Mothers In Motion Program: Implementation Process and Acceptability by Community
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
Implementation Process
3. Results
3.1. Demographics
3.2. Common Themes
4. Discussion
5. Limitations to the Study
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chang, M.; Nitzke, S.; Guilford, E.; Adair, C.; Hazard, D. Motivators and barriers to healthful eating and physical activity among low-income overweight and obese mothers. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2008, 108, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhen-Duan, J.; Engebretsen, B.; Laroche, H.H. Diet and physical activity changes among low-income families: Perspectives of mothers and their children. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-Being 2019, 14, 1658700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Palmer, S.M.; Knoblauch, S.T.; Winham, D.M.; Hiller, M.B.; Shelley, M.C. Putting Knowledge into Practice: Low-Income Women Talk about Food Choice Decisions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2020, 17, 5092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sawyer, A.D.M.; van Lenthe, F.; Kamphuis, C.B.M.; Terragni, L.; Roos, G.; Poelman, M.P.; Nicolaou, M.; Waterlander, W.; Djojosoeparto, S.K.; Scheidmeir, M.; et al. Dynamics of the complex food environment underlying dietary intake in low-income groups: A systems map of associations extracted from a systematic umbrella literature review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2021, 18, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Birch, L.; Savage, J.S.; Ventura, A. Influences on the Development of Children’s Eating Behaviours: From Infancy to Adolescence. Can. J. Diet. Pr. Pract. Res. 2007, 68, s1–s56. [Google Scholar]
- National and State Level Estimates of WIC Eligibility and Program Reach in 2020. Available online: https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/eligibility-and-program-reach-estimates-2020#:~:text=Among%20all%20infants%20and%20children,other%20races%20or%20multiple%20races (accessed on 1 April 2023).
- Prevention CfDCa: Eligibility and enrollment in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)--27 states and New York City, 2007–2008. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2013, 62, 189–193.
- Green, L.W.; Ottoson, J.M.; García, C.; Hiatt, R.A. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu. Rev. Public. Health 2009, 30, 151–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Glanz, K.; Melvin, C. How not to get lost in translation: Implementing the recommendations and identifying research gaps. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2008, 35 (Suppl. S1), S3–S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eakin, E.G.; Reeves, M.M.; Winkler, E.; Healy, G.N.; Dunstan, D.W.; Owen, N.; Marshal, A.M.; Wilkie, K.C. Six-month outcomes from living well with diabetes: A randomized trial of a telephone-delivered weight loss and physical activity intervention to improve glycemic control. Ann. Behav. Med. 2013, 46, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heath, G.W.; Parra, D.C.; Sarmiento, O.L.; Andersen, L.B.; Owen, N.; Goenka, S.; Montes, F.; Brownson, R.C. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: Lessons from around the world. Lancet 2012, 380, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pagoto, S. The current state of lifestyle intervention implementation research: Where do we go next? Transl. Behav. Med. 2011, 1, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waltz, T.J.; Powell, B.J.; Fernández, M.E.; Abadie, B.; Damschroder, L.J. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: Diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement. Sci. 2019, 14, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Powell, B.J.; Waltz, T.J.; Chinman, M.J.; Damschroder, L.J.; Smith, J.L.; Matthieu, M.M.; Proctor, E.K.; Kirchner, J.E. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement. Sci. 2015, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Miller, C.J.; Barnett, M.L.; Baumann, A.A.; Gutner, C.A.; Wiltsey-Stirman, S. The FRAME-IS: A framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implement. Sci. 2021, 16, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, M.W.; Nitzke, S.; Brown, R.; Resnicow, K. A community based prevention of weight gain intervention (Mothers In Motion) among young low-income overweight and obese mothers: Design and rationale. BMC Public. Health 2014, 14, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chang, M.W.; Brown, R.; Nitzke, S. A Community-Based Intervention Program’s Effects on Dietary Intake Behaviors. Obesity 2017, 25, 2055–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chang, M.W.; Nitzke, S.; Brown, R. Mothers In Motion intervention effect on psychosocial health in young, low-income women with overweight or obesity. BMC Public. Health 2019, 19, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, M.; Pek, J.; Wegener, D. Lifestyle Behavior Intervention Effect on Physical Activity in Low-Income Overweight or Obese Mothers of Young Children. J. Pediatr. Perinatol. Child. Health 2022, 6, 352–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, M.W.; Brown, R.; Nitzke, S. Results and lessons learned from a prevention of weight gain program for low-income overweight and obese young mothers: Mothers In Motion. BMC Public. Health 2017, 17, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rogers, E.M. Diffuision of Innovations, 5th ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, M.; Nitzke, S.; Brown, R. Design and Outcomes of a Mothers In Motion Behavioral Intervention Pilot Study. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2010, 42 (Suppl. S3), S11–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
FRAME-IS Module and Sub-Component | Completion |
---|---|
Module 1 | |
The innovation being implemented is: | Mothers In Motion: Client videos Train-the-trainer videos for WIC personnel |
The implementation strategy used | Share success stories, work closely with informal local opinion leaders and champions, involve WIC clients and family members, and develop implementation blueprint |
The modification(s) being made are: | Client videos. Deliver online instead of DVD format Train-the-trainer videos. Deliver online rather than 2-day in-person training |
The reasons(s) for modification(s) are: | Client videos. To broadly reach WIC clients Train-the-trainer videos. To save training cost and time |
Module 2 | |
What is modified? | Client videos. Content and delivery Train-the-trainer videos. Content and delivery |
Module 3 | |
What is the nature of the content, evaluation, or training modification | Client videos. Add nutritional contents to stress management modules and selection of appropriate strategies for accomplishing goal Train-the-trainer videos. Develop contents that were relevant to daily practice and emphasized practical application |
Module 4 | |
What is the goal? | Client videos. Increase acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability Train-the-trainer videos. Increase acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability |
What is the level of the rational for the modification | Client videos. To meet the needs of WIC clients Train-the-trainer videos. To meet the needs of WIC personnel |
Module 5 | |
When is the modification initiated? | Client videos. Year 4 of the 5-year MIM program Train-the-trainer videos. Year 4 of the 5-year MIM program |
Is the modification planned | Client videos. Planned and proactive Train-the-trainer videos. Planned and proactive |
Module 6 | |
Who participated in the decision to modify? | Client videos. Researcher, WIC stakeholders and clients Train-the-trainer videos. Researcher, WIC stakeholders, managers, dietitians, and nurses |
OPTIONAL: Who makes the ultimate decision? | Researcher |
Module 7 | |
How widespread is the modification? | Client videos. Implement and sustain by WIC nationwide Train-the-trainer videos. Implement and sustain by State of Michigan WIC |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chang, M.-W.; Militello, L.K.; Stephens, J.D. Mothers In Motion Program: Implementation Process and Acceptability by Community. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15122739
Chang M-W, Militello LK, Stephens JD. Mothers In Motion Program: Implementation Process and Acceptability by Community. Nutrients. 2023; 15(12):2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15122739
Chicago/Turabian StyleChang, Mei-Wei, Lisa K. Militello, and Janna D. Stephens. 2023. "Mothers In Motion Program: Implementation Process and Acceptability by Community" Nutrients 15, no. 12: 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15122739
APA StyleChang, M. -W., Militello, L. K., & Stephens, J. D. (2023). Mothers In Motion Program: Implementation Process and Acceptability by Community. Nutrients, 15(12), 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15122739