Next Article in Journal
Dietary Interventions to Promote Healthy Eating among Office Workers: A Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Diet Advice for Crohn’s Disease: FODMAP and Beyond
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/nu12123752
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chlorella vulgaris Ameliorates Oxidative Stress and Improves the Muscle Regenerative Capacity of Young and Old Sprague-Dawley Rats

by
Nurhazirah Zainul Azlan
1,2,
Yasmin Anum Mohd Yusof
3 and
Suzana Makpol
1,*
1
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Level 17, Preclinical Building, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
2
Department of Basic Medical Sciences for Nursing, Kulliyyah of Nursing, Bandar Indera Mahkota Campus, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan Pahang 25200, Malaysia
3
Faculty of Medicine and Defense Health, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, Kem Sungai Besi, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(12), 3752; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123752
Submission received: 7 November 2020 / Revised: 30 November 2020 / Accepted: 1 December 2020 / Published: 7 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemicals and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Muscle atrophy in ageing is a multifactorial degenerative process impacted by cellular ageing biology, which includes oxidative stress. Chlorella vulgaris is a coccoid green eukaryotic microalga rich in antioxidants. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of C. vulgaris in ameliorating oxidative stress, thus elucidating its mechanism in improving muscle mass, strength and function in young and old rats. Fifty-six male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats aged 3 months (young) and 21 months (old) were divided into three groups: Group 1 (control) was given distilled water; Group 2 was treated with 150 mg/kg body weight (BW) of C. vulgaris; and Group 3 was treated with 300 mg/kg BW of C. vulgaris for three months. Grip and muscle strength and muscle integrity were determined on days 0, 30, 60, and 90 of treatment. Urine and blood were collected on days 0 and 90 of treatment for oxidative stress marker determination, while the gastrocnemius muscles were collected for muscle oxidative stress analysis. Increased grip strength of the front and hind paws was observed in young C. vulgaris-treated rats on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to the untreated control on the same days (p < 0.05). There was a significant increase in lean bone mineral content (BMC) in young rats treated with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris compared to untreated rats on days 30 and 60. The fat mass was significantly decreased in young and old C. vulgaris-treated rats on day 90 compared to the untreated control. The total path was significantly increased for old rats treated with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris on days 60 and 90 compared to day 0. Young and old C. vulgaris-treated rats demonstrated a significant decrease in urinary isoprostane F2t and plasma creatine kinase-MM (CKMM) compared to the control on day 90. A significant decrease in malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxyalkenal (HAE) levels were observed in young and old rats treated with C. vulgaris. C. vulgaris improved the muscle mass, strength, and function in young and old rats. This effect could be due to its potency in ameliorating oxidative stress in the skeletal muscle of young and old rats.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Approximately 40% of the human body weight consists of skeletal muscle, which represents 50% to 75% of body proteins [1]. It accounts for 30% to 50% of the whole-body turnover of protein; hence, skeletal muscle is regarded as the body’s largest tissue [1]. Skeletal muscle performance diminishes with the progression of ageing in a state known as sarcopenia. Sarcopenia can be described as an age-linked decline in the strength, mass, and function of muscle, which is highly correlated with ageing [2]. The diverse factors of the degenerative process that influence muscle atrophy can be categorized into primary ageing, which is cellular ageing, and secondary ageing, which is affected by environmental, behavioral, and disease factors [3]. The most obvious and consistent changes related to the progression of ageing are a reduction in lean body mass and an increase in fat mass [4].
Sarcopenia can also be diagnosed based on the occurrence of both a slow gaiting speed and a low muscle mass [5]. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) suggested specifications for a sarcopenia diagnosis. This includes the detection of both a lower muscle mass, which can be quantified by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and the detection of the strength of the lower muscle and/or impaired performance, such as a slower speed of walking [6]. The muscle mass has been reported to decrease annually by 1% to 2% after 50 years of age, and muscle strength decreases by 1.5% per year between the ages of 50 and 60 years and 3% thereafter [7]. A previous longitudinal study reported that in elderly individuals aged 75 years old, the loss of muscle strength was 3.0% to 4.0% and 2.5% to 3.0% per year for men and women, respectively, and the loss of muscle mass was 0.80% to 0.98% and 0.64% to 0.70% per year for men and women, respectively [8].
The older population aged 70 to 80 years old is projected to increase due to an increased life expectancy [9]. Sarcopenia will lead to poor oxygen uptake, poor regulation of glucose, weakness and disability, loss of independence, decreased mobility, and increased risks of falls and fractures, and eventually contribute to morbidity and mortality [10,11,12]. Exercise and physical activity are effective approaches to alleviate sarcopenia that result in remarkable gains in muscle strength and power in elderly individuals [3]. Nutritional supplementation is another approach for sarcopenia management. Supplementation with essential amino acids and arginine has been reported to increase the body mass, function, and the strength of the muscle [13].
In this study, Chlorella vulgaris was investigated for its effects in the prevention of sarcopenia. In Japan, C. vulgaris powder is consumed as a supplement to replace a low intake of vegetables and fruits, as its composition is similar to that of green-yellow vegetables [14,15]. C. vulgaris has been reported to contain richly nutritive compounds such as carbohydrates, proteins, nucleic acids, minerals, β-carotene, chlorophyll-a and -b, lutein, tocopherol, ascorbic acid, retinol, and riboflavin [16,17]. Previous studies reported the antidiabetic [18,19] and anticancer effects of C. vulgaris [20,21,22]. C. vulgaris also exhibits higher antioxidant activities than the tocotrienol-rich fraction (TRF) and Piper betle [23]. Another study reported the antioxidant properties of C. vulgaris against induced liver cancer in rats were mediated by decreasing the oxidative stress markers SOD, MDA, and catalase [20].
C. vulgaris has shown potential as an anti-ageing compound by decreasing ageing biomarkers in senescent human diploid fibroblast (HDF) cells [24]. In our previous study on human skeletal muscle myoblast (HSMM) cells, it was observed that C. vulgaris was able to promote myoblast differentiation by increasing the fusion and maturation index. Additionally, C. vulgaris also decreased the expression of senescence biomarkers and increased the amount of positively stained myogenin, a protein that regulates the differentiation of muscle myoblasts [25]. C. vulgaris also demonstrated ameliorating outcomes on the myogenic regulatory factor (MRF) and muscle-specific miRNA (myomiR) expression of HSMM cells [26].
The antioxidant properties of C. vulgaris may promote muscle regeneration and further applications for sarcopenia prevention. Therefore, this research aimed to determine the effects of C. vulgaris in reviving muscle mass, strength, and function by focusing on its effect in ameliorating oxidative stress in the skeletal muscle of young and old Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were chosen for their long lifespan, and that their age can be correlated with human ages. In this study, 3- and 21-month-old rats were given treatments for up to 3 months and were sacrificed at the ages of 6 and 24 months old, which correlates to human ages of 18 and 60 years old [27,28,29]. Therefore, the SD rats were able to manifest the characteristics of ageing in humans.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

This research was performed in accordance with the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" as postulated by the National Institute of Health (NIH), along with approval of the experimental design by the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Research and Innovation Secretariat (Project Code: FF-2016-318) and the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Animal Ethics Committee (UKMAEC Approval Number: BIOC/PP/2016/SUZANA/27-JULY/770-SEPT.-2016-AUG.-2018). The SD rats were divided into two groups: 28 young male SD rats taken at 3 months old and 28 male aged SD rats taken at 21 months old. The rats used in this study weighed 250 to 400 g and were purchased from Nano Life Quest Sdn. Bhd. (Malaysia). Each age group of rats was further allotted into three groups: Group 1 was the control group given 1 mL of distilled water (n = 8), Group 2 was given 150 mg/kg body weight (BW) C. vulgaris (n = 10), and Group 3 was given 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris (n = 10) for three months. Each rat was randomly kept in individual Sealsafe® Plus Rat IVC Green Line (TECHNIPLAST, Varese, Italy) cages in an animal care facility and allowed to acclimatize for one week before administration of the treatment. The rats were maintained in animal care facilities with a temperature of 24 °C and a 12-h light and dark cycle. The rats were also provided with rat pellets and water at all times (ad libitum), and wood shavings (Chipsi, Germany) were used as the bedding. The bedding was changed twice per week. The number of animals was chosen based on previous studies that used Wistar rats and diabetic type 2 Goto-Kakizaki [18,30].

2.2. C. vulgaris Preparation

The C. vulgaris Beijerinck strain 072 stock was acquired from the University of Malaya Algae Culture Collection (UMACC, Malaysia). Bold’s basal media (BBM) was used to grow the C. vulgaris stock with a 12-h light and dark cycle, and the stock was harvested by centrifugation at 1000 rpm. The centrifuged algae were weighed according to each rat’s body weight (BW) by diluting the algae in 1 mL distilled water prior to the treatments. The treatments were given as 1 mL of C. vulgaris extract by oral gavage once daily in the morning for 90 consecutive days. The rats were monitored daily for any sign of toxicity. Body weight was measured weekly, and the organs, including heart, liver, kidney, brain, and gastrocnemius muscle, were taken for the measurement of the relative organ weight after sacrifice.

2.3. Grip Strength Test

The front paw and hind paw grip strength were measured using a Bioseb Grip Strength Test (USA). The grip strength was used to determine the maximal peak force developed by a rat when it pulled out the metal bar. The machine was set up on a strong and stable table. The rat was allowed to grasp the metal bar by its front paws when it was pulled by the tail backwards in the horizontal plane. Peak tension, the force applied to the bar just before it lost its grip, was recorded in grams unit. The rats were pulled three times, and the machine recorded the highest peak tension. Then, the same procedure was repeated for the hind paw grip strength measurement.

2.4. Measurement of Bone Density

For the analysis of the computerized tomography of bone density, the entire body of the rat was scanned by applying dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Hologic Discovery W, Bedford, USA). The rats were anaesthetized 10 to 15 min before the procedure. The sedated rat was then placed on the X-ray platform, and scanning was performed within 3 min. As the scanning was performed, a large radiating scanning arm moved over the rats, and a low-dose X-ray beam was passed through the rats. The changes in radiation as it moved were converted by Hologic software for the quantification of bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), lean BMC and fat mass for each rat.

2.5. Open Field Test

The rats were carried to the test room in its home cage and were handled by the base of their tails at all times. The open-field test was carried out in a square and black painted wooden box 60 cm × 60 cm. The rat was placed into one of the four corners facing towards the wall of the box and allowed to explore the field for 5 min, during which its movement was recorded by a video camera mounted to the ceiling. The rat was simultaneously assessed using HVS Image Software 2017 based on the parameters of interest, which include the total path length and the percentage of time moving. After the 5-min test, the rats were returned to their home cage, and the wooden box was wiped with 70% ethanol and permitted to dry between tests.

2.6. Urine Collection

Collection of urine was carried out from each rat on days 0 and 90 of treatment by spontaneous urination using clear plastic wrap. An empty clean cage was layered with cling wrap, and a single rat was allowed to roam inside the cage until urination. The rat was removed as soon as it urinated, and the voided urine was later aspirated with a pipette tip while avoiding contamination with any feces. A total of 1 mL of urine was collected and transferred to a microcentrifuge tube prior to being kept in a −80 °C freezer until further analysis.

2.7. Blood Collection

Blood was withdrawn from each rat on Day 0 and 90 of treatment by the orbital sinus collection methodology. The rat was anesthetized prior to blood collection and was handled with the thumb and forefinger of the left hand. The skin around the rat’s eye was pulled out until the eye bulged out, and a capillary tube was inserted with slight thumb pressure into the medial canthus of the eye at a 30 degree angle to the nose. Blood flowed through the capillary tube after puncturing through the tissue and plexus/sinus. A total of 3 mL of blood was collected into an EDTA tube before gently removing the capillary tube. The bleeding was then stopped by applying gentle pressure by the finger and wiping with sterile cotton. The collected blood was later centrifuged, and the plasma was kept in a −80 °C freezer until further analysis.

2.8. Euthanization of Animals

The anesthetic agent used in this study was KTX, which is a combination of ketamine, xylazine, and zoletil-50 (tiletamine and zolazepam). The KTX was administered based on 0.1 mL/250 g of rat body weight for each rat by intraperitoneal injection into the lower right quadrant of the abdomen due to its rapid onset, efficacy and minimal pain, fear and distress [31]. The rats were then left for approximately 30 min for the KTX to induce its sedative effect. This was observed by the clinical signs, including disorientation and a loss of consciousness, depression of respiratory or rapid irregular breathing, a progressive decline in heart rate and blood pressure, urination, and defecation. Once fully unconscious, the rats were euthanized by the decapitation method using a decapitator (Modiezham Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia).

2.9. Collection of Organs

All rats were fasted overnight on day 90 before sacrifice for necropsy examination. Organs such as the heart, liver, kidneys, brain, and gastrocnemius muscle were dissected from the sacrificed rats. All of the organs were washed with 90% normal saline to remove any adherent tissue and later weighed. The weight of the organs was taken as quickly as possible to avoid drying and was analyzed relative to the BW of the animals.

2.10. Analysis of Urinary Oxidative Stress

Urine samples collected from all rats were measured for 15-isoprostane F2t activity by a urinary isoprostane ELISA kit (Oxford Biomedical Research, Oxford, USA) as specified by the manufacturer’s protocol. The sample was prepared by diluting 100 µL of urine with glucuronidase before being added to an anti-15-isoprostane F2t-coated well plate. The mixture was then mixed with 15-isoprostane F2t horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate followed by tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate. The developed colour was quantified as the absorbance at 650 nm by a Multimode Plate Reader Enspire (Perkin Elmer, Singapore). The data obtained were calculated to acquire the concentration of isoprostanes (ng/mL) of each sample based on the standard curve plotted using the standard solution provided.

2.11. Analysis of Plasma Oxidative Stress

Plasma collected from each rat was measured for creatine kinase-MM (CKMM) activity by a Rat CK-MM ELISA Kit (Life Diagnostics Inc., West Chester, PA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A total of 25 µL plasma was then diluted with diluent for sample preparation before being dispensed into anti-rat CK-MM antibody-coated microtiter plates. Enzyme conjugates were then added to each well followed by TMB reagent. The stop solution was added to stop the reaction and the plates were gently shaken before reading their absorbance at 450 nm with a Multimode Plate Reader Enspire (Perkin Elmer, Singapore). The results obtained were calculated to acquire the concentration of CKMM (ng/mL) of each sample based on the standard curve plotted using the standard solution provided.

2.12. Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Oxidative Stress

Lipid peroxidation was indicated by the measurement of malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxyalkenals (HAE) by using a Bioxytech® LPO-586TM assay kit (OxisResearch, Oregon, USA) as specified by the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 100 mg of gastrocnemius muscle was weighed and homogenized with PBS buffer containing 0.5 M BHT. The resulting clear supernatant homogenates were mixed with diluted R1 reagent followed by R2 reagent addition. The supernatant absorbance was quantified at 586 nm by a Multimode Plate Reader Enspire (Perkin Elmer, Singapore). The data obtained were calculated to acquire the concentration of MDA + HAE (μM) of each sample based on the standard curve plotted using the standard solution provided.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as the mean ± SD, and a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS software version 25 was used to carry out the statistical analysis. The data acquired were analysed by using one-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons by Tukey’s post hoc test.

3. Results

3.1. Body Weight and Relative Organ Weight

The body weights of the control young rats and young rats treated with C. vulgaris were significantly increased on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 1A). A corresponding increase was exhibited in the body weight of the control old rats and old rats treated with C. vulgaris compared to the control young rats on day 0 of treatment (p < 0.05). On day 30, the body weight of the control old rats and old rats treated with 150 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris was also significantly increased compared to that of the day 30 control young rats (p < 0.05). No significant changes were demonstrated in the body weight of the control and C. vulgaris-treated old rats on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to the day 0 control old rats.
Measurement of the organ weight showed that the liver and kidney weights of the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris at 150 mg/kg BW were significantly decreased compared to the control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 1B).

3.2. Measurement of Grip Strength

The grip strength of the front paws of the control young rats was significantly increased on day 90 of treatment compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 2A). C. vulgaris treatment of the young rats showed a significant increase in front paw grip strength on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to day 0 (p < 0.05). The treatment of young rats with C. vulgaris significantly increased the grip strength of the front paws on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to that of the control young rats on the respective days of treatment (p < 0.05).
The front paw grip strength of the old rats was significantly increased on days 0, 30, 60, and 90 of treatment compared to that of the control young rats on the respective days of treatment (p < 0.05) (Figure 2A). A similar increase in front paw grip strength was observed in control old rats and old rats treated with C. vulgaris on days 60 and 90 of treatment compared to day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05). C. vulgaris treatment at 300 mg/kg BW significantly increased the grip strength of the front paws of old rats on day 30 of treatment compared to the day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05).
The grip strength of the hind paws of the control young rats and the young rats treated with C. vulgaris was significantly increased on Day 60 and Day 90 of treatment compared to the Day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 2B). On day 30 of treatment, the grip strength of the hind paws of the young rats treated with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris was significantly increased compared to that of the young rats on day 0 (p < 0.05). Treatment with C. vulgaris significantly increased the grip strength of the hind paws of the young rats on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to that of the respective control (p < 0.05).
The hind paw grip strength of the old rats was significantly increased on days 0, 30, 60, and 90 of treatment compared to that of the control young rats on the respective days of treatment (p < 0.05) (Figure 2B). A similar increase in hind paw grip strength was observed in the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris on days 30, 60, and 90 of treatment compared to the day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05). Treatment with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris significantly increased the hind paw grip strength of the old rats on day 90 compared to its control (p < 0.05).

3.3. Measurement of Muscle and Bone Integrity

The BMCs of the control young rats and the young rats treated with C. vulgaris were significantly increased on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 3A). The BMCs of the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris were significantly increased on days 0, 30, 60, and 90 of treatment compared to the control young rats on the respective days of treatment (p < 0.05). A similar increase in BMCs was observed in old rats treated with C. vulgaris on days 60 and 90 compared to the day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05). The BMC was also increased in the control old rats on day 90 compared to the day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05).
The BMD of the control young rats and the young rats treated with C. vulgaris was significantly increased on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 3B). The BMD of the control old rats and old rats treated with C. vulgaris was significantly increased on days 0, 30, 60, and 90 of treatment compared to the control young rats on the respective days of treatment (p < 0.05). A similar increase in BMD was observed in the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to the day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05).
The lean BMC of the control young rats and young rats treated with C. vulgaris was significantly increased on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 3C). Treatment with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris in the young rats significantly increased their lean BMC on days 30 and 60 of treatment compared to that of the respective control (p < 0.05). The lean BMCs of the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris were significantly increased on days 0, 30, and 60 of treatment compared to the control young rats on the respective days of treatment (p < 0.05). A similar increase in lean BMCs was observed in the old rats treated with C. vulgaris on day 90 of treatment compared to the day 90 control young rats (p < 0.05). The lean BMC was significantly increased in the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris on days 60 and 90 compared to the day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05). On day 30 of treatment, the lean BMC of the old rats treated with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris was significantly increased compared to that of the day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05).
The lean fat mass of the control young rats and the young rats treated with 150 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris was significantly increased on days 30 and 60 compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 3D). A similar increase in the lean fat mass of the control young rats and the young rats treated with C. vulgaris on day 90 of treatment was seen as compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05). Treatment with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris significantly decreased the lean fat mass in the young rats on days 30, 60, and 90 of treatment compared to their respective control (p < 0.05). The lean fat mass of the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris was significantly increased on days 0 and 30 compared to the control young rats on the respective days of treatment (p < 0.05). However, treatment with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris decreased the lean fat mass of the old rats on day 90 compared to the day 90 control young rats (p < 0.05). A similar decrease in fat mass was observed in old rats treated with C. vulgaris on day 90 compared to the day 90 control old rats (p < 0.05).

3.4. Measurement of Muscle Function

In the open field test, the total path of the young rats treated with C. vulgaris was significantly increased on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A). The total path of the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris was significantly increased on days 0, 30, and 60 compared to the control young rats on the respective days of treatment (p < 0.05). A similar increase in the total path was observed among old rats treated with C. vulgaris on day 90 compared to the day 90 control young rats (p < 0.05). Treatment with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris significantly increased the total path of the old rats on days 60 and 90 compared to the day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05).
The percentage of time spent moving by young rats treated with C. vulgaris was significantly increased on days 30, 60, and 90 compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 4B). The percentage of time spent moving by the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris was significantly increased on days 0, 30, and 60 compared to the control young rats on the respective days of treatment (p < 0.05). A similar increase in the percentage of time spent moving was observed in the old rats treated with C. vulgaris on day 90 compared to the day 90 control young rats (p < 0.05).

3.5. Levels of Oxidizing Stress Markers in the Tissue, Plasma, and Urine

The isoprostane F2t urinary oxidative stress level of the control young rats was significantly increased on day 90 compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 5A). On day 90, C. vulgaris treatment significantly decreased the isoprostane F2t urinary oxidative stress level of the young rats compared to the day 90 control young rats (p < 0.05). A similar decrease was observed in the isoprostane F2t urinary oxidative stress level of young rats treated with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris on day 90 of treatment compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05).
On day 90, C. vulgaris treatment decreased the isoprostane F2t urinary oxidative stress level of old rats compared to that of the day 90 control old rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 5A). A similar decrease was observed in the isoprostane F2t urinary oxidative stress level of old rats treated with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris on day 90 of treatment compared to the day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05).
The level of plasma CKMM was significantly increased in the control young rats on day 90 of treatment compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05) (Figure 5B). Treatment with C. vulgaris significantly decreased the level of plasma CKMM in young rats on day 90 compared to the day 0 and day 90 control young rats (p < 0.05). The level of plasma CKMM was significantly increased in the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris on day 0 of treatment compared to the day 0 control young rats (p < 0.05). A similar increase in the level of plasma CKMM was observed in the control old rats on day 90 of treatment compared to the day 0 control old rats (p < 0.05). Treatment with C. vulgaris significantly decreased the level of plasma CKMM in old rats on day 90 compared to the day 0 and day 90 control old rats (p < 0.05).
A significant increase in the MDA and HAE levels in the control old rats compared to the control young rats (p < 0.05) was observed (Figure 5C). Treatment with C. vulgaris significantly decreased the levels of tissue MDA and HAE in both the young and old rats compared to the control young and control old rats, respectively (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

Ongoing research on sarcopenia mainly focuses on alleviating the disease and reducing the economic burden resulting from this overwhelming condition in the elderly population. This disease is characterized by an increased risk of falls and fracture due to a decrease in muscle strength and mass, a decrease in BMD and limited mobility [32]. Improvements in the characteristics of sarcopenia may produce favourable effects towards modulating sarcopenia in the elderly. In this study, rats in two different age groups representing young and elderly humans were used to measure muscle function. The results of this study showed that the body weight of the young rats was significantly increased with an increasing number of days, suggesting the effect of age on the body weight of the young rats. However, no significant difference was seen in the body weight of the old rats with an increasing number of days. This could be due to the slower rate of muscle regeneration in old rats or the growth process in old rats reaching a plateau. In a previous study, the body weight of the C57BL/6 mice was reported to increase significantly until 12 months of age (mid age), which then reached a plateau, with no increase in body weight observed [33]. In sarcopenia, overall body weight may not be affected, and it may not lead to a net body weight loss due to increased deposition of lipids within the muscle fibers and fat tissue, particularly intra-abdominal fat. As a result, the body weight can be variable due to variations in muscular mass, adipose tissue and bone mass [34,35].
No significant difference was observed in the relative organ weight of the heart, brain, and muscle for all young groups treated with C. vulgaris, suggesting that no toxicity of C. vulgaris occurred. A previous study also reported no toxicity or mortality in female SD rats treated with C. vulgaris by using the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guideline 420 [36]. However, a significant decrease in the liver and kidney relative organ weight was observed in the control old rats and the old rats treated with C. vulgaris compared to the control young rats. This finding was similar to a previous finding in C57BL/6 mice, which reported that the kidney weight reached a plateau at 23 to 28 months (old mice), and a significant decrease in the liver weight was observed at 23 to 28 months of age and 30 months of age (very old) [33].
The grip strength test has been used for the assessment of the effects of drugs, toxins, and chemical substances on muscle function and it is also suitable to measure the muscle strength in clinical settings [37,38,39]. This test is usually performed to quantify muscular strength in age-associated neurodegenerative diseases such as stroke and Parkinson’s disease [40,41,42] to measure any alterations in motor coordination [40]. The results of this study showed that the front paw grip strength of young rats was significantly increased with an increasing number of days, indicating the effect of age in promoting grip strength in young rats. Treatment with C. vulgaris was found to increase the grip strength of young rats, indicating the ability of C. vulgaris to improve the muscle function in young rats. Changes in grip strength values, such as low scores, indicate a low muscular strength, and they therefore act as evidence of motor neurotoxicity, while an increased grip strength indicates an improvement of muscle function [43]. A similar observation was found in old rats, whereby the front paw grip strength of the old rats was significantly increased with an increasing number of days, suggesting an effect of age in promoting muscle function. However, C. vulgaris treatment did not result in any significant impact on the grip strength of the front paws of the old rats.
The hind paw grip strength of the young and old rats gave a similar pattern of increment as the grip strength of the front paws. The hind paw grip strength of the young and old rats was significantly increased with an increasing number of days. Treatment with C. vulgaris at one month and two months was found to increase the hind paw grip strength of young rats compared to the untreated control. In addition, C. vulgaris treatment for three months improved the grip strength of the hind paws of both the young and old rats, confirming the beneficial effect of C. vulgaris in improving muscle function.
A DXA scan is an effortless, reproducible, and precise method to analyze the composition of bodies. A previous study reported that the BMD and total body soft-tissue composition and major subregions measured with DXA demonstrated a precise composition analysis even at different times of measurement with low radiation exposure, and it has been used for the assessment of muscle mass in elderly men [44,45,46]. The results from this study demonstrated that the BMD, BMC, and lean BMC were significantly increased with an increasing number of days in both young and old rats. The fat mass, however, was significantly increased with an increase in the number of days only in young rats, and no difference was observed in the old rats. Another previous study also reported the use of DXA in assessing the skeletal muscle mass, strength and quality in older populations and showed that muscle mass loss is related to a decrease in muscle strength in older adults. However, the muscle strength decline is much faster than the muscle mass decline [46]. Treatment with C. vulgaris at 300 mg/kg BW for one month and two months in this study was found to increase the lean BMCs in young rats. No similar effect was observed in old rats. Treatment with 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris also decreased the fat mass in young rats. In old rats, C. vulgaris decreased the fat mass, indicating that C. vulgaris has the capability of improving muscle strength by modulating the BMC and fat mass in the body. This also indicates that C. vulgaris has the potential to increase the skeletal muscle mass, as greater skeletal muscle mass is related to greater BMC [47].
Increased muscle mass and decreased fat mass may aid in reversing the effects of sarcopenia and ageing. A similar result was observed in a previous study of 19-month-old Wistar Han rats that were treated with espindolol, a small-molecule anabolic catabolic transforming agent (ACTA). Espindolol was found to increase muscle mass and decrease fat mass by reducing p38 phosphorylation [34]. Increased p38 phosphorylation was reported to occur in the branchial muscle of old rats, resulting in decreased muscle-specific gene expression. Cellular stress is one of the factors that can cause increased p38, which leads to its activation and affects muscle mass [48]. Therefore, C. vulgaris may improve muscle mass and decrease fat mass through the inactivation of p38 via its antioxidant properties. A previous study reported that esomeprazole, a treatment for stress ulcers, inactivates the p38 MAPK pathway by its antioxidative effect [49].
The open field test monitoring system is a functional instrument for examining the impairment in locomotion in animal models with neuromuscular disease and the potency of therapeutic drugs, which could help improve muscle function and locomotion. Animals with a decreased total path distance and movement time are associated with decreased muscle function because these animals will be less active and exhibit reduced ambulatory activity [50]. The total path for young 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris-treated rats was significantly increased compared to that of untreated rats on day 30. For old rats, 300 mg/kg BW C. vulgaris significantly increased the total path on days 60 and 90 compared to untreated old rats on day 0. However, no significant differences were demonstrated in the percentage of time spent moving in old untreated and treated rats, which might be due to less movement by the old rats. A previous study reported a significant decrease in total distance travelled, horizontal and vertical activity, and time of movement and rest in 30- to 33-week-old dystrophia muscularis 2 Jackson (B6. WK-Lama2dy−2J/J) mice, a mouse model of laminin mutations that exhibit paralysis of the hindlimbs associated with dystrophic changes and demyelination of nerves in the skeletal muscle [51].
Excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production occurs when the production rate of free radicals overcomes the capacity of antioxidant defense in the body. Excess ROS in the body can cause oxidative stress, resulting in damage to mitochondrial DNA and the loss of organelle functions, and this may lead to accelerated ageing. This damage accumulates with increasing age in almost all organs, including skeletal muscle. The increase in ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) production has been reported to have an impact on signalling pathways that are in charge of the synthesis of protein and proteolysis in skeletal muscle; therefore, oxidative stress can be one of the mechanisms involved in the development of sarcopenia [52,53,54].
The measurement of urinary F2t isoprostanes has been described in a previous study as one of the reliable indicators to ascertain oxidative stress in vivo [55,56]. The F2t isoprostanes are prostaglandin PGF2α isomers that are produced in vivo from the free radical-initiated peroxidation of arachidonic acid, independent of cyclooxygenase enzymes [55,57,58,59]. Another oxidative stress marker in ageing that has been widely used is creatine kinase (CK). Creatine kinase (CK) is also recognized as creatine phosphokinase and it occurs in three isoenzymes, CK1, CK2, and CK3. The isoenzyme CK3 contains MM subunits and is found in skeletal muscle, and CK-MM is a practical biomarker for skeletal muscle injury [60]. In 1997, Roserberg was the first researcher to define sarcopenia. He reported that creatinine, a breakdown product of creatine phosphate in the muscle, can be used to measure the muscle mass. Creatinine was found to decrease with increasing age, indicating creatine kinase-MM as a useful marker in skeletal muscle injury resulting from the presence of excessive oxidative stress [61]. The CKMM released to the bloodstream indicates the manifestation of both mechanical and metabolic disturbances within the sarcomere, which also reflects the integrity, stability and function of the plasma membrane [62].
A previous study reported that there was an age-associated increase in lipid peroxide concentration, with the MDA level being significantly higher in the 50- to 59-year-old age group than in the 30- to 39-year-old age group in a human study [63]. Another study reported a significant increase in MDA levels along with muscle injury biomarkers, such as CK and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), in older subjects (65.1 ± 3.5 years old) compared to young subjects (20.3 ± 2.8 years old) [64]. Sarcopenia also occurs when the relative skeletal muscle mass index (RASM) for women was <5.67 kg/m2 and for men it was <7.25 kg/m2, and the plasma ratio of MDA/HNE was significantly increased in sarcopenic patients compared to nonsarcopenic patients [65]. It is well known that ageing is accompanied by increased lipid peroxidation due to a decreased antioxidant defense resulting from increased ROS production, indicating skeletal muscle oxidative injury [64]. In this study, CKMM and MDA + HAE were significantly higher in untreated old rats than in untreated young rats, and C. vulgaris treatment in this study was observed to decrease the urinary isoprostane F2t and MDA + HAE levels in both the young and old rats compared to the respective untreated controls on day 90. This observation may be attributed to the antioxidant properties of C. vulgaris.
This finding was in association with a previous study that used a Chlorella-supplemented diet in the treatment of muscle-specific mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 activity-deficient mice (ALDH2*2 Tg mice) characterized by age-associated muscle atrophy, as in sarcopenia. This study reported that urinary isoprostane levels declined in ALDH2*2 Tg mice fed a diet supplemented with Chlorella for four months and that MDA + HAE levels declined in LDH2*2 Tg mice fed a diet supplemented with Chlorella for six months [66]. The findings of this study also demonstrated that the plasma oxidative stress of creatine kinase-MM was significantly decreased in both young and old rats treated with C. vulgaris compared to its respective control on day 90. This observation may signify that the consumption of C. vulgaris helps reduce oxidative stress, as ascertained by oxidative stress markers.
A previous study showed that HDFs induced with oxidative stress by hydrogen peroxide demonstrated DNA damage and a decreased telomere length and telomerase activity. However, C. vulgaris treatment modulated the effects of hydrogen peroxide in HDF cells obtained from both young and old donors [67]. Another study reported that the consumption of a Chlorella-supplemented diet by ALDH2*2 Tg mice improved their skeletal muscle atrophy by increasing the size of their muscle cells. Additionally, the relative cross-sectional areas of the gastrocnemius muscle cells were negatively correlated with the expression levels of MDA and HAE in ALDH2*2 Tg mice. This study also suggested that a Chlorella-supplemented diet prevented mitochondrial dysfunction in the gastrocnemius muscle, as demonstrated by the decline in cytochrome c oxidase activity [66].
Other previous studies have reported the promotion of the differentiation of human myoblast cells in young and senescent myoblasts, which consequently helps in the reversal of ageing and may be beneficial for the treatment of age-related muscular disease [25,26]. In this study, C. vulgaris showed its potential in promoting muscle function, as indicated by an increased muscle mass and strength in young and old rats. Decreases in urinary isoprostane F2t, plasma CKMM and the skeletal muscle oxidative stress markers MDA and HAE were also demonstrated in young and old rats treated with C. vulgaris. The antioxidant features of C. vulgaris may be held accountable in promoting differentiation in both muscle myoblast cells and animal studies. Figure 6 summarizes the antioxidant components of C. vulgaris that have been reported in previous studies and their effects in promoting muscle regeneration.

5. Conclusions

C. vulgaris supplementation is beneficial as an anti-ageing agent in young and old rats due to its effect in promoting muscle function, thus enhancing muscle performance. These effects could be due to its antioxidant properties and its ability to ameliorate oxidative stress. This finding may indicate its potential in reducing the severity of sarcopenia and may also be beneficial for other age-related muscular atrophy conditions and other muscular diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M. and Y.A.M.Y.; methodology, S.M. and Y.A.M.Y.; validation, S.M., and Y.A.M.Y.; formal analysis, N.Z.A.; investigation, N.Z.A.; data curation, S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, N.Z.A.; writing—review and editing, S.M.; visualization, S.M.; supervision, S.M. and Y.A.M.Y.; project administration, S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) Malaysia, grant numbers FRGS/2/2014/SKK01/UKM/01/1 and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), grant number: UKM-FF-2016-318.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the University of Malaya Algae Culture Collection (UMACC, Malaysia) for supplying the stock of C. vulgaris. We are also thankful to all the staff of the Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Medicine UKM and the staff of the Herbal Medicine Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Frontera, W.R.; Ochala, J. Skeletal muscle: A brief review of structure and function. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2014, 96, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ziaaldini, M.M.; Marzetti, E.; Picca, A.; Murlasits, Z. Biochemical pathways of sarcopenia and their modulation by physical exercise: A narrative review. Front. Med. 2017, 4, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cartee, G.D.; Hepple, R.T.; Bamman, M.M.; Zierath, J.R. Exercise promotes healthy aging of skeletal muscle. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 1034–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Evans, W.J. Skeletal muscle loss: Cachexia, sarcopenia, and inactivity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 1123S–1127S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Muscaritoli, M.; Anker, S.D.; Argiles, J.; Aversa, Z.; Bauer, J.M.; Biolo, G.I.A.N.N.I.; Boirie, Y.; Bosaeus, I.; Cederholm, T.; Costelli, P.; et al. Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and pre-cachexia: Joint document elaborated by special interest groups “Cachexia-Anorexia in Chronic Wasting Diseases” and “Nutrition in Geriatrics”. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 29, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Baeyens, J.P.; Bauer, J.M.; Boirie, Y.; Cederholm, T.; Landi, F.; Martin, F.C.; Michel, J.P.; Rolland, Y.; Schneider, S.M.; et al. Sarcopenia: European Consensus on Definition and Diagnosis report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010, 39, 412–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Von Haehling, S.; Morley, J.E.; Anker, S.D. An overview of sarcopenia: Facts and numbers on prevalence and clinical impact. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2010, 1, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mitchell, W.K.; Atherton, P.J.; Williams, J.; Larvin, M.; Lund, J.N.; Narici, M. Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and the impact of advancing age on human skeletal muscle size and strength; a quantitative review. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. World Health Organization. World Report on Ageing and Health; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 1–260. [Google Scholar]
  10. Burton, L.A.; Sumukadas, D. Optimal management of sarcopenia. Clin. Interv. Aging 2010, 5, 217–228. [Google Scholar]
  11. Janssen, I. Evolution of sarcopenia research. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2010, 35, 707–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Noran, N.; Hairi, A.B.; Tee, G.H.; Izzuna, M. Sarcopenia in older people. Geriatrics 2012, 2012, 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  13. Børsheim, B.; Bui, Q.U.T.; Tissier, S.; Kobayashi, H.; Ferrando, A.A.; Wolfe, R.R. Effect of amino acid supplementation on muscle mass, strength and physical function in elderly. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 27, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Noda, K.; Ohno, N.; Tanaka, K.; Okuda, M.; Yadomae, T.; Nomoto, K.; Shoyama, Y. A new type of biological response modifier from Chlorella vulgaris which needs protein moiety to show an antitumour activity. Phytother. Res. 1998, 12, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shibata, S.; Natori, Y.; Nishihara, T.; Tomisaka, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Sansawa, H.; Nguyen, V.C. Antioxidant and anti-cataract effects of Chlorella on rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2003, 49, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kitada, K.; Machmudah, S.; Sasaki, M.; Goto, M.; Nakashima, Y.; Kumamoto, S.; Hasegawa, T. Supercritical CO2 extraction of pigment components with pharmaceutical importance from Chlorella vulgaris. J. Chem. Technol. Biot. 2009, 84, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Panahi, Y.; Pishgoo, B.; Jalalian, H.R.; Mohammadi, E.; Taghipour, H.R.; Sahebkar, A.; Abolhasani, E. Investigation of the effects of Chlorella vulgaris as an adjunctive therapy for dyslipidemia: Results of a randomised open-label clinical trial. Nutr. Diet. 2012, 69, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jeong, H.; Kwon, H.J.; Kim, M.K. Hypoglycemic effect of Chlorella vulgaris intake in type 2 diabetic Goto-Kakizaki and normal Wistar rats. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2009, 3, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Aizzat, O.; Yap, S.; Sopiah, H.; Madiha, M.; Hazreen, M.; Shailah, A.; Junizam, W.W.; Syaidah, A.N.; Srijit, D.; Musalmah, M.; et al. Modulation of oxidative stress by Chlorella vulgaris in streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats. Adv. Med. Sci. 2010, 55, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ngah, W.Z.W.; Yusof, Y.A.M. Chemo preventive effect of Chlorella vulgaris in choline deficient diet and ethionine induced liver carcinogenesis in rats. Int. J. Cancer Res. 2006, 2, 234–241. [Google Scholar]
  21. Azamai, E.S.M.; Sulaiman, S.; Habib, S.H.M.; Looi, M.L.; Das, S.; Hamid, N.A.A.; Ngah, W.Z.W.; Yusof, Y.A.M. Chlorella vulgaris triggers apoptosis in hepatocarcinogenesis-induced rats. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2009, 10, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mukti, N.A.; Sulaiman, S.; Saad, S.M.; Basari, H. Chlorella vulgaris menunjukkan kesan antioksidan dan antitumor terhadap kanser hepar dalam kajian in vivo dan in vitro. Sains Malays. 2009, 38, 773–784. [Google Scholar]
  23. Makpol, S.; Yeoh, T.W.; Ruslam, F.C.; Arifin, K.T.; Yusof, Y.M. Comparative effect of Piper Betle, Chlorella vulgaris and tocotrienol-rich fraction on antioxidant enzymes activity in cellular ageing of human diploid fibroblasts. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Saberbaghi, T.; Abbasian, F.; Yusof, Y.A.M.; Makpol, S. Modulation of cell cycle profile by Chlorella vulgaris prevents replicative senescence of human diploid fibroblasts. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zainul Azlan, N.; Yusof, Y.A.M.; Alias, E.; Makpol, S. Chlorella vulgaris Improves the Regenerative Capacity of Young and Senescent Myoblasts and Promotes Muscle Regeneration. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zainul Azlan, N.; Yusof, Y.A.M.; Alias, E.; Makpol, S. Chlorella vulgaris Modulates Genes and Muscle-Specific microRNAs Expression to Promote Myoblast Differentiation in Culture. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 2019, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  27. Andreollo, N.A.; dos Santos, E.F.; Araújo, M.R.; Lopes, L.R. Rat’s age versus human’s age: What is the relationship? ABCD Arq. Bras. Cir. Dig. 2012, 25, 49–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sengupta, P. The laboratory rat: Relating its age with human’s. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 4, 624. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sengupta, P. A scientific review of age determination for a laboratory rat: How old is it in comparison with human age? Biomed. Int. 2015, 2, 81–89. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee, H.S.; Park, H.J.; Kim, M.K. Effect of Chlorella vulgaris on lipid metabolism in Wistar rats fed high fat diet. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2008, 2, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheong, L.K. Introduction to Techniques of Intravenous Inoculation and Anaesthesia in Rodents and Rabbit: An Illustration of Simple and Efficient Approaches; Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tarantino, U.; Baldi, J.; Scimeca, M.; Piccirilli, E.; Piccioli, A.; Bonanno, E.; Gasbarra, E. The role of sarcopenia with and without fracture. Injury 2016, 47, S3–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lessard-Beaudoin, M.; Laroche, M.; Demers, M.J.; Grenier, G.; Graham, R.K. Characterization of age-associated changes in peripheral organ and brain region weights in C57bl/6 mice. Exp. Gerontol. 2015, 63, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pötsch, M.S.; Tschirner, A.; Palus, S.; Von Haehling, S.; Doehner, W.; Beadle, J.; Coats, A.J.; Anker, S.D.; Springer, J. The anabolic catabolic transforming agent (Acta) espindolol increases muscle mass and decreases fat mass in old rats. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2014, 5, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Meyer, O.; Tilson, H.; Byrd, W.; Riley, M. Method for the routine assessment of fore- and hindlimb grip strength of rats and mice. Neurobehav. Toxicol. 1979, 1, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Zainul Azlan, N.; Abd Ghafar, N.; Yusof, Y.A.M.; Makpol, S. Toxicity study of Chlorella vulgaris water extract on female Sprague Dawley rats by using the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guideline 420. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 3063–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Norman, K.; Stobäus, N.; Gonzalez, M.C.; Schulzke, J.D.; Pirlich, M. Hand grip strength: Outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 30, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Evans, T.M.; Van Remmen, H.; Purkar, A.; Mahesula, S.; Gelfond, J.; Sabia, M.; Qi, W.; Lin, A.L.; Jaramillo, C.A.; Haskins, W.E. Microwave and magnetic (M2) proteomics of a mouse model of mild traumatic brain injury. Transl. Proteom. 2014, 3, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Cohen, T.V.; Kollias, H.D.; Liu, N.; Ward, C.W.; Wagner, K.R. Genetic disruption of Smad7 impairs skeletal muscle growth and regeneration. J. Physiol. 2015, 593, 2479–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ablat, N.; Lv, D.; Ren, R.; Xiaokaiti, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhao, X.; Sun, Y.; Lei, H.; Xu, Y.; Ma, Y.; et al. Neuroprotective Effects of a standardized flavonoid extract from Safflower against a rotenone-induced rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Molecules 2016, 21, 1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Trueman, R.C.; Diaz, C.; Farr, T.D.; Harrison, D.J.; Fuller, A.; Tokarczuk, P.F.; Stewart, A.J.; Paisey, S.J.; Dunnett, S.B. Systematic and detailed analysis of behavioural tests in the rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model of stroke: Tests for long-term assessment. J. Cerebr. Blood F Met. 2017, 37, 1349–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Alamri, F.F.; Al Shoyaib, A.; Biggers, A.; Jayaraman, S.; Guindon, J.; Karamyan, V.T. Applicability of the grip strength and automated Von Frey tactile sensitivity tests in the mouse photothrombotic model of stroke. Behav. Brain Res. 2018, 336, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hairi, N.N.; Cumming, R.G.; Naganathan, V.; Handelsman, D.J.; Le Couteur, D.G.; Creasey, H.; Waite, L.M.; Seibel, M.J.; Sambrook, P.N. Loss of muscle strength, mass (sarcopenia), and quality (specific force) and its relationship with functional limitation and physical disability: The Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2010, 58, 2055–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Giusto, M.; Lattanzi, B.; Albanese, C.; Galtieri, A.; Farcomeni, A.; Giannelli, V.; Lucidi, C.; Di Martino, M.; Catalano, C.; Merli, M. Sarcopenia in liver cirrhosis: The role of computed tomography scan for the assessment of muscle mass compared with Dual-Energy X-Ray absorptiometry and anthropometry. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 27, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Mazess, R.B.; Barden, H.S.; Bisek, J.P.; Hanson, J. Dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1990, 51, 1106–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Goodpaster, B.H.; Park, S.W.; Harris, T.B.; Kritchevsky, S.B.; Nevitt, M.; Schwartz, A.V.; Simonsick, E.M.; Tylavsky, F.A.; Visser, M.; Newman, A.B. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2006, 61, 1059–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dorsey, K.B.; Thornton, J.C.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Gallagher, D. Greater lean tissue and skeletal muscle mass are associated with higher bone mineral content in children. Nutr. Metab. 2010, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Rahnert, J.A.; Luo, Q.; Balog, E.M.; Sokoloff, A.J.; Burkholder, T.J. Changes in growth-related kinases in head, neck and limb muscles with age. Exp. Gerontol. 2011, 46, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Xie, W.; Huang, X.; Chen, R.; Chen, R.; Li, T.; Wu, W.; Huang, Z. Esomeprazole alleviates the damage to stress ulcer in rats through not only its antisecretory effect but its antioxidant effect by inactivating the p38 MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2019, 13, 2969–2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Tatem, K.S.; Quinn, J.L.; Phadke, A.; Yu, Q.; Gordish-Dressman, H.; Nagaraju, K. Behavioral and locomotor measurements using an open field activity monitoring system for skeletal muscle diseases. Jove J. Vis. Exp. 2014, 91, e51785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Yu, Q.; Sali, A.; Van Der Meulen, J.; Creeden, B.K.; Gordish-Dressman, H.; Rutkowski, A.; Rayavarapu, S.; Uaesoontrachoon, K.; Huynh, T.; Nagaraju, K.; et al. Omigapil treatment decreases fibrosis and improves respiratory rate in Dy2j mouse model of congenital muscular dystrophy. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arthur, S.T.; Cooley, I.D. The effect of physiological stimuli on sarcopenia; Impact of Notch and Wnt signaling on impaired aged skeletal muscle repair. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 731–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Powers, S.K.; Morton, A.B.; Ahn, B.; Smuder, A.J. Redox control of skeletal muscle atrophy. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 98, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Di Filippo, E.S.; Mancinelli, R.; Pietrangelo, T.; La Rovere, R.M.L.; Quattrocelli, M.; Sampaolesi, M.; Fulle, S. Myomir dysregulation and reactive oxygen species in aged human satellite cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 473, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Klawitter, J.; Haschke, M.; Shokati, T.; Klawitter, J.; Christians, U. Quantification of 15-F2t-isoprostane in human plasma and urine: Results from enzyme-linked immunoassay and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry cannot be compared. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2011, 25, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Guerreiro, G.; Mescka, C.P.; Sitta, A.; Donida, B.; Marchetti, D.; Hammerschmidt, T.; Faverzani, J.; Coelho Dde, M.; Wajner, M.; Dutra-Filho, C.S.; et al. Urinary biomarkers of oxidative damage in maple syrup urine disease: The L-carnitine role. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2015, 42, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Roberts, L.J.; Morrow, J.D. Measurement of F 2-isoprostanes as an index of oxidative stress in vivo. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 28, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, W.; Morrow, J.D.; Yin, H. Quantification of F2-isoprostanes as a reliable index of oxidative stress in vivo using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) method. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009, 47, 1101–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Czerska, M.; Mikolajewska, K.; Zielinski, M.; Gromadzinska, J.; Wasowicz, W. Today’s oxidative stress markers. Med. Pr. 2015, 66, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kumar, V.; Gill, K.D. To measure activity of creatine kinase in serum. In Basic Concepts in Clinical Biochemistry: A Practical Guide, 1st ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 131–133. [Google Scholar]
  61. Rosenberg, I.H. Sarcopenia: Origins and clinical relevance. J. Nutr. 1997, 127, 990S–991S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Oosthuyse, T.; Bosch, A.N. The effect of gender and menstrual phase on serum creatine kinase activity and muscle soreness following downhill running. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kasapoglu, M.; Özben, T. Alterations of antioxidant enzymes and oxidative stress markers in aging. Exp. Gerontol. 2001, 36, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bouzid, M.A.; Hammouda, O.; Matran, R.; Robin, S.; Fabre, C. Changes in oxidative stress markers and biological markers of muscle injury with aging at rest and in response to an exhaustive exercise. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bellanti, F.; Romano, A.D.; Buglio, A.L.; Castriotta, V.; Guglielmi, G.; Greco, A.; Serviddio, G.; Vendemiale, G. Oxidative stress is increased in sarcopenia and associated with cardiovascular disease risk in sarcopenic obesity. Maturitas 2018, 109, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Nakashima, Y.; Ohsawa, I.; Nishimaki, K.; Kumamoto, S.; Maruyama, I.; Suzuki, Y.; Ohta, S. Preventive effects of Chlorella on skeletal muscle atrophy in muscle-specific mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 activity-deficient mice. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Makpol, S.; Yaacob, N.; Zainuddin, A.; Yusof, Y.A.M.; Ngah, W.Z.W. Chlorella vulgaris modulates hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage and telomere shortening of human fibroblasts derived from different aged individuals. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2009, 6, 560–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Safi, C.; Zebib, B.; Merah, O.; Pontalier, P.Y.; Vaca-Garcia, C. Morphology, composition, production, processing and applications of Chlorella vulgaris: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 35, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Tokuşoglu, Ö.; Üunal, M. Biomass nutrient profiles of three microalgae: Spirulina platensis, Chlorella vulgaris, and Isochrisis galbana. J. Food Sci. 2003, 68, 1144–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dreyer, H.C.; Volpi, E. Role of protein and amino acids in the pathophysiology and treatment of sarcopenia. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2005, 24, 140S–145S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Fujita, S.; Volpi, E. Amino acids and muscle loss with aging. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 277S–280S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ursu, A.V.; Marcati, A.; Sayd, T.; Sante-Lhoutellier, V.; Djelveh, G.; Michaud, P. Extraction, fractionation and functional properties of proteins from the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 157, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bosaeus, I.; Rothenberg, E. Nutrition and physical activity for the prevention and treatment of age-related sarcopenia. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016, 75, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Khor, S.C.; Razak, A.M.; Ngah, W.Z.W.; Yusof, Y.A.M.; Karim, N.A.; Makpol, S. The tocotrienol-rich fraction is superior to tocopherol in promoting myogenic differentiation in the prevention of replicative senescence of myoblasts. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Radhakrishnan, S.; Bhavan, P.; Seenivasan, C.; Muralisankar, T. Nutritional profile of Spirulina platensis, Chlorella vulgaris and Azolla pinnata to novel protein source for aquaculture feed formulation. Austin J. Aquac. Mar. Biol. 2017, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  76. Tachtsis, B.; Camera, D.; Lacham-Kaplan, O. Potential Roles of n-3 PUFAs during Skeletal Muscle Growth and Regeneration. Nutrients 2018, 10, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Nutrients 12 03752 g001 550
Figure 1. The (A) body weight and (B) relative organ weight of the young and old rats. The data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 8 (control rats), n = 10 (C. vulgaris-treated rats). a p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 0, b p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 30, c p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats Day 60, with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. BW: Body weight; CV: C. vulgaris.
Figure 1. The (A) body weight and (B) relative organ weight of the young and old rats. The data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 8 (control rats), n = 10 (C. vulgaris-treated rats). a p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 0, b p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 30, c p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats Day 60, with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. BW: Body weight; CV: C. vulgaris.
Nutrients 12 03752 g001
Nutrients 12 03752 g002 550
Figure 2. The grip strength of (A) the front paws and (B) the hind paws of young and old rats. The data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 8 (control rats), n = 10 (C. vulgaris-treated rats). * p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on the respective day, # p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on the respective day, a p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 0, b p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 30, c p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 60, d p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 90, e p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on Day 0, with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. BW: Body weight; CV: C. vulgaris.
Figure 2. The grip strength of (A) the front paws and (B) the hind paws of young and old rats. The data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 8 (control rats), n = 10 (C. vulgaris-treated rats). * p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on the respective day, # p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on the respective day, a p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 0, b p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 30, c p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 60, d p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 90, e p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on Day 0, with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. BW: Body weight; CV: C. vulgaris.
Nutrients 12 03752 g002
Nutrients 12 03752 g003a 550Nutrients 12 03752 g003b 550
Figure 3. The (A) bone mineral content (BMC), (B) bone mineral density (BMD), (C) lean BMC and (D) fat mass of the young and old rats. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 8 (control rats), n = 10 (C. vulgaris-treated rats). * p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on the respective day, # p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on the respective day, a p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 0, b p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 30, c p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 60, d p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 90, e p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on Day 0, with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. BW: Body weight; CV: C. vulgaris.
Figure 3. The (A) bone mineral content (BMC), (B) bone mineral density (BMD), (C) lean BMC and (D) fat mass of the young and old rats. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 8 (control rats), n = 10 (C. vulgaris-treated rats). * p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on the respective day, # p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on the respective day, a p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 0, b p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 30, c p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 60, d p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 90, e p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on Day 0, with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. BW: Body weight; CV: C. vulgaris.
Nutrients 12 03752 g003aNutrients 12 03752 g003b
Nutrients 12 03752 g004 550
Figure 4. The (A) total path and (B) the percentage of time spent moving by the young and old rats. The data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 8 (control rats), n = 10 (C. vulgaris-treated rats). a p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 0, b p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 30, c p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 60, d p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 90, e p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on Day 0, with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. BW: Body weight; CV: C. vulgaris.
Figure 4. The (A) total path and (B) the percentage of time spent moving by the young and old rats. The data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 8 (control rats), n = 10 (C. vulgaris-treated rats). a p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 0, b p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 30, c p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 60, d p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 90, e p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on Day 0, with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. BW: Body weight; CV: C. vulgaris.
Nutrients 12 03752 g004
Nutrients 12 03752 g005 550
Figure 5. The (A) urinary oxidative stress, (B) plasma oxidative stress and (C) skeletal muscle oxidative stress of young and old rats. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 8 (control rats), n = 10 (C. vulgaris-treated rats). *p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 90, # p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on Day 90, a p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 0, b p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on Day 0, with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. BW: Body weight; CV: C. vulgaris.
Figure 5. The (A) urinary oxidative stress, (B) plasma oxidative stress and (C) skeletal muscle oxidative stress of young and old rats. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 8 (control rats), n = 10 (C. vulgaris-treated rats). *p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 90, # p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on Day 90, a p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control young rats on Day 0, b p < 0.05 significantly different compared to the control old rats on Day 0, with a post hoc Tukey HSD test. BW: Body weight; CV: C. vulgaris.
Nutrients 12 03752 g005
Nutrients 12 03752 g006 550
Figure 6. The antioxidant properties of C. vulgaris and its effect in promoting muscle regeneration [17,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76].
Figure 6. The antioxidant properties of C. vulgaris and its effect in promoting muscle regeneration [17,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76].
Nutrients 12 03752 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zainul Azlan, N.; Mohd Yusof, Y.A.; Makpol, S. Chlorella vulgaris Ameliorates Oxidative Stress and Improves the Muscle Regenerative Capacity of Young and Old Sprague-Dawley Rats. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3752. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123752

AMA Style

Zainul Azlan N, Mohd Yusof YA, Makpol S. Chlorella vulgaris Ameliorates Oxidative Stress and Improves the Muscle Regenerative Capacity of Young and Old Sprague-Dawley Rats. Nutrients. 2020; 12(12):3752. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123752

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zainul Azlan, Nurhazirah, Yasmin Anum Mohd Yusof, and Suzana Makpol. 2020. "Chlorella vulgaris Ameliorates Oxidative Stress and Improves the Muscle Regenerative Capacity of Young and Old Sprague-Dawley Rats" Nutrients 12, no. 12: 3752. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123752

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop