Next Article in Journal
Association of Dietary Live Microbe Intake with Cardiovascular Disease in US Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study of NHANES 2007–2018
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Vitamin D3 and Marine Omega-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation on Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation: 4-Year Findings from the VITAL Randomized Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Are Undernutrition and Obesity Associated with Post-Discharge Mortality and Re-Hospitalization after Hospitalization with Community-Acquired Pneumonia?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects on Serum Inflammatory Cytokines of Cholecalciferol Supplementation in Healthy Subjects with Vitamin D Deficiency
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 22
10.3390/nu14224907
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Vitamin D and COVID-19: Narrative Review after 3 Years of Pandemic

by
Emanuele Gotelli
1,
Stefano Soldano
1,
Elvis Hysa
1,
Sabrina Paolino
1,
Rosanna Campitiello
1,
Carmen Pizzorni
1,
Alberto Sulli
1,
Vanessa Smith
2,3,4 and
Maurizio Cutolo
1,*
1
Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine and Specialties, University of Genova, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, 16132 Genova, Italy
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
3
Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
4
Unit for Molecular Immunology and Inflammation, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Inflammation Research Center (IRC), 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(22), 4907; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14224907
Submission received: 21 October 2022 / Revised: 14 November 2022 / Accepted: 17 November 2022 / Published: 20 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vitamin D, Immune Response, and Autoimmune Diseases)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Active vitamin D [1,25(OH)2D3—calcitriol] is a secosteroid hormone whose receptor is expressed on all cells of the immune system. Vitamin D has a global anti-inflammatory effect and its role in the management of a SARS-CoV-2 infection has been investigated since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this narrative review, the laboratory and clinical results of a vitamin D supplementation have been collected from both open-label and blinded randomized clinical trials. The results are generally in favor of the utility of maintaining the serum concentrations of calcifediol [25(OH)D3] at around 40 ng/mL and of the absolute usefulness of its supplementation in subjects with deficient serum levels. However, two very recent large-scale studies (one open-label, one placebo-controlled) have called into question the contribution of vitamin D to clinical practice in the era of COVID-19 vaccinations. The precise role of a vitamin D supplementation in the anti-COVID-19 armamentarium requires further investigations in light of the breakthrough which has been achieved with mass vaccinations.

1. Introduction

Active vitamin D [1,25(OH)2D3—calcitriol] is a fat-soluble hormone that exerts multiple biological properties (endocrine, paracrine and intracrine) in the human body [1]. The paracrine and intracrine functions of vitamin D have aroused great interest, in particular for the almost ubiquitous expression of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) by the cells of the immune system, supporting a role in the regulation of the acute and chronic inflammatory response [2].
In particular, the link between vitamin D and inflammation in course of respiratory infections has been studied for more than a century, starting from the clinical pieces of evidence of the antimicrobial activity exerted by vitamin D against Mycobacterium tuberculosis [3]. Recently, a robust meta-analysis of more than 1500 researches on this topic identified a vitamin D supplementation as a protective factor against acute airways infections, thanks to its immunomodulatory properties [4]. Vitamin D does not act directly against the most common respiratory viruses (i.e., influenza virus, rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus), but it globally reduces the expression and secretion of pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines [5,6].
Following the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic between the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020, several investigations have been carried out regarding the correlation between vitamin D [calcifediol—25(OH)D3] serum concentrations and the course of COVID-19, in order to assess whether a vitamin D supplementation could be beneficial even against an SARS-CoV-2 infection [7].
As low 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations are common in COVID-19 patients and correlate with a worse prognosis of the disease, ad hoc studies have been performed to evaluate the clinical effects of a vitamin D supplementation in COVID-19 patients.
This narrative review is therefore structured in first part concerning the physiology of vitamin D and the interconnection between its immunological effects and the inflammatory response caused by SARS-CoV-2, while the second part is focused on randomized clinical trials (RCTs), regarding the effects of a vitamin D supplementation on COVID-19 (susceptibility, disease course and the impact on vaccinations).

2. Vitamin D Physiology

Vitamin D derives from foods (both of animal and vegetable origin) and for the most part (about 80%), from cutaneous 7-dehydrocholesterol, that is converted into pre-vitamin D3 by ultraviolet B sun rays with wavelength between 290 and 315 nm [8,9].
Pre-vitamin D3 belongs to the steroid family thanks to the cholesterol-derived sterane ring, formed by four condensed rings of carbon atoms (secosteroid) [10]. Pre-vitamin D3 undergoes thermal processes of isomerization to cholecalciferol and it is released by epidermal keratinocytes in the bloodstream, where it circulates bound to a vitamin D-binding protein (VBP); on the other side, cholecalciferol of a food origin is incorporated in chylomicrons, reaches the venous circulation through the lymph and binds to the VBP [11].
Cholecalciferol undergoes the first hydroxylation in the hepatocytes in position 25 by mitochondrial and microsomal enzymes (CYP27A1 or CYP2R1). Calcifediol, or 25(OH)D3, is the resulting metabolite and the form that is usually measured in the serum to determine vitamin D concentrations, due to its high availability and long half-life (about three weeks). Calcifediol is therefore hydroxylated in position 1 by CYP27B1 in the kidney: calcitriol, or 1,25(OH)2D3, is the active final form of vitamin D [11].
CYP27B1 is almost ubiquitously expressed in the human body. When synthesized by renal proximal tubular cells, calcitriol exerts endocrine activities, regulating calcium-phosphorus homeostasis. In the small intestine, it increases the absorption of calcium and phosphorus, in the skeleton promotes bone mineralization, upregulating an osteoclastic differentiation and downregulating the release of the parathyroid hormone and in the kidneys, it stimulates the reabsorption of calcium [12]. All these activities are possible thanks to the expression of VDR on the target cells. VDR belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily and when it binds to calcitriol, it regulates rapid non-genomic and slower genomic effects [13].
The endocrine effects of vitamin D are due to the non-genomic interactions of VDR, which stimulates the activation of signaling molecules and the formation of second messengers, that phosphorylate target protein kinases, regulating the entrance of calcium in the cells through the Ca2+ channels [14].
The extra-osseus effects of vitamin D are due to a conformational change in VDR, which heterodimerizes with the retinoic acid X receptor and migrates into the cell nucleus, regulating the transcription of thousands of genes, involved in immunomodulation and cell growth differentiation [15].
At last, calcitriol is inactivated by CYP24A1 (hydroxylation in position 24), excreted in the bile and then eliminated via the feces, after an enterohepatic recirculation [8].

3. Vitamin D Immunomodulatory Effects and SARS-CoV-2 Inflammatory Response

SARS-CoV-2 and active vitamin D almost always exhibit opposing biological actions.
SARS-CoV-2 is a beta coronavirus that is transmitted by airway droplets from human to human and expresses surface spike proteins, which bind to several receptors of human cells (CD26, CD147 and CD209) with the type 2 angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE2) as the main target [16]. ACE2 is highly expressed by respiratory, gastrointestinal and endothelial cells [17]. SARS-CoV-2 uses the S1 subunit of its receptor-binding domain (RBD) to bind ACE2 and the co-receptors, while the S2 subunit is used to invade the target cells. Viral RNA nucleic acid is then replicated and exocytosed by the host cells to spread the infection [18].
ACE2 is not only a receptor for SARS-CoV-2 but mainly a key regulator enzyme of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. ACE2 catalyzes the conversion of angiotensin II to angiotensin 1–7, which promotes vasodilatory, anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic effects, by acting on the AT2 and MAS receptors [19]. ACE2 also counteracts the action of the ACE enzyme, which, on the contrary, favors the production of angiotensin II, that promotes the increase in the peripheral vascular resistance, endothelial pro-coagulative dysfunction and pulmonary interstitial fibrosis, by acting on the AT1 receptors [19]. SARS-CoV-2 causes an imbalance of the ACE2/ACE ratio, favoring the detrimental biological effects of ACE [17].
On the contrary, calcitriol stimulates the expression of ACE2 in different human tissues and helps to restore a physiological ACE2/ACE ratio, in opposition to the viral prothrombotic and proinflammatory effects [20].

3.1. Innate Immunity Activation in COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 usually infects cells in the upper respiratory tract, triggering the first line of defense, represented by innate immunity. SARS-CoV-2 is able to overcome the mucus produced by epithelial cells and the defense proteins contained in it, activating cellular pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and consequently the innate immune response [21].
Among PRRs, SARS-CoV-2 is usually recognized by Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)-2 and TLR-4, expressed on the surface of immune (monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells), endothelial and epithelial cells [22]. The stimulation of TLR-2 and TLR-4 signaling causes the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, IL-18, IL-33 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, mediated by Nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome and NF-kB transcription factor [23].
Moreover, TLR-4 can activate the type I interferon (IFN) antiviral pathway through the downstream/adaptor proteins TRIF (TIR-domain-containing adapter inducing IFN-β), TRAF3 (TNF receptor-associated factor 3) and IRF3 (interferon regulatory factor 3) [24]. However, SARS-CoV-2 downregulates the production of type I IFN, blocking the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING), which acts as an activator of IRF3 [24].
Interestingly, calcitriol attenuates TLR-2 signaling as well as the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome/NF-kB axis in animal and human models of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus) [25,26,27,28].
After a recognition by PRRs, SARS-CoV-2 is able to escape defense mechanisms, in particular the autophagy process [29]. SARS-CoV-2 downregulates the autophagy promoters, such as the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator pathways, and upregulates autophagy inhibitors, such as RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase (AKT1) and S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (SKP2) [30]. Moreover, the fusion between autophagosomes and lysosomes is impaired by the virus, due to the degradation of autophagy-initiating protein Beclin-1 (BECN-1) [31]. SARS-CoV-2 also degrades TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), that regulates not only an autophagy initiation but also the production of type I IFN [32].
It is of note that calcitriol hinders the replication of SARS-CoV-2 at the intracellular level, inducing the expression of BECN-1, so promoting autophagy [33,34].
The viral activation of PRRs then causes the recruitment of innate immunity cells, in particular neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages and dendritic cells.
Neutrophils are recruited in affected tissues by IL-8 and they release extracellular traps (NETs) of nuclear material to bind and destroy pathogens [35]. Animal models of COVID-19 have suggested that paradoxically H3 and H4 histones released with NETosis increase the infectious capacity of SARS-CoV-2 rather than counter it [36]. Furthermore, inefficient NETs favor the formation of microthrombi in damaged tissues, a peculiar feature of the endothelial injury caused by the virus [37].
Calcitriol can reduce the expression of NETs in rat models of pulmonary diseases [38]. Analogously, it stimulates the release of cathelicidin by neutrophils and the LL-37 peptide which promotes, through macrophages, the removal of NETs and hinders the binding between SARS-CoV-2 subunits and ACE2 receptors [39,40]. Indeed, LL-37 peptide and the total number of serum leukocytes ratio in COVID-19 patients has been correlated with the severity of the disease [41].
Monocytes can be directly infected by SARS-CoV-2, through Fcγ receptors, stimulating NLRP3 inflammasome together with other pro-inflammatory mediators [42,43]. The final result is a classical activation of macrophages (M1), that release the aforementioned pro-inflammatory cytokines. It is of note that calcitriol induces the expression of IL-10 by immune cells, so promoting an alternative/anti-inflammatory activation of macrophages (M2) [28].
At last, the dendritic cells’ production of type I IFN is impaired, as well as the release of IL-12 and IL-23, resulting in a reduced activation of the T helper (Th)-17 response [44]. In this case, the biological effects of calcitriol seem superimposable and less advantageous, as it too reduces the production of IL-12 and IL-23, favoring a more tolerogenic state [45].

3.2. Adaptive Immunity Response in COVID-19

When the defense mechanisms of innate immunity are not able to resolve the infection, monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells present SARS-CoV-2 antigen peptides complexed with the major histocompatibility complex class II to naïve T cells [46]. The activation of CD4+ T cells is predominant compared to CD8+ T cells, a ratio that remains constant even with the latest variants of the virus [47]. T helper (Th)-1 cells release type II IFN (or IFN γ) and TNF, which activate the cell-mediated response, polarizing macrophages towards a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype [47]. These T-cells are usually effective in resolving a SARS-CoV-2 infection and are stimulated by anti-COVID-19 vaccines [48]. However, in the most severe cases of COVID-19, the inflammatory response is unable to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 and the impairment of T regulator cells together with the intense Th1 activation which manifests itself with the peripheral blood lymphopenia and subsequently with an inflammatory abnormal response that can lead to the notorious “cytokine storm”, with dramatic clinical manifestations, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome [49,50].
On the other hand, calcitriol down-regulates the Th1 response, activating several transcription factors in CD4+ T cells that shift the production of cytokines towards IL-10, which has an anti-inflammatory effect, polarizing also the macrophages toward an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype [51].
The production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies develops from naïve B cells and begins a few days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms [47]. Immunoglobulins (Ig)M are directed against viral nucleocapsid, spike proteins and RBD, the latter with neutralizing properties [47]. Seroconversion into IgG is completed after ten days [47]. IgA are also crucial for COVID-19 patients: they are secreted by mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue and promotes viral shedding from the airway’s epithelium [52].
Interestingly, calcitriol promotes the differentiation of naïve B cells towards IgA-secreting plasmablasts, with an active role in the defense mucosal [53].
The schematic model reported so far of an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection derives for the most part from experiences regarding the first circulating variants of the virus (alpha–delta) [54]. The emergence of ever new viral variants, due to nucleotide changes in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, caused by RNA replication errors with consequent mutations in host cell binding proteins, does not seem to significantly modify the biological interactions with vitamin D [54]. In fact, active vitamin D shows global anti-inflammatory effects, summarized in Figure 1, which may mitigate the inflammatory response induced by SARS-CoV-2, but that are certainly not anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific [54].

4. Vitamin D Serum Concentrations and COVID-19

4.1. Effects of Vitamin D on Susceptibility to COVID-19

In recent years, 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations, especially below 25 nmol/L (10 ng/mL) have been identified as a risk factor for susceptibility to viral respiratory infections [55]. As a consequence, several studies have been performed to investigate the correlation between 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations and the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 and a recent meta-analysis of fifty-four papers has shown that a 25(OH)D3 deficiency (less than 30 ng/mL) was significantly associated with a SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratios between 1.49 and 1.83 depending on the levels of 25(OH)D3 deficiency) [56]. Of note, an observational study of 379 United Kingdom (UK) healthcare workers has found a U-shaped relationship between 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity: the susceptibility to COVID-19 increases with 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations below 30 ng/mL (the lower the levels, the greater the risk), but, surprisingly, even with 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations above 40 ng/mL (the higher the levels, the greater the risk) [57]. Therefore, 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations of 40 ng/mL seem the optimal target in the general population [7]. However, to explain the increase in the infectious risk reported in the previous study, it is important to remember that reaching high 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations too quickly is counterproductive, as they activate fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) and 24-hydroxylase signaling, which inactivates calcitriol [58,59].

4.2. Effects of Vitamin D on Severity of COVID-19

Several studies have investigated the correlation between 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations and the severity of a SARS-CoV-2 infection (disease duration, pulmonary involvement, risk of need for intensive care units—ICUs—and overall mortality) [60]. 25(OH)D3 significantly correlates with the length of hospitalization, the need for invasive cares, such as mechanical ventilation, the lung involvement and the mortality [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. Although there is not a total agreement in the observational studies conducted so far [70,71], most of the meta-analyzes confirm the significant correlation between 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations and the severity of COVID-19, even when caused by the more recent omicron subvariants of SARS-CoV-2 [72,73,74,75,76].

4.3. COVID-19 and Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation

In light of the previously reported evidence, firstly open-label and subsequently placebo-controlled RCTs evaluated the efficacy of a vitamin D supplementation in reducing the impact of COVID-19 [77]. Some authors were concerned that low 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations found in COVID-19 patients could be interpreted more as a consequence of the systemic inflammation, rather than a predisposing factor for the development of the disease [78,79].
The evidence from open label and single-blinded RCTs was immediately encouraging. In fact, even in the presence of different prescriptive schemes (i.e., 0.266–0.532 mg of oral calcifediol three times for the first week of the disease and then weekly, 0.5 mcg of calcitriol per day for two weeks, 1000–2000 IU of cholecalciferol for 7–14 days, 5000 IU of cholecalciferol per day for two weeks, 10,000 IU of cholecalciferol per day for two weeks, 50,000 IU of cholecalciferol on the first and eighth day of hospitalization or 400,000 IU of oral cholecalciferol within 72 h after COVID-19 diagnosis), a vitamin D supplementation was associated with a reduction in inflammatory markers (IL-6), an improvement in the lung functions (arterial oxygen saturation/inspired fraction of oxygen ratio) and a reduction in hospitalization, access to ICUs and the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients [80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. However, in a large open-label RCT regarding 6200 adults in the UK (CORONAVIT Study), 800 IU per day or 3200 IU per day of cholecalciferol for six months were not able to reduce the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 in healthy volunteers, in comparison to a control group [88].
Furthermore, also placebo-controlled RCTs have been designed and conducted, providing conflicting data (the results are resumed in Table 1).
On the one hand, there were studies in favor of a vitamin D supplementation. Oral calcifediol, equivalent to 3000 to 6000 IU of cholecalciferol per day for two months, significantly decreased the peripheral neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in COVID-19 patients, a functional parameter associated with a reduction in the access to ICUs and mortality [89]. Similarly, oral cholecalciferol (60,000 IU daily for a week) significantly accelerated the healing, decreasing the SARS-CoV-2 RNA in infected patients [90]. Moreover, 25,000 IU of cholecalciferol for four consecutive days, followed by 25,000 IU weekly for up to six weeks significantly improved the clinical conditions of COVID-19 patients reducing the request of an oxygen supplementation and the length of their hospital stay [91]. At last, a supplementation of 4000 IU daily of cholecalciferol for 30 days significantly decreased the risk of suffering from a SARS-CoV-2 infection [92].
However, other placebo-controlled RCTs questioned the usefulness of a vitamin D supplementation. For example, a single high dose of 200,000 IU of cholecalciferol proved ineffective to reduce the rate of ICUs access or the global mortality of COVID-19 hospitalized patients [93]. A similar conclusion was obtained with a single supplementation of 500,000 IU of oral cholecalciferol [94]. Although these results were predictable, due to the negative effects of FGF-23 and 24-hydroxylase, activated by single high doses of vitamin D, another more recent study was disappointing [95]. A total of 17,278 adults were supplemented with 5 mL/day of cod liver oil (containing approximately 400 IU of cholecalciferol) for up to six months in Norway: no difference was found in COVID-19 incidence and disease course in comparison with a placebo group (17,323 adults) [95].
Taken together those studies suggest that a vitamin D supplementation is efficient in COVID-19 when administered for a medium or long term, whereas high and/or single doses were found not to be effective.

4.4. Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation in COVID-19 Vaccinations

The development of anti-COVID-19 vaccines has turned the fight against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants in a positive way [96]. It has been hypothesized that vitamin D may positively influence the efficacy of vaccines, considering that low vitamin D serum concentrations were associated with an insufficient humoral response after a COVID-19 vaccinations in patients suffering from solid tumors [97,98]. However, a sub analysis of the recent aforementioned open-label CORONAVIT study found no efficacy from a supplementation of 800 or 3200 IU of cholecalciferol daily for 6 months in improving the immunogenicity of anti-COVID-19 vaccines ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 [99].

5. Conclusions

The solid pathophysiological rationale on the usefulness of a vitamin D supplementation also in a SARS-CoV-2 infection has not been fully endorsed by the current RCTs, due to the well-known difficulties in designing clinical studies on this topic for multiple variables (i.e., the baseline characteristics of the treated population, vitamin D supplementation regimens and different outcomes) [100].
However, most of the evidence gathered so far confirms the biological and clinical utility of a vitamin D supplementation in COVID-19 patients, in particular when the 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations are deficient. Current and future RCTs should clarify the most advantageous dosage of a vitamin D supplementation and the target population that can benefit the most from it.
At last, it needs to be definitively clarified whether a vitamin D supplementation can also be recommended for a subject vaccinated against COVID-19. In fact, unlike RCTs performed in the pre-vaccination period, the most recent RCTs seem to overshadow the role of a vitamin D supplementation when taken together with COVID-19 vaccines [95,99]. This challenging question is still open at the moment.

Author Contributions

E.G. and M.C. conceptualized the structure of the manuscript, collected data and wrote the paper. S.S., E.H., S.P., R.C., C.P., A.S. and V.S. reviewed and edited the manuscript. R.C. created Figure 1. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data was provided in this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) Study Group on Neuroendocrine Immunology (NEIRD) for continuous cultural support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

V.S. is a senior clinical investigator of the Research Foundation Flanders, Belgium (FWO; 1.8.029.20 N). The FWO was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References

  1. Trombetta, A.C.; Meroni, M.; Cutolo, M. Steroids and Autoimmunity. Front Horm. Res. 2017, 48, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. El-Sharkawy, A.; Malki, A. Vitamin D Signaling in Inflammation and Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Molecules 2020, 25, 3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zdrenghea, M.T.; Makrinioti, H.; Bagacean, C.; Bush, A.; Johnston, S.L.; Stanciu, L.A. Vitamin D modulation of innate immune responses to respiratory viral infections. Rev. Med. Virol. 2016, 27, e1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jolliffe, D.A.; Camargo, C.A.; Sluyter, J.D.; Aglipay, M.; Aloia, J.F.; Ganmaa, D.; Bergman, P.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Borzutzky, A.; Damsgaard, C.T.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9, 276–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Greiller, C.L.; Martineau, A.R. Modulation of the Immune Response to Respiratory Viruses by Vitamin D. Nutrients 2015, 7, 4240–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cutolo, M.; Paolino, S.; Sulli, A.; Smith, V.; Pizzorni, C.; Seriolo, B. Vitamin D, steroid hormones, and autoimmunity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1317, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cutolo, M.; Paolino, S.; Smith, V. Evidences for a protective role of vitamin D in COVID-19. RMD Open 2020, 6, e001454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lips, P. Vitamin D physiology. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2006, 92, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Holick, M.F.; Chen, T.C.; Lu, Z.; Sauter, E. Vitamin D and Skin Physiology: A D-Lightful Story. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2007, 22, V28–V33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kawagoe, F.; Mototani, S.; Kittaka, A. The Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of D-Ring-Modified Vitamin D Analogues. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Delanghe, J.R.; Speeckaert, R.; Speeckaert, M.M. Behind the scenes of vitamin D binding protein: More than vitamin D binding. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 29, 773–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bouillon, R.; Marcocci, C.; Carmeliet, G.; Bikle, D.; White, J.H.; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Lips, P.; Munns, C.F.; Lazaretti-Castro, M.; Giustina, A.; et al. Skeletal and Extraskeletal Actions of Vitamin D: Current Evidence and Outstanding Questions. Endocr. Rev. 2018, 40, 1109–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Haussler, M.R.; Jurutka, P.W.; Mizwicki, M.; Norman, A.W. Vitamin D receptor (VDR)-mediated actions of 1α,25(OH)2vitamin D3: Genomic and non-genomic mechanisms. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 25, 543–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fleet, J.C. The role of vitamin D in the endocrinology controlling calcium homeostasis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017, 453, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Trochoutsou, A.I.; Kloukina, V.; Samitas, K.; Xanthou, G. Vitamin-D in the Immune System: Genomic and Non-Genomic Actions. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 953–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, H.; Rao, Z. Structural biology of SARS-CoV-2 and implications for therapeutic development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021, 19, 685–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Scialo, F.; Daniele, A.; Amato, F.; Pastore, L.; Matera, M.G.; Cazzola, M.; Castaldo, G.; Bianco, A. ACE2: The Major Cell Entry Receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Lung 2020, 198, 867–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wiersinga, W.J.; Rhodes, A.; Cheng, A.C.; Peacock, S.J.; Prescott, H.C. Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA 2020, 324, 782–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Santos, R.A.S.; Sampaio, W.O.; Alzamora, A.C.; Motta-Santos, D.; Alenina, N.; Bader, M.; Campagnole-Santos, M.J. The ACE2/Angiotensin-(1–7)/MAS Axis of the Renin-Angiotensin System: Focus on Angiotensin-(1–7). Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 505–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Getachew, B.; Tizabi, Y. Vitamin D and COVID-19: Role of ACE2, age, gender, and ethnicity. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 5285–5294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stravalaci, M.; Pagani, I.; Paraboschi, E.M.; Pedotti, M.; Doni, A.; Scavello, F.; Mapelli, S.N.; Sironi, M.; Perucchini, C.; Varani, L.; et al. Recognition and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 by humoral innate immunity pattern recognition molecules. Nat. Immunol. 2022, 23, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Khanmohammadi, S.; Rezaei, N. Role of Toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 2735–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hornef, M.W.; Normark, B.H.; Vandewalle, A.; Normark, S. Intracellular recognition of lipopolysaccharide by toll-like receptor 4 in intestinal epithelial cells. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 1225–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Han, L.; Zhuang, M.-W.; Deng, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Nan, M.-L.; Zhang, X.-J.; Gao, C.; Wang, P.-H. SARS-CoV-2 ORF9b antagonizes type I and III interferons by targeting multiple components of the RIG-I/MDA-5–MAVS, TLR3–TRIF, and cGAS–STING signaling pathways. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 5376–5389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vyas, S.P.; Srivastava, R.N.; Goswami, R. Calcitriol attenuates TLR2/IL-33 signaling pathway to repress Th9 cell differentiation and potentially limits the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2020, 476, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sakalyte, R.; Denkovskij, J.; Bernotiene, E.; Stropuviene, S.; Mikulenaite, S.O.; Kvederas, G.; Porvaneckas, N.; Tutkus, V.; Venalis, A.; Butrimiene, I. The Expression of Inflammasomes NLRP1 and NLRP3, Toll-Like Receptors, and Vitamin D Receptor in Synovial Fibroblasts From Patients with Different Types of Knee Arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 12, 767512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Huang, J.; An, Q.; Ju, B.-M.; Fan, P.; He, L.; Wang, L. Role of vitamin D/VDR nuclear translocation in down-regulation of NF-κB/NLRP3/caspase-1 axis in lupus nephritis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 100, 108131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Villaggio, B.; Soldano, S.; Cutolo, M. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 downregulates aromatase expression and inflammatory cytokines in human macrophages. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2012, 30, 934–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. García-Pérez, B.E.; González-Rojas, J.A.; Salazar, M.I.; Torres-Torres, C.; Castrejón-Jiménez, N.S. Taming the Autophagy as a Strategy for Treating COVID-19. Cells 2020, 9, 2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gassen, N.C.; Papies, J.; Bajaj, T.; Emanuel, J.; Dethloff, F.; Chua, R.L.; Trimpert, J.; Heinemann, N.; Niemeyer, C.; Weege, F.; et al. SARS-CoV-2-mediated dysregulation of metabolism and autophagy uncovers host-targeting antivirals. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Okuyan, H.M.; Dogan, S.; Bal, T.; Çabalak, M. Beclin-1, an autophagy-related protein, is associated with the disease severity of COVID-19. Life Sci. 2021, 278, 119596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sui, C.; Xiao, T.; Zhang, S.; Zeng, H.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, B.; Xu, G.; Gao, C.; Zhang, Z. SARS-CoV-2 NSP13 Inhibits Type I IFN Production by Degradation of TBK1 via p62-Dependent Selective Autophagy. J. Immunol. 2022, 208, 753–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yuk, J.-M.; Shin, D.-M.; Lee, H.-M.; Yang, C.-S.; Jin, H.S.; Kim, K.-K.; Lee, Z.-W.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, J.-M.; Jo, E.-K. Vitamin D3 Induces Autophagy in Human Monocytes/Macrophages via Cathelicidin. Cell Host. Microbe. 2009, 6, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Chen, K.; Wang, J.; Dong, Q.; Xie, J.; Yuan, Y. Vitamin D promotes autophagy in AML cells by inhibiting miR-17-5p-induced Beclin-1 overexpression. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2021, 476, 3951–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Al-Kuraishy, H.M.; Al-Gareeb, A.I.; Al-Hussaniy, H.A.; Al-Harcan, N.A.H.; Alexiou, A.; Batiha, G.E.-S. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) and Covid-19: A new frontiers for therapeutic modality. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2022, 104, 108516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hong, W.; Yang, J.; Zou, J.; Bi, Z.; He, C.; Lei, H.; He, X.; Li, X.; Alu, A.; Ren, W.; et al. Histones released by NETosis enhance the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 by bridging the spike protein subunit 2 and sialic acid on host cells. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2022, 19, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Aloul, K.M.; Nielsen, J.E.; Defensor, E.B.; Lin, J.S.; Fortkort, J.A.; Shamloo, M.; Cirillo, J.D.; Gombart, A.F.; Barron, A.E. Upregulating Human Cathelicidin Antimicrobial Peptide LL-37 Expression May Prevent Severe COVID-19 Inflammatory Responses and Reduce Microthrombosis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 880961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, C.; Weng, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Lu, C.; Jin, H.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Sheng, A.; Sun, Y. Low-Dose Vitamin D Protects Hyperoxia-Induced Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia by Inhibiting Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Front. Pediatr. 2020, 8, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gönen, M.S.; Alaylıoğlu, M.; Durcan, E.; Özdemir, Y.; Şahin, S.; Konukoğlu, D.; Nohut, O.K.; Ürkmez, S.; Küçükece, B.; Balkan, I.I.; et al. Rapid and Effective Vitamin D Supplementation May Present Better Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) Patients by Altering Serum INOS1, IL1B, IFNg, Cathelicidin-LL37, and ICAM1. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Li, D.; Chen, P.; Han, S.; Zhao, G.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xiong, J.; Qiu, J.; et al. Human Cathelicidin Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Killing Two Birds with One Stone. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 1545–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Keutmann, M.; Hermes, G.; Meinberger, D.; Roth, A.; Stemler, J.; Cornely, O.A.; Klatt, A.R.; Streichert, T. The ratio of serum LL-37 levels to blood leucocyte count correlates with COVID-19 severity. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Junqueira, C.; Crespo, Â.; Ranjbar, S.; de Lacerda, L.B.; Lewandrowski, M.; Ingber, J.; Parry, B.; Ravid, S.; Clark, S.; Schrimpf, M.R.; et al. FcγR-mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection of monocytes activates inflammation. Nature 2022, 606, 576–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sefik, E.; Qu, R.; Junqueira, C.; Kaffe, E.; Mirza, H.; Zhao, J.; Brewer, J.R.; Han, A.; Steach, H.R.; Israelow, B.; et al. Inflammasome activation in infected macrophages drives COVID-19 pathology. Nature 2022, 606, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mateus, D.; Sebastião, A.I.; Carrascal, M.A.; Carmo, A.D.; Matos, A.M.; Cruz, M.T. Crosstalk between estrogen, dendritic cells, and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rev. Med. Virol. 2021, 32, e2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ao, T.; Kikuta, J.; Ishii, M. The Effects of Vitamin D on Immune System and Inflammatory Diseases. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sette, A.; Crotty, S. Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Cell 2021, 184, 861–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tarke, A.; Sidney, J.; Methot, N.; Yu, E.D.; Zhang, Y.; Dan, J.M.; Goodwin, B.; Rubiro, P.; Sutherland, A.; Wang, E.; et al. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on the total CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in infected or vaccinated individuals. Cell Rep. Med. 2021, 2, 100355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moss, P. The T cell immune response against SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Immunol. 2022, 23, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Meckiff, B.J.; Ramírez-Suástegui, C.; Fajardo, V.; Chee, S.J.; Kusnadi, A.; Simon, H.; Eschweiler, S.; Grifoni, A.; Pelosi, E.; Weiskopf, D.; et al. Imbalance of Regulatory and Cytotoxic SARS-CoV-2-Reactive CD4+ T Cells in COVID-19. Cell 2020, 183, 1340–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hu, B.; Huang, S.; Yin, L. The cytokine storm and COVID-19. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 93, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chauss, D.; Freiwald, T.; McGregor, R.; Yan, B.; Wang, L.; Nova-Lamperti, E.; Kumar, D.; Zhang, Z.; Teague, H.; West, E.E.; et al. Autocrine vitamin D signaling switches off pro-inflammatory programs of TH1 cells. Nat. Immunol. 2021, 23, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Russell, M.W.; Moldoveanu, Z.; Ogra, P.L.; Mestecky, J. Mucosal Immunity in COVID-19: A Neglected but Critical Aspect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 611337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Treptow, S.; Grün, J.; Scholz, J.; Radbruch, A.; Heine, G.; Worm, M. 9- cis Retinoic acid and 1.25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 drive differentiation into IgA + secreting plasmablasts in human naïve B cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2020, 51, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mistry, P.; Barmania, F.; Mellet, J.; Peta, K.; Strydom, A.; Viljoen, I.M.; James, W.; Gordon, S.; Pepper, M.S. SARS-CoV-2 Variants, Vaccines, and Host Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2022, 12, 809244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Martineau, A.R.; Jolliffe, D.A.; Hooper, R.L.; Greenberg, L.; Aloia, J.F.; Bergman, P.; Dubnov-Raz, G.; Esposito, S.; Ganmaa, D.; Ginde, A.A.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ 2017, 356, i6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Chiodini, I.; Gatti, D.; Soranna, D.; Merlotti, D.; Mingiano, C.; Fassio, A.; Adami, G.; Falchetti, A.; Eller-Vainicher, C.; Rossini, M.; et al. Vitamin D Status and SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 736665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lugg, S.T.; Mackay, W.R.; Faniyi, A.A.; Faustini, S.E.; Webster, C.; Duffy, J.E.; Hewison, M.; Shields, A.M.; Parekh, D.; Richter, A.G.; et al. Vitamin D status: A U-shaped relationship for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in UK healthcare workers. BMJ Open Respir. Res. 2022, 9, e001258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jones, G.; Prosser, D.E.; Kaufmann, M. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D-24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1): Its important role in the degradation of vitamin D. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2011, 523, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Griffin, G.; Hewison, M.; Hopkin, J.; Kenny, R.A.; Quinton, R.; Rhodes, J.; Subramanian, S.; Thickett, D. Perspective: Vitamin D supplementation prevents rickets and acute respiratory infections when given as daily maintenance but not as intermittent bolus: Implications for COVID-19. Clin. Med. 2021, 21, e144–e149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Takase, T.; Tsugawa, N.; Sugiyama, T.; Ikesue, H.; Eto, M.; Hashida, T.; Tomii, K.; Muroi, N. Association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and COVID-19 severity. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2022, 49, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nguyen, N.N.; Raju, M.N.P.; da Graca, B.; Wang, D.; Mohamed, N.A.; Mutnal, M.B.; Rao, A.; Bennett, M.; Gokingco, M.; Pham, H.; et al. 25-hydroxyvitamin D is a predictor of COVID-19 severity of hospitalized patients. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0268038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sulli, A.; Gotelli, E.; Casabella, A.; Paolino, S.; Pizzorni, C.; Alessandri, E.; Grosso, M.; Ferone, D.; Smith, V.; Cutolo, M. Vitamin D and Lung Outcomes in Elderly COVID-19 Patients. Nutrients 2021, 13, 717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ramirez-Sandoval, J.C.; Castillos-Ávalos, V.J.; Paz-Cortés, A.; Santillan-Ceron, A.; Hernandez-Jimenez, S.; Mehta, R.; Correa-Rotter, R. Very Low Vitamin D Levels are a Strong Independent Predictor of Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Severe COVID-19. Arch. Med. Res. 2021, 53, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Campi, I.; Gennari, L.; Merlotti, D.; Mingiano, C.; Frosali, A.; Giovanelli, L.; Torlasco, C.; Pengo, M.F.; Heilbron, F.; Soranna, D.; et al. Vitamin D and COVID-19 severity and related mortality: A prospective study in Italy. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Szerszeń, M.D.; Kucharczyk, A.; Bojarska-Senderowicz, K.; Pohorecka, M.; Śliwczyński, A.; Engel, J.; Korcz, T.; Kosior, D.; Walecka, I.; Zgliczyński, W.S.; et al. Effect of Vitamin D Concentration on Course of COVID-19. Med. Sci. Monit. 2022, 28, e937741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Robeck, R.S.; Moore, A.; Gendron, B. The Relationship of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D at Admission and Severity of Illness in COVID-19 Patients. Med. J. Ft. Sam. Houst Tex. 2022, Per 22-07/08/09, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  67. Neves, F.F.; Pott-Junior, H.; Santos, S.D.S.; Cominetti, M.R.; Freire, C.C.D.M.; da Cunha, A.F.; Júnior, A.A.J. Vitamin D deficiency predicts 30-day hospital mortality of adults with COVID-19. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2022, 50, 322–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gholi, Z.; Yadegarynia, D.; Eini-Zinab, H.; Shariatpanahi, Z.V. Vitamin D deficiency is Associated with Increased Risk of Delirium and Mortality among Critically Ill, Elderly Covid-19 Patients. Complement. Ther. Med. 2022, 70, 102855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Crafa, A.; Cannarella, R.; Condorelli, R.A.; Mongioì, L.M.; Barbagallo, F.; Aversa, A.; La Vignera, S.; Calogero, A.E. Corrigendum to: Influence of 25-hydroxy-cholecalciferol levels on SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eclinicalmedicine 2021, 41, 101168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kazemi, E.; Mansursamaei, A.; Rohani-Rasaf, M.; Sheibani, H. Comparison of the cardiovascular system, clinical condition, and laboratory results in COVID-19 patients with and without vitamin D insufficiency. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hu, Y.; Kung, J.; Cave, A.; Banh, H.L. Effects of Vitamin D Serum Level on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 25, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Akbar, M.R.; Wibowo, A.; Pranata, R.; Setiabudiawan, B. Low Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (Vitamin D) Level Is Associated with Susceptibility to COVID-19, Severity, and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 660420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Al Kiyumi, M.; Kalra, S.; Davies, J.; Kalhan, A. The impact of vitamin d deficiency on the severity of symptoms and mortality rate among adult patients with Covid-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 25, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, Z.; Joshi, A.; Leopold, K.; Jackson, S.; Christensen, S.; Nayfeh, T.; Mohammed, K.; Creo, A.; Tebben, P.; Kumar, S. Association of vitamin D deficiency with COVID-19 infection severity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Endocrinol. 2021, 96, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dissanayake, H.A.; de Silva, N.L.; Sumanatilleke, M.; de Silva, S.D.N.; Gamage, K.K.K.; Dematapitiya, C.; Kuruppu, D.C.; Ranasinghe, P.; Pathmanathan, S.; Katulanda, P. Prognostic and Therapeutic Role of Vitamin D in COVID-19: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 107, 1484–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Peng, D.; Huang, H.; Liu, Z.; Gao, Y.; Liu, Y. Vitamin D levels and clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2 in children: A longitudinal cohort study. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 960859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. D’Ecclesiis, O.; Gavioli, C.; Martinoli, C.; Raimondi, S.; Chiocca, S.; Miccolo, C.; Bossi, P.; Cortinovis, D.; Chiaradonna, F.; Palorini, R.; et al. Vitamin D and SARS-CoV2 infection, severity and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0268396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Antonelli, M.; Kushner, I. Low Serum Levels of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Accompany Severe COVID-19 Because it is a Negative Acute Phase Reactant. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 362, 333–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Smaha, J.; Kužma, M.; Jackuliak, P.; Nachtmann, S.; Max, F.; Tibenská, E.; Binkley, N.; Payer, J. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D Concentration Significantly Decreases in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia during the First 48 Hours after Hospital Admission. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Entrenas Castillo, M.E.; Entrenas Costa, L.M.E.; Vaquero Barrios, J.M.V.; Alcalá Díaz, J.F.A.; López Miranda, J.L.; Bouillon, R.; Quesada Gomez, J.M.Q. Effect of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 203, 105751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Elamir, Y.M.; Amir, H.; Lim, S.; Rana, Y.P.; Lopez, C.G.; Feliciano, N.V.; Omar, A.; Grist, W.P.; Via, M.A. A randomized pilot study using calcitriol in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Bone 2021, 154, 116175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zurita-Cruz, J.; Fonseca-Tenorio, J.; Villasís-Keever, M.; López-Alarcón, M.; Parra-Ortega, I.; López-Martínez, B.; Miranda-Novales, G. Efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation in hospitalized COVID-19 pediatric patients: A randomized controlled trial. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 943529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cervero, M.; López-Wolf, D.; Casado, G.; Novella-Mena, M.; Ryan-Murua, P.; Taboada-Martínez, M.L.; Rodríguez-Mora, S.; Vigón, L.; Coiras, M.; Torres, M. Beneficial Effect of Short-Term Supplementation of High Dose of Vitamin D3 in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter, Single-Blinded, Prospective Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 863587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Sánchez-Zuno, G.; González-Estevez, G.; Matuz-Flores, M.; Macedo-Ojeda, G.; Hernández-Bello, J.; Mora-Mora, J.; Pérez-Guerrero, E.; García-Chagollán, M.; Vega-Magaña, N.; Turrubiates-Hernández, F.; et al. Vitamin D Levels in COVID-19 Outpatients from Western Mexico: Clinical Correlation and Effect of Its Supplementation. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sabico, S.; Enani, M.A.; Sheshah, E.; Aljohani, N.J.; Aldisi, D.A.; Alotaibi, N.H.; Alshingetti, N.; Alomar, S.Y.; Alnaami, A.M.; Amer, O.E.; et al. Effects of a 2-Week 5000 IU versus 1000 IU Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Recovery of Symptoms in Patients with Mild to Moderate Covid-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Karonova, T.L.; Golovatyuk, K.A.; Kudryavtsev, I.V.; Chernikova, A.T.; Mikhaylova, A.A.; Aquino, A.D.; Lagutina, D.I.; Zaikova, E.K.; Kalinina, O.V.; Golovkin, A.S.; et al. Effect of Cholecalciferol Supplementation on the Clinical Features and Inflammatory Markers in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Center Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Annweiler, C.; Beaudenon, M.; Gautier, J.; Gonsard, J.; Boucher, S.; Chapelet, G.; Darsonval, A.; Fougère, B.; Guérin, O.; Houvet, M.; et al. COVIT-TRIAL study group. High-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D supplementation in older adults with COVID-19 (COVIT-TRIAL): A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial. PLOS Med. 2022, 19, e1003999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jolliffe, D.A.; Holt, H.; Greenig, M.; Talaei, M.; Perdek, N.; Pfeffer, P.; Vivaldi, G.; Maltby, S.; Symons, J.; Barlow, N.L.; et al. Effect of a test-and-treat approach to vitamin D supplementation on risk of all cause acute respiratory tract infection and covid-19: Phase 3 randomised controlled trial (CORONAVIT). BMJ 2022, 378, e071230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Maghbooli, Z.; Sahraian, M.A.; Jamalimoghadamsiahkali, S.; Asadi, A.; Zarei, A.; Zendehdel, A.; Varzandi, T.; Mohammadnabi, S.; Alijani, N.; Karimi, M.; et al. Treatment with 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 (Calcifediol) is Associated with a Reduction in the Blood Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Marker of Disease Severity in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Pilot Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial. Endocr. Pract. 2021, 27, 1242–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rastogi, A.; Bhansali, A.; Khare, N.; Suri, V.; Yaddanapudi, N.; Sachdeva, N.; Puri, G.D.; Malhotra, P. Short term, high-dose vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 disease: A randomised, placebo-controlled, study (SHADE study). Postgrad. Med. J. 2020, 98, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. De Niet, S.; Trémège, M.; Coffiner, M.; Rousseau, A.-F.; Calmes, D.; Frix, A.-N.; Gester, F.; Delvaux, M.; Dive, A.-F.; Guglielmi, E.; et al. Positive Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. A Villasis-Keever, M.; López-Alarcón, M.G.; Miranda-Novales, G.; Zurita-Cruz, J.N.; Barrada-Vázquez, A.S.; González-Ibarra, J.; Martínez-Reyes, M.; Grajales-Muñiz, C.; E Santacruz-Tinoco, C.; Martínez-Miguel, B.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Vitamin D Supplementation to Prevent COVID-19 in Frontline Healthcare Workers. A Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch. Med. Res. 2022, 53, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Murai, I.H.; Fernandes, A.L.; Sales, L.P.; Pinto, A.J.; Goessler, K.F.; Duran, C.S.C.; Silva, C.B.R.; Franco, A.S.; Macedo, M.B.; Dalmolin, H.H.H.; et al. Effect of a Single High Dose of Vitamin D3 on Hospital Length of Stay in Patients With Moderate to Severe COVID-19. JAMA 2021, 325, 1053–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Mariani, J.; Antonietti, L.; Tajer, C.; Ferder, L.; Inserra, F.; Cunto, M.S.; Brosio, D.; Ross, F.; Zylberman, M.; López, D.E.; et al. High-dose vitamin D versus placebo to prevent complications in COVID-19 patients: Multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0267918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Brunvoll, S.H.; Nygaard, A.B.; Ellingjord-Dale, M.; Holland, P.; Istre, M.S.; Kalleberg, K.T.; Søraas, C.L.; Holven, K.B.; Ulven, S.M.; Hjartåker, A.; et al. Prevention of covid-19 and other acute respiratory infections with cod liver oil supplementation, a low dose vitamin D supplement: Quadruple blinded, randomised placebo controlled trial. BMJ 2022, 378, e071245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sharif, N.; Alzahrani, K.J.; Ahmed, S.N.; Dey, S.K. Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 714170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Chiu, S.-K.; Tsai, K.-W.; Wu, C.-C.; Zheng, C.-M.; Yang, C.-H.; Hu, W.-C.; Hou, Y.-C.; Lu, K.-C.; Chao, Y.-C. Putative Role of Vitamin D for COVID-19 Vaccination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ma, Y.; Zhu, P.; Zhong, G.; Wang, D.; Cao, L.; Bai, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, A.; Wang, X. Serial negative response after standard and third (Booster) dose of COVID-19 inactivated vaccine is associated with low vitamin D levels in patients with solid cancers. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 898606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jolliffe, D.A.; Vivaldi, G.; Chambers, E.S.; Cai, W.; Li, W.; Faustini, S.E.; Gibbons, J.M.; Pade, C.; Coussens, A.K.; Richter, A.G.; et al. Vitamin D Supplementation Does Not Influence SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Efficacy or Immunogenicity: Sub-Studies Nested within the CORONAVIT Randomised Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Camargo, C.A., Jr.; Martineau, A.R. Vitamin D to prevent COVID-19: Recommendations for the design of clinical trials. FEBS J. 2020, 287, 3689–3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 14 04907 g001 550
Figure 1. Main biological effects of SARS-CoV-2 and active vitamin D on immune cells. Abbreviations: AB: antibodies, Ig: immunoglobulin; IFN: interferon; IL: interleukin; TH: T helper; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; M1: classically activated macrophages; M2: alternatively activated macrophages; NETs: neutrophil extracellular traps. Symbols: ↑: upregulation; ↓: downregulation. Produced at www.biorender.com (accessed on 11 November 2022).
Figure 1. Main biological effects of SARS-CoV-2 and active vitamin D on immune cells. Abbreviations: AB: antibodies, Ig: immunoglobulin; IFN: interferon; IL: interleukin; TH: T helper; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; M1: classically activated macrophages; M2: alternatively activated macrophages; NETs: neutrophil extracellular traps. Symbols: ↑: upregulation; ↓: downregulation. Produced at www.biorender.com (accessed on 11 November 2022).
Nutrients 14 04907 g001
Table
Table 1. Randomized double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials regarding the biological and clinical effects of vitamin D supplementation in COVID-19 prevention and treatment.
Table 1. Randomized double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials regarding the biological and clinical effects of vitamin D supplementation in COVID-19 prevention and treatment.
TrialsStudy PopulationPatients’ Cohorts’ CharacteristicsRecruitment PeriodTime of Follow-UpSupplementation RegimenEffects of Vitamin D Supplementation
Treatment with 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (calcifediol) is associated with a reduction in the blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio marker of disease severity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a pilot multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial (Maghbooli Z et al., 2021, Ref. [89])106 COVID-19 adult hospitalized patients with 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations < 30 ng/mL53 patients on vitamin D3 group
53 patients on placebo group		May 2020–October 20202 months25 mcg of 25(OH)D3 daily (equivalent to 3000–6000 IU of
cholecalciferol) in addition to standard care		Increase in neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio
Short term, high-dose vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, study (SHADE study) (Rastogi A et al. 2022, Ref. [90])40 COVID-19 hospitalized patients with mild symptoms or asymptomatic16 patients with 25(OH)D serum concentrations < 20 ng/mL received vitamin D3 treatment
24 patients received placebo		202021 days60,000 IU daily of cholecalciferol (oral nano-liquid droplets) for a week in addition to standard care. If 25(OH)D serum concentrations were < 50 ng/mL in the treatment group, supplementation was continued for another weekFaster healing
Decrease in serum fibrinogen
Positive effects of vitamin D supplementation in patients hospitalized for COVID-19: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (De Niet S et al., 2022, Ref. [91])50 COVID-19 hospitalized patients with 25(OH)D3 serum concentrations < 20 ng/mL26 patients received vitamin D3 supplementation
24 patients received placebo		August 2020–August 20219 weeks25,000 IU daily of cholecalciferol over four consecutive days followed by 25,000 IU weekly of cholecalciferol in addition to best available treatmentDecrease in length of hospital stay
Decrease in duration of supplemental oxygen request
Improve of clinical recovery, assessed by WHO scale
Efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation to prevent COVID-19 in frontline healthcare workers. A randomized clinical trial. (Villasis-Keever. et al., 2022, Ref. [92])321 SARS-CoV-2 free healthcare workers not receiving vitamin D supplementation160 healthcare workers received vitamin D supplementation
161 healthcare workers received placebo		15 July 2020–30 December 202030 days4000 IU daily of cholecalciferol capsulesLower infection rate without serious adverse events
Effect of a single high dose of vitamin D3 on hospital length of stay in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial (Murai IH et al., 2021, Ref. [93])240 COVID-19 adult hospitalized patients120 patients received vitamin D supplementation
120 patients received placebo		2 June 2020–7 October 2020Hospitalization period200,000 IU of cholecalciferol in a single oral doseNo effects on in-hospital mortality, admission to intensive care unit or need for mechanical ventilation
High-dose vitamin D versus placebo to prevent complications in COVID-19 patients; multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial (Mariani J et al. 2022, Ref. [94])218 COVID-19 adult hospitalized patients115 patients received vitamin D3 supplementation
103 patients received placebo		14 August 2020–22 June 2021Hospitalization period500,000 IU of oral cholecalciferol (5 capsules of 100,000 IU) in a single oral doseNo change in the respiratory Sepsis related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between baseline and the highest value recorded up to day 7
No difference for length of hospital stays, intensive care unit admissions and in-hospital mortality
Prevention of COVID-19 and other acute respiratory infections with cod liver oil supplementation, a low dose vitamin D supplement: quadruple blinded, randomised placebo controlled trial (Brunvoll SH et al., 2017, Ref. [95])34,601 adults not receiving vitamin D supplementation17,278 adults received cod liver oil
17,323 adults received placebo		10 November 2020–2 June 20216 months400 IU daily of cholecalciferolNo decrease in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and serious COVID-19 (self-reported dyspnoea, admission to hospital, death)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gotelli, E.; Soldano, S.; Hysa, E.; Paolino, S.; Campitiello, R.; Pizzorni, C.; Sulli, A.; Smith, V.; Cutolo, M. Vitamin D and COVID-19: Narrative Review after 3 Years of Pandemic. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4907. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14224907

AMA Style

Gotelli E, Soldano S, Hysa E, Paolino S, Campitiello R, Pizzorni C, Sulli A, Smith V, Cutolo M. Vitamin D and COVID-19: Narrative Review after 3 Years of Pandemic. Nutrients. 2022; 14(22):4907. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14224907

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gotelli, Emanuele, Stefano Soldano, Elvis Hysa, Sabrina Paolino, Rosanna Campitiello, Carmen Pizzorni, Alberto Sulli, Vanessa Smith, and Maurizio Cutolo. 2022. "Vitamin D and COVID-19: Narrative Review after 3 Years of Pandemic" Nutrients 14, no. 22: 4907. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14224907

APA Style

Gotelli, E., Soldano, S., Hysa, E., Paolino, S., Campitiello, R., Pizzorni, C., Sulli, A., Smith, V., & Cutolo, M. (2022). Vitamin D and COVID-19: Narrative Review after 3 Years of Pandemic. Nutrients, 14(22), 4907. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14224907

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop