Next Article in Journal
Cyperus esculentus L. and Tetracarpidium conophorum Müll. Arg. Supplemented Diet Improved Testosterone Levels, Modulated Ectonucleotidases and Adenosine Deaminase Activities in Platelets from L-NAME-Stressed Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Inadequate Intake of Dietary Fibre in Adolescents, Adults, and Elderlies: Results of Slovenian Representative SI. Menu Study
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Intake, Eating Behavior, Physical Activity, and Quality of Life in Infertile Women with PCOS and Obesity Compared with Non-PCOS Obese Controls
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Nutrient Intake and Food Consumption among Dutch Toddlers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/nu13103528
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vitamin D Intake in Slovenian Adolescents, Adults, and the Elderly Population

by
Maša Hribar
1,2,
Hristo Hristov
1,
Živa Lavriša
1,
Barbara Koroušić Seljak
3,
Matej Gregorič
4,
Urška Blaznik
4,
Katja Žmitek
1,5 and
Igor Pravst
1,2,5,*
1
Nutrition Institute, Tržaška Cesta 40, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3
Computer Systems Department, Jozef Stefan Institute, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
4
National Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
5
VIST–Higher School of Applied Sciences, Gerbičeva cesta 51A, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(10), 3528; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103528
Submission received: 10 September 2021 / Revised: 29 September 2021 / Accepted: 5 October 2021 / Published: 8 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue European Dietary Surveys: What's on the Menu?)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vitamin D is involved in calcium and phosphorus metabolism, and is vital for numerous bodily functions. In the absence of sufficient UV-B light-induced skin biosynthesis, dietary intake becomes the most important source of vitamin D. In the absence of biosynthesis, the recommended dietary vitamin D intake is 10–20 µg/day. Major contributors to dietary vitamin D intake are the few foods naturally containing vitamin D (i.e., fish), enriched foods, and supplements. The present study aimed to estimate the vitamin D intake in Slovenia, to identify food groups that notably contribute to vitamin D intake, and to predict the effects of hypothetical mandatory milk fortification. This study was conducted using data collected by the national cross-sectional food consumption survey (SI.Menu) in adolescents (n = 468; 10–17 years), adults (n = 364; 18–64 years), and the elderly (n = 416; 65–74 years). Data collection was carried out between March 2017 and April 2018 using the EU Menu Methodology, which included two 24-h recalls, and a food propensity questionnaire. Very low vitamin D intakes were found; many did not even meet the threshold for very low vitamin D intake (2.5 µg/day). Mean daily vitamin D intake was 2.7, 2.9, and 2.5 µg in adolescents, adults, and the elderly, respectively. Daily energy intake was found to be a significant predictor of vitamin D intake in all population groups. In adolescents and adults, sex was also found to be a significant predictor, with higher vitamin D intake in males. The study results explained the previously reported high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in Slovenia. An efficient policy approach is required to address the risk of vitamin D deficiency, particularly in vulnerable populations.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D (VitD) deficiency and insufficiency are global health issues, posing a major public health risk [1,2]. Poor VitD status is connected with skeletal and non-skeletal health issues, including the functioning of the immune system [3,4,5,6,7]. Maintenance of an optimal VitD status is therefore of the utmost importance. The most common biomarker of VitD status is the serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D). Optimal VitD status can be achieved by biosynthesis in the human skin when exposed to sufficient ultraviolet B light radiation (UVB) [8]. In the absence of or with insufficient UVB skin irradiation, VitD becomes an essential nutrient, and needs to be provided by dietary intake. Due to the changing solar zenith angle in European countries situated above the latitude of 35° N [9] (including Slovenia; 45–46° N [10]), the intensity of UVB light in wintertime is not sufficient to induce cutaneous synthesis of VitD [11]. In such cases, dietary intake becomes a major source of VitD [12,13]. The term Vitamin D usually covers two fat-soluble vitamers, namely ergocalciferol (D2) and cholecalciferol (D3). While D3 is obtained by endogenous synthesis via UVB exposure and diet (animal sources), the source of D2 is solely from the diet (from fungi). Overall, dietary VitD intake is obtained through food naturally rich in VitD, VitD-enriched food, or prescribed and over-the-counter medicines and supplements. The majority of foods are a naturally poor source of VitD, with the exception of oil-rich fish and eggs [12]. These VitD-rich foods tend to be consumed quite rarely or in smaller quantities [14], whereas poorer VitD sources (such as meat and meat products, milk products, and animal fats) are consumed regularly, and therefore constitute the majority of dietary VitD intake [15]. In addition to naturally occurring VitD, its content can be enhanced during production or processing; this is achieved through bioaddition and/or fortification. The term bioaddition is used to describe processes that are used during food production to enhance naturally occurring VitD, by feeding the animal a VitD-rich diet (used in meat and eggs) or by UVB irradiation of mushrooms or yeast [16]. The term fortification usually describes a process where either D2 or D3 is added near or at the end of food processing [16]. VitD fortification was initially used in cow’s milk to prevent rickets in Northern America and Europe [17]. In addition to dairy products, other types of foods are now also used as a vehicle of fortification, such as orange juice, cereal-based foods, and infant formulas [15]. Fortification can be either voluntary or mandatory policy. While a few countries, such as the USA, Canada, Australia, and Finland, have implemented regulated food fortification to increase dietary VitD intake [18], most countries have voluntary VitD fortification (also called “enrichment”) [18,19,20,21,22]. As in most European Union (EU) countries, this is also the case in Slovenia, where there are no recommendations regarding VitD fortification. The choice of fortification is in the hands of food manufacturers, and later is the choice of the end consumers. An important source of VitD intake is also supplementation with prescribed and over-the-counter medicines and food supplements. VitD is available both in multivitamin/multimineral and single-component products. These typically contain daily dosages of up to about 100 µg [16,23]. It should be noted that in Slovenia, VitD is routinely prescribed to children during the first year (10 µg), and further supplementation is recommended until the age of 18 years [24], while there is no official supplementation recommendation for the general adult population. However, in Slovenia during the COVID-19 pandemic, the typical non-medical prescribed VitD supplementation dosage in adults was 25 µg per day [23].
The low VitD status across the world is alarming [1,2,25,26], and this is also the case in Slovenia [11]. A previous study representative of Slovenia showed that during the extended winter period (November–April), 40.8% of adults in Slovenia had a serum 25(OH)D level below the critical level of 30 nmol/L, and 81.6% were below the recommended 50 nmol/L [11]; however, that study did not investigate dietary intake of VitD. It should be noted that thresholds for deficiency, insufficiency, and optimal status are still not fully harmonised across organisations [26,27,28,29,30,31], and there is a lack of consensus on the recommended daily intake of VitD [32]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends 10 µg/day (400 International Units (IUs)) for those aged 51–65 years, and 15 µg/day (600 IU) for those aged over 65 years [27], whereas the daily recommended level by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is 15 µg/day (600 IU) for all ages [30]. A level of 20 µg/day (800 IU) is recommended by D-A-CH (the nutrition societies of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) [33]. These recommendations typically refer to VitD intake in the absence of UVB-induced endogenous synthesis [30,33]. Interestingly, for food labeling purposes, the nutrient reference value (NRV) for VitD is still set at 5 µg/day [34], and 50% of NRV (2.5 µg/day) has been used as a lower reference nutrient intake (LRNI) [35]. Several studies have reported VitD intakes well below the recommendations. In Europe, the reported VitD intake is generally between 3 and 5 µg per day [14,31,35,36,37,38,39,40], with higher intakes in Northern Europe (up to 11 µg/day) and lower in Southern Europe [14,26,37,38,41]. In Slovenia, only some specific population groups have been investigated (such as children [42,43], teenagers [44,45,46], and others [47,48,49,50,51]); nationally representative data for the healthy adult population are not available. Regarding the VitD intake, Lichthammer et al. [52] included populations (15–75 years) from four Central-Eastern European countries (including 81 subjects from Slovenia), and reported very low mean VitD intakes in all countries (the lowest in Austria with 2.2 µg daily, followed by Slovenia (2.6 µg), Poland (3.8 µg), and Hungary (4.1 µg)).
To address the challenge of the low VitD status in Slovenia, the National expert working group on guidelines for sufficient vitamin D levels in the Slovenian population was established by the National Institute of Public Health, at the request of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia. The objective of the present study was to estimate the nationally representative VitD intake in the adolescent, adult, and elderly populations in Slovenia. We also aimed to identify food groups that notably contribute to VitD intake, and to estimate changes in dietary VitD intakes in the hypothetical scenario of mandatory milk fortification.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

Data were collected within the scope of the cross-sectional Slovenian national food consumption survey (SI.Menu study). Data collection was carried out between March 2017 and April 2018 using the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) Guidance on EU Menu Methodology [53]. The detailed study methodology is described in detail elsewhere [54]. In short, the participants were Slovenian residents, selected using the Central Register of the Population of Slovenia according to age, size and type of household, and place of residency. A total of 2280 individuals were allocated to three age groups: adolescents (10–17 years old), adults (18–64 years old), and the elderly (65–74 years old). Altogether, the response rate was 62.2% (n = 1319). The survey protocol was registered and accepted by the National Medical Ethics Committee (KME 0120-337/2016). All participants were informed about the details of the survey, and thereafter signed a written informed consent form. For the participants younger than 18 years of age, written consent was also obtained from the parent or legal guardian. Data were collected by skilled interviewers, during two interviews. The first interview included a general questionnaire, following by the food propensity questionnaire (FPQ), and the first 24 h dietary recall, while the second interview included second 24 h dietary recall.

2.2. Dietary Assessment Methods

2.2.1. General Questionnaire and Anthropometric Measurements

At the first face-to-face interview, participants completed a general questionnaire using computer-assisted personal interviewing. The questionnaire was adapted for adolescents and adults/the elderly. It included questions on socio-economic and socio-demographic determinants, such as marital status, place of living, level of education, employment status, and monthly income of the household. Participants also provided self-reported physical activity levels, which were converted to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) score, as described by Craig et al. [55]. Participants’ weight and height were measured by using calibrated instruments at the end of the first interview.

2.2.2. 24-h Dietary Recall

The interviewers performed two 24-h dietary recalls. The first recall was performed with a computer-assisted face-to-face interviewer, the second recall was repeated between 7 days to 3 weeks after the first one and was administered either by computer-assisted telephone interview or by face-to-face interview. During the recall, participants were asked to report their intake data for food and beverages consumed during the preceding day, following a daily meal timeline. Portion sizes were estimated using a nationally adjusted and validated picture book, developed in “Pilot study for the Assessment of Nutrient Intake and Food Consumption Among Kids in Europe” (PANCAKE), that contained 46 pictures of different food products or simple recipes, with each one photographed in six different portion sizes [54,56].

2.2.3. Food Propensity Questionnaire

As recommended by the EFSA, a FPQ was used to record the usual frequency of consumption of specific foods and food supplements in the last 12 months [53,57]. In total, 75 food items were allocated into nine food groups: cereals and cereal products; milk and milk products; fruit; vegetables; meat, fish, eggs, and meat products; fats and fatty food; sugar and sweeteners; beverages; and miscellaneous. The frequency response options for the food list were never, 1–3 times per month or less, once per week, 2–3 times per week, 4–6 times per week, and 1–2 times per day or more. A special field was dedicated to food supplement use, where examples were listed (e.g., multivitamins, vitamin D, proteins, omega 3 and omega 6 fatty acids, etc.), and there was the possibility to add more.

2.3. Assessment of Nutrient Intake

All foods and beverages reported during the 24-h recalls were assigned the appropriate energy and nutrient contents based on compositional data from the Open Platform for Clinical Nutrition (OPEN) [58]. The OPEN is a web-based application based on the national food composition database, which contains information and data for ingredients and recipes frequently used in Slovenia. To enable an accurate estimation of the nutritional composition of more complex foods and dishes, a disaggregation method was applied based on the recipes provided by the subjects, when applicable, or traditional recipes collected in the OPEN platform. To estimate the usual daily VitD intake in the population, we used the Multiple Source Method (MSM) analysis [59], in which reported foods were allotted into corresponding food categories, included in the FPQ [53].
All the extracted foods (n = 2377) from the SI.Menu consumption dataset were checked by a nutrition expert, and missing composition data were supplemented with VitD content. When the VitD content of the food was not found in OPEN, additional food composition databases were used (the National Food Composition Database in Finland (Fineli) [60], The Composition of Foods [61], or the United States Department of Agriculture Food Composition Database (USDA) [62]). Altogether, 63.4% of food items from the whole list were determined to be a source of dietary VitD. For assessment of the hypothetical VitD intake in the scenario of mandatory milk fortification, we assumed that all types of milk were enriched with an additional 2 µg of VitD per 100 mL [63].

2.4. Data Analysis

Exclusion criteria and assessment of under- and over-reporting subjects are explained in Zupanič et al. [64]. In short, subjects with incomplete anthropometric and/or 24-h recall data, and over-and under-reporting (based on the ratio of reported energy intake, with consideration of metabolic rate) were excluded. The final sample contained 1248 valid subjects: 468 adolescents, 364 adults, and 416 elderly subjects.
Usual VitD intake distributions per age group, adjusted for within individual day-to-day variation, were modelled with the MSM [59]. This method examines different food and nutrient distributions to estimate adjusted population distributions. It is characterised by a two-part shrinkage technique applied to residuals of two regression models, one for the positive daily intake data and one for the event of consumption. The shrunken residuals are back-transformed to their original scale, and the individual usual intake is obtained by multiplication of the frequency and amounts. The MSM was used to correct dietary intake data for intra- and inter-personal variability. Corrections were carried out only for food categories (28/101) identified as a source of VitD. Corrections for the reported frequency of food consumption were carried out for all categories which were included in the FPQ. We should note that while most (24/28) of the relevant food categories that are a source of VitD were included in the FPQ, this was not the case for a few products, including eggs. For such foods, the consumption was estimated only with consideration of 24 h recall data, without correction by FPQ data. Sex and body mass index (BMI) were included as covariates in the models. After the MSM was applied, individual usual daily intakes of VitD were calculated [65]. The same approach was used for the estimation of VitD intake in the hypothetical scenario of mandatory milk fortification, but different food composition data were used (details provided in Section 2.3).
Descriptive characteristics (mean, median, proportions) are presented for age cohorts and per different socio-demographic-, anthropometric-, and individual-based variables within each age group. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the significant differences between different sub-populations in terms of VitD intake. The adjusted means of VitD intake were determined by sex, place of living, BMI, and IPAQ levels for all age groups, while education and income were also used for adults and the elderly, and employment status was used only for adults. Some models were adjusted for energy intake. To report nationally representative epidemiological data, weighting was carried out with iterative proportional fitting [66], with consideration of age and sex, using census data from the 2017 reference population. The prevalence of very low VitD consumption was found using a previously defined LRNI threshold of 2.5 µg/day [35], separately for all age groups, with adjustments for socio-demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle parameters. Model parameters were estimated by the maximum likelihood method. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as a measure of relative risk for very low VitD intake (less than LRNI). Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05, except where it is stated otherwise.
The MSM online tool V1.0.1 (https://msm.dife.de/; accessed on 6 June 2021; the Department of Epidemiology of the German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Germany) was used for estimation of individual nutrient intakes, while statistical analyses were conducted using STATA V15.1 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

We analyzed data for three population groups in the SI.Menu study [54]; adolescents, adults, and the elderly. The study population was representative for sex and age (10–17/18–64/65–75 years). The most relevant demographic and lifestyle characteristics of the study sample are outlined in Table 1. VitD supplementation was explicitly reported by 3.6%, 6.0%, and 4.8% of adolescents, adults, and the elderly, respectively. When considering both the use of VitD and multivitamin products, the proportion of supplementation was 17.1%, 17.3%, and 7.0%, in adolescents, adults, and the elderly, respectively (Table 1). Our study design unfortunately did not provide enough detail about supplementation patterns to estimate intakes of VitD with medicines and/or food supplements, or to investigate seasonal differences in supplementation practices. VitD intakes in this study, therefore, corresponded to consumption of regular foods, without food supplements.
A comparison of the 24 h recalls and FPQ data showed notable differences in the ability of both methods to identify true consumers of specific food categories (Supplementary Table S1). For example, the proportion of true consumers of sea fish was up to 10% higher when FPQ data were considered. Therefore, the usual dietary VitD food intakes were estimated using the MSM method, with consideration of both 24 h recalls and FPQ data [53].
Population-weighted dietary VitD intake for all three study populations is presented in Table 2. The mean VitD intake was 2.73 µg/day (95% CI: 2.56–2.91), 2.85 µg/day (95% CI: 2.69–3.00), and 2.45 µg/day (95% CI: 2.34–2.57) for adolescents, adults, and the elderly, respectively. When adjusting for energy intakes, mean VitD intakes were 1.24, 1.34 and 1.20 µg per 1000 kcal per day, respectively. The highest prevalence of very low VitD intakes (below 2.5 µg/day) was observed in the elderly population (61.0%), followed by adolescents (55.0%) and adults (45.8%).
Adjusted mean VitD intakes by sex, place of living, BMI, IPAQ score, education, income, and employment for different age groups are presented in Table 3, with separate models for all three study populations, and are additionally adjusted for energy intake. Linear regression analyses showed that energy intake was a significant predictor of VitD intake for all three population groups (higher VitD intake for higher energy intake), while sex, education level, and BMI were significant predictors only in some models. Sex determined the VitD intake in adolescents and adults; in both cases, higher intakes were observed in males. Body mass index (BMI) was found to be a significant predictor only in adolescents, with lower VitD intake in those who were overweight/obese, while education was found to be a significant determinant of VitD intake in the elderly population, with the highest VitD intake in those with a university degree. Similar trends were also observed in other models investigating the likelihood of a very low VitD intake (Figure 1). For all three population groups, the model used a threshold of lower reference nutrient intake (LRNI; 2.5 µg/day). Sex was again found to be a significant predictor in adolescents (p < 0.001), adults (p < 0.001), and the elderly (p < 0.005), with higher odds ratios in females. In comparison with adolescent males, adolescent females were 3.47 (95% CI: 2.3–5.2) times more likely to have intakes below the LRNI, while in adults, this difference was even more pronounced (OR 10.29; 95% CI: 5.8–18.4). BMI was also a significant (p < 0.001) predictor in adolescents, with an OR 2.88 (95% CI: 1.9–4.5) times higher for overweight/obese subjects.
We further investigated the relative contributions of specific food categories to the dietary VitD intakes for the three investigated age groups (Figure 2). Beef, veal and pork meat, sea fish, and eggs were found to be the most important contributors of VitD intake among all age groups, with minor differences among groups. These food groups contributed from 13 to 20% of the dietary VitD intake. Processed meat and fish (fish cans and pate, and sausages, hot dogs, and meat pate) together contributed up to 11% of the VitD intake. In adolescents, processed breakfast cereals (sweetened flakes) were also found as a notable VitD source (~7%), while this was not observed in adults and the elderly population.
For a more comprehensive insight into the importance of specific foods for VitD intake, we also investigated population-weighted consumption patterns for age groups (Supplementary Table S2), with the use of a threshold for LRNI (2.5 µg/day). In all age groups, those with a very low VitD intake reported a lower consumption of sea fish. In adolescents, this was also observed for beef, veal, and pork meat, sweetened flakes, and mushrooms. Among the adult population, those with intakes below LRNI had also lower intakes of fish cans and pate, sausages, hot dogs, and meat pate, milk, cakes and rolls, milk ice-cream and milk pudding, butter, biscuits and wafers, croissants and similar products, and ready and half-ready meals. In the elderly age group, the same applied to fish cans and pate, cheese and cheese products, milk, and mushrooms.
Our study also aimed to estimate changes in dietary VitD intakes in a hypothetical scenario of mandatory milk fortification. Using food intake data from all age groups, we modelled VitD intake in the scenario in which all milk would be fortified with 2 µg of VitD per 100 mL. As presented in Figure 3 and Table 4, the effect of such mandatory fortification would be most notable in adolescents. The projected increase in daily VitD intake due to milk fortification was 2 µg for adolescents and about 1 µg for adults and the elderly population. The estimated total mean VitD intake after accounting for the fortification would be 4.82 µg (SD: 2.51), 4.01 µg (SD: 1.88), and 3.58 µg (SD: 1.79) for adolescents, adults, and the elderly, respectively.

4. Discussion

While a very high prevalence of VitD deficiency has been reported recently in Slovenia [11], there was no nationally representative data available on the dietary intakes of VitD. Using data collected by the Slovenian national food consumption survey (SI.Menu) we estimated daily VitD intakes using two non-consecutive 24 h dietary recalls and FPQ data. Three different age groups (adolescents, adults, and the elderly) were included in the analyses of VitD intake. That estimated VitD intakes were 2.73 µg/day, 2.85 µg/day, and 2.45 µg/day, respectively. While Lichthammer et al. [52] reported similar daily VitD intakes, they observed the highest intakes in their youngest age group (14–18 years; 3.72 µg/day). It should be noted that in their study, VitD intake was estimated with a different method (food frequency questionnaire; FFQ), and that their sample size was much smaller (n = 434 with 81 subjects from Slovenia). VitD intakes have been investigated in some other Slovenian populations, such as children [42,43], teenagers [44,45,46], and others [47,48,49,50,51]. VitD intake in adolescents varied from 2 to 4 µg/day [44,46], and was 2.1 µg/day in pregnant women [49]. In the elderly living in residential homes, intakes were particularly concerning (1 µg/day) [51]. When comparing our results to other European countries, we found many similarities. In two studies from neighboring Austria, the VitD intake was 2.1 µg/d (n = 4972; various dietary intake tools; all age groups above 4 years) [67], with the highest intakes in the adult population. The intake was 2.53 µg/d in a study by Kudlacek et al. (n = 1048; 21–76 years) [68]. In girls (11–17 years), the mean VitD intake ranged from 1.5 µg/day in Spain to 3.2 µg/day in Poland, whereas for boys (11–17 years), intakes ranged from 1.9 µg/day in France to 4.8 µg/day in Poland [35]. VitD intake in the elderly population (>65 years) ranged from 0.7 µg/day in Spain to 15 µg/day in Norway [38]. Across Europe, mean VitD intake varied from 1.1 to 6 µg per day [14,31,36,37,38,39,40], with higher intakes in Northern Europe (up to 14 µg/day) and lower intakes in Southern Europe [14,26,37,38,41]. Higher intakes in Northern Europe can be explained by the higher intake of fish and VitD enriched foods.
In adolescents and adults, our results indicate higher intakes of VitD in males; however, this difference was not significant in the elderly population. The same pattern was observed when looking at the odds ratio (OR) for VitD intakes below the lower reference nutrient intake (LRNI; 2.5 µg/d). Adolescent males had an adjusted VitD intake of 2.95 µg/d, in comparison to 2.52 µg/d in females. Meanwhile, the adjusted intake in adult males was 3.21 µg/d in comparison to 2.31 µg/d in adult females. Males usually have higher VitD intakes than women [14,37], which is also related to the higher amount of consumed food. This was also observed in our study, where daily energy intake was a significant predictor of VitD intake. Furthermore, in adolescents, those with normal BMI had a significantly higher intake of VitD (and lower OR for very low VitD intake) in comparison with overweight or obese adolescents. Similar observations were made in a study from Northern Norway [69], but in the adult population. In the elderly, VitD intake was statistically higher among those with a higher education level. Similar observations were reported in two Swiss studies in some population groups [70,71].
To investigate the prevalence of very low VitD intake, we took the cut-off value of 2.5 µg/day. The prevalence of intake below the LRNI was 55.0, 45.8, and 61.0% in adolescents, adults, and the elderly, respectively. The highest prevalence of below LRNI intake was among teenage females (72.6%), and the lowest was among adult males (21.0%). In the population of adolescent males, 38.8% had intakes below 2.5 µg/day, in comparison to 72.6% of females. In European adolescents (11–17 years), the prevalence of intakes of VitD below the LRNI ranged from 17.1% (Netherlands) to 81.7% (France) in males, and 36.6% (Netherlands) to 97.9% in females (Spain) [35]. In the Slovenian adult population, males had a much lower prevalence of below LRNI intakes (21.0%) than females (71.0%). The prevalence data from other European countries were also very varied, ranging from 26.8% (Netherlands; 31–60 years) to 94.7% (Spain; 18–60 years) in adult females, and from 7.3% (Netherlands; 31–60 years) to 87.4% (Spain; 18–60 years) in adult males [35]. In our elderly population, 58.2% of males and 63.5% of females had below LRNI intakes. In other elderly European populations (<60 years) [35], the prevalence ranged from 17.4% (Netherlands) to 100% (Spain) in females, and from 5.7% (Netherlands) to 100% (Spain) in males. We should also note that a notable trend of lower risk for very low VitD intake was observed in those with higher financial status in both adults and elderlies (OR 0.73 and 0.80, respectively), but was not statistically significant. This also corresponded to the observed trend of increased OR for unemployed (OR 2.03, p=0.14).
In the present study, the main contributors to VitD intake across age groups were eggs, sea fish, beef, veal, and pork, fish cans and pate, sweetened flakes (only in adolescents), and sausages, hot dogs, and meat pate. Likewise, in other European countries, the leading food group contributors to VitD intake were fish/shellfish, added fats, meats/meat products, cakes, cereals, and dairy products [31,37,72].
Very low dietary intake of VitD in the Slovenian population, shown in our study, partially explains the previously reported high prevalence of VitD deficiency during winter, when sun-induced biosynthesis of VitD is not sufficient [11]. While the public health outcomes of this epidemiological situation have not been well investigated, it should be mentioned that VitD is a key component in various bodily functions [3,4,5,6,7], also related to the functioning of the immune system and bone health. Although this study did not address this topic, it should be mentioned that Slovenia has been among the countries with the most severe death toll from COVID-19 (currently 2,174 deaths/1 mio. population [73]; the majority of those deaths occurred during the autumn/winter pandemic wave in 2020/21), and that we also have quite a high prevalence of osteoporosis in comparison with some other European countries. For example, in Slovenia, 27.5% of women over 50 years had osteoporosis [74], while reported rates for France and Span are much below 20% [75].
In Slovenia, there is no mandatory fortification of foods with VitD, or even national recommendations. However, rules for the enrichment of foods are defined in the EU Regulation No 1925/2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods [21], which enables the enrichment of foods with VitD using either cholecalciferol or ergocalciferol [76]. The fortification of foods with VitD (either mandatory or voluntarily based on national recommendations) is currently in place in North American and some European countries [77,78,79]. The amount of added VitD varies across countries, as do the food matrixes. Typical matrixes for fortification include milk and dairy products. In countries with implemented VitD fortification policies, the amount of added VitD is increasing [79]. Canada recently proposed a mandatory policy to increase fluid milk fortification from 1 µg to 2 µg/100 mL, due to inadequate VitD intake in the population [63]. Our goal was to investigate a hypothetical scenario in which milk was fortified with 2 µg of VitD per 100 mL of milk, as proposed in Canada [63]. The projected increase in daily dietary VitD intake in this model was 2.0 µg, 1.1 µg, and 1.0 µg in adolescents, adults, and the elderly, respectively. It should be noted that a review of Black et al. [80] showed that each ingested microgram of VitD with fortified food leads to an increase in serum 25(OH)D of 1.2 nmol/L. However, the problem of limiting fortification to milk is in the fact that not everyone in the population consumes milk (i.e., due to lactose intolerance, etc.), and the idea of mandatory fortification is to protect the general population. A preferable fortification approach may therefore be adding VitD in smaller amounts to various food matrixes [81]. Jääskeläinen et al. [77] reported the effects of the implementation of VitD fortification on VitD status in Finland. Their approach was to fortify both fluid milk (1.0 µg/100 g) and spreadable fats (20 µg/100 g). The intervention resulted in higher VitD intakes and a lower prevalence of VitD deficiency, based on serum 25(OH)D levels [77]. We should also mention that in Finland and the United States, fortified foods have the highest contribution to dietary VitD intake [82].
The strength of our study is that VitD intake was estimated with the exploitation of data collected with the Slovenian national SI.Menu food consumption survey, using both 24 h recalls and food propensity questionnaire data. Another strength is that sampling was carried out with three quotas, enabling insights into the more vulnerable populations of adolescents and the elderly. We should also mention that since the SI.Menu study collected a series of sociodemographic and lifestyle indicators, we were able to include those in the regression analyses. Study limitations should be also noted. While the SI.Menu study was designed using a very robust EU Menu methodology and harmonized with the EFSA, the study was not primarily designed to investigate dietary VitD intakes. The objective of the SI.Menu study was to collect data on food consumption in order to inform regulatory risk assessments related to the use of food additives, food contaminants, etc. Nutritional assessment was a secondary objective, and the FPQ was therefore not tailored for this purpose. Because of this, our FPQ dataset did not include the frequency of consumption of some foods (particularly eggs), which are an important source of VitD in the diet. Considering the study design, food composition (VitD content) needed to be estimated using food composition databases, and not with laboratory analyses. A methodological limitation is that in Slovenia, national food composition data do not include the amount of VitD in some foods, and we were therefore forced to use additional food composition databases. An important study limitation is also that we could only estimate daily intake of VitD with foods, without accounting for the use of medicines and food supplements. While the consumption of such products was included in the FPQ of the SI.Menu study, the collected data did not enable assessment of the corresponding VitD intake. The only available data regarding VitD supplements was if a person was taking them. In the present study, 3.6%, 6.0%, and 4.8% of adolescents, adults, and the elderly, respectively, reported the use of VitD supplements. However, supplementation can be an important additional source of VitD [14,83]. For example, a typical dosage of VitD in food supplements is much higher than the expected intake with foods, at 25 µg VitD daily dosage [23]. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic changed people’s behaviors considerably [84], and a much higher frequency of VitD supplementation was reported during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown in Slovenia [85], affecting VitD intakes considerably. However, the long-term effects of the pandemic are not known. Ideally, further research should focus on the assessment of VitD intakes from all sources in the post-COVID-19 period.

5. Conclusions

The estimated dietary intake of VitD in the Slovenian population was very low; 2.73 µg, 2.85 µg, and 2.45 µg in adolescents, adults, and the elderlies, respectively. The VitD intake was well below the recommended intake in all age groups. Most of the population did not even meet the threshold for a lower reference nutrient intake (LRNI; 2.5 µg/day). In all population groups, daily energy intake was a significant predictor of VitD intake. An additional predictor for adolescents and adults was also sex, with higher VitD intakes among males. Higher BMI was also found to be a predictor for lower VitD intake in adolescents, while in the elderly population this was observed in those with lower education levels. The main contributors to VitD intake in the Slovenian diet were eggs, fish and fish products, and meat and meat products. Assessment of the hypothetical scenario of mandatory milk fortification with 2 µg VitD per 100 mL showed a notable increase in the predicted VitD intake, with the highest effect in adolescents, but the expected dietary VitD intake would still be notably below the recommended intake.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu13103528/s1, Supplementary Table S1. Patterns of observed food consumption related to vitamin D in the diet: comparison of true consumers with the use of FPQ data and 24 h dietary recall. Supplementary Table S2. Patterns of observed FPQ food consumption related to vitamin D in the diet in subjects with intakes lower and higher than 2.5 µg vitamin D per day.

Author Contributions

M.H. wrote the first version of the manuscript; M.H. and H.H. performed the data analyses; B.K.S. was responsible for information technology, and H.H. for the preparation of the database and data analyses. M.H. conducted food-matching to estimate VitD levels. Ž.L. participated in data collection and manuscript review; M.G. and U.B. were responsible for the SI. Menu study design and food consumption data. K.Ž. was responsible for the funding of the study, participated in the study design, collaborated in the data analyses, and reviewed the manuscript. I.P. revised the final draft and prepared the submission. All authors reviewed the manuscript and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was conducted within the national research program P3-0395 “Nutrition and Public health” and projects “Challenges in achieving adequate vitamin D status in the adult population” (L7-1849), “Children and adults nutrition as a protective or health-risk factor” (L3-8213) and “Dietary challenges in the population of nursing homes’ residents”, supported by the Slovenian Research Agency and Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia. The original SI.Menu 2017/18 national food consumption survey was funded by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA contract No. OC/EFSA/DATA/2014/02-LOT2-CT03), Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia, and Slovenian Research Agency.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the National Medical Ethics Committee, Ljubljana, Slovenia (KME 53/07/16; approval No. 0120-337/2016 issued on 19 July 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of all SI.Menu project partners and their researchers, particularly Nataša Delfar, Metka Zaletel, Darja Lavtar, Ada Hočevar Grom, and Ivan Eržen (National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia); Petra Golja (Department of Food Science at Biotechnical Faculty and Group of Anthropology at Biotechnical Faculty of University of Ljubljana, Slovenia); Stojan Kostanjevec (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Majda Pajnkihar (University of Maribor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Maribor, Slovenia); Tamara Poklar Vatovec (University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences, Koper, Slovenia); Eva Valenčič (Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia); Evgen Benedik (University Medical Centre Ljubljana, University Children’ s Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia); and students: Katarina Žlavs and Naska Kvarantan. We also acknowledge the support of Veronika Belec and her team and interviewers at the GfK Research Institute (Slovenia) for conducting the survey fieldwork.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. I.P. has led and participated in various other research projects in the area of nutrition, public health, and food technology that were (co)funded by the Slovenian Research Agency, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Food of the Republic of Slovenia, and, for specific applied research projects, and also by food businesses. I.P., K.Ž, M.G., and U.B are members of a national workgroup responsible for the development of recommendations for adequate vitamin D status among the Slovenian population.

References

  1. Cashman, K.D.; Dowling, K.G.; Škrabáková, Z.; Gonzalez-Gross, M.; Valtueña, J.; De Henauw, S.; Moreno, L.; Damsgaard, C.T.; Michaelsen, K.F.; Mølgaard, C.; et al. Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: Pandemic? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 1033–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Holick, M.F. The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: Approaches for diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2017, 18, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Autier, P.; Boniol, M.; Pizot, C.; Mullie, P. Vitamin D status and ill health: A systematic review. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014, 2, 76–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Autier, P.; Mullie, P.; Macacu, A.; Dragomir, M.; Boniol, M.; Coppens, K.; Pizot, C.; Boniol, M. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on non-skeletal disorders: A systematic review of meta-analyses and randomised trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017, 5, 986–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D status: Measurement, interpretation, and clinical application. Ann. Epidemiol. 2009, 19, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zittermann, A. Vitamin D in preventive medicine: Are we ignoring the evidence? Br. J. Nutr. 2003, 89, 552–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zittermann, A.; Pilz, S.; Hoffmann, H.; Marz, W. Vitamin D and airway infections: A European perspective. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2016, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kimlin, M.G. Geographic location and vitamin D synthesis. Mol. Aspects Med. 2008, 29, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. O’Neill, C.M.; Kazantzidis, A.; Ryan, M.J.; Barber, N.; Sempos, C.T.; Durazo-Arvizu, R.A.; Jorde, R.; Grimnes, G.; Eiriksdottir, G.; Gudnason, V.; et al. Seasonal Changes in Vitamin D-Effective UVB Availability in Europe and Associations with Population Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin, D. Nutrients 2016, 8, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ovsenik Jeglič, T. Climate of Slovenia 1971–2000—Sunshine Duration; The Environmental Agency of the Republic of Slovenia: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2006.
  11. Hribar, M.; Hristov, H.; Gregorič, M.; Blaznik, U.; Zaletel, K.; Oblak, A.; Osredkar, J.; Kušar, A.; Žmitek, K.; Rogelj, I.; et al. Nutrihealth study: Seasonal variation in vitamin D status among the Slovenian adult and elderly population. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. World Health Organization/International Research Agency for Cancer (WHO/IARC). Vitamin D and Cancer; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008; p. 210. Available online: https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Working-Group-Reports/Vitamin-D-And-Cancer-2008 (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  14. Kiely, M.; Black, L.J. Dietary strategies to maintain adequacy of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. Suppl. 2012, 243, 14–23. [Google Scholar]
  15. Roseland, J.M.; Phillips, K.M.; Patterson, K.Y.; Pehrsson, P.R.; Taylor, C.L. Vitamin D in Foods: An Evolution of Knowledge. In Vitamin D, 4th ed.; Feldman, D., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 41–77. [Google Scholar]
  16. Whiting, S.J.; Calvo, M.S. Vitamin D Fortification and Supplementation Policies to Correct Vitamin D Insufficiency/Deficiency Globally. In Vitamin D, 4th ed.; Feldman, D., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 91–108. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cheney, M.C. Canadian experience with food fortification. Public Health Rev. 2000, 28, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Pilz, S.; Marz, W.; Cashman, K.D.; Kiely, M.E.; Whiting, S.J.; Holick, M.F.; Grant, W.B.; Pludowski, P.; Hiligsmann, M.; Trummer, C.; et al. Rationale and Plan for Vitamin D Food Fortification: A Review and Guidance Paper. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hennessy, Á.; Walton, J.; Flynn, A. The impact of voluntary food fortification on micronutrient intakes and status in European countries: A review. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2013, 72, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. European Commission (EC). Commission Regulation (EC) No 1170/2009 of 30 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of Council and Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the lists of vitamin and minerals and their forms that can be added to foods, including food supplements. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, L314/36, 336–342. [Google Scholar]
  21. European Commission (EC). Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, L404, 426–438. [Google Scholar]
  22. EFSA Panel on Nutrition; Novel Foods; Food Allergens; Turck, D.; Castenmiller, J.; De Henauw, S.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.I.; Kearney, J.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; et al. Safety of extended uses of UV-treated baker’s yeast as a Novel Food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06602. [Google Scholar]
  23. Žmitek, K.; Krušič, S.; Pravst, I. An Approach to Investigate Content-Related Quality of Nutraceuticals Used by Slovenian Consumers: A Case Study with Folate and Vitamin D Supplements. Foods 2021, 10, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Battelino, T. Zapisnik 56. redne seje RSK za pediatrijo. Slov. Pediatrija 2010, 17, 241–243. [Google Scholar]
  25. van Schoor, N.; Lips, P. Global Overview of Vitamin D Status. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. 2017, 46, 845–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lips, P.; Cashman, K.D.; Lamberg-Allardt, C.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Obermayer-Pietsch, B.; Bianchi, M.L.; Stepan, J.; Fuleihan, G.E.-H.; Bouillon, R. Current vitamin D status in European and Middle East countries and strategies to prevent vitamin D deficiency: A position statement of the European Calcified Tissue Society. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 180, 23–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. World Health Organization (WHO). Vitamin and Mineral Requirements in Human Nutrition, 2nd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  28. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D; Ross, A.C., Taylor, C.L., Yaktine, A.L., Del Valle, H.B., Eds.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  29. Holick, M.F.; Binkley, N.C.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Gordon, C.M.; Hanley, D.A.; Heaney, R.P.; Murad, M.H.; Weaver, C.M. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 1911–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Bresson, J.L.; Burlingame, B.; Dean, T.; Fairweather-Tait, S.; Heinonen, M.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.I.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.; Naska, A.; Neuhauser-Berthold, M.; et al. Dietary reference values for vitamin D. EFSA J. 2016, 14, e04547. [Google Scholar]
  31. Spiro, A.; Buttriss, J.L. Vitamin D: An overview of vitamin D status and intake in Europe. Nutr. Bull. 2014, 39, 322–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bouillon, R. Comparative analysis of nutritional guidelines for vitamin D. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 466–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. German Nutrition, S. New reference values for vitamin D. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 60, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. European Commission (EC). Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 Text with EEA relevance. Off. J. Eur. Union 2011, L 304/18, 18–63. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mensink, G.B.; Fletcher, R.; Gurinovic, M.; Huybrechts, I.; Lafay, L.; Serra-Majem, L.; Szponar, L.; Tetens, I.; Verkaik-Kloosterman, J.; Baka, A.; et al. Mapping low intake of micronutrients across Europe. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 110, 755–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Novaković, R.; Cavelaars, A.E.; Bekkering, G.E.; Roman-Viñas, B.; Ngo, J.; Gurinović, M.; Glibetić, M.; Nikolić, M.; Golesorkhi, M.; Medina, M.W.; et al. Micronutrient intake and status in Central and Eastern Europe compared with other European countries, results from the EURRECA network. Public Health Nutr. 2013, 16, 824–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jenab, M.; Salvini, S.; van Gils, C.H.; Brustad, M.; Shakya-Shrestha, S.; Buijsse, B.; Verhagen, H.; Touvier, M.; Biessy, C.; Wallström, P.; et al. Dietary intakes of retinol, beta-carotene, vitamin D and vitamin E in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, S150–S178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Roman Viñas, B.; Ribas Barba, L.; Ngo, J.; Gurinovic, M.; Novakovic, R.; Cavelaars, A.; de Groot, L.C.; van’t Veer, P.; Matthys, C.; Serra Majem, L. Projected prevalence of inadequate nutrient intakes in Europe. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2011, 59, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Freisling, H.; Fahey, M.T.; Moskal, A.; Ocke, M.C.; Ferrari, P.; Jenab, M.; Norat, T.; Naska, A.; Welch, A.A.; Navarro, C.; et al. Region-specific nutrient intake patterns exhibit a geographical gradient within and between European countries. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 1280–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Rippin, H.L.; Hutchinson, J.; Jewell, J.; Breda, J.J.; Cade, J.E. Adult Nutrient Intakes from Current National Dietary Surveys of European Populations. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Elmadfa, I.; Meyer, A.; Nowak, V.; Hasenegger, V.; Putz, P.; Verstraeten, R.; Remaut-DeWinter, A.M.; Kolsteren, P.; Dostálová, J.; Dlouhý, P.; et al. European Nutrition and Health Report 2009. Forum Nutr. 2009, 62, 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  42. Policnik, R.; Pokorn, D.; Kulnik, D.; Micetic-Turk, D.; Hlastan-Ribic, C. Energy and nutrient intake among pre-school children in central slovenia. Acta Aliment. 2013, 42, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zdešar Kotnik, K. Smiselnost Uporabe Vitaminskih in Mineralnih Prehranskih Dopolnil Pri Mladostnikih = Advisability of Vitamin and Mineral Dietary Supplement Use Among Adolescents. Ph.D. Thesis, Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška Fakulteta, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fidler Mis, N.; Kobe, H.; Štimec, M. Dietary intake of macro-and micronutrients in Slovenian adolescents: Comparison with reference values. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 61, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gregorič, M. Ocena Prehranskega Vnosa Pri Mladostnikih Z Vidika Varovanja Zdravja = Assessment of Dietary Intake Among Adolescents from Health Protection Aspect. Ph.D. Thesis, Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška Fakulteta, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  46. Koch, V.; Gregorič, M. Prehranska kakovost zajtrka slovenskih srednješolcev = Nutritional quality of breakfast eaten by secondary school students in Slovenia. Zdr. Varst. 2009, 48, 131–142. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jeretina, B. Dejavniki Vpliva Na Pojav Prezgodnje Menopavze = Risk Factors for The Onset of Premature Menopause. Ph.D. Thesis, Univerza v Ljubljani, Zdravstvena Fakulteta, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  48. Juvan, S. Kakovost vegetarijanske prehrane med študenti = Quality of Vegetarian Nutrition between Students. Ph.D. Thesis, Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška Fakulteta, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  49. Soltirovska Salamon, A.; Benedik, E.; Bratanič, B.; Velkavrh, M.; Rogelj, I.; Fidler Mis, N.; Bogovič Matijašić, B.; Paro-Panjan, D. Vitamin D status and its determinants in healthy Slovenian pregnant women. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2015, 67, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Urh, N.; Babnik, K.; Rebec, D.; Poklar Vatovec, T. Ocena prehranskega stanja starejših v socialnovarstvenem zavodu = Assessment of the nutritional status of the elderly in a residential home. Obz. Zdrav. Nege. 2017, 51, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gregorič, M.; Kotnik, K.Z.; Pigac, I.; Blenkuš, M.G. A Web-Based 24-H Dietary Recall Could Be a Valid Tool for the Indicative Assessment of Dietary Intake in Older Adults Living in Slovenia. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Lichthammer, A.; Nagy, B.; Orbán, C.; Tóth, T.; Csajbók, R.; Molnár, S.; Tátrai-Németh, K.; Bálint, M.V. A comparative study of eating habits, calcium and Vitamin D intakes in the population of Central-Eastern European countries. New Med. 2015, 19, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  53. European Food Safety Authority. Guidance on the EU Menu methodology. EFSA J. 2014, 12, 3944. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gregorič, M.; Blaznik, U.; Delfar, N.; Zaletel, M.; Lavtar, D.; Koroušić Seljak, B.; Golja, P.; Zdešar Kotnik, K.; Pravst, I.; Fidler Mis, N.; et al. Slovenian national food consumption survey in adolescents, adults and elderly. EFSA Supporting Publ. 1729, 16, en-1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Craig, C.L.; Marshall, A.L.; Sjöström, M.; Bauman, A.E.; Booth, M.L.; Ainsworth, B.E.; Pratt, M.; Ekelund, U.; Yngve, A.; Sallis, J.F. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1381–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Vede, T. Izdelava in validacija slikovnega gradiva za določanje vnosa živil [Design and Validation of Food Picture Book]. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dodd, K.W.; Guenther, P.M.; Freedman, L.S.; Subar, A.F.; Kipnis, V.; Midthune, D.; Tooze, J.A.; Krebs-Smith, S.M. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: A review of the theory. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2006, 106, 1640–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Korošec, M.; Golob, T.; Bertoncelj, J.; Stibilj, V.; Koroušić Seljak, B. The Slovenian food composition database. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Harttig, U.; Haubrock, J.; Knüppel, S.; Boeing, H. The MSM program: Web-based statistics package for estimating usual dietary intake using the Multiple Source Method. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 65, S87–S91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Nutrition Unit of the National Institute for Health and Welfare. Fineli—The National Food Composition Database. Available online: https://fineli.fi/fineli/en/index (accessed on 10 May 2020).
  61. Roe, M.; Pinchen, H.; Church, S.; Finglas, P. McCance and Widdowson’s The Composition of Foods Seventh Summary Edition and updated Composition of Foods Integrated Dataset. Nutr. Bull. 2015, 40, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bodner-Montville, J.; Ahuja, J.K.; Ingwersen, L.A.; Haggerty, E.S.; Enns, C.W.; Perloff, B.P. USDA food and nutrient database for dietary studies: Released on the web. J. Food Compos. 2006, 19, S100–S107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Department of Health. Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Made Under the Food and Drugs Act (Nutrition Symbols, Other Labelling Provisions Partially Hydrogenated Oils and Vitamin D.). In Part I; No. 6; Canada Gazette: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2018; Volume 152, p. 256. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zupanič, N.; Hristov, H.; Gregorič, M.; Blaznik, U.; Delfar, N.; Koroušić Seljak, B.; Ding, E.L.; Fidler Mis, N.; Pravst, I. Total and Free Sugars Consumption in a Slovenian Population Representative Sample. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Haubrock, J.; Nöthlings, U.; Volatier, J.-L.; Dekkers, A.; Ocké, M.; Harttig, U.; Illner, A.-K.; Knüppel, S.; Andersen, L.F.; Boeing, H.; et al. Estimating Usual Food Intake Distributions by Using the Multiple Source Method in the EPIC-Potsdam Calibration Study. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Kolenikov, S. Calibrating Survey Data using Iterative Proportional Fitting (Raking). Stata J. 2014, 14, 22–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Koenig, J.; Elmadfa, I. Status of calcium and vitamin D of different population groups in Austria. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2000, 70, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kudlacek, S.; Schneider, B.; Peterlik, M.; Leb, G.; Klaushofer, K.; Weber, K.; Woloszczuk, W.; Willvonseder, R. Assessment of vitamin D and calcium status in healthy adult Austrians. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2003, 33, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kamycheva, E.; Joakimsen, R.M.; Jorde, R. Intakes of Calcium and Vitamin D Predict Body Mass Index in the Population of Northern Norway. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. de Mestral, C.; Marques-Vidal, P.; Gaspoz, J.-M.; Theler, J.-M.; Guessous, I. Independent association between socioeconomic indicators and macro- and micro-nutrient intake in Switzerland. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Galobardes, B.; Morabia, A.; Bernstein, M.S. Diet and socioeconomic position: Does the use of different indicators matter? Int. J. Epidemiol. 2001, 30, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Rossum, C.T.M.v.; Fransen, H.P.; Verkaik-Kloosterman, J.; Buurma-Rethans, E.J.M.; Ocké, M.C. Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2007–2010: Diet of Children and Adults Aged 7 to 69 Years; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2011. Available online: https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/350050006.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2021).
  73. WORLDOMETERS. Coronavirus in Slovenia. Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/slovenia/ (accessed on 23 September 2021).
  74. IOS. The Eastern European & Central Asian Regional Audit Epidemiology, Costs & Burden of Osteoporosis in 2010. Available online: https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/sites/iofbonehealth/files/2019-06/2010_Eastern_European_Central_Asian_Audit_English.pdf (accessed on 23 September 2021).
  75. Borgström, F.; Karlsson, L.; Ortsäter, G.; Norton, N.; Halbout, P.; Cooper, C.; Lorentzon, M.; McCloskey, E.V.; Harvey, N.C.; Javaid, M.K.; et al. Fragility fractures in Europe: Burden, management and opportunities. Arch. Osteoporos. 2020, 15, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. European Commission (EC). Community Register on the Addition of Vitamins and Minerals and of Certain other Substances to Foods. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2021-01/labelling_nutrition-vitamins_minerals-comm_reg_en.pdf (accessed on 23 September 2021).
  77. Jääskeläinen, T.; Itkonen, S.T.; Lundqvist, A.; Erkkola, M.; Koskela, T.; Lakkala, K.; Dowling, K.G.; Hull, G.L.; Kröger, H.; Karppinen, J.; et al. The positive impact of general vitamin D food fortification policy on vitamin D status in a representative adult Finnish population: Evidence from an 11-y follow-up based on standardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D data. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 2017, 105, 1512–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Calvo, M.S.; Whiting, S.J. Vitamin D Fortification in North America: Current Status and Future Considerations. In Handbook of Food Fortification and Health; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 259–275. [Google Scholar]
  79. Itkonen, S.T.; Erkkola, M.; Lamberg-Allardt, C.J.E. Vitamin D Fortification of Fluid Milk Products and Their Contribution to Vitamin D Intake and Vitamin D Status in Observational Studies-A Review. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Black, L.J.; Seamans, K.M.; Cashman, K.D.; Kiely, M. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of vitamin D food fortification. J. Nutr. 2012, 142, 1102–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Brown, J.; Sandmann, A.; Ignatius, A.; Amling, M.; Barvencik, F. New perspectives on vitamin D food fortification based on a modeling of 25(OH)D concentrations. Nutr. J. 2013, 12, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. O’Mahony, L.; Stepien, M.; Gibney, M.J.; Nugent, A.P.; Brennan, L. The potential role of vitamin D enhanced foods in improving vitamin D status. Nutrients 2011, 3, 1023–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Whiting, S.J.; Langlois, K.A.; Vatanparast, H.; Greene-Finestone, L.S. The vitamin D status of Canadians relative to the 2011 Dietary Reference Intakes: An examination in children and adults with and without supplement use. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 94, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Janssen, M.; Chang, B.P.I.; Hristov, H.; Pravst, I.; Profeta, A.; Millard, J. Changes in Food Consumption During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Consumer Survey Data From the First Lockdown Period in Denmark, Germany, and Slovenia. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Žmitek, K.; Hribar, M.; Lavriša, Ž.; Hristov, H.; Kušar, A.; Pravst, I. Socio-Demographic and Knowledge-Related Determinants of Vitamin D Supplementation in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessment of an Educational Intervention. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 13 03528 g001 550
Figure 1. Percentage of the population with a very low vitamin D intake (lower reference nutrient intake; 2.5 µg/day) by sex, place of living, education, family net income, body mass index (BMI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) score, and employment. Notes: BMI was considered to be normal when it was below 25 kg/m2, except for adolescents, where sex/age adjusted cut-off points [22,23] were used. Logistic regression analysis was conducted on samples with excluded missing values (Family net income: n = 57 (adults) and 40 (elderly); IPAQ: n = 5 (adolescents), 4 (adults), 6 (elderly)); Prevalence odds ratio for lower reference nutrient intake (<2.5 µg/day of vitamin D); lower reference nutrient intake prevalence probability test per different socio-demographic groups within age categories: p < 0.001 sex (adolescents), p < 0.001 BMI (adolescents), p < 0.05 IPAQ (adolescents); p < 0.001 sex (adults), p < 0.005 sex (elderly).
Figure 1. Percentage of the population with a very low vitamin D intake (lower reference nutrient intake; 2.5 µg/day) by sex, place of living, education, family net income, body mass index (BMI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) score, and employment. Notes: BMI was considered to be normal when it was below 25 kg/m2, except for adolescents, where sex/age adjusted cut-off points [22,23] were used. Logistic regression analysis was conducted on samples with excluded missing values (Family net income: n = 57 (adults) and 40 (elderly); IPAQ: n = 5 (adolescents), 4 (adults), 6 (elderly)); Prevalence odds ratio for lower reference nutrient intake (<2.5 µg/day of vitamin D); lower reference nutrient intake prevalence probability test per different socio-demographic groups within age categories: p < 0.001 sex (adolescents), p < 0.001 BMI (adolescents), p < 0.05 IPAQ (adolescents); p < 0.001 sex (adults), p < 0.005 sex (elderly).
Nutrients 13 03528 g001
Nutrients 13 03528 g002 550
Figure 2. The relative contribution of food categories to Vitamin D intake among different population groups (% of total Vitamin D intake).
Figure 2. The relative contribution of food categories to Vitamin D intake among different population groups (% of total Vitamin D intake).
Nutrients 13 03528 g002
Nutrients 13 03528 g003 550
Figure 3. Histograms of vitamin D intakes from the regular diet (red bars) and in a projected fortified diet (scenario of mandatory fortification of milk with 2 µg Vitamin D per 100 mL) (green bars).
Figure 3. Histograms of vitamin D intakes from the regular diet (red bars) and in a projected fortified diet (scenario of mandatory fortification of milk with 2 µg Vitamin D per 100 mL) (green bars).
Nutrients 13 03528 g003
Table
Table 1. Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of the study sample.
Table 1. Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of the study sample.
Age Cohorts
AdolescentsAdultsElderly
(10–17 Years) (18–64 Years)(65–74 Years)
n = 468n = 364n = 416
Age; years—mean (SD) 13.4 (2.37)43.6 (13.81)68.7 (2.7)
Place of living—n (%)Rural270 (57.7)202 (55.5)229 (55.1)
Intermediate76 (16.2)56 (15.4)71 (17.1)
Urban122 (26.1)106 (29.1)116 (27.9)
Sex—n (%)Male238 (50.9)173 (47.5)213 (51.2)
Female230 (49.1)191 (52.5)203 (48.8)
Education—n (%)No university degreen.a.249 (68.4)342 (82.2)
University degreen.a.115 (31.6)74 (17.8)
Family monthly net income—n (%)Below averagen.a.118 (38.4)269 (71.5)
Above averagen.a.189 (61.6)107 (28.5)
BMI—mean (SD) 21.0 (4.2)26.7 (5.2)28.4 (5.0)
n (%)Normal301 (64.6)148 (40.7)108 (26.0)
Overweight and obese167 (35.7)216 (59.3)308 (74.0)
IPAQ—n (%)Low intensity108 (23.3)127 (35.3)137 (33.4)
Moderate 141 (30.5)108 (30.0)133 (32.4)
High intensity214 (46.2)125 (34.7)140 (34.2)
Employment status—n (%)Employedn.a.226 (62.1)n.a.
Unemployedn.a.42 (11.5)n.a.
Studentn.a.32 (8.8) n.a.
Retiredn.a.64 (17.6)n.a.
Use of dietary supplements—n (%)Vitamin D17 (3.63)22 (6.04)20 (4.81)
Multivitamin72 (15.4)52 (14.3)11 (2.64)
Vitamin D and/or multivitamin supplements80 (17.1)63 (17.3)29 (6.97)
Notes: Body mass index (BMI) was considered to be normal when it was below 25 kg/m2, except for adolescents, where sex/age adjusted cut-off points [22,23] were used; International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ); standard deviation (SD); not applicable (n.a).
Table
Table 2. Population-weighted dietary vitamin D intake (µg/day), and prevalence of very low vitamin D intake.
Table 2. Population-weighted dietary vitamin D intake (µg/day), and prevalence of very low vitamin D intake.
Adolescents (10–17)Adults (18–64)Elderly (65–74)
AllMaleFemaleAllMaleFemaleAllMale Female
Sample Size, n (%)468 (100)238 (50.85)230 (49.15)364 (100)173 (47.53)191 (52.47)416 (100)213 (51.20)203 (48.80)
Vitamin D intake
Mean [µg/day]
(95% CI)		2.73
(2.56–2.91)		3.02
(2.83–3.22)		2.42
(2.14–2.70)		2.85
(2.69–3.00)		3.39
(3.17–3.62)		2.30
(2.14–2.44)		2.45
(2.34–2.57)		2.60
(2.42–2.78)		2.32
(2.16–2.48)
Std.Err.0.090.100.140.080.120.080.060.090.08
Median [µg/day]2.332.701.952.663.012.042.212.302.13
Mean [µg/1000 kcal per day] (95% CI)1.24
(1.15–1.33)		1.23
(1.12–1.35)		1.25
(1.11–1.40)		1.34
(1.27–1.41)		1.47
(1.37–1.57)		1.21
(1.13–1.29)		1.20
(1.13–1.27)		1.20
(1.10–1.30)		1.20
(1.10–1.29)
Prevalence of very low vitamin D intake (%)
<2.5 [µg/day]55.0
(47.4–62.4)		38.8
(30.0–48.5)		72.6
(64.6–79.3)		45.8
(40.1–51.6)		21.0
(15.2–28.2)		71.0
(63.5–77.5)		61.0
(51.7–69.6)		58.2
(43.6–71.5)		63.5
(50.6–74.7)
Notes: 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Table
Table 3. Unadjusted and adjusted mean (95% CI) levels of vitamin D intake (µg/day) by sex, place of living, body mass index (BMI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) score, education, income, employment, and energy intake (kcal/day) for different age groups. All three models were adjusted to account for differences in energy intake (kcal/day).
Table 3. Unadjusted and adjusted mean (95% CI) levels of vitamin D intake (µg/day) by sex, place of living, body mass index (BMI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) score, education, income, employment, and energy intake (kcal/day) for different age groups. All three models were adjusted to account for differences in energy intake (kcal/day).
VariableAdolescents
(10–17 Years Old)		Adults
(18–64 Years Old)		Elderly
(65–74 Years Old)
UnadjustedAdjusted UnadjustedAdjusted UnadjustedAdjusted
SexMale3.01 (2.82–3.20)2.95 (2.72–3.17)3.35 (3.16–3.53)3.22 (3.03–3.42)2.67 (2.51–2.83)2.55 (2.37–2.73)
Female2.44 (2.18–2.70)2.52 (2.29–2.76)2.31 (2.15–2.46)2.46 (2.28–2.64)2.35 (2.16–2.54)2.49 (2.30–2.68)
Place of livingRural2.64 (2.46–2.80)2.63 (2.42–2.84)2.88 (2.71–3.05)2.86 (2.68–3.03)2.57 (2.41–2.73)2.56 (2.39–2.73)
Intermediate2.87 (2.24-3.50)2.85 (2.46-3.24)2.66 (2.25–3.07)2.68 (2.36–3.00)2.38 (2.06–2.71)2.50 (2.20–2.81)
Urban2.86 (2.54–3.17)2.90 (2.60–3.21)2.73 (2.52–2.94)2.81 (2.59–3.04)2.48 (2.24–2.72)2.44 (2.20–2.69)
EducationNo university degreen.a.n.a.2.74 (2.59–2.88)2.76 (2.61–2.92)2.43 (2.31–2.55)2.45 (2.31–2.60)
University degree2.94 (2.69–3.19)2.92 (2.69–3.16)2.88 (2.47–3.29)2.85 (2.52–3.17)
Family net incomeBelow average (≤EUR 1300)n.a.n.a.2.63 (2.40–2.85)2.71 (2.50–2.93)2.44 (2.30–2.60)2.51 (2.33–2.64)
Above average (>EUR 1300)2.92 (2.74–3.10)2.89 (2.71–3.05)2.68 (2.42–2.94)2.56 (2.31–2.81)
BMINormal2.95 (2.72–3.16)2.94 (2.75–3.14)2.72 (2.52–2.92)2.81 (2.60–3.01)2.51 (2.28–2.73)2.57 (2.31–2.83)
Overweight and obese2.34 (2.13–2.56)2.35 (2.10–2.62)2.86 (2.69–3.02)2.82 (2.66–2.98)2.52 (2.37–2.66)2.50 (2.36–2.65)
IPAQLow intensity2.77 (2.55–2.99)2.72 (2.40–3.05)2.79 (2.60–2.99)2.78 (2.56–2.99)2.56 (2.33–2.78)2.54 (2.32–2.76)
Moderate2.64 (2.27–3.02)2.71 (2.42–3.00)2.74 (2.48–2.98)2.82 (2.60–3.05)2.30 (2.14–2.46)2.35 (2.13–2.57)
High intensity2.79 (2.56–3.01)2.77 (2.53–2.99)2.89 (2.65–3.122.85 (2.63–3.06)2.69 (2.45–2.93)2.67 (2.45–2.89)
EmploymentEmployedn.a.n.a.2.91 (2.75–3.08)2.81 (2.64–2.98)n.a.n.a.
Unemployed2.51 (2.14–2.87)2.85 (2.46–3.23)
Student2.91 (2.53–3.29)2.96 (2.47–3.44)
Retired2.54 (2.23–2.86)2.76 (2.44–3.07)
Notes: BMI was considered to be normal when it was below 25 kg/m2, except for adolescents, where sex/age adjusted cut-off points [22,23] were used. Linear regression analysis conducted on samples with excluded missing values (Family net income: n = 57 (adults) and 40 (elderly); IPAQ: n = 5 (adolescents), 4 (adults), 6 (elderly)); Difference in predicted marginal means of vitamin D intake per different socio-demographic groups within age categories: p < 0.05 sex (adolescents), p < 0.001 BMI (adolescents); p < 0.0001 sex (adults); p < 0.05 education (elderly). The energy intake was a significant predictor of vitamin D intake, with β = regression coefficients per different age group as follows: β = +0.0004 (p ≤ 0.001) for adolescents, β = +0.0006 (p ≤ 0.001) for adults, β = +0.0006 (p ≤ 0.001) for the elderly.
Table
Table 4. Comparison of estimated vitamin D intake (μg/day) from a regular diet and projected fortified diet.
Table 4. Comparison of estimated vitamin D intake (μg/day) from a regular diet and projected fortified diet.
Adolescents (10–17)Adults (18–64)Elderly (65–74)
AllMaleFemaleAllMaleFemaleAllMaleFemale
Unadjusted mean vitamin D intake—μg/day (SD)
Regular diet2.73 (1.77)3.01 (2.44)2.44 (2.00)2.80 (1.24)3.35 (1.23)2.31 (1.03)2.51 (1.26)2.67 (1.16)2.35 (1.35)
Projected fortified diet *4.82 (2.51)5.46 (2.29)4.16 (2.56)4.01 (1.88)4.53 (1.90)3.56 (1.73)3.58 (1.79)3.62 (1.83)3.54 (1.75)
Median vitamin D intake—μg/day
Regular diet2.252.661.952.593.022.022.262.382.01
Projected increase with fortification *2.014.103.151.101.041.231.010.871.25
Projected fortified diet *4.266.765.13.694.063.253.273.253.26
Notes: Vitamin D intakes in the study sample, without population weighting. SD: Standard deviation; * Projected fortified diet with the scenario of mandatory fortification of milk with 2 µg Vitamin D per 100 mL.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hribar, M.; Hristov, H.; Lavriša, Ž.; Koroušić Seljak, B.; Gregorič, M.; Blaznik, U.; Žmitek, K.; Pravst, I. Vitamin D Intake in Slovenian Adolescents, Adults, and the Elderly Population. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103528

AMA Style

Hribar M, Hristov H, Lavriša Ž, Koroušić Seljak B, Gregorič M, Blaznik U, Žmitek K, Pravst I. Vitamin D Intake in Slovenian Adolescents, Adults, and the Elderly Population. Nutrients. 2021; 13(10):3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hribar, Maša, Hristo Hristov, Živa Lavriša, Barbara Koroušić Seljak, Matej Gregorič, Urška Blaznik, Katja Žmitek, and Igor Pravst. 2021. "Vitamin D Intake in Slovenian Adolescents, Adults, and the Elderly Population" Nutrients 13, no. 10: 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103528

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop