapped functional associates were deemed significant with the |z|-score ≥ 2 and the p-value < 0.05 of the overlap (B-H p-value < 0.1) between our experimentally observed dataset and the QIAGEN Ingenuity Knowledge Base.

2.6. Statistical Evaluation

Hepatic lipid quantification data (expressed as milligrams per dry liver tissue weight) were analyzed and visualized in R (v4.2.2) using FSA, rstatix, and gpubr packages.
Statistical differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq data in CLC Genomics Workbench was conducted through the Differential Expression for RNA-Seq tool via generalized linear modeling for each gene assuming the negative binomial distribution of read counts and subsequent Wald testing for all group pairs to generate the expression track tables. In IPA, p-values of overlap were calculated using a right-tailed Fisher’s exact test and further adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing applying Benjamini–Hochberg correction method (B-H p-values). At times, p-values were reported in their negative logarithmic format (−logp-value; −logB-H p-value) as provided by IPA. z-scores were calculated using internal IPA algorithms.
Selected DEGs were visualized in R in counts per million (CPMs) normalized for the library sizes with the trimmed mean of M values (TMM) method using ggpubr package.

3. Results

3.1. Livers Accumulate Less Lipid upon Increasing Consumption of Bean

MAFLD onset is grossly identified by excessive accumulation of lipid in the liver. Consumption of bean markedly reduced the lipid content per g liver dry weight in both females and males (Figure 1). Regression analysis indicated that the reduction was linear across increasing bean doses in both sexes (regression coefficient, −35.3, p < 0.001 and −90.3, p < 0.001 in female and male mice, respectively). Pairwise comparisons revealed that females exhibit less hepatic lipid at the 35% dose without any statistical distinction with the higher bean dose, whereas males had a significant effect only in the 70% group which statistically differed from both 0% and 35% bean doses (Figure 1a). The 70% bean dose nullified sex-dependent differences in hepatic lipid levels (Figure 1b).

3.2. Dietary Bean Visually Reduces Steatosis Severity in the Liver Tissue

To determine the phenotypic liver response to consumption of increasing doses of bean, frozen sections of liver were stained for histological evaluation. The H&E-stained sections (Figure 2) showed that livers from male and female 0% bean-fed mice displayed the classic features of hepatic steatosis, i.e., extensive accumulation of lipid droplets, heterogenous in size and shape, in the cytoplasm and the consequential ballooning [8]. However, only focal areas of lymphocyte accumulation were detected, and no evidence of fibrosis was observed. These changes were not observed in mice fed the 70% bean diet, and lipid accumulation was similar to that observed in the low-fat-fed group of mice. To confirm these effects, sections were subjected to ORO staining (Figure 3) and to trichome staining. The ORO staining confirms the results of the H&E stain relative to lipid accumulation. The trichrome stain (data not shown) confirmed the lack of collagen accumulation in any of the animals evaluated.

3.3. Liver Transcriptomic Signature upon Consumption of Bean Indicates Protection from Hepatotoxicity

To infer the underlying molecular mechanisms that may explain the effects on liver lipid content and histology (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3), total RNA was isolated from liver samples and subjected to the RNA-Seq. Only 0%, 35%, and 70% bean-containing diet groups were selected as the most prominently responsive to dietary beans. The Tox Functions engine within the IPA Core Analysis was used to provide an overview of the toxicity endpoints associated with the bean-induced liver within the Hepatotoxicity category as a focus. Accordingly, bean-induced DEGs patterns revealed significant suppression of hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and necrosis, and upregulation of bile acid secretion in both female and male mice (Figure 4a). Suppression of hepatic steatosis was significant in the 70% compared to both the 0% (z-score = −2.549) and the 35% (z-score = −2.195) bean groups in females (Figure 4b). In contrast, the bean-stimulated expression patterns in the male cohort did not reach statistically significant z-score values but the trend was similar to the females (Supplementary Table S3).
Collectively, hepatotoxicity analysis of global bean-induced liver transcriptomes indicates that consumption of bean altered expression of hepatic genes predominantly related to the lipid metabolism, and it was more pronounced in female than male mice—an observation consistent with hepatic lipid content in the bean-fed animals (Figure 1) and the histopathologic changes shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Therefore, we next focused on the key mechanisms regulating hepatic FA metabolism involving the observed bean-induced DEGs.

3.4. Bean Consumption Maps to Hepatic Fatty Acid Metabolic Pathways and Regulators

Hepatic fat is stored as lipid droplets which consist predominantly of triacylglycerols (TAGs) formed by esterification of free fatty acids (FAs) with glycerol [30]. Considering the central role of FAs to MAFLD progression [31,32], we performed IPA Canonical Pathways analysis with a particular focus on metabolic signaling associated with FAs. Consumption of beans significantly upregulated TAG degradation and downregulated TAG biosynthesis (Figure 5a). The FA β-oxidation was upregulated in the 70% dose compared to the 0% and 35% bean groups in females, albeit the FA activation and the mitochondrial L-carnitine shuttle pathway had significant overlaps with the observed DEGs in both cohorts but insufficient z-scores to infer their activation (Figure 5a; Supplementary Table S3). Similarly, β-oxidation of unsaturated/odd-number FAs and the FA α-oxidation also displayed only significant overlap with bean-induced DEGs (Figure 5a; Supplementary Table S3). Finally, biosynthetic pathways of long-chain FAs conjugates oleate, stearate, and γ-linoleate indicated a pattern of inhibition, which corresponds to suppression of lipogenesis upon consumption of beans for both sex cohorts (Figure 5a).
To identify the most significant potential regulators of bean effects in the context of lipid metabolism, we subjected the observed DEGs to the Upstream Analysis in IPA. The sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor 1 (SREBF1; also known as sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c, SREBP1c) and MLX-interacting protein-like (MLXIPL; also known as the carbohydrate regulatory element-binding protein, ChREBP) are the key transcriptional regulators of de novo lipogenesis in liver. SREBP1 was predicted to be inhibited in all but the lowest bean dose groups. MLXIPL showed a trend of inhibition in the female cohort; however, in males, was upregulated in the 70% versus 0% and 35% bean diets (Figure 5b). While SREBF1 is stimulated by insulin (even under conditions of insulin resistance) via mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and by liver X receptor α (LXRα, encoded by Nr1h3), MLXIPL signaling is induced by dietary glucose (even more potently by dietary fructose) independently of insulin or dietary fat [33,34,35]. Accordingly, we observed inhibition of insulin and its receptor INSR and insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) based on bean-induced downstream DEGs indicative of improved insulin sensitivity. To support the trend, mTOR complex 2 partner and regulator RICTOR (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR) displayed inhibition, whereas negative regulators of mTOR complex 1, tuberous sclerosis proteins TSC1/2, were upregulated (Supplementary Table S4). SREBF cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) promoting SREBF1 activity is counteracted by insulin-induced genes INSIG-1/2—also in accordance with our data (Figure 5b). LXRα belongs to the nuclear receptors [36], and bean-induced DEGs predict its inhibition, consistent with upregulation of nuclear receptor co-repressor N-Cor (Figure 5b) which also suppresses their target genes [37]. Another nuclear receptor group, peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are involved in regulation of majority of genes involved in lipid metabolism as nutrient sensors activated by FA derivatives [34,36]. Hepatic PPARα (Ppara) stimulates expression of genes associated with mitochondrial and peroxisomal FA β-oxidation, whereas PPARγ (Pparg) is associated adipose tissue and lipid droplet regulation but shows strong responsiveness to MAFLD in liver. Bean suppressed PPARγ, but PPARα was predicted to be upregulated in females yet downregulated in males based on their downstream DEGs. Progression of MAFLD to MASH involved regulatory network of upregulated SREBF1, PPARγ, and disrupted activity of hepatocyte nuclear factors HFN1A, HFN4A, and ONECUT1 [38,39] which were predicted to be upregulated upon bean consumption (Figure 5b, Supplementary Table S4). Finally, sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) improves metabolic disfunction, and its activation has been associated with beneficial caloric restriction and exercise [33]; however, here, isocaloric diet containing even 35% protein deriving from bean was sufficient to arrange DEGs patterns predicting activation of SIRT3 in females (Figure 5b).
Taken together, dietary bean dose-dependently affects key regulatory nodes of TAG metabolism associated with MAFLD, and such effects differ between females and males.

3.5. Consumption of Beans Reduces Uptake and De Novo Lipogenesis of Free Fatty Acids and Differentially Affects Transport, Oxidation, and Incorporation into Lipid Droplets

TAGs serve as both the source and preferred anabolic end-point of intracellular FAs [30,34]. Corresponding to Canonical Pathways analysis results in Figure 5a, dietary bean increased expression of TAG hydrolases, such as hepatic lipase C (Lipc) and several carboxylesterases Ces1d, Ces2a, Ces2e, Ces3a, Notum, etc., which signify greater capacity for lipolysis in the liver in female and male livers. Upstream analysis indicated that males’ DEGs predicted activation of hormone-sensitive lipase (Lipe) and monoacylglycerol lipase (Mgll), despite observed reduced expression of Mgll and Pnpla2—lipolysis-initiating lipase which was slightly expressed more in females fed beans, instead (Figure 5b; Supplementary Figure S1). TAGs can also undergo lipophagy via formation of autolysosomes [34,40]. While both cohorts had reduced expression of lysosomal acid lipase A (Lipa), females also increased expression of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3; encoded by Map1lc3a; Supplementary Figure S1), one of the markers of lipophagy (autophagic degradation of lipid droplets) in liver [40,41,42,43]. Nevertheless, bean-induced DEGs showed inhibition of upstream transcription factor EB (TFEB; Figure 5b), which regulates lipophagy and drives expression of LIPA, serving as another piece of evidence that lipophagy is hardly mediating dietary bean effects [42,44]. Finally, bean-fed females increased expression of LDLR-related protein 1 (Lrp1) and apolipoprotein E (ApoE), which are involved in uptake of dietary TAG-rich chylomicron remnants and improved MAFLD (Figure 6; Supplementary Figure S1 and Table S4) [45].
Lipolysis leads to intracellular FA flux, which in MAFLD patients is predominantly driven by uptake of free non-esterified FAs [46]. Consuming increasing doses of beans reduced expression of the plasma membrane FA-binding protein (FABPpm, encoded by Fabp2) and FA translocase/cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36)—higher levels of which are a biomarker of high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis [34] and whose reduction had a larger magnitude in males than in females (Figure 6). Expression of Cd36 is regulated by PPARγ, aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), LXRα, mTOR [34,47], and even SREBF1 and MLXIPL [34,48], all of which were affected by dietary bean based on their downstream DEGs (Figure 5b; Supplementary Table S6). Females also slightly increased expression of the very long-chain FA transport proteins 2 and 5 (FATP2/5, also known as very long-chain acyl-CoA synthetases and solute carrier family 27A members 2/5, encoded by Slc27a2/5), despite significant downregulation of SLC27A2 in upstream analysis (Figure 5b and Figure 6). However, Slc27a5, which was the only upregulated FATP in males, has been reported to be rather associated with conjugation of bile acids than FAs uptake (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table S4) [49].
Once inside the cells, FAs are transported by cytosolic FA-binding proteins (FABPs), acyl-CoA-binding domain containing proteins (ACBDs), and others [34]. Males exhibited reduced expression of Fabp4/5 and Acbd4, whereas females decreased expression of Fabp5 and Acbd5 with a slight increase in Fabp1 levels (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table S4). While all these FABPs correlate with the hepatic fat content [35], FABP1 was also associated with protective role by redirecting intracellular FAs towards oxidation, energy utilization, and disposal [33,50,51].
FAs enter metabolic pathways following activation by acyl-CoA synthetases (ACSs) as respective acyl-CoA molecules [52]. Consumption of beans suppressed short-chain ACS Acss2 and long-chain ACS Acsl5 in both sex cohorts (females also reduced levels of ER-based Acsl3). In contrast, bean increased propionyl-CoA ACS Acsf, medium-chain ACSs Acsm1/5 (however, Acsm3 was reduced in females), and expression of long-chain Acsl1. While Acsl1 is associated with oxidation of long-chain FAs, Acsl3/5 are mainly connected to thioesterification of de novo synthesized FAs for lipogenic pathways (Supplementary Figure S3 and Table S4) [34,51].
Oxidation is the main mechanism of FAs utilization which occurs predominantly in mitochondria (β-oxidation), but also can take place in peroxisomes (α-oxidation of branched-chain FAs and β-oxidation of very long-chain FAs) and in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; ω-oxidation of FAs via cytochrome P450 enzymes, CYPs) [52]. The 70% of bean sample compared to the bean-free control and lower bean dose in males significantly reduced expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase CPT1 (Cpt1a)—the rate-limiting step of mitochondrial β-oxidation—regulating long-chain FAs transfer across mitochondrial outer membrane. In contrast, females elevated carnitine-acylcarnitine translocase (CACT, Slc25a20) and CPT2 levels mediating transport of CPT1-derived acyl-carnitines across inner mitochondrial membrane and conversion thereof back to acyl-CoAs, respectively [48,52]. CPT2 also showed a trend of increase in the male cohort but without significant p-value (Figure 6; Supplementary Table S4 and Figure S4). CPT1 is regulated by MLXIPL, PPARα, and PPARγ coactivator-1 (PGC-1), and subunit and stabilizator of the latter, Ppargc1b, showed inhibited trend in upstream analysis (Supplementary Table S6) [34,50,53]. Subsequently, bean consumption differentially affected enzymes involved in the course of FA β-oxidation in mitochondria with a noticeable trend towards an increased acyl-CoA dehydrogenases (ACADs) for short-chain FAs Acadsb, medium-chain FAs Acadm, and long-chain FAs Acadl, Acadvl, and Acad11 in females, whereas males upregulated only short-chain FAs mitochondrial ACADs Acadsb and Acad8. Females also upregulated 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase Hadh, including hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase-α (Hadha) and hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase-β (Hadhb)—units of the mitochondrial trifunctional protein degrading long-chain FAs [54]; as well as final thiolase (Acaa2) producing acetyl-CoA and shorter by two carbons acyl-CoA molecules [52]. Additionally, enoyl-CoA isomerase (Eci2) and 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase (Decr1), both of which handle unsaturated FAs, were induced in females (Supplementary Figure S4 and Table S4). In contrast, males upregulated only mitochondrial short-chain FAs ACADs (Acadsb and Acad8), Acaa2, and Eci2. Such a transcriptomic signature implies that despite a greater capacity of female livers to β-oxidize various FAs, males rather target short-chain FAs in mitochondria (Supplementary Figure S2).
Long- and very long-chain acyl-CoAs canonically undergo initial catabolism via peroxisomal β-oxidation which consists of essentially the same reactions as the mitochondrial one but catalyzed by different enzymes [52,55,56]. Consumption of beans induced expression of peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase (Acox1 for females and Acox2 for males) mediating rate-limiting initial dehydrogenation. Upstream analysis indicated that ACOX1 was predicted to be upregulated in both sex cohorts upon bean consumption with higher z-score in males than females (Supplementary Figure S5 and Tables S4 and S6). L-bifunctional protein (LBP, encoded by Ehhadh) and D-bifunctional protein (DBP, encoded by Hsd17b4) mediating hydration and subsequent dehydrogenation of FAs were upregulated (Figure 5b) in males, but peroxisomal 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase Decr2 expression was reduced. Subunits of final thiolases in peroxisomes Acaa1a/b were increased only in female cohort. Finally, there was a slight decrease in peroxisomal FAs transporter—ATP-binding cassette (ABC) protein of subclass D Abcd1 in both sex cohorts under bean-containing diets. This is in contrast to increased Slc27a2 and Acbd5 associated with peroxisomal import of long- and very-long chain FAs in females (Supplementary Figure S5) [55].
Imbalanced hepatocytes upon MAFLD counterintuitively respond to systemic lipid overload with enhanced de novo lipogenesis of new FAs [33,34,35]. Bean consumption incrementally reduced expression of key enzymes in this process: aforementioned Acss2 and ATP-citrate lyase (ACLY), both cytosolic and mitochondrial acetyl-CoA carboxylases I and II, respectively (ACC1/2, Acaca/b), fatty acid synthase (FASN), including elongases Elovl2/5/6 and desaturases Fads1/2, Scd1 in both sex cohorts. Males additionally decreased levels of Elovl1 transcripts but increased such of Elovl3, whereas females reduced expression of lipogenic Slc25a1 (Figure 6; Supplementary Figure S6 and Table S4). Expression of these lipogenic genes is regulated mainly by SREBF1, especially when stimulated by postprandial circulating insulin, and by MLXIPL induced by dietary carbohydrates [8,35].
Newly synthesized long-chain FAs are in the form of acyl-CoAs which can enter TAGs biosynthetic pathways or be first transformed to free FAs acyl-CoA thioesterases (ACOTs). The glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) pathway (also termed the Kennedy pathway; involves G3P- (GPATs) and acyl-G3P acyltransferases (AGPATs)), while 2-monoacylglycerol pathway consists of mono- (MGATs) and diacylglycerol acyltransferases (DGATs). Both are connected by lipins-mediated production of diacylglycerol [34,48]. Bean consumption reduces expression of lipins Lpin2, a GPAT encoded by Gpam, AGPATs Agpat2 (females) and Agpat3 (males) [34]. Males also reduce glycerol kinase Gk that generates G3P from glucose and glycerol but upregulate Dgat2. Additionally, bean induced significant downregulation of Lpcat3 (both sex cohorts) and Pnpla3 (females only) that possess acyl-G3P acyltransferase activity within TAGs biosynthesis pathway according to IPA Canonical Pathways (Figure 5a; Supplementary Figure S7). Finally, packaging of newly made TAGs into lipid droplets also involves DFF45-like effector proteins (CIDE group) together with abovementioned ACSL3/5 [34], and consumption of beans reduced their expression in males (Supplementary Figure S7), while females’ DEGs indicated downregulation of CIDEC in the upstream analysis (Figure 5b). CIDE proteins, ACSL3, DGAT2, including perilipins (PLINs), PNPLA3, and apolipoproteins are packaged into lipid droplets for storage and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs) for export [57]. Consumption of bean reduced expression of Plin3 (males also reduced Plin2), apolipoproteins ApoA4 and ApoC2 (females also reduced ApoA5) but increased levels of Plin5 as well as aforementioned ApoE (females also elevated ApoA2, while males increased ApoH; (Supplementary Figure S7). The upstream analysis also indicated that bean-upregulated FOXA1 (Figure 5b; Supplementary Table S6) which suppresses multiple target genes involved in TAGs synthesis, such as GPAM, DGAT2, and some apolipoproteins [58].
Ultimately, increasing dose of consumed beans significantly affected genes involved in every key mechanism of hepatic FAs metabolism, enabling its effective regulation of hepatocellular FAs and TAGs levels. These findings were consistent with results of IPA Canonical Pathways analysis, whereas IPA Upstream analysis revealed similar patterns of bean-induced DEGs and their functional association.

4. Discussion

MAFLD is a global public health concern rooted at the crossroads of metabolically dysregulated chronic non-communicable diseases and the respective detrimental economic, societal, and environmental consequences [59,60,61]. Effective care of MALFD patients is limited by the affordability, accessibility, and safety of interventions for the public and depends on the stage of disease progression. Nevertheless, even if better treatment measures are developed, modifying lifestyle risk factors remains central in MAFLD management, therapy, and prevention, according to consensus statements and recommendations for the public health agenda from the multidisciplinary group of experts [5]. Within lifestyle, chronic positive energy balance, particularly in adults, is a strong driver of MAFLD, but the global trends have been opposite and highly refractory to change [62]. This reality drives attention toward global food patterns and food types therein.
Given that the Mediterranean-type food pattern is reported to be protective against metabolic disorders, such as MAFLD, whereas the Western-type pattern is a major risk factor for the disease, a category of foods discriminating the two patterns are pulses. Moreover, dietary guidelines, such as The Dietary Guidelines for Americans [14], inadvertently support the consumption of pulses as a vegetable side dish rather than as a staple food. We argue that as a consequence of such exclusion, dietary quality and associated health benefits are markedly reduced. This dilemma is partly due to a lack of clinical or population data that inform what dose/dietary concentration of pulse is needed to secure protection against fatty liver disease and whether biological sex plays a role. These issues are directly addressed by the work reported herein.

4.1. Dietary Bean-Induced Liver Phenotype

The design of this study used ad libitum feeding of a recognized obesogenic diet formulation that induces both MAFLD as well as obesity in C57BL6/J mice since that is the human context in which our study questions are most appropriately considered. Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 clearly show that excessive hepatic steatosis—a hallmark of MAFLD [8,27,63]—is prevented by common bean consumption regardless of sex. Such an effect only becomes uniform enough to achieve statistical significance in female mice when ≥ 35% of dietary protein is derived from bean. In male mice, 70% dose is required to render an effect statistically distinct from the bean-free control. Implication of hepatic steatosis in the response to the dietary bean was consistent with the results of the bean-induced DEGs that mapped to this hepatotoxicity with the highest p-values (Figure 4). The magnitude of bean required relative to the amount currently consumed in populations such as those in developed countries such as the USA, Canada, and many countries in Europe, underscores the critical importance of understanding the metabolic pathways through which common bean exerts these effects.

4.2. Triacylglycerol as the Main Chemical Form of Hepatic Lipid

Hepatic steatosis develops as acquisition and biosynthesis of intrahepatic lipids surpass the limits of their catabolism, utilization, and export such that excess fat is stored in intracellular vacuoles as lipid droplets [35]. The latter consist of neutral lipids, e.g., TAGs and cholesterol esters, surrounded by a phospholipid monolayer carrying proteins involved in synthesis, degradation, and trafficking of those lipids [57]. There is a fine-tuned balance between formation and degradation of TAGs within lipid droplets. TAGs are the preferred form of energy storage in the liver as they are biochemically inert [30] and, thus, serve as both the source and anabolic end-point of hepatocellular FAs [34]. In contrast, diacylglycerols, acyl-carnitines, ceramides, glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, free cholesterol, and especially free FAs are associated with severe lipotoxicity [31,32,64]. About 15% of MAFLD-associated TAGs in the liver originate from the diet [46]. Females upregulate Lrp1 expression, indicative of greater uptake of chylomicron remnants but, simultaneously, of improved MAFLD state [45]. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the consumption of beans significantly upregulates canonical degradation of TAGs with the concomitant pattern of TAGs biosynthesis inhibition (Figure 5a). Therefore, the expected reduction in hepatic TAGs content based on such a transcriptomic signature is also observed in the lipid quantification and liver histopathology (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3).

4.3. Contribution of Extracellular Free Fatty Acids Uptake

Excessive caloric intake renders adipose tissue and skeletal muscle (the primary destinations of dietary fat in the postprandial state) overloaded with intestinally derived chylomicrons so that their remnants and their spillover-derived non-esterified FAs are cleared from circulation by the liver [34]. Moreover, the accompanying dysfunction of adipose tissue increases its rates of lipolysis [32,65], releasing non-esterified free FAs into circulation. These free FAs are the primary source for 59% of TAGs in MAFLD livers. MAFLD-compromised hepatocytes upregulate the uptake of free FAs [34,50,64]. While short- and medium-chain FAs diffuse across hepatocyte plasma membrane due to their lipophilicity [66], long-chain FAs entry is mediated mostly by the membrane-bound proteins [34]. Higher levels of respective CD36 are a biomarker of high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis [34], and its reported knockdown improved insulin sensitivity and steatosis owing to observed decrease in FA uptake and TAGs concentration [34,50,67]. CD36, which was dramatically reduced more in males than females upon dietary bean, is considered the most contributing factor in FA-induced lipotoxicity in MALFD [64]. Its expression is regulated by PPARγ and LXR [34], whose downregulation, according to upstream analysis, was consistent with CD36 suppression (Figure 5b). Therefore, upon bean consumption, females show a greater response in mediating uptake of lipoproteins and their degradation, whereas males rather downregulate FAs transport mechanisms.

4.4. Hepatocellular Oxidation of Fatty Acids

Analysis of intracellular FAs transport proteins and FABPs, ACSs, and ACOTs, as well as transcripts of FA oxidation enzymes indicated: a) bean consumption generally exerted a pro-catabolic profile in both sex cohorts; b) females displayed more evidence for enhanced mitochondrial β-oxidation of long-chain FAs and peroxisomal β-oxidation of very long-chain FAs; and c) males’ DEGs patterns connect more to mitochondrial β-oxidation of short-chain, odd-number, and unsaturated FAs and peroxisomal β-oxidation of long-chain FAs. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) suppressing mTOR, SREBP1, and ACC1/2 in favor of FAs β-oxidation [50,68] showed patterns of bean-induced activation (Supplementary Table S6), which is in accordance with the sex-dependent signature of bean consumption that significantly mapped FAs β-oxidation to females. Taken together, this points to a priori differential dietary challenges and sex-dependent differences in hepatic lipid catabolism which accordingly result in differential effects of dietary beans. While females exhibit a more pronounced increase in capacity for FA oxidation in livers than males, the latter demonstrate differential effects of bean consumption on hepatic FA β-oxidation.

4.5. Bean Effects Shared by Both Sex Cohorts

A dramatic reduction in the capacity to drive de novo lipogenesis in hepatocytes of mice was more uniform between females and males. Considering that mice fed bean-containing diets also reduced body adiposity [22], the contribution of adipose tissue-derived free FAs would be markedly reduced. Furthermore, under the MAFLD conditions, 26% of hepatic TAGs originate from de novo lipogenesis of new FAs in hepatocytes [46]. Thus, the suppression of lipogenic genes we demonstrate herein, including upstream regulators assessment indicating significant and dose-dependent inhibition of lipogenic SREBF1, potentially resembles the primary mechanism of bean-induced protection. After all, bean-promoted health benefits were potent enough to reduce expression of genes driving the obesogenic phenotype in C57BL6/J mouse model, such as Acss2, Acly, Elovl6, Scd1, Acaca, and Slc25a1 [26]. Therefore, consumption of beans induces sex-dependent effects on improving hepatic FA oxidative capacity but not on the suppression of de novo lipogenesis. This is consistent with observed transcriptomic trend of TAGs biosynthesis inhibition (Figure 5a).

4.6. Differential Sex-Dependent Effects of Common Bean

The multi-omics integrative studies determined that males exhibit more MAFLD-associated hepatic genes than females, especially those associated with lipid metabolism, and identified key genes driving MAFLD in the livers of female and male mice, including but not limited to Insig1, Acss2, Acot/4, Pnpla3 shared by both sexes; female-specific Lipc, Srebf1, Slc27a5; male-specific Cidec, Mogat1, Cd36, Fasn, Cpt2 [69,70]. Consistently, all these genes were detected among observed DEGs or their predicted upstream regulators, including the observation that males displayed more hepatic DEGs upon bean consumption than females. Observation that bean-induced protective effects from hepatic steatosis were qualitatively observed at the lower dose in females compared to males indicate that there are sex-dependent differences in MAFLD etiology and that males overall exhibit greater susceptibility to MAFLD comorbidities [69,70,71,72]. We report that female and male mice responded to dietary beans with opposite effects on PPARα and MLXIPL, and males exhibited steatogenic associations (Figure 5b; Supplementary Table S4 and S6). Levels of PPARα and PPARγ are increased upon a high-fat diet; however, knockout studies indicated that PPARα ablation exacerbates MAFLD and PPARγ ablation protects mice from its development [36]. MLXIPL contribution to MAFLD development stems from obesogenic effects of dietary carbohydrates [73]. We report, however, that primary lipogenic targets of MLXIPL signaling, such as key genes of de novo lipogenesis, show significant reduction in transcript expression in males. Taken together, these could indicate less efficient FA oxidation as well as the effects of dietary carbohydrates may be in the way of bean-induced protective health benefits for the liver in males.

4.7. Translational Considerations

In many respects, a vegan food pattern is a predominant type practiced globally. The significance of this is that it is well established that human health and well-being are maintained when all protein is obtained from plant sources. Moreover, globally, a substantial amount of plant protein is consumed from the botanical family Fabaceae. Within that family, the foods contributing to the protein are primarily either oilseed legumes (soy and peanut) or grain legumes, i.e., pulses (common bean, chickpea, lentil, and dry pea). Oilseed legumes predominate in economically developed countries, while pulses—in the remainder of the world. There, pulses are treated as a staple food crop, not a vegetable side dish. By definition, a staple food crop is eaten daily in large amounts as a primary source of energy and protein, and they are affordable and accessible. As such, pulses, with common bean as an example, could be leveraged to reduce the prevalence of fatty liver disease in developed countries featuring low levels of pulse consumption and in developing countries where the public health trends indicate that fatty liver disease is increasing in segments of the population with improving economic status preferring highly processed convenience foods. Collectively, this raises the important question: is increased pulse consumption feasible given the amounts needed to secure disease preventive effects, e.g., on MAFLD?
In our judgment, the answer is yes, but it will require increased prominence of stealth health approaches. Specifically, flours of each pulse can be prepared as minimally processed whole food ingredients and incorporated into foods for which consumers in various populations show a preference. As witnessed by the rapid increase in the release of pulse-containing food products, it is feasible. Beyond this, the effort will gain credibility in the biomedical community by identification of the specific gene/protein targets by which bean inhibits the development of a disease such as MAFLD and the specific chemical(s) that alters gene expression or protein activity. Whether the chemicals are an intrinsic component of bean and other pulses or are produced by interacting pulse food components with the gut microbiome and its associated immune component remains to be determined. Once that chemistry is understood, pulses can be processed to ensure that their use as food ingredients maintains the amount and form necessary to secure health benefits.

4.8. Limitations and Strengths

Our primary goal in the present study was to determine dose- and sex-dependent effects of bean consumption on liver protection from the obesogenic dietary environment and both quantitative chemical analyses and qualitative histopathology provide strong evidence of dose and biological sex dependent effects of bean consumption of dietary induced MAFLD. In addition, a secondary objective was to deduce potential molecular mechanisms underlying these observed phenotypes. Considering the multi-faceted nature of hepatic lipid metabolism, the results we report herein are only the tip of the iceberg and provide an initial overview of dietary bean effects on MAFLD prevention. Recognizing that transcriptional signatures are only one step in the regulatory cascade that determines protein activity and metabolite patterns, this work will serve to direct detailed analyses of effects of bean consumption on the phosphoproteome that are focused and guided by metabolomic analyses of plasma and liver. However, those analyses are considered beyond the scope of this investigation.
The translation of preclinical data to potential human relevance must always be done bearing in mind the limitations of each animal model. In the work reported herein, the model is well established for its value in studying metabolic dysfunction and the underlying findings have been demonstrated in two rodent species. This work was done in a preclinical model rather than in human subjects because of the paucity of information available about dose or the effect of biological sex. Additionally, a specific bean cultivar and a dose response design were used in male and female animals. Ultimately, mechanistic studies using genetically engineered mouse (GEM) methodology, e.g., knock-out strategies, will be required to establish causality. The work reported herein constitutes a foundation for in-depth, targeted analyses upon which genetic manipulations can be designed.

5. Conclusions

We demonstrate that consumption of common bean under isocaloric and obesogenic dietary conditions exerts potent protection from lipid accumulation in the liver in a dose- and sex-dependent manner. In particular:
❖
females exhibited lower hepatic lipid content at the 35% dose, whereas males achieved a similar reduction with the 70% dose of bean;
❖
common bean dose-responsively inhibited de novo lipogenesis in both sex cohorts;
❖
additionally, females showed greater capacity for FA oxidation, whereas males significantly reduced uptake of extracellular free FAs;
❖
bean consumption significantly affected genes involved in TAGs metabolism consistent with enhanced hydrolysis and diminished biosynthesis;
❖
bean-induced DEGs patterns indicated that reduced PPARα signaling and activated by dietary carbohydrates MLXIPL signaling may be at the core of lower susceptibility of male mice to dietary bean protection from hepatic steatosis;
❖
hepatic CYPs-regulated FA oxidation, oxidative stress, cholesterol metabolism, bile acid metabolism, and inflammation appear to also be significantly affected by increasing doses of beans in the diet and will be assessed in further communications.
Collectively, we provide strong evidence that incorporating common bean into the diet dose dependently protects both female and male mice from the diet-induced onset of MAFLD.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu15030526/s1, Table S1: Diet formulations; Table S2: IPA Input; Table S3: Toxicity functions; Table S4: DEGs; Table S5: Canonical Pathways; Table S6: Upstream regulators; Figure S1: Effect of dietary bean on the liver lipid content; Figure S2: Dietary bean effects on expression of hepatic fatty acid transport genes in female and male mice; Figure S3: Expression of genes involved in de novo lipogenesis in the livers of female and male mice upon consumption of beans; Figure S4: Dietary bean dose-dependently affects expression of acyl-CoA synthetases in the livers of female and male mice; Figure S5: Consumption of beans promotes sex-dependent changes in gene expression regulating mitochondrial β-oxidation in the livers of mice; Figure S6: Effects of dietary bean on peroxisomal β-oxidation in the livers of mice; Figure S7: Dietary beans affect expression of genes involved in lipid droplet and lipoprotein formation and clearance in both female and male mice; Figure S8: Effects of dietary bean on gene expression involved in triacylglycerol metabolism in both female and male mice; Figure S9: Observed DEGs among the predicted significant upstream regulators.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L., M.T.F. and H.J.T.; methodology, J.N.M., E.S.N., M.T.F. and T.L.; software, T.L., J.N.M. and H.J.T.; validation, H.J.T., J.N.M. and E.S.N.; formal analysis, H.J.T. and T.L.; investigation, H.J.T.; resources, H.J.T.; data curation, J.N.M.; writing—original draft preparation, T.L. and H.J.T.; writing—review and editing, H.J.T., T.L., M.T.F. and J.N.M.; visualization, T.L., H.J.T. and J.N.M.; supervision, H.J.T.; project administration, M.T.F. and H.J.T.; funding acquisition, M.T.F. and H.J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, grant number 3060-21650-001-08S and National Institute for Food and Agriculture: 2020-05206.

Data Availability Statement

The RNA sequencing data reported herein is being submitted to the Gene Expression Omnibus, a database for gene expression profiling managed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Please contact the corresponding author for the GEO accession number.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Neuhouser, M.L. The importance of healthy dietary patterns in chronic disease prevention. Nutr. Res. 2019, 70, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bovolini, A.; Garcia, J.; Andrade, M.A.; Duarte, J.A. Metabolic syndrome pathophysiology and predisposing factors. Int. J. Sport. Med. 2021, 42, 199–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fedacko, J.; Takahashi, T.; Singh, R.B.; Pella, D.; Chibisov, S.; Hristova, K.; Pella, D.; Elkilany, G.N.; Juneja, L.R.; Behl, S.; et al. Chapter 1—Western diets and risk of non-communicable diseases. In Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals in Metabolic and Non-Communicable Diseases; Singh, R.B., Watanabe, S., Isaza, A.A., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Akter, S.; Akhter, H.; Chaudhury, H.S.; Rahman, M.H.; Gorski, A.; Hasan, M.N.; Shin, Y.; Rahman, M.A.; Nguyen, M.N.; Choi, T.G.; et al. Dietary carbohydrates: Pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets to obesity-associated metabolic syndrome. BioFactors 2022, 48, 1036–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lazarus, J.V.; Mark, H.E.; Anstee, Q.M.; Arab, J.P.; Batterham, R.L.; Castera, L.; Cortez-Pinto, H.; Crespo, J.; Cusi, K.; Dirac, M.A.; et al. Advancing the global public health agenda for NAFLD: A consensus statement. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 19, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eslam, M.; Sanyal, A.J.; George, J.; Sanyal, A.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.; Tiribelli, C.; Kleiner, D.E.; Brunt, E.; Bugianesi, E.; Yki-Järvinen, H.; et al. MAFLD: A Consensus-Driven Proposed Nomenclature for Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1999–2014.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xian, Y.X.; Weng, J.P.; Xu, F. MAFLD vs. NAFLD: Shared features and potential changes in epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and pharmacotherapy. Chin. Med. J. 2020, 134, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nassir, F.; Rector, R.S.; Hammoud, G.M.; Ibdah, J.A. Pathogenesis and Prevention of Hepatic Steatosis. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 11, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lazarus, J.V.; Mark, H.E.; Villota-Rivas, M.; Palayew, A.; Carrieri, P.; Colombo, M.; Ekstedt, M.; Esmat, G.; George, J.; Marchesini, G.; et al. The global NAFLD policy review and preparedness index: Are countries ready to address this silent public health challenge? J. Hepatol. 2022, 76, 771–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cholankeril, G.; Wong, R.J.; Hu, M.; Perumpail, R.B.; Yoo, E.R.; Puri, P.; Younossi, Z.M.; Harrison, S.A.; Ahmed, A. Liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the US: Temporal trends and outcomes. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2017, 62, 2915–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goldberg, D.; Ditah, I.C.; Saeian, K.; Lalehzari, M.; Aronsohn, A.; Gorospe, E.C.; Charlton, M. Changes in the Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, and Alcoholic Liver Disease Among Patients with Cirrhosis or Liver Failure on the Waitlist for Liver Transplantation. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 1090–1099.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Riazi, K.; Azhari, H.; Charette, J.H.; Underwood, F.E.; King, J.A.; Afshar, E.E.; Swain, M.G.; Congly, S.E.; Kaplan, G.G.; Shaheen, A.-A. The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 7, 851–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alalwani, J.; Eljazzar, S.; Basil, M.; Tayyem, R. The impact of health status, diet and lifestyle on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Narrative review. Clin. Obes. 2022, 12, e12525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Didinger, C.; Thompson, H.J. Defining nutritional and functional niches of legumes: A Call for clarity to distinguish a future role for pulses in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Didinger, C.; Thompson, H. Motivating pulse-centric eating patterns to benefit human and environmental well-being. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Viguiliouk, E.; Blanco Mejia, S.; Kendall, C.W.C.; Sievenpiper, J.L. Can pulses play a role in improving cardiometabolic health? Evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2017, 1392, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ferreira, H.; Vasconcelos, M.; Gil, A.M.; Pinto, E. Benefits of pulse consumption on metabolism and health: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kazemi, M.; Buddemeyer, S.; Fassett, C.M.; Gans, W.M.; Johnston, K.M.; Lungu, E.; Savelle, R.L.; Tolani, P.N.; Dahl, W.J. Pulses and Prevention and Management of Chronic Disease. In Health Benefits of Pulses; Dahl, W.J., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 55–72. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lutsiv, T.; Weir, T.L.; McGinley, J.N.; Neil, E.S.; Wei, Y.; Thompson, H.J. Compositional Changes of the High-Fat Diet-Induced Gut Microbiota upon Consumption of Common Pulses. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. McGinley, J.N.; Fitzgerald, V.K.; Neil, E.S.; Omerigic, H.M.; Heuberger, A.L.; Weir, T.L.; McGee, R.; Vandemark, G.; Thompson, H.J. Pulse Crop Effects on Gut Microbial Populations, Intestinal Function, and Adiposity in a Mouse Model of Diet-Induced Obesity. Nutrients 2020, 12, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Thompson, H.J.; McGinley, J.N.; Neil, E.S.; Brick, M.A. Beneficial Effects of Common Bean on Adiposity and Lipid Metabolism. Nutrients 2017, 9, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Neil, E.S.; McGinley, J.N.; Fitzgerald, V.K.; Lauck, C.A.; Tabke, J.A.; Streeter-McDonald, M.R.; Yao, L.; Broeckling, C.D.; Weir, T.L.; Foster, M.T.; et al. White Kidney Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Consumption Reduces Fat Accumulation in a Polygenic Mouse Model of Obesity. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Jiang, W.; Zhu, Z.; McGinley, J.N.; El, B.K.; Manni, A.; Thompson, H.J. Identification of a molecular signature underlying inhibition of mammary carcinoma growth by dietary N-3 fatty acids. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 3795–3806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mensack, M.M.; McGinley, J.N.; Thompson, H.J. Metabolomic analysis of the effects of edible dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on tissue lipid metabolism and carcinogenesis in rats. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, S155–S165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. U.S. Department of Agricultur; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2020. Available online: https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/ (accessed on 15 April 2022).
  26. Chu, D.T.; Malinowska, E.; Jura, M.; Kozak, L.P. C57BL/6J mice as a polygenic developmental model of diet-induced obesity. Physiol. Rep. 2017, 5, e13093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Morán-Costoya, A.; Proenza, A.M.; Gianotti, M.; Lladó, I.; Valle, A. Sex Differences in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Estrogen Influence on the Liver–Adipose Tissue Crosstalk. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2021, 35, 753–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Löfgren, L.; Forsberg, G.-B.; Ståhlman, M. The BUME method: A new rapid and simple chloroform-free method for total lipid extraction of animal tissue. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Krämer, A.; Green, J.; Pollard, J., Jr.; Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics 2013, 30, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marjot, T.; Moolla, A.; Cobbold, J.F.; Hodson, L.; Tomlinson, J.W. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adults: Current Concepts in Etiology, Outcomes, and Management. Endocr. Rev. 2020, 41, 66–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yoon, H.; Shaw, J.L.; Haigis, M.C.; Greka, A. Lipid metabolism in sickness and in health: Emerging regulators of lipotoxicity. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 3708–3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Geng, Y.; Faber, K.N.; de Meijer, V.E.; Blokzijl, H.; Moshage, H. How does hepatic lipid accumulation lead to lipotoxicity in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease? Hepatol. Int. 2021, 15, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nassir, F. NAFLD: Mechanisms, Treatments, and Biomarkers. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alves-Bezerra, M.; Cohen, D.E. Triglyceride Metabolism in the Liver. Compr. Physiol. 2017, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ipsen, D.H.; Lykkesfeldt, J.; Tveden-Nyborg, P. Molecular mechanisms of hepatic lipid accumulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 3313–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Xiao, Y.; Kim, M.; Lazar, M.A. Nuclear receptors and transcriptional regulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol. Metab. 2021, 50, 101119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liang, N.; Jakobsson, T.; Fan, R.; Treuter, E. The Nuclear Receptor-Co-repressor Complex in Control of Liver Metabolism and Disease. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sahoo, S.; Singh, D.; Chakraborty, P.; Jolly, M.K. Emergent Properties of the HNF4α-PPARγ Network May Drive Consequent Phenotypic Plasticity in NAFLD. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Loft, A.; Alfaro, A.J.; Schmidt, S.F.; Pedersen, F.B.; Terkelsen, M.K.; Puglia, M.; Chow, K.K.; Feuchtinger, A.; Troullinaki, M.; Maida, A.; et al. Liver-fibrosis-activated transcriptional networks govern hepatocyte reprogramming and intra-hepatic communication. Cell Metab. 2021, 33, 1685–1700.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shin, D.W. Lipophagy: Molecular Mechanisms and Implications in Metabolic Disorders. Mol. Cells 2020, 43, 686–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grefhorst, A.; van de Peppel, I.P.; Larsen, L.E.; Jonker, J.W.; Holleboom, A.G. The Role of Lipophagy in the Development and Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 601627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Filali-Mouncef, Y.; Hunter, C.; Roccio, F.; Zagkou, S.; Dupont, N.; Primard, C.; Proikas-Cezanne, T.; Reggiori, F. The ménage à trois of autophagy, lipid droplets and liver disease. Autophagy 2022, 18, 50–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, M.; Xie, W.; Li, X. Identification of Autophagy-Related Genes in the Progression from Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver to Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021, 14, 3163–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jarc, E.; Petan, T. Lipid Droplets and the Management of Cellular Stress. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2019, 92, 435–452. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Hodson, L.; Gunn, P.J. The regulation of hepatic fatty acid synthesis and partitioning: The effect of nutritional state. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Donnelly, K.L.; Smith, C.I.; Schwarzenberg, S.J.; Jessurun, J.; Boldt, M.D.; Parks, E.J. Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 1343–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Wang, C.; Yan, Y.; Hu, L.; Zhao, L.; Yang, P.; Moorhead, J.F.; Varghese, Z.; Chen, Y.; Ruan, X.Z. Rapamycin-mediated CD36 translational suppression contributes to alleviation of hepatic steatosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 447, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lehner, R.; Quiroga, A.D. Chapter 5—Fatty Acid Handling in Mammalian Cells. In Biochemistry of Lipids, Lipoproteins and Membranes, 6th ed.; Ridgway, N.D., McLeod, R.S., Eds.; Elsevier: Boston, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 149–184. [Google Scholar]
  49. Anderson, C.M.; Stahl, A. SLC27 fatty acid transport proteins. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013, 34, 516–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Badmus, O.O.; Hillhouse, S.A.; Anderson, C.D.; Hinds, T.D.; Stec, D.E. Molecular mechanisms of metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD): Functional analysis of lipid metabolism pathways. Clin. Sci. 2022, 136, 1347–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mashek, D.G. Hepatic Fatty Acid Trafficking: Multiple Forks in the Road. Adv. Nutr. 2013, 4, 697–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Talley, J.T.; Mohiuddin, S.S. Biochemistry, Fatty Acid Oxidation. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  53. Schreurs, M.; Kuipers, F.; Van Der Leij, F.R. Regulatory enzymes of mitochondrial β-oxidation as targets for treatment of the metabolic syndrome. Obes. Rev. 2010, 11, 380–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Diebold, I.; Schön, U.; Horvath, R.; Schwartz, O.; Holinski-Feder, E.; Kölbel, H.; Abicht, A. HADHA and HADHB gene associated phenotypes—Identification of rare variants in a patient cohort by Next Generation Sequencing. Mol. Cell. Probes 2019, 44, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Watkins, P.A.; Chen, L.; Braverman, N. Peroxisomal Disorders in Children. In Liver Disease in Children, 5th ed.; Suchy, F.J., Sokol, R.J., Balistreri, W.F., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021; pp. 671–697. [Google Scholar]
  56. Wanders, R.J.A.; Ferdinandusse, S.; Brites, P.; Kemp, S. Peroxisomes, lipid metabolism and lipotoxicity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2010, 1801, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Scorletti, E.; Carr, R.M. A new perspective on NAFLD: Focusing on lipid droplets. J. Hepatol. 2022, 76, 934–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Moya, M.; Benet, M.; Guzmán, C.; Tolosa, L.; García-Monzón, C.; Pareja, E.; Castell, J.V.; Jover, R. Foxa1 reduces lipid accumulation in human hepatocytes and is down-regulated in nonalcoholic fatty liver. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Popkin, B.M.; Ng, S.W. The nutrition transition to a stage of high obesity and noncommunicable disease prevalence dominated by ultra-processed foods is not inevitable. Obes. Rev. 2022, 23, e13366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chia, A.; Ong, J.; Bundele, A.; Lim, Y.W. Social entrepreneurship in obesity prevention: A scoping review. Obes. Rev. 2022, 23, e13378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wells, J.C.; Sawaya, A.L.; Wibaek, R.; Mwangome, M.; Poullas, M.S.; Yajnik, C.S.; Demaio, A. The double burden of malnutrition: Aetiological pathways and consequences for health. Lancet 2020, 395, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lazarus, J.V.; Mark, H.E.; Colombo, M.; Demaio, S.; Dillon, J.F.; George, J.; Hagström, H.; Hocking, S.; Lee, N.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J.; et al. A sustainable development goal framework to guide multisectoral action on NAFLD through a societal approach. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 55, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Naeem, M.; Markus, M.R.P.; Mousa, M.; Schipf, S.; Dörr, M.; Steveling, A.; Aghdassi, A.; Kühn, J.-P.; Kromrey, M.-L.; Nauck, M.; et al. Associations of liver volume and other markers of hepatic steatosis with all-cause mortality in the general population. Liver Int. 2022, 42, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rada, P.; González-Rodríguez, Á.; García-Monzón, C.; Valverde, Á.M. Understanding lipotoxicity in NAFLD pathogenesis: Is CD36 a key driver? Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pei, K.; Gui, T.; Kan, D.; Feng, H.; Jin, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Du, Z.; Gai, Z.; Wu, J.; et al. An Overview of Lipid Metabolism and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 4020249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Schönfeld, P.; Wojtczak, L. Short- and medium-chain fatty acids in energy metabolism: The cellular perspective. J. Lipid Res. 2016, 57, 943–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wilson, C.G.; Tran, J.L.; Erion, D.M.; Vera, N.B.; Febbraio, M.; Weiss, E.J. Hepatocyte-Specific Disruption of CD36 Attenuates Fatty Liver and Improves Insulin Sensitivity in HFD-Fed Mice. Endocrinology 2016, 157, 570–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Enjoji, M.; Kohjima, M.; Nakamuta, M. Lipid metabolism and the liver. In The Liver in Systemic Diseases; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 105–122. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chella Krishnan, K.; Kurt, Z.; Barrere-Cain, R.; Sabir, S.; Das, A.; Floyd, R.; Vergnes, L.; Zhao, Y.; Che, N.; Charugundla, S.; et al. Integration of Multi-omics Data from Mouse Diversity Panel Highlights Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Cell Syst. 2018, 6, 103–115.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Kurt, Z.; Barrere-Cain, R.; LaGuardia, J.; Mehrabian, M.; Pan, C.; Hui, S.T.; Norheim, F.; Zhou, Z.; Hasin, Y.; Lusis, A.J.; et al. Tissue-specific pathways and networks underlying sexual dimorphism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Biol. Sex Differ. 2018, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Goossens, G.H.; Jocken, J.W.E.; Blaak, E.E. Sexual dimorphism in cardiometabolic health: The role of adipose tissue, muscle and liver. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021, 17, 47–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Link, J.C.; Reue, K. Genetic Basis for Sex Differences in Obesity and Lipid Metabolism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2017, 37, 225–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Daniel, P.V.; Mondal, P. Causative and Sanative dynamicity of ChREBP in Hepato-Metabolic disorders. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2020, 99, 151128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 15 00526 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of dietary bean on the liver lipid content. Box plots report amount of hepatic lipid (in mg) normalized to g of dry liver weight across the diet groups and sex cohorts. Diets are indicated by the percent (%) of dietary protein provided by bean, including a low-fat (LF) diet as a negative control. Kruskal–Wallis testing showed significant differences by the diet effect (χ2 = 41.598, p-value = 2.021× 10−8 in the female cohort; χ2 = 40.15, p-value = 4.029 × 10−8 in the male cohort). (a) Pairwise comparisons between the diet group were conducted using the post-hoc Dunn test; (b) Pairwise comparison between sex cohorts were tested with the Mann–Whitney U test. The Benjamini–Hochberg method was used for the multiple testing correction of p-values. ** p-value < 0.01; *** p-value < 0.001; **** p-value < 0.0001.
Figure 1. Effect of dietary bean on the liver lipid content. Box plots report amount of hepatic lipid (in mg) normalized to g of dry liver weight across the diet groups and sex cohorts. Diets are indicated by the percent (%) of dietary protein provided by bean, including a low-fat (LF) diet as a negative control. Kruskal–Wallis testing showed significant differences by the diet effect (χ2 = 41.598, p-value = 2.021× 10−8 in the female cohort; χ2 = 40.15, p-value = 4.029 × 10−8 in the male cohort). (a) Pairwise comparisons between the diet group were conducted using the post-hoc Dunn test; (b) Pairwise comparison between sex cohorts were tested with the Mann–Whitney U test. The Benjamini–Hochberg method was used for the multiple testing correction of p-values. ** p-value < 0.01; *** p-value < 0.001; **** p-value < 0.0001.
Nutrients 15 00526 g001
Nutrients 15 00526 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of lipid accumulation in male and female H&E-stained liver sections across different diets. (a) Male 0%; (b) Female 0% bean; (c) Male 70% bean; (d) Female 70% bean; (e) Male low fat; (f) Female low fat. Steatosis (arrows); hepatocyte ballooning (arrowheads); magnification 200×; bars = 40 µm.
Figure 2. Comparison of lipid accumulation in male and female H&E-stained liver sections across different diets. (a) Male 0%; (b) Female 0% bean; (c) Male 70% bean; (d) Female 70% bean; (e) Male low fat; (f) Female low fat. Steatosis (arrows); hepatocyte ballooning (arrowheads); magnification 200×; bars = 40 µm.
Nutrients 15 00526 g002
Nutrients 15 00526 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of lipid accumulation in male and female Oil Red O-stained liver sections across different diets. (a) Male 0%; (b) Female 0% bean; (c) Male 70% bean; (d) Female 70% bean; (e) Male low fat; (f) Female low fat. Extracellular lipid (arrows); intracellular lipid (arrowheads); magnification 200×; bars = 40 µm.
Figure 3. Comparison of lipid accumulation in male and female Oil Red O-stained liver sections across different diets. (a) Male 0%; (b) Female 0% bean; (c) Male 70% bean; (d) Female 70% bean; (e) Male low fat; (f) Female low fat. Extracellular lipid (arrows); intracellular lipid (arrowheads); magnification 200×; bars = 40 µm.
Nutrients 15 00526 g003
Nutrients 15 00526 g004 550
Figure 4. Heatmap of the Hepatotoxicity Functions based on the differentially expressed gene patterns in the liver tissue samples of female (F) and male (M) mice. Functions were organized by the collective score values. Pairwise comparisons are indicated in the column headers with first three from the left for the females and the other three columns for the males. Significant functions were filtered by B-H p-values < 0.1 and |z|-scores > 2, (a) shades of purple indicate −logB-H p-values; (b) blue shades indicates inhibition, orange—activation, for 70% diet group in at least one sex cohort. Dots denote insignificant |z|-scores < 2.
Figure 4. Heatmap of the Hepatotoxicity Functions based on the differentially expressed gene patterns in the liver tissue samples of female (F) and male (M) mice. Functions were organized by the collective score values. Pairwise comparisons are indicated in the column headers with first three from the left for the females and the other three columns for the males. Significant functions were filtered by B-H p-values < 0.1 and |z|-scores > 2, (a) shades of purple indicate −logB-H p-values; (b) blue shades indicates inhibition, orange—activation, for 70% diet group in at least one sex cohort. Dots denote insignificant |z|-scores < 2.
Nutrients 15 00526 g004
Nutrients 15 00526 g005 550
Figure 5. Canonical pathways and upstream regulators associated with fatty acid metabolism in liver upon consumption of common bean. (a) Canonical pathways; (b) upstream regulators. Pairwise diet comparison groups are indicated in the columns. Heatmap colors and their intensity indicate activity status according to the z-score values direction: orange signifies activation and blue—inhibition. Dots denote insignificant |z|-scores < 2. Indicated pathways had a significant p-values of overlap < 0.05 (B-H p-values < 0.1) and are organized by the collectively largest absolute z-score values across the comparisons.
Figure 5. Canonical pathways and upstream regulators associated with fatty acid metabolism in liver upon consumption of common bean. (a) Canonical pathways; (b) upstream regulators. Pairwise diet comparison groups are indicated in the columns. Heatmap colors and their intensity indicate activity status according to the z-score values direction: orange signifies activation and blue—inhibition. Dots denote insignificant |z|-scores < 2. Indicated pathways had a significant p-values of overlap < 0.05 (B-H p-values < 0.1) and are organized by the collectively largest absolute z-score values across the comparisons.
Nutrients 15 00526 g005
Nutrients 15 00526 g006 550
Figure 6. Expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism in the livers of female and male mice upon consumption of beans. Differential expression analysis performed in CLC Genomic Workbench. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01; *** p-value < 0.001; **** p-value < 0.0001.
Figure 6. Expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism in the livers of female and male mice upon consumption of beans. Differential expression analysis performed in CLC Genomic Workbench. * p-value < 0.05; ** p-value < 0.01; *** p-value < 0.001; **** p-value < 0.0001.
Nutrients 15 00526 g006
Table
Table 1. IPA analysis-ready identifiers mapped to DEGs within each comparison group pair.
Table 1. IPA analysis-ready identifiers mapped to DEGs within each comparison group pair.
Group
Cohort		35% vs. 0% Bean70% vs. 0% Bean70% vs. 35% Bean
DEGs1DEGs1DEGs1
Pre-filtered Mapped IDs2
Females354735793541
Males353935393497
Core Analysis-ready IDs3
Females461966389
Males3941130535
TOTAL DEGs 466,624
1 Differentially expressed genes; 2 All mapped to DEGs and duplicate-resolved identifiers; 3 Filtered by p-value < 0.05. 4 Total amount of observed DEGs from CLC Genomics Workbench output dataset.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lutsiv, T.; McGinley, J.N.; Neil, E.S.; Foster, M.T.; Thompson, H.J. Thwarting Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) with Common Bean: Dose- and Sex-Dependent Protection against Hepatic Steatosis. Nutrients 2023, 15, 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15030526

AMA Style

Lutsiv T, McGinley JN, Neil ES, Foster MT, Thompson HJ. Thwarting Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) with Common Bean: Dose- and Sex-Dependent Protection against Hepatic Steatosis. Nutrients. 2023; 15(3):526. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15030526

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lutsiv, Tymofiy, John N. McGinley, Elizabeth S. Neil, Michelle T. Foster, and Henry J. Thompson. 2023. "Thwarting Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) with Common Bean: Dose- and Sex-Dependent Protection against Hepatic Steatosis" Nutrients 15, no. 3: 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15030526

APA Style

Lutsiv, T., McGinley, J. N., Neil, E. S., Foster, M. T., & Thompson, H. J. (2023). Thwarting Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) with Common Bean: Dose- and Sex-Dependent Protection against Hepatic Steatosis. Nutrients, 15(3), 526. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15030526

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop