Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes by Household Income: A Multi-City Comparison of Nielsen Purchasing Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Comment on Sobczyk, M.K.; Gaunt, T.R. The Effect of Circulating Zinc, Selenium, Copper and Vitamin K1 on COVID-19 Outcomes: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 233
Previous Article in Journal
Macronutrient Intake and Insulin Resistance in 5665 Randomly Selected, Non-Diabetic U.S. Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetically Predicted Circulating Copper and Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dietary-Derived Essential Nutrients and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

1
Department of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Biomarker and Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, Beijing 100191, China
3
Key Laboratory for Neuroscience, National Health Commission/Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
4
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2022, 14(5), 920; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14050920
Submission received: 30 January 2022 / Accepted: 18 February 2022 / Published: 22 February 2022

Abstract

:
Previous studies have suggested a close but inconsistent relationship between essential nutrients and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and whether this association is causal remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the potential causal relation between essential nutrients (essential amino acids, essential fatty acids, essential minerals, and essential vitamins) and the risk of ALS using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Large-scale European-based genome-wide association studies’ (GWASs) summary data related to ALS (assembling 27,205 ALS patients and 110,881 controls) and essential nutrient concentrations were separately obtained. MR analysis was performed using the inverse variance–weighted (IVW) method, and sensitivity analysis was conducted by the weighted median method, simple median method, MR–Egger method and MR–PRESSO method. We found a causal association between genetically predicted linoleic acid (LA) and the risk of ALS (OR: 1.066; 95% CI: 1.011–1.125; p = 0.019). An inverse association with ALS risk was noted for vitamin D (OR: 0.899; 95% CI: 0.819–0.987; p = 0.025) and for vitamin E (OR: 0.461; 95% CI: 0.340–0.626; p = 6.25 × 10−7). The sensitivity analyses illustrated similar trends. No causal effect was observed between essential amino acids and minerals on ALS. Our study profiled the effects of diet-derived circulating nutrients on the risk of ALS and demonstrated that vitamin D and vitamin E are protective against the risk of ALS, and LA is a suggested risk factor for ALS.

1. Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease associated with muscle weakness and atrophy, and patients usually die as a result of respiratory failure within 3–5 years of symptom onset [1,2]. No treatment is currently effective in reversing the progression of ALS, with the exception of riluzole, which probably prolongs median survival by 2–3 months [3]. The etiology of ALS is complex, largely unknown, and involves genetic and environmental factors [4]. Given the accumulated studies investigating risk factors for ALS, the implication of such findings has been a focus. Targeted lifestyle and dietary changes have been shown to be beneficial in the early stages of ALS [5,6].
Essential nutrients accessible from the diet include essential amino acids, essential fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals. Supplementing essential nutrients is considered a promising preventive intervention for many diseases due to its ability to maintain metabolic homeostasis and to mitigate oxidative stress [7,8,9]. With efforts made to delineate the influence of essential nutrients on ALS, different conclusions have been drawn. For instance, a large, pooled prospective study reported that long-term vitamin E supplementation was inversely associated with the risk of ALS [10], while null results were found in two other case–control studies [11,12]. Similarly, controversial results were observed for docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) [13,14], iron [15,16], vitamin A, and vitamin C [11,17]. This inconsistency is largely because most of this evidence came from observational studies, which are plagued by selection bias and unmeasured confounders. In addition, we previously found that most ALS patients showed a loss of appetite [18] and the presence of metabolic disorders [19], which may affect the absorption and consumption of dietary nutrients, making the true relationship between essential nutrients and ALS elusive. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are recognized to overcome the limitations of observational studies and provide the highest level of evidence [20]. However, no previous RCT has been conducted to identify the risk/protective effect of essential nutrients on ALS.
Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis is a genetic statistical approach to estimate the causal association between an exposure and an outcome using single nucleotide polymorphisms as instrumental variables (IVs), which mimic the random assignment to groups of RCTs by naturally allocating alleles and can lessen residual confounding [21].
In this study, we performed a two-sample MR approach to systematically decipher the causal association between nutrition status and ALS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection and Selection of Instrumental Variables (IVs)

Essential amino acids, essential fatty acids, essential minerals, and essential vitamins were considered essential nutrients. We searched PubMed to extract identified exposure-related SNPs from the most recent and largest genome-wide association studies (GWASs) based on the European population.
SNPs related to amino acids were extracted from seven datasets, namely, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, and valine [22,23]. Arachidonic acid (AA), alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), DHA, docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), gamma linolenic acid (GLA), and linoleic acid (LA) [22,24,25] were included in the essential fatty acid category. For the essential minerals, GWASs for calcium [26], copper, iron [27], magnesium [28], phosphorus [29], selenium [30], and zinc [31] were searched separately. In addition, we sought out updated calcium GWAS data in a preprint paper based on the UK Biobank with a fivefold enlarged sample size [32], and these data were recorded as a supplement to calcium, named “Calcium (UKB)”. To comprehensively assess the effects of vitamins and provitamins on disease, we examined both the absolute levels of vitamins or provitamins in blood and the relative concentrations of corresponding circulating metabolites quantified by a high-throughput platform. For absolute vitamin or provitamin levels, absolute vitamin A (retinol) [33], absolute beta-carotene [34], absolute vitamin B (vitamin B-6 and vitamin B-12) [35,36], absolute vitamin C (ascorbic acid) [37], absolute vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD)) [38], and absolute vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) [39] were included, and for the relative concentrations of corresponding metabolites, relative retinol [40], relative vitamin C (ascorbate) [23], and relative vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol and gamma-tocopherol) [23] were used.
We obtained large-scale European-based ALS GWAS summary data from a recently published study, which included 27,205 ALS patients and 110,881 controls [41]. All patients were diagnosed according to the (revised) El Escorial criteria by specialized neurologists.
We set strict selection criteria for eligible IVs: (1) independent SNPs (r2 = 0.01, KB = 5000) with genome-wide association levels (p < 5 × 10−8) for exposure events; for exposures without genome-wide association significant IVs, suggestive level genome-wide association significant (p < 1 × 10−5) IVs were employed as proxies; (2) nonrare SNPs (MAF ≥ 0.01); and (3) proxies in strong linkage disequilibrium (r2 > 0.8) were employed to replace SNPs that failed to provide corresponding information for ALS. Proxy loci not included in the ALS dataset were excluded. The LDlink online tool [42] was employed in searching proxies. In total, we derived 1–168 genetic instruments for 35 essential nutritional biomarkers. Due to methodology limitations, exposures with at least two IVs were ultimately included in the downstream analysis. Lysine, methionine, ALA, absolute lycopene, absolute beta-carotene, and absolute vitamin B-6 were removed.
To measure the phenotypic variation explained by each SNP, R2 = 2 × beta2 × (1 − EAF) × EAF/SD2, where EAF = effect allele frequency and beta = effect of each SNP on exposures [43]. We similarly calculated F statistics for individual SNPs to indicate the strength of IVs (F = R2 × (N − 2)/((1 − R2))) [44]. Detailed information on SNPs is displayed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.2. Mendelian Randomization

