Associations between the Genetic Heritability of Dyslipidemia and Dietary Patterns in Korean Adults Based on Sex Differences
1
Graduate School, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Nursing, Ansan University, Ansan 15328, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(20), 4385; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15204385
Submission received: 7 September 2023
/
Revised: 11 October 2023
/
Accepted: 14 October 2023
/
Published: 16 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Nutrition for Genetic Disorders)
Abstract
:Dyslipidemia can be defined as an abnormality in serum lipid levels that is substantially linked to genetic variations and lifestyle factors, such as diet patterns, and has distinct sex-specific characteristics. We aimed to elucidate the genetic impact of dyslipidemia according to sex and explore the associations between genetic variants and dietary patterns in large-scale population-based cohorts. After performing genome-wide association studies (GWASs) in male, female, and entire cohorts, significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified in the three groups, and genetic risk scores (GRSs) were calculated by summing the risk alleles from the selected SNPs. After adjusting for confounding variables, the risk of dyslipidemia was 2.013-fold and 2.535-fold higher in the 3rd quartile GRS group in the male and female cohorts, respectively, than in the 1st quartile GRS group. While instant noodle and soft drink intake were significantly associated with GRS related to hyperlipidemia in male cohorts, coffee consumption was substantially related to GRS related to hyperlipidemia in female cohorts. Considering the influence of genetic factors and dietary patterns, the findings of this study suggest the potential for implementing sex-specific strategic interventions to avoid dyslipidemia.
1. Introduction
Dyslipidemia is characterized by imbalanced lipid concentrations in the blood, which include high levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TGs), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [1]. Dyslipidemia is a chronic metabolic disorder that can cause atherosclerosis, ultimately leading to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [2]. CVD is a major health problem worldwide due to its high morbidity and mortality, accounting for 32% of all global deaths [3,4]. Early detection, prevention, and appropriate management of CVDs are essential to reduce personal and social burdens and costs; thus, dyslipidemia is an important modifiable risk factor [5]. Regarding CVDs, there are well-described differences between males and females because sex hormones, sex-specific gene expression, and epigenetic modifiers interact with the disease throughout an individual’s lifespan [6]. Dyslipidemia has distinct characteristics based on sex, not only in terms of epidemiological and pathophysiological aspects but also in genetic traits [7,8,9]. Several studies have discovered that males and females show dissimilar lipid metabolism, such as a greater percentage of men than women with elevated TG concentration in the blood, or the tendency for middle-aged women to have higher levels of HDL-C than men [10,11,12]. Interestingly, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in APOA5 was associated with dyslipidemia only in male subjects [13].
Nutrition and diet strongly impact the development of dyslipidemia, and it is well known that food choices are crucial in its prevention and management [14]. Consuming a diet high in fructose, trans-fatty acids, or sugar-sweetened beverages can alter blood lipid levels to an abnormal range. In addition, some dietary habits, such as a high intake of omega-3-rich foods, nuts, or dietary fiber, are known to help maintain lipid levels within the range of non-dyslipidemia [15,16,17]. Korean cuisine is known for its unique features, and is characterized by fermented foods, soup with spicy seasonings, and high pork consumption [18,19]. In addition, a significant proportion of Koreans have shifted to the use and consumption of recipes from other countries [20]. The substantial salt intake of Koreans is also notable, being approximately 1.87 times higher than recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [21]. Given that various Korean diets may affect dyslipidemia, few studies have been conducted [22,23].
The genetic risk score (GRS) is a small score based on specific alleles at SNPs that can indicate inherited heritability in individuals from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) [24]. Since GRS approaches have recently attracted considerable interest, this score has been used to predict an individual’s risk of developing a particular disease or trait, as well as to develop new interventions by dissecting the interaction of genes and environmental factors [24,25]. To date, the GRS has been used in dyslipidemia and CVD risk studies and shows great risk-predictive value; however, more studies are needed with regard to ethnicity and sex [26]. Although the GRS of dyslipidemia has cumulative effects on blood lipid levels in Koreans [27], its interaction with diet has not been fully elucidated.
Gene–diet interactions can modify the outbreak and severity of dyslipidemia and propose life-course prevention in early life [28]. To the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated whether Korean dietary patterns are associated with sex-specific genetic variants of dyslipidemia. Therefore, we aimed to clarify genetic heritability based on GRS and examine the associations between dietary patterns and sex-specific genetic variants related to dyslipidemia in a Korean cohort.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES), conducted by the Korea National Institutes of Health, recruited health examinee (HEXA) cohorts of Korean individuals aged 41–85 years living in several cities, which is a large prospective population-based cohort. Participants visited designated medical institutions to undergo health screenings and complete surveys to determine their health status and lifestyle [29]. A total of 52,458 individuals had available epidemiological and genomic data. We excluded individuals with missing data from the analysis. The exclusion criteria were subjects who had been diagnosed with fatty liver or cholecystitis [30,31,32]. After exclusion, 47,562 participants remained, as shown in Figure 1.
2.2. Biochemical Measurements
Fasting serum lipid levels were measured using an automated chemistry analyzer (ADIVA 1650, Siemens, Tarrytown, NY, USA). Detailed methods have been described previously [29]. We identified dyslipidemia cases based on whether subjects met any of the following criteria: TC ≥ 240 mg/dL, LDL-C ≥ 160 mg/dL, TGs ≥ 200 mg/dL, or HDL-C < 40 mg/dL, according to the Korean Society of Lipid and Arteriosclerosis Korean Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia [33].
2.3. Genotyping, Quality Control, GWASs, and Calculating GRS
Genomic DNA samples were genotyped by the Korean Biobank Array, also called K-Chip [34]. Genotyping was performed to determine the genotypes of 7,079,946 SNPs in 58,700 individuals. SNP quality control (QC) was conducted to purify the genomic data and analyze 47,562 of the 58,700 subjects from the HEXA study included in the K-chip. Finally, 5,417,091 SNPs were analyzed after QC by applying a minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.05, SNP call rate < 0.95, and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) p-value < 1 × 10−6. Data purification and SNP detection were performed using Plink Ver 1.9 at http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/purecell/plink/ (accessed on 4 May 2023).
The GWASs were performed for the entire cohort, and for male and female participants separately using logistic regression analysis. Age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were used as covariates. Significant SNPs were detected in each of the three groups using functional mapping and annotation of genome-wide association studies (FUMA-GWASs) at https://fuma.ctglab.nl/ (accessed on 4 May 2023) [35].
The GRS was calculated by summing the scores of 0, 1, or 2 points for each significant SNP, depending on the number of risk alleles of all lead SNPs from the GWASs, using the –score function in Plink Ver 1.9.
Following the calculation of the GRSs, the scores were classified into three subgroups: low scores in the 1st quartile, intermediate scores in the 2nd quartile, and high scores in the 3rd quartile, based on a previous study.
2.4. Dietary Patterns
Dietary pattern data were gathered using a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SQFFQ) developed and validated by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [36]. Among the 106 food items in the SQFFQ, the frequency of the intake of pork belly, beef, intestines, sausage, chicken, soup, instant noodles, snacks, soda, and coffee was used for analysis in this study. We used ≤70th percentile as the cut-off for dividing into low and high intake frequency groups, based on answers of never, once a month, 2–3 times per month, 1–2 times a week, 3–4 times a week, 5–6 times a week, once a day, twice a day, and ≥3 times per day [37].
2.5. Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Ver 26.0 (IBM, New York, NY, USA), and figures were generated using R Ver 4.3.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and Origin Pro Ver 8 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).
The demographic characteristics of the HEXA cohort were described and divided into groups according to the presence or absence of dyslipidemia in males, females, and the entire cohort. Categorical variables are expressed as numbers and frequencies, whereas continuous variables are expressed as means and standard errors of the mean (SEM). Statistical differences in frequency or mean were assessed using Student’s t-test, chi-square test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc Scheffé tests were used for multiple comparisons among the GRS quartiles in each male and female cohort. We conducted a subgroup analysis by age, dividing the cohorts into middle-aged (41–60 years) and elderly (61–85 years).
To evaluate the effect of GRS on dyslipidemia, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for dyslipidemia incidence were calculated with the 1st quartile as the reference category, separately for males, females, and the entire cohort.
Participants were categorized into high- and low-intake groups based on their dietary patterns, as described above. The interaction between GRS quartiles and dietary patterns was analyzed using binary multivariate logistic regression after adjusting for covariates, including age, sex, and BMI. The adjusted OR and 95% CI were calculated using the 1st quartile as the reference. Statistical significance was set at p-value < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Demographic Characteristics of Study Participants
The demographic characteristics and dietary patterns of the participants are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. Although the average age of individuals with dyslipidemia was lower than that of individuals without dyslipidemia in the male cohort, the average age of individuals with dyslipidemia was higher than that of individuals without dyslipidemia in females. BMI was significantly higher in the dyslipidemia group than in the non-dyslipidemia group in both the male and female cohorts, as well as in the entire cohort (Supplementary Table S1). Among the blood lipid levels, TC, TG, and LDL-C concentrations were significantly higher in dyslipidemia subjects than in non-dyslipidemia subjects in the male and female cohorts. The HDL-C level in dyslipidemia subjects was lower than that in non-dyslipidemia subjects in all cohorts. There was a higher percentage of current smokers among men and women with dyslipidemia than among those without dyslipidemia. In the female cohort, current alcohol drinkers were significantly fewer among individuals with dyslipidemia than among those without. Only male participants with dyslipidemia had a significantly wider waist circumference than male participants without dyslipidemia. Among both males and females, those with dyslipidemia had wider hip circumferences than those without dyslipidemia. Individuals with dyslipidemia had a significantly higher GRS than those without dyslipidemia in both male and female cohorts (Table 1).
3.2. Significant SNPs Related to Dyslipidemia
In the male cohort, 16 SNPs were identified by GWAS (p < 5 × 10−8) (Table 3A). Among these, rs662799, located in the APOA5 gene, was the most significant (p = 2.11 × 10−57). In rs662799, individuals who carried A:G and G:G alleles showed a 1.506-fold and 2.472-fold higher risk of dyslipidemia incidence compared to those who carried A:A alleles, respectively (Table 4).
In the female cohort, GWAS analysis revealed 20 significant SNPs, and the rs651821 variant located in the APOA5 gene was the most significant (p = 1.10 × 10−77). Subjects with T:C and C:C alleles of rs651821 had 1.362 and 2.212 times higher odds of dyslipidemia incidence, respectively.
Meanwhile, 25 SNPs were identified in the entire cohort. The most significant variant was rs651821 in the APOA5 gene (p = 2.491 × 10−132), which was present as the most significant variant in the female cohort but not found in the male cohort (Supplementary Table S3).
3.3. OR of Dyslipidemia Incidence by GRS Quartiles
Females in the 2nd quartile had a 1.339 times higher risk of dyslipidemia than those in the 1st quartile, whereas males in the 2nd quartile had a 1.627 times greater risk of dyslipidemia than those in the 1st quartile. Female individuals in the 3rd quartile group had a 2.013 times higher risk of dyslipidemia than females in the 1st quartile of the GRSs, and male individuals in the 3rd quartile group had a 2.535 times higher risk of dyslipidemia than males in the 1st quartile (Figure 2).
3.4. Blood Lipid Concentrations and Biochemical Parameters Stratified by GRS Quartiles
Males in the 1st and 3rd quartiles did not show different TC levels, and the LDL-C concentration in the 3rd quartile was lower than that in the 2nd quartile. In the female cohort, the blood concentrations of TC and LDL-C increased in the higher quartiles (Figure 3A,B). Serum TG concentration in the higher quartile was higher than that in the lower quartile in both cohorts (Figure 3C). HDL cholesterol levels were significantly lower in the lower quartile group than in the higher quartile group in both males and females (Figure 3D). The gamma-glutamyl transferase (λ-GTP) levels were significantly higher in 3rd quartile male and female individuals than those of males and females in the 1st quartile. Only female subjects in each quartile showed different albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, and creatinine concentrations in their blood, whereas quartiles from the male and female cohorts showed differences in alkaline phosphatase levels (Table 5). In middle-aged males and females, however, there were no significant differences in biochemical parameters stratified by GRS quartiles (Supplementary Table S4). Among the elderly males, λ-GTP levels were significantly higher in the 3rd quartile than those in the 1st quartile. Blood calcium levels in elderly males were significantly higher in the 3rd quartile than those in the 1st and 2nd quartile. In addition, it was found that the λ-GTP and ALP levels were significantly higher in the 2nd quartile than those in the 1st quartile of elderly females (Supplementary Table S5).
3.5. Interaction between GRS and Dietary Patterns
Table 6 shows the associations between the GRS for dyslipidemia and dietary patterns in male and female cohorts. In the male cohort, instant noodle intake and soft drink intake were significantly related to dyslipidemia risk in the higher quartile of the GRSs (p = 0.028 and p = 0.030, respectively). The higher GRS quartiles of males exhibited a greater OR compared to the lower GRS quartiles when considering the interaction with instant noodles. Soft drink intake also interacted with higher GRS quartiles for dyslipidemia risk in males and the entire cohort (Supplementary Table S6). In the entire cohort, there was an interaction between GRS and the consumption of soft drinks, affecting dyslipidemia (Supplementary Table S6, p < 0.001). Interestingly, coffee consumption was significantly associated with GRS for dyslipidemia only in the female cohort (p = 0.038). The OR increased with an increase in GRS quartiles in females. Except for the intake of instant noodles, soft drinks, and coffee, the other dietary patterns did not show any interaction with GRS for dyslipidemia risk.
4. Discussion
In the present study, we identified sex differences in genetic susceptibility to dyslipidemia and evaluated whether the GRS is associated with blood lipid concentrations in a population-based Korean cohort. We also confirmed the interaction between the GRS and dietary patterns in relation to dyslipidemia risk by sex. The GRSs were calculated from 16 and 20 SNPs related to dyslipidemia in the male and female cohorts, respectively. In both cohorts, the risk of dyslipidemia was more than two times higher in the higher GRS group than in the lower GRS group. Furthermore, sex differences in dietary patterns affected dyslipidemia and genetic heritability. Both instant noodle and soft drink intake were substantially linked with the risk of dyslipidemia in male participants, whereas coffee consumption was significantly associated with the risk of dyslipidemia in female participants.
Sex differences in the prevalence and pathophysiology of dyslipidemia are well established [7,8]; however, there is a gap in the literature regarding the genetic architecture of dyslipidemia. Our findings on sex-specific SNPs reveal evidence that genetic susceptibility to dyslipidemia differs by sex because most of the discovered SNPs did not overlap. Notably, the SNPs from the female cohort were located in tribbles pseudo kinase 1 (TRIB1), alpha 1-3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase and alpha 1-3-galactosyltransferase (ABO), hemoglobin subunit gamma 2 (HBG2), SIK family kinase 3 (SIK3), and translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 40 (TOMM40), whereas the SNPs from the male cohort were located in lipoprotein lipase (LPL), protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type D (PTPRD), chloride voltage-gated channel 7 (CLCN7), leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily D member 6 (CYP2D6), and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP). While the apolipoprotein 5 (APOA5) gene is considered integral to lipid homeostasis [38], two different polymorphisms of this gene, rs662799 A > G and rs651821 T > C, were associated with a significant increase in the incidence of dyslipidemia in male and female subjects, respectively. Each GRS derived from male- and female-specific SNPs had different tendencies of TC and LDL-C concentration levels in the blood, which may be related to the fact that females have greater genetic heritability of cholesterol and LDL-C compared with males [39]. The GRSs from the male and female cohorts interacted with TG and HDL-C levels in opposite directions. Increased TG level by PRS is causally linked to coronary artery disease and has already been reported in another cohort [40]. However, to the best of our knowledge, decreasing HDL-C by GRS quartiles related to dyslipidemia is a new discovery.
The results from the male participants confirmed that a high intake of instant noodles had a significant impact on the genetic risk of dyslipidemia. While instant noodles are primarily composed of saturated fats and carbohydrates, they also contain very few proteins [41]. In addition, instant noodles are not recommended for consumption by patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome because hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a type of reactive oxygen species, inhibits blood sugar control [42,43]. Furthermore, in a previous study confirming the relationship between instant noodle intake and lipid concentration levels in Koreans, instant noodle intake was found to have a negative effect on blood serum levels [44]. In 3397 college students, consuming instant noodles more than three times a week increased the risk of developing hypertriglyceridemia by 2.6 times, compared to eating them less than once a month [45]. This is the first study to identify a sex difference in the association between instant noodle intake and the genetic heritability of dyslipidemia; as such, the precise mechanism underlying this sex disparity should be explored in future studies. Several previous studies have identified sex differences in the associations between instant noodle consumption and risk factors for chronic diseases, such as metabolic syndrome and hypertension [46,47], but the effects of genetic variants by sex have not been considered. Therefore, individuals with these genetic characteristics should refrain from eating instant noodles, which are currently enjoyed by many Koreans.
Analysis of female participants confirmed that high coffee intake had a statistically significant effect on the genetic risk of dyslipidemia. Coffee is a complex mixture of various compounds, including a diterpene alcohol, which increases blood cholesterol levels [48]. Moreover, previous studies have shown that coffee alters blood lipid concentrations to within abnormal ranges [49]. In a study investigating 1017 Westerners, coffee consumption substantially contributed to an increase in TC, LDL-C, and TG levels, and lipid levels varied significantly with the frequency of consumption, while, on the other hand, it has been reported that genetic variations within the ADORA gene family increase the risk of dyslipidemia in Korean adults who consume coffee [50,51]. In addition, rs662799 of APOA5, one of the key SNPs used for GRS calculation in this study, had a significant association between human complex diseases and coffee consumption in a previous study in Japan. Our findings are very consistent with this previous study that showed a close link between SNPs, which cause cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease in the Japanese population, and coffee consumption. Moreover, our research is highly reliable in that it was conducted with subjects of the same ethnicity [52]. Despite these concerns, coffee consumption has rapidly increased in South Korea, with adults consuming an average of 353 cups annually [53]. Moreover, it is of grave concern that the majority of coffee consumed by Koreans consists of coffee mixes, coffee beverages, and instant coffee [54]. In contrast to coffee beans, mixed coffee, coffee beverages, and instant coffee contain a substantial quantity of sugar, which exacerbates the negative effects of cardiovascular disease [54,55,56]. Considering these points, women at high genetic risk for dyslipidemia should regulate their coffee consumption, and dietary guidelines for coffee intake should be developed to prevent and manage dyslipidemia.
Soft drink intake had a statistically significant effect on genetic predisposition to dyslipidemia in the entire cohort and male participants in this study. Soft drinks are a major source of sugar that affects serum lipid concentrations. Soft drink consumption reduces HDL-C and increases LDL-C and TG levels [57,58]. In addition, a previous study found that soft drink intake increased the incidence of obesity and metabolic syndrome [59]. In particular, there was a strong association between obesity, low HDL-C levels, and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged Korean men [60]. Several previous studies have confirmed sex differences in soft drink consumption and cardiovascular diseases [61,62]; however, to our knowledge, no study has considered the genetic predisposition to dyslipidemia. Therefore, it is crucial for individuals with genetic polymorphisms associated with dyslipidemia to avoid consuming soft drinks as much as possible to reduce the risk of dyslipidemia. Furthermore, as the gut microbiota is a causal factor of dyslipidemia and the microbiota-dependent mechanism of dietary sugar elaborates the interaction with metabolism, future studies should integrate gut microbiota with dietary patterns to comprehensively understand the multifaceted interactions with dyslipidemia [63,64].
Meat consumption is known to increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases owing to the unfavorable effects of saturated fat contained in red meat [65]. In addition, compared to unprocessed red meat, processed meat contains excessive salt, which can negatively affect blood lipid levels. Unexpectedly, no significant associations were found between the GRS for dyslipidemia and meat consumption, such as pork belly, intestines, beef, and sausages, in the present study. This also conflicts with the results of a recent study conducted on Korean HEXA cohorts [66], which showed that increased red meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of dyslipidemia; however, genetic predisposition was not considered. Since dyslipidemia is influenced by a complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors [7,8,9], this study confirmed the association between the GRS of dyslipidemia and meat consumption.
The present study has a number of strengths. First, this is the first study to examine the interaction between dietary patterns and sex-specific GRS for dyslipidemia in a large prospective cohort of Koreans. Moreover, dietary factors, including the intake of instant noodles, soft drinks, and coffee, were found to be significantly associated with the GRS for dyslipidemia. This study also has several limitations. First, the participants comprised an urban-based cohort that included only middle-aged and older adults. In addition, although potential confounding factors that influence dyslipidemia were adjusted for, residual confounding factors that were not included in the analysis may have had an effect. Lastly, the effect of cooking methods and calorie intake were not taken into consideration because SQFFQ does not provide culinary techniques or accurate estimates of calorie intake. Further studies are required to control the potential impact of these limitations on susceptibility to dyslipidemia.
5. Conclusions
This study revealed sex differences in genetic susceptibility to dyslipidemia, which correlated significantly with dietary patterns. Individuals with minor alleles had a higher risk of dyslipidemia compared to those with major alleles of the most significant lead SNPs, although these SNPs differed between males and females, being rs662799 and rs651821. Individuals with a higher GRS had a higher risk of dyslipidemia than those with a lower GRS in both males and females, with higher LDL-C and TG concentrations. Notably, among male participants with high GRSs, a high intake of instant noodles and soft drinks emerged as crucial, whereas high consumption of coffee strongly affected only female participants. These findings support the importance of implementing sex-specific strategic interventions, taking into account genetic predisposition and dietary patterns, to prevent dyslipidemia.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu15204385/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Demographic characteristics of the study participants in the entire cohort, Supplementary Table S2: Dietary patterns of the study participants in the entire cohort, Supplementary Table S3: Significant SNPs related to dyslipidemia in the entire cohort, Supplementary Table S4: Comparison of biochemical parameters by quartiles of the genetic risk score in middle-aged, Supplementary Table S5: Comparison of biochemical parameters by quartiles of the genetic risk score in elderly, Supplementary Table S6: Effects of GRS and dietary patterns interactions on dyslipidemia in the entire cohort.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.K., H.K.J. and H.Y.Y.; methodology, S.K., G.L. and H.K.J.; data curation, Y.K. and S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K., H.K.J. and H.Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.K., G.L., Y.K. and H.Y.Y.; supervision, H.Y.Y.; funding acquisition, H.Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), with a grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2022R1F1A1068307), a Chung-Ang University research grant in 2021, and a Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship in 2020.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review boards of Chung-Ang University (approval no. 1041078-201908-HRBR-236-01; approval date: 10 September 2019).
Informed Consent Statement
All the participants provided written informed consent.
Data Availability Statement
The original data could be available upon request from the Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Republic of Korea.
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted with bioresources from the National Biobank of Korea, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Republic of Korea (NBK-2019-066).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
References
- Arnett, D.K.; Blumenthal, R.S.; Albert, M.A.; Buroker, A.B.; Goldberger, Z.D.; Hahn, E.J.; Himmelfarb, C.D.; Khera, A.; Lloyd-Jones, D.; McEvoy, J.W.; et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019, 140, e563–e595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gotto, A.M. Evolving concepts of dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease: The Louis F. Bishop Lecture. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005, 46, 1219–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsao, C.W.; Aday, A.W.; Almarzooq, Z.I.; Alonso, A.; Beaton, A.Z.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Boehme, A.K.; Buxton, A.E.; Carson, A.P.; Commodore-Mensah, Y. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022, 145, e153–e639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO Fact Sheet—CVDs. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (accessed on 18 July 2023).
- Musunuru, K. Atherogenic Dyslipidemia: Cardiovascular Risk and Dietary Intervention. Lipids 2010, 45, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- EUGenMed; Cardiovascular Clinical Study Group; Regitz-Zagrosek, V.; Oertelt-Prigione, S.; Prescott, E.; Franconi, F.; Gerdts, E.; Foryst-Ludwig, A.; Maas, A.H.; Kautzky-Willer, A. Gender in cardiovascular diseases: Impact on clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 24–34. [Google Scholar]
- Ha, K.H.; Kwon, H.-S.; Kim, D.J. Epidemiologic characteristics of dyslipidemia in Korea. J. Lipid Atheroscler. 2015, 4, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmisano, B.T.; Zhu, L.; Eckel, R.H.; Stafford, J.M. Sex differences in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Mol. Metab. 2018, 15, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaura, F.; Palmu, J.; Aittokallio, J.; Kauko, A.; Niiranen, T. Genetic, molecular, and cellular determinants of sex-specific cardiovascular traits. Circ. Res. 2022, 130, 611–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carroll, M.D.; Kit, B.K.; Lacher, D.A. Trends in Elevated Triglyceride in Adults: United States, 2001–2012; US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Couillard, C.; Bergeron, N.; Prud’homme, D.; Bergeron, J.; Tremblay, A.; Bouchard, C.; Mauriege, P.; Després, J.-P. Gender difference in postprandial lipemia: Importance of visceral adipose tissue accumulation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1999, 19, 2448–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.H.; Kim, H.C.; Ahn, S.V.; Hur, N.W.; Choi, D.P.; Park, C.G.; Suh, I. Prevalence of dyslipidemia among Korean adults: Korea national health and nutrition survey 1998–2005. Diabetes Metab. J. 2012, 36, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, G.; Jeon, H.K.; Yoo, H.Y. Sex-related differences in single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with dyslipidemia in a Korean population. Lipids Health Dis. 2022, 21, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kopin, L.; Lowenstein, C. Dyslipidemia. Ann. Intern. Med. 2017, 167, Itc81–Itc96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bruckert, E.; Rosenbaum, D. Lowering LDL-cholesterol through diet: Potential role in the statin era. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2011, 22, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haslam, D.E.; Peloso, G.M.; Herman, M.A.; Dupuis, J.; Lichtenstein, A.H.; Smith, C.E.; McKeown, N.M. Beverage consumption and longitudinal changes in lipoprotein concentrations and incident dyslipidemia in US adults: The Framingham heart study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e014083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lê, K.-A.; Ith, M.; Kreis, R.; Faeh, D.; Bortolotti, M.; Tran, C.; Boesch, C.; Tappy, L. Fructose overconsumption causes dyslipidemia and ectopic lipid deposition in healthy subjects with and without a family history of type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1760–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.S. Awareness of meat consumption and alternative foods according to sustainable dietary habits. J. Korean Pract. Arts Educ. 2022, 35, 101–124. [Google Scholar]
- Chung, Y. Assessment of Coronavirus disease, the nose pollution filter, fermented spicy Kimchee, and peppery hot soup consumed in Korea. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2021, 14, 785–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, S.-W. Current status of nutrient intake in Korea: Focused on macronutrients. J. Korean Med. Assoc. 2022, 65, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.Y.; Jo, G.; Lee, J.; Singh, G.M.; Lee, J.-T.; Shin, M.-J. Association between dietary sodium intake and disease burden and mortality in Koreans between 1998 and 2016: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2020, 14, 501–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Park, S.; Yang, H.J.; Shin, P.-K.; Hur, H.J.; Park, S.-J.; Lee, K.-H.; Hong, M.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, S.-W. Alleviation of dyslipidemia via a traditional balanced Korean diet represented by a low glycemic and low cholesterol diet in obese women in a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients 2022, 14, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.-A.; Shin, S. Dietary patterns and the risk of dyslipidemia in Korean adults: A prospective cohort study based on the health Examinees (HEXA) study. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2021, 121, 1242–1257.e1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hunter, D.J. Gene–environment interactions in human diseases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lewis, C.M.; Vassos, E. Polygenic risk scores: From research tools to clinical instruments. Genome Med. 2020, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dron, J.S.; Hegele, R.A. The evolution of genetic-based risk scores for lipids and cardiovascular disease. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2019, 30, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Go, M.J.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Kim, D.-J.; Lee, H.-J.; Jang, H.B.; Park, K.-H.; Song, J.; Lee, J.-Y. Effect of genetic predisposition on blood lipid traits using cumulative risk assessment in the Korean population. Genom. Inform. 2012, 10, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, L. Gene-diet interactions in complex disease: Current findings and relevance for public health. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2012, 1, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Han, B.G. Cohort Profile: The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) Consortium. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, S.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Fan, R.; Arsenault, B.; Gill, D.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Zheng, J.S.; Larsson, S.C. Lifestyle and metabolic factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Mendelian randomization study. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2022, 37, 723–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Chen, L.; Liu, K.; Li, C.; Li, H.; Xiong, K.; Li, Z.; Lu, C.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y. Mendelian randomization rules out the causal relationship between serum lipids and cholecystitis. BMC Med. Genom. 2021, 14, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tam, C.H.T.; Lim, C.K.P.; Luk, A.O.Y.; Ng, A.C.W.; Lee, H.M.; Jiang, G.; Lau, E.S.H.; Fan, B.; Wan, R.; Kong, A.P.S.; et al. Development of genome-wide polygenic risk scores for lipid traits and clinical applications for dyslipidemia, subclinical atherosclerosis, and diabetes cardiovascular complications among East Asians. Genome Med. 2021, 13, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhee, E.J.; Kim, H.C.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, E.Y.; Kim, B.J.; Kim, E.M.; Song, Y.; Lim, J.H.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, S.; et al. 2018 Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia in Korea. J. Lipid Atheroscler. 2019, 8, 78–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moon, S.; Kim, Y.J.; Han, S.; Hwang, M.Y.; Shin, D.M.; Park, M.Y.; Lu, Y.; Yoon, K.; Jang, H.M.; Kim, Y.K.; et al. The Korea Biobank Array: Design and Identification of Coding Variants Associated with Blood Biochemical Traits. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Watanabe, K.; Taskesen, E.; van Bochoven, A.; Posthuma, D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahn, Y.; Kwon, E.; Shim, J.E.; Park, M.K.; Joo, Y.; Kimm, K.; Park, C.; Kim, D.H. Validation and reproducibility of food frequency questionnaire for Korean genome epidemiologic study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, 1435–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jee, D.; Kang, S.; Huang, S.; Park, S. Polygenetic-Risk Scores Related to Crystallin Metabolism Are Associated with Age-Related Cataract Formation and Interact with Hyperglycemia, Hypertension, Western-Style Diet, and Na Intake. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beckstead, J.A.; Oda, M.N.; Martin, D.D.; Forte, T.M.; Bielicki, J.K.; Berger, T.; Luty, R.; Kay, C.M.; Ryan, R.O. Structure-function studies of human apolipoprotein A-V: A regulator of plasma lipid homeostasis. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 9416–9423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flynn, E.; Tanigawa, Y.; Rodriguez, F.; Altman, R.B.; Sinnott-Armstrong, N.; Rivas, M.A. Sex-specific genetic effects across biomarkers. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2021, 29, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ripatti, P.; Rämö, J.T.; Mars, N.J.; Fu, Y.; Lin, J.; Söderlund, S.; Benner, C.; Surakka, I.; Kiiskinen, T.; Havulinna, A.S.; et al. Polygenic Hyperlipidemias and Coronary Artery Disease Risk. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 2020, 13, e002725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, B.X. Asian noodles: History, classification, raw materials, and processing. Food Res. Int. 2008, 41, 888–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, C.H.; Kim, C.H.; Park, H.K.; Suh, K.I.; Lee, K.U. Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide on Insulin Secretion in Rat Pancreatic Islets. Korean Diabetes J. 2002, 26, 265–273. [Google Scholar]
- Mathis, B.J.; Tanaka, K.; Hiramatsu, Y. Factors of Obesity and Metabolically Healthy Obesity in Asia. Medicina 2022, 58, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- LEE, J.-W.; LEE, Y.-H. Frequency of instant noodle (Ramyeon) intake and food value recognition, and their relationship to blood lipid levels of male adolescents in rural area. Korean J. Community Nutr. 2003, 8, 485–494. [Google Scholar]
- Huh, I.S.; Kim, H.; Jo, H.K.; Lim, C.S.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, S.J.; Kwon, O.; Oh, B.; Chang, N. Instant noodle consumption is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors among college students in Seoul. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2017, 11, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shin, H.J.; Cho, E.; Lee, H.J.; Fung, T.T.; Rimm, E.; Rosner, B.; Manson, J.E.; Wheelan, K.; Hu, F.B. Instant noodle intake and dietary patterns are associated with distinct cardiometabolic risk factors in Korea. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 1247–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Kang, Y. Noodle consumption is positively associated with incident hypertension in middle-aged and older Korean women. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2019, 13, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Urgert, R.; Katan, M.B. The cholesterol-raising factor from coffee beans. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1997, 17, 305–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jee, S.H.; He, J.; Appel, L.J.; Whelton, P.K.; Suh, I.; Klag, M.J. Coffee consumption and serum lipids: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 153, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, L.; Ma, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, P. The effect of coffee consumption on serum lipids: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 66, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Shon, J.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Park, Y.J. Effects of coffee intake on dyslipidemia risk according to genetic variants in the adora gene family among Korean adults. Nutrients 2020, 12, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matoba, N.; Akiyama, M.; Ishigaki, K.; Kanai, M.; Takahashi, A.; Momozawa, Y.; Ikegawa, S.; Ikeda, M.; Iwata, N.; Hirata, M.; et al. GWAS of 165,084 Japanese individuals identified nine loci associated with dietary habits. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2020, 4, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Je, Y.; Jeong, S.; Park, T. Coffee consumption patterns in Korean adults: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001–2011). Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 23, 691–702. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kim, K.Y.; Yang, S.J.; Yun, J.-M. Consumption of instant coffee mix and risk of metabolic syndrome in subjects that visited a health examination center in Gwangju. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 46, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, E.K.; Choe, J.S. Correlation of nutrient intake, obesity-related anthropometrics, and blood lipid status with instant coffee-mix intakes in Gangneung and Samcheok residents. Korean J. Community Nutr. 2013, 18, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, B.-E.; Lee, H.-J.; Cho, E.; Hwang, K.-T. Fatty acid compositions of fats in commercial coffee creamers and instant coffee mixes and their sensory characteristics. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 41, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Høstmark, A.T.; Tomten, S.E. Cola intake and serum lipids in the Oslo Health Study. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2009, 34, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Airaodion, A.I.; Ogbuagu, U.; Ekenjoku, J.A.; Ogbuagu, E.O.; Airaodion, E.O. Hyperglycemic and hyperlipidemic effect of some coca-cola soft drinks in Wistar rats. Acta Sci. Nutr. Health 2019, 3, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, E.H.; Kim, H.; Kwon, O. Association between total sugar intake and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged Korean men and women. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, S.; Kim, S.-A.; Ha, J.; Lim, K. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in relation to obesity and metabolic syndrome among Korean adults: A cross-sectional study from the 2012–2016 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Nutrients 2018, 10, 1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narain, A.; Kwok, C.S.; Mamas, M.A. Soft drinks and sweetened beverages and the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2016, 70, 791–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, C.T.; Chen, D.R.; Chan, C.C.; Yeh, Y.P.; Chen, H.H. Sex differences in the association between sugar-sweetened beverages consumption and metabolic risks among the working-age population in Taiwan. Public Health Nutr. 2022, 26, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, G.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xu, G.; Wang, X.; Liang, F.; Lai, W.; Xiao, X.; Zhu, Q.; et al. Exploring the causal effects of the gut microbiome on serum lipid levels: A two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1113334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kawano, Y.; Edwards, M.; Huang, Y.; Bilate, A.M.; Araujo, L.P.; Tanoue, T.; Atarashi, K.; Ladinsky, M.S.; Reiner, S.L.; Wang, H.H.; et al. Microbiota imbalance induced by dietary sugar disrupts immune-mediated protection from metabolic syndrome. Cell 2022, 185, 3501–3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Erkkilä, A.; de Mello, V.D.; Risérus, U.; Laaksonen, D.E. Dietary fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: An epidemiological approach. Prog. Lipid Res. 2008, 47, 172–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, S.A.; Shin, S. Red meat and processed meat consumption and the risk of dyslipidemia in Korean adults: A prospective cohort study based on the Health Examinees (HEXA) study. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 1714–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
Flowchart of the study participants. SQFFQ, semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of the study participants. SQFFQ, semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire.
Figure 2.
Adjusted OR plot of dyslipidemia incidence by GRS quartiles. GRS was calculated by summing the number of risk alleles in significant SNPs and was classified into 1st to 3rd quartiles based on increasing values. The logistic regression was conducted with the covariates, including age and BMI. The 1st quartile of dyslipidemia GRS was set as a reference group in each of the male and female cohorts.
Figure 2.
Adjusted OR plot of dyslipidemia incidence by GRS quartiles. GRS was calculated by summing the number of risk alleles in significant SNPs and was classified into 1st to 3rd quartiles based on increasing values. The logistic regression was conducted with the covariates, including age and BMI. The 1st quartile of dyslipidemia GRS was set as a reference group in each of the male and female cohorts.
Figure 3.
Comparison of blood lipid concentration by GRS quartiles. Means and SEM of total cholesterol (TC) (A), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (B), triglycerides (TGs) (C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (D) in the GRS quartiles by sex are presented. One-way ANOVA with the post hoc Scheffé test was conducted. Significant differences between GRS quartiles within male or female cohorts are represented by * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3.
Comparison of blood lipid concentration by GRS quartiles. Means and SEM of total cholesterol (TC) (A), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (B), triglycerides (TGs) (C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (D) in the GRS quartiles by sex are presented. One-way ANOVA with the post hoc Scheffé test was conducted. Significant differences between GRS quartiles within male or female cohorts are represented by * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of the study participants.
| Characteristics | Male | Female | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dyslipidemia (n = 4990) | Non-Dyslipidemia (n = 10,879) | Dyslipidemia (n = 8474) | Non-Dyslipidemia (n = 23,219) | ||
| Age, years | 58.63 ± 0.122 | 60.29 ± 0.082 *** | 58.33 ± 0.079 | 57.32 ± 0.052 *** | |
| Smoking status | non-smoking | 1587 (32.6) | 4037 (38) | 7784 (92) | 21,349 (94.4) |
| past smoking | 1768 (36.4) | 4214 (40) | 221 (2.6) | 648 (2.9) | |
| current smoking | 1501 (31) | 2337 (22) *** | 272 (3.2) | 595 (2.6) ** | |
| Drinking status | non-drinking | 1284 (25.7) | 2698 (24.8) | 5807 (68.6) | 15,525 (66.9) |
| past drinking | 339 (6.8) | 793 (7.3) | 193 (2.3) | 497 (2.1) | |
| current drinking | 3364 (67.4) | 7384 (67.9) | 2470 (29.1) | 7185 (30.9) ** | |
| Waist circumference, cm | 87.32 ± 0.102 | 84.29 ± 0.073 *** | 80.39 ± 0.087 | 78.09 ± 0.054 *** | |
| Hip circumference, cm | 96.00 ± 0.076 | 94.49 ± 0.052 *** | 93.18 ± 0.062 | 92.58 ± 0.037 *** | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.96 ± 0.037 | 23.88 ± 0.026 *** | 24.14 ± 0.032 | 23.33 ± 0.019 *** | |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 208.61 ± 0.647 | 183.99 ± 0.276 *** | 235.95 ± 0.449 | 192.17 ± 0.177 *** | |
| Triglyceride, mg/dL | 210.58 ± 1.847 | 104.75 ± 0.366 *** | 164.85 ± 1.030 | 98.18 ± 0.240 *** | |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 124.90 ± 0.609 | 105.96 ± 0.260 *** | 148.69 ± 0.418 | 109.74 ± 0.166 *** | |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 45.12 ± 0.192 | 57.08 ± 0.121 *** | 55.61 ± 0.191 | 62.79 ± 0.091 *** | |
| GRS | 16.83 ± 0.042 | 15.65 ± 0.028 *** | 21.18 ± 0.037 | 20.07 ± 0.022 *** | |
Values of continuous variables are presented as means and standard error of the mean (SEM), and those of categorical variables are presented as the number of subjects and percentages. Student’s t-test and chi-square test were performed as appropriate. Significant differences between dyslipidemia and non-dyslipidemia groups in male and female cohorts separately are indicated by ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. BMI, body mass index; GRS, genetic risk score.
Table 2.
Dietary patterns of the study participants.
| Parameters | Male | Female | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dyslipidemia (n = 4990) | Non-Dyslipidemia (n = 10,879) | Dyslipidemia (n = 8474) | Non-Dyslipidemia (n = 23,219) | ||
| Pork belly | Low Intake | 3619 (72.5) | 7976 (73.3) | 7117 (84.0) | 19,507 (84.0) |
| High intake | 1371 (27.5) | 2903 (26.7) | 1357 (16.0) | 3712 (16.0) | |
| Beef | Low Intake | 3291 (66.0) | 7192 (66.1) | 5712 (67.4) | 15,425 (66.4) |
| High Intake | 1699 (34.0) | 3687 (33.9) | 2762 (32.6) | 7794 (33.6) | |
| Intestines | Low Intake | 4330 (86.8) | 9592 (88.2) | 5869 (69.3) | 16,252 (70.0) |
| High Intake | 660 (13.2) | 1287 (11.8) * | 2605 (30.7) | 6967 (30.0) | |
| Sausages | Low Intake | 3489 (69.9) | 8001 (73.5) | 6654 (78.5) | 17,822 (76.7) |
| High Intake | 1501 (30.1) | 2878 (26.5) *** | 1820 (21.48) | 5397 (23.2) *** | |
| Chicken | Low Intake | 3192 (64.0) | 7223 (66.4) | 5895 (69.6) | 15,696 (67.6) |
| High Intake | 1798 (36.0) | 3656 (33.6) ** | 2579 (30.4) | 7523 (32.4) *** | |
| Soup | Low Intake | 3199 (64.1) | 7067 (64.9) | 5978 (70.5) | 16,193 (69.7) |
| High Intake | 1791 (35.9) | 3812 (35.0) | 2496 (29.5) | 7026 (30.3) | |
| Instant noodles | Low Intake | 3488 (69.9) | 8129 (74.7) | 6358 (75.0) | 17,296 (74.5) |
| High Intake | 1502 (30.1) | 2750 (25.2) *** | 2116 (25.0) | 5923 (25.5) | |
| Snacks | Low Intake | 3212 (64.4) | 7079 (65.1) | 7523 (88.8) | 20,420 (88.0) |
| High Intake | 1778 (35.6) | 3800 (34.9) | 951 (11.2) | 2799 (12.0) * | |
| Soft drinks | Low Intake | 3198 (64.1) | 7394 (68.0) | 6612 (78.0) | 18,452 (79.5) |
| High Intake | 1792 (35.9) | 3485 (32.0) *** | 1862 (22.0) | 4767 (20.5) ** | |
| Coffee | Low Intake | 3550 (71.1) | 8154 (75.0) | 7465 (88.0) | 20,478 (88.2) |
| High Intake | 1440 (28.9) | 2725 (25.0) *** | 1009 (11.9) | 2741 (11.8) | |
Categorical variables are presented as the number of subjects and percentages. A chi-square test was performed. Significant differences between dyslipidemia and non-dyslipidemia groups in male and female cohorts separately are indicated by * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
Table 3.
Significant SNPs related to dyslipidemia.
| A. Male Participants | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHR | SNP | POS | Mi | Ma | p-Value | Gene | MAF | OR | LB | UB |
| 2 | rs13306194 | 2:21252534_G/A | G | A | 1.95 × 10−08 | APOB | 0.1043 | 0.804 | 0.745 | 0.8676 |
| 2 | rs1260326 | 2:27730940_T/C | T | C | 1.10 × 10−08 | GCKR | 0.4269 | 0.8686 | 0.8277 | 0.9116 |
| 8 | rs117026536 | 8:19818773_G/T | G | T | 2.63 × 10−15 | LPL | 0.103 | 0.7364 | 0.6827 | 0.7945 |
| 8 | rs4922120 | 8:19878598_A/G | A | G | 5.31 × 10−10 | PTPRD | 0.3089 | 0.8495 | 0.8069 | 0.8944 |
| 8 | rs2954038 | 8:126507389_C/A | C | A | 9.73 × 10−12 | CLCN7 | 0.316 | 1.198 | 1.138 | 1.263 |
| 11 | rs1787701 | 11:116563992_C/G | G | C | 9.29 × 10−14 | LGR5 | 0.2521 | 0.814 | 0.7711 | 0.8593 |
| 11 | rs151007118 | 11:116583864_G/T | T | G | 3.90 × 10−12 | THADA | 0.1574 | 1.27 | 1.187 | 1.359 |
| 11 | rs11216118 | 11:116596395_C/T | T | C | 3.11 × 10−15 | Consequence none | 0.0783 | 1.459 | 1.329 | 1.603 |
| 11 | rs180363 | 11:116597889_T/C | T | C | 2.56 × 10−15 | Consequence none | 0.154 | 0.7712 | 0.7231 | 0.8224 |
| 11 | rs61905084 | 11:116610294_T/C | T | C | 3.92 × 10−23 | CYP2D6 | 0.2248 | 0.7532 | 0.7121 | 0.7966 |
| 11 | rs113932726 | 11:116650638_C/T | T | C | 7.54 × 10−41 | HBB | 0.1074 | 1.784 | 1.639 | 1.942 |
| 11 | rs662799 | 11:116663707_G/A | G | A | 2.11 × 10−57 | APOA5 | 0.3543 | 1.523 | 1.447 | 1.604 |
| 11 | rs11603365 | 11:117006015_T/A | T | A | 1.05 × 10−11 | Consequence none | 0.1713 | 0.8066 | 0.7581 | 0.8581 |
| 16 | rs56156922 | 16:56987369_T/C | T | C | 1.32 × 10−09 | CETP | 0.1523 | 0.8177 | 0.7662 | 0.8726 |
| 16 | rs7499892 | 16:57006590_C/T | T | C | 1.47 × 10−08 | CFHR1 | 0.1876 | 1.195 | 1.124 | 1.272 |
| 19 | rs429358 | 19:45411941_T/C | C | T | 3.81 × 10−12 | APOE | 0.1126 | 1.321 | 1.221 | 1.43 |
| B. Female Participants | ||||||||||
| CHR | SNP | POS | Mi | Ma | p-Value | Gene | MAF | OR | LB | UB |
| 2 | rs13306194 | 2:21252534_G/A | G | A | 5.85 × 10−09 | APOB | 0.1072 | 0.8463 | 0.8001 | 0.8952 |
| 2 | rs1260326 | 2:27730940_T/C | T | C | 7.27 × 10−17 | GCKR | 0.4256 | 0.8588 | 0.8286 | 0.8900 |
| 8 | rs2954031 | 8:126491733_G/T | G | T | 9.25 × 10−11 | TRIB1 | 0.4705 | 1.124 | 1.085 | 1.1650 |
| 9 | rs9411474 | 9:136125716_C/G | G | C | 1.04 × 10−08 | ABO | 0.2464 | 1.128 | 1.082 | 1.1750 |
| 9 | rs651007 | 9:136153875_C/T | T | C | 3.19 × 10−08 | TNFRSF11A | 0.2789 | 1.118 | 1.074 | 1.1620 |
| 11 | rs11216068 | 11:116505239_C/T | T | C | 4.60 × 10−09 | LOC107984372 | 0.1207 | 1.179 | 1.116 | 1.2460 |
| 11 | rs74357270 | 116523300_A/T | T | A | 8.30 × 10−11 | LINC02702 | 0.296 | 1.138 | 1.094 | 1.1830 |
| 11 | rs75310100 | 116578361_G/T | G | T | 6.14 × 10−16 | HBG2 | 0.1975 | 0.8348 | 0.799 | 0.8721 |
| 11 | rs151007118 | 116583864_G/T | T | G | 1.11 × 10−15 | Consequence none | 0.16 | 1.223 | 1.164 | 1.2840 |
| 11 | rs11216118 | 116596395_C/T | T | C | 2.07 × 10−18 | Consequence none | 0.07777 | 1.356 | 1.266 | 1.4510 |
| 11 | rs180346 | 116612659_A/C | A | C | 7.95 × 10−29 | IL18RAP | 0.1936 | 0.7797 | 0.7463 | 0.8146 |
| 11 | rs1942478 | 116651463_T/G | T | G | 4.15 × 10−18 | ZPR1 | 0.1927 | 0.8228 | 0.7873 | 0.8598 |
| 11 | rs2075291 | 116661392_C/A | A | C | 3.38 × 10−49 | APOA5 | 0.1075 | 1.575 | 1.483 | 1.6730 |
| 11 | rs651821 | 11:116662579_C/T | C | T | 1.10 × 10−77 | APOA5 | 0.3584 | 1.432 | 1.379 | 1.4870 |
| 11 | rs11216183 | 116781545_C/A | C | A | 2.55 × 10−10 | SIK3 | 0.08296 | 0.8173 | 0.7677 | 0.8700 |
| 11 | rs143791312 | 116895355_C/T | C | T | 1.15 × 10−09 | SIK3 | 0.07257 | 0.8131 | 0.7607 | 0.8691 |
| 19 | rs406315 | 19:45384116_G/A | A | G | 3.92 × 10−15 | NECTIN2 | 0.2565 | 0.8832 | 0.8485 | 0.9192 |
| 19 | rs2278426 | 19:11350488_C/T | C | T | 1.16 × 10−09 | ANGPTL8 | 0.06933 | 0.7636 | 0.7139 | 0.8167 |
| 19 | rs10119 | 19:45406673_G/A | A | G | 5.01 × 10−19 | TOMM40 | 0.1193 | 1.289 | 1.219 | 1.3640 |
| 19 | rs1065853 | 19:45413233_G/T | G | T | 1.11 × 10−22 | APOE | 0.04856 | 0.6736 | 0.6224 | 0.7290 |
CHR, chromosome; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; Mi, minor allele; Ma, major allele; MAF, minor allele frequency; OR, odds ratio; LB, lower bound; UB, upper bound. The p-value for the OR was adjusted for age and BMI.
Table 4.
Effects of the minor allele of significant SNPs on dyslipidemia.
| Male | Female | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs662799 A > G (APOA5) | rs651821 T > C (APOA5) | |||||
| carriers | A:A | A:G | G:G | T:T | T:C | C:C |
| (n = 7937) | (n = 6553) | (n = 1379) | (n = 15,467) | (n = 13,322) | (n = 2904) | |
| OR | 1 | 1.506 | 2.472 | 1 | 1.362 | 2.212 |
| 95% CI | 1.400–1.619 | 2.193–2.787 | 1.290–1.437 | 2.034–2.407 | ||
| p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
Values are expressed as the OR with 95% CI, which were estimated using logistic regression after adjusting for age and BMI. Carriers of only major alleles were used as the reference group.
Table 5.
Comparison of biochemical parameters by quartiles of the genetic risk score.
| Male | Female | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Quartile (n = 4844) | 2nd Quartile (n = 6029) | 3rd Quartile (n = 4996) | 1st Quartile (n = 9602) | 2nd Quartile (n = 10,671) | 3rd Quartile (n = 11,420) | |
| HbA1c, % | 5.72 ± 0.012 | 5.70 ± 0.010 | 5.68 ± 0.011 | 5.62 ± 0.007 | 5.62 ± 0.006 | 5.63 ± 0.006 |
| λ-GTP, IU/L | 40.533 ± 0.7607 | 42.853 ± 0.7167 | 45.166 ± 0.9849 *** | 21.602 ± 0.1926 | 22.561 ± 0.2266 * | 23.249 ± 0.2442 *** |
| Albumin, g/dL | 4.664 ± 0.0036 | 4.669 ± 0.0031 | 4.669 ± 0.0034 | 4.601 ± 0.0023 | 4.610 ± 0.022 * | 4.610 ± 0.0021 * |
| AST, IU/L | 25.83 ± 0.206 | 25.92 ± 0.148 | 26.52 ± 0.260 | 23.96 ± 0.099 | 23.91 ± 0.091 | 24.28 ± 0.121 + |
| ALP, IU/L | 65.71 ± 0.271 | 66.22 ± 0.291 | 66.80 ± 0.260 * | 68.37 ± 0.200 | 67.81 ± 0.196 | 67.49 ± 0.196 ** |
| ALT, IU/L | 24.95 ± 0.272 | 24.82 ± 0.200 | 25.07 ± 0.222 | 20.62 ± 0.135 | 20.41 ± 0.125 | 20.76 ± 0.152 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.968 ± 0.0044 | 0.965 ± 0.0038 | 0.970 ± 0.0050 | 0.704 ± 0.0016 | 0.708 ± 0.0017 | 0.701 ± 0.0017 + |
| Blood Calcium, mg/dL | 9.498 ± 0.0053 | 9.508 ± 0.0046 | 9.521 ± 0.0050 ** | 9.496 ± 0.0038 | 9.499 ± 0.0037 | 9.503 ± 0.0035 |
Values represent means ± SEM from one-way ANOVA with the post hoc Scheffé test. HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; λ-GTP, gamma-glutamyl transferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine transaminase. Significant differences versus the 1st quartile are indicated by * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.005. Significant differences versus the 2nd quartile are indicated by + p < 0.05.
Table 6.
Effects of GRS and dietary pattern interactions on dyslipidemia.
| A. Meats | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Male | Female | |||||||
| 1st Quartile | 2nd Quartile | 3rd Quartile | p-Value | 1st Quartile | 2nd Quartile | 3rd Quartile | p-Value | ||
| Pork belly | Low Intake | 1 | 1.635 (1.473–1.816) | 2.580 (2.321–2.868) | 0.907 | 1 | 1.352 (1.257–1.454) | 2.014 (1.879–2.159) | 0.140 |
| High Intake | 1 | 1.698 (1.433–2.012) | 2.699 (2.267–3.213) | 1 | 1.359 (1.149–1.608) | 2.250 (1.916–2.642) | |||
| Beef | Low Intake | 1 | 1.642 (1.471–1.832) | 2.621 (2.345–2.930) | 0.662 | 1 | 1.317 (1.214–1.429) | 2.019 (1.869–2.182) | 0.703 |
| High Intake | 1 | 1.674 (1.436–1.951) | 2.601 (2.228–3.036) | 1 | 1.429 (1.271–1.606) | 2.117 (1.891–2.369) | |||
| Intestines | Low Intake | 1 | 1.712 (1.556–1.884) | 2.702 (2.451–2.979) | 0.370 | 1 | 1.333 (1.230–1.444) | 2.011 (1.863–2.171) | 0.904 |
| High Intake | 1 | 1.317 (1.033–1.678) | 2.118 (1.660–2.702) | 1 | 1.399 (1.239–1.580) | 2.137 (1.904–2.399) | |||
| Sausages | Low Intake | 1 | 1.668 (1.500–1.854) | 2.706 (2.430–3.013) | 0.563 | 1 | 1.370 (1.270–1.478) | 2.144 (1.966–2.272) | 0.213 |
| High Intake | 1 | 1.619 (1.375–1.908) | 2.398 (2.027–2.836) | 1 | 1.301 (1.128–1.499) | 1.851 (1.616–2.120) | |||
| Chicken | Low Intake | 1 | 1.718 (1.536–1.921) | 2.804 (2.504–3.140) | 0.504 | 1 | 1.352 (1.248–1.465) | 2.035 (1.885–2.197) | 0.396 |
| High Intake | 1 | 1.545 (1.333–1.791) | 2.301 (1.979–2.675) | 1 | 1.351 (1.198–1.525) | 2.076 (1.850–2.330) | |||
| B. Soup, instant noodles, snacks, and drinks | |||||||||
| Groups | Male | Female | |||||||
| 1st Quartile | 2nd Quartile | 3rd Quartile | p-Value | 1st Quartile | 2nd Quartile | 3rd Quartile | p-Value | ||
| Soup | Low Intake | 1 | 1.687 (1.508–1.887) | 2.770 (2.473–3.102) | 0.350 | 1 | 1.311 (1.210–1.419) | 2.016 (1.868–2.175) | 0.738 |
| High Intake | 1 | 1.599 (1.380–1.852) | 2.356 (2.027–2.739) | 1 | 1.452 (1.284–1.641) | 2.125 (1.889–2.390) | |||
| Instant noodles | Low Intake | 1 | 1.672 (1.504–1.859) | 2.633 (2.366–2.931) | 0.028 | 1 | 1.384 (1.281–1.494) | 2.017 (1.873–2.171) | 0.087 |
| High Intake | 1 | 1.601 (1.357–1.888) | 2.569 (2.168–3.044) | 1 | 1.258 (1.098–1.440) | 2.154 (1.895–2.449) | |||
| Snacks | Low Intake | 1 | 1.742 (1.558–1.948) | 2.820 (2.518–3.159) | 0.085 | 1 | 1.347 (1.254–1.446) | 2.079 (1.943–2.225) | 0.210 |
| High Intake | 1 | 1.504 (1.297–1.744) | 2.279 (1.961–2.648) | 1 | 1.414 (1.164–1.716) | 1.835 (1.519–217) | |||
| Soft drinks | Low Intake | 1 | 1.739 (1.559–1.940) | 2.576 (2.303–2.881) | 0.030 | 1 | 1.388 (1.287–1.498) | 2.117 (1.970–2.276) | 0.196 |
| High Intake | 1 | 1.494 (1.282–1.742) | 2.662 (2.282–3.106) | 1 | 1.225 (1.063–1.412) | 1.818 (1.586–2.084) | |||
| Coffee | Low Intake | 1 | 1.691 (1.522–1.879) | 2.636 (2.368–2.933) | 0.188 | 1 | 1.338 (1.246–1.437) | 2.002 (1.870–2.142) | 0.038 |
| High Intake | 1 | 1.561 (1.320–1.846) | 2.560 (2.159–3.034) | 1 | 1.463 (1.203–1.778) | 2.489 (2.063–3.003) | |||
Values represent the adjusted OR, 95% CI, and p-value for interaction with GRS. Binary multivariable logistic regression was conducted with the cross-product of the dietary group and GRS quartiles and adjusted for covariates, including age and BMI. The 1st quartile of the GRSs was set as the reference.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kim, S.; Jeon, H.K.; Lee, G.; Kim, Y.; Yoo, H.Y. Associations between the Genetic Heritability of Dyslipidemia and Dietary Patterns in Korean Adults Based on Sex Differences. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4385. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15204385
AMA Style
Kim S, Jeon HK, Lee G, Kim Y, Yoo HY. Associations between the Genetic Heritability of Dyslipidemia and Dietary Patterns in Korean Adults Based on Sex Differences. Nutrients. 2023; 15(20):4385. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15204385
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Sei, Hye Kyung Jeon, Gyeonghee Lee, Youbin Kim, and Hae Young Yoo. 2023. "Associations between the Genetic Heritability of Dyslipidemia and Dietary Patterns in Korean Adults Based on Sex Differences" Nutrients 15, no. 20: 4385. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15204385
APA StyleKim, S., Jeon, H. K., Lee, G., Kim, Y., & Yoo, H. Y. (2023). Associations between the Genetic Heritability of Dyslipidemia and Dietary Patterns in Korean Adults Based on Sex Differences. Nutrients, 15(20), 4385. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15204385
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