Aiming to ensure the validity of the IVs, heterogeneity and directional pleiotropy were tested using Cochran’s Q test and the MR–PRESSO method. For Cochran’s Q test, nonsignificant heterogeneity (p > 0.05) was indicated by analogical estimates for each IV. For the MR–PRESSO method [45], (1) the overall horizontal pleiotropy was tested with the “global test”; (2) the “MR–PRESSO outlier test” was adopted to remove possible outliers in IVs and to generate corrected results; and (3) the “MR–PRESSO distortion test” was used to determine whether there was distortion between pre- and post-correction results. Similarly, the MR–Egger regression intercept was calculated as an additional means to examine horizontal pleiotropy. When there was no obvious distance from the intercept to the origin, it was regarded as having no influence on pleiotropy.
In this MR framework, the multiplicative random effect inverse variance–weighted method (IVW) was utilized as the main approach to analyze causality, which regresses the effect of SNPs on the outcome by the effect of the SNP on the exposure [46]. To ensure the robustness of the IVW results, additional sensitivity analyses were performed, including the simple median method, weighted median method and MR–Egger method. The weighted median method enables satisfactory estimates when at least 50% of the IVs are valid instruments [47]. The MR–Egger method can model terms to detect and correct the bias caused by pleiotropy, obtaining a consistent estimate of the causal effect [48]. We also implemented the “leave-one-out” (LOO) method to assess the influence of an individual SNP on the overall causal findings by excluding each genetic variant in turn and recomputing the MR–IVW estimates. The MR–Steiger method was employed to determine whether the direction of causality was true. Our flow chart was visualized in Figure 1.
p values were adjusted according to the strict Bonferroni correction. p < 0.05/k was considered a significant level (where k is the number of exposures), and a p value between 0.05/k and 0.05 was suggestive of a positive association. All analyses were performed in R software version 4.1.0 by the “TwoSampleMR” package (version 0.5.6) [49] and the “MR–PRESSO” package (version 1.0) [45].

3. Results

The 29 dietary-derived potential risk factors for ALS that we evaluated involved five traits related to amino acids, seven to fatty acids, eight to minerals, and nine to vitamins, including 2–168 SNPs as genetic proxies for each of them. All associations analyzed by IVW random-effects models are shown in Table 1.
In our restricted analysis of amino acid profiles and ALS risk, no association was noted between them (Table 1 and Table 2, Figure 2, and Supplementary Figure S1). However, the IVW estimated for isoleucine and tryptophan may be vulnerable to the heterogeneity of SNPs (isoleucine: Cochran’s Q test p value = 0.037; tryptophan: Cochran’s Q test p value = 0). Due to the limited number of IVs in isoleucine, we cannot conduct further analysis. After removing the tryptophan outliers, we obtained analyzable results (p-outlier value = 0.893).
With regard to the effect of fatty acids on ALS, the results are summarized in Figure 3. We found a suggestive significant association between LA and the risk of ALS, which was elevated by 6.6% for a one standard deviation unit increase in the LA concentration (IVW-OR: 1.066, 95% CI: 1.011–1.125, p value = 0.019). The robustness of this result was supported by the MR–Egger approach (OR = 1.162, 95% CI: 1.029–1.312, p value = 0.028), and estimates using the weighted median method (OR = 1.049, 95% CI: 0.976–1.128, p value = 0.196) and simple median method (OR = 1.047, 95% CI: 0.972–1.128, p value = 0.226) also showed similar trends. No heterogeneity was detected in the individual SNPs associated with LA and the risk of ALS (Cochran’s Q test p value = 0.253). No indication of horizontal pleiotropy was found based on the MR–Egger intercept test (intercept = −0.014, p value = 0.146), and the MR–PRESSO analysis showed no outlying SNPs (Table 3). Scatter plots indicated the estimated effect of LA on ALS by each SNP (Figure 4A). In addition, we noted a positive significant association between DGLA and the risk of ALS (OR: 1.031, 95% CI: 1.017–1.045, p value = 1.70 × 10−5) without the influence of heterogeneity. Due to only two proxy SNPs being available for DGLA, sensitivity analyses could not be performed. The estimated effect of DGLA on ALS by each SNP is displayed in Figure 4B. Genetically predicted AA, DHA, DPA, EPA, and GLA were not associated with the risk of ALS (Table 1 and Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S2).
We observed no causal relationship between circulating essential minerals and the risk of ALS (Table 1 and Table 2, Figure 5, and Supplementary Figure S3). The MR–Egger regression did not identify evidence of horizontal pleiotropy for any of the mineral-related traits. Heterogeneity in the SNPs for iron was inferred (Cochran’s Q test p value = 0.034). However, because of the removal of SNPs with a null association with the overall iron status, this calculation was only based on three SNPs.
When information about IVs related to circulating vitamins was considered, the results generated by IVW analysis indicated that absolute 25OHD and relative alpha-tocopherol had strongly protective effects on ALS risk (absolute 25OHD, OR: 0.899, 95% CI: 0.819–0.987, p value = 0.025; and relative alpha-tocopherol, OR: 0.461; 95% CI: 0.340–0.626; p value = 6.25 × 10−7) (Table 1 and Table 3 and Figure 6). Both associations were broadly concordant in various sensitivity analyses. The results of the MR–Egger method (OR = 0.876, 95% CI: 0.774–0.993, p value = 0.042) and weighted median method (OR = 0.901, 95% CI: 0.800–1.014, p value = 0.084) underpinned the causal effect of 25OHD on ALS, while the estimates of the simple median method (OR = 0.617, 95% CI: 0.355–1.072, p value = 0.087) and weighted median method (OR  = 0.536, 95% CI: 0.324–0.886, p value = 0.015) were aligned with the significant relationship between relative alpha-tocopherol. No heterogeneity was detected using Cochran’s Q test separately (absolute 25OHD: p value = 0.110; relative alpha-tocopherol: p value = 0.758). The MR–Egger intercept test showed no evidence of directional pleiotropy (absolute 25OHD: intercept = 0.001, p value = 0.548; relative alpha-tocopherol: intercept = −0.065, p value = 0.643), and no outlying SNP was found. The scatter plots indicated the SNP-based causal estimates of absolute 25OHD on ALS (Figure 4C) and relative alpha-tocopherol on ALS (Figure 4D). The LOO analysis showed that SNPs rs577185477 and rs11723621 at a known risk locus for absolute 25OHD influenced the causal estimate for ALS (Supplementary Figure S4F). No effect of individual relative alpha-tocopherol-related SNPs on ALS risk was observed (Supplementary Figure S4H). A null effect of genetically predicted increases in circulating levels of absolute retinol, absolute vitamin B-12, absolute ascorbate, absolute alpha-tocopherol, relative retinol, relative ascorbate, and relative gamma-tocopherol on the risk of ALS was found (Table 1 and Table 2, Figure 6, and Supplementary Figure S4).

4. Discussion

In the present MR study, we classified and profiled the potential causal role of essential dietary nutritiona6l modifiers on ALS risk using GWAS summary statistics. Higher genetically predicted levels of 25OHD and relative alpha-tocopherol were calculated to be associated with a reduced risk of ALS, and increased LA levels showed a suggestive positive association with ALS risk. Our findings implied that the abnormal levels of these nutrients were not only a symptom of ALS but also independent risk/protective factors for ALS. Among the essential amino acids and minerals, no evidence supports that additional supplementation has an influence on the risk of ALS.
Essential fatty acids are important components of cholesterol and phospholipids and are involved in the maintenance of membrane fluidity and beta-oxidation [50]. Our results showed that LA was a major risk factor for the effects of essential fatty acids on ALS, preliminarily suggesting that dietary supplementation with LA is not beneficial or is even harmful to ALS. As secondary evidence, we found that DGLA, which is derived from LA and is capable of anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative effects, had a strong risk effect on ALS [51,52]. LA is an n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid. Because of the deficiency of desaturases that insert double bonds beyond C9 in humans, LA is accessible only from diet [53]. Although there is no direct clinical evidence for the neurotoxic effect of LA, a longitudinal pre-diagnostic study revealed that circulating AA, an N-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid derived from LA, was positively associated with the risk of ALS [13]. Due to the extremely low concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids in plasma and the limited sample sizes of that study, the measurement error cannot be neglected. Our study adopted the MR framework and involved large-scale genetic data, ensuring reliable statistical power. Studies have shown that LA-rich food increases oxidative stress and inflammation [54,55], both of which contribute to ALS [56]. LA enhances tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-mediated oxidative stress [57], while TNF-α, a potent inflammatory cytokine, has been found to induce apoptosis and to contribute to oxidative stress by activating microglia in an SOD1-G93A mouse model [58]. In addition, LA is considered to limit the synthesis of long-chain n-3 PUFAs from alpha-linolenic acid [59,60], while the intake of n-3 PUFA-enriched foods can prevent or delay the onset of ALS by reducing inflammation and providing neuroprotection [14,61]. Therefore, excessive LA may create a potentially inflammatory environment that increases the risk of ALS [62]. However, no relationship was found between n-3 PUFAs and ALS in our research, which may be due to the limited IV numbers of n-3 PUFAs and thereby the finite proportion of phenotypic variance explanation. In the future, more experiments are needed to explore the exact mechanism underlying LA and ALS.
Among the vitamins, we found an inversely causal association between two fat-soluble vitamins, namely, vitamin D and vitamin E, and ALS, while water-soluble vitamins showed negative results. Vitamin D is a steroid molecule that is produced in the skin by exposure to the ultraviolet spectrum of sunlight or is obtained from food and biological dietary supplements [63]. It has been reported that severe vitamin D deficiency is independently associated with significantly accelerated ALS progression and reduced life expectancy [64,65]. Since overactivation of glutamate receptors leads to continuously increased cytoplasmic calcium concentrations and subsequent ALS burden [66,67], vitamin D can exert neuroprotective effects by upregulating calcium-binding proteins and reducing glutamate-induced caspase-3 activity [68,69]. In addition, vitamin D can assist neurotrophic factors in protecting motoneurons [64]. However, contrary to our findings, Susanna C Larsson et al. reported a null causal association between serum 25OHD concentrations and ALS risk [70], which may be due to the different selections of GWAS data. The 25OHD GWAS [71] utilized in their study included 79,366 Europeans and yielded only two more new loci (SEC23A and AMDHD1) than previous 25OHD GWAS findings and explained approximately 7.5% of the heritability of 25OHD. Due to the gene prediction level of 25OHD depending on a medium polygenic structure, the statistical power of the 25OHD GWAS used was insufficient. To compensate for this shortcoming, we enrolled the 25OHD GWAS with the largest sample size. Similarly, a larger ALS GWAS and various sensitivity analyses were employed in our study to ensure convincing and robust estimates.
Vitamin E is another common essential vitamin [72], which mainly provides antioxidative protection against lipid peroxidation, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [73]. The results of several large prospective cohort studies implied that the regular use of vitamin E supplements has a time-dependent protective effect on ALS [10,74]. In addition, vitamin E was suggested to have a synergistic effect with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on reducing the risk of ALS [75]. In this category, we adopted two respective sets of instruments to measure the absolute and relative concentrations of vitamins, aiming to generate robust results. Although both sets for retinol and ascorbate yield similar conclusions, a significant association between the relative concentration of alpha-tocopherol and the risk of ALS was not found for absolute alpha-tocopherol. Owing to the high overlapping IVs of absolute alpha-tocopherol and lipid metabolism [76], its protective effect may be offset by the strong risk that lipids pose in ALS. Moreover, the number of IVs is too limited to develop MR–PRESSO analysis; therefore, pleiotropic bias cannot be ruled out, which violates the MR–InSIDE hypothesis. The IVs adopted for relative alpha-tocopherol have allowed for circumvention of these hurdles. Hence, our findings, in combination with previous literature, indicate that vitamin E supplementation may be a preventive agent for ALS. However, vitamin E and fat always coexist in the diet, making it necessary to comprehensively consider the complex effects of the overall diet on ALS, where using vitamin supplements may be advisable.
This pioneering study provided evidence for the primary prevention of ALS from a dietary perspective. We found that ALS-associated essential nutrients were concentrated in polyunsaturated fatty acids and fat-soluble vitamins, providing supportive evidence of the importance of lipid metabolism in ALS. No evidence has shown that diet-derived circulating essential amino acids and minerals influence the risk of ALS in the general population, even though some of them (e.g., branched-chain amino acids [77], iron, zinc, and selenium [78]) have attracted widespread attention. However, our research has certain limitations. First, since MR analyses assume linearity, potential nonlinear associations may bias the results, whereas we were unable to confirm whether the relationships between these essential nutrients and ALS risk are non-U-shaped or are other shapes. Second, some vitamins have a variety of compounds. A previous study proposed that the plasma alpha-tocopherol concentration was not an ideal biomarker for vitamin E status [79]. The survival of circulating alpha-tocopherol was longer in individuals with high lipid levels, possibly related to reduced lipoprotein catabolism and tissue absorption. As the best biomarkers for vitamin status cannot be determined via MR approaches, we still leveraged currently widely recognized active forms of vitamins as their proxies, which have mature measurement techniques and biological mechanisms, allowing for more clinically applicable conclusions than those for the unusual forms. It is tempting to select other naturally occurring vitamin forms to verify our findings. Third, our results suggested a potential influence of dietary nutrient supplementation on ALS prevention. The estimates according to genetic variance reflect the effects of lifetime accumulation exposure to a biomarker. Therefore, the short-term efficacy of nutrient supplementation for diseases should be interpreted with caution. Fourth, given that different nutrients play specific roles in biological processes, their protective effect on the overall ALS population may be driven by a strong effect on a certain subgroup of diseases. For example, vitamin D can maintain calcium homeostasis, which may be extremely beneficial for those with a severe calcium imbalance. However, the lack of individual-level ALS GWAS data makes it hard to validate this hypothesis accurately. Perhaps subsequent experiments could pay attention to this issue. Moreover, when genetic data become available for ALS patients with clinical phenotypes, future similar studies should be performed to assess whether dietary nutrients provide modifying effects on ALS progression and not just consider disease prevention.

5. Conclusions

Evidence from our study demonstrated that vitamin D and vitamin E are protective against the risk of ALS, and LA is suggested to be positively associated with ALS risk. It is unlikely that a clinical benefit for the primary prevention of ALS will be achieved through supplementing essential amino acids and minerals. Our study classified and profiled the effects of specific diet-derived circulating nutrients on the risk of ALS, providing evidence for medical interventions for ALS in the general population from the perspective of gene–environmental interactions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14050920/s1, Figure S1: Scatter plot and forest plot of essential amino acids and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Figure S2: Scatter plot and forest plot of essential fatty acids and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Figure S3: Scatter plot and forest plot of essential minerals and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Figure S4: Scatterplot and forest plot of essential vitamins and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Table S1: Characteristics of instrumental variables (IVs).

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, K.X.; data curation, Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W. and K.X.; writing—review and editing, L.T., K.X., and Y.W.; methodology, T.H. and N.H.; validation, L.Z. and G.Z.; supervision, D.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 81873784 and 82071426, and the Clinical Cohort Construction Program of Peking University Third Hospital, grant number BYSYDL2019002.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because no individual patients were directly involved in the overall process of our study. Our study was based only on publicly available GWAS data.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Materials. Codes generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the GWASs for making summary data publicly available, and we are grateful to all participants who contributed to those studies. We also thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Clinical Cohort Construction Program of Peking University Third Hospital for the support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oskarsson, B.; Gendron, T.F.; Staff, N.P. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: An Update for 2018. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2018, 93, 1617–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Chia, R.; Chio, A.; Traynor, B.J. Novel genes associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Diagnostic and clinical implications. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miller, R.G.; Mitchell, J.D.; Moore, D.H. Riluzole for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 65, CD001447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Brown, R.H.; Al-Chalabi, A. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhang, L.; Tang, L.; Huang, T.; Fan, D. Life Course Adiposity and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Ann. Neurol. 2020, 87, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ludolph, A.C.; Dorst, J.; Dreyhaupt, J.; Weishaupt, J.H.; Kassubek, J.; Weiland, U.; Meyer, T.; Petri, S.; Hermann, A.; Jordan, B.; et al. Effect of High-Caloric Nutrition on Survival in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2020, 88, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hilt, Z.T.; Morrell, C.N. Essential Amino Acids-Essential in Arterial Thrombosis. Circulation 2020, 142, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gramlich, L.; Ireton-Jones, C.; Miles, J.M.; Morrison, M.; Pontes-Arruda, A. Essential Fatty Acid Requirements and Intravenous Lipid Emulsions. JPEN J. Parenter Enter. Nutr. 2019, 43, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shenkin, A. The key role of micronutrients. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 25, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, H.; O’Reilly, E.J.; Weisskopf, M.G.; Logroscino, G.; McCullough, M.L.; Schatzkin, A.; Kolonel, L.N.; Ascherio, A. Vitamin E intake and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A pooled analysis of data from 5 prospective cohort studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 173, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Longnecker, M.P.; Kamel, F.; Umbach, D.M.; Munsat, T.L.; Shefner, J.M.; Lansdell, L.W.; Sandler, D.P. Dietary intake of calcium, magnesium and antioxidants in relation to risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neuroepidemiology 2000, 19, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Okamoto, K.; Kihira, T.; Kobashi, G.; Washio, M.; Sasaki, S.; Yokoyama, T.; Miyake, Y.; Sakamoto, N.; Inaba, Y.; Nagai, M. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Japan. Neuroepidemiology 2009, 32, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. O’Reilly, E.J.; Bjornevik, K.; Furtado, J.D.; Kolonel, L.N.; Le Marchand, L.; McCullough, M.L.; Stevens, V.L.; Shadyab, A.H.; Snetselaar, L.; Manson, J.E.; et al. Prediagnostic plasma polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 2020, 94, e811–e819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fitzgerald, K.C.; O’Reilly, E.J.; Falcone, G.J.; McCullough, M.L.; Park, Y.; Kolonel, L.N.; Ascherio, A. Dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake and risk for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2014, 71, 1102–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nadjar, Y.; Gordon, P.; Corcia, P.; Bensimon, G.; Pieroni, L.; Meininger, V.; Salachas, F. Elevated serum ferritin is associated with reduced survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zemla, B.; Zielonka, I.; Kolosza, Z. Tobacco smoking and exposure to dust and gas pollution in the place of work and lung cancer risk. Neoplasma 1988, 35, 135–143. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, M.; Liu, Z.; Sun, W.; Yuan, Y.; Jiao, B.; Zhang, X.; Shen, L.; Jiang, H.; Xia, K.; Tang, B.; et al. Association Between Vitamins and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Center-Based Survey in Mainland China. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Ye, S.; Chen, L.; Tang, L.; Fan, D. Loss of appetite in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is associated with weight loss and anxiety/depression. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, J.; Fu, J.; Zhao, W.; Ren, C.; Liu, P.; Chen, L.; Li, D.; Tang, L.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Hypermetabolism associated with worse prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2021, 269, 1447–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, K.; Lim, C.Y. Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology. J. Lipid Atheroscler. 2019, 8, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Smith, G.D.; Timpson, N.; Ebrahim, S. Strengthening causal inference in cardiovascular epidemiology through Mendelian randomization. Ann. Med. 2008, 40, 524–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kettunen, J.; Demirkan, A.; Wurtz, P.; Draisma, H.H.; Haller, T.; Rawal, R.; Vaarhorst, A.; Kangas, A.J.; Lyytikainen, L.P.; Pirinen, M.; et al. Genome-wide study for circulating metabolites identifies 62 loci and reveals novel systemic effects of LPA. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shin, S.Y.; Fauman, E.B.; Petersen, A.K.; Krumsiek, J.; Santos, R.; Huang, J.; Arnold, M.; Erte, I.; Forgetta, V.; Yang, T.P.; et al. An atlas of genetic influences on human blood metabolites. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Guan, W.; Steffen, B.T.; Lemaitre, R.N.; Wu, J.H.Y.; Tanaka, T.; Manichaikul, A.; Foy, M.; Rich, S.S.; Wang, L.; Nettleton, J.A.; et al. Genome-wide association study of plasma N6 polyunsaturated fatty acids within the cohorts for heart and aging research in genomic epidemiology consortium. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2014, 7, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Lemaitre, R.N.; Tanaka, T.; Tang, W.; Manichaikul, A.; Foy, M.; Kabagambe, E.K.; Nettleton, J.A.; King, I.B.; Weng, L.C.; Bhattacharya, S.; et al. Genetic loci associated with plasma phospholipid n-3 fatty acids: A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies from the CHARGE Consortium. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. O’Seaghdha, C.M.; Wu, H.; Yang, Q.; Kapur, K.; Guessous, I.; Zuber, A.M.; Kottgen, A.; Stoudmann, C.; Teumer, A.; Kutalik, Z.; et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies six new Loci for serum calcium concentrations. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Benyamin, B.; Esko, T.; Ried, J.S.; Radhakrishnan, A.; Vermeulen, S.H.; Traglia, M.; Gogele, M.; Anderson, D.; Broer, L.; Podmore, C.; et al. Novel loci affecting iron homeostasis and their effects in individuals at risk for hemochromatosis. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Meyer, T.E.; Verwoert, G.C.; Hwang, S.J.; Glazer, N.L.; Smith, A.V.; van Rooij, F.J.; Ehret, G.B.; Boerwinkle, E.; Felix, J.F.; Leak, T.S.; et al. Genome-wide association studies of serum magnesium, potassium, and sodium concentrations identify six Loci influencing serum magnesium levels. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kestenbaum, B.; Glazer, N.L.; Kottgen, A.; Felix, J.F.; Hwang, S.J.; Liu, Y.; Lohman, K.; Kritchevsky, S.B.; Hausman, D.B.; Petersen, A.K.; et al. Common genetic variants associate with serum phosphorus concentration. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 21, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cornelis, M.C.; Fornage, M.; Foy, M.; Xun, P.; Gladyshev, V.N.; Morris, S.; Chasman, D.I.; Hu, F.B.; Rimm, E.B.; Kraft, P.; et al. Genome-wide association study of selenium concentrations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 1469–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Evans, D.M.; Zhu, G.; Dy, V.; Heath, A.C.; Madden, P.A.; Kemp, J.P.; McMahon, G.; St Pourcain, B.; Timpson, N.J.; Golding, J.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies loci affecting blood copper, selenium and zinc. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013, 22, 3998–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Sinnott-Armstrong, N.; Tanigawa, Y.; Amar, D.; Mars, N.; Benner, C.; Aguirre, M.; Venkataraman, G.R.; Wainberg, M.; Ollila, H.M.; Kiiskinen, T.; et al. Genetics of 35 blood and urine biomarkers in the UK Biobank. Nat. Genet. 2021, 53, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. D’Adamo, C.R.; D’Urso, A.; Ryan, K.A.; Yerges-Armstrong, L.M.; Semba, R.D.; Steinle, N.I.; Mitchell, B.D.; Shuldiner, A.R.; McArdle, P.F. A Common Variant in the SETD7 Gene Predicts Serum Lycopene Concentrations. Nutrients 2016, 8, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ferrucci, L.; Perry, J.R.; Matteini, A.; Perola, M.; Tanaka, T.; Silander, K.; Rice, N.; Melzer, D.; Murray, A.; Cluett, C.; et al. Common variation in the beta-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenase 1 gene affects circulating levels of carotenoids: A genome-wide association study. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 84, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Hazra, A.; Kraft, P.; Lazarus, R.; Chen, C.; Chanock, S.J.; Jacques, P.; Selhub, J.; Hunter, D.J. Genome-wide significant predictors of metabolites in the one-carbon metabolism pathway. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 4677–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Grarup, N.; Sulem, P.; Sandholt, C.H.; Thorleifsson, G.; Ahluwalia, T.S.; Steinthorsdottir, V.; Bjarnason, H.; Gudbjartsson, D.F.; Magnusson, O.T.; Sparso, T.; et al. Genetic architecture of vitamin B12 and folate levels uncovered applying deeply sequenced large datasets. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zheng, J.S.; Luan, J.; Sofianopoulou, E.; Imamura, F.; Stewart, I.D.; Day, F.R.; Pietzner, M.; Wheeler, E.; Lotta, L.A.; Gundersen, T.E.; et al. Plasma Vitamin C and Type 2 Diabetes: Genome-Wide Association Study and Mendelian Randomization Analysis in European Populations. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Manousaki, D.; Mitchell, R.; Dudding, T.; Haworth, S.; Harroud, A.; Forgetta, V.; Shah, R.L.; Luan, J.; Langenberg, C.; Timpson, N.J.; et al. Genome-wide Association Study for Vitamin D Levels Reveals 69 Independent Loci. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2020, 106, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Major, J.M.; Yu, K.; Wheeler, W.; Zhang, H.; Cornelis, M.C.; Wright, M.E.; Yeager, M.; Snyder, K.; Weinstein, S.J.; Mondul, A.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies common variants associated with circulating vitamin E levels. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 3876–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Long, T.; Hicks, M.; Yu, H.C.; Biggs, W.H.; Kirkness, E.F.; Menni, C.; Zierer, J.; Small, K.S.; Mangino, M.; Messier, H.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies common-to-rare variants associated with human blood metabolites. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 568–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Van Rheenen, W.; van der Spek, R.A.A.; Bakker, M.K.; van Vugt, J.; Hop, P.J.; Zwamborn, R.A.J.; de Klein, N.; Westra, H.J.; Bakker, O.B.; Deelen, P.; et al. Common and rare variant association analyses in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identify 15 risk loci with distinct genetic architectures and neuron-specific biology. Nat. Genet. 2021, 53, 1636–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alexander, T.A.; Machiela, M.J. LDpop: An interactive online tool to calculate and visualize geographic LD patterns. BMC Bioinform. 2020, 21, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shim, H.; Chasman, D.I.; Smith, J.D.; Mora, S.; Ridker, P.M.; Nickerson, D.A.; Krauss, R.M.; Stephens, M. A multivariate genome-wide association analysis of 10 LDL subfractions, and their response to statin treatment, in 1868 Caucasians. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Palmer, T.M.; Lawlor, D.A.; Harbord, R.M.; Sheehan, N.A.; Tobias, J.H.; Timpson, N.J.; Davey Smith, G.; Sterne, J.A. Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2012, 21, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Verbanck, M.; Chen, C.Y.; Neale, B.; Do, R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Burgess, S.; Bowden, J.; Fall, T.; Ingelsson, E.; Thompson, S.G. Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants. Epidemiology 2017, 28, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Bowden, J.; Davey Smith, G.; Haycock, P.C.; Burgess, S. Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet. Epidemiol. 2016, 40, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Burgess, S.; Thompson, S.G. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 32, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Hemani, G.; Zheng, J.; Elsworth, B.; Wade, K.H.; Haberland, V.; Baird, D.; Laurin, C.; Burgess, S.; Bowden, J.; Langdon, R.; et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. eLife 2018, 7, e34408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Norheim, F.; Gjelstad, I.M.; Hjorth, M.; Vinknes, K.J.; Langleite, T.M.; Holen, T.; Jensen, J.; Dalen, K.T.; Karlsen, A.S.; Kielland, A.; et al. Molecular nutrition research: The modern way of performing nutritional science. Nutrients 2012, 4, 1898–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hussein, N.; Ah-Sing, E.; Wilkinson, P.; Leach, C.; Griffin, B.A.; Millward, D.J. Long-chain conversion of [13C]linoleic acid and alpha-linolenic acid in response to marked changes in their dietary intake in men. J. Lipid Res. 2005, 46, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Nilsen, D.W.T.; Myhre, P.L.; Kalstad, A.; Schmidt, E.B.; Arnesen, H.; Seljeflot, I. Serum Levels of Dihomo-Gamma (gamma)-Linolenic Acid (DGLA) Are Inversely Associated with Linoleic Acid and Total Death in Elderly Patients with a Recent Myocardial Infarction. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Marangoni, F.; Agostoni, C.; Borghi, C.; Catapano, A.L.; Cena, H.; Ghiselli, A.; La Vecchia, C.; Lercker, G.; Manzato, E.; Pirillo, A.; et al. Dietary linoleic acid and human health: Focus on cardiovascular and cardiometabolic effects. Atherosclerosis 2020, 292, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Sato, M.; Shibata, K.; Nomura, R.; Kawamoto, D.; Nagamine, R.; Imaizumi, K. Linoleic acid-rich fats reduce atherosclerosis development beyond its oxidative and inflammatory stress-increasing effect in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice in comparison with saturated fatty acid-rich fats. Br. J. Nutr. 2005, 94, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Turpeinen, A.M.; Basu, S.; Mutanen, M. A high linoleic acid diet increases oxidative stress in vivo and affects nitric oxide metabolism in humans. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 1998, 59, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Obrador, E.; Salvador, R.; Lopez-Blanch, R.; Jihad-Jebbar, A.; Valles, S.L.; Estrela, J.M. Oxidative Stress, Neuroinflammation and Mitochondria in the Pathophysiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Toborek, M.; Blanc, E.M.; Kaiser, S.; Mattson, M.P.; Hennig, B. Linoleic acid potentiates TNF-mediated oxidative stress, disruption of calcium homeostasis, and apoptosis of cultured vascular endothelial cells. J. Lipid Res. 1997, 38, 2155–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hensley, K.; Mhatre, M.; Mou, S.; Pye, Q.N.; Stewart, C.; West, M.; Williamson, K.S. On the relation of oxidative stress to neuroinflammation: Lessons learned from the G93A-SOD1 mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006, 8, 2075–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chan, J.K.; McDonald, B.E.; Gerrard, J.M.; Bruce, V.M.; Weaver, B.J.; Holub, B.J. Effect of dietary alpha-linolenic acid and its ratio to linoleic acid on platelet and plasma fatty acids and thrombogenesis. Lipids 1993, 28, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, M.; Ma, L.J.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Wan, J.B. n-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the management of alcoholic liver disease: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, S116–S129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Torres, P.; Cacabelos, D.; Pairada, J.; Bauer, K.C.; Boada, J.; Fontdevila, L.; Rossi, C.; Povedano, M.; Ferrer, I.; Pamplona, R.; et al. Gender-Specific Beneficial Effects of Docosahexaenoic Acid Dietary Supplementation in G93A-SOD1 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mice. Neurotherapeutics 2020, 17, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Innes, J.K.; Calder, P.C. Omega-6 fatty acids and inflammation. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2018, 132, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Amini, S.; Jafarirad, S.; Amani, R. Postpartum depression and vitamin D: A systematic review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 1514–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Camu, W.; Tremblier, B.; Plassot, C.; Alphandery, S.; Salsac, C.; Pageot, N.; Juntas-Morales, R.; Scamps, F.; Daures, J.P.; Raoul, C. Vitamin D confers protection to motoneurons and is a prognostic factor of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 1198–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Juntas-Morales, R.; Pageot, N.; Marin, G.; Dupuy, A.M.; Alphandery, S.; Labar, L.; Esselin, F.; Picot, M.C.; Camu, W. Low 25OH Vitamin D Blood Levels Are Independently Associated With Higher Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Severity Scores: Results From a Prospective Study. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rothstein, J.D. Excitotoxicity hypothesis. Neurology 1996, 47, S19–S25, discussion S26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jaiswal, M.K. Calcium, mitochondria, and the pathogenesis of ALS: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ibi, M.; Sawada, H.; Nakanishi, M.; Kume, T.; Katsuki, H.; Kaneko, S.; Shimohama, S.; Akaike, A. Protective effects of 1 alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3) against the neurotoxicity of glutamate and reactive oxygen species in mesencephalic culture. Neuropharmacology 2001, 40, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kajta, M.; Makarewicz, D.; Zieminska, E.; Jantas, D.; Domin, H.; Lason, W.; Kutner, A.; Lazarewicz, J.W. Neuroprotection by co-treatment and post-treating with calcitriol following the ischemic and excitotoxic insult in vivo and in vitro. Neurochem. Int. 2009, 55, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Larsson, S.C.; Roos, P.M. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Mendelian randomization study. Neurobiol. Aging 2020, 87, 140.e1–140.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jiang, X.; O’Reilly, P.F.; Aschard, H.; Hsu, Y.H.; Richards, J.B.; Dupuis, J.; Ingelsson, E.; Karasik, D.; Pilz, S.; Berry, D.; et al. Genome-wide association study in 79,366 European-ancestry individuals informs the genetic architecture of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Goncharova, P.S.; Davydova, T.K.; Popova, T.E.; Novitsky, M.A.; Petrova, M.M.; Gavrilyuk, O.A.; Al-Zamil, M.; Zhukova, N.G.; Nasyrova, R.F.; Shnayder, N.A. Nutrient Effects on Motor Neurons and the Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Carrera-Julia, S.; Moreno, M.L.; Barrios, C.; de la Rubia Orti, J.E.; Drehmer, E. Antioxidant Alternatives in the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Comprehensive Review. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ascherio, A.; Weisskopf, M.G.; O’Reilly, E.J.; Jacobs, E.J.; McCullough, M.L.; Calle, E.E.; Cudkowicz, M.; Thun, M.J. Vitamin E intake and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2005, 57, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Veldink, J.H.; Kalmijn, S.; Groeneveld, G.J.; Wunderink, W.; Koster, A.; de Vries, J.H.; van der Luyt, J.; Wokke, J.H.; Van den Berg, L.H. Intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E reduces the risk of developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007, 78, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Willer, C.J.; Schmidt, E.M.; Sengupta, S.; Peloso, G.M.; Gustafsson, S.; Kanoni, S.; Ganna, A.; Chen, J.; Buchkovich, M.L.; Mora, S.; et al. Discovery and refinement of loci associated with lipid levels. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1274–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Bjornevik, K.; O’Reilly, E.J.; Berry, J.D.; Clish, C.B.; Jeanfavre, S.; Kato, I.; Kolonel, L.N.; Le Marchand, L.; McCullough, M.L.; Paganoni, S.; et al. Prediagnostic plasma branched-chain amino acids and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 2019, 92, e2081–e2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Peters, S.; Broberg, K.; Gallo, V.; Levi, M.; Kippler, M.; Vineis, P.; Veldink, J.; van den Berg, L.; Middleton, L.; Travis, R.C.; et al. Blood Metal Levels and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Risk: A Prospective Cohort. Ann. Neurol. 2021, 89, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Traber, M.G.; Leonard, S.W.; Bobe, G.; Fu, X.; Saltzman, E.; Grusak, M.A.; Booth, S.L. Alpha-Tocopherol disappearance rates from plasma depend on lipid concentrations: Studies using deuterium-labeled collard greens in younger and older adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 101, 752–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Flow chart showing the process for the Mendelian randomization analyses. The number in the line indicates 3 key assumptions for MR. Assumption 1: The selected genetic variants are not related to other confounders. Assumption 2: The selected genetic variants are significantly related to the exposure. Assumption 3: The selected genetic variants are significantly related to the risk of the outcome only through the pathway from exposure. IVs, instrumental variables; GWASs, genome-wide association studies; MR, Mendelian randomization; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR–PRESSO, Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier.
Figure 1. Flow chart showing the process for the Mendelian randomization analyses. The number in the line indicates 3 key assumptions for MR. Assumption 1: The selected genetic variants are not related to other confounders. Assumption 2: The selected genetic variants are significantly related to the exposure. Assumption 3: The selected genetic variants are significantly related to the risk of the outcome only through the pathway from exposure. IVs, instrumental variables; GWASs, genome-wide association studies; MR, Mendelian randomization; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR–PRESSO, Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier.
Nutrients 14 00920 g001
Figure 2. Associations of genetically predicted essential amino acids with risk of ALS using main and sensitivity MR analyses. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Figure 2. Associations of genetically predicted essential amino acids with risk of ALS using main and sensitivity MR analyses. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Nutrients 14 00920 g002
Figure 3. Associations of genetically predicted essential polyunsaturated fatty acids with risk of ALS using main and sensitivity MR analyses. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Figure 3. Associations of genetically predicted essential polyunsaturated fatty acids with risk of ALS using main and sensitivity MR analyses. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Nutrients 14 00920 g003
Figure 4. Scattered plots of the casual effect of essential nutrients on ALS. The x-axis plots the previously published β–estimate for the association between each SNP and essential nutrients. The y-axis plots the β–estimate for the association between each SNP and risk of ALS. The slope of each line corresponds to the estimated MR effect per method. The examined essential nutrients included (A) linoleic acid (LA), (B) Dihomo–gamma–linoleic acid (DGLA), (C) absolute 25OHD, and (D) relative alpha-tocopherol. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Figure 4. Scattered plots of the casual effect of essential nutrients on ALS. The x-axis plots the previously published β–estimate for the association between each SNP and essential nutrients. The y-axis plots the β–estimate for the association between each SNP and risk of ALS. The slope of each line corresponds to the estimated MR effect per method. The examined essential nutrients included (A) linoleic acid (LA), (B) Dihomo–gamma–linoleic acid (DGLA), (C) absolute 25OHD, and (D) relative alpha-tocopherol. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Nutrients 14 00920 g004
Figure 5. Associations of genetically predicted essential minerals with risk of ALS using main and sensitivity MR analyses. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Figure 5. Associations of genetically predicted essential minerals with risk of ALS using main and sensitivity MR analyses. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Nutrients 14 00920 g005
Figure 6. Associations of genetically predicted essential vitamins with risk of ALS using main and sensitivity MR analyses. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Figure 6. Associations of genetically predicted essential vitamins with risk of ALS using main and sensitivity MR analyses. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; IVW, inverse variance–weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Nutrients 14 00920 g006
Table 1. Summary of the causal effects of each trait on ALS via different MR methods.
Table 1. Summary of the causal effects of each trait on ALS via different MR methods.
ExposuresMethodsNo. SNPsOR (95%CI)p Value
Essential amino acids
IsoleucineIVW21.003 (0.666, 1.510)0.988
LeucineIVW30.961 (0.770, 1.198)0.723
LeucineMR–Egger30.370 (0.131, 1.045)0.312
LeucineSimple median30.927 (0.708, 1.214)0.583
LeucineWeighted median30.899 (0.745, 1.084)0.264
PhenylalanineIVW31.035 (0.800, 1.340)0.792
PhenylalanineMR–Egger30.352 (0.045, 2.722)0.500
PhenylalanineSimple median31.085 (0.844, 1.395)0.523
PhenylalanineWeighted median31.111 (0.887, 1.392)0.359
TryptophanIVW201.848 (0.383, 8.916)0.444
TryptophanMR–Egger20609.49 (0, 534, 720, 778, 694.025)0.549
TryptophanSimple median201.096 (0.248, 4.851)0.904
TryptophanWeighted median201.358 (0.302, 6.117)0.690
ValineIVW50.949 (0.840, 1.071)0.397
ValineMR–Egger50.688 (0.340, 1.391)0.374
ValineSimple median50.94 (0.790, 1.120)0.492
ValineWeighted median50.932 (0.791, 1.099)0.404
Essential polyunsaturated fatty acids
Arachidonic acid (AA)IVW20.995 (0.984, 1.007)0.415
Dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA)IVW21.031 (1.017, 1.045)1.70 × 10−5
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)IVW51.048 (0.924, 1.190)0.464
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)MR–Egger51.013 (0.427, 2.403)0.978
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)Simple median51.147 (0.971, 1.355)0.106
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)Weighted median51.008 (0.889, 1.143)0.902
Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA)IVW30.874 (0.607, 1.257)0.466
Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA)MR–Egger30.660 (0.276, 1.576)0.521
Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA)Simple median30.885 (0.635, 1.233)0.469
Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA)Weighted median30.840 (0.645, 1.095)0.198
Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)IVW20.872 (0.647, 1.175)0.367
Gamma linolenic acid (GLA)IVW20.724 (0.184, 2.844)0.643
Linoleic acid (LA)IVW181.066 (1.011, 1.125)0.019
Linoleic acid (LA)MR–Egger181.162 (1.029, 1.312)0.028
Linoleic acid (LA)Simple median181.047 (0.972, 1.128)0.226
Linoleic acid (LA)Weighted median181.049 (0.976, 1.128)0.196
Minerals
CalciumIVW71.088 (0.775, 1.527)0.626
CalciumMR–Egger70.928 (0.484, 1.781)0.831
CalciumSimple median71.04 (0.582, 1.856)0.895
CalciumWeighted median70.98 (0.668, 1.437)0.918
Calcium (UKB)IVW1681.027 (0.952, 1.107)0.495
Calcium (UKB)MR–Egger1681.011 (0.868, 1.178)0.883
Calcium (UKB)Simple median1681.009 (0.891, 1.143)0.887
Calcium (UKB)Weighted median1680.989 (0.858, 1.139)0.878
CopperIVW21.007 (0.940, 1.079)0.837
IronIVW31.033 (0.890, 1.199)0.670
IronMR–Egger30.664 (0.468, 0.942)0.262
IronSimple median31.098 (0.982, 1.229)0.100
IronWeighted median31.080 (0.973, 1.200)0.147
MagnesiumIVW60.450 (0.057, 3.532)0.448
MagnesiumMR–Egger60.058 (0, 44.465)0.448
MagnesiumSimple median62.813 (0.294, 26.959)0.370
MagnesiumWeighted median60.592 (0.085, 4.110)0.596
PhosphorusIVW51.196 (0.946, 1.512)0.134
PhosphorusMR–Egger50.743 (0.160, 3.443)0.730
PhosphorusSimple median51.185 (0.785, 1.788)0.420
PhosphorusWeighted median51.123 (0.781, 1.615)0.532
SeleniumIVW21.036 (0.885, 1.213)0.658
ZincIVW21.032 (0.961, 1.109)0.387
Vitamins
absolute retinolIVW21.502 (0.718, 3.142)0.280
absolute vitamin B-12IVW61.003 (0.919, 1.095)0.942
absolute vitamin B-12MR–Egger60.949 (0.732, 1.230)0.714
absolute vitamin B-12Simple median61.018 (0.885, 1.170)0.804
absolute vitamin B-12Weighted median60.986 (0.879, 1.107)0.812
absolute ascorbateIVW91.013 (0.889, 1.153)0.848
absolute ascorbateMR–Egger91.098 (0.895, 1.346)0.401
absolute ascorbateSimple median91.050 (0.862, 1.278)0.631
absolute ascorbateWeighted median91.060 (0.912, 1.232)0.445
absolute 25OHDIVW710.899 (0.819, 0.987)0.025
absolute 25OHDMR–Egger710.876 (0.774, 0.993)0.042
absolute 25OHDSimple median710.943 (0.779, 1.142)0.548
absolute 25OHDWeighted median710.901 (0.800, 1.014)0.084
absolute alpha-tocopherolIVW31.192 (0.599, 2.372)0.616
absolute alpha-tocopherolMR–Egger38.432 (0.018, 4012.598)0.621
absolute alpha-tocopherolSimple median31.661 (0.784, 3.518)0.185
absolute alpha-tocopherolWeighted median31.364 (0.673, 2.766)0.389
relative retinolIVW220.980 (0.949, 1.012)0.221
relative retinolMR–Egger220.963 (0.884, 1.049)0.395
relative retinolSimple median220.989 (0.949, 1.030)0.579
relative retinolWeighted median220.986 (0.946, 1.028)0.515
relative ascorbateIVW121.005 (0.893, 1.130)0.937
relative ascorbateMR–Egger121.008 (0.687, 1.478)0.970
relative ascorbateSimple median121.050 (0.886, 1.245)0.573
relative ascorbateWeighted median121.086 (0.921, 1.280)0.328
relative alpha-tocopherolIVW110.461 (0.340, 0.626)6.52 × 10−7
relative alpha-tocopherolMR–Egger110.489 (0.220, 1.084)0.112
relative alpha-tocopherolSimple median110.617 (0.355, 1.072)0.087
relative alpha-tocopherolWeighted median110.536 (0.324, 0.886)0.015
relative gamma-tocopherolIVW120.988 (0.784, 1.245)0.918
relative gamma-tocopherolMR–Egger120.902 (0.553, 1.470)0.688
relative gamma-tocopherolSimple median121.018 (0.738, 1.404)0.915
relative gamma-tocopherolWeighted median120.950 (0.718, 1.259)0.723
Table 2. Summary of the additional MR analysis for the effect of each non ALS-associated trait on ALS; * the F statistics are the mean F value for each eligible instrumental variable.
Table 2. Summary of the additional MR analysis for the effect of each non ALS-associated trait on ALS; * the F statistics are the mean F value for each eligible instrumental variable.
ExposuresF Statistics *R2MR–EggerCochran’s QMR–PRESSOMR–Steiger
InterceptpQpRS SobsP-
Global Test
P-
Outlier
P-
Distortion
Correct
Causal Direction
p
Essential amino acids
Isoleucine32.070.003NANA4.3330.037NANANANATRUE4.74 × 10−23
Leucine32.5320.0040.090.324.0490.132NANANANATRUE3.27 × 10−38
Phenylalanine26.0320.0040.0830.4873.9010.142NANANANATRUE7.23 × 10−31
Tryptophan16.8310.043–0.0310.58752.831058.666<2 × 10−40.8930.074TRUE4.08 × 10−134
Valine29.9510.0060.0310.4293.4230.494.6510.587NANATRUE7.73 × 10−61
Polyunsaturated fatty acids
Arachidonic acid (AA)1302.6270.233NANA0.7250.395NANANANATRUE2.57 × 10−198
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)19.2110.0070.0040.9435.7740.2179.8260.26NANATRUE2.22 × 10−49
Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA)129.6750.0440.0160.6033.8780.144NANANANATRUE5.75 × 10−192
Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)68.3050.016NANA1.3210.25NANANANATRUE8.54 × 10−63
Gamma linolenic acid (GLA)77.2980.018NANA0.9930.319NANANANATRUE8.70 × 10−76
Minerals
Calcium22.1820.0030.0060.5916.1180.418.540.486NANATRUE7.48 × 10−85
Calcium (UKB)25.3910.01400.827186.8650.139188.910.152NANATRUE0
Copper18.080.014NANA0.8350.361NANANANATRUE3.71 × 10−28
Iron159.7410.010.0950.2386.7470.034NANANANATRUE9.72 × 10−127
Magnesium20.9880.0050.0150.55611.060.0519.8240.1NANATRUE4.97 × 10−73
Phosphorus18.290.0040.0220.582.7330.6034.430.633NANATRUE2.82 × 10−50
Selenium39.2180.008NANA2.2910.13NANANANATRUE8.59 × 10−42
Zinc23.670.018NANA0.9660.326NANANANATRUE4.77 × 10−28
Vitamins
absolute retinol24.9430.01NANA20.157NANANANATRUE7.89 × 10−25
absolute vitamin B-1275.0360.0120.0080.6765.1090.4030.7740.366NANATRUE3.62 × 10−212
absolute ascorbate20.3030.004−0.0070.358.3310.4029.6430.506NANATRUE9.77 × 10−120
absolute alpha-tocopherol3.1210.001−0.0650.6434.0220.134NANANANATRUE1.04 × 10−24
relative retinol4.1580.0470.0050.66528.9450.11531.6430.13NANATRUE1.59 × 10−118
relative ascorbate83.860.04−0.00020.9889.9010.53911.7690.55NANATRUE1.17 × 10−62
relative gamma-tocopherol5.8810.0120.0040.68414.5030.20617.7950.214NANATRUE2.71 × 10−52
NA, Due to the limitation of the number of SNPs, no valid value can be obtained. True, The assumed causal relationship is in the right direction.
Table 3. Summary of the additional analysis for the causal effects of each ALS-associated trait on ALS.
Table 3. Summary of the additional analysis for the causal effects of each ALS-associated trait on ALS.
MethodsDihomo-Gamma-Linolenic
Acid (DGLA)
Linoleic Acid (LA)Absolute 25-OHDRelative
Alpha-Tocopherol
mean F statistics 218.41917.00989.9014.07
R2 0.0490.0230.0140.006
MR–EggerinterceptNA−0.0140.001−0.065
p valueNA0.1460.5480.643
Cochran’s QQ0.06220.41984.756.652
p value0.8040.2530.110.758
MR–PRESSORS SobsNA23.10285.8087.907
P-global testNA0.2580.1440.807
P-outlierNANANANA
P-distortionNANANANA
MR–Steigercorrect causal directionTRUETRUETRUETRUE
p value4.37 × 10−2072.11 × 10−20701.98 × 10−45
NA, Due to the limitation of the number of SNPs, no valid value can be obtained. True, The assumed causal relationship is in the right direction.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, K.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Tang, L.; Zhang, G.; Huang, T.; Huang, N.; Fan, D. Dietary-Derived Essential Nutrients and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14050920

AMA Style

Xia K, Wang Y, Zhang L, Tang L, Zhang G, Huang T, Huang N, Fan D. Dietary-Derived Essential Nutrients and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study. Nutrients. 2022; 14(5):920. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14050920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Kailin, Yajun Wang, Linjing Zhang, Lu Tang, Gan Zhang, Tao Huang, Ninghao Huang, and Dongsheng Fan. 2022. "Dietary-Derived Essential Nutrients and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study" Nutrients 14, no. 5: 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14050920

APA Style

Xia, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Tang, L., Zhang, G., Huang, T., Huang, N., & Fan, D. (2022). Dietary-Derived Essential Nutrients and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study. Nutrients, 14(5), 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14050920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop